DAVID M. LOEV, ATTORNEY AT LAW
                         2777 ALLEN PARKWAY, SUITE 1000
                               HOUSTON, TX  77019
                            TELEPHONE (713) 524-4110
                             FACSIMILE (713) 524-4122

                                 April 5, 2006

Donald C. Hunt                                           VIA FED-EX
Division of Corporate Finance                           ------------
United States Securities and Exchange Commission       AND VIA EDGAR
Mail Stop 6010                                         -------------
100 F. Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Phone: (202) 551-3647

RE:     Claron Ventures, Inc.
        Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form SB-2
        Filed February 6, 2005
        File No. 333-129664

Dear Mr. Hunt:

     We  have  enclosed  three  red-lined  copies  of  the  amended registration
statement  for  your  review.  In response to your comment letter dated February
28,  2006,  Claron  Ventures,  Inc. (the "Company," "we," us") has the following
responses:

DESCRIPTION  OF  BUSINESS
- -------------------------

1)   We believe  that  Nevada  gives  more  favorable  treatment  and  has  more
     favorable  statutes  relating  to  officers  and  Directors than many other
     states.  For  example, Nevada Revised Statutes ("NRS") 78.335, Directors in
     Nevada companies must be removed by "not less than two-thirds of the voting
     power  of  the  issued  and outstanding stock entitled to vote." This is in
     contrast  to  many  of  the  more  popular states where companies choose to
     incorporate,  which  require  only  majority  vote  to  remove  Directors,
     including  Delaware,  which  pursuant  to Delaware General Corporation Law,
     Section  141(k)  only  requires  a  vote  of  "a majority of the share then
     entitled  to  vote."

     We  believe  that  the  difference  between needing a vote of a majority of
     the voting shares and a vote of two-thirds of the voting shares to remove a
     Director  from  their position with the Company is a significant difference
     and  provides  "favorable  treatment  for"  Directors,  who in turn appoint
     officers,  under  Nevada  law.



2)   The Company will conduct the VLF-EM survey on the North East quarter of the
     South  East  cell  of  the Lucky Todd Claim where the adit and grab samples
     were  previously taken during the Phase I activities. The approximate total
     area  which  is  planned  to  be surveyed by the VLF-EM survey is 50 acres.

EXPLORATION  WORK
- -----------------

3)   The Company has no direct agreement with Mr. Sookchoof whereby he agreed to
     conduct all of the exploration work. We do have an agreement with Diamond S
     Holdings,  Ltd., which has agreed to perform the exploration work on behalf
     of  the Company under the supervision of Mr. Sookchoof, which agreement has
     been  filed  as  Exhibit  10.2  to the Amended SB-2 Registration Statement,
     which  we believe to be the only un-filed exhibit relating to the Company's
     mineral  claims.

PLAN  OF  OPERATION  FOR  THE  NEXT  TWELVE  MONTHS
- ---------------------------------------------------

4)   We have  revised  our  language  under  "Description  of  Property"  which
     previously had said that the presence of snow would not hamper a year round
     exploration  and/or  development  program  to  state:

          "Snow  may  be present on the ground from December to April, and while
     we  do  not  believe  this  presence  would hamper a year-round exploration
     and/or  development  program, such presence of snow could cause us to spend
     additional  resources  to  heat  and/or remove snow from our operations, if
     any,  and  as  a result, we do not plan to begin our Phase II studies until
     such  snow  has  melted."

     Additionally,  we  have  added  a  risk  factor  describing the risk to our
     planned  exploration  activities and future operations due to the inclement
     weather  in  and  around  our  claims,  which  is  entitled  "Our  planned
     exploration  and  development  activities  may  be  adversely  effected  by
     inclement  weather  in  and  around  our  claims."

LIQUIDITY  AND  CAPITAL  RESOURCES
- ----------------------------------

5)   There are  no  current  arrangements  with  the  Company's  Chief Executive
     Officer  regarding  the  payment of expenses and/or any written commitments
     from  him  to  provide  the  Company with funding. Upon further review, our
     previous response to comment 40 was incorrect and misstated that certain of
     the  Company's expenses were paid by the Company's Chief Executive Officer,
     Trevor  Sali,  when  in reality, those payments were paid by the Company or
     paid  by  the  Company's  Chief Executive Officer with Company funds on the
     Company's  behalf  and  not paid with Mr. Sali's own funds. As the payments
     were  made  by  the Company and not the Company's CEO, there are no related
     documents  or  agreements  relating  to  such  payments.



MINERAL  RIGHTS
- ---------------

6)   We have filed as Exhibit 10.1, the Bill of Sale relating to our purchase of
     the  Lucky  Todd  Claims.  The Company does not believe there are any other
     material  agreements  relating to the Company's claims, which have not been
     filed  as  exhibits  to  our  amended  Form  SB-2  Filing.

7)   As the  references to "mineral values" and "known mineral zones" were based
     on "grab" and "dump" samples, we have removed all references to these items
     pursuant  to  your  previous  comment 32. Additionally, we have removed the
     previous  language  in  our  risk  factor  entitled  "Our  property has not
     produced  any  commercial reserves or ore body, and the probability of such
     property  producing  any  commercially  viable  reserves  in  the future is
     remote"  which  related  to our "encouraging results" and instead added the
     following  language:

          "Until  further  exploration activities can be conducted, there can be
     no  assurance  that  a  commercially mineable ore body exists on any of our
     properties."

SELLING  SHAREHOLDERS
- ---------------------

8)   The subscription  receivable  as  of October 31, 2005, of $495 related to a
     subscriber's  check which bounced. The shares were issued to the subscriber
     prior  to  the  Company  finding out that the check did not clear. The $495
     subscription  receivable  was  paid  to  the  Company  by  the  subscriber
     subsequent  to  October  31,  2005,  and  as  such  there  is  currently no
     subscription  receivable  remaining.  We  have  therefore  received  full
     consideration  for  all  shares  which we have issued to date and which are
     being registered in this Prospectus. As there is no subscription receivable
     as of the period ending January 31, 2006, no language has been added to the
     amended  Form  SB-2  relating  to  this  receivable.

PART  II

UNDERTAKINGS
- ------------

9)   We  have revised  the  language under "Undertakings" as you have requested.

SIGNATURES
- ----------

10)  We have  clarified  who  is  signing  the  Form SB-2 in the capacity of the
     Principal  Accounting  Officer.



EXHIBIT  23.3
- -------------

11)  We have  revised  our expert's consent to include a consent to the specific
     summary  of  the  expert's  report  contained  in  the  Form  SB-2.




                              Very  truly  yours,

                              /s/  John  S.  Gillies
                              --------------------------
                              Associate
                              DAVID  M.  LOEV,  ATTORNEY  AT  LAW