UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-25137
_________________________________
Concur Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
___________________________________
Delaware | 91-1608052 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
18400 NE Union Hill Road Redmond, Washington | 98052 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (425) 702-8808
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | o [Do not check if a smaller reporting company] | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of August 3, 2012: 54,985,468
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2012
INDEX
Page | |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Concur Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 113,167 | $ | 89,469 | $ | 321,945 | $ | 254,333 | |||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Cost of operations | 32,033 | 25,651 | 91,288 | 71,333 | |||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 45,217 | 36,694 | 127,440 | 102,475 | |||||||||||
Systems development and programming | 11,713 | 8,352 | 31,460 | 25,582 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 18,767 | 11,579 | 50,511 | 38,176 | |||||||||||
Revaluation of contingent consideration | (3,281 | ) | 2,675 | (6,858 | ) | 1,410 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 5,177 | 2,723 | 13,776 | 6,862 | |||||||||||
Total expenses | 109,626 | 87,674 | 307,617 | 245,838 | |||||||||||
Operating income | 3,541 | 1,795 | 14,328 | 8,495 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | 516 | 443 | 1,528 | 1,748 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (4,859 | ) | (4,654 | ) | (14,421 | ) | (13,819 | ) | |||||||
Loss from equity investments | (982 | ) | (210 | ) | (2,048 | ) | (217 | ) | |||||||
Other, net | (600 | ) | (75 | ) | (1,023 | ) | (313 | ) | |||||||
Total other expense | (5,925 | ) | (4,496 | ) | (15,964 | ) | (12,601 | ) | |||||||
Loss before income tax | (2,384 | ) | (2,701 | ) | (1,636 | ) | (4,106 | ) | |||||||
Income tax benefit | (9,148 | ) | (4,928 | ) | (2,490 | ) | (7,322 | ) | |||||||
Consolidated net income | 6,764 | 2,227 | 854 | 3,216 | |||||||||||
Less: Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | 142 | 39 | 346 | 72 | |||||||||||
Net income attributable to Concur | $ | 6,906 | $ | 2,266 | $ | 1,200 | $ | 3,288 | |||||||
Net income per share attributable to Concur common stockholders: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
Diluted | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | |||||||||||
Weighted average shares used in computing net income per share: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 54,778 | 53,936 | 54,465 | 53,278 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 57,500 | 55,758 | 56,631 | 55,354 |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Concur Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | ||||||
Assets | |||||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 237,816 | $ | 370,157 | |||
Short-term investments | 243,421 | 185,392 | |||||
Restricted cash | — | 852 | |||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,662 and $1,307 | 84,808 | 66,963 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | 9,515 | 9,831 | |||||
Deferred costs and other assets | 44,919 | 32,865 | |||||
Total current assets | 620,479 | 666,060 | |||||
Non-current assets: | |||||||
Property and equipment, net | 53,201 | 45,975 | |||||
Investments | 61,380 | 51,426 | |||||
Deferred costs and other assets | 38,894 | 35,049 | |||||
Intangible assets, net | 109,861 | 55,179 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | 27,181 | 22,970 | |||||
Goodwill | 279,370 | 279,192 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 1,190,366 | $ | 1,155,851 | |||
Liabilities and equity | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 10,318 | $ | 8,906 | |||
Customer funding liabilities | 29,269 | 38,563 | |||||
Accrued compensation | 23,133 | 25,706 | |||||
Acquisition-related liabilities | 4,331 | 3,968 | |||||
Other accrued expenses and liabilities | 26,680 | 23,546 | |||||
Deferred revenues | 67,223 | 55,888 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 160,954 | 156,577 | |||||
Non-current liabilities: | |||||||
Senior convertible notes, net | 248,491 | 239,461 | |||||
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities | 321 | 744 | |||||
Deferred revenues | 15,976 | 16,381 | |||||
Acquisition-related contingent consideration | 23,440 | 33,490 | |||||
Tax liabilities | 9,473 | 9,367 | |||||
Total liabilities | 458,655 | 456,020 | |||||
Equity: | |||||||
Concur stockholders’ equity: | |||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share | 55 | 54 | |||||
Authorized shares: 195,000 | |||||||
Shares issued and outstanding: 54,812 and 54,065 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 845,325 | 811,888 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (109,079 | ) | (110,279 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (5,378 | ) | (3,008 | ) | |||
Total Concur stockholders’ equity | 730,923 | 698,655 | |||||
Noncontrolling interest | 788 | 1,176 | |||||
Total equity | 731,711 | 699,831 | |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,190,366 | $ | 1,155,851 |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Concur Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Operating activities: | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated net income | $ | 6,764 | $ | 2,227 | $ | 854 | $ | 3,216 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 5,177 | 2,723 | 13,776 | 6,862 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 5,981 | 5,049 | 17,020 | 14,855 | |||||||||||
Accretion of discount and issuance costs on notes | 3,062 | 2,857 | 9,030 | 8,425 | |||||||||||
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts | 129 | (141 | ) | 355 | (571 | ) | |||||||||
Share-based compensation | 17,528 | 6,151 | 39,074 | 24,854 | |||||||||||
Revaluation of contingent consideration | (3,281 | ) | 2,675 | (6,858 | ) | 1,410 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (10,289 | ) | (5,013 | ) | (3,568 | ) | (7,358 | ) | |||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | (191 | ) | (56 | ) | (364 | ) | (201 | ) | |||||||
Loss from equity investments | 982 | 210 | 2,048 | 217 | |||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: | |||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (3,291 | ) | (3,319 | ) | (18,664 | ) | (10,505 | ) | |||||||
Deferred costs and other assets | (3,194 | ) | (3,539 | ) | (6,105 | ) | (6,837 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable | (1,147 | ) | 7 | (31 | ) | (708 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued liabilities | 3,033 | 3,855 | (1,325 | ) | 2,649 | ||||||||||
Deferred revenues | 3,848 | 2,658 | 11,339 | 6,955 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 25,111 | 16,344 | 56,581 | 43,263 | |||||||||||
Investing activities: | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments | (144,102 | ) | (113,403 | ) | (442,124 | ) | (335,253 | ) | |||||||
Maturities of investments | 159,479 | 118,088 | 384,238 | 460,028 | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in customer funding liabilities, net of changes in restricted cash | (897 | ) | 1,830 | (8,461 | ) | (2,828 | ) | ||||||||
Investment in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates | (12,002 | ) | (999 | ) | (18,866 | ) | (43,271 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition funds held at trust | — | (19,471 | ) | — | (19,471 | ) | |||||||||
Capital expenditures | (7,166 | ) | (8,241 | ) | (22,595 | ) | (20,937 | ) | |||||||
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (806 | ) | (89 | ) | (68,266 | ) | (24,197 | ) | |||||||
Payments of contingent consideration related to Etap Acquisition | — | — | (5,275 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (5,494 | ) | (22,285 | ) | (181,349 | ) | 14,071 | ||||||||
Financing activities: | |||||||||||||||
Investments in consolidated joint venture by noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | 1,152 | |||||||||||
Payments on repurchase of common stock | (76 | ) | — | (1,451 | ) | — | |||||||||
Net proceeds from share-based equity award activity | 393 | 267 | 2,064 | 1,631 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan activity | 557 | 456 | 1,717 | 1,374 | |||||||||||
Minimum tax withholding on restricted stock awards | — | (13 | ) | (9,718 | ) | (11,094 | ) | ||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | 191 | 56 | 364 | 201 | |||||||||||
Repayments on capital leases | — | — | — | (199 | ) | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 1,065 | 766 | (7,024 | ) | (6,935 | ) | |||||||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (266 | ) | 250 | (549 | ) | 698 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 20,416 | (4,925 | ) | (132,341 | ) | 51,097 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 217,400 | 385,120 | 370,157 | 329,098 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 237,816 | $ | 380,195 | $ | 237,816 | $ | 380,195 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | |||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 3,594 | $ | 3,594 | $ | 7,188 | $ | 7,367 | |||||||
Income tax payments (receipts), net | $ | 126 | $ | (175 | ) | $ | 397 | $ | (908 | ) |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Concur Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted)
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Description of the Company and Basis of Presentation
Throughout these consolidated financial statements Concur Technologies, Inc. is referred to as “Concur,” the "Company," “we,” “us” and “our.” We report our operating results on the basis of a fiscal year that starts October 1 and ends September 30. We refer to our fiscal years ended September 30, 2010, 2011 and 2012, as, “2010,” “2011” and “2012.” All dollar, option and share amounts are reported in thousands, unless otherwise noted.
Description of the Company
We are a leading global provider of integrated travel and expense management solutions for companies of all industries and sizes worldwide. Our core mission is to continuously innovate to reduce the costs for our customers and enhance the user experience for travelers. Our easy-to-use cloud computing solutions help companies and their employees control costs, save time, and boost productivity by streamlining the expense management, travel procurement, itinerary management, and invoice management processes. By capturing and reporting on activity throughout the travel and expense management process, our solutions provide detailed information to help clients effectively negotiate with vendors, create budgets, and manage compliance. Our solutions adapt to individual employee preferences, while scaling to meet the needs of companies from small to large.
Concur, the Concur logo, TripIt and GlobalExpense, as well as a number of other names and brands that are not referenced in these consolidated financial statements, are trademarks or registered trademarks of Concur or its affiliates. Other parties’ marks are the property of their respective owners and should be treated as such.
Basis of Presentation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Concur and its wholly-owned subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. All intercompany accounts and transactions were eliminated in consolidation. In addition, we established a Japanese joint venture during 2011 and hold a controlling interest (75% voting interest) in Concur (Japan) Ltd., (“Concur Japan”). We recorded a noncontrolling interest in the consolidated statements of operations for the noncontrolling investors’ interests in the operations of Concur Japan. We recorded a noncontrolling interest of $0.8 million and $1.2 million as of June 30, 2012, and September 30, 2011, respectively, in stockholders’ equity.
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting. In our opinion, we have included all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. These adjustments consist of normal recurring items. Our unaudited consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2011.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously presented for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current presentation.
Note 2. Accounting Estimates, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Use of Estimates
We prepared our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP which requires us to make estimates and assumptions affecting the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Examples of estimates and assumptions include valuing assets and liabilities acquired through business combinations, fair value of acquisition related contingent considerations, valuing and estimating useful lives of intangible assets, recognizing uncertain tax positions, estimating tax valuation allowances on tax attribute carryforwards, deferring certain revenues and costs, the determination of allowances for accounts receivable, estimating useful lives of property and equipment and estimating product warranties.
6
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 2012, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (Topic 820)-Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04), which provides a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related footnotes.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Instead, an entity will be required to present either a continuous statement of net income and other comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU 2011-05, to defer the effective date of the specific requirement to present items that are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income to net income alongside their respective components of net income and other comprehensive income. The new guidance will be effective for us with the reporting period beginning October 1, 2012, and will have presentation changes only.
In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend and simplify the rules related to testing goodwill for impairment. The revised guidance allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation, based on the entity's events and circumstances, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine whether it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. Net Income Per Share
We calculate basic net income per share by dividing net income attributable to Concur for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share attributable to Concur is computed giving effect to all potential weighted average diluted common stock, including options, restricted stock units, warrants and the senior convertible notes, using the treasury stock method.
The computation of basic and diluted net income per share is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Concur | $ | 6,906 | $ | 2,266 | $ | 1,200 | $ | 3,288 | |||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 54,778 | 53,936 | 54,465 | 53,278 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of share-based equity awards | 1,955 | 1,822 | 1,952 | 2,076 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of senior convertible notes | 767 | — | 214 | — | |||||||||||
Diluted | 57,500 | 55,758 | 56,631 | 55,354 | |||||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Concur common stockholders: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
Diluted | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
The following table presents shares of potential common stock outstanding for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 that were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because the effect of these shares in the computation of diluted net income per share would have been anti-dilutive.
7
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
Senior convertible notes | — | 5,491 | — | 5,491 | |||||||
Warrants associated with the senior convertible notes | 5,491 | 5,491 | 5,491 | 5,491 |
Under the treasury stock method, the senior convertible notes will generally not have a dilutive impact on net income per share until the average stock price for the period exceeds the conversion price for the senior convertible notes.
We also have entered into the note hedge transactions (“Note Hedges”) with respect to our common stock (discussed in Note 9), to minimize the impact of potential economic dilution upon conversion of the senior convertible notes. The Note Hedges were outstanding during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Since the beneficial impact of the Note Hedges is anti-dilutive, it is excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share.
Note 4. Property and Equipment
As of the dates specified below, our property and equipment consisted of the following:
June 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | ||||||
Land and building | $ | 5,988 | $ | 5,972 | |||
Leasehold improvements | 5,966 | 5,935 | |||||
Computer hardware | 27,607 | 23,565 | |||||
Computer software | 71,487 | 59,039 | |||||
Furniture and equipment | 1,702 | 1,592 | |||||
Property and equipment, gross | 112,750 | 96,103 | |||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | (59,549 | ) | (50,128 | ) | |||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 53,201 | $ | 45,975 |
Depreciation expense totaled $6.0 million and $17.0 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and $5.0 million and $14.9 million for the same periods in 2011.
Note 5. Investments
Our investment portfolio primarily includes strategic investments in privately-held companies. We account for our strategic investments under either the cost or equity method. Our equity method investment balance is adjusted each period to recognize our proportionate share of net income or loss, including adjustments to recognize certain differences between our carrying value and our equity in net assets. In April 2012, we exercised our warrant to purchase an additional 1.5 million shares of preferred stock in ClearTrip, Inc. for a total of $12.0 million. The additional shares of preferred stock have been accounted for under the cost method.
Our total equity and cost method investment balances recorded as of June 30, 2012, and September 30, 2011, were as follows:
June 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | ||||||
Equity method investments | $ | 15,512 | $ | 17,560 | |||
Cost method investments | 45,868 | 33,866 | |||||
Total investments | $ | 61,380 | $ | 51,426 |
Note 6. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying balance of goodwill for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, were as follows:
Balance as of September 30, 2011 | $ | 279,192 | |
Addition — Etap Acquisition earn-out (1) | 2,697 | ||
Other adjustments (2) | (2,519 | ) | |
Balance as of June 30, 2012 | $ | 279,370 |
8
(1) On August 1, 2009, we completed the acquisition of Etap-On-Line (“Etap Acquisition”). The purchase price was subject to specified earn-out provisions to be determined over a three year period ending September 30, 2012. We recorded a $2.7 million earn-out as additional goodwill for the nine months ended June 30, 2012.
(2) Other adjustments represent primarily the impact of foreign currency translation for instances when goodwill is recorded in foreign entities whose functional currency is also their local currency. These goodwill balances are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at period end. Adjustments related to foreign currency translation are included in other comprehensive income (loss).
In the fourth quarter of 2011, we completed the acquisition of GlobalExpense Limited (“GlobalExpense Acquisition”) for total cash consideration of $19.2 million. In addition, the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration as of the acquisition date was $2.6 million which was included in the total purchase price. The total preliminary purchase price and the fair value of the contingent consideration were primarily allocated to goodwill of $11.4 million and intangible assets of $10.4 million. The initial purchase price allocation is preliminary as of June 30, 2012, pending finalization of valuation reports and deferred tax calculations. Changes to amounts recorded as assets or liabilities, may result in a corresponding adjustment to goodwill.
Note 7. Intangible Assets
During the first quarter of 2012, we acquired intangible assets and accounted for them as acquisition of assets because the acquired assets did not constitute a business according to the definition of a business under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. We recorded the total acquisition costs, including cash payments for the acquired assets and the related transaction costs, of $67.3 million as an intangible asset. This amount has been assigned to customer relationships, because the intangible asset consists of a large number of customer contracts for our travel and expense management services that were previously resold to small-to-medium sized businesses by ADP, Inc. under a reseller agreement between us and ADP, Inc. These customer contracts typically have initial terms of one year or less with automatic renewal, subject to the right of either party to terminate the contract with prior written notice. The acquired intangible asset has an estimated useful life of nine years, based primarily on our analysis of the historical attrition data for the underlying customer contracts over the past 12 years.
The following table presents our intangible assets as of the dates specified below:
June 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Amount | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Amount | |||||||||||||||||
Trade name and trademarks | $ | 2,910 | $ | (759 | ) | $ | 2,151 | $ | 2,926 | $ | (457 | ) | $ | 2,469 | |||||||||
Technology | 25,282 | (17,105 | ) | 8,177 | 24,848 | (13,117 | ) | 11,731 | |||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | 125,806 | (26,273 | ) | 99,533 | 57,995 | (17,016 | ) | 40,979 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 153,998 | $ | (44,137 | ) | $ | 109,861 | $ | 85,769 | $ | (30,590 | ) | $ | 55,179 |
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded amortization expense of $5.2 million and $13.8 million in our consolidated statement of operations, and we recorded amortization expense of $2.7 million and $6.9 million for the same periods in 2011. The increase in amortization expense is primarily due to the increased intangible asset base through acquisitions. The following table presents the estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets held at June 30, 2012:
Years Ended September 30, | Amortization of Intangible Assets | ||
2012 (July 1, 2012, through September 30, 2012) | $ | 4,459 | |
2013 | 17,278 | ||
2014 | 15,878 | ||
2015 | 15,772 | ||
2016 | 13,418 | ||
Thereafter | 43,056 | ||
Total | $ | 109,861 |
9
Note 8. Customer Funding Liabilities
We draw funds from and make payments on behalf of our customers for employee expense reimbursements and related corporate credit card payments. We hold these funds in cash and record our obligation to make these expense reimbursements and payments on behalf of our customers as Customer Funding Liabilities.
Note 9. Debt
In March 2010, we issued $287.5 million principal amount of our 2.50% senior convertible notes due April 15, 2015 (“Notes”). All amounts from the issuance of the Notes were settled in April 2010.
The Notes are governed by an Indenture, dated April 6, 2010 (“Indenture”), between Concur and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The Notes will mature on April 15, 2015, unless earlier repurchased or converted, and bear interest at a rate of 2.50% per year payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing October 15, 2010.
The Notes are convertible into cash and shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 19.10 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $52.35 per share, subject to adjustment. Prior to January 15, 2015, conversion is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth below. Holders of the Notes who convert their Notes in connection with a fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture) will, under certain circumstances, be entitled to a make-whole premium in the form of an increase in the conversion rate. Additionally, in the event of a fundamental change, holders of the Notes may require Concur to repurchase all or a portion of their Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the fundamental change repurchase date (as defined in the Indenture).
Holders of the Notes may convert their Notes on or after January 15, 2015, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for accrued interest. Upon conversion, we will satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering cash and shares of common stock, if any, based on a daily settlement amount (as defined in the Indenture). Prior to January 15, 2015, holders of the Notes may convert their Notes under any of the following conditions:
• | during any calendar quarter commencing after June 30, 2010, (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of common stock for 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price on each applicable trading day; |
• | during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes for each day of that five consecutive trading day period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of common stock and the applicable conversion rate on such day; or |
• | upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. |
In accounting for the issuance of the Notes, we separated the Notes into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component was calculated by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated convertible feature. The carrying amount of the equity component representing the conversion option was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the par value of the Notes as a whole. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount (“debt discount”) is accreted to interest expense over the term of the Note. The equity component will not be remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.
In accounting for the transaction costs related to the issuance of the Notes, we allocated the total amount incurred to the liability and equity components. Transaction costs allocated to the liability component are being amortized to expense over the term of the Notes, and transaction costs allocated to the equity component were netted with the equity component in additional paid-in capital.
The following table shows the liability component amounts recorded within our consolidated financial statements for the Notes:
June 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | ||||||
Principal amount | $ | 287,500 | $ | 287,500 | |||
Less: note discount | (35,127 | ) | (43,213 | ) | |||
Less: note issuance costs | (3,882 | ) | (4,826 | ) | |||
Senior convertible notes, net | $ | 248,491 | $ | 239,461 |
10
The following table presents the interest expense recognized related to the Notes for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Contractual interest expense | $ | 1,797 | $ | 1,797 | $ | 5,391 | $ | 5,391 | |||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 318 | 304 | 944 | 904 | |||||||||||
Accretion of debt discount | 2,744 | 2,553 | 8,086 | 7,522 | |||||||||||
$ | 4,859 | $ | 4,654 | $ | 14,421 | $ | 13,817 | ||||||||
Effective interest rate of the liability component | 7.73 | % | 7.73 | % | 7.73 | % | 7.73 | % |
The net proceeds from the Notes were approximately $279.0 million after payment of the initial purchasers’ discounts and offering expenses. From these net proceeds, we used a net total of approximately $34.1 million which included $60.1 million to pay for the cost of the Note Hedge offset by proceeds of $26.1 million from our sale of Warrants. These transactions are described in more detail below. We expect to use the net proceeds of the Notes for general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions and strategic transactions.
Note Hedges
To minimize the impact of potential economic dilution upon conversion of the Notes, we entered into Note Hedges with respect to our common stock. We paid $60.1 million for the Note Hedges. The Note Hedges cover approximately 5.5 million shares of our common stock at a strike price of $52.35 subject to anti-dilution adjustments, and are exercisable upon conversion of the Notes. The Note Hedges will expire upon the maturity of the Notes. The Note Hedges are intended to reduce the potential economic dilution upon conversion of the Notes in the event that the market value per share of our common stock, as measured under the Notes, at the time of exercise is greater than the conversion price of the Notes.
Warrants
Separately, we entered into warrant transactions, whereby we sold warrants to acquire up to 5.5 million shares of our common stock at a strike price of $73.29 per share (“Warrants”), subject to anti-dilution adjustments. The Warrants will expire upon the maturity of the Notes. We received proceeds of $26.1 million from the sale of the Warrants. If the market value per share of our common stock, as measured under the Warrants, exceeds the strike price of the Warrants, the Warrants will have a dilutive effect on our net income per share.
Note 10. Income Taxes
We base the provision for income taxes in our interim consolidated financial statements on estimated annual effective tax rates in the tax jurisdictions where we operate. We monitor the assumptions used in estimating the annual effective tax rate and make adjustments, if required, throughout the year. If actual results differ from the assumptions used in estimating our annual effective income tax rate, future income tax expense could be materially affected. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, our effective tax rates of 383.7% and 152.2% respectively, differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to losses in tax jurisdictions where we are not able to record a tax benefit combined with the timing of recognized earnings and losses throughout the year, the relative mix of earning or losses within the tax jurisdictions in which we operate, and offset in part of the net impact of permanent book to tax differences associated with our acquisition of TripIt, Inc. (“TripIt Acquisition”).
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, our effective tax rates of 182.5% and 178.3% respectively, varies from the federal statutory rate due to nondeductible compensation related to the TripIt Acquisition, nondeductible TripIt Acquisition costs, and partially offset by an increase in R&D development credits and the recognition of a tax benefit resulting from legislation enacted December 17, 2010 retroactively reinstating the research and development tax credit.
We measure and recognize uncertain tax positions. To recognize such positions we first determine if it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit. We then measure the benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We do not believe that it is reasonably possible that the estimates of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next twelve months. Tax positions for Concur and its subsidiaries are subject to income tax audits by multiple tax jurisdictions throughout the world. An adverse resolution of one or more uncertain tax positions in any period could have a material impact on the results of operations for that period.
11
Note 11. Share-based Compensation
Our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (“Equity Plan”) provides for grants of stock options, restricted stock, stock bonuses, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). As of June 30, 2012, we had 1.1 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under our Equity Plan. Based on our Equity Plan design, the 1.1 million shares of common stock equates to approximately 0.7 million RSUs reserved for future grants which we generally use as long-term employee incentive and retention tools. We recognize compensation expense for equity awards on a straight line basis over the requisite service period of the award.
We have calculated an additional paid in capital (“APIC”) pool that represents the excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation that are available to absorb future tax deficiencies. We include those excess tax benefits in APIC only when they have been realized. If the amount of future tax deficiencies is greater than the available APIC pool, we will record the excess deficiencies as income tax expense in our consolidated statement of operations. Excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies, to the extent realized, are a factor in the calculation of diluted shares used in computing dilutive income per share.
The following table presents our share-based compensation resulting from equity awards that we recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Cost of operations | $ | 2,161 | $ | 621 | $ | 4,839 | $ | 1,955 | |||||||
Sales and marketing | 8,321 | 3,046 | 19,248 | 13,582 | |||||||||||
Systems development and programming | 2,019 | 1,091 | 4,013 | 4,267 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 5,027 | 1,393 | 10,974 | 5,050 | |||||||||||
Total share-based compensation | $ | 17,528 | $ | 6,151 | $ | 39,074 | $ | 24,854 |
Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $0.4 million and $2.1 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, and $0.3 million and $1.6 million for the same periods in the prior year. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we realized a state income tax benefit in APIC from exercises of stock options and vesting of RSUs. We presented excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options and vesting of RSUs, as financing cash flows and a corresponding reduction in operating cash flows.
The following table presents our stock option activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2012:
Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding as of September 30, 2011 | 986 | $ | 10.50 | ||||||||||
Exercised | (272 | ) | 7.67 | ||||||||||
Forfeited or expired | — | — | |||||||||||
Outstanding as of June 30, 2012 | 714 | 11.57 | 2.81 | $ | 40,382 | ||||||||
Exercisable as of June 30, 2012 | 714 | $ | 11.57 | 2.81 | $ | 40,382 |
The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was $13.1 million and $13.5 million, respectively.
RSUs are awards that entitle the holder to shares of our common stock as the award vests. Some of our RSUs are subject to performance-based vesting as well as time-based vesting. RSUs generally vest over four years, but may accelerate in certain circumstances. The compensation expense incurred for RSUs is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant and is amortized ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
12
The following table presents a summary of RSU award activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2012:
Shares | Weighted Average Share Value | |||||
Outstanding as of September 30, 2011 | 2,535 | $ | 41.90 | |||
Granted | 1,413 | 55.56 | ||||
Vested and released | (654 | ) | 35.48 | |||
Cancelled | (107 | ) | 44.54 | |||
Outstanding as of June 30, 2012 | 3,187 | $ | 49.19 |
As of June 30, 2012, we had $94.2 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation costs net of estimated forfeitures that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
Note 12. Fair Value Measurements
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and its subsequent updates establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, categorizing the inputs used to measure fair value.
The hierarchy can be described as follows:
• | Level 1- observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; |
• | Level 2- inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and |
• | Level 3- unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. |
Assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in our consolidated financial statements on a nonrecurring basis include items such as property and equipment, equity and cost method investments, and other assets. These assets are measured at fair value if determined to be impaired. The fair values of these investments are determined based on valuation techniques using the best information available, and may include quoted market prices, market comparables, and discounted cash flow projections. An impairment charge is recorded when the cost of the investment exceeds its fair value and this condition is determined to be other-than-temporary.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
We have highly liquid investments classified as cash equivalents and short-term investments included in our consolidated balance sheet. Cash equivalents consist of money market instruments and commercial paper that have original maturities of 90 days or less.
We also invest in commercial paper with maturities greater than 90 days but that generally mature within 270 days. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2012, are summarized below:
Fair value measurement using | Assets/Liabilities at fair value | ||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Money market accounts (1) | $ | 44,709 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 44,709 | |||||||
Commercial paper (2) | — | 229,596 | — | 229,596 | |||||||||||
Other fixed income securities (2) | — | 114,122 | — | 114,122 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 44,709 | $ | 343,718 | $ | — | $ | 388,427 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition-related contingent consideration | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 26,534 | $ | 26,534 |
(1) Included in cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Included in either cash and cash equivalents or short-term investments on our consolidated balance sheets.
13
Our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of September 30, 2011, are summarized below:
Fair value measurement using | Assets/Liabilities at fair value | ||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Money market accounts (1) | $ | 58,336 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 58,336 | |||||||
Commercial paper (2) | — | 272,583 | — | 272,583 | |||||||||||
Other fixed income securities (2) | — | 122,785 | — | 122,785 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 58,336 | $ | 395,368 | $ | — | $ | 453,704 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition-related contingent consideration | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 33,490 | $ | 33,490 |
(1) Included in cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Included in either cash and cash equivalents or short-term investments on our consolidated balance sheets.
Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of our money market funds that were classified as Level 1 in the table above were derived from quoted market prices as substantially all of these instruments have maturity dates (if any) within one year from our date of purchase and active markets for these instruments exist. Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of commercial paper and other fixed income securities that were classified as Level 2 in the table above, generally all of which mature within one year and the counterparties to which have high credit ratings, were derived from the following: non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated by observable market data and quoted market prices for similar instruments.
Acquisition-related Contingent Consideration
We estimate the fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration using various valuation approaches including the Monte Carlo Simulation approach and discounted cash flow model. Acquisition related contingent consideration liabilities are classified as Level 3 liabilities, because we use unobservable inputs to value them, reflecting our assessment of the assumptions market participants would use to value these liabilities. The unrealized gains and losses related to the contingent consideration in these acquisitions are included in operating expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
TripIt Contingent Consideration
As part of the TripIt Acquisition, we agreed to pay contingent cash consideration of up to $38.3 million to the former shareholders of TripIt on the 30 month anniversary of the closing or at such earlier time as specified in the Agreement (the “Top-Up Payment Date”). If, on the Top-Up Payment Date, the value of the consideration issued at the closing (the “Market Value”) is less than approximately $82.1 million or $100.90 per share (the “Guaranteed Value”), subject to adjustments, we will make a payment to such holders in an aggregate amount equal to the difference between the Guaranteed Value and the Market Value (the “Top-Up Payment”), subject to certain limited exceptions. Such right to receive the Top-Up Payment will terminate in the event the value of the shares paid at closing increases by approximately $38.3 million to $100.90 per share at any time prior to the Top-Up Payment Date. If shares were sold or transferred before the Top-Up Payment Date, such holders will not be eligible to receive a Top-Up Payment. In addition, certain former shareholders that became employees of Concur will not be eligible to receive a Top-Up Payment if these employees terminate employment with Concur prior to the required service period. As of June 30, 2012, the required service period has been met and the full amount of the portion of the fair value of the contingent consideration subject to the continued employment requirement has been recognized as compensation expense.
Changes in the Top-Up Payment liability since the acquisition date were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. On a quarterly basis, we re-measure the fair value of the contingent Top-Up Payment and any changes in contingent consideration are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as revaluation of contingent consideration or compensation expense.
The fair value of the cash contingent consideration was estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation approach, which utilizes certain inputs that are unobservable in the market. Key inputs include the expected term, risk free rate, stock price, and volatility of our stock and the strike price of $100.90. A volatility of 43% was used to calculate the fair value of our contingent consideration as of June 30, 2012. Volatility is considered a significant assumption and is based on our historical stock price. Also, the fair value of the contingent consideration is significantly impacted by the changes in our stock price. If the stock price increases (decreases) significantly, the fair value of the contingent consideration will decrease (increase) accordingly. The contingent consideration payment liability is included in acquisition-related contingent considerations on our consolidated balance sheets.
14
The following table presents a reconciliation of TripIt contingent consideration liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of June 30, 2012:
Balance as of September 30, 2011 | $ | 30,972 | |
Total gains: | |||
Recorded as revaluation of contingent consideration | (7,420 | ) | |
Recorded as compensation expense | (112 | ) | |
Balance as of June 30, 2012 | $ | 23,440 |
The following table presents a reconciliation of TripIt contingent consideration liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of June 30, 2011:
Balance as of September 30, 2010 | $ | — | |
Contingent consideration issued at business combination | 17,395 | ||
Total losses: | |||
Recorded as revaluation of contingent consideration | 1,410 | ||
Recorded as compensation expense | 5,305 | ||
Balance as of June 30, 2011 | $ | 24,110 |
GlobalExpense Contingent Consideration
As part of the GlobalExpense Acquisition, we will potentially pay contingent cash consideration totaling up to £2.0 million, based on the achievement of certain revenue targets through September 30, 2012. The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated by applying a probability based model, which utilizes significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. Key assumptions include a 98% weighted probability of achieving the earn-out as of June 30, 2012. This liability is short term in nature and is included in the acquisition-related liabilities on the June 30, 2012 consolidated balance sheet. The following table presents a reconciliation of the contingent consideration measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of June 30, 2012:
Balance as of September 30, 2011 | $ | 2,517 | |
Total losses: | |||
Recorded as revaluation of contingent consideration | 562 | ||
Foreign currency translation | 15 | ||
Balance as of June 30, 2012 | $ | 3,094 |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, fair value adjustments made to assets required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were immaterial.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value of our senior convertible notes is estimated using Level 2 inputs based on quoted market prices in markets that are not active. The fair value of our senior convertible notes is primarily affected by our stock price and also subject to interest. As of June 30, 2012, the carrying amount and fair value of our senior convertible notes was $248.5 million and $409.7 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the carrying amount and fair value of our senior convertible notes was $239.5 million and $291.3 million, respectively.
Note 13. Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table shows the changes in equity attributable to both Concur and the noncontrolling interest in our consolidated subsidiary in which we have control, but not total ownership interest.
15
Attributable to Concur | Noncontrolling Interest | Total Equity | |||||||||
Equity at September 30, 2011 | $ | 698,655 | $ | 1,176 | $ | 699,831 | |||||
Comprehensive loss: | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 1,200 | (346 | ) | 854 | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (2,392 | ) | (42 | ) | (2,434 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized gain on investments, net of tax | 22 | — | 22 | ||||||||
Comprehensive loss | (1,170 | ) | (388 | ) | (1,558 | ) | |||||
Share-based transactions and compensation expense | 34,738 | — | 34,738 | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (1,300 | ) | — | (1,300 | ) | ||||||
Equity at June 30, 2012 | $ | 730,923 | $ | 788 | $ | 731,711 | |||||
Attributable to Concur | Noncontrolling Interest | Total Equity | |||||||||
Equity at September 30, 2010 | $ | 637,826 | $ | — | $ | 637,826 | |||||
Initial investment by noncontrolling interest partners | — | 1,225 | 1,225 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 3,288 | (72 | ) | 3,216 | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 2,353 | 11 | 2,364 | ||||||||
Net unrealized gain on investments, net of tax | 22 | — | 22 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | 5,663 | (61 | ) | 5,602 | |||||||
Share-based transactions and compensation expense | 62,212 | — | 62,212 | ||||||||
Equity at June 30, 2011 | $ | 705,701 | $ | 1,164 | $ | 706,865 |
The following table shows the components of comprehensive income attributable to Concur for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Consolidated net income | $ | 6,764 | $ | 2,227 | ||||
Less: loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | (142 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (2,241 | ) | 909 | |||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax | (20 | ) | 3 | |||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Concur | $ | 4,645 | $ | 3,178 |
Note 14. Geographic Data
We market our services and products primarily in the United States and operate in a single industry segment. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. The following table presents our revenues by geographic region:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 96,415 | $ | 77,023 | $ | 272,821 | $ | 219,919 | |||||||
Europe | 12,532 | 9,075 | 37,117 | 24,749 | |||||||||||
Other | 4,220 | 3,371 | 12,007 | 9,665 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 113,167 | $ | 89,469 | $ | 321,945 | $ | 254,333 |
Note 15. Contingencies
Product Warranty and Indemnification Obligations
We provide services and software solutions to our customers under sales contracts, which usually include a limited warranty regarding product and service performance and a limited indemnification of customers against losses, expenses and
16
liabilities from damages that may be awarded against them if our services or software are found to infringe upon a patent, copyright, trademark, or other proprietary right of a third party. The contracts generally limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations in a variety of industry-standard respects. We also enter into similar limited indemnification terms in agreements with certain strategic business partners and vendors. To date, we have experienced minimal warranty claims and have not had significant reimbursements to any customers for any losses related to the limited indemnification described above.
Legal Matters
On February 15, 2012, an alleged derivative and class action complaint, captioned Deborah A. Collins v. S. Steven Singh, et al., No. 12-2-05878-4-SEA, was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County against Concur Technologies, Inc. as a nominal defendant and certain of its directors and executive officers by a plaintiff who claims to be a shareholder. Plaintiff alleged, among other things, that certain restricted stock units and bonuses granted to officers were improper and subjected Concur to unnecessary tax liability, and that Concur's 2012 proxy statement was false and misleading. Plaintiff purported to bring both derivative claims on Concur's behalf and a direct claim on behalf of shareholders, and sought relief including damages, disgorgement, equitable remedies and attorneys' fees and costs. Concur moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that all of the claims are derivative, and that plaintiff failed to establish her standing to assert such claims on Concur's behalf inasmuch as she did not make a pre-suit demand on the Board of Directors and failed to plead adequately that such demand was excused. On July 20, 2012, the Court granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice.
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Any such proceedings, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, costly, and result in the diversion of significant operational resources or management time.
Although the outcomes of legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, we are not currently involved in any legal proceeding in which the outcome, in our judgment based on information currently available, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial position.
17
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) provides information that we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes that are included with this report. Also, the discussion of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in this section is an integral part of the analysis of our results of operations and financial condition.
Throughout this MD&A, we refer to Concur Technologies, Inc. as “Concur,” the "Company," “we,” “us” and “our.” We report our operating results on a fiscal year basis that starts October 1 and ends September 30. We refer to our fiscal years ended September 30, 2010, 2011 and 2012, as “2010,” “2011” and “2012.” Throughout this MD&A, where we provide discussion of the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, and we provide data for the same period in the prior year, we will refer to the prior period as “2011.” All dollar, option and share amounts are reported in thousands, unless otherwise noted.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations, intentions, future financial performance, future financial condition, and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements can be identified by our use of the future tense, or by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “continue” and other similar words and phrases. These forward-looking statements involve many risks and uncertainties, described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, as well as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The occurrence of any of these risks and uncertainties may cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any such forward-looking statements for any reason.
Overview
We are a leading provider of integrated travel and expense management solutions for companies of all industries, sizes and geographies. Our core mission is to reduce costs for our customers and enhance the user experience for travelers, leveraging continuous innovation. Our easy-to-use cloud computing solutions help companies and their employees control costs, save time, and boost productivity by streamlining the expense management, travel procurement, itinerary management, and invoice management processes. By capturing and reporting on activity throughout the travel and expense management process, our solutions provide detailed information to help clients effectively negotiate with vendors, create budgets, and manage compliance.
Our strategic focus in 2012 is to continue to grow our core subscription business and to reduce our cost of deploying and operating our services as a percentage of revenue. We expect our subscription revenues to increase in 2012 compared to 2011 due to anticipated growth in demand. We expect total sales and marketing expenses in 2012 to increase in absolute dollars compared to 2011, driven primarily by an increase in sales personnel and marketing programs globally.
We operate in and report on one segment, which is integrated travel and expense management.
Revenues
Revenues. Revenues consist primarily of fees paid for subscription services. To a much lesser degree, revenues also include the amortization of set-up fees paid to us in connection with subscription services. Revenues are affected by pricing, the number of new customers, customer contract durations and our customer retention rate.
Portions of our revenues are generated from sales made through our referral partners. When we assume a majority of the business risks associated with performance of the contractual obligations, we record the revenues on a gross basis and amounts paid to our referral partners are recognized as sales and marketing expenses. Our assumption of such business risks is evidenced when, among other things, we take responsibility for delivery of the product or service, establish pricing of the arrangement and are the primary obligor in the arrangement. Our judgment as to whether we have assumed the majority of the business risks associated with performance of the contractual obligations materially affects how we report revenues and expenses.
International Revenues. Revenues from customers outside the United States represented 15% of total revenues for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 14% for each of the same periods in the prior year. We expect our international revenues to grow in the near term, as our products and services continue to gain acceptance in international
18
markets primarily due to our Etap Acquisition, GlobalExpense Acquisition, our investment in global distribution and increased global awareness of our products.
Operating Expenses
Cost of Operations. Cost of operations expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and related expenses and allocated overhead costs (including depreciation, occupancy, insurance, telecommunications and computer equipment expenses) associated with employees and contractors who provide our subscription and implementation services. Cost of operations expenses also include co-location and related telecommunications costs, royalties, and amortization of deferred set-up costs that we incur in connection with our subscription services.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist of personnel costs (including sales commissions) and related expenses, referral fees and allocated overhead costs associated with our sales and marketing personnel, miscellaneous sales and marketing costs, such as advertising, trade shows and other promotional activities.
Systems Development and Programming. Systems development and programming costs consist of personnel costs and related expenses and allocated overhead costs associated with employees and contractors engaged in software engineering, program management and quality assurance.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of personnel costs and related expenses and allocated overhead costs, all associated with employees and contractors in accounting, finance, human resources, information technologies, legal and facilities, as well as miscellaneous costs, such as professional fees, public company regulatory compliance costs and insurance costs.
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration. Revaluation of contingent consideration consists of changes in value of our acquisition-related contingent consideration liability that is not subject to a continued employment requirement. The changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subject to the continued employment requirement are recognized as compensation expense. We remeasure this contingent consideration each quarter, with any changes in the fair value recorded as income or expense.
Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets represents the amortization of the intangible assets from acquisitions. We are amortizing our intangible assets as non-cash charges to operations over an expected useful life which is consistent with the timing and level of expected cash flows attributed to customer relationships, use of acquired technology, trade name and trademarks.
Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Revenues
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 113,167 | $ | 89,469 | $ | 23,698 |
Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2012 | % | 2011 | % | ||||||||||
United States | $ | 96,415 | 85.2 | % | $ | 77,023 | 86.1 | % | |||||
Europe | 12,532 | 11.1 | % | 9,075 | 10.1 | % | |||||||
Other | 4,220 | 3.7 | % | 3,371 | 3.8 | % | |||||||
Total revenues | $ | 113,167 | 100 | % | $ | 89,469 | 100 | % |
Revenues increased 26.5%, or $23.7 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to growth in the number of customers for our subscription services as well as higher transaction volumes. The growth in the number of customers for our subscription services is a result of higher market demand for our subscription services and high rates of retention of existing subscription customers. We believe this demand reflects the market’s growing awareness of our integrated travel and expense management solutions and the increasing acceptance of outsourced services such as ours. Additionally, the foreign currency impact had the effect of slightly decreasing our revenues when compared to the same period a year ago.
We expect revenues to continue to grow in 2012 as a result of the growing demand for our subscription service offerings and our planned deployments resulting from business sold in previous quarters.
19
Cost of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Cost of operations | $ | 32,033 | $ | 25,651 | $ | 6,382 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 28.3 | % | 28.7 | % |
Cost of operations increased by 24.9%, or $6.4 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in absolute dollars was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs and related expenses of $5.4 million mainly driven by increased headcount of approximately 65%. Additionally, there was an increase of $0.8 million in initial set-up costs that we incur and then amortize in connection with our subscription services.
We expect cost of operations expenses to trend down as a percentage of total revenues over the long term as the incremental cost to deploy and support each new customer is expected to decrease due to economies of scale anticipated in our subscription service model infrastructure. We anticipate that cost of operations will continue to increase in absolute dollars in 2012 as we continue to expand our capacity to deploy and support additional new customers.
Sales and Marketing
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 45,217 | $ | 36,694 | $ | 8,523 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 40.0 | % | 41.0 | % |
Sales and marketing expenses increased by 23.2%, or $8.5 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in absolute dollars was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs and related expenses of $10.3 million, primarily due to a headcount increase of approximately 30% to add new customers and increase penetration with existing customers. This was offset by a decrease of $4.9 million in contingent consideration associated with the TripIt Acquisition that is recorded in compensation expense (see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements). Additionally, customer acquisition costs and amortization of those costs increased by $2.2 million and advertising costs increased by $0.6 million compared to the same period in the prior year.
We expect total sales and marketing expenses in 2012 to increase in absolute dollars compared to 2011, driven primarily by an increase in sales personnel and marketing programs globally. These increases reflect a key part of our strategic focus in 2012, which is to expand our sales and marketing efforts to create greater awareness of our subscription services in our target markets and to support expected demand.
Systems Development and Programming
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Systems development and programming | $ | 11,713 | $ | 8,352 | $ | 3,361 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 10.4 | % | 9.3 | % |
Systems development and programming costs increased by 40.2%, or $3.4 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in absolute dollars was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs of $2.9 million driven by increased headcount of approximately 30% to extend our service offerings and develop new technologies.
In response to the demand for our subscription services, the majority of our systems and development resources are focused on developing internal-use software used to provide these services to our customers. We capitalize costs in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for software developed or obtained for internal use and amortize it over its estimated useful life. Capitalized internal-use software costs, net of amortization, increased $1.9 million, from $32.3 million at March 31, 2012, to $34.2 million at June 30, 2012.
We anticipate that recognized systems development and programming costs in 2012 will increase in absolute dollars compared to 2011 as we continue to focus on product innovation and enhancement.
20
General and Administrative
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
General and administrative | $ | 18,767 | $ | 11,579 | $ | 7,188 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 16.6 | % | 12.9 | % |
General and administrative expenses increased by 62.1%, or $7.2 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in absolute dollars was primarily due to an increase of $6.5 million in personnel costs and related expenses (including share-based compensation). Personnel costs are impacted by a headcount increase of approximately 30% to support our growth and other general and administrative costs. Additionally, allocated overhead and infrastructure costs increased by $1.0 million, offset by a decrease of $0.5 million in professional fees mainly attributable to the timing of acquisitions, litigation and other related costs.
We expect the absolute dollar amount of general and administrative expenses to continue to increase in 2012 compared to 2011 due to increases in personnel costs related to the growth of our business.
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Revaluation of contingent consideration | $ | (3,281 | ) | $ | 2,675 | $ | (5,956 | ) | |||
Percent of total revenues | (2.9 | )% | 3.0 | % |
Revaluation of contingent consideration consisted of a gain of $3.3 million primarily relating to the TripIt Acquisition for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a loss of $2.7 million for same period in the prior year. The change in the assumptions applied in the valuation during the current period, primarily the increase or decrease in our stock price, resulted in the change in the amount of the revaluation during each respective period.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | $ | 5,177 | $ | 2,723 | $ | 2,454 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 4.6 | % | 3.0 | % |
Amortization of intangible assets represents the amortization of the intangible assets from acquisitions. We are amortizing our intangible assets as charges to operations over an expected useful life which is consistent with the timing and level of expected cash flows attributed to customer relationships, use of acquired technology and trade name and trademarks. Amortization of intangible assets increased for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year, due primarily to additional intangible assets acquired in 2012 and other acquisitions completed in 2011.
Interest Income, Interest Expense, Loss from Equity Investments and Other
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 516 | $ | 443 | $ | 73 | |||||
Interest expense | (4,859 | ) | (4,654 | ) | (205 | ) | |||||
Loss from equity investments | (982 | ) | (210 | ) | (772 | ) | |||||
Other, net | (600 | ) | (75 | ) | (525 | ) | |||||
Total other expense, net | $ | (5,925 | ) | $ | (4,496 | ) | $ | (1,429 | ) |
The loss from equity investments resulted from investments made in privately held companies. Under the equity method, we record our investment at cost and adjust the carrying amount of the investment to recognize our proportionate share of net income or loss, including adjustments to recognize certain differences between our carrying value and our equity in net assets,
21
into our consolidated statements of operations after the date of investment.
Income Tax Expense
Three Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit | $ | (9,148 | ) | $ | (4,928 | ) | $ | (4,220 | ) | ||
Effective tax rate | 383.7 | % | 182.5 | % |
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, our effective tax rate of 383.7% differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to losses in tax jurisdictions where we are not able to record a tax benefit combined with the timing of recognized earnings and losses throughout the year, the relative mix of earnings or losses within the tax jurisdictions in which we operate, and offset in part by the net impact of permanent book to tax differences associated with the TripIt Acquisition.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our effective tax rate of 182.5% varies from the federal statutory rate due to the nondeductible compensation related to the TripIt Acquisition, nondeductible TripIt Acquisition costs, and partially offset by an increase in R&D development credits and the recognition of a tax benefit resulting from legislation enacted December 17, 2010 retroactively reinstating the research and development tax credit.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. We make estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. We also make estimates and judgments in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.
We measure and recognize uncertain tax positions. To recognize such positions we first determine if it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit. We then measure the benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We do not believe that it is reasonably possible that the estimates of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next twelve months. Tax positions for Concur and its subsidiaries are subject to income tax audits by multiple tax jurisdictions throughout the world. However, an adverse resolution of one or more uncertain tax positions in any period could have a material impact on the results of operations for that period.
Nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Revenues
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 321,945 | $ | 254,333 | $ | 67,612 |
Nine Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2012 | % | 2011 | % | ||||||||||
United States | $ | 272,821 | 84.8 | % | $ | 219,919 | 86.5 | % | |||||
Europe | 37,117 | 11.5 | % | 24,749 | 9.7 | % | |||||||
Other | 12,007 | 3.7 | % | 9,665 | 3.8 | % | |||||||
Total revenues | $ | 321,945 | 100 | % | $ | 254,333 | 100 | % |
Revenues increased 26.6%, or $67.6 million, for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the growth in the number of customers for our subscription services as a result of higher market demand for our subscription services and high rates of retention of existing subscription customers. We believe this demand reflects the market’s growing awareness of our integrated travel and expense management solutions and the increasing acceptance of outsourced services such as ours.
We expect revenues to continue to grow in 2012 as a result of the growing demand for our subscription service offerings and our planned deployments from new business sold in previous quarters.
22
Cost of Operations
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Cost of operations | $ | 91,288 | $ | 71,333 | $ | 19,955 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 28.4 | % | 28.0 | % |
Cost of operations increased by 28.0%, or $20.0 million, for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in absolute dollars was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs and related expenses of $13.7 million driven by increased headcount of approximately 55% to support our growing customer base. Furthermore, there was an increase of $4.4 million in initial set-up costs that we incur and then amortize in connection with our subscription services, and an increase of $1.3 million in infrastructure and allocated overhead costs.
We expect cost of operations expenses to trend down as a percentage of total revenues over the long term as the incremental cost to deploy and support each new customer is expected to decrease due to economies of scale anticipated in our subscription service model infrastructure. We anticipate that cost of operations will continue to increase in absolute dollars in 2012 as we continue to expand our capacity to deploy and support additional new customers.
Sales and Marketing
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 127,440 | $ | 102,475 | $ | 24,965 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 39.6 | % | 40.3 | % |
Sales and marketing expenses increased by 24.4%, or $25.0 million, for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in absolute dollars was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs and related expenses of $21.3 million, primarily due to additional headcount of approximately 30% and adding new customers and increasing penetration within our existing customer base. This was offset by a decrease of $4.9 million in contingent consideration associated with the TripIt Acquisition that is recorded as compensation expense (see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements). Additionally, customer acquisition costs and amortization of those costs increased by $6.1 million, and advertising costs increased by $1.5 million.
We expect total sales and marketing expenses in 2012 to increase in absolute dollars compared to 2011, driven primarily by an increase in sales personnel and marketing programs globally. These increases reflect a key part of our strategic focus in 2012, which is to expand our sales and marketing efforts to create greater awareness of our subscription services in our target markets and to support expected demand.
Systems Development and Programming
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Systems development and programming | $ | 31,460 | $ | 25,582 | $ | 5,878 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 9.8 | % | 10.1 | % |
Systems development and programming costs increased by 23.0%, or $5.9 million, for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in absolute dollars was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs and related expenses of $3.6 million, primarily due to increased headcount of approximately 30%. This was offset by a decrease of $0.5 million in contingent consideration associated with the TripIt Acquisition that is recorded as compensation expense (see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements). Additionally, allocated overhead and infrastructure costs increased by $2.8 million. This was primarily due to an increase in depreciation costs as we upgrade and extend our service offerings and develop new technologies.
In response to the demand for our subscription services, the majority of our systems and development resources are focused on developing internal-use software used to provide these services to our customers. We capitalize costs in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for software developed or obtained for internal use and amortize it over its estimated useful life. Capitalized internal-use software costs, net of amortization, increased $7.2 million, from $27.0 million at September 30, 2011, to $34.2 million at June 30, 2012.
23
We anticipate that recognized systems development and programming costs in 2012 will increase in absolute dollars compared to 2011 as we continue to focus on product innovation and enhancement.
General and Administrative
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
General and administrative | $ | 50,511 | $ | 38,176 | $ | 12,335 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 15.7 | % | 15.0 | % |
General and administrative expenses increased by 32.3%, or $12.3 million, for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year. The growth in absolute dollars was primarily due to an increase of $12.1 million in personnel costs (including share-based compensation) and related expenses as we increased headcount by approximately 20% to support our growth. Additionally, there was an increase of $2.4 million in allocated overhead and infrastructure costs, offset by a decrease of $2.9 million in professional fees mainly attributable to acquisitions, litigation and other related costs.
We expect the absolute dollar amount of general and administrative expenses to continue to increase in 2012 compared to 2011 due to increases in personnel costs related to the growth of our business.
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Revaluation of contingent consideration | $ | (6,858 | ) | $ | 1,410 | $ | (8,268 | ) | |||
Percent of total revenues | (2.1 | )% | 0.6 | % |
Revaluation of contingent consideration consisted of a gain of $6.9 million primarily relating to the TripIt Acquisition for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a loss of $1.4 million for the prior year period. The change in the assumptions applied in the valuation during the current period, primarily the increase in our stock price, resulted in the change in the amount of the revaluation during each respective period.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | $ | 13,776 | $ | 6,862 | $ | 6,914 | |||||
Percent of total revenues | 4.3 | % | 2.7 | % |
Amortization of intangible assets represents the amortization of the intangible assets from acquisitions. We are amortizing our intangible assets as charges to operations over an expected useful life which is consistent with the timing and level of expected cash flows attributed to customer relationships, use of acquired technology and trade name and trademarks. Amortization of intangible assets increased $6.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to additional intangible assets acquired in 2012 and other acquisitions completed in 2011.
Interest Income, Interest Expense, Loss from Equity Investments and Other
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 1,528 | $ | 1,748 | $ | (220 | ) | ||||
Interest expense | (14,421 | ) | (13,819 | ) | (602 | ) | |||||
Loss from equity investments | (2,048 | ) | (217 | ) | (1,831 | ) | |||||
Other, net | (1,023 | ) | (313 | ) | (710 | ) | |||||
Total other expense, net | $ | (15,964 | ) | $ | (12,601 | ) | $ | (3,363 | ) |
The loss from equity investments resulted from investments made in privately held companies. Under the equity method,
24
we record our investment at cost and adjust the carrying amount of the investment to recognize our proportionate share of net income or loss, including adjustments to recognize certain differences between our carrying value and our equity in net assets, into our consolidated statements of operations after the date of investment.
Income Tax Expense
Nine Months Ended June 30, | Variance Dollars | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit | $ | (2,490 | ) | $ | (7,322 | ) | $ | 4,832 | |||
Effective tax rate | 152.2 | % | 178.3 | % |
For the nine months ended June 30, 2012, our effective tax rate of 152.2% differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to losses in tax jurisdictions where we are not able to record a tax benefit combined with the timing of recognized earnings and losses throughout the year, the relative mix of earnings or losses within the tax jurisdictions in which we operate, and offset in part by the net impact of permanent book to tax differences associated with the TripIt Acquisition.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, our effective tax rate of 178.3% varies from the federal statutory rate due to the nondeductible compensation related to the TripIt Acquisition, nondeductible TripIt Acquisition costs, and partially offset by an increase in R&D development credits and the recognition of a tax benefit resulting from legislation enacted December 17, 2010 retroactively reinstating the research and development tax credit.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. We make estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. We also make estimates and judgments in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.
We measure and recognize uncertain tax positions. To recognize such positions we first determine if it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit. We then measure the benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We do not believe that it is reasonably possible that the estimates of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next twelve months. Tax positions for Concur and its subsidiaries are subject to income tax audits by multiple tax jurisdictions throughout the world. However, an adverse resolution of one or more uncertain tax positions in any period could have a material impact on the results of operations for that period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our available sources of liquidity as of June 30, 2012, consisted principally of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $481.2 million.
Our cash flows were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ Change | 2012 | 2011 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 25,111 | $ | 16,344 | $ | 8,767 | $ | 56,581 | $ | 43,263 | $ | 13,318 | |||||||||||
Investing activities | (5,494 | ) | (22,285 | ) | 16,791 | (181,349 | ) | 14,071 | (195,420 | ) | |||||||||||||
Financing activities | 1,065 | 766 | 299 | (7,024 | ) | (6,935 | ) | (89 | ) |
Our operating cash inflows consist of payments received from our customers related to our subscription and other product offerings. Our operating cash outflows mainly consist of payments of compensation to employees, payments to vendors directly related to our services, related sales and marketing and administrative costs, costs of operations and systems development and programming costs. Net cash provided by operating activities was $25.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $16.3 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase in operating cash flows was primarily driven by higher income during the three months ended June 30, 2012, after adjustments for non-cash related items.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 was $56.6 million compared to $43.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in operating cash flows was primarily driven by higher income after adjustments for non-cash related items, partially offset by the increase in accounts receivable and additional vendor payments and compensation related cash payments during the nine months ended June 30, 2012.
Cash flows from investing activities corresponds with purchases, sales, and maturities of investments, cash outlays for acquisitions, capital expenditures, including leasehold improvements and internal-use software, and changes in customer funding liabilities, net of the change in restricted cash. Our investing activities used $5.5 million for the three months ended
25
June 30, 2012, compared to $22.3 million for the same period in the prior year. The change in investing cash flows is primarily due to changes in investment and acquisition activities. We used $12.0 million in payments related to the exercise of our ClearTrip warrants in the three months ended June 30, 2012. Additionally, net maturities of our short-term investments provided $15.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $4.7 million provided from next maturities of our short term investments during the same period in the prior year. Furthermore, we made a payment of $19.5 million to a trust for an acquisition in the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Our investing activities used $181.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to cash provided of $14.1 million for the same period in the prior year. The change in investing cash flows is primarily due to changes in investment and acquisition activities. We used $68.3 million in payments related to acquisitions for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $24.2 million for the same period in the prior year. Additionally, we made a payment of $19.5 million to a trust for an acquisition in the nine months ended June 30, 2011. Furthermore, we used $57.9 million for net purchases of our short-term investments for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $124.8 million provided from net maturities of our short-term investments for the same period in the prior year.
Our financing activities provided cash of $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $0.8 million for the same period in the prior year. Cash used by financing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2012, primarily relates to increased proceeds from share-based equity awards and employee stock purchase plan activity, as compared to for the same period in the prior year.
Financing activities used $7.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $6.9 million for the same period in the prior year. Cash used by financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, primarily relates to minimum tax withholding on restricted stock awards, as compared to for the same period in the prior year.
In March 2010, we issued Notes, a Notes Hedge and Warrants. The Notes will mature on April 15, 2015, unless converted earlier. All amounts in connection with the Notes, Notes Hedge, and Warrants were settled in cash in April 2010. As of June 30, 2012, the Notes have not been repurchased or converted. We also have not received any shares under the Notes Hedge or delivered cash or shares under the Warrants. For further information, see Note 9 in the consolidated financial statements.
Our Board of Directors previously authorized a stock repurchase program (“Repurchase Program”) that allowed us to repurchase up to 9.0 million shares of our common stock through January 2013. In December 2011, our Board of Directors extended the Repurchase Program for an additional two-year period expiring in January 2015, and increased the number of shares eligible for repurchase by an additional 3.0 million shares to 12.0 million shares. We may repurchase our common stock from time to time in the open market based on market conditions. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, we repurchased 1.3 thousand shares and 27.8 thousand shares of our outstanding common stock for a total cost of $0.1 million and $1.3 million under this program. There were no share repurchases for the same periods in prior year. As of June 30, 2012, 7.1 million shares remained eligible for repurchase under the Repurchase Program.
We believe our cash and cash equivalents, amounts available under existing credit arrangements, as well as expected positive operating cash flows, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for normal business operations, working capital needs and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. In the longer term, or if we decide to acquire assets or businesses, we may require additional funds and may seek to raise such additional funds through private or public sales of debt or equity securities, or securities convertible or exchangeable into such securities, strategic relationships, bank debt, lease financing arrangements or other available means. There can be no assurances that any such funds will be available or, if they are available, that they will be available on acceptable terms to meet our business needs. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, stockholders may experience dilution, or such equity securities may have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of June 30, 2012.
26
Years Ended September 30, | Senior Convertible Notes, including interest | Operating Leases | Purchase Obligations | ||||||||
2012 (July 1, 2012 through September 30, 2012) | $ | — | $ | 1,424 | $ | 2,023 | |||||
2013 | 7,188 | 6,040 | 6,305 | ||||||||
2014 | 7,188 | 7,540 | 4,416 | ||||||||
2015 | 294,687 | 6,731 | 3,630 | ||||||||
2016 | — | 6,310 | 3,548 | ||||||||
2017 and thereafter | — | 36,762 | 1,820 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 309,063 | $ | 64,807 | $ | 21,742 |
Senior Convertible Notes
As of June 30, 2012, investors may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to the full principal amount of the Notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest on or after January 15, 2015, or upon the occurrence of certain events including specified corporate events or trading. For further information, see Note 9 of the consolidated financial statements.
Operating Leases
We lease office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. We lease our current headquarters in Redmond, Washington under an operating lease that expires on May 31, 2013. We do not include amounts for certain operating expenses under these leases such as common area maintenance.
As of June 13, 2012, Concur entered into a lease agreement for our future corporate headquarters with Kilroy Realty, L.P. for office space located at 601 108th Avenue Northeast, Bellevue, Washington (the “Lease”). Under the Lease, which provides for an initial ten-year term with an option to renew the lease for an additional five years, Concur initially will pay approximately $3.6 million in base rent per year over the initial term of the Lease, subject to an annual increase equal to three percent of the then-current base rent. The Lease will expire ten years after the lease commencement date, unless renewed or extended pursuant to its terms. Amounts for common area maintenance are included in our contractual obligation.
We also lease office space in the United States in the states of Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Texas and Virginia, and internationally in Australia, China (Hong Kong), Czech Republic, France, Germany, India, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Singapore, Japan and the United Kingdom.
Purchase Obligations
We have future minimum purchase obligations under arrangements with third parties that are enforceable and legally binding. Future obligations are primarily related to subscription services to support sales and marketing and are based on contracted commitments.
Acquisition related contingent consideration
Contingent consideration is recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet as of the acquisition dates, and remeasured to fair value each reporting period, with any changes in the value recorded as income or expense. As of June 30, 2012, we had accrued $26.5 million for the fair value of the expected contingent consideration payment for the TripIt Acquisition and GlobalExpense Acquisition.
As part of the TripIt Acquisition, we agreed to pay additional cash consideration, if any, to the former shareholders of TripIt on the Top-Up Payment Date.
As part of the GlobalExpense Acquisition, we agreed to pay additional cash consideration, if any, to the former shareholders of GlobalExpense Limited based on achievement of certain revenue targets through September 30, 2012. We agreed to pay such additional consideration, if any, in 2013.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
27
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances; such estimates and judgments are periodically re-evaluated. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments or conditions.
The estimates and judgments noted above are affected by our application of accounting policies. Our critical accounting policies are those we deem most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, including those that require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. Our critical accounting policies include revenue recognition, income taxes, business combinations, contingent consideration, and allowances for accounts receivable.
Revenue Recognition
We generate our revenues from the delivery of subscription services, and to a much lesser degree, consulting services. We recognize revenues in accordance with accounting standards for software and service companies.
We recognize revenue when:
• | evidence of an arrangement exists; |
• | delivery has occurred; |
• | the fees are fixed or determinable; and |
• | collection is considered probable. |
If collection is not considered probable, we recognize revenues when the fees are collected. If the fees are not fixed or determinable, we recognize revenues as payments become due from the customer. Accordingly, our judgment as to the probability of collection and determinability of fees may materially affect the timing of our revenue recognition and results of operations. If non-standard acceptance periods or non-standard performance criteria are required, we recognize revenue upon the expiration of the acceptance period or satisfaction of the acceptance/performance criteria, as applicable.
Our revenues are typically recognized monthly as the service is provided to the customer and consist of:
• | fees paid for subscription services; and |
• | amortization of related set-up fees. |
Set-up fees paid by customers in connection with subscription services, as well as the associated direct and incremental costs, such as labor and commissions, are deferred until the customer begins service and is recognized ratably over the expected lives of the customer relationships, which generally range from three to five years. In addition to set-up fees, our deferred revenue balances include subscription fees paid in advance of their recognition.
Consulting services consist of fees for professional services, which relate to system implementation and integration, planning, data conversion, training, and documentation of procedures. In determining whether the consulting services can be accounted for separately from subscription revenue, we primarily consider the timing of when the consulting contract was signed in comparison to the subscription service start date. Consulting services that are sold with the subscription service are recognized ratably over the expected lives of the customer relationships. Consulting services that are sold after the initial contract are typically fixed fee contracts and are recognized as revenue upon delivery. We also sell consulting services under milestone or time and materials based contracts and, in such cases, recognize consulting revenues as milestones are completed and services are delivered.
Revenues are adjusted for estimated sales allowances, which are based on our historical experience, including a review of our experience related to price adjustments and sales credits issued.
Portions of our revenues are generated from sales made through our referral partners. When we assume a majority of the business risks associated with performance of the contractual obligations, we record the revenues on a gross basis and amounts paid to our referral partners are recognized as sales and marketing expenses. Our assumption of such business risks is evidenced when, among other things, we take responsibility for delivery of the product or service, establish pricing of the arrangement and are the primary obligor in the arrangement. Our judgment as to whether we have assumed the majority of the business risks associated with performance of the contractual obligations materially affects how we report revenues and expenses.
Income Taxes
We make estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.
We measure and recognize uncertain tax positions. To recognize such positions we must first determine if it is more likely
28
than not that the position will be sustained on audit. We must then measure the benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions for Concur and our subsidiaries are subject to income tax audits by multiple tax jurisdictions throughout the world. We do not believe that it is reasonably possible that the estimates of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next twelve months. However, an adverse resolution of one or more uncertain tax positions in any period could have a material impact on the results of operations for that period.
Business Combinations
We are required to allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed as well as to in-process research and development based upon their estimated fair values. This valuation requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to long-lived and intangible assets.
Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets include but are not limited to estimates about: future expected cash flows from customer contracts, customer lists, distribution agreements, proprietary technology and non-compete agreements; the acquired company’s brand awareness and market position, assumptions about the period of time the brand will continue to be used in our product portfolio; as well as expected costs to develop the in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimated cash flows from the projects when completed, and discount rates. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Assumptions may be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur.
Other estimates associated with the accounting for these acquisitions may change as additional information becomes available regarding the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Contingent Consideration
We estimated the fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration using various valuation approaches, as well as significant unobservable inputs, reflecting our assessment of the assumptions market participants would use to value these liabilities. The fair value of contingent consideration is remeasured each reporting period, with any changes in the value recorded as income or expense.
Accounts Receivable Allowances
We record provisions for estimated sales allowances against subscription and consulting revenues in the period in which the related revenues are recorded. We record our sales allowances based on historical experience, including a review of our experience related to price adjustments and sales credits issued.
We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables, and we provide an allowance for doubtful accounts, included in general and administrative expenses. In estimating allowances for doubtful accounts, we consider specific receivables when collection is doubtful, as well as an analysis of our historical bad debt experience and the current economic environment. If the data used to estimate the allowance provided for doubtful accounts does not adequately reflect our future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be needed and future results of operations could be materially affected.
New Accounting Standards
See Note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for a full description of new accounting pronouncements, including the respective expected dates of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial condition.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There has been no material change in our market risk during the three months ended June 30, 2012. For additional information, see Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on November 17, 2011.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer), our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were effective in providing reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
29
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2012, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitation on Effectiveness of Controls
It should be noted that any system of controls, including disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. The design of any control system is based, in part, upon the benefits of the control system relative to its costs. Our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and the actual effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures is described above.
Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
30
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On February 15, 2012, an alleged derivative and class action complaint, captioned Deborah A. Collins v. S. Steven Singh, et al., No. 12-2-05878-4-SEA, was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County against Concur Technologies, Inc. as a nominal defendant and certain of its directors and executive officers by a plaintiff who claims to be a shareholder. Plaintiff alleged, among other things, that certain restricted stock units and bonuses granted to officers were improper and subjected Concur to unnecessary tax liability, and that Concur's 2012 proxy statement was false and misleading. Plaintiff purported to bring both derivative claims on Concur's behalf and a direct claim on behalf of shareholders, and sought relief including damages, disgorgement, equitable remedies and attorneys' fees and costs. Concur moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that all of the claims are derivative, and that plaintiff failed to establish her standing to assert such claims on Concur's behalf inasmuch as she did not make a pre-suit demand on the Board of Directors and failed to plead adequately that such demand was excused. On July 20, 2012, the Court granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice.
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Any such proceedings, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, costly, and result in the diversion of significant operational resources or management time.
Although the outcomes of legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, we are not currently involved in any legal proceeding in which the outcome, in our judgment based on information currently available, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We operate in a dynamic and rapidly changing business environment that involves multiple risks and substantial uncertainty. The following discussion addresses risks and uncertainties that could cause, or contribute to causing, actual results to differ from expectations in material ways. In evaluating our business, investors should pay particular attention to the risks and uncertainties described below and in other sections of this report and in our subsequent filings with the SEC. These risks and uncertainties, or other events that we do not currently anticipate or that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
We depend on sales of a relatively small number of our solutions for a substantial majority of our revenues, and decreased demand for any of those solutions could substantially harm our revenues, while we may be unable to expand our service offerings successfully.
We generated 92% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from our travel procurement, expense management, and integrated travel procurement and expense management solutions. We expect these solutions to continue to constitute a large percentage of our total revenues even as we expand our service offerings. Our financial performance and business outlook depends on continued market acceptance of these solutions. If customers reduce or cancel their subscriptions for our solutions due to economic conditions or because our competitors (some of which have substantially greater resources than we do) develop new offerings, or if we do not keep up with technological advancements in services and software platforms, delivery models or product features, our revenues could decline. There can be no assurance that our solutions will continue to maintain current levels of market penetration or that we will maintain current levels of revenues from sales of these solutions in the future. There can also be no assurance that we will be able to introduce new solutions successfully, or that any initial interest in such solutions will result in significant revenue or long term success for us.
If the market for integrated travel and expense services develops more slowly than we expect it to, our future revenue and profitability will be harmed.
The market for integrated travel and expense services is developing, and it is not certain whether these services will continue to achieve market acceptance and sustain high demand. Our future revenue and profits depend on increasing customer subscriptions for integrated travel and expense services. The market for integrated travel and expense services may not grow, or may shrink. Our future financial performance and revenue growth depend on the willingness of enterprise customers to use integrated travel and expense services. Many enterprises have internal resources and processes to manage corporate travel and expenses, so they may not perceive the benefit of our external integrated travel and expense management services. Privacy concerns and transition costs are also factors that may affect an enterprise’s decision to subscribe to an external solution. If enterprises do not value the benefit of integrated travel and expense services, then the market for these services will not develop at the rate that we anticipate.
Uncertain and unfavorable global economic conditions may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our financial performance depends, in part, on the state of the global economy, which has deteriorated in the recent past,
31
and which remains uncertain and may deteriorate in the future. Declining levels of global economic activity typically lead to declines in corporate spending on travel, fewer travel and expense transactions, lower information technology spending, and deceased revenue for us. The core factors that affect customer usage and therefore our subscription revenue are unemployment, recession-driven attrition through business failure or acquisition, and travel budget cutbacks.
If unfavorable economic conditions remain uncertain or worsen, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
We face significant competition from companies with longer operating histories and greater resources than we have, and our business, financial condition and operating results will suffer if we fail to compete effectively.
Our principal direct competition comes from independent vendors of corporate travel and expense management software and services, as well as financial institutions and enterprise resource planning software vendors that sell products similar to ours along with their suites of other products and services. Some of our competitors may offer services similar to ours at a greatly reduced price to achieve greater sales of other services. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories; more financial, technical, marketing and other resources; greater name recognition; and more customers for their products and services than we do. Some of our competitors, particularly major financial institutions and enterprise resource planning software vendors, have well-established relationships with our current and potential customers, as well as with systems integrators and other vendors and service providers. Our competitors may also be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products, or better withstand economic downturns. We also compete with the internal development efforts of potential customers and, at times, have to overcome their reluctance to move away from existing paper-based systems. In addition, we anticipate the entrance of new competitors in the future. This competitive landscape may make it difficult for us to achieve our objective of increasing the number of our customers and expanding our role in the travel supply chain. Increased competition may also result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and change in market share and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We depend on strategic relationships with reseller and referral partners, so if we do not maintain our existing strategic relationships or enter into new strategic relationships, our revenues could decline.
We depend on strategic reseller and referral relationships to offer products and services to a larger customer base than we can reach through our current direct sales, telesales and internal marketing efforts. Some of our strategic reseller and referral partners are in early stages of operation and, accordingly, it is not certain whether our partners will be able or willing to expend the required effort and resources to market our products and services successfully or provide the volume and quality of orders and lead referrals that we expect. In addition, some of our partners have entered, and may continue to enter, into strategic relationships with our competitors. Further, many of our partners have multiple strategic relationships and they may not regard us as significant for their businesses. Our partners may terminate their respective relationships with us, pursue other partnerships or relationships, or attempt to develop or acquire products or services that compete with our products or services. Our partners also may impair our ability to enter into other desirable strategic relationships. Further, unfavorable global economic conditions may hurt our partners, making them less effective or causing them to modify or cancel their relationships with us.
If we are unable to maintain our existing strategic relationships or enter into new ones, we would have to devote substantially more resources to the distribution, sales and marketing of our products and services, which would increase our costs and decrease our earnings.
Our operating results depend on our ability to grow our subscription services.
Our costs of providing subscription services are relatively fixed in the short term, so we may not be able to adjust expenses quickly enough to offset slowdowns in subscription sales. In addition, delays in deployment of our subscription services may prevent us from recognizing subscription revenue for indeterminate periods of time, even when we have already incurred costs relating to the deployment. Further, we may experience unanticipated increases in costs associated with providing our subscription services to customers over the term of our customer contracts as a result of inaccurate internal cost projections or other factors, which may harm our operating results. If our customers cannot make payments or gain access to credit to make payments, they may be forced to cancel existing subscriptions for our products and services. Some of our sales contracts contain cancellation provisions and, if cancelled, could result in us recognizing substantially less revenue than the aggregate value of those contracts over their terms. If customers terminate subscription agreements before the end of their respective terms, or if we are not able to renew such agreements, our operating results could be adversely affected.
We depend on our relationships with travel suppliers, so adverse changes in our existing relationships could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
An important component of our business success is our ability to maintain and develop relationships with travel suppliers.
32
Adverse changes in existing relationships, including any impact of the economic recession on the businesses of those suppliers, could reduce the amount, quality and breadth of attractively priced travel products and services that we are able to offer, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
If our customers have concerns over the scalability or security of our products, they may not continue buying our products and our revenues will decline.
If customers believe that our subscription services offerings are not sufficiently scalable, do not provide adequate security for the dissemination of information over the Internet or corporate extranets, or are otherwise inadequate for Internet or extranet use or if, for any other reason, our customers decide not to accept our subscription services for use, our business will be harmed. As part of our subscription services, we receive credit card, travel booking, employee, purchasing, supplier and other financial and accounting data, through the Internet or extranets and there can be no assurance that this information will not be subject to computer break-ins, theft and other improper activity that could jeopardize the security of information handled by our products. Any such lapse in security could expose us to litigation, loss of customers, damage to our reputation, or otherwise harm our business.
In addition, any person who circumvents our security measures could steal proprietary or confidential customer information or cause interruptions in our operations. We incur significant costs to protect against security breaches, and may incur significant additional costs to alleviate problems caused by any breaches. Customers’ concerns about security could deter them from using the Internet to conduct transactions that involve confidential information, so our failure to prevent security breaches, or well-publicized security breaches affecting the Internet in general, could significantly harm our business and financial results.
Privacy concerns could result in regulatory changes that may impose additional costs and liabilities on us and limit our use of information.
Many of our travel and expense software solutions collect, store and report information regarding travel procurement and employee spending. Personal privacy has become a significant issue in the United States and many other countries where we operate. Many federal, state and foreign government bodies and agencies have imposed or are considering imposing restrictions and requirements regarding the collection, use and disclosure of personal information obtained from consumers and individuals. Changes to laws or regulations affecting privacy, if applicable to our business, could impose additional costs and liability on us and could limit our use and disclosure of such information. If we were required to change our business activities or revise or eliminate services, our business could be harmed. Privacy concerns, whether valid or not, may inhibit market adoption of our service in certain industries and foreign countries In addition, we may be subject to fines, penalties and potential litigation if we fail to comply with such regulatory restrictions and requirements.
Interruption of our operations could prevent us from delivering our products and services to our customers, which could significantly harm our business.
Because our business is primarily conducted over the Internet, it depends on our ability to protect our computer equipment and the information stored in our computer equipment, offices and hosting facilities against damage from earthquake, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunications failures, unauthorized intrusion and other events. There can be no assurance that our disaster preparedness will prevent significant interruption of our operations.
In addition, we engage third party facility providers for our Web hosting facilities and related infrastructure that is essential for our subscription services. Our service to customers could be interrupted in the event of a natural disaster, by a hosting provider decision to close a facility or terminate operations or by other unanticipated problems. Similarly, we use third-party telecommunications providers for Internet and other telecommunication services. We also rely heavily on our own and third-party financial, accounting, and other data processing systems, as well as various financial institutions to perform financial services in connection with our operations and our services offerings, such as providing depository services and executing Automated Clearing House and wire transfers as part of our expense reimbursement services. Any of these third-party providers may fail to perform their obligations adequately, and any of these third-party systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled for varying periods of time, causing business interruption, system damage, or inability to process funds on behalf of our customers, which could reduce our revenue, cause us to issue credits or pay penalties, cause customers to terminate their subscriptions, cause other liability to customers, or cause regulatory intervention or damage to our reputation.
Our quarterly revenues and operating results may fluctuate, and if we fail to meet the expectations of investors or public market analysts, our stock price could decline substantially.
Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and if they fall below the expectations of investors or public market analysts, the price of our common stock could substantially decline. Factors that might cause quarterly fluctuations in our operating results include:
• | general economic and market conditions; |
33
• | the evolving demand for our solutions; |
• | spending decisions by our customers and prospective customers; |
• | our ability to manage expenses; |
• | the timing of new product releases; |
• | changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors; |
• | the timing of large contracts or contract terminations; |
• | changes in mix of our offerings; |
• | the mix of sales channels through which our solutions are sold; |
• | costs of developing new products and enhancements; |
• | our ability to adequately provide software solutions on-demand; |
• | foreign currency fluctuations; and |
• | global political conditions. |
Our acquisitions of, and investments in, other companies, products, or technologies may not yield expected benefits.
As part of our business strategy, from time to time we invest in or acquire complementary businesses, joint ventures, products or technologies, and we expect that we will make such investments and acquisitions in the future. For example, in July 2011, we acquired GlobalExpense Limited, a London-based market leader in Web-based end-to-end expense management.
We may not realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions or investments to the extent that we anticipate, or at all, because acquisitions and investments involve many risks, including:
• | difficulties integrating the acquired operations, personnel, technologies, products or infrastructure; |
• | diversion of management attention or other resources from other business operations and strategic priorities; |
• | unexpected difficulties encountered when we enter new markets in which we have little or no experience, or where competitors may have stronger market positions; |
• | potential loss of key employees; |
• | inability to maintain relationships with customers and partners of the acquired business; |
• | the difficulty of incorporating acquired technology and rights into our products and services; |
• | potential unknown liabilities associated with an acquired business or investment; |
• | unanticipated expenses related to integrating acquired technology with our existing technology; |
• | the impact on our results of operations due to depreciation and amortization related to acquired intangible assets, fixed assets and deferred compensation; |
• | potential litigation, such as claims by third parties related to intellectual property of the businesses we acquire or in which we invest; |
• | potential write-offs of our investments in acquired assets; |
• | the need to implement controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a public company at companies that prior to the acquisition lacked such controls, procedures and policies; and |
• | challenges caused by distance, language and cultural differences. |
We may issue additional equity securities or convertible debt securities to pay for future acquisitions or investments, the issuance of which could be dilutive to our existing stockholders and affect the trading price of our securities. If any acquisition or investment is not perceived as ultimately improving our financial condition and operating results, our stock price may decline. Further, if we fail to properly evaluate and execute acquisitions or investments, our business and prospects may be seriously harmed and the value of your investment may decline.
The growth of the international component of our business subjects us to additional management challenges and incremental costs associated with foreign operations.
Our international operations are an increasingly important part of our business. Customers located outside the United States represented 15% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012. In addition, a portion of our United States revenue reflects utilization of our services outside of the United States by customers located in the United States. We expect international revenues as a percentage of our total revenues to increase. Our international operations are subject to many difficulties and incremental costs, including:
• | costs to customize our products for foreign markets; |
• | foreign currency exchange rate risk; |
34
• | compliance with multiple, conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations; |
• | different pricing environments; |
• | longer sales cycles; |
• | greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable; |
• | import and export restrictions and tariffs; |
• | adverse tax consequences; |
• | potentially weaker protection for our intellectual property than in the United States and practical difficulties in enforcing our rights abroad; |
• | regional data privacy laws that apply to the transmission of customer data across international borders; |
• | difficulties staffing and managing foreign operations; and |
• | regional economic and political conditions. |
Our ability to sell our solutions into international markets will depend on our ability to develop and support solutions that incorporate the tax laws, accounting practices and currencies of applicable countries. Our international operations also involve foreign currency risks for us. Most of our revenues are denominated in United States dollars, but we believe that an increasing portion of our revenues will be denominated in foreign currencies. Unfavorable economic conditions have been accompanied by increased foreign currency exchange rate volatility. Our international revenues and expenses are currently subject to the risks of foreign currency fluctuations.
Our international operations also increase our exposure to international laws and regulations. If we are unable to comply with foreign laws and regulations, which are often complex and subject to variation and unexpected changes, we could incur unexpected costs and potential litigation. For example, the governments of foreign countries might attempt to regulate our services and products or levy sales or other taxes relating to our activities. In addition, foreign countries might impose tariffs, duties, price controls or other restrictions on foreign currencies or trade barriers, any of which could make it more difficult for us to conduct our business in international markets.
In 2011, we acquired products and services in international markets through our acquisition GlobalExpense Limited and established a Japanese joint venture, Concur Japan. We intend to continue to expand our global sales and marketing activities and enter into relationships with additional international distribution partners. We are in the early stages of developing our distribution channels in markets outside the United States. We may not be able to attract and retain distribution partners that will be able to market our products effectively.
Changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse, unexpected financial reporting fluctuations and affect our reported financial results.
A change in accounting standards or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and will occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way in which we conduct our business.
If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could adversely affect investor views of us and the value of our common stock.
Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. However, despite our efforts any failure to maintain or implement required controls could cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations, or result in material misstatements in our financial information. Any such delays or restatements could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and lead to a decline in the trading price of our stock.
Our business is subject to changing regulations regarding corporate governance and public disclosure that will increase both our costs and the risk of noncompliance.
As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses, and these compliance expenses are expected to increase over time. For example, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and rules subsequently implemented or to be implemented by the SEC and The NASDAQ Stock Market include new disclosure and corporate governance requirements on public companies. Our management and other personnel are required to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. If we do not adequately comply with applicable laws and regulations applicable to public companies, we could be subject to liability, increased compliance
35
costs, regulatory inquiries or litigation.
Our lengthy sales cycle could cause our operating results to vary significantly.
Our sales cycle, which is the time between initial contact with a potential customer and the ultimate sale, is often lengthy and unpredictable. Our potential customers typically commit significant resources to an evaluation of available alternatives and require us to expend substantial time, effort and money educating them about the value of our offerings. As a result, we have limited ability to forecast the timing and size of specific sales. In addition, customers may delay their purchases from one quarter to another as they wait for new product enhancements. Customers may delay their purchases for even longer periods due to their inability to assess and forecast future business activity, impaired purchasing ability or other economic factors. Any delay in completing, or failure to complete, sales in a particular quarter or year could harm our business and could cause our operating results to vary significantly.
If we do not successfully develop or introduce new products or enhancements to existing products, or successfully integrate acquired products and services with our offerings, we may lose existing customers or fail to attract new customers and our financial performance and revenue growth may suffer.
Our financial performance and revenue growth depends upon the successful development, introduction and customer acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our software solutions and on our ability to integrate products and services that we acquire into our existing and future solutions. We have experienced delays in the planned release dates of enhancements to our solutions and we have discovered errors in new releases after their introduction. Either situation could result in adverse publicity, loss of sales, delay in market acceptance of our products and services, or customer claims, including, among other things, warranty claims against us, any of which could cause us to lose existing customers or affect our ability to attract new customers. If we do not deliver new product versions, upgrades or other enhancements to existing products and services on a timely and cost-effective basis, we may lose existing customers or may not be able to attract new customers. We are also continually seeking to develop new offerings. However, we remain subject to all of the risks inherent in product development, including unanticipated technical or other development problems, which could result in material delays in product introduction and acceptance or significantly increased costs. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop new solutions successfully, or to introduce and gain market acceptance of new solutions in a timely manner.
If our products and services do not keep pace with technological change, our sales could decline and our business could be harmed.
We must continually modify and enhance our software solutions to keep pace with changes in hardware and software platforms, database technology, electronic commerce technical standards and other items. As a result, uncertainties related to the timing and nature of new product announcements or introductions, or modifications by vendors of operating systems, back-office applications and browsers and other Internet-related applications, could cause our sales to decline and harm our business.
We rely on third-party software and services that may be difficult to replace.
We license or purchase software and services provided by third parties to offer some of our services and software offerings. Such third-party software and services may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The loss or inability to maintain our rights to use any of these software or services could result in delays in the sale of our services or software offerings until equivalent technology is either developed by us, or, if available, is identified, licensed and integrated, which could harm our business.
Our stock price has experienced high volatility, may continue to be volatile and may decline.
The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated widely in the past and may do so in the future, as a result of many factors. In particular, the stock market as a whole has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that affected the market price of many technology companies in ways that may have been unrelated to those companies’ operating performance. Factors that could cause our stock price to fluctuate include:
• | general and industry-specific business, economic and market conditions; |
• | the announcement of a merger or acquisition; |
• | fluctuations in our actual and anticipated operating results; |
• | changes in our earnings estimates, or other information published by analysts; |
• | failing to achieve revenue or earnings expectations; |
• | volatility inherent in prices of technology company stocks; |
• | adverse publicity; and |
• | the volume of trading in our common stock, including sales upon exercise of outstanding options. |
36
Securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies that experience periods of volatility in the market prices of their securities. Securities class action litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.
If we fail to attract and retain qualified personnel, our business could be harmed.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting, motivating and retaining key personnel. Many of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than us for attracting experienced personnel. We also compete for personnel with other software vendors and consulting and professional services companies. Further, changes in applicable stock exchange listing standards relating to obtaining stockholder approval of equity compensation plans could make it more difficult or expensive for us to grant options to employees in the future. We rely on our direct sales force to sell our services and software in the marketplace. We anticipate increasing our direct sales force. There is significant competition for direct sales personnel with the advanced sales skills and technical knowledge we need. If we were not able to hire or retain competent sales personnel our business would suffer. In addition, by relying primarily on a direct sales model, we may miss sales opportunities that might be available through other sales channels, such as domestic and international resellers and strategic referral arrangements. Any inability to hire and retain salespeople or any other qualified personnel, or any loss of the services of key personnel, would harm our business.
Our ability to protect our intellectual property is limited and we have been or may be sued by third parties for alleged infringement of their proprietary rights.
Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary technology, processes, trade secrets and other proprietary information and our ability to protect this information from unauthorized disclosure and use. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions and other similar measures to protect our proprietary information. We have issued patents and have patent applications pending in various countries. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary and third parties may attempt to develop similar technology independently. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, particularly because the global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to control the ultimate destination or security of software or other data transmitted. While we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, software piracy can be expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States and we expect that it will become more difficult to monitor use of our products as we increase our international presence. There can be no assurance that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate, or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology. In addition, there can be no assurance that third parties will not claim infringement by us with respect to current or future products or other intellectual property rights. We have received in the past, and may receive in the future, communications from third parties claiming that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of others. The cost to defend or settle these claims could be material to our business. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain. Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve, could divert management attention from executing our business plans and could require us to change our technology, change our business practices and/or pay monetary damages or enter into short- or long-term royalty or licensing agreements which may not be available in the future at the same terms or at all. In addition, many of our customer agreements require us to indemnify our customers for third-party intellectual property infringement claims, which would increase the cost to us of an adverse ruling on such a claim. Any adverse determination related to intellectual property claims or litigation could prevent us from offering our solutions to others, or could otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, over the past several years, we have made numerous changes in our product names. Although we own registered trademarks in the United States and have filed trademark applications in the United States and in certain other countries, we cannot assure you that our strategy with respect to our trademark portfolio will be adequate to secure or protect all necessary intellectual property.
Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of Concur.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and of Delaware General Corporation Law, may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of Concur. For example:
• | our Board of Directors may, without stockholder approval, issue shares of preferred stock with special voting or economic rights; |
• | our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights and, therefore, each of our directors can only be elected by a majority of our votes cast at a stockholder meeting; |
• | a special meeting of stockholders may only be called by a majority of our Board of Directors, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, or our Chief Executive Officer; |
• | our stockholders may not take action by written consent; |
37
• | our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, only one of which is elected each year; |
• | we require advance notice for nominations for election to the Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and |
• | we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which, under certain circumstances, may make it more difficult for a person who would be an “Interested Stockholder,” as defined in Section 203, to effect various business combinations with us for a three-year period. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws do not exclude us from the restrictions imposed under Section 203. |
In addition, the fundamental changes provisions of our outstanding senior convertible notes due in 2015 may delay or prevent a change in control of Concur, because those provisions allow note holders to require us to repurchase the notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change.
We have outstanding indebtedness.
In April 2010, we completed an offering of $287.5 million aggregate principal amount of our senior convertible notes due in 2015, as a result of which we incurred approximately $287.5 million principal amount of indebtedness that we may be required to repurchase at maturity in 2015 or upon the occurrence of fundamental changes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to repay this indebtedness when due, or that we will be able to refinance this indebtedness on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, this indebtedness could, among other things:
• | make it difficult for us to pay other obligations; |
• | make it difficult to obtain favorable terms for any necessary future financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other purposes; |
• | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service the indebtedness, reducing the amount of cash flow available for other purposes; and |
• | limit our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business. |
Conversion of our senior convertible notes will dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders.
The conversion of some or all of our outstanding senior convertible notes due in 2015 will dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders to the extent we deliver newly-issued shares of common stock upon conversion. Holders of such notes may convert them on or after January 15, 2015, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date of such notes. We expect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering cash and potentially shares of common stock. Prior to January 15, 2015, conversion of such notes is subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. Any sales in the public market of shares of common stock issued upon conversion of such notes could adversely affect trading prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of such notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of such notes could be used to satisfy short positions, or anticipated conversion of such notes into shares of our common stock could depress the price of our common stock.
The note hedges and warrants may adversely affect the value of our common stock.
In connection with our offering of senior convertible notes due in 2015, we entered into note hedges covering approximately 5.5 million shares of our common stock. We also sold warrants to acquire up to approximately 5.5 million shares of our common stock at an initial strike price of $73.29. The note hedges are intended to reduce the potential economic dilution to our common stock upon conversion of the senior convertible notes. However, the warrants could have a dilutive effect, if the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the strike price of the warrants. The counterparties to our note hedges and warrants are likely to enter into or unwind various derivatives with respect to our common stock, or purchase or sell shares of our common stock or other securities linked to or referencing our common stock in secondary market transactions prior to the maturity of the senior convertible notes. These activities could adversely affect the value of our common stock.
38
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Form | File No. | Date of First Filing | Exhibit Number | Provided Herewith | |
10.01 | Office Lease Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2012, between Registrant and Kilroy Realty, L.P. | — | — | — | — | X | |
31.01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | — | — | — | — | X | |
31.02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | — | — | — | — | X | |
32.01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).* | — | — | — | — | X | |
32.02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).* | — | — | — | — | X | |
101 | Consolidated financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL.** | — | — | — | — | X |
* | This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Concur specifically incorporates it by reference. |
** | The following consolidated financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
39
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 7, 2012
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | |
By | /s/ Francis J. Pelzer V |
Francis J. Pelzer V | |
Chief Financial Officer principal financial officer and duly authorized signatory |
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Form | File No. | Date of First Filing | Exhibit Number | Provided Herewith | |
10.01 | Office Lease Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2012, between Registrant and Kilroy Realty, L.P. | — | — | — | — | X | |
31.01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | — | — | — | — | X | |
31.02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | — | — | — | — | X | |
32.01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).* | — | — | — | — | X | |
32.02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).* | — | — | — | — | X | |
101 | Consolidated financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL.** | — | — | — | — | X |
* | This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Concur specifically incorporates it by reference. |
** | The following consolidated financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
41