Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _____________ to ____________
Commission File Number 000-26041
F5 NETWORKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
WASHINGTON | 91-1714307 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
incorporation or organization) |
401 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) | ||
(206) 272-5555 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filero Accelerated filerþ Non-accelerated filero
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of May 5, 2006 was 40,547,825.
Table of Contents
F5 NETWORKS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
Table of Contents
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7-12 | ||||||||
12-23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23-24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.2 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 32.1 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
F5 NETWORKS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited, in thousands)
March 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 23,003 | $ | 51,867 | ||||
Short-term investments | 321,003 | 184,314 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $2,309 and $2,969 | 51,953 | 41,703 | ||||||
Inventories | 3,024 | 2,699 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | 3,942 | 3,935 | ||||||
Other current assets | 12,266 | 9,906 | ||||||
Total current assets | 415,191 | 294,424 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 3,870 | 3,871 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 23,669 | 16,158 | ||||||
Long-term investments | 76,009 | 128,834 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | 19,682 | 36,212 | ||||||
Goodwill | 81,652 | 49,677 | ||||||
Other assets, net | 16,674 | 8,323 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 636,747 | $ | 537,499 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 14,605 | $ | 7,668 | ||||
Accrued liabilities | 23,042 | 19,648 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 44,256 | 36,009 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 81,903 | 63,325 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 7,580 | 6,650 | ||||||
Deferred revenue, long-term | 3,650 | 3,314 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 11,230 | 9,964 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Shareholders’ equity | — | — | ||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, no par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 40,388 and 38,593 shares issued and outstanding | 460,789 | 412,419 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,684 | ) | (1,430 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 84,509 | 53,221 | ||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 543,614 | 464,210 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 636,747 | $ | 537,499 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
F5 NETWORKS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Products | $ | 72,775 | $ | 53,332 | $ | 141,366 | $ | 99,729 | ||||||||
Services | 21,341 | 14,398 | 40,837 | 28,010 | ||||||||||||
Total | 94,116 | 67,730 | 182,203 | 127,739 | ||||||||||||
Cost of net revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Products | 15,441 | 11,820 | 30,034 | 22,348 | ||||||||||||
Services | 5,846 | 3,908 | 10,820 | 7,294 | ||||||||||||
Total | 21,287 | 15,728 | 40,854 | 29,642 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 72,829 | 52,002 | 141,349 | 98,097 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 31,162 | 20,885 | 60,027 | 40,525 | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 12,276 | 7,789 | 22,754 | 14,763 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 7,148 | 5,854 | 14,545 | 10,860 | ||||||||||||
Total | 50,586 | 34,528 | 97,326 | 66,148 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 22,243 | 17,474 | 44,023 | 31,949 | ||||||||||||
Other income, net | 3,877 | 1,641 | 6,847 | 3,028 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 26,120 | 19,115 | 50,870 | 34,977 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 10,053 | 7,003 | 19,582 | 12,872 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 16,067 | $ | 12,112 | $ | 31,288 | $ | 22,105 | ||||||||
Net income per share — basic | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.79 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares — basic | 40,120 | 36,905 | 39,636 | 36,234 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share — diluted | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares — diluted | 41,627 | 38,921 | 41,278 | 38,394 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
F5 NETWORKS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(unaudited, in thousands)
Six Months Ended March 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive | Retained | Shareholders' | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Loss | Earnings | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2005 | 38,593 | $ | 412,419 | $ | (1,430 | ) | $ | 53,221 | $ | 464,210 | ||||||||||
Exercise of employee stock options | 1,570 | 35,298 | — | — | 35,298 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock under employee stock purchase plan | 62 | 2,229 | — | — | 2,229 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock | 163 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation | — | 10,843 | — | — | 10,843 | |||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 31,288 | — | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | — | (20 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities | — | — | (234 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | 31,034 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2006 | 40,388 | $ | 460,789 | $ | (1,684 | ) | $ | 84,509 | $ | 543,614 | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
F5 NETWORKS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, in thousands)
Six months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 31,288 | $ | 22,105 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Loss on disposition of assets | 37 | 38 | ||||||
Stock based compensation | 10,843 | — | ||||||
Provisions for doubtful accounts and sales returns | (397 | ) | 547 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 5,017 | 3,261 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 18,973 | (12,264 | ) | |||||
Tax benefit from employee stock option plans | — | 24,359 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts acquired: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (9,560 | ) | (12,703 | ) | ||||
Inventories | (258 | ) | (398 | ) | ||||
Other current assets | (1,736 | ) | (1,218 | ) | ||||
Other assets | (1,392 | ) | (120 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 8,923 | 3,047 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 8,353 | 4,414 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 70,091 | 31,068 | ||||||
Investing activities | ||||||||
Purchases of investments | (240,444 | ) | (198,264 | ) | ||||
Sales of investments | 156,222 | 122,726 | ||||||
Investment of restricted cash | 2 | 29 | ||||||
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | (42,778 | ) | (395 | ) | ||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (9,047 | ) | (3,491 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (136,045 | ) | (79,395 | ) | ||||
Financing activities | ||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and purchases of stock under employee stock purchase plan | 37,077 | 45,125 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 37,077 | 45,125 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (28,877 | ) | (3,202 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 13 | 93 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 51,867 | 24,901 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 23,003 | $ | 21,792 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
F5 NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
We provide products and services to help companies efficiently and securely manage their Internet Protocol (IP) traffic. Our products improve the performance, availability and security of applications running on Internet-based networks. Internet traffic between servers running applications and clients using these applications passes through our products where the content is inspected to ensure that it is safe and modified as necessary to ensure that it is delivered securely and in a way that optimizes the performance of both the network and the applications. We also offer a broad range of services such as consulting, training, installation, maintenance, and other technical support services.
Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for their fair statement in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income or shareholders’ equity.
Revenue Recognition
Our products are integrated with software that is essential to the functionality of the equipment. Accordingly, we recognize revenue in accordance with the guidance provided under Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” and SOP No. 98-9 “Modification of SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions,” Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 48, “Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists,” and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.”
We sell products through distributors, resellers, and directly to end users. We recognize product revenue upon shipment, net of estimated returns, provided that collection is reasonably assured and no significant performance obligations remain. In certain regions where we do not have the ability to reasonably estimate returns, we defer revenue on sales to our distributors until we have received information from the channel partner indicating that the distributor has sold the product to its customer. Payment terms to domestic customers are generally net 30 to net 45 days. Payment terms to international customers range from net 30 to net 90 days based on normal and customary trade practices in the individual markets. We have offered extended payment terms to certain customers, in which case, revenue is recognized when payments are received.
