April 21, 2005

John Fieldsend, Esq.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549

                    Re: Alliance Recovery Corporation ("ARC")
                    Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form SB-2
                    File No. 333-121659
                    Filed on February 11, 2005

Dear Mr. Fieldsend:

The following is in response to David Mittleman, Esq.'s letter dated February
25, 2005:

General
- -------

1.   Please disclose your response to our prior comment 2. Also, please tell us
     whether you anticipate completing the renegotiation with Mirador prior to
     requesting acceleration of this registration statement.

     ANSWER:   We have executed a new agreement with Mirador for 2005. In
               Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have included as new Exhibit 10.
               3, the new Mirador Consulting, Inc. agreement ("2005 Consulting
               Agreement"). Please note that the compensation paid to Mirador
               pursuant to the 2005 Consulting Agreement is 300,000 shares of
               restricted common stock only. Such shares are to be issued in
               accordance with the exemption from registration in Section 4(2)
               of the 1933 Securities Act. In response to your prior comment 2,
               the 2004 Mirador agreement requires the Company only to issue
               200,000 shares of common stock and 200,000 warrants. The Company
               is registering the 200,000 shares of commons tock and the 200,000
               shares of common stocks underlying the warrants.

Front Cover Page of Prospectus, page 3
- --------------------------------------

2.   We reissue our prior comment 7 in part. The selling security holders will
     utilize this prospectus to find purchasers of your shares. Accordingly,
     please add a sentence here briefly highlighting that purchasers in this
     offering may be receiving an illiquid security.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, on the cover page of the
               prospectus, we have added language regarding purchasers receiving
               an illiquid security.

Summary Information, page 5
- ---------------------------

3.   We reissue our prior comment 13 in part. Please better clarify the current
     status of your business rather than what you intend of your business.

     ANSWER:   On the Summary Information page of Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2,
               we have stated that Alliance presently has no business
               operations. Notwithstanding this insertion, Alliance feels it is
               important to state its intended business.



Risk Factors, page 6
- --------------------

4.   We reissue our prior comment 14 in part. The following risk factors
     continue to contain generic disclosure that could apply to any company in
     any industry:

     o    "Our success is dependent on our ability to raise additional financing
          in the future."

     o    "The operation of our facility may result in liability claims against
          us resulting in possible damages about our insurance limits and
          negatively affecting our profitability."

          ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have deleted both risk
                    factors.

We have a limited operating history..., page 7
- ----------------------------------------------

5.   We note your response to our prior comment 17. However, please clarify what
     you mean by, "[w]e will not need financing until we raise $20 million and
     commence operations of our facility."

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have included the following
               language before the statement set forth above: "Since we
               presently do not have any business operations..." The remainder
               of the sentence indicates that shareholders and present
               management will have a willingness to provide short term
               financing. This should clarify the statement set forth above.

There is presently no public trading market..., page 6
- ------------------------------------------------------

6.   We reissue our prior comment 21 in part. In a distinct risk factor, please
     discuss the risks that result given that the offering price was arbitrarily
     determined and that the price bears no relation to your assets, earnings,
     book value, or other criteria of value.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have added a distinct risk
               factor regarding the above.

Use of Proceeds, page 10
- ------------------------

7.   We note your response to our prior comment 22. However, please disclose
     your possible aggregate proceeds from the exercise of warrants in this
     section and in your Management's Discussion and Analysis section as well.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have added the following
               language in the "Use of Proceeds" section and the "MD&A" section:
               "We will receive aggregate proceeds of $3,926,502 from the
               exercise of the outstanding warrants."


Determination of the Offering Price, page 11
- --------------------------------------------

8.   We reissue our prior comment 25. You may not simply "estimate" your
     offering price. The initial offering price apparently is $0.50 per share.
     Only once your shares are listed or traded may the selling shareholders
     sell at prevailing market prices.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have deleted the language
               regarding estimating the offering price and stated that is based
               on the share price paid by the selling security holders for the
               purchase of the units.



Plan of Operations, page 14
- ---------------------------

9.   We note your response to our prior comment 33. However, please disclose the
     qualifications, financial resources, and any other material aspects,
     including timing, necessary to become listed on the American Stock Exchange
     or the Nasdaq Small Cap. Also, please clarify whether the standard of
     "being traded on a recognized stock exchange" includes being listed on the
     OTC Bulletin Board.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have expanded our discussion
               of obtaining a quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board. In addition,
               we have deleted any language referring to the American Stock
               Exchange, the Nasdaq Small Cap and "being traded on a recognized
               stock exchange."

10.  We note your response to our prior comment 34. However, please be more
     specific about your discussions with suppliers and operators who have
     expressed an interest in, or with whom you have had discussions about,
     participating in your overall business. If you are unable to provide
     greater specificity, please state this in your document.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have added language at the
               end of two paragraphs that start as follows: "During the
               permitting period..." and "Also at this time, some preliminary
               site work..." Both additions indicate that Alliance can not
               provide further details until the $20M capitalization has
               occurred.

One Step Manufacturing Process, page 20
- ---------------------------------------

11.  We note your response to our prior comment 40. However, in paragraph three
     of this section, you describe the pyrolytic reaction that all current
     thermal operations utilize. Please clarify if this is the process you will
     use in your facilities, or whether your process will improve upon the one
     you describe.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have added language the
               process.

Process of Tire Derived Fuel, Page 21
- -------------------------------------

12.  We note your response to our prior comment 43. However, please disclose
     what fuels are derived currently from tires, and please tell us how they
     are derived.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have added language
               disclosing the above request.

Product, Markets & Services, page 23
- ------------------------------------

13.  We note your response to our prior comment 48. Please include your
     calculations in your document.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have included Alliance's
               calculations.





Directors, Executive Officers, page 30
- --------------------------------------

14.  We note your response to our prior comment 67. Please identify the other
     directorships Mr. Martin held in reporting companies, naming each company.
     Please state if his directorships were not with reporting companies. See
     Item 401 (a)(5) of Regulation S-B.

     ANSWER:   Mr. Martin has not served on the board of directors of any
               reporting companies. Therefore, we have not added any additional
               disclosure to Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2. However, for your
               information, he has held directorships in the following private
               Ontario companies: Nith River Farm Inc. - 1978-1996; Mister Beef
               Inc. - 1975-1986; Trivest Feeders Ltd. - 1976-1987; Plan Plus
               Inc. (based in Lindsay, Ontario) - 2004 to present; Assante
               Financial Corp. (prior to its listing as a reporting company) -
               1996-1997.

Selling Stock Holders, page 33
- ------------------------------

15.  We note your response to our prior comment 71. However, please identify the
     beneficial owner that has the ultimate voting or investment control over
     the shares listed in your selling shareholder table for Eagle Visions
     Securities Corp. See Interpretation 60 under Section 1. Regulation S-K in
     the Division of Corporation Finance's Manual of Publicly Available
     Telephone Interpretations (July 1997).

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have included the beneficial
               owner of Eagle Vision Securities Corp.

16.  We reissue our prior comments 72 and 73. Qualifying your response by "to
     [your] knowledge," suggests that you are uncertain as to whether any
     selling stockholder is a broker-dealer or an affiliate of a broker-dealer.
     In this regard, please tell us whether you have conducted any due diligence
     to verify the broker-dealer status of the selling stockholders.

     ANSWER:   Alliance has determined that Brawley Cathers Limited is the only
               selling stockholder that is a registered broker-dealer. However,
               it is only registered in Canada and not with the NASD. Please
               advise us if anything further is required by the Commission.

Plan of Distribution, page 39
- -----------------------------

17.  We note your response to our prior comment 75. However, Item 510 of
     Regulation S-B requires you to provide the undertaking in the first
     sentence of Item 512(e) in your prospectus. Currently, you have this
     undertaking only in Part II of your document, which is not part of the
     prospectus. Therefore, please include this undertaking in the prospectus
     portion of your document as well as in Part II. If the undertaking is in
     your prospectus already, please tell us where it can be found. See Item 14
     of Form SB-2 and Item 510 of Regulation S-B.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have included the first
               sentence of Item 512(e) in the "Plan of Distribution" section. It
               has already been included in Part II.

Financial Statements
- --------------------

General
- -------

18.  In your next amendment please update your financial statements, as
     necessary, through December 31, 2004. See Item 310(g) of Regulation S-B.

     ANSWER:   Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2 included updated financial
               statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.



Item 26, Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities, page 43
- ---------------------------------------------------------

19.  We note your response to or prior comment 82. Please do disclose the first
     two sentences of your response with regard to the purchasers listed in the
     table on pages 45-46.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have added the first two
               sentences of our prior response in Item 26, at the beginning of
               the table.

Item 28, Undertakings, page 48
- ------------------------------

20.  Please remove the redundant undertaking required by Item 512(e) in your
     document.

     ANSWER:   In Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2, we have removed the redundant
               undertaking required by Item 512(e).

Very truly yours,

ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP

BY: s/s Anslow & Jaclin, LLP
ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP