Law Offices of Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLC
                                3823 44th Ave. NE
                            Seattle, Washington 98105
              Telephone: (206) 522-2256 / Facsimile: (206) 260-0111

                                                 Writer's e-mail: tpuzzo@msn.com
                                                   Writer's cell: (206) 412-6868

                                November 30, 2012

VIA EDGAR

Tom Kluck
Legal Branch Chief
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

     Re: Lion Consulting Group, Inc.
         Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
         Filed November 30, 2012
         File No. 333-181624

Dear Mr. Kluck:

     Pursuant to the staff's comment letter dated November 1, 2012, we
respectfully submit this letter on behalf of our client, Lion Consulting Group,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

     Amendment No. 4 to the Company's Form S-1 was filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission") via EDGAR on November 30, 2012.

     The staff's comments are reproduced in bold italics in this letter, and the
Company's responses to the staff's comments follow each staff comment.
References to page numbers are made to the redlined Amendment No. 4 to the Form
S-1.

GENERAL

1.   WE NOTE YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT NO. 1 OF OUR LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 10,
     2012. IN RESPONSE TO OUR COMMENT, YOU STATE THAT YOU WILL NOT PROVIDE IT
     CONSULTING. HOWEVER, WE NOTE ON PAGE 15 THAT YOU HAVE ALLOCATED AMOUNTS TO
     "WEBHOSTING." ADDITIONALLY, ON PAGE 20, YOU INDICATE THAT YOU INTEND TO
     PROVIDE E-COMMERCE RELATED SERVICES. FURTHER, ON PAGE 24, YOU STATE THAT
     YOU INTEND TO PROVIDE SERVICES FOR "SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES." PLEASE
     ADVISE OR REVISE AS APPROPRIATE.

     Company response: The Company has removed references, to webhosting,
e-commerce, and social networking on pages 15, 20, and 24.

USE OF PROCEEDS, PAGE 15

2.   WE NOTE YOUR DISCLOSURE IN THE CHART IN THIS SECTION AND THE CHART ON PAGE
     25. PLEASE REVISE YOUR CHARTS, AS APPROPRIATE, TO ADDRESS ANY
     DISCREPANCIES. FOR EXAMPLE ONLY, WE NOTE THAT THE LINE ITEM "MARKETING AND
     COLLATERAL" APPEARS IN THE CHART ON PAGE 25, BUT IT DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE
     CHART ON PAGE 15.

     Company response: Both charts have been reconciled are identical. Please
see pages 15 and 25.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, PAGE 19

3.   WE NOTE YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT 4 OF OUR LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2012.
     IN RESPONSE TO OUR COMMENT, YOU PROVIDED AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, WHICH
     ADDRESSES WHETHER A COMPANY WITH LIMITED OPERATIONS IN SWITZERLAND HAS TO
     REGISTER IN SWITZERLAND WITH ANY AUTHORITY, INCLUDING THE COMMERCIAL
     REGISTER. HOWEVER, THE OPINION DOES NOT COMPLETELY ADDRESS OUR CONCERNS,
     AND WE REISSUE IN PART OUR PRIOR COMMENT. WE NOTE THAT MR. WAGNER IS YOUR
     SOLE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR AND THE ONLY INDIVIDUAL PROVIDING SERVICES ON
     YOUR BEHALF. WE FURTHER NOTE, THAT HE IS CURRENTLY LOCATED IN SWITZERLAND.
     IT THEREFORE APPEARS THAT THE BULK OF YOUR OPERATIONS WILL, AT LEAST FOR
     THE TIME BEING, TAKE PLACE IN SWITZERLAND. THUS, PLEASE EXPAND YOUR
     DISCLOSURE TO DISCUSS THE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTING COMPANIES
     BASED IN SWITZERLAND THAT MAY IMPACT INVESTORS OR PROVIDE A DETAILED
     EXPLANATION AS TO WHY THE COMPANY IS NOT SUBJECT TO SUCH REGULATIONS. FOR
     EXAMPLE ONLY, PLEASE DISCUSS WHETHER THERE ARE ANY LAWS IN SWITZERLAND THAT
     WOULD REGULATE THE COMPANY'S OPERATIONS OF PROVIDING BUSINESS SERVICES OR
     RESTRICT FUNDS FROM BEING DISTRIBUTED TO INVESTORS OR WHETHER THERE ARE ANY
     LAWS THAT WOULD IMPACT AN INVESTOR'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE A JUDGMENT AGAINST
     THE COMPANY.

     Company response: The Company's Switzerland legal counsel advises the
Company that the laws of Switzerland do not regulate the Company's business.
Therefore, the Company is not discussing the applicability of Switzerland laws
on the Company in the Form S-1. Please see the attached correspondence from the
Company's Switzerland legal counsel.

PRINCIPAL SERVICES, PAGE 19

4.   WE NOTE YOUR DISCLOSURE THAT YOU ANTICIPATE OFFERING YOUR SERVICES 6 MONTHS
     FROM THE FILING DATE. HOWEVER, ON PAGE 24, YOU INDICATE THAT IT WILL BE 12
     MONTHS BEFORE YOU CAN BEGIN OFFERING SERVICES. PLEASE REVISE YOUR
     DISCLOSURE AS APPROPRIATE TO ADDRESS THIS DISCREPANCY OR ADVISE.

     Company response: The Company has revised the Form S-1 to state that it
anticipates offering its services 6 months (and not 12 months) from the date of
the prospectus on pages 3 and 24.

5.   WE NOT YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT 5 OF OUR LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2012.
     PLEASE CLARIFY THAT YOU DO NOT HAVE AN AGREEMENT IN PLACE WITH UNITED OIL
     GAS CORP. AND TRISTAR ENERGY GROUP INC. TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THESE
     ENTITIES.

                                       2

SIGNATURES

6.   PLEASE HAVE MR. WAGNER SIGN IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL
     EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER. SEE
     INSTRUCTION 1 TO SIGNATURES ON FORM S-1.

     Company response: The Company has revise the signature page to the Form S-1
to have Mr. Wagner sign in his individual capacity as principal executive
officer, and principal financial and accounting officer.

Please contact the undersigned with any questions or comments.

                                         Very truly yours,

                                         /s/ Thomas E. Puzzo
                                         ------------------------------
                                         Thomas E. Puzzo

                                       3

JEGHER GIL


     Philippe P. Wagner
     Lion Consulting Group, Inc.
     United States of America



     Zurich, November 15, 2012


Juan Carlos Gil
Rechtsanwalt, LL.M.

Eingetragen im Anwaltsregister
juancarlos.gil@jeghergil.ch


     SWISS REGISTRATION OF COMPANY INCORPORATED ABROAD

     Dear Mr Wagner,

     Reference is made to your email of November 5, 2012 relating to a letter by
     the United States Securities and Exchange Commission dated November 1, 2012
     and my letter dated September 2, 2012.

     You had asked me before whether a company incorporated in the United States
     which  has  limited  business  operations  in  Switzerland  ("Company")  is
     required to register in Switzerland in the event that its sole  shareholder
     and  director is a Swiss  national  with a Swiss  domicile.  In reply I had
     stated  that under Swiss law there is no  obligation  for such a company to
     register in Switzerland with any authority including without limitation the
     Commercial Register.

     You have now asked me to expand my  comments to the  additional  facts that
     you as a Swiss national  domiciled in Switzerland  are the sole officer and
     director  and the only  individual  providing  services  on  behalf  of the
     Company.

     There is no general  principle  requiring  the Company to register with any
     authority in Switzerland.

     In the event that the bulk of operations of the Company is in  Switzerland,
     the only  director  and  shareholder  is a Swiss  individual  domiciled  in
     Switzerland, the Company does not have any infrastructure abroad, including
     without limitation office space and employees,  there is a possibility that
     the Swiss tax  authorities  may,  for Swiss  tax  purposes,  disregard  the
     company structure and tax the Swiss individual. There is also a possibility
     that the Swiss tax authorities  may, for Swiss tax purposes,  deem that the
     Company has a permanent  establishment  in Switzerland  and tax the Company
     accordingly.

JEGHER GIL


     In the event that the bulk of  operations  is provided out of  Switzerland,
     there is a possibility that Swiss  regulations may apply to the services in
     relation  to  investment   management   services   rendered  to  collective
     investment schemes. There are no general regulations in relation to general
     consulting  services.  It is my understanding that the Company will not act
     as an investment  manager but provide  consulting  services in the field of
     management  consulting.  There  are  no  specific  Swiss  legal  provisions
     regulating such consulting services.

     The  facts set out  above on their  own will not  impact  on an  investor's
     ability to enforce a foreign  judgment  against the Company in Switzerland.
     However, a recognition and enforcement of the judgement against the Company
     in  Switzerland  would  only  make  sense  if the  Company  has  assets  in
     Switzerland.  The general rules of Swiss international private law would be
     applicable in determining  whether a foreign  judgment  against the Company
     can be recognised  and enforced in  Switzerland.  Having said this,  from a
     Swiss law perspective  courts in the United States have jurisdiction  which
     would be the main  requirement  for enforcing  judgments  against a company
     incorporated in the United States in contractual and corporate  matters and
     such judgments would be enforceable in Switzerland.

     Yours sincerely,


     /s/ Juan Carlos Gil
     -----------------------------
     Juan Carlos Gil