SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number
1-12981
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
| | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | |
| | |
| | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(610)
647-2121
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes
☒
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated
filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | | ☒ | | Accelerated filer | | ☐ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | Smaller reporting company | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act). Yes
☐
No
☒
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of the latest practicable date was: Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value, outstanding at July 25, 2019 was 228,345,814 shares.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. AMETEK, Inc. (the “Company”) believes that all adjustments (which primarily consist of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position of the Company at June 30, 2019, the consolidated results of its operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and its cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 have been included. Quarterly results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
As discussed below in Note 2, effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No.
2016-02
(Topic 842),
(“ASU
2016-02”)
using the effective date transition method. Amounts and disclosures set forth in this Form
10-Q
reflect this change.
2. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-02
Leases (ASC 842). In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.
2018-10,
“Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases” (ASU
2018-10),
which provides narrow amendments to clarify how to apply certain aspects of the new lease standard, and ASU No.
2018-11,
“Leases (Topic 842) - Targeted Improvements” (ASU
2018-11),
which addressed implementation issues related to the new lease standard. These and certain other lease-related ASUs have generally been codified in ASC 842. ASC 842 supersedes the lease accounting requirements in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 840, Leases (ASC 840). ASC 842 establishes a
right-of-use
model that requires a lessee to record a
right-of-use
(“ROU”) asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases. Under ASC 842, leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The standard also requires disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019 using the effective date transition method. Prior period results continue to be presented under ASC 840 based on the accounting standards originally in effect for such periods.
The Company has elected certain practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within ASC 842 to leases that commenced before January 1, 2019, including the package of practical expedients. The election of the package of practical expedients resulted in the Company not reassessing prior conclusions under ASC 840 related to lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs for expired and existing leases prior to January 1, 2019. The Company did not elect the practical expedient to not record short-term leases on its consolidated balance sheet. The adoption of ASU
2016-02
did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or cash flows. Upon adoption, the Company recognized a ROU asset and lease liability of $192.4 million and $198.6 million, respectively. See Note 8.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.
2018-02,
Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(“ASU
2018-02”).
ASU
2018-02
addresses a specific consequence of the Tax Act by allowing an election to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act’s reduction of the U.S federal corporate income tax rate. ASU
2018-02
is effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal income tax rate in the Tax Act is recognized. The Company adopted ASU
2018-02
on January 1, 2019, and upon adoption, the Company did not elect to reclassify the stranded income tax effects of the Tax Act from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.
2018-13,
(“ASU
2018-13”),
which changes the fair value measurement disclosure requirements of ASC Topic 820,
(“ASC 820”), by eliminating, modifying and adding to those requirements. ASU
2018-13
also modifies the disclosure objective paragraphs of ASC 820 to
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
eliminate (1) “at a minimum” from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” and (2) other similar “open ended” disclosure requirements to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities. ASU
2018-13
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not determined the impact ASU
2018-13
may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.
2018-14,
Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General
(“ASU
2018-14”),
which changes the disclosure requirements of ASC Topic 715,
Compensation – Retirement Benefits
, by eliminating, modifying and adding to those requirements. ASU
2018-14
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted and the amendments in this ASU should be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. The Company has not determined the impact ASU
2018-14
may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.
2018-15,
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other –
(“ASU
2018-15”),
that requires implementation costs incurred by customers in cloud computing arrangements to be deferred and recognized over the term of the arrangement, if those costs would be capitalized by the customer in a software licensing arrangement under the
internal-use
software guidance in ASC Topic 350,
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
. ASU
2018-15
requires a customer to disclose the nature of its hosting arrangements that are service contracts and provide disclosures as if the deferred implementation costs were a separate, major depreciable asset class. ASU
2018-15
is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not determined the impact ASU
2018-15
may have on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.
The Company adopted ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The cumulative adjustment made to the January 1, 2018 consolidated balance sheet for the adoption of ASC 606 was to increase Retained earnings by $4.2 million, increase Total assets by $7.9 million and increase Total liabilities by $3.7 million.
The outstanding contract asset and (liability) accounts were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
Contract assets - January 1 | | $ | | | | $ | | |
Contract assets – June 30 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Change in contract assets – increase | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Contract liabilities – January 1 | | | | | | | | |
Contract liabilities – June 30 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Change in contract liabilities – increase | | | | ) | | | | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | | | | $ | | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
The net change was driven by higher contract assets and an increase in contract liabilities during the period. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized revenue of $
110.3
million and $89.1 million, respectively, that was previously included in the beginning balance of contract liabilities.
Contract assets are reported as a component of Other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $10.8 million and $8.9 million of Customer advanced payments (contract liabilities), respectively, were recorded in Other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Changes in the accrued product warranty obligation were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
Balance at the beginning of the period | | $ | | | | $ | | |
Accruals for warranties issued during the period | | | | | | | | |
Settlements made during the period | | | | ) | | | | ) |
Warranty accruals related to acquired businesses and other during the period | | | | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at the end of the period | | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The calculation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares considered outstanding during the periods. The calculation of diluted earnings per share reflects the effect of all potentially dilutive securities (principally outstanding stock options and restricted stock grants). Securities that are anti-dilutive have been excluded and are not significant. The number of weighted average shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity-based compensation plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5. | Fair Value Measurements |
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The Company utilizes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to the valuations used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table provides the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, consistent with the fair value hierarchy, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
The fair value of fixed-income investments, which are valued as level 1 investments, was based on quoted market prices. The fixed-income investments are shown as a component of long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, gains and losses on the investments noted above were not significant.
No
transfers between level 1 and level 2 investments occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
Cash, cash equivalents and fixed-income investments are recorded at fair value at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The following table provides the estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instrument liabilities, for which fair value is measured for disclosure purposes only, compared to the recorded amounts at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Long-term debt, net (including current portion) | | $ | | ) | | $ | | ) | | $ | | ) | | $ | | ) |
The fair value of
short-term
borrowings, net approximates the carrying value. Short-term borrowings, net are valued as level 2 liabilities as they are corroborated by observable market data. The Company’s long-term debt, net is all privately held with no public market for this debt, therefore, the fair value of long-term debt, net was computed based on comparable current market data for similar debt instruments and is considered to be a level 3 liability.
At June 30, 2019, the Company had
no
forward contracts outstanding. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, realized gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts were not significant. The Company does not typically designate its foreign currency forward contracts as hedges.
The Company has designated certain foreign-currency-denominated long-term borrowings as hedges of the net investment in certain foreign operations. As of June 30, 2019, these net investment hedges included
British-pound-and
Euro-denominated long-term debt. These borrowings were designed to create net investment hedges in each of the designated foreign subsidiaries. The Company designated the British-pound- and Euro-denominated loans referred to above as hedging instruments to offset translation gains or losses on the net investment due to changes in the British pound and Euro exchange rates. These net investment hedges are evidenced by management’s contemporaneous documentation supporting the hedge designation. Any gain or loss on the hedging instruments (the debt) following hedge designation is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income in the same manner as the translation adjustment on the hedged investment based on changes in the spot rate, which is used to measure hedge effectiveness.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
At June 30, 2019, the Company had $387.8 million of British-pound-denominated loans, which were designated as a hedge against the net investment in British pound functional currency foreign subsidiaries. At June 30, 2019, the Company had $654.5 million in Euro-denominated loans, which were designated as a hedge against the net investment in Euro functional currency foreign subsidiaries. As a result of the British-pound- and Euro-denominated loans being designated and 100% effective as net investment hedges, $5.5 million of
pre-tax
currency remeasurement gains have been included in the foreign currency translation component of other comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2019.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
| | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Raw materials and purchased parts | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. This determination generally depends on whether the arrangement conveys to the Company the right to control the use of an explicitly or implicitly identified fixed asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Control of an underlying asset is conveyed to the Company if the Company obtains the rights to direct the use of and to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from using the underlying asset. The Company has lease agreements which include lease and
non-lease
components, which the Company has elected to account for as a single lease component for all classes of underlying assets. Lease expense for variable lease components are recognized when the obligation is probable.
Operating leases are included in ROU assets, accrued liabilities and other, and other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Operating lease payments are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has no material finance leases. The Company primarily leases buildings (real estate) and automobiles which are classified as operating leases. ASC 842 requires a lessee to discount its unpaid lease payments using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, its incremental borrowing rate. As an implicit interest rate is not readily determinable in our leases, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments.
The lease term for all of the Company’s leases includes the
non-cancellable
period of the lease plus any additional periods covered by either a Company option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise, or an option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease controlled by the lessor. Options for lease renewals have been excluded from the lease term (and lease liability) for the majority of the Company’s leases as the reasonably certain threshold is not met. In a small number of the Company’s leases, the options for renewals have been included in the lease term as the reasonably certain threshold is met due to the Company having significant economic incentive for extending the lease.
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability are comprised of fixed payments, variable payments that depend on an index or rate and amounts probable to be payable under the exercise of the Company option to purchase the underlying asset if reasonably certain.
Variable lease payments not dependent on a rate or index associated with the Company’s leases are recognized when the events, activities, or circumstances in the lease agreement on which those payments are assessed are probable. Variable lease payments are presented as operating expense in the Company’s income statement in the same line item as expense arising from fixed lease payments.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company has commitments under operating leases for certain facilities, vehicles and equipment used in its operations. Our leases have initial lease terms ranging from one month to 14 years. Certain lease agreements contain provisions for future rent increases.
The components of lease expense were as follows:
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | $ | | |
| | | | |
Lease liabilities included in Accrued liabilities and other | | | | |
Lease liabilities included in Other long-term liabilities | | | | |
| | | | |
| | $ | | |
| | | | |
Supplemental cash flow information and other information related to leases was as follows:
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Cash used in operations for operating leases | | $ | | |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating liabilities | | $ | | |
Weighted-average remaining lease terms - operating leases (years) | | | | |
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases | | | | % |
Maturities of lease liabilities as of June 30, 2019 were as follows:
| | | | |
Lease Liability Maturity Analysis | | | |
| | | |
| | $ | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | $ | | |
| | | | |
The Company does not have any leases that have not yet commenced which are significant.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill by segment were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Balance at December 31, 2018 | | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase price allocation adjustments and other | | | | | | | | ) | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | | | | | | ) | | | | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company is in the process of finalizing the measurement of certain tangible and intangible assets and liabilities for its fourth quarter of 2018 acquisitions of Forza, Telular and Spectro Scientific including inventory, property, plant and equipment, goodwill, trade names, customer relationships and purchased technology and the accounting for income taxes.
At June 30, 2019, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $128.6 million, of which $79.2 million, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate.
The following is a reconciliation of the liability for uncertain tax positions (in millions):
| | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2018 | | $ | | |
Additions for tax positions | | | | |
Reductions for tax positions | | | | |
| | | | |
| | $ | | |
| | | | |
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The amounts recognized in income tax expense for interest and penalties during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were not significant.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was 20.4%, compared with 21.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was 20.4%, compared with 22.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Both comparative quarters effective tax rates include the impact of the 2017 U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) including the reduction of the U.S. corporate income tax rate and the current impact of the global intangible
low-taxed
income (“GILTI”) and the foreign-derived intangible income (“FDII”) provisions. The lower rates for 2019 reflects higher year over year tax benefits related to share-based payment transactions as well as a partial release of a state related valuation allowance for carryforward interest deductions.
In December 2018, the Company completed a private placement agreement to sell $575 million and 75 million Euros in senior notes to a group of institutional investors (the “2018 Private Placement”). There were two funding dates under the 2018 Private Placement. The first funding occurred in December 2018 for $475 million and 75 million Euros ($85.1 million). The second funding occurred in January 2019 for $100 million. The 2018 Private Placement senior notes carry a weighted average interest rate of 3.93% and are subject to certain customary covenants, including financial covenants that, among other things, require the Company to maintain certain
debt-to-EBITDA
(earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) and interest coverage ratios. The proceeds from the 2018 Private Placement were used to pay down domestic borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
12. | Share-Based Compensation |
Under the terms of the Company’s stockholder-approved share-based plans, performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), incentive and
non-qualified
stock options and restricted stock have been, and may be, issued to the Company’s officers, management-level employees and members of its Board of Directors. Stock options granted prior to 2018 generally vest at a rate of
one-fourth
on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date and have a maximum contractual term of
. Beginning in 2018, stock options granted generally vest at a rate of
one-third
on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date and have a maximum contractual term of
.
Restricted stock granted to employees prior to 2018 generally vests
after the grant date (cliff vesting) and is subject to accelerated vesting due to certain events, including doubling of the grant price of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business during any five consecutive trading days.
Beginning in 2018, restricted stock granted to employees generally vests
one-third
on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. Restricted stock granted to non-employee directors generally vests
after the grant date (cliff vesting) and is subject to accelerated vesting due to certain events, including doubling of the grant price of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business during any five consecutive trading days.
In March 2019, the Company granted PRSUs to officers and certain key management-level employees an aggregate target award of approximately 102,000 shares of its common stock. The PRSUs vest three years from the grant date based on continuous service, with the number of shares earned (0% to 200%
of the target award) depending upon the extent to which the Company achieves certain financial and market performance targets measured over the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021. Half of the PRSUs were valued in a manner similar to restricted stock as the financial targets are based on the Company’s operating results, which represents a performance condition. The grant date fair value of these PRSUs are recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period based on the number of awards probable to vest at each reporting date. The other half of the PRSUs were valued using a Monte Carlo model as the performance target is related to the Company’s total shareholder return compared to a group of peer companies, which represents a market condition. The Company recognizes the grant date fair value of these awards as compensation expense ratably over the vesting period.
Total share-based compensation expense was as follows:
Pre-tax
share-based compensation expense is included in the consolidated statement of income in either Cost of sales or Selling, general and administrative expenses, depending on where the recipient’s cash compensation is reported.
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following table sets forth net sales and income by reportable segment and on a consolidated basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income and income before income taxes: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment operating income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total segment operating income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate administrative expenses | | | | ) | | | | ) | | | | ) | | | | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated operating income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | ) | | | | ) | | | | ) | | | | ) |
| | | | ) | | | | ) | | | | ) | | | | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated income before income taxes | | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | | | $ | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the quarter ended June 30, 2019, the Company posted record sales and operating income, as well as strong orders, backlog, operating income margins, net income, diluted earnings per share and operating cash flow. The Company achieved these results from organic sales growth in both EIG and EMG, contributions from the 2018 acquisitions of Spectro Scientific Corporation in November 2018, Forza Silicon Corporation (“Forza) and Telular Corporation in October 2018 and Motec in June 2018, as well as our Operational Excellence initiatives.
For 2019, the Company’s strong backlog, the full year impact of the 2018 acquisitions and continued focus on and implementation of Operational Excellence initiatives are expected to have a positive impact on the remainder of the Company’s 2019 results.
Results of operations for the second quarter of 2019 compared with the second quarter of 2018
Net sales for the second quarter of 2019 were $1,289.4 million, an increase of $80.5 million or 6.7%, compared with net sales of $1,208.9 million for the second quarter of 2018. The increase in net sales for the second quarter of 2019 was due to 3% organic sales growth, a 5% increase from acquisitions and an unfavorable 1% effect of foreign currency translation.
Total international sales for the second quarter of 2019 were $613.0 million or 47.5% of net sales, an increase of $3.6 million or .6%, compared with international sales of $609.4 million or 50.4% of net sales for the second quarter of 2018. The $3.6 million increase in international sales was primarily driven from recent acquisitions. Both reportable segments of the Company maintain strong international sales presences in Europe and Asia.
Orders for the second quarter of 2019 were $1,278.1 million, an increase of $47.3 million or 3.8%, compared with $1,230.8 million for the second quarter of 2018. The increase in orders for the second quarter of 2019 was due to 3% increase from acquisitions and a favorable 1% effect of foreign currency translation.
Segment operating income for the second quarter of 2019 was $314.0 million, an increase of $25.9 million or 9.0%, compared with segment operating income of $288.1 million for the second quarter of 2018. Segment operating income, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 24.4% for the second quarter of 2019, compared with 23.8% for the second quarter of 2018. The increase in segment operating income and segment operating margins for the second quarter of 2019 resulted primarily from the increase in net sales noted above, as well as the benefits of the Company’s Operational Excellence initiatives.
The proceeds from the fundings from the 2018 Private Placement were used to pay down domestic borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
In the third quarter of 2018, $80 million of 6.35% senior notes and $160 million of 7.08% senior notes matured and were paid. In the fourth quarter of 2018, $65 million of 7.18% senior notes matured and were paid. The
debt-to-capital
ratio was 34.6% at June 30, 2019, compared with 38.3% at December 31, 2018. The net
debt-to-capital
ratio (total debt, net less cash and cash equivalents divided by the sum of net debt and stockholders’ equity) was 28.9% at June 30, 2019, compared with 34.9% at December 31, 2018. The net
debt-to-capital
ratio is presented because the Company is aware that this measure is used by third parties in evaluating the Company.
Additional financing activities for the first six months of 2019 included cash dividends paid of $63.6 million, compared with $64.7 million for the first six months of 2018. Effective February 12, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase of $500 million in the authorization for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock. Proceeds from stock option exercises were $45.8 million for the first six months of 2019, compared with $18.3 million for the first six months of 2018.
As a result of all of the Company’s cash flow activities for the first six months of 2019, cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2019 totaled $567.9 million, compared with $354.0 million at December 31, 2018. At June 30, 2019, the Company had $320.0 million in cash outside the United States, compared with $311.2 million at December 31, 2018. The Company utilizes this cash to fund its international operations, as well as to acquire international businesses. The Company is in compliance with all covenants, including financial covenants, for all of its debt agreements. The Company believes it has sufficient cash-generating capabilities from domestic and unrestricted foreign sources, available credit facilities and access to long-term capital funds to enable it to meet its operating needs and contractual obligations in the foreseeable future.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s critical accounting policies are detailed in Part II, Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition of its Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2018. Primary disclosure of the Company’s significant accounting policies is also included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of its Annual Report on Form
10-K.
The majority of the Company’s revenues on product sales are recognized at a point in time when the customer obtains control of the product. The transfer in control of the product to the customer is typically evidenced by one or more of the following: the customer having legal title to the product, the Company’s present right to payment, the customer’s physical possession of the product, the customer accepting the product, or the customer has the benefits of ownership or risk of loss. Legal title transfers to the customer in accordance with the delivery terms of the order, usually upon shipment, which is the point that control transfers. For a small percentage of sales where title and risk of loss transfers at the point of delivery, the Company recognizes revenue upon delivery to the customer, which is the point that control transfers, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition are met.
Under ASC 606, the Company determined that revenues from certain of its customer contracts met the criteria of satisfying its performance obligations over time, primarily in the areas of the manufacture of custom-made equipment and for service repairs of customer-owned equipment. Prior to the adoption of the new standard, these revenues were recorded upon shipment or, in the case of those sales where title and risk of loss passes at the point of delivery, the Company recognized revenue upon delivery to the customer. Recognizing revenue over time for custom-manufactured equipment is based on the Company’s judgment that, in certain contracts, the product does not have an alternative use and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date. This change in revenue recognition accelerated the revenue recognition and costs on the impacted contracts.
Applying the practical expedient available under ASC 606, the Company recognizes incremental cost of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the assets that the Company would have otherwise recognized is one year or less. These costs are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income.
Revenues associated with repairs of customer-owned assets were previously recorded upon completion and shipment of the repaired equipment to the customer. Under ASC 606, if the Company’s performance enhances an asset that the customer controls as the asset is enhanced, revenue must be recognized over time. The revenue associated with the repair of a customer-owned asset meets this criterion.
The determination of the revenue to be recognized in a given period for performance obligations satisfied over time is based on the input method. The Company recognizes revenue over time as it performs on these contracts because the transfer of control to the customer occurs over time, revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. The Company generally uses the total
cost-to-cost
input method of progress because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer that occurs as costs are incurred. Under the
cost-to-cost
method, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the proportion of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion of the performance obligation. On certain contracts, labor hours is used as the measure of progress when it is determined to be a better depiction of the transfer of control to the customer due to the timing and pattern of labor hours incurred.
Performance obligations also include post-delivery service, installation and training. Post-delivery service revenues are recognized over the contract term. Installation and training revenues are recognized over the period the service is provided. Warranty terms in customer contracts can also be considered separate performance obligations if the warranty provides services beyond assurance that a product complies with agreed-upon specification or if a warranty can be purchased separately. The Company does not incur significant obligations for customer returns and refunds.
Payment terms generally begin upon shipment of the product. The Company does have contracts with multiple billing terms that are all due within one year from when the product is delivered. No significant financing component exists. Payment terms are generally
30-60
days from the time of shipment or customer acceptance, but terms can be shorter or longer. For customer contracts that have revenue recognized over time, revenue is generally recognized prior to a payment being due from the customer. In such cases, the Company recognizes a contract asset at the time the revenue is recognized. When payment becomes due based on the contract terms, the Company reduces the contract asset and records a receivable. In contracts with billing milestones or in other instances with a long production cycle or concerns about credit, customer advance payments are received. The Company may receive a payment in excess of revenue recognized to that date. In these circumstances, a contract liability is recorded.
The Company has certain contracts with variable consideration in the form of volume discounts, rebates and early payment options, which may affect the transaction price used as the basis for revenue recognition. In these contracts, the amount of the variable consideration is not considered constrained and is allocated among the various performance obligations in the customer contract based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation to the total standalone value of all the performance obligations.
Forward-Looking Information
Information contained in this discussion, other than historical information, is considered “forward-looking statements” and is subject to various factors and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ significantly from expectations. These factors and uncertainties include general economic conditions affecting the industries the Company serves; changes in the competitive environment or the effects of competition in the Company’s markets; risks associated with international sales and operations; the Company’s ability to consummate and successfully integrate future acquisitions; the Company’s ability to successfully develop new products, open new facilities or transfer product lines; the price and availability of raw materials; compliance with government regulations, including environmental regulations; and the ability to maintain adequate liquidity and financing sources. A detailed discussion of these and other factors that may affect the Company’s future results is contained in AMETEK’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including its most recent reports on Form
10-K,
10-Q
and
8-K.
AMETEK disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, unless required by the securities laws to do so.
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our system of disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(b)
as of June 30, 2019. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Such evaluation did not identify any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.