7
Table of Contents
Whenever a software license, hardware, installation and post-contract customer support (“PCS”) elements are sold together, a portion of the sales price is allocated to each element based on their respective fair values as determined when the individual elements are sold separately. Revenues from the license of software are recognized when the software has been shipped and the customer is obligated to pay for the software. When rights of return are present and we cannot estimate returns, we recognize revenue when such rights of return lapse. Revenues for PCS are recognized on a straight-line basis over the service contract term. PCS includes rights to upgrades, when and if available, a limited period of telephone support updates and bug fixes. Installation revenue is recognized when the product has been installed at the customer’s site. Consulting services are customarily billed at fixed rates, plus out-of-pocket expenses, and revenues are recognized when the consulting has been completed. Training revenue is recognized when the training has been completed.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired as of the acquisition date. We have adopted the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). SFAS No. 142 requires goodwill to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances, and written down when impaired. Goodwill of $24.2 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of uRoam, Inc. in fiscal year 2003, goodwill of $25.5 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of MagniFire Websystems Inc. in fiscal year 2004 and goodwill of $32.0 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of Swan Labs, Inc. (“Swan Labs”) in first fiscal quarter of 2006. In March 2006, we completed our annual impairment test and concluded that there was no impairment of goodwill.
Stock-Based Compensation
On July 1, 2005, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, (“FAS 123R”). Prior to July 1, 2005, we accounted for share-based payments under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees(“APB 25”), and related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(“FAS 123”). In accordance with APB 25 no compensation cost was required to be recognized for options granted that had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
We adopted FAS 123R using the modified-prospective-transition method. Accordingly, compensation cost recognized for the three month and six month periods ended March 31, 2006 include: a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of July 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FAS 123, and b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to July 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R. The results for the prior periods have not been restated.
Effective July 1, 2005 we adopted the straight-line attribution method for recognizing compensation expense. Previously under the disclosure-only provisions of FAS 123, we used the accelerated method of expense recognition pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 28,Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans(“FIN 28”). For all unvested options outstanding as of July 1, 2005, the previously measured but unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value at the original grant date, will be recognized on an accelerated basis over the remaining vesting period. For share-based payments granted subsequent to July 1, 2005, compensation expense, based on the fair value on the date of grant, will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the price of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. In determining the fair value of stock options, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model which is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to the risk free interest rate, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the option and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.
The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. We do not anticipate declaring dividends in the foreseeable future. Expected volatility is based on the annualized daily historical volatility of our stock price commensurate with the expected life of the option. For the period ended March 31, 2006, the expected term of the option is based on the vesting terms of the option and a contractual life of ten years using the simplified method calculation as defined by Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. For the period ended March 31, 2005, the expected term of the option is based on an evaluation of the historical employee stock option exercise behavior, the vesting terms of the respective option and a contractual life of ten years. Our stock price volatility and option lives involve management’s best estimates at that time, both of which impact the fair value of the option calculated under the Black-
8
Table of Contents
Scholes methodology and, ultimately, the expense that will be recognized over the life of the option. FAS 123R also requires that we recognize compensation expense for only the portion of options or stock units that are expected to vest. Therefore, we apply an estimated forfeiture rate that is derived from historical employee termination behavior. The estimated forfeiture rate in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 is 5%. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.
The following table shows the pro forma effect on our net income and net income per share for the three months and six month periods ended March 31, 2005, had compensation expense been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the methodology prescribed by FAS 123. Stock-based compensation for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2006 has been included in statements of income. The pro forma effect may not be representative of expense in future periods since the estimated fair value of stock options on the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period, and additional options may be granted or options may be cancelled in future years (in thousands, except per share data):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||
March 31, 2005 | March 31, 2005 | |||||||
Net income, as reported | $ | 12,112 | $ | 22,105 | ||||
Deduct : Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value methods, net of tax effect | ( 2,391 | ) | ( 5,137 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income | $ | 9,721 | $ | 16,968 | ||||
Net income per share: | ||||||||
As reported — basic | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.61 | ||||
Pro forma — basic | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
As reported — diluted | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.58 | ||||
Pro forma — diluted | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
Earnings Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per share data):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Numerator | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 16,067 | $ | 12,112 | $ | 31,288 | $ | 22,105 | ||||||||
Denominator | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic | 40,120 | 36,905 | 39,636 | 36,234 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of common shares from stock options and restricted stock units | 1,507 | 2,016 | 1,642 | 2,160 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted | 41,627 | 38,921 | 41,278 | 38,394 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income per share | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.79 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||
Approximately 117,000 and 319,000 of common shares potentially issuable from stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common stock for the respective period. Approximately 246,000 and 422,000 of common shares potentially issuable from stock options for the six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common stock for the respective period.
2. Commitments and Contingencies
Guarantees and Product Warranties
In the normal course of business to facilitate sales of our products, we indemnify other parties, including customers, resellers,
9
Table of Contents
lessors, and parties to other transactions with us, with respect to certain matters. We have agreed to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our officers and directors, and our bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to our agents. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.
We generally offer warranties of one year for hardware and 90 days for software. We accrue for warranty costs as part of our cost of sales based on associated material product costs and technical support labor costs. The following table summarizes the activity related to product warranties for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 1,575 | $ | 1,062 | $ | 1,565 | $ | 1,062 | ||||||||
Provision for warranties issued | 320 | 272 | 700 | 538 | ||||||||||||
Payments | (313 | ) | (271 | ) | (683 | ) | (537 | ) | ||||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 1,582 | $ | 1,063 | $ | 1,582 | $ | 1,063 | ||||||||
Purchase Commitments
We currently have arrangements with contract manufacturers and other suppliers for the manufacture of our products. The arrangement with the primary contract manufacturer allows them to procure component inventory on our behalf based on a rolling production forecast provided by us. We are obligated to the purchase of component inventory that the contract manufacturer procures in accordance with the forecast, unless we give notice of order cancellation in advance of applicable lead times. As of March 31, 2006, we were committed to purchase approximately $16.3 million of such inventory during the next quarter.
Litigation
We are not aware of any pending legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. We may in the future be party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including claims that our products allegedly infringe upon third-party trademarks or other intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
3. Geographic Sales and Significant Customers
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. We are organized as, and operate in, one reportable segment: the development, marketing and selling of a comprehensive suite of application networking solutions that helps customers efficiently and securely manage application traffic on their Internet-based networks. We manage our business based on four geographic regions: the Americas (primarily the United States); Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA); Japan; and the Asia Pacific region. Our chief operating decision-making group reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis accompanied by information about revenues by geographic region. Our foreign offices conduct sales, marketing and support activities. Our management evaluates performance based primarily on revenues in the geographic locations in which we operate. Revenues are attributed by geographic location based on the location of the customer. Our assets are primarily located in the United States and not allocated to any specific region. Therefore, geographic information is presented only for net product revenue.
