SCHEDULE 14C INFORMATION
Amendment No. 2
Information Statement Pursuant to Section 14(c) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Check the appropriate box:
|X| Preliminary Information Statement
|_| Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14c-5(d)(2))
|_| Definitive Information Statement
DUNE ENERGY, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|X| No fee required.
|_| Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14c-5(g) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee
is calculated and state how it was determined):
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|_| Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|_| Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DUNE ENERGY, INC.
3050 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 695
Houston, Texas 77056
INFORMATION STATEMENT
(Dated May ___, 2007)
WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A
PROXY. THE "ACTIONS", DEFINED BELOW, HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY WRITTEN
CONSENT OF THE SHAREHOLDER WHO OWNS A MAJORITY (58.3%) OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK OF DUNE ENERGY, INC. A VOTE OF THE REMAINING SHAREHOLDERS IS NOT
NECESSARY.
GENERAL
This Information Statement is being furnished on or about the date first
set forth above to holders (who are holders of record as of the close of
business on April 25, 2007 (the "Record Date") of the common stock, $0.001 par
value per share ("Common Stock"), of Dune Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("we" or the "Company"), in connection with the following (the "Actions"):
1. Increasing the number of shares of Common Stock that the Company is
presently authorized to issue from 100,000,000 to 200,000,000;
2. Amending the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, with the only
amendment being to increase the number of presently authorized
shares of Common Stock as set forth above;
3. Authorizing and approving the issuance of up to 4,000,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock in connection with the retention of two
key individuals currently employed by the Company; and
4. Authorizing and approving the issuance of a number of shares of
Common Stock in excess of twenty percent (20%) of the Company's
currently issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock, which may
result from the Company issuing certain securities convertible into
shares of Common Stock in connection with a proposed acquisition.
Our Board of Directors has unanimously approved, and Itera Holdings BV,
the holder of 35,464,397 shares (58.3%) of the 60,810,813 shares of Common Stock
outstanding as of the date of this Information Statement, has consented in
writing to, the Actions. Such approval and consent are sufficient under Section
228 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our By-Laws to approve the
Actions. The elimination of the need for a special or annual meeting of
stockholders to ratify or approve the Actions is authorized by Section 228(a) of
the DGCL, which provides that the written consent of stockholders holding at
least a majority of the voting power may be substituted for such a special or
annual meeting. In order to eliminate the costs and management time involved in
holding a special or annual meeting and in order to effect or ratify the Actions
as early as possible in order to accomplish the purposes of the Company as
hereafter described, the Board of Directors voted to utilize the written consent
of the shareholder holding a majority of the voting power of the Company. Our
Board of Directors does not intend to solicit any proxies or consents in
connection with the foregoing actions. Accordingly, the Actions will not be
submitted to our other shareholders for a vote and this Information Statement is
being furnished to shareholders solely to provide them with certain information
concerning the Actions in accordance with the requirements of Delaware law and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the regulations promulgated
thereunder, including particularly Regulation 14C.
The offices of the Company are located at 3050 Post Oak Blvd., Houston,
Texas 77056 and the Company's telephone number is (713) 888-0895.
1. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF PRESENTLY AUTHORIZED
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
The Company intends to increase the number of shares of its Common Stock
that it is presently authorized to issue from 100,000,000 to 200,000,000. The
Company believes that this increase in the number of its presently authorized
shares is appropriate and in the best interests of the Company because it would
afford us with the flexibility of issuing a higher percentage of equity than
debt in connection with a potential transaction. Such potential transaction
could involve, among other things, issuing shares of our Common Stock in order
to (i) raise capital to finance a potential acquisition, (ii) issue shares of
our Common Stock directly to a seller in a potential acquisition, (iii) raise
capital to refinance all or a portion of our existing credit facility and/or
(iv) raise capital to accelerate our drilling program and provide general
working capital. While we may utilize shares of our Common Stock resulting from
the increase in our number of authorized shares of Common Stock in connection
with the "Acquisition" described in Item 4 below, the increase in the number of
authorized shares of Common Stock is not specifically for such purpose and the
increase is approved whether or not we consummate the Acquisition.
The increase in the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock will
become effective upon the Company's filing of the Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, described below, with the Secretary of State of Delaware.
Since the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock will be
increased to 200,000,000, the issuance in the future of such authorized shares
may have the effect of diluting the earnings per share and book value per share,
as well as the stock ownership and voting rights, of the currently outstanding
shares of Common Stock.
Release No. 34-15230 of the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") requires disclosure and discussion of the effects
of any shareholder proposal that may be used as an anti-takeover device.
However, the proposed increased in the number of shares of authorized Common
Stock is not the result of any such specific effort; rather, as indicated above,
the purpose of the increase in the number of shares of authorized Common Stock
is to provide the Company's management with the ability to issue shares for
future acquisition, financing and operational possibilities, and not to
construct or enable any anti-takeover defense or mechanism on behalf of the
Company. While it is possible that management could use the additional shares to
resist or frustrate a third-party transaction providing an above-market premium
2
that is favored by a majority of the independent stockholders, the Company has
no intent or plan to employ the additional unissued authorized shares as an
anti-takeover device. As a consequence, the increase in authorized Common Stock
may make it more difficult for, prevent or deter a third party from acquiring
control of the Company or changing its board of directors and management, as
well as inhibit fluctuations in the market price of the Company's shares that
could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts. The Company currently has
no such provisions in any of its governing documents.
As summarized below, provisions of the Company's Certificate of
Incorporation and by-laws and applicable provisions of the Delaware General
Corporation Law may have anti-takeover effects, making it more difficult for or
preventing a third party from acquiring control of the Company or changing its
board of directors and management. These provisions may also have the effect of
deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in the Company's control or in
its management.
Undesignated Preferred Stock. The Company's Certificate of Incorporation
authorizes issuance of shares of preferred stock with such designations, rights
and preferences as may be determined from time to time by our Board of
Directors. Our Board of Directors can also fix the number of shares constituting
a series of preferred stock, without any further vote or action by the Company's
stockholders. The issuance of undesignated preferred stock with voting,
conversion or other rights or preferences, while providing flexibility in
connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have
the effect of (i) delaying or preventing a change in control, (ii) causing the
market price of the Company's Common Stock to decline or (iii) impairing the
voting power and other rights of the holders of the Company's Common Stock.
No Cumulative Voting. The Company's Certificate of Incorporation and
bylaws do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors. The
combination of the present ownership by a few stockholders of a significant
portion of the Company's issued and outstanding Common Stock and lack of
cumulative voting makes it more difficult for other stockholders to replace the
Company's Board of Directors or for another party to obtain control of the
Company by replacing its Board of Directors.
Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. The
Company is subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law regulating corporate takeovers. In general, Section 203
prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging, under certain
circumstances, in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a
period of three years following the time the person became an interested
stockholder unless:
o prior to the time the person became an interested stockholder, the
board of directors of the corporation approved either the business
combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming
an interested stockholder;
o upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the stockholder owned a
least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time
the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the
3
voting stock outstanding (but not the outstanding stock owned by the
interested stockholder) those (1) shares owned by persons who are
directors and also officers and (2) shares owned by employee stock plans
in which employee participants do not have the right to determine
confidentiality whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered
in a tender or exchange offer; or
o at or subsequent to the time the person became an interested
stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board of
directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders,
and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3rd%
of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested
shareholder.
The application of Section 203 may limit the ability of the Company's
stockholders to approve a transaction that they may deem to be in their
interests. Under Section 203, a "business combination" generally includes a
merger, asset or stock sale, or other similar transaction with an interested
stockholder, and an "interested stockholder" is generally a person who, together
with it affiliates and associates, owns or, in the case of affiliates or
associates of the corporation, owned 15% or more of a corporation's outstanding
voting securities within three years prior to the determination of interested
stockholder status.
2. AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The Company intends to file with the Secretary of State of Delaware an
Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation, in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A, approximately 21 days after the mailing of the Company's definitive
Information Statement on this Schedule 14C to all stockholders of the Company on
the Record Date. The only amendment to the Company's Certificate of
Incorporation will be with respect to the increase of the number of presently
authorized shares of Common Stock of the Company from 100,000,000 to
200,000,000.
The increase in the number of presently authorized shares of the Company's
Common Stock evidenced by the Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation may
have an anti-takeover effect requiring disclosure and discussion under Release
No. 34-15230, as disclosed above in this Information Statement under "Increase
in Number of Presently Authorized Shares of Common Stock."
3. ISSUANCE OF 4,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
TO CERTAIN KEY INDIVIDUALS
Our Common Stock is listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol
"DNE". The rules of the American Stock Exchange require a listed company to
obtain shareholder approval prior to issuing common stock to existing employees
in order to retain their services (the "Amex Approval").
On April 17, 2007, the Company entered into Restricted Stock Agreements
with each of Alan Gaines and Amiel David, our current Chairman and Senior
Advisor to the Board of Directors, respectively, pursuant to which the Company
shall, upon receipt of the Amex Approval, grant up to an aggregate of 4,000,000
shares of Common Stock. The issuance of all such shares has been approved by our
4
Board and by our majority stockholder for the purpose of retaining these key
employees. Copies of the Restricted Stock Agreements were attached as Exhibits
99.9 and 99.10 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on
April 18, 2007. Pursuant to the Restricted Stock Agreements, we have granted
restricted stock awards to these individuals, as follows:
o 3,000,000 shares of our Common Stock to Mr. Gaines, which vest
equally as to one-third of the shares over a three year period commencing at the
grant date; and
o 1,000,000 shares of our Common Stock to Dr. David, which fully
vest as of the grant date.
As provided in the Restricted Stock Agreements, we retain a right of first
refusal to acquire any of the shares awarded to Mr. Gaines and Dr. David at a
per share price equal to the difference between (x) any bona fide third party
offer and (y) the closing price for our Common Stock on the grant date. We have
also agreed to pay each of these executive officers an additional gross-up
amount equal to all Federal, state or local taxes imposed upon him by reason of
the restricted stock awards. In the event on or prior to June 30, 2007 we do not
complete the Acquisition (as described in this Information Statement under "Item
4. Issuance of Shares in Excess of 20% of the Company's Issued and Outstanding
Shares of Common Stock"), then all shares granted to Mr. Gaines and to Dr. David
will be cancelled and such restricted stock awards shall be deemed null and
void.
4. ISSUANCE OF SHARES IN EXCESS OF 20% OF THE COMPANY'S
ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
The rules of the American Stock Exchange require a listed company to
obtain shareholder approval when issuing in excess of twenty percent (20%) of
its issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock.
On April 18, 2007, we announced that we had entered into a certain Stock
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated effective April 13, 2007 (the "SPSA") with
Goldking Energy Holdings, L.P. (the "Shareholder"), pursuant to which the
Company agreed to acquire (the "Acquisition") all of the issued and outstanding
shares of common stock (the "GEC Common Stock") of Goldking Energy Corporation
("Goldking"). The closing of the purchase of the GEC Common Stock (the
"Closing") is scheduled to occur on or before May 28, 2007, unless extended by
us, at our option, until June 12, 2007 (the "Closing Date"). The transfer of
ownership of the GEC Common Stock will be effective as of the Closing Date. A
copy of the SPSA was filed as Exhibit 99.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2007.
The purchase price we agreed to pay for the GEC Common Stock at the
Closing is $320,500,000 (the "Purchase Price"), payable as follows: (a)
$302,500,000 in cash (the "Cash Portion"), subject to adjustment as discussed
below, and (b) 10,055,866 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share
(the "Consideration Shares"), representing shares having a value of $18,000,000
based on the closing price for our common stock on the American Stock Exchange
on April 13, 2007. The Consideration Shares will not be registered under state
or federal securities laws on the Closing Date. At the Closing, we will enter
5
into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Shareholder, pursuant to which we
will agree to file a registration statement covering the Consideration Shares
for resale within 90 days from the Closing Date, and to cause such registration
statement to become effective within 180 days following the Closing Date. Upon
the occurrence of certain events, we will be obligated to pay to the
Shareholder, certain penalties in either cash or in additional shares of our
common stock, at our election.
Upon the execution of the SPSA, we paid a performance deposit of
$15,000,000 to the Shareholder (the "Earnest Money"), which will be credited
against the Cash Portion paid at the Closing. If, however, the Shareholder
terminates the SPSA prior to the Closing due to our failure to perform or
satisfy certain pre-Closing conditions, including obtaining financing for the
transaction, the Shareholder will be entitled to retain the Earnest Money, and
we will be obligated to pay any interest accrued on the Purchase Price if we
elect to extend the Closing Date beyond May 28, 2007, as discussed below. If we
terminate the SPSA following the Shareholder's failure to perform or satisfy
certain pre-Closing conditions, we will be entitled to the return of the Earnest
Money and to pursue arbitration proceedings against the Shareholder to recover
damages not to exceed $20,000,000.
We presently intend to raise sufficient capital to consummate the proposed
Acquisition by issuing $300 million of 10.5% Senior Secured Notes and $180
million of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Preferred Stock"). We
anticipate that we will issue 180,000 shares of Preferred Stock, with a stated
value of $1,000 per share.
The Preferred Stock, which will have a liquidation preference of $1,000
per share, will pay a dividend at a rate of 10% per annum, payable quarterly, at
the option of the Company, in additional shares of Preferred Stock, shares of
the Company's Common Stock (subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions)
or cash. The Preferred Stock will be initially convertible into 60 million
shares of our Common Stock, based on an initial conversion price of $3.00 per
share of the Common Stock and reflecting a 20% conversion premium to the $2.50
per share closing price of our Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange on
May 1, 2007. We have granted the initial purchaser of the Preferred Stock a
30-day option to acquire an additional 36,000 shares of Preferred Stock.
There will also be a one-time test for adjustment of the conversion price
and the dividend rate, effective as of May 1, 2008, based upon a specified
average trading price of our Common Stock for the 30 trading days up to and
including April 30, 2008. If we meet or exceed this target, there will be no
adjustment. In addition, the conversion price of the Preferred Stock will be
subject to adjustment pursuant to customary anti-dilution provisions and may
also be adjusted upon the occurrence of a fundamental change. The Preferred
Stock is redeemable at the option of the holder on December 1, 2012 or upon a
change of control. In the event we fail to redeem shares of Preferred Stock
"put" to the Company by a holder, then the conversion price shall be lowered and
the dividend rate increased. After December 1, 2012, the Company may redeem
shares of Preferred Stock. Holders converting Preferred Stock prior to June 1,
2010 will be entitled to receive a certain make whole premium.
In addition to adjustments to the number of shares of our Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock based upon the foregoing events
and circumstances, it is also possible that the holders of all or a portion of
the shares of our Preferred Stock may elect never to convert such shares into
shares of our Common Stock. As a result, we are not in a position to quantify
how many shares of our Common Stock will ultimately be issuable upon conversion
of the Preferred Stock. However because the number of shares of the Company's
Common Stock for which the Preferred Stock is initially convertible will exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the current issued and outstanding shares of the
Company's Common Stock, the Company has obtained stockholder approval and
authorization to issue such number of shares of Common Stock in excess of such
twenty percent (20%) threshold. In the event that we do not consummate the
Acquisition, we will not issue the Preferred Stock.
If we fail to obtain the financing necessary to enable us to purchase the
GEC Common Stock by June 12, 2007, the Shareholder will be entitled to terminate
the SPSA and retain the Earnest Money and we will be obligated to pay the
Shareholder any interest accrued on the Purchase Price as the result of our
election to extend the Closing Date beyond May 28, 2007, as discussed above.
6
The Purchase Price of the Acquisition is subject to various adjustments,
including the following:
o If we elect to extend the Closing Date beyond May 28, 2007 (but in
no event later than June 12, 2007), interest will accrue on the Purchase Price
at the rate of 10% per annum during the period from May 29, 2007, until the
Closing occurs, and the Cash Portion will be increased by the amount of the
accrued interest. The Cash Portion will also be increased by the amount of
certain payments to Goldking or Goldking's wholly-owned subsidiary, Goldking
Operating Company, a Texas corporation (the "Subsidiary") by EnerVest Energy,
LP., if made before the Closing. If the payment from EnerVest Energy, L.P., is
not received until after the Closing, we will pass through this payment to the
Shareholder upon receipt.
o The SPSA provides that we will assume no long-term debt of
Goldking or the Subsidiary and that all such long-term debt will be paid and
discharged by the Shareholder at the Closing. Goldking or the Subsidiary may
incur additional long-term debt under its existing bank credit agreements
between the date of the SPSA and the Closing Date, and the Cash Portion will be
increased by the amount of all incremental long-term debt thus incurred. Any
such increase in the Cash Portion will be used by the Shareholder to pay and
discharge all such incremental long-term debt at the Closing.
o Prior to the Closing, we will have the right to conduct title and
environmental due diligence on Goldking's and the Subsidiary's oil and gas
fields located in South Louisiana and along the Texas Gulf Coast, including
working and other interests in oil and gas leases, wells, and properties,
together with rights under related operating, marketing, and service contracts
and agreements, seismic exploration licenses and rights, and personal property,
equipment, and facilities (collectively, the "Assets") and to assert title
defects and environmental defects if the value of each such defect exceeds,
individually, $100,000. The Cash Portion will be reduced with respect to uncured
title defects and unremedied environmental defects if, and only to the extent
that, the aggregate values of the uncured title defects and unlimited
environmental defects, as of the Closing Date, exceed $5,000,000. The
Shareholder may terminate the SPSA if we identify title defects and
environmental defects that, without regard to either the foregoing individual or
aggregate dollar thresholds, would result in reductions to the Cash Portion in
excess of $32,050,000. Similarly, we may terminate the SPSA if the unsatisfied
title defects and unremedied environmental defects agreed upon by the
Shareholder and us or determined by arbitration would result in adjustments to
the Cash Portion, without regard to either the individual or aggregate dollar
thresholds referenced above, in excess of $32,050,000.
Set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof is material
information relating to the business, properties and financial statements of
Goldking.
Set forth on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof are our (i)
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006
and (ii) unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2006, giving effect to the proposed Acquisition.
Set forth on Exhibit D attached hereto and made a part hereof are pro
forma reserve estimates for our Company, giving effect to the proposed
Acquisition.
INCORPORATION OF COMPANY INFORMATION BY REFERENCE
The Commission allows us to "incorporate by reference" information into
this information statement, which means that we can disclose important
information to you by referring you to other documents we have filed or will
file with the Commission. We are incorporating by reference in this Information
Statement the documents listed below concerning the Company and a description of
its business, properties and financial statements pursuant to Item 14(c)(1) of
Regulation 14A promulgated by the Commission under the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"):
7
(a) Our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 on Form
10-KSB dated April 2, 2007 and Form 10-KSB/A dated April 20,
2007;
(b) Our Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated April 30, 2007;
(c) Our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 24, 2007;
(d) Our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2007; and
(e) Our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2007.
In addition to the foregoing, all documents which we file with the
Commission pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after
the date of this Information Statement and before that date, which is the 21
days after the effective date of our filing with the Commission of the
definitive Information Statement on this Schedule 14C, shall be deemed to be
incorporated by reference in this Information Statement and to be a part of it
from the filing dates of such documents.
Certain statements in and portions of this Information Statement update
and replace information in the above listed documents incorporated by reference.
Likewise, statements in or portions of a future document incorporated by
reference in this Information Statement may update and replace statements in and
portions of this Information Statement or the above listed documents. You should
be aware that statements contained in this Information Statement concerning the
provisions of any documents filed as an exhibit to our Company reports or
otherwise filed with the Commission are not necessarily complete, and in each
instance reference is made to the copy of such document so filed. Each such
statement is qualified in its entirety by such reference.
We shall provide you without charge, upon your written or oral request, a
copy of any of the documents incorporated by reference in this information
statement, other than exhibits to such documents which are not specifically
incorporated by reference into such documents. Please direct your written or
telephone requests to Dune Energy, Inc., 3050 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 695,
Houston, TX 77056 (Attn: Frank T. Smith, Jr., Chief Financial Officer),
telephone number (713) 888-0895.
For further information about us, you may read and copy the above filings,
together with annual and special reports and other information we file with the
Commission pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, at the
Commission's public reference room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room
by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330, and may obtain copies of our
filings from the public reference room by calling (202) 942-8090. The Commission
maintains a web site (www.sec.gov) that contains the reports, proxy and
information statements and other information regarding companies that file
electronically with the Commission such as us.
