Pacwest Bancorp (PACW) 10-Q 2014 Q1 Quarterly report

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to

Commission File Number: 00-30747

PACWEST BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	33-0885320 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 1640 Los Angeles, California (Address of principal executive offices)	90067 (Zip Code)

(310) 286-1144
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

        As of May 6, 2014, there were 101,910,929 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding, excluding 40,000 shares of unvested restricted stock.

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

MARCH 31, 2014 FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION			3
ITEM 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Unaudited)		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)		6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)		7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		8
ITEM 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		56
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		104
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures		104
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION			105
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings		105
ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		107
ITEM 6.	Exhibits		108
SIGNATURES			109

2

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Par Value and Share Data)

(Unaudited)

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	113,508		$	96,424
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions		228,579			50,998
Total cash and cash equivalents		342,087			147,422
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value ($37,594 and $37,904 covered by FDIC loss sharing at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013)		1,477,473			1,494,745
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		25,000			27,939
Total investment securities		1,502,473			1,522,684
Loans and leases, net of unearned income ($398,365 and $448,418 covered by FDIC loss sharing at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013)		4,161,067			4,312,352
Allowance for loan and lease losses ($20,930 and $21,793 for loans covered by FDIC loss sharing at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013)		(81,180	)		(82,034	)
Total loans and leases, net		4,079,887			4,230,318
Other real estate owned, net ($6,177 and $9,036 covered by FDIC loss sharing at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013)		46,870			51,837
Premises and equipment, net		29,908			32,435
FDIC loss sharing asset		34,628			45,524
Cash surrender value of life insurance		77,955			77,489
Goodwill		208,743			208,743
Core deposit and customer relationship intangibles, net		15,884			17,248
Other assets		179,418			199,663
Total assets	$	6,517,853		$	6,533,363
LIABILITIES
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	2,391,609		$	2,318,446
Interest-bearing deposits		2,977,799			2,962,541
Total deposits		5,369,408			5,280,987
Borrowings		5,748			113,726
Subordinated debentures		132,790			132,645
Discontinued operations		112,432			123,028
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		63,773			73,884
Total liabilities		5,684,151			5,724,270
Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 200,000,000 and 75,000,000 shares at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively; issued 46,532,624 and 46,526,124 shares, respectively (includes 1,087,436 and 1,216,524 shares of unvested restricted stock, respectively)		465			465
Additional paid-in capital		1,278,152			1,286,737
Accumulated deficit		(429,342	)		(454,422	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 755,044 and 703,290 shares at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013		(22,398	)		(20,340	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		6,825			(3,347	)
Total stockholders' equity		833,702			809,093
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	6,517,853		$	6,533,363

See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."

3

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
Interest income:
Loans and leases	$	77,463		$	73,352		$	61,010
Investment securities		10,823			10,422			8,216
Deposits in financial institutions		74			82			43
Total interest income		88,360			83,856			69,269
Interest expense:
Deposits		1,225			1,450			2,649
Borrowings		79			86			144
Subordinated debentures		1,041			1,062			783
Total interest expense		2,345			2,598			3,576
Net interest income		86,015			81,258			65,693
(Negative provision) provision for credit losses		(644	)		(1,338	)		3,137
Net interest income after negative provision for credit losses		86,659			82,596			62,556
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,002			3,197			2,863
Other commissions and fees		1,932			2,125			1,933
Gain on sale of leases		106			683			225
Gain (loss) on sale of securities		4,752			(272	)		409
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		466			448			433
FDIC loss sharing expense, net		(11,430	)		(10,593	)		(3,137	)
Other income		5,863			486			114
Total noninterest income		4,691			(3,926	)		2,840
Noninterest expense:
Compensation		28,627			27,697			25,350
Accelerated vesting of restricted stock		—			12,420			—
Occupancy		7,595			7,553			6,598
Data processing		2,540			2,216			2,233
Other professional services		2,286			2,314			2,097
Business development		934			992			736
Communications		737			860			613
Insurance and assessments		1,593			1,572			1,261
Non-covered other real estate owned, net		(246	)		25			313
Covered other real estate owned, net		(1,615	)		(594	)		(813	)
Intangible asset amortization		1,364			1,430			1,176
Acquisition and integration		2,200			4,253			692
Other expense		4,854			5,350			3,927
Total noninterest expense		50,869			66,088			44,183
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes		40,481			12,582			21,213
Income tax expense		(14,576	)		(9,135	)		(7,719	)
Net earnings from continuing operations		25,905			3,447			13,494
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes		(1,413	)		(578	)		—
Income tax benefit		588			240			—
Net loss from discontinued operations		(825	)		(338	)		—
Net earnings	$	25,080		$	3,109		$	13,494
Basic earnings per share:
Net earnings from continuing operations	$	0.57		$	0.07		$	0.37
Net earnings	$	0.55		$	0.06		$	0.37
Diluted earnings per share:
Net earnings from continuing operations	$	0.57		$	0.07		$	0.37
Net earnings	$	0.55		$	0.06		$	0.37
Dividends declared per share	$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.25

See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."

4

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
Net earnings	$	25,080		$	3,109		$	13,494
Other comprehensive income (loss) related to unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		22,291			(6,607	)		(6,410	)
Income tax benefit (expense) related to unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period		(9,363	)		2,775			2,692
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss included in net earnings		(4,752	)		272			(409	)
Income tax (benefit) expense related to reclassification adjustment		1,996			(114	)		172
Other comprehensive income (loss)		10,172			(3,674	)		(3,955	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	35,252		$	(565	)	$	9,539

See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."

5

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
	Common Stock
															Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
	Shares			Par Value		Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Treasury Stock						Total
Balance, December 31, 2013		45,822,834		$	465	$	1,286,737		$	(454,422	)	$	(20,340	)	$	(3,347	)	$	809,093
Net earnings		—			—		—			25,080			—			—			25,080
Other comprehensive income—net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax		—			—		—			—			—			10,172			10,172
Restricted stock awarded and earned stock compensation, net of shares forfeited		6,500			—		1,611			—			—			—			1,611
Restricted stock surrendered		(51,754	)		—		—			—			(2,058	)		—			(2,058	)
Tax effect from vesting of restricted stock		—			—		1,110			—			—			—			1,110
Cash dividends paid ($0.25 per share)		—			—		(11,306	)		—			—			—			(11,306	)
Balance, March 31, 2014		45,777,580		$	465	$	1,278,152		$	(429,342	)	$	(22,398	)	$	6,825		$	833,702

See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."

6

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	25,080		$	13,494
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		6,653			7,292
(Negative provision) provision for credit losses		(644	)		3,137
Gain on sale of other real estate owned		(2,323	)		(1,910	)
Provision for losses on other real estate owned		94			1,185
Gain on sale of leases		(106	)		(225	)
Gain on sale of premises and equipment		(1,571	)		—
Gain on sale of securities		(4,752	)		(409	)
Earned stock compensation		1,611			1,764
Tax effect included in stockholders' equity of restricted stock vesting		(1,110	)		(660	)
Decrease in accrued and deferred income taxes, net		19,679			8,611
Decrease in FDIC loss sharing asset		10,896			1,635
Increase in other assets		(6,156	)		(486	)
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(20,107	)		(7,601	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		27,244			25,827
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net decrease in loans and leases		149,440			113,099
Proceeds from sale of loans and leases		1,128			3,054
Securities available-for-sale:
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns		33,860			100,980
Proceeds from sales		142,041			12,810
Purchases		(140,048	)		(132,446	)
Net redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		2,939			3,726
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		7,209			8,847
Purchases of premises and equipment, net		(1,115	)		(742	)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment		3,753			—
Net cash provided by investing activities		199,207			109,328
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits:
Noninterest-bearing		73,163			2,022
Interest-bearing		15,258			(157,913	)
Net decrease in borrowings		(107,953	)		(1,362	)
Restricted stock surrendered		(2,058	)		(2,182	)
Tax effect included in stockholders' equity of restricted stock vesting		1,110			660
Cash dividends paid		(11,306	)		(9,106	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(31,786	)		(167,881	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		194,665			(32,726	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		147,422			164,404
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	342,087		$	131,678
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	2,483		$	4,063
Cash received for income taxes, net of payments		(5,693	)		(760	)
Loans transferred to other real estate owned		13			4,980

See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."

7

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION

        PacWest Bancorp is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Our principal business is to serve as the holding company for our Los Angeles-based wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Pacific Western Bank, which we refer to as "Pacific Western" or the "Bank." When we say "we," "our," or the "Company," we mean the Company on a consolidated basis with the Bank. When we refer to "PacWest" or to the holding company, we are referring to the parent company on a stand-alone basis.

        Pacific Western is a full-service commercial bank offering a broad range of banking products and services including: accepting demand, money market, and time deposits; originating loans and leases, including commercial, real estate construction, equipment finance leases, SBA guaranteed and consumer loans; and providing other business-oriented products. Our operations are primarily located in Southern California extending from San Diego County to California's Central Coast; we also operate three banking offices in the San Francisco Bay area, a leasing operation based in Utah, and asset-based lending operations based in Arizona as well as San Jose and Santa Monica, California. The Bank focuses on conducting business with small to medium sized businesses in our marketplace and the owners and employees of those businesses. The majority of our loans are secured by the real estate collateral of such businesses. Our asset-based lending function operates in Arizona, California, Texas, Colorado, Minnesota, and the Pacific Northwest. Our equipment leasing function has lease receivables in 45 states.

        We generate our revenue primarily from interest received on loans and leases and, to a lesser extent, from interest received on investment securities, and fees received in connection with deposit services, extending credit and other services offered, including foreign exchange services. Our major operating expenses are the interest paid by the Bank on deposits and borrowings, compensation and general operating expenses. The Bank relies on a foundation of locally generated and relationship-based deposits, with 73 branches located across 10 California counties. The Bank has a relatively low cost of funds due to a high percentage of noninterest-bearing and low cost deposits.

        We have completed 26 acquisitions from May 2000 through March 31, 2014, including the acquisition of First California Financial Group, Inc. ("FCAL") on May 31, 2013. Since 2000, our acquisitions have been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, the operating results of the acquired entities have been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements from their respective acquisition dates. See Note 3,Acquisitions, for more information about the FCAL acquisition, and Note 18,Subsequent Events, for information regarding the completion of the CapitalSource Inc. ("CapitalSource") merger on April 7, 2014.

Basis of Presentation

        The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which we may refer to as GAAP. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

        Our financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and

8

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Continued)

Exchange Commission. The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year.

Use of Estimates

        Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period to prepare these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates subject to change in the near term include, among other items, the allowance for credit losses, the carrying value of intangible assets, the carrying value of the FDIC loss sharing asset, the realization of deferred tax assets, and the fair value estimates of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in acquisitions.

Reclassifications

        Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation format. Starting with the June 30, 2013 quarter-end, loan tables present non-purchased credit impaired ("Non-PCI") and purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loan categories in addition to covered and non-covered loan information. Previously the loan tables only presented covered and non-covered loan categories.

NOTE 2—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        In connection with the acquisition of FCAL on May 31, 2013, we acquired Electronic Payment Services ("EPS"), a division of the Bank that is being discontinued. Accordingly, all income and expense related to EPS have been removed from continuing operations and are included in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings under the caption "Loss from discontinued operations." For the three months ended March 31, 2014, revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income) and pre-tax loss for the EPS division were $3,000 and $1.4 million, respectively. Liabilities of the EPS division, which consist primarily of noninterest-bearing deposits, are included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets under the caption "Discontinued operations." For segment reporting purposes, the EPS division is included in our Banking Segment.

NOTE 3—ACQUISITIONS

        We completed the FCAL acquisition during the time period of January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2014, using the acquisition method of accounting, and accordingly, the operating results of FCAL have been included in our condensed consolidated financial statements from its May 31, 2013 date of acquisition.

9

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3—ACQUISITIONS (Continued)

        The following table presents the balance sheet of FCAL at estimated fair value as of its acquisition date:

	May 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Assets Acquired:
Cash and due from banks	$	6,124
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions		266,889
Investment securities available-for-sale		4,444
FHLB stock		9,518
Loans and leases		1,049,613
Other real estate owned		13,772
Premises and equipment		15,322
FDIC loss sharing asset		17,241
Cash surrender value of life insurance		13,265
Goodwill		129,070
Core deposit and customer relationship intangibles		7,927
Other assets		47,671
Total assets acquired	$	1,580,856
Liabilities Assumed:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	361,166
Interest-bearing deposits		739,713
Subordinated debentures		24,061
Discontinued operations		184,619
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		19,729
Total liabilities assumed	$	1,329,288
Total consideration paid	$	251,568
Summary of consideration:
PacWest common stock issued	$	242,268
Cancellation of FCAL common stock owned by PacWest (at acquisition date fair value)		9,300
Total	$	251,568

First California Financial Group Acquisition

        On May 31, 2013, we completed the acquisition of First California Financial Group, Inc., or FCAL. As part of the acquisition, First California Bank or FCB, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FCAL, merged with and into Pacific Western.

        In the FCAL acquisition, each share of FCAL common stock was converted into the right to receive 0.2966 of a share of PacWest common stock. The exchange ratio was calculated based on the volume-weighted average share price of PacWest common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days

10

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3—ACQUISITIONS (Continued)

ending on the second full trading day prior to the receipt of the last of the regulatory approvals required under the merger agreement. PacWest issued an aggregate of approximately 8.4 million shares of PacWest common stock to FCAL stockholders. In addition, 1,094,000 shares of FCAL common stock previously owned by PacWest at a cost of $4.1 million were cancelled in the transaction. These shares were carried in our securities available-for-sale portfolio at their estimated market value with their unrealized gain of $5.2 million included in stockholders' equity at May 31, 2013. Under acquisition accounting, this unrealized gain was recognized in earnings. Based on the closing price of PacWest's common stock on May 31, 2013 of $28.83 per share, the aggregate consideration paid to FCAL common stockholders, including the 1,094,000 shares of FCAL common stock owned by us and cancelled in the merger, was $251.6 million.

        The FCAL acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. The assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the May 31, 2013 acquisition date. The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in goodwill of $129.1 million. All of the recognized goodwill is expected to be non-deductible for tax purposes.

        FCB was a full-service commercial bank headquartered in Westlake Village, California. FCB provided a full range of banking services, including revolving lines of credit, term loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, consumer loans and home equity loans to individuals, professionals, and small to mid-sized businesses. FCB operated 15 branches throughout Southern California in the Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Ventura, and San Luis Obispo Counties. We made this acquisition to expand our presence in Southern California. We completed the conversion and integration of the FCB branches to Pacific Western's operating platform in June 2013 and as a result, we added seven locations to our branch network.

        See Note 18,Subsequent Events,for information regarding the completion of the CapitalSource Inc. merger on April 7, 2014.

NOTE 4—GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        Goodwill arises from the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and other intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives generated from purchase business combinations are not subject to amortization and are instead tested for impairment no less than annually. Impairment exists when the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. An impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to that excess and would be included in "Noninterest expense" in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings.

        Our intangible assets with definite lives are core deposit intangibles, or CDI, and customer relationship intangibles, or CRI. These intangible assets are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values and reviewed for impairment at least quarterly. The amortization expense represents the estimated decline in the value of the underlying deposits or loan customers acquired. The weighted average amortization period remaining for our CDI and CRI was 2.6 years. The aggregate CDI and CRI amortization expense is expected to be $5.3 million for 2014. The estimated aggregate amortization expense related to these intangible assets for each of the next five years is $4.8 million for 2015, $3.0 million for 2016, $1.6 million for 2017, $1.3 million for 2018, and $954,000 for 2019.

11

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4—GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

        The following table presents the changes in the gross amounts of CDI and CRI and the related accumulated amortization for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Gross Amount of CDI and CRI:
Balance, beginning of period	$	48,963		$	48,963		$	45,412
Balance, end of period		48,963			48,963			45,412
Accumulated Amortization:
Balance, beginning of period		(31,715	)		(30,285	)		(30,689	)
Amortization		(1,364	)		(1,430	)		(1,176	)
Balance, end of period		(33,079	)		(31,715	)		(31,865	)
Net CDI and CRI, end of period	$	15,884		$	17,248		$	13,547

NOTE 5—INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Securities Available-for-Sale

        The following tables present amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and carrying value of securities available-for-sale as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014
Security Type	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Carrying Value
	(In thousands)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise pass through securities	$	560,004	$	16,204	$	(1,539	)	$	574,669
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations		272,832		762		(3,957	)		269,637
Covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations		29,649		8,032		(87	)		37,594
Municipal securities		455,437		5,599		(13,103	)		447,933
Corporate debt securities		84,210		308		(307	)		84,211
Government-sponsored enterprise debt securities		36,180		74		(200	)		36,054
Other securities		27,393		37		(55	)		27,375
Total securities available-for-sale	$	1,465,705	$	31,016	$	(19,248	)	$	1,477,473

12

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5—INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

	December 31, 2013
Security Type	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Carrying Value
	(In thousands)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise pass through securities	$	691,944	$	18,012	$	(2,768	)	$	707,188
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations		197,069		388		(4,584	)		192,873
Covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations		30,502		7,552		(150	)		37,904
Municipal securities		459,182		1,749		(24,273	)		436,658
Corporate debt securities		84,119		71		(1,483	)		82,707
Government-sponsored enterprise debt securities		10,046		—		(174	)		9,872
Other securities		27,654		2		(113	)		27,543
Total securities available-for-sale	$	1,500,516	$	27,774	$	(33,545	)	$	1,494,745

        The covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMO's") were acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition of Affinity Bank in August 2009 and are covered by an FDIC loss sharing agreement. The loss sharing provisions of this agreement expire in the third quarter of 2014 for non-single family covered assets such as these private label CMO's. Other securities consist primarily of asset-backed securities. See Note 11,Fair Value Measurements, for information on fair value measurements and methodology.

        As of March 31, 2014, securities available-for-sale with a carrying value of $291.9 million were pledged as collateral for borrowings, public deposits and other purposes as required by various statutes and agreements.

        During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we sold $137.3 million in government-sponsored enterprise ("GSE") pass through securities for which we realized a gross gain of $4.8 million. We sold these securities to take advantage of favorable market conditions for premium coupon seasoned GSE pass through securities, and redeployed the proceeds into single-maturity investments that are expected to perform better under current market conditions. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we sold $12.4 million in corporate debt securities for which we realized a $409,000 gross gain. These securities were sold as part of our investment portfolio risk management activities to reduce price volatility and duration.

13

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5—INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

        The following tables present, for those securities that were in a gross unrealized loss position, the carrying values and the gross unrealized losses on securities by length of time the securities were in an unrealized loss position as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014
	Less Than 12 Months					12 months or Longer					Total
Security Type	Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In thousands)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise pass through securities	$	119,687	$	(1,381	)	$	673	$	(158	)	$	120,360	$	(1,539	)
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations		218,387		(3,957	)		—		—			218,387		(3,957	)
Covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations		89		(1	)		1,047		(86	)		1,136		(87	)
Municipal securities		175,910		(5,984	)		98,152		(7,119	)		274,062		(13,103	)
Corporate debt securities		37,294		(307	)		—		—			37,294		(307	)
Government-sponsored enterprise debt securities		25,936		(200	)		—		—			25,936		(200	)
Other securities		16,550		(55	)		—		—			16,550		(55	)
Total	$	593,853	$	(11,885	)	$	99,872	$	(7,363	)	$	693,725	$	(19,248	)

	December 31, 2013
	Less Than 12 Months					12 months or Longer					Total
Security Type	Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In thousands)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise pass through securities	$	148,662	$	(2,767	)	$	32	$	(1	)	$	148,694	$	(2,768	)
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations		179,938		(4,486	)		4,383		(98	)		184,321		(4,584	)
Covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations		1,640		(60	)		617		(90	)		2,257		(150	)
Municipal securities		337,208		(24,273	)		—		—			337,208		(24,273	)
Corporate debt securities		72,636		(1,483	)		—		—			72,636		(1,483	)
Government-sponsored enterprise debt securities		9,872		(174	)		—		—			9,872		(174	)
Other securities		23,969		(113	)		—		—			23,969		(113	)
Total	$	773,925	$	(33,356	)	$	5,032	$	(189	)	$	778,957	$	(33,545	)

14

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5—INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

        We reviewed the securities that were in a continuous loss position less than 12 months and longer than 12 months at March 31, 2014, and concluded that their losses were a result of the level of market interest rates relative to the types of securities and pricing changes caused by shifting supply and demand dynamics and not a result of downgraded credit ratings or other indicators of deterioration of the underlying issuers' ability to repay. Accordingly, we determined that the securities were temporarily impaired and we did not recognize such impairment in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings. Additionally, we have no plans to sell these securities and believe that it is more likely than not we would not be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost.

        The following table presents the contractual maturity distribution of our available-for-sale securities portfolio based on amortized cost and carrying value as of the date indicated:

	March 31, 2014
Maturity	Amortized Cost		Carrying Value
	(In thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	3,585	$	3,587
Due after one year through five years		24,390		24,614
Due after five years through ten years		266,745		265,949
Due after ten years		1,170,985		1,183,323
Total securities available-for-sale	$	1,465,705	$	1,477,473

        Mortgage-backed securities have contractual terms to maturity, but require periodic payments to reduce principal. In addition, expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because obligors and/or issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

        The following table presents the composition of our interest income on investment securities:

	Three Months Ended
Securities Interest by Type:	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Taxable interest	$	6,920	$	6,564	$	5,563
Nontaxable interest		3,328		3,333		2,425
Dividend income		575		525		228
Total interest income on investment securities	$	10,823	$	10,422	$	8,216

15

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5—INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

FHLB Stock

        At March 31, 2014, the Company had a $25.0 million investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco ("FHLB") stock carried at cost. During the first quarter of 2014, FHLB stock decreased $2.9 million due to redemptions by the FHLB. We evaluated the carrying value of our FHLB stock investment at March 31, 2014, and determined that it was not impaired. Our evaluation considered the long-term nature of the investment, the current financial and liquidity position of the FHLB, repurchase activity of excess stock by the FHLB at its carrying value, the return on the investment, and our intent and ability to hold this investment for a period of time sufficient to recover our recorded investment.

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES

        The Company's loan portfolio consists of (1) purchased credit-impaired ("PCI") loans and (2) non-purchased credit-impaired ("Non-PCI") loans. PCI loans represent acquired loans for which there was, at the acquisition date, evidence of credit deterioration since their origination and it was probable that we would be unable to collect all contractually required payments. Such loans are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30, "Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality." Non-PCI loans are comprised of originated loans and acquired non-impaired loans for which there was no evidence of credit deterioration at their acquisition date and it was probable that we would be able to collect all contractually required payments. Originated loans are carried at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income. Unearned income is recognized as an adjustment to interest income over the contractual life of the loans using the effective interest method or taken into income when the related loans are paid off or sold. The purchase discount on acquired non-impaired loans is recognized as an adjustment to interest income over the contractual life of such loans using the effective interest method or taken into income when the related loans are paid off or sold.

        We further present our loans by "covered" and "non-covered" loan categories. Covered loans represent loans covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC for which we will be reimbursed for a substantial portion of any future losses under the terms of the agreements. Covered loans also include a portion of the loans acquired in the FCAL acquisition as FCB had acquired two failed banks from the FDIC for which the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC remain in effect. Non-covered loans and leases represent loans and leases not covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements.

16

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the composition of our loan and lease portfolio as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014									December 31, 2013
	Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total			Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total
	(In thousands)
Non-covered loans and leases	$	3,745,849		$	16,871		$	3,762,720		$	3,844,591		$	20,326		$	3,864,917
Covered loans		82,720			315,645			398,365			85,948			362,470			448,418
Total gross loans and leases		3,828,569			332,516			4,161,085			3,930,539			382,796			4,313,335
Unearned income		(18	)		—			(18	)		(983	)		—			(983	)
Total loans and leases, net of unearned income		3,828,551			332,516			4,161,067			3,929,556			382,796			4,312,352
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Non-covered loans and leases		(59,980	)		(270	)		(60,250	)		(60,241	)		—			(60,241	)
Covered loans		—			(20,930	)		(20,930	)		—			(21,793	)		(21,793	)
Total allowance for loan and lease losses		(59,980	)		(21,200	)		(81,180	)		(60,241	)		(21,793	)		(82,034	)
Total net loans and leases	$	3,768,571		$	311,316		$	4,079,887		$	3,869,315		$	361,003		$	4,230,318

17

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following table presents the composition of our gross loans and leases by portfolio segment as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Non-PCI Loans and Leases		PCI Loans		Total		Non-PCI Loans and Leases		PCI Loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Non-Covered Loans and Leases
Real estate mortgage	$	2,257,853	$	15,306	$	2,273,159	$	2,359,125	$	18,900	$	2,378,025
Real estate construction		231,351		1,531		232,882		200,332		1,391		201,723
Commercial		942,687		—		942,687		963,152		—		963,152
Leases		249,736		—		249,736		269,769		—		269,769
Consumer		64,222		34		64,256		52,213		35		52,248
Total gross non-covered loans and leases	$	3,745,849	$	16,871	$	3,762,720	$	3,844,591	$	20,326	$	3,864,917
Covered Loans
Real estate mortgage	$	62,719	$	306,226	$	368,945	$	65,739	$	352,234	$	417,973
Real estate construction		8,722		8,315		17,037		8,758		9,036		17,794
Commercial		8,719		873		9,592		8,855		974		9,829
Consumer		2,560		231		2,791		2,596		226		2,822
Total gross covered loans	$	82,720	$	315,645	$	398,365	$	85,948	$	362,470	$	448,418
Total Loans and Leases
Real estate mortgage	$	2,320,572	$	321,532	$	2,642,104	$	2,424,864	$	371,134	$	2,795,998
Real estate construction		240,073		9,846		249,919		209,090		10,427		219,517
Commercial		951,406		873		952,279		972,007		974		972,981
Leases		249,736		—		249,736		269,769		—		269,769
Consumer		66,782		265		67,047		54,809		261		55,070
Total gross loans and leases	$	3,828,569	$	332,516	$	4,161,085	$	3,930,539	$	382,796	$	4,313,335

18

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following tables present a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses on Non-PCI loans and leases by portfolio segment and PCI loans for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
	Real Estate Mortgage			Real Estate Construction			Commercial			Leases			Consumer			Total Non-PCI			Total PCI			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
Balance, beginning of period	$	26,078		$	4,298		$	23,694		$	3,227		$	2,944		$	60,241		$	21,793		$	82,034
Charge-offs		(94	)		—			(1,069	)		(372	)		(15	)		(1,550	)		—			(1,550	)
Recoveries		261			24			377			—			27			689			51			740
Provision (negative provision)		(1,893	)		(219	)		1,332			551			829			600			(644	)		(44	)
Balance, end of period	$	24,352		$	4,103		$	24,334		$	3,406		$	3,785		$	59,980		$	21,200		$	81,180
Amount of the allowance applicable to loans and leases:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,690		$	251		$	5,337		$	—		$	387		$	8,665
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	21,662		$	3,852		$	18,997		$	3,406		$	3,398		$	51,315
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality																			$	21,200
Loans and Leases:
Ending balance	$	2,320,572		$	240,073		$	951,406		$	249,736		$	66,782		$	3,828,569		$	332,516		$	4,161,085
The ending balance of the loan and lease portfolio is composed of loans and leases:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	58,532		$	12,926		$	17,572		$	220		$	3,972		$	93,222
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,262,040		$	227,147		$	933,834		$	249,516		$	62,810		$	3,735,347
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality																			$	332,516

19

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
	Real Estate Mortgage			Real Estate Construction			Commercial			Leases			Consumer			Total Non-PCI			Total PCI		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
Balance, beginning of period	$	38,700		$	3,221		$	20,759		$	1,493		$	1,726		$	65,899		$	26,069	$	91,968
Charge-offs		(322	)		—			(708	)		(114	)		(9	)		(1,153	)		—		(1,153	)
Recoveries		177			323			407			—			23			930			97		1,027
Provision (negative provision)		(1,290	)		(244	)		693			627			(246	)		(460	)		3,137		2,677
Balance, end of period	$	37,265		$	3,300		$	21,151		$	2,006		$	1,494		$	65,216		$	29,303	$	94,519
Amount of the allowance applicable to loans and leases:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	7,805		$	122		$	4,467		$	—		$	273		$	12,667
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	29,460		$	3,178		$	16,684		$	2,006		$	1,221		$	52,549
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality																			$	29,303
Loans and Leases:
Ending balance	$	1,818,285		$	126,707		$	814,292		$	204,766		$	19,148		$	2,983,198		$	487,489	$	3,470,687
The ending balance of the loan and lease portfolio is composed of loans and leases:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	95,712		$	13,688		$	13,355		$	244		$	629		$	123,628
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,722,573		$	113,019		$	800,937		$	204,522		$	18,519		$	2,859,570
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality																			$	487,489

Non-Purchased Credit Impaired (Non-PCI) Loans and Leases

        The following table presents the composition of Non-PCI loans and leases by portfolio segment as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Amount			% of Total			Amount			% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate mortgage	$	2,320,572			60	%	$	2,424,864			62	%
Real estate construction		240,073			6			209,090			5
Commercial		951,406			25			972,007			25
Leases		249,736			7			269,769			7
Consumer		66,782			2			54,809			1
Total gross Non-PCI loans and leases		3,828,569			100	%		3,930,539			100	%
Less:
Unearned income		(18	)					(983	)
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(59,980	)					(60,241	)
Total net Non-PCI loans and leases	$	3,768,571					$	3,869,315

20

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following table presents the credit risk rating categories for Non-PCI loans and leases by portfolio segment and class as of the dates indicated. Nonclassified loans and leases are those with a credit risk rating of either pass or special mention, while classified loans and leases are those with a credit risk rating of either substandard or doubtful.

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Nonclassified		Classified		Total		Nonclassified		Classified		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	159,966	$	10,907	$	170,873	$	168,216	$	12,337	$	180,553
SBA 504		37,143		5,175		42,318		39,869		5,297		45,166
Other		2,043,877		63,504		2,107,381		2,134,866		64,279		2,199,145
Total real estate mortgage		2,240,986		79,586		2,320,572		2,342,951		81,913		2,424,864
Real estate construction:
Residential		59,795		747		60,542		58,131		750		58,881
Commercial		173,294		6,237		179,531		143,918		6,291		150,209
Total real estate construction		233,089		6,984		240,073		202,049		7,041		209,090
Commercial:
Collateralized		535,547		44,437		579,984		568,348		18,838		587,186
Unsecured		141,532		1,977		143,509		151,896		1,856		153,752
Asset-based		196,802		3,772		200,574		195,569		6,859		202,428
SBA 7(a)		21,729		5,610		27,339		22,880		5,761		28,641
Total commercial		895,610		55,796		951,406		938,693		33,314		972,007
Leases		245,936		3,800		249,736		269,137		632		269,769
Consumer		62,431		4,351		66,782		50,398		4,411		54,809
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	3,678,052	$	150,517	$	3,828,569	$	3,803,228	$	127,311	$	3,930,539

        In addition to our internal risk rating process, our federal and state banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's loan risk rating classifications. Our regulators may require the Company to recognize rating downgrades based on their judgments related to information available to them at the time of their examinations. Risk rating downgrades generally result in higher allowances for credit losses.

21

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following tables present an aging analysis of our Non-PCI loans and leases by portfolio segment and class as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014
	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	170,873	$	170,873
SBA 504		393		1,092		—		1,485		40,833		42,318
Other		5,065		379		12,941		18,385		2,088,996		2,107,381
Total real estate mortgage		5,458		1,471		12,941		19,870		2,300,702		2,320,572
Real estate construction:
Residential		—		—		—		—		60,542		60,542
Commercial		—		—		2,013		2,013		177,518		179,531
Total real estate construction		—		—		2,013		2,013		238,060		240,073
Commercial:
Collateralized		140		382		365		887		579,097		579,984
Unsecured		—		1		64		65		143,444		143,509
Asset-based		—		—		—		—		200,574		200,574
SBA 7(a)		1,471		21		407		1,899		25,440		27,339
Total commercial		1,611		404		836		2,851		948,555		951,406
Leases		4,075		220		—		4,295		245,441		249,736
Consumer		280		32		3,180		3,492		63,290		66,782
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	11,424	$	2,127	$	18,970	$	32,521	$	3,796,048	$	3,828,569

22

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

	December 31, 2013
	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	180,553	$	180,553
SBA 504		2,564		—		—		2,564		42,602		45,166
Other		12,466		560		2,406		15,432		2,183,713		2,199,145
Total real estate mortgage		15,030		560		2,406		17,996		2,406,868		2,424,864
Real estate construction:
Residential		—		—		—		—		58,881		58,881
Commercial		—		—		2,013		2,013		148,196		150,209
Total real estate construction		—		—		2,013		2,013		207,077		209,090
Commercial:
Collateralized		66		407		259		732		586,454		587,186
Unsecured		83		—		68		151		153,601		153,752
Asset-based		—		—		—		—		202,428		202,428
SBA 7(a)		1,173		597		243		2,013		26,628		28,641
Total commercial		1,322		1,004		570		2,896		969,111		972,007
Leases		2,530		132		244		2,906		266,863		269,769
Consumer		3,315		4		—		3,319		51,490		54,809
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	22,197	$	1,700	$	5,233	$	29,130	$	3,901,409	$	3,930,539

        At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had no loans and leases (excluding PCI loans) that were greater than 90 days past due and still accruing interest. It is the Company's policy to discontinue accruing interest when principal or interest payments are past due 90 days or when, in the opinion of management, there is a reasonable doubt as to the collectability of a loan or lease in the normal course of business.

23

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following table presents our nonaccrual and performing Non-PCI loans and leases by portfolio segment and class as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Nonaccrual		Performing		Total		Nonaccrual		Performing		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	6,639	$	164,234	$	170,873	$	6,723	$	173,830	$	180,553
SBA 504		2,519		39,799		42,318		2,602		42,564		45,166
Other		29,701		2,077,680		2,107,381		18,648		2,180,497		2,199,145
Total real estate mortgage		38,859		2,281,713		2,320,572		27,973		2,396,891		2,424,864
Real estate construction:
Residential		387		60,155		60,542		389		58,492		58,881
Commercial		3,353		176,178		179,531		2,830		147,379		150,209
Total real estate construction		3,740		236,333		240,073		3,219		205,871		209,090
Commercial:
Collateralized		7,797		572,187		579,984		9,991		577,195		587,186
Unsecured		411		143,098		143,509		458		153,294		153,752
Asset-based		558		200,016		200,574		1,070		201,358		202,428
SBA 7(a)		2,993		24,346		27,339		3,037		25,604		28,641
Total commercial		11,759		939,647		951,406		14,556		957,451		972,007
Leases		220		249,516		249,736		632		269,137		269,769
Consumer		3,543		63,239		66,782		394		54,415		54,809
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	58,121	$	3,770,448	$	3,828,569	$	46,774	$	3,883,765	$	3,930,539

        At March 31, 2014, nonaccrual loans and leases totaled $58.1 million. Nonaccrual loans and leases included $5.7 million of loans 30 to 89 days past due and $33.4 million of current loans that were placed on nonaccrual status based on management's judgment regarding their collectability. Nonaccrual loans and leases totaled $46.8 million at December 31, 2013, including $4.2 million of loans 30 to 89 days past due and $37.3 million of current loans that were placed on nonaccrual status based on management's judgment regarding their collectability.

24

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        Non-PCI Nonaccrual loans and leases and performing restructured loans are considered impaired for reporting purposes. The following table presents the composition of our impaired loans and leases as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Nonaccrual Loans/Leases		Performing Restructured Loans		Total Impaired Loans/Leases		Nonaccrual Loans/Leases		Performing Restructured Loans		Total Impaired Loans/Leases
	(In thousands)
Real estate mortgage	$	38,859	$	19,673	$	58,532	$	27,973	$	34,303	$	62,276
Real estate construction		3,740		9,186		12,926		3,219		4,293		7,512
Commercial		11,759		5,813		17,572		14,556		2,744		17,300
Leases		220		—		220		632		—		632
Consumer		3,543		429		3,972		394		308		702
Total	$	58,121	$	35,101	$	93,222	$	46,774	$	41,648	$	88,422

25

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following tables present information regarding our Non-PCI impaired loans and leases by portfolio segment and class for the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(In thousands)
With An Allowance Recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	5,658	$	6,198	$	132	$	5,717	$	6,215	$	198
SBA 504		1,092		1,092		99		1,642		1,643		230
Other		18,656		18,831		2,459		15,937		16,571		1,760
Real estate construction:
Residential		774		774		158		778		778		168
Commercial		443		443		93		1,250		1,250		1
Commercial:
Collateralized		5,989		6,360		4,415		4,377		4,692		4,270
Unsecured		778		808		357		801		829		375
Asset-based		558		558		388		1,070		1,070		180
SBA 7(a)		919		919		177		1,136		1,136		178
Consumer		3,721		3,788		387		424		471		240
With No Related Allowance Recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	2,971	$	3,385	$	—	$	3,013	$	3,385	$	—
SBA 504		2,519		3,624		—		2,602		3,646		—
Other		27,636		35,127		—		33,365		46,062		—
Real estate construction:
Commercial		11,709		16,175		—		5,484		9,923		—
Commercial:
Collateralized		5,852		7,848		—		6,700		9,924		—
Unsecured		344		462		—		179		247		—
SBA 7(a)		3,132		5,105		—		3,037		4,945		—
Leases		220		220		—		632		632		—
Consumer		251		366		—		278		394		—
Total Non-PCI Loans and Leases With and Without An Allowance Recorded:
Real estate mortgage	$	58,532	$	68,257	$	2,690	$	62,276	$	77,522	$	2,188
Real estate construction		12,926		17,392		251		7,512		11,951		169
Commercial		17,572		22,060		5,337		17,300		22,843		5,003
Leases		220		220		—		632		632		—
Consumer		3,972		4,154		387		702		865		240
Total	$	93,222	$	112,083	$	8,665	$	88,422	$	113,813	$	7,600

26

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014				2013
	Weighted Average Recorded Investment(1)		Interest Income Recognized		Weighted Average Recorded Investment(1)		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With An Allowance Recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	5,658	$	20	$	8,860	$	20
SBA 504		1,092		15		1,672		22
Other		16,174		119		48,032		395
Real estate construction:
Residential		774		4		1,046		—
Commercial		5		—		3,296		34
Commercial:
Collateralized		3,765		6		2,523		13
Unsecured		742		6		2,228		10
Asset-based		304		—		19		—
SBA 7(a)		919		10		2,159		15
Consumer		2,151		4		458		2
With No Related Allowance Recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	2,971	$	—	$	—	$	—
SBA 504		2,519		—		2,936		—
Other		23,549		63		11,312		93
Real estate construction:
Commercial		5,491		25		3,688		25
Commercial:
Collateralized		4,861		6		1,297		—
Unsecured		326		—		143		—
SBA 7(a)		3,132		2		3,119		5
Leases		220		—		244		—
Consumer		251		1		155		—
Total Non-PCI Loans and Leases With and Without An Allowance Recorded:
Real estate mortgage	$	51,963	$	217	$	72,812	$	530
Real estate construction		6,270		29		8,030		59
Commercial		14,049		30		11,488		43
Leases		220		—		244		—
Consumer		2,402		5		613		2
Total	$	74,904	$	281	$	93,187	$	634

(1)

For the loans and leases (excluding PCI loans) reported as impaired at March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, amounts were calculated based on the period of time such loans and leases were impaired during the reporting period.

27

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following tables present Non-PCI new troubled debt restructurings and defaulted troubled debt restructurings for the periods indicated:

	Troubled Debt Restructurings
							Troubled Debt Restructurings That Subsequently Defaulted(1)
			Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	Number of Loans						Number of Loans		Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Real estate mortgage:
Other		4	$	2,515	$	2,515		—	$	—
Real estate construction:
Commercial		2		4,927		4,927		—		—
Commercial:
Collateralized		4		3,287		3,287		2		559
Unsecured		2		38		38		1		21
Asset-based		—		—		—		1		301
SBA 7(a)		1		238		238		—		—
Consumer		1		124		124		—		—
Total		14	$	11,129	$	11,129		4	$	881	(2)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Real estate mortgage:
Other		5	$	13,223	$	13,223		1	$	1,298
Real estate construction:
Commercial		—		—		—		1		562
Commercial:
Collateralized		1		395		395		—		—
Total		6	$	13,618	$	13,618		2	$	1,860	(3)

(1)

The population of defaulted restructured loans for the period indicated includes only those loans restructured during the preceding 12-month period. The table excludes defaulted troubled restructurings in those classes for which the recorded investment was zero at the end of the period.

(2)

Represents the balance at March 31, 2014, for which there were no charge-offs.

(3)

Represents the balance at March 31, 2013, for which there were no charge-offs.

28

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

Purchased Credit Impaired (PCI) Loans

        The following table reflects the PCI loans by portfolio segment as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Amount			% of Total			Amount			% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate mortgage	$	356,653			96	%	$	412,791			96	%
Real estate construction		11,062			3			12,015			3
Commercial		2,542			1			3,021			1
Consumer		416			—			424			—
Total gross PCI loans		370,673			100	%		428,251			100	%
Less:
Discount		(38,157	)					(45,455	)
Allowance for loan losses		(21,200	)					(21,793	)
Total net PCI loans	$	311,316					$	361,003

        The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of PCI loans and accretable yield on those loans for the period indicated:

	Covered PCI Loans						Non-Covered PCI Loans
	Carrying Amount			Accretable Yield			Carrying Amount			Accretable Yield
	(In thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	340,677		$	(133,648	)	$	20,326		$	(5,920	)
Accretion		13,903			13,903			4,362			4,362
Payments received		(60,779	)		—			(7,817	)		—
Decrease (increase) in expected cash flows, net		—			869			—			(3,903	)
Negative provision (provision) for credit losses		914			—			(270	)		—
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	294,715		$	(118,876	)	$	16,601		$	(5,461	)

29

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6—LOANS AND LEASES (Continued)

        The following table presents the credit risk rating categories for PCI loans by portfolio segment as of the dates indicated. Nonclassified loans are those with a credit risk rating of either pass or special mention, while classified loans are those with a credit risk rating of either substandard or doubtful.

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Nonclassified		Classified		Total		Nonclassified		Classified		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate mortgage	$	193,554	$	127,978	$	321,532	$	216,092	$	155,042	$	371,134
Real estate construction		3,663		6,183		9,846		4,399		6,028		10,427
Commercial		455		418		873		569		405		974
Consumer		—		265		265		—		261		261
Total PCI loans	$	197,672	$	134,844	$	332,516	$	221,060	$	161,736	$	382,796

        In addition to our internal risk rating process, our federal and state banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's loan risk rating classifications. Our regulators may require the Company to recognize rating downgrades based on their judgments related to information available to them at the time of their examinations.

NOTE 7—OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED (OREO)

        The following tables summarize OREO by property type at the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
Property Type	Non-Covered OREO		Covered OREO		Total OREO		Non-Covered OREO		Covered OREO		Total OREO
	(In thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	10,050	$	3,111	$	13,161	$	10,672	$	5,081	$	15,753
Construction and land development		30,464		2,218		32,682		31,950		3,113		35,063
Multi-family		—		835		835		—		835		835
Single family residence		179		13		192		179		7		186
Total OREO, net	$	40,693	$	6,177	$	46,870	$	42,801	$	9,036	$	51,837

        The following table presents a rollforward of OREO, net of the valuation allowance, for the periods indicated:

	Non-Covered OREO			Covered OREO			Total OREO
	(In thousands)
OREO Activity:
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	42,801		$	9,036		$	51,837
Foreclosures		—			13			13
Provision for losses		—			(94	)		(94	)
Reductions related to sales		(2,108	)		(2,778	)		(4,886	)
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	40,693		$	6,177		$	46,870

30

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 8—FDIC LOSS SHARING ASSET

        We are party to four loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Such agreements cover a substantial portion of losses incurred on covered loans, other real estate owned, and certain investment securities.

        The following table presents the changes in the FDIC loss sharing asset for the period indicated:

	FDIC Loss Sharing Asset
	(In thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	45,524
FDIC share of recoveries, net of losses		(2,601	)
Cash received from FDIC		(383	)
Net amortization		(7,912	)
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	34,628

        The following table presents information about the composition of the FDIC loss sharing asset, the true-up liability, and the non-single family and the single family covered assets as of the date indicated:

	March 31, 2014
	Affinity Bank		Los Padres Bank		Western Commercial Bank		San Luis Trust Bank		Total
	(In thousands)
FDIC loss sharing asset	$	4,868	$	17,827	$	1,783	$	10,150	$	34,628
True-up liability		N/A		N/A	$	1,539	$	5,196	$	6,735
Non-single family covered assets(1)	$	167,456	$	115,460	$	16,007	$	41,297	$	340,220
Single family covered assets	$	14,277	$	72,887		N/A	$	33,607	$	120,771
Loss sharing expiration dates:
Non-single family		3rd Quarter 2014		3rd Quarter 2015		4th Quarter 2015		1st Quarter 2016
Single family		3rd Quarter 2019		3rd Quarter 2020		N/A		1st Quarter 2021
Loss recovery expiration dates:
Non-single family		3rd Quarter 2017		3rd Quarter 2018		4th Quarter 2018		1st Quarter 2019
Single family		3rd Quarter 2019		3rd Quarter 2020		N/A		1st Quarter 2021

(1)

Excludes securities.

31

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 9—BORROWINGS, SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES AND BROKERED DEPOSITS

Borrowings

        The following table summarizes our borrowings as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-recourse debt	$	5,748		6.18	%	$	7,126		6.30	%
FHLB advances		—		—			106,600		0.06	%
Total borrowings	$	5,748				$	113,726

        The non-recourse debt represents the payment stream of certain leases sold to third parties. The debt is secured by the equipment in the leases and all interest rates are fixed. As of March 31, 2014, this debt had a weighted average remaining maturity of 2.2 years.

        The Bank has established secured and unsecured lines of credit. We may borrow funds from time to time on a term or overnight basis from the FHLB, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ("FRBSF"), or other financial institutions.

        FHLB Secured Lines of Credit.    The borrowing arrangements with the FHLB are based on two separate FHLB programs, one collateralized by loans and the other by securities available-for-sale. At March 31, 2014, our FHLB borrowing lines were secured by: (1) a blanket lien on certain qualifying loans in our loan portfolio which were not pledged to the FRBSF, and (2) available-for-sale securities with a carrying value of $10.7 million. As of March 31, 2014, our aggregate remaining borrowing capacity under the FHLB secured borrowing lines was $1.3 billion.

        FRBSF Secured Line of Credit.    The Bank has a secured line of credit with the FRBSF. As of March 31, 2014, the Bank had secured borrowing capacity of $580.7 million collateralized by liens covering $722.8 million of certain qualifying loans. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no balances outstanding.

        Federal Funds Arrangements with Commercial Banks.    As of March 31, 2014, the Bank had unsecured lines of credit of $80.0 million with correspondent banks for the purchase of overnight funds, subject to availability of funds. These lines are renewable annually and have no unused commitment fees. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no balances outstanding.

32

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 9—BORROWINGS, SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES AND BROKERED DEPOSITS (Continued)

Subordinated Debentures

        The following table summarizes the terms of each issuance of the subordinated debentures outstanding as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
													Date Issued		Maturity Date			Next Reset Date
Series	Amount			Rate(1)			Amount			Rate(2)							Rate Index
	(Dollars in thousands)
Trust V	$	10,310			3.33	%	$	10,310			3.34	%		8/15/03		9/17/33	3 month LIBOR + 3.10		6/13/14
Trust VI		10,310			3.28	%		10,310			3.29	%		9/3/03		9/15/33	3 month LIBOR + 3.05		6/12/14
Trust CII		5,155			3.18	%		5,155			3.19	%		9/17/03		9/17/33	3 month LIBOR + 2.95		6/13/14
Trust VII		61,856			2.97	%		61,856			2.99	%		2/5/04		4/23/34	3 month LIBOR + 2.75		7/28/14
Trust CIII		20,619			1.92	%		20,619			1.93	%		8/15/05		9/15/35	3 month LIBOR + 1.69		6/12/14
Trust FCCI		16,495			1.83	%		16,495			1.84	%		1/25/07		3/15/37	3 month LIBOR + 1.60		6/12/14
Trust FCBI		10,310			1.78	%		10,310			1.79	%		9/30/05		12/15/35	3 month LIBOR + 1.55		6/12/14
Gross subordinated debentures		135,055						135,055
Unamortized discount		(2,265	)					(2,410	)
Net subordinated debentures	$	132,790					$	132,645

(1)

As of April 28, 2014.

(2)

As of January 28, 2014.

        Interest payments made by the Company on subordinated debentures are considered dividend payments under the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB") regulations. Bank holding companies, such as PacWest Bancorp, are required to notify the FRB prior to declaring and paying a dividend to stockholders during any period in which quarterly and/or cumulative twelve-month net earnings are insufficient to fund the dividend amount, among other requirements.

Brokered Deposits

        Brokered time deposits totaled $48.0 million at March 31, 2014, and $49.4 million at December 31, 2013, all of which were part of the CDARS program. The CDARS program represents deposits that are participated with other FDIC-insured financial institutions as a means to provide FDIC deposit insurance coverage for the full amount of our customers' deposits.

NOTE 10—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lending Commitments

        The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and commitments to purchase equipment being acquired for lease to others. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the

33

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 10—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

amount recognized in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

        The following table presents a summary of the financial instruments described above as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Loan commitments to extend credit	$	1,010,073	$	1,001,740
Standby letters of credit		35,125		39,200
Commitments to purchase equipment being acquired for lease to others		17,262		8,475
	$	1,062,460	$	1,049,415

        Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

        Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements. Most guarantees expire within one year from the date of issuance. The Company generally requires collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk.

        In addition, the Company has investments in low income housing project partnerships, which provide the Company income tax credits, and in a few small business investment companies. The investments call for capital contributions up to an amount specified in the partnership agreements. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had commitments to contribute capital to these entities totaling $16.8 million and $11.0 million, respectively.

Legal Matters

        In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to various legal actions, which we believe are incidental to the operation of our business. The outcome of such legal actions and the timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict. In the opinion of management, based upon information currently available to us, any resulting liability, in addition to amounts already accrued, taking into consideration insurance which may be applicable, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial statements or operations.

FCAL-Related Litigation

        As set forth below, there are a number of litigation matters pending against FCB, the defense of which PacWest has assumed.

34

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 10—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

        Fourteen lawsuits have been filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles against FCB, among others, by various former clients of political campaign and non-profit organization treasurer Kinde Durkee. The lawsuits are entitled (i) Wardlaw, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. SC 114232), filed September 23, 2011; (ii) Lou Correa for State Senate, Orange County's Youth et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 479872), filed February 29, 2012; (iii) Committee(s) to Re-elect Lorreta Sanchez, Linda Sanchez, and Susan Davis, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 479873), filed February 29, 2012; (iv) Holden for Assembly v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 489604), filed August 3, 2012; (v) Latino Diabetes Ass'n v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 489605), filed August 3, 2012; (vi) Jose Solorio Assembly Officeholder Committee, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. 492855), filed September 27, 2012; (vii) Foster for Treasurer 2014, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 492878), filed September 27, 2012; (viii) Los Angeles County Democratic Central Committee, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 492854), filed September 27, 2012; (ix) FCAL v. 68th AD Democratic PAC, et al. (Case No. : BC470812), filed September 23, 2011(the "Interpleader Action"); (x) First California Bank v. Shallman, John, Shallman Communication/John D. Shallman v. FCB (Case No. LC099226), filed December 11, 2012; (xi) National Popular Vote, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC501213) filed February 19, 2013; (xii) Zine v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC504476), filed April 2, 2013; (xiii) Rothman, Elliott v. FCAL (Case No. BC511180), filed June 5, 2013; and (xiv) Ted Lieu as Treasurer for Ted Lieu for Assembly 2008 v. First California Bank (Case No. BC470182), filed November 18, 2011.

        Plaintiffs in each of the cases claim, among other things, that FCB aided and abetted a fraud and unlawful conversion by Ms. Durkee and/or her affiliated company of funds held in accounts at FCB. Based largely on the same alleged conduct, plaintiffs also assert claims for an alleged violation of California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 and for declaratory relief. Plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as various forms of equitable and declaratory relief.

        Each of the cases is pending before the same judge, who is coordinating their progress. FCB has answered each of the complaints, and the parties have engaged in discovery.

        On September 23, 2011, FCB filed a Complaint-in-Interpleader in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles (Case No. BC 470182), pursuant to which FCB interpleaded the sum of $2,539,049 as the amounts on deposit in accounts at FCB that were controlled by Ms. Durkee on behalf of the several hundred named defendants (the "Interpleader Action"). FCB seeks an order requiring the defendants to interplead and litigate their respective claims, discharging FCB from liability, and restraining proceedings or actions against FCB by the defendants with respect to those amounts. On December 6, 2011, the Interpleader Action was designated as complex and transferred to the Superior Court's complex litigation division. It has been related to the other pending actions that relate to the conduct of Ms. Durkee.

        On June 18, 2012, FCB moved for summary judgment in the Interpleader Action. At hearings held in late 2012 and early 2013, the Superior Court entered summary judgment with respect to a majority of the accounts at issue. Those sums have been paid by the Superior Court to the former accountholders. There still remains a total of $99,884.79 on deposit with the Court in the Interpleader Action.

35

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 10—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

        In September 2013, Ms. Durkee pled guilty to mail fraud resulting in a judgment of $9.7 million being entered against her. The parties participated in a mediation on October 16, 2013, which did not result in settlement of any claims. Thereafter, at a Further Status Conference on December 19, 2013, the Court scheduled a jury trial on August 13, 2014 as to the following cases: Orange County's Youth, Latino Diabetes Association, Jose Solorio Assembly Officeholder Committee, Holden for Assembly, and Committee(s) to Re-elect Lorreta Sanchez, Linda Sanchez, and Susan Davis (the "First 7 Plaintiffs"). July 14, 2014 has been reserved as the hearing date for the Bank's motion for summary judgment on the claims of the First 7 Plaintiffs.

CapitalSource Merger-Related Litigation

        Since July 24, 2013, 11 putative stockholder class action lawsuits (the "Merger Litigations") were filed against PacWest and certain other defendants in connection with PacWest entering into the CapitalSource Merger Agreement in which PacWest agreed to acquire CapitalSource. The CapitalSource Merger Agreement was publicly announced on July 22, 2013. Five of the 11 actions were filed in Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County: (1) Engel v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. BC516267, filed on July 24, 2013; (2) Miller v.Fremder et al., Case No. BC516590, filed on July 29, 2013; (3) Basu v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. BC516775, filed on July 31, 2013; (4) Holliday v.PacWest Bancorp et al., Case No. BC517209, filed on August 5, 2013 and (5) Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v.CapitalSource Inc. et al., Case No. BC517698, filed on August 8, 2013 (collectively, the "California Actions"). The other six actions were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: (1) Fosket v.Byrnes et al., Case No. 8765, filed on August 1, 2013; (2) Bennett v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. 8770, filed on August 2, 2013; (3) Chalfant v.CapitalSource et al., Case No. 8777, filed on August 6, 2013; (4) Oliveira v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. 8779, filed on August 7, 2013; (5) Desai v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. 8804, filed on August 13, 2013; and (6) Fattore v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. 8927, filed on September 19, 2013 (collectively, the "Delaware Actions").

        On August 15, 2013, the Delaware Actions were consolidated into a single action, captionedIn re CapitalSource Inc. Stockholder Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 8765-CS, and assigned to Chancellor Leo E. Strine. On September 25, 2013, plaintiffs in the Delaware Actions filed a Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the "Delaware Consolidated Complaint"). On September 17, 2013, the California Actions were consolidated into a single action, captionedIn re CapitalSource Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Lead Case No. BC516267, and assigned to Judge Elihu M. Berle. On October 2, 2013, plaintiffs in the California Actions filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint (the "California Consolidated Complaint").

        The Delaware Consolidated Complaint and the California Consolidated Complaint each allege that the members of the CapitalSource board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to CapitalSource stockholders by approving the proposed merger for inadequate consideration; approving the transaction in order to obtain benefits not equally shared by other CapitalSource stockholders; entering into the merger agreement containing preclusive deal protection devices; and failing to take steps to maximize the value to be paid to the CapitalSource stockholders. The Delaware Consolidated Complaint and the California Consolidated Complaint also each allege claims against CapitalSource and PacWest for aiding and abetting these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. Plaintiffs in these actions seek, among

36

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 10—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

other things, declaratory and injunctive relief concerning the alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, injunctive relief prohibiting consummation of the merger, rescission, an accounting by defendants, damages and attorneys' fees and costs, and other and further relief. The judge in the Delaware Actions ruled on October 23, 2013, that discovery would proceed in the Delaware Actions and that it would be shared with the plaintiffs in the California Actions and that the California Actions would be stayed while that process takes place. Thereafter, on October 28, 2013, the California Actions' plaintiffs stipulated in the California Actions that they would participate in the discovery process in the Delaware Actions and the administrative stay in the California Actions will remain in place unless and until the Delaware Actions are abandoned.

        On December 20, 2013, the parties in the California and Delaware Actions entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the "MOU") setting forth the terms of an agreement in principle to settle both the California and Delaware Actions, subject to certain conditions and future occurrences. Under the terms of the MOU, the merger closed on April 7, 2014. The parties are finalizing a draft Stipulation of Settlement which, consistent with the terms of the MOU, will resolve both the California and Delaware Actions. The parties plan to submit this Settlement Stipulation to the Delaware Court for review as soon as it is complete, and to seek Court approval shortly thereafter. There is also a further status conference scheduled in the California Action on September 10, 2014. At this stage, it is not possible to predict the outcome of the proceedings or their financial impact on the Company; however, the agreements provide, among other things, for payment of Plaintiffs' attorneys fees by Company and/or its insurers, as a condition precedent to a release and dismissal of the Merger Litigations with prejudice.

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        We use fair value to measure certain assets on a recurring basis, primarily securities available-for-sale; we have no liabilities being measured at fair value. For assets measured at the lower of cost or fair value, the fair value measurement criteria may or may not be met during a reporting period and such measurements are therefore considered "nonrecurring" for purposes of disclosing our fair value measurements. Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to adjust carrying values for impaired loans and other real estate owned and also to record impairment on certain assets, such as goodwill, core deposit intangibles, and other long-lived assets.

37

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following table presents information on the assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of the date indicated:

	Fair Value Measurement as of March 31, 2014
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Measured on a Recurring Basis:
Securities available-for-sale:
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise residential mortgage-backed securities	$	844,306	$	—	$	844,306	$	—
Covered private label CMOs		37,594		—		—		37,594
Municipal securities		447,933		—		447,933		—
Corporate securities		84,211		—		84,211		—
Government-sponsored enterprise debt securities		36,054		—		36,054		—
Other securities		27,375		509		26,866		—
	$	1,477,473	$	509	$	1,439,370	$	37,594

        There were no transfers of assets either between Level 1 and Level 2 nor in or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for assets measured on a recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

        The following table presents information about quantitative inputs and assumptions used to evaluate the fair values provided by our third party pricing service for our Level 3 covered private label CMOs measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014:

Unobservable Inputs	Range of Inputs	Weighted Average Input
Voluntary annual prepayment speeds	0% - 34.4%		6.0	%
Annual default rates	0% - 39.1%		3.4	%
Loss severity rates	0% - 64.4%		29.9	%
Discount rates	0% - 11.5%		5.3	%

        The following table summarizes activity for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis that are categorized as Level 3 for the period indicated:

	Covered Private Label CMOs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	37,904
Total realized in earnings		296
Total unrealized gain in comprehensive income		544
Net settlements		(1,150	)
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	37,594

38

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following tables present assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of the date indicated and the gains and (losses) recognized on such assets for the period indicated:

	Fair Value Measurement as of March 31, 2014								Gain (Loss) Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis:
Non-covered impaired loans	$	31,926	$	—	$	5,284	$	26,642	$	(1,420	)
Covered other real estate owned		754		—		754		—		(87	)
SBA loan servicing asset		764		—		—		764		—
	$	33,444	$	—	$	6,038	$	27,406	$	(1,507	)

        The following table presents the valuation methodology and unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2014:

Asset	Fair Value (in 000's)		Valuation Methodology	Unobservable Inputs	Range	Weighted Average
Impaired loans(1)	$	25,788	Discounted	Discount rates	0% - 8.66%		6.47	%
			cash flow
SBA loan servicing asset	$	764	Discounted	Prepayment	3.40% - 16.34%			(2)
			cash flow	speeds
				Discount rates	9.63% - 13.42%			(2)

(1)

Excludes $854,000 of impaired loans with balances of $250,000 or less.

(2)

Not readily available.

        ASC Topic 825, "Financial Instruments," requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate such fair values. Additionally, certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from the applicable disclosure requirements.

39

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following tables present a summary of the carrying values and estimated fair values of certain financial instruments as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014
			Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying or Contract Amount
			Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	113,508	$	113,508	$	113,508	$	—	$	—
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions		228,579		228,579		228,579		—		—
Securities available-for-sale		1,477,473		1,477,473		509		1,439,370		37,594
Investment in FHLB stock		25,000		25,000		—		25,000		—
Loans and leases, net		4,079,887		4,089,647		—		5,284		4,084,363
SBA loan servicing asset		764		764		—		—		764
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand, money market, interest checking, and savings deposits		4,719,833		4,719,833		—		4,719,833		—
Time deposits		649,575		649,824		—		649,824		—
Borrowings		5,748		5,748		—		5,748		—
Subordinated debentures		132,790		132,649		—		132,649		—

	December 31, 2013
			Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying or Contract Amount
			Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	96,424	$	96,424	$	96,424	$	—	$	—
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions		50,998		50,998		50,998		—		—
Securities available-for-sale		1,494,745		1,494,745		507		1,456,334		37,904
Investment in FHLB stock		27,939		27,939		—		27,939		—
Loans and leases, net		4,230,318		4,231,078		—		2,051		4,229,027
SBA loan servicing asset		807		807		—		—		807
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand, money market, interest checking, and savings deposits		4,616,616		4,616,616		—		4,616,616		—
Time deposits		664,371		665,148		—		665,148		—
Borrowings		113,726		113,726		106,600		7,126		—
Subordinated debentures		132,645		132,498		—		132,498		—

40

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used to measure our assets recorded at fair value (under ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement") and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value (under ASC Topic 825).

        Cash and due from banks.    The carrying amount is assumed to be the fair value because of the liquidity of these instruments.

        Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions.    The carrying amount is assumed to be the fair value given the short-term nature of these deposits.

        Securities available-for-sale.    Securities available-for-sale are measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of "Accumulated other comprehensive income" in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. See Note 5,Investment Securities, for further information on unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale.

        Fair value for securities categorized as Level 1, which are publicly traded securities, are based on readily available quoted prices. In determining the fair value of the securities categorized as Level 2, we obtain a report from a nationally recognized broker-dealer detailing the fair value of each investment security we hold as of each reporting date. The broker-dealer uses observable market information to value our securities, with the primary source being a nationally recognized pricing service. We review the market prices provided by the broker-dealer for our securities for reasonableness based on our understanding of the marketplace and we consider any credit issues related to the securities. As we have not made any adjustments to the market quotes provided to us and they are based on observable market data, they have been categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

        Our covered private label CMOs are categorized as Level 3 due in part to the inactive market for such securities. There is a wide range of prices quoted for private label CMOs among independent third party pricing services and this range reflects the significant judgment being exercised over the assumptions and variables that determine the pricing of such securities. We consider this subjectivity to be a significant unobservable input and have concluded that the covered private label CMOs should be categorized as a Level 3 measured asset. Our fair value estimate was based on prices provided to us by a nationally recognized pricing service which we also use to determine the fair value of the majority of our securities portfolio. We determined the reasonableness of the fair values by reviewing assumptions at the individual security level about prepayment, default expectations, estimated severity loss factors, and discount rates, all of which are not directly observable in the market. Significant changes in default expectations, severity loss factors, or discount rates, which occur all together or in isolation, would result in different fair value measurements.

        FHLB stock.    Investments in FHLB stock are recorded at cost and measured for impairment quarterly. Ownership of FHLB stock is restricted to member banks and the securities do not have a readily determinable market value. Purchases and sales of these securities are at par value with the issuer. The fair value of investments in FHLB stock is equal to the carrying amount.

        Non-PCI impaired loans.    Nonaccrual loans and performing restructured loans are considered impaired for reporting purposes and are measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

41

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

Non-PCI nonaccrual loans with an unpaid principal balance over $250,000 and all performing restructured loans are reviewed individually for the amount of impairment, if any. Non-PCI nonaccrual loans with an unpaid principal balance of $250,000 or less are evaluated for impairment collectively.

        To the extent a loan is collateral dependent, we measure such impaired loan based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. The fair value of each loan's collateral is generally based on estimated market prices from an independently prepared appraisal, which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidating such collateral; such valuation inputs result in a nonrecurring fair value measurement that is categorized as a Level 2 measurement. The Level 2 measurement is based on appraisals obtained within the last 12 months and for which a charge-off was recognized or a change in the specific valuation allowance was made during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

        When adjustments are made to an appraised value to reflect various factors such as the age of the appraisal or known changes in the market or the collateral, such valuation inputs are considered unobservable and the fair value measurement is categorized as a Level 3 measurement. The impaired loans categorized as Level 3 also include unsecured loans and other secured loans whose fair values are based significantly on unobservable inputs such as the strength of a guarantor, including an SBA government guarantee, cash flows discounted at the effective loan rate, and management's judgment.

        The Non-PCI impaired loan balances shown above represent those nonaccrual and restructured loans for which impairment was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The amounts shown as net losses include the impairment recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014, for the loan balances shown. Of the $58.1 million of nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2014, none were written down to their collateral fair values through charge-offs during the quarter.

        Other real estate owned.    The fair value of foreclosed real estate, both non-covered and covered, is generally based on estimated market prices from independently prepared current appraisals or negotiated sales prices with potential buyers, less estimated costs to sell; such valuation inputs result in a fair value measurement that is categorized as a Level 2 measurement on a nonrecurring basis. As a matter of policy, appraisals are required annually and may be updated more frequently as circumstances require in the opinion of management. The Level 2 measurement for OREO is based on appraisals obtained within the last 12 months and for which a write-down was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

        When a current appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value as a result of known changes in the market or the collateral and there is no observable market price, such valuation inputs result in a fair value measurement that is categorized as a Level 3 measurement. To the extent a negotiated sales price or reduced listing price represents a significant discount to an observable market price, such valuation input would result in a fair value measurement that is also considered a Level 3 measurement. The OREO losses disclosed are write-downs based on either a recent appraisal obtained after foreclosure or an accepted purchase offer by an independent third party received after foreclosure.

        SBA servicing asset.    In accordance with ASC Topic 860, "Transfers and Servicing," the SBA servicing asset, included in "Other assets" in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, is carried at its implied fair value. The fair value of the servicing asset is estimated by discounting future cash flows

42

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

using market-based discount rates and prepayment speeds. The discount rate is based on the current U.S. Treasury yield curve, as published by the Department of the Treasury, plus a spread for the marketplace risk associated with these assets. We utilize estimated prepayment vectors using SBA prepayment information provided by Bloomberg for pools of similar assets to determine the timing of the cash flows. These nonrecurring valuation inputs are considered to be Level 3 inputs.

        Deposits.    Deposits are carried at historical cost. The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, interest checking, money market, and savings accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of the balance sheet date and considered Level 2. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows and considered Level 2. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. No value has been separately assigned to the Company's long-term relationships with its deposit customers, such as a core deposit intangible.

        Borrowings.    Borrowings include overnight FHLB advances and other fixed-rate term borrowings. Borrowings are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of overnight FHLB advances is equal to the carrying value and considered Level 1. The fair value of fixed-rate borrowings is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity dates or call dates, if applicable, using estimated market discount rates that reflect current rates offered for borrowings with similar remaining maturities and characteristics and are considered Level 2.

        Subordinated debentures.    Subordinated debentures are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of subordinated debentures with variable rates is determined using a market discount rate on the expected cash flows.

        Commitments to extend credit.    The majority of our commitments to extend credit carry current market interest rates if converted to loans. Because these commitments are generally unassignable by either the borrower or us, they only have value to the borrower and us. The estimated fair value approximates the recorded deferred fee amounts and is excluded from the table above because it is not material.

Limitations

        Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time and are based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect income taxes or any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company's entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a portion of the Company's financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on what management believes to be conservative judgments regarding expected future cash flows, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimated fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. Since the fair values have been estimated as of March 31, 2014, the amounts that will actually be realized or paid at settlement or maturity of the instruments could be significantly different.

43

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 12—EARNINGS PER SHARE

        The following is a summary of the calculation of basic and diluted net earnings per share for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Basic Earnings Per Share:
Net earnings from continuing operations	$	25,905		$	3,447		$	13,494
Less: earnings allocated to unvested restricted stock(1)		(500	)		(280	)		(326	)
Net earnings from continuing operations allocated to common shares		25,405			3,167			13,168
Net loss from discontinued operations allocated to common shares		(804	)		(338	)		—
Net earnings allocated to common shares	$	24,601		$	2,829		$	13,168
Weighted-average basic shares and unvested restricted stock outstanding		45,799			46,069			37,391
Less: weighted-average unvested restricted stock outstanding		(1,148	)		(1,743	)		(1,594	)
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		44,651			44,326			35,797
Basic earnings per share:
Net earnings from continuing operations	$	0.57		$	0.07		$	0.37
Net loss from discontinued operations		(0.02	)		(0.01	)		—
Net earnings	$	0.55		$	0.06		$	0.37
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Net earnings from continuing operations allocated to common shares	$	25,405		$	3,167		$	13,168
Net loss from discontinued operations allocated to common shares		(804	)		(338	)		—
Net earnings allocated to common shares	$	24,601		$	2,829		$	13,168
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		44,651			44,326			35,797
Diluted earnings per share:
Net earnings from continuing operations	$	0.57		$	0.07		$	0.37
Net loss from discontinued operations		(0.02	)		(0.01	)		—
Net earnings	$	0.55		$	0.06		$	0.37

(1)

Represents cash dividends paid to holders of unvested restricted stock, net of estimated forfeitures, plus undistributed earnings amounts available to holders of unvested restricted stock, if any.

NOTE 13—STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

        The Company's 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2003 Plan, permits stock based compensation awards to officers, directors, key employees and consultants. As of March 31, 2014, the 2003 Plan authorized grants of stock-based compensation instruments to purchase or issue up to 9,000,000 shares of authorized but unissued Company common stock, subject to adjustments provided by the 2003 Plan. As of March 31, 2014, there were 3,927,147 shares available for grant under the 2003 Plan. Upon consummation of the CapitalSource merger an additional 10,686,565 shares were added to the 2003

44

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 13—STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)

Plan. See Note 18,Subsequent Events, for information regarding the issuance of stock in connection with the CapitalSource merger, which was completed on April 7, 2014.

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock

        In December 2013, the Company accelerated the vesting of certain restricted stock awards that resulted in a pre-tax charge of $12.4 million ($12.2 million after tax). This action was taken by the Company in order to eliminate an additional $21.0 million of compensation and tax expense related to change in control payments that the Company would have otherwise incurred upon consummation of the CapitalSource merger. Such eliminated expenses relate to tax gross-up payments and the value of lost tax deductions, in each case due to the impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code as they apply to change in control payments that would have become payable to certain PacWest employees in conjunction with the CapitalSource merger. The restricted stock awards that were vested on an accelerated basis in 2013 would have otherwise vested upon consummation of the CapitalSource merger, and the $12.2 million after-tax charge to earnings recorded in December 2013 would have been incurred at that time.

        In April 2014, upon closing of the CapitalSource merger, 1,013,377 awarded shares of both time-based and performance-based common stock vested due to the triggering of the change of control provision contained within the 2003 Plan. We recorded a $16.8 million after-tax charge to earnings for the vesting of such shares in April 2014.

Restricted Stock

        At March 31, 2014, there were outstanding 479,986 shares of unvested time-based restricted common stock and 607,450 shares of unvested performance-based restricted common stock. All but 40,000 awarded shares of time-based restricted common stock that were issued prior to the closing of the CapitalSource merger vested upon the closing of the CapitalSource merger. The remaining awarded shares of time-based restricted common stock vest over a service period of four years from the date of the grant. Unless defined otherwise in the award, both time-based and performance-based restricted common stock vest immediately upon a change in control of the Company as defined in the 2003 Plan or upon death of the employee.

        Compensation expense related to time-based restricted stock awards is based on the fair value of the underlying stock on the award date and is recognized over the vesting period using the straight-line method. Restricted stock amortization, excluding the accelerated vesting of restricted stock, totaled $1.6 million, $2.3 million, and $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, December 31, 2013, and March 31, 2013, respectively. Such amounts are included in "Compensation expense" on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of earnings. As of March 31, 2014, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock was $27.4 million. At April 30, 2014, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested time-based restricted stock was $1.2 million.

45

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 14—ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

        The following table provides information about reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") for the period indicated:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
AOCI Component:	Amount Reclassified from AOCI			Affected Line Item in the Statement Where Net Income is Presented
	(In thousands)
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:
	$	4,752		Gain on sale of securities
		(1,996	)	Income tax expense
Total reclassification for the period	$	2,756		Net of tax

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
AOCI Component:	Amount Reclassified from AOCI			Affected Line Item in the Statement Where Net Income is Presented
	(In thousands)
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:
	$	409		Gain on sale of securities
		(172	)	Income tax expense
Total reclassification for the period	$	237		Net of tax

NOTE 15—BUSINESS SEGMENTS

        The Company's reportable segments consist of "Banking," "Asset Financing," and "Other." At March 31, 2014, the Other segment consisted of the PacWest Bancorp holding company and other elimination and reconciliation entries.

        The Bank's Asset Financing segment includes the operations of the divisions and subsidiaries that provide asset-based commercial loans and equipment leases. The asset-based lending products are offered primarily through three business units: (1) First Community Financial ("FCF"), a division of the Bank, based in Phoenix, Arizona; (2) BFI Business Finance ("BFI"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, based in San Jose, California; and (3) Celtic Capital Corporation ("Celtic"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank based in Santa Monica, California. The equipment leasing products are offered through Pacific Western Equipment Finance ("EQF"), a division of the Bank based in Midvale, Utah.

46

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 15—BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)

        The following tables present information regarding our business segments as of and for the periods indicated (the only segment income statements for which discontinued operations are applicable and reported are those for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013):

	March 31, 2014
Balance Sheet Data	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Loans and leases, net of unearned income	$	3,707,308		$	453,759		$	—		$	4,161,067
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(74,833	)		(6,347	)		—			(81,180	)
Total loans and leases, net	$	3,632,475		$	447,412		$	—		$	4,079,887
Goodwill	$	183,065		$	25,678		$	—		$	208,743
Core deposit and customer relationship intangibles, net		14,139			1,745			—			15,884
Total assets		5,990,162			517,126			10,565			6,517,853
Total deposits(1)		5,415,691			—			(46,283	)		5,369,408

(1)

The negative balance for total deposits in the "Other" segment represents the elimination of holding company cash held in deposit accounts at the Bank.

	March 31, 2013
Balance Sheet Data	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Loans and leases, net of unearned income	$	3,004,525		$	464,738		$	—		$	3,469,263
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(89,382	)		(5,137	)		—			(94,519	)
Total loans and leases, net	$	2,915,143		$	459,601		$	—		$	3,374,744
Goodwill	$	53,995		$	25,678		$	—		$	79,673
Core deposit and customer relationship intangibles, net		11,159			2,388			—			13,547
Total assets		4,773,916			504,554			21,435			5,299,905
Total deposits(1)		4,580,514			—			(27,284	)		4,553,230

(1)

The negative balance for total deposits in the "Other" segment represents the elimination of holding company cash held in deposit accounts at the Bank.

47

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 15—BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Results of Operations	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	77,595		$	10,765		$	—		$	88,360
Intersegment interest income (expense)		222			(222	)		—			—
Other interest expense		(1,227	)		(77	)		(1,041	)		(2,345	)
Net interest income		76,590			10,466			(1,041	)		86,015
Negative provision (provision) for credit losses		826			(182	)		—			644
Gain on sale of securities		4,752			—			—			4,752
FDIC loss sharing expense		(11,430	)		—			—			(11,430	)
Other noninterest income		6,897			4,445			27			11,369
Total noninterest income		219			4,445			27			4,691
OREO income, net		1,861			—			—			1,861
Intangible asset amortization		(1,191	)		(173	)		—			(1,364	)
Acquisition and integration costs		(2,200	)		—			—			(2,200	)
Other noninterest expense		(40,990	)		(6,573	)		(1,603	)		(49,166	)
Total noninterest expense		(42,520	)		(6,746	)		(1,603	)		(50,869	)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		35,115			7,983			(2,617	)		40,481
Income tax (expense) benefit		(12,334	)		(3,331	)		1,089			(14,576	)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		22,781			4,652			(1,528	)		25,905
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes		(1,413	)		—			—			(1,413	)
Income tax benefit		588			—			—			588
Net loss from discontinued operations		(825	)		—			—			(825	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	21,956		$	4,652		$	(1,528	)	$	25,080

48

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 15—BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)

	Three Months Ended December 31, 2013
Results of Operations	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	72,391		$	11,465		$	—		$	83,856
Intersegment interest income (expense)		241			(241	)		—			—
Other interest expense		(1,451	)		(85	)		(1,062	)		(2,598	)
Net interest income		71,181			11,139			(1,062	)		81,258
Negative provision (provision) for credit losses		2,026			(688	)		—			1,338
Loss on sale of securities		(272	)		—			—			(272	)
FDIC loss sharing expense		(10,593	)		—			—			(10,593	)
Other noninterest income		5,933			979			27			6,939
Total noninterest income		(4,932	)		979			27			(3,926	)
Accelerated vesting of restricted stock		(12,420	)		—			—			(12,420	)
OREO income, net		569			—			—			569
Intangible asset amortization		(1,274	)		(156	)		—			(1,430	)
Acquisition and integration costs		(4,253	)		—			—			(4,253	)
Other noninterest expense		(41,248	)		(5,720	)		(1,586	)		(48,554	)
Total noninterest expense		(58,626	)		(5,876	)		(1,586	)		(66,088	)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		9,649			5,554			(2,621	)		12,582
Income tax (expense) benefit		(7,902	)		(2,287	)		1,054			(9,135	)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		1,747			3,267			(1,567	)		3,447
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes		(578	)		—			—			(578	)
Income tax benefit		240			—			—			240
Net loss from discontinued operations		(338	)		—			—			(338	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	1,409		$	3,267		$	(1,567	)	$	3,109

49

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 15—BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Results of Operations	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	56,907		$	12,362		$	—		$	69,269
Intersegment interest income (expense)		471			(471	)		—			—
Other interest expense		(2,650	)		(143	)		(783	)		(3,576	)
Net interest income		54,728			11,748			(783	)		65,693
Negative provision (provision) for credit losses		(2,336	)		(801	)		—			(3,137	)
Gain on sale of securities		409			—			—			409
FDIC loss sharing expense		(3,137	)		—			—			(3,137	)
Other noninterest income		5,001			544			23			5,568
Total noninterest income		2,273			544			23			2,840
OREO income, net		500			—			—			500
Intangible asset amortization		(993	)		(183	)		—			(1,176	)
Acquisition and integration costs		(692	)		—			—			(692	)
Other noninterest expense		(35,346	)		(6,053	)		(1,416	)		(42,815	)
Total noninterest expense		(36,531	)		(6,236	)		(1,416	)		(44,183	)
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		18,134			5,255			(2,176	)		21,213
Income tax (expense) benefit		(6,430	)		(2,199	)		910			(7,719	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	11,704		$	3,056		$	(1,266	)	$	13,494

NOTE 16—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

        In connection with the CapitalSource merger on April 7, 2014, the Bank paid an advisory fee of $9.0 million to Castle Creek Financial LLC ("Castle Creek Financial"). Castle Creek Financial is an affiliate of Castle Creek Capital LLC, which is controlled by the Company's chairman.

NOTE 17—RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

        In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-11, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." Under ASU 2013-11, an unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. However, to the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position, or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. ASU 2013-11

50

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 17—RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (Continued)

was effective for us on January 1, 2014 and did not have any material effect on our financial statements.

        In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01, "Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects." ASU 2014-01 allows investors in low-income housing tax credit ("LIHTC") entities that meet certain conditions to present the net tax benefits (net of the amortization of the cost of the investment) within income tax expense. The cost of the investments that meet the conditions will be amortized in proportion to (and over the same period as) the total expected tax benefits, including tax credits and other tax benefits, as they are realized on the tax return. ASU 2014-01 is effective for us on January 1, 2015 and is to be applied retrospectively if investors elect the proportional amortization method. However, if investors have LIHTC investments accounted for under the effective yield method at adoption, they may continue to apply that method for those existing investments. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard permits expenses currently reported in noninterest expense to be reported in income tax expense. The adoption of this standard in January 2015 will not have a material impact on our financial statements, however, total noninterest expense and income tax expense will change.

        In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, "Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans Upon Foreclosure." ASU 2014-04 clarifies when a creditor should reclassify mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate from loans receivable to other real estate owned. ASU 2014-04 defines when an in-substance repossession or foreclosure has occurred and when a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate collateralizing a mortgage loan. ASU 2014-04 is effective for us on January 1, 2015 and can be applied either prospectively or using a modified retrospective transition method, and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this standard may have on our financial statements.

NOTE 18—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

CapitalSource Merger

        On April 7, 2014, PacWest Bancorp ("PacWest") completed the merger with CapitalSource Inc. ("CapitalSource"). The combined company is called PacWest Bancorp. As part of the merger, CapitalSource Bank, ("CSB"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CapitalSource, merged with and into PacWest's wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Pacific Western Bank, and the combined subsidiary bank is called Pacific Western Bank. As of March 31, 2014, CapitalSource had $9.1 billion in assets.

        Upon closing, PacWest created the CapitalSource division of Pacific Western Bank. This division, which will operate under the CapitalSource name, will continue to serve businesses nationwide with a full spectrum of middle-market lending. Pacific Western Bank, through its combined network of 81 branches throughout California, will continue to serve small and medium-sized businesses with financing solutions, cash management and deposit services.

        In the merger with CapitalSource, each share of CapitalSource common stock was converted into the right to receive $2.47 in cash and 0.2837 of a share of PacWest Bancorp common stock. PacWest issued an aggregate of approximately 56.7 million shares of PacWest common stock to CapitalSource stockholders. Based on the closing price of PacWest's common stock on April 7, 2014 of $45.83 per

51

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 18—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued)

share, the aggregate consideration paid to CapitalSource common stockholders and holders of equity awards to acquire CapitalSource common stock was approximately $3.1 billion.

        Former holders of CapitalSource common stock and equity awards to acquire CapitalSource common stock as a group received shares of PacWest common stock in the merger constituting approximately 55% of the outstanding shares of PacWest common stock immediately after the merger. As a result, holders of PacWest common stock immediately prior to the merger, as a group, own approximately 45% of the outstanding shares of the PacWest common stock immediately after the merger.

        The integration of CSB's deposit system and the conversion of CSB's branches to Pacific Western Bank's operating platform were completed over the weekend of April 12, 2014. CSB had 21 branches, 12 of which were closed in the consolidation with Pacific Western Bank at the close of business on April 11, 2014. One overlapping Pacific Western Bank branch was closed at the close of business on April 11, 2014 as well. All remaining branches re-opened on Monday April 14, 2014 as Pacific Western Bank branches.

        CSB was a commercial lender headquartered in Los Angeles, California. CSB provided financial products to small to middle market businesses nationwide and also provided depository products and services to consumers in southern and central California. CSB's loan origination efforts were conducted nationwide with offices located in Chevy Chase, Maryland; Los Angeles, California; Denver, Colorado; Chicago, Illinois; and New York, New York. As a result of the merger, we will increase our presence as a middle-market lender and increase our market share in our primary Southern California market.

        The CapitalSource merger has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. The assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the April 7, 2014 merger date. Such fair values are preliminary estimates and are subject to adjustment for up to one year after the merger date or when additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomes available and such information is considered final, whichever is earlier. While the fair values are preliminary we believe there will not be material adjustments to the amounts recorded with the exception of the acquired tax assets, which will be finalized once the final tax returns have been filed. The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in goodwill of $1.6 billion. All of the recognized goodwill is expected to be non-deductible for tax purposes. The assignment of goodwill to reporting segments has not yet been completed.

52

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 18—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued)

        The following table presents the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for CapitalSource as of April 7, 2014:

	April 7, 2014
	(In thousands)
Assets Acquired:
Cash and due from banks	$	768,553
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions		60,612
Investment securities available-for-sale		429,771
Loans and leases		6,886,289
Other real estate owned		7,665
Goodwill and intangible assets		1,611,153
Deferred tax asset, net		235,026
Other assets		732,514
Total assets acquired at fair value	$	10,731,583
Liabilities Assumed:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	4,631
Interest-bearing deposits		6,236,419
Other borrowings		992,109
Subordinated debentures		300,918
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		120,318
Total liabilities assumed at fair value	$	7,654,395
Total consideration paid	$	3,077,188
Summary of consideration:
Cash paid	$	483,118
PacWest common stock issued		2,594,070
Total	$	3,077,188

        The following table presents the amounts of the significant purchase accounting adjustments which will be accreted/amortized to earnings and the related amortization periods.

Description	Purchase Accounting Adjustment			Estimated Accretion/ Amortization Period
(In thousands) (DR. (CR.))
Loans and non-operating leases	$	(214,765	)	60 months using a level yield method
Operating leases (included in Other assets)	$	(10,352	)	48 months using a level yield method
Core deposit intangible	$	6,720		Straight line over 84 months
Investment in trust preferred securities	$	(3,352	)	Straight line over 280 months
Time deposit premium	$	(17,183	)	60 months using an accelerated method
Subordinated debentures	$	111,235		Straight line over 280 months

53

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 18—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued)

        As of April 7, 2014, the fair value of the CapitalSource Non-PCI loans acquired was $6.8 billion, the related gross contractual amount was $7.0 billion, and the estimated contractual cash flows not expected to be collected were $121.5 million.

        The following table summarizes the accretable yield on the purchased credit impaired loans acquired in the CapitalSource merger as of April 7, 2014:

	April 7, 2014 Accretable Yield
	(In thousands)
Undiscounted contractual cash flows	$	234,378
Undiscounted cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference)		(120,534	)
Undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected		113,844
Estimated fair value of PCI loans acquired		(88,627	)
Acquired accrued interest receivable		—
Accretable yield	$	25,217

        On April 7, 2014, as required by the merger agreement and as described in the joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to the merger, the Board of Directors of PacWest adopted a Tax Asset Protection Plan (the "Plan"). This Plan was described in detail in the joint proxy/prospectus and is similar to the Tax Benefit Preservation Plan that CapitalSource had in place prior to the merger. The purpose of the Plan is to seek to preserve PacWest's ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax assets (collectively, the "NOLs") for U.S. federal income tax purposes that PacWest and certain of its subsidiaries will continue to have after the merger. The Plan seeks to protect the ability to utilize the NOLs by mitigating the potential for an "ownership change" within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").

        In general, an "ownership change" would occur if PacWest's "5-percent shareholders," as defined under Section 382 of the Code, collectively increase their ownership in PacWest, in relation to their respective historical low points, by more than 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. In general, institutional holders that file as "investment advisers" for SEC purposes, such as mutual fund companies that hold PacWest common stock on behalf of several individual mutual funds where no single fund owns five percent or more of PacWest's common stock, are typically not treated as "5-percent shareholders" for purposes of Section 382 of the Code.

        The following table presents our unaudited pro forma results of operations for the periods presented as if the CapitalSource and FCAL acquisitions had been completed on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma results of operations include the historical accounts of the Company, CapitalSource, and FCAL, and pro forma adjustments as may be required, including the amortization of intangibles with definite lives and the amortization or accretion of any premiums or discounts arising from fair value adjustments for assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The unaudited pro forma information is intended for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of our future operating results or operating results that would have occurred had the CapitalSource and FCAL acquisitions been completed at the beginning of 2013. No assumptions have been applied to the pro

54

PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 18—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued)

forma results of operations regarding possible revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies or asset dispositions.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014		2013
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Pro forma revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income)	$	194,820	$	207,982
Pro forma net earnings from continuing operations	$	56,943	$	53,890
Pro forma net earnings from continuing operations per share:
Basic	$	0.56	$	0.53
Diluted	$	0.56	$	0.53

Other

        We have evaluated events that have occurred subsequent to March 31, 2014 and have concluded there are no subsequent events that would require recognition or disclosure in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

55

ITEM 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Information

        This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking information about the Company and its subsidiaries, which statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for "forward-looking statements" provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Such statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond the control of the Company. We caution readers that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, implied or projected by, such forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

•

lower than expected revenues;

•

credit quality deterioration or pronounced and sustained reduction in real estate market values could cause an increase in the allowance for credit losses and a reduction in earnings;

•

increased competitive pressure among depository institutions;

•

the Company's ability to complete future acquisitions and to successfully integrate such acquired entities or achieve expected benefits, synergies and/or operating efficiencies within expected time frames or at all;

•

difficulties and delays in integrating the Company and CapitalSource businesses or fully realizing cost savings and other benefits;

•

business disruption following the CapitalSource merger;

•

the reaction to the CapitalSource merger of the companies' customers, employees and counterparties;

•

the additional regulatory requirements associated with being a bank and bank holding company with assets in excess of $10 billion;

•

the possibility that personnel changes will not proceed as planned;

•

the cost of additional capital is more than expected;

•

a change in the interest rate environment reduces interest margins;

•

asset/liability repricing risks and liquidity risks;

•

pending legal matters may take longer or cost more to resolve or may be resolved adversely to the Company;

•

general economic conditions, either nationally or in the market areas in which the Company does or anticipates doing business, are less favorable than expected;

•

environmental conditions, including natural disasters, may disrupt our business, impede our operations, negatively impact the values of collateral securing the Company's loans or impair the ability of our borrowers to support their debt obligations;

•

the economic and regulatory effects of the continuing war on terrorism and other events of war, including the conflicts and uncertainties in the Middle East;

•

legislative or regulatory requirements or changes adversely affecting the Company's business;

•

changes in the securities markets; and

56

•

regulatory approvals for any capital activities cannot be obtained on the terms expected or on the anticipated schedule.

Overview

        PacWest Bancorp ("PacWest") is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Our principal business is to serve as the holding company for our Los Angeles-based wholly-owned subsidiary bank, Pacific Western Bank, which we refer to as Pacific Western or the Bank.

        Pacific Western is a full-service commercial bank offering a broad range of banking products and services including: accepting demand, money market, and time deposits; originating loans, including commercial, real estate construction, SBA guaranteed and consumer loans; originating equipment finance leases; and providing other business-oriented products. Our operations are primarily located in Southern California extending from San Diego County to California's Central Coast; we also operate three banking offices in the San Francisco Bay area, a leasing operation based in Utah, and asset-based lending operations based in Arizona as well as San Jose and Santa Monica, California. The Bank focuses on conducting business with small to medium-sized businesses in our marketplace and the owners and employees of those businesses. The majority of our loans are secured by the real estate collateral of such businesses. Our asset-based lending function operates in Arizona, California, Texas, Colorado, Minnesota, and the Pacific Northwest. Our equipment leasing function has lease receivables in 45 states.

        Pacific Western competes actively for deposits, and emphasizes solicitation of noninterest-bearing deposits. In managing the top line of our business, we focus on loan growth, loan yield, deposit cost, and net interest margin; net interest income, on a year-to-date basis, accounted for 94.8% of our net revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income).

        Total assets decreased $15.5 million during the first quarter of 2014 to $6.5 billion due mainly to decreases in total loans and leases, securities available-for-sale, the FDIC loss sharing asset, and other assets, offset partially by an increase in cash and cash equivalents. At March 31, 2014, gross loans and leases totaled $4.2 billion, a decrease of $152.3 million since December 31, 2013. The gross Non-PCI loan and lease portfolio totaled $3.8 billion, a decrease of $102.0 million during the first quarter reflecting $320.2 million in net pay downs offset by $168.0 million in originations and purchases. The PCI loan portfolio, which is mostly covered loans, totaled $332.5 million, down $50.3 million during the first quarter due to repayments and resolution activities. Securities available-for-sale declined $17.3 million, due mainly to the sale of $137.3 million in government sponsored enterprise ("GSE") pass through securities that resulted in a net gain of $4.8 million. Cash and cash equivalents increased $194.7 million to $342.1 million at quarter-end in anticipation of the CapitalSource merger, which closed April 7, 2014.

        Total liabilities decreased $40.1 million during the first quarter of 2014 to $5.7 billion due to decreases in FHLB advances, liabilities of discontinued operations, and accrued interest payable and other liabilities, offset partially by an increase in total deposits. The increase in total deposits of $88.4 million was represented by an increase in core deposits of $103.2 million, offset partially by a decrease of $14.8 million in time deposits. The increase in core deposits was composed of increases of $73.2 million, $30.2 million, and $7.4 million in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, and savings deposits, respectively, offset by a decrease of $7.5 million in interest checking deposits. At March 31, 2014, core deposits totaled $4.7 billion, or 88% of total deposits, and noninterest-bearing demand deposits totaled $2.4 billion, or 45% of total deposits.

57

        In December 2013, we accelerated the vesting of certain restricted stock awards that resulted in a pre-tax charge of $12.4 million ($12.2 million after tax). This action was taken by the Company in order to eliminate an additional $21.0 million of compensation and tax expense related to change in control payments that the Company would have otherwise incurred upon consummation of the CapitalSource merger. Such eliminated expenses relate to tax gross-up payments and the value of lost tax deductions, in each case due to the impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code as they apply to change in control payments that would have become payable to certain PacWest employees in conjunction with the CapitalSource merger. The restricted stock awards that were vested on an accelerated basis in 2013 would have otherwise vested upon consummation of the CapitalSource merger, and the $12.2 million after-tax charge to earnings recorded in December 2013 would have been incurred at that time.

CapitalSource Merger

        On April 7, 2014, we completed the merger with CapitalSource. The combined company is called PacWest Bancorp. As part of the merger, CapitalSource Bank ("CSB"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CapitalSource, merged with and into PacWest's wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Pacific Western Bank, and the combined subsidiary bank is called Pacific Western Bank. As of March 31, 2014, CapitalSource had $9.1 billion in assets. On a pro forma combined basis with CapitalSource and excluding purchase accounting adjustments, we would have had approximately $15.6 billion in assets as of March 31, 2014.

        Upon closing, we created the CapitalSource division of Pacific Western Bank. This division, which will operate under the CapitalSource name, will continue to serve businesses nationwide with a full spectrum of middle-market lending. Pacific Western Bank, through its combined network of 81 branches throughout California, will continue to serve small and medium-sized businesses with financing solutions, cash management and deposit services.

        In the merger with CapitalSource, each share of CapitalSource common stock was converted into the right to receive $2.47 in cash and 0.2837 of a share of PacWest common stock. We issued an aggregate of approximately 56.7 million shares of PacWest common stock to CapitalSource stockholders. Based on the closing price of PacWest's common stock on April 7, 2014 of $45.83 per share, the aggregate consideration paid to CapitalSource common stockholders and holders of equity awards to acquire CapitalSource common stock was approximately $3.1 billion.

        Former holders of CapitalSource common stock and equity awards to acquire CapitalSource common stock as a group received shares of PacWest common stock in the merger constituting approximately 55% of the outstanding shares of PacWest common stock immediately after the merger. As a result, holders of PacWest common stock immediately prior to the merger, as a group, own approximately 45% of the outstanding shares of the PacWest common stock immediately after the merger.

        The integration of CSB's deposit system and the conversion of CSB's branches to Pacific Western Bank's operating platform were completed over the weekend of April 12, 2014. CSB had 21 branches, 12 of which were closed in the consolidation with Pacific Western Bank at the close of business on April 11, 2014. One overlapping Pacific Western Bank branch was closed at the close of business on April 11, 2014 as well. All remaining branches re-opened on Monday April 14, 2014 as Pacific Western Bank branches.

58

        CSB was a commercial lender headquartered in Los Angeles, California. CSB provided financial products to small to middle market businesses nationwide and also provided depository products and services to consumers in southern and central California. CSB's loan origination efforts were conducted nationwide with offices located in Chevy Chase, Maryland; Los Angeles, California; Denver, Colorado; Chicago, Illinois; and New York, New York. As a result of the merger, we will increase our presence as a middle-market lender and increase our market share in our primary Southern California market.

        For further information, see Note 18,Subsequent Events, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) contained in "Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)."

First California Financial Group Acquisition

        On May 31, 2013, we completed the acquisition of First California Financial Group, Inc. ("FCAL"). As part of the acquisition, First California Bank ("FCB"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FCAL, merged with and into Pacific Western. For further information, see Note 3,Acquisitions, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) contained in "Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)."

Key Performance Indicators

        Among other factors, our operating results depend generally on the following key performance indicators:

The Level of Our Net Interest Income

        Net interest income is the excess of interest earned on our interest-earning assets over the interest paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. A sustained low interest rate environment combined with low loan growth and high levels of marketplace liquidity may lower both our net interest income and net interest margin going forward.

        Our primary interest-earning assets are loans and investments. Our primary interest-bearing liabilities are deposits. We attribute our high net interest margin to our high level of noninterest-bearing deposits and low cost of deposits. While our deposit balances will fluctuate depending on deposit holders' perceptions of alternative yields available in the market, we attempt to minimize these variances by attracting a high percentage of noninterest-bearing deposits, which have no expectation of yield.

Loan and Lease Growth

        We generally seek new lending opportunities in the $500,000 to $15 million range; try to limit loan maturities to one year for commercial loans, up to 18 months for construction loans, and up to ten years for commercial real estate loans; and price lending products so as to preserve our interest spread and net interest margin. Achieving robust loan growth has been challenging and repayments have outpaced new loan volume. Net loan growth would have involved: (a) under-pricing our competitors in many cases at margins that are not significantly above our securities portfolio yield, and (b) incurring unacceptable interest rate risk. We continue to selectively make or renew quality loans to our good customers that contribute positively to our profitability and net interest margin and we are focused on building relationships rather than attracting customers at low prices.

59

The Magnitude of Credit Losses

        We stress credit quality in originating and monitoring the loans that we make and measure our success by the levels of our nonperforming assets, net charge-offs, and allowance for credit losses. We maintain an allowance for credit losses on loans and leases, which is the sum of our allowance for loan and lease losses and our reserve for unfunded loan commitments. Provisions for credit losses are charged to operations as and when needed for both on and off-balance sheet credit exposure. Loans and leases which are deemed uncollectable are charged off and deducted from the allowance for loan and lease losses. Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off are added to the allowance for loan and lease losses. The provision for credit losses on the loan and lease portfolio was based on our allowance methodology and reflected historical and current net charge-offs, the levels and trends of nonaccrual and classified loans and leases, the migration of loans and leases into various risk classifications, and the level of outstanding loans and leases. For acquired non-impaired loans, a provision for credit losses may be recorded to reflect credit deterioration after the acquisition date. For purchased credit impaired loans, a provision for credit losses may be recorded to reflect decreases in expected cash flows on such loans compared to those previously estimated.

        We regularly review our loans and leases to determine whether there has been any deterioration in credit quality stemming from economic conditions or other factors which may affect collectability of our loans and leases. Changes in economic conditions, such as inflation, unemployment, increases in the general level of interest rates, declines in real estate values and negative conditions in borrowers' businesses could negatively impact our customers and cause us to adversely classify loans and leases and increase portfolio loss factors. An increase in classified loans and leases generally results in increased provisions for credit losses. Any deterioration in the real estate market may lead to increased provisions for credit losses because of our concentration in real estate loans.

The Level of Our Noninterest Expense

        Our noninterest expense includes fixed and controllable overhead, the major components of which are compensation, occupancy, data processing, and other professional services. It also includes costs that tend to vary based on the volume of activity, such as OREO expense. We measure success in controlling both fixed and variable costs through monitoring of the efficiency ratio. We calculate the base efficiency ratio by dividing noninterest expense by net revenues (the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income). We also calculate a non-GAAP measure called the "adjusted efficiency ratio." The adjusted efficiency ratio is calculated in the same manner as the base efficiency ratio except that (a) noninterest income is reduced by net FDIC loss sharing expense, securities gains and losses, and gain on sale of an owned building, and (b) noninterest expense is reduced by OREO expenses, acquisition and integration costs, and accelerated vesting of restricted stock.

        The consolidated base and adjusted efficiency ratios have been as follows:

Three Months Ended	Base Efficiency Ratio			Adjusted Efficiency Ratio
March 31, 2014		56.1	%		52.7	%
December 31, 2013		85.5	%		56.7	%
September 30, 2013		64.3	%		57.3	%
June 30, 2013		93.5	%		62.4	%
March 31, 2013		64.5	%		61.7	%

        We disclose the adjusted efficiency ratio as it shows the trend in recurring overhead-related noninterest expense relative to recurring net revenues. See "Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measurements" for the calculations of the base and adjusted efficiency ratios.

60

Adjusted Net Earnings from Continuing Operations

        Our net earnings from continuing operations for the first quarter of 2014 totaled $25.9 million. Another measure of earnings used as an indicator of earnings generating capability and ability to absorb credit losses is adjusted net earnings from continuing operations. We calculate adjusted net earnings from continuing operations by excluding credit loss provisions, net FDIC loss sharing expense, securities gains and losses, OREO expenses, acquisition and integration costs, and accelerated vesting of restricted stock. On a pre-tax basis, before loss from discontinued operations, this amounted to $45.3 million for the first quarter of 2014. After applying our effective tax rate for continuing operations of 36.0% for the first quarter of 2014, our adjusted net earnings from continuing operations were $29.0 million.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The Company's accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The Company has identified several policies as being critical because they require management to make particularly difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies relate to the allowance for credit losses, the carrying values of intangible assets, and the realization of deferred income tax assets. For further information, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Non-GAAP Measurements

        Certain discussion in this Form 10-Q contains certain non-GAAP financial disclosures for adjusted earnings from continuing operations before income taxes, adjusted efficiency ratio, adjusted allowance for credit losses to loans and leases, return on average tangible equity, and tangible common equity ratio. The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures to provide meaningful supplemental information regarding the Company's operational performance and to enhance investors' overall understanding of such financial performance:

•

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations—as analysts and investors view this measure as an indicator of the Company's ability to both generate earnings and absorb credit losses, we disclose this amount in addition to pre-tax earnings.

•

Adjusted efficiency ratio—we disclose this measure in addition to efficiency ratio as it shows the trend in recurring overhead-related noninterest expense relative to recurring net revenues.

•

Return on average tangible equity, tangible common equity amounts and ratios, and tangible book value per share—given that the use of these measures is prevalent among banking regulators, investors and analysts, we disclose them in addition to return on average equity, equity-to-assets ratio, and book value per share, respectively.

•

Adjusted allowance for credit losses to loans and leases—as the allowance for credit losses takes into account credit deterioration on acquired loans and leases, which include an estimate of credit losses in their initial fair values, we disclose the adjusted allowance for credit losses to loans and leases in addition to the allowance for credit losses to loans and leases. The adjusted allowance for credit losses to loans and leases excludes acquired loans and leases and the related allowance.

        The methodology for determining adjusted earnings from continuing operations before income taxes, adjusted efficiency ratio, return on average tangible equity, tangible common equity amounts and ratios, tangible book value per share, and adjusted allowance for credit losses to loans and leases may differ among companies.

61

        These non-GAAP financial measures are presented for supplemental informational purposes only for understanding the Company's operating results and should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").

        The following tables present performance amounts and ratios in accordance with GAAP and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measurements to the GAAP financial measurements:

	Three Months Ended
Adjusted Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	$	40,481		$	12,582		$	21,213
Plus: Provision (negative provision) for credit losses		(644	)		(1,338	)		3,137
Accelerated vesting of restricted stock		—			12,420			—
Non-covered OREO (income) expense, net		(246	)		25			313
Covered OREO (income) expense, net		(1,615	)		(594	)		(813	)
Acquisition and integration costs		2,200			4,253			692
Less: FDIC loss sharing expense, net		(11,430	)		(10,593	)		(3,137	)
Gain (loss) on sale of securities		4,752			(272	)		409
Gain on sale of an owned building		1,570			—			—
Adjusted earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	$	45,284		$	38,213		$	27,270

	Three Months Ended
Adjusted Efficiency Ratio	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest expense	$	50,869		$	66,088		$	44,183
Less: Non-covered OREO (income) expense, net		(246	)		25			313
Covered OREO (income) expense, net		(1,615	)		(594	)		(813	)
Acquisition and integration costs		2,200			4,253			692
Accelerated vesting of restricted stock		—			12,420			—
Adjusted noninterest expense	$	50,530		$	49,984		$	43,991
Net interest income	$	86,015		$	81,258		$	65,693
Noninterest income		4,691			(3,926	)		2,840
Net revenues		90,706			77,332			68,533
Less: FDIC loss sharing expense, net		(11,430	)		(10,593	)		(3,137	)
Gain (loss) on sale of securities		4,752			(272	)		409
Gain on sale of an owned building		1,570			—			—
Adjusted net revenues	$	95,814		$	88,197		$	71,261
Base efficiency ratio(1)		56.1	%		85.5	%		64.5	%
Adjusted efficiency ratio(2)		52.7	%		56.7	%		61.7	%

(1)

Noninterest expense divided by net revenues.

(2)

Adjusted noninterest expense divided by adjusted net revenues.

62

	Three Months Ended
Return on Average Tangible Equity	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
PacWest Bancorp Consolidated:
Net earnings	$	25,080		$	3,109		$	13,494
Average stockholders' equity	$	820,248		$	818,935		$	589,207
Less: Average intangible assets		225,294			233,628			93,786
Average tangible common equity	$	594,954		$	585,307		$	495,421
Annualized return on average equity(1)		12.40	%		1.51	%		9.29	%
Annualized return on average tangible equity(2)		17.10	%		2.11	%		11.05	%

(1)

Calculated as annualized net earnings divided by average stockholders' equity.

(2)

Calculated as annualized net earnings divided by average tangible common equity.

Tangible Common Equity	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
PacWest Bancorp Consolidated:
Stockholders' equity	$	833,702		$	809,093
Less: Intangible assets		224,627			225,991
Tangible common equity	$	609,075		$	583,102
Total assets	$	6,517,853		$	6,533,363
Less: Intangible assets		224,627			225,991
Tangible assets	$	6,293,226		$	6,307,372
Equity to assets ratio		12.79	%		12.38	%
Tangible common equity ratio(1)		9.68	%		9.24	%
Book value per share	$	18.21		$	17.66
Tangible book value per share	$	13.31		$	12.73
Shares outstanding		45,777,580			45,822,834
Pacific Western Bank:
Stockholders' equity	$	910,644		$	911,200
Less: Intangible assets		224,627			225,991
Tangible common equity	$	686,017		$	685,209
Total assets	$	6,507,288		$	6,523,742
Less: Intangible assets		224,627			225,991
Tangible assets	$	6,282,661		$	6,297,751
Equity to assets ratio		13.99	%		13.97	%
Tangible common equity ratio(1)		10.92	%		10.88	%

(1)

Calculated as tangible common equity divided by tangible assets.

63

Adjusted Allowance for Credit Losses to Loans and Leases (Excludes PCI Loans)	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for credit losses	$	66,955		$	67,816
Less: Allowance related to acquired loans and leases		737			607
Adjusted allowance for credit losses	$	66,218		$	67,209
Gross loans and leases	$	3,828,569		$	3,930,539
Less: Carrying value of acquired Non-PCI loans and leases		1,001,248			1,060,172
Adjusted loans and leases	$	2,827,321		$	2,870,367
Allowance for credit losses to loans and leases(1)		1.75	%		1.73	%
Adjusted allowance for credit losses to loans and leases(2)		2.34	%		2.34	%

(1)

Allowance for credit losses divided by gross loans and leases.

(2)

Adjusted allowance for credit losses divided by adjusted loans and leases.

Results of Operations

Acquisitions Impact Earnings Performance

        The comparability of financial information is affected by our acquisitions. We completed the FCAL acquisition on May 31, 2013 ($1.6 billion in assets). This acquisition has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, FCAL's operating results have been included in the consolidated financial statements from its acquisition date.

Earnings Performance

        The following table presents profitability metrics for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
Profitability Measures:
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.55		$	0.06		$	0.37
Diluted	$	0.55		$	0.06		$	0.37
Annualized return on:
Average assets		1.56	%		0.19	%		1.02	%
Average equity		12.40	%		1.51	%		9.29	%
Average tangible equity(1)		17.10	%		2.11	%		11.05	%
Net interest margin		5.95	%		5.41	%		5.40	%
Core net interest margin(2)		5.42	%		5.31	%		5.36	%
Base efficiency ratio		56.1	%		85.5	%		64.5	%
Adjusted efficiency ratio(3)		52.7	%		56.7	%		61.7	%

(1)

Calculation reduces average equity by average intangible assets.

(2)

Excludes accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs.

(3)

Excludes FDIC loss sharing expense, securities gains and losses, gain on sale of an owned building, OREO expense, acquisition and integration costs, and accelerated vesting of restricted stock.

64

        The following table presents net credit costs for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
(Negative provision) provision for credit losses	$	(644	)	$	(1,338	)	$	3,137
Non-covered OREO (income) expense, net		(246	)		25			313
Covered OREO (income) expense, net		(1,615	)		(594	)		(813	)
Less: FDIC loss sharing expense, net		11,430			10,593			3,137
Total net credit costs	$	8,925		$	8,686		$	5,774

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to Fourth Quarter of 2013

        Net earnings were $25.1 million, or $0.55 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2014, compared to $3.1 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2013. The quarter-over-quarter increase in net earnings of $22.0 million was due mostly to: (a) the $12.4 million ($12.2 million after tax) accelerated vesting of restricted stock that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2013 and not repeated in the first quarter of 2014; (b) the $4.7 million ($2.8 million after tax) increase in net interest income; (c) the $5.0 million ($2.9 million after tax) increase in gain on sale of securities; and (d) the $5.4 million ($3.1 million after tax) increase in other income, including the $1.6 million ($911,000 after tax) gain on sale of an owned building, which was a former branch location obtained in the FCAL acquisition.

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to First Quarter of 2013

        Net earnings for the first quarter of 2014 were $25.1 million, or $0.55 per diluted share, compared to net earnings for the first quarter of 2013 of $13.5 million, or $0.37 per diluted share. The $11.6 million increase in net earnings was due primarily to: (a) the $20.3 million ($11.8 million after tax) increase in net interest income; (b) the $4.3 million ($2.5 million after tax) increase in gain on sale of securities; and (c) the $5.7 million ($3.3 million after tax) increase in other income. The items were offset partially by: (a) the $3.3 million ($1.9 million after tax) increase in compensation expense; (b) the $3.2 million ($1.8 million after tax) increase in net credit costs; (c) the $1.5 million ($1.4 million after tax) increase in acquisition and integration costs; (d) the $997,000 ($578,000 after tax) increase in occupancy expense; and (e) the $927,000 ($538,000 after tax) increase in other expense.

Net Interest Income

        Net interest income, which is our principal source of revenue, represents the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. Net interest income is affected by changes in both interest rates and the volume of average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

65

        The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the distribution of average assets, liabilities and stockholders' equity, as well as interest income and yields earned on average interest-earning assets and interest expense and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014							December 31, 2013							March 31, 2013
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yields and Rates			Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yields and Rates			Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yields and Rates
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Loans and leases, net of unearned income(1)	$	4,231,319	$	77,463		7.42	%	$	4,301,377	$	73,352		6.77	%	$	3,500,895	$	61,010		7.07	%
Investment securities(2)		1,512,694		10,823		2.90	%		1,531,335		10,422		2.70	%		1,365,210		8,216		2.44	%
Deposits in financial institutions		118,682		74		0.25	%		129,716		82		0.25	%		69,056		43		0.25	%
Total interest-earning assets		5,862,695	$	88,360		6.11	%		5,962,428	$	83,856		5.58	%		4,935,161	$	69,269		5.69	%
Other assets		650,681							670,302							440,990
Total assets	$	6,513,376						$	6,632,730						$	5,376,151
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest checking deposits	$	627,493	$	78		0.05	%	$	627,256	$	83		0.05	%	$	523,503	$	62		0.05	%
Money market deposits		1,451,964		618		0.17	%		1,512,369		654		0.17	%		1,207,332		484		0.16	%
Savings deposits		223,074		14		0.03	%		220,331		14		0.03	%		155,687		12		0.03	%
Time deposits		666,463		515		0.31	%		694,924		699		0.40	%		796,644		2,091		1.06	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		2,968,994		1,225		0.17	%		3,054,880		1,450		0.19	%		2,683,166		2,649		0.40	%
Borrowings		18,176		79		1.76	%		9,861		86		3.46	%		12,561		144		4.65	%
Subordinated debentures		132,696		1,041		3.18	%		132,560		1,062		3.18	%		108,250		783		2.93	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		3,119,866	$	2,345		0.30	%		3,197,301	$	2,598		0.32	%		2,803,977	$	3,576		0.52	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		2,374,325							2,397,642							1,940,435
Other liabilities		198,937							218,852							42,532
Total liabilities		5,693,128							5,813,795							4,786,944
Stockholders' equity		820,248							818,935							589,207
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	6,513,376						$	6,632,730						$	5,376,151
Net interest income			$	86,015						$	81,258						$	65,693
Net interest rate spread						5.81	%						5.26	%						5.17	%
Net interest margin						5.95	%						5.41	%						5.40	%
Total deposits	$	5,343,319						$	5,452,522						$	4,623,601
All-in deposit cost(3)						0.09	%						0.11	%						0.23	%

(1)

Includes nonaccrual loans and leases and loan fees.

(2)

The tax-equivalent yield on investment securities was 3.35%, 3.14%, and 2.79% for the three months ended March 31, 2014, December 31, 2013, and March 31, 2013, respectively.

(3)

All-in deposit cost is calculated as annualized interest expense on deposits divided by average total deposits.

        The net interest margin ("NIM") and loan and lease yields are impacted by accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs, which causes volatility from period to period.

66

The effects of this item on the NIM and loan and lease yield are shown in the following tables for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
NIM:	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
Increase due to accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs		0.53	%		0.10	%		0.04	%
Core		5.42	%		5.31	%		5.36	%
Loan and Lease Yield:
Increase due to accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs		0.74	%		0.13	%		0.08	%
Core		6.68	%		6.64	%		6.99	%

        The following table presents the loan yields and related average balances for our Non-PCI loans and leases, PCI loans, and total loan and lease portfolio for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Yields:
Non-PCI loans and leases		6.17	%		6.14	%		6.71	%
PCI loans		21.83	%		13.15	%		9.23	%
Total loans and leases		7.42	%		6.77	%		7.07	%
Average Balances:
Non-PCI loans and leases	$	3,891,990		$	3,916,650		$	2,999,002
PCI loans		339,329			384,727			501,893
Total loans and leases	$	4,231,319		$	4,301,377		$	3,500,895

        Reductions in the higher yielding PCI loans will result in lower net interest income in the absence of larger amounts of originated or acquired non-impaired loans.

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to Fourth Quarter of 2013

        Net interest income increased by $4.7 million to $86.0 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $81.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2013 due primarily to higher interest income on loans and leases. Interest income on loans and leases increased $4.1 million due mostly to higher accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs, offset partially by two fewer days in the current quarter. Interest income on investment securities increased $401,000 due to purchases of higher yielding securities during the first quarter, offset partially by the sale of $137.3 million in lower yielding GSE securities and reduced discount accretion on our covered private label mortgage-backed securities due to slower prepayments. Interest expense declined by $253,000 due mainly to a lower average rate and average balance for time deposits, as well as a lower average balance for money market deposits and two fewer days in the current quarter.

        Our NIM for the first quarter of 2014 was 5.95% compared to 5.41% for the fourth quarter of 2013. The 54 basis point increase in NIM was driven by a 53 basis point increase in our earning asset yield. The increase in the earning asset yield was due to the 65 basis point increase in the loan and lease yield.

67

        The yield on loans and leases increased to 7.42% for the first quarter of 2014 from 6.77% for the fourth quarter of 2013 due to higher accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs. The accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs totaled $7.7 million for the first quarter and $1.4 million for the fourth quarter. When accelerated accretion is excluded, the core yield on loans and leases was 6.68% for the first quarter and 6.64% for the fourth quarter.

        The yield on PCI loans increased to 21.83% for the first quarter of 2014 from 13.15% for the fourth quarter of 2013 due mainly to the $6.3 million increase in accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs. When accelerated accretion is excluded, the core yield on PCI loans increased to 12.68% for the first quarter from 11.67% for the fourth quarter due to improved performance on the underlying loans.

        The cost of average funding sources declined one basis point to 0.17% for the first quarter of 2014 from 0.18% for the fourth quarter of 2013. This includes all-in deposit cost which declined two basis points to 0.09% for the current quarter compared to the prior quarter. The cost of total interest-bearing deposits and total interest-bearing liabilities each declined two basis points to 0.17% and 0.30% for the first quarter. Such declines are due mainly to a lower average rate on time deposits.

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to First Quarter of 2013

        Net interest income increased by $20.3 million to $86.0 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $65.7 million for the first quarter of 2013. This change was due mainly to a $16.5 million increase in interest income on loans and leases, a $2.6 million increase in interest income on investment securities, and a $1.2 million decrease in interest expense on deposits.

        Interest income on loans and leases increased due mainly to the addition of the acquired FCAL loan portfolio and higher accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs. Average loans and leases increased $730.4 million to $4.2 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $3.5 billion for the same quarter in 2013. Interest income on investment securities increased due to purchases of higher yielding securities, lower premium amortization on pass through securities attributable to slower prepayment speeds, and higher dividends on FHLB stock, offset partially by the sale of $137.3 million in lower yielding pass through securities and reduced discount accretion on our covered private label mortgage-backed securities due to slower prepayment speeds. The decline in interest expense on deposits for the first quarter of 2014 compared to the same period last year was due mainly to the lower rate and average balance of time deposits.

        The NIM increased 55 basis points to 5.95% for the first quarter of 2014 compared to 5.40% for the same quarter last year driven by a 42 basis point increase in our earning asset yield and a 14 basis point decline in our cost of average funding sources. The increase in the earning asset yield was due to the 35 basis point increase in the loan and lease yield and 46 basis point increase in the yield on securities. The decline in the cost of our average funding sources was due mainly to the decrease in our cost of interest-bearing deposits.

        The yield on loans and leases increased 35 basis points for the first quarter of 2014 compared to 7.07% for the same quarter of 2013. This increase was due to higher accelerated accretion of acquisition discounts resulting from PCI loan payoffs. Such accelerated accretion totaled $7.7 million for the 2014 quarter and $677,000 for the first quarter of 2013. When accelerated accretion is excluded, the core yield on loans and leases was 6.68% for the first quarter of 2014 and 6.99% for the first quarter of 2013. The decline in the core yield was attributable to lower yields on new loan and lease originations.

        The cost of average funding sources declined 14 basis points to 0.17% for the first quarter of 2014 from 0.31% for the first quarter of 2013. This includes all-in deposit cost which also declined 14 basis

68

points to 0.09% for the current quarter from 0.23% for the same quarter last year. The cost of total interest-bearing deposits declined 23 basis points to 0.17% and total interest-bearing liabilities declined 22 basis points to 0.30% for the first quarter of 2014. Such declines are due mainly to a lower rate on average time deposits and lower average time deposits as part of our overall deposit mix.

Provision for Credit Losses

        The following table sets forth the details of the provision for credit losses and allowance for credit losses data for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Provision For Credit Losses:
Addition to (reduction in) allowance for Non-PCI loans and leases	$	600		$	(325	)	$	(460	)
Addition to (reduction in) reserve for unfunded loan commitments		(600	)		325			460
Total provision (negative provision) for Non-PCI loans and leases		—			—			—
Provision (negative provision) for PCI loans		(644	)		(1,338	)		3,137
Total provision (negative provision) for credit losses	$	(644	)	$	(1,338	)	$	3,137
Non-PCI Allowance for Credit Losses Data:
Net charge-offs (recoveries) on Non-PCI loans and leases	$	861		$	(15	)	$	223
Annualized net charge-offs to average Non-PCI loans and leases		0.09	%		—			0.03	%
At Period End:
Allowance for loan and lease losses	$	59,980		$	60,241		$	65,216
Allowance for credit losses		66,955			67,816			71,896
Non-PCI nonaccrual loans and leases		58,121			46,774			43,127
Non-PCI classified loans and leases		150,517			127,311			107,178
Allowance for credit losses to Non-PCI loans and leases		1.75	%		1.73	%		2.41	%
Allowance for credit losses to Non-PCI nonaccrual loans and leases		115.2	%		145.0	%		166.7	%

        Provisions for credit losses are charged to earnings as and when needed for both on and off-balance sheet credit exposures. We have a provision for credit losses on our non-purchased credit impaired ("Non-PCI") loans and leases and a provision for credit losses on our purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loans. The provision for credit losses on our Non-PCI loans and leases is based on our allowance methodology and is an expense, or contra-expense, that, in our judgment, is required to maintain the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded loan commitments. Our allowance methodology reflects net charge-offs, the levels and trends of nonaccrual and classified loans and leases, the migration of loans and leases into various risk classifications, and the level of outstanding loans and leases and commitments. The provision for credit losses on our PCI loans results from decreases or increases in expected cash flows on such loans compared to those previously estimated.

        Our Non-PCI loans and leases at March 31, 2014, included $1.0 billion in loans and leases acquired in acquisitions. These acquired loans and leases were initially recorded at their estimated fair values and such initial fair values included an estimate of credit losses. The allowance calculation for Non-PCI loans and leases takes into consideration those acquired loans and leases whose credit quality has deteriorated since their acquisition dates. At March 31, 2014, $737,000 of our allowance for credit

69

losses applies to these acquired loans and leases. When these acquired loans and leases are excluded from the total of Non-PCI loans and leases and the related allowance of $737,000 is excluded from the allowance for credit losses, the result is an adjusted coverage ratio of our allowance for credit losses to Non-PCI loans and leases of 2.34% at March 31, 2014; the comparable ratio at December 31, 2013 was 2.34%.

        Increased provisions for credit losses may be required in the future based on loan and unfunded commitment growth, the effect that changes in economic conditions, such as inflation, unemployment, market interest rate levels, and real estate values, may have on the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, and other negative conditions specific to our borrowers' businesses. See further discussion in "Balance Sheet Analysis—Allowance for Credit Losses on Non-PCI Loans" and "Balance Sheet Analysis—Allowance for Credit Losses on PCI Loans" contained herein.

Noninterest Income

        The following table summarizes noninterest income by category for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Noninterest Income:
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	3,002		$	3,197		$	2,863
Other commissions and fees		1,932			2,125			1,933
Gain on sale of leases		106			683			225
Gain (loss) on sale of securities		4,752			(272	)		409
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		466			448			433
FDIC loss sharing expense, net		(11,430	)		(10,593	)		(3,137	)
Other income		5,863			486			114
Total noninterest income	$	4,691		$	(3,926	)	$	2,840

        The following table presents the details of FDIC loss sharing income (expense), net for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
FDIC Loss Sharing Income (Expense) , Net:
(Loss) gain on FDIC loss sharing asset(1)	$	(2,206	)	$	(1,909	)	$	3,466
FDIC loss sharing asset amortization, net		(7,912	)		(8,111	)		(5,991	)
Net reimbursement to FDIC for covered OREOs(2)		(1,224	)		(508	)		(614	)
Other		(88	)		(65	)		2
Total FDIC loss sharing income (expense), net	$	(11,430	)	$	(10,593	)	$	(3,137	)

(1)

Includes increases related to covered loan loss provisions and decreases for: (a) write-offs for covered loans expected to be resolved at amounts higher than their carrying values, and (b) amounts to be reimbursed to the FDIC for covered loans resolved at amounts higher than their carrying values.

(2)

Represents amounts to be reimbursed to the FDIC for gains on covered OREO sales and due from the FDIC for covered OREO write-downs.

70

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to Fourth Quarter of 2013

        Noninterest income increased by $8.6 million to a positive $4.7 million for the first quarter of 2014 from a negative $3.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2013. The increase was due mostly to the $5.0 million increase in gain on sales of securities during the first quarter and a $5.4 million increase in other income, offset by an increase of $837,000 in FDIC loss sharing expense and a decrease of $577,000 in gain on sales of leases. During the first quarter we sold $137.3 million in GSE pass through securities that resulted in a gain of $4.8 million. We sold these securities to take advantage of favorable market conditions for premium coupon seasoned GSE securities and redeployed the proceeds into single-maturity investments that are expected to perform better under current market conditions. During the fourth quarter we sold $10.0 million in collateralized loan obligation ("CLO") securities, which resulted in a net loss of $272,000. We sold the CLO securities in order to minimize our risk in holding these securities subject to the then proposed regulations referred to as the Volcker rule. The increase in other income was due to $3.5 million in income recognized on the early repayment of leases and a $1.6 million gain on the sale of an owned building, which was a former branch location; there is no similar income in the other periods presented. The increase in FDIC loss sharing expense was due to lower covered OREO expense attributable mainly to higher gain on sales of covered OREO and higher losses on the FDIC loss sharing asset.

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to First Quarter of 2013

        Noninterest income increased by $1.9 million to $4.7 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $2.8 million for the first quarter of 2013. The increase was due mostly to the $4.3 million increase in gain on sales of securities and a $5.7 million increase in other income, offset by an increase of $8.3 million in FDIC loss sharing expense. During the first quarter of 2013, we sold $12.4 million in corporate debt securities to reduce overall portfolio price volatility and extension risk and recognized a gain of $409,000. The increase in FDIC loss sharing expense was due to: (1) a higher loss on the FDIC loss sharing asset attributable mainly to a lower provision for credit losses on covered loans, and (2) higher amortization of the FDIC loss sharing asset.

71

Noninterest Expense

        The following table summarizes noninterest expense by category for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest Expense:
Compensation	$	28,627		$	27,697		$	25,350
Accelerated vesting of restricted stock		—			12,420			—
Occupancy		7,595			7,553			6,598
Data processing		2,540			2,216			2,233
Other professional services		2,286			2,314			2,097
Business development		934			992			736
Communications		737			860			613
Insurance and assessments		1,593			1,572			1,261
Non-covered other real estate owned, net		(246	)		25			313
Covered other real estate owned, net		(1,615	)		(594	)		(813	)
Intangible asset amortization		1,364			1,430			1,176
Acquisition and integration		2,200			4,253			692
Other expense		4,854			5,350			3,927
Total noninterest expense	$	50,869		$	66,088		$	44,183

        The following tables present the components of OREO expense, net for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Non-Covered OREO Expense:
Provision for losses	$	—		$	83		$	92
Maintenance costs		453			163			270
Gain on sale		(699	)		(221	)		(49	)
Total non-covered OREO (income) expense, net	$	(246	)	$	25		$	313
Covered OREO Expense:
Provision for losses	$	94		$	338		$	1,093
Maintenance costs		(85	)		42			(45	)
Gain on sale		(1,624	)		(974	)		(1,861	)
Total covered OREO (income) expense, net	$	(1,615	)	$	(594	)	$	(813	)

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to Fourth Quarter of 2013

        Noninterest expense decreased by $15.2 million to $50.9 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $66.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2013. The decline was due to the $12.4 million of expense from accelerated vesting of restricted stock incurred in the fourth quarter and not repeated in the first quarter, as well as decreases of $2.1 million and $1.0 million in acquisition and integration costs and covered OREO expense, respectively. The decrease in covered OREO expense was due mainly to a higher gain on sales of covered OREO of $650,000, lower write-downs of $244,000, and lower maintenance costs of $127,000. Compensation expense increased $930,000 due mainly to the

72

timing of payroll taxes and lower cost deferral on loan originations, offset partially by lower restricted stock amortization, excluding the accelerated vesting of restricted stock.

        In December 2013, we accelerated the vesting of certain restricted stock awards that resulted in a pre-tax charge of $12.4 million ($12.2 million after tax). This action was taken by the Company in order to eliminate an additional $21.0 million of compensation and tax expense related to change in control payments that the Company would have otherwise incurred upon consummation of the CapitalSource merger. Such eliminated expenses relate to tax gross-up payments and the value of lost tax deductions, in each case due to the impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code as they apply to change in control payments that would have become payable to certain PacWest employees in conjunction with the CapitalSource merger. The restricted stock awards that were vested on an accelerated basis in 2013 would have otherwise vested upon consummation of the CapitalSource merger, and the $12.2 million after-tax charge to earnings recorded in December 2013 would have been incurred at that time.

        Noninterest expense includes certain non-cash items: (a) amortization of restricted stock, which is included in compensation, and (b) intangible asset amortization. Amortization of restricted stock, excluding the accelerated vesting of restricted stock, totaled $1.6 million for the first quarter of 2014, $2.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2013, and $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2013. Intangible asset amortization totaled $1.4 million for each of the first quarter of 2014 and fourth quarter of 2013, and $1.2 million for the first quarter of 2013.

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to First Quarter of 2013

        Noninterest expense increased by $6.7 million to $50.9 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $44.2 million for the first quarter of 2013. This change was due mainly to the increases of $3.3 million, $1.5 million, $997,000, and $927,000 in compensation expense, acquisition and integration costs, occupancy expense, and other expense, respectively. The increases in compensation expense and occupancy expense were attributable mainly to the addition of the acquired FCAL operations. The increase in other expense was due mostly to higher net losses on low income housing investments and higher employee-related expenses.

Income Taxes

        The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2014 was 35.8% compared to 74.1% for the fourth quarter of 2013 and 36.4% for the first quarter of 2013. The fourth quarter of 2013 effective tax rate was driven higher than normal by the non-deductibility of most of the $12.4 million accelerated vesting of restricted stock. When this item is excluded, the adjusted effective tax rate was 36.4% for the fourth quarter. Generally, the difference in the effective tax rates between periods relates mainly to the level of tax credits and tax deductions and the amount of tax exempt income recorded in each of the periods. The Company operates primarily in the federal and California jurisdictions and the blended statutory tax rate for federal and California is 42%.

Business Segments

        The Company's reportable segments consist of "Banking," "Asset Financing," and "Other." At March 31, 2014, the Other segment consisted of the PacWest Bancorp holding company and other elimination and reconciliation entries. For further information, see Note 15,Business Segments, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) contained in "Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)."

73

        The following tables present information regarding our business segments as of and for the periods indicated (the only segment income statements for which discontinued operations are applicable and reported are those for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013):

	March 31, 2014
Balance Sheet Data	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Loans and leases, net of unearned income	$	3,707,308		$	453,759		$	—		$	4,161,067
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(74,833	)		(6,347	)		—			(81,180	)
Total loans and leases, net	$	3,632,475		$	447,412		$	—		$	4,079,887
Goodwill	$	183,065		$	25,678		$	—		$	208,743
Core deposit and customer relationship intangibles, net		14,139			1,745			—			15,884
Total assets		5,990,162			517,126			10,565			6,517,853
Total deposits(1)		5,415,691			—			(46,283	)		5,369,408

(1)

The negative balance for total deposits in the "Other" segment represents the elimination of holding company cash held in deposit accounts at the Bank.

	March 31, 2013
Balance Sheet Data	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Loans and leases, net of unearned income	$	3,004,525		$	464,738		$	—		$	3,469,263
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(89,382	)		(5,137	)		—			(94,519	)
Total loans and leases, net	$	2,915,143		$	459,601		$	—		$	3,374,744
Goodwill	$	53,995		$	25,678		$	—		$	79,673
Core deposit and customer relationship intangibles, net		11,159			2,388			—			13,547
Total assets		4,773,916			504,554			21,435			5,299,905
Total deposits(1)		4,580,514			—			(27,284	)		4,553,230

(1)

The negative balance for total deposits in the "Other" segment represents the elimination of holding company cash held in deposit accounts at the Bank.

74

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Results of Operations	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	77,595		$	10,765		$	—		$	88,360
Intersegment interest income (expense)		222			(222	)		—			—
Other interest expense		(1,227	)		(77	)		(1,041	)		(2,345	)
Net interest income		76,590			10,466			(1,041	)		86,015
Negative provision (provision) for credit losses		826			(182	)		—			644
Gain on sale of securities		4,752			—			—			4,752
FDIC loss sharing expense		(11,430	)		—			—			(11,430	)
Other noninterest income		6,897			4,445			27			11,369
Total noninterest income		219			4,445			27			4,691
OREO income, net		1,861			—			—			1,861
Intangible asset amortization		(1,191	)		(173	)		—			(1,364	)
Acquisition and integration costs		(2,200	)		—			—			(2,200	)
Other noninterest expense		(40,990	)		(6,573	)		(1,603	)		(49,166	)
Total noninterest expense		(42,520	)		(6,746	)		(1,603	)		(50,869	)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		35,115			7,983			(2,617	)		40,481
Income tax (expense) benefit		(12,334	)		(3,331	)		1,089			(14,576	)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		22,781			4,652			(1,528	)		25,905
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes		(1,413	)		—			—			(1,413	)
Income tax benefit		588			—			—			588
Net loss from discontinued operations		(825	)		—			—			(825	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	21,956		$	4,652		$	(1,528	)	$	25,080

75

	Three Months Ended December 31, 2013
Results of Operations	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	72,391		$	11,465		$	—		$	83,856
Intersegment interest income (expense)		241			(241	)		—			—
Other interest expense		(1,451	)		(85	)		(1,062	)		(2,598	)
Net interest income		71,181			11,139			(1,062	)		81,258
Negative provision (provision) for credit losses		2,026			(688	)		—			1,338
Loss on sale of securities		(272	)		—			—			(272	)
FDIC loss sharing expense		(10,593	)		—			—			(10,593	)
Other noninterest income		5,933			979			27			6,939
Total noninterest income		(4,932	)		979			27			(3,926	)
Accelerated vesting of restricted stock		(12,420	)		—			—			(12,420	)
OREO income, net		569			—			—			569
Intangible asset amortization		(1,274	)		(156	)		—			(1,430	)
Acquisition and integration costs		(4,253	)		—			—			(4,253	)
Other noninterest expense		(41,248	)		(5,720	)		(1,586	)		(48,554	)
Total noninterest expense		(58,626	)		(5,876	)		(1,586	)		(66,088	)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		9,649			5,554			(2,621	)		12,582
Income tax (expense) benefit		(7,902	)		(2,287	)		1,054			(9,135	)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		1,747			3,267			(1,567	)		3,447
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes		(578	)		—			—			(578	)
Income tax benefit		240			—			—			240
Net loss from discontinued operations		(338	)		—			—			(338	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	1,409		$	3,267		$	(1,567	)	$	3,109

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Results of Operations	Banking			Asset Financing			Other			Consolidated Company
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	56,907		$	12,362		$	—		$	69,269
Intersegment interest income (expense)		471			(471	)		—			—
Other interest expense		(2,650	)		(143	)		(783	)		(3,576	)
Net interest income		54,728			11,748			(783	)		65,693
Negative provision (provision) for credit losses		(2,336	)		(801	)		—			(3,137	)
Gain on sale of securities		409			—			—			409
FDIC loss sharing expense		(3,137	)		—			—			(3,137	)
Other noninterest income		5,001			544			23			5,568
Total noninterest income		2,273			544			23			2,840
OREO income, net		500			—			—			500
Intangible asset amortization		(993	)		(183	)		—			(1,176	)
Acquisition and integration costs		(692	)		—			—			(692	)
Other noninterest expense		(35,346	)		(6,053	)		(1,416	)		(42,815	)
Total noninterest expense		(36,531	)		(6,236	)		(1,416	)		(44,183	)
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		18,134			5,255			(2,176	)		21,213
Income tax (expense) benefit		(6,430	)		(2,199	)		910			(7,719	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	11,704		$	3,056		$	(1,266	)	$	13,494

76

First Quarter of 2014 Compared to First Quarter of 2013

        Net earnings for the Banking segment increased by $10.6 million to $22.0 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $11.7 million for the first quarter of 2013. This change was due mostly to increases in net interest income, negative provision for credit losses, gain on sale of securities, and other income. Other income includes a $1.6 million gain on the sale of an owned building that was a former branch location obtained in the FCAL acquisition. These items were offset partially by increases in FDIC loss sharing expense, compensation expense, occupancy expense, and acquisition and integration costs.

        Net interest income for the Banking segment increased by $21.9 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to the first quarter of 2013, due mainly to an increase in interest-earning assets and lower interest expense on deposits. The yield on average interest-earning assets was 5.82% for the first quarter of 2014 compared to 5.13% for the same quarter last year. The net interest margin attributed to the Banking segment was 5.75% for the first quarter of 2014 compared to 4.94% for the first quarter of 2013.

        Net earnings for the Asset Financing segment increased by $1.6 million to $4.7 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $3.1 million for the first quarter of 2013. This change was due mainly to an increase in noninterest income, offset partially by lower net interest income. Noninterest income increased $3.9 million due mainly to $3.5 million in income recognized on the early repayment of leases. The yield on average interest-earning assets was 9.54% for the first quarter of 2014 compared to 11.66% for the same quarter last year. Yields are impacted by amortization and accretion of purchase premiums and discounts as loans and leases run off.

        Net loss for the Other segment increased by $262,000 to $1.5 million for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2013. This change was due primarily to higher interest expense and higher employee-related expense, offset partially by lower compensation expense. The Other segment consists principally of holding company operations, which result in expenses principally for compensation, facilities, professional services, and interest on subordinated debentures.

77

Balance Sheet Analysis

Investment Portfolio

        The following table presents the components, yields, and durations of our securities available-for-sale as of the date indicated:

	March 31, 2014
Security Type	Amortized Cost		Carrying Value		Yield(1)			Duration (in years)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise pass through securities	$	560,004	$	574,669		2.63	%		3.9
Government agency and government-sponsored enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations		272,832		269,637		2.40	%		5.2
Covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations		29,649		37,594		6.99	%		2.9
Municipal securities(2)		455,437		447,933		2.79	%		6.0
Corporate debt securities		84,210		84,211		2.58	%		2.6
Government-sponsored enterprise debt securities		36,180		36,054		2.22	%		5.9
Other securities		27,393		27,375		0.64	%		0.1
Total securities available-for-sale(2)	$	1,465,705	$	1,477,473		2.70	%		4.6

(1)

Represents the yield for the month of March 2014.

(2)

The tax equivalent yield was 4.18% and 3.12% for municipal securities and total securities available-for-sale, respectively.

        The following table shows the geographic composition of the majority of our municipal securities portfolio as of the date indicated:

	March 31, 2014
	Carrying Value		% of Total
	(In thousands)
Municipal Securities by State:
Texas	$	84,273		19	%
Washington		42,991		10	%
New York		32,867		8	%
Colorado		25,881		6	%
Illinois		24,766		6	%
Ohio		22,739		5	%
California		19,799		4	%
Hawaii		15,469		3	%
Florida		15,308		3	%
Massachusetts		15,370		3	%
Total of 10 largest states		299,463		67	%
All other states		148,470		33	%
Total municipal securities	$	447,933		100	%

78

Loans and Leases

        The following table presents the balance of our total gross loans and leases by portfolio segment and class as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	172,012		4	%	$	181,735		4	%
SBA 504		42,318		1	%		45,166		1	%
Other		2,427,774		58	%		2,569,097		60	%
Total real estate mortgage		2,642,104		63	%		2,795,998		65	%
Real estate construction:
Residential		62,115		1	%		58,898		1	%
Commercial		187,804		5	%		160,619		4	%
Total real estate construction		249,919		6	%		219,517		5	%
Total real estate loans		2,892,023		69	%		3,015,515		70	%
Commercial:
Collateralized		580,742		14	%		588,031		13	%
Unsecured		143,624		3	%		153,880		4	%
Asset-based		200,574		5	%		202,428		5	%
SBA 7(a)		27,339		1	%		28,642		1	%
Total commercial		952,279		23	%		972,981		23	%
Leases		249,736		6	%		269,769		6	%
Consumer		67,047		2	%		55,070		1	%
Total gross loans and leases	$	4,161,085		100	%	$	4,313,335		100	%

        The following tables present our loan and lease portfolio activity for the first quarter of 2014 and fourth quarter of 2013:

	December 31, 2013		Originated and Purchased(1)		Net Paydowns			March 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Non-PCI loans, excluding Asset Financing Segment	$	3,458,342	$	139,735	$	(219,818)	(2)	$	3,378,259
Asset Financing Segment		472,197		28,251		(50,138	)		450,310
Total Non-PCI loans and leases		3,930,539		167,986		(269,956	)		3,828,569
PCI loans		382,796		—		(50,280	)		332,516
Total	$	4,313,335	$	167,986	$	(320,236	)	$	4,161,085

(1)

Includes loan purchases of $17.4 million.

(2)

Includes two loan payoffs for $26.6 million and $23.2 million.

79

	September 30, 2013		Originated and Purchased(1)		Net Paydowns			December 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Non-PCI loans, excluding Asset Financing Segment	$	3,483,866	$	167,691	$	(193,215)	(2)	$	3,458,342
Asset Financing Segment		467,689		68,725		(64,217	)		472,197
Total Non-PCI loans and leases		3,951,555		236,416		(257,432	)		3,930,539
PCI loans		432,757		—		(49,961	)		382,796
Total	$	4,384,312	$	236,416	$	(307,393	)	$	4,313,335

(1)

Includes loan purchases of $20.9 million.

(2)

Includes two loans of a single lending relationship for $31.8 million that repaid on December 31, 2013.

        Our real estate loan portfolio is predominantly commercial-related loans and as such does not expose us to the risks generally associated with residential mortgage loans such as option ARM, interest-only, or subprime mortgage loans. Our portfolio does expose us to risk elements associated with mortgage loans on commercial property. Commercial real estate mortgage loan repayments typically do not rely on the sale of the underlying collateral, but instead rely on the income producing potential of the collateral as the source of repayment. Ultimately, though, due to the loan amortization period generally being greater than the contractual loan term, the borrower may be required to refinance the loan, either with us or another lender, or pay off the loan, by selling the underlying collateral.

        At March 31, 2014, we had $223.9 million of commercial real estate mortgage loans maturing over the next 12 months. For any of these loans, in the event that we provide a concession through a refinance or modification which we would not ordinarily consider in order to protect as much of our investment as possible, such loans may be considered troubled debt restructurings even though they performed throughout their terms. The circumstances regarding any modification and a borrower's specific situation, such as their ability to obtain financing from another source at similar market terms, are evaluated on an individual basis to determine if a troubled debt restructuring has occurred. Higher levels of troubled debt restructurings may lead to increased classified assets and credit loss provisions.

80

        The following table presents the composition of our total real estate mortgage loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
Loan Category	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate mortgage:
Industrial/warehouse	$	352,240		13	%	$	354,345		13	%
Retail		320,975		12	%		346,370		12	%
Office buildings		421,732		16	%		434,961		16	%
Owner-occupied		221,540		8	%		233,195		8	%
Hotel		172,012		7	%		181,735		6	%
Healthcare		187,635		7	%		189,737		7	%
Mixed use		38,721		1	%		68,966		2	%
Gas station		32,569		1	%		35,224		1	%
Self storage		63,408		2	%		73,760		3	%
Restaurant		20,764		1	%		21,510		1	%
Land acquisition/development		4,402		—			4,420		—
Unimproved land		12,416		1	%		12,517		1	%
Other		173,205		7	%		174,780		6	%
Total commercial real estate mortgage		2,021,619		76	%		2,131,520		76	%
Residential real estate mortgage:
Multi-family		298,407		12	%		330,229		12	%
Single family owner-occupied		200,431		8	%		212,508		8	%
Single family nonowner-occupied		34,454		1	%		33,741		1	%
Mixed use		11,046		—			10,701		—
HELOCs		76,147		3	%		77,299		3	%
Total residential real estate mortgage		620,485		24	%		664,478		24	%
Total gross real estate mortgage loans	$	2,642,104		100	%	$	2,795,998		100	%

81

        The following table presents the balance of our total gross loans and leases by portfolio segment and class, showing the non-covered and covered components, at the date indicated:

	March 31, 2014
	Non-Covered Loans and Leases					Covered Loans					Total Loans and Leases
	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	169,678		4	%	$	2,334		1	%	$	172,012		4	%
SBA 504		42,318		1	%		—		—			42,318		1	%
Other		2,061,163		55	%		366,611		92	%		2,427,774		58	%
Total real estate mortgage		2,273,159		60	%		368,945		93	%		2,642,104		63	%
Real estate construction:
Residential		60,542		2	%		1,573		—			62,115		1	%
Commercial		172,340		4	%		15,464		4	%		187,804		5	%
Total real estate construction		232,882		6	%		17,037		4	%		249,919		6	%
Total real estate loans		2,506,041		66	%		385,982		97	%		2,892,023		69	%
Commercial:
Collateralized		574,058		15	%		6,684		1	%		580,742		14	%
Unsecured		140,716		4	%		2,908		1	%		143,624		3	%
Asset-based		200,574		5	%		—		—			200,574		5	%
SBA 7(a)		27,339		1	%		—		—			27,339		1	%
Total commercial		942,687		25	%		9,592		2	%		952,279		23	%
Leases		249,736		7	%		—		—			249,736		6	%
Consumer		64,256		2	%		2,791		1	%		67,047		2	%
Total gross loans and leases		3,762,720		100	%		398,365		100	%	$	4,161,085		100	%

82

Non-Covered Loans and Leases

        The following table presents the balance of our non-covered loans and leases by portfolio segment and class as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	169,678		4	%	$	179,340		5	%
SBA 504		42,318		1	%		45,166		1	%
Other		2,061,163		55	%		2,153,519		56	%
Total real estate mortgage		2,273,159		60	%		2,378,025		62	%
Real estate construction:
Residential		60,542		2	%		58,881		1	%
Commercial		172,340		4	%		142,842		4	%
Total real estate construction		232,882		6	%		201,723		5	%
Total real estate loans		2,506,041		66	%		2,579,748		67	%
Commercial:
Collateralized		574,058		15	%		581,097		15	%
Unsecured		140,716		4	%		150,985		4	%
Asset-based		200,574		5	%		202,428		5	%
SBA 7(a)		27,339		1	%		28,642		1	%
Total commercial		942,687		25	%		963,152		25	%
Leases		249,736		7	%		269,769		7	%
Consumer		64,256		2	%		52,248		1	%
Total gross non-covered loans and leases	$	3,762,720		100	%	$	3,864,917		100	%

83

        The following table presents the composition of our non-covered real estate mortgage loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
Loan Category	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate mortgage:
Industrial/warehouse	$	334,833		15	%	$	336,648		14	%
Retail		270,661		12	%		281,739		12	%
Office buildings		385,391		17	%		392,921		16	%
Owner-occupied		207,777		9	%		218,786		9	%
Hotel		169,678		7	%		179,340		8	%
Healthcare		180,132		8	%		180,957		8	%
Mixed use		36,080		2	%		63,218		3	%
Gas station		28,855		1	%		31,421		1	%
Self storage		44,032		2	%		47,762		2	%
Restaurant		19,910		1	%		20,617		1	%
Land acquisition/development		4,402		—			4,420		—
Unimproved land		11,920		1	%		12,043		1	%
Other		166,366		7	%		167,356		7	%
Total commercial real estate mortgage		1,860,037		82	%		1,937,228		82	%
Residential real estate mortgage:
Multi-family		193,651		9	%		211,360		9	%
Single family owner-occupied		139,326		6	%		149,917		6	%
Single family nonowner-occupied		17,075		1	%		16,084		1	%
Mixed used		10,590		—			10,230		—
HELOCs		52,480		2	%		53,206		2	%
Total residential real estate mortgage		413,122		18	%		440,797		18	%
Total gross non-covered real estate mortgage loans	$	2,273,159		100	%	$	2,378,025		100	%

84

Covered Loans

        The following table presents the composition of our covered loans as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	2,334		1	%	$	2,395		1	%
Other		366,611		92	%		415,578		92	%
Total real estate mortgage		368,945		93	%		417,973		93	%
Real estate construction:
Residential		1,573		—			17		—
Commercial		15,464		4	%		17,777		4	%
Total real estate construction		17,037		4	%		17,794		4	%
Total real estate loans		385,982		97	%		435,767		97	%
Commercial:
Collateralized		6,684		1	%		6,934		1	%
Unsecured		2,908		1	%		2,895		1	%
Total commercial		9,592		2	%		9,829		2	%
Consumer		2,791		1	%		2,822		1	%
Total gross covered loans		398,365		100	%		448,418		100	%

85

        The following table presents our gross covered real estate mortgage loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
Loan Category	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate mortgage:
Industrial/warehouse	$	17,407		5	%	$	17,697		4	%
Retail		50,314		14	%		64,631		16	%
Office buildings		36,341		10	%		42,040		10	%
Owner-occupied		13,763		4	%		14,409		3	%
Hotel		2,334		—			2,395		1	%
Healthcare		7,503		2	%		8,780		2	%
Mixed use		2,641		1	%		5,748		1	%
Gas station		3,714		1	%		3,803		1	%
Self storage		19,376		5	%		25,998		6	%
Restaurant		854		—			893		—
Unimproved land		496		—			474		—
Other		6,839		2	%		7,424		2	%
Total commercial real estate mortgage		161,582		44	%		194,292		46	%
Residential real estate mortgage:
Multi-family		104,756		28	%		118,869		29	%
Single family owner-occupied		61,105		17	%		62,591		15	%
Single family nonowner-occupied		17,379		5	%		17,657		4	%
Mixed use		456		—			471		—
HELOCs		23,667		6	%		24,093		6	%
Total residential real estate mortgage		207,363		56	%		223,681		54	%
Total gross covered real estate mortgage loans	$	368,945		100	%	$	417,973		100	%

        We are party to four loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Such agreements cover a substantial portion of losses incurred on acquired covered loans, other real estate owned, and certain investment securities. The loss sharing agreements relate to the acquisitions of: (1) Affinity Bank ("Affinity") in August 2009, (2) Los Padres Bank ("Los Padres") in August 2010, (3) Western Commercial Bank ("Western Commercial"), in connection with the May 2013 FCAL acquisition, and (4) San Luis Trust Bank ("San Luis"), also in connection with the May 2013 FCAL acquisition. Generally, under the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and receive 80% of loss recoveries on the covered assets. For information regarding the individual loss sharing agreements, see Note 8,FDIC Loss Sharing Asset, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) contained in "Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)."

Allowance for Credit Losses on Non-PCI Loans and Leases

        The allowance for credit losses on Non-PCI loans and leases is the combination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded loan commitments. The allowance for loan and lease losses is reported as a reduction of outstanding loan and lease balances and the reserve for unfunded loan commitments is included within "Other liabilities" on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Generally, as loans are funded, the amount of the commitment reserve applicable to such funded loans is transferred from the reserve for unfunded loan commitments to the allowance for loan and lease losses based on our allowance methodology. The following discussion is for Non-PCI loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses thereon. Refer to "Balance Sheet Analysis—Allowance for Credit Losses on PCI Loans" for the policy on covered loans.

86

        The allowance for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level deemed appropriate by management to adequately provide for known and inherent risks in the loan and lease portfolio and other extensions of credit at the balance sheet date. The allowance is based upon a continuing review of the portfolio, past loan and lease loss experience, current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers' ability to pay, and the underlying collateral value of the loans and leases. Loans and leases that are deemed to be uncollectable are charged off and deducted from the allowance. The provision for loan and lease losses and recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off are added to the allowance.

        The methodology we use to estimate the amount of our allowance for credit losses is based on both objective and subjective criteria. While some criteria are formula driven, other criteria are subjective inputs included to capture environmental and general economic risk elements which may trigger losses in the loan and lease portfolios, and to account for the varying levels of credit quality in the loan and lease portfolios of the entities we have acquired that have not yet been captured in our objective loss factors.

        Specifically, our allowance methodology contains three key elements: (i) amounts based on specific evaluations of impaired loans and leases; (ii) amounts of estimated losses on several pools of loans categorized by risk rating and loan and lease type; and (iii) amounts for environmental and general economic factors that indicate probable losses incurred but not captured through the other elements of our allowance process. In addition, for loans and leases measured at fair value on the acquisition date and deemed to be non-impaired, our allowance methodology captures deterioration in credit quality and other inherent risks of such acquired assets experienced after the purchase date.

        Impaired loans and leases are identified at each reporting date based on certain criteria and the majority of which are individually reviewed for impairment. Non-PCI nonaccrual loans and leases with an unpaid principal balance over $250,000 and all performing restructured loans are reviewed individually for the amount of impairment. Non-PCI nonaccrual loans and leases with an unpaid principal balance of $250,000 or less are evaluated for impairment collectively. A loan or lease is considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the agreement. We measure impairment of a loan based upon the fair value of the loan's collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent or the present value of cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, if the loan is not collateral-dependent. The impairment amount on a collateral-dependent loan is charged-off to the allowance, and the impairment amount on a loan that is not collateral-dependent is set up as a specific reserve. We measure impairment of a lease based upon the present value of the scheduled lease and residual cash flows, discounted at the lease's effective interest rate. Increased charge-offs or additions to specific reserves generally result in increased provisions for credit losses.

        Our loan and lease portfolio, excluding impaired loans and leases that are evaluated individually, is categorized into several pools for purposes of determining allowance amounts by pool. The pools we currently evaluate are: commercial real estate construction, residential real estate construction, SBA real estate, hospitality real estate, real estate other, commercial collateralized, commercial unsecured, SBA commercial, consumer, asset-based and leasing. Within these pools, we then evaluate loans and leases not adversely classified, which we refer to as "pass" credits, separately from adversely classified loans and leases. The adversely classified loans and leases are further grouped into three credit risk rating categories: "special mention," "substandard," and "doubtful," which we define as follows:

•

Special Mention: Loans and leases classified as "special mention" have a potential weakness that requires management's attention. If not addressed, these potential weaknesses may result in further deterioration in the borrower's ability to repay the loan or lease.

87

•

Substandard: Loans and leases classified as "substandard" have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the collection of the debt. They are characterized by the possibility that we will sustain some loss if the weaknesses are not corrected.

•

Doubtful: Loans and leases classified as "doubtful" have all the weaknesses of those classified as "substandard," with the additional trait that the weaknesses make collection or repayment in full highly questionable and improbable.

        In addition, we may refer to the loans and leases classified as "substandard" and "doubtful" together as "classified" loans and leases. For additional information on classified loans and leases, see Note 6,Loans and Leases, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) contained in "Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)."

        The allowance amounts for "pass" rated loans and leases and those loans and leases adversely classified, which are not reviewed individually, are determined using historical loss rates developed through migration analysis. The migration analysis is updated quarterly based on historic losses and movement of loans between ratings. As a result of this migration analysis and its quarterly updating, decreases we experience in both charge-offs and adverse classifications generally result in lower loss factors.

        Finally, in order to ensure our allowance methodology is incorporating recent trends and economic conditions, we apply environmental and general economic factors to our allowance methodology including: credit concentrations; delinquency trends; economic and business conditions; the quality of lending management and staff; lending policies and procedures; loss and recovery trends; nature and volume of the portfolio; nonaccrual and problem loan trends; usage trends of unfunded commitments; and other adjustments for items not covered by other factors.

        Management believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate and appropriate for the known and inherent risks in our Non-PCI loan and lease portfolio. In making its evaluation, management considers certain quantitative and qualitative factors including the Company's historical loss experience; the volume and type of lending conducted by the Company; the results of our credit review process; the levels of classified and criticized loans and leases; the levels of impaired loans and leases, including nonperforming loans and leases and performing restructured loans; regulatory policies; general economic conditions; underlying collateral values; and other factors regarding collectability and impairment. To the extent we experience, for example, increased levels of documentation deficiencies, adverse changes in collateral values, or negative changes in economic and business conditions that adversely affect our borrowers, our classified loans and leases may increase. Higher levels of classified loans and leases generally result in higher allowances for loan and lease losses.

        We recognize that the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses is sensitive to the assigned credit risk ratings and inherent loss rates at any given point in time. Therefore, we perform sensitivity analyses to provide insight regarding the impact that adverse changes in credit risk ratings may have on our allowance for loan and lease losses. The sensitivity analyses have inherent limitations and are based on various assumptions as of a point in time and, accordingly, it is not necessarily representative of the impact loan risk rating changes may have on the allowance for loan and lease losses.

        At March 31, 2014, in the event that 1% of our Non-PCI loans and leases were downgraded one credit risk rating category for each category (e.g., 1% of the "pass" category moved to the "special mention" category, 1% of the "special mention" category moved to "substandard" category, and 1% of the "substandard" category moved to the "doubtful" category within our current allowance methodology), the allowance for credit losses would have increased by approximately $1.4 million. In the event that 5% of our Non- PCI loans and leases were downgraded one credit risk category, the allowance for credit losses would increase by approximately $6.9 million.

88

        Given our current risk management processes, we believe that the credit risk ratings and inherent loss rates currently assigned are appropriate. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different conclusions that could be significant to the Company's financial statements. In addition, current credit risk ratings are subject to change as we continue to review loans and leases within our portfolio and as our borrowers are impacted by economic trends within their market areas.

        Although we have established an allowance for loan and lease losses that we consider appropriate, there can be no assurance that the established allowance for loan and lease losses will be sufficient to offset losses on loans and leases in the future. Management also believes that the reserve for unfunded loan commitments is appropriate. In making this determination, we use the same methodology for the reserve for unfunded loan commitments as we do for the allowance for loan and lease losses and consider the same quantitative and qualitative factors, as well as an estimate of the probability of advances of the commitments correlated to their credit risk rating.

        The following table presents information regarding the allowance for credit losses on Non-PCI loans and leases as of the dates indicated:

Non-PCI Allowance Data:	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan and lease losses	$	59,980		$	60,241		$	65,216
Reserve for unfunded loan commitments		6,975			7,575			6,680
Total allowance for credit losses	$	66,955		$	67,816		$	71,896
Allowance for credit losses to loans and leases		1.75	%		1.73	%		2.41	%
Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans and leases		115.2	%		145.0	%		166.7	%
Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming assets		63.8	%		68.8	%		74.6	%

        The following table presents the changes in our allowance for credit losses on Non-PCI loans and leases for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
Non-PCI Allowance for Credit Losses:	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses, beginning of period	$	67,816		$	67,801	$	72,119
Provision (negative provision) for credit losses		—			—		—
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(861	)		15		(223	)
Allowance for credit losses, end of period	$	66,955		$	67,816	$	71,896

89

        The following table presents the changes in our allowance for loan and lease losses on Non-PCI loans and leases for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
Non-PCI Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period	$	60,241		$	60,551		$	65,899
Loans and leases charged off:
Real estate mortgage		(94	)		(712	)		(322	)
Commercial		(1,069	)		(1,778	)		(708	)
Leases		(372	)		—			(114	)
Consumer		(15	)		(87	)		(9	)
Total loans and leases charged off		(1,550	)		(2,577	)		(1,153	)
Recoveries on loans charged off:
Real estate mortgage		261			842			177
Real estate construction		24			1,140			323
Commercial		377			593			407
Consumer		27			17			23
Total recoveries on loans charged off		689			2,592			930
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(861	)		15			(223	)
Provision (negative provision) for loan and lease losses		600			(325	)		(460	)
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period	$	59,980		$	60,241		$	65,216
Ratios:
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans and leases (end of period)		1.57	%		1.53	%		2.19	%
Allowance for loan and lease losses to nonaccrual loans and leases (end of period)		103.2	%		128.8	%		151.2	%
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans and leases		0.09	%		—			0.03	%

        The following table presents the changes in our reserve for unfunded loan commitments for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
Non-PCI Reserve for Unfunded Loan Commitments:	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Reserve for unfunded loan commitments, beginning of period	$	7,575		$	7,250	$	6,220
Provision (negative provision)		(600	)		325		460
Reserve for unfunded loan commitments, end of period	$	6,975		$	7,575	$	6,680

Allowance for Credit Losses on PCI Loans

        The PCI loans are subject to our internal and external credit review. If deterioration in the expected cash flows results in a reserve requirement, a provision for credit losses is charged to earnings. For PCI loans, the allowance for loan losses is measured at the end of each financial reporting period based on expected cash flows. Decreases or (increases) in the amount and changes in the timing of expected cash flows on the PCI loans as of the financial reporting date compared to those previously estimated are usually recognized by recording a provision or a (negative provision) for credit losses on such loans.

90

        The following table presents the changes in our allowance for credit losses on PCI loans for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses on PCI loans, beginning of period	$	21,793		$	23,235		$	26,069
Provision (negative provision)		(644	)		(1,338	)		3,137
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		51			(104	)		97
Allowance for credit losses on PCI loans, end of period	$	21,200		$	21,793		$	29,303

Nonperforming Assets and Performing Restructured Loans

        The following table presents nonperforming assets and performing restructured loans information as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans and leases(1)	$	58,121		$	46,774		$	43,127
Other real estate owned		46,870			51,837			53,272
Total nonperforming assets	$	104,991		$	98,611		$	96,399
Performing restructured loans(1)	$	35,101		$	41,648		$	80,501
Nonaccrual loans and leases to loans and leases, net of unearned income(1)		1.52	%		1.19	%		1.45	%
Nonperforming assets ratio(1)(2)		2.71	%		2.48	%		3.17	%

(1)

Excludes PCI loans.

(2)

Nonperforming assets ratio is calculated as nonperforming assets divided by the sum of total Non-PCI loans and leases and total OREO.

        Nonperforming assets include Non-PCI nonaccrual loans and leases and OREO and totaled $105.0 million at March 31, 2014 compared to $98.6 million at December 31, 2013. The $6.4 million increase in nonperforming assets was due to an $11.3 million increase in nonaccrual loans and leases and an $4.9 million decrease in OREO. The nonperforming assets ratio increased to 2.71% at March 31, 2014 from 2.48% at December 31, 2013.

Nonaccrual Loans and Leases

        The $11.3 million increase in nonaccrual loans and leases (excluding PCI loans) during the first quarter of 2014 was attributable to (a) additions of $18.4 million, (b) charge-offs of $1.5 million, and (c) other reductions, payoffs and returns to accrual status of $5.6 million.

91

        The following table presents our Non-PCI nonaccrual loans and leases and accruing loans and leases past due between 30 and 89 days by portfolio segment and class as of the dates indicated:

	Nonaccrual Loans and Leases
											Accruing and 30 - 89 Days Past Due
	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Amount		% of Loan Category			Amount		% of Loan Category			March 31, 2014 Amount		December 31, 2013 Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate mortgage:
Hospitality	$	6,639		3.9	%	$	6,723		3.7	%	$	—	$	—
SBA 504		2,519		6.0	%		2,602		5.8	%		1,092		2,155
Other(1)		29,701		1.4	%		18,648		0.8	%		1,831		11,270
Total real estate mortgage		38,859		1.7	%		27,973		1.2	%		2,923		13,425
Real estate construction:
Residential		387		0.6	%		389		0.7	%		—		—
Commercial		3,353		1.9	%		2,830		1.9	%		—		—
Total real estate construction		3,740		1.6	%		3,219		1.5	%		—		—
Commercial:
Collateralized		7,797		1.3	%		9,991		1.7	%		140		119
Unsecured		411		0.3	%		458		0.3	%		—		82
Asset-based		558		0.3	%		1,070		0.5	%		—		—
SBA 7(a)		2,993		10.9	%		3,037		10.6	%		387		459
Total commercial		11,759		1.2	%		14,556		1.5	%		527		660
Leases		220		0.1	%		632		0.2	%		4,075		2,273
Consumer(2)		3,543		5.3	%		394		0.7	%		307		3,313
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	58,121		1.5	%	$	46,774		1.2	%	$	7,832	$	19,671

(1)

Of the $11.3 million in accruing and 30-89 days past due at December 31, 2013, one loan for $5.9 million moved to nonaccrual status at March 31, 2014.

(2)

Of the $3.3 million in accruing and 30-89 days past due at December 31, 2013, one loan for $3.2 million moved to nonaccrual status at March 31, 2014.

92

        The following table lists the ten largest Non-PCI lending relationships on nonaccrual status, excluding SBA-related loans, as of the date indicated:

March 31, 2014 Nonaccrual Amount		Description
(In thousands)
$	6,723	Two loans, each secured by a hotel in San Diego County. The borrower is paying according to the restructured terms of each loan.
	5,904	Loan secured by 2nd trust deeds on two single family residences in Los Angeles County.(1)
	5,324	Three loans to a contractor, one of which is secured by equipment, one of which is secured by an industrial building in San Diego County, and one of which is unsecured. The borrower is paying according to the restructured terms of each loan.
	3,521	Two loans secured by 19 properties located predominantly in San Luis Obispo County. Collateral consists of five undeveloped residential properties, two single family residences, two commercial buildings, and 10 undeveloped commercial properties. The borrower is paying according to the restructured terms of each loan.(1)
	3,154	Loan secured by an industrial building in Santa Barbara County.(1)
	2,704	Two loans that are both unsecured. The borrower is paying according to the restructured terms of each loan.
	2,428	Loan secured by a single retail building located in San Bernardino County.(1)
	1,494	Loan secured by industrial zoned land in Ventura County.
	1,468	Loan secured by an industrial building in San Diego County. The borrower is paying according to the restructured terms of the loan.(1)
	1,320	Loan secured by an office building in Maricopa County, Arizona. Subsequent to quarter-end, the loan was paid off in full.
$	34,040	Total

(1)

New nonaccrual in first quarter of 2014.

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)

        The following table presents the components of total OREO by property type as of the dates indicated:

Property Type	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	13,161	$	15,753	$	8,083
Construction and land development		32,682		35,063		38,145
Multi-family		835		835		3,301
Single family residence		192		186		3,743
Total OREO	$	46,870	$	51,837	$	53,272

        OREO decreased $5.0 million during the first quarter of 2014 due mainly to sales of $4.9 million.

93

Performing Restructured Loans

        Non-PCI performing restructured loans declined by $6.5 million during the first quarter of 2014 to $35.1 million at March 31, 2014. The decline was attributable primarily to the removal of $9.7 million in loans from restructured loan status due to the performance of the loans in accordance with their modified terms and $7.6 million in transfers to nonaccrual status, offset partially by $10.6 million in additions. At March 31, 2014, we had $19.7 million in real estate mortgage loans, $9.2 million in real estate construction loans, $5.8 million in commercial loans, and $429,000 in consumer loans that were accruing interest under the terms of troubled debt restructurings.

        The majority of the performing restructured loans was on accrual status prior to the loan modifications and has remained on accrual status after the loan modifications due to the borrowers making payments before and after the restructurings. In these circumstances, generally, a borrower may have had a fixed-rate loan that they continued to repay, but may be having cash flow difficulties. In an effort to work with certain borrowers, we have agreed to interest rate reductions to reflect the lower market interest rate environment and/or interest-only payments for a period of time. In these cases, we do not forgive principal or extend the maturity date as part of the loan modification. As a result of the current economic environment in our market areas, we anticipate loan restructurings to continue.

PCI Nonaccrual Loans and Performing Restructured Loans

        Loans accounted for as purchased credit impaired are generally considered accruing and performing loans as the loans accrete their discount to interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably estimable. Accordingly, PCI loans that are contractually past due are still considered to be accruing and performing loans. If the timing and amount of future cash flows is not reasonably estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income is not recognized until the timing and amount of future cash flows can be reasonably estimated.

        The following table presents a summary of PCI loans that would normally be considered nonaccrual except for the accounting requirements regarding PCI loans and PCI performing restructured loans as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
PCI nonaccrual loans	$	79,492	$	101,411	$	107,596
PCI performing restructured loans	$	13,351	$	26,137	$	28,154

94

Deposits

        The following table presents the balance of each major category of deposits at the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
Deposit Category	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	2,391,609		45	%	$	2,318,446		44	%
Interest checking deposits		613,144		11			620,622		12
Money market deposits		1,489,068		28			1,458,910		28
Savings deposits		226,012		4			218,638		4
Total core deposits		4,719,833		88			4,616,616		88
Time deposits under $100,000		209,512		4			225,360		4
Time deposits $100,000 and over		440,063		8			439,011		8
Total time deposits		649,575		12			664,371		12
Total deposits	$	5,369,408		100	%	$	5,280,987		100	%

        Total deposits increased $88.4 million during the first quarter to $5.4 billion at March 31, 2014, due to an increase in core deposits of $103.2 million, offset partially by a decrease of $14.8 million in time deposits. The increase in core deposits was composed of increases of $73.2 million, $30.2 million, and $7.4 million in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, and savings deposits, respectively, offset by a decrease of $7.5 million in interest checking deposits. At March 31, 2014, core deposits totaled $4.7 billion, or 88% of total deposits, and noninterest-bearing demand deposits totaled $2.4 billion, or 45% of total deposits.

        The following table summarizes the maturities of time deposits as of the date indicated:

	March 31, 2014
Maturity	Time Deposits Under $100,000		Time Deposits $100,000 or More		Total Time Deposits		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Due in three months or less	$	66,507	$	135,183	$	201,690		0.38	%
Due in over three months through six months		43,178		131,913		175,091		0.37	%
Due in over six months through twelve months		44,978		74,391		119,369		0.38	%
Due in over 12 months through 24 months		20,734		38,291		59,025		0.72	%
Due in over 24 months		34,115		60,285		94,400		0.77	%
Total	$	209,512	$	440,063	$	649,575		0.46	%

Regulatory Matters

Capital

        Bank regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy through standardized risk-based capital guidelines that compare different levels of capital (as defined by such guidelines) to risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet obligations. Banks and bank holding companies considered to be "well capitalized" must maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%, a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0%, and a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 10%. Regulatory capital requirements limit the amount of deferred tax assets that may be included when determining the amount of regulatory capital. Deferred tax asset amounts in excess of the calculated limit are deducted from regulatory capital. There was no limitation on our deferred tax assets at March 31, 2014. No

95

assurance can be given that the regulatory capital deferred tax asset limitation will not increase in the future.

        The following table presents regulatory capital requirements and our regulatory capital ratios as of the date indicated:

	March 31, 2014
	Well Capitalized Requirement			Pacific Western Bank			PacWest Bancorp Consolidated
Tier 1 leverage capital ratio		5.00	%		10.88	%		11.73	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		6.00	%		15.00	%		16.16	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		10.00	%		16.25	%		17.42	%
Tangible common equity ratio		N/A			10.92	%		9.68	%

Subordinated Debentures

        The Company issued subordinated debentures to trusts that were established by us or entities we have acquired, which, in turn, issued trust preferred securities, which totaled $131.0 million at March 31, 2014. With the FCAL acquisition, we added $26.0 million of trust preferred securities. The Company includes in Tier 1 capital an amount of trust preferred securities equal to no more than 25% of the sum of all core capital elements, which is generally defined as shareholders' equity less goodwill, net of any related deferred income tax liability. At March 31, 2014, the amount of trust preferred securities included in Tier I capital was $131.0 million. Our existing trust preferred securities are currently grandfathered as Tier 1 capital under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. However, under new capital rules approved in July 2013 by the FRB and FDIC, once the Company completes the CapitalSource merger or any subsequent acquisition such that, upon completion of such transaction, the Company exceeds $15 billion in consolidated total assets, beginning in 2015, only 25% of the Company's $131.0 million of trust preferred securities currently outstanding will be included in Tier 1 capital, and in 2016, none of the Company's trust preferred securities will be included in Tier 1 capital. Further, under such rules, trust preferred securities no longer included in the Company's Tier 1 capital may be included as a component of Tier 2 capital on a permanent basis without phase-out. See "—New Capital Rules" below. If trust preferred securities are excluded from regulatory capital, we remain "well capitalized" at March 31, 2014.

New Capital Rules

        In July 2013, the Company's primary federal regulator, the FRB, and the Bank's primary federal regulator, the FDIC, approved final rules (the "New Capital Rules") establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations. The New Capital Rules generally implement the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's (the "Basel Committee") December 2010 final capital framework referred to as "Basel III" for strengthening international capital standards. The New Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries, including the Company and the Bank, as compared to the current U.S. general risk-based capital rules. The New Capital Rules revise the definitions and the components of regulatory capital, as well as address other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions' regulatory capital ratios. The New Capital Rules also address asset risk weights and other matters affecting the denominator in banking institutions' regulatory capital ratios and replace the existing general risk-weighting approach, which was derived from the Basel Committee's 1988 "Basel I" capital accords, with a more risk- sensitive approach based, in part, on the "standardized approach" in the Basel Committee's 2004 "Basel II" capital accords. The New Capital Rules are effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of their components

96

and other provisions. We are currently evaluating the impact of the New Capital Rules on our capital ratios and related calculations.

Dividends on Common Stock and Interest on Subordinated Debentures

        Bank holding companies, such as PacWest Bancorp, are required to notify the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB") prior to declaring and paying a dividend to stockholders during any period in which quarterly and/or cumulative twelve-month net earnings are insufficient to fund the dividend amount, among other requirements. Interest payments made by the Company on subordinated debentures are considered dividend payments under FRB regulations.

Liquidity Management

Liquidity

        The goals of our liquidity management are to ensure the ability of the Company to meet its financial commitments when contractually due and to respond to other demands for funds such as the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of customers who may be either depositors wanting to withdraw funds or borrowers who may need assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs. We have an Executive Asset/Liability Management Committee, or Executive ALM Committee, which is comprised of members of senior management and is responsible for managing balance sheet and off-balance sheet commitments to meet the needs of customers while achieving our financial objectives. Our Executive ALM Committee meets regularly to review funding capacities, current and forecasted loan demand, and investment opportunities.

        The Company manages its liquidity by maintaining pools of liquid assets on-balance sheet, consisting of cash and due from banks, interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions and unpledged investment securities available-for-sale, which we refer to as our primary liquidity. In addition, we also maintain available borrowing capacity under secured borrowing lines with the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ("FRBSF"), which we refer to as our secondary liquidity. In addition to its secured lines of credit, the Bank also maintains unsecured lines of credit, subject to availability, of $80.0 million with correspondent banks for purchase of overnight funds.

97

        The following table provides a summary of the Bank's primary and secondary liquidity levels at the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)
Primary Liquidity—On-Balance Sheet:
Cash and due from banks	$	113,508		$	96,424
Interest-earning deposits at financial institutions		228,579			50,998
Investment securities available-for-sale		1,477,473			1,494,745
Less: pledged securities		(291,933	)		(208,340	)
Total primary liquidity	$	1,527,627		$	1,433,827
Ratio of primary liquidity to total deposits		28.5	%		27.2	%
Secondary Liquidity—Off-Balance Sheet Available
Secured Borrowing Capacity:
Total secured borrowing capacity with the FHLB	$	1,282,711		$	1,329,512
Less: secured advances outstanding		—			(106,600	)
Net secured borrowing capacity with the FHLB		1,282,711			1,222,912
Secured credit line with the FRBSF		580,668			563,560
Total secondary liquidity	$	1,863,379		$	1,786,472

        During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Bank's primary liquidity increased $93.8 million due mostly to a $177.6 million increase in interest-earning deposits at financial institutions, offset partially by a $100.1 million net decrease in unpledged investment securities available-for-sale. The Bank's secondary liquidity increased $76.9 million during the first quarter due to increases in borrowing capacity for the Bank's secured borrowing lines with the FHLB and FRBSF. The borrowing lines increased due to the payoff of the borrowings that were outstanding at the beginning of the period, partially offset by a decrease in total borrowing capacity due to decreases in qualifying loan collateral. Our total liquidity and the ratio of primary liquidity to total deposits remain at historically high levels. We expect that our liquidity ratios will be lower at future reporting dates as a result of the merger with CapitalSource, as excess liquidity will be used to pay off CapitalSource's outstanding borrowings.

        At March 31, 2014, $722.8 million of certain qualifying loans were specifically pledged as collateral for the secured borrowing line maintained with the FRBSF. The FHLB borrowing lines are secured by: (1) a blanket lien on certain qualifying loans in our loan portfolio, which are not pledged to the FRBSF, and (2) a portion of our available-for-sale securities.

        In addition to our primary liquidity, we generate liquidity from cash flow from our amortizing loan and securities portfolios and from our large base of core customer deposits, defined as noninterest-bearing demand, interest checking, savings and money market accounts. At March 31, 2014, such deposits totaled $4.7 billion and represented 88% of the Company's total deposits. These core deposits are normally less volatile, often with customer relationships tied to other products offered by the Company promoting long-standing relationships and stable funding sources.

        Deposits from our customers may decline if interest rates increase significantly or if corporate customers move funds from the Bank generally. In order to address the Bank's liquidity risk as deposit balances may fluctuate, the Bank maintains adequate levels of available liquidity.

98

        The following table provides a summary of the Bank's core deposits at the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Core Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	2,391,609	$	2,318,446
Interest checking		613,144		620,622
Money market deposits		1,489,068		1,458,910
Savings deposits		226,012		218,638
Total core deposits	$	4,719,833	$	4,616,616

        Our asset/liability management policy establishes various liquidity guidelines for the Bank. The policy includes guidelines for On-Balance Sheet Liquidity (a measurement of primary liquidity to total deposits), Coverage and Crisis Coverage Ratios (measurements of liquid assets to expected short-term liquidity required for the loan and deposit portfolios under normal and stressed conditions), Loan to Funding Ratio, Wholesale Funding Ratio, and other guidelines developed for measuring and maintaining liquidity. As of March 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all liquidity guidelines established in the asset/liability management policy.

        We may use large denomination brokered time deposits, the availability of which is uncertain and subject to competitive market forces, for liquidity management purposes. At March 31, 2014, the Bank had none of these brokered deposits. However, we had $48.0 million of time deposits that were part of the CDARS program. The CDARS program represents deposits that are participated with other FDIC insured financial institutions as a means to provide FDIC deposit insurance coverage for the full amount of our participating customers' deposits.

Holding Company Liquidity

        The primary sources of liquidity for the Company, on a stand-alone basis, include dividends from the Bank and our ability to raise capital, issue subordinated debt and secure outside borrowings. The ability of the Company to obtain funds for the payment of dividends to our stockholders and for other cash requirements is largely dependent upon the Bank's earnings. Pacific Western is subject to restrictions under certain federal and state laws and regulations that limit its ability to transfer funds to the Company through intercompany loans, advances or cash dividends.

        Dividends paid by state banks, such as the Bank, are regulated by the California Department of Business Oversight ("DBO") under its general supervisory authority as it relates to a bank's capital requirements. A state bank may declare a dividend without the approval of the DBO as long as the total dividends declared in a calendar year do not exceed either the retained earnings or the total of net profits for three previous fiscal years less any dividends paid during such period. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, PacWest received $40.0 million in dividends from the Bank. For the foreseeable future, any dividends from the Bank to the Company require DBO approval.

        At March 31, 2014, the Company had, on a stand-alone basis, $46.3 million in cash on deposit at the Bank. Management believes that this amount of cash, along with anticipated dividends from the Bank and the cash that was acquired when we merged CapitalSource into PacWest, will be sufficient to fund the Company's remaining 2014 cash flow needs.

99

Contractual Obligations

        The following table summarizes the known contractual obligations of the Company as of the date indicated:

	March 31, 2014
	Due Within One Year		Due in One to Three Years		Due in Three to Five Years		Due After Five Years		Total
	(In thousands)
Time deposits(1)	$	495,739	$	137,519	$	15,246	$	—	$	648,504
Long-term debt obligations(1)		3,076		2,314		318		135,055		140,763
Contractual interest(2)		869		2,239		528		—		3,636
Operating lease obligations		16,754		25,847		15,635		12,220		70,456
Other contractual obligations		15,164		6,597		337		209		22,307
Total	$	531,602	$	174,516	$	32,064	$	147,484	$	885,666

(1)

Excludes purchase accounting fair value adjustments.

(2)

Excludes interest on subordinated debentures as these instruments are floating rate.

        Long-term debt obligations include subordinated debentures. Debt obligations are also discussed in Note 9,Borrowings, Subordinated Debentures and Brokered Deposits, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) contained in "Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)." Operating lease obligations are discussed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The other contractual obligations relate to our minimum liability associated with our data and item processing contract with a third-party provider and commitments to contribute capital to investments in low income housing project partnerships.

        We believe that we will be able to meet our contractual obligations as they come due through the maintenance of adequate cash levels. We expect to maintain adequate cash levels through profitability, loan and securities repayment and maturity activity, and continued deposit gathering activities. We believe we have in place various borrowing mechanisms for both short-term and long-term liquidity needs.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        Our obligations also include off-balance sheet arrangements consisting of loan and lease-related commitments, of which only a portion is expected to be funded. At March 31, 2014, our loan and lease-related commitments, including standby letters of credit, totaled $1.1 billion. The commitments, which result in funded loans and leases, increase our profitability through net interest income. We manage our overall liquidity taking into consideration funded and unfunded commitments as a percentage of our liquidity sources. Our liquidity sources have been and are expected to be sufficient to meet the cash requirements of our lending activities.

Asset/Liability Management and Interest Rate Sensitivity

Interest Rate Risk

        We measure our interest rate risk position on at least a quarterly basis using two methods: (i) net interest income simulation analysis, and (ii) market value of equity modeling. The results of these analyses are reviewed by the Executive ALM Committee and the Board ALCO quarterly. If hypothetical changes to interest rates cause changes to our simulated net present value of equity and/or

100

net interest income outside our pre-established limits, we may adjust our asset and liability mix in an effort to bring our interest rate risk exposure within our established limits.

        We evaluated the results of our net interest income simulation and market value of equity models prepared as of March 31, 2014, the results of which are presented below. Our net interest income simulation indicates that our balance sheet is neutral to the first 100 basis points of rate increase, shifting to asset sensitive when rates are modeled to increase 200 basis points or more. This profile is primarily a result of the amount of variable rate loans in our loan portfolio, including loans with in-the-money interest rate floors that are projected to lift off of those floors as rates increase, combined with the level of noninterest bearing deposits that comprise a significant portion of our funding. Our market value of equity model indicates an asset sensitive profile in the up 100 and 200 basis point scenarios, switching to liability sensitive in the up 300 basis point scenario. An asset sensitive profile would suggest that a sudden sustained increase in rates would result in an increase in our estimated market value of equity, while a liability sensitive profile would suggest that our estimated market value of equity would decrease when rates increase. In general, we view the net interest income model results as more relevant to the Company's current operating profile and manage our balance sheet giving priority to this information.

Net Interest Income Simulation

        We used a simulation model to measure the estimated changes in net interest income that would result over the next 12 months from immediate and sustained changes in interest rates as of March 31, 2014. This model is an interest rate risk management tool and the results are not necessarily an indication of our future net interest income. This model has inherent limitations and these results are based on a given set of rate changes and assumptions at one point in time. We have assumed no growth in either our total interest-sensitive assets or liabilities over the next 12 months; therefore, the results reflect an interest rate shock to a static balance sheet.

        This analysis calculates the difference between net interest income forecasted using both increasing and declining interest rate scenarios and net interest income forecasted using a base market interest rate derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve at March 31, 2014. In order to arrive at the base case, we extend our balance sheet at March 31, 2014 one year and reprice any assets and liabilities that would contractually reprice or mature during that period using the products' pricing as of March 31, 2014. Based on such repricings, we calculate an estimated net interest income and net interest margin.

        The repricing relationship for each of our assets and liabilities includes many assumptions. For example, many of our assets are floating-rate loans, which are assumed to reprice to the same extent as the change in market rates according to their contracted index, except for floating-rate loans tied to our base lending rate which are assumed to reprice upward only after the first 75 basis point increase in market rates. This assumption is due to the fact that our base lending rate is 4.00% while the major bank prime rate is 3.25%. Some loans and investment vehicles include the opportunity of prepayment (imbedded options) and the simulation model uses a prepayment model to estimate these prepayments and reinvest these proceeds at current simulated yields. Our deposit products reprice at our discretion and are assumed to reprice more slowly in a rising or declining interest rate environment and usually reprice at a rate less than the change in market rates. In December 2013, we decreased the assumed pricing sensitivity of money market and savings deposits to changes in market interest rates (the "deposit pricing beta"), based on an updated study of the historical repricing relationship. This assumption change resulted in lower interest expense in rising interest rate scenarios, which caused the Bank's net interest income simulation results to be more asset sensitive. The effects of certain balance sheet attributes, such as fixed-rate loans, floating-rate loans that have reached their floors, and the volume of noninterest-bearing deposits as a percentage of earning assets, impact our assumptions and consequently the results of our interest rate risk management model. Changes that could vary significantly from our assumptions include loan and deposit growth or contraction, changes in the mix

101

of our earning assets or funding sources, the actual deposit pricing beta, and future asset/liability management decisions, all of which may have significant effects on our net interest income.

        The simulation analysis does not account for all factors that impact this analysis, including changes by management to mitigate the impact of interest rate changes or the impact a change in interest rates may have on our credit risk profile, loan prepayment estimates, and spread relationships, which can change regularly. In addition, the simulation analysis does not make any assumptions regarding loan fee income, which is a component of our net interest income and tends to increase our net interest margin. Management reviews the model assumptions for reasonableness on a quarterly basis.

        The following table presents as of March 31, 2014, forecasted net interest income and net interest margin for the next 12 months using a base market interest rate and the estimated change to the base scenario given immediate and sustained upward and downward movements in interest rates of 100, 200 and 300 basis points:

March 31, 2014 Interest Rate Scenario	Estimated Net Interest Income		Percentage Change From Base			Estimated Net Interest Margin			Estimated Net Interest Margin Change From Base
	(Dollars in millions)
Up 300 basis points	$	321.5		6.5	%		5.43	%		0.32	%
Up 200 basis points	$	311.1		3.0	%		5.26	%		0.15	%
Up 100 basis points	$	302.0		—	%		5.11	%		—	%
BASE CASE	$	302.0		—			5.11	%		—
Down 100 basis points	$	300.0		(0.7	)%		5.08	%		(0.03	)%
Down 200 basis points	$	298.9		(1.0	)%		5.06	%		(0.05	)%
Down 300 basis points	$	298.3		(1.2	)%		5.05	%		(0.06	)%

        The net interest income simulation model prepared as of March 31, 2014 suggests our balance sheet is neutral to the first 100 basis points of rate rise, then becoming asset sensitive as rates increase 200 basis points or more. Due to the historically low market interest rates as of March 31, 2014, the "down" scenarios are not considered meaningful and are excluded from the following discussion. The asset sensitive risk profile is due mostly to the mix of fixed-rate loans and the amount of loans with in-the-money interest rate floors to total loans in the loan portfolio relative to our amount of interest-bearing deposits that would reprice as interest rates change. Although $2.0 billion of the $4.1 billion of total loans in the portfolio have variable interest rate terms, only $405 million of those variable-rate loans would immediately reprice at March 31, 2014 under the modeled scenarios. Of the remaining variable-rate loans, $1.3 billion would not immediately reprice because the loans' fully-indexed rates are below their floor rates. Of these $1.3 billion of loans at their floors, the fully-indexed rates would rise off of the floors and reprice as follows:

Cumulative Amount of Loans		Rate Increase Needed to Reprice
(Dollars in millions)
$	791.5		100 bps
$	884.1		200 bps
$	908.4		300 bps

        An additional $661 million of hybrid ARM loans would not immediately reprice because the loans contain an initial fixed-rate period before they become adjustable. The cumulative amounts of hybrid ARM loans that would switch from being fixed-rate to floating-rate, because the initial fixed-rate term would expire, was approximately $47 million, $127 million, and $487 million in the next one, two, and three years, respectively.

102

        In comparing the March 31, 2014 simulation results to December 31, 2013, our profile has remained relatively unchanged while our overall estimated net interest income has decreased slightly. The decrease in the simulated net interest income was primarily a result of less interest income due to the lower average balance of the loan portfolio.

Market Value of Equity

        We measure the impact of market interest rate changes on the net present value of estimated cash flows from our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, defined as the market value of equity, using a simulation model. This simulation model assesses the changes in the market value of our interest-sensitive financial instruments that would occur in response to an instantaneous and sustained increase or decrease in market interest rates of 100, 200, and 300 basis points. This analysis assigns significant value to our noninterest-bearing deposit balances. The projections are by their nature forward-looking and therefore inherently uncertain, and include various assumptions regarding cash flows and interest rates.

        This model is an interest rate risk management tool and the results are not necessarily an indication of our actual future results. Actual results may vary significantly from the results suggested by the market value of equity table. Loan prepayments and deposit attrition, changes in the mix of our earning assets or funding sources, and future asset/liability management decisions, among others, may vary significantly from our assumptions. The base case is determined by applying various current market discount rates to the estimated cash flows from the different types of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items existing at March 31, 2014.

        The following table shows the projected change in the market value of equity for the set of rate scenarios presented as of March 31, 2014:

March 31, 2014 Interest Rate Scenario	Estimated Market Value		Dollar Change From Base			Percentage Change From Base			Percentage of Total Assets			Ratio of Estimated Market Value to Book Value
	(Dollars in millions)
Up 300 basis points	$	1,115.6	$	(7.6	)		(0.7	)%		17.1	%		133.8	%
Up 200 basis points	$	1,140.9	$	17.6			1.6	%		17.5	%		136.8	%
Up 100 basis points	$	1,159.2	$	35.9			3.2	%		17.8	%		139.0	%
BASE CASE	$	1,123.3		—			—			17.2	%		134.7	%
Down 100 basis points	$	1,064.3	$	(59.0	)		(5.2	)%		16.3	%		127.7	%
Down 200 basis points	$	1,047.1	$	(76.2	)		(6.8	)%		16.1	%		125.6	%
Down 300 basis points	$	1,044.1	$	(79.1	)		(7.0	)%		16.0	%		125.2	%

        In comparing the March 31, 2014 simulation results to December 31, 2013, our base case estimated market value of equity has increased while our overall profile has become more asset sensitive. Base case market value of equity increased $25.3 million compared to December 31, 2013; this increase was due primarily to the $24.6 million increase in shareholders' equity.

        Our market value of equity profile is affected by the assumed floors in the Company's base lending rate and the significant value placed on the Company's noninterest-bearing deposits for purposes of this analysis. Static balances of noninterest-bearing deposits do not impact the net interest income simulation, while at the same time the value of these deposits increases substantially in the market value of equity model when market rates are assumed to rise.

103

ITEM 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

        Please see the section above titled "Asset/Liability Management and Interest Rate Sensitivity" in "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" which provides an update to our quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk. This analysis should be read in conjunction with text under the caption "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which text is incorporated herein by reference. Our analysis of market risk and market-sensitive financial information contains forward-looking statements and is subject to the disclosure at the beginning of Item 2 regarding such forward-looking information.

ITEM 4.    Controls and Procedures

        As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by the Company's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

        There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

104

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    Legal Proceedings

        In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to various legal actions, which we believe are incidental to the operation of our business. The outcome of such legal actions and the timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict. In the opinion of management, based upon information currently available to us, any resulting liability, in addition to amounts already accrued, taking into consideration insurance which may be applicable, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial statements or operations.

FCAL-Related Litigation

        As set forth below, there are a number of litigation matters pending against FCB, the defense of which PacWest has assumed.

        Fourteen lawsuits have been filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles against FCB, among others, by various former clients of political campaign and non-profit organization treasurer Kinde Durkee. The lawsuits are entitled (i) Wardlaw, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. SC 114232), filed September 23, 2011; (ii) Lou Correa for State Senate, Orange County's Youth et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 479872), filed February 29, 2012; (iii) Committee(s) to Re-elect Lorreta Sanchez, Linda Sanchez, and Susan Davis, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 479873), filed February 29, 2012; (iv) Holden for Assembly v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 489604), filed August 3, 2012; (v) Latino Diabetes Ass'n v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 489605), filed August 3, 2012; (vi) Jose Solorio Assembly Officeholder Committee, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. 492855), filed September 27, 2012; (vii) Foster for Treasurer 2014, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 492878), filed September 27, 2012; (viii) Los Angeles County Democratic Central Committee, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC 492854), filed September 27, 2012; (ix) FCAL v. 68th AD Democratic PAC, et al. (Case No. : BC470812), filed September 23, 2011(the "Interpleader Action"); (x) First California Bank v. Shallman, John, Shallman Communication/John D. Shallman v. FCB (Case No. LC099226), filed December 11, 2012; (xi) National Popular Vote, et al. v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC501213) filed February 19, 2013; (xii) Zine v. First California Bank, et al. (Case No. BC504476), filed April 2, 2013; (xiii) Rothman, Elliott v. FCAL (Case No. BC511180), filed June 5, 2013; and (xiv) Ted Lieu as Treasurer for Ted Lieu for Assembly 2008 v. First California Bank (Case No. BC470182), filed November 18, 2011.

        Plaintiffs in each of the cases claim, among other things, that FCB aided and abetted a fraud and unlawful conversion by Ms. Durkee and/or her affiliated company of funds held in accounts at FCB. Based largely on the same alleged conduct, plaintiffs also assert claims for an alleged violation of California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 and for declaratory relief. Plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as various forms of equitable and declaratory relief.

        Each of the cases is pending before the same judge, who is coordinating their progress. FCB has answered each of the complaints, and the parties have engaged in discovery.

        On September 23, 2011, FCB filed a Complaint-in-Interpleader in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles (Case No. BC 470182), pursuant to which FCB interpleaded the sum of $2,539,049 as the amounts on deposit in accounts at FCB that were controlled by Ms. Durkee on behalf of the several hundred named defendants (the "Interpleader Action"). FCB seeks an order requiring the defendants to interplead and litigate their respective claims, discharging FCB from liability, and restraining proceedings or actions against FCB by the defendants with respect to those amounts. On December 6, 2011, the Interpleader Action was designated as complex and transferred to

105

the Superior Court's complex litigation division. It has been related to the other pending actions that relate to the conduct of Ms. Durkee.

        On June 18, 2012, FCB moved for summary judgment in the Interpleader Action. At hearings held in late 2012 and early 2013, the Superior Court entered summary judgment with respect to a majority of the accounts at issue. Those sums have been paid by the Superior Court to the former accountholders. There still remains a total of $99,884.79 on deposit with the Court in the Interpleader Action.

        In September 2013, Ms. Durkee pled guilty to mail fraud resulting in a judgment of $9.7 million being entered against her. The parties participated in a mediation on October 16, 2013, which did not result in settlement of any claims. Thereafter, at a Further Status Conference on December 19, 2013, the Court scheduled a jury trial on August 13, 2014 as to the following cases: Orange County's Youth, Latino Diabetes Association, Jose Solorio Assembly Officeholder Committee, Holden for Assembly, and Committee(s) to Re-elect Lorreta Sanchez, Linda Sanchez, and Susan Davis (the "First 7 Plaintiffs"). July 14, 2014 has been reserved as the hearing date for the Bank's motion for summary judgment on the claims of the First 7 Plaintiffs.

CapitalSource Merger-Related Litigation

        Since July 24, 2013, 11 putative stockholder class action lawsuits (the "Merger Litigations") were filed against PacWest and certain other defendants in connection with PacWest entering into the CapitalSource Merger Agreement in which PacWest agreed to acquire CapitalSource. The CapitalSource Merger Agreement was publicly announced on July 22, 2013. Five of the 11 actions were filed in Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County: (1) Engel v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. BC516267, filed on July 24, 2013; (2) Miller v.Fremder et al., Case No. BC516590, filed on July 29, 2013; (3) Basu v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. BC516775, filed on July 31, 2013; (4) Holliday v.PacWest Bancorp et al., Case No. BC517209, filed on August 5, 2013 and (5) Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v.CapitalSource Inc. et al., Case No. BC517698, filed on August 8, 2013 (collectively, the "California Actions"). The other six actions were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: (1) Fosket v.Byrnes et al., Case No. 8765, filed on August 1, 2013; (2) Bennett v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. 8770, filed on August 2, 2013; (3) Chalfant v.CapitalSource et al., Case No. 8777, filed on August 6, 2013; (4) Oliveira v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. 8779, filed on August 7, 2013; (5) Desai v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. 8804, filed on August 13, 2013; and (6) Fattore v.CapitalSource, Inc. et al., Case No. 8927, filed on September 19, 2013 (collectively, the "Delaware Actions").

        On August 15, 2013, the Delaware Actions were consolidated into a single action, captionedIn re CapitalSource Inc. Stockholder Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 8765-CS, and assigned to Chancellor Leo E. Strine. On September 25, 2013, plaintiffs in the Delaware Actions filed a Verified Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the "Delaware Consolidated Complaint"). On September 17, 2013, the California Actions were consolidated into a single action, captionedIn re CapitalSource Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Lead Case No. BC516267, and assigned to Judge Elihu M. Berle. On October 2, 2013, plaintiffs in the California Actions filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint (the "California Consolidated Complaint").

        The Delaware Consolidated Complaint and the California Consolidated Complaint each allege that the members of the CapitalSource board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to CapitalSource stockholders by approving the proposed merger for inadequate consideration; approving the transaction in order to obtain benefits not equally shared by other CapitalSource stockholders; entering into the merger agreement containing preclusive deal protection devices; and failing to take steps to maximize the value to be paid to the CapitalSource stockholders. The Delaware Consolidated Complaint and the California Consolidated Complaint also each allege claims against CapitalSource and PacWest for

106

aiding and abetting these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. Plaintiffs in these actions seek, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief concerning the alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, injunctive relief prohibiting consummation of the merger, rescission, an accounting by defendants, damages and attorneys' fees and costs, and other and further relief. The judge in the Delaware Actions ruled on October 23, 2013, that discovery would proceed in the Delaware Actions and that it would be shared with the plaintiffs in the California Actions and that the California Actions would be stayed while that process takes place. Thereafter, on October 28, 2013, the California Actions' plaintiffs stipulated in the California Actions that they would participate in the discovery process in the Delaware Actions and the administrative stay in the California Actions will remain in place unless and until the Delaware Actions are abandoned.

        On December 20, 2013, the parties in the California and Delaware Actions entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the "MOU") setting forth the terms of an agreement in principle to settle both the California and Delaware Actions, subject to certain conditions and future occurrences. Under the terms of the MOU, the merger closed on April 7, 2014. The parties are finalizing a draft Stipulation of Settlement which, consistent with the terms of the MOU, will resolve both the California and Delaware Actions. The parties plan to submit this Settlement Stipulation to the Delaware Court for review as soon as it is complete, and to seek Court approval shortly thereafter. There is also a further status conference scheduled in the California Action on September 10, 2014. At this stage, it is not possible to predict the outcome of the proceedings or their financial impact on the Company; however, the agreements provide, among other things, for payment of Plaintiffs' attorneys fees by Company and/or its insurers, as a condition precedent to a release and dismissal of the Merger Litigations with prejudice.

ITEM 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c)   Issuer Repurchases of Common Stock

        The following table presents stock purchases made during the first quarter of 2014:

Purchase Dates	Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)		Average Price Paid Per Share
January 1 - January 31, 2014		—	$	—
February 1 - February 28, 2014		51,754		39.76
March 1 - March 31, 2014		—		—
Total		51,754	$	39.76

(1)

Shares repurchased pursuant to net settlement by employees, in satisfaction of financial obligations incurred through the vesting of the Company's restricted stock.

107

ITEM 6.    Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description
	2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger dated July 22, 2013 between PacWest Bancorp and CapitalSource Inc. (Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 26, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
	2.2	Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 20, 2013 by and between PacWest Bancorp and CapitalSource Inc. (Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
	3.1	Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of PacWest Bancorp, a Delaware corporation (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2008 and incorporated herein by this reference).
	3.2	Certificate of Amendment, dated May 14, 2010, to Certificate of Incorporation of PacWest Bancorp (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2010 and incorporated herein by this reference).
	3.3	Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State, dated April 7, 2014.
	3.4	Certificate of Correction of Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State, dated April 14, 2014.
	3.5	Bylaws of PacWest Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, dated April 22, 2008 (Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2008 and incorporated herein by this reference).
	31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
	31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
	32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
	32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
	101	Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2014, December 31, 2013, and March 31, 2013, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2014, December 31, 2013, and March 31, 2013, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2014, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, and (vi) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

108

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PACWEST BANCORP
Date: May 12, 2014	/s/ VICTOR R. SANTORO Victor R. Santoro Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

109