10
Table of Contents
The following presents revenues by geographic region (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 52,549 | $ | 37,479 | $ | 104,754 | $ | 72,676 | ||||||||
EMEA | 16,787 | 10,702 | 31,903 | 21,736 | ||||||||||||
Japan | 14,602 | 12,283 | 25,915 | 20,882 | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 10,178 | 7,266 | 19,631 | 12,445 | ||||||||||||
$ | 94,116 | $ | 67,730 | $ | 182,203 | $ | 127,739 | |||||||||
Net revenues from international customers are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars and totaled $41.6 million and $30.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $77.4 and $55.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Two domestic distributors accounted for 24.3% and 24.4% of total net revenue for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2006, respectively. One domestic distributor accounted for 17.8% and 16.9% of total net revenue for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2005, respectively. One domestic distributor accounted for 10.7% and 24.8% of accounts receivable as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
4. Business Combinations
On October 4, 2005, we acquired all of the capital stock of Swan Labs, a privately held Delaware corporation headquartered in San Jose, California for $43.0 million in cash. We also incurred $3.2 million of direct transaction costs for a total purchase price of approximately $46.2 million. As a result of the transaction, we acquired all the assets of Swan Labs, all property, equipment and other assets that Swan Labs used in its business and assumed all the liabilities of Swan Labs. Swan Labs provides wide area network (WAN) optimization and application acceleration products and services. The addition of Swan Labs is intended to allow us to quickly enter the WAN optimization market, broaden our customer base and augment our existing product line. The results of operations of Swan Labs have been included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
We accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The total purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over those fair values is recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on estimates and assumptions provided by management, and other information compiled by management, including an independent valuation, prepared by valuation specialists that utilize established valuation techniques appropriate for the technology industry. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is not amortized but instead is tested for impairment at least annually.
The purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):
Assets acquired | ||||
Cash | $ | 3,448 | ||
Fair value of tangible assets | 1,497 | |||
Deferred tax assets, net | 2,341 | |||
Developed technology and customer relationships | 8,589 | |||
Goodwill | 31,975 | |||
Total assets acquired | $ | 47,850 | ||
Liabilities assumed | ||||
Accrued liabilities | $ | (1,405 | ) | |
Deferred revenue | (229 | ) | ||
Total liabilities assumed | (1,634 | ) | ||
Net assets acquired | $ | 46,216 | ||
Of the total estimated purchase price, $8.0 million and $0.6 million was allocated to developed technology and customer relationships, respectively. To determine the value of the developed technology, a combination of cost and market approaches were used. The cost approach required an estimation of the costs required to reproduce the developed technology. The market approach measures the fair value of the technology through an analysis of recent comparable transactions. To determine the value of customer relationships, the income approach was used. The income approach estimates the fair value based on the earnings and cash flow capacity of an asset. The $8.6 million allocated to developed technology and customer relationships will be amortized on a straight-
11
Table of Contents
line basis over an estimated useful life of five years.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2005. Our discussion may contain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, based upon current expectations. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. Actual results and timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including, among others, product development, supplier or manufacturing delays, competition, management of growth, world events, potential fluctuations in operating results, international commerce, outcome of legal proceedings and claims, acquisitions and strategic transactions. These risk and uncertainties, as well as other risk and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ significantly from management’s expectations, are described in further detail under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. The company undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Overview
We are a global provider of software and hardware products and services that help companies efficiently and securely manage their Internet traffic. Our products enhance the delivery, optimization and security of application traffic on Internet-based networks. We market and sell our products primarily through indirect sales channels in the Americas (primarily the United States); Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA); Japan; and the Asia Pacific region. Enterprise customers (Fortune 1000 or Business Week Global 1000 companies) in financial services, transportation, government and telecommunications industries continue to make up the largest percentage of our customer base.
Our management monitors and analyzes a number of key performance indicators in order to manage our business and evaluate our financial and operating performance. Those indicators include:
•Revenues.The majority of our revenues are derived from sales of our Application Security, Application Optimization, and Application Availability platforms. We also derive revenues from the sales of services including annual maintenance contracts, installation, training and consulting services. We carefully monitor the sales mix of our revenues within each reporting period. We believe customer acceptance rates of our new products and feature enhancements are key indicators of future trends. We also consider overall revenue concentration by customer and by geographic region as additional indicators of current and future trends.
•Cost of revenues and gross margins.We strive to control our cost of revenues and thereby maintain our gross margins. Significant items impacting cost of revenues are hardware costs paid to our contract manufacturers, third-party software license fees, amortization of developed technology, and personnel and overhead expenses. Our margins have remained relatively stable over the past two years; however factors such as sales price, product mix, inventory obsolescence, returns, component price increases, and warranty costs could significantly impact our gross margins from quarter to quarter and represent the significant indicators we monitor on a regular basis.
•Operating expenses.Operating expenses are substantially driven by personnel and related overhead expenses. Existing headcount and future hiring plans are the predominant factors in analyzing and forecasting future operating expense trends. Other significant operating expenses that we monitor include marketing and promotions, travel, professional fees, computer costs related to the development of new products, facilities and depreciation expenses.
•Liquidity and cash flows.Our financial condition remains strong with significant cash and investments and no long term debt. The increase in cash and investments for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to net income from operations, with operating activities providing cash of $70.1 million. Going forward, we believe the primary driver of cash flows will be net income from operations. Capital expenditures for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 were comprised primarily of tenant improvements and information technology infrastructure and equipment to support the growth of our core business activities. We will continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of or investments in businesses, products, or technologies that we believe are strategic, which may require the use of cash.
•Balance sheet.We view cash, short-term and long-term investments, deferred revenue, accounts receivable balances and day’s sales outstanding as important indicators of our financial health. Deferred revenues continued to increase due to the growth in the amount of annual maintenance contracts purchased on new products and maintenance renewal contracts related to our existing
12
Table of Contents
product installation base. Our day’s sales outstanding for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 was 50. We expect to maintain this metric going forward.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements. These critical accounting policies are consistent with those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Revenue Recognition.We recognize revenue in accordance with the guidance provided under Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” and SOP No. 98-9 “Modification of SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions,” Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 48, “Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists,” and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” and SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.”
