UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 |
OR |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | |
For the transition period from to |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-13495
MAC-GRAY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 04-3361982 |
(State or other jurisdiction incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
404 WYMAN STREET, SUITE 400 | |
WALTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS | 02451-1212 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (781) 487-7600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer x Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of November 5, 2007, 13,272,064 shares of common stock of the registrant, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.
Item 1. Financial Statements
MAC-GRAY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
| | December 31, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | |
Assets | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 11,994 | | $ | 12,639 | |
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | | 9,176 | | 10,810 | |
Inventory of finished goods, net | | 7,237 | | 6,622 | |
Prepaid facilities management rent and other current assets | | 13,912 | | 14,540 | |
Total current assets | | 42,319 | | 44,611 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | 118,654 | | 124,992 | |
Goodwill | | 38,454 | | 45,596 | |
Intangible assets, net | | 125,543 | | 156,361 | |
Prepaid facilities management rent and other assets | | 14,034 | | 14,736 | |
Total assets | | $ | 339,004 | | $ | 386,296 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Current portion of capital lease obligations | | $ | 1,245 | | $ | 1,413 | |
Trade accounts payable | | 10,447 | | 8,870 | |
Accrued facilities management rent | | 16,527 | | 17,007 | |
Accrued expenses | | 11,445 | | 9,512 | |
Deferred revenues and deposits | | 591 | | 808 | |
Total current liabilities | | 40,255 | | 37,610 | |
Long-term debt | | 174,000 | | 216,000 | |
Long-term capital lease obligations | | 1,823 | | 2,412 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 29,620 | | 30,511 | |
Other liabilities | | 1,666 | | 2,743 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) | | — | | — | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | |
Preferred stock of Mac-Gray Corporation ($.01 par value, 5 million shares authorized, no shares outstanding) | | — | | — | |
Common stock of Mac-Gray Corporation ($.01 par value, 30 million shares authorized, 13,443,754 issued and 13,077,694 outstanding at December 31, 2006, and 13,443,754 issued and 13,264,397 outstanding at September 30, 2007) | | 134 | | 134 | |
Additional paid in capital | | 70,553 | | 72,184 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 183 | | 60 | |
Retained earnings | | 24,571 | | 26,504 | |
| | 95,441 | | 98,882 | |
Less: common stock in treasury, at cost (366,060 shares at December 31, 2006 and 179,357 shares at September 30, 2007) | | (3,801 | ) | (1,862 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 91,640 | | 97,020 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 339,004 | | $ | 386,296 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MAC-GRAY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities management revenue | | $ | 55,770 | | $ | 59,837 | | $ | 171,241 | | $ | 176,059 | |
Product sales | | 14,233 | | 16,688 | | 35,479 | | 41,155 | |
Total revenue | | 70,003 | | 76,525 | | 206,720 | | 217,214 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of facilities management revenue | | 37,539 | | 41,136 | | 113,925 | | 118,153 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 9,189 | | 9,405 | | 25,906 | | 27,506 | |
Cost of product sales | | 11,329 | | 13,189 | | 27,887 | | 31,427 | |
Total cost of revenue | | 58,057 | | 63,730 | | 167,718 | | 177,086 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | 11,946 | | 12,795 | | 39,002 | | 40,128 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
General and administration expenses | | 4,039 | | 4,232 | | 12,775 | | 13,274 | |
Sales and marketing expenses | | 3,747 | | 3,764 | | 11,913 | | 11,961 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 411 | | 412 | | 1,175 | | 1,197 | |
(Gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets, net | | (92 | ) | (120 | ) | 23 | | (244 | ) |
Total operating expenses | | 8,105 | | 8,288 | | 25,886 | | 26,188 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | 3,841 | | 4,507 | | 13,116 | | 13,940 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | (3,666 | ) | (3,586 | ) | (10,247 | ) | (9,844 | ) |
Loss related to derivative instruments | | (965 | ) | (986 | ) | (40 | ) | (734 | ) |
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes | | (790 | ) | (65 | ) | 2,829 | | 3,362 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (523 | ) | (190 | ) | 933 | | 1,215 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (267 | ) | $ | 125 | | $ | 1,896 | | $ | 2,147 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income per common share – basic | | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | | $ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.16 | |
Net (loss) income per common share — diluted | | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | | $ | 0.14 | | $ | 0.16 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic | | 13,034 | | 13,245 | | 12,988 | | 13,188 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted | | 13,034 | | 13,670 | | 13,414 | | 13,629 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
MAC-GRAY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
| | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Other | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Additional | | Comprehensive | | | | | | Treasury Stock | | | |
| | Number | | | | Paid In | | (Loss) | | Comprehensive | | Retained | | Number | | | | | |
| | of shares | | Value | | Capital | | Income | | Income | | Earnings | | of shares | | Cost | | Total | |
Balance, December 31, 2006 | | 13,443,754 | | $ | 134 | | $ | 70,553 | | $ | 183 | | | | $ | 24,571 | | 366,060 | | $ | (3,801 | ) | $ | 91,640 | |
Cumulative change related to the adoption of FIN 48 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | | | 500 | | — | | — | | $ | 500 | |
| | 13,443,754 | | $ | 134 | | $ | 70,553 | | $ | 183 | | | | $ | 25,071 | | 366,060 | | $ | (3,801 | ) | $ | 92,140 | |
Net income | | — | | — | | — | | — | | $ | 2,147 | | 2,147 | | — | | — | | $ | 2,147 | |
Other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on derivative instrument, net of tax of $80 (Note 4) | | — | | — | | — | | (123 | ) | (123 | ) | — | | — | | — | | $ | (123 | ) |
Comprehensive income | | — | | — | | — | | — | | $ | 2,024 | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Options exercised | | — | | — | | — | | — | | | | (463 | ) | (118,168 | ) | 1,228 | | $ | 765 | |
Stock issuance - Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | — | | — | | — | | — | | | | (22 | ) | (49,446 | ) | 514 | | $ | 492 | |
Stock compensation expense | | — | | — | | 1,318 | | — | | | | — | | — | | — | | $ | 1,318 | |
Windfall tax benefit | | — | | — | | 301 | | — | | | | — | | — | | — | | $ | 301 | |
Stock grants | | — | | — | | 12 | | — | | | | (229 | ) | (19,089 | ) | 197 | | $ | (20 | ) |
Balance, September 30, 2007 | | 13,443,754 | | $ | 134 | | $ | 72,184 | | $ | 60 | | | | $ | 26,504 | | 179,357 | | $ | (1,862 | ) | $ | 97,020 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
MAC-GRAY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
| | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,896 | | $ | 2,147 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities, net of effects of acquisitions: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 27,081 | | 28,703 | |
Increase in allowance for doubtful accounts and lease reserves | | 17 | | 70 | |
Loss (gain) on sale of assets | | 23 | | (244 | ) |
Stock grants | | 51 | | (20 | ) |
Loss related to derivative instruments | | 40 | | 734 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 2,219 | | 892 | |
Non cash stock compensation | | 888 | | 1,318 | |
Increase in accounts receivable | | (194 | ) | (1,706 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in inventory | | (1,156 | ) | 1,212 | |
Increase in prepaid facilities management rent and other assets | | (6,724 | ) | (3,361 | ) |
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued facilities management rent, accrued expenses and other liabilities | | (3,228 | ) | (1,453 | ) |
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenues and customer deposits | | (59 | ) | 217 | |
Net cash flows provided by operating activities | | 20,854 | | 28,509 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | (20,340 | ) | (22,031 | ) |
Payments for acquisitions | | (18,780 | ) | (48,579 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | 200 | | 353 | |
Net cash flows used in investing activities | | (38,920 | ) | (70,257 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Payments on capital lease obligations | | (1,029 | ) | (1,165 | ) |
Borrowings on revolving credit facility | | 40,000 | | 60,000 | |
Payments on revolving credit facility | | (21,000 | ) | (18,000 | ) |
Windfall tax benefit | | 319 | | 301 | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | 454 | | 765 | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | 138 | | 492 | |
Net cash flows provided by financing activities | | 18,882 | | 42,393 | |
| | | | | |
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 816 | | 645 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 11,046 | | 11,994 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 11,862 | | $ | 12,639 | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, the Company acquired various vehicles under capital lease agreements totaling $982 and $1,922, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
MAC-GRAY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of the management of Mac-Gray Corporation (the “Company” or “Mac-Gray”), the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments), which are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, the results of its operations, and its cash flows. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2006 audited consolidated financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The Company generates the majority of its revenue from card and coin-operated laundry equipment located in 43 states throughout the United States, as well as the District of Columbia. The Company’s principal customer base is the multi-unit housing market, which consists of apartments, condominium units, colleges and universities, military bases, hotels and motels. The Company also sells the MicroFridge® product lines, kitchen appliances and sells, services and leases commercial laundry equipment to commercial laundromats and institutions. The majority of the Company’s purchases of laundry equipment are from one supplier.
2. Acquisitions
On August 8, 2007, the Company acquired the laundry facilities management assets of a regional operator in Maryland. On April 26, 2007, the Company acquired the laundry facilities management assets of a regional operator in upstate New York. On February 28, 2007, the Company acquired the laundry facilities management assets and distribution rights of a regional operator in the Southeast United States. These acquisitions have been reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements from the dates of the acquisition, and have been accounted for as purchase business combinations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations”, (“FAS 141”). The total purchase price of each of these acquisitions has been allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities, based on estimates of their related fair value. A twenty-year amortization period has been assigned to the acquired contract rights, a ten year amortization period for the acquired distribution rights, and the acquired used laundry equipment has been assigned an average life of two to seven years based upon physical evaluation of the equipment.
The total purchase price for each of these acquisitions was allocated as follows:
| | February 28, 2007 | | April 26, 2007 | | August 8, 2007 | |
Contract rights | | $ | 546 | | $ | 2,134 | | $ | 31,000 | |
Goodwill | | — | | — | | 7,142 | |
Trade name | | — | | — | | 2,000 | |
Distribution rights | | 1,623 | | — | | — | |
Equipment | | 170 | | 526 | | 2,500 | |
Inventory | | 239 | | — | | 358 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total Purchase Price | | $ | 2,578 | | $ | 2,660 | | $ | 43,000 | |
The allocation of the purchase price for each of the 2007 acquisitions is subject to the finalization of the asset valuations.
7
The following unaudited pro forma operating results of the Company assume the acquisitions took place on January 1, 2006. Such information includes adjustments to reflect additional depreciation, amortization and interest expense, and is not necessarily indicative of what the results of operations would have been or the results of operations in future periods.
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | |
Net revenue | | $ | 77,409 | | $ | 78,987 | | $ | 229,290 | | $ | 233,551 | |
Net income (loss) | | (642 | ) | (4 | ) | 1,189 | | 1,523 | |
Net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 0.09 | | $ | 0.12 | |
Diluted | | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 0.09 | | $ | 0.11 | |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company made certain other acquisitions for a combined purchase price of $341, which was allocated to contract rights.
3. Long Term Debt
Effective December 29, 2006, the Company amended its senior bank credit facilities, reducing the credit line to $65,000 (with the option, subject to customary terms and conditions, to increase the line up to $100,000, in increments of not less than $10,000, over the life of the facility), reducing the interest rate on outstanding borrowings, modifying certain covenants and extending the maturity date to December 29, 2011. Concurrent with the August 2007 acquisition, the Company increased its credit line to $85,000. The senior credit facilities are collateralized by a blanket lien on all of our assets and our two main subsidiaries, Mac-Gray Services, Inc. and Intirion Corporation, as well as a pledge by the Company of all of the capital stock of its two subsidiaries. Borrowings outstanding under the revolving line of credit bear interest at a fluctuating rate equal to (i) in the case of Eurodollar rate loans, the LIBOR rate (adjusted for statutory reserves) plus an applicable percentage, ranging from 1.00% to 1.50% (1.50% as of September 30, 2007) determined quarterly by reference to the funded debt ratio, or (ii) in the case of alternate base rate loans and swing line loans, the higher of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (b) the annual rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as its “prime rate,” in each case, plus an applicable percentage, ranging from 0.00% to 0.50% (0.50% as of September 30, 2007), determined and payable quarterly by reference to the funded debt ratio. Under the senior credit facilities, the Company pays a commitment fee equal to a percentage, ranging from 0.25% to 0.30%, determined and payable quarterly by reference to the funded debt ratio, of the average daily-unused portion of the revolver under the senior credit facility. This commitment fee percentage was 0.30% as of September 30, 2007.
As of September 30, 2007, there was $66,000 outstanding under the revolving line of credit and $860 in outstanding letters of credit under the senior credit facilities. The available balance under the revolving line of credit was $18,140 at September 30, 2007. The average interest rate on the borrowings outstanding under the senior credit facilities at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007 were 5.94% and 6.47%, respectively, including the applicable spread paid to the banks.
The credit agreement for the senior credit facilities includes customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions pertaining to: (i) the incurrence of additional indebtedness, (ii) limitations on liens, (iii) making distributions, dividends and other payments, (iv) the making of certain investments and loans, (v) mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, (vi) dispositions of assets, (vii) the maintenance of minimum consolidated net worth, maximum funded debt ratios, minimum consolidated cash flow coverage ratios, and maximum senior secured leverage ratios, (viii) transactions with affiliates, (ix) sale and leaseback transactions, (x) entering into swap agreements, and (xi) changes to governing documents, in each case subject to numerous baskets, exceptions and thresholds. The funded debt ratio, consolidated cash flow coverage ratio and senior secured
8
leverage ratio that the Company was required to meet as of September 30, 2007 were 4.25 to 1.00, 1.10 to 1.00, and 2.50 to 1.00, respectively. The Company was in compliance with these and all other financial covenants at September 30, 2007.
The credit agreement for the senior credit facilities provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to: (i) failure to pay any principal or interest when due, (ii) failure to comply with covenants, (iii) any material representation or warranty made by the Company proving to be incorrect in any material respect, (iv) defaults relating to or acceleration of other material indebtedness, (v) certain insolvency or receivership events affecting the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (vi) a change in control, (vii) material judgments, claims or liabilities against the Company or (viii) a material defect in the lenders’ lien against the collateral securing the obligations under the credit agreement. There were no events of default under the senior credit facilities at September 30, 2007.
On August 16, 2005, the Company issued senior unsecured notes in the amount of $150,000. These notes bear interest at 7.625% payable semi-annually each February and August. The maturity date of the notes is August 15, 2015. The senior credit facilities were amended to permit the offering of the notes and modify certain of the covenants applicable to the senior credit facilities. The proceeds from the senior notes, less financing costs, were used to retire the term loan and pay down the revolver under the senior credit facilities.
On and after August 15, 2010, the Company will be entitled, at its option, to redeem all or a portion of these notes at the redemption prices (expressed in percentages of principal amount on the redemption date), plus accrued interest to the redemption date, if redeemed, during the 12-month period commencing on August 15 of the years set forth below:
| | Redemption | |
Period | | Price | |
2010 | | 103.813 | % |
2011 | | 102.542 | % |
2012 | | 101.271 | % |
2013 and thereafter | | 100.000 | % |
Subject to certain conditions, the Company will be entitled, at its option, on one or more occasions prior to August 15, 2008 to redeem notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes originally issued at a redemption price (expressed as a percentage of principal amount on the redemption date) of 107.625%, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds from one or more equity offerings.
The terms of the senior notes include customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions pertaining to: (i) incurrence of additional indebtedness and issuance of preferred stock, (ii) payment of dividends on or making of distributions in respect of capital stock or making certain other restricted payments or investments, (iii) entering into agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries, (iv) sale or other disposition of assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries, (v) transactions with affiliates, (vi) incurrence of liens, (vii) sale/leaseback transactions, and (viii) merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of our assets, in each case subject to numerous baskets, exceptions and thresholds. The Company was in compliance with these and all other financial covenants at September 30, 2007.
The terms of the senior notes provide for customary events of default, including, but not limited to: (i) failure to pay any principal or interest when due, (ii) failure to comply with covenants and limitations, (iii) certain insolvency or receivership events affecting us or any of our subsidiaries and (iv) unsatisfied material judgments, claims or liabilities against us. There were no events of default under the senior notes at September 30, 2007.
9
Capital lease obligations on the Company’s fleet of vehicles totaled $3,068 and $3,825 at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, respectively.
Required payments under the Company’s long-term debt and capital lease obligations are as follows:
| | Amount | |
2007 (three months) | | $ | 367 | |
2008 | | 1,310 | |
2009 | | 1,070 | |
2010 | | 807 | |
2011 | | 66,271 | |
Thereafter | | 150,000 | |
| | $ | 219,825 | |
4. Derivative Instruments
The Company entered into standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) interest rate swap agreements (the “Swap Agreements”) to manage the interest rate risk associated with its debt. Concurrent with the reduction of the amounts due under the senior credit facilities, certain Swap Agreements previously designated as cash flow hedges ceased to qualify as such. The change in the fair value of the four Swap Agreements that do not qualify for hedge accounting is recognized in the income statement in the period in which the change occurs. The change in the fair value of these contracts resulted in a loss of $965 and $986 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 and a loss of $40 and $734 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively. One Swap Agreement continues to be designated as a cash flow hedge.
The table below outlines the details of each remaining Swap Agreement:
| | | | | | Notional | | | | | |
| | Original | | | | Amount | | | | | |
Date of | | Notional | | Fixed/ | | September 30, | | Expiration | | Fixed | |
Origin | | Amount | | Amortizing | | 2007 | | Date | | Rate | |
June 24, 2003 | | $ | 20,000 | | Amortizing | | $ | 7,857 | | Jun 30, 2008 | | 2.34 | % |
June 24, 2003 | | $ | 20,000 | | Fixed | | $ | 20,000 | | Jun 30, 2008 | | 2.69 | % |
May 2, 2005 | | $ | 17,000 | | Fixed | | $ | 17,000 | | Dec 31, 2011 | | 4.69 | % |
May 2, 2005 | | $ | 12,000 | | Fixed | (1) | $ | — | | Sep 30, 2009 | | 4.66 | % |
May 2, 2005 | | $ | 10,000 | | Fixed | (1) | $ | — | | Dec 31, 2011 | | 4.77 | % |
(1) Effective Date is June 30, 2008
10
In accordance with the Swap Agreements and on a quarterly basis, interest expense is calculated based on the floating 90-day LIBOR and the fixed rate. If interest expense as calculated is greater based on the 90-day LIBOR, the financial institution pays the difference to the Company. If interest expense as calculated is greater based on the fixed rate, the Company pays the difference to the financial institution. Depending on fluctuations in the LIBOR, the Company’s interest rate exposure and its related impact on interest expense and net cash flow may increase or decrease. The counter party to the Swap Agreements exposes the Company to credit loss in the event of non-performance, however, nonperformance is not anticipated.
The fair value of a Swap Agreement is the estimated amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreement at the reporting date, taking into account current interest rates and the credit worthiness of the counter party. At December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, the fair value of the Swap Agreements was $1,335 and $398, respectively. These amounts have been included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income relate entirely to the Company’s interest rate Swap Agreement which is accounted for as a cash flow hedge. If the Company were to change its hedging strategy, it would recognize a gain of approximately $133 based on the fair value of this Swap Agreement at September 30, 2007.
The activity included in other comprehensive income is as follows:
| | For the three months ended | | For the nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | |
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments | | $ | (147 | ) | $ | (84 | ) | $ | (156 | ) | $ | (203 | ) |
Income tax expense | | 63 | | 32 | | 69 | | 80 | |
Total other comprehensive loss | | $ | (84 | ) | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (87 | ) | $ | (123 | ) |
11
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets consist of the following:
| | As of December 31, 2006 | |
| | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Book Value | |
Goodwill: | | | | | | | |
Facilities Management | | $ | 38,231 | | | | $ | 38,231 | |
Product Sales | | 223 | | | | 223 | |
| | $ | 38,454 | | | | $ | 38,454 | |
Intangible assets: | | | | | | | |
Facilities Management: | | | | | | | |
Trade Name | | $ | 12,650 | | $ | — | | $ | 12,650 | |
Non-compete agreements | | 4,041 | | 3,861 | | 180 | |
Contract rights | | 125,437 | | 18,290 | | 107,147 | |
Product Sales: | | | | | | | |
Customer lists | | 1,451 | | 830 | | 621 | |
Deferred financing costs | | 5,996 | | 1,051 | | 4,945 | |
| | $ | 149,575 | | $ | 24,032 | | $ | 125,543 | |
| | As of September 30, 2007 | |
| | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Book Value | |
Goodwill: | | | | | | | |
Facilities Management | | $ | 45,373 | | | | $ | 45,373 | |
Product Sales | | 223 | | | | 223 | |
| | $ | 45,596 | | | | $ | 45,596 | |
Intangible assets: | | | | | | | |
Facilities Management: | | | | | | | |
Trade Name | | $ | 14,650 | | $ | — | | $ | 14,650 | |
Non-compete agreements | | 4,041 | | 3,891 | | 150 | |
Contract rights | | 158,578 | | 23,500 | | 135,078 | |
Distribution rights | | 1,623 | | 93 | | 1,530 | |
Product Sales: | | | | | | | |
Customer lists | | 1,451 | | 903 | | 548 | |
Deferred financing costs | | 5,996 | | 1,591 | | 4,405 | |
| | $ | 186,339 | | $ | 29,978 | | $ | 156,361 | |
12
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
Estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets consists of the following:
2007 (three months) | | $ | 2,307 | |
2008 | | 9,182 | |
2009 | | 9,065 | |
2010 | | 8,872 | |
2011 | | 8,467 | |
Thereafter | | 102,385 | |
| | $ | 140,278 | |
Amortization expense of intangible assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 was $5,275 and $5,945, respectively.
6. Income Taxes
The Company adopted FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), at the beginning of fiscal year 2007. FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 requires a company to evaluate whether the tax position taken by a company will more likely than not be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the changes to the Company’s reserve for uncertain tax positions was accounted for as a $500 adjustment to increase the beginning balance of retained earnings on the Company’s balance sheet. Upon adoption, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions at January 1, 2007 was $893. The Company had estimated potential exposure for the year 2003. As of September 15, 2007 the statute of limitations had expired and the reserve of $163 was no longer required.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as to income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. The Company has concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2003. The 2004 U.S. federal income tax return is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. All material state and local income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2002.
The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had approximately $68 accrued for interest, and no accrual for penalties at the beginning of fiscal year 2007. The Company does not anticipate the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change by December 31, 2007.
7. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in various litigation proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the Company’s ultimate liability, if any, under pending litigation would not materially affect its financial condition or the results of its operations.
13
8. Earnings Per Share
A reconciliation of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding is as follows:
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (267 | ) | $ | 125 | | $ | 1,896 | | $ | 2,147 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic | | 13,034 | | 13,245 | | 12,988 | | 13,188 | |
Effect of dilutive securites: | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | — | | 425 | | 426 | | 441 | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted | | 13,034 | | 13,670 | | 13,414 | | 13,629 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income per share - basic | | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | | $ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.16 | |
Net (loss) income per share - diluted | | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | | $ | 0.14 | | $ | 0.16 | |
There were 216 and 557 shares under option plans that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share at September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effects.
9. Segment Information
The Company operates four business units which are based on the Company’s different product and service categories: Laundry Facilities Management, Laundry Equipment Sales, MicroFridge® and Reprographics. These four business units have been aggregated into two reportable segments (“Facilities Management” and “Product Sales”). The Facilities Management segment includes two business units: Laundry Facilities Management and Reprographics. The Laundry Facilities Management business unit provides coin and debit card-operated laundry equipment to multi-unit housing facilities such as apartment buildings, colleges and universities and public housing complexes. The Reprographics business unit provides coin and debit-card-operated copiers to academic and public libraries. The Product Sales segment includes two business units: MicroFridge® and Laundry Equipment Sales. The MicroFridge® business unit revenue includes sales of its own patented and proprietary line of refrigerator/freezer/microwave oven combinations to a customer base which includes hospitality and assisted living facilities, military housing and colleges and universities. The MicroFridge business unit also sells a full range of kitchen and laundry appliances. The Laundry Equipment Sales business unit operates as a distributor of, and provides service to, commercial laundry equipment in public laundromats, as well as for institutional purchasers, including hospitals, hotels and the United States military for use in their own on-premise laundry facilities.
There are no intersegment revenues.
14
9. Segment Information (continued)
The tables below present information about the operations of the reportable segments of Mac-Gray for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007. The information presented represents the key financial metrics that are utilized by the Company’s senior management in assessing the performance of each of the Company’s reportable segments.
| | For the three months ended | | For the nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities management | | $ | 55,770 | | $ | 59,837 | | $ | 171,241 | | $ | 176,059 | |
Product sales | | 14,233 | | 16,688 | | 35,479 | | 41,155 | |
Total | | 70,003 | | 76,525 | | 206,720 | | 217,214 | |
Gross margin: | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities management | | 9,081 | | 9,398 | | 31,656 | | 30,727 | |
Product sales | | 2,865 | | 3,397 | | 7,346 | | 9,401 | |
Total | | 11,946 | | 12,795 | | 39,002 | | 40,128 | |
Selling, general, administration, depreciation and amortization expenses | | 8,197 | | 8,408 | | 25,863 | | 26,432 | |
(Gain) loss on sale of assets | | (92 | ) | (120 | ) | 23 | | (244 | ) |
Interest and other expenses, net | | 3,666 | | 3,586 | | 10,247 | | 9,844 | |
Loss related to derivative instruments | | 965 | | 986 | | 40 | | 734 | |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | | $ | (790 | ) | $ | (65 | ) | $ | 2,829 | | $ | 3,362 | |
| | December 31, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | |
Assets: | | | | | |
Facilities management | | $ | 293,749 | | $ | 339,881 | |
Product sales | | 25,973 | | 25,723 | |
Total for reportable segments | | 319,722 | | 365,604 | |
Corporate (1) | | 18,321 | | 19,732 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 961 | | 960 | |
Total | | $ | 339,004 | | $ | 386,296 | |
(1) Principally cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses and property, plant and equipment not included elsewhere.
15
10. Stock Compensation
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, grants of options for 310 shares were issued. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair values of the stock options granted were estimated using the following components:
Fair value of options at grant date | | $1.91 - | $5.65 | |
Risk free interest rate | | 4.25% - | 4.98% | |
Estimated forfeiture rate | | 0% - | 4% | |
Estimated option term | | 1 - | 8 years | |
Expected volatility | | 23.82% - | 26.36% | |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company granted 76 shares of restricted stock with an average fair market value of $12.19 per share. The stock vests evenly over three years upon the achievement of certain performance objectives to be determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year. Because the performance objectives for 2007 had not been achieved as of September 30, 2007, the restricted stock subject to vesting based upon the performance objectives for 2007 was not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.
For the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, income before taxes was reduced by a stock compensation expense of $294 and $366, respectively. The impact on net income was a reduction of $174 and $216, respectively, and a reduction in basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.01 and $0.02, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, income before taxes was reduced by a stock compensation expense of $888 and $1,436, respectively. The impact on net income was a reduction of $533 and $849, respectively, and a reduction in basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.04 and $0.06, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, cash flows from financing activities were increased (and cash flows from operations were correspondingly decreased) by $319 and $301, respectively, due to additions to the windfall tax pool.
The allocation of stock compensation expense is consistent with the allocation of the participants’ salary and other compensation expenses.
At September 30, 2007, options for 484 shares and 116 restricted shares have been granted but have not yet vested. Compensation expense related to unvested options and restricted shares will be recognized in the following years:
2007 (three months) | | $ | 366 | |
2008 | | 1,298 | |
2009 | | 742 | |
2010 | | 43 | |
| | $ | 2,449 | |
16
11. Product Warranties
The Company offers limited-duration warranties on MicroFridge® products and, at the time of sale, provides reserves for all estimated warranty costs based upon historical warranty costs. Actual costs have not exceeded the Company’s estimates.
The activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is as follows:
| | Accrued | |
| | Warranty | |
Balance, December 31, 2006 | | $ | 456 | |
Accruals for warranties issued | | 151 | |
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) | | (254 | ) |
Balance, September 30, 2007 | | $ | 353 | |
12. New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently reviewing this new accounting standard but does not expect it to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of No. 115” (“FAS 159”), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. FAS 159 expands opportunities to use fair value measurements in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The Company is currently reviewing this new accounting standard but does not expect it to have a material impact on its financial statements.
17
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This report contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Additional statements identified by words such as “will,” “likely,” “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “designed,” “develop,” “would,” “future,” “can,” “could,” “outlook” and other expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters, also identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events and financial performance. Investors should not rely on forward-looking statements because they are subject to a variety of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the following:
• | | debt service requirements under our existing and future indebtedness; |
| | |
• | | availability of cash flow to finance capital expenditures; |
| | |
• | | our ability to renew laundry leases with our customers; |
| | |
• | | competition in the laundry facilities management industry; |
| | |
• | | our ability to maintain relationships with our suppliers, including Whirlpool Corporation; |
| | |
• | | our ability to consummate acquisitions and successfully integrate the businesses we acquire; |
| | |
• | | increases in multi-unit housing sector vacancy rates and condominium conversions; |
| | |
• | | our susceptibility to product liability claims; |
| | |
• | | our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights and create new technology; |
| | |
• | | our ability to retain our key personnel and attract and retain other highly skilled employees; |
| | |
• | | decreases in the value of our intangible assets; |
| | |
• | | our ability to comply with current and future environmental regulations; |
| | |
• | | actions of our controlling stockholders; and |
| | |
• | | those factors discussed under Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). |
Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements, and accordingly, we can give no assurances that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will occur or, if any of them do, what impact they will have on our results of operations or financial condition. In view of these uncertainties, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless the context suggest otherwise, references to the “Company,” “Mac-Gray,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to Mac-Gray Corporation and its subsidiaries. We have registered, applied to register or are using the following trademarks: MicroFridge®, MaytagDirectÔ, LaundryViewÔ, PrecisionWashÔ, Intelligent Laundry SolutionsÔ, LaundryLinxÔ, TechLinxÔ,
18
VentSnakeÔ, IntelliVaultÔ, and Safe PlugÔ. The following are trademarks of parties other than us: Maytag®, Amana®, Whirlpool® and Magic Chef®.
Overview
Since its founding in 1927, Mac-Gray Corporation has grown to become the second largest laundry facilities management business in the United States. Through our portfolio of card and coin-operated laundry equipment located in laundry facilities across the country, we provide laundry convenience to residents of multi-unit housing, such as apartment buildings, condominiums, colleges and universities, and hotels and motels. Based on our ongoing survey of colleges and universities, we believe we are the largest provider of such services to the college and university market in the United States. Mac-Gray Corporation was incorporated in Delaware in 1997. We report our business in two segments, facilities management and product sales. Facilities management consists of our laundry facilities management and reprographics business units. Product sales consist of our laundry equipment sales and MicroFridge® business units.
Our business model is built on a stable demand for laundry services, combined with long-term leases, strong customer relationships, a broad customer base, and predictable capital needs. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, our total revenue was $76.5 million and $217.2 million, respectively. Approximately 78% and 81% of our total revenue and 73% and 77% of our gross margin for these same three and nine month periods were generated by our facilities management segment. We generate facilities management revenue primarily by entering into long-term leases with property owners or property management companies for the exclusive right to install and maintain laundry equipment in common area laundry rooms within their properties in exchange for a negotiated portion of the revenue we collect. As of September 30, 2007, approximately 90% of our installed machine base was located in laundry facilities subject to long-term leases, which have a weighted average remaining term of approximately five years. Our capital costs are typically incurred in connection with new or renewed leases, and include investments in laundry equipment and card and coin-operated systems, incentive payments to property owners or property management companies, and expenses to refurbish laundry facilities. Our capital costs consist of a large number of relatively small amounts, which are associated with our entry into or renewal of leases. Accordingly, our capital needs are predictable and largely within our control. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we incurred approximately $10.7 million and $22.0 million, respectively, of capital expenditures. In addition, we made incentive payments of approximately $1.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 to property owners and property management companies in connection with securing our lease arrangements.
In addition, through our product sales segment, we generate revenue by selling commercial laundry equipment, our line of combination refrigerator/freezer/microwave oven units under the MicroFridge® brand, and the full lines of Maytag®, Whirlpool®, Amana® and Magic Chef® domestic laundry and kitchen appliances under our MaytagDirectTM program. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, our product sales segment generated approximately 22% and 19%, respectively, of our total revenue and 27% and 23%, respectively, of our gross margin.
Our financial objective is to maintain and enhance profitability by retaining existing customers, adding customers in areas in which we currently operate, and selectively expanding our geographic footprint and density through acquisitions. One of the key challenges we face is maintaining and expanding our customer base in a competitive industry. Within any given geographic area, Mac-Gray may compete with local independent operators, regional operators and multi-region operators, and one national operator as well as property owners and property management companies who self operate their laundry facilities. We devote substantial resources to our sales efforts and are focused on continued innovation in order to distinguish us from our competitors. Approximately 10% to 15% of our laundry room leases are up for renewal each year. Over the past five calendar years, we have retained approximately 97% of our total installed equipment base each year while adding approximately 4% per year to our revenue base through organic growth.
19
Recent Developments
On August 8, 2007, we acquired the laundry facilities management assets of a regional operator in Maryland. The cost of this acquisition was approximately $43.0 million in cash and was funded using borrowings under the Company’s senior credit facilities. In connection with the acquisition, the Company increased the maximum availability under the credit facilities from $65.0 million to $85.0 million. We estimate that this acquisition will add approximately $25.0 million of annual revenue.
Results of Operations (Dollars in thousands)
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The information presented below for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 is derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report:
| | For the three months ended September 30, | | For the nine months ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | Increase | | % | | | | | | Increase | | % | |
| | 2006 | | 2007 | | (Decrease) | | Change | | 2006 | | 2007 | | (Decrease) | | Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Laundry facilities management | | $ | 55,281 | | $ | 59,554 | | $ | 4,273 | | 8 | % | $ | 169,391 | | $ | 174,680 | | $ | 5,289 | | 3 | % |
Reprographics revenue | | 489 | | 283 | | (206 | ) | -42 | % | 1,850 | | 1,379 | | (471 | ) | -25 | % |
Total facilities management revenue | | 55,770 | | 59,837 | | 4,067 | | 7 | % | 171,241 | | 176,059 | | 4,818 | | 3 | % |
MicroFridge® revenue | | 9,575 | | 11,038 | | 1,463 | | 15 | % | 22,973 | | 26,052 | | 3,079 | | 13 | % |
Laundry equipment sales revenue | | 4,658 | | 5,650 | | 992 | | 21 | % | 12,506 | | 15,103 | | 2,597 | | 21 | % |
Total product sales revenue | | 14,233 | | 16,688 | | 2,455 | | 17 | % | 35,479 | | 41,155 | | 5,676 | | 16 | % |
Total revenue | | $ | 70,003 | | $ | 76,525 | | $ | 6,522 | | 9 | % | $ | 206,720 | | $ | 217,214 | | $ | 10,494 | | 5 | % |
Revenue
Total revenue increased by $6,522, or 9%, to $76,525 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $70,003 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Total revenue increased by $10,494, or 5%, to $217,214 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $206,720 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Facilities management revenue. Total facilities management revenue increased by $4,067, or 7%, to $59,837 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $55,770 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 is primarily attributable to the revenue associated with the laundry facilities management business acquired from Hof Service Company, Inc. (“Hof”) on August 8, 2007, which accounted for $3,875, or 95%, of the total increase. Total facilities management revenue increased by $4,818, or 3%, to $176,059 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $171,241 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 is primarily attributable to the revenue associated with the laundry facilities management business acquired from Hof, which accounted for $3,875, or 80%, of the total increase.
Within the facilities management segment, revenue in the laundry facilities management business unit increased by $4,273, or 8%, to $59,554 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $55,281 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Revenue in the laundry facilities management business unit increased by $5,289, or 3%, to $174,680 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $169,391 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in laundry facilities management revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same periods in 2006 is primarily attributable to the revenue associated with the laundry facilities management business acquired from Hof, which accounted for $3,875, or 91%, of the total increase for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 73% of the total increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The remaining increases are
20
attributable primarily to the placement of additional laundry equipment in the field as well as selected vend price increases. The increases were offset in part by reduced usage of the Company’s equipment in apartment building laundry rooms as a result of high apartment vacancy rates in certain markets, particularly in the Southeast and the Southwest.
Revenue in the reprographics business unit decreased by $206, or 42%, to $283 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $489 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Revenue in the reprographics business unit decreased by $471, or 25%, to $1,379 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $1,850 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the reprographics business unit accounted for less than 1% of consolidated revenue. Due to the continued decline in revenue, in the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company took a non-cash impairment charge of $1.6 million, net of taxes related to the reprographics business. Revenue from this business unit is expected to continue to decline.
Product sales revenue. Revenue from our product sales segment increased by $2,455, or 17%, to $16,688 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $14,233 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Revenue from our product sales segment increased by $5,676, or 16%, to $41,155 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $35,479 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increases in revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same periods in 2006 are attributable to an increase in sales in both the laundry equipment sales business unit and the MicroFridge® business unit.
Revenue in the laundry equipment sales business unit increased by $992, or 21%, to $5,650 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $4,658 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Revenue in the laundry equipment sales business unit increased by $2,597, or 21%, to $15,103 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $12,506 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Sales in the laundry equipment sales business unit are sensitive to the strength of the economy, local economic factors, local permitting and the availability of financing to small businesses, and therefore have the potential to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. The increased sales in 2007 are, in part, the result of a focused marketing effort initiated in 2006.
Revenue in the MicroFridge® business unit increased by $1,463, or 15%, to $11,038 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $9,575 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is attributable to improved sales in the academic and government sectors compared to sales for the same period in the prior year. Sales in the other sectors were essentially flat compared to the prior year. Revenue increased by $3,079, or 13%, to $26,052 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $22,973 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 is primarily attributable to an increase in sales to the government market and to a lesser extent, sales to the academic market, partially offset by a decline in the retail and property management markets. Our sales to the government will continue to fluctuate based on shifting budget priorities as well as the timing of the release of funds for military housing initiatives.
Cost of revenue
Cost of facilities management revenue. Cost of facilities management revenue includes rent paid to customers as well as those costs associated with installing and servicing machines and costs of collecting, counting, and depositing facilities management revenue. Cost of facilities management revenue increased by $3,597, or 10%, to $41,136 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $37,539 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Cost of facilities management revenue increased by $4,228, or 4%, to $118,153 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $113,925 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase is due, in part, to the increased revenue attributable to the Hof acquisition. As a percentage of facilities management revenue, cost of facilities management revenue is 69% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to 67% for the same period in 2006 and 67% for both the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Facilities management rent as a percentage of facilities management revenue was 49% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 48% for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Facilities management rent as a percentage of facilities management revenue was 49% for both the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. Facilities management rent can be affected by new and renewed laundry leases, lease portfolios acquired and by other factors such as the amount of incentive payments and laundry room betterments invested in new or renewed laundry leases. As
21
we vary the amount invested in a facility, the facilities management rent as a function of facilities management revenue can vary. Incentive payments and betterments are amortized over the life of the laundry lease. The percentage of facilities management rent to facilities management revenue is also impacted by the facilities management rent rate structure in the reprographics business unit. Because this business unit has a much lower facilities management rent rate structure than the laundry facilities management business unit, the reduction in the size of the reprographics business unit through the non-renewal of leases could result in an increase in the overall facilities management rent as a percentage of revenue.
Depreciation and amortization related to operations. Depreciation and amortization related to the Facilities Management operations increased by $153, or 2%, to $9,303 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $9,150 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Depreciation and amortization related to the Facilities Management operations increased by $1,519, or 6%, to $27,179 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $25,660 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in depreciation and amortization for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same periods in 2006 is primarily attributable to the contract rights and equipment we acquired as part of our 2006 and 2007 acquisitions. Also contributing to the increased depreciation expense was new equipment placed in laundry facilities at new locations and replacement of older equipment as contracts were renegotiated.
Cost of product sales. Cost of product sales consists primarily of the cost of laundry equipment, MicroFridge® equipment and parts sold, as well as salaries and related warehousing expenses as part of the product sales segment. Cost of product sales increased by $1,860, or 16%, to $13,189 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $11,329 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and by $3,540, or 13%, to $31,427 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $27,887 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. As a percentage of sales, cost of product sales was 79% for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to 80% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 76% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to 79% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The gross margin in the MicroFridge® business unit decreased to 20% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 21% for the same period in 2006 and increased to 22% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 21% for the corresponding period in 2006. The gross margin in the MicroFridge® business unit is impacted by the mix of products and markets into which they sell. The increase in academic sales, at a slightly lower margin than sales to other markets, negatively impacted the gross margin for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 compared to the corresponding period in 2006. The gross margin in the laundry equipment sales business unit increased to 22% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 18% for the same period in 2006 and to 25% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 20% for the same period in 2006. The increase in the margin is primarily attributable to the mix of products sold in 2007 compared to the mix of products sold in the corresponding period in 2006.
Operating expenses
General, administration, sales and marketing, and related depreciation and amortization expense. General, administration, sales and marketing, and related depreciation and amortization expense increased by $211, or 3%, to $8,408 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $8,197 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. General, administration, sales and marketing, and related depreciation and amortization expense increased by $569, or 2%, to $26,432 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $25,863 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. As a percentage of total revenue, general, administration, sales and marketing and related depreciation expenses were 11% and 12% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and 12% and 13% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in expenses in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 is due primarily to an increase in personnel related costs partially offset by lower professional fees. The increase in expenses in the first nine months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 is due primarily to a non-cash stock compensation expense related to the adoption of a long-term incentive program for certain members of management, which was not in effect during the full nine months ended September 30, 2006.
22
Income from operations
Income from operations increased by $666, or 17%, to $4,507 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $3,841 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and by $824, or 6%, to $13,940 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $13,116 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 due primarily to the reasons discussed above.
Interest expense, net
Interest expense, net of interest income, decreased by $80, or 2%, to $3,586 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $3,666 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 interest expense decreased by $403, or 4%, to $9,844 compared to $10,247 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This decrease is due primarily to our ability to lower our weighted average debt balance compared with the same period a year ago even while adding to our equipment base through acquisitions. Also contributing to this decrease is a lower applicable rate we pay to our bank group as a result of our amended credit facility agreement, which was effective in December 2006.
Loss related to derivative instruments
We are party to interest rate Swap Agreements that we had accounted for as cash flow hedges. The fair value of these swaps had been included in other comprehensive income in the equity section of the balance sheet. As a result of the reduction in the amount outstanding under our senior credit facilities, certain Swap Agreements no longer qualified for cash flow hedge accounting treatment. The revised accounting treatment resulted in the recording of losses of $986 and $965 in the income statement for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we recorded losses of $734 and $40, respectively.
Provision for income taxes
The benefit from income taxes decreased by $333, or 64%, to $190 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $523 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The provision for income taxes increased by $282, or 30%, to $1,215 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $933 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The changes are the combination of a decrease in the pretax loss for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase in pretax income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, an increase in the effective tax rate, and a reduction in the reserve for uncertain tax positions. The effective tax rate, without considering the impact of the reduction in the reserve, increased 1% to 42% from 41% and 1% from 40% to 41% respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same periods in 2006. The increases in the effective tax rates are due primarily to a change in the permanent tax items as a percent of taxable income. Reductions in the reserve for uncertain tax positions further reduced the effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The Company had estimated potential exposure for the year 2003. As of September 15, 2007, the statute of limitations had expired and the reserve of $163 was no longer required. The Company had estimated potential state income tax nexus exposure by its subsidiary for the years 2001 and 2002. As of September 15, 2006, the statute of limitations had expired and the reserve was no longer required.
Net income
As a result of the foregoing, net income increased by $392 to $125 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to net loss of $267 for the same period ending September 30, 2006. Net income increased by $251, or 13%, to $2,147 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to net income of $1,896 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
23
Seasonality
We experience moderate seasonality as a result of our operations in the college and university market. Revenues derived from the college and university market represented approximately 16% of our total facilities management revenue in 2006. Academic facilities management and rental revenues are derived substantially during the school year in the first, second and fourth calendar quarters. Conversely, our operating and capital expenditures have historically been higher during the third calendar quarter when we install a large amount of equipment while colleges and universities are generally on summer break. Product sales, principally of MicroFridge® products, to this market are typically higher during the third calendar quarter as compared to the rest of the calendar year, somewhat offsetting the seasonality effect of the laundry facilities management business unit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources (Dollars in thousands)
We believe that we can satisfy our working capital requirements and funding of capital needs with internally generated cash flow and, as necessary, borrowings from our revolving loan facility described below. Capital requirements for the year ending December 31, 2007, including contract incentive payments, are currently expected to be between $30,000 and $34,000. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, spending on capital expenditures and contract incentives totaled $22,031 and $2,283, respectively. The capital expenditures for 2007 are primarily composed of laundry equipment installed in connection with new customer leases and the renewal of existing leases.
From time to time, we consider potential acquisitions. We believe that any future acquisitions of significant size would likely require us to obtain additional debt or equity financing. In the past, we have been able to obtain such financing for other material transactions on terms that we believed to be reasonable. However, it is possible that we may not be able to obtain acquisition financing on favorable terms, or at all, in the future.
Our current long-term liquidity needs are principally the repayment of the outstanding principal amounts of our long-term indebtedness, including borrowings under our senior credit facility and our senior notes. We are unable to project with certainty whether our long-term cash flow from operations will be sufficient to repay our long-term debt when it comes due. If this cash flow were insufficient, then we would need to refinance such indebtedness or otherwise amend its terms to extend the maturity dates. We cannot make any assurances that such refinancings or amendments, if necessary, would be available on reasonable terms, if at all.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, our source of cash was from financing and operating activities. Our primary uses of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were the acquisition of regional laundry facilities management operators, the purchase of new laundry machines and the semi-annual interest payment on our senior notes. We anticipate that we will continue to use cash flows provided by operating activities to finance working capital needs, including interest payments on outstanding indebtedness, capital expenditures and other working capital needs.
Operating Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, net cash flows provided by operating activities were $28,509 and $20,854, respectively. Cash flows from operations consists primarily of facilities management revenue and product sales, offset by the cost of facilities management revenues, cost of product sales, and general, administration, sales and marketing expenses. The change in working capital is primarily due to the timing of purchases of inventory, capital equipment and services, and when such expenditures are due to be paid. The increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is attributable to a decrease in inventory of $1,212 in 2007 compared to an increase of $1,156 in 2006, and a smaller increase in prepaid facilities management rent and other assets of $3,361 in 2007 compared to an increase of $6,724 in 2006. Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily due to the assets acquired in our 2006 and 2007 acquisitions, and new equipment placed in service with customers.
24
Investing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, net cash flows used in investing activities were $70,257 and $38,920, respectively. Of the 2007 total, $48,579 was used for acquisitions, and of the 2006 total, $18,780 was used for acquisitions. Other capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, primarily laundry equipment for new and renewed lease locations, were $22,031 and $20,340, respectively.
Financing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net cash flows provided by financing activities were $42,393. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net cash flows provided by financing activities were $18,882. Cash flows provided by financing activities consist primarily of net proceeds from bank borrowings and proceeds from the exercise of options and the issuance of stock through the employee stock purchase program. Cash flows provided by financing activities increased in the first nine months of 2007 and 2006 due to borrowings to fund acquisitions.
Effective December 29, 2006, we amended our senior bank credit facilities, reducing the credit line to $65,000 (with the option, subject to customary terms and conditions, to increase the line up to $100,000, in increments of not less than $10,000, over the life of the facility), reducing the interest rate on outstanding borrowings, modifying certain covenants and extending the maturity date to December 29, 2011. Concurrent with the August 2007 acquisition, we increased our credit line to $85,000 using the existing option in the credit facilities. The senior credit facilities are collateralized by a blanket lien on all of our assets and our two main subsidiaries, Mac-Gray Services, Inc. and Intirion Corporation, as well as a pledge by us of all of the capital stock of our two subsidiaries. Borrowings outstanding under the senior credit facilities bear interest at a fluctuating rate equal to (i) in the case of Eurodollar rate loans, the LIBOR rate (adjusted for statutory reserves) plus an applicable percentage, ranging from 1.00% to 1.50% (1.50% as of September 30, 2007), determined quarterly by reference to the funded debt ratio or (ii) in the case of alternate base rate loans and swing line loans, the higher of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (b) the annual rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as its “prime rate,” in each case, plus an applicable percentage, ranging from 0.00% to 0.50% (0.50% as of September 30, 2007), determined quarterly by reference to the funded debt ratio. The average interest rates of our borrowings under the senior credit facilities at September 30, 2006 and 2007 were 6.65% and 6.47%, respectively.
Under the senior credit facilities, we pay a commitment fee equal to a percentage, ranging from 0.25% to 0.30%, determined quarterly by reference to the funded debt ratio, of the average daily-unused portion of the senior credit facilities. This commitment fee percentage was 0.30% as of September 30, 2007.
The credit agreement for the senior credit facilities includes customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions pertaining to: (i) the incurrence of additional indebtedness, (ii) limitations on liens, (iii) making distributions, dividends and other payments, (iv) the making of certain investments and loans, (v) mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, (vi) dispositions of assets, (vii) the maintenance of minimum consolidated net worth, maximum funded debt ratios, minimum consolidated cash flow coverage ratios, and maximum senior secured leverage ratios, (viii) transactions with affiliates, (ix) sale and leaseback transactions, (x) entering into swap agreements, and (xi) changes to governing documents, in each case subject to numerous baskets, exceptions and thresholds. The funded debt ratio, consolidated cash flow coverage ratio and senior secured leverage ratio that we were required to meet as of September 30, 2007 were 4.25 to 1.00, 1.10 to 1.00, and 2.50 to 1.00, respectively. We were in compliance with these and all other financial covenants at September 30, 2007.
The credit agreement for the senior credit facilities provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to:(i) failure to pay any principal or interest when due, (ii) failure to comply with covenants, (iii) any material representation or warranty made by us proving to be incorrect in any material respect, (iv) defaults relating to or acceleration of other material indebtedness, (v) certain insolvency or receivership events affecting us or any of our subsidiaries, (vi) a change in control, (vii) material judgments, claims or liabilities against us, or (viii) a material defect in the lenders’ lien against the collateral securing the obligations under the credit agreement. There were no events of default under the 2005 senior credit facilities at September 30, 2007.
