JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
Commission File Number: 33-62895
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Exact name of registrant as specified in charter
MASSACHUSETTS 04-2664016
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02117
(Address of principal executive offices)
(617) 572-6000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Number of shares outstanding of our only class of common stock as of
August 14, 2002:
50,000
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30,
2002 December 31,
(Unaudited) 2001
---------------------------
(in millions)
Assets
Investments
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity--at amortized cost
(fair value: June 30--$82.2; December 31--$82.1) .. $ 82.9 $ 83.7
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: June 30--$2,662.4; December 31--$2,391.9) .. 2,705.3 2,412.5
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: June 30--$14.9; December 31--$12.1) ........ 15.5 13.1
Mortgage loans on real estate ....................... 621.3 580.9
Real estate ......................................... 20.4 20.6
Policy loans ........................................ 362.6 352.0
Short-term investments .............................. 0.1 --
Other invested assets ............................... 46.1 39.6
--------- ---------
Total Investments ................................. 3,854.2 3,502.4
Cash and cash equivalents ........................... 44.0 115.4
Accrued investment income ........................... 69.2 60.8
Premiums and accounts receivable .................... 3.3 12.5
Deferred policy acquisition costs ................... 1,130.9 1,060.8
Reinsurance recoverable ............................. 131.8 110.4
Other assets ........................................ 119.9 121.8
Separate account assets ............................. 6,249.3 6,729.1
--------- ---------
Total Assets ...................................... $11,602.6 $11,713.2
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
2
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS -- (CONTINUED)
June 30,
2002 December 31,
(Unaudited) 2001
-------------------------
(in millions)
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity
Liabilities
Future policy benefits ........................................ $ 3,646.2 $ 3,335.4
Policyholders' funds .......................................... 3.6 3.0
Unearned revenue .............................................. 237.1 221.0
Unpaid claims and claim expense reserves ...................... 26.8 25.0
Dividends payable to policyholders ............................ 0.3 0.3
Income taxes .................................................. 193.4 191.1
Other liabilities ............................................. 218.2 242.7
Separate account liabilities .................................. 6,249.3 6,729.1
--------- ---------
Total Liabilities ........................................... 10,574.9 10,747.6
Commitments and contingencies -- Note 4
Shareholder's Equity
Common stock, $50 par value; 50,000 shares authorized and
outstanding ................................................. 2.5 2.5
Additional paid in capital .................................... 572.4 572.4
Retained earnings ............................................. 433.5 377.8
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ................. 19.3 12.9
--------- ---------
Total Shareholder's Equity .................................. 1,027.7 965.6
--------- ---------
Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity .................. $11,602.6 $11,713.2
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
3
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
-----------------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums ........................................................... $ 15.5 $ 16.3 $ 27.7 $ 31.7
Universal life and investment-type product charges ................. 85.4 88.9 174.3 185.2
Net investment income .............................................. 65.0 53.9 127.2 110.5
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs $(1.3)
and $0.9 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001
and $(4.6) and $1.1 for the six months ended June 30, 2002
and 2001, respectively ........................................... (3.0) -- (15.4) 0.6
Other revenue ...................................................... -- -- 1.3 0.1
------------------ ------------------
Total revenues ................................................... 162.9 159.1 315.1 328.1
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits to policyholders .......................................... 97.4 66.6 181.4 128.3
Other operating costs and expenses ................................. 10.9 20.1 26.8 43.6
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized investment gains (losses)
$(1.3) and $0.9 for the three months ended June 30, 2002
and 2001 and $(4.6) and $1.1 for the six months ended June
30, 2002 and 2001, respectively .................................. 7.9 11.8 15.8 37.5
Dividends to policyholders ......................................... 5.0 5.6 9.8 10.9
------------------ ------------------
Total benefits and expenses ...................................... 121.2 104.1 233.8 220.3
------------------ ------------------
Income before income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change ........................................ 41.7 55.0 81.3 107.8
Income taxes ......................................................... 12.6 18.8 25.6 39.8
------------------ ------------------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change ................. 29.1 36.2 55.7 68.0
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax - Note 1 .......... -- -- -- (1.6)
------------------ ------------------
Net income ........................................................... $ 29.1 $ 36.2 $ 55.7 $ 66.4
================== ==================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
4
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated
Additional Other Total Outstanding
Common Paid In Retained Comprehensive Shareholder's Shares
Stock Capital Earnings Income Equity (actual)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions, except outstanding shares data)
Balance at April 1, 2001 .................. $2.5 $572.4 $263.1 $ 9.4 $ 847.4 50,000
Comprehensive income:
Net income .............................. 36.2 36.2
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses) ........... 3.6 3.6
--------
Comprehensive income ...................... 39.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at June 30, 2001 .................. $2.5 $572.4 $299.3 $13.0 $ 887.2 50,000
==========================================================================
Balance at April 1, 2002 .................. $2.5 $572.4 $404.4 $ 5.6 $ 984.9 50,000
Comprehensive income:
Net income .............................. 29.1 29.1
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses) ........... 13.7 13.7
--------
Comprehensive income ...................... 42.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at June 30, 2002 .................. $2.5 $572.4 $433.5 $19.3 $1,027.7 50,000
==========================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
5
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated
Additional Other Total Outstanding
Common Paid In Retained Comprehensive Shareholder's Shares
Stock Capital Earnings Income Equity (actual)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions, except outstanding shares data)
Balance at January 1, 2001 ................. $2.5 $572.4 $232.9 $(2.2) $ 805.6 50,000
Comprehensive income:
Net income ............................... 66.4 66.4
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses) ............ 8.0 8.0
--------
Comprehensive income ....................... 74.4
Change in accounting principle,
net of tax - Note 1 ...................... 7.2 7.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at June 30, 2001 ................... $2.5 $572.4 $299.3 $13.0 $ 887.2 50,000
===========================================================================
Balance at January 1, 2002 ................. $2.5 $572.4 $377.8 $12.9 $ 965.6 50,000
Comprehensive income:
Net income ............................... 55.7 55.7
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses) ............ 6.4 6.4
--------
Comprehensive income ....................... 62.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at June 30, 2002 ................... $2.5 $572.4 $433.5 $19.3 $1,027.7 50,000
===========================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
6
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2002 2001
-------------------
(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income ............................................................. $ 55.7 $ 66.4
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Amortization of discount - fixed maturities .......................... (0.2) (0.2)
Net realized investment and other losses (gains) ..................... 15.4 (0.6)
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs .......................... (71.8) (30.4)
Depreciation and amortization ........................................ 0.6 0.3
Increase in accrued investment income ................................ (8.4) (12.0)
Increase in premiums and accounts receivable ......................... 9.2 4.6
Increase in other assets and other liabilities, net .................. (56.8) (152.4)
(Decrease) increase in policy liabilities and accruals, net .......... (31.8) 203.2
(Decrease) increase in income taxes .................................. (1.2) 61.5
------ ------
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities ................ (89.3) 140.4
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of:
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................................. 252.2 41.7
Equity securities available-for-sale ................................. 4.8 4.4
Real estate .......................................................... 0.3 --
Short-term investments and other invested assets ..................... -- 2.0
Maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity .................................... 2.0 2.0
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................................. 82.4 88.6
Short-term investments and other invested assets ..................... 1.5 33.2
Mortgage loans on real estate ........................................ 50.1 35.6
Purchases of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity .................................... (1.1) (1.2)
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .................................. (626.1) (460.7)
Equity securities available-for-sale ................................. (6.9) (1.2)
Real estate .......................................................... (0.1) (0.3)
Short-term investments and other invested assets ..................... (10.1) (22.6)
Mortgage loans on real estate issued ................................... (78.1) (27.8)
Other, net ............................................................. (15.2) (15.6)
------ ------
Net cash used in investing activities .............................. (344.3) (321.9)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Universal life and investment-type contract deposits ................... 570.7 454.5
Universal life and investment-type contract maturities and withdrawals . (208.5) (500.7)
------ ------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities ................ 362.2 (46.2)
------ ------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents .......................... (71.4) (227.7)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period ......................... 115.4 277.3
------ ------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period ............................... $ 44.0 $ 49.6
====== ======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
7
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company (the Company) is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of John Hancock Life Insurance Company (John Hancock or the Parent).
The Company, domiciled in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, issues variable and
universal life insurance policies, individual whole and term life policies and
fixed and variable annuity contracts. Those policies primarily are marketed
through John Hancock's sales organization, which includes a career agency system
composed of Company-supported independent general agencies and a direct
brokerage system that markets directly to external independent brokers. Policies
are also sold through various unaffiliated securities broker-dealers and certain
other financial institutions. Currently, the Company writes business in all
states except New York.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all
adjustments, consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for
a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations.
Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2002. These unaudited consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Company's annual audited financial
statements as of December 31, 2001 included in the Company's Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (hereafter referred to as the Company's 2001 Form 10-K). All
of the Company's United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings are
available on the internet at www.sec.gov, under the name Hancock John Variable
Life.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2001 has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information
and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States for complete financial statements.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Costs that vary with, and are related primarily to, the production of new
business have been deferred to the extent that they are deemed recoverable. Such
costs include commissions, certain costs of policy issue and underwriting, and
certain agency expenses. The Company tests the recoverability of its deferred
policy acquisition costs quarterly with a model that uses data such as market
performance, lapse rates, mortality experience and expense levels. As of June
30, 2002 the Company's deferred policy acquisition costs are deemed recoverable.
For participating traditional life insurance policies, such costs are being
amortized over the life of the contracts at a constant rate based on the present
value of the estimated gross margin amounts expected to be realized over the
lives of the contracts. Estimated gross margin amounts include anticipated
premiums and investment results less claims and administrative expenses, changes
in the net level premium reserve and expected annual policyholder dividends. For
universal life insurance contracts and investment-type products, such costs are
being amortized generally in proportion to the present value of expected gross
profits arising principally from surrender charges and investment results, and
mortality and expense margins. The effects on the amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs of revisions to estimated gross margins and profits are
reflected in earnings in the period such estimated gross margins and profits are
revised. For non-participating term life and long-term care insurance products,
such costs are being amortized over the premium-paying period of the related
policies using assumptions consistent with those used in computing policy
benefit reserves. Present values of expected gross profits or expected gross
margins are discounted at the latest revised interest rate which is applied to
the remaining benefit period. At June 30, 2002, the average discount rate is
6.2% for universal life products, and the total amortization period life is 30
years for universal life products. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs was $7.9 million and $11.8 million for the three month periods ended June
30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $15.8 million and $37.5 million for the six
month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
8
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs is allocated to: (1) net
realized investment and other gains (losses) for those products in which such
gains (losses) have a direct impact on the amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs; (2) unrealized investment gains and losses, net of tax, to
provide for the effect on the deferred policy acquisition costs asset that would
result from the realization of unrealized gains and losses on assets backing
participating traditional life insurance and universal life and investment-type
contracts; and (3) a separate component of benefits and expenses to reflect
amortization related to the gross margins or profits, excluding realized gains
and losses, relating to policies and contracts in force.
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) related to certain products
have a direct impact on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs as
such gains and losses affect the amount and timing of profit emergence.
Accordingly, to the extent that such amortization results from net realized
investment and other gains (losses), management believes that presenting
realized investment gains and losses net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs provides information useful in evaluating the operating
performance of the Company. This presentation may not be comparable to
presentations made by other insurers.
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Changes
On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities," (SFAS No. 133), as amended by SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain
Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB
Statement 133". The adoption of SFAS No. 133, as amended, resulted in a charge
to operations accounted for as a cumulative effect of accounting change of $1.6
million (net of tax of $0.4 million) as of January 1, 2001. In addition, as of
January 1, 2001, a $7.2 million (net of tax of $3.9 million) cumulative effect
of accounting change was recorded in other comprehensive income for (1) the
transition adjustment in the adoption of SFAS No. 133, as amended, an increase
in comprehensive income of $0.8 million (net of tax of $0.4 million), and (2)
the reclassification of $603.1 million in securities from the held-to-maturity
category to the available-for-sale category, an increase in comprehensive income
of $6.4 million (net of tax of $3.4 million).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and other intangible
assets deemed to have indefinite lives no longer be amortized to earnings, but
instead be reviewed at least annually for impairment. Intangible assets with
definite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The
Company has no goodwill, or other purchased indefinite lived intangible assets
subject to SFAS No. 142 and, therefore, the adoption of SFAS No. 142 had no
impact on its earnings or financial position.