We sell products through distributors, resellers, and directly to end users. We recognize product revenue upon shipment, net of estimated returns, provided that collection is determined to be probable and no significant obligations remain. In certain regions where we do not have the ability to reasonably estimate returns, revenue is recognized upon sale to the end user. In this situation, we receive a sales report from the channel partner to determine when the sales transaction to the end user has occurred. Payment terms to domestic customers are generally net 30 to net 45 days. Payment terms to international customers range from net 30 to net 90 days based on normal and customary trade practices in the individual markets. We have offered extended payment terms to certain customers, in which case, revenue is recognized when payments are received.
Whenever a software license, hardware, installation and post-contract customer support (PCS) elements are combined into a package with a single “bundled” price, a portion of the sales price is allocated to each element of the bundled package based on their respective fair values as determined when the individual elements are sold separately. Revenues from the license of software are recognized when the software has been shipped and the customer is obligated to pay for the software. When rights of return are present and we cannot estimate returns, we recognize revenue when such rights of return lapse. Revenues for PCS are recognized on a straight-line basis over the service contract term. PCS includes rights to upgrades, when and if available, a limited period of telephone support, updates, and bug fixes. Installation revenue is recognized when the product has been installed at the customer’s site. Consulting services are customarily billed at fixed rates, plus out-of-pocket expenses, and revenues are recognized when the consulting has been completed. Training revenue is recognized when the training has been completed.
Reserve for Doubtful Accounts.Estimates are used in determining our allowance for doubtful accounts and are based upon an assessment of selected accounts and as a percentage of our remaining accounts receivable by aging category. In determining these percentages, we evaluate historical write-offs, current trends in the credit quality of our customer base, as well as changes in the credit policies. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and do not require any collateral. If there is deterioration of a major customer’s credit worthiness or actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, our allowance for doubtful accounts may not be sufficient.
Reserve for Product Returns.In some instances, product revenue from distributors is subject to agreements allowing rights of return. Product returns are estimated based on historical experience and are recorded at the time revenues are recognized. Accordingly, we reduce recognized revenue for estimated future returns at the time revenue is recorded. When rights of return are present and we cannot estimate returns, revenue is recognized when such rights lapse. The estimates for returns are adjusted periodically based upon changes in historical rates of returns and other related factors. It is possible that these estimates will change in the future or that the actual amounts could vary from our estimates.
Reserve for Warranties.A warranty reserve is established based on our historical experience and an estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. While we believe that our warranty reserve is adequate and that the judgment applied is appropriate, such amounts estimated to be due and payable could differ materially from what will actually transpire in the future.
13
Table of Contents
Accounting for Income Taxes.We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” or SFAS 109. Accordingly, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate as part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes in each geographic region. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Due to the evolving nature and complexity of tax rules combined with the large number of jurisdictions in which we operate, it is possible that our estimates of our tax liability could change in the future, which may result in additional tax liabilities and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Stock-based Compensation.We adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, (“FAS 123R”) on July 1, 2005. We recognized $5.2 million and $10.1 million of expense related to stock-based compensation charges included in operating expenses for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. Prior to July 1, 2005, we accounted for share-based payments under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees(“APB 25”), and related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(“FAS 123”). In accordance with APB 25 no compensation cost was required to be recognized for options granted that had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
We adopted FAS 123R using the modified-prospective-transition application method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized includes: a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of July 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FAS 123, and b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to July 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R. The results for the prior periods have not been restated.
Effective July 1, 2005 we adopted the straight-line attribution method for recognizing compensation expense. Previously under the disclosure-only provisions of FAS 123, we used the accelerated method of expense recognition pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 28,Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans(“FIN 28”). For all unvested options outstanding as of July 1, 2005, the previously measured but unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value at the original grant date, will be recognized on an accelerated basis over the remaining vesting period. For share-based payments granted subsequent to July 1, 2005, compensation expense, based on the fair value on the date of grant, will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. As of March 31, 2006, there was $28.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, the majority of which will be recognized ratably over the next two years. Going forward, stock compensation expenses may increase as we issue additional equity-based awards to continue to attract and retain key employees.
In addition, we recently modified the method in which we issue incentive awards to our employees through stock-based compensation. In prior years, stock-based compensation consisted only of stock options. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, we began to grant restricted stock unit awards instead of stock options. The value of restricted stock units is determined by the number of shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant. Alternatively, in determining the fair value of stock options, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model that employs the following key assumptions: expected volatility is based on the annualized daily historical volatility of our stock price, over the expected life of the option and; expected term of the option is based on historical employee stock option exercise behavior, the vesting terms of the respective option and a contractual life of ten years. Our stock price volatility and option lives involve management’s best estimates at that time, both of which impact the fair value of the option calculated under the Black-Scholes methodology and, ultimately, the expense that will be recognized over the life of the option.
FAS 123R also requires that we recognize compensation expense for only the portion of options or stock units that are expected to vest. Therefore, we apply estimated forfeiture rates that are derived from historical employee termination behavior. Our estimated forfeiture rate in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 is 5%. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.
Goodwill Impairments.Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired as of the acquisition date. We have adopted the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). SFAS No. 142 requires goodwill to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances, and written down when impaired. Goodwill of $24.2 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of uRoam, Inc. in fiscal year 2003, goodwill of $25.5 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of MagniFire Websystems Inc. in fiscal year 2004 and goodwill of $32.0 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of Swan Labs in fiscal year 2006. We complete our annual impairment test in the second quarter of each fiscal year and when events or conditions indicate that an impairment may have occurred. There was no impairment of goodwill during the six months ended March
14
Table of Contents
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes and risk factors included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Products | $ | 72,775 | $ | 53,332 | $ | 141,366 | $ | 99,729 | ||||||||
Services | 21,341 | 14,398 | 40,837 | 28,010 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 94,116 | $ | 67,730 | $ | 182,203 | $ | 127,739 | ||||||||
Percentage of net revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Products | 77.3 | % | 78.7 | % | 77.6 | % | 78.1 | % | ||||||||
Services | 22.7 | 21.3 | 22.4 | 21.9 | ||||||||||||
Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Net revenues.Total net revenues increased 39.0% and 42.6% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, up from the comparable periods in the prior year. The improvement was due to increased demand for our application delivery networking products and higher services revenues resulting from our increased installed base of products. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, each of our primary geographic regions reported higher revenues compared to the prior period. International revenues were 44.2% and 42.5% of total net revenues for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, compared to 44.7% and 43.1% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005, respectively. We expect international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of net revenues, although we cannot provide assurance that international revenues as a percentage of net revenues will remain at current levels.
Net product revenues increased 36.5% and 41.8% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively up from the comparable periods in the prior year. The increase in the six months ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to absolute growth in the volume of product sales of our Application Traffic Management (ATM), product line as well as incremental revenues derived from sales of our FirePass and TrafficShield product lines. Sales of our ATM family of application delivery networking products represented 89.5% and 89.4% of product revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and 90.5% and 89.9% of product revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Net service revenues increased 48.2% and 45.8% for the three month and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, up from the comparable periods in the prior year. The increase in services revenue was primarily due to increases in the purchase or renewal of maintenance contracts as our installed base of products increased.
Ingram Micro Inc. and GE Access, two of our domestic distributors, accounted for 12.6% and 11.7% of our total net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, and 13.7% and 10.7% of our total net revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. Ingram Micro Inc., accounted for 17.8% and 16.9% of our total net revenues for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2005, respectively. GE Access accounted for 10.7% of our accounts receivable as of March 31, 2006.
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of net revenues and gross profit | ||||||||||||||||
Products | $ | 15,441 | $ | 11,820 | $ | 30,034 | $ | 22,348 | ||||||||
Services | 5,846 | 3,908 | 10,820 | 7,294 | ||||||||||||
Total | 21,287 | 15,728 | 40,854 | 29,642 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 72,829 | $ | 52,002 | $ | 141,349 | $ | 98,097 | ||||||||
Cost of net revenues and gross profit (as a percentage of related net revenue) | ||||||||||||||||
Products | 21.2 | % | 22.2 | % | 21.2 | % | 22.4 | % | ||||||||
Services | 27.4 | 27.1 | 26.5 | 26.0 | ||||||||||||
Total | 22.6 | 23.2 | 22.4 | 23.2 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 77.4 | % | 76.8 | % | 77.6 | % | 76.8 | % | ||||||||
15
Table of Contents
Cost of Net Product Revenues. Cost of net product revenues consist of finished products purchased from our contract manufacturers, manufacturing overhead, freight, warranty, provisions for excess and obsolete inventory, and amortization expenses in connection with developed technology from acquisitions. Our product margins remained stable for all periods presented at 78% to 79%. In absolute dollars, cost of net product revenues increased to $15.4 million and $30.0 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, up from $11.8 million and $22.3 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005, respectively. The increases were primarily due to the higher volume of units shipped.
Cost of Net Service Revenues. Cost of net service revenues consist of the salaries and related benefits of our professional services staff, travel, facilities, and depreciation expenses. For the three months and six months ended March 31, 2006, cost of net services revenues as a percentage of net service revenues remained relatively stable as compared to the periods in the prior year at 27.4% and 26.5%, respectively, and increased in absolute dollars primarily as a result of recent growth in professional services headcount. Professional services headcount at the end of March 2006 increased to 176 from 123 at the end of March 2005. Going forward, we expect to continue to increase our cost of service revenues to support our expanded product lines and growing customer base.
We expect to maintain our gross margins in the near term; however, gross margins could be adversely affected by increased material cost, component shortages, excess and obsolete inventory charges and heightened sales price competition.
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 31,162 | $ | 20,885 | $ | 60,027 | $ | 40,525 | ||||||||
Research and development | 12,276 | 7,789 | 22,754 | 14,763 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 7,148 | 5,854 | 14,545 | 10,860 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 50,586 | $ | 34,528 | $ | 97,326 | $ | 66,148 | ||||||||
Operating expenses (as a percentage of net revenue) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 33.1 | % | 30.8 | % | 32.9 | % | 31.7 | % | ||||||||
Research and development | 13.0 | 11.5 | 12.5 | 11.6 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 7.6 | 8.6 | 8.0 | 8.5 | ||||||||||||
Total | 53.7 | % | 50.9 | % | 53.4 | % | 51.8 | % | ||||||||
Sales and marketing.Sales and marketing expenses consist of salaries, commissions and related benefits of our sales and marketing staff, the costs of our marketing programs, including public relations, advertising and trade shows, facilities and depreciation expenses. In absolute dollars, sales and marketing expenses increased 49.2% and 48.1% for the three and six months ended months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, from the comparable periods in the prior year. The increase in sales and marketing expense was primarily due to increased sales and marketing commissions and personnel costs of $4.9 million and $10.1 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. The increased commissions and personnel costs were driven by growth in sales and marketing employee headcount and increased revenue for the respective periods. Sales and marketing headcount at the end of March 2006 increased to 398 from 293 at the end of March 2005. In addition, sales and marketing expense includes stock-based compensation expense of $2.2 million and $4.3 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, due to the adoption of FAS 123R in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005. We expect to continue to increase sales and marketing expenses in absolute dollars in order to grow revenues and increase our market share.
Research and development. Research and development expenses consist of the salaries and related benefits for our product development personnel, prototype materials and expenses related to the development of new and improved products, facilities and depreciation expenses. In absolute dollars, research and development expenses increased 57.6% and 54.1% for the three and six months ended months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, from the comparable periods in the prior year. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to higher research and development salary and benefit expenses of $2.2 million and $3.7 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. Research and development headcount at the end of March 2006 increased to 278 from 205 at the end of March 2005. The growth in research and development employee headcount was primarily related to enhancement of our current products and our ability to develop new, technologically advanced products that meet the changing needs of our customers. In addition, research and development expense includes stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million and $3.0 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, due to the adoption of FAS 123R in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005. We expect to continue to increase research and development expenses as our future success is dependent on the continued development of our products.
16
Table of Contents
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of the salaries, benefits and related costs of our executive, finance, information technology, human resource and legal personnel, third-party professional service fees, bad debt charges, facilities, and depreciation expenses. In absolute dollars, general and administrative expenses increased 22.1% and 33.9% for the three and six months ended months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million and $2.9 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, due to the adoption of FAS 123R in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005. In addition, general and administrative salary and benefit expenses increased $0.9 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. General and administrative headcount at the end of March 2006 increased to 121 from 89 at the end of March 2005. These increases in general and administrative expenses were partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense. General and administrative expense is expected to remain at these increased levels as we continue to build our infrastructure to support the worldwide growth of our business.
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Other Income and Income Taxes | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations | $ | 22,243 | $ | 17,474 | $ | 44,023 | $ | 31,949 | ||||||||
Other income, net | 3,877 | 1,641 | 6,847 | 3,028 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 26,120 | 19,115 | 50,870 | 34,977 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 10,053 | 7,003 | 19,582 | 12,872 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 16,067 | $ | 12,112 | $ | 31,288 | $ | 22,105 | ||||||||
Other income and income taxes (as percentage of revenue) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations | 23.6 | % | 25.8 | % | 24.2 | % | 25.0 | % | ||||||||
Other income, net | 4.1 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 27.8 | 28.2 | 28.0 | 27.4 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 10.7 | 10.3 | 10.7 | 10.1 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 17.1 | % | 17.9 | % | 17.2 | % | 17.3 | % | ||||||||
Other income, net.Other income, net, consists of interest income and foreign currency transaction gains and losses. Other income, net, increased 126.1% as compared to the prior period. The significant increase was due to a combination of higher yields and increased investment balances. The increased investment balances are the result of cash provided from operating and financing activities.
Provision for Income taxes. We recorded a 38.5% provision for income taxes during the current period. As of March 31, 2006 we do not have a valuation allowance on any of our deferred tax assets in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate because we believe that the assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making this determination we have considered projected future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the appropriateness of a valuation allowance. Our net deferred tax assets at March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005 were $23.6 million and $43.6 million, respectively. Our world wide effective tax rate may fluctuate based on a number of factors including variations in projected taxable income in our geographic locations, changes in the valuation of our net deferred tax assets, resolution of potential exposures or establishment of potential exposures, introduction of new accounting standards or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof in any of our geographic locations. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We establish reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on judgment of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes and interest may be due. These reserves are established when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable, we believe that certain positions may be challenged and may not be sustained on review by tax authorities. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate. The ultimate resolution of these potential exposures may be greater or less than the liabilities recorded which could result in an adjustment to our future tax expense and a fluctuation in our effective tax rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments were $420.0 million as of March 31, 2006 compared to $365.0 million as of September 30, 2005, representing an increase of $55.0 million. The increase was primarily due to cash provided by operating activities of $70.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 compared to $31.1 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase in cash flow from operations for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 resulted from increased
17
Table of Contents
net income combined with changes in operating assets and liabilities, as adjusted for various non-cash items including stock based compensation, depreciation and amortization charges.
Cash used in investing activities was $136.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 compared to $79.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The significant amount of cash used in investing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to the purchase of investments partially offset by the sale of investments and $42.8 million of cash payments, net of cash acquired, to shareholders of Swan Labs, which was acquired in October 2005.
Cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2006 was $37.1 million compared to $45.1 million for the same period in the prior year. Our financing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 consisted of cash received from the exercise of employee stock options and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan. Based on our current operating and capital expenditure forecasts, we believe that our existing cash and investment balances together with cash generated from operations should be sufficient to meet our operating requirements for the foreseeable future.
As of March 31, 2006, our principal commitments consisted of obligations outstanding under operating leases. We lease our facilities under operating leases that expire at various dates through 2012. There have been no material changes in our principal lease commitments compared to those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005. In connection with the lease agreement for our corporate headquarters we established a restricted escrow account collateralized by a certificate of deposit that has been included on our balance sheet as a component of restricted cash. The total amount required in escrow reduces at various dates as set forth by the lease agreement. The amount required in escrow at March 31, 2006 was $3.6 million as set forth by the lease agreement.
We outsource the manufacturing of our pre-configured hardware platforms to contract manufacturers who assemble each product to our specifications. Our agreement with our largest contract manufacturer allows them to procure component inventory on our behalf based upon a rolling production forecast. We are contractually obligated to purchase the component inventory in accordance with the forecast, unless we give notice of order cancellation in advance of applicable lead times. As of March 31, 2006, we were committed to purchase approximately $16.3 million of such inventory during the next quarter. Committed purchases includes additional component inventory due to the anticipated Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS) requirements in the European Union which become effective July 1, 2006.
Risk Factors that May Affect Future Results
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our business, operating results, financial performance, and share price may be materially adversely affected by a number of factors, including but not limited to the following risk factors, any one of which could cause actual results to vary materially from anticipated results or from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q or in other reports, press releases or other statements issued from time to time. Additional factors that may cause such a difference are set forth elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
In addition to other information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the following factors, among others, sometimes have affected, and in the future could affect our actual results and could cause future results to differ materially from those in any forward looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Factors that could cause future results to differ from expectations include, but are not limited to the following:
Our success depends on our timely development of new products and features, market acceptance of new product offerings and proper management of the timing of the life cycle of our products
We expect the application delivery networking market to be characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. Our continued success depends on our ability to identify and develop new products and new features for our existing products to meet the demands of these changes, and for those products and features to be accepted by our existing and target customers. If we are unable to identify, develop and deploy new products and new product features on a timely basis, our business and results of operations may be harmed.
In September 2004, we announced the release of our next-generation ATM product featuring the Traffic Management Operating System, or TMOS. This major new version of ATM represented the culmination of over two years of research and development efforts. TMOS is specifically designed to facilitate the development and integration of application delivery functions as modules that can be added to ATM’s core functionality to keep pace with rapidly evolving customer needs. We currently offer software modules as
18
Table of Contents
add-ons for this product and our continued success depends significantly on our ability to integrate new modules and functionality onto this platform and the acceptance of the new hardware and software platforms associated with this release by our existing and target customers.
The current life cycle of our products is typically 12 to 24 months. The introduction of new products or product enhancements may shorten the life cycle of our existing products, or replace sales of some of our current products, thereby offsetting the benefit of even a successful product introduction, and may cause customers to defer purchasing our existing products in anticipation of the new products. This could harm our operating results by decreasing sales, increasing our inventory levels of older products and exposing us to greater risk of product obsolescence. We have also experienced, and may in the future experience, delays in developing and releasing new products and product enhancements. This has led to, and may in the future lead to, delayed sales, increased expenses and lower quarterly revenue than anticipated. Also, in the development of our products, we have experienced delays in the prototyping of our products, which in turn has led to delays in product introductions. In addition, complexity and difficulties in managing product transitions at the end-of-life stage of a product can create excess inventory of components associated with the outgoing product that can lead to increased expenses. Any or all of the above problems could materially harm our business and operating results.
Our success depends on sales and continued innovation of our ATM product lines
For the six months ended March 31, 2006, we derived 89.4% of our product revenues from sales of our ATM family of application delivery networking product lines. We expect to derive a significant portion of our net revenues from sales of our ATM products in the future. Implementation of our strategy depends upon ATM being able to solve critical network availability and performance problems of our customers. If ATM is unable to solve these problems for our customers or if we are unable to sustain the high levels of innovation in ATM’s product feature set needed to maintain leadership in what will continue to be a competitive market environment, our business and results of operations will be harmed.
We may not be able to compete effectively in the emerging application delivery networking market
The markets we serve are new, rapidly evolving and highly competitive, and we expect competition to persist and intensify in the future. Our principal competitors in the application delivery networking market include Cisco Systems, Inc., Nortel Networks Corporation, Foundry Networks, Inc., Citrix Systems, Inc., Radware Ltd. and Juniper Networks, Inc. We expect to continue to face additional competition as new participants enter our market. In addition, larger companies with significant resources, brand recognition and sales channels may form alliances with or acquire competing application delivery networking solutions and emerge as significant competitors. Potential competitors may bundle their products or incorporate an Internet traffic management or security component into existing products in a manner that discourages users from purchasing our products.
