| | | | | |
| | March 31, 2006 | |
| | | | | |
| | Amortized | | Fair | |
| | Cost | | Value | |
(In thousands) | | | | | |
Securities Available for Sale | | | | | | | |
Debt securities: | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government agencies | | $ | 64 | | $ | 59 | |
Municipal bonds and obligations | | | 64,109 | | | 64,170 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 261,738 | | | 252,878 | |
Other bonds and obligations | | | 24,294 | | | 24,430 | |
Total debt securities | | | 350,205 | | | 341,537 | |
| | | | | | | |
Equity securities: | | | | | | | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | | 36,717 | | | 36,717 | |
Other equity securities | | | 4,155 | | | 6,375 | |
Total equity securities | | | 40,872 | | | 43,092 | |
Total securities available for sale | | | 391,077 | | | 384,629 | |
| | | | | | | |
Securities Held to Maturity | | | | | | | |
Municipal bonds and obligations | | | 23,237 | | | 23,237 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 5,609 | | | 5,451 | |
Total securities held to maturity | | | 28,846 | | | 28,688 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total securities | | $ | 419,923 | | $ | 413,317 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2005 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | Amortized | | Fair | |
| | Cost | | Value | |
(In thousands) | | | | | | | |
Securities Available for Sale | | | | | | | |
Debt securities: | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government agencies | | $ | 69 | | $ | 63 | |
Municipal bonds and obligations | | | 63,701 | | | 63,673 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 264,705 | | | 258,504 | |
Other bonds and obligations | | | 24,356 | | | 24,703 | |
Total debt securities | | | 352,831 | | | 346,943 | |
| | | | | | | |
Equity securities: | | | | | | | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | | 36,717 | | | 36,717 | |
Other equity securities | | | 4,950 | | | 7,216 | |
Total equity securities | | | 41,667 | | | 43,933 | |
Total securities available for sale | | | 394,498 | | | 390,876 | |
| | | | | | | |
Securities Held to Maturity | | | | | | | |
Municipal bonds and obligations | | | 23,851 | | | 23,851 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 6,057 | | | 5,912 | |
Total securities held to maturity | | | 29,908 | | | 29,763 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total securities | | $ | 424,406 | | $ | 420,639 | |
| | | | | | | |
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. LOANS
Loans consist of the following:
| | March 31, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 |
| | | | Percent | | | | Percent |
| | Balance | | of total | | Balance | | of total |
(Dollars in millions) | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 - 4 family | | $ | 520 | | | 36 | % | | $ | 514 | | | 37 | % |
Construction | | | 36 | | | 2 | | | | 35 | | | 2 | |
Total residential mortgages | | | 556 | | | 38 | | | | 549 | | | 39 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial mortgages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Construction | | | 60 | | | 4 | | | | 59 | | | 4 | |
Single and multi-family | | | 67 | | | 5 | | | | 69 | | | 5 | |
Other | | | 310 | | | 21 | | | | 283 | | | 20 | |
Total commercial mortgages | | | 437 | | | 30 | | | | 411 | | | 29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial business loans | | | 152 | | | 11 | | | | 159 | | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Auto | | | 153 | | | 11 | | | | 148 | | | 10 | |
Home equity and other | | | 151 | | | 10 | | | | 149 | | | 11 | |
Total consumer loans | | | 304 | | | 21 | | | | 297 | | | 21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total loans | | $ | 1,449 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 1,416 | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4. LOAN LOSS ALLOWANCE AND NONACCRUAL LOANS
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows:
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | | | | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
(In thousands) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 13,001 | | $ | 9,337 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 290 | | | 493 | |
Loans charged-off | | | (331 | ) | | (328 | ) |
Recoveries | | | 130 | | | 143 | |
| | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 13,090 | | $ | 9,645 | |
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired and nonaccrual loans:
| | | | | |
| | March 31, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
(In thousands) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Impaired loans with no valuation allowance | | $ | 1,282 | | $ | 1,430 | |
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance | | | 424 | | | 484 | |
Total impaired loans | | $ | 1,706 | | $ | 1,914 | |
| | | | | | | |
Specific valuation allowance allocated to impaired loans | | $ | 201 | | $ | 257 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total nonaccrual loans | | $ | 908 | | $ | 1,186 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing | | $ | 3 | | $ | 110 | |
5. DEPOSITS
A summary of deposit balances, by type, is as follows:
| | March 31, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | | | Percent | | | | Percent | |
| | Balance | | of deposits | | Balance | | of deposits | |
(In millions) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Demand | | $ | 169 | | | 12 | % | $ | 180 | | | 13 | % |
NOW | | | 148 | | | 10 | | | 149 | | | 11 | |
Money market | | | 284 | | | 20 | | | 245 | | | 18 | |
Savings | | | 216 | | | 15 | | | 222 | | | 16 | |
Total non-maturity (core) deposits | | | 817 | | | 57 | | | 796 | | | 58 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Brokered time | | | 57 | | | 4 | | | 57 | | | 4 | |
Other time | | | 577 | | | 39 | | | 518 | | | 38 | |
Total time deposits | | | 634 | | | 43 | | | 575 | | | 42 | |
Total deposits | | $ | 1,451 | | | 100 | % | $ | 1,371 | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6. REGULATORY CAPITAL
The Bank’s actual and required capital ratios are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | FDIC Minimums |
| March 31, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | | to be Well-Capitalized |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital to risk weighted assets | | 10.7 | % | | | 11.1 | % | | | 10.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets | | 9.8 | | | | 10.2 | | | | 6.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 capital to average assets | | 7.8 | | | | 7.8 | | | | 5.0 | |
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At each date shown, Berkshire Bank met the conditions to be classified as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios.
7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company has share-based compensation plans under which incentive and nonqualified stock options may be granted periodically to certain employees and directors. The options are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the underlying shares at the date of grant and have a contractual life of ten years. The options vest based on continued service with the Company in accordance with vesting periods which generally range from two to five years following the date of the grant. Restricted stock awards may also be granted under these compensation plans. The restricted stock awards generally have vesting periods ranging from two to five years, during which time the holder receives dividends and has full voting rights. Certain option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control as defined in the compensation plans. The Company generally issues shares awarded under its share-based compensation plans from shares held in treasury. The Company’s share-based compensation plans are described more fully in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2005 Form 10-K. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of each option grant as of the date of the grant. Assumptions made in relation to prior grants have been previously disclosed in the 2005 Form 10-K and prior Forms 10-K.
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), on January 1, 2006 using the “modified prospective” method. Under this method, awards that are granted, modified, or settled after December 31, 2005, are measured and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Also under this method, expense is recognized for unvested awards that were granted prior to January 1, 2006, based on the fair value determined at the grant date under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123). Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company accounted for stock compensation under the intrinsic value method permitted by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25) and related interpretations. Accordingly, the Company previously recognized no compensation cost for employee stock options that were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
There were no grants of stock options during the first quarter of 2006. There was a grant of 47,600 restricted stock awards during the first quarter of 2006. These awards were valued at $33.78 based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the grant date. These awards will vest in annual steps over a three year vesting period. At March 31, 2006 there were 263,592 shares available for future issuance under equity compensation plans. There were 3,500 options forfeited (average price of $22.44) and 100 awards forfeited (average fair value of $22.30) during the first quarter of 2006. There were 64,975 shares exercised during this quarter, at an average exercise price of $17.13. Options that vested in the first quarter totaled 120,131 (average fair value of $4.64) and total outstanding options remaining unvested at the end of the first quarter were 49,407 (average fair value of $6.33). At March 31, 2006, there was $2.71 million and $313 thousand of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock awards and stock option awards, respectively. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 and 1.9 years, respectively.
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company recorded $337 thousand in accrued expense related to the vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards and $84 thousand in expense related to the vesting of outstanding stock options. In the first quarter of 2005, the Company recorded $335 thousand in expense related to the vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards.
BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R to it’s stock option plans in 2005.
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, 2005 | |
(In thousands, except per share data) | | | |
Net income as reported | | $ | 3,252 | |
Deduct: Total share-based employee | | | | |
compensation expense associated with | | | | |
stock options determined under fair | | | | |
value based method for all option | | | | |
awards, net of related tax effects | | | 109 | |
| | | | |
Pro forma net income | | $ | 3,143 | |
| | | | |
Earnings per share | | | | |
Basic - as reported | | $ | 0.61 | |
Basic - pro forma | | $ | 0.59 | |
| | | | |
Diluted - as reported | | $ | 0.57 | |
Diluted - pro forma | | $ | 0.55 | |
| | | | |
For restricted stock awards, the Company measures compensation cost based on the fair value of the shares as of the date of the award. All share-based compensation awards are classified as equity as they are recorded to the balance sheet. At the end of 2005, there were 790,984 options outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $19.79. At March 31, 2006, there were 722,509 options outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $20.02, of which 677,952 were exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $19.86. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was $10.8 million, with a weighted average remaining contractual term of 6.0 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options was $10.2 million, with a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.9 years.
There were 112,652 unvested stock awards at the end of 2005 with a grant-date fair value of $24.34. During the first quarter, a total of 62,222 stock awards vested with a grant-date fair value of $21.90. At March 31, 2006, the total amount of unvested restricted stock awards was 97,930 shares, with a grant-date fair value of $30.48.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first quarter of 2006 was $1.07 million. The total grant-date fair value of options vested during the quarter was $557 thousand. The total fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the quarter was $1.36 million. Most vestings of share-based awards are scheduled in the first quarter of each year based on the anniversary dates of the original grants.
The total compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements recognized in income was $421 thousand in the first quarter of 2006 and $335 thousand in the first quarter of 2005. The tax benefit recognized in income related to these costs was $139 thousand and $111 thousand respectively. The effect of the change to FAS 123R in the first quarter of 2006 on income before taxes was a reduction of $84 thousand, and the change to net income was a reduction of $56 thousand. Cash flow from operations was reduced by $574 thousand in excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements, and cash flow from financing activities was increased by this amount during the first quarter of 2006. Basic and diluted earnings per share were reduced by $0.01 due to the impact of the change on net income in the most recent quarter. For the first quarter of 2005, share-based employee compensation cost, net of related tax effects, included in net income as reported was $224 thousand. The total share-based employee compensation cost, net of related tax effects, that would have been included in net income in the first quarter of 2005 if the fair-value-based method had been applied to all awards was $333 thousand.
There were no modifications recorded in either period. The total amount of cash received from exercise of share options in the first quarter of 2006 was $1.11 million. A tax benefit of $323 thousand was recorded in relation to these exercises.
In the first quarter of 2005, the weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock awards granted was $638 thousand based on 18,190 restricted stock awards granted at a fair value of $35.10 per share based on the closing stock price on the date of the grant. There were no options granted during this period. During the first quarter of 2005, there were 47,652 options exercised with a total intrinsic value of $921 thousand. The total grant-date fair value of options vested during the first quarter of 2005 was $581 thousand and the total grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the first quarter of 2005 was $1.17 million.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The following analysis discusses changes in the financial condition and results of operations at and for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, appearing in Part I, Item 1 of this document. This discussion and analysis update should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the following discussion, income statement comparisons are against the same period of the previous year and balance sheet comparisons are against the previous fiscal year-end, unless otherwise noted.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on assumptions and may describe future plans, strategies and expectations of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Berkshire Bank. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions. The Company and the Bank’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations of Berkshire and its subsidiaries include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, national and regional economic conditions, legislative and regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality and composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in Berkshire’s and the Bank’s market area, changes in real estate market values in Berkshire’s and the Bank’s market area, and changes in relevant accounting principles and guidelines. Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in the Form 10-K and this Form 10-Q under Item 1A. Risk Factors. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, Berkshire does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation to release publicly the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
General
Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. is the holding company for Berkshire Bank. Established in 1846, Berkshire Bank is one of Massachusetts' oldest and largest independent banks and the largest banking institution based in Western Massachusetts. The Bank is headquartered in Pittsfield, Massachusetts with branches serving communities throughout Western Massachusetts and Northeastern New York. The Bank is transitioning into a regional bank and is positioning itself as the financial institution of choice in its retail and commercial markets, delivering exceptional customer service and a broad array of competitively priced deposit, loan, insurance, wealth management and trust services, and investment products.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2005 Form 10-K. Please see those policies in conjunction with this discussion. Critical accounting policies are those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Management believes that the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments, are as follows:
Allowance for Loan Losses. Arriving at an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of judgment. The allowance for loan losses provides for probable losses based upon evaluations of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. Management uses historical information, as well as current economic data, to
assess the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses as it is affected by changing economic conditions and various external factors, which may impact the portfolio in ways currently unforeseen. Although we believe that we use the appropriate information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary if certain future events occur that cause actual results to differ from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. For example, a downturn in the local economy could cause an increase in non-performing loans. Additionally, a decline in real estate values could cause some of our loans to become inadequately collateralized. In either case, this may require us to increase our provision for loan losses, which would negatively impact earnings. The allowance for loan losses discussion in Item 1 of the 2005 Form 10-K provides additional information about the allowance.
Income Taxes. Management considers accounting for income taxes as a critical accounting policy due to the subjective nature of certain estimates that are involved in the calculation and evaluation of the timing and recognition of resulting tax liabilities and assets. Management uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in which deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities. Management must assess the realizability of the deferred tax asset and to the extent that management believes that recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance is established. Adjustments to increase or decrease the valuation allowance are generally charged or credited, respectively, to income tax expense.
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets. In conjunction with the acquisition of Woronoco Bancorp in 2005, goodwill was recorded as an intangible asset equal to the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets were recorded for the fair value of core deposits and non-compete agreements. The valuation techniques used by management to determine the carrying value of assets acquired in the acquisition and the estimated lives of identifiable intangible assets involve estimates for discount rates, projected future cash flows, and time period calculations, all of which are susceptible to change based on changes in economic conditions and other factors. Future events or changes in the estimates which were used to determine the carrying value of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets or which otherwise adversely affect their value or estimated lives could have a material adverse impact on future results of operations.
Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements
Please refer to the note on Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Note 1 to the financial statements of this report for a detailed discussion of new accounting pronouncements.
The following summary data is based in part on the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, and other information appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Historical data is also based in part on, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s prior filings with the SEC. Data includes the impact of the acquisition of Woronoco Bancorp on June 1, 2005 and the termination of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan on June 30, 2005.
| | At or for the Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Per Share: | | | | | | | |
Earnings - diluted | | $ | 0.55 | | $ | 0.57 | |
Dividends declared | | | 0.14 | | | 0.12 | |
Book value | | | 28.79 | | | 22.01 | |
Tangible book value | | | 17.26 | | | 20.77 | |
Common stock price: | | | | | | | |
High | | | 36.08 | | | 37.64 | |
Low | | | 32.37 | | | 33.40 | |
Close | | | 34.94 | | | 33.75 | |
| | | | | | | |
Operating and Financial Ratios: | | | | | | | |
Return on average assets | | | 0.94 | % | | 1.00 | % |
Return on average equity | | | 7.64 | | | 9.94 | |
Net interest margin | | | 3.27 | | | 3.34 | |
Stockholders' equity/total assets | | | 12.04 | | | 9.92 | |
Tangible stockholders' equity/tangible assets | | | 7.59 | | | 9.42 | |
| | | | | | | |
Annualized Year-To-Date Growth: | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 48 | % | | 24 | % |
Total loans | | | 9 | | | 13 | |
Total deposits | | | 23 | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | |
At Period End: (In millions) | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,056 | | $ | 1,294 | |
Total loans | | | 1,449 | | | 855 | |
Other earning assets | | | 415 | | | 372 | |
Intangible assets | | | 99 | | | 7 | |
Deposits | | | 1,451 | | | 847 | |
Borrowings | | | 352 | | | 314 | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 248 | | | 128 | |
| | | | | | | |
For the Period: (In thousands) | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | $ | 14,608 | | $ | 10,027 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 290 | | | 493 | |
Non-interest income | | | 4,091 | | | 2,744 | |
Non-interest expense | | | 11,225 | | | 7,536 | |
Net income | | | 4,818 | | | 3,252 | |
| | | | | | | |
Asset Quality Ratios: | | | | | | | |
Net charge-offs (annualized)/average loans | | | 0.06 | % | | 0.08 | % |
Loan loss allowance/total loans | | | 0.90 | | | 1.13 | |
Non-performing assets/total assets | | | 0.04 | | | 0.11 | |
_______________________________________ | | | | | | | |
(1) All operating ratios are based on average balance sheet amounts where applicable. | | | | | | | |
(2) Tangible equity or book value is total stockholders' equity less goodwill and other intangible | | | | | | | |
assets. Tangible assets are total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets. | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The following table presents an analysis of average rates and yields on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the years included.
