Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 22, 2008 (12 weeks)
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-14893
THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 13-4038356 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification No.) | |
One Pepsi Way, Somers, New York | 10589 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
914-767-6000 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A (Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
The number of shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. outstanding as of April 19, 2008 was 218,353,461 and 100,000, respectively.
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
Index
Index
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
in millions, except per share amounts, unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
in millions, except per share amounts, unaudited
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | |||||||
Net revenues | $ | 2,651 | $ | 2,466 | ||||
Cost of sales | 1,482 | 1,343 | ||||||
Gross profit | 1,169 | 1,123 | ||||||
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses | 1,061 | 1,003 | ||||||
Operating income | 108 | 120 | ||||||
Interest expense, net | 59 | 66 | ||||||
Other non-operating (income) expenses, net | (3 | ) | 1 | |||||
Minority interest | 3 | 8 | ||||||
Income before income taxes | 49 | 45 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 21 | 16 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 28 | $ | 29 | ||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 | ||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding | 222 | 227 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | ||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding | 229 | 233 | ||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.11 | ||||
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Table of Contents
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
in millions, unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
in millions, unaudited
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | |||||||
Cash Flows — Operations | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 28 | $ | 29 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 144 | 144 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 3 | (9 | ) | |||||
Share-based compensation | 12 | 14 | ||||||
Net other non-cash charges and credits | 69 | 74 | ||||||
Changes in operating working capital: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | (4 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
Inventories | (88 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (14 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and other current liabilities | (86 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable | 12 | 1 | ||||||
Net change in operating working capital | (180 | ) | (196 | ) | ||||
Casualty insurance payments | (16 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
Other, net | (40 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided by Operations | 20 | 21 | ||||||
Cash Flows — Investments | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (185 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions | (27 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 2 | 4 | ||||||
Other investing activities, net | — | 6 | ||||||
Net Cash Used for Investments | (210 | ) | (213 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows — Financing | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings, net | 341 | 265 | ||||||
Payments of long-term debt | (2 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid | (31 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefit from the exercise of equity awards | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 7 | 16 | ||||||
Share repurchases | (180 | ) | (141 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing | 136 | 107 | ||||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (57 | ) | (89 | ) | ||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Beginning of Period | 647 | 629 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents — End of Period | $ | 590 | $ | 540 | ||||
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
in millions, except per share amounts
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
in millions, except per share amounts
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
March | December | |||||||
22, 2008 | 29, 2007 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current Assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 590 | $ | 647 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 1,536 | 1,520 | ||||||
Inventories | 666 | 577 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 377 | 342 | ||||||
Total Current Assets | 3,169 | 3,086 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 4,072 | 4,080 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net | 4,178 | 4,181 | ||||||
Goodwill | 1,542 | 1,533 | ||||||
Other assets | 231 | 235 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 13,192 | $ | 13,115 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable and other current liabilities | $ | 1,857 | $ | 1,968 | ||||
Short-term borrowings | 577 | 240 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 1,305 | 7 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 3,739 | 2,215 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 3,479 | 4,770 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 1,206 | 1,186 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,335 | 1,356 | ||||||
Minority interest | 989 | 973 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 10,748 | 10,500 | ||||||
Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share: authorized 900 shares, issued 310 shares | 3 | 3 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,817 | 1,805 | ||||||
Retained earnings (includes impact from adopting FIN 48 in fiscal year 2007 of $5) | 3,105 | 3,124 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (42 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock: 90 shares and 86 shares at March 22, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively, at cost | (2,439 | ) | (2,269 | ) | ||||
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 2,444 | 2,615 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 13,192 | $ | 13,115 | ||||
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Tabular dollars in millions, except per share amounts
Note 1—Basis of Presentation
We prepare our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., as well as the related footnote disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These interim financial statements have been prepared in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include certain information and disclosures required for comprehensive annual financial statements. Therefore, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007 as presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, this interim information includes all material adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation.
When used in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “PBG,” “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” each refers to The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. and, where appropriate, to Bottling Group, LLC (“Bottling LLC”), our principal operating subsidiary.
Our U.S. and Canadian operations report using a fiscal year that consists of fifty-two weeks, ending on the last Saturday in December. Every five or six years a fifty-third week is added. Fiscal years 2008 and 2007 consist of fifty-two weeks. Our remaining countries report using a calendar-year basis. Accordingly, we recognize our quarterly business results as outlined below:
Quarter | U.S. & Canada | Mexico & Europe | ||
First Quarter | 12 weeks | January and February | ||
Second Quarter | 12 weeks | March, April and May | ||
Third Quarter | 12 weeks | June, July and August | ||
Fourth Quarter | 16 weeks | September, October, November and December |
At March 22, 2008, PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”) owned 76,911,458 shares of our common stock, consisting of 76,811,458 shares of common stock and all 100,000 authorized shares of Class B common stock. At March 22, 2008, PepsiCo owned approximately 35.0 percent of our outstanding common stock and 100 percent of our outstanding Class B common stock, together representing 41.6 percent of the voting power of all classes of our voting stock. In addition, PepsiCo owns approximately 6.6 percent of the equity of Bottling LLC and has a 40 percent ownership interest in PR Beverages Limited, our Russian venture, which is consolidated under Bottling LLC. We fully consolidate the results of Bottling LLC and present PepsiCo’s share as minority interest in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We also consolidate in our financial statements entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, as well as variable interest entities where we are the primary beneficiary. Minority interest in earnings and ownership has been recorded for the percentage of these entities not owned by PBG. We have eliminated all intercompany accounts and transactions in consolidation.