9
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 2 -- Transactions with Parent
John Hancock provides the Company with personnel, property and facilities in
carrying out certain of its corporate functions. John Hancock annually
determines a fee (the Parent Company service fee) for these services and
facilities based on a number of criteria, which are periodically revised to
reflect continuing changes in the Company's operations. The Parent Company
service fee is included in other operating costs and expenses within the
Company's income statements. John Hancock charged the Company a service fee of
$39.1 million and $41.5 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2002
and 2001, respectively, $84.4 million and $80.1 million for the six month period
ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. As of June 30, 2002, the Company
owed John Hancock $12.8 million related to these services, which is included in
other liabilities. John Hancock has guaranteed that, if necessary, it will make
additional capital contributions to prevent the Company's shareholder's equity
from declining below $1.0 million.
Note 3 -- Segment Information
The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units offering
different products and services. The reportable segments are managed separately,
as they focus on different products, markets or distribution channels.
Protection Segment. Offers a variety of individual life insurance, including
participating whole life, term life, universal life and variable life insurance.
Products are distributed through multiple distribution channels, including
insurance agents and brokers and alternative distribution channels that include
banks, financial planners, direct marketing and the Internet.
Asset Gathering Segment. Offers individual annuities, consisting of fixed
deferred annuities and variable annuities. This segment distributes its products
through distribution channels including insurance agents and brokers affiliated
with the Company, securities brokerage firms, financial planners and banks.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. Allocations of net investment income
are based on the amount of assets allocated to each segment. Other costs and
operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on a review of the nature
of such costs, cost allocations utilizing time studies, and other relevant
allocation methodologies.
Management of the Company evaluates performance based on segment after-tax
operating income, which excludes the effect of net realized investment and other
gains or losses and other unusual or non-recurring events and transactions.
Segment after-tax operating income is determined by adjusting GAAP net income
for net realized investment and other gains and losses and certain other items
which management believes are not indicative of overall operating trends. While
these items may be significant components in understanding and assessing the
Company's financial performance, management believes that the presentation of
after-tax operating income enhances its understanding of the Company's results
of operations by highlighting net income attributable to the normal, recurring
operations of the business.
Amounts reported as segment adjustments in the tables below primarily relate to:
(i) certain net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related
amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs; (ii) benefits to
policyholders and expenses incurred relating to the settlement of a class action
lawsuit against the Company involving a dispute regarding disclosure of costs on
various modes of life insurance policy premium payment; (iii) restructuring
costs related to our distribution systems and retail operations; and (iv)
cumulative effect of an accounting change.
10
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Segment Information - (Continued)
The following table summarizes selected financial information by segment for the
dates and periods indicated, and reconciles segment revenues and segment
after-tax operating income to amounts reported in the consolidated statements of
income:
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
-------------------------------------
(in millions)
As of or for the three months ended June 30, 2002:
Revenues: .....................................................
Revenues from external customers ............................ $ 92.8 $ 8.1 $ 100.9
Net investment income ....................................... 64.7 0.3 65.0
-------------------------------------
Segment revenues ............................................ 157.5 8.4 165.9
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ............ (3.0) -- (3.0)
-------------------------------------
Revenues .................................................... $ 154.5 $ 8.4 $ 162.9
=====================================
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income .......................... $ 35.0 $ 0.4 $ 35.4
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ............ (1.8) -- (1.8)
Class action lawsuit ........................................ (4.5) -- (4.5)
-------------------------------------
Net income .................................................. $ 28.7 $ 0.4 $ 29.1
=====================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees accounted
for by the equity method .................................. $ 1.1 $ -- $ 1.1
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs ........... 3.3 4.6 7.9
Segment assets .............................................. $10,043.8 $ 1,558.8 $11,602.6
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
-------------------------------------
(in millions)
As of or for the three months ended June 30, 2001:
Revenues: .....................................................
Revenues from external customers ............................ $ 93.4 $ 11.8 $ 105.2
Net investment income ....................................... 54.7 (0.8) 53.9
-------------------------------------
Segment revenues ............................................ 148.1 11.0 159.1
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ............ -- -- --
-------------------------------------
Revenues .................................................... $ 148.1 $ 11.0 $ 159.1
=====================================
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income .......................... $ 32.7 $ 3.7 $ 36.4
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ............ (0.2) -- (0.2)
-------------------------------------
Net income .................................................. $ 32.5 $ 3.7 $ 36.2
=====================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees accounted
for by the equity method .................................. $ (1.8) $ -- $ (1.8)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs ........... 9.4 2.4 11.8
Segment assets .............................................. $ 9,409.3 $ 2,150.2 $11,559.5
11
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Segment Information - (Continued)
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
-------------------------------------
(in millions)
As of or for the six months ended June 30, 2002:
Revenues: ..................................................
Revenues from external customers ......................... $ 186.0 $ 17.3 $ 203.3
Net investment income .................................... 127.0 0.2 127.2
-------------------------------------
Segment revenues ......................................... 313.0 17.5 330.5
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ......... (15.4) -- (15.4)
-------------------------------------
Revenues ................................................. $ 297.6 $ 17.5 $ 315.1
=====================================
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ....................... $ 68.0 $ 1.7 $ 69.7
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ......... (9.8) -- (9.8)
Class action lawsuit ..................................... (4.5) -- (4.5)
Restructuring charges .................................... 0.3 -- 0.3
-------------------------------------
Net income ............................................... $ 54.0 $ 1.7 $ 55.7
=====================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees accounted
for by the equity method ............................... $ 2.1 $ -- $ 2.1
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs ........ 8.1 7.7 15.8
Segment assets ........................................... $10,043.8 $ 1,558.8 $11,602.6
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
-------------------------------------
(in millions)
As of or for the six months ended June 30, 2001:
Revenues: ..................................................
Revenues from external customers ......................... $ 193.1 $ 23.9 $ 217.0
Net investment income .................................... 111.9 (1.4) 110.5
-------------------------------------
Segment revenues ......................................... 305.0 22.5 327.5
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ......... 0.6 -- 0.6
-------------------------------------
Revenues ................................................. $ 305.6 $ 22.5 $ 328.1
=====================================
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ....................... $ 64.4 $ 3.4 $ 67.8
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) ......... 0.2 -- 0.2
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax ...... (1.6) -- (1.6)
-------------------------------------
Net income ............................................... $ 63.0 $ 3.4 $ 66.4
=====================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees accounted
for by the equity method ............................... $ (1.3) $ -- $ (1.3)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs ........ 28.0 9.5 37.5
Segment assets ........................................... $ 9,409.3 $ 2,150.2 $11,559.5
The Company operates only in the United States. The Company has no reportable
major customers and revenues are attributed to countries based on the location
of customers.
12
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 4 -- Contingencies and Other Matters
Class Action
During 1997, the Company entered into a court-approved settlement relating to a
class action lawsuit involving certain individual life insurance policies sold
from 1979 through 1996. In entering into the settlement, the Company
specifically denied any wrongdoing. The total reserve held in connection with
the settlement to provide for relief to class members and for legal and
administrative costs associated with the settlement amounted to $6.0 million and
$14.1 million at June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. There were
no costs related to the settlement incurred for the three months ended June 30,
2002 or 2001. The estimated reserve is based on a number of factors, including
the estimated cost per claim and the estimated costs to administer the claims.
During 1996, management determined that it was probable that a settlement would
occur and that a minimum loss amount could be reasonably estimated. Accordingly,
the Company recorded its best estimate based on the information available at the
time. The terms of the settlement agreement were negotiated throughout 1997 and
approved by the court on December 31, 1997. In accordance with the terms of the
settlement agreement, the Company contacted class members during 1998 to
determine the actual type of relief to be sought by class members. The majority
of the responses from class members were received by the fourth quarter of 1998.
The type of relief sought by class members differed from the Company's initial
estimates. In 1999, the Company updated its estimate of the cost of claims
subject to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) relief and revised its reserve
estimate accordingly. The reserve estimate was further evaluated quarterly, and
was adjusted in the fourth quarter of 2001. The adjustment to the reserve in the
fourth quarter of 2001 was the result of the Company being able to better
estimate the cost of settling the remaining claims, which on average tend to be
larger, more complicated claims. The better estimate comes from experience with
actual settlements on similar claims.
Administration of the ADR component of the settlement continues to date.
Although some uncertainty remains as to the cost of claims in the final phase
(i.e., arbitration) of the ADR process, it is expected that the final cost of
the settlement will not differ materially from the amounts presently provided
for by the Company.
Other Matters
On July 19, 2002, the Company announced it had entered into a class action
lawsuit settlement agreement involving policyholders who paid premiums on a
monthly, quarterly or semiannual basis, rather than annually. The class action
lawsuit, known as the "Modal Premium" action, was filed in a New Mexico state
court and is applicable to all United States policyholders in the class. As a
result of the settlement, the Company has established a $6.9 million reserve as
of June 30, 2002 to provide for relief to class members and for legal and
administrative costs associated with the settlement. In entering into the
settlement, the Company specifically denied any wrongdoing. Although some
uncertainty remains as to the entire cost of claims, it is expected that the
final cost of the settlement will not differ materially from the amounts
presently provided for by the Company.
In the normal course of its business operations, the Company is involved with
litigation from time to time with claimants, beneficiaries and others, and a
number of litigation matters were pending as of June 30, 2002. It is the opinion
of management, after consultation with counsel, that the ultimate liability with
respect to these claims, if any, will not materially affect the financial
position or results of operations of the Company.
13
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 5 -- Value of Business Acquired
The Company recognizes one purchased intangible asset. The present value of
estimated future profits of insurance policies inforce related to business
acquired is recorded as the value of business acquired (VOBA), and is included
in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. VOBA is amortized in
proportion to the present value of expected gross profits of the businesses
acquired.
The following tables set forth certain summarized financial information relating
to VOBA as of the dates and periods indicated.
Accumulated
Gross mortization
Carrying A and Other Net Carrying
Amount Changes Amount
------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Amortizable intangible assets:
June 30, 2002
VOBA........................................ $25.0 $(18.0) $7.0
June 30, 2001
VOBA........................................ $25.0 $(16.5) $8.5
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Amortization expense:
VOBA, net of tax of $- and $0.2 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2002 and
2001, respectively, and $0.2 million and
$0.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively........ $0.1 $0.3 $0.2 $0.5
Estimated future amortization expense for the
years ended December 31, Tax Effect Net Expense
-----------------------
(in millions)
2002.......................................... $0.3 $0.5
2003.......................................... $0.3 $0.5
2004.......................................... $0.3 $0.5
2005.......................................... $0.2 $0.5
2006.......................................... $0.2 $0.4
2007.......................................... $0.2 $0.4
The changes in the carrying value of VOBA, presented for each business segment,
for the period indicated are as follows:
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
-------------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance at April 1, 2002 ............... $ 8.5 -- $ 8.5
Amortization and other changes:
Amortization ......................... (0.1) -- (0.1)
Adjustment to unrealized gains on
securities available-for-sale ...... (1.4) -- (1.4)
------------------------------------
Balance at June 30, 2002 ............... $ 7.0 -- $ 7.0
====================================
14
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 5 -- Value of Business Acquired - (Continued)
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
------------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2002 ............. $ 7.3 -- $ 7.3
Amortization and other changes:
Amortization ......................... (0.4) -- (0.4)
Adjustment to unrealized gains on
securities available-for-sale ...... 0.1 -- 0.1
------------------------------------
Balance at June 30, 2002 ............... $ 7.0 -- $ 7.0
====================================
Note 6 - Subsequent Events
On August 11, 2002, US Airways and certain of its subsidiaries filed petitions
for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company's fixed
maturities securities include notes and collateralized structured financings
backed by US Airways or its subsidiaries, and in some cases guaranteed by a
guarantor rated AA or better. As of June 30, 2002, these securities were
recorded with a carrying value of $13.4 million, net unrealized losses of $0.5
million, and accrued investment income of $0.5 million. A further breakdown is
shown below:
o $10.2 million, with $0.3 million in accrued interest, are senior
tranche Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificate (EETC) bonds guaranteed
by MBIA, GE, or SNECMA, all of which are rated AA or better.
o $1.1 million, with no accrued interest, are senior tranche EETC
bonds without a guarantee. These bonds had an original loan-to-value
of 40-50% and have a liquidity facility to pay interest for up to 18
months.
o $2.1 million, with $0.2 million in accrued interest, are Equipment
Trust Certificate (ETC) bonds that originally had a loan-to-value of
75-80%.
With the bankruptcy filing, US Airways has the right to affirm or reject the
leases on the aircraft that underlie these investments. For tranches other than
the guaranteed EETCs, to the extent that (1) US Airways rejects the leases and
(2) the aircraft are worth less than our loan balance, we will suffer a loss. We
do not yet know if US Airways intends to reject the leases underlying our bonds.
15
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION and ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION and RESULTS
of OPERATIONS
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A) addresses the consolidated and segment financial condition of
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company (the Company) as of June 30, 2002,
compared with December 31, 2001, and its consolidated results of operations for
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001, and,
where appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's MD&A and annual
audited financial statements as of December 31, 2001 included in the Company's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (hereafter referred to as the Company's 2001 Form 10-K). All
of the Company's United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings are
available on the internet at www.sec.gov under the name Hancock John Variable
Life Insurance Company.
Statements, analyses, and other information contained in this report relating to
trends in the Company's operations and financial results, the markets for the
Company's products, the future development of the Company's business, and the
contingencies and uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as
other statements including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan,"
"estimate," "intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar expressions,
are "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's current
expectations and beliefs concerning future events and their potential effects on
the Company. Future events and their effect on the Company may not be these
anticipated by management. The Company's actual results may differ materially
from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Forward-Looking Statements" included herein for a discussion of
factors that could cause or contribute to such material differences.
Overview
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company (the Company), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of John Hancock Life Insurance Company (John Hancock or the Parent
Company) is a leading life insurance company providing a broad range of products
and services in the retail market, which offers insurance protection and asset
gathering products and services primarily to retail consumers.
Our revenues are derived principally from:
o premiums on individual life insurance and annuities with life
contingencies;
o product charges from variable and universal life insurance products
and annuities;
o net investment income and net realized investment and other gains
(losses) on general account assets.
Our expenses consist principally of insurance benefits provided to
policyholders, interest credited on policyholders' account balances, dividends
to policyholders, other operating costs and expenses, which include commissions
and general business expenses, net of expenses deferred, amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs, and premium and income taxes.
Our profitability depends in large part upon: (1) the adequacy of our product
pricing, which is primarily a function of competitive conditions, our ability to
assess and manage trends in mortality and morbidity experience, our ability to
generate investment earnings and our ability to maintain expenses in accordance
with pricing assumptions; (2) the amount of assets under management; and (3) the
maintenance of our target spreads between the rate of earnings on our
investments and rates credited on policyholders' account balances. Overall,
financial market conditions have a significant impact on all these profit
drivers.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and
understanding of our results of operation. For a detailed discussion of the
application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1- Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to consolidated financial
statements of the Company's 2001 Form 10-K. Note that the application of these
accounting policies in the preparation of this report requires management to use
judgments involving assumptions and estimates concerning future results or other
developments including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future
transactions or events. There can be no assurance that actual
16
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
results will not differ from those estimates. These judgments are reviewed
frequently by senior management, and an understanding of them may enhance the
reader's understanding of the Company's financial statements and MD&A.
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Costs that vary with, and are related to, the production of business have been
deferred to the extent that they are deemed recoverable. Such costs include
commissions, certain costs of policy issue and underwriting, and certain agency
expenses. The Company tests the recoverability of its deferred policy
acquisition costs quarterly with a model that uses data such as market
performance, lapse rates, mortality experience and expense levels. We amortize
deferred policy acquisition costs on term life insurance ratably with premiums.
We amortize deferred policy acquisition costs on our annuity products and retail
life insurance, other than term, based on a percentage of the estimated gross
profits over the life of the policies, which are generally twenty years for
annuities and thirty years for life policies. Our estimated gross profits are
computed based on assumptions related to the underlying policies including
mortality, lapse, expenses, and asset growth rates. We amortize deferred policy
acquisition costs such that the percentage of gross profits to the amount of
deferred policy acquisition costs amortized is constant over the life of the
policies.
Estimated gross profits, including net realized investment and other gains
(losses), are adjusted periodically to take into consideration the actual
experience to date and changes in the remaining estimated gross profits. When
estimated gross profits are adjusted, we also adjust the amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs to maintain a constant amortization percentage
over the life of the policies. Our current estimated gross profits include
certain judgments concerning mortality, lapse and asset growth that are based on
a combination of actual Company experience and historical market experience of
equity and fixed income returns. Short-term variances of actual results from the
judgments made by management can impact quarter to quarter earnings.
Recently, equity market declines have raised the issue of recoverability
of deferred policy acquisition costs on variable annuity products. Our analysis
has determined that our current variable annuity deferred policy acquisition
costs balance of $140.7 million is only 12.4% of our total deferred policy
acquisition costs asset. Approximately 30% of our variable annuity product
assets are invested in fixed income accounts which partially insulate account
values from declines in the equity markets. For example, in the second quarter
of 2002, the Standard & Poor's Index was down 13%, while our variable annuity
products assets were down 8.98%. As a result of these facts and our quarterly
recoverability testing, all of the Company's deferred policy acquisition costs
were deemed recoverable at June 30, 2002. In our modeling one scenario involved
additional declines of 10% in the equity markets in each of the two subsequent
quarters to June 30, 2002. We capped expected future returns in the mid-teen
level. These facts would result in a one-time write off of deferred policy
acquisition costs by the fourth quarter of 2002 of approximately $5 to $6
million, after-tax. In addition amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs would increase by approximately $0.5 to $1.0 million, after-tax, per
quarter.
Investment in Debt and Equity Securities
Impairments on our investment portfolio are recorded as a charge to income in
the period when the impairment is judged by management to occur. See the General
Account Investments section of this document and the discussion of Credit Risk
in the Quantitative and Qualitative Information About Market Risk section of
this document for a more detailed discussion of the judgments involved in
determining impairments.
Certain of our fixed income securities classified as held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale are not publicly traded, and quoted market prices are not
available from brokers or investment bankers on these securities. The change in
the fair value of the available-for-sale securities is recorded in other
comprehensive income as an unrealized gain or loss. We calculate the fair value
of these securities ourselves through the use of pricing models and discounted
cash flows calling for a substantial level of management's judgment. Our
approach is based on currently available information, and we believe it to be
appropriate and fundamentally sound. However, different pricing models or
assumptions or changes in relevant current information could produce different
valuation results. The Company's pricing model takes into account a number of
factors including credit quality, country of issue, market sector and average
investment life, and our pricing analysts take appropriate action to reduce
valuation of securities where an event occurs which negatively impacts the
securities' value. Certain events that could impact the valuation of securities
include issuer credit ratings, business climate, management changes, litigation
and government actions, among others. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - General Account Investments" section of this document for a more
detailed discussion of this process and the judgments used therein.
17
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Income Taxes
We establish reserves for possible penalty and interest payments to various
taxing authorities with respect to the admissability and timing of tax
deductions. Management makes judgments concerning the eventual outcome of these
items and reviews those judgments on an ongoing basis.
Reinsurance
We reinsure portions of the risks we assume for our protection products.
The maximum amount of individual ordinary life insurance retained by us on any
life is $10 million under an individual policy and $20 million under a
second-to-die policy. As of January 1, 2001, we established additional
reinsurance programs, which limit our exposure to fluctuations in life claims
for individuals for whom the net amount at risk is $3 million or more.
The Company enters into reinsurance agreements to specifically address
insurance exposure to multiple life insurance claims as a result of a
catastrophic event. The Company's catastrophic reinsurance coverage expired on
December 31, 2001 for its individual life insurance products and on June 30,
2002 for its group life insurance products. The Company's parent is in the
process of putting in place replacement catastrophic reinsurance covering life
insurance policies written by the parent and all of its U.S. life insurance
subsidiaries. The deductible for individual and group coverages combined is $25
million per occurrence and the limit of coverage is $40 million per occurrence.
Both the deductible and the limit apply to the combined U.S. insurance
companies, including the parent. Should catastrophic reinsurance become
unavailable to the Company in the future, the absence of, or further limitations
on, reinsurance coverage could adversely affect the Company's future net income
and financial position.
By entering into reinsurance agreements with a diverse group of highly
rated reinsurers, we seek to control our exposure to losses. Our reinsurance,
however, does not discharge our legal obligations to pay policy claims on the
policies reinsured. As a result, we enter into reinsurance agreements only with
highly rated reinsurers. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that all our
reinsurers will pay the claims we make against them. Failure of a reinsurer to
pay a claim could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
Economic Trends
The sales and other financial results of our business over the last several
years have been affected by general economic and industry trends. The
appreciation of equity markets in the 1990's resulted in variable products,
including variable life insurance and variable annuities, accounting for the
majority of increases in total premiums and deposits for the insurance industry.
This trend reversed in 2001and 2002 due to declines in equity market performance
and we have seen investors return to stable investment products. We believe, our
diverse distribution network and product offerings will assist in the
maintenance of assets and provide for sales growth. Although sales of
traditional life insurance products and, more recently, variable annuity
products have experienced declines, sales of fixed annuity products, single life
insurance, universal life, insurance and term life insurance, and corporate
owned life insurance have increased.
18
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Results of Operations
The table below presents the consolidated results of operations for the periods
presented.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
--------------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues .................................... $ 162.9 $ 159.1 $ 315.1 $ 328.1
Benefits and expenses ....................... 121.2 104.1 233.8 220.3
----------------- -----------------
Income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change .... 41.7 55.0 81.3 107.8
Income taxes ................................ 12.6 18.8 25.6 39.8
----------------- -----------------
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change ......................... 29.1 36.2 55.7 68.0
Cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax (1) ............................ -- -- -- (1.6)
----------------- -----------------
Net income .................................. $ 29.1 $ 36.2 $ 55.7 $ 66.4
================= =================
(1) Cumulative effect of accounting changes is shown net of taxes of $0.4
million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001. There was
no cumulative effect of accounting change for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2002.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2001
Consolidated pre-tax income of $41.7 million, for the three months ended June
30, 2002 decreased by $13.3 million, or 24.2%, from the prior year. The
Protection Segment's pre-tax income decreased $6.9 million, or 14.0%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the three months ended June 30,
2001 due to an increase in benefits to policyholders of $29.8 million, or 46.5%,
and an increase in net realized investment and other losses of $3.0 million.
Offsetting these changes was a decrease in other operating costs and expenses of
$9.6 million, or 48.7% and an increase in net investment income of $10.1
million, or 18.5%. Pre-tax loss in the Asset Gathering Segment was $0.7 million,
a decrease of $6.4 million, or 112.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2002
from that reported in the prior year. The decrease in Asset Gathering was due to
a decrease in universal life and investment-type product charges of $3.6
million, or 31.0%, and increases of $0.9 million in benefits to policyholders
and $0.5 million in operating expenses.
Revenues of $162.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 increased
$3.8 million, or 2.4%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2001, due to
an increase of $6.6 million, or 4.5%, in revenues in the Protection Segment. The
Protection Segment's increase in revenues was driven by an increase of $10.1
million, or 18.5%, in net investment income offset by net realized investment
and other losses of $3.0 million and a decrease of $0.8 million, or 4.9%, in
premiums. The increase in net investment income was due to a 22.3% increase in
average net asset balances offset by a 26 basis point decrease in yields. The
decrease in premiums was due to a higher percentage of traditional life
insurance being reinsured. Net realized investment and other losses were due to
losses on fixed maturity investments. Revenues in the Asset Gathering Segment
decreased $2.8 million, or 25.5%, due to a decrease in universal life and
investment-type product charges of $3.6 million, or 31.0%. The decrease in
universal life and investment-type product charges was driven by lower account
values due to poor separate account performance and policies sold to the Parent
Company as part of the safe harbor annuity exchange program.
Benefits and expenses of $121.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002
increased $17.1 million, or 16.4%, compared to the three months ended June 30,
2001, due to an increase of $13.5 million, or 13.7%, in the Protection Segment.
The increase in Protection was driven by an increase of $29.8 million, or 46.5%,
in benefits to policyholders due to the growth in the non-traditional life
insurance business, as universal life account values increased by 25.0% compared
to prior year period and a $6.9 million reserve recorded for the settlement of
the "Modal Premium" class action lawsuit (See Note 4 - Contingencies and Other
Matters in the notes to the unaudited
19
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
consolidated financial statements). The reserve was recorded to provide relief
to class members and for legal and administrative costs associated with the
settlement. Protection's increase in benefits to policyholders was partially
offset by a decrease of $9.6 million, or 48.7%, in other operating costs and
expenses and a decrease in non-traditional life business amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs of $6.1 million, or 64.9%. The decrease in
other operating costs and expenses was due to increased credits of $10.6 million
for reinsurance ceded expense allowances, resulting from both a new traditional
life insurance treaty implemented during 2001 and growth in the non-traditional
life insurance business. The decrease in amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs in the non-traditional life insurance business was due to
additional amortization in the prior period, resulting from the implementation
of new modeling systems. Benefits and expenses in the Asset Gathering Segment
increased $3.6 million, or 67.9%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, due to a
$2.2 million increase amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. The
increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs was due to poor
separate account performance, offset by policies sold to the Parent Company in
the prior year. This was coupled with an increase in benefits to policyholders
of $0.9 million, or 36.0%, due to an increase in guaranteed minimum death
benefit payments.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
Consolidated pre-tax income of $81.3 million, for the six months ended June 30,
2002 decreased by $26.5 million, or 24.6%, from the prior year. The Protection
Segment's pre-tax income decreased $21.7 million, or 21.2%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2002 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2001 due to an
increase in net realized investment and other losses of $16.0 million, a
decrease in premiums of $4.0 million, or 12.6%, a decrease in universal life and
investment-type product charges of $3.0 million, or 1.9%, and an increase in
benefits to policyholders of $52.8 million, or 42.8%. Offsetting these changes
was a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of $19.9
million, or 71.1%, a decrease in other operating costs and expenses of $18.1
million, or 43.9%, and an increase in net investment income of $15.1 million, or
13.5%. Pre-tax income in the Asset Gathering Segment decreased $4.8 million, or
85.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from that reported in the
comparable prior year period. The change in Asset Gathering was due to a
decrease of $7.9 million, or 33.1%, in universal life and investment-type
product charges partially offset by an increase of $1.5 million, or 107.1%, in
net investment income and an increase of $1.3 million in other income.
Revenues of $315.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 decreased
$13.0 million, or 4.0%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2001, due to a
decrease of $7.9 million, or 2.6%, in revenues in the Protection Segment and a
decrease of $5.1 million, or 22.7%, in revenues in the Asset Gathering Segment.
The Protection Segment's decrease in revenues was driven by an increase of $16.0
million in net realized investment and other losses due to losses on fixed
maturity investments, a decrease of $4.0 million, or 12.6%, in premiums as a
result of a higher percentage of the traditional life insurance business being
reinsured, and a decrease of $3.0 million, or 1.9%, in universal life and
investment-type product charges, due to lower amortization of unearned revenue
on non-traditional life insurance business, offset by an increase of $15.1
million, or 13.5%, in net investment income. The increase in net investment
income was driven by to a 22.3% increase in average asset balances offset by a
57 basis point decrease in yields. Revenues in the Asset Gathering Segment
decreased $5.1 million, or 22.7%, due to decreases of approximately $7.9
million, or 33.1%, in universal life and investment-type product charges offset
by an increase in net investment income of $1.5 million, or 107.1%, and an
increase in other revenue of $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002
from that reported in the comparable prior year period. The decrease in
universal life and investment-type product charges was driven by lower account
values due to poor separate account performance and policies sold to the Parent
Company as part of the safe harbor annuity exchange program. The increase in net
investment income was due to a $43 million increase in average assets,
principally due to the fixed annuity product line, which was first offered by
the Company in the last quarter of the prior year and the increase in other
income was due to a gain on sale of policies to the Parent Company.
Benefits and expenses of $233.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002
increased $13.5 million, or 6.1%, compared to the six months ended June 30,
2001, due to an increase of $13.6 million, or 6.7%, in the Protection Segment.
The increase in Protection was driven by an increase in benefits to
policyholders of $52.8 million, or 42.8%, driven by the non-traditional life
insurance business, as universal life account values increased by 25.0% compared
to the prior year period. In addition, Protection Segment benefits to
policyholders increased $6.9 million due to a reserve recorded for the
settlement of the "Modal Premium" class action lawsuit. (See Note 4 -
Contingencies and Other Matters in the notes to the unaudited consolidated
financial statements). The reserve was recorded to provide relief to class
members and for legal and administrative costs associated with the settlement.
Protection's increase in benefits to policyholders was partially offset by a
decrease of $19.9 million, or 71.1%, in
20
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and a decrease of $18.1
million, or 43.9%, in other operating costs and expenses. The decrease in
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs was driven by poor mortality
experience on the non-traditional insurance business. The decrease in other
operating costs and expenses was due to increased credits of $21.2 million for
reinsurance ceded expense allowances, resulting from both a new traditional life
reinsurance treaty implemented during 2001 and growth in the non-traditional
life insurance business. Benefits and expenses in the Asset Gathering Segment
decreased $0.3 million, or 6.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2002, due to
a $1.8 million decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs,
driven by lower account balances due to the sale of policies to the Parent
Company in the prior year, offset by separate account performance. This was
partially offset by and increase in other operating costs and expenses of $1.4
million driven by an increase in guaranteed minimum death benefit payments.
21
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Results of Operations by Segment
We operate our business in two business segments, the Protection Segment and the
Asset Gathering Segment. Both of our business segments primarily serve retail
customers. The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units
offering different products and services, and are managed separately, as they
focus on different products, markets or distribution channels.
Protection Segment. Offers a variety of individual life insurance, including
participating whole life, term life, universal life and variable life insurance.
Products are distributed through multiple distribution channels, including
insurance agents and brokers and alternative distribution channels that include
banks, financial planners, direct marketing and the Internet.
Asset Gathering Segment. Offers individual annuities, consisting of fixed
deferred annuities and variable annuities. This segment distributes its products
through distribution channels including insurance agents and brokers affiliated
with the Company, securities brokerage firms, and financial planners.
We evaluate segment performance on segment after-tax operating income, which
excludes the effect of net realized investment and other gains (losses) and
other unusual or non-recurring events and transactions. Segment after-tax
operating income is determined by adjusting generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) net income for net realized investment and other gains
(losses), cumulative effect of accounting changes, and certain other items which
we believe are not indicative of overall operating trends or are one-time in
nature. While these items may be significant components in understanding and
assessing our consolidated financial performance, we believe that the
presentation of segment after-tax operating income enhances the understanding of
our results of operations by highlighting net income attributable to the normal,
recurring operations of the business. However, segment after-tax operating
income is not a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP.
A discussion of the adjustments to GAAP reported income, many of which affect
each operating segment, follows the table below. A reconciliation of segment
after-tax operating income, as adjusted, to GAAP reported net income precedes
each segment discussion.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
----------------------------------------
Segment Data: (1) ........................ (in millions)
Segment after-tax operating income:
Protection Segment ..................... $ 35.0 $ 32.7 $ 68.0 $ 64.4
Asset Gathering Segment ................ 0.4 3.7 1.7 3.4
------------------ ------------------
Total segment after-tax operating income 35.4 36.4 69.7 67.8
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Net realized investment and
other gains (losses) ................. (1.8) (0.2) (9.8) 0.2
Class action lawsuit ................... (4.5) -- (4.5) --
Restructuring charges .................. -- -- 0.3 --
------------------ ------------------
Total after-tax adjustments ............ (6.3) (0.2) (14.0) 0.2
------------------ ------------------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect
of accounting change ................. 29.1 36.2 55.7 68.0
Cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax ............................. -- -- -- (1.6)
------------------ ------------------
Net income ............................. $ 29.1 $ 36.2 $ 55.7 $ 66.4
================== ==================
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" set forth below.
Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income
Our GAAP reported net income was affected by net realized investment and other
gains (losses) and other unusual or non-recurring events and transactions
presented in the reconciliation of GAAP reported net income to segment after-tax
operating income in Note 3 -- Segment Information in the notes to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements. A description of these adjustments follows.
22
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
In both periods, net realized investment and other gains (losses) have been
excluded from segment after-tax operating income because such data are often
excluded by analysts and investors when evaluating the overall financial
performance of insurers.
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) have been reduced by
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs to the extent that such
amortization results from net realized investment and other gains (losses). We
believe presenting net realized investment and other gains (losses) in this
format provides information useful in evaluating our operating performance. This
presentation may not be comparable to presentations made by other insurers.
Summarized below is a reconciliation of (a) net realized investment and other
gains (losses) per the unaudited consolidated financial statements and (b) the
adjustment made for net realized investment and other gains (losses) to
calculate segment after-tax operating income for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2002 and 2001.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
--------------------------------------
(in millions)
Net realized investment and other gains
(losses) ................................... $(4.3) $ 0.9 $(20.0) $ 1.7
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net realized
investment and other gains ................. 1.3 (0.9) 4.6 (1.1)
---------------- ---------------
Net realized investment and other gains,
net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs per unaudited
consolidated
financial statements ....................... (3.0) -- (15.4) 0.6
Less income tax effect ....................... 1.2 (0.2) 5.6 (0.4)
---------------- ---------------
Net realized investment and other gains
(losses), net - after-tax adjustment to
calculate segment operating income ......... $(1.8) $(0.2) $ (9.8) $ 0.2
================ ===============
The Company incurred restructuring charges to reduce costs and increase future
operating efficiency by consolidating portions of our operations. After-tax
restructuring gains due to curtailment of pension benefits were $0.3 million for
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002. No such gains were incurred
in the three month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, or in the
six month period ended June 30, 2001.
The Company incurred a $4.5 million after-tax charge related to the settlement
of the Modal Premium class action lawsuit. The settlement agreement involves
policyholders who paid premiums on a monthly, quarterly, or semi-annual basis
rather than annually. The settlement costs are intended to provide for relief to
class members and for legal and administrative costs associated with the
settlement. In entering into the settlement, the Company specifically denied any
wrongdoing. Although some uncertainty remains as to the entire cost of claims,
it is expected that the final cost of the settlement will not differ materially
from the amounts presently provided by the Company.
23
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Protection Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the
Protection Segment for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues (1) ............................ $157.5 $148.1 $313.0 $305.0
Benefits and expenses ................... 105.4 98.8 210.8 203.4
Income taxes ............................ 17.1 16.6 34.2 37.2
---------------- ----------------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) .. 35.0 32.7 68.0 64.4
---------------- ----------------
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Net realized investment and other gains
(losses) ............................ (1.8) (0.2) (9.8) 0.2
Class action lawsuit .................. (4.5) -- (4.5) --
Restructuring charges ................. -- -- 0.3 --
---------------- ----------------
Total after-tax adjustments ............. (6.3) (0.2) (14.0) 0.2
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change ..................... 28.7 32.5 54.0 64.6
Cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax ............................ -- -- -- (1.6)
---------------- ----------------
Net income .............................. $ 28.7 $ 32.5 $ 54.0 $ 63.0
================ ================
Other Data:
Segment after-tax operating income:
Non-traditional life (variable and
universal life) ..................... $ 32.5 $ 30.6 $ 66.5 $ 63.9
Traditional life ...................... 2.5 2.1 1.5 0.5
---------------- ----------------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) .. $ 35.0 $ 32.7 $ 68.0 $ 64.4
================ ================
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this MD&A.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income was $35.0 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2002, an increase of $2.3 million, or 7.0%, from $32.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2001. Non-traditional life insurance business
after-tax operating income increased $1.9 million. Traditional life insurance
business after-tax operating income increased $0.4 million.
Revenues were $157.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, an
increase of $9.4 million, or 6.3%, from $148.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2001. Revenue growth was due to an increase in net investment
income of $10.0 million, or 18.5%, offset by a $0.8 million decrease in
premiums. The increase in net investment income was due to a 22.3% increase in
average invested assets offset by a 26 basis point decrease in yields. The
decrease in premiums was due to a higher percent of the traditional life
insurance business being reinsured. Ceded reinsurance premiums as a percent of
direct premiums were at 44% in the current period, compared to 20% in the prior
period, resulting from a new traditional life insurance reinsurance treaty
implemented during 2001.
Benefits and expenses were $105.4 million for the three months ended June 30,
2002, an increase of $6.6 million, or 6.7%, from $98.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2001. Benefits to policyholders increased $22.9 million,
or 35.7%, due to the growth in the non-traditional life insurance business, as
universal life account balances
24
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
increased by 25.0% compared to the prior year period. Offsetting this increase
was a decrease in other operating costs and expenses of $9.6 million, or 48.7%,
and a decrease in non-traditional life business' amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs of $6.1 million, or 64.9%; the prior period included
additional amortization resulting from the implementation of new modeling
systems. The lower operating expenses were due to increased credits of $10.6
million for reinsurance ceded expense allowances, resulting from both a new
traditional life insurance reinsurance treaty implemented during 2001 and growth
in the non-traditional life insurance business. The Segment's effective tax rate
on operating income decreased to 32.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2002
from 33.7% for the comparable prior year period, due to increased deductions for
general account dividends received on common stock investments.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income was $68.0 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2002, an increase of $3.6 million, or 5.6%, from $64.4 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2001. Non-traditional life insurance business
after-tax operating income increased $2.6 million. Traditional life insurance
business after-tax operating income increased $1.0 million.
Revenues were $313.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase
of $8.0 million, or 2.6%, from $305.0 million for the six months ended June 30,
2001. Revenue growth was driven by a $15.1 million increase in net investment
income offset by a $4.0 million decrease in premiums and a $3.0 million decrease
in universal life and investment-type product charges. The increase in net
investment income was due to a 22.3% increase in average invested assets offset
by a 57 basis point decrease in yields. The decline in premiums is due to a
higher percent of the traditional life insurance business being reinsured. Ceded
reinsurance premiums as a percent of direct premiums were at 45% in the current
period, compared to 18% in the prior period resulting from a new traditional
life insurance reinsurance treaty implemented during 2001. The decrease in
universal life and investment-type product charges was due to lower amortization
of unearned revenue of $8.6 million on the non-traditional life insurance
business, partially offset by an increase in cost of insurance fees of $2.6
million. Cost of insurance fees was up due to a 7.6% growth of the variable life
insurance in force.
Benefits and expenses were $210.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2002, an increase of $7.4 million, or 3.6%, from $203.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2001. Benefits to policyholders increased $46.1 million,
or 37.4%, due to the growth in the non-traditional life insurance business, as
universal life account values increased by 25.0% compared to the prior year
period. Offsetting this increase were a decrease in amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs of $19.9 million, or 71.1%, and a decrease in other
operating costs and expenses of $17.7 million, or 43.0%. The decrease in
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs was due to poor mortality
experience on the non-traditional life insurance business and also, additional
amortization in the prior period resulted from the implementation of new
modeling systems. The lower operating expenses were due to increased credits of
$21.2 million for reinsurance ceded expense allowances, resulting from both a
new traditional life reinsurance treaty implemented during 2001 and growth in
the non-traditional life insurance business. The Segment's effective tax rate on
operating income decreased to 33.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from
36.6% for the comparable prior year period, due to increased deductions for
general account dividends received on common stock investments.
25
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Asset Gathering Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the
Asset Gathering Segment for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
---------------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues (1) ............................. $ 8.4 $ 11.0 $ 17.5 $ 22.5
Benefits and expenses .................... 8.9 5.3 16.6 16.9
Income taxes ............................. (0.9) 2.0 (0.8) 2.2
------------------ ------------------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) ... 0.4 3.7 1.7 3.4
------------------ ------------------
GAAP Reported:
Net income ............................... $ 0.4 $ 3.7 $ 1.7 $ 3.4
================== ==================
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this MD&A.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income was $0.4 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2002, a decrease of $3.3 million, or 89.2%, from the comparable prior
year period. The decrease in segment after-tax operating income was due to $2.6
million decrease in revenues due to the sale, at fair value, of certain policies
by the Company to its Parent as part of the safe harbor annuity exchange program
and poor equity market performance.
Revenues were $8.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 a decrease
of $2.6 million, or 23.6%, from $11.0 million for the comparable prior year
period. Lower revenues were due to a decrease in investment-type product charges
of $3.6 million, or 31.0%, to $8.0 million for the three months ended June 30,
2002 from $11.6 million reported in the comparable prior year period.
Investment-type product charges decreased as a result of lower account values
due to poor separate account performance and policies sold to the Parent
Company, as part of the safe harbor exchange program. This decrease was
partially offset by an increase in net investment income of $1.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2002, due to a $35.7 million increase in average
assets in the fixed annuity product line, which was first offered by the Company
in the fourth quarter of 2001.
Benefits and expenses increased $3.6 million, or 67.9%, to $8.9 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2002 from $5.3 million reported in the comparable
prior year period. The increase in benefits and expenses is due to a $2.2
million increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs driven by
poor separate account performance partially offset by policies sold to the
Parent Company in the prior year. In our modeling one scenario involved
additional declines of 10% in the equity markets in each of the two subsequent
quarters to June 30, 2002. We capped expected future returns in the mid-teen
level. These facts would result in a one-time write off of deferred policy
acquisition costs by the fourth quarter of 2002 of approximately $5 to $6
million, after-tax. In addition, amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs would increase by approximately $0.5 to $1.0 million, after-tax, per
quarter. This increase in deferred policy acquisition costs was coupled with an
increase in benefits to policyholders of $1.0 million, or 40.0%, principally due
to an increase in interest credited to fixed annuity contractholders, as average
liabilities increased $37.3 million. The Segment's effective tax rate on
operating income was (180.0)%, for the three months ended June 30, 2002, due to
increased dividend received deductions in variable annuity separate accounts,
compared to an effective tax rate on operating income of 35.1%, for the three
months ended June 30, 2001.
26
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
Segment after-tax operating income was $1.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2002, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 50.0%, from the comparable prior
year period. The decrease was due to a decrease of $5.0 million in revenues.
Revenues were $17.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, a decrease
of $5.0 million, or 22.2%, from the comparable prior year period. Revenue
consists primarily of $16.0 million in investment-type product charges on
variable annuity products, which decreased $7.9 million from the prior period.
Investment-type product charges decreased as a result of lower account values
due to poor separate account performance and policies sold to the Parent
Company, as part of the safe harbor exchange program. This decrease was
partially offset by an increase in net investment income of $1.6 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2002, due in part to an increase of $23.4 million in
average invested assets in the fixed annuity product line, which was first
offered by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2001.
Benefits and expenses decreased $0.3 million, or 1.8%, to $16.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2002 from $16.9 million reported in the comparable
prior year period. The decrease in benefits and expenses is due to a $1.8
million decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs driven by
lower account balances, as noted, offset by poor separate account performance.
In our modeling one scenario involved additional declines of 10% in the equity
markets in each of the two subsequent quarters to June 30, 2002. We capped
expected future returns in the mid-teen level. These facts would result in a
one-time write off of deferred policy acquisition costs by the fourth quarter of
2002 of approximately $5 to $6 million, after-tax. In addition amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs would increase by approximately $$0.5 to $1.0
million, after-tax, per quarter. Offsetting the decrease to amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs was an increase in other operating costs and
expenses of $1.4 million, to $3.8 million, resulting from higher state licensing
fees. The Segment's effective tax rate on operating income was (88.9)%, for the
six months ended June 30, 2002, due to increased dividend received deductions in
variable annuity separate accounts, compared to an effective tax rate on
operating income of 39.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2001.
27
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
General Account Investments
We manage our general account assets in investment segments that support
specific classes of product liabilities. These investment segments permit us to
implement investment policies that both support the financial characteristics of
the underlying liabilities, and also provide returns on our invested capital.
The investment segments also enable us to gauge the performance and
profitability of our various businesses.
Asset/Liability Risk Management
Our primary investment objective is to maximize after-tax returns within
acceptable risk parameters. We are exposed to two primary types of investment
risk:
o Interest rate risk, meaning changes in the market value of fixed
maturity securities as interest rates change over time, and
o Credit risk, meaning uncertainties associated with the continued
ability of an obligor to make timely payments of principal and
interest
We use a variety of techniques to control interest rate risk in our portfolio of
assets and liabilities. In general, our risk management philosophy is to limit
the net impact of interest rate changes on our assets and liabilities. Assets
are invested predominantly in fixed income securities, and the asset portfolio
is matched with the liabilities so as to eliminate the company's exposure to
changes in the overall level of interest rates. Each investment segment holds
bonds, mortgages, and other asset types that will satisfy the projected cash
needs of its underlying liabilities. Another important aspect of our
asset-liability management efforts is the use of interest rate derivatives. We
selectively apply derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps and
futures, to reduce the interest rate risk inherent in combined portfolios of
assets and liabilities. For a more complete discussion of the interest rate risk
management practices, please see the Interest Rate Risk section in the
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk section of this
document.
Management of credit risk is central to our business and we devote considerable
resources to the credit analysis underlying each investment acquisition. Our
corporate bond management group employs a staff of highly specialized,
experienced, and well-trained credit analysts. We rely on these analysts'
ability to analyze complex private financing transactions and to acquire the
investments needed to profitably fund our liability requirements. In addition,
when investing in private fixed maturity securities, we rely upon broad access
to proprietary management information, negotiated protective covenants, call
protection features and collateral protection.
Our bond portfolio is reviewed on a continuous basis to assess the integrity of
current quality ratings. As circumstances warrant, specific investments are
"re-rated" with the adjusted quality ratings reflected in our investment system.
All bonds are evaluated regularly against the following criteria:
o material declines in the issuer's revenues or margins;
o significant management or organizational changes;
o significant uncertainty regarding the issuer's industry;
o debt service coverage or cash flow ratios that fall below
industry-specific thresholds;
o violation of financial covenants; and
o other business factors that relate to the issuer.
Product prices are set on the basis of expected default losses over the long
term. Actual losses therefore vary above and below this average, and the market
value of the portfolio as a whole also changes as market credit spreads move up
and down during an economic cycle. The Company is able to hold to this
investment strategy over the long term, both because of its strong capital
position, the fixed nature of its liabilities and the matching of those
liabilities with assets, and because of the experience gained through many
decades of a consistent investment philosophy. Despite the current high levels
of market default rates and widened credit spreads, we expect losses on our
investment portfolio to approximate priced for losses over the long term. We
generally intend to hold all of our fixed maturity investments to maturity to
meet liability payments, and to ride out any unrealized gains and losses over
the long term.
28
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Overall Composition of the General Account
Invested assets, excluding separate accounts, totaled $3.9 billion and $3.6
billion as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. The portfolio
composition has not significantly changed at June 30, 2002 as compared to
December 31, 2001. The following table shows the composition of investments in
our general account portfolio.
As of June 30, As of December 31,
2002 2001
----------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
----------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Fixed maturity securities (1) $2,788.2 71.5% $2,496.2 69.0%
Mortgage loans (2) 621.3 16.0 580.9 16.0
Real estate 20.4 0.5 20.6 0.6
Policy loans (3) 362.6 9.3 352.0 9.7
Equity securities 15.5 0.4 13.1 0.4
Other invested assets 46.1 1.2 39.6 1.1
Short-term investments 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cash and cash equivalents (4) 44.0 1.1 115.4 3.2
----------------------------------------------
Total invested assets $3,898.2 100.0% $3,617.8 100.0%
==============================================
(1) In addition to bonds, the fixed maturity security portfolio contains
redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $48.6 million and
$45.6 million as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. The
total fair value of the fixed maturity security portfolio was $2,787.5 and
$2,494.6 million, at June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.
(2) The fair value of the mortgage loan portfolio was $656.3 and $604.3
million as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.
(3) Policy loans are secured by the cash value of the underlying life
insurance policies and do not mature in a conventional sense, but expire
in conjunction with the related policy liabilities.
(4) Cash and cash equivalents are included in total invested assets for the
purposes of calculating yields on the income producing assets for the
Company.
Consistent with the nature of the Company's product liabilities, assets are
heavily oriented toward fixed maturity securities. The Company determines the
allocation of assets primarily on the basis of cash flow and return requirements
of its products and by the level of investment risk.
Fixed Maturity Securities. The fixed maturity securities portfolio is
predominantly comprised of low risk, investment grade, publicly and privately
traded corporate bonds and senior tranches of asset-backed securities (ABS) and
mortgage-backed securities (MBS), with the balance invested in government bonds.
The fixed maturity securities portfolio also includes redeemable preferred
stock. As of June 30, 2002, fixed maturity securities represented 71.5% of
general account investment assets with a carrying value of $2.8 billion, roughly
comprised of 63% public securities and 37% private securities. Each year the
Company directs the majority of its net cash inflows into investment grade fixed
maturity securities. Typically between 5% and 15% of funds allocated to fixed
maturity securities are invested in below-investment-grade bonds while
maintaining a policy to limit the overall level of these bonds to no more than
10% of invested assets and the majority of that balance in the BB category.
Allocations are based on an assessment of relative value and the likelihood of
enhancing risk-adjusted portfolio returns. While the Company has profited from
the below-investment-grade asset class in the past, care is taken to manage its
growth strategically by limiting its size relative to the Company's assets.
29
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
The following table shows the composition by our internal industry
classification of the fixed maturity securities portfolio and the unrealized
gains and losses contained therein.
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Industry Classification
As of June 30, 2002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value Carrying Value
of Securities of Securities
Total Net with Gross Gross with Gross Gross
Carrying Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Value Gain (Loss) Gains Gains Losses Losses
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Corporate securities:
Banking and finance ...... $ 387.6 $ 12.8 $ 314.9 $ 14.4 $ 72.7 $ (1.6)
Communications ........... 121.3 (5.1) 71.2 2.4 50.1 (7.5)
Government ............... 61.9 2.9 51.6 3.2 10.3 (0.3)
Manufacturing ............ 494.8 4.4 353.8 17.1 141.0 (12.7)
Oil & gas ................ 295.8 (2.1) 195.9 10.0 99.9 (12.1)
Services / trade ......... 183.8 5.3 145.0 6.5 38.8 (1.2)
Transportation ........... 195.2 1.0 125.1 6.1 70.1 (5.1)
Utilities ................ 494.9 8.3 310.7 22.1 184.2 (13.8)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Corporate Securities . 2,235.3 27.5 1,568.2 81.8 667.1 (54.3)
MBS/ABS .................... 517.2 12.9 455.6 16.6 61.6 (3.7)
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. ......
government agencies ...... 25.1 1.3 23.5 1.3 1.6 --
Debt securities issued by
foreign governments ...... 6.2 0.3 5.3 0.4 0.9 (0.1)
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ... 4.4 0.2 4.4 0.2 -- --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total .................. $2,788.2 $ 42.2 $2,057.0 $ 100.3 $ 731.2 $ (58.1)
=================================================================================
As of June 30, 2002, there are $100.3 million of gross unrealized gains
and $58.1 million of the gross unrealized losses on the fixed maturities
portfolio. $51.2 million, or 88.1%, of those unrealized losses are concentrated
in the manufacturing, oil and gas, transportation, utility and communications
industries. Only the communications and oil and gas industries have net
unrealized losses.
Manufacturing: Manufacturing is a large, diverse sector encompassing cyclical
industries. Low commodity prices continue to pressure the subsectors of mining,
chemicals, metals, and forest products. When the economy recovers, these
cyclical subsectors should recover and the bonds of companies in these
subsectors should recover as well. We have financed these subsectors though
several economic cycles and have the ability and intent to hold our investments
until they recover in value or mature. Our portfolio should also benefit from
our underwriting process where we stress test each company's financial
performance through a recession scenario.
Oil & Gas: In the Oil & Gas industry much of our unrealized loss arises from
companies in emerging markets, primarily Latin America. Our philosophy in
emerging markets is to generally lend to those companies with dollar based
export products such as oil companies. Emerging markets continue to experience
significant stress and bond prices across most emerging market countries are
down. However, our oil & gas investments are faring well as these companies have
dollar based revenues to pay their debts and have continued to do so. In many
cases, deals are structured so that all export revenues first pass through an
offshore trust and our debt service is then paid before any dollars are released
back to the company. This type of transaction is known as an export receivables
deal. All of our Venezuelan transactions are structured in this manner.
Transportation: The Transportation sector consists largely of air, rail, and
automotive manufacturers and service companies. All of these subsectors are
experiencing cyclical downturns, particularly the airline industry, having
30
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
been hit both by the recession and the fallout from September 11. While most
airlines are losing money, we lend to this industry almost exclusively on a
secured basis (approximately 99% of our loans are secured). These secured
airline financings are of two types: Equipment Trust Certificates (ETC's) and
Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETC's). The ETC's initially have an 80%
loan-to-value ratio and the EETC senior tranches initially have a 40-50%
loan-to-value and include a provision for a third party to pay interest for
eighteen months from a default. For us to lose money on an ETC, three things
must happen: the airline must default, the airline must decide it does not want
to fly our aircraft, and the aircraft must be worth less than our loan. When
lending to this industry, we underwrite both the airline and the aircraft. We've
been lending to this industry in this fashion for 25 years through several
economic cycles and have seen values on our secured airline bonds fall and
recover thorough these cycles.
Utilities: The Utility sector has faced a number of challenges over the past few
years including the California Power Crisis, the Enron bankruptcy, and the
recession which has resulted in a drop in demand. More recently, there have been
issues around energy trading activities and the financial liquidity of some
large merchant industry players. These events caused a general widening in
utility and project finance bond spreads over the course of the year. We expect
a recovery in many of the utility bonds due to the following events: the
situation in California has begun to stabilize, Southern California Edison has
avoided bankruptcy, and individual companies have addressed their liquidity
issues.
Communications: The Communication sector has experienced aggressive expansion
which has resulted in considerable excess capacity. There have been high profile
companies which have filed for bankruptcy. Among the remaining players, further
pressure has resulted. Our strategy has been to focus on operating companies
with strong balance sheets and diversified product offerings. As in past
recessions, we see pressure on these bonds. We would expect improvement when the
economy begins to recover.
The following table shows the composition by credit quality of the securities
with gross unrealized losses in our fixed maturity securities portfolio.
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Quality
As of June 30, 2002
-----------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Value of
Securities with
S&P Equivalent Gross Unrealized Gross Unrealized
SVO Rating (1) Designation (2) Losses (3)(4)% of Total Losses (3)(4) % of Total
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A........... $ 145.1 20.5% $ 4.0 7.1%
2 BBB................ 391.0 55.3 27.8 49.0
3 BB................. 112.8 15.9 13.8 24.3
4 B.................. 35.3 5.0 5.8 10.2
5 CCC and lower...... 15.8 2.2 5.0 8.8
6 In or near default. 7.4 1.1 0.3 0.6
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total.............. $ 707.4 100.0% $56.7 100.0%
===========================================================
(1) With respect to securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, the Company
has assigned a rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent
to that used by the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Does not include redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $23.8
million and unrealized losses of $1.4 million.
(4) Includes 60 securities that are awaiting an SVO rating with a carrying
value of $98.0 million and unrealized losses of $4.7 million. Due to lags
between the funding of an investment, the processing of final legal
documents, the filing with the SVO, and the rating by the SVO, there will
always be a number of unrated securities at each statement date. Unrated
securities comprised 13.4% and 8.1% of the total carrying value and total
gross unrealized losses of securities in a loss position including
redeemable preferred stock, respectively.
At June 30, 2002, $31.8 million, or 56.1%, of the gross unrealized losses are on
securities that are rated investment grade. Unrealized losses on investment
grade securities principally relate to changes in interest rates or changes in
31
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
credit spreads since the securities were acquired. Any such unrealized losses
are recognized in income if, and when, we decide to sell such securities (note
that such a decision only would be made with respect to our available-for-sale
portfolio). We believe that the discussion of securities with ongoing unrealized
losses should focus on below investment grade securities that generally are more
likely to develop credit concerns.
As of June 30, 2002, there are $24.9 million of the gross unrealized losses on
the below investment grade securities in the fixed maturities portfolios. Of
this amount, 72.1% has been in place for over six months. The Company believes,
however, that after its comprehensive review of each borrower's ability to meet
the obligations of the notes, and based on information available at this time,
these securities will continue to pay as scheduled, and the Company has the
ability and the intent to hold these securities until they recover in value or
mature. The scheduled maturity dates for securities in an unrealized loss
position at June 30, 2002 is shown below.
Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Maturity
June 30, 2002
----------------------------------------
Carrying Value of
Securities with Gross Gross Unrealized
Unrealized Loss Loss
----------------------------------------
(in millions)
Due in one year or less .................... $ 20.7 $ 1.8
Due after one year through five years ...... 232.3 18.7
Due after five years through ten years ..... 251.6 22.7
Due after ten years ........................ 165.0 11.2
----------------------------------------
Mortgage-backed securities ................. 61.6 3.7
----------------------------------------
Total ...................................... $731.2 $ 58.1
========================================
The following are the securities that had the largest unrealized loss as of June
30, 2002:
Carrying Unrealized
Description of Issuer Value Loss
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Petrochemical and related products producer............... $ 5.1 $ 1.7
Argentinean oil company with US dollar based cash flows... 1.5 1.5
Large US wireless communications company.................. 8.9 1.4
US telecommunications company............................. 1.3 1.0
The securities above have undergone thorough analysis by our investment
professionals, and at this time we believe that the borrowers have the financial
capacity to make all required contractual payments on the notes when due, and we
intend to hold these securities until they either mature or recover in value.
In keeping with the investment philosophy of tightly managing interest rate
risk, the Company's MBS & ABS holdings are heavily concentrated in commercial
MBS where the underlying loans are largely call protected, which means they are
not pre-payable without penalty prior to maturity at the option of the issuer.
By investing in MBS and ABS securities with relatively predictable repayments,
the Company adds high quality, liquid assets to the portfolios without incurring
the risk of cash flow variability.
The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) of the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners evaluates all public and private bonds purchased as investments by
insurance companies. The SVO assigns one of six investment categories to each
security it reviews (See the SVO website at www.naic.org/1SVO/, for more
information). Category 1 is the highest quality rating, and Category 6 is the
lowest. Categories 1 and 2 are the equivalent of investment grade debt as
defined by rating agencies such as Standard & Poors (S&P) and Moody's (i.e.,
BBB-/Baa3
32
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
or higher), while Categories 3-6 are the equivalent of below-investment grade
securities. SVO ratings are reviewed and may be revised at least once a year.
The following table sets forth the SVO ratings for the Company's bond portfolio
along with an equivalent S&P rating agency designation. The majority of bonds
are investment grade, with 88.4% and 87.7% invested in Category 1 and 2
securities as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. Below
investment grade bonds were 11.6% and 12.3% of fixed maturity investments
excluding redeemable preferred stocks and 8.2% and 8.4% of total invested assets
as of June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2001, respectively. This allocation
reflects the Company's strategy of avoiding the unpredictability of interest
rate risk in favor of relying on the ability of bond analysts to better predict
credit or default risk. The bond analysts operate in an industry-based,
team-oriented structure that permits the evaluation of a wide range of below
investment grade offerings in a variety of industries resulting in a
well-diversified high yield portfolio.
Valuation techniques for the bond portfolio vary by security type and the
availability of market data. Pricing models and their underlying assumptions
impact the amount and timing of unrealized gains and losses recognized, and the
use of different pricing models or assumptions could produce different financial
results. External pricing services are used where available, broker dealer
quotes are used for thinly traded securities, and a spread pricing matrix is
used when price quotes are not available, which typically is the case for our
private placement securities. The spread pricing matrix is based on credit
quality, country of issue, market sector and average investment life and is
created for these dimensions through brokers' estimates of public spreads
derived from their respective publications. When utilizing the spread pricing
matrix, securities are valued by utilizing a discounted cash flow method where
each bond is assigned a spread that is added to the current U.S. Treasury rates
to discount the cash flows of the security. The spread assigned to each security
is changed from month to month based on changes in the market. Certain market
events that could impact the valuation of securities include issuer credit
ratings, business climate, management changes, litigation, and government
actions among others. The Company's pricing analysts take appropriate actions to
reduce valuations of securities where such an event occurs which negatively
impacts the securities' value. To the extent that bonds have longer maturity
dates, management's estimate of fair value may involve greater subjectivity
since they involve judgment about events well into the future.
A majority (62.5%) of the below investment grade bonds are in Category 3, the
highest quality below investment grade. Category 6 bonds, those in or near
default, represent securities that were originally acquired as long-term
investments, but subsequently became distressed. The carrying value of bonds in
or near default was $23.1 million and $24.7 million as of June 30, 2002 and
December 31, 2001, respectively. At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, $0.4
million and $0.5 million, respectively of interest on bonds in or near default
was included in accrued investment income. It is the Company's policy to reverse
any accrued investment income and cease accruing interest income on bonds in or
near default and to only accrue interest income on bonds near default that the
Company expects to collect. Management judgment is used and the actual results
could be materially different.
33
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Quality
As of June 30, As of December 31,
2002 2001
--------------------------------------------------
SVO S&P Equivalent Carrying % of Carrying % of
Rating (1) Designation (2) Value (3)(4) Total Value (3)(4) Total
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A..................... $ 975.3 35.6% $ 910.4 37.2%
2 BBB.......................... 1,445.9 52.8 1,237.9 50.5
3 BB........................... 198.9 7.3 190.2 7.8
4 B............................ 68.1 2.5 59.7 2.4
5 CCC and lower................ 28.3 1.0 27.7 1.1
6 In or near default........... 23.1 0.8 24.7 1.0
--------------------------------------------------
Total........................ $2,739.6 100.0% $2,450.6 100.0%
==================================================
(1) For securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, the Company has assigned a
rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to that used by
the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Does not include redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $48.6
million and $45.6 million as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001,
respectively.
(4) Includes 209 securities that are awaiting an SVO rating with a carrying
value of $366.1 million as of June 30, 2002. Due to lags between the
funding of an investment, the processing of final legal documents, the
filing with the SVO, and the rating by the SVO, there will always be a
number of unrated securities at each statement date.
Mortgage Loans. As of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company held
mortgage loans with a carrying value of $621.3 million and $580.9 million,
respectively, including $170.2 million and $166.3 million, respectively, of
agricultural loans and $451.1 million and $414.6 million, respectively, of
commercial loans.
The following table shows the Company's agricultural mortgage loan portfolio by
its three major sectors: agribusiness, timber and production agriculture.
As of June 30, 2002 As of December 31, 2001
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Amortized Carrying % of Total Amortized Carrying % of Total
Cost Value Carrying Value Cost Value Carrying Value
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Agri-business $ 113.6 $ 112.9 66.3% $115.0 $112.8 67.8%
Timber 57.2 56.8 33.4 52.8 52.4 31.5
Production agriculture 0.5 0.5 0.3 1.1 1.1 0.7
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Total $ 171.3 $ 170.2 100.0% $168.9 $166.3 100.0%
===================================== ====================================
34
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Investment Results
The following table summarizes the Company's investment results for the periods
indicated. Overall, the yield, net of investment expenses, on the general
account portfolio decreased from the second quarter of the prior year. The lower
yield was the result of old assets rolling over into new investments with lower
interest rates. The inflow of new cash was invested at rates that were lower
than the overall portfolio earnings rate during the second quarter of 2001.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
As of As of As of As of
June 30, 2002 June 30, 2001 June 30, 2002 June 30, 2001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
General account assets-excluding
policy loans
Gross income 7.14% $ 61.2 7.34% $ 50.0 7.05% $ 119.9 7.65% $ 103.4
Ending assets-excluding
policy loans 3,535.6 2,758.8 3,535.6 2,758.8
Policy loans
Gross income 6.15% 5.5 5.93% 5.1 5.77% 10.3 6.56% 11.1
Ending assets 362.6 342.5 362.6 342.5
Total gross income 7.05% 66.7 7.18% 55.1 6.93% 130.2 7.53% 114.5
Less: investment expenses (1.7) (1.2) (3.0) (4.0)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net investment income 6.87% $ 65.0 7.03% $ 53.9 6.77% $ 127.2 7.27% $ 110.5
======== ======== ======== ========
Impairments: The Company has a process in place to identify securities that
could potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process
involves monitoring market events that could impact issuers' credit ratings,
business climate, management changes, litigation and government actions, and
other similar factors. This process also involves monitoring late payments,
downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements,
revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues.
At the end of each quarter, the Parent's Investment Review Committee reviews all
securities trading below ninety cents on the dollar to determine whether
impairments need to be taken. This committee includes the head of workouts, the
head of each industry team, and the head of portfolio management. The analysis
focuses on each company's or project's ability to service its debts in a timely
fashion and the length of time the security has been trading below cost. The
results of this analysis are reviewed by the Parent's Committee of Finance, a
subcommittee of the Board of Directors, quarterly. To supplement this process, a
bi-annual review is made of the entire fixed maturity portfolio to assess credit
quality including a review of all impairments with the Parent's Committee of
Finance.
The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether the
impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and
circumstances considered include (1) the length of time the fair value has been
below cost; (2) the financial position of the issuer, including the current and
future impact of any specific events; and (3) the Company's ability and intent
to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value. To the extent
the Company determines that a security is deemed to be other than temporarily
impaired, the difference between amortized cost and fair value would be charged
to earnings.
There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the
process of monitoring impairments and determining if an impairment is other than
temporary. These risks and uncertainties include (1) the risk that our
assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual obligations
will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that issuer, (2)
the risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected of have more of
an impact on the issuer than anticipated, and (3) the risk that new information
obtained by us or changes in other facts and circumstances lead us to change our
intent to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value.
Any of these situations could result in a charge to earnings in a future period
to the extent of the impairment charge recorded. Because the majority of our
portfolio is classified as available-for-sale and held at fair value with the
related unrealized gains (losses) recorded in shareholders' equity, the charge
to earnings would not have a significant impact on shareholders' equity.
35
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
The Company recorded losses on fixed maturity securities of $15.5 million in the
first six months of 2002, which were driven primarily by write-downs and sales
of securities. The following list shows the largest losses, the related
circumstances giving rise to the loss and a discussion of how those
circumstances impacted other material investments held. Unless noted otherwise,
all of the items shown are impairments of securities held at June 30, 2002.
o $8.4 million on securities issued by the holding company of a large
domestic power producer that was downgraded to below investment
grade status in July due to liquidity concerns. We also hold senior
debt at various projects of this producer that is supported by the
cash flows of those projects and does not depend on the financial
support of the parent.
o $4.2 million on securities of an Australian power project that
failed to produce the benefits expected from the deregulation of
that country's power industry. The circumstances of this impairment
have no impact on other investments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity describes the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash flows
to meet the immediate capital needs to facilitate business operations.
Historically, our principal cash flow sources have been premiums, deposits and
charges on policies, investment income, maturing investments and proceeds from
sales of investment assets. In addition to the need for cash flow to meet
operating expenses, our liquidity requirements relate principally to the
liabilities associated with our various life insurance and annuity products and
to the funding of investments in new products, processes and technologies.
Product liabilities include the payment of benefits under life insurance
policies and annuity contracts and the payment of policy surrenders, withdrawals
and policy loans. The Company periodically adjusts its investment policy to
respond to changes in short-term and long-term cash requirements and provide
adequate funds to pay benefits without forced sales of investments.
The liquidity of our insurance operations is also related to the overall quality
of our investments. As of June 30, 2002, $2,421.2 million, or 88.4% of the fixed
maturity securities held by us and rated by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services,
a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P) or the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners were rated investment grade (BBB or higher by S&P or
1 or 2 by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners). The remaining
$318.4 million, or 11.6%, of fixed maturity investments, and 8.2% of invested
assets, were rated non-investment grade. For additional discussion of our
investment portfolio see the General Account Investments section above in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Segment Operations.
We employ an asset/liability management approach tailored to the specific
requirements of each of our product lines. Each product line has an investment
strategy based on the specific characteristics of the liabilities in the product
line. As part of this approach, we develop investment policies and operating
guidelines for each portfolio based upon the return objectives, risk tolerance,
liquidity, and tax and regulatory requirements of the underlying products and
business segments.
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities was $(89.3) million and
$140.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums
received, fees received and investment income. The $229.7 million decrease in
the first six months of 2002 compared to the same period in 2001 resulted
primarily from a $235.0 million decrease in policy liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $344.3 million and $321.9 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Changes in the cash
provided by investing activities primarily relate to the management of the
Company's investment portfolios and the investment of excess capital generated
by operating and financing activities. The increase in cash used in investing
activities in 2002 as compared to 2001 resulted from increased net
36
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
acquisitions of mortgage loans of $35.8 million and a reduction in short-term
investment maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions of $31.7 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to same period in 2001.
Partially offsetting these uses of cash was an increase in net sales and
maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions of fixed maturities of $39.0
million during the same six month period.
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities was $362.2 million and
$(46.2) million, for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Changes in cash provided by financing activities relate to excess deposits or
withdrawals under investment type contracts. The $408.4 increase for the first
six months of 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001 resulted from a $116.2
million increase in cash payments received as deposits for universal life
insurance and investment-type contracts and a $292.2 million reduction in cash
payments made on maturities and withdrawals of universal life insurance and
investment-type contracts.
We maintain reinsurance programs designed to protect against large or unusual
losses. Based on our review of our reinsurers' financial statements and
reputations in the reinsurance marketplace, we believe that our reinsurers are
financially sound, and, therefore, that we have so significant exposure to
uncollectible reinsurance in excess of uncollectable amounts already recognized
in our unaudited consolidated financial statements. The Company has also entered
into reinsurance agreements which transfers risks and profits to John Hancock
Life Insurance Company, the parent. The reinsurance agreements provide
reinsurance expense allowances to reimburse the Company for the related
expenses. The agreements cover variable annuity, variable life insurance and
term life insurance contracts issued by the Company.
Given our historical cash flows and that of our wholly owned subsidiary and
current financial results, management believes that the cash flow from the
operating activities over the next year will provide sufficient liquidity for
our operations and pay other operating expenses. Although we anticipate that we
will be able to meet our cash requirements, we can give no assurances in this
regard.
37
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements, analyses, and other information contained herein relating to
trends in the Company's operations and financial results, the markets for the
Company's products, the future development of the Company's business, and the
contingencies and uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as
other statements including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan,"
"estimate," "expect," "intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar
expressions, are "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's
current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and their effects on
the Company, which may not be those anticipated by management. The Company's
actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these
forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to, the risks that (1) a significant downgrade in our
ratings for claims-paying ability and financial strength may lead to policy and
contract withdrawals and materially harm our ability to market our products; (2)
new laws and regulations, including the recently-enacted Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, or changes to existing laws or regulations, (including, but not limited
to, those relating to the Federal Estate Tax Laws), and the applications and
interpretations given to these laws, may adversely affect the Company's sales of
insurance and investment related products; (3) we face increasing competition in
our retail businesses from mutual fund companies, banks and investment
management firms as well as from other insurance companies; (4) a decline or
increased volatility in the securities markets, and other economic factors, may
adversely affect our variable life insurance and variable annuity business; (5)
due to acts of terrorism or other hostilities, there could be business
disruption, economic contraction, increased mortality, morbidity and liability
risks, generally, or investment losses that could adversely affect our business;
(6) our life insurance and annuity sales are highly dependent on third party
distribution relationships; (7) customers may not be responsive to new or
existing products or distribution channels, (8) interest rate volatility may
adversely affect our profitability; (9) our net income and revenues will suffer
if customers surrender annuities and variable and universal life insurance
policies; (10) we will face losses if the claims on our insurance products, or
reductions in rates of mortality on our annuity products, are greater than we
projected; (11) we face investment and credit losses relating to our investment
portfolio (12) we may experience volatility in net income due to changes in
standards for accounting for derivatives and other changes; (13) we are subject
to risk-based capital requirements and possible guaranty fund assessments; (14)
we may be unable to retain personnel who are key to our business; (15) we face
risks from ceded reinsurance business in respect to life insurance; (16) we may
incur multiple life insurance claims as a result of a catastrophic event which,
because of higher deductibles and lower limits, could adversely affect the
Company's future net income and financial position; (17) litigation and
regulatory proceedings may result in financial losses, harm our reputation and
divert management resources, and (18) we face unforeseen liabilities arising
from our acquisitions and dispositions of businesses.
Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed, as well as
to further discussion of the risks described above, in other documents filed by
the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Company specifically disclaims any obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future
developments, or otherwise.
38
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE and QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Capital Markets Risk Management
The Company maintains a disciplined, comprehensive approach to managing capital
market risks inherent in its business operations. To mitigate these risks, and
effectively support Company objectives, investment operations are organized and
staffed to focus investment management expertise on specific classes of
investments, with particular emphasis placed on private placement markets. In
addition, a dedicated unit of asset / liability risk management (ALM)
professionals centralizes the implementation of its interest rate risk
management program. As an integral component of its ALM program, derivative
instruments are used in accordance with risk reduction techniques established
through Company policy. The Company's use of derivative instruments is monitored
on a regular basis by the Parent's Investment Compliance Department and reviewed
quarterly with senior management and the Parent's Committee of Finance.
The Company's principal capital market exposures are credit and interest rate
risk, although we have certain exposures to changes in equity prices and foreign
currency exchange rates. Credit risk pertains to the uncertainty associated with
the ability of an obligor or counterparty to continue to make timely and
complete payments of contractual principal and/or interest. Interest rate risk
pertains to the market value fluctuations that occur within fixed maturity
securities or liabilities as market interest rates move. Equity and foreign
currency risk pertain to price fluctuations, associated with the Company's
ownership of equity investments or non-US dollar denominated investments, driven
by dynamic market environments.
Credit Risk
The Company manages the credit risk inherent in its fixed maturity securities by
applying strict credit and underwriting standards, with specific limits
regarding the proportion of permissible below investment grade holdings. We also
diversify our fixed maturity securities with respect to investment quality,
issuer, industry, geographical, and property-type concentrations. Where
possible, consideration of external measures of creditworthiness, such as
ratings assigned by nationally recognized rating agencies, supplement our
internal credit analysis. The Company uses simulation models to examine the
probability distribution of credit losses to ensure that it can readily
withstand feasible adverse scenarios. In addition, the Company periodically
examines, on various levels of aggregation, its actual default loss experience
on significant asset classes to determine if the losses are consistent with the
(1) levels assumed in product pricing, (2) ACLI loss experience and (3) rating
agencies' quality-specific cohort default data. These tests have generally found
the Company's aggregate experience to be favorable relative to these external
benchmarks and consistent with priced-for levels.
The Company has a process in place to identify securities that could potentially
have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves
monitoring market events that could impact issuers' credit ratings, business
climate, management changes, litigation and government actions, and other
similar factors. This process also involves monitoring late payments, downgrades
by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue
forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues.
At the end of each quarter, the Parent's Investment Review Committee reviews all
securities trading below ninety cents on the dollar to determine whether
impairments need to be taken. This committee includes the head of workouts, the
head of each industry team, and the head of portfolio management. The analysis
focuses on each company's or project's ability to service its debts in a timely
fashion and the length of time the security has been trading below cost. The
results of the analysis are reviewed by the Parent's Committee of Finance, a
subcommittee of the Board of Directors, quarterly. To supplement this process, a
bi-annual review is made of the entire fixed maturity portfolio to assess credit
quality including a review of all impairments with the Parent's Committee of
Finance.
The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether the
impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and
circumstances considered include (1) the length of time the fair value has been
below cost; (2) the financial position of the issuer, including the current and
future impact of any specific events; and (3) the Company's ability and intent
to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value. To the extent
the Company determines that a security is deemed to be other than temporarily
impaired, the difference between amortized cost and fair value would be charged
to earnings.
39
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the
process of monitoring impairments and determining if an impairment is other than
temporary. These risks and uncertainties include (1) the risk that our
assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual obligations
will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that issuer, (2)
the risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected or have more of
an impact on the issuer than anticipated and (3) the risk that new information
obtained by us or changes in other facts and circumstances lead us to change our
intent to hold the security to maturity or until it recovers in value.
Any of these situations could result in a charge to earnings in a future period
to the extent of the impairment charge recorded. Because the majority of our
portfolio is classified as available-for-sale and held at fair value with the
related unrealized gains (losses) recorded in shareholder's equity, the charge
to earnings would not have a significant impact on shareholder's equity.
As of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2002, the Company's fixed maturity
portfolio was comprised of 88.4% and 87.7% investment grade securities and 11.6%
and 12.3% below-investment-grade securities, respectively. These percentages are
consistent with recent experience and indicative of the Company's long-standing
investment philosophy of pursuing moderate amounts of credit risk in return for
higher expected returns. We believe that credit risk can be successfully managed
given the Parent's proprietary credit evaluation models and experienced
personnel.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company maintains a tightly controlled approach to managing its potential
interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from many of our primary
activities, as we invest substantial funds in interest-sensitive assets to
support the issuance of our various interest-sensitive liabilities within our
Protection and Asset Gathering Segments.
The Company manages interest rate sensitive segments of the business, and the
supporting investments, under one of two broadly defined risk management methods
designed to provide an appropriate matching of assets and liabilities. For
guaranteed rate products, where contractual liability cash flows are highly
predictable (e.g., immediate annuities) sophisticated duration-matching
techniques are utilized to manage the segment's exposure to both parallel and
non-parallel yield curve movements. Typically this type of management is
expressed as a targeted duration mismatch of zero with an operational tolerance
of 90 days, with other measures used for limiting exposure to non-parallel risk.
For non-guaranteed rate products, such as whole life insurance or single premium
deferred annuities, liability cash flows are less predictable. Therefore, a
conventional duration-matching strategy is less effective at managing the
inherent risk. For these products, we manage interest rate risk based on
scenario-based portfolio modeling that seeks to identify the most appropriate
investment strategy given probable policyholder behavior and liability crediting
needs under a wide range of interest rate environments.
We project asset and liability cash flows on guaranteed rate products and then
discount them against credit-specific interest rate curves to attain fair
values. Duration is then calculated by re-pricing these cash flows against a
modified or "shocked" interest rate curve and evaluating the change in fair
value versus the base case. As of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the fair
value of fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans supporting
duration-managed liabilities was approximately $1,179.1 million and $1,226.1
million, respectively. Based on the information and assumptions we use in our
duration calculations in effect as of December 31, 2001, we estimate that a 100
basis point immediate, parallel increase in interest rates ("rate shock") would
have no effect on the net fair value, or surplus, of our duration managed assets
and liabilities based on our targeted mismatch of zero, but could be -/+ $2.9
million based on our operational tolerance of 90 days.
The risk management method for non-guaranteed rate products, such as whole life
insurance or single premium deferred annuities is less formulaic, but more
complex, due to the less predictable nature of the liability cash flows. For
these products, we manage interest rate risk based on scenario-based portfolio
modeling that seeks to identify the most appropriate investment strategy given
probable policyholder behavior and liability crediting needs under a wide range
of interest rate environments. As of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the
fair value of fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans supporting
liabilities managed under this modeling was approximately $2,957.8 million and
$1,587.2 million, respectively. A rate shock (as defined above) would decrease
the fair value of these assets by $109.4 million, which we estimate would be
offset by a comparable change in the fair value of the associated liabilities,
thus minimizing the impact on surplus.
40
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Derivative Instruments. The Company uses a variety of derivative financial
instruments, including swaps, caps, floors, and exchange traded futures
contracts, in accordance with Company policy. Permissible derivative
applications include the reduction of economic risk (i.e., hedging) related to
changes in yields, price, cash flows, and currency exchange rates. In addition,
certain limited applications of "income generation" are allowed. Examples of
this type of use include the purchase of call options to offset the sale of
embedded options in Company liability issuance or the purchase of swaptions to
offset the purchase of embedded put options in certain investments. The Company
does not make a market or trade derivatives for speculative purposes.
The Parent's Investment Compliance Unit monitors all derivatives activity for
consistency with internal policies and guidelines. All derivatives trading
activity is reported monthly to the Parent's Committee of Finance for review,
with a comprehensive governance report provided jointly each quarter by the
Parent's Derivatives Supervisory Officer and Chief Investment Compliance
Officer. The table below reflects the Company's derivative positions that are
managing interest rate risk as of June 30, 2002. The notional amounts in the
table represent the basis on which pay or receive amounts are calculated and are
not reflective of credit risk. These exposures represent only a point in time
and will be subject to change as a result of ongoing portfolio and risk
management activities.
As of June 30, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair Value
----------------------------------------------------
Weighted
Notional Average Term -100 Basis +100 Basis
Amount (Years) Point Change(1) As of 6/30/02 Point Change(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions, except for Weighted Average Term)
Interest rate swaps....... $1,735.8 4.7 $(42.1) $(17.0) $ 5.6
Futures contracts......... 55.9 7.6 (3.2) 0.1 3.0
Interest rate caps........ 239.4 5.3 1.0 2.2 4.3
Interest rate floors...... 485.4 7.9 10.9 6.0 5.7
-------------- ----------------------------------------------------
Totals................ $2,516.5 5.4 $(33.4) $ (8.7) $18.6
============== ====================================================
(1) The selection of a 100 basis point immediate change in interest rates
should not be construed as a prediction by us of future market events but
rather as an illustration of the potential impact of such an event.
Our non-exchange-traded derivatives are exposed to the possibility of loss from
a counterparty failing to perform its obligations under terms of the derivative
contract. We believe the risk of incurring losses due to nonperformance by our
counterparties is remote. To manage this risk, Company procedures include the
(a) on-going evaluation of each counterparty's credit ratings, (b) the
application of credit limits and monitoring procedures based on a commercially
available derivatives valuation and reporting system, (c) periodic reporting of
each counterparty's "potential exposure", (d) master netting agreements and,
where appropriate, (e) collateral agreements. Futures contracts trade on
organized exchanges and, therefore, have effectively no credit risk.
41
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On July 19, 2002, the Company announced it had entered into a class action
lawsuit settlement agreement involving policyholders who paid premiums on a
monthly, quarterly or semiannual basis, rather than annually. The class action
lawsuit, known as the "Modal Premium" action, was filed in a New Mexico state
court and is applicable to all United States policyholders in the class. As a
result of the settlement, the Company has established a $6.9 million reserve as
of June 30, 2002 to provide for relief to class members and for legal and
administrative costs associated with the settlement. In entering into the
settlement, the Company specifically denied any wrongdoing. Although some
uncertainty remains as to the entire cost of claims, it is expected that the
final cost of the settlement will not differ materially from the amounts
presently provided for by the Company.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS and REPORTS on FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
NONE
b) Reports on Form 8-K.
There were no reports on Form 8-K required to be filed during the period covered
by this report.
42
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the dates indicated.
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
By: /s/ MICHELE G. VAN LEER
----------------------------------------------
August 8, 2002 Michele G. Van Leer
Vice Chairman and President
By: /s/ EARL W. BAUCOM
----------------------------------------------
August 8, 2002 Earl W. Baucom
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
43