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | Average | | Yield/Rate | | Average | | Yield/Rate | |
| | Balance | | (FTE basis) | | Balance | | (FTE basis) | |
(Dollars in millions) | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgages | | $ | 555 | | | 5.09 | % | $ | 240 | | | 5.10 | % |
Commercial mortgages | | | 428 | | | 7.23 | | | 276 | | | 5.93 | |
Commercial business loans | | | 153 | | | 7.46 | | | 140 | | | 6.43 | |
Auto loans | | | 148 | | | 6.15 | | | 125 | | | 5.86 | |
Other consumer loans | | | 150 | | | 7.07 | | | 59 | | | 5.43 | |
Total loans | | | 1,434 | | | 6.21 | | | 840 | | | 5.73 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities | | | 418 | | | 4.96 | | | 396 | | | 4.41 | |
Short-term investments | | | 2 | | | 4.45 | | | 2 | | | 2.67 | |
Total earning assets | | | 1,854 | | | 5.99 | | | 1,238 | | | 5.31 | |
Other assets | | | 190 | | | | | | 73 | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,044 | | | | | $ | 1,311 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and stockholders' equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW | | $ | 141 | | | 1.01 | % | $ | 95 | | | 0.18 | % |
Money Market | | | 270 | | | 3.12 | | | 159 | | | 1.62 | |
Savings | | | 218 | | | 0.76 | | | 163 | | | 1.00 | |
Time | | | 611 | | | 3.92 | | | 320 | | | 2.91 | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 1,240 | | | 2.86 | | | 737 | | | 1.86 | |
Borrowings | | | 380 | | | 3.96 | | | 330 | | | 3.24 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1,620 | | | 3.12 | | | 1,067 | | | 2.28 | |
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 169 | | | | | | 108 | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 5 | | | | | | 4 | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 1,794 | | | | | | 1,179 | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 250 | | | | | | 132 | | | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 2,044 | | | | | $ | 1,311 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate spread | | | | | | 2.87 | % | | | | | 3.03 | % |
Net interest margin | | | | | | 3.27 | % | | | | | 3.34 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Supplementary Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of funds | | | | | | 2.83 | % | | | | | 2.03 | % |
Total core deposits | | $ | 798 | | | | | $ | 524 | | | | |
Total deposits | | | 1,409 | | | | | | 844 | | | | |
Total deposits and borrowings | | | 1,789 | | | | | | 1,175 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
______________________________________________
(1) The average balances of loans include nonaccrual loans, loans held for sale, and deferred fees and costs.
(2) The average balance of investment securities is based on amortized cost.
(3) | The first quarter adjustment to net interest income for determining fully taxable equivalent income was $494,000 and $260,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively, based on a tax rate of 35%. |
(4) | Cost of funds includes all deposits and borrowings. |
Summary
The Company reported a 48% increase in first quarter net income to $4.82 million in 2006, compared to $3.25 million in 2005. Earnings growth reflected the benefit of the acquisition of Woronoco Bancorp in June 2005, together with the benefit of organic growth. First quarter earnings per diluted share totaled $0.55 in 2006, compared to $0.57 a year ago. Earnings per share reflected the issuance of shares for the Woronoco acquisition.
First quarter financial highlights included:
| · | 23% annualized growth in total deposits |
| · | 11% annualized growth in core deposits |
| · | 13% annualized growth in total commercial loans |
| · | 9% annualized growth in total loans |
| · | 5% linked quarter growth in fee income |
During the first quarter of 2006, the effects on net income of a tightening net interest margin were partially offset by the growth in loans and deposits, and in fee income. The Company neared completion of three new branches which are expected to open in its New York Region in the second quarter. The Company established its Pioneer Valley Regional Headquarters and continued to expand sources for its indirect automobile loan program. Additionally, the Company named a new director from the Albany area, and it announced a 300,000 share stock repurchase program. The Company was active in all areas that it has identified as key components of its plan for strategic growth as it evolves into a regional bank.
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
Assets. Total assets were $2.06 billion at quarter-end, up slightly from $2.04 billion as of the prior year end. Total loans increased by $32 million, growing at a 9% annualized rate, to $1.45 billion. While most categories of loans increased, growth was strongest in the Bank’s primary target category of commercial real estate, which increased at a 25% annualized rate during the quarter due to the contribution of new leadership teams in the New York and Pioneer Valley regions. Total commitments to originate new commercial loans increased during the quarter by $50 million to $100 million at quarter-end. Excluding loans, there were no significant changes to other major categories of assets during the first quarter.
Asset Quality. Asset quality became more favorable during the most recent quarter, with annualized net charge-offs measuring 0.06% of average loans and quarter-end non-performing assets measuring 0.04% of total assets. Non-performing loans decreased by $278 thousand to $908 thousand during the quarter. This decrease helped to offset the impact of loan growth on the loan loss allowance, which increased to $13.1 million from $13.0 million. The allowance measured 0.90% of total loans at quarter-end, compared to 0.92% as of the prior year end. Loans delinquent 30-89 days declined to $3.8 million from $4.2 million for these dates.