Our quarterly and annual operating results are volatile and may cause our stock price to fluctuate
Our quarterly and annual operating results have varied significantly in the past and will vary significantly in the future, which makes it difficult for us to predict our future operating results. In particular, we anticipate that the size of customer orders may increase as we continue to focus on larger business accounts. A delay in the recognition of revenue, even from just one account, may have a significant negative impact on our results of operations for a given period. In the past, a majority of our sales have been realized near the end of a quarter. Accordingly, a delay in an anticipated sale past the end of a particular quarter may negatively impact our results of operations for that quarter, or in some cases, that year. Additionally, we have exposure to the credit risks of some of our customers and sub-tenants. Although we have programs in place that are designed to monitor and mitigate the associated risk, there can be no assurance that such programs will be effective in reducing our credit risks adequately. We monitor individual payment capability in granting credit arrangements, seek to limit the total credit to amounts we believe our customers can pay, and maintain reserves we believe are adequate to cover exposure for potential losses. If there is a deterioration of a sub-tenant’s or major customer’s creditworthiness or actual defaults are higher than expected future resulting losses, if incurred, could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Further, our operating results may be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors in future quarters or years. Our failure to meet these expectations will likely harm the market price of our common stock.
The average selling price of our products may decrease and our costs may increase, which may negatively impact gross profits
It is possible that the average selling prices of our products will decrease in the future in response to competitive pricing pressures, increased sales discounts, new product introductions by us or our competitors or other factors. Therefore, in order to maintain our
19
Table of Contents
gross profits, we must develop and introduce new products and product enhancements on a timely basis and continually reduce our product costs. Our failure to do so will cause our net revenue and gross profits to decline, which will harm our business and results of operations. In addition, we may experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results due to the erosion of our average selling prices.
It is difficult to predict our future operating results because we have an unpredictable sales cycle
Our products have a lengthy sales cycle, which is difficult to predict. Historically, our sales cycle has ranged from approximately two to three months and has tended to lengthen as we have increasingly focused our sales efforts on the enterprise market. Also, as our distribution strategy has evolved into more of a channel model, utilizing value-added resellers, distributors and systems integrators, the level of variability in the length of sales cycle across transactions has increased and made it more difficult to predict the timing of many of our sales transactions. Sales of our products require us to educate potential customers in their use and benefits. Sales of our products are subject to delays from the lengthy internal budgeting, approval and competitive evaluation processes that large corporations and governmental entities may require. For example, customers frequently begin by evaluating our products on a limited basis and devote time and resources to testing our products before they decide whether or not to purchase. Customers may also defer orders as a result of anticipated releases of new products or enhancements by our competitors or us. As a result, our products have an unpredictable sales cycle that contributes to the uncertainty of our future operating results.
Our business may be harmed if our contract manufacturers are not able to provide us with adequate supplies of our products or if a single source of hardware assembly is lost or impaired
We rely on third party contract manufacturers to assemble our products. We outsource the manufacturing of our hardware platforms to contract manufacturers who assemble these hardware platforms to our specifications. We have experienced minor delays in shipments from contract manufacturers in the past. However, if we experience major delays in the future or other problems, such as inferior quality and insufficient quantity of product, any one or a combination of these factors may harm our business and results of operations. The inability of our contract manufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of our products or the loss of our contract manufacturer may cause a delay in our ability to fulfill orders while we obtain a replacement manufacturer and may harm our business and results of operations. In particular, because we subcontract substantially all of our manufacturing to a single contract manufacturer, with whom we do not have a long-term contract, any termination, loss or impairment in our arrangement with this single source of hardware assembly, or any impairment of their facilities or operations, would harm our business, financial condition and results of operation.
If the demand for our products grows, we will need to increase our raw material and component purchases, contract manufacturing capacity and internal test and quality control functions. Any disruptions in product flow may limit our revenue, may harm our competitive position and may result in additional costs or cancellation of orders by our customers.
Our business could suffer if there are any interruptions or delays in the supply of hardware components from our third-party sources
We currently purchase several hardware components used in the assembly of our products from a number of single or limited sources. Lead times for these components vary significantly. The unavailability of suitable components, any interruption or delay in the supply of any of these hardware components, or the inability to procure a similar component from alternate sources at acceptable prices within a reasonable time, may delay assembly and sales of our products and, hence, our revenues, and may harm our business and results of operations.
We may not adequately protect our intellectual property and our products may infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure of confidential and proprietary information to protect our intellectual property rights. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology. Monitoring unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States.
Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. In the ordinary course of our business, we are involved in disputes and licensing
20
Table of Contents
discussions with others regarding their claimed proprietary rights and cannot assure you that we will always successfully defend ourselves against such claims. If we are found to infringe the proprietary rights of others, or if we otherwise settle such claims, we could be compelled to pay damages or royalties and either obtain a license to those intellectual property rights or alter our products so that they no longer infringe upon such proprietary rights. Any license could be very expensive to obtain or may not be available at all. Similarly, changing our products or processes to avoid infringing the rights of others may be costly or impractical. In addition, we have initiated, and may in the future initiate, claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights, to determine the scope and validity of our proprietary rights or those of our competitors. Any of these claims, whether claims that we are infringing the proprietary rights of others, or vice versa, with or without merit, may be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and diversion of technical and management personnel or require us to cease using infringing technology, develop non-infringing technology or enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Further, our license agreements typically require us to indemnify our customers, distributors and resellers for infringement actions related to our technology, which could cause us to become involved in infringement claims made against our customers, distributors or resellers. Any of the above-described circumstances relating to intellectual property rights disputes could result in our business and results of operations being harmed.
Many of our products include intellectual property licensed from third parties. In the future, it may be necessary to renew licenses for third party intellectual property or obtain new licenses for other technology. These third party licenses may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. The inability to obtain certain licenses, or litigation regarding the interpretation or enforcement of license rights and related intellectual property issues, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, we license some third party intellectual property on a non-exclusive basis and this may limit our ability to protect our intellectual property rights in our products.