8
OUTSTANDING SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS
As of the Record Date, the Company's authorized capitalization consists of
100,000,000 shares of Common Stock, of which 60,810,813 were issued and
outstanding. Holders of Common Stock have equal rights to receive dividends
when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, out of funds legally
available therefore. Holders of Common Stock have one vote for each share held
of record and do not have cumulative voting rights and are entitled, upon
liquidation of the Company, to share ratably in the net assets available for
distribution, subject to the rights, if any, of holders of any preferred stock
then outstanding. Shares of Common Stock are not redeemable and have no
preemptive or similar rights. All outstanding shares of Common Stock are fully
paid and nonassessable.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of our Common Stock as of April 17, 2007 by (i) each person who, to
our knowledge, beneficially owns more than 5% of outstanding shares of our
Common Stock; (ii) each of our current directors and executive officers; and
(iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group:
Name of Percent
Beneficial Owner Amount(1) of Class
- ---------------- --------- --------
Itera Holdings BV 35,464,397 58.3%
Alan Gaines (Chairman of the Board) 3,315,501(2)(3) 5.4%
James A. Watt (President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director) 0(4) *
Frank T. Smith, Jr. (Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer) 25,000(5) *
Richard M. Cohen (Director and Secretary) 312,185(6) *
Steven Barrenechea (Director) 222,500(6)(7) *
Steven M. Sisselman (Director) 100,000(6) *
William E. Greenwood (Director) 0 *
Alan D. Bell (Director) 0 *
All Officers & Directors as a Group
(8 persons) 3,752,686(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) 6.1%
* Indicates ownership of less than 1%.
- ----------
(1) A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be
acquired by such person within 60 days from April 17, 2007. Each beneficial
owner's percentage ownership is determined by assuming that options that are
held by such person (but not held by any other person), and which are
exercisable within 60 days from April 17, 2007, have been exercised.
(2) Includes 625,000 shares underlying a stock option granted May 12, 2005.
(3) Excludes 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock to be granted pursuant to a
Restricted Stock Agreement dated April 17, 2007. All such shares are to be
cancelled in the event the Acquisition is not completed by June 30, 2007. Such
shares vest in equal installments of 1,000,000 shares each commencing on the
grant date and the first and second anniversary date thereof.
9
(4) Excludes 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock granted on April 17, 2007 pursuant
to a Restricted Stock Agreement. All such shares are to be cancelled in the
event the Acquisition is not completed by June 30, 2007. Such shares vest in
equal installments of 1,000,000 shares each commencing on April 17, 2008, 2009
and 2010.
(5) Includes 25,000 shares of Common Stock granted on April 17, 2007 pursuant to
a Restricted Stock Agreement. An additional 25,000 shares vest on each of April
17, 2008 and 2009.
(6) Includes (i) 50,000 shares underlying a stock option granted on October 28,
2005 and (ii) 50,000 shares underlying a stock option granted on January 24,
2007.
(7) Excludes 25,000 shares underlying a stock option granted on December 15,
2007.
DISSENTERS' RIGHT OF APPRAISAL
Stockholders do not have the statutory right to dissent and obtain an
appraisal of their shares under Delaware law in connection with the increase in
the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Richard M. Cohen,
Secretary
May __, 2007
10
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
DUNE ENERGY, INC.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT:
FIRST: The name of the corporation is Dune Energy, Inc. (hereinafter
called the "Corporation").
SECOND: The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on November 20, 1998.
THIRD: The Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended by
striking out the first paragraph of Article Fourth thereof and by substituting
in lieu of said paragraph of said Article the following new first paragraph:
"FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which the corporation
shall have authority to issue is two hundred one million (201,000,000), of which
two hundred million (200,000,000) shall be shares of Common Stock and one
million (1,000,000) shall be shares of preferred stock. The par value of all of
such shares is $0.001 per share."
FOURTH: The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein
certified has been duly adopted and written consent has been given in accordance
with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation this ____ day of May, 2007.
By:
--------------------------
Name: James A. Watt
Title: Chief Executive Officer
A-1
EXHIBIT B
Goldking Energy Corporation
Information Required under Item 14(c)(2) of Regulation 14A
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Goldking Energy Corporation ("Goldking") is a private independent energy
company that was incorporated in Delaware in 2004. Its offices are located at
777 Walker Street, Suite 2450, Houston, Texas 77002. Goldking is focused on the
exploration, exploitation and development of natural gas and crude oil
properties located onshore and in state waters along the Gulf Coast.
Below is a summary of Goldking's properties:
Garden Island Bay ("GIB"). The GIB field is located at the mouth of the
Mississippi River in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, approximately 75 miles
southeast of New Orleans. The field is structured by a large, shallow, rock
piercing salt dome with large radial faults and overhangs. The field was
discovered by Texaco in 1934 and it drilled over 900 wells, mostly shallow wells
to exploit discovered oil and natural gas. Production in the field is from 41
separate pay sands at depths from 1,400--13,000 feet. The deepest field well is
the 15,036 foot Cities #2 SL 3942, drilled in 1964 on the northern flank of the
dome. With over 16,000 acres held by production, Garden Island Bay is one of the
largest remaining Louisiana State Leases. This field has had cumulative
production of over 231 MMbbl of oil and 252 Bcf of natural gas.
Goldking currently operates and owns a 100% working interest in the GIB
field and holds over 16,000 gross and net acres. While highly drilled at
shallower depths, the GIB field is largely untested below 12,000 feet. There is
a volume of untested sediment surrounding the Garden Island Bay salt dome that
could contain reserve potential down to 20,000 feet. In addition, the 3-D survey
indicates the possibility of a potentially hydrocarbon- trapping structure
against a salt overhang on the south flank of the field. As of February 2007,
Goldking had 21 net producing wells in the GIB field. During February 2007,
average net production at the field was 600 Bbl/d of oil and 849 Mcf/d of
natural gas. During 2006, Goldking performed five recompletions or workovers
resulting in initial incremental net production rates of 5,466 Mcfe/d.
South Florence. The South Florence field is located in western Vermilion
Parish, approximately 40 miles southwest of Lafayette, Louisiana. The field was
discovered in 1971 by Amoco Production Company when production was established
in the Lower Miocene sand section. Like Garden Island Bay, Bateman Lake and
Leeville, South Florence is structured due to a deep-seated, rock piercing salt
dome. 32 wells have been drilled on the structure and over 50 recognized Miocene
pay sands have been penetrated to date. Depth of the pay zones ranges from 1,800
to 11,050 feet. This field has had cumulative production of over 8.4 MMbbl of
oil and 70.7 Bcf of natural gas. Goldking operates and owns a 100% working
interest in the South Florence field and holds 2,080 gross and net acres under
lease. As of February 2007, Goldking had 13 net producing wells in the South
Florence field. During February 2007, average net production at the field was
381 Bbl/d of oil and 3,130 Mcf/d of natural gas. Goldking has identified one
proved undeveloped location at this field.
B-1
Comite. The Comite field is located in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana,
due east of the city of Baton Rouge. The field was discovered in 1981 and two
wells have been drilled to date. The field is located down-thrown to the first
Tuscaloosa expansion fault, a part of an east-west trending regional fault
system. The Comite field is an expanded three-way fault closure associated with
the large regional expansion fault. Field reservoirs are located at
approximately 18,000 feet. The deepest field well is the 20,720 foot
Chesapeake--Hodges 81 #1 well drilled in 1996. This field has had cumulative
production of over 23 MMbbl of oil and 101 Bcf of natural gas. Goldking operates
and owns a 65% working interest in the Comite field. Goldking holds 1,440 gross
and 1,437 net acres under lease. As of February, Goldking had one net producing
well in the Comite field. During February 2007, average net production at the
field was 28 Bbl/d of oil and 1,367 Mcf/d of natural gas.
North Broussard. The North Broussard field is located on the St.
Martin--Lafayette Parish line just east of Lafayette, Louisiana. The field was
discovered in 1984 and nine wells have been drilled to date. The field is
located on an east-west trending structure formed by a large growth fault. Field
reservoirs are geo-pressured Frio sands (Bol Mex) from 12,700 feet-13,800 feet.
The deepest field well is the 14,310 foot Texaco #4 BLC drilled in 1992. This
field has had cumulative production of over 2 MMbbl of oil and 17 Bcf of natural
gas. Goldking operates and owns a 20% to 100% working interest in the North
Broussard field. Goldking holds 4,262 gross and net acres under lease. An
untested fault block on the east side of the field has been identified by 3-D
seismic activities and the target sands exhibit possible direct hydrocarbon
indicators within the prospective closures. Goldking has negotiated a farmout of
this prospect to Krescent Energy. Krescent has drilled a sidetrack from an
existing wellbore to test this prospect and is currently completing this well.
If successful, Goldking will receive a 38.55% net revenue interest in the
production stream after payout. As of February 2007, Goldking had three net
producing wells in the North Broussard field. During February 2007, average net
production at the field was 17 Mcf/d of natural gas. Goldking has identified one
additional drilling location in the North Broussard field.
Bateman Lake. Bateman Lake is a natural gas condensate field which lies
beneath the Atchafalaya River south of Morgan City in St. Mary Parish,
Louisiana. This field is approximately 75 miles southwest of New Orleans. The
field was discovered in 1934 by Texaco and is an elongated, subsurface structure
that has a fault system along its crest. Production comes from more than 30 pay
sands from 1,400 feet to 15,000 feet. The deepest well in the field is the
Texaco Emerald Land #1 (20,315 feet Measured Depth, 18,500 feet True Vertical
Depth) which was drilled in 1998 as a dry hole. This field has had cumulative
production of over 152 MMbbl of oil and 2.3 Tcf of natural gas. Goldking
operates and owns a 20% to 100% working interest in the Bateman Lake field.
Goldking controls contiguous leasehold of over 13,780 gross and 13,754 net
acres, covering most of the known productive area of the field. A field-wide
unit insures that all of this acreage is held-by-production and is not in
jeopardy of being released by a competitor. As of February 2007, Goldking had
ten net producing wells in the Bateman Lake field. During February 2007, average
net production at the field was 104 Bbl/d of oil and 2,853 Mcf/d of natural gas.
Goldking has negotiated the farmout of 201 acres of land at Bateman Lake to
Texana Resources Partners, Ltd. who drilled a successful exploratory well
targeting potential pay sands at 9,900 feet.
B-2
Leeville. The Leeville field is located in southern Lafourche Parish,
Louisiana, about 50 miles south of New Orleans. Texaco discovered the field in
1931 and drilled more than 500 mostly shallow wells to exploit discovered oil
and natural gas. The majority of these wells penetrated depths of less than
10,000 feet. The Leeville field was created by a shallow rock-piercing salt dome
with shallow salt at 3,500 feet. A large growth fault system crosses the field
acting as the trapping mechanism for the oil and natural gas. Production comes
from 45 different pay sands at depths ranging from 1,400 - 19,000 feet. The
deepest field well is the 21,168 foot Texaco SL 4665 #3 drilled in 1970 on the
southwest edge of the field in Section 31. This field has had cumulative
production of over 108 MMbbl of oil and 171 Bcf of natural gas. Goldking
currently has an exploration agreement with Manti Resources that has resulted in
the drilling of eight of 11 successful shallow wells and six of eight successful
recompletions during 2006. Goldking operates and owns a 20% to 100% working
interest in the Leeville field. Goldking holds 8,312 gross and 8,028 net acres
down to 12,950 feet. As of February 2007, Goldking had eight net producing wells
in the Leeville field. During February 2007, average net production at the field
was 282 Bbl/d of oil and 611 Mcf/d of natural gas. Goldking performed six
recompletions or workovers during 2006 resulting in initial incremental net
production rates of 888 Mcfe/d. Since the fourth quarter of 2006, Goldking has
participated in the drilling of five wells in the field.
Chocolate Bayou. The Chocolate Bayou field is located in Brazoria County,
Texas. The field was discovered in 1939 by Texaco and Phillips and over 400
wells have been drilled to date in the field and nearby surrounding areas. The
field is located on a northeast-southwest trending subsurface structure which
was formed by a large growth fault. Reservoirs in the field range in depth from
8,700 feet to 14,500 feet. The deepest well in the field area is The Meridian
Resource Company--Farms IP #5X drilled in 1993 to a total depth of 18,800 feet
and over two Tcf of natural gas and 77 MMbbl. Goldking operates and owns a 20%
to 100% working interest in the Chocolate Bayou field holding 1,281 gross and
net acres under lease. Goldking has acquired a license to a recently merged and
reprocessed 50 square mile 3-D seismic survey covering the Chocolate Bayou field
and surrounding areas. As of February 2007, Goldking had six net producing wells
in the Chocolate Bayou field. During February 2007, average net production from
the field was 67 Bbl/d of oil and 540 Mcf/d of natural gas. The proposed Weiting
#30 prospect location will test an updip closure to proved reserves in the
12,000 foot sand and other shallower structural traps.
Live Oak. The Live Oak field is located in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana
approximately 30 miles south of the city of Lafayette. The field was discovered
in 1954 by the Houston Oil Co. The field is comprised of two anticlinal
structures separated by a large east-west trending growth fault. This field has
had cumulative production of approximately 660 Bcf of natural gas and 9.8 MMbbl
of oil from pay sands that range in depth from 9,200 feet to 15,200 feet.
Goldking operates and owns an 85% to 100% working interest in the Live Oak
field. Goldking holds 700 gross and net acres under lease. Goldking currently
operates 13 wells, three of which are salt-water disposal wells. Goldking's
operating rights are depth restricted and do not extend below approximately
14,000 feet. Goldking currently holds a license to 10 square miles of 3-D
seismic data. As of February 2007, Goldking had seven net producing wells in the
Live Oak field. During February 2007, average net production at the field was 36
Bbl/d of oil and 281 Mcf/d of natural gas.
B-3
Manchester SW. The Manchester Southwest field is located in southeastern
Calcasieu Parish, approximately three miles southeast of the city of Lake
Charles, Louisiana. The field was discovered in 1969 and four wells have been
drilled to date. The field is located on a north-south trending subsurface
structure down-thrown to a large growth fault. Field reservoirs are found at
depths in a 13,000 foot range. The deepest field well is the 13,500 foot Amoco
A-1 Ranch #1 which was completed in 1970 as a dry hole. This field has
cumulative production of over 3.3 MMbbl of oil and 8.8 Bcf of natural gas.
Goldking operates and owns 92% to 100% working interest in the Manchester SW
field and holds 134.8 gross and net acres under lease. As of February 2007,
Goldking had one producing well in the Manchester SW field. During February
2007, average net production at the field was 60 Bbl/d of oil and 162 Mcf/d of
natural gas.
Murphy Lake. The Murphy Lake field is located in southeastern St. Martin
Parish, Louisiana. The field was discovered in 1978 with the drilling of the
Amerada Hess Norman #1 well. The field is located on a three-way structural
closure on the down-thrown side of a large growth fault. Field reservoirs are
located at depths that range from 13,250 feet to 13,400 feet. The deepest field
well is the 15,277 foot Amerada Hess--Dow-Norman et al. #1 drilled in 1978. This
field has had cumulative production of over 8.6 MMbbl of oil and 2.2 Bcf of
natural gas from six wells. Goldking operates and owns an 87.5% working interest
in the Murphy Lake field. Goldking holds 299 gross and net acres under lease. As
of February 2007, Goldking had two net producing wells in the Murphy Lake field.
During February 2007, average net production at the field was 75 Bbl/d of oil
and 99 Mcf/d.
Other Goldking Properties. Goldking has ownership in 12 other producing
properties, located throughout the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana, which
represents less than 15% of its PV-10 value. These properties are geographically
interspersed with Goldking's larger core fields and provide a small but
relatively stable flow of production. Goldking's working interests in these
fields range from 3.5% to 100%, with five fields operated by partners. Such
fields represent 17% of the net proved reserves and 19% of Goldking's net
production as of February 2007.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Set forth below are the audited consolidated balance sheets of Goldking
(formerly Goldking Holding Corporation) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder's equity and cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the period from July
27, 2004 (inception) through December 31, 2004.
B-4
GOLDKING ENERGY CORPORATION REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
Goldking Energy Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Goldking Energy Corporation (formerly Goldking Holding Corporation) as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholder's equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2006 and 2005, and the period from July 27, 2004 (inception) through December
31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
statements are free from material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a text basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Goldking Energy Corporation (formerly Goldking Holding Corporation)
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations and their
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the period from
July 27, 2004 (inception) through December 31, 2004, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Hein & Associates LLP
Hein & Associates LLP
Houston, Texas
April 13, 2007
B-5
GOLDKING ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006 AND 2005
(AMOUNTS IN USD)
2006 2005
------------ -------------
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents .............................. $ 8,766,660 $ 10,419,522
Restricted cash ........................................ 160,674 241,686
Accounts receivable .................................... 16,013,796 9,021,093
Accounts receivable from affiliates .................... -- 41,260
Accounts receivable from property acquisition .......... 2,312,283 --
Assets from price risk management activities ........... 3,588,984 704,975
Deferred taxes ......................................... -- 289,592
Prepaid expenses and other current assets .............. 4,398,643 2,465,535
------------- -------------
Total current assets ............................. 35,241,040 23,183,663
Oil and gas properties (under the successful efforts method of
accounting) ............................................... 242,335,749 108,826,625
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization ... (16,796,715) (2,868,875)
------------- -------------
Oil and gas properties, net .................................. 225,539,034 105,957,750
Escrow related to asset retirement obligation ................ 2,123,707 2,034,392
Deferred taxes--non current .................................. 369,081 657,187
Assets from price risk management activities--non-current .... 4,334,705 --
Other assets, net ............................................ 3,333,780 810,707
------------- -------------
Total assets ..................................... $ 270,941,347 $ 132,643,699
============= =============
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt ................... $ 19,517,000 $ 10,000,000
Short-term notes payable ............................... 2,576,801 1,636,994
Accounts payable ....................................... 5,902,007 4,615,353
Revenue distributions payable .......................... 10,586,943 3,943,523
Operator prepayment liabilities ........................ 366,756 471,842
Accrued lease operating expenses ....................... 1,334,397 1,767,307
Other accrued liabilities .............................. 6,329,634 3,019,720
Deferred taxes ......................................... 816,027 --
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities ........................ 47,429,565 25,454,739
Long-term debt ............................................... 157,000,000 48,950,000
Asset retirement obligation .................................. 6,008,583 5,782,671
Liabilities from price risk management activities ............ -- 811,846
------------- -------------
Total liabilities ................................ 210,438,148 80,999,256
Commitments and Contingencies -- See Note 12
Stockholder's Equity:
Common stock, $.01 par, 10 shares authorized, issued and
outstanding ......................................... -- --
Additional paid-in capital ............................. 60,053,526 53,618,526
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) .......... 3,302,162 (496,703)
Accumulated (deficit) .................................. (2,852,489) (1,477,380)
------------- -------------
Total stockholder's equity ....................... 60,503,199 51,644,443
------------- -------------
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity ....... $ 270,941,347 $ 132,643,699
============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
B-6
GOLDKING ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(AMOUNTS IN USD)
Year Ended December 31
-----------------------------
Period from
July 27, 2004
(Inception) to
December 31,
2006 2005 2004
------------ ------------ --------------
Revenues and Other:
Oil and natural gas revenues ................. $ 55,794,335 $ 10,553,338 $ 1,044,804
Price risk management activities ............. 324,355 (958,682) (6,617)
Gain on sale of oil and natural gas properties 3,305,028 50,738 --
Interest and other income .................... 480,949 95,687 21,829
------------ ------------ ------------
59,904,667 9,741,081 1,060,016
Costs and Expenses:
Oil and natural gas operating expenses ....... 20,135,006 4,389,973 560,292
Production and ad valorem taxes .............. 5,437,504 870,337 70,752
Depreciation, depletion and amortization ..... 14,958,039 2,658,799 240,871
Oil and natural gas exploration expenses ..... 4,293,599 2,700 99,846
Asset retirement accretion expense ........... 445,177 68,076 16
General and administrative expenses .......... 9,303,831 2,505,261 656,138
------------ ------------ ------------
Total operating expenses .................. 54,573,156 10,495,146 1,627,915
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) from operations ................... 5,331,511 (754,065) (567,899)
Interest expense ................................ (7,723,152) (780,698) (6,354)
------------ ------------ ------------
Loss before income taxes ........................ (2,391,641) (1,534,763) (574,253)
Income tax (expense) benefit .................... 1,016,532 574,607 57,029
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss ..................................... $ (1,375,109) $ (960,156) $ (517,224)
============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
B-7
GOLDKING ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
(AMOUNTS IN USD)
Accumulated
Common Stock Additional Other Accumulated Total
---------------------------- Paid-in Comprehensive earnings Stockholder's
Shares Amount Capital gain (Loss) (Deficit) Equity
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, July 27, 2004
(inception) 10 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Cash contributions -- -- 14,826,266 -- -- 14,826,266
Assumed liabilities in excess
of contributed assets -- -- (422,741) -- -- (422,741)
Net loss -- -- -- -- (517,224) (517,224)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 2004 10 -- 14,403,525 -- (517,224) 13,886,301
Cash contributions -- -- 39,215,001 -- -- 39,215,001
Net loss -- -- -- -- (960,156) (960,156)
Unrealized loss from price
risk management
activities, net of tax of
$315,143 -- -- -- (496,703) -- (496,703)
Total comprehensive loss -- -- -- -- -- (1,456,859)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 2005 10 -- 53,618,526 (496,703) (1,477,380) 51,644,443
Cash contributions -- -- 6,435,000 -- -- 6,435,000
Net loss -- -- -- -- (1,375,109) (1,375,109)
Unrealized gain from price
risk management
activities, net of tax of
$2,410,257 -- -- -- 3,798,865 3,798,865
Total comprehensive income -- -- -- -- -- 2,423,756
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 2006 10 $ -- $ 60,053,526 $ 3,302,162 $ (2,852,489) $ 60,503,199
============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
B-8
GOLDKING ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(AMOUNTS IN USD)
Period from
July 27, 2004
Year Ended Year Ended (Inception) to
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2006 2005 2004
------------- ------------- --------------
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss $ (1,375,109) $ (960,156) $ (517,224)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Gain on sale of oil and natural gas property (3,305,028) (50,738) --
Non-cash price risk management activities 1,409,682 958,682 6,617
Deferred income tax (benefit) (1,016,532) (574,607) (57,029)
Accretion of asset retirement liability 445,177 68,076 16
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 14,958,039 2,658,799 240,871
Amortization of deferred financing costs 780,033 42,719 --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable (9,263,726) (7,333,282) (1,552,170)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets (1,933,108) (2,235,545) (229,990)
Decrease in other assets 2,950 (2,077) --
Increase in accounts and revenue distributions
payable 7,128,104 6,713,349 837,418
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities, lease
operating expenses payable and operator
prepayment liabilities 2,563,205 875,559 1,124,227
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 10,393,687 160,779 (147,264)
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Acquisition of oil and natural gas properties (123,800,418) (80,769,845) --
Capital expenditures (14,033,733) (11,337,036) (7,322,343)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 6,510,218 57,172 --
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash 81,012 (241,686) --
Purchase of derivatives related to future periods (3,231,120) (1,563,174) (107,100)
Increase in escrow fund (89,315) (2,034,392) --
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash used in investing activities (134,563,356) (95,888,961) (7,429,443)
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Capital contributions from shareholder 6,435,000 39,215,001 14,826,266
Proceeds from long-term borrowing 177,000,000 58,950,000 --
Repayments of long-term borrowing (59,433,000) -- --
Payments for deferred financing costs (2,425,000) (535,000) --
Increase (decrease) in short-term notes payable 939,807 1,636,994 (368,850)
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 122,516,807 99,266,995 14,457,416
------------- ------------- -------------
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (1,652,862) 3,538,813 6,880,709
Cash and Cash Equivalents--beginning of period 10,419,522 6,880,709 --
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash and Cash Equivalents--end of period $ 8,766,660 $ 10,419,522 $ 6,880,709
============= ============= =============
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest $ 7,865,972 $ 81,685 $ 6,574
Federal and state income taxes -- -- --
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Net liabilities contributed by shareholder upon formation
(excluding cash) $ -- $ -- $ (422,741)
Asset retirement obligation assumed 1,331,408 5,632,282 66,401
Short-term note payable to finance insurance policies 2,891,027 1,836,730 --
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
B-9
GOLDKING ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1--THE COMPANY
Goldking Energy Corporation is an independent energy company
engaged, directly or through its subsidiaries, in the acquisition, development,
exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas in the United States,
principally on shore and in state waters in South Louisiana and the upper Texas
Gulf Coast. Goldking was originally formed as Goldking Holding Corporation on
July 20, 2004 by Goldking Energy Holdings, L.P., a Texas Limited Partnership
that owns all of its capital stock but was renamed to Goldking Energy
Corporation on December 8, 2006. On July 26, 2004, certain members of management
contributed cash and all of the capital stock of three operating entities,
Goldking Texas, Inc. (formerly named Goldking Energy Corporation, later merged
into Goldking Operating Company), Goldking Operating Company and Goldking Energy
Offshore Corporation (later merged into Goldking Operating Company) (the
"Predecessor Entities"), and Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. ("NGP") contributed
cash to Goldking in exchange for equity interests in Goldking Energy Holdings
L.P. and its General Partner. Operations commenced on July 27, 2004.
NOTE 2--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
Accounting policies used by Goldking and its subsidiaries conform to
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
more significant of such policies are discussed below. The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Goldking and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management of Goldking to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Goldking bases its estimates on historical experience and
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Goldking's estimates of oil and natural gas reserve quantities are
the basis for the calculation of depreciation, depletion and impairment of oil
and natural gas properties. Other items subject to estimates and assumptions
include: the carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment, asset retirement
obligations, valuation allowances for receivables and deferred income tax
assets, and valuation of derivative instruments.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in prior period financial
statements to conform to the current period presentation. These
reclassifications have not resulted in any changes to previously reported net
loss for any periods.
B-10
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
December 31,
------------------------------
2006 2005
----------- -----------
Crude oil and natural gas sales .......... $11,701,267 $ 7,981,394
Joint interest billings .................. 4,288,586 1,006,256
Employee ................................. 23,943 33,443
----------- -----------
Total .............................. $16,013,796 $ 9,021,093
=========== ===========
Goldking routinely assesses the recoverability of all material trade
and other receivables to determine their collectibility, and accrues a reserve
on a receivable when, based on the judgment of management, it is probable that a
receivable will not be collected and the amount of any reserve may be reasonably
estimated. Actual write-offs could exceed the recorded allowance. No allowance
for doubtful accounts was considered necessary at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Prepaid Expenses
Prepaid expenses consist of the following:
December 31,
------------------------------
2006 2005
----------- -----------
Prepaid insurance ........................ $ 3,196,251 $ 2,106,590
Prepaid drilling costs ................... 571,855 357,045
Other current assets ..................... 630,537 1,900
----------- -----------
Total ................................. $ 4,398,643 $ 2,465,535
=========== ===========
Oil and Natural Gas Properties
Successful Efforts Method--Goldking accounts for its crude oil and
natural gas properties under the successful efforts method of accounting. Under
this method, costs to acquire mineral interests in crude oil and natural gas
properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves and
to drill and equip development wells are capitalized. Depreciation and depletion
of producing oil and natural gas properties are provided under the
unit-of-production method. Proved developed reserves are used to compute unit
rates for unamortized tangible and intangible development costs, and proved
reserves are used for unamortized leasehold costs. Upon sale or retirement of
depreciable or depletable property, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization ("DD&A") are eliminated from the
accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. Repairs and maintenance
are expensed as incurred. Exploratory expenses, including geological and
geophysical costs and delay rentals, for unevaluated oil and natural gas
properties are charged to expense as incurred. Costs to drill exploratory wells
that do not find proved reserves are expensed as oil and natural gas exploration
costs. Goldking will carry the costs of an exploratory well as an asset if the
well is found to have a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its
capitalization as a producing well and as long as Goldking is making sufficient
progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the
project. Goldking's ability to move forward on a project may be dependent on
gaining access to transportation or processing facilities or obtaining permits
and government or partner approval, the timing of which is beyond Goldking's
control. Exploratory well costs may remain suspended as long as Goldking is
actively pursuing access to necessary facilities and access to such permits and
approvals and believes they will be obtained. Goldking has no significant
suspended costs at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Impairment--Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, "Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS No. 144"),
Goldking reviews proved oil and natural gas properties and other long-lived
assets for impairment when events and circumstances indicate a decline in the
recoverability of the carrying value of such properties, such as a downward
B-11
revision of the reserve estimates or commodity prices. Goldking estimates the
future cash flows expected in connection with the properties and compares such
future cash flows to the carrying amount of the properties to determine if the
carrying amount is recoverable. When the carrying amounts of the properties
exceed their estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying amount of
the properties is written down to their estimated fair value. The factors used
to determine fair value include, but are not limited to, estimates of proved
reserves, future commodity prices, and timing of future production, future
capital expenditures and a risk-adjusted discount rate. No asset impairments
were recorded by Goldking for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 or for
the period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004.
Individually significant unproved properties are periodically
assessed for impairment of value and a loss is recognized at the time of
impairment by providing an impairment allowance. Cash flows used in the
impairment analysis are determined based on management's estimates of crude oil
and natural gas reserves, future commodity prices and future costs to extract
the reserves. Cash flow estimates related to probable and possible reserves are
reduced by additional risk-weighting factors. Other individually insignificant
unproved properties are combined into groups and amortized on the basis of
Goldking's experience of successful drilling and average holding period.
Goldking has no significant investments in unproved properties at December 31,
2006 and 2005.
Asset Retirement Obligations
SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,"
addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement
costs. This statement requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset
retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred. The
associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying cost
of the asset. Goldking's asset retirement obligations consist of estimated costs
for dismantlement, removal, site reclamation and similar activities associated
with its oil and natural gas properties. An asset retirement obligation and the
related asset retirement cost are recorded when an asset is first drilled,
constructed or purchased. The asset retirement cost is determined and discounted
to present value using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. After initial
recording, the liability is increased for the passage of time, with the increase
being reflected as accretion expense in the statement of operations. Subsequent
adjustments in the cost estimate are reflected in the asset retirement
obligation liability and the amounts continue to be amortized over the useful
life of the related long-lived asset.
Other Assets
Other assets are recorded at cost and consist of the following:
December 31,
------------------------------
2006 2005
----------- -----------
Deferred financing costs ................. $ 2,137,248 $ 492,281
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net ... 1,196,532 315,476
Other asset .............................. -- 2,950
----------- -----------
Total .............................. $ 3,333,780 $ 810,707
=========== ===========
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are amortized on a straight-line basis,
which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the
associated debt.
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment
Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated on the
straight-line method based on the expected lives of the assets.
B-12
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized when items of income and
expense are recognized in the financial statements in different periods than
when recognized in the tax return. Deferred tax assets arise when expenses are
recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when income
items are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements.
Deferred tax assets also arise when operating losses or tax credits are
available to offset tax payments due in future years. Deferred tax liabilities
arise when income items are recognized in the financial statements before the
tax returns or when expenses are recognized in the tax return prior to the
financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair
values for each class of financial instruments. The fair value of a financial
instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current
transaction between two willing parties.
The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash,
accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued Liabilities and short-term notes
payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature or maturity of the
instruments.
The fair value of Goldking's long-term debt is estimated based on
the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates
offered to Goldking for debt of the same maturities. The carrying amount of
borrowings outstanding under Goldking's long-term debt agreement approximates
fair value as the interest rates are tied to current market rates.
Derivative instruments are carried at their estimated fair market
value on the balance sheet.
Statement of Cash Flows
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents
include cash on hand and investments purchased with original maturities of three
months or less.
Restricted Cash
Goldking classifies cash balances as restricted cash when cash is
restricted as to withdrawal or usage. The restricted cash balance of $160,674
and $241,686 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively relate to Goldking's
price risk management activities.
Revenue Recognition
Goldking uses the sales method to account for sales of crude oil and
natural gas. Under this method, revenues are recognized based on actual volumes
of oil and natural gas sold to purchasers. The volumes sold may differ from the
volumes to which Goldking is entitled based on their interests in the
properties. These differences create imbalances which are recognized as a
liability only when the imbalance exceeds the estimate of remaining reserves.
Goldking had no significant imbalances at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Goldking uses various derivative instruments in connection with
anticipated crude oil and natural gas sales to minimize the impact of commodity
price fluctuations. Such instruments include the purchase of put options, fixed
price swaps and costless collars. Although these derivative instruments expose
Goldking to credit risk, Goldking monitors the creditworthiness of its
counterparties, who include Bank of America, N.A., BP North America Gas and
Power and Coral Energy Holdings L.P., and believes that losses from
nonperformance are unlikely to occur. However, Goldking is not able to predict
sudden changes in its counterparties' creditworthiness.
B-13
Goldking accounts for its derivative instruments and hedging
activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities", as amended. The statement established
accounting and reporting standards requiring every derivative instrument
(including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) to be
recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair
value. SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be
recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are
met wherein gains and losses are reflected in shareholder's equity in other
comprehensive income (loss) until the forecasted production occurs; at which
time these amounts are reclassified to earnings. Only derivative instruments
that are expected to be highly effective in offsetting anticipated gains or
losses on the hedged cash flows and that are subsequently documented to have
been highly effective can qualify for hedge accounting. Any ineffectiveness in
hedging instruments whereby gains or losses do not exactly offset anticipated
gains or losses of hedged cash flows is recorded in earnings in the period in
which the gain or loss occurs.
Related Party Transactions
Goldking pays Board of Director and advisory fees to affiliates of
NGP. Directors' fees totaling $20,000, $20,000 and $8,333 during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the period from July 27, 2004 (inception)
through December 31, 2004, respectively, were paid to affiliates of NGP.
Additionally, advisory fees totaling $75,000 and $75,000 were also paid to
affiliates of NGP during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. There were no advisory fees paid to affiliates of NGP during the
period from July 27, 2004 (inception) through December 31, 2004. Goldking pays a
"financing fee" to an NGP affiliate that is equal to 1% of NGP's cash capital
contributions to Goldking, which fees totaled $65,000, $385,000 and $150,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the period from July 27, 2004
(inception) through December 31, 2004, respectively. The financing fees were
treated as offering costs and reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in
capital.
During 2006, Goldking advanced its two principal owners
approximately $1,500,000, one-half to each, to purchase certain royalty and
override interest in oil and natural gas properties. The advances were repaid in
their entirety prior to the year ended December 31, 2006.
During 2006, Goldking leased an airplane from a corporation owned by
one of the officer/directors of Goldking. Airplane lease and usage payments
totaled approximately $56,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Additionally, Goldking leases employees from the same corporation to operate the
aircraft and perform services related to Goldking's field transportation assets.
Payments for the leased employees totaled $24,000 for the year ended December
31, 2006.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Substantially all of Goldking's accounts receivable result from
natural gas and crude oil sales or joint interest billings to third parties in
the oil and natural gas industry in the United States. This concentration of
customers and joint interest owners may impact Goldking's overall credit risk in
that these entities may be similarly affected by changes in economic and other
conditions. Accounts receivable are generally not collateralized. Historically,
Goldking has not experienced credit losses on its accounts receivable. Based on
the current demand for natural gas and crude oil, Goldking does not expect that
termination of sales to any of its current purchasers would have a material
adverse effect on the its ability to find replacement purchasers and to sell its
production at favorable market prices. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, three
customers represented 73% and 65%, respectively of crude oil and natural gas
sales receivable.
Further, Goldking's derivative instruments also expose it to credit
risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. Generally, these
contracts are with major investment grade financial institutions and other
substantive counterparties. Goldking believes that credit risk related to the
crude oil and natural gas futures and collar contracts is no greater than the
risk associated with the primary contracts, and that the elimination of price
risk through its hedging and derivative activities reduces volatility in
reported results of operations, financial position and cash flows from period to
period and lowers its overall business risk. However, as a result of these same
hedging and derivative activities, Goldking may be exposed to greater credit
risk in the future.
B-14
Cash and cash equivalents include investments in money market
accounts placed with highly-rated financial institutions. Goldking's bank
deposit accounts may, at times, exceed federally insured limits. Accounts are
guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $100,000.
Goldking has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting for Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 157 Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS No. 157").
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
Goldking is currently evaluating the impact that this interpretation may have on
its consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. In June 2006, the FASB
issued Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48") "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes" which is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 "Accounting for
Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109"). This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements in
accordance with SFAS 109. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN
48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Goldking
does not expect FIN 48 to have a material effect on Goldking's financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. In May 2005, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections," which replaces
Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 20, "Accounting Changes" and SFAS No.
3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements--An Amendment
of APB Opinion No. 28." SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and
reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes
retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as the required
method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a
correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and
correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
Goldking adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 154 on January 1, 2006. There was no
impact to the financial statements as a result of this change.
NOTE 3--PREDECESSOR ENTITIES
The contribution of assets and liabilities of the Predecessor
Entities to Goldking at inception was determined to be a transfer of assets and
liabilities between entities under common control. Accordingly, the contributed
assets and assumed liabilities of $1,264,189 and $1,686,930, respectively, have
been reflected at the Predecessor Entities' carrying value. The contributed
assets consist primarily of oil and natural gas properties and the assumed
liabilities consist primarily of trade payables, employee benefits liabilities
and notes payable. The contribution of the Predecessor Entities provided
Goldking with a platform with which to conduct operations related to the
acquisition, exploration and development of crude oil and natural gas reserves.
NOTE 4--ACQUISITION OF OIL & NATURAL GAS PROPERTIES
On September 28, 2006, Goldking acquired certain oil and natural gas
properties from Hilcorp Energy II, L.P., Hilcorp Energy I, L.P., and Hilcorp
Energy IV, L.P. (the "Hilcorp Properties") for total cash consideration of
$123,184,100, which was based on the contract acquisition price of $126,000,000,
net of certain purchase price adjustments agreed to with the seller. The
properties consist of interests in the Abbeville, Bayou Choctaw, Comite, South
Florence, Lake Arthur, Lake Boeuf, East Lake Sand, Manchester, Murphy Lake and
South Thornwell Fields in various parishes in South Louisiana, and Columbus,
Hitchcock, Malo Domingo and Toro Grande Fields in South Texas.
B-15
The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Oil and natural gas properties ................................... $ 125,883,529
Net working capital .............................................. (1,010,683)
Asset retirement obligations ..................................... (1,072,428)
-------------
Cash paid including acquisition costs of approximately $616,318 $(123,800,418)
=============
On October 31, 2005, Goldking acquired certain oil and natural gas
properties from EnerVest Energy, L.P. ("EnerVest") for total cash consideration
of $79,071,310, which was based on a contract price of $94,470,700, net of
revenues and expenses, capital expenditures, and certain other purchase price
adjustments as a result of operations from the effective date July 1, 2005
through the closing date of the transaction of October 31, 2005, totaling
$15,399,390. The properties, referred to as the Bayou Properties, consist of
interests in the Bateman Lake, Broussard North, Leeville and Garden Island Bay
Fields in various parishes in South Louisiana, and the Chocolate Bayou Field in
Brazoria County, Texas.
The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their fair values, on
October 31, 2005:
Oil and natural gas properties .............................. $ 89,021,577
Net working capital ......................................... (2,965,008)
Asset retirement obligations ................................ (5,632,281)
------------
Cash paid including acquisition costs of $1,352,978 ...... $ 80,424,288
============
The following summarizes the unaudited pro forma financial
information for years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 assuming the Hilcorp
Properties acquired from Hilcorp Energy II, L.P., Hilcorp Energy I, L.P., and
Hilcorp Energy IV, L.P. on September 28, 2006 and the Bayou Properties acquired
from EnerVest on October 31, 2005, as described in NOTE 4, occurred as of
January 1, 2005. These unaudited pro forma financial results have been prepared
for informational purposes only. These unaudited pro forma financial results may
not be indicative of the results that would have occurred if Goldking had
completed the acquisitions at these dates or the results that will be attained
in the future.
Year Ended
December 31,
------------------------
2006 2005
------- -------
(dollars in thousands)
Oil and natural gas revenues ................. $85,358 $84,905
Net income ................................... 2,353 7,838
NOTE 5--PROPERTY SALES
On May 4, 2006, Goldking sold its interest in the Buna Field for
cash consideration of $573,135 and recognized a gain of $311,255. On August 16,
2006, Goldking sold its interests in 18 non-operated properties located in
Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico and West Virginia to GreenBriar Energy IV LP for
cash consideration of $5,858,695 (net of costs associated with the sale of
approximately $150,000). A gain of $2,965,712 was recognized on the sale to
GreenBriar during the year ended December 31, 2006. Goldking sold its interest
in other miscellaneous oil and natural gas properties resulting in cash proceeds
of $78,388 and recognizing gains on these sales of $28,061.
NOTE 6--ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Goldking maintains an escrow agreement that has been established for
the purpose of assuring maintenance and administration of a performance bond
which secures certain plugging and abandonment obligations assumed by Goldking
B-16
in the acquisition of oil and natural gas properties from EnerVest. At December
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, the amount of the escrow account totaled
$2,123,707 and $2,034,392.
Changes in Goldking's asset retirement obligations were as follows:
Period from
July 27, 2004
(Inception) to
Year ended December 31, December 31,
--------------------------- --------------
2006 2005 2004
----------- ----------- --------------
Asset retirement obligations, beginning of period $ 5,782,671 $ 82,313 $ --
Fair value of liabilities assumed in acquisitions 1,331,408 5,632,282 --
Liabilities contributed at formation ............ -- -- 82,297
Liabilities related to property sales ........... (6,442) -- --
Restatement due to change in abandonment year ... (1,544,231) -- --
Accretion expense ............................... 445,177 68,076 16
----------- ----------- -----------
Asset retirement obligations, end of period $ 6,008,583 $ 5,782,671 $ 82,313
=========== =========== ===========
NOTE 7--DEBT
Long-Term Debt
In connection with Goldking's acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties
on September 28, 2006, Goldking Energy Corporation (later renamed Goldking
Texas, Inc., then merged into Goldking Operating Company), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Goldking, entered into a $260,000,000 Senior Secured Credit
Facility (the "Credit Agreement") with Bank of America, N.A. and Union Bank of
California, N.A. Proceeds from the Credit Agreement were used to retire existing
debt, fund the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties and provide working
capital. The Credit Agreement was guaranteed by Goldking.
On December 19, 2006, Goldking amended its Credit Agreement with
Bank of America and certain other lenders, entering into a First Amendment to
Credit Agreement (the "First Amended Credit Agreement"). Also on December 19,
2006, Goldking entered into a Second Lien Term Loan Agreement (the "Second Lien
Loan Agreement").