Note 2—Seasonality of Business
The results for the first quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year because sales of our products are seasonal, especially in our Europe segment where sales tend to be more sensitive to weather conditions. The seasonality of our operating results arises from higher sales in the second and third quarters versus the first and fourth quarters of the year, combined with the impact of fixed costs, such as depreciation and interest, which are not significantly impacted by business seasonality. From a cash flow perspective, the majority of our cash flow from operations is generated in the third and fourth quarters.
5
Table of Contents
Note 3—New Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 157
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which establishes a framework for reporting fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company adopted the required provisions of SFAS 157 that became effective in our first quarter of 2008. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. For further information about the adoption of the required provisions of SFAS 157 see Note 8.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for certain items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on our Consolidated Financial Statements for items within the scope of FSP 157-2, which will become effective beginning with our first quarter of 2009.
SFAS No. 158
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”). Effective for the current fiscal year, the standard requires the measurement date for PBG sponsored plan assets and liabilities to coincide with our fiscal year-end. SFAS 158 provides two transition alternatives related to the change in measurement date provisions. We adopted the measurement date provisions of SFAS 158 on the first day of fiscal year 2008 using the “two-measurement” approach. As a result, we measured our plan assets and benefit obligations on December 30, 2007 and adjusted our opening balances of retained earnings and accumulated comprehensive loss for the change in net periodic benefit cost and fair value, respectively, from the previously used September 30 measurement date. The adoption of the measurement date provisions resulted in a net decrease in our pension and other postretirement medical benefit plans liability of $9 million, a net decrease in retained earnings of $16 million, net of minority interest of $2 million and taxes of $9 million and a net decrease in accumulated comprehensive loss of $19 million, net of minority interest of $2 million and taxes of $14 million. There was no impact on our results of operations.
SFAS No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”), which allows entities to choose to measure financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 became effective beginning with our first quarter of 2008. We have currently chosen not to adopt the provisions of SFAS 159 for our existing financial instruments.
SFAS No. 141(R)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”), which addresses the recognition and accounting for identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests in business combinations. SFAS 141(R) also establishes expanded disclosure requirements for business combinations. SFAS 141(R) will become effective beginning with our first quarter of 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 160
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”), which addresses the
6
Table of Contents
accounting and reporting framework for minority interests by a parent company. SFAS 160 also addresses disclosure requirements to distinguish between interests of the parent and interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 will become effective beginning with our first quarter of 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 161
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”), which requires enhanced disclosures for derivative and hedging activities. SFAS 161 will become effective beginning with our first quarter of 2009. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
EITF Issue No. 06-11
In June 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”), which requires income tax benefits from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for equity classified nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units and outstanding equity share options to be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital and to be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. The adoption of EITF 06-11, which became effective in the first quarter of 2008, did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
EITF Issue No. 07-1
In December 2007, the FASB ratified the EITF’s Consensus for Issue No. 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements” (“EITF 07-1”), which defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting requirements for transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the arrangement and third parties. EITF 07-1 will become effective beginning with our first quarter of 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
Note 4—Earnings per Share
The following table reconciles the shares outstanding and net earnings used in the computations of both basic and diluted earnings per share:
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
Shares in millions | 22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 28 | $ | 29 | ||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding during period on which basic earnings per share is calculated | 222 | 227 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive shares: | ||||||||
Incremental shares under stock compensation plans | 7 | 6 | ||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding during period on which diluted earnings per share is calculated | 229 | 233 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options or other equity awards from our stock compensation plans were exercised and converted into common stock that would then participate in net income. For the 12 weeks ended March 22, 2008 and March 24, 2007, options to purchase 3.0 million shares and 243 thousand shares, respectively, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the Company’s common shares during the related periods and the effect of including the options in the computation would be antidilutive.
Note 5—Share-Based Compensation
We offer stock option awards and restricted stock units as our primary form of long-term incentive compensation. Stock option awards generally vest over three years and have a 10 year term. Restricted stock unit awards generally vest over three years and are settled in shares of PBG stock after the vesting period.
Share-based compensation expense is recognized only for share-based payments expected to vest. We estimate forfeitures, both at the date of grant as well as throughout the vesting period, based on the Company’s historical experience and future expectations. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option-valuation model to value stock option awards. The fair value of restricted stock unit awards is based on the fair value of PBG stock on the date of grant.
Total share-based compensation expense recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | |||||||
Total share-based compensation expense | $ | 12 | $ | 14 | ||||
Income tax benefit | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Minority interest | 0 | (1 | ) | |||||
Net income impact | $ | 8 | $ | 9 | ||||
During each of the 12 week periods ended March 22, 2008 and March 24, 2007, we granted approximately 3 million options at a weighted-average fair value of $7.06 and $8.15, respectively.
During each of the 12 week periods ended March 22, 2008 and March 24, 2007, we granted approximately 1 million restricted stock units at a weighted-average fair value of $35.77 and $30.85, respectively.
8
Table of Contents
Unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans amounted to $116 million as of March 22, 2008. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years.
Note 6—Balance Sheet Details
March | December | |||||||
22, 2008 | 29, 2007 | |||||||
Accounts Receivable | ||||||||
Trade accounts receivable | $ | 1,341 | $ | 1,319 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (56 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable from PepsiCo | 173 | 188 | ||||||
Other receivables | 78 | 67 | ||||||
$ | 1,536 | $ | 1,520 | |||||
Inventories | ||||||||
Raw materials and supplies | $ | 221 | $ | 195 | ||||
Finished goods | 445 | 382 | ||||||
$ | 666 | $ | 577 | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net | ||||||||
Land | $ | 323 | $ | 320 | ||||
Buildings and improvements | 1,532 | 1,484 | ||||||
Manufacturing and distribution equipment | 4,092 | 4,091 | ||||||
Marketing equipment | 2,397 | 2,389 | ||||||
Capital leases | 36 | 36 | ||||||
Other | 158 | 164 | ||||||
8,538 | 8,484 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (4,466 | ) | (4,404 | ) | ||||
$ | 4,072 | $ | 4,080 | |||||
Industrial Revenue Bonds
Pursuant to the terms of an industrial revenue bond, we transferred title of certain fixed assets with a net book value of $58 million to a state governmental authority in the U.S. to receive a property tax abatement. The title to these assets will revert back to PBG upon retirement or cancellation of the bond. These fixed assets are still recognized in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as all risks and rewards remain with the Company.
March | December | |||||||
22, 2008 | 29, 2007 | |||||||
Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 575 | $ | 615 | ||||
Accounts payable to PepsiCo | 329 | 255 | ||||||
Trade incentives | 183 | 235 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | 203 | 276 | ||||||
Other accrued taxes | 111 | 140 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 60 | 70 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 396 | 377 | ||||||
$ | 1,857 | $ | 1,968 | |||||
9
Table of Contents
Note 7—Other Intangible Assets, net and Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
The components of other intangible assets are as follows:
March | December | |||||||
22, 2008 | 29, 2007 | |||||||
Intangibles subject to amortization: | ||||||||
Gross carrying amount: | ||||||||
Customer relationships and lists | $ | 55 | $ | 54 | ||||
Franchise and distribution rights | 46 | 46 | ||||||
Other identified intangibles | 30 | 30 | ||||||
131 | 130 | |||||||
Accumulated amortization: | ||||||||
Customer relationships and lists | (15 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
Franchise and distribution rights | (32 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Other identified intangibles | (18 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
(65 | ) | (63 | ) | |||||
Intangibles subject to amortization, net | 66 | 67 | ||||||
Intangibles not subject to amortization: | ||||||||
Carrying amount: | ||||||||
Franchise rights | 3,223 | 3,235 | ||||||
Licensing rights | 315 | 315 | ||||||
Distribution rights | 299 | 294 | ||||||
Trademarks | 217 | 213 | ||||||
Other identified intangibles | 58 | 57 | ||||||
Intangibles not subject to amortization | 4,112 | 4,114 | ||||||
Total other intangible assets, net | $ | 4,178 | $ | 4,181 | ||||
Intangible asset amortization
Intangible asset amortization expense was $2 million for the 12 weeks ended March 22, 2008 and March 24, 2007. Amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be approximately $7 million or less.
10
Table of Contents
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by reportable segment for the 12 weeks ended March 22, 2008 are as follows:
U.S. & | ||||||||||||||||
Canada | Europe | Mexico | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at December 29, 2007 | $ | 1,290 | $ | 17 | $ | 226 | $ | 1,533 | ||||||||
Unallocated purchase price relating to acquisition | 21 | — | — | 21 | ||||||||||||
Impact of foreign currency translation | (17 | ) | — | 5 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at March 22, 2008 | $ | 1,294 | $ | 17 | $ | 231 | $ | 1,542 | ||||||||
During the first quarter, we acquired Pepsi-Cola Batavia Bottling Corp. The Pepsi-Cola franchised bottler serves certain New York counties in whole or in part. The acquisition did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 8—Fair Value Measurements
SFAS 157 defines and establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In accordance with SFAS 157, we have categorized our financial assets and liabilities, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as set forth below. If the inputs used to measure the financial instruments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
Financial assets and liabilities recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1- Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date (examples include active exchange-traded equity securities, listed derivatives, and most U.S. Government and agency securities). We currently do not have any Level 1 financial assets or liabilities.
Level 2- Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets. Level 2 inputs include the following:
• | Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets (examples include corporate and municipal bonds which trade infrequently); | ||
• | Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability (examples include interest rate and currency swaps); and | ||
• | Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability (examples include certain securities and derivatives). |
Level 3- Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. We currently do not have any Level 3 financial assets or liabilities.
11
Table of Contents
The following table presents the financial assets and liabilities we measure at fair value on a recurring basis, based on the fair value hierarchy as of March 22, 2008:
Level 2 | ||||
Financial Assets: | ||||
Cash flow hedges | $ | 12 | ||
Interest rate swaps | 7 | |||
Prepaid forward contracts | 21 | |||
Total | $ | 40 | ||
Financial Liabilities: | ||||
Unfunded deferred compensation liability | $ | 78 | ||
Foreign currency hedges | 2 | |||
Cash flow hedges | 1 | |||
Total | $ | 81 | ||
Cash Flow Hedges
We use futures contracts to hedge the risk of adverse movements in commodity prices primarily related to anticipated purchases of raw materials and energy used in our operations. We also enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge portions of our forecasted U.S. dollar purchases in our Canadian business. The fair value of these cash flow hedges is primarily based on the forward curves of the specific indices upon which settlement is based.
Interest Rate Swaps
We finance a portion of our operations through fixed-rate debt instruments. We effectively converted $550 million of our senior notes to floating-rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps. The fair value of our interest rate swaps is primarily based on the LIBOR index.
Foreign Currency Hedges
In 2007, we entered into forward exchange contracts to economically hedge a portion of intercompany receivable balances that are denominated in Mexican pesos. The fair value of our forward exchange contracts is primarily based on observable forward foreign exchange rates.
Unfunded Deferred Compensation Liability
Our unfunded deferred compensation liability is subject to changes in our stock price as well as price changes in other equity and fixed-income investments. Employees’ deferred compensation amounts are not directly invested in these investment vehicles. We track the performance of each employee’s investment selections and adjust the deferred compensation account accordingly. The fair value of the unfunded deferred compensation liability is primarily based on the market indices corresponding to the employees’ investment selections.
We use prepaid forward contracts to hedge the portion of our deferred compensation liability that is based on our stock price. At March 22, 2008, we had a prepaid forward contract for 610,000 shares, which was accounted for as an economic hedge. The fair value of this forward contract is primarily based on the current value of our stock price.
12
Table of Contents
Note 9—Pension and Postretirement Medical Benefit Plans
Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor both pension and other postretirement medical benefit plans in various forms in the United States and other similar pension plans in our international locations, covering employees who meet specified eligibility requirements.
The assets, liabilities and expense associated with our international plans were not significant to our results of operations and our financial position and are not included in the tables and discussion presented below.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Our U.S. employees that were hired prior to January 1, 2007 participate in non-contributory defined benefit pension plans, which cover full-time salaried employees, as well as hourly employees. Benefits generally are based on years of service and compensation, or stated amounts for each year of service. Effective January 1, 2007, newly hired salaried and non-union hourly employees are not eligible to participate in these plans. All of our qualified plans are funded and contributions are made in amounts not less than the minimum statutory funding requirements and not more than the maximum amount that can be deducted for U.S. income tax purposes.
Postretirement Medical Plans
Our postretirement medical plans provide medical and life insurance benefits principally to U.S. retirees and their dependents. Employees are eligible for benefits if they meet age and service requirements and qualify for retirement benefits. The plans are not funded and since 1993 have included retiree cost sharing.
Components of net pension expense
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | |||||||
Service cost | $ | 12 | $ | 13 | ||||
Interest cost | 23 | 21 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets — (income) | (27 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
Amortization of net loss | 3 | 9 | ||||||
Amortization of prior service costs | 2 | 1 | ||||||
Net pension expense for the defined benefit plans | $ | 13 | $ | 20 | ||||
There were no contributions made to our U.S. pension plans for the 12 weeks ended March 22, 2008.
Components of postretirement medical expense
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | |||||||
Service cost | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
Interest cost | 5 | 5 | ||||||
Amortization of net loss | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Total postretirement medical expense | $ | 7 | $ | 7 | ||||
13
Table of Contents
Defined Contribution Benefits
Nearly all of our U.S. employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plans, which are voluntary defined contribution savings plans. We make matching contributions to the 401(k) savings plans on behalf of participants eligible to receive such contributions. If a participant has less than 10 years of service, our match will equal $0.50 for each dollar the participant elects to defer up to four percent of the participant’s pay. If the participant has 10 or more years of service, our match will equal $1.00 for each dollar the participant elects to defer up to four percent of the participant’s pay. Salaried and non-union hourly employees hired in the U.S. on or after January 1, 2007 also receive an additional Company retirement contribution equal to two percent of their compensation into their 401(k) account. Defined contribution expense was $7 million and $6 million for the 12 weeks ended March 22, 2008 and March 24, 2007, respectively.
Note 10—Segment Information
We operate in one industry, carbonated soft drinks and other ready-to-drink beverages, and all of our segments derive revenue from these products. We conduct business in all or a portion of the U.S., Mexico, Canada, Spain, Russia, Greece and Turkey. PBG manages and reports operating results through three reportable segments — U.S. & Canada, Europe (which includes Spain, Russia, Greece and Turkey) and Mexico. The operating segments of the U.S. and Canada are aggregated into a single reportable segment due to their economic similarity as well as similarity across products, manufacturing and distribution methods, types of customers and regulatory environments.
Operationally, the Company is organized along geographic lines with specific regional management teams having responsibility for the financial results in each reportable segment. We evaluate the performance of these segments based on operating income or loss. Operating income or loss is exclusive of net interest expense, minority interest, foreign exchange gains and losses and income taxes.
The following tables summarize select financial information related to our reportable segments:
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | |||||||
Net Revenues | ||||||||
U.S. & Canada | $ | 2,207 | $ | 2,102 | ||||
Europe | 236 | 176 | ||||||
Mexico | 208 | 188 | ||||||
Worldwide net revenues | $ | 2,651 | $ | 2,466 | ||||
Operating Income (Loss) | ||||||||
U.S. & Canada | $ | 136 | $ | 143 | ||||
Europe | (31 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Mexico | 3 | 2 | ||||||
Worldwide operating income | 108 | 120 | ||||||
Interest expense, net | 59 | 66 | ||||||
Other non-operating (income) expenses, net | (3 | ) | 1 | |||||
Minority interest | 3 | 8 | ||||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 49 | $ | 45 | ||||
14
Table of Contents
March | December | |||||||
22, 2008 | 29, 2007 | |||||||
Total Assets | ||||||||
U.S. & Canada | $ | 9,746 | $ | 9,737 | ||||
Europe | 1,754 | 1,671 | ||||||
Mexico | 1,692 | 1,707 | ||||||
Worldwide total assets | $ | 13,192 | $ | 13,115 | ||||
Note 11—Comprehensive Income
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 28 | $ | 29 | ||||
Net currency translation adjustment | (21 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||
Cash flow hedge adjustment (a) | 4 | 1 | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost and net loss in net periodic pension/postretirement cost to expense (b) | 4 | 6 | ||||||
Pension liability adjustment (c) | — | 5 | ||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 15 | $ | 9 | ||||
(a) | Net of minority interest and taxes of $2 million and $0 million for the 12 weeks ended March 22, 2008 and March 24, 2007, respectively. | |
(b) | Net of minority interest and taxes of $2 million and $5 million for the 12 weeks ended March 22, 2008 and March 24, 2007, respectively. | |
(c) | Net of minority interest and taxes of $3 million for the 12 weeks ended March 24, 2007. |
Note 12— Restructuring Charges and Full Service Vending Rationalization
Restructuring Charges
In the third quarter of 2007, we announced a restructuring program (the “Organizational Realignment”) to realign the Company’s organization to adapt to changes in the marketplace, improve operating efficiencies and enhance the growth potential of the Company’s product portfolio. During the first quarter of 2008, we substantially completed the Organizational Realignment, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 positions to date across all of our reporting segments.
The Organizational Realignment will cost approximately $30 million over the course of the program, which is primarily for severance, relocation and other employee-related costs. Since the inception of the program and through March 22, 2008, we have recognized approximately $28 million of this cost including a pre-tax cash charge of approximately $2 million being recorded in the first quarter of 2008 primarily related to relocation expenses in our U.S. & Canada segment.
15
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the nature of and activity related to pre-tax costs and cash payments associated with the Organizational Realignment:
Severance | Enhanced | |||||||||||||||
& Related | Pension | Relocation | ||||||||||||||
Total | Benefits | Benefits | & Other | |||||||||||||
Costs incurred through December 29, 2007 | $ | 26 | $ | 15 | $ | 4 | $ | 7 | ||||||||
Cash payments | (13 | ) | (7 | ) | — | (6 | ) | |||||||||
Non-cash settlements | (1 | ) | — | — | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Remaining costs accrued at December 29, 2007 | $ | 12 | $ | 8 | $ | 4 | $ | — | ||||||||
Costs incurred | 2 | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Cash payments | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | — | (2 | ) | |||||||||
Remaining costs accrued at March 22, 2008 | $ | 11 | $ | 7 | $ | 4 | $ | — | ||||||||
Full Service Vending Rationalization
During 2007, we adopted a Full Service Vending (“FSV”) Rationalization plan, which we expect to substantially complete by the end of the second quarter of 2008, to rationalize our vending asset base in our U.S. & Canada segment by disposing older underperforming assets and redeploying certain assets to higher return accounts. Our FSV business portfolio consists of accounts whereby PBG stocks and services vending equipment.
Over the course of the FSV Rationalization plan, we will incur a pre-tax charge of $30 to $35 million, the majority of which is non-cash, including costs associated with the removal of these assets from service, disposal costs and redeployment expenses. Since the inception of the program and through March 22, 2008, we incurred a pre-tax charge of approximately $24 million with a pre-tax cash charge of $1 million being recorded in the first quarter of 2008. This pre-tax charge is recorded in selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
Note 13—Contingencies
We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits, environmental and other matters arising from the normal course of business. We believe that the ultimate liability arising from such claims or contingencies, if any, in excess of amounts already recognized is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Note 14—Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The table below presents the Company’s supplemental cash flow information.
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | |||||||
Interest paid | $ | 71 | $ | 77 | ||||
Income taxes paid | 6 | 23 | ||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
Decrease in accounts payable related to capital expenditures | (49 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||
Capital lease additions | 1 | 2 |
16
Table of Contents
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL REVIEW
Tabular dollars in millions, except per share data
OUR BUSINESS
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. is the world’s largest manufacturer, seller and distributor of Pepsi-Cola beverages and has the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages in all or a portion of the U.S., Mexico, Canada, Spain, Russia, Greece and Turkey. When used in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “PBG,” “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” each refers to The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. and, where appropriate, to Bottling Group, LLC (“Bottling LLC”), our principal operating subsidiary.
PBG operates in one industry, carbonated soft drinks and other ready-to-drink beverages, and all of our segments derive revenue from these products. PBG manages and reports operating results through three reportable segments — U.S. & Canada, Europe (which includes Spain, Russia, Greece and Turkey) and Mexico. Operationally, the Company is organized along geographic lines with specific regional management teams having responsibility for the financial results in each reportable segment.
Management’s Financial Review should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007, which include additional information about our accounting policies, practices and the transactions that underlie our financial results. The preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes, including various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits, taxes, environmental and other matters arising out of the normal course of business. We use our best judgment, our knowledge of existing facts and circumstances and actions that we may undertake in the future, in determining the estimates that affect our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
OUR CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP often requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect a number of amounts included in our financial statements and related disclosures. We have chosen accounting policies that we believe are appropriate to report accurately and fairly our operating results and financial position and have based our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
As discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007, management believes the following policies to be the most critical to the portrayal of PBG’s financial condition and results of operations and require the use of estimates, assumptions and the application of judgment:
• | Other Intangible Assets, net and Goodwill; |
• | Pension and Postretirement Medical Benefit Plans; |
• | Casualty Insurance Costs; and |
• | Income Taxes. |
17
Table of Contents
OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS
ITEMS AFFECTING COMPARABILITY OF OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS
The year-over-year comparisons of our financial results are affected by the following items included in our reported results for the 12 weeks ended:
March | ||||
Income/(Expense) | 22, 2008 | |||
Gross profit | ||||
PR Beverages | $ | (4 | ) | |
Operating income | ||||
PR Beverages | (4 | ) | ||
Restructuring and Full Service Vending Rationalization charges | (3 | ) | ||
Net income | ||||
Restructuring and Full Service Vending Rationalization charges | (1 | ) | ||
Diluted earnings per share | ||||
Restructuring and Full Service Vending Rationalization charges | $ | (0.01 | ) |
2008 Items
PR Beverages Limited (“PR Beverages”)
On March 1, 2007, together with PepsiCo we formed PR Beverages, a venture that will enable us to strategically invest in Russia to accelerate our growth. PBG contributed its business in Russia to PR Beverages and PepsiCo entered into bottling agreements with PR Beverages for PepsiCo beverage products sold in Russia on the same terms as in effect for PBG immediately prior to the venture. PepsiCo also granted PR Beverages an exclusive license to manufacture and sell the concentrate for such products.
We fully consolidate PR Beverages into our financial statements and record minority interest for PepsiCo’s 40 percent ownership interest. Increases or decreases in operating results resulting from the consolidation of the venture are offset by minority interest related to PepsiCo’s ownership interest. Minority interest is recorded below operating income.
Restructuring Charges
In the third quarter of 2007, we announced a restructuring program (the “Organizational Realignment”) to realign the Company’s organization to adapt to changes in the marketplace, improve operating efficiencies and enhance the growth potential of the Company’s product portfolio. During the first quarter of 2008, we substantially completed the Organizational Realignment, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 positions to date across all of our reporting segments. We expect to recognize annual cost savings of approximately $30 million as a result of the program.
Substantially all costs associated with the Organizational Realignment required or will require cash payments. The total after-tax cash expenditures, including payments made pursuant to existing unfunded indemnity plans, are expected to be approximately $25 million, of which $16 million has been recognized since the inception of the program and through March 22, 2008.
Full Service Vending Rationalization
During 2007, we adopted a Full Service Vending (“FSV”) Rationalization plan, which we expect to substantially complete by the end of the second quarter of 2008, to rationalize our vending asset base in our U.S. & Canada segment by disposing older underperforming assets and redeploying certain assets to higher return accounts. Our FSV business portfolio consists of accounts whereby PBG stocks and services vending equipment. Over the course of the FSV Rationalization plan, we will incur a pre-tax charge of $30 to $35 million, the majority of which is non-cash, including costs
18
Table of Contents
associated with the removal of these assets from service, disposal costs and redeployment expenses. This plan is part of the Company’s broader initiative designed to improve operating income margins of our FSV business.
During the first quarter of 2008, we incurred a pre-tax charge of approximately $1 million associated with the FSV Rationalization plan, which is recorded in selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
For further information about our restructuring charges and FSV Rationalization see Note 12 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AND WORLDWIDE FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||
March | March | % | ||||||||||
22, 2008 | 24, 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
Net revenues | $ | 2,651 | $ | 2,466 | 7 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales | 1,482 | 1,343 | 10 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 1,169 | 1,123 | 4 | |||||||||
Selling, delivery, and administrative expenses | 1,061 | 1,003 | 6 | |||||||||
Operating income | 108 | 120 | (10 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | 28 | 29 | (3 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share(1) | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | (2 | )% |
(1) | — | Percentage change for diluted earnings per share is calculated by using earnings per share data that is expanded to the fourth decimal place. |
The impact of foreign currency translation, driven by the strength of all our foreign functional currencies, contributed approximately three percentage points of growth in worldwide net revenues, cost of sales and selling, delivery and administrative expenses and contributed two percentage points to gross profit. Foreign currency translation decreased worldwide operating income by approximately three percentage points.
Net revenues —Growth of seven percent reflected positive growth across all segments driven by volume and rate increases.
Cost of sales —Increase of 10 percent primarily attributable to higher raw material costs.
Gross profit —Growth of four percent reflected volume and rate increases which were partially offset by a mix shift into lower margin packages in the U.S. & Canada segment and higher raw material costs worldwide.
Selling, delivery and administrative (“SD&A”) expenses —Increase of six percent includes investment in our operating infrastructure in Europe mitigated by continued cost productivity improvements and disciplined cost management.
Operating income —Decrease of 10 percent includes a four percentage point negative impact from the consolidation of PR Beverages, a three percentage point negative impact from foreign currency translation and a two percentage point negative impact from the restructuring and FSV Rationalization charges. Negative mix shifts in the U.S. & Canada segment primarily drove the remaining decrease partially offset by volume and rate increases and cost productivity improvements across all segments.
Net income— Decrease of three percent reflected lower operating income and higher taxes, partially offset by lower net interest expense, minority interest and foreign currency transactional gains. As a result of the decrease in net income, diluted earnings per share decreased two percent.
19
Table of Contents
2008 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Tables and discussion are presented as compared to the similar periods in the prior year. Growth rates are rounded to the nearest whole percentage.
Volume
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 22, 2008 vs. March 24, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. & | ||||||||||||||||
Worldwide | Canada | Europe | Mexico | |||||||||||||
Total volume change | 2 | % | 2 | % | 7 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||
Our worldwide physical case volume increased two percent in the first quarter primarily due to the shift of the Easter holiday into the first quarter in 2008 versus the second quarter in 2007 (“Easter shift”) in our U.S. & Canada segment.
In our U.S. & Canada segment, volume increased two percentage points driven by the Easter shift. The Easter shift particularly benefited our take home channel which increased four percent, driven primarily by growth in supermarkets, supercenters and mass merchandisers. This increase was offset by a two percent decline in the cold drink channel, partially due to declines in our foodservice channel, including restaurants, travel and leisure, and workplace, which has been particularly impacted by the economic downturn in the U.S. Cold drink volume was also negatively impacted by the actions we took to eliminate low-returning assets in our full service vending business. These actions lowered our cold drink volume by about one percentage point.
In our Europe segment, overall volume grew seven percent as a result of solid growth in all countries. Russia continued to lead Europe with volume growth of 13 percent reflecting strong performance in CSDs and non-carbonated beverages.
In our Mexico segment, the two percentage point growth reflected a strong performance in our CSD and bottled water portfolios, partially offset by declines in non-carbonated beverage and jugs volume.
Net Revenues
12 Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 22, 2008 vs. March 24, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. & | ||||||||||||||||
Worldwide | Canada | Europe | Mexico | |||||||||||||
Volume impact | 2 | % | 2 | % | 7 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||
Net price per case impact | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Currency translation | 3 | 2 | 15 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total Net Revenues change | 7 | % | 5 | % | 34 | % | 10 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide net revenues were $2.7 billion in the first quarter, increasing seven percent. The increase reflected growth in volume, net price per case and foreign currency translation.
In our U.S. & Canada segment, increases in net revenues were driven by net price per case improvement of three percentage points which includes a two percentage point impact from foreign currency translation. The improvement of net price per case was partially offset by a negative mix shift into our lower margin take home channel as a result of the Easter shift and declines in the cold drink channel.
In our Europe segment, growth across all countries in net revenues reflected strong increases in net price per case, volume and the positive impact of foreign currency translation. Growth in Europe was led by strong double-digit growth in Russia and Turkey.
20
Table of Contents
In our Mexico segment, growth in net revenues reflected strong increases in net rate per case and improving volume trends.
In the first quarter, our U.S. & Canada segment generated approximately 83 percent of our worldwide net revenues. Our Europe segment generated nine percent of our net revenues and Mexico generated the remaining eight percent.
Cost of Sales
12 Weeks Ended | ||||
March 22, 2008 vs. | ||||
March 24, 2007 | ||||
Worldwide | ||||
Volume impact | 2 | % | ||
Cost per case impact | 5 | |||
Currency translation | 3 | |||
Total Cost of Sales change | 10 | % | ||
Worldwide cost of sales was $1.5 billion in the first quarter of 2008, increasing 10 percent. The increase in cost of sales across all segments was mainly due to cost per case increases resulting from higher raw material costs and the negative impact of foreign currency translation.
Selling, Delivery and Administrative Expenses
12 Weeks Ended | ||||
March 22, 2008 vs. | ||||
March 24, 2007 | ||||
Worldwide | ||||
Cost impact | 3 | % | ||
Restructuring and Full Service Vending Rationalization charges | 0 | |||
Currency translation | 3 | |||
Total SD&A change | 6 | % | ||
Worldwide SD&A expenses were $1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2008, increasing six percent. Increases in worldwide SD&A expenses reflect investment in our operating infrastructure in Europe and the impact of foreign currency translation. These increases were partially offset by cost productivity improvements and disciplined cost management. The restructuring and FSV Rationalization charges added less than one percentage point to our total SD&A expenses. In the U.S. & Canada segment, SD&A expenses increased two percentage points compared to the same period last year, driven primarily by foreign currency translation and reflects continued cost productivity improvements and disciplined cost management.
Operating Income
Worldwide operating income was $108 million in the first quarter of 2008, decreasing 10 percent compared to the similar period last year. Decreases in worldwide operating income primarily reflect a four percentage point negative impact from the consolidation of PR Beverages, a three percentage point negative impact from foreign currency translation and a two percentage point negative impact from the restructuring and FSV Rationalization charges. Negative mix shifts in the U.S. & Canada segment primarily drove the remaining decrease partially offset by volume and rate increases and cost productivity improvements across all segments.
In our U.S. & Canada segment, operating income decreased six percent primarily due to cost per case increases resulting from higher raw material costs, a negative mix shift into our lower margin take home channel as a result of the Easter shift, declines in the cold drink channel and a two
21
Table of Contents
percentage point impact from the restructuring and FSV Rationalization charges, partially offset by cost productivity improvements.
In our Europe segment, operating loss increased 23 percent primarily due to the negative impact of consolidating PR Beverages, foreign currency translation and investment activity which drove higher losses in the quarter due to the seasonality of our business in this segment.
In our Mexico segment, operating income increased $1 million, due primarily to strong gross profit improvement.
Interest Expense, net
Net interest expense decreased $7 million in the first quarter versus the prior year, largely due to lower effective interest rates on long-term debt due to interest rate swaps and short-term borrowings.
Other Non-operating Expenses (Income), net
Other net non-operating income was $3 million in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to $1 million of net non-operating expenses in the first quarter of 2007. Income in 2008 was primarily a result of foreign exchange gains due to the strength of the Russian ruble and Mexico peso.
Minority Interest
In 2008, minority interest primarily reflects PepsiCo’s ownership in Bottling LLC of 6.6 percent, coupled with their 40 percent ownership in the PR Beverages venture. The $5 million decrease in the first quarter is primarily driven by PepsiCo’s minority interest in the PR Beverages venture.
Income Tax Expense
Our effective tax rate for the 12 weeks ended March 22, 2008 was 42.6%, compared with our effective tax rate of 36.3% for the 12 weeks ended March 24, 2007. The increase in our effective tax rate in the first quarter is primarily driven by the timing of recording discrete items.
LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
Cash Flows
In the first quarter of 2008 PBG generated $20 million of net cash from operations, a decrease of $1 million from 2007. The decrease in net cash provided by operations was driven primarily by lower profits and investment in our hydration strategy, offset by timing of inventory purchases and lower tax payments.
Net cash used for investments was $210 million, a decrease of $3 million from 2007. The decrease in cash used for investments reflects lower acquisition payments, partially offset by higher payments for capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $136 million, an increase of $29 million versus prior year. This increase in cash from financing reflects higher short term borrowings to fund working capital needs and share repurchases.
22
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of cash come from our operating activities and the issuance of debt and bank borrowings. We believe that these cash inflows will be sufficient to fund capital expenditures, benefit plan contributions, acquisitions, share repurchases, dividends and working capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Our liquidity has not been materially impacted by the current credit environment.
We had $362 million and $50 million of outstanding commercial paper at March 22, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively.
Our $1.3 billion of 5.63 percent senior notes will become due in February 2009. We plan to refinance these notes.
On March 27, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase in the Company’s quarterly dividend from $0.14 to $0.17 per share on the outstanding common stock of the Company. This action will result in a 21-percent increase in our quarterly dividend.
On March 20, 2008, together with PepsiCo, we announced the joint acquisition of 75.5 percent in Russia’s leading branded juice company JSC Lebedyansky (“Lebedyansky”) for $1.4 billion, excluding the company’s baby food and mineral water business. As announced, PepsiCo will acquire 75 percent and PBG will acquire 25 percent of the 75.5 percent stake. PBG plans to fund the acquisition using its commercial paper program and cash provided by operations. The acquisition is expected to be completed during the second half of our fiscal year 2008 and is subject to normal local regulatory approvals and the demerger of the baby food business. Additionally, together with PepsiCo, we expect to tender for the remaining 24.5 percent ownership of Lebedyansky’s juice business. PBG and PepsiCo’s tender for Lebedyansky’s remaining shares will continue to be purchased 25 percent and 75 percent, respectively.
Contractual Obligations
As of March 22, 2008, there have been no material changes outside the normal course of business in the contractual obligations disclosed in Item 7 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007, under the caption “Contractual Obligations”.
23
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Except for the historical information and discussions contained herein, statements contained in this Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data and our operating plans. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to be materially different. Among the events and uncertainties that could adversely affect future periods are:
• | changes in our relationship with PepsiCo; |
• | PepsiCo’s ability to affect matters concerning us through its equity ownership of PBG, representation on our Board and approval rights under our Master Bottling Agreement; |
• | material changes in expected levels of bottler incentive payments from PepsiCo; |
• | restrictions imposed by PepsiCo on our raw material suppliers that could increase our costs; |
• | material changes from expectations in the cost or availability of raw materials, ingredients or packaging materials; |
• | limitations on the availability of water or obtaining water rights; |
• | an inability to achieve cost savings; |
• | material changes in capital investment for infrastructure and an inability to achieve the expected timing for returns on cold-drink equipment and related infrastructure expenditures; |
• | decreased demand for our product resulting from changes in consumers’ preferences; |
• | an inability to achieve volume growth through product and packaging initiatives; |
• | impact of competitive activities on our business; |
• | impact of customer consolidations on our business; |
• | changes in product category consumption; |
• | unfavorable weather conditions in our markets; |
• | an inability to successfully integrate acquired businesses or to meet projections for performance in newly acquired territories; |
• | loss of business from a significant customer; |
• | loss of key members of management; |
• | failure or inability to comply with laws and regulations; |
• | changes in laws, regulations and industry guidelines governing the manufacture and sale of food and beverages, including restrictions on the sale of carbonated soft drinks in schools; |
• | litigation, other claims and negative publicity relating to alleged unhealthy properties of soft drinks; |
• | changes in laws and regulations governing the environment, transportation, employee safety, labor and government contracts; |
• | changes in accounting standards and taxation requirements (including unfavorable outcomes from audits performed by various tax authorities); |
• | unforeseen social, economic and political changes; |
• | possible recalls of our products; |
• | interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements; |
• | limitations on our ability to invest in our business as a result of our repayment obligations under our existing indebtedness; |
• | changes in our debt ratings; |
• | material changes in expected interest and currency exchange rates and unfavorable market performance of assets in our pension plans; and |
• | an inability to achieve strategic business plan targets that could result in a non-cash intangible asset impairment charge. |
24
Table of Contents
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes to our market risks as disclosed in Item 7 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PBG’s management carried out an evaluation, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of our last fiscal quarter. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, such that the information relating to PBG and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports filed with the SEC (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to PBG’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In addition, PBG’s management carried out an evaluation, as required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of changes in PBG’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
25
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
PBG PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
We repurchased approximately 5 million shares of PBG common stock in the first quarter of 2008. Since the inception of our share repurchase program in October 1999, we have repurchased approximately 137 million shares of PBG common stock. Our share repurchases for the first quarter of 2008 are as follows:
Total Number of Shares | Maximum Number of | |||||||||||||||
Total Number | Purchased as Part of | Shares that May Yet Be | ||||||||||||||
of Shares | Average Price | Publicly Announced Plans | Purchased Under the Plans | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased1 | Paid per Share2 | or Programs3 | or Programs3, 4 | ||||||||||||
Period 1 12/30/07—01/26/08 | 220,000 | $ | 39.60 | 220,000 | 18,321,400 | |||||||||||
Period 2 01/27/08—02/23/08 | 3,974,500 | $ | 34.95 | 3,974,500 | 14,346,900 | |||||||||||
Period 3 02/24/08—03/22/08 | 938,300 | $ | 33.94 | 938,300 | 13,408,600 | |||||||||||
Total | 5,132,800 | $ | 34.96 | 5,132,800 | ||||||||||||
1 | Shares have only been repurchased through publicly announced programs. | |
2 | Average share price excludes brokerage fees. | |
3 | The PBG Board has authorized the repurchase of shares of common stock on the open market and through negotiated transactions as follows: |
Number of Shares | ||||
Authorized to be | ||||
Date Share Repurchase Program was Publicly Announced | Repurchased 4 | |||
October 14, 1999 | 20,000,000 | |||
July 13, 2000 | 10,000,000 | |||
July 11, 2001 | 20,000,000 | |||
May 28, 2003 | 25,000,000 | |||
March 25, 2004 | 25,000,000 | |||
March 24, 2005 | 25,000,000 | |||
December 15, 2006 | 25,000,000 | |||
Total shares authorized to be repurchased as of March 22, 2008 | 150,000,000 | |||
Unless terminated by resolution of the PBG Board, each share repurchase program expires when we have repurchased all shares authorized for repurchase thereunder.
4 | Number of shares does not include an additional 25 million shares of PBG common stock that was publicly announced for repurchase on March 27, 2008. This brings the total number of shares authorized for repurchase to 175 million since the Company initiated its share repurchase program in October 1999. |
26
Table of Contents
Item 6.
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT NO. | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT | |
10.1 | The PBG Directors’ Stock Plan (As Amended and Restated as of March 27, 2008) | |
31.1 | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 | |
99.1 | Bottling Group, LLC Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 22, 2008, as required by the SEC as a result of Bottling Group, LLC’s guarantee of up to $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of our 7% Senior Notes due in 2029 |
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC. (Registrant) | ||||
Date: April 28, 2008 | /s/ Thomas M. Lardieri | |||
Thomas M. Lardieri | ||||
Vice President and Controller | ||||
Date: April 28, 2008 | /s/ Alfred H. Drewes | |||
Alfred H. Drewes | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |