UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2012.
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to .
Commission File Number 001-16249
ICG GROUP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 23-2996071 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
| |
690 Lee Road, Suite 310, Wayne, PA | | 19087 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(610) 727-6900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | x |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of August 6, 2012, was 37,013,052 shares.
ICG GROUP, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Availability of Reports and Other Information
Our Internet website address is www.icg.com. Unless this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) explicitly states otherwise, neither the information on our website, nor the information on the website of any of our companies, is incorporated by reference into this Report.
Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed by us with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are accessible free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish them to, the SEC.
The public may read and copy any of the reports that are filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
1
Forward-Looking Statements
Forward-looking statements made with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business in this Report, and those made from time to time by us through our senior management, are made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and projections about future events but are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us and our companies that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| • | | economic conditions generally; |
| • | | capital spending by our companies’ customers; |
| • | | our companies’ collective ability to compete successfully against their respective competitors and against alternative solutions; |
| • | | our companies’ collective ability to retain existing customer relationships and secure new ones; |
| • | | developments in the respective markets in which our companies operate and our companies’ collective ability to respond to such changes in a timely and effective manner; |
| • | | our and our companies’ collective ability to retain key personnel; |
| • | | our ability to deploy capital effectively and on acceptable terms; |
| • | | our and our companies’ collective ability to successfully integrate any acquired business, and any other difficulties related to the acquisition of businesses by us or our companies; |
| • | | the impact of any potential acquisitions, dispositions or other strategic transactions, which may impact our operations, financial condition, capitalization or indebtedness; |
| • | | our ability to execute strategic divestitures and maximize value in connection with those divestitures; and |
| • | | our ability to have continued access to capital and to manage capital resources effectively. |
During the periods presented in this Report, Procurian Inc. represented a sizable majority of our consolidated revenue. Accordingly, the occurrence of any of the above factors (as applicable) at Procurian Inc. could have a disproportionately significant adverse effect on our results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
In light of those risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this Report might not occur. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue” or the negative of those terms or other similar expressions. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For a more detailed discussion of some of the foregoing risks and uncertainties, see
Part II – Item 1A – “Risk Factors” of this Report and Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as well as other reports and registration statements filed by us with the SEC.
2
Our Companies
The results of operations of our companies are reported in two segments: the “core” reporting segment and the “venture” reporting segment. Our core reporting segment includes the companies in which our management takes a very active role in providing strategic direction and management assistance. We own majority controlling equity positions in (and therefore consolidate the financial results of) four of those core companies, including MSDSonline Holdings, Inc., which we acquired on March 30, 2012; we call those companies our “consolidated core companies.” We generally own substantial minority equity positions (i.e., the largest equity positions) in our other core companies, which we call our “equity core companies.” We expect to devote relatively large initial amounts of capital to acquire stakes in core companies, particularly consolidated core companies, since any such acquisition would entail the deployment of cash and/or the issuance of ICG Group, Inc. Common Stock to purchase a large equity stake in a target with relatively strong financial characteristics and growth potential.
Our venture reporting segment includes companies (our “venture companies”) to which we generally devote less capital than we do to our core companies and, therefore, in which we hold relatively smaller ownership stakes than we do in our core companies. As a result, we generally have less influence over the strategic direction and management decisions of our venture companies than we do over those of our core companies.
At June 30, 2012, our consolidated core companies consisted of:
GovDelivery Holdings, Inc. (“GovDelivery”)
GovDelivery is a provider of government-to-citizen communication solutions. GovDelivery’s digital subscription management software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform enables government organizations to provide citizens with access to relevant information by delivering new information through e-mail, mobile text alerts, RSS and social media channels from U.S. and U.K. government entities at the national, state and local levels.
Investor Force Holdings, Inc. (“InvestorForce”)
InvestorForce is a financial software company specializing in the development of online applications for the financial services industry. InvestorForce provides pension consultants and other financial intermediaries with a Web-based enterprise platform that integrates data management with robust analytic and reporting capabilities in support of their institutional and other clients. InvestorForce’s applications provide investment consultants with the ability to conduct real-time analysis and research into client, manager and market movement and to produce timely, automated client reports.
MSDSonline Holdings, Inc. (“MSDSonline”)
MSDSonline offers an integrated suite of on-demand products and services that help companies manage hazardous chemicals and automate various reporting processes to streamline complex environmental, health and safety compliance requirements. MSDSonline’s products and services help businesses create safer work environments, save time, lower costs and reduce the risk and liability associated with meeting compliance requirements.
Procurian Inc. (f/k/a ICG Commerce Holdings, Inc.) (“Procurian”)
Procurian is a specialist in comprehensive procurement solutions that partners with transformational business leaders to drive sustainable changes to their cost structures on an accelerated basis. Procurian integrates superior market intelligence into its customers’ businesses to optimize spending and deliver savings.
3
At June 30, 2012, our equity core companies consisted of:
CIML, LLC (“Channel Intelligence”)
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, Channel Intelligence, Inc. reorganized its corporate structure, creating a parent holding company, CIML, LLC, and allocating a portion of its existing assets to a separate entity, MyList Corporation. CIML, LLC, the parent company, now holds all of the equity interests of Channel Intelligence, Inc. and MyList Corporation. As used herein, Channel Intelligence refers to CIML, LLC, which includes the operations of both Channel Intelligence, Inc. and MyList Corporation.
Channel Intelligence is a technology and marketing services company that helps retailers, manufacturers and other advertisers make their products and services easier for consumers to find and buy online and in local retail stores. Through its proprietary technologies and large product database, Channel Intelligence offers online marketing services and helps its customers support their consumers through all phases of the sales funnel, from lead generation to consideration to purchase and delivery.
In July and August 2012, ICG acquired additional equity ownership interests in Channel Intelligence, increasing ICG’s ownership interest in that company to 52%. As a result of those acquisitions, ICG will consolidate Channel Intelligence beginning in the third quarter of 2012.
Freeborders, Inc. (“Freeborders”)
Freeborders is a provider of technology solutions and outsourcing from China. Freeborders provides industry expertise to North American and European companies specializing in financial services, technology, retail/consumer goods, manufacturing and transportation and logistics. Freeborders’ offerings help companies seeking cost-effective technology solutions.
WhiteFence, Inc. (“WhiteFence”)
WhiteFence is a Web services provider used by household consumers to compare and purchase essential home services, such as electricity, natural gas, telephone and cable/satellite television. WhiteFence reaches customers directly through company-owned websites and through its network of exclusive channel partners that integrate the Web services applications into their own business processes and websites.
At June 30, 2012, our venture companies consisted of:
Acquirgy, Inc. (“Acquirgy”)
Acquirgy specializes in direct response marketing services and technology that provide customers with a wide range of direct marketing products and services to help market their products and services on the Internet and through other media channels such as television, radio, and print advertising.
GoIndustry-DoveBid plc (LSE.AIM:GOI) (“GoIndustry”)
GoIndustry is a leader in auction sales and valuations of used industrial machinery and equipment. GoIndustry combines traditional asset sales experience with innovative technology and advanced direct marketing to service the needs of multi-national corporations, insolvency practitioners, dealers and asset-based lenders around the world.
On July 5, 2012, GoIndustry was sold to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Liquidity Services, Inc. (“Liquidity Services”) and is therefore no longer an ICG company as of the date of this Report.
SeaPass Solutions Inc. (“SeaPass”)
SeaPass develops and markets processing solutions that enable insurance carriers, agents and brokers to transmit and receive data in real time by leveraging existing systems to interact automatically. The company’s technology allows information to be accessed in real time, which increases efficiency across all lines of the insurance business.
4
Item 1. Financial Statements
ICG GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 57,145 | | | $ | 121,909 | |
Restricted cash | | | 295 | | | | 133 | |
Other receivables | | | — | | | | 22,679 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance($526-2012; $616-2011) | | | 41,496 | | | | 32,762 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 613 | | | | 613 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 6,553 | | | | 2,835 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 106,102 | | | | 180,931 | |
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization ($18,741-2012; $17,000-2011) | | | 8,060 | | | | 6,046 | |
Marketable securities | | | 1,025 | | | | — | |
Ownership interests | | | 43,125 | | | | 39,052 | |
Goodwill | | | 55,472 | | | | 22,538 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 45,468 | | | | 14,431 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 31,906 | | | | 31,940 | |
Cost method investments | | | 11,345 | | | | 10,820 | |
Other assets, net | | | 1,382 | | | | 1,062 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 303,885 | | | $ | 306,820 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | 4,173 | | | $ | 4,759 | |
Accounts payable | | | 4,982 | | | | 2,300 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 9,205 | | | | 6,179 | |
Accrued compensation and benefits | | | 12,004 | | | | 12,058 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 16,726 | | | | 13,491 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 47,090 | | | | 38,787 | |
Long-term debt | | | 8,666 | | | | 10,761 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 125 | | | | 61 | |
Other liabilities | | | 5,504 | | | | 2,336 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 61,385 | | | | 51,945 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Redeemable noncontrolling interest (Note 13) | | | 2,852 | | | | 1,378 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Equity | | | | | | | | |
ICG Group, Inc.’s Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized, 40,913 shares issued (2012) and 40,729 shares issued (2011) | | | 41 | | | | 41 | |
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,749 shares (2012) and 3,281 shares (2011) | | | (24,733 | ) | | | (20,619 | ) |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 3,545,262 | | | | 3,544,121 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (3,290,747 | ) | | | (3,277,733 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 202 | | | | 74 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total ICG Group, Inc.’s Stockholders’ Equity | | | 230,025 | | | | 245,884 | |
Noncontrolling Interest | | | 9,623 | | | | 7,613 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Equity | | | 239,648 | | | | 253,497 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities, Redeemable noncontrolling interest and Equity | | $ | 303,885 | | | $ | 306,820 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
ICG GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 45,078 | | | $ | 35,328 | | | $ | 81,708 | | | $ | 69,282 | |
| | | | |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | 27,018 | | | | 21,775 | | | | 50,643 | | | | 42,765 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 15,199 | | | | 12,115 | | | | 28,790 | | | | 23,702 | |
Research and development | | | 4,038 | | | | 3,325 | | | | 7,352 | | | | 6,454 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 1,436 | | | | 338 | | | | 1,860 | | | | 675 | |
Impairment related and other | | | 160 | | | | 82 | | | | 287 | | | | 119 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 47,851 | | | | 37,635 | | | | 88,932 | | | | 73,715 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | (2,773 | ) | | | (2,307 | ) | | | (7,224 | ) | | | (4,433 | ) |
Other income (loss), net | | | 1,054 | | | | 1,612 | | | | 1,451 | | | | 26,558 | |
Interest income | | | 93 | | | | 124 | | | | 230 | | | | 208 | |
Interest expense | | | (88 | ) | | | (186 | ) | | | (196 | ) | | | (332 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity loss | | | (1,714 | ) | | | (757 | ) | | | (5,739 | ) | | | 22,001 | |
Income tax (expense) benefit | | | (392 | ) | | | 963 | | | | (932 | ) | | | (1,977 | ) |
Equity loss | | | (3,236 | ) | | | (3,185 | ) | | | (5,539 | ) | | | (6,761 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | (5,342 | ) | | | (2,979 | ) | | | (12,210 | ) | | | 13,263 | |
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest | | | 652 | | | | 254 | | | | 804 | | | | 606 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (5,994 | ) | | $ | (3,233 | ) | | $ | (13,014 | ) | | $ | 12,657 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Basic income (loss) per share attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.36 | ) | | $ | 0.34 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares used in computation of basic income (loss) per share | | | 35,917 | | | | 36,961 | | | | 36,037 | | | | 36,953 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Diluted income (loss) per share attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.36 | ) | | $ | 0.33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares used in computation of diluted income (loss) per share | | | 35,917 | | | | 36,961 | | | | 36,037 | | | | 37,976 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (5,342 | ) | | $ | (2,979 | ) | | $ | (12,210 | ) | | $ | 13,263 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized holding gains (losses) in marketable securities | | | 1,565 | | | | — | | | | 1,565 | | | | — | |
Reclassification adjustments/realized net gains on marketable securities | | | (1,446 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,446 | ) | | | — | |
Other accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 23 | | | | 5 | | | | 9 | | | | (15 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | (5,200 | ) | | | (2,974 | ) | | | (12,082 | ) | | | 13,248 | |
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest | | | 675 | | | | 259 | | | | 813 | | | | 591 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (5,875 | ) | | $ | (3,233 | ) | | $ | (12,895 | ) | | $ | 12,657 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
ICG GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ICG Group, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Treasury Stock, | | | Additional | | | | | | Other | | | Non- | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | at cost | | | Paid-In | | | Accumulated | | | Comprehensive | | | Controlling | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Deficit | | | Income | | | Interest | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2010 | | | 39,439 | | | $ | 39 | | | | (2,440 | ) | | $ | (12,031 | ) | | $ | 3,541,044 | | | $ | (3,305,299 | ) | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 4,622 | | | $ | 228,429 | |
Equity-based compensation expense related to stock appreciation rights and stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,034 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,034 | |
Equity-based compensation expense related to deferred stock units | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 353 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 353 | |
Equity-based compensation expense related to restricted stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 177 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 177 | |
Issuance of deferred stock units to directors | | | 65 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 81 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 81 | |
Issuance of restricted stock to employees, net of forfeitures | | | 82 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Exercise of stock appreciation rights and stock options, net of surrenders | | | 24 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (125 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (124 | ) |
Impact of redeemable noncontrolling interest accretion | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (199 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (199 | ) |
Impact of incremental acquisition of Procurian | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,059 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (261 | ) | | | (1,320 | ) |
Impact of subsidiary equity transactions | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 556 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 665 | | | | 1,221 | |
Repurchase of common stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | (67 | ) | | | (770 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (770 | ) |
Noncontrolling owners share of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of consolidated subsidiary | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (15 | ) | | | 15 | | | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,657 | | | | — | | | | 712 | | | | 13,369 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of June 30, 2011 | | | 39,610 | | | $ | 40 | | | | (2,507 | ) | | $ | (12,801 | ) | | $ | 3,541,862 | | | $ | (3,292,642 | ) | | $ | 39 | | | $ | 5,753 | | | $ | 242,251 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | | | 40,729 | | | $ | 41 | | | | (3,281 | ) | | $ | (20,619 | ) | | $ | 3,544,121 | | | $ | (3,277,733 | ) | | $ | 74 | | | $ | 7,613 | | | $ | 253,497 | |
Equity-based compensation expense related to stock appreciation rights and stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,226 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,226 | |
Equity-based compensation expense related to deferred stock units | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 246 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 246 | |
Equity-based compensation expense related to restricted stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,599 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,599 | |
Issuance of deferred stock units and restricted stock to directors | | | 76 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 135 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 135 | |
Issuance of restricted stock to employees, net of forfeitures | | | 77 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (188 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (188 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | | | 31 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 252 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 252 | |
Impact of redeemable noncontrolling interest accretion | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (211 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (211 | ) |
Impact of incremental acquisition of consolidated subsidiary | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,144 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (385 | ) | | | (1,529 | ) |
Impact of subsidiary equity transactions | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (774 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,509 | | | | 735 | |
Repurchase of common stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | (468 | ) | | | (4,114 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,114 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation in marketable securities and reclassification adjustments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 119 | | | | — | | | | 119 | |
Noncontrolling owners share of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of consolidated subsidiary | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9 | | | | (9 | ) | | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13,014 | ) | | | — | | | | 895 | | | | (12,119 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of June 30, 2012 | | | 40,913 | | | $ | 41 | | | | (3,749 | ) | | $ | (24,733 | ) | | $ | 3,545,262 | | | $ | (3,290,747 | ) | | $ | 202 | | | $ | 9,623 | | | $ | 239,648 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
ICG GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | |
Operating Activities | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (12,210 | ) | | $ | 13,263 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 3,603 | | | | 2,271 | |
Impairment related and other | | | 287 | | | | 119 | |
Other income (loss) | | | (1,451 | ) | | | (26,558 | ) |
Equity loss | | | 5,539 | | | | 6,761 | |
Equity-based compensation | | | 3,582 | | | | 1,780 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 34 | | | | 1,496 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | (5,249 | ) | | | (2,996 | ) |
Tax receivable | | | — | | | | 6,314 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | (2,876 | ) | | | (739 | ) |
Accounts payable | | | 1,732 | | | | 539 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 810 | | | | 13 | |
Accrued compensation and benefits | | | (521 | ) | | | (4,941 | ) |
Deferred revenue | | | 815 | | | | 765 | |
Other liabilities | | | (236 | ) | | | 684 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities | | | (6,141 | ) | | | (1,229 | ) |
Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures, net | | | (3,498 | ) | | | (1,865 | ) |
Advanced deposits for acquisition of fixed assets | | | (1,138 | ) | | | 16 | |
Change in restricted cash | | | (162 | ) | | | 66 | |
Ownership acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | | (57,583 | ) | | | (4,130 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of ownership interests | | | 15,913 | | | | 51,878 | |
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities | | | 7,526 | | | | — | |
Proceeds from other distributions | | | — | | | | 1,424 | |
Acquisitions by subsidiary | | | (11,500 | ) | | | (1,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities | | | (50,442 | ) | | | 46,389 | |
Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary equity | | | (1,529 | ) | | | (1,320 | ) |
Repayment long-term debt and capital lease obligations | | | (3,618 | ) | | | (3,365 | ) |
Borrowings of long-term debt | | | 1,008 | | | | 238 | |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | (4,114 | ) | | | (770 | ) |
Tax withholdings related to equity-based awards | | | (188 | ) | | | (146 | ) |
Cash received for stock option exercises | | | 252 | | | | 22 | |
Other financing activities | | | 26 | | | | (49 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities | | | (8,163 | ) | | | (5,390 | ) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash | | | (18 | ) | | | 97 | |
| | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (64,764 | ) | | | 39,867 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 121,909 | | | | 92,438 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 57,145 | | | $ | 132,305 | |
| | | | | | | | |
8
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMETS
(Unaudited)
1. The Company
Description of the Company
ICG Group, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “ICG”) acquires and builds Internet software and services companies that improve the productivity and efficiency of their business customers. Founded in 1996, ICG devotes its expertise and capital to maximizing the success of those companies.
Basis of Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein (the “Consolidated Financial Statements”) include the accounts of ICG Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, wholly-controlled subsidiaries and majority-owned subsidiaries.
ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 included the financial position of the following majority-owned subsidiaries:
| | |
June 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
GovDelivery | | GovDelivery |
InvestorForce | | InvestorForce |
MSDSonline (1) | | Procurian |
Procurian | | |
ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (its “Consolidated Statements of Operations”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 include the results of the following majority-owned subsidiaries:
| | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
GovDelivery | | GovDelivery | | GovDelivery | | GovDelivery |
InvestorForce | | InvestorForce | | InvestorForce | | InvestorForce |
MSDSonline | | Procurian | | MSDSonline(1) | | Procurian |
Procurian | | | | Procurian | | |
(1) | On March 30, 2012, ICG acquired 96% of MSDSonline and began consolidating the financial position of that company as of that date. The results of operations of MSDSonline from the date of acquisition through March 31, 2012 were immaterial; the results of operations of MSDSonline are included in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations beginning on April 1, 2012. See Note 4, “Consolidated Core Companies,” for additional information regarding the acquisition of MSDSonline. |
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Accounting for Ownership Interests
The various interests that ICG acquires in its companies are accounted for under one of three methods: the consolidation method, the equity method and the cost method. The applicable accounting method is generally determined based on ICG’s voting interest in a company.
Consolidation. Companies in which ICG directly or indirectly owns greater than 50% of the outstanding voting securities, and for which other stockholders do not possess the right to affect significant management decisions, are generally accounted for under the consolidation method of accounting. Under this method, a subsidiary’s balance sheet and results of operations are reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements, and all significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Participation of other stockholders in the net assets and in the earnings or losses of a consolidated subsidiary is reflected in the line items “Noncontrolling Interest” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and “Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Noncontrolling interest adjusts ICG’s consolidated results of operations to reflect only ICG’s share of the earnings or losses of the consolidated subsidiary. The results of operations and cash flows of a consolidated subsidiary are generally included through the latest interim period in which ICG owned a greater than 50% direct or indirect voting interest for the entire interim period or otherwise exercised control over the company.
9
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2. Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)
Equity-based compensation activity at ICG’s consolidated subsidiaries may result in changes to ICG’s equity ownership of those companies. That activity typically results in adjustments to ICG’s carrying value of the relevant consolidated company and ICG’s additional paid-in capital. Any impact of equity-based compensation activity at ICG’s consolidated subsidiaries is included in the line item “Impact of subsidiary equity transactions” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity.
Equity Method.Companies that are not consolidated, but over which ICG exercises significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and are referred to in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as “equity method companies.” The determination as to whether or not ICG exercises significant influence with respect to a company depends on an evaluation of several factors, including, among others, representation on that company’s board of directors, the level of ICG’s ownership of that company’s equity interests (which is generally between a 20% and a 50% interest in the voting securities of an equity method company) and voting rights associated with those equity interests. Under the equity method of accounting, a company’s accounts are not reflected in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations. ICG’s share of the earnings and/or losses of the company, as well as any adjustments resulting from prior period finalizations of equity income/losses, are reflected in the line item “Equity loss” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations; for the three and six months ended June 30 2012, there were no material finalization adjustments. The carrying values of ICG’s equity method companies are reflected in the line item “Ownership interests” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
When ICG’s carrying value in an equity method company is reduced to zero, no further losses are recorded in ICG’s Consolidated Financial Statements unless ICG has guaranteed obligations of the equity method company or has committed to additional funding. When the equity method company subsequently reports income, ICG will not record its share of that income until it equals the amount of its share of losses not previously recognized.
Cost Method.Companies not accounted for under either the consolidation method or equity method of accounting are accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are referred to in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as “cost method companies.” ICG’s share of the earnings and/or losses of cost method companies is not included in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Operations. However, impairment charges related to cost method companies are recognized in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. If circumstances suggest that the value of a cost method company with respect to which an impairment charge has been made has subsequently recovered, that recovery is not recorded. The carrying values of ICG’s cost method companies are reflected in the line item “Cost method investments” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
ICG initially records its carrying value in companies accounted for under the cost method at cost, unless the equity securities of a cost method company have readily determinable fair values based on quoted market prices, in which case the interests are valued at fair value and classified as marketable securities or some other classification in accordance with guidance for ownership interests in debt and equity securities.
Changes in Ownership Interests
Any changes in ICG’s ownership interest in a consolidated subsidiary in which ICG maintains control is recognized as an equity transaction, and appropriate adjustments are made to both ICG’s additional paid-in capital and the corresponding noncontrolling interests. If control is lost, any retained interest is measured at fair value, and a gain or loss is recognized in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations at that time. In addition, to the extent ICG maintains a smaller equity ownership, the accounting method used for that company would be changed to the equity or cost method of accounting, as appropriate, for subsequent periods.
10
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2. Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)
An increase in ICG’s ownership interest in an equity method company over which ICG maintains significant influence is accounted for as a step acquisition, with an allocation of the excess purchase price to the fair value of the net assets acquired. A decrease in ICG’s ownership interest in an equity method company over which ICG maintains significant influence is accounted for as a dilution gain or loss in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and reflects the difference between ICG’s share of the underlying net assets of that company prior to the relevant change in ownership and ICG’s share of the underlying net assets of that company subsequent to the relevant change in ownership. When a change occurs that results in a loss of the ability to exercise significant influence over an equity method company, ICG discontinues equity method accounting and applies the cost method of accounting as of the date that the ability to exercise significant influence was lost. A change resulting in an increase in ICG’s ownership interest in an equity method company to that of a controlling financial interest is accounted for as a step acquisition, with an allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the net assets acquired. ICG remeasures its previously held ownership interest in a company that was previously not consolidated at the acquisition date fair value; any gain or loss resulting from that remeasurement is recognized in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations at that time. In addition, ICG begins to include the financial position and operating results of the newly-consolidated subsidiary in its Consolidated Financial Statements from the date ICG obtains the controlling financial interest in that subsidiary.
Any change in ICG’s ownership interest in a cost method company resulting in ICG’s ability to exercise significant influence over that company or in ICG’s obtaining a controlling financial interest in that company is accounted for with a retroactive adjustment of ICG’s ownership interest for ICG’s share of the past results of the former cost method company’s operations. Therefore, prior results of operations of the former cost method company could change the value of ICG’s ownership interest in its Consolidated Balance Sheets at the time of any such retroactive adjustment; moreover, any such change could be significant. An increase in ICG’s ownership interest in a cost method company that results in accounting for that company using the equity method of accounting or the consolidation of that company by ICG also results in an allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the net assets acquired. Consistent with ICG’s accounting for an equity method company, if ICG’s ownership interest in a cost method company increases to that of a controlling financial interest, ICG remeasures its previously held ownership interest at the acquisition date fair value and recognizes any gain or loss resulting from this remeasurement in its Consolidated Statements of Operations at that time. In addition, ICG begins to include the financial position and operating results of the newly-consolidated subsidiary in its Consolidated Financial Statements from the date ICG obtains the controlling financial interest in that company.
Issuances of Stock by Consolidated Subsidiaries and Equity Method Companies
The effects of any changes in ICG’s equity ownership interest in a company accounted for under the consolidation or equity method of accounting resulting from the issuance of additional equity interests by that company are accounted for as a disposition of shares by ICG. The difference between the carrying amount of ICG’s ownership interest in a company and the underlying net book value of that company after the issuance of stock by that company is reflected as an equity transaction in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (in the case of consolidated subsidiaries) or as a gain or loss in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations (in the case of equity method companies).
11
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2. Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Those estimates include evaluation of ICG’s convertible debt and equity holdings, including holdings in marketable securities, asset impairment, revenue recognition, income taxes and commitments and contingencies. Those estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best judgments. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, such as the current economic environment, that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management adjusts those estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate that it is necessary or appropriate to do so. Uncertain market conditions and stagnant information technology spending have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in those estimates and assumptions. It is reasonably possible that ICG’s accounting estimates with respect to the ultimate recoverability of ICG’s ownership interests in convertible debt and equity holdings, goodwill and the useful life of intangible assets could change in the near term and that the effect of such changes on the Consolidated Financial Statements could be material. Management believes the recorded amounts of ownership interests, goodwill, intangible assets and cost method investments were not impaired at June 30, 2012.
Ownership Interests, Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Cost Method Investments
ICG evaluates its carrying value in equity method companies and cost method companies continuously to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of any such company exists and should be recognized. In order to make this determination with respect to a company, ICG considers that company’s achievement of its business plan objectives and milestones, the fair value of its ownership interest in that company (which, in the case of any company listed on a public stock exchange, is the quoted stock price of the relevant ownership interest), the financial condition and prospects of that company, and other relevant factors. The business plan objectives and milestones ICG considers include, among others, those related to financial performance, such as achievement of planned financial results or completion of capital raising activities, and those that are not primarily financial in nature, such as obtaining key business partnerships or the hiring of key employees. Impairment charges are determined by comparing ICG’s carrying value of a company with its estimated fair value. Fair value is determined by using a combination of estimating the cash flows related to the relevant asset, including estimated proceeds on disposition, and an analysis of market price multiples of companies engaged in lines of business similar to the company being evaluated. ICG concluded that the carrying value of its equity and cost method companies was not impaired as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
ICG tests goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently as conditions warrant, and tests intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. ICG concluded that its goodwill and intangible assets were not impaired as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Revenue Recognition
During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, ICG’s consolidated revenue was attributable to GovDelivery, InvestorForce, MSDSonline and Procurian (primarily Procurian). Since MSDSonline was acquired on March 30, 2012 and the results of operations for the two-day period from March 30, 2012 through March 31, 2012 were immaterial to ICG, revenue related to MSDSonline has been included in ICG’s consolidated revenue beginning on April 1, 2012.
GovDelivery revenue consists of nonrefundable setup fees and monthly maintenance and hosting fees. Those fees generally are deferred and recognized as the services are performed, which is typically over the service term. Costs related to performing setup services are expensed as incurred.
12
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2. Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)
InvestorForce generates revenue from license fees earned in connection with hosted services, setup fees and support and maintenance fees, as well as professional services fees. Hosted services primarily consist of data aggregation, performance calculation, real-time analysis and automated production of performance reports for the institutional investment community. Generally, InvestorForce charges its clients minimum quarterly base fees for hosted services. Those minimum fees are recognized on a prorated basis over the service term. As the volume of client accounts increases, additional fees apply. Those additional fees are recognized in the period in which account volumes exceed the contract minimum. Setup and support and maintenance fees are deferred and recognized ratably over the service term. Revenue from professional services, which consist of the creation of custom platform enhancements, is recognized when the platform is delivered to, and can be used by, the customer.
MSDSonline derives revenues from three sources: (1) subscription fees, (2) professional services fees and (3) compliance solutions project fees. The vast majority of MSDSonline’s revenues are derived from subscription fees from customers accessing the company’s database and web-based tools; that revenue is recognized ratably over the applicable contract term, beginning on the contract implementation date. MSDSonline also generates (a) professional services fees from compiling its customers’ online libraries of material safety data sheet documents and indexing those documents for the customers’ use and (b) fees from training and compliance services projects; the revenue derived from those fees is recognized on a percentage of completion basis over the applicable project’s timeline.
Procurian primarily generates revenue from procurement management services. Procurian also generates a portion of its revenue from consulting projects. Procurement management services include services and technology designed to help companies achieve unit cost savings and process efficiencies. Procurian earns fees for transition services, sourcing, category management and transaction management services. Procurian estimates the total contract value (excluding performance bonus fees) under the contractual arrangements it has with its customers and recognizes revenue under those arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant contract, which approximates the life of the customer relationship. Performance bonus fees are deferred until the contingency is achieved or it is determined from existing data and past experience that the savings will be achieved. The portion of those fees related to the portion of the contract that has been performed are then recognized and the remaining performance bonus fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the contract, which approximates the life of the customer relationship. Consulting projects are engagements in which Procurian negotiates prices from certain suppliers on behalf of its customers in certain categories in which Procurian has sourcing expertise. Under those projects, either the customer pays a fixed fee or a performance bonus. In fixed-fee sourcing arrangements, revenue is recognized on a proportional performance basis, provided that there is no uncertainty as to Procurian’s ability to fulfill its obligations under the contract or to provide other services that are to be rendered under the contract.
Concentration of Customer Base and Credit Risk
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, Zurich Insurance Company Ltd (“Zurich”), a customer of Procurian, represented 22% and 15%, respectively, of ICG’s consolidated revenue. Accounts receivable, including unbilled amounts, from Zurich as of June 30, 2012 were $7.2 million. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, none of ICG’s companies’ customers represented more than 10% of ICG’s consolidated revenue.
Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, ICG and its companies are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. ICG does not expect any liability with respect to any legal claims or actions that would materially affect its consolidated financial position or cash flows.
13
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2. Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting guidance that permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors regarding whether it is more likely than not that an impairment to the entity’s goodwill exists as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Previous accounting guidance required an entity to test goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill before performing the second step of the test to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The guidance became effective for ICG on January 1, 2012 and did not have a significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to the presentation of other comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. The guidance provides two options for presenting the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income. The guidance became effective for ICG on January 1, 2012 and did not have a significant impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements. ICG has revised the presentation of its Consolidated Financial Statements beginning with its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 to conform to the guidance.
In May 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance that results in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in financial statements governed by GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The guidance changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements and clarifies the FASB’s intent regarding the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. The guidance became effective for ICG on January 1, 2012 and did not have a significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3. Goodwill and Intangibles Assets
Goodwill
The following table summarizes the activity related to ICG’s goodwill (in thousands):
| | | | |
Goodwill at December 31, 2011 | | $ | 22,538 | |
Increase in goodwill due to MSDSonline acquisition on March 30, 2012 (Note 4) | | | 15,847 | |
Estimated increase in goodwill due to preliminary allocation of acquisition price for subsidiary acquisition (Note 4) | | | 17,087 | |
| | | | |
Goodwill at June 30, 2012 | | $ | 55,472 | |
| | | | |
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, all of ICG’s goodwill was allocated to its consolidated core companies.
14
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
3. Goodwill and Intangibles Assets – (Continued)
Intangible Assets
The following table summarizes ICG’s intangible assets (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | As of June 30, 2012 | |
Intangible Assets | | Useful Life | | Gross Carrying Amount | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | Net Carrying Amount | |
Customer relationships | | 3-11 years | | $ | 33,757 | | | $ | (3,438 | ) | | $ | 30,319 | |
Trademarks/trade names | | 3-11 years | | | 8,524 | | | | (490 | ) | | | 8,034 | |
Technology | | 5-10 years | | | 3,459 | | | | (320 | ) | | | 3,139 | |
Non-compete agreements | | 2-5 years | | | 3,916 | | | | (373 | ) | | | 3,543 | |
Intellectual property | | 5 years | | | 41 | | | | (8 | ) | | | 33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 49,697 | | | | (4,629 | ) | | $ | 45,068 | |
Other intellectual property | | Indefinite | | | 400 | | | | — | | | | 400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 50,097 | | | $ | (4,629 | ) | | $ | 45,468 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | As of December 31, 2011 | |
Intangible Assets | | Useful Life | | Gross Carrying Amount | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | Net Carrying Amount | |
Customer relationships | | 3-11 years | | $ | 13,317 | | | $ | (2,344 | ) | | $ | 10,973 | |
Trademarks/trade names | | 3-11 years | | | 1,547 | | | | (243 | ) | | | 1,304 | |
Technology | | 10 years | | | 1,559 | | | | (149 | ) | | | 1,410 | |
Non-compete agreements | | 2-5 years | | | 336 | | | | (29 | ) | | | 307 | |
Intellectual property | | 5 years | | | 41 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 37 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 16,800 | | | | (2,769 | ) | | | 14,031 | |
Other intellectual property | | Indefinite | | | 400 | | | | — | | | | 400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 17,200 | | | $ | (2,769 | ) | | $ | 14,431 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization expense for intangible assets during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 was $1.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 was $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. ICG amortizes intangibles using the straight line method.
Remaining estimated amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
2012 (remaining six months) | | $ | 2,884 | |
2013 | | $ | 5,754 | |
2014 | | $ | 5,705 | |
2015 | | $ | 4,797 | |
2016 | | $ | 4,462 | |
Thereafter | | $ | 21,466 | |
| | | | |
Remaining amortization expense | | $ | 45,068 | |
| | | | |
Impairment
There were no impairment charges related to goodwill or intangible assets associated with ICG’s consolidated subsidiaries during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
15
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
4. Consolidated Core Companies
On March 30, 2012, ICG acquired 96% of the equity of MSDSonline; the acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method. Accordingly, ICG allocated the purchase price to the acquired tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values at the date of acquisition, which were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
Net assets acquired: | | | | |
Goodwill | | $ | 15,847 | |
Customer lists (11 year life) | | | 20,440 | |
Technology (5 year life) | | | 1,900 | |
Trademarks, trade names and domain names (11 year life) | | | 6,800 | |
Non-compete agreements (3 year life) | | | 3,580 | |
Other net assets (liabilities) | | | 1,170 | |
| | | | |
| | | 49,737 | |
Redeemable noncontrolling interest(1) | | | (1,355 | ) |
| | | | |
| | $ | 48,382 | |
| | | | |
(1) | ICG estimated the fair value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest of MSDSonline with consideration of discounts for lack of control and lack or marketability. See Note 13, “Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest.” |
Because MSDSonline was acquired on March 30, 2012, the results of its operations from the acquisition date through March 31, 2012 were immaterial to ICG and are therefore not included in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for that period. See the pro forma information table below.
On June 29, 2012, Procurian acquired Media IQ, LLC (“Media IQ”), a media audit and benchmarking services provider, for consideration consisting of (a) $11.5 million in cash paid at closing, (b) Procurian common stock valued at $4.0 million, which is classified as a liability and included in the line items “Accrued Expenses” and “Other Liabilities” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012, and (c) $2.0 million of deferred cash payment that is due in $1.0 million increments on the one- and two-year anniversaries of the closing date of the acquisition. Procurian will allocate the purchase price to the acquired tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The estimated total amount of intangible assets will be included in goodwill until that allocation is completed, which is expected to happen by December 31, 2012.
The information in the following table represents revenue, net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. and net income (loss) per diluted share attributable to ICG Group, Inc. for the relevant periods had ICG consolidated MSDSonline for the entire six-month period ended June 30, 2012 and the three- and six-month period ended June 30, 2011. The pro forma information in the following table also includes the effect of Procurian’s acquisition of Media IQ had ICG owned 80% of Procurian and had Media IQ been included in Procurian’s results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | |
| | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 46,372 | | | $ | 39,740 | | | $ | 87,963 | | | $ | 77,688 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (5,791 | ) | | $ | (2,977 | ) | | $ | (12,724 | ) | | $ | 13,021 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per diluted share attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (0.16 | ) | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | 0.34 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
16
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
4. Consolidated Core Companies – (Continued)
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, ICG acquired additional equity ownership interests (totaling slightly less than 1%) in Procurian through the purchase of Procurian common stock from former Procurian employees for aggregate consideration of $1.5 million. The increase in ICG’s equity ownership interest in Procurian resulted in an increase in ICG’s controlling interest and a corresponding decrease in noncontrolling interest ownership. Accordingly, ICG recorded a decrease during the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $0.4 million to “Noncontrolling Interest” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining purchase price of $1.1 million was recorded as a decrease to “Additional paid-in capital” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012. This transaction is also included in the line item “Impact of incremental acquisition of consolidated subsidiary” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, in connection with the transaction with Media IQ, Procurian issued additional shares of common stock to both Media IQ and ICG. Following those stock issuances, ICG’s equity ownership interest in Procurian decreased from 81% to 80% as of June 29, 2012. That reduction in ICG’s equity ownership interest in Procurian was accounted for as a disposition of shares and resulted in a dilution loss of $1.1 million that was recorded as a decrease to “Additional paid-in capital” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012; that dilution gain is included in the line item “Impact of subsidiary equity transactions” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Other changes to ICG’s equity ownership interests in its consolidated core companies, as well as equity-based compensation award activity at ICG’s consolidated core companies also result in adjustments to “Additional paid-in capital” and “Noncontrolling Interest” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The impact of those changes to ICG’s equity ownership interests in its consolidated core companies (excluding the acquisition of additional equity ownership interests in Procurian from former Procurian employees discussed above) on ICG’s “Additional paid-in capital,” which are included in the line item “Impact of subsidiary equity transactions” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | |
GovDelivery | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 18 | |
InvestorForce | | $ | 3 | | | $ | (368 | ) |
MSDSonline | | $ | 150 | | | $ | — | |
Procurian | | $ | (964 | ) | | $ | 906 | |
The impact of those changes to the noncontrolling interest, which are also included in the line item “Impact of subsidiary equity transactions” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | |
InvestorForce | | $ | — | | | $ | 369 | |
Procurian | | $ | 1,509 | | | $ | 296 | |
In July and August 2012, ICG acquired additional equity ownership interests in Channel Intelligence for consideration of $2.4 million, increasing ICG’s ownership interest in that company to 52%. Following the first of those acquisitions, which occurred on July 11, 2012, ICG will consolidate the financial results of Channel Intelligence. ICG will complete an acquisition allocation related to that transaction, which it expects to finalize by December 31, 2012.
17
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
4. Consolidated Core Companies – (Continued)
In July 2012, Procurian acquired Utilities Analyses, Inc. (“UAI”), an energy procurement specialist, for $6.7 million in cash. Procurian will allocate the purchase price to the acquired tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values at the date of acquisition, which it expects to finalize by December 31, 2012.
5. Ownership Interests and Cost Method Investments
Equity Method Companies
The following unaudited summarized financial information relates to ICG’s companies accounted for under the equity method of accounting as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. This aggregate information has been compiled from the financial statements of those companies.
Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2012 (1) | | | December 31, 2011 (2) | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 14,680 | | | $ | 13,687 | |
Other current assets | | | 27,896 | | | | 28,767 | |
Non-current assets | | | 70,184 | | | | 69,218 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 112,760 | | | $ | 111,672 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Current liabilities | | $ | 49,722 | | | $ | 47,125 | |
Non-current liabilities | | | 4,691 | | | | 10,770 | |
Long-term debt | | | 23,456 | | | | 18,959 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 34,891 | | | | 34,818 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 112,760 | | | $ | 111,672 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total carrying value | | $ | 43,125 | | | $ | 39,052 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Includes (ICG voting ownership): Acquirgy (25%), Channel Intelligence (49%), Freeborders (31%), GoIndustry (26%), SeaPass (38%) and WhiteFence (36%). |
(2) | Includes (ICG voting ownership): Acquirgy (25%), Channel Intelligence (49%), Freeborders (31%), GoIndustry (26%), SeaPass (26%) and WhiteFence (36%). |
As of June 30, 2012, ICG’s aggregate carrying value in equity method companies exceeded ICG’s share of the net assets of those equity method companies by approximately $33.5 million. Of that excess, $28.0 million was allocated to equity method goodwill, which is not amortized, and $5.5 million was allocated to equity method intangibles, which are generally amortized over periods ranging from three to seven years. As of December 31, 2011, ICG’s aggregate carrying value in equity method companies exceeded ICG’s share of the net assets of these equity method companies by approximately $28.4 million. Of that excess, $24.6 million was allocated to equity method goodwill, which is not amortized, and $3.8 million was allocated to equity method intangibles, which are generally amortized over periods ranging from three to seven years.
18
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
5. Ownership Interests and Cost Method Investments – (Continued)
Results of Operations (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 (1) | | | 2011(2) | | | 2012(1) | | | 2011(3) | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Revenue | | $ | 29,751 | | | $ | 42,531 | | | $ | 59,105 | | | $ | 92,672 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (7,094 | ) | | $ | (7,208 | ) | | $ | (12,561 | ) | | $ | (17,032 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Equity income (loss) excluding impairments and amortization of intangible assets | | $ | (2,909 | ) | | $ | (2,649 | ) | | $ | (4,947 | ) | | $ | (5,639 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | (327 | ) | | | (536 | ) | | | (592 | ) | | | (1,122 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity income (loss) | | $ | (3,236 | ) | | $ | (3,185 | ) | | $ | (5,539 | ) | | $ | (6,761 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Includes Acquirgy, Channel Intelligence, Freeborders, GoIndustry, SeaPass and WhiteFence. |
(2) | Includes Acquirgy, Channel Intelligence, ClickEquations, Inc. (“ClickEquations”) (to June 14, 2011, the date of disposition), Freeborders, GoIndustry, SeaPass, StarCite, Inc. (“StarCite”) and WhiteFence. |
(3) | Includes Acquirgy, Channel Intelligence, ClickEquations (to June 14, 2011, the date of disposition), Freeborders, GoIndustry, Metastorm Inc. (“Metastorm”) (to February 17, 2011, the date of disposition), SeaPass, StarCite and WhiteFence. |
Impairment – Equity Companies
ICG performs ongoing business reviews of its equity method companies to determine whether ICG’s carrying value in those companies is impaired. ICG has determined its carrying value in its equity method companies was not impaired during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Other Equity Company Information
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, ICG participated in an equity financing transaction for SeaPass. During the period, ICG acquired $9.0 million of SeaPass preferred stock, increasing its ownership in SeaPass from 26% to 38%. ICG completed a purchase price allocation related to this transaction, which resulted in an allocation of the purchase price to equity-method intangible assets that will be amortized over five years and equity-method goodwill.
On February 17, 2011, Metastorm, one of ICG’s equity core companies, was sold to Open Text Corporation. ICG’s portion of the sale proceeds was $53.0 million; $51.3 million of those proceeds were received at closing on February 17, 2011, and the remaining proceeds were placed in escrow in connection with a customary indemnification holdback. As a result of that transaction, ICG recorded a gain of $24.9 million that is included in the line item “Other income (loss)” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011. In November 2011, ICG received $1.1 million of escrowed proceeds, which ICG recorded as a gain during the year ended December 31, 2011. In March 2012, ICG received $0.2 million of escrowed proceeds, representing the final distribution of escrowed proceeds. ICG recorded that amount as a gain during the six months ended June 30, 2012, which is included in the line item “Other income (loss)” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
On June 14, 2011, Channel Intelligence acquired substantially all of the assets of ClickEquations, primarily in exchange for Channel Intelligence preferred stock that was distributed to ClickEquations’ stockholders, including ICG. The transaction diluted ICG’s ownership in Channel Intelligence and, accordingly, ICG recorded a dilution gain of $0.5 million. Based on the excess of the specified value of the Channel Intelligence preferred stock received by ICG in the transaction over ICG’s carrying value of ClickEquations on the transaction date, ICG recorded a loss on the sale of ClickEquations in the amount of $0.8 million. Both the dilution gain and the loss on the sale transaction are included in “Other income (loss)” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
19
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
5. Ownership Interests and Cost Method Investments – (Continued)
In connection with the Channel Intelligence/ClickEquations transaction, ICG and Channel Intelligence entered into a loan agreement under which Channel Intelligence borrowed $1.0 million from ICG on June 14, 2011. The loan, which matures on June 14, 2014, bears interest at an annual rate of 15% and requires quarterly interest payments beginning in the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. Under the loan agreement, Channel Intelligence is entitled to borrow an additional $1.5 million from ICG on or before June 11, 2013 to facilitate its operations.
On December 30, 2011, StarCite, one of ICG’s equity method companies, was sold to The Active Network, Inc. (NYSE: ACTV) (“Active”) for consideration to ICG consisting of $15.8 million of cash and 668,755 shares of Active common stock valued at $9.1 million, based on the $13.60 closing price of the stock on December 30, 2011. Approximately $0.1 million of the cash consideration and 102,199 shares of the stock consideration were placed in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims. Of the stock consideration, 52,893 shares would have been received only if the closing price of Active’s stock did not exceed certain thresholds following the closing; ICG will not receive that contingent stock consideration because the stipulated thresholds were met.
As of December 31, 2011, ICG had not received the consideration related to this transaction. Accordingly, ICG recorded a receivable in the amount of $22.7 million that is reflected in the line item “Other receivables” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011. That amount represented cash of $15.7 million and Active common stock valued at $7.0 million, based on the $13.60 closing stock price of Active on December 30, 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, ICG received both the cash consideration of $15.7 million and the shares of Active common stock.
Marketable securities represent ICG’s holdings of publicly-traded equity securities and are accounted for as available-for-sale securities. Upon the registration of shares of Active common stock with the SEC on April 5, 2012, ICG recorded an adjustment to increase the value of the Active common stock, with an offsetting increase to other comprehensive income in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, to reflect those shares at fair value based on the closing price of Active common stock on that date. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, ICG sold 447,057 shares of Active common stock at an average price per share of $16.88. ICG received total proceeds of $7.5 million and recognized a gain on the sale of those securities in the amount of $1.4 million, which is included in the line item “Other income (loss), net” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The fair value of the remaining shares of Active common stock is reflected in the line item “Marketable Securities” on ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012.
On July 5, 2012, GoIndustry was sold to Liquidity Services. ICG’s portion of the proceeds was $2.9 million of cash, which has been received. ICG expects to record equity loss for its share of the sale transaction costs to the extent of ICG’s remaining basis in GoIndustry and a gain of $2.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012 that will be included in the line item, “Other income (loss)” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Cost Method Investments
ICG’s carrying values of its holdings of cost method companies were $11.3 million and $10.8 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Those amounts are reflected in the line item “Cost method investments” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the relevant dates.
ICG owns approximately 9% of Anthem Ventures Fund, L.P. (formerly eColony, Inc.) and Anthem Ventures Annex Fund, L.P. (collectively, “Anthem”), which invest in technology companies. ICG acquired its interest in Anthem in 2000. ICG currently has no carrying value in Anthem. Accordingly, the receipt of distributions from Anthem by ICG, if any, would result in a gain at the time ICG receives those distributions.
ICG performs ongoing business reviews of its cost method companies to determine whether ICG’s carrying value in those companies is impaired. ICG determined its carrying value in its cost method companies was not impaired during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
20
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
5. Ownership Interests and Cost Method Investments – (Continued)
Escrow Information
In addition to the escrowed proceeds described above, as of June 30, 2012, the following amounts of ICG’s potential proceeds from sales of former equity method and cost method companies remained in escrow to satisfy potential or ongoing indemnification claims: (1) 97,100 shares of Active common stock, valued at $1.5 million (based on the stock’s June 30, 2012 closing price), (2) 13,069 shares of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (NYSE: ICE) common stock, valued at $1.8 million (based on the stock’s June 30, 2012 closing price), and (3) $0.8 million of cash. The release of any of those escrowed proceeds to ICG would result in additional gains at the time ICG is entitled to such proceeds, the amount is fixed or determinable and realization is assured.
6. Financial Instruments
Derivative Financial Instruments
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, Procurian was party to an interest rate swap hedge agreement with PNC Bank to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in the variable interest rate related to Procurian’s term loan with PNC Bank. The net mark-to-market adjustments recognized by Procurian, which are detailed in the table below, represent the change in value of the swap related to the fluctuations in the applicable interest rates during the relevant periods. This instrument is set to mature in 2015. See Note 7, “Debt.”
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, Procurian purchased average rate currency options and forward contracts with quarterly expirations to mitigate the risk of currency fluctuations at Procurian’s operations in Europe (including the United Kingdom), Asia and South America. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, Procurian utilized average rate currency options with quarterly expirations to mitigate the risk of currency fluctuations at Procurian’s operations in Europe (including the United Kingdom), Asia and South America. The net mark-to-market adjustments recognized by Procurian, which are detailed in the table below, represent the premiums paid for the options by Procurian, as well as the change in value of the options related to the fluctuation of exchange rates during the relevant period.
The following table presents the classifications and fair values of our derivative instruments as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | |
Derivative | | Classification | | June 30, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | |
Average rate currency options and forward contracts | | Prepaids and other current assets | | $ | 117 | | | $ | — | |
| | | |
Interest rate swap | | Accrued expenses | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (36 | ) |
The following table presents the mark-to-market impact on earnings resulting from ICG’s hedging activities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
Derivative | | Classification | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | | |
Average rate currency options and forward contracts | | Other income (loss), net | | $ | (123 | ) | | $ | 6 | | | $ | (123 | ) | | $ | (142 | ) |
Interest rate swap | | Interest income (expense) | | $ | 18 | | | $ | (55 | ) | | $ | 30 | | | $ | (32 | ) |
21
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
6. Financial Instruments – (Continued)
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, which are as follows:
Level 1 – Observable inputs such as quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities in active public markets.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices based on quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions, or valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs to the valuation techniques that are significant to the fair value of the asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:
Market Approach – Fair value is determined based on prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities.
Income Approach – Fair value is determined by converting relevant future amounts to a single present amount based on market expectations (including present value techniques and option pricing models).
Cost Approach – Fair value represents the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of the relevant asset (often referred to as replacement cost).
The fair value hierarchy of ICG’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Asset (liability) as of June 30, 2012 | | | Valuation Technique (Approach) | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | | | | |
Cash equivalents (money market accounts and commercial paper investments) | | $ | 50,337 | | | Market | | $ | 50,337 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Hedges of interest rate risk(1) | | | (6 | ) | | Market | | | — | | | | (6 | ) | | | — | |
Acquisition contingent consideration obligations | | | (1,197 | ) | | Income | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,197 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 49,134 | | | | | $ | 50,337 | | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (1,197 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Asset (liability) as of December 31, 2011 | | | Valuation Technique (Approach) | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | | | | |
Cash equivalents (money market accounts and commercial paper investments) | | $ | 111,775 | | | Market | | $ | 111,775 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Hedges of interest rate risk(1) | | | (36 | ) | | Market | | | — | | | | (36 | ) | | | — | |
Acquisition contingent consideration obligations | | | (1,197 | ) | | Income | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,197 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 110,542 | | | | | $ | 111,775 | | | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | (1,197 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | ICG’s counterparties under the arrangements provide quarterly statements of market values of those instruments based on significant inputs that are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
22
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
7. Debt
Long-Term Debt
ICG’s long-term debt of $12.8 million and $15.5 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, related to its consolidated core companies and consisted primarily of a term loan at Procurian.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Interest Rates | | June 30, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | (in thousands) | |
| | | |
Procurian term loan | | 1.99-3.09% | | $ | 12,666 | | | $ | 14,667 | |
Capital leases and other debt | | 2.25-10.27% | | | 173 | | | | 853 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 12,839 | | | | 15,520 | |
Current maturities | | | | | (4,173 | ) | | | (4,759 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | | $ | 8,666 | | | $ | 10,761 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Loan and Credit Agreements
As of June 30, 2012, Procurian and a number of its wholly-owned subsidiaries were party to a loan agreement with PNC Bank that provided for a revolving line of credit and a term loan. Under the line of credit, which was set to mature on August 2, 2013, Procurian was able to borrow up to $15.0 million and to obtain up to $5.0 million of letters of credit, subject to specified fees and other terms. The line of credit was subject to a 0.25% per annum unused commitment fee that was payable to the bank quarterly. Under the term loan, Procurian initially borrowed $20.0 million in order to fund a cash dividend paid to stockholders, including ICG, during 2010. Procurian also paid a nonrefundable $0.2 million commitment fee to PNC Bank upon the initial consummation of the line of credit and term loan. Both the line of credit and the term loan have been secured by a first priority lien on the assets of the borrowing companies.
The term loan and the line of credit both bore interest, at Procurian’s option, at either (1) a base rate equal to the highest of PNC Bank’s prime rate, the sum of the Federal Funds Open Rates plus 0.5% and the sum of the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.0%, or (2) a daily to six month LIBOR rate plus a margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.5%, depending on the then-current debt-to-EBITDA ratio of the borrowing companies. Under the loan agreement, any outstanding principal and interest under the line of credit would become due and payable periodically through August 2, 2013, the principal under the term loan was payable in $0.3 million monthly installments through August 1, 2015, and any outstanding interest under the term loan would become due and payable periodically through August 1, 2015. There are no amounts outstanding under the line of credit; the amounts outstanding under the term loan as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012 are set forth in the table above.
On August 6, 2010, Procurian entered into an interest rate swap hedge agreement whereby 50% of the term loan was effectively converted to a fixed interest rate of 1.34% by the hedge agreement. At June 30, 2012, the effective interest rate being paid by Procurian under the term loan, including the applicable margin, was 1.99% for the portion of the loan tied to a floating LIBOR rate and 3.09% for the portion of the loan covered by the interest rate swap hedge agreement. Procurian terminated the hedge agreement, without penalty, on August 1, 2012.
On August 9, 2012, Procurian and PNC Bank entered into an amendment to the loan agreement. The amendment, among other things, (1) extended the term of the line of credit to August 2, 2015 and the term of the term loan to August 1, 2017, (2) increased the amount borrowed and outstanding under the term loan to $25.0 million (a $13.0 million increase from the August 9, 2012 term loan balance of $12.0 million) and (3) decreased the range of margins used to calculate the interest rates applicable to both the line of credit and the term loan from between 1.75% and 2.5% to between 1.5% and 2.0%. Following the amendment, any outstanding principal and interest under the line of credit will become due and payable periodically through August 2, 2015, the principal under the term loan is payable in $0.4 million monthly installments through August 1, 2017, and any outstanding interest under the term loan will become due and payable periodically through August 1, 2017.
23
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
7. Debt – (Continued)
On October 26, 2011, GovDelivery entered into a loan agreement with Venture Bank under which the company may borrow up to $1.0 million under a revolving line of credit that is secured by GovDelivery’s assets. The term of the line of credit expires on March 2, 2013. The line of credit bears interest at a base rate equal to the prime rate plus 2.0%, but in no case less than 7.0% (the interest rate at June 30, 2012 was 7.0%). No amounts were outstanding under the line of credit at June 30, 2012. There was $0.4 million outstanding on the line of credit at December 31, 2011.
On December 18, 2009, ICG entered into an amended and restated letter of credit agreement with Comerica Bank (the “LC Agreement”) that provides for the issuance of letters of credit of up to $10.0 million, subject to a cash-secured borrowing base, as defined by the LC Agreement. On December 16, 2011, ICG entered into an amendment to LC Agreement to extend the term through December 14, 2012. Issuance fees of 0.50% per annum of the face amount of each letter of credit will be paid to Comerica Bank upon issuance. The LC Agreement is also subject to a 0.25% per annum unused commitment fee payable to the bank on a quarterly basis. No amounts were outstanding under those agreements at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
8. Segment Information
ICG has two reporting segments: the “core” segment and the “venture” segment. Companies in which ICG holds equity or convertible debt interests that are not deemed to be marketable securities are included in either the core or venture segment, while companies in which ICG holds equity interests that have been designated as marketable securities are considered “corporate” assets.
The core reporting segment includes companies in which ICG’s management takes a very active role in providing strategic direction and management assistance; those companies may be consolidated by ICG or may be equity method or cost method companies. The venture reporting segment includes companies to which ICG generally devotes less capital, holds relatively smaller ownership stakes and generally has less influence over the strategic directions and management decisions than it does with its core companies. At June 30, 2012, the core segment included the results of ICG’s consolidated core companies, recorded ICG’s share of earnings and losses of its equity core companies and captured ICG’s carrying value in its consolidated core companies and equity core companies. At June 30, 2012, the venture segment recorded ICG’s share of earnings and losses of venture companies accounted for under the equity method of accounting and captured ICG’s carrying value in those companies. ICG’s carrying value of its holdings in cost method investments are considered “corporate” assets as of June 30, 2012.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, $3.5 million and $5.9 million, respectively, of ICG’s consolidated revenue relates to sales generated in Europe, primarily the United Kingdom and Switzerland. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, $2.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively, of ICG’s consolidated revenue relates to sales generated in the United Kingdom. The remaining consolidated revenue for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 relates primarily to sales generated in the United States. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, ICG’s assets were located primarily in the United States.
On July 5, 2012, GoIndustry was sold to Liquidity Services. The amount of equity loss related to GoIndustry for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 is included in ICG’s venture segment in the table below. Beginning in the third quarter of 2012, the amount of equity loss related to GoIndustry will be removed from the venture segment and reflected in “Dispositions” in the table below.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, ClickEquations, Metastorm and StarCite were sold. The amount of equity loss related to each of these companies has been removed from segment results and is reflected in “Dispositions” in the table below for the relevant 2011 period.
24
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
8. Segment Information – (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Information | |
(in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Reconciling Items | | | | |
| | Core | | | Venture | | | Total Segment | | | Dispositions | | | Corporate | | | Other(1) | | | Consolidated Results | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 45,078 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 45,078 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 45,078 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (1,500 | ) | | $ | (1,836 | ) | | $ | (3,336 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (3,476 | ) | | $ | 818 | | | $ | (5,994 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 35,328 | | | | — | | | $ | 35,328 | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 35,328 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | (1,118 | ) | | $ | (1,130 | ) | | $ | (974 | ) | | $ | (2,476 | ) | | $ | 1,347 | | | $ | (3,233 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 81,708 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 81,708 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 81,708 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (2,185 | ) | | $ | (3,054 | ) | | $ | (5,239 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (8,598 | ) | | $ | 823 | | | $ | (13,014 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 69,282 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 69,282 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 69,282 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | 150 | | | $ | (2,629 | ) | | $ | (2,479 | ) | | $ | (2,100 | ) | | $ | (8,623 | ) | | $ | 25,859 | | | $ | 12,657 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Month Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | |
Corporate other income (loss) (Note 10) | | $ | 1,470 | | | $ | 1,601 | | | $ | 1,627 | | | $ | 26,465 | |
Noncontrolling interest | | | (652 | ) | | | (254 | ) | | | (804 | ) | | | (606 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 818 | | | $ | 1,347 | | | $ | 823 | | | $ | 25,859 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Core | | | Venture | | | Total Segment | | | Dispositions | | | Corporate | | | Other | | | Consolidated Results | |
| | | | | | | |
Assets as of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30, 2012 | | $ | 237,438 | | | $ | 13,074 | | | $ | 250,512 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 53,373 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 303,885 | |
| | | | | | | |
Assets as of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2011 | | $ | 172,416 | | | $ | 7,157 | | | $ | 179,573 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 127,247 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 306,820 | |
25
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
9. Equity-Based Compensation
Equity-based compensation for the periods presented in the following table is primarily included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table provides additional information related to ICG’s equity-based compensation (in thousands, except weighted average years):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Unrecognized Equity-Based Compensation as of June 30, 2012 | | | Weighted Average Years Remaining of Equity-Based Compensation as of June 30, 2012 |
| 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Stock Appreciation Rights | | $ | 618 | | | $ | 526 | | | $ | 1,226 | | | $ | 1,034 | | | $ | 5,268 | | | 2.6 |
Restricted Stock | | | 713 | | | | 42 | | | | 1,396 | | | | 77 | | | | 9,624 | | | 3.4 |
Deferred Stock Units | | | 87 | | | | 268 | | | | 246 | | | | 353 | | | | 231 | | | 0.7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity-Based Compensation | | $ | 1,418 | | | $ | 836 | | | $ | 2,868 | | | $ | 1,464 | | | $ | 15,123 | | | |
Equity-Based Compensation for Consolidated Core Companies | | | 518 | | | | 210 | | | | 714 | | | | 316 | | | | 3,675 | | | 3.2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity-Based Compensation | | $ | 1,936 | | | $ | 1,046 | | | $ | 3,582 | | | $ | 1,780 | | | $ | 18,798 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
Each SAR represents the right of the holder to receive, upon exercise of that SAR, shares of ICG Common Stock equal to the amount by which the fair market value of a share of that Common Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR exceeds the base price of the SAR. The base price is determined by the NASDAQ closing price of ICG’s Common Stock on the date of grant (or the closing price on the next trading day if there are no trades in ICG’s stock on the date of grant). The fair value of each SAR is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. SARs generally vest over four years, with 25% vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 75% vesting equally each month over the subsequent 36 months.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, ICG granted 259,625 SARs to employees at a weighted-average base price of $9.25 per share and a weighted-average fair value of $4.90 per share. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, ICG granted 275,625 SARs to employees and a non-management director at a weighted average base price of $12.15 per share and a weighted-average fair value of $6.58 per share. There were no SARs exercised in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, 17,188 and 98,057 SARs were exercised, respectively. Those exercises resulted in the issuance of 1,576 and 19,998 shares of ICG’s Common Stock during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, 1,598 SARs were forfeited. There were no forfeitures during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. There were 4,405,418 and 4,147,391 SARs outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic values of the SARs outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $7.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively.
Stock Options
The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Stock options generally vest ratably over four years: 25% vests on the first anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 75% vests equally each month over the subsequent 36 months. There were no stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, 3,700 and 30,500 stock options were exercised, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, 3,125 and 3,425 stock options were exercised, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, 600 and 8,000 stock options expired, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, 42,117 and 69,117 stock options expired, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, 21 stock options were forfeited. There were no forfeitures in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011. There were 144,687 and 183,208 stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively; the aggregate intrinsic values of the stock options outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
26
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
9. Equity-Based Compensation – (Continued)
SARs and Stock Options Fair Value Assumptions
ICG estimates the grant date fair value of SARs and stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. Those assumptions include estimating the expected life of the award and estimating volatility of ICG’s stock price over the expected term. Expected volatility approximates the historical volatility of ICG’s Common Stock over the period commensurate with the expected term of the award. The expected term calculation is based on an average of the award vesting term and the life of the award. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant for an instrument with a maturity that is commensurate with the expected term of the award. Changes in these assumptions, the estimated forfeitures and/or the requisite service period can materially affect the amount of equity-based compensation recognized in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following assumptions were used to determine the fair value of SARs granted to employees and a non-management director by ICG during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
| | | | |
| | Three and Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | |
Expected volatility | | 56% | | 56% |
Average expected life of SAR (in years) | | 6.25 | | 5.25-6.25 |
Risk-free interest rate | | 0.92% | | 1.62-1.97% |
Dividend yield | | 0% | | 0% |
Restricted Stock
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, ICG granted 69,875 shares of restricted stock to its employees. Those shares were valued at $0.6 million on the date of grant and will vest as follows: 12.5% of the award vests on the nine-month anniversary of the grant and the remaining 87.5% vests equally every six months subsequent to the first vesting date. Also during the three months ended June 30, 2012, ICG granted 28,348 shares of restricted stock to executives of one of its consolidated subsidiaries. Those shares were valued at $0.3 million on the date of grant and will vest only upon the achievement of certain performance conditions. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, ICG granted 18,750 shares of restricted stock to certain non-management directors under ICG’s Amended and Restated Non-Management Director Compensation Plan (the “Director Plan”). Those shares were valued at $0.2 million and will vest in the first quarter of 2013. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, ICG granted 66,875 shares of restricted stock to its employees. Those shares vest in equal annual installments over four years and were valued at $0.8 million on the date of grant. Also during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, ICG granted 15,035 shares of restricted stock to executives of one of its consolidated subsidiaries that vest after seven years, with the possibility to accelerate the vesting for the achievement of certain performance conditions. Those shares were valued at $0.2 million on the date of grant. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, 62,461 and 68,711 shares of restricted stock vested, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, 6,250 shares of restricted stock vested. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, 375 shares of restricted stock were forfeited. There were no forfeitures during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. There were 1,273,672 and 1,225,785 shares of restricted stock issued and unvested at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
The issuance of shares of restricted stock to executives of one of ICG’s consolidated subsidiaries during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is included with the issuances of shares of restricted stock to employees in the line item “Issuance of restricted stock to employees, net of forfeitures” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and the vesting amortization associated with those awards of $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 is included in the line item “Equity-based compensation expense related to restricted stock” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity. The expense associated with those awards of $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 is included in line item “Equity-Based Compensation for Consolidated Core Companies” in the table above.
27
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
9. Equity-Based Compensation – (Continued)
Deferred Stock Units (DSUs)
ICG periodically issues DSUs to its non-management directors. Each DSU represents a share of Common Stock into which that DSU will be converted upon the termination of the recipient’s service at ICG. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, ICG issued 41,250 DSUs and 60,000 DSUs, respectively, to its non-management directors under the Director Plan; those DSUs were valued at $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 52,500 DSUs vested. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, 7,500 DSUs and 39,000 DSUs, respectively, vested.
ICG issues quarterly compensation payments to each non-management director for his service on the Board of Directors and its committees under the Director Plan. Each director has the right to elect to receive those payments in whole or in part in the form of DSUs in lieu of cash. Each participating director receives DSUs representing shares of ICG’s Common Stock with a fair market value equal to the relevant cash fees (with such fair market value determined by reference to the closing Common Stock price reported by NASDAQ on the date these cash fees otherwise would have been paid). Those DSUs vest immediately. The expense for those DSUs is recorded when the fees to which the DSUs relate are earned.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, ICG issued 9,538 and 15,251 DSUs, respectively, to ICG’s non-management directors. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, ICG issued 2,297 and 5,734 DSUs, respectively, to ICG’s non-management directors. The expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three- and six month-periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, associated with the quarterly grants for service is included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative” in ICG’s Consolidated Statements of Operations (but is not reflected in the summarized Equity-Based Compensation table above).
Consolidated Core Companies
All of ICG’s consolidated core companies issue equity-based compensation awards to their employees. Those awards are most often in the form of stock options that vest over four years. The fair value of the stock option awards are estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The majority of the stock options vest 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining 75% vest equally each month over the subsequent 36 months. The remaining awards generally vest ratably over four years, with 25% vesting on each anniversary date over that term.
10. Other Income (Loss)
Other income (loss), net consists of the effect of transactions and other events relating to ICG’s ownership interests in its companies and its operations in general.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | |
Realized gains on sales of marketable securities (Note 5) | | $ | 1,446 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,446 | | | $ | — | |
Gain on sale of Metastorm (Note 5) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 208 | | | | 24,853 | |
Loss on sale of ClickEquations (Note 5) | | | — | | | | (803 | ) | | | — | | | | (803 | ) |
Dilution gain on equity method companies (Note 5) | | | — | | | | 473 | | | | — | | | | 473 | |
Gains on sales/distributions of ownership interests | | | 12 | | | | 531 | | | | 12 | | | | 531 | |
Gains on other distributions | | | — | | | | 1,424 | | | | — | | | | 1,424 | |
Other | | | 12 | | | | (24 | ) | | | (39 | ) | | | (13 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,470 | | | | 1,601 | | | | 1,627 | | | | 26,465 | |
Total other income (loss) for consolidated core companies | | | (416 | ) | | | 11 | | | | (176 | ) | | | 93 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,054 | | | $ | 1,612 | | | $ | 1,451 | | | $ | 26,558 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
28
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
10. Other Income (Loss) – (Continued)
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, ICG received a distribution of $0.5 million of previously escrowed funds, which related to a sale of ICG’s equity holdings in a former cost method company. Also during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, ICG received a distribution from Anthem in the amount of $1.4 million. Those amounts were recorded as gains and are included in the line items “Gains on sales/distributions of ownership interests” and “Gains on other distributions,” respectively, in the table above.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, Procurian recorded foreign currency losses of $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to changes in exchange rates associated with its operations in Europe (including the United Kingdom), Asia and South America. There were no significant foreign currency gains or losses related to changes in exchanges rates associated with Procurian’s operations during the three months ended June 30, 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Procurian recorded foreign currency gains of $0.1 million related to changes in exchange rates associated with its foreign operations. Those foreign currency gains and losses, which include the mark-to-market adjustments related to the average rate currency options and forward contracts utilized by Procurian (discussed in Note 6, “Financial Instruments”), comprise the majority of the other income (loss) for ICG’s consolidated core companies included in the above table.
11. Income Taxes
ICG Group, Inc., GovDelivery, InvestorForce and Procurian file a consolidated federal income tax return. MSDSonline joined that consolidated federal income tax return as of March 30, 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the effective tax rate for the combined group was (8.0%) and (5.8%), respectively, excluding discrete items. This differs from the statutory rate of 35%, primarily due to the valuation allowance that is maintained on certain deferred tax assets. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, ICG recorded tax expense of $0.9 million related to its consolidated operations. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, ICG recorded tax expense of $2.0 million, primarily net deferred tax expense on discrete items related to the gain on the sale of Metastorm, partially offset by the loss on the sale of ClickEquations.
A valuation allowance has been provided for the portion of ICG’s net deferred tax assets that ICG believes, after evaluating all positive and negative evidence, both historical and prospective, is more likely than not to not be realized.
As of December 31, 2010, ICG was entitled to an income tax refund of $6.3 million, which was received during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
12. Net Income (Loss) per Share
The calculations of net income (loss) per share were (in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | |
Basic and Diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (5,994 | ) | | $ | (3,233 | ) | | $ | (13,014 | ) | | $ | 12,657 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Basic: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. per share | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) | �� | $ | (0.36 | ) | | $ | 0.34 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. per share | | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.36 | ) | | $ | 0.33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Shares used in computation of basic income (loss) per share | | | 35,917 | | | | 36,961 | | | | 36,037 | | | | 36,953 | |
SARs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 886 | |
Stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 102 | |
Restricted stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 23 | |
DSUs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares used in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share | | | 35,917 | | | | 36,961 | | | | 36,037 | | | | 37,976 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
12. Net Income (Loss) per Share – (Continued)
The following dilutive securities were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands, except weighted average price per share data):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Weighted Average Price Per Share | |
| | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | |
SARs | | | 4,405 | | | $ | 7.80 | |
Stock options | | | 145 | | | $ | 5.57 | |
Restricted stock(1) | | | 1,274 | | | $ | — | |
Deferred stock units | | | 41 | | | $ | — | |
| | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | |
SARs | | | 4,405 | | | $ | 7.80 | |
Stock options | | | 145 | | | $ | 5.57 | |
Restricted stock(1) | | | 1,274 | | | $ | — | |
Deferred stock units | | | 41 | | | $ | — | |
| | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | |
SARs | | | 4,149 | | | $ | 7.71 | |
Stock options | | | 239 | | | $ | 10.00 | |
Restricted stock | | | 136 | | | $ | — | |
Deferred stock units | | | 53 | | | $ | — | |
| | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | |
SARs | | | 1,851 | | | $ | 7.86 | |
Stock options | | | 42 | | | $ | 27.30 | |
Restricted stock | | | 82 | | | $ | — | |
Deferred stock units | | | — | | | $ | — | |
(1) | Anti-dilutive securities include contingently issuable shares unvested as of June 30, 2012, the vesting of which is based on performance conditions and market conditions that have not yet been achieved. |
13. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Certain GovDelivery stockholders have the ability to require GovDelivery to redeem portions of their shares, beginning in 2013. Because that redemption is outside the control of GovDelivery, ICG has classified this noncontrolling interest outside of equity and will accrete to its estimated redemption value with an offset to additional paid-in capital. This noncontrolling interest is classified as “Redeemable noncontrolling interest” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Certain MSDSonline stockholders have the ability to require MSDSonline to redeem their shares, beginning in 2014. Because that redemption is outside the control of MSDSonline, ICG has classified this noncontrolling interest outside of equity and will accrete to its estimated redemption value with an offset to additional paid-in capital. This noncontrolling interest is classified as “Redeemable noncontrolling interest” in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
30
ICG GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
13. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest – (Continued)
The following reconciles the activity related to the redeemable noncontrolling interest described above during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
| | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | $ | 1,182 | |
Redeemable noncontrolling interest portion of net subsidiary income/(loss) | | | (106 | ) |
Accretion to estimated redemption value | | | 199 | |
Impact of subsidiary equity transactions | | | 2 | |
| | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2011 | | $ | 1,277 | |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | $ | 1,378 | |
Redeemable noncontrolling interest portion of net subsidiary income/(loss) | | | (91 | ) |
Accretion to estimated redemption value | | | 211 | |
Acquisition of MSDSonline | | | 1,355 | |
Impact of subsidiary equity transactions | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2012 | | $ | 2,852 | |
| | | | |
14. Share Repurchase Program
In accordance with ICG’s share repurchase program, ICG may repurchase, from time to time, up to $50.0 million of shares of Common Stock in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or pursuant to trading plans meeting the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, ICG repurchased 164,638 and 467,438 shares, respectively, of its Common Stock. Those shares were repurchased at an average stock price of $8.79 per share and $8.76 per share during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, ICG repurchased 66,700 shares of its Common Stock at an average purchase price of $11.50 per share. During the third quarter of 2012, ICG repurchased 160,100 shares of its Common Stock at an average stock price of $9.03 per share. Since commencement of this program, ICG has repurchased a total of 3,908,965 shares of Common Stock at an average purchase price of $6.66 per share. As of the date of this Report, ICG may repurchase an additional $24.0 million of its Common Stock under this program. All repurchases are reflected in the line item “Treasury stock, at cost” as a reduction of Stockholders’ Equity in ICG’s Consolidated Balance Sheets in the relevant periods.
31
ITEM 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Introduction
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth elsewhere in this Report and discussed in our other SEC filings. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto included in this Report.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the consolidated accounts of ICG Group, Inc., a company incorporated in Delaware, and its subsidiaries, both wholly-owned and consolidated (ICG Group, Inc. and all such subsidiaries are collectively hereinafter referred to as “ICG,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”), and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Executive Summary
We focus on acquiring and building software and services companies that improve the productivity and efficiency of their business customers. The results of operations of our companies in which we hold equity ownership interests are reported in two segments: the “core” reporting segment and the “venture” reporting segment. Our core reporting segment includes the companies in which our management takes a very active role in providing strategic direction and management assistance. We own majority controlling equity positions in (and therefore consolidate the financial results of) four of the companies that we currently consider part of our core segment (including MSDSonline, which was acquired on March 30, 2012); we call those companies our “consolidated core companies.” We own substantial minority equity positions (i.e., the largest equity positions) in our other core companies, which we call our “equity core companies.” We expect to devote relatively large initial amounts of capital to acquire stakes in core companies, particularly consolidated core companies, since any such acquisition would entail the deployment of cash and/or the issuance of ICG stock to purchase a large equity stake in a target with relatively strong financial characteristics and growth potential.
Our venture reporting segment includes companies to which we generally devote less capital than we do to our core companies and, therefore, in which we hold relatively smaller ownership stakes than we do in our core companies. As a result, we generally have less influence over the strategic direction and management decisions of our venture companies than we do over those of our core companies.
The various interests that we acquire in our companies are accounted for under one of three accounting methods: the consolidation method, the equity method and the cost method. The applicable accounting method is generally determined based on our voting interest in a company. Generally, if we own more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of a company, and other stockholders do not possess the right to affect the significant operational management decisions of that company, the company’s accounts are reflected within our Consolidated Financial Statements. Generally, if we own between 20% and 50% of the outstanding voting securities of a company, that company’s accounts are not reflected within our Consolidated Financial Statements, but our share of the earnings or losses of the company is reflected in the caption “Equity loss” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Companies not accounted for under either the consolidation or the equity method of accounting are accounted for under the cost method of accounting. Under the cost method, our share of the earnings or losses of these companies is not included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Because we own significant interests in a number of companies that are in different stages of profitability, we have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, significant volatility in our results. While many of our companies have consistently reported losses, we have recorded net income in certain periods and experienced significant volatility from period to period due to infrequently occurring transactions and other events relating to our ownership interests in companies. Those transactions and events are described in more detail in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report and include dispositions of, changes to and impairment of our ownership interests in companies and dispositions of our holdings of marketable securities.
32
The increase in our consolidated revenue from the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 to the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 was due to revenue growth at three of our consolidated core companies, which is primarily attributable to new customers at those companies. Procurian experienced 14% year-over-year revenue growth in the first half of 2012 compared to 29% year-over-year revenue growth in the first half of 2011. The slower revenue growth that was experienced at Procurian during the first half of 2012 is largely due to a reduction in the amount of spend Procurian manages for a small number of its existing customers. New customer signings at Procurian in 2012 more than offset those existing customer contract reductions. We expect growth rates at Procurian in the second half of 2012 to be consistent with the growth rates experienced during the first half of 2012. GovDelivery experienced revenue growth of 37% in the first half of 2012, which was better than planned, due to the timing of contract signings. Our acquisition of MSDSonline on March 30, 2012 did not impact our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the first quarter of 2012 but revenue at MSDSonline in the second quarter of 2012 was, and any revenue at MSDSonline in future periods will continue to be, additive to our consolidated revenue.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes our and our consolidated subsidiaries’ cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and long-term debt, including the current portion thereof, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 57,145 | | | $ | 121,909 | |
Restricted cash | | | 295 | | | | 133 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 57,440 | | | $ | 122,042 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Long-term debt, including current portion | | $ | (12,839 | ) | | $ | (15,520 | ) |
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, proceeds from the potential sales of all or a portion of our interests in certain companies and equity issuances, will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, including any future commitments to our companies, debt obligations and general operating requirements. As of the date of this Report, we were not obligated for any material funding or guarantee commitments to existing companies or potential acquisition candidates. We will continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and may acquire additional ownership interests in new and existing companies in the next twelve months.
GovDelivery, InvestorForce, MSDSonline and Procurian have funded their operations through a combination of cash flow from operations and borrowings. It is expected that Procurian’s and MSDSonline’s existing cash balances, cash flow from operations and, in the case of Procurian, a recent increase in debt borrowings will be sufficient to fund their respective operations, including the repayment of debt obligations at Procurian, for the foreseeable future. GovDelivery and InvestorForce are expected to require additional borrowings to fund their respective operations through 2012. From time to time, our consolidated core companies pursue acquisition opportunities. In connection with such acquisitions, ICG may provide equity financing and/or borrowings to its consolidated core companies.
We do not own 100% of our consolidated core companies. When one of those consolidated core companies pays a dividend, the noncontrolling interest holders may receive a portion of that dividend. In addition, equity issuances or repurchases by one of our consolidated core subsidiaries may change the ownership that ICG and the noncontrolling interest holders have in that subsidiary. Any change in the ownership of a consolidated subsidiary would result in an adjustment to ICG’s additional paid-in capital and the noncontrolling interest.
Our consolidated working capital decreased from $142.1 million as of December 31, 2011 to $59.0 million as of June 30, 2012, a decrease of $83.1 million. That decrease to working capital was primarily due to our acquisition of MSDSonline, Procurian’s acquisition of Media IQ and our participation in the equity financing at SeaPass during the six months ended June 30, 2012.
33
Summary of Statements of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | $ | (6,141 | ) | | $ | (1,229 | ) |
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | $ | (50,442 | ) | | $ | 46,389 | |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | $ | (8,163 | ) | | $ | (5,390 | ) |
The increase in cash used in operating activities from 2011 to 2012 was primarily related to a $2.8 million increase in operating loss from the 2011 period to the 2012 period and an increase in cash used in working capital components in the 2012 period, primarily due to the receipt of a $6.3 million income tax refund in the 2011 period. Those changes resulted in an increase to cash used in operating activities in the 2012 period and were partially offset by lower payments associated with accrued compensation in the 2012 period compared to similar payments made during the 2011 period.
The change from cash provided by investing activities of $46.4 million in 2011 to cash used in investing activities of $50.4 million in 2012 was primarily related to proceeds received from the sale of ownership interests in Metastorm in the 2011 period compared to our acquisition of MSDSonline, Procurian’s acquisition of Media IQ and our participation in the equity financing at SeaPass in the 2012 period.
The increase in cash used in financing activities from 2011 to 2012 was primarily due to the repurchase of our common stock during the 2012 period, partially offset by lower repayments and higher borrowings of long-term debt in the 2012 period.
From time to time, we and our companies are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not expect any liability with respect to any legal claims or actions that would materially affect our financial position or cash flows.
Contractual Cash Obligations and Commercial Commitments
We had no material changes to contractual cash obligations and commercial commitments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
34
Our Companies
As of June 30, 2012, we owned interests in 10 companies that are categorized below by segment and method of accounting.
| | |
CORE COMPANIES (%Ownership Interest) |
Consolidated | | Equity Method |
GovDelivery (92%) | | Channel Intelligence (49%)(1) |
InvestorForce (79%) | | Freeborders (31%) |
MSDSonline (96%) | | WhiteFence (36%) |
Procurian (80%) | | |
| | |
VENTURE COMPANIES (%Ownership Interest) |
Consolidated | | Equity Method |
(none) | | Acquirgy (25%) |
| | GoIndustry (26%)(2) |
| | SeaPass (38%) |
(1) | On July 11, 2012, Channel Intelligence became a consolidated core company. As of the date of this Report, we own 52% of Channel Intelligence. |
(2) | As of June 30, 2012, we owned 2,546,743 shares, or approximately 26%, of the voting securities of GoIndustry. GoIndustry’s common stock was traded on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange under ticker symbol GOI. On July 5, 2012, GoIndustry was sold to Liquidity Services. |
Results of Operations
The following table contains selected unaudited financial information related to our segments. Each segment includes the results of our consolidated companies and records our share of the earnings and losses of companies accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The companies included in each segment are consistent between periods, with the exception of certain companies that ICG acquired or disposed of in a given period. The method of accounting for any particular company may change based upon, among other things, a change in our ownership interest.
“Dispositions” includes those companies that have been sold or ceased operations and are no longer included in a segment for the periods presented. A disposition could be the sale of a division, subsidiary or asset group of one of our consolidated companies, typically classified as discontinued operations for accounting purposes, or the disposition of our ownership interest in a core or venture company accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The amounts presented as “Dispositions” in the following table represent (1) our share of the results of Metastorm, which was sold on February 17, 2011, (2) our share of the results of ClickEquations, which was sold on June 11, 2011, and (3) our share of the results of StarCite, which was sold on December 30, 2011. On July 5, 2012, GoIndustry, an equity method company in our venture segment, was sold to Liquidity Services. Accordingly, our share of the results of GoIndustry are included in the venture segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and will be presented as “Dispositions” beginning in the third quarter of 2012. “Corporate” expenses represent the general and administrative expenses of our business operations, which include supporting our companies and operating as a public company. The measure of segment net income (loss) reviewed by us does not include items such as gains on the disposition of company ownership interests and marketable securities holdings and impairment charges associated with companies, which are reflected in “Other” reconciling items in the information that follows.
35
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Information | |
(in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Reconciling Items | | | | |
| | Core | | | Venture | | | Total Segment | | | Dispositions | | | Corporate | | | Other(1) | | | Consolidated Results | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 45,078 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 45,078 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 45,078 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (1,500 | ) | | $ | (1,836 | ) | | $ | (3,336 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (3,476 | ) | | $ | 818 | | | $ | (5,994 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 35,328 | | | | — | | | $ | 35,328 | | | $ | 0 | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 35,328 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | (1,118 | ) | | $ | (1,130 | ) | | $ | (974 | ) | | $ | (2,476 | ) | | $ | 1,347 | | | $ | (3,233 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 81,708 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 81,708 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 81,708 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | (2,185 | ) | | $ | (3,054 | ) | | $ | (5,239 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (8,598 | ) | | $ | 823 | | | $ | (13,014 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 69,282 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 69,282 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 69,282 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to ICG Group, Inc. | | $ | 150 | | | $ | (2,629 | ) | | $ | (2,479 | ) | | $ | (2,100 | ) | | $ | (8,623 | ) | | $ | 25,859 | | | $ | 12,657 | |
For the Quarters Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Results of Operations–Core Companies
The following presentation includes the results of our core companies, which, at June 30, 2012, included our four consolidated core companies: GovDelivery, InvestorForce, MSDSonline and Procurian.
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Period Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (Percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Selected data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 45,078 | | | $ | 35,328 | | | $ | 9,750 | | | | 28 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | (27,018 | ) | | | (21,775 | ) | | | (5,243 | ) | | | (24 | %) |
Selling, general and administrative | | | (9,944 | ) | | | (7,397 | ) | | | (2,547 | ) | | | (34 | %) |
Research and development | | | (4,038 | ) | | | (3,325 | ) | | | (713 | ) | | | (21 | %) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | (1,436 | ) | | | (338 | ) | | | (1,098 | ) | | | >(200 | %) |
Impairment related and other | | | (25 | ) | | | (82 | ) | | | 57 | | | | 70 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | | (42,461 | ) | | | (32,917 | ) | | | (9,544 | ) | | | (29 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 2,617 | | | | 2,411 | | | | 206 | | | | 9 | % |
Interest and other | | | (493 | ) | | | (166 | ) | | | (327 | ) | | | (197 | %) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (2,224 | ) | | | (1,164 | ) | | | (1,060 | ) | | | (91 | %) |
Equity loss | | | (1,400 | ) | | | (1,093 | ) | | | (307 | ) | | | (28 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (1,500 | ) | | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | (1,488 | ) | | | >(200 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue
The increase in our consolidated revenue from the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was due to revenue growth at three of our consolidated core companies, Procurian, GovDelivery and InvestorForce, and is primarily attributable to Zurich, a relatively new Procurian customer, and other new customers at those companies. Procurian experienced 23% revenue growth in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011, which was better than planned due to the timing of the execution of certain contracts. GovDelivery experienced revenue growth of 30% in the second quarter of 2012, which was consistent with its plan. Additionally, the acquisition of MSDSonline on March 30, 2012 contributed slightly to the year-over-year increase in revenue.
36
Operating Expenses
The increase in our operating expenses from the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was due primarily to increases in cost of revenue at Procurian and GovDelivery and is largely attributable to the increase in revenue at those companies. In addition, the increase in our operating expenses was due to (1) additional costs at Procurian associated with increased headcount to facilitate new customer signings and technology investments and (2) increased sales efforts and product development at GovDelivery. The acquisition of MSDSonline on March 30, 2012 also increased our operating expenses for the second quarter of 2012 from the corresponding period in the prior year.
Interest and Other
The increase in interest and other expenses in the second quarter of 2012 from the same period in 2011 primarily related to an increase in foreign currency losses at Procurian.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)
The increase in income tax expense in the second quarter of 2012 from the same period in 2011 primarily relates to higher income at Procurian in the current period.
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Period Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Selected data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 81,708 | | | $ | 69,282 | | | $ | 12,426 | | | | 18 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | (50,643 | ) | | | (42,765 | ) | | | (7,878 | ) | | | (18 | %) |
Selling, general and administrative | | | (17,867 | ) | | | (14,311 | ) | | | (3,556 | ) | | | (25 | %) |
Research and development | | | (7,352 | ) | | | (6,454 | ) | | | (898 | ) | | | (14 | %) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | (1,860 | ) | | | (675 | ) | | | (1,185 | ) | | | (176 | %) |
Impairment related and other | | | (152 | ) | | | (119 | ) | | | (33 | ) | | | (28 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | | (77,874 | ) | | | (64,324 | ) | | | (13,550 | ) | | | (21 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 3,834 | | | | 4,958 | | | | (1,124 | ) | | | (23 | %) |
Interest and other | | | (348 | ) | | | (212 | ) | | | (136 | ) | | | (64 | %) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (3,186 | ) | | | (2,564 | ) | | | (622 | ) | | | (24 | %) |
Equity loss | | | (2,485 | ) | | | (2,032 | ) | | | (453 | ) | | | (22 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (2,185 | ) | | $ | 150 | | | $ | (2,335 | ) | | > | (200 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue
The increase in our consolidated revenue from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the six months ended June 30, 2012 was due to revenue growth at three of our consolidated core companies, Procurian, GovDelivery and InvestorForce, and is primarily attributable to Zurich, a relatively new Procurian customer, and other new customers at those companies. Procurian and GovDelivery experienced revenue growth of 14% and 37%, respectively, in the first half of 2012 compared to the first half of 2011, both of which were slightly better than planned due to the timing of the execution of certain contracts. The acquisition of MSDSonline during the six month period ended June 30, 2012 also contributed slightly to the increase in revenue.
Operating Expenses
The increase in operating expenses from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the six months ended June 30, 2012 was due primarily to increases in cost of revenue at Procurian and GovDelivery and is largely attributable to the increase in revenue at those companies. In addition, the increase in our operating expenses was due to (1) additional costs at Procurian associated with increased headcount to facilitate new customer signings and technology investments and (2) increased sales efforts and product development at GovDelivery. Operating expenses at MSDSonline, which was acquired during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, also contributed to the increase.
37
Interest and Other
The increase in interest and other expenses in the second quarter of 2012 from the same period in 2011 primarily related to an increase in foreign currency losses at Procurian, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense at that company.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)
The increase in income tax expense in the second quarter of 2012 from the same period in 2011 primarily relates to higher income at Procurian.
Equity Loss
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Period Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Selected data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Our share of total net loss | | $ | (1,352 | ) | | $ | (1,045 | ) | | $ | (307 | ) | | | (29 | %) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | (48 | ) | | | (48 | ) | | | — | | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity loss | | $ | (1,400 | ) | | $ | (1,093 | ) | | $ | (307 | ) | | | (28 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The change in our share of the results of our equity core companies was primarily driven by higher losses at Channel Intelligence and WhiteFence in the second quarter of 2012 from the corresponding period in 2011.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Period Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Selected data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Our share of total net loss | | $ | (2,389 | ) | | $ | (1,936 | ) | | $ | (453 | ) | | | (23 | %) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | (96 | ) | | | (96 | ) | | | — | | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity loss | | $ | (2,485 | ) | | $ | (2,032 | ) | | $ | (453 | ) | | | (22 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The change in our share of the results of our equity core companies was primarily driven by increased losses at Channel Intelligence and Freeborders in the first half of 2012 from the corresponding period in 2011.
Results of Operations – Venture Companies
There are currently no consolidated companies that we consider to be part of our venture reporting segment. Accordingly, the following presentation includes our share of the results of our venture companies accounted for under the equity method of accounting, which is also recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item “Equity loss.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Period Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Selected data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Our share of total net loss | | $ | (1,557 | ) | | $ | (951 | ) | | $ | (606 | ) | | | (64 | %) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | (279 | ) | | | (167 | ) | | | (112 | ) | | | (67 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity loss | | $ | (1,836 | ) | | $ | (1,118 | ) | | $ | (718 | ) | | | (64 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity loss related to our venture companies during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was higher than the quarter ended June 30, 2011, primariy as a result of larger losses at SeaPass.
38
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Period Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Selected data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Our share of total net loss | | $ | (2,558 | ) | | $ | (2,295 | ) | | $ | (263 | ) | | | (11 | %) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | (496 | ) | | | (334 | ) | | | (162 | ) | | | (49 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity loss | | $ | (3,054 | ) | | $ | (2,629 | ) | | $ | (425 | ) | | | (16 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity loss related to our venture companies for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was higher than the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily as a result of larger losses at SeaPass.
Results of Operations – Reconciling Items
Dispositions
During 2011, three of ICG’s equity method companies were sold: Metastorm (on February 17, 2011), ClickEquations (on June 14, 2011) and StarCite (on December 30, 2011). Prior to those sales, Metastorm and StarCite were included in our core segment and ClickEquations was included in our venture segment. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our aggregate share of ClickEquations’ and StarCite’s results was $1.0 million, which included $0.3 million of ICG’s intangible asset amortization related to StarCite. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our aggregate share of Metastorm’s, ClickEquations’ and StarCite’s results was $2.1 million, which included $0.7 million of ICG’s intangible asset amortization, primarily related to StarCite. Following the respective sales, our share of those three companies’ results and the related ICG intangible asset amortization were removed from the results of the respective segments and are included in “Dispositions” in the “Results of Operations” segment information in the summary table above for all relevant periods presented.
Corporate
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Quarterly Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (Percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | | $ | (5,255 | ) | | $ | (4,718 | ) | | $ | (537 | ) | | | (11 | %) |
Impairment related and other | | | (135 | ) | | | — | | | | (135 | ) | | | (100 | %) |
Interest income | | | 82 | | | | 115 | | | | (33 | ) | | | (29 | %) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | 1,832 | | | | 2,127 | | | | (295 | ) | | | (14 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (3,476 | ) | | $ | (2,476 | ) | | $ | (1,000 | ) | | | (40 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The increase in general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2012 from the comparable 2011 period primarily related to an increase in equity-based compensation expense in 2012, which primarily relates to shares of restricted stock granted to ICG’s chief executive officer and ICG’s president during the fourth quarter of 2011.
The income tax benefit recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2012 relates to the tax benefit for losses at corporate, which offset income at our core companies within the consolidated tax return. The income tax benefit recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily relates to the deferred tax benefit associated with the sale of ClickEquations in that period.
39
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Quarterly Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (Percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | | $ | (10,923 | ) | | $ | (9,391 | ) | | $ | (1,532 | ) | | | (16 | %) |
Impairment related and other | | | (135 | ) | | | — | | | | (135 | ) | | | (100 | %) |
Interest income | | | 206 | | | | 181 | | | | 25 | | | | 14 | % |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | 2,254 | | | | 587 | | | | 1,667 | | | | >200 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (8,598 | ) | | $ | (8,623 | ) | | $ | 25 | | | | <1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The increase in general and administrative expenses in the first half of 2012 from the comparable 2011 period primarily related to an increase in equity-based compensation expense in 2012, which primarily relates to shares of restricted stock granted to ICG’s chief executive officer and ICG’s president during the fourth quarter of 2011.
The income tax benefit in the first half of 2012 relates primarily to the tax benefit for losses at corporate, which offset income at our core companies within the consolidated tax return. The income tax benefit in the first half of 2011 relates to deferred tax expense associated with the sale of Metastorm, more than offset by the deferred tax benefit associated with the sale of ClickEquations and the tax benefit related to the tax benefit for losses at corporate, which offset income at our core companies within the consolidated tax return.
Other
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Quarterly Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (Percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Corporate other income (loss), net | | $ | 1,470 | | | $ | 1,601 | | | $ | (131 | ) | | | (8 | %) |
Noncontrolling interest | | | (652 | ) | | | (254 | ) | | | (398 | ) | | | (157 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 818 | | | $ | 1,347 | | | $ | (529 | ) | | | (39 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate other income (loss), net for the three months ended June 30, 2012 related almost entirely to ICG’s recognized gain on the sale of marketable securities. See Note 5, “Ownership Interests and Cost Method Investments,” and Note 10, “Other Income (Loss),” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Corporate other income (loss), net for the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily relates to funds received in connection with the distribution from the sale of former companies.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Quarterly Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | (in thousands) | | | (Percentage) | |
| | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Corporate other income (loss), net | | $ | 1,627 | | | $ | 26,465 | | | $ | (24,838 | ) | | | (94 | %) |
Noncontrolling interest | | | (804 | ) | | | (606 | ) | | | (198 | ) | | | (33 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 823 | | | $ | 25,859 | | | $ | (25,036 | ) | | | (97 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate other income (loss), net for the six months ended June 30, 2012 related almost entirely to ICG’s recognized gains on the sale of marketable securities and funds received in connection with the Metastorm sale. See Note 5, “Ownership Interests and Cost Method Investments,” and Note 10, “Other Income (Loss),” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Corporate other income (loss), net for the six months ended June 30, 2011 related to funds received in connection with the Metastorm sale, which ICG recorded as a gain in the period at the time the sale was consummated.
40
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to our interests in our companies, marketable securities, revenue, income taxes and commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies are important to the presentation of our financial statements and often require difficult, subjective and complex judgments.
Valuation of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Ownership Interests in Companies
We test goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently as conditions warrant, and test intangible assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Additionally, we perform ongoing business reviews to evaluate our ownership interests in companies accounted for under the equity and cost methods of accounting to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline in the value of a company should be recognized. We use quantitative and qualitative measures to assess the need to record impairment losses on goodwill, intangible assets and ownership interests in our companies when impairment indicators are present. Where impairment indicators are present, we determine the amount of the impairment charge as the excess of the carrying value over the fair value. We determine fair value using a combination of the discounted cash flow methodology, which is based upon converting expected future cash flows to present value, and the market approach, which includes analysis of market price multiples of companies engaged in lines of business similar to the company being evaluated. The market price multiples are selected and applied to the company based on relative performance, future prospects and risk profile of the company in comparison to the guideline companies. Significant assumptions relating to future operating results must be made when estimating the future cash flows associated with these companies. Significant assumptions relating to the achievement of business plan objectives and milestones must be made when evaluating whether impairment indicators are present. If unforeseen events occur or operating trends change significantly, additional impairment losses could occur.
Revenue Recognition
Procurian may assume all or a part of a customer’s procurement function as part of its engagement by a customer. Typically, in those engagements, Procurian is paid a fixed fee agreed upon in advance and/or a fee based on a percentage of the amount spent by its customers’ respective purchasing departments in the specified areas Procurian manages. Additionally, in some cases, Procurian has the opportunity to earn additional fees based on the level of savings achieved for customers. Procurian recognizes revenue as earned, which is typically over the life of a customer contract (which approximates the life of the relevant customer relationship). Any additional fees are deferred until the contingency is achieved or it is determined from existing data and past experience that the savings will be achieved and then are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract.
GovDelivery revenue consists of nonrefundable setup fees and monthly maintenance and hosting fees. These fees are deferred and recognized as the services are performed, which is typically over the service term. Costs related to performing setup services are expensed as incurred.
InvestorForce generates revenue from license fees earned in connection with hosted services, setup fees and support and maintenance fees. Hosted services consist primarily of data aggregation, performance calculation, real-time analysis and automated production of performance reports for the institutional investment community. A minimum quarterly base fee is charged for hosted services. Those minimum fees are recognized on a prorated basis over the service term. As the volume of client accounts increases, additional fees apply. Any additional fees are recognized in the period in which account volumes exceed the contract minimum. Setup and support and maintenance fees are deferred and recognized ratably over the applicable service term.
41
MSDSonline derives revenues from three sources: (1) subscription fees, (2) professional services fees and (3) compliance solutions project fees. The vast majority of MSDSonline’s revenues are derived from subscription fees from customers accessing the company’s database and web-based tools; that revenue is recognized ratably over the applicable contract term, beginning on the contract implementation date. MSDSonline also generates (a) professional services fees from compiling its customers’ online libraries of material safety data sheet documents and indexing those documents for the customers’ use and (b) fees from training and compliance services projects; the revenue derived from those fees is recognized on a percentage of completion basis over the applicable project’s timeline.
Equity Income/Loss
We record our share of our companies’ net income/loss, which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as equity income/loss. Since we do not control these companies, this equity income/loss is based on unaudited results of operations of our companies and may require adjustment in the future when the audits of our companies are complete. The compilation and review of these results of operations require significant judgment and estimates by management.
Deferred Income Taxes
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We consider future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance. In the event that we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if we later determine that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed.
Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we are a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. From time to time, we are also a guarantor of various third-party obligations and commitments. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required for these contingencies, if any, that would be charged to earnings is made after careful analysis of each individual matter. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in circumstances, such as a change in settlement strategy. Changes in required reserves could increase or decrease our earnings in the period the changes are made.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Any marketable securities we hold are reported at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets based on quoted prices in active markets for identical or comparable assets.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance that permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors regarding whether it is more likely than not that an impairment to the entity’s goodwill exists as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Previous accounting guidance required an entity to test goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill before performing the second step of the test to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. That guidance became effective for ICG on January 1, 2012 and did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to the presentation of other comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. That guidance provides two options for presenting the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income. That guidance became effective for ICG on January 1, 2012 and did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We have revised our presentation of our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report to conform to the guidance.
42
In May 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance that results in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in financial statements governed by GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The guidance changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, and clarifies the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. That guidance became effective for ICG on January 1, 2012 and did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Procurian conducts a portion of its business in foreign currencies and, from time to time, may utilize derivative financial instruments, specifically fair value hedges, to manage foreign currency risks. In accordance with GAAP, gains and losses related to fair value hedges are recognized in income, along with adjustments of carrying amounts of the hedged items. Those instruments are marked to market, and unrealized gains and losses are included in current period net income. Those options provide a predetermined rate of exchange at the time the option is purchased and allow Procurian to minimize the risk of currency fluctuations. In determining whether to use a hedging instrument for a particular currency, Procurian considers the type of currency at issue, the level of sales and purchases made by the company over the relevant period of time and the costs associated with the relevant hedging instrument. During the three months ending June 30, 2012, Procurian purchased average rate options to mitigate the risk of currency fluctuations at its operations in Europe, particularly Switzerland, in addition to purchasing forwards to mitigate the risk of currency fluctuations at its operations in Europe, Asia and South America. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Procurian purchased average rate currency options to mitigate the risk of currency fluctuations at its operations in Europe, Asia and South America. Those instruments net settle each quarter, and resulted in an immaterial loss in the relevant periods.
Procurian was party to a term loan agreement with PNC Bank in the amount of $20.0 million, the interest rate for which is computed based on certain fixed and variable indices. During the year ended December 31, 2010, Procurian entered into a rate swap transaction to minimize the risk of interest rate fluctuations. This rate swap transaction was terminated by Procurian in August 2012. Procurian recognized an immaterial loss during each of the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 related to this instrument.
We are exposed to equity price risks on the marketable portion of our equity securities. Our public holdings at June 30, 2012 include an equity position in Active and an equity position in GoIndustry, which was sold in July 2012. A 20% adverse change in equity prices, based on a sensitivity analysis of our holdings in Active as of June 30, 2012, would result in a decrease in the fair value of our public holdings of Active of approximately $0.2 million.
Our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. Our marketable securities, if any, are carried at fair value.
43
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Controls and Procedures
Management’s Quarterly Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered in this Report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this Report, our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our periodic SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the relevant SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
The design of any system of control is based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives under all future events, no matter how remote, that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may not deteriorate. Because of their inherent limitations, systems of control may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Accordingly, even effective systems of control can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
44
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 1A – Risk Factors
There have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, except that the risk factor in that Report on Form 10-K entitled “If our companies are unable to attract new customers or retain customers, including certain significant customers, our and our companies’ respective businesses, results of operations and financial conditions could be negatively affected” has been updated to read as follows:
Our companies may not be able to attract or retain customers due to a variety of reasons, including increased competition, the unwillingness of customers and potential customers to spend money on our companies’ products and services due to economic factors or otherwise, insolvency and the unavailability of credit. If our companies are unable to attract new customers or retain existing customers, our and our companies’ respective businesses, results of operations and financial conditions could be negatively affected.
Zurich Insurance Company Ltd (“Zurich”), a relatively new customer of Procurian, represented approximately 22% of our consolidated revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and approximately 15% of our consolidated revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Aside from Procurian’s relationship with Zurich, most of our companies have a number of important individual customer relationships. If any of our companies are not able to retain those customers, or if any such customers significantly reduce the amount of products or services that they purchase from one or more of our companies, those companies and their and our respective businesses, results of operations and financial positions could be negatively affected.
ITEM 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In 2008, we adopted a share repurchase program under which we may, from time to time, repurchase shares of our Common Stock in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or pursuant to trading plans meeting the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. Following its expansion in November 2011, the program covers the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of shares of our Common Stock. The table below contains information relating to the repurchases of our Common Stock that occurred under the share repurchase program through the date of the filing of this Report.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) | | | Average Price Paid per Share(2) | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program(1) | | | Approximate Dollar Value That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program | |
| | | | |
Repurchased as of 12/31/11 | | | 3,281,427 | | | $ | 6.24 | | | | 3,281,427 | | | $ | 29.5 million | |
1/1/12 to 1/31/12 | | | 0 | | | | — | | | | 0 | | | $ | 29.5 million | |
2/1/12 to 2/29/12 | | | 0 | | | | — | | | | 0 | | | $ | 29.5 million | |
3/1/12 to 3/31/12 | | | 302,800 | | | $ | 8.75 | | | | 302,800 | | | $ | 26.9 million | |
4/1/12 to 4/30/12 | | | 0 | | | | — | | | | 0 | | | $ | 26.9 million | |
5/1/12 to 5/31/12 | | | 128,788 | | | $ | 8.75 | | | | 128,788 | | | $ | 25.7 million | |
6/1/12 to 6/30/12 | | | 35,850 | | | $ | 8.95 | | | | 35,850 | | | $ | 25.4 million | |
7/1/12 to 7/31/12 | | | 158,100 | | | $ | 9.05 | | | | 158,100 | | | $ | 24.0 million | |
8/1/12 to 8/9/12 | | | 2,000 | | | $ | 8.75 | | | | 2,000 | | | $ | 24.0 million | |
Total | | | 3,908,965 | | | $ | 6.66 | | | | 3,908,965 | | | $ | 24.0 million | |
(1) | All shares purchased in open market transactions. |
(2) | Average price paid per share excludes commissions. |
45
ITEM 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
ITEM 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not applicable.
None.
46
Exhibit Index
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Document |
| |
10.1 | | Executive Lease Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2012, by and among Channel Intelligence, Inc., CIML, LLC, Internet Capital Group Operations, Inc., ICG Group, Inc. and Douglas Alexander (incorporated by reference into Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 26, 2012 (File No. 001-16249)).* |
| |
10.2 | | CIML, LLC 2012 Profits Interest Plan, effective as of July 26, 2012 (incorporated by reference into Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 26, 2012 (File No. 001-16249)).* |
| |
10.3 | | CIML, LLC 2012 Profits Interest Plan Restricted Unit Award Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2012, between CIML, LLC and Douglas Alexander (incorporated by reference into Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 26, 2012 (File No. 001-16249)).* |
| |
10.4 | | Waiver and First Amendment to Loan Documents, dated as of August 9, 2012, by and among Procurian USA Inc., ICG Commerce Investments, LLC, Procurian International I LLC, Procurian Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association (filed herewith). |
| |
10.5 | | Amended and Restated Term Note, dated as of August 9, 2012, by Procurian USA Inc., ICG Commerce Investments LLC, Procurian International I LLC and Procurian Inc. in favor of PNC Bank, National Association (filed herewith). |
| |
11.1 | | Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings (included herein at Note 12 “Net Income (Loss) per Share” to the Consolidated Financial Statements). |
| |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. |
| |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. |
| |
32.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. |
| |
32.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. |
| |
101 | | The following financial information formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) from ICG’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed August 9, 2012: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) – Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (unaudited) – Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) – Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).** |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
** | As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability under those sections. |
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, ICG Group, Inc. has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
Date: August 9, 2012 | | ICG GROUP, INC. |
| | |
| | By: | | /s/ R. Kirk Morgan |
| | Name: | | R. Kirk Morgan |
| | Title: | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
48