Deposits and Borrowings. Total deposits increased by $79 million during the first quarter, reaching $1.45 billion. The 23% annualized increase in total deposits resulted from growth in money market and time accounts, which had the highest demand in the current rising interest rate environment. The annualized rate of deposit growth was 35% in the Pioneer Valley region, 258% in the New York region, and 9% in the Berkshire County region. Deposit growth was tempered by a $12 million (4%) decrease in transaction account balances. This was attributable to seasonal factors affecting business deposits along with the impact of higher interest rates on balances kept in these accounts. In addition to funding loan growth, proceeds from deposit growth were used to replace borrowings, which are the highest cost funding source. During the first quarter, borrowings decreased by $61 million to $352 million.
Equity. Total stockholders’ equity increased by $1.6 million (1%) to $247.6 million during the first quarter. The growth in stockholders’ equity included net income of $4.8 million and a $1.8 million benefit from stock option exercises totaling 65,000 shares. Factors which partially offset this growth were cash dividends of $1.2 million, purchases of 55,000 treasury shares totaling $2.1 million, and a $2.1 million increase in the accumulated other comprehensive loss due to lower securities prices stemming from higher interest rates. A stock award of 47,600 shares totaling $1.7 million resulted in a decrease in the balance of treasury stock and an increase in the balance of
unearned compensation. During the quarter, the Company completed a previously announced plan for the purchase of 150,000 shares and announced a new stock repurchase plan totaling 300,000 shares. No purchases had been made under this new plan as of quarter-end. Reflecting the Bank’s $5 million dividend to the holding company, the Bank’s risk-based capital ratio decreased to 10.7% from 11.1% during the quarter, remaining in excess of the 10.0% requirement for a “well-capitalized” status.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
Net Income. All major categories of income and expense increased in the first quarter of 2006, compared to the first quarter of 2005, primarily due to the acquisition of Woronoco Bancorp in June 2005, together with the benefit of organic growth. First quarter net income was $4.82 million in 2006 compared to $3.25 million in 2005.
Net Interest Income. First quarter net interest income increased by $4.6 million (46%) to $14.6 million in 2006 compared to $10.0 million in 2005. Average earning assets increased by $616 million (50%). Berkshire’s first quarter net interest margin decreased to 3.27% in 2006 compared to 3.34% in the prior year.
The increase in average assets was primarily due to the Woronoco acquisition, along with organic loan growth. The growth was primarily in average loans, with growth recorded in all major categories. Liability growth was also recorded in all major categories of deposits, as well as in borrowings. Both asset yields and liability costs increased due to increases in average interest rates. Growth in average non-interest bearing demand deposits helped restrain growth in the cost of funds, with the result that the net interest margin declined less than the net interest spread. The decline in the net interest margin reflected the changed composition of the balance sheet following the Woronoco acquisition. It also reflected the generally flat yield curve which reduced the spread available on loans and deposits, and it was also impacted by competitive deposit market conditions which made deposit pricing spreads more costly. Additionally, during 2005, the Company maintained a focus on lower-yielding shorter duration earning assets due to anticipated interest rate increases. To counter these effects, the Company has promoted loan growth and growth of relationship-oriented transaction account balances. Additionally, the Company has used funds from deposit growth to pay down borrowings, which are generally a higher costing source of funds.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses is a charge to earnings in an amount sufficient to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level deemed adequate by the Company. The level of the allowance is a critical accounting estimate, which is subject to uncertainty. The level of the allowance was discussed in the previous section on Asset Quality in the discussion of financial condition. The first quarter provision for loan losses decreased in 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to a decrease in nonaccruing loans in 2006 offset by loan growth.
Non-Interest Income. First quarter non-interest income increased by $1.3 million (49%) in 2006 compared to 2005. Results in 2005 included $588 thousand in net gains on the sale of loans and securitized loans to provide funding for loan originations. First quarter fee income totaled $3.2 million in 2006, increasing by $1.7 million (113%) compared to the prior year. Significant growth was recorded in all fee income categories, especially insurance commissions and fees which increased to $908 thousand from $32 thousand, primarily due to the acquisition of the Woronoco insurance operations. Service fee income growth continues to be a significant element of the Company’s growth strategy. The annualized ratio of fee income to average assets was 0.62% in the first quarter of 2006, compared to 0.46% in the same quarter of 2005. First quarter non-interest income also included net gains on the sale of securities totaling $497 thousand in 2006 and $429 thousand in 2005; these gains were related to the sale of equity securities, reducing equity price risk in the investment portfolio.