We may not be able to sustain or develop new distribution relationships and a reduction or delay in sales to a significant distribution partner could hurt our business
Our sales strategy requires that we establish and maintain multiple distribution channels in the United States and internationally through leading industry resellers, systems integrators, Internet service providers and other channel partners. We have a limited number of agreements with companies in these channels, and we may not be able to increase our number of distribution relationships or maintain our existing relationships. If we are unable to establish or maintain our indirect sales channels, our business and results of operations will be harmed. In addition, two domestic distributors of our products accounted for 24.4% of our total net revenue for the six month period ended March 31, 2006 and one domestic distributor accounted for 16.9% of our total net revenue for the six month period ended March 31, 2005. A substantial reduction or delay in sales of our products to this or any other key distribution partner could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Undetected software errors may harm our business and results of operations
Software products frequently contain undetected errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. We have experienced these errors in the past in connection with new products and product upgrades. We expect that these errors will be found from time to time in new or enhanced products after commencement of commercial shipments. These problems may cause us to incur significant warranty and repair costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts and cause significant customer relations problems. We may also be subject to liability claims for damages related to product errors. While we carry insurance policies covering this type of liability, these policies may not provide sufficient protection should a claim be asserted. A material product liability claim may harm our business and results of operations.
Our products must successfully operate with products from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the source of the problem. The occurrence of software errors, whether caused by our products or another vendor’s products, may result in the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products. The occurrence of any of these problems may harm our business and results of operations.
Our operating results are exposed to risks associated with international commerce
As our international sales increase, our operating results become more exposed to international operating risks. These risks include risks related to potential recessions in economies outside the United States, foreign currency exchange rates, managing foreign sales offices, regulatory, political, or economic conditions in specific countries, military conflict or terrorist activities, changes in laws and tariffs, inadequate protection of intellectual property rights in foreign countries, foreign regulatory requirements, and natural disasters. All of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business. We intend to continue expanding into international markets. International sales represented 42.5% and 43.1% of our net revenues for the six month period ended March 31, 2006 and 2005,
21
Table of Contents
respectively. In particular, we derived 14.2% of our total revenue from the Japanese market for the six month period ended March 31, 2006. This revenue is dependent on a number of factors outside our control, including the viability and success of our resellers and the strength of the Japanese economy.
Changes in governmental regulations could negatively affect our revenues
Our products are subject to various regulations promulgated by the United States and various foreign governments including, but not limited to, environmental regulations and regulations implementing export license requirements and restrictions on the import or export of some technologies, especially encryption technology. Changes in governmental regulation and our inability or failure to obtain required approvals, permits or registrations could harm our international and domestic sales and adversely affect our revenues, business and operations.
Acquisitions, including our recent acquisition of Swan Labs, present many risks and we may not realize the financial and strategic goals that are contemplated at the time of the transaction
With respect to our acquisitions, as well as any other future acquisitions we may undertake, we may find that the acquired assets do not further our business strategy as expected, or that we paid more than what the assets are later worth, or that economic conditions change, all of which may generate future impairment charges. There may be difficulty integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired business, and we may have difficulty retaining the key personnel of the acquired business. We may have difficulty in incorporating the acquired technologies or products with our existing product lines. Our ongoing business and management’s attention may be disrupted or diverted by transition or integration issues and the complexity of managing geographically and culturally diverse locations. We may have difficulty maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies across locations. We may experience significant problems or liabilities associated with the product quality, technology and other matters.
Our inability to successfully operate and integrate newly-acquired businesses appropriately, effectively and in a timely manner, or to retain key personnel of any acquired business, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to take advantage of further growth in demand for integrated traffic management and security solutions and other advances in technology, as well as on our revenues, gross margins and expenses.
Our success depends on our key personnel and our ability to attract and retain qualified sales and marketing, operations, product development and professional services personnel
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our key management, product development, sales, marketing and finance personnel, many of whom may be difficult to replace. The complexity of our application delivery networking products and their integration into existing networks and ongoing support, as well as the sophistication of our sales and marketing effort, requires us to retain highly trained professional services, customer support and sales personnel. Competition for qualified professional services, customer support and sales personnel in our industry is intense because of the limited number of people available with the necessary technical skills and understanding of our products. Our ability to retain and hire these personnel may be adversely affected by volatility or reductions in the price of our common stock, since these employees are generally granted stock options. The loss of services of any of our key personnel, the inability to retain and attract qualified personnel in the future or delays in hiring qualified personnel, may harm our business and results of operations.
We face litigation risks
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation in general, and intellectual property and securities litigation in particular, can be expensive, lengthy and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Responding to the allegations has been, and will likely continue to be, expensive and time-consuming for us. An unfavorable resolution of the lawsuits could adversely affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition.
Anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us
Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The rights of the holders of common stock may be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of our company without further action by our shareholders and may adversely affect the voting and
22
Table of Contents
other rights of the holders of common stock. Further, certain provisions of our bylaws, including a provision limiting the ability of shareholders to raise matters at a meeting of shareholders without giving advance notice, may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or management of our company, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. In addition, our articles of incorporation provide for a staggered board, which may make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of our board of directors. Similarly, state anti-takeover laws in the State of Washington related to corporate takeovers may prevent or delay a change of control of our company.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Management believes there have been no material changes to our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk during the six month period ended March 31, 2006, compared to those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our chief executive officer and our chief accounting officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, have concluded that as of that date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including, our chief executive officer and our chief accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are not aware of any pending legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition. We may in the future be party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including claims that allegedly infringe upon third-party trademarks or other intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Reference is made to Item 3, Legal Proceedings in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005, filed December 12, 2005 for descriptions of our legal proceedings. We continue to believe that the resolution of these legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on us and there have been no material developments since our 10-K filing.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on March 2, 2006, to elect two Class I directors to hold office until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders for the fiscal year end 2008 or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. At the Annual Meeting, the following nominees were elected as follows:
Votes | ||||||||
For | Withheld | |||||||
Karl D. Guelich | 33,589,979 | 2,860,914 | ||||||
Keith D. Grinstein | 34,579,504 | 1,871,889 |
23
Table of Contents
Directors with continuing terms: | ||
John McAdam | ||
Alan J. Higginson | ||
Rich Malone | ||
A. Gary Ames |
24
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||
3.1 | — | Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1) | ||
3.2 | — | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (1) | ||
4.1 | — | Specimen Common Stock Certificate (1) | ||
31.1* | — | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.2* | — | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.1* | — | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Filed herewith. | |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-75817. |
25
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 9th day of May, 2006.
F5 NETWORKS, INC. | ||||
By: | /s/ JOHN RODRIGUEZ | |||
John Rodriguez | ||||
Chief Accounting Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | ||||
26
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||
3.1 | — | Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1) | ||
3.2 | — | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (1) | ||
4.1 | — | Specimen Common Stock Certificate (1) | ||
31.1* | — | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.2* | — | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.1* | — | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Filed herewith. | |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-75817. |
27