The First Amended Credit Agreement provides for the following loan
facilities:
Revolver Loan Facility. A $200,000,000 revolving credit facility
(the "Revolver") with an initial borrowing base of $130,000,000,
including a letter of credit sub-limit of $20,000,000. The Revolver
matures on September 28, 2010. Goldking borrowed $117,000,000 under
this facility as of December 19, 2006, as well as $4,125,000 in
outstanding letters of credit.
Term B Loan Facility. A $20,000,000 single draw term loan facility
(the "Term B Loan") maturing September 28, 2007. Goldking borrowed
$19,517,000 under this facility as of December 19, 2006.
Second Lien Term Loan Facility. A $40,000,000 single draw loan
facility (the "Second Lien Term Loan") maturing September 28, 2011.
Goldking borrowed $40,000,000 under this facility as of December 19,
2006.
Borrowings under Goldking's Term B Loan and Revolver, as well as any
other obligations under the First Amended Credit Agreement, and obligations
related to Goldking's commodity hedge positions, are together secured by first
priority liens covering and encumbering substantially all of Goldking's assets,
including mineral interests owned by Goldking and its subsidiaries, the capital
stock of its current and future subsidiaries, and all personal property owned by
Goldking and its subsidiaries. Borrowings under the Second Lien Term Loan are
secured by second priority liens covering substantially all of Goldking's
assets, including mineral interests owned by Goldking and its subsidiaries, the
capital stock of its current and future subsidiaries and all personal property
owned by Goldking and its subsidiaries. The Term B Loan and the Second Lien Term
Loan are referred to together as the "Senior Term Loans".
B-17
The Credit Agreement allows either Base Rate borrowings or
Eurodollar borrowings on both the Revolver and the Senior Term Loans, at the
option of the borrower.
Base Rate Borrowings: In the case of Base Rate borrowings, interest
is calculated based on the sum of (1) the greater of (a) the Prime Rate then in
effect, or (b) the sum of the Federal Funds Rate then in effect plus 0.5%, and
(2) the Applicable Base Rate Margin. For the Revolver, the Applicable Base Rate
Margin ranges from 0.0% to 0.675%, based on facility utilization. For the Term B
Loan, the Applicable Base Rate Margin is a fixed 2.0%. For the Second Lien Term
Loan, the Applicable Base Rate Margin is 4%.
Eurodollar Borrowings: In the case of Eurodollar borrowings, for the
Revolver and Term B Loan, interest is calculated based on the sum of the
Adjusted LIBOR Rate (defined as the applicable LIBOR rate divided by 1.0 minus
the prevailing Eurodollar Reserve Percentage) plus the Applicable Eurodollar
Margin. For the Revolver, the Applicable Eurodollar Margin ranges from 1.25% to
1.875%, based on facility utilization. For the Term B Loan, the Applicable
Eurodollar Margin is a fixed 3.25%. In the case of Eurodollar borrowings under
the Second Lien Term Loan, interest is calculated based on the sum of the
average British Banker's Association Interest Settlement Rate for deposits in
Dollars, plus 5%.
The First Amended Credit Agreement requires compliance by Goldking
with certain covenants, including financial covenants, on a quarterly basis. The
financial covenants, which are generally effective beginning, and for the three
month period ended, December 31, 2006, include: (1) a requirement to maintain a
minimum ratio of consolidated current assets to consolidated current
liabilities, as defined, of at least 1.0 at the end of each fiscal quarter; (2)
a requirement to maintain a ratio of consolidated earnings before interest,
depreciation, taxes and amortization ("EBITDA") for the four fiscal quarter
period most recently ended to the consolidated interest expense for such period
of at least 2.5 to 1 (except that this ratio is calculated for the three month
period ending December 31, 2006, the six month period ending March 31, 2007, and
the nine month period ending June 30, 2007, and for four trailing fiscal quarter
periods thereafter); and, (3) so long as amounts remain outstanding under the
Term B Loan, a requirement to maintain the ratio of consolidated funded
indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA for the four fiscal quarter periods most
recently ended prior to the determination period at or below 4.0 to 1, 3.75 to
1, 3.5 to 1, 3.25 to 1 and 3.0 to 1 for the fiscal quarters ending December 31,
2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007, September 30, 2007 and each fiscal quarter
thereafter, respectively (except that calculation of consolidated EBITDA will be
annualized for the three month period ending December 31, 2006, for the six
month period ending March 31, 2007 and for the nine month period ending June 31,
2007, and calculated based on trailing four fiscal quarter periods thereafter).
The Second Lien Loan Agreement also requires compliance by Goldking
with certain financial covenants on a quarterly basis as follows: (1) Goldking
must not permit its ratio of consolidated current assets to consolidated current
liabilities, as defined, to be less than 1.0 for any fiscal quarter beginning
December 31, 2006; (2) Goldking must not permit its ratio of consolidated EBITDA
to consolidated net interest expense, as defined, to be less than 2.0
(calculated as noted above in the First Amended Credit Agreement covenant); (3)
so long as amounts remain outstanding under the Term B Loan, Goldking must not
permit its consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA, as defined,
to exceed 4.5 for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, 4.25 for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, 4.0 for the fiscal quarter ended June 31,
2007, 3.75 for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 and 3.5 for each
fiscal quarter thereafter; and, (4) Goldking will not permit at any time the
ratio of its present value of proved mineral interests to Consolidated Funded
Indebtedness to be less than 1.5.
The First Amended Credit Agreement restricts Goldking's ability to
incur additional debt, except for certain pre-existing letters of credit,
unsecured letters of credit permitted in connection with certain allowed
derivative contracts, the financing of Borrower's annual insurance premium and
certain other unsecured debt in an amount not to exceed $500,000, or to dispose
of oil and natural gas properties except as provided for in the First Amended
Credit Agreement. The First Amended Credit Agreement prohibits transactions
which hedge in excess of 85% of Goldking's anticipated future production of
proved crude oil and natural gas.
B-18
Goldking was in violation of the Consolidated EBITDA to Consolidated
Net Interest Expense covenant and the Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to
Consolidated EBITDA covenant for the quarter ending December 31, 2006 under the
First Amended Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Loan Agreement. Goldking's
lenders under the First Amended Credit Agreement and Second Lien Loan Agreement
waived these covenants for the quarter ending December 31, 2006. Goldking's
lenders under the First Amended Credit Agreement amended the Agreement such that
Goldking's ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to Consolidated Net Interest Expense for
the quarter ending March 31, 2007 must not be less than 2.0 to 1.0, and such
that Goldking's ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA
for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 must not exceed 5.0 to 1.0. The Agreement
was also amended such that the calculation of these two ratios is conducted for
the quarter ending March 31, 2007 based on the period January 1, 2007 through
March 31, 2007, for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 based on the period April
1, 2007 through June 30, 2007 annualized, for the quarter ending September 30,
2007 based on the period April 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 annualized,
for the quarter ending December 31, 2007 based on the period April 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007 annualized, and for the quarter ending March 31, 2008,
and thereafter, based on the four trailing consecutive quarters including such
quarter.
Goldking's lenders under the Second Lien Loan Agreement amended the
Agreement such that Goldking's ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to
Consolidated EBITDA for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 must not exceed 5.0 to
1.0. The Agreement was also amended such that the calculation of Consolidated
EBITDA to Consolidated Net Interest Expense and Consolidated Funded Indebtedness
to Consolidated EBITDA ratios are conducted for the quarter ending March 31,
2007 based on the period January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2007 annualized, for
the quarter ending June 30, 2007 based on the period April 1, 2007 through June
30, 2007 annualized, for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 based on the
period April 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 annualized, for the quarter
ending December 31, 2007 based on the period April 1, 2007 through December 31,
2007 annualized, and for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, and thereafter,
based on the four trailing consecutive quarters including such quarter. Goldking
expected to be in compliance with these amended financial covenants for the
quarter ending March 31, 2007 and thereafter.
The Credit Agreement required an upfront fee of $2,375,000, in
addition to an annual administrative agency fee of $50,000. The upfront fee was
allocated to the facilities available under the Credit Agreement (and later to
the facilities available under the First Amended Credit Agreement and the Second
Lien Loan Agreement, which facilities did not result in additional upfront
fees), and is being amortized over the respective lives of the facilities. The
annual administrative agency fee is being amortized over a one-year period. At
September 30, 2006, Goldking expensed approximately $300,000 in unamortized fees
related to its previous facility.
Outstanding letters of credit under the Credit Agreement totaled
$4,125,000 at September 30, 2006. In addition, Goldking had $825,000 of
outstanding letters of credit provided by other financial institutions.
Prior to the Credit Agreement, the First Amended Credit Agreement
and the Second Lien Loan Agreement, Goldking Energy Corporation (later renamed
Goldking Texas, Inc., then merged into Goldking Operating Company), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Goldking, had a credit facility with Bank of America,
N.A. and Union Bank of California, N.A. (the, "Former Credit Agreement"). The
Former Credit Agreement, which was guaranteed by Goldking, consisted of the
following three loan facilities:
Revolver--$40 million initial borrowing base, maturing on October
31, 2008. The Former Credit Agreement also provided for letters of
credit not exceeding $6.0 million if Goldking still had available
borrowings under the Revolver.
Term B--$15 million limit, maturing on October 31, 2008.
Term C--$10 million limit, maturing on October 31, 2006.
Interest on the facilities was payable as it accrued on the
fifteenth day following the last day of each fiscal quarter, or at other times
as were agreed to by the parties at the time of the borrowings. The interest
rates under the facilities consisted of a base rate margin plus the greater of
the banks prime rate or the sum of (i) the Federal Funds Rate in effect on the
B-19
day of the borrowing, plus (ii) one half of one percent. Goldking also had an
option in certain cases to elect a Eurodollar Tranche which bear interest at the
Adjusted LIBOR Rate. The Adjusted LIBOR Rate is the rate per annum equal to the
quotient obtained by dividing (a) the applicable LIBOR Rate by (b) 1.00 minus
the Eurodollar Reserve Percentage.
The applicable base rate margin for the Revolver loans ranged from
..0% to .75%, depending on the ratio of outstanding credit to borrowing base. The
applicable base rate margin for the Term B and Term C loans were 2.25% and
3.75%, respectively, except that the applicable base rate margin with respect to
each base rate that is a Term C loan was to be increased by .5% per annum on
each of January 1, 2006 and on the first day of each fiscal quarter thereafter.
The Former Credit Agreement was secured by first and prior liens
covering and encumbering the mineral interests owned by Goldking and its
subsidiaries, the capital stock of its current and future subsidiaries and all
personal property owned by Goldking and its subsidiaries.
The Former Credit Agreement required compliance with certain
covenants, including financial covenants on a quarterly basis. The financial
covenants included maintaining the ratio of consolidated current assets to
consolidated current liabilities, as defined, of at least 1.0 to 1.0, the ratio
of consolidated EBIDTA for the four fiscal quarter period most recently ended to
the consolidated interest expense for such period of at least 2.5 to 1 and, so
long as amounts remained outstanding under the Term C loan, Goldking could not
permit the ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated EBIDTA for
the four fiscal quarter periods most recently ended prior to the determination
period of greater than 4.0 to 1.0.
The Former Credit Agreement restricted Goldking's ability to incur
additional borrowings, except for certain pre-existing letters of credit, debt
permitted by certain allowed derivative contracts and certain other unsecured
debt in an amount not to exceed $500,000, or to dispose of oil and natural gas
properties except as provided for in the Former Credit Agreement. The Former
Credit Agreement also restricted Goldking's ability to enter into speculative
commodity, interest rate, currency or other derivative transactions except as
provided for in the Credit Agreement, required Goldking to hedge at least 75%
and 50% of its anticipated 2006 and 2007 crude oil and natural gas production,
respectively, but prohibited transactions which hedge in excess of 85% of
Goldking's anticipated production from proved crude oil and natural gas.
The Former Credit Agreement required an upfront fee of $500,000, in
addition to an annual administrative agency fee of $35,000. The upfront fee was
allocated to the various facilities available under the Former Credit Agreement,
and was being amortized over their respective lives. The annual administrative
agency fee was amortized over a one-year period. The unamortized fees associated
with the Former Credit Agreement were expensed in conjunction with the new
Credit Agreement.
At December 31, 2005, Goldking was in violation of certain covenants
required under the Former Credit Agreement, and received waivers from the
lending group related to those items. Outstanding letters of credit under the
Former Credit Agreement totaled $2,450,000 at December 31, 2005.
A summary of Goldking's long-term debt follows:
Debt Interest Rate
------------------------------- -------------------------------
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
2006 2005 2006 2005
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Revolver ............... $ 117,000,000 $ 33,950,000 7.235% 6.385%
Term B ................. -- 15,000,000 -- 7.500%
Term C ................. -- 10,000,000 -- 8.831%
First lien term loan ... 19,517,000 -- 10.25% --
Second lien term loan .. 40,000,000 -- 10.36% --
------------- -------------
Outstanding debt ....... 176,517,000 58,950,000
Less: current maturities (19,517,000) (10,000,000)
------------- -------------
Total ............... $ 157,000,000 $ 48,950,000
============= =============
B-20
Goldking's annual maturities of outstanding long-term debt as of
December 31, 2006:
2007......................................................... $ 19,517,000
2008......................................................... --
2009......................................................... --
2010......................................................... 117,000,000
2011......................................................... 40,000,000
-------------
Total..................................................... $ 176,517,000
=============
Short-Term Notes Payable
On October 30, 2006, Goldking entered into a loan agreement with MD
Premium Finance Corporation in the amount of $2,891,027 to finance certain
insurance policies. The loan agreement requires nine monthly payments of
$331,750 beginning November 30, 2006. Interest under the loan agreement is 7.75%
per annum. The loan agreement is secured by any proceeds from losses claimed
under the related insurance policies and any dividends that may be due Goldking
under the policies. As of December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance was
$2,576,801.
On November 1, 2005, Goldking entered into a loan agreement with MD
Premium Finance Corporation in the amount of $1,836,730 to finance certain
insurance policies. The loan agreement required nine monthly payments of
$209,686 beginning December 1, 2005. Interest under the loan agreement was 6.5%
per annum. The loan agreement was secured by any proceeds from losses claimed
under the related insurance policies and any dividends that may have been due
Goldking under the policies. As of December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance
was $1,636,994.
NOTE 8--INCOME TAXES
The income tax provision consists of the following:
Period from
July 27, 2004
Year ended December 31, (Inception) to
--------------------------- December 31,
2006 2005 2004
----------- ----------- --------------
Current Taxes:
Federal ........................................... $ -- $ -- $ --
States ............................................ -- -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
Total current .................................. -- -- --
Deferred Taxes (benefit):
Federal ........................................... (891,364) (456,209) (72,532)
States ............................................ (125,168) (118,398) 15,503
----------- ----------- -----------
Total deferred ................................. $(1,016,532) $ (574,607) $ (57,029)
=========== =========== ===========
Deferred Taxes (Benefit) on other comprehensive income $ 2,410,257 $ (315,143) $ --
=========== =========== ===========
B-21
A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the effective
tax rate is as follows:
Period from
July 27, 2004
Year ended December 31, (Inception) to
------------------------- December 31,
2006 2005 2004
---------- ---------- ---------------
Federal statutory benefit rate effect of: ........... (34.00) (34.00) (34.00)
State taxes, net of federal benefit .............. (5.23) (5.09) 1.78
Conversion of tax status from S-Corp to C-Corp and
other, net .................................... (3.27) 1.65 22.29
---------- ---------- ----------
Effective rate ................................ (42.50) (37.44) (9.93)
========== ========== ==========
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, Goldking had approximately
$24,000,000 and $11,000,000, respectively, of net operating loss carryforwards
for federal income tax purposes, which begin to expire in 2024.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted from the following:
Period from
July 27, 2004
Year ended December 31, (Inception) to
----------------------------- December 31,
2006 2005 2004
------------ ------------ --------------
Deferred tax assets:
State deferred taxes ........................................ $ (66,962) $ 107,025 $ --
Accrued liabilities ......................................... 92,360 -- --
Asset retirement obligation ................................. 1,996,666 1,966,108 27,986
Derivative asset/hedging contracts .......................... 249,800 529,676 2,250
Loss carry forwards ......................................... 8,228,736 3,761,519 181,652
------------ ------------ ------------
Total deferred tax assets ................................ 10,500,600 6,364,328 211,888
Deferred tax liabilities:
State deferred taxes ........................................ -- -- 10,230
Derivative asset/hedging contracts .......................... 1,835,072 -- --
Property, plant and equipment, principally due to differences
in depreciation, amortization, lease impairment and
abandonments ............................................. 9,112,474 5,417,549 144,629
------------ ------------ ------------
Total deferred tax liability ............................. 10,947,546 5,417,549 154,859
------------ ------------ ------------
Net deferred tax asset (liability) ....................... $ (446,946) $ 946,779 $ 57,029
============ ============ ============
B-22
Net deferred tax assets and liabilities were classified in the
consolidated balance sheet as follows:
December 31,
--------------------------
2006 2005
--------- ---------
Current assets ................................ $ -- $ 289,592
Non-current assets ............................ 369,081 657,187
Current liabilities ........................... (816,027) --
--------- ---------
Net deferred tax asset (liability) ........ $(446,946) $ 946,779
========= =========
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management
considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred
tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the
periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon
the projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred
tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that
Goldking will realize the benefits of these deductible differences at December
31, 2006. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be
reduced in the future if estimates of future taxable income during the carry
forward period are reduced.
NOTE 9--EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Goldking has adopted a 401(k) savings plan. Participation is
voluntary, and all regular employees are eligible to participate. Goldking makes
contributions to match certain employee contributions. Goldking recognized
expense related to the 401(k) savings plan in the amount of $248,568 and $52,324
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Goldking did not
recognize any expense related to the 401(k) savings plan for the period from
July 27, 2004 (inception) through December 31, 2004, respectively.
NOTE 10--DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Goldking hedges a portion of forecasted crude oil and natural gas
production with derivative instruments. Goldking uses various derivative
instruments in connection with anticipated crude oil and natural gas sales to
minimize the impact of commodity price fluctuations. The instruments include
fixed price swaps, put options and costless collars. A collar is a combination
of a purchased put option and sold call option. Goldking accounts for its
production hedge derivative instruments as defined in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities", as amended by SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities" and SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of
Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (herein referred
as "SFAS 133"). Under SFAS 133, all derivatives are recorded at fair value on
the balance sheet. Those derivatives designated as cash flow hedges that meet
certain requirements are granted hedge accounting treatment. Generally,
utilizing cash flow hedge accounting, all periodic changes in fair value of the
derivatives designated as hedges that are considered to be effective, as
defined, are recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive income" until the
underlying production is sold and delivered. Goldking is exposed to the risk
that periodic changes will not be effective, as defined, or that the derivatives
will no longer qualify for hedge accounting. Ineffectiveness, as defined,
results when the change in the total fair value of the derivative instrument is
greater than the change in the value of Goldking's expected future cash receipt
for sale of production. To the extent that the periodic changes in the fair
value of the derivatives are not effective, that ineffectiveness is recorded to
"Price risk management activities" in the statement of operations. Likewise, if
a hedge ceases to qualify for hedge accounting, those periodic changes in the
fair value of derivative instruments are recorded to "Price risk management
activities" in the statement of operations in the period of the change.
B-23
During the year ended December 31, 2005, Goldking recognized losses
of $958,682 related to its derivative activities which did not qualify for hedge
accounting. All such transactions settled during the year ending December 31,
2006. Goldking has designated all open derivative transactions as of December
31, 2006 as cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, Goldking has
recorded derivative assets of $7,923,689 and $704,975, respectively, related to
derivative activities. At December 31, 2006, $3,588,984 of this asset was
reflected in current assets and $4,334,705 was reflected as non current assets.
At December 31, 2005 Goldking has recorded liabilities of $811,846 related to
its speculative and hedge accounting derivative activities. None of the
remaining hedged volumes relates to 2006 or 2005 production. Fair market value
is calculated for open contracts at December 31, 2006 using market quotes
received from third parties. Goldking has hedge accounting derivatives in place
to hedge production volumes through 2008.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, Goldking had deferred in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) $3,302,161 and $(496,703), net of tax benefit
(expense) of $(2,095,114) and $315,143, respectively. The change in the
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from December 31, 2006 and 2005
included a gain of $1,143,428, net of tax of, due to the change in value of
other comprehensive income on cash flow hedges entered into in fiscal year 2005
as well as a gain of $2,655,437, net of tax, related to hedges entered into
during fiscal year 2006. There were no reclassifications of prior year end
accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006. The December 31, 2006 balance of accumulated other
comprehensive income includes $2,504,651, net of tax, which will be reclassified
to income during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as the production that
those derivatives are hedging is sold and delivered.
At December 31, 2006, Goldking recognized ineffectiveness income of
$1,453,364 including option premium cost related to exclusion of time values for
hedge accounting. This income was included in "Price risk management activities"
on the statement of operations. Goldking hedges production volumes with NYMEX
basis contracts which are standard contracts for delivery at Cushing, OK and
Henry Hub, LA for crude oil and natural gas respectively. These locations differ
from the production locations and may lead to ineffectiveness due to location
basis differences. Goldking excludes time value for option hedges, which leads
to Goldking recognizing the cost of the option premium in earnings over time.
The excluded time value taken to expense during the 4th quarter ending December
31, 2006, was $1,494,532. The ineffectiveness not including the excluded time
value was $41,168 compared to a change in fair value of hedge accounting
derivatives of $1,453,364. This demonstrates that Goldking was 97% effective on
its derivative hedging activity.
From time to time, if the fair value of an open contract or
contracts exceeds the available credit limit with a particular counterparty,
Goldking could be required to post a letter of credit to further guarantee its
performance. As of December 31, 2006, Goldking did not have any outstanding
letters of credit issued relating to derivative contracts.
Commodity price derivative contracts entered into as of December 31,
2006 are as follows:
Natural Gas Crude Oil
--------------------------- -----------------------------
Average
Average Price price per
Production Period MBtu per MBtu Barrels Bbl
- ------------------------------------------- --------- --------------- ----------- ---------------
2007 Put (counterparty).................... 840,000 $3.75 - $8.50 156,000 $65.00
2007 Collar (counterparty)................. 720,000 $8.50 - $10.85 156,000 $55.00 - $94.60
2007 Swap (counterparty)................... 1,440,000 $7.94 132,000 $69.05
2008 Put (counterparty).................... 730,000 $3.75 - $8.50 120,000 $65.00
2008 Collar (counterparty)................. 480,000 $8.00 - 10.50 96,000 $65.00 - 89.10
2008 Swap (counterparty)................... 960,000 $8.14 120,000 $69.60
B-24
Commodity price derivative contracts entered into as of December 31,
2005 are as follows:
Natural Gas Crude Oil
-------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Average Price Average price
Production Period MBtu Per MBtu Barrels per Bbl
- --------------------------------- --------- ------------- -------- --------------
2006 Put (NYMEX and counterparty) 1,200,000 $8.17 232,000 $53.92
2006 Collar (NYMEX and
counterparty)................ 120,000 $6.00 - 10.00 12,000 $46.00 - 61.00
2007 Collar (counterparty)....... 720,000 Hedge $8.50 - 10.85 120,000 Hedge $55.00 - 65.25
2007 Put (counterparty).......... 120,000 $3.78
2008 Put (counterparty).......... 10,000 $3.75
For natural gas, transactions are generally settled based upon the
NYMEX price on the penultimate trading day of the month for a given NYMEX
contract (the "settlement price"). With respect to any particular put
transaction, the counterparty is required to make a payment to Goldking in the
event that the floating settlement price for any settlement period is less than
the fixed strike price for the transaction. For any particular collar
transaction, the counterparty is required to make a payment to Goldking if the
floating settlement price for any settlement period is below the fixed floor
price for the transaction, and Goldking is required to make payment to the
counterparty if the floating settlement price for any settlement period is above
the ceiling fixed price for the transaction. Goldking is not required to make or
receive any payment in connection with a collar transaction if the floating
settlement price is between the floor and the ceiling. In the case of a swap
transaction, the counterparty is required to make a payment to Goldking if the
floating settlement price for any settlement period is below the fixed swap
price for the transaction, and Goldking is required to make a payment to the
counterparty if the floating settlement price for any settlement period is above
the fixed swap price for the transaction.
NOTE 11--SALES TO MAJOR CUSTOMERS
Below is a table listing purchasers of its natural gas and crude oil
production which individually accounted for 10% or more of total oil and gas
sales for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the period from July
27, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004. In the exploration, development and
production business, production is normally sold to relatively few customers.
However, based on the current demand for natural gas and crude oil, Goldking
believes that the loss of any of its major purchasers would not have a material
adverse effect on its operations.
Period from
Year Ended Year Ended July 27, 2004
December 31, December 31, (inception) to
Major Purchaser 2006 2005 December 31,
- ---------------------------------- ------------ ------------ --------------
Texon LP.......................... 52.5% -- --
Texaco Natural Gas................ 13.1% -- --
Plains Marketing, L.P............. -- 13.1% --
Upstream Energy Service, L.P...... 14.0% 19.9% 12.2%
Cokinos Energy Corp............... -- 14.9% --
Gulfmark Energy Inc............... -- 10.4% --
NOTE 12--COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
Goldking and its subsidiaries are involved in litigation in the
ordinary course of business. These proceedings are subject to the uncertainties
inherent in any litigation. Goldking is defending itself vigorously in all such
matters and does not believe that the ultimate disposition of such proceedings
will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, EOG Resources, Inc.
("EOG") stated its intent to exercise a preferential right to purchase certain
interests in the Wieting Gas Unit at Chocolate Bayou Field, Brazoria County,
B-25
Texas, which, Goldking acquired from EnerVest Energy, L.P during 2005. Goldking
believes it is likely that any dispute on this matter will be resolved among
Goldking, EOG and EnerVest. In a worst case, however, Goldking may be required
to assign its interest in the Wieting Gas Unit to EOG in return for an allocated
portion of the purchase price, which is not anticipated to exceed $720,000,
minus any net proceeds received from these interests after the July 1, 2005
effective date of purchase by Goldking. In this event it is likely that Goldking
will seek additional compensation from EnerVest for its handling of this matter.
Non-Cancelable Leases and Other Commitments
At December 31, 2006, Goldking and its consolidated subsidiaries
held leases and other commitments for buildings, vehicles and equipment
maintenance. Net rental expenses from leases were $293,368, $125,963 and $62,145
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the period from July 27,
2004 (inception) through December 31, 2004, respectively.
Net minimum lease commitments as of December 31, 2006 consist of the
following:
Building
Leases
--------
2007 ................................................. $314,892
2008 ................................................. 253,563
2009 ................................................. 84,521
--------
Total ............................................ $652,976
========
NOTE 13--SUPPLEMENTAL OIL AND NATURAL GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities
of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves. Crude oil and natural gas reserve
engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of
crude oil and natural gas that cannot be precisely measured. The accuracy of any
reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of
engineering and geological interpretation and judgment.
Goldking retained Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc., independent
third-party reserve engineers, to perform an independent evaluation of proved
reserves. Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. evaluated the Bayou Properties,
the Hilcorp Properties, Live Oak Field and all other properties as of January 1,
2007. Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. evaluated the Bayou Properties and
Live Oak Field as of January 1, 2006, and T.J. Smith & Company, Inc. evaluated
all other properties as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. Results of drilling,
testing and production subsequent to the date of the estimates may justify
revision of such estimates. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different
from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.
All of Goldking's reserves are located in the United States.
B-26
Proved Reserves
The following reserve schedule was developed by Goldking's reserve
engineers and sets forth the changes in estimated quantities of proved reserves
of Goldking during each of the periods presented:
Period from
July 27, 2004
(Inception) to
Year Ended Year Ended December 31,
December 31, 2006 December 31, 2005 2004
------------------- ------------------- --------------------
Natural Natural Natural
Oil Gas Oil Gas Oil Gas
(MBbls) (MMcf) (MBbls) (MMcf) (MBbls) (MMcf)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Proved reserves as of:
Beginning of the period (1) ............... 5,491 33,977 414 3,059 156 1,159
Revisions of previous estimates ........... 31 (2,531) (118) (397) (3) (12)
Extensions, discoveries and other additions 377 969 109 1,657 -- --
Production ................................ (532) (3,008) (82) (607) (12) (73)
Sale of minerals in place ................. (73) (1,503) -- -- -- --
Purchase of minerals in place ............. 3,050 34,474 5,168 30,265 273 1,985
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
End of the period .............. 8,344 62,378 5,491 33,977 414 3,059
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
- ----------
(1) The beginning of the year reserves at July 27, 2004 represents the
reserves contributed at formation from the Predecessor Entities.
Proved developed natural gas reserves as of:
July 27, 2004 (1)............................................. 1,159 MMcf
January 1, 2005............................................... 3,020 MMcf
January 1, 2006............................................... 17,439 MMcf
January 1, 2007............................................... 45,711 MMcf
- ----------
(1) The beginning of the year reserves at July 27, 2004 represents the
reserves contributed at formation from the Predecessor Entities.
Proved developed oil reserves as of:
July 27, 2004 (1)............................................. 156,000 Bbls
January 1, 2005............................................... 318,000 Bbls
January 1, 2006............................................... 3,041,000 Bbls
January 1, 2007............................................... 5,268,000 Bbls
- ----------
(1) The beginning of the year reserves at July 27, 2004 represents the
reserves contributed at formation from the Predecessor Entities.
B-27
Oil and Natural Gas Operations
Aggregate results of operations, in connection with Goldking's crude
oil and natural gas producing activities, for each of the periods are shown
below:
Period from
July 27, 2004
Year Ended December 31, (inception) to
----------------------------- December 31,
2006 2005 2004
------------ ------------ --------------
Revenues ...................................................... $ 55,794,335 $ 10,553,338 $ 1,044,804
Production costs (1) .......................................... (25,572,510) (5,260,310) (631,044)
Exploration expenses .......................................... (4,293,599) (2,700) (99,846)
DD&A and valuation provision .................................. (14,722,572) (2,628,178) (240,697)
Accretion expense ............................................. (445,177) (68,076) (16)
------------ ------------ ------------
Income before income taxes .................................... 10,760,477 2,594,074 73,201
Income tax expense ............................................ (4,573,203) (973,093) (7,269)
------------ ------------ ------------
Results of operations from oil and natural gas producing
activities ......................................... $ 6,187,274 $ 1,620,981 $ 65,932
============ ============ ============
- ----------
(1) Production costs consist of oil and natural gas operations expense,
production and ad valorem taxes, plus general and administrative expense
supporting Goldking's oil and natural gas operations.
Costs Incurred in Oil and Natural Gas Activities
Costs incurred in connection with Goldking's crude oil and natural
gas acquisition, exploration and development activities for each of the years
are shown below:
Period from
July 27, 2004
Year ended December 31, (inception) to
---------------------------- December 31,
2006 2005 2004
------------ ------------ -------------
Property acquisition costs:
Proved ...................... $125,833,529 $ 89,367,134 $ 7,183,963
Unproved .................... 292,963 6,860 2,280
------------ ------------ ------------
Total acquisition costs ......... 126,126,492 89,373,994 7,186,243
Exploration costs ............... -- 278,295 51
Development costs ............... 7,376,198 10,705,785 1,288,691
------------ ------------ ------------
Total consolidated operations $133,502,690 $100,358,074 $ 8,474,985
============ ============ ============
Aggregate Capitalized Costs
Aggregate capitalized costs relating to Goldking's crude oil and
natural gas producing activities, including asset retirement costs and related
accumulated DD&A:
December 31,
-------------------------------
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Unproved oil and natural gas properties .... $ 292,963 $ --
Proved oil and natural gas properties ...... 242,042,786 108,826,625
------------- -------------
Total oil and natural gas properties ....... 242,335,749 108,826,625
Accumulated DD&A ........................... (16,795,715) (2,868,875)
------------- -------------
Net capitalized costs .................. $ 225,539,034 $ 105,957,750
============= =============
B-28
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil
and Natural Gas Reserves
The following information is based on Goldking's best estimate of
the required data for the Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash
Flows as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 in accordance with SFAS No. 69,
"Disclosures About Oil and Natural Gas Producing Activities" which requires the
use of a 10% discount rate. This information is not the fair market value, nor
does it represent the expected present value of future cash flows of Goldking's
proved oil and natural gas reserves.
December 31,
-----------------------
2006 2005
--------- ---------
(dollars in thousands)
Future cash inflows .................................................................... $ 906,295 $ 684,100
Future production costs (1) ............................................................ (253,789) (114,600)
Future development costs ............................................................... (85,899) (41,121)
Future income tax expenses ............................................................. (149,318) (164,712)
--------- ---------
Future net cash flows .................................................................. 417,289 363,667
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows ................................. (150,035) (120,348)
--------- ---------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at the end of the year . $ 267,254 $ 243,319
========= =========
- ----------
(1) Production costs include oil and natural gas operations expense,
production ad valorem taxes, transportation costs and general and
administrative expense supporting Goldking's oil and natural gas
operations.
Future cash inflows are computed by applying year-end prices,
adjusted for location and quality differentials on a property-by-property basis,
to year-end quantities of proved reserves, except in those instances where fixed
and determinable price changes are provided by contractual arrangements at
year-end. The discounted future cash flow estimates do not include the effects
of Goldking's derivative instruments. See the following table for average
prices.
December 31,
---------------------
2006 2005
-------- --------
Average crude oil price per Bbl ...................... $ 59.58 $ 59.71
Average natural gas price per Mcf .................... 6.56 10.48
Future production and development costs, which include dismantlement
and restoration expense, are computed by estimating the expenditures to be
incurred in developing and producing Goldking's proved crude oil and natural gas
reserves at the end of the year, based on year-end costs, and assuming
continuation of existing economic conditions.
Future development costs include $35,331,000, $7,806,000 and
$1,153,000--that Goldking expects to spend in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
to develop proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves.
Future income tax expenses are computed by applying the appropriate
year-end statutory tax rates to the estimated future pretax net cash flows
relating to Goldking's proved crude oil and natural gas reserves, less the tax
bases of the properties involved. The future income tax expenses give effect to
tax credits and allowances, but do not reflect the impact of general and
administrative costs and exploration expenses of ongoing operations relating to
Goldking's proved crude oil and natural gas reserves.
B-29
Sources of Changes in Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
Principal changes in the aggregate standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows attributable to Goldking's proved crude oil and
natural gas reserves, as required by SFAS No. 69, at year end are set forth in
the table below.
Period from
July 27, 2004
Year ended December 31, (inception) to
----------------------- December 31,
2006 2005 2004
--------- --------- --------------
(dollars in thousands)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at the
beginning of the year ......................................... $ 243,319 $ 6,528 $ 4,394
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs . 13,776 13,377 --
Revisions of previous quantity estimates .......................... (54,573) (6,295) (895)
Changes in estimated future development costs ..................... -- -- --
Purchases (sales) of minerals in place ............................ 106,780 400,623 1,905
Net changes in prices and production costs ........................ (76,561) (63,044) 138
Accretion of discount ............................................. 39,206 6,235 667
Sales of oil and natural gas produced, net of production costs .... (30,222) (5,293) (414)
Development costs incurred during the period ...................... 7,376 3,992 --
Net change in income taxes ........................................ 18,153 (112,804) 733
--------- --------- ---------
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at the
end of the year ............................................ $ 267,254 $ 243,319 $ 6,528
========= ========= =========
NOTE 14--SUBSEQUENT EVENT
Goldking Energy Holdings, LP, a Texas limited partnership and the
sole shareholder of Goldking expects to enter into a binding Stock Purchase and
Sale Agreement no later than April 30, 2007 to sell 100% of the outstanding
stock of Goldking to an unrelated party. This transaction has been preliminarily
approved by Goldking's board of directors and is expected to close by June 30,
2007.
B-30
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS OF GOLDKING
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this
information statement. This discussion and analysis contains forward looking
statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including
statements using terminology such as "may," "will," "expects," "plans,"
"initiatives", "intends," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," or
"potential," or a similar negative phrase or other comparable terminology
regarding beliefs, hopes, plans, expectations or intentions for the future.
Forward looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Goldking's
ability to predict results or the actual future effect of plans, initiatives or
strategies is inherently uncertain and the actual results and timing of certain
events could differ materially from Goldking's current expectations.
Overview
Goldking is a growing, independent energy company focused on the
exploration, exploitation and development of oil and natural gas properties
located onshore and in state waters in the Gulf Coast region of the United
States. Since Goldking's incorporation in July 2004, they have completed
numerous acquisitions in their core geographic area, specifically targeting
under-exploited and under-explored fields that had significant prospective
acreage and high net revenue interests. Goldking's fields are primarily faulted,
salt core structures characterized by multiple pay zones, many of which have not
been drilled or completed. They believe this represents a significant
opportunity to add reserves and grow production through the application of
proven drilling and imaging technology. As they have built their property base,
they have also assembled a talented and experienced technical team with proven
expertise in evaluating and discovering and drilling and producing from complex
reservoirs along the Gulf Coast. Goldking has taken the same targeted approach
that they used in compiling their portfolio of assets to hiring highly skilled
technical and operational people with backgrounds in their core region.
In December 2004, Goldking completed the Live Oak Acquisition from
Dunhill Exploration and Production, LLC. In October 2005, Goldking completed the
acquisition of the Bayou Properties (the "Bayou Acquisition") from EnerVest
which it believes contains significant development and exploration
opportunities. In September 2006, Goldking completed the acquisition of the
Hilcorp Properties which diversified its assets and added meaningful scale with
significant PDP reserves. Goldking financed these acquisitions with a
combination of funding from private equity stock investments, bank financings
and cash flow from operations.
As of December 31, 2006, based on the Reserve Report prepared by the
independent engineering firm of Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. (the "CG&A
Report"), Goldking had 112.4 Bcfe of estimated proved reserves with a PV-10 of
$362.9 million. Average prices used in determining PV-10 were $5.62 per Mcf of
natural gas and $61.06 per barrel of oil each with appropriate adjustments for
quality and location applied. These prices do not reflect the impact of the
hedging activities.
The following table summarizes of Goldking's property acquisitions.
Price
Purchase Net Proved per
Acquisition Date Acquired Price Reserves Mcfe
- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ---------- ---------- -----
($ millions) (Bcfe)
Live Oak(1)............................................... December 15, 2004 $ 6.0 7.5 $0.80
Bayou(2).................................................. October 31, 2005 89.0 45.4 1.96
Hilcorp(3)................................................ September 28, 2006 126.0 53.3 2.36
---------- ----- -----
Total................................................................... $ 221.0 106.2 $2.08
========== ===== =====
- ----------
(1) Includes payment of a $0.9 million closing adjustment by Goldking with an
effective date of August 1, 2004.
(2) Includes payment of a $5.5 million closing adjustment by EnerVest with an
effective date of July 1, 2005.
(3) No closing adjustment paid with an effective date of September 1, 2006.
B-31
Capital Expenditures
Goldking has developed an active capital expenditure program to take
advantage of its inventory of drilling prospects. Goldking capital expenditures
included $89 million in 2005 and $126 million in 2006 for acquisitions.
Goldking's exploration, exploitation and development drilling capital
expenditures were approximately $16.1 million in 2006.
Trends Affecting Goldking's Results of Operations
Bayou and Hilcorp Properties Acquisitions. Goldking's results of
operations reflect the inclusion of the Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005
and the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties on September 28, 2006. Because of
Goldking's growth through acquisitions, its historical results of operations and
period-to-period comparison of these results and certain financial data may not
be meaningful or indicative of future results.
Production Trends. Average daily production of natural gas increased
from 462 Mcf per day during the period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to
December 31, 2004 to 1,662 Mcf per day for the year ended December 31, 2005 to
8,242 Mcf per day for the year ended December 31, 2006. Average daily production
of oil increased from 77 Bbl per day during the period from July 27, 2004
(inception) to December 31, 2004 to 224 Bbl per day for the year ended December
31, 2005 to 1,458 Bbl per day for the year ended December 31, 2006. Natural gas
and oil production has increased since 2004 due to the Live Oak, Bayou and
Hilcorp Properties acquisitions. Goldking expects its 2007 natural gas and oil
production to increase due to its acquisition of the Hilcorp properties on
September 28, 2006 and combined exploration and development activity of its
existing properties.
Natural Gas and Oil Prices. Goldking's revenues are dependent on the
prevailing prices of natural gas and oil and its ability to effectively hedge
production to minimize adverse fluctuations in prices. Higher natural gas and
oil prices have led to a higher demand for drilling rigs, operating personnel
and field supplies and services, and have caused increases in the cost of those
goods and services. To date, higher sales prices have offset higher field costs.
Future earnings and cash flows are dependent on Goldking's ability to manage its
overall cost structure to a level that allows for profitable production.
Goldking's future earnings and cash flows are dependent on its ability to manage
its overall cost structure to a level that allows for profitable production.
Goldking's expectations with respect to future production rates are
subject to a number of uncertainties, including those associated with the
availability and cost of drilling rigs and third party services, natural gas and
oil prices, the potential for mechanical problems, permitting issues, drilling
success rates, the availability of acceptable delivery and sales arrangements
with respect to the natural gas and crude oil production and the accuracy of its
assumptions regarding the sustainability of historical growth rates, weather and
other uncertainties. See "Risk Factors--Risks Related to Our Business."
Production Expenses. Production expenses, which are driven by
industry demand and competition for labor and services from the 2005 hurricane
season, have caused substantial product and wage inflation. Also, given the age
of much of Goldking's field facilities and the ever-increasing regulatory
environment, a company focused on growth such as Goldking can expect to
experience increasing production expenditures. However, with anticipated
expanding production volumes that should result from exploration, exploitation
and development expenditures during 2007, per-unit costs are expected to begin
decreasing during the second half of 2007 and on into 2008.
General and Administration Expenses. In order to manage and maximize
growth, Goldking increased its professional staff, which has resulted in
increased general and administrative costs. In the fourth quarter of 2005 and
throughout 2006, Goldking incurred substantial costs associated with the
integration of the Bayou and the Hilcorp Properties acquisitions, various system
conversion costs and professional fees related to its annual audit and related
activities. Additional integration and systems conversion costs will be incurred
and substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of 2007.
B-32
Debt Service Obligations. The indebtedness Goldking incurred in the
acquisition of the Bayou Properties and Hilcorp Properties significantly
increased its debt service obligations.
Significant Factors Affecting Revenues and Expenses
Revenues
Natural gas and oil sales. Goldking's revenues are generated from
sales of natural gas and oil and are substantially dependent on prevailing
prices of natural gas and oil. Prices for natural gas and oil are subject to
large fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of or
demand for natural gas and oil, market uncertainty and a variety of additional
factors beyond Goldking's control. Natural gas and oil prices have fluctuated
substantially from 2004 to 2006. Average prices received per Mcf of natural gas
were $7.37, $10.01 and $7.66 during the period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to
December 31, 2004, the year ended December 31, 2005, and the year ended December
31, 2006, respectively. Average prices received per Bbl of oil were $41.79,
$54.84 and $61.54 during the period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to December
31, 2004, the year ended December 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2006,
respectively.
Goldking enters into derivative arrangements for a portion of its
natural gas and oil production to achieve a more predictable cash flow and to
reduce its exposure to adverse fluctuations in the prices of natural gas and
oil. For derivative instruments that are designated as a hedge, to the extent
the instrument is price effective, Goldking defers recognition of any gains and
losses in the instrument until it records revenue from the production associated
with that instrument. Until their recognition, these deferred gains and losses
are classified as unrealized gains or losses on derivative contracts on
Goldking's balance sheet. Upon their recognition, these gains and losses are
included with the revenue received from the associated production. For
derivative instruments that are not classified as a hedge and for hedges, to the
extent they are not price effective, Goldking recognizes in each period any gain
or loss from settlement or mark-to-market valuations as price risk management
activities in the statement of operations. Rising oil and natural gas prices
created $1.0 million in derivative losses in 2005, and fluctuating oil prices
and lower natural gas prices led to $0.3 million in derivative gains during the
year ended December 31, 2006. In addition, at December 31, 2006, Goldking had
unrealized gains in derivative contracts that were designated as hedges of $3.3
million, net of tax. These unrealized gains are a result of the mark-to-market
valuations for derivative contracts designated as hedges. Gains and losses from
price risk management activities are a result of settlements and mark-to market
valuations from derivative contracts not designated as hedges as well as the
price ineffectiveness from derivative contracts designated as hedges. Any
payments actually due to or from counterparties in the future on these
derivatives will ultimately be offset by corresponding changes in prices
received from the sale of natural gas and oil production. See "Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk".
Costs and Expenses
Goldking's costs and expenses primarily involve the obligation of
operating and maintaining its wells.
Oil and natural gas operating expenses. Oil and natural gas
operating expenses include certain direct employment-related costs, repair and
maintenance costs, electrical power and fuel costs and other expenses necessary
to maintain operations. Oil and natural gas operating expenses are driven in
part by the type of commodity produced, the level of maintenance activity and
the geographical location of its properties. Goldking capitalizes workover costs
that result in reserve additions and includes the remainder in oil and natural
gas operating expenses.
Production and ad valorem taxes. Production taxes represent the
state taxes imposed on mineral production. Production taxes are calculated based
on sales revenues or volume of sales depending on the state. Ad valorem taxes
represent property taxes.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation, depletion
and amortization represent the expensing of the capitalized costs of the natural
gas and oil properties and the other property and equipment.
B-33
Oil and natural gas exploration expenses. Exploration expenses
include the geological and geophysical costs relating to Goldking's exploration
efforts and costs related to unsuccessful exploratory wells.
Asset retirement accretion expense. Asset retirement accretion
expense relates to the accretion of the present value of the asset retirement
obligations using Goldking's credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate in effect
when the asset retirement obligation was initially recorded.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative
expenses include employee compensation and benefits, professional fees or legal,
accounting and other advisory services, corporate overhead and franchise taxes.
Other Expenses and Income
Interest and other income. Goldking also generates interest income
from its cash deposits and other income (loss) from gains or losses on the sale
of assets.
Income tax benefit. Income tax benefit represents current and
deferred income taxes. Taxes are calculated by applying the statutory tax rates
in effect for the applicable period to book loss. These calculated income tax
amounts are further adjusted to reflect the impact of federal and state
valuation allowances and to adjust for the tax effect of book income and book
expense items which are not taxable or deductible for tax purposes.
B-34
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected operating data for the
periods indicated.
For the
Period from Fiscal Years Ended
July 27 to December 31,
December 31, ---------------------
2004 2005 2006
-------- -------- --------
(dollars in thousands,
except for operating data)
Operating Results Data:
Revenues and other:
Oil and gas revenues .......................................... $ 1,045 $ 10,553 $ 55,795
Price risk management activities .............................. (7) (959) 324
Gain on sales of oil and gas properties ....................... -- 51 3,305
Interest and other income ..................................... 22 96 481
-------- -------- --------
Total revenue .......................................... 1,060 9,741 59,905
Costs and expenses:
Oil and gas operating expenses ................................ 560 4,390 20,135
Production and ad valorem taxes ............................... 71 870 5,437
Depreciation, depletion and amortization ...................... 241 2,659 14,958
Oil and gas exploration expenses .............................. 100 3 4,294
Asset retirement accretion expense ............................ -- 68 445
General and administrative expenses ........................... 656 2,505 9,304
-------- -------- --------
Total operating expense ................................ 1,628 10,495 54,573
Income (loss) from operations ................................. (568) (754) 5,332
Interest expense .............................................. (6) (781) (7,723)
-------- -------- --------
Loss before income taxes ............................... (574) (1,535) (2,391)
Income tax benefit ............................................ 57 575 1,016
-------- -------- --------
Net loss .................................................. $ (517) $ (960) $ (1,375)
======== ======== ========
Net sales volumes:
Oil (Mbbl) .................................................... 12 82 532
Natural gas (MMcf) ............................................ 73 607 3,008
-------- -------- --------
Natural gas equivalents (MMcfe) ........................ 145 1,099 6,200
Average realized sales price (excluding derivative activities):
Oil ($/Bbl) ................................................... $ 41.84 $ 54.84 $ 61.54
Natural gas ($/Mcf) ........................................... 7.37 10.01 7.66
Average per Mcfe:
Oil and natural gas operating expense ......................... $ 3.86 $ 3.99 $ 3.25
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion ........... 1.66 2.42 2.41
General and administrative .................................... 4.53 2.28 1.50
B-35
Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2005
Oil and gas revenue. Goldking's oil and gas revenues increased to
$55.8 million for 2006 as compared to $10.6 million for 2005 due primarily to
the Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005, and to a lesser extent the
acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties in September 2006, offset by the sale of
certain non-operated properties in August 2006.
Goldking recognized gains of $0.3 million related to derivatives
that were not designated as hedges during 2006 compared to a loss of $1.0
million during 2005 due to a reduction in prices related to oil and gas
production at December 31, 2006.
During 2006, Goldking recognized gains on the sale of oil and gas
properties of $3.3 million due primarily to the sale of the Buna Field in May
2006 and the sale of substantially all of its remaining non-operated properties
in August 2006. There were no property sales during 2005.
Oil and gas operating expenses. Goldking's oil and gas operating
expenses increased to $20.1 million for 2006 as compared to $4.4 million for
2005 due primarily to the Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005, and to a lesser
extent the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties in September 2006, offset by
the sale of certain non-operated properties in August 2006.
Production and ad valorem taxes. Production and ad valorem taxes
increased to $5.4 million for 2006 as compared to $0.9 million for 2005 due
primarily to the Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005, and to a lesser extent
the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties in September 2006, offset by the sale
of certain non-operated properties in August 2006.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation, depletion
and amortization expenses increased to $15.0 million for 2006 as compared to
$2.7 million for 2005 as a result of a full year of amortization related to the
Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005, and to a lesser extent three months of
amortization related to the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties in September
2006.
Oil and gas exploration expenses. Goldking's oil and gas exploration
expenses of $4.3 million for 2006 included six dry holes totaling $3.1 million
and geological and geophysical expenses totaling $1.2 million. There were de
minimis oil and gas exploration expenses during 2005.
Asset retirement accretion expense. Goldking's asset retirement
accretion expense increased to $0.4 million for 2006 from less than $0.1 million
for 2005 due primarily to the Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005, and to a
lesser extent the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties in September 2006.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative
expenses increased to $9.3 million for 2006 as compared to $2.5 million for 2005
due in most part to a significant increase in staffing levels and related costs
occasioned by the increased scope of operations associated with the Bayou
Acquisition on October 31, 2005 and the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties in
September 2006, as well as the costs associated with evaluating, completing and
integrating both acquisitions.
Interest expense. Interest expense of $7.7 million for 2006 was
related primarily to borrowings used to fund the Bayou Acquisition. In addition,
interest expense for 2006 included amortization of debt issue costs associated
with the senior credit facility of $0.5 million and the write-off of debt issue
costs of $0.3 million associated with a credit facility that was replaced in
September 2006 by the current senior credit facility created in part to fund the
acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties. Interest expense during 2005 was $0.8
million, and related primarily to borrowings used to fund the Bayou Acquisition
in October 2005.
B-36
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to the Period from July 27, 2004
(Inception) to December 31, 2004
Oil and gas revenue. Goldking's revenues increased to $10.6 million
for 2005 as compared to $1.0 million for the period from July 27, 2004
(inception) to December 31, 2004 due to the Bayou Acquisition on October 31,
2005, the Live Oak Acquisition on December 15, 2004, and a full year of
operations in 2005.
Included in revenue for 2005 was a loss of $1.0 million related to
derivatives that were not designated as hedges. The corresponding loss in 2004
was de minimis. The increase in the loss was due to a general increase in
commodity prices throughout the year 2005.
Oil and gas operating expenses. Oil and gas operating expenses
increased to $4.4 million for 2005 as compared to $0.6 million for the period
from July 27, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004 due to the Bayou Acquisition
on October 31, 2005, the Live Oak Acquisition on December 15, 2004, and a full
year of operations in 2005.
Production and ad valorem taxes. Production and ad valorem taxes
increased to $0.9 million for 2005 as compared to less than $0.1 million for the
period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004 due to the Bayou
Acquisition on October 31, 2005, the Live Oak Acquisition on December 15, 2004
and a full year of operations in 2005.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation, depletion
and amortization expense increased to $2.7 million for 2005 as compared to $0.2
million for the period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004 as a
result of amortization related to the Bayou Acquisition during November and
December 2005 and the full year amortization of the property acquired in the
Live Oak Acquisition on December 15, 2004.
Oil and gas exploration expenses. Oil and natural gas exploration
expenses for 2005 were de minimis. Oil and gas exploration expenses for the
period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004 were $0.1 million,
and included two dry holes and no geological and geophysical expenses.
Asset retirement accretion expense. Asset retirement accretion
expense was less than $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 due to
the Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative
expenses increased to $2.5 million for 2005 as compared to $0.7 million for the
period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004 due to the increased
scope of operations associated with the Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005
and the Live Oak Acquisition on December 15, 2004 and a full year of operations
in 2005.
Interest expense. Interest expense of $0.8 million for 2005
increased from a few thousand dollars for the period from July 27, 2004
(inception) to December 31, 2004 as a result of the borrowing under Goldking's
credit facility to fund the Bayou Acquisition on October 31, 2005.
Net loss. The net loss of $1.0 million for 2005 as compared to the
net loss of $0.5 million for the period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to
December 31, 2004 was primarily due to increased operating and general and
administrative expenses associated with the Bayou Acquisition on October 31,
2005. Moreover, the properties acquired in the Bayou Acquisition were not at
full production capacity during November and December 2005 due to the impact of
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita during the third quarter of 2005.
B-37
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview. Goldking's principal requirements for capital are to fund
its exploration, development and acquisition activities and to satisfy its
contractual obligations, primarily for the repayment of debt and any amounts
owed during the period related to its hedging positions. Goldking's uses of
capital include the following:
o drilling and completing new natural gas and oil wells;
o constructing and installing new production infrastructure;
o acquiring additional reserves and producing properties;
o acquiring and maintaining its lease acreage position and its
seismic resources;
o maintaining, repairing and enhancing existing natural gas and
oil wells;
o plugging and abandoning depleted or uneconomic wells and
disassembly and removal of abandoned facilities; and
o indirect costs related to exploration activities, including
payroll and other expenses attributable to exploration
professional staff.
The following table sets forth selected cash flow data for the
periods indicated.
Goldking Energy Corporation
----------------------------------------------
Period from
July 27, 2004
(inception) to Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2004 2005 2006
-------------- ------------ ------------
(dollars in thousands)
Cash Flow:
- ------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities ........................... $ (147) $ 161 $ 10,394
Net cash used in investing activities .... (7,429) (95,889) (134,564)
Net cash provided by financing activities 14,457 99,267 122,517
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents .............. $ 6,881 $ 3,539 $ (1,653)
Cash flows provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by
operating activities increased to $10.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2006 as compared to $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This
increase was primarily a result of increased cash flow from oil and natural gas
properties acquired on October 31, 2005, and to a lesser extent, properties
acquired on September 28, 2006. In addition to fluctuations in other operating
assets and liabilities that are caused by the timing of cash receipts and
disbursements, commodity prices, production volumes and operating expenses are
the key factors influencing changes in operating cash flows.
Goldking's operating cash flow is sensitive to many variables, the
most significant of which is the volatility of prices for natural gas and oil
produced. Prices for these commodities are determined primarily by prevailing
market conditions. Regional and worldwide economic activity, weather and other
substantially variable factors influence market conditions for these products.
These factors are beyond Goldking's control and are difficult to predict. While
the use of some hedging and derivative arrangements may limit the downside risk
of adverse price movements, it also may limit future gains from favorable
movements.
B-38
To mitigate some of the potential negative impact on cash flow,
Goldking utilizes commodity-based derivative instruments with major financial
institutions to reduce exposure to fluctuations in the price of crude oil and
natural gas. Goldking uses financially settled crude oil and natural gas puts,
swaps and zero-cost collars. Any gains or losses resulting from the change in
fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedges or from hedging
transactions that are determined to be ineffective are recorded in income,
whereas gains and losses from the settlement of hedging contracts are recorded
in crude oil and natural gas revenue.
With a financially settled purchased put, the counterparty is
required to make a payment to Goldking if the settlement price for any
settlement period is below the hedged price of the transaction. With a swap, the
counterparty is required to make a payment to Goldking if the settlement price
for any settlement period is below the hedged price for the transaction, and
Goldking is required to make a payment to the counterparty if the settlement
price for any settlement period is above the hedged price for the transaction.
With a zero-cost collar, the counterparty is required to make a payment to
Goldking if the settlement price for any settlement period is below the floor
price of the collar, and Goldking is required to make a payment to the
counterparty if the settlement price for any settlement period is above the cap
price for the collar.
Cash flows used in investing activities. Net cash used in investing
activities increased to $134.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to $95.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Payments to
purchase oil and gas properties increased to $123.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to $80.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2005.
Cash flows provided by financing activities. Net cash provided by
financing activities increased to $122.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2006 as compared to $99.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 due to an
increase in long-term borrowing to $117.6 million for the year ended December
31, 2006 as compared to $59 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 offset
by a reduction in capital contributions from Goldking's principal shareholder to
$6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to $39.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Equity contributions. Below is a summary of the equity contributions
received during the periods ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006:
o During the period from July 27, 2004 (inception) to December
31, 2004, Goldking received net cash contributions of $14.8
million from its majority shareholders.
o During the year ended December 31, 2005, Goldking received net
cash contributions of $39.2 million from its majority
shareholders.
o During the year ended December 31, 2006, Goldking received net
cash contributions of $6.4 million from its majority
shareholders.
Senior Credit Facility. On September 28, 2006, Goldking Operating
Company, Goldking's wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a $260,000,000 senior
secured first lien credit facility ("senior credit facility") with Bank of
America, N.A. and Union Bank of California, N.A. The Senior Credit Facility,
which is guaranteed by Goldking Energy Corporation, initially consisted of (1) a
$200,000,000 revolving credit facility with an initial borrowing base of
$130,000,000, including a letter of credit sub-limit of $20,000,000 and (2) a
$60,000,000 term B loan, which matures September 28, 2007. The revolving credit
facility matures on September 28, 2010. Goldking borrowed $117,000,000 under the
revolving credit facility on September 28, 2006 and had $4,125,000 in
outstanding letters of credit. Goldking borrowed $60 million under the term B
loan facility on September 28, 2006. Goldking was in violation of the
Consolidated EBITDA to Consolidated Net Interest Expense covenant and the
Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA covenant for the quarter
ending December 31, 2006 under the First Amended Credit Agreement and the Second
Lien Loan Agreement. Goldking's lenders under the First Amended Credit Agreement
and the Second Lien Loan Agreement waived these covenants for the quarter ending
December 31, 2006. The First Amended Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Loan
Agreement will be paid off by the Shareholder with the proceeds it receives from
Dune for the GEC Common Stock.
B-39
On December 20, 2006, Goldking amended the Senior Credit Facility
with Bank of America and certain other lenders to replace the existing $60
million term B loan with a $20 million first lien term loan due September 28,
2007 and a $40 million second lien term loan due September 28, 2011.
Capital expenditures. Capital expenditures for the year ended
December 31, 2006 were $137.8 million, which included $123.8 million related to
the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties and development costs related to the
Bayou Properties. Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2005 were
$92.1 million and included $80.4 million related to the acquisition of the Bayou
Properties. Capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
do not include the asset retirement obligations recorded in conjunction with the
acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties and the Bayou Acquisition.
Capital Resources. Goldking intended to fund its capital expenditure
program, contractual commitments, including settlement of derivative contracts
and future acquisitions, from cash flows from operations and borrowings under
its credit facility. Goldking primarily used cash to fund acquisitions and
exploration and development expenditures during the year ended December 31,
2006, the year ended December 31, 2005 and the period from July 27, 2004
(inception) to December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2006, Goldking had a working
capital deficit of $12.2 million.
Contractual Obligations. The table below provides estimates of the
timing of future payments that Goldking is obligated to make based on agreements
in place at December 31, 2006. All amounts listed in the table below are
categorized as liabilities on Goldking's balance sheet with the exception of
lease payments for operating leases, performance bonds and outstanding letters
of credit issued for performance obligations. Contractual obligations related to
the credit facility include only payments of principal.
As of December 31, 2006
Payments Due by Period
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1 year or less 2 - 3 years 4 - 5 years after 5 years
-------- -------------- ----------- ----------- -------------
(dollars in thousands)
Contractual Obligations:
Revolver ............................... $117,000 $ -- $ -- $117,000 $ --
First and second lien loan ............. 59,517 19,517 -- 40,000 --
Operating lease-office ................. 653 315 338 -- --
Short term note payable ................ 2,577 2,577 -- -- --
Letters of credit ...................... 4,950 4,950 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Contractual Obligations ... 184,697 27,359 338 157,000 --
Other Long-Term Obligations:
Asset retirement obligations ........... 6,008 -- -- 209 5,779
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Contractual Obligations and
Commitments ................. $190,705 $ 27,359 $ 338 $157,229 $ 5,779
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Inflation and Seasonality
Inflation. Historically, general inflationary trends have not had a
material effect on operating results. However, Goldking has experienced
inflationary pressure on technical staff compensation and the cost of oilfield
services and equipment due to the increase in drilling activity and competitive
pressures resulting from higher oil and natural gas prices in recent years.
Seasonality. Operating revenues and expenses are generally not
affected by seasonal changes. At times, there may be seasonal declines in
natural gas prices, usually in autumn, when natural gas storage facilities near
full capacity. These seasonal declines in prices are usually temporary.
B-40
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market-sensitive instruments and risk management. Market risk is the
potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as
commodity prices and interest rates. Goldking's primary market risk exposure is
commodity price risk. This exposure is discussed in detail below.
Commodity price risk. Goldking utilizes commodity-based derivative
instruments with major financial institutions to reduce exposure to fluctuations
in the price of crude oil and natural gas. Goldking uses financially settled
crude oil and natural gas puts, swaps and zero-cost collars. Any gains or losses
resulting from the change in fair value from hedging transactions that are
determined to be ineffective are recorded in income, whereas gains and losses
from the settlement of hedging contracts are recorded in crude oil and natural
gas revenue.
Interest rate risk. Goldking's exposure to changes in interest rates
relates primarily to long-term debt obligations. Goldking may utilize interest
rate derivatives to alter interest rate exposure in an attempt to reduce
interest rate expense related to existing debt issues. Interest rate derivatives
are used solely to modify interest exposure and not to modify the overall
leverage of the debt portfolio. Goldking is exposed to changes in interest rates
as a result of the senior credit facility.
Goldking will generally invest cash equivalents in high-quality
credit instruments consisting primarily of money market funds with maturities of
90 days or less. Goldking does not expect any material loss from cash
equivalents and therefore Goldking believes its interest rate exposure on
invested funds is not material.
Hedging. With a financially settled purchased put, the counterparty
is required to make a payment to us if the floating settlement price for any
settlement period is below the fixed settlement price of the transaction. With a
swap, the counterparty is required to make a payment to us if the settlement
price for any settlement period is below the hedged price for the transaction,
and Goldking is required to make a payment to the counterparty if the settlement
price for any settlement period is above the hedged price for the transaction.
With a zero-cost collar, the counterparty is required to make a payment to us if
the settlement price for any settlement period is below the floor price of the
collar, and Goldking is required to make a payment to the counterparty if the
settlement price for any settlement period is above the cap price for the
collar.
Derivative instruments are reported on the balance sheet at fair
value as short-term or long-term receivables or payables.
The energy markets have historically been very volatile, and there
can be no assurances that crude oil and natural gas prices will not be subject
to wide fluctuations in the future. While the use of hedging and derivative
arrangements limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, some of these
instruments also limit future gains from favorable movements.
As of December 31, 2006, Goldking had the following derivative
contracts outstanding:
Natural Gas Crude Oil
---------------------------- -------------------------
Average
strike price Average strike
Production Period MMbtu per MMbtu Barrels price per Bbl
- ------------------------------------------------------------ --------- --------------- ------- ---------------
2007 Put (counterparty)..................................... 840,000 $3.75 - $ 8.50 156,000 $65.00
2007 Collar (counterparty).................................. 720,000 $8.50 - $10.85 156,000 $55.00 - $94.60
2007 Swap (counterparty).................................... 1,440,000 $7.94 132,000 $69.05
2008 Put (counterparty)..................................... 730,000 $3.75 - $ 8.50 120,000 $65.00
2008 Collar (counterparty).................................. 480,000 $8.00 - $10.50 96,000 $65.00 - $89.10
2008 Swap (counterparty).................................... 960,000 $8.14 120,000 $69.60
Disclosure of Limitations. Goldking's ultimate realized gain or loss
with respect to commodity price fluctuations will depend on the future exposures
that arise during the period, Goldking's hedging strategies at the time and
commodity prices at the time.
B-41
Critical Accounting Policies
Goldking has identified the following policies as critical to the
understanding of its financial condition and results of operations. This is not
a comprehensive list of all of Goldking's accounting policies. In many cases,
the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, with
no need for management's judgment in selecting their application. There are also
areas in which management's judgment in selecting any available alternative
would not produce a materially different result. However, certain accounting
policies are important to the portrayal of its financial condition and results
of operations and require management's most subjective or complex judgments. In
applying those policies, management uses its judgment to determine the
appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates.
Those estimates are based on historical experience, observation of trends in the
industry, and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate.
Goldking's critical accounting policies and estimates are set forth below.
Certain of these accounting policies and estimates are particularly sensitive
because of their complexity and the possibility that future events affecting
them may differ materially from management's current judgment. Goldking's most
sensitive accounting policy affecting its financial statements is its oil and
natural gas reserves, which are highly sensitive to changes in oil and natural
gas prices that have been volatile in recent years. Although decreases in oil
and natural gas prices are partially offset by Goldking's hedging program, to
the extent reserves are adversely impacted by reductions in oil and natural gas
prices, Goldking could experience increased depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense in future periods.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period.
Proved Oil and Natural Gas Reserves. Proved oil and natural gas
reserves are defined by the SEC as those volumes of oil and natural gas that
geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty are
recoverable from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
conditions. Proved developed reserves are volumes expected to be recovered from
existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Although
Goldking's external engineers are knowledgeable of and follow the guidelines for
reserves established by the SEC, the estimation of reserves requires the
engineers to make a number of significant assumptions based on professional
judgment. Estimated reserves are often subject to future revision, certain of
which could be substantial, based on the availability of additional information,
including: reservoir performance, new geological and geophysical data,
additional drilling, technological advancements, price changes and other
economic factors. Changes in oil and natural gas prices can lead to a decision
to start-up or shut-in production, which can lead to revisions in reserve
quantities. Reserve revisions will inherently lead to adjustments of
depreciation rates utilized by us. Goldking cannot predict the types of reserve
revisions that will be required in future periods.
Oil and Natural Gas Properties. Goldking accounts for its crude oil
and natural gas properties under the Successful Efforts method of accounting.
Under this method of accounting, costs to acquire mineral interests in crude oil
and natural gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find
proved reserves and to drill and equip development wells are capitalized.
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
"Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS No. 144"), Goldking reviews
proved oil and natural gas properties and other long-lived assets for impairment
when events and circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the
carrying value of such properties, such as a downward revision of the reserve
estimates or commodity prices. Goldking estimates the future cash flows expected
in connection with its properties and compare such future cash flows to the
carrying amount of its properties to determine if the carrying amount is
recoverable. When the carrying amounts of the properties exceed their estimated
undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying amount of the properties is written
down to their estimated fair value. The factors used to determine fair value
include, but are not limited to, estimates of proved reserves, future commodity
prices, and timing of future production, future capital expenditures and a
risk-adjusted discount rate.
B-42
Individually significant unproved properties are periodically
assessed for impairment of value and a loss is recognized at the time of
impairment by providing an impairment allowance. Cash flows used in the
impairment analysis are determined based on management's estimates of crude oil
and natural gas reserves, future commodity prices and future costs to extract
the reserves. Cash flow estimates related to probable and possible reserves are
reduced by additional risk-weighting factors.
Future production volumes from oil and natural gas properties are a
significant factor in performing this impairment test. There are numerous
uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and natural gas
reserves. Oil and natural gas reserve engineering is a subjective process of
estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be
precisely measured. Such cost estimates related to future development costs of
proved oil and natural gas reserves could be subject to significant revisions
due to changes in regulatory requirements, technological advances and other
factors which may be difficult to predict.
Asset Retirement Obligations. Goldking's investment in oil and
natural gas properties includes an estimate of the future cost associated with
dismantlement, abandonment and restoration of its properties. These costs are
recorded as provided in SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations. The present value of the future costs are added to the capitalized
cost of its oil and natural gas properties and recorded as a short-term or
long-term liability. The capitalized cost is included in oil and natural gas
properties cost that are depleted over the life of the assets. The estimation of
future costs associated with dismantlement, abandonment and restoration require
the use of estimated costs in future periods that, in some cases, will not be
incurred until a substantial number of years in the future. Such costs estimates
could be subject to significant revisions in subsequent years due to changes in
regulatory requirements, technological advances and other factors which may be
difficult to predict.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Goldking uses various
derivative instruments in connection with anticipated crude oil and natural gas
sales to minimize the impact of commodity price fluctuations. Such instruments
include the purchase of fixed price puts, fixed price swaps and costless
collars. Although these derivative instruments expose Goldking to credit risk,
Goldking monitors the creditworthiness of its counterparties, who include Bank
of America, N.A., BP North America Gas and Power, Union Bank of California and
Coral Energy Holdings L.P., and believe that losses from nonperformance are
unlikely to occur. However, Goldking is not able to predict sudden changes in
its counterparties' creditworthiness.
Goldking accounts for its derivative instruments and hedging
activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities", as amended. The statement established
accounting and reporting standards requiring every derivative instrument
(including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) to be
recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair
value. SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be
recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are
met, wherein gains and losses are reflected in shareholder's equity in other
comprehensive income (loss) until the forecasted production occurs, at which
time these amounts are reclassified to earnings. Only derivative instruments
that are expected to be highly effective in offsetting anticipated gains or
losses on the hedged cash flows and that are subsequently documented to have
been highly effective can qualify for hedge accounting. Any ineffectiveness in
hedging instruments whereby gains or losses do not exactly offset anticipated
gains or losses of hedged cash flows is recorded in earnings in the period in
which the gain or loss occurs.
The net cash flows related to any recognized gains or losses
associated with these hedges are reported as oil and natural gas revenue and
presented in cash flow from operations. If a hedge is terminated prior to
expected maturity, gains or losses are deferred and included in income in the
same period as the physical production hedged by the contract is delivered.
The conditions to be met for a derivative instrument to qualify as a
cash flow hedge are the following: (i) the item to be hedged exposes us to price
risk; (ii) the derivative reduces the risk exposure and is designated as a hedge
at the time the derivative contract is entered into; (iii) at the inception of
the hedge and throughout the hedge period there is a high correlation of changes
in the market value of the derivative instrument and the fair value of the
underlying item being hedged.
B-43
When the designated item associated with a derivative instrument
matures, is sold, extinguished or terminated, derivative gains or losses are
recognized as part of the gain or loss on sale or settlement of the underlying
item. When a derivative instrument is associated with an anticipated transaction
that is no longer expected to occur or if the correlation no longer exists, the
gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in income to the extent the future
results have not been offset by the effects of price changes on the hedged item
since the inception of the hedge.
Price volatility within a measured month is the primary factor
affecting the analysis of effectiveness of Goldking's oil and natural gas
derivatives. Volatility can reduce the correlation between the hedge settlement
price and the price received for physical deliveries. Secondary factors
contributing to changes in pricing differentials include changes in the basis
differential which is the difference in the locally indexed price received for
daily physical deliveries of the hedged quantities and the index price used in
hedge settlement, and changes in grade and quality factors of the hedged oil and
natural gas production which would further impact the price received for
physical deliveries.
Income Taxes. Goldking accounts for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes". Provisions for income taxes include
deferred taxes resulting primarily from temporary differences due to different
reporting methods for oil and natural gas properties for financial reporting
purposes and income tax purposes.
When recording income tax expense, certain estimates are required by
management due to timing and the impact of future events on when income taxes
expenses and benefits are recognized by us. Goldking may have to periodically
evaluate any tax operating loss and other carryforwards to determine whether a
gross tax asset, as well as evaluation allowance, should be recognized in its
financial statements.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Substantially all of Goldking's accounts receivable result from
natural gas and crude oil sales or joint interest billings to third parties in
the oil and natural gas industry in the United States. This concentration of
customers and joint interest owners may impact its overall credit risk in that
these entities may be similarly affected by changes in economic and other
conditions. Accounts receivable are generally not collateralized. Historically,
Goldking has not experienced credit losses on these receivables. Based on the
current demand for natural gas and crude oil, Goldking does not expect that
termination of sales to any of its current purchasers would have a material
adverse effect on its ability to find replacement purchasers and to sell its
production at favorable market prices.
Further, Goldking's derivative instruments also expose it to credit
risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. Generally, these
contracts are with major investment grade financial institutions and other
substantive counterparties. Goldking believes that credit risk related to its
crude oil and natural gas hedging contracts and collar contracts is no greater
than the risk associated with the primary contracts, and that the elimination of
price risk through its hedging and derivative activities reduces volatility in
reported results of operations, financial position and cash flows from period to
period and lowers its overall business risk. However, as a result of these same
hedging and derivative activities, Goldking may be exposed to greater credit
risk in the future.
Cash and cash equivalents include investments in money market
accounts placed with high-rated financial institutions. Goldking's bank deposit
accounts may, at times, exceed federally insured limits. Accounts are guaranteed
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $100,000. Goldking
has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
B-44
SUMMARY REPORT OF
CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC. -- PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
REGARDING
DECEMBER 31, 2006 RESERVE ESTIMATES FOR GOLDKING ENERGY CORPORATION
EVALUATION SUMMARY
GOLDKING OPERATING COMPANY INTERESTS
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES
BAYOU, LIVE OAK & HILCORP PROPERTIES ET AL
LOUISIANA & TEXAS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006
SEC REPORT
[LOGO OF PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS]
EVALUATION SUMMARY
GOLDKING OPERATING COMPANY INTERESTS
B-45
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES
BAYOU, LIVE OAK & HILCORP PROPERTIES ET AL
LOUISIANA & TEXAS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006
SEC REPORT
CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
/s/ Robert D. Ravnaas, P.E.
ROBERT D. RAVNAAS, P.E.
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
/s/ W. Todd Brooker, P.E.
W. TODD BROOKER, P.E.
VICE PRESIDENT
Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.
PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
9601 AMBERGLEN BLVD., SUITE 117 306 WEST SEVENTH STREET,SUITE 302 1000 LOUISIANA STREET ,SUITE 625
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729-1106 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-4987 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5008
512-249-7000 817-336-2461 713-651-9944
FAX 512-233-2618 FAX 817-877-3728 FAX 713-651-9980
www.cgaus.com
February 2, 2007
Mr. Richard E. Castagno
Director - Reservoir Engineering
Goldking Energy Corporation
777 Walker Street, Suite 2450
Houston, Texas 77002
Re: Evaluation Summary - SEC
Goldking Operating Company Interests
Total Proved Reserves
Bayou, Live Oak & Hilcorp Properties et al
Louisiana & Texas
As of December 31, 2006
==========================================
B-46
Dear Mr. Castagno:
As requested, we are submitting our estimates of total proved
reserves and forecasts of economics attributable to the Goldking Operating
Company ("Goldking") interests in certain oil and gas properties located in
various fields in Louisiana and Texas. This report is based upon a
Goldking-provided SEC pricing deck that uses December 29, 2006 spot closing
prices. The results of this evaluation are presented in the accompanying
tabulations, with a composite summary of the presented below:
Proved Proved
Developed Developed Proved Total
Producing Non-Prod. Undeveloped Proved
--------- --------- ----------- ------
Net Reserves
Oil - Mbbl 3,314.0 1,954.5 3,075.4 8,343.9
Gas - MMcf 28,639.9 17,071.2 16,667.3 62,378.3
NGL - Mbbl 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Revenue
Oil - M$ 197,281.2 116,619.6 183,187.9 497,088.7
Gas - M$ 191,079.7 112,079.1 106,041.4 409,200.3
NGL - M$ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Severance Taxes - M$ 32,852.2 18,638.7 24,949.9 76,440.8
Ad Valorem Taxes - M$ 4,709.3 6,349.2 5,592.0 16,650.5
Operating Expenses - M$ 78,866.0 24,058.9 13,387.9 116,312.8
Workover Expenses - M$ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3rd Party COPAS - M$ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other Deductions - M$ 31,642.2 6,865.8 5,876.8 44,384.8
Investments - M$ 36,093.9 9,976.5 39,829.2 85,899.6
Net Operating Income - M$ 204,197.4 162,815.3 199,593.7 566,606.4
Discounted @ 10% - M$ 144,546.7 93,730.3 124,607.7 362,884.6
B-47
Goldking Operating Company Interests
February 2, 2007
Page 2
The discounted cash flow value shown above should not be construed to represent
an estimate of the fair market value by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.
("CG&A").
Presentation
The report is divided into four reserve category sections: Total
Proved ("TP"), Proved Developed Producing ("PDP"), Proved Developed
Non-Producing ("PDNP") and Proved Undeveloped ("PUD"). Within each reserve
category section are Tables I which present composite reserve estimates and
economic forecasts for the particular reserve category. Following each of the
Tables I within the PDP, PDNP and PUD sections are Table II "oneline" summaries
that present estimates of ultimate recovery, gross and net reserves, ownership,
revenue, expenses, investments, net income and discounted cash flow for the
individual properties that make up the corresponding Table I. Also included
within each of the four reserve category sections are composite Tables I for
each field in alphabetical order.
For a more detailed explanation of the report layout, please refer
to the Table of Contents following this letter. The data presented in the
composite Tables I are explained in page 1 of the Appendix. The methods employed
in estimating reserves are described in page 2 of the Appendix.
Hydrocarbon Pricing
As requested, oil and gas prices were adjusted to the following
12-29-2006 closing spot prices, with details as provided in Attachment A, page 4
of the Appendix:
WTI Cushing Henry Hub
Crude Oil Natural Gas
Year $/STB $/MMBtu
---------- ----------- -----------
2007 $ 61.06 $ 5.62
Thereafter $ 61.06 $ 5.62
Oil and gas prices were held flat at $61.06 per barrel and $5.62 per
MMBtu throughout the life of each property. Oil and gas price differentials were
applied unescalated on a per property basis as provided and include adjustments
for basis differential, transportation and/or crude quality and gravity
corrections. Gas shrinkage and heating value as provided were applied separately
as corrections to net gas sales and net gas price, respectively.
Risking
Reserves and economics were not risked for any of the properties in
this report.
Expenses and Taxes
As required by SEC criteria, operating expenses and capital
expenditures were not escalated. Initial lease operating expenses (column 22)
were forecast on a per well basis based on historical expenses. Other Deductions
(column 27) includes variable per-well operating expenses. Oil and gas severance
tax values were determined by applying normal state severance tax rates, except
for severance tax abatement properties. Ad valorem taxes were applied on a "per
field" basis as provided by Goldking.
Miscellaneous
An on-site field inspection of the properties has not been
performed. The mechanical operation or conditions of the wells and their related
facilities have not been examined nor have the wells been tested by Cawley,
Gillespie & Associates, Inc. Possible environmental liability related to the
properties has not been investigated nor considered. The salvage value of
equipment at abandonment and the cost of plugging at abandonment have been
included in the evaluation at the end of the proved reserve life as requested by
Goldking. The abandonment cases were evaluated by field and are summarized in
the attached Tables II and in Attachment B, page 5 of the Appendix.
B-48
Goldking Operating Company Interests
February 2, 2007
Page 3
The proved reserve classifications used conform to the criteria of
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") as defined in page 3 of the
Appendix. The reserves and economics are predicated on regulatory agency
classifications, rules, policies, laws, taxes and royalties in effect as noted
herein. The possible effects of changes in legislation or other Federal or State
restrictive actions have not been considered. All reserve estimates represent
our best judgment based on data available at the time of preparation, and
assumptions as to future economic and regulatory conditions. It should be
realized that the reserves actually recovered, the revenue derived therefrom and
the actual cost incurred could be more or less than the estimated amounts.
The reserve estimates were based on interpretations of factual data
furnished by Goldking. Oil and gas prices, pricing differentials, expense data,
capital investments, plug and abandonment costs, tax values and ownership
interests were also supplied by Goldking and were accepted as furnished. To some
extent, information from public records has been used to check and/or supplement
these data. The basic engineering and geological data were subject to third
party reservations and qualifications. Nothing has come to our attention,
however, that would cause us to believe that we are not justified in relying on
such data.
This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Goldking Operating
Company. Third parties should not rely on it without the written consent of the
above and Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. Our work papers and related data
are available for inspection and review by authorized, interested parties.
Yours very truly,
/s/ Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.
CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
B-49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Goldking Operating Company Interests
Bayou, Live Oak & Hilcorp Properties et al - LA & TX
As of December 31, 2006
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT LETTER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOTAL PROVED TAB
o Table I - Total Proved
o Summary Plot - Total Proved
o Table I - Total Proved - By Field (for 23 Fields)
PROVED DEVELOPED PRODUCING TAB
o Table I - PDP
o Summary Plot - PDP
o Table II - PDP - Alphabetical by Field & Property, sub-totals on Field
o Table I - Total Proved - By Field (for 21 Fields)
PROVED DEVELOPED NON-PRODUCING TAB
o Table I - PDNP
o Summary Plot - PDNP
o Table II - PDNP - Alphabetical by Field & Property, sub-totals on Field
o Table I - Total Proved - By Field (for 14 Fields)
PROVED UNDEVELOPED TAB
o Table I - PUD
o Summary Plot - PUD
o Table II - PUD - Alphabetical by Field & Property, sub-totals on Field
o Table I - Total Proved - By Field (for 8 Fields)
APPENDIX TAB
o Page 1 - Explanatory Comments for Summary Tables
o Page 2 - Methods Employed in the Estimation of Reserves
o Page 3 - Reserve Definitions and Classifications
o Page 4 - Attachment A - SEC Pricing 12-29-2006
o Page 5 - Attachment B - Abandonment Costs & Timing
Note: Table I's are Grand Total Summaries of Reserves and Economics. Table II's
are "One-Line" Lease Summaries of Economics for wells/leases in
corresponding Table I's.
B-50
APPENDIX
Methods Employed in the Estimation of Reserves
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The four methods customarily employed in the estimation of reserves
are (1) production performance, (2) material balance, (3) volumetric and (4)
analogy. Most estimates, although based primarily on one method, utilize other
methods depending on the nature and extent of the data available and the
characteristics of the reservoirs.
Basic information includes production, pressure, geological and
laboratory data. However, a large variation exists in the quality, quantity and
types of information available on individual properties. Operators are generally
required by regulatory authorities to file monthly production reports and may be
required to measure and report periodically such data as well pressures, gas-oil
ratios, well tests, etc. As a general rule, an operator has complete discretion
in obtaining and/or making available geological and engineering data. The
resulting lack of uniformity in data renders impossible the application of
identical methods to all properties, and may result in significant differences
in the accuracy and reliability of estimates.
A brief discussion of each method, its basis, data requirements,
applicability and generalization as to its relative degree of accuracy follows:
Production performance. This method employs graphical analyses of
production data on the premise that all factors which have controlled the
performance to date will continue to control and that historical trends can be
extrapolated to predict future performance. The only information required is
production history. Capacity production can usually be analyzed from graphs of
rates versus time or cumulative production. This procedure is referred to as
"decline curve" analysis. Both capacity and restricted production can, in some
cases, be analyzed from graphs of producing rate relationships of the various
production components. Reserve estimates obtained by this method are generally
considered to have a relatively high degree of accuracy with the degree of
accuracy increasing as production history accumulates.
Material balance. This method employs the analysis of the
relationship of production and pressure performance on the premise that the
reservoir volume and its initial hydrocarbon content are fixed and that this
initial hydrocarbon volume and recoveries therefrom can be estimated by
analyzing changes in pressure with respect to production relationships. This
method requires reliable pressure and temperature data, production data, fluid
analyses and knowledge of the nature of the reservoir. The material balance
method is applicable to all reservoirs, but the time and expense required for
its use is dependent on the nature of the reservoir and its fluids. Reserves for
depletion type reservoirs can be estimated from graphs of pressures corrected
for compressibility versus cumulative production, requiring only data that are
usually available. Estimates for other reservoir types require extensive data
and involve complex calculations most suited to computer models which makes this
method generally applicable only to reservoirs where there is economic
justification for its use. Reserve estimates obtained by this method are
generally considered to have a degree of accuracy that is directly related to
the complexity of the reservoir and the quality and quantity of data available.
Volumetric. This method employs analyses of physical measurements of
rock and fluid properties to calculate the volume of hydrocarbons in-place. The
data required are well information sufficient to determine reservoir subsurface
datum, thickness, storage volume, fluid content and location. The volumetric
method is most applicable to reservoirs which are not susceptible to analysis by
production performance or material balance methods. These are most commonly
newly developed and/or no-pressure depleting reservoirs. The amount of
hydrocarbons in-place that can be recovered is not an integral part of the
volumetric calculations but is an estimate inferred by other methods and a
knowledge of the nature of the reservoir. Reserve estimates obtained by this
method are generally considered to have a low degree of accuracy; but the degree
of accuracy can be relatively high where rock quality and subsurface control is
good and the nature of the reservoir is uncomplicated.
B-51
Analogy. This method which employs experience and judgment to
estimate reserves, is based on observations of similar situations and includes
consideration of theoretical performance. The analogy method is applicable where
the data are insufficient or so inconclusive that reliable reserve estimates
cannot be made by other methods. Reserve estimates obtained by this method are
generally considered to have a relatively low degree of accuracy.
Much of the information used in the estimation of reserves is itself
arrived at by the use of estimates. These estimates are subject to continuing
change as additional information becomes available. Reserve estimates which
presently appear to be correct may be found to contain substantial errors as
time passes and new information is obtained about well and reservoir
performance.
B-52
APPENDIX
Reserve Definitions and Classifications
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Securities and Exchange Commission, in SX Reg. 210.4-10 dated
November 18, 1981, as amended September 19, 1989, requires adherence to the
following definitions of "proved" oil and gas reserves:
"(2) Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are
the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids
which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to
be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and
operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is
made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only
by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future
conditions.
"(i) Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is
supported by either actual production or conclusive formation test. The area of
a reservoir considered proved includes (A) that portion delineated by drilling
and defined by gas-oil and/or oil-water contacts, if any, and (B) the
immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which can be reasonably
judged as economically productive on the basis of available geological and
engineering data. In the absence of information on fluid contacts, the lowest
known structural occurrence of hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of
the reservoir.
"(ii) Reserves which can be produced economically through
application of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are
included in the "proved" classification when successful testing by a pilot
project, or the operation of an installed program in the reservoir, provides
support for the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based.
"(iii) Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following:
(A) oil that may become available from known reservoirs but is classified
separately as "indicated additional reserves"; (B) crude oil, natural gas, and
natural gas liquids, the recovery of which is subject to reasonable doubt
because of uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics, or economic
factors; (C) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that may occur in
un-drilled prospects.
"(3) Proved developed oil and gas reserves. Proved developed oil and
gas reserves are reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing
wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Additional oil and gas
expected to be obtained through the application of fluid injection or other
improved recovery techniques for supplementing the natural forces and mechanisms
of primary recovery should be included as "proved developed reserves" only after
testing by a pilot project or after the operation of an installed program has
confirmed through production response that increased recovery will be achieved.
"(4) Proved undeveloped reserves. Proved undeveloped oil and gas
reserves are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on
un-drilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure
is required for recompletion. Reserves on un-drilled acreage shall be limited to
those drilling units offsetting productive units that are reasonably certain of
production when drilled. Proved reserves for other un-drilled units can be
claimed only where it can be demonstrated with certainty that there is
continuity of production from the existing productive formation. Under no
circumstances should estimates for proved undeveloped reserves be attributable
to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved
recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved
effective by actual tests in the area and in the same reservoir."
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B-53
Instruction 4 of Item 2(b) of Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-K states that "disclosure of estimates of probable or possible
reserves and any estimated value thereof shall not be disclosed in any document
publicly filed with the Commission." In evaluation reports prepared for other
than Securities and Exchange Commission purposes, Cawley, Gillespie &
Associates, Inc. may include "probable" and "possible" reserves based on the
following definitions:
Probable oil and gas reserves. Probable oil and gas reserves are the
estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which
geological and engineering data infer to be commercially recoverable but where
uncertainty as to this data preclude the classification of these reserves as
"proved". The degree of risk in relying on estimates of "probable" reserves is
greater than for "proved" reserves.
Possible oil and gas reserves. Possible oil and gas reserves are the
estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which
limited geological and engineering data infer to be commercially recoverable but
where uncertainty as to this data preclude the classification of these reserves
as "probable". The degree of risk in relying on estimates of "possible" reserves
is greater than for "probable" reserves.
ATTACHMENT A
Goldking Operating Company Interests
12/31/2006 Reserve Report Pricing
SEC Price Case *
WTI Cushing HH Spot
Oil Price Gas Price
Year $/BBL $/MMBTU
---------- ----------- ---------
2007 61.06 5.620
Escalation flat flat
Cap 61.06 5.620
* Spot prices provided by Goldking, referenced 12-29-2006.
B-54
Exhibit C
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements and related notes are presented to show the pro forma effects of the
acquisition of Goldking. In addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed
financial statements include the effects of Goldking's acquisition of certain
oil and natural gas properties from Hilcorp Energy II, L.P., Hilcorp Energy I,
L.P. and Hilcorp Energy IV, L.P. on September 28, 2006. The pro forma condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 is
presented to show income from continuing operations as if the Goldking and
Hilcorp acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of the period. The pro forma
condensed consolidated balance sheet is based on the assumption that the
Goldking acquisition occurred effective December 31, 2006.
Pro forma data are based on assumptions and include adjustments as
explained in the notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements. The pro forma data are not necessarily indicative of the
financial results that would have been attained had the Goldking acquisition
occurred on the dates referenced above and should not be viewed as indicative of
operations in future periods. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with notes thereto, Dune's
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
included in this offering circular and Goldking's consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 included in this
offering circular.
C-1
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2006
Dune Goldking Adjustments Pro Forma
---- -------- ----------- ---------
(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and equivalents ......................................... $ 3,575 $ 8,767 $ 13,415 (a) $ 44,825
398,992 (b)
(110,983)(c)
(268,941)(d)
Restricted cash .............................................. -- 161 -- 161
Accounts receivable .......................................... 3,850 18,326 -- 22,176
Other current assets ......................................... 132 7,987 -- 8,119
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total current assets ................................. 7,557 35,241 32,483 75,281
35,218 225,539 15,000 (a) 352,671
Oil and natural gas properties being amortized ............... 68,033 (c)
8,881 (e)
Oil and natural gas properties not subject to amortization ... 5,856 -- (3,853)(e) 2,003
1,182 2,137 3,984 (a) 6,008
Deferred financing costs ..................................... 26,008 (b)
(7,303)(d)
Other assets ................................................. 1,046 8,024 (369)(c) 8,701
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total assets.......................................... $ 50,859 $ 270,941 $ 142,864 $ 464,664
========= ========= ========= =========
Liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit):
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities...................... $ 4,685 $ 27,096 $ -- $ 31,781
Current maturities of long-term debt ......................... 4,786 19,517 (4,786)(a) --
(19,517)(d)
Deferred taxes ............................................... -- 816 (816)(c) --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total current liabilities ............................ 9,471 47,429 (25,119) 31,781
Long-term debt ............................................... 55,239 157,000 37,185 (a) 285,000
.................................................... 285,000 (b)
.................................................... (249,424)(d)
Other liabilities ............................................ 1,398 6,009 -- 7,407
Redeemable convertible preferred stock ....................... -- -- 140,000 (b) 140,000
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total liabilities .................................... 66,108 210,438 187,642 464,188
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Shareholders' equity (deficit):
Common stock ................................................. 59 -- 10 (c) 69
Additional paid-in capital ................................... 43,586 60,053 (42,063)(c) 61,576
Accumulated other comprehensive income ....................... -- 3,302 (3,302)(c) --
(58,894) (2,852) (7,303)(d) (61,169)
Accumulated deficit .......................................... 2,852 (c)
5,028 (e)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) ......................... (15,249) 60,503 (44,778) 476
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit).. $ 50,859 $ 270,941 $ 142,864 $ 464,664
========= ========= ========= =========
See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
C-2
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dune Goldking
----------------------------------------------
Pro
Pro Forma Forma Pro Forma Pro Forma
Actual Actual Adjustments Combined Adjustments Consolidated
------ ------ ----------- -------- ----------- ------------
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Revenues .......................................... $ 7,580 $ 55,794 $ 29,564(1) $ 85,358 $ -- $ 92,938
Operating expenses:
General and administrative expense ......... 4,823 9,304 -- 9,304 -- 14,127
Direct operating expenses .................. 2,011 25,572 7,708(1) 33,280 -- 35,291
Oil and gas exploration expense ............ -- 4,294 -- 4,294 6,321 (e) 10,615
Accretion expense .......................... 25 445 112(2) 557 -- 582
Depletion, depreciation and amortization ... 4,402 14,958 7,557(3) 22,515 3,194 (e) 34,209
4,098 (f)
Proved property impairment expense ......... 42,913 -- -- -- (18,640)(e) 24,273
--------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses ................... 54,174 54,573 15,377 69,950 (5,027)(e) 119,097
--------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Operating income (loss) ........................... (46,594) 1,221 14,187 15,408 5,027 (26,159)
--------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Other income (expense):
Interest income ............................ 217 481 -- 481 -- 698
Interest expense ........................... (4,582) (6,943) (7,703)(4) (14,646) (24,764)(h) (43,992)
Amortization of deferred financing costs ... (2,148) (780) -- (780) (7,303)(d) (15,432)
(5,201)(g)
Gain (loss) on embedded derivative liability (34) 324 -- 324 -- 290
Other expense .............................. (495) 3,305 -- 3,305 -- 2,810
--------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Total other income (expense) ............... (7,042) (3,613) (7,703) (11,316) (37,268) (55,626)
--------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before income taxes ................. (53,636) (2,392) 6,484 4,092 (32,241) (81,785)
Income tax (expense) benefit ...................... -- 1,017 (2,756)(5) (1,739) -- (1,739)
--------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) ................................. $(53,636) $ (1,375) $ 3,728 $ 2,353 $ (32,241) $ (83,524)
========= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted........................... $ (0.92) $ (1.22)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted.......................... 58,583,932 10,055,866(i) 68,639,798
See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
C-3
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The acquisition is described in the section entitled "The
Transactions" contained elsewhere in this offering circular. The unaudited pro
forma statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the
unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, are based on the
consolidated financial statements of Dune and Goldking for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and the adjustments and assumptions described below.
2. Dune/Goldking Pro Forma Adjustments:
The unaudited pro forma financial statements reflect the following
adjustments:
a. Record the net proceeds from the $65,000,000 Credit Agreement and
the related repayment of $32,601,000 of Dune's debt and $15,000,000
Earnest Money deposit paid to the Shareholder.
b. Record the net proceeds from the offering of the notes and the
Preferred Stock. Total fees amount to $26,008,000.
c. Record purchase of Goldking by issuing 10,055,866 shares of common
stock and cash of $110,983,000.
d. Record payoff of existing long-term debt of Dune and Goldking and
record the accelerated amortization of deferred financing costs
related to the payoff of the existing long-term debt.
e. Record the effects of the change in Dune's accounting method from
full cost to successful efforts.
f. Record incremental depreciation, depletion and amortization expense,
using units of production method, resulting from the purchase of
Goldking.
g. Record amortization of deferred financing costs of the notes and the
Preferred Stock. Amortization expense is $5,201,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
h. Adjust interest expense to exclude interest expense from redeemed
existing debt of Dune and Goldking, and include interest expense of
$43,925,000 associated with the offering of the notes and the
Preferred Stock. An increase of 0.125% in the interest rate of the
notes would produce an increase of interest expense of $356,250. An
increase of 0.125% in the dividend rate of the Preferred Stock would
produce an increase of interest expense of $175,000.
i. Represents shares to be issued to the Shareholder for the
acquisition of Goldking. This amount excludes 7,000,000 shares that
have been issued to officers of Dune in 2007 that are cancelled in
the event we do not complete the acquisition of Goldking on or prior
to June 30, 2007. If these shares were included in the weighted
average outstanding shares, the pro forma net loss would be $1.10.
3. Goldking/Hilcorp Pro Forma Adjustments:
(1) To reflect the historical revenues and operating expenses of the
Hilcorp Properties for the period January 1, 2006 to September 30,
2006. These amounts were derived from the audited statements of
revenues and direct operating expenses of the properties acquired by
Goldking.
(2) To reflect the Hilcorp Properties' depreciation, depletion and
amortization of oil and gas properties for production from January
1, 2006 to September 30, 2006. The depreciation, depletion and
amortization was computed by allocating the total Hilcorp
Properties' purchase price of $126.0 million to leasehold cost
($101.2 million) and tangibles ($24.8 million) and amortizing the
costs based on the actual historical production divided by total
proved reserves and proved developed reserves for leasehold costs
and tangibles, respectively. There were no amounts allocated to
unproved properties at the acquisition date. The allocation of the
purchase price to the individual fields was based on their relative
estimated fair value at the time of the acquisition based on amounts
contained in the reserve report.
(3) To reflect additional asset retirement obligation accretion for the
Hilcorp Properties for the period January 1, 2006 to September 30,
2006.
(4) To record additional interest expense related to the Hilcorp
Properties. Pro forma interest expense assumes the $177.0 million of
bank borrowing incurred if the acquisition of the Hilcorp Properties
had occurred on January 1, 2006. Pro forma interest expense also
includes $0.9 million of amortization of debt issue cost related to
the credit facility.
(5) To reflect additional income taxes associated with income from the
Hilcorp Properties using an effective rate of 39.7% for the period
January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006.
C-4
Exhibit D
PRO FORMA RESERVE ESTIMATES
The pro forma reserve estimates set forth below were created by combining
Dune and Goldking proved reserve estimates for specific line items for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008. These pro forma reserve estimates
have not been prepared by D&M, CG&A or any other independent petroleum
engineers. Further, our and Goldking's independent petroleum engineers made
different assumptions when calculating our respective proved reserve estimates.
As a result, the combination of our and Goldking's proved reserve estimates may
not accurately portray the proved reserves of our company following the
acquisition and in the future. However, the individual estimates for each of
Dune and Goldking presented in the footnotes below are from the D&M Reserve
Report and the CG&A Reserve Report respectively. While the amounts presented
below are necessarily presented with numerical specificity, the actual results
achieved during the periods presented will differ from these pro forma reserve
estimates and such differences may be material. These estimates are based on
information which is currently available and are subject to the uncertainties
inherent in the application of judgmental factors in interpreting such
information.
While we believe the assumptions underlying these amounts are reasonable
in light of current circumstances, no representation can be or is being made
with respect to our ability to achieve these pro forma reserve estimates.
Prospective investors must make their own determination as to the reasonableness
of the below amounts in determining whether to purchase the securities.
Prospective investors should also note that if one or more assumptions are not
met, these pro forma reserve estimates may not be met. In addition, our future
results are subject to risks and uncertainties over which we have no control or
ability to predict. We can give no assurance as to our future operations or the
amount of future income or loss as they relate to the below amounts. These pro
forma reserve estimates should be read in conjunction with the rest of the
offering circular, including "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements"
and "Risk Factors". See "Risk Factors--The pro forma reserve estimates presented
in this offering circular will differ from our actual results."
Year Ending
December 31,
----------------------
2007 2008
--------- ---------
(dollars in thousands)
Net oil and condensate production (Mbbl)(1)................................................... 1,163 1,332
Net sales gas production (MMcf)(2) ........................................................... 9,734 11,016
Oil and condensate prices ($ / Bbl)(3) ....................................................... $ 59.59 $ 59.55
Gas price ($ / Mcf)(4)........................................................................ 6.20 6.25
Future gross revenue oil and condensate(5) ................................................... $ 69,288 $ 79,298
Future gross revenue gas(6)................................................................... 60,405 68,847
Other revenue(7).............................................................................. 6 --
--------- ---------
Future gross revenue total................................................................. 129,699 148,145
Production and ad valorem taxes(8)............................................................ 12,988 14,685
Operating expenses(9)......................................................................... 13,072 13,197
Other deductions(10).......................................................................... 5,246 4,694
Capital costs(11) ............................................................................ 54,587 15,130
--------- ---------
Future net cash flow(12)................................................................... 43,806 100,439
--------- ---------
Future field-level operating income(13)....................................................... $ 98,393 $ 115,569
========= =========
- ----------
(1) Represents a sum of Net Oil and Condensate Production of 50 Mbbl for 2007
and 60 Mbbl for 2008 from the D&M Reserve Report and Net Oil Production of
1,113 Mbbl for 2007 and 1,272 Mbbl for 2008 from the CG&A Reserve Report.
D-1
(2) Represents a sum of Net Sales Gas Production of 2,643 MMcf for 2007 and
3,038 MMcf for 2008 from the D&M Reserve Report and Net Sales Gas of 7,091
MMcf for 2007 and 7,978 MMcf for 2008 from the CG&A Reserve Report.
(3) Calculated as weighted average based on production levels of Oil and
Condensate Prices of $59.59/Bbl for 2007 and $59.57/Bbl for 2008 from the
D&M Reserve Report and Average Oil Price of $59.59/Bbl for 2007 and
$59.55/Bbl for 2008 from the CG&A Reserve Report.
(4) Calculated as weighted average based on production levels of Gas Prices of
$5.54/Mcf for 2007 and $5.54/Mcf for 2008 from the D&M Reserve Report and
an Average Gas Price of $6.45/Mcf for 2007 and $6.52/Mcf for 2008 from the
CG&A Reserve Report.
(5) Represents a sum of Future Gross Revenue Oil and Condensate of $2,995 for
2007 and $3,552 for 2008 from the D&M Reserve Report and Oil Revenue of
$66,293 for 2007 and $75,746 for 2008 from the CG&A Reserve Report.
(6) Represents a sum of Future Gross Revenue Gas of $14,637 for 2007 and
$16,843 for 2008 from the D&M Reserve Report and Gas Revenue of $45,768
for 2007 and $52,004 for 2008 from the CG&A Reserve Report.
(7) Equal to Other Revenue of $6 for 2007 and $0 for 2008 from the CG&A
Reserve Report.
(8) Represents a sum of Production and Ad Valorem Taxes of $1,544 for 2007 and
$1,783 for 2008 from the D&M Reserve Report, Production Taxes of $9,293
for 2007 and $10,431 for 2008 and Ad Valorem Taxes of $2,151 for 2007 and
$2,470 for 2008 from the CG&A Reserve Report.
(9) Represents a sum of Total Operating Expenses of $3,113 for 2007 and $3,275
for 2008 from the D&M Reserve Report and Operating Expenses of $9,959 for
2007 and $9,922 for 2008 from the CG&A Reserve Report.
(10) Equal to Other Deductions of $5,246 for 2007 and $4,694 for 2008 from the
CG&A Reserve Report.
(11) Represents a sum of Capital Costs of $19,256 for 2007 and $7,324 for 2008
from the D&M Reserve Report and Investments of $35,331 for 2007 and $7,806
for 2008 from the CG&A Reserve Report.
(12) Calculated as the sum of (i) Future Gross Revenue Total of $17,632 for
2007 and $20,395 for 2008 less the sum of (a) Production and Ad Valorem
Taxes of $1,544 for 2007 and $1,783 for 2008, (b) Total Operating Expenses
of $3,113 for 2007 and $3,275 for 2008, and (c) Capital Costs of $19,256
for 2007 and $7,324 for 2008, each from the D&M Reserve Report and (ii)
Total Revenue of $112,067 for 2007 and $127,750 for 2008 less (a)
Production Taxes of $9,293 for 2007 and $10,431 for 2008, (b) Ad Valorem
Taxes of $2,151 for 2007 and $2,470 for 2008, (c) Operating Expenses of
$9,959 for 2007 and $9,922 for 2008, (d) Other Deductions of $5,246 for
2007 and $4,694 for 2008, and (e) Investments of $35,331 for 2007 and
$7,806 for 2008, each from the CG&A Reserve Report. As of April 20, 2007,
the 2007 and 2008 averages of the NYMEX forward curve for (i) WTI crude
oil are $66.28/Bbl and $69.64/Bbl, respectively and (ii) for Henry Hub
natural gas are $8.02/Mcf and $8.61/Mcf, respectively.
(13) Calculated as Future Net Cash Flow (as defined above in footnote 12) plus
Capital Costs (as defined above in footnote 11).
D-2