Non-Interest Expense and Income Tax Expense. First quarter non-interest expense increased by $3.7 million (49%) in 2006 compared to 2005. Increases were recorded in most major categories, primarily due to the impact of the Woronoco acquisition and expansion in the New York region. The amortization of intangible assets increased to $478 thousand from $30 thousand due to the Woronoco acquisition and the operating cost of New York branches opened since mid-year 2005 totaled $230 thousand in the most recent quarter. While the Company has significantly expanded its loan origination activities, much of the impact on expenses has been offset by higher deferrals of loan origination related compensation; these deferrals increased by $827 thousand in the most recent quarter compared to the same quarter of 2005. The first quarter annualized ratio of non-interest expense to
total assets was 2.20% in 2006 compared to 2.30% in 2005. The Company’s strategy continues to emphasize the realization of efficiencies from expanded operations, targeted programs developed in the Company’s Six Sigma process improvement discipline, and ongoing expense controls.
The effective income tax expense rate recorded in the first quarter of 2006 was 32.9%, which increased from 31.4% in the first quarter of 2005 due to the higher proportion of loan interest income in 2006 resulting from higher loan portfolio growth compared to growth in tax advantaged investment securities.
Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive income is a component of total stockholders’ equity on the balance sheet. Comprehensive income includes changes in accumulated other comprehensive income, which consist of changes (after-tax) in the unrealized market gains and losses of investment securities available for sale and the net gain/(loss) on derivative instruments used as cash flow hedges. The Company recorded $2.7 million in comprehensive income in the first quarter of 2006, compared to a comprehensive loss of $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2005. Net unrealized securities losses were recorded in both periods primarily due to changes in bond prices as a result of interest rate changes.
Liquidity and Cash Flows
The Company’s primary source of funds was deposit growth in the first three months of 2006. The primary uses of funds were net paydowns of borrowings and loan growth. Net deposit and loan growth are expected to continue to be significant sources and uses of funds. The Company’s total commitments to originate new real estate secured commercial loans increased by $50 million to $200 million during the quarter. Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank are a significant source of liquidity for daily operations and for borrowings targeted for specific asset/liability purposes. Berkshire Hills Bancorp’s primary routine source of funds is dividends from Berkshire Bank, which paid a $5 million dividend to its parent in the most recent quarter. The holding company also receives cash from the exercise of stock options and uses cash for dividends, treasury stock purchases, and debt service for its junior subordinated debentures. Additional discussion about the Company’s liquidity and cash flows is contained in the Company’s 2005 Form 10-K in Item 7.
Capital Resources
Please see the “Equity” section of the Comparison of Financial Condition for a discussion of stockholders’ equity. At March 31, 2006, Berkshire Bank continued to be classified as “well capitalized.” Additional information about regulatory capital is contained in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements and in the 2005 Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
In the normal course of operations, the Company engages in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in the Company’s financial instruments. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. A further presentation of the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements is presented in the Company’s 2005 Form 10-K. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Information relating to payments due under contractual obligations is presented in the 2005 Form 10-K. There were no material changes in the Company’s payments due under contractual obligations during the first three months of 2006.
Please see the discussion and analysis of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk provided in the Company’s 2005 Form 10-K for a general discussion of the qualitative aspects of market risk and discussion of the simulation model used by the Company to measure its interest rate risk.
In addition to the instantaneous interest rate shock simulation model previously disclosed, the Company has regularly utilized other types of analyses in assessing its interest rate sensitivities. While primary emphasis was given to the rate shock model, the Company has also periodically utilized a rate change ramp simulation model, which modeled the impact of interest rate changes which were ramped evenly over a twelve month period, rather than as an instantaneous shock. Emphasis was placed on the shock model in part due to the generational low levels of interest rates and the anticipation of a future rebound. In recent periods, the Federal Reserve Bank has raised interest rates on a ramped basis and the Company now views the ramp model as more relevant for assessing the risk of the current and anticipated interest rate environments. Accordingly, the simulation results presented below are for a twelve month ramped interest rate change, and the year-end 2005 results have also been changed to reflect this assumption. Additionally, the model has been extended to include a second simulated year in order to fully assess the impact of changes which were ramped in the first year. No other changes have been made to the assumptions or methodologies used in the model.