25
As of September 30, 2007, there was $66,000 outstanding under the revolving line of credit and $860 in outstanding letters of credit under the senior credit facilities. The available balance under the revolving line of credit was $18,140 at September 30, 2007.
On August 16, 2005, we issued $150,000 of senior unsecured notes maturing on August 15, 2015. Interest on the notes will accrue at the rate of 7.625% per annum payable semiannually in arrears. On and after August 15, 2010, we will be entitled, at our option, to redeem all or a portion of these notes at the redemption prices set forth below (expressed in percentages of principal amount on the redemption date), plus accrued interest to the redemption date, if redeemed, during the 12 month period commencing on August 15 of the years set forth below:
| | Redemption | |
Period | | Price | |
2010 | | 103.813 | % |
2011 | | 102.542 | % |
2012 | | 101.271 | % |
2013 and thereafter | | 100.000 | % |
Subject to certain conditions, we will be entitled, at our option, on one or more occasions prior to August 15, 2008 to redeem notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes originally issued at a redemption price (expressed as a percentage of principal amount on the redemption date) of 107.625%, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds from one or more equity offerings.
The terms of senior notes include customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions pertaining to: (i) incurrence of additional indebtedness and issuance of preferred stock, (ii) payment of dividends on or making of distributions in respect of capital stock or making certain other restricted payments or investments, (iii) entering into agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries, (iv) sale or other disposition of assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries, (v) transactions with affiliates, (vi) incurrence of liens, (vii) sale/leaseback transactions, and (viii) merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of our assets, in each case subject to numerous baskets, exceptions and thresholds. We were in compliance with all financial covenants at September 30, 2007.
The terms of senior notes provide for customary events of default, including, but not limited to: (i) failure to pay any principal or interest when due, (ii) failure to comply with covenants and limitations, (iii) certain insolvency or receivership events affecting us or any of our subsidiaries, and (iv) unsatisfied material judgments, claims or liabilities against us. There were no events of default under the senior notes at September 30, 2007.
The net proceeds of the senior notes were used to retire the term loan and reduce the revolving loan balance outstanding under the senior credit facilities.
We have entered into standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association, or ISDA, interest rate Swap Agreements to manage the interest rate risk associated with our senior credit facilities. For a description of our interest rate Swap Agreements see “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
26
Contractual Obligations
A summary of our contractual obligations and commitments related to our outstanding long-term debt and future minimum lease payments related to our vehicle fleet, warehouse rent and facilities management rent as of September 30, 2007 is as follows:
Fiscal | | Long-term | | Interest on | | Facilities rent | | Capital lease | | Operating lease | | | |
Year | | debt | | senior notes | | commitments | | commitments | | commitments | | Total | |
2007 (3 mos.) | | $ | — | | $ | 2,860 | | $ | 2,415 | | $ | 367 | | $ | 679 | | $ | 6,321 | |
2008 | | — | | 11,438 | | 8,283 | | 1,310 | | 2,576 | | 23,607 | |
2009 | | — | | 11,438 | | 6,977 | | 1,070 | | 2,182 | | 21,667 | |
2010 | | — | | 11,438 | | 6,039 | | 807 | | 2,042 | | 20,326 | |
2011 | | 66,000 | | 11,438 | | 4,506 | | 271 | | 1,682 | | 83,897 | |
Thereafter | | 150,000 | | 45,752 | | 9,210 | | — | | 5,511 | | 210,473 | |
Total | | $ | 216,000 | | $ | 94,364 | | $ | 37,430 | | $ | 3,825 | | $ | 14,672 | | $ | 366,291 | |
We anticipate that available funds from current operations, existing cash and other sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet current operating requirements and anticipated capital expenditures. However, we may require external sources of financing for any significant future acquisitions. Further, our senior credit facilities mature in December 2011. The repayment of this facility may require external financing.
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
We are exposed to a variety of risks, including changes in interest rates on some of our borrowings. In the normal course of our business, we manage our exposure to these risks as described below. We do not engage in trading market-risk sensitive instruments for speculative purposes.
Interest rates
The table below provides information about our debt obligations that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. The fair market value of long-term debt approximates book value at September 30, 2007.
(in thousands) | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | Thereafter | | Total | |
Variable rate | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 66,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 66,000 | |
Average interest rate | | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 6.47 | % | 0 | % | 6.47 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We entered into standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) interest rate swap agreements (the “Swap Agreements”) to manage the interest rate risk associated with our debt. Concurrent with the reduction of the amounts due under the senior credit facilities, certain Swap Agreements previously designated as cash flow hedges ceased to qualify as such. The change in the fair value of the four Swap Agreements that do not qualify for hedge accounting is recognized in the income statement in the period in which the change occurs. The change in the fair value of these four contracts resulted in a loss of $734 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. One Swap Agreement continues to be designated as a cash flow hedge.
27
The table below outlines the detail of each remaining interest rate Swap Agreement:
| | | | | | Notional | | | | | |
| | Original | | | | Amount | | | | | |
Date of | | Notional | | Fixed/ | | September 30, | | Expiration | | Fixed | |
Origin | | Amount | | Amortizing | | 2007 | | Date | | Rate | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
June 24, 2003 | | $ | 20,000 | | Amortizing | | $ | 7,857 | | Jun 30, 2008 | | 2.34 | % |
June 24, 2003 | | $ | 20,000 | | Fixed | | $ | 20,000 | | Jun 30, 2008 | | 2.69 | % |
May 2, 2005 | | $ | 17,000 | | Fixed | | $ | 17,000 | | Dec 31, 2011 | | 4.69 | % |
May 2, 2005 | | $ | 12,000 | | Fixed | (1) | $ | — | | Sep 30, 2009 | | 4.66 | % |
May 2, 2005 | | $ | 10,000 | | Fixed | (1) | $ | — | | Dec 31, 2011 | | 4.77 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Effective Date is June 30, 2008
In accordance with the interest rate Swap Agreements and on a quarterly basis, interest expense is calculated based on the floating 90-day LIBOR and the fixed rate. If interest expense as calculated is greater based on the 90-day LIBOR, the financial institution pays the difference to us. If interest expense as calculated is greater based on the fixed rate, we pay the difference to the financial institution. Depending on fluctuations in the LIBOR, our interest rate exposure and its related impact on interest expense and net cash flow may increase or decrease. The counter party to the interest rate Swap Agreement exposes us to credit loss in the event of non-performance, however, nonperformance is not anticipated.
The fair value of the interest rate Swap Agreements is the estimated amount that we would receive or pay to terminate the agreement at the reporting date, taking into account current interest rates and the credit worthiness of the counter party. At September 30, 2007, the fair values of the interest rate Swap Agreements were $398. This amount has been included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2007 in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Changes in internal controls. In addition, no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the third quarter ending September 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
28
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006, except to the extent previously updated or to the extent additional factual information disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates to such risk factors. The risks described in our annual report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
10.1 | | Incremental Facility Amendment and Amendment No. 1dated August 8, 2007 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 21, 2006, by and among the Company, the other Borrowers (as defined therein), the lenders named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (1) |
|
31.1 | | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1) |
|
31.2 | | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1) |
|
32.1 | | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (2) |
(1) Filed herewith.
(2) Furnished herewith
29
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunder duly authorized.
| MAC-GRAY CORPORATION |
November 9, 2007 | /s/ Michael J. Shea | |
| Michael J. Shea |
| Executive Vice President, Chief |
| Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| (On behalf of registrant and as principal |
| financial officer) |
30