| | | | | | | | | |
Change in | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rates-Basis | | 1 - 12 Months | | 13 - 24 Months | |
Points (Rate Ramp) | | $ Change | | % Change | | $ Change | | % Change | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
At March 31, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+ 200 | | $ | (1,332 | ) | | (2.22 | )% | $ | (2,339 | ) | | (3.80 | )% |
+ 100 | | | (649 | ) | | (1.08 | ) | | (1,018 | ) | | (1.65 | ) |
-100 | | | 695 | | | 1.16 | | | 1,415 | | | 2.30 | |
-200 | | | 549 | | | 0.91 | | | 98 | | | 0.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At December 31, 2005 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+ 200 | | $ | (210 | ) | | (0.53 | )% | $ | 830 | | | 1.29 | % |
+ 100 | | | (327 | ) | | (0.34 | ) | | 291 | | | 0.45 | |
-100 | | | 1,140 | | | 1.86 | | | 1,480 | | | 2.30 | |
-200 | | | 915 | | | 1.49 | | | (1,189 | ) | | (1.85 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
When comparing the year-end 2005 rate shock sensitivity as reported in the 2005 Form 10-K to the ramp rate change scenario shown above, there is no material change in the qualitative assessment of overall interest rate sensitivity of the Bank. Please see the 2005 Form 10-K for further discussion of the interest rate sensitivity at that date.
During the most recent quarter, the Company displayed a slightly negative income sensitivity to higher interest rates due to shifts in the deposit mix to money market deposits and to shorter duration time accounts and due to the growth of loans with intermediate term pricing durations. The Company’s liability sensitivity also increased due to lower prepayments of loans and investments as a result of higher prevailing interest rates. Due to the Company’s growth plans, these factors are anticipated to continue to influence potential changes in the Company’s interest rate risk in future periods. The Company would consider using longer-term borrowings or other financial instruments to partially offset further liability sensitivity related to loan and deposit growth. The Company previously sought to maintain a neutral or asset sensitive position due to rising short term rates. Currently, the Company anticipates that short term rates may be nearing a peak and it is willing to accept some moderate liability sensitivity in support of its overall strategic objectives, and giving consideration to possible pauses and possible future decreases in short term rates.
For the Bank, market risk also includes price risk, primarily security price risk. The net unrealized loss on securities available for sale increased to $6.4 million (1.6% of amortized cost) at March 31, 2006, compared to $3.6 million (0.9% of cost) as of the prior year end. This change was primarily due to the impact of higher interest rates on the market value of debt securities. The increased amount of unrealized losses was spread throughout the portfolio, and no securities were deemed to be impaired on an other-than-temporary basis.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective for gathering, analyzing, and disclosing the information the Company is required to disclose in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is not involved in any legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the normal course of business. Such routine proceedings, in the aggregate, are believed by management to be immaterial to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table provides certain information with regard to shares repurchased by the Company in the first quarter of 2006.
Period | | | Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | |
January 1- | | | | |
January 31, 2006 | - | $ - | - | 43,100 |
February 1- | | | | |
February 28, 2006 | 54,365 | $ 33.25 | 43,100 | 300,000 |
March 1- | | | | |
March 31, 2006 | 635 | $ 33.19 | - | 300,000 |
Total | 55,000 | $ 33.25 | 43,100 | 300,000 |
| | | | |
_______________________________________________
(1) Total shares purchased outside of the publicly announced plan totaled 11,900. These shares were transacted directly with option exercisers to assist them with their tax withholding obligations.
On February 23, 2006, the Company announced that it had completed the repurchase of 150,000 shares, or approximately 1.7% of its outstanding common stock, under the terms of a stock repurchase plan authorized on May 25, 2005. At year-end 2005, there were 43,100 shares remaining authorized to be purchased under this plan, and these shares were purchased in February 2006 as shown above. For the total 150,000 shares repurchased under this plan, the average price paid per share was $32.67.
Also on February 23, 2006, the Company authorized a new plan to purchase up to 300,000 shares, from time to time, subject to market conditions. This repurchase plan will continue until it is completed or terminated by the Board of Directors. As of March 31, 2006, there had been no purchases made pursuant to this plan. There were no other stock purchase plans in effect at March 31, 2006, and the Company has no plans that it has elected to terminate prior to expiration or under which it does not intend to make further purchases.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
None.
| 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.(1) |
| 3.2 | Bylaws of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.(2) |
4.0 Specimen Stock Certificate of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.(1)
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
| | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
___________________________________________
| (1) | Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form S-1, Registration Statement and amendments thereto, initially filed on March 10, 2000, Registration No. 333-32146. |
| (2) | Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to the Form 10-K as filed on March 16, 2006. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| BERKSHIRE HILLS BANCORP, INC. |
| | | |
| | | |
Dated: May 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ Michael P. Daly | |
| | Michael P. Daly | |
| | President, Chief Executive Officer | |
| | and Director | |
| | | |
| | | |
Dated: May 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ Wayne F. Patenaude | |
| | Wayne F. Patenaude | |
| | Senior Vice President, | |
| | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
25