SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[ X ] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 |
OR
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number | Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter and Principal Office Address and Telephone Number | State of Incorporation | I.R.S. Employer Identification Number |
1-16681 | The Laclede Group, Inc. 720 Olive Street St. Louis, MO 63101 314-342-0500 | Missouri | 74-2976504 |
1-1822 | Laclede Gas Company 720 Olive Street St. Louis, MO 63101 314-342-0500 | Missouri | 43-0368139 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report) and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes | [ X ] | No | [ ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
The Laclede Group, Inc.: | Large accelerated filer | [ ] | Accelerated filer | [ X ] | Non-accelerated filer | [ ] |
Laclede Gas Company: | Large accelerated filer | [ ] | Accelerated filer | [ ] | Non-accelerated filer | [ X ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
The Laclede Group, Inc.: | Yes | [ ] | No | [ X ] |
Laclede Gas Company: | Yes | [ ] | No | [ X ] |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:
Shares Outstanding At | ||
Registrant | Description of Common Stock | August 5, 2008 |
The Laclede Group, Inc.: | Common Stock ($1.00 Par Value) | 21,971,760 |
Laclede Gas Company: | Common Stock ($1.00 Par Value) | 10,391 * |
* 100% owned by The Laclede Group, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS | Page No. | ||||
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||||
Item 1 | Financial Statements | ||||
The Laclede Group, Inc.: | |||||
Statements of Consolidated Income | 4 | ||||
Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income | 5 | ||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | 6-7 | ||||
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows | 8 | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 9-22 | ||||
Laclede Gas Company: | |||||
Statements of Income | Ex. 99.1, p. 1 | ||||
Statements of Comprehensive Income | Ex. 99.1, p. 2 | ||||
Balance Sheets | Ex. 99.1, p. 3-4 | ||||
Statements of Cash Flows | Ex. 99.1, p. 5 | ||||
Notes to Financial Statements | Ex. 99.1, p. 6-13 | ||||
Item 2 | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and | ||||
Results of Operations (The Laclede Group, Inc.) | 23-35 | ||||
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and | |||||
Results of Operations (Laclede Gas Company) | Ex. 99.1, p. 14-23 | ||||
Item 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 36 | |||
Item 4 | Controls and Procedures | 36 | |||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |||||
Item 1 | Legal Proceedings | 37 | |||
Item 2 | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 37 | |||
Item 5 | Other Information | 37 | |||
Item 6 | Exhibits | 37 | |||
SIGNATURES – The Laclede Group, Inc. | 38 | ||||
SIGNATURES – Laclede Gas Company | 39 | ||||
INDEX TO EXHIBITS | 40 |
FILING FORMAT
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined report being filed by two separate registrants: The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility).
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The interim financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
3
Item 1. Financial Statements
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC. | |||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME | |||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
(Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
Operating Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Regulated Gas Distribution | $ | 189,598 | $ | 185,696 | $ | 1,017,579 | $ | 1,027,777 | |||||||
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing | 314,646 | 218,771 | 735,831 | 548,088 | |||||||||||
Other | 1,244 | 1,753 | 3,774 | 4,187 | |||||||||||
Total Operating Revenues | 505,488 | 406,220 | 1,757,184 | 1,580,052 | |||||||||||
Operating Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Regulated | |||||||||||||||
Natural and propane gas | 112,896 | 121,490 | 713,263 | 746,589 | |||||||||||
Other operation expenses | 34,285 | 29,283 | 108,487 | 99,779 | |||||||||||
Maintenance | 6,543 | 5,830 | 18,592 | 17,488 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,819 | 8,565 | 26,295 | 25,630 | |||||||||||
Taxes, other than income taxes | 14,549 | 13,360 | 60,485 | 60,467 | |||||||||||
Total Regulated Operating Expenses | 177,092 | 178,528 | 927,122 | 949,953 | |||||||||||
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing | 308,035 | 212,948 | 714,928 | 531,497 | |||||||||||
Other | 1,102 | 1,589 | 3,815 | 4,398 | |||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 486,229 | 393,065 | 1,645,865 | 1,485,848 | |||||||||||
Operating Income | 19,259 | 13,155 | 111,319 | 94,204 | |||||||||||
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net | (836 | ) | 1,027 | 2,889 | 5,403 | ||||||||||
Interest Charges: | |||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 4,876 | 5,626 | 14,877 | 16,877 | |||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust | 347 | 69 | 486 | 208 | |||||||||||
Other interest charges | 1,189 | 1,826 | 7,408 | 8,199 | |||||||||||
Total Interest Charges | 6,412 | 7,521 | 22,771 | 25,284 | |||||||||||
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes | |||||||||||||||
and Dividends on Laclede Gas Redeemable Preferred Stock | 12,011 | 6,661 | 91,437 | 74,323 | |||||||||||
Income Tax Expense | 2,902 | 1,888 | 30,713 | 26,110 | |||||||||||
Dividends on Laclede Gas Redeemable Preferred Stock | 8 | 10 | 27 | 33 | |||||||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | 9,101 | 4,763 | 60,697 | 48,180 | |||||||||||
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net | |||||||||||||||
of Income Tax (Note 2) | 158 | 4,499 | 20,819 | 988 | |||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 9,259 | $ | 9,262 | $ | 81,516 | $ | 49,168 | |||||||
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding | 21,701 | 21,478 | 21,614 | 21,434 | |||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share of Common Stock: | |||||||||||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 2.81 | $ | 2.24 | |||||||
Income from Discontinued Operations | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.96 | 0.05 | |||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 3.77 | $ | 2.29 | |||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Common Stock: | |||||||||||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 2.80 | $ | 2.24 | |||||||
Income from Discontinued Operations | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.96 | 0.05 | |||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 3.76 | $ | 2.29 | |||||||
Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock | $ | 0.375 | $ | 0.365 | $ | 1.125 | $ | 1.095 | |||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
4
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC. | |||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | |||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
(Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 9,259 | $ | 9,262 | $ | 81,516 | $ | 49,168 | |||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax: | |||||||||||||||
Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivative instruments: | |||||||||||||||
Net hedging gain (loss) arising during period | (10,388 | ) | 5,194 | (16,266 | ) | 3,222 | |||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included | |||||||||||||||
in net income | 3,256 | (2,464 | ) | (1,184 | ) | (4,384 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging | |||||||||||||||
derivative instruments | (7,132 | ) | 2,730 | (17,450 | ) | (1,162 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss included in net periodic | |||||||||||||||
pension cost | 43 | — | 129 | — | |||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax | (7,089 | ) | 2,730 | (17,321 | ) | (1,162 | ) | ||||||||
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Items of | |||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | (2,739 | ) | 1,055 | (6,692 | ) | (449 | ) | ||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax | (4,350 | ) | 1,675 | (10,629 | ) | (713 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive Income | $ | 4,909 | $ | 10,937 | $ | 70,887 | $ | 48,455 | |||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
5
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC. | ||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | ||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED) | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | Sept. 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
(Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||
Utility Plant | $ | 1,215,336 | $ | 1,187,828 | $ | 1,176,954 | ||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization | 402,229 | 394,034 | 392,250 | |||||||||||
Net Utility Plant | 813,107 | 793,794 | 784,704 | |||||||||||
Non-utility property | 3,952 | 4,065 | 4,050 | |||||||||||
Other investments | 43,226 | 43,635 | 43,309 | |||||||||||
Property and investments of discontinued operations | — | 42,601 | 42,748 | |||||||||||
Other Property and Investments | 47,178 | 90,301 | 90,107 | |||||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 32,971 | 52,746 | 36,365 | |||||||||||
Accounts receivable: | ||||||||||||||
Gas customers – billed and unbilled | 103,602 | 102,224 | 104,038 | |||||||||||
Other | 126,871 | 57,861 | 79,241 | |||||||||||
Allowances for doubtful accounts | (14,107 | ) | (11,232 | ) | (15,591 | ) | ||||||||
Delayed customer billings | 18,389 | — | 11,621 | |||||||||||
Inventories: | ||||||||||||||
Natural gas stored underground at LIFO cost | 84,205 | 138,256 | 55,301 | |||||||||||
Propane gas at FIFO cost | 19,907 | 19,950 | 19,950 | |||||||||||
Materials, supplies, and merchandise at average cost | 5,699 | 4,990 | 5,656 | |||||||||||
Derivative instrument assets | 18,948 | 31,057 | 23,379 | |||||||||||
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments | 3,341 | 12,813 | 13,387 | |||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 9,245 | — | 6,255 | |||||||||||
Prepayments and other | 19,847 | 27,914 | 26,848 | |||||||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations | — | 30,756 | 32,851 | |||||||||||
Total Current Assets | 428,918 | 467,335 | 399,301 | |||||||||||
Deferred Charges: | ||||||||||||||
Prepaid pension cost | — | — | 55,101 | |||||||||||
Regulatory assets | 267,574 | 285,054 | 168,458 | |||||||||||
Other | 4,409 | 4,669 | 6,223 | |||||||||||
Total Deferred Charges | 271,983 | 289,723 | 229,782 | |||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,561,186 | $ | 1,641,153 | $ | 1,503,894 | ||||||||
6
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC. | ||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued) | ||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED) | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | Sept. 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
(Thousands, except share amounts) | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES | ||||||||||||||
Capitalization: | ||||||||||||||
Common stock (70,000,000 shares authorized, 21,961,795, 21,645,637, and 21,605,135 shares issued, respectively) | $ | 21,962 | $ | 21,646 | $ | 21,605 | ||||||||
Paid-in capital | 144,955 | 136,061 | 134,277 | |||||||||||
Retained earnings | 324,694 | 268,761 | 276,052 | |||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (8,772 | ) | 1,857 | 2,942 | ||||||||||
Total Common Stock Equity | 482,839 | 428,325 | 434,876 | |||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stock (less current sinking fund requirements) – Laclede Gas | 467 | 627 | 627 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust | — | 46,400 | 46,400 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt (less current portion) – Laclede Gas | 309,167 | 309,122 | 309,101 | |||||||||||
Total Capitalization | 792,473 | 784,474 | 791,004 | |||||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Notes payable | 58,600 | 211,400 | 102,100 | |||||||||||
Accounts payable | 191,402 | 99,109 | 123,568 | |||||||||||
Advance customer billings | — | 25,440 | — | |||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and preferred stock | 160 | 40,160 | 40,160 | |||||||||||
Wages and compensation accrued | 13,267 | 11,532 | 9,811 | |||||||||||
Dividends payable | 8,326 | 7,970 | 7,951 | |||||||||||
Customer deposits | 14,923 | 15,899 | 17,322 | |||||||||||
Interest accrued | 6,204 | 11,103 | 6,595 | |||||||||||
Taxes accrued | 26,313 | 20,922 | 33,660 | |||||||||||
Deferred income taxes current | — | 2,644 | — | |||||||||||
Other | 6,257 | 5,756 | 5,301 | |||||||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | — | 21,730 | 18,273 | |||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 325,452 | 473,665 | 364,741 | |||||||||||
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 233,368 | 223,750 | 232,610 | |||||||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits | 4,030 | 4,200 | 4,259 | |||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefit costs | 71,164 | 63,678 | 20,471 | |||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations | 27,300 | 26,125 | 25,899 | |||||||||||
Regulatory liabilities | 84,436 | 39,589 | 37,100 | |||||||||||
Other | 22,963 | 22,554 | 23,885 | |||||||||||
Deferred credits and other liabilities of discontinued operations | — | 3,118 | 3,925 | |||||||||||
Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities | 443,261 | 383,014 | 348,149 | |||||||||||
Total Capitalization and Liabilities | $ | 1,561,186 | $ | 1,641,153 | $ | 1,503,894 | ||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
7
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC. | |||||||||
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS | |||||||||
(UNAUDITED) | |||||||||
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||
June 30, | |||||||||
(Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Operating Activities: | |||||||||
Net Income | $ | 81,516 | $ | 49,168 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | |||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | (44,491 | ) | — | ||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion | 27,828 | 28,879 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | (6,247 | ) | (20,124 | ) | |||||
Other – net | 3,225 | 1,529 | |||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||
Accounts receivable – net | (67,513 | ) | (34,762 | ) | |||||
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments | 9,472 | 30,994 | |||||||
Deferred purchased gas costs | 72,856 | 38,022 | |||||||
Accounts payable | 92,780 | 26,640 | |||||||
Delayed customer billings - net | (43,829 | ) | (43,064 | ) | |||||
Taxes accrued | 5,391 | 18,142 | |||||||
Natural gas stored underground | 54,051 | 82,175 | |||||||
Other assets and liabilities | 8,215 | (25,607 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 193,254 | 151,992 | |||||||
Investing Activities: | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | 83,554 | — | |||||||
Capital expenditures | (41,503 | ) | (43,020 | ) | |||||
Other investments | (76 | ) | (131 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from unconsolidated affiliate trust’s redemption of its common securities | 1,400 | — | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 43,375 | (43,151 | ) | ||||||
Financing Activities: | |||||||||
Maturity of first mortgage bonds | (40,000 | ) | — | ||||||
Redemption of long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust | (46,400 | ) | — | ||||||
Repayment of short-term debt – net | (152,800 | ) | (105,200 | ) | |||||
Issuance of common stock | 6,863 | 5,353 | |||||||
Dividends paid | (24,197 | ) | (23,310 | ) | |||||
Preferred stock reacquired | (160 | ) | (159 | ) | |||||
Other | 290 | 62 | |||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (256,404 | ) | (123,254 | ) | |||||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (19,775 | ) | (14,413 | ) | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | 52,746 | 50,778 | |||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | $ | 32,971 | $ | 36,365 | |||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Paid During the Period for: | |||||||||
Interest | $ | 30,109 | $ | 30,731 | |||||
Income taxes | 40,924 | 20,418 | |||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
8
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
These notes are an integral part of the accompanying consolidated financial statements of The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of Laclede Group, this interim report includes all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K.
The consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Laclede Group are comprised primarily from the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility). Laclede Gas is a regulated natural gas distribution utility having a material seasonal cycle. As a result, these interim statements of income for Laclede Group are not necessarily indicative of annual results or representative of succeeding quarters of the fiscal year. Due to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, earnings are typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds with the heating season.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - On March 31, 2008, Laclede Group sold 100% of its interest in SM&P Utility Resources, Inc. (SM&P), its wholly-owned subsidiary, which comprised the Non-Regulated Services segment. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the results of operations for SM&P are reported as discontinued operations in the statement of income and its associated assets and liabilities are classified separately in the balance sheet. The operating results of SM&P have been aggregated and reported on the Statements of Consolidated Income as Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax. The Company has reported in discontinued operations interest expense based on amounts previously recorded by SM&P. Discontinued operations does not include general corporate overheads previously recorded by SM&P. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation. For additional information relative to the Company’s sale of SM&P, refer to Note 2, Discontinued Operations.
REVENUE RECOGNITION - Laclede Gas reads meters and bills its customers on monthly cycles. The Utility records its regulated gas distribution revenues from gas sales and transportation services on an accrual basis that includes estimated amounts for gas delivered, but not yet billed. The accruals for unbilled revenues are reversed in the subsequent accounting period when meters are actually read and customers are billed. The amounts of accrued unbilled revenues at June 30, 2008 and 2007, for the Utility, were $10.9 million and $7.2 million, respectively. The amount of accrued unbilled revenue at September 30, 2007 was $11.9 million.
INCOME TAXES - Laclede Group and its subsidiaries have elected, for tax purposes only, various accelerated depreciation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, certain other costs are expensed currently for tax purposes while being deferred for book purposes. Effective October 1, 2007, generally accepted accounting principles require that tax benefits be recognized in the financial statements as determined by new recognition and measurement provisions. These provisions permit the benefit from a tax position to be recognized only if, and to the extent that, it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authority, based on the technical merits of the position. Unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties, if any, are recorded as liabilities or as a reduction to deferred tax assets. Laclede Group companies record deferred tax liabilities and assets measured by enacted tax rates for the net tax effect of all temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements, and the related tax basis. Changes in enacted tax rates, if any, and certain property basis differences will be reflected by entries to regulatory asset or liability accounts for regulated companies, and will be reflected as income or loss for non-regulated companies.
Laclede Gas’ investment tax credits utilized prior to 1986 have been deferred and are being amortized in accordance with regulatory treatment over the useful life of the related property.
GOODWILL - The Company previously reported Goodwill separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the total of which was fully attributable to SM&P, and was included in the Non-Regulated Services operating segment. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company sold 100% of its interest in SM&P, thereby reducing Goodwill to zero at March 31, 2008. Goodwill for prior periods has been reclassified in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is included in the Property and Investments of Discontinued Operations line. For further information on the sale of SM&P, see Note 2, Discontinued Operations.
GROSS RECEIPTS TAXES - Gross receipts taxes associated with Laclede Gas’ natural gas utility service are imposed on the Utility and billed to its customers. These amounts are recorded gross in the Statements of Consolidated Income. Amounts recorded in Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Revenues for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $9.0 million and $8.1 million, respectively. Amounts recorded in Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $47.2 million and $46.9 million, respectively. Gross receipts taxes are expensed by the Utility and included in the Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes line.
9
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - Awards of stock-based compensation are made pursuant to The Laclede Group 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 for descriptions of these plans.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company awarded 74,100 shares of performance-contingent restricted stock to executive officers at a weighted average grant date fair value of $29.32 per share. This number of shares represents the maximum shares that can be earned pursuant to the terms of the awards. The shares were awarded on December 5, 2007 and have a performance period ending in September 2010, during which participants are entitled to receive full dividends and voting rights on 49,400 of these shares based on the target level of performance. The number of shares that will ultimately vest is dependent upon the attainment of certain levels of earnings and dividend growth performance goals; further, under the terms of the award, the Compensation Committee (Committee) of the Board of Directors may reduce by up to 50% the number of shares that vest if the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) during the performance period ranks in the bottom quartile relative to a comparator group of companies. This TSR provision is considered a market condition under generally accepted accounting principles and is discussed further below.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made a separate award of 15,000 shares of performance-contingent restricted stock to an executive officer at a weighted average grant date fair value of $33.26 per share. This number of shares represents the maximum shares that can be earned pursuant to the terms of the award. The shares were awarded on December 5, 2007 and have a performance period ending in September 2009, during which the participant is entitled to receive full dividends and voting rights on 10,000 of these shares based on the target level of performance. The number of shares that will ultimately vest is dependent upon the attainment of certain business development performance metrics and succession management objectives and is not subject to the aforementioned TSR provision.
The weighted average grant date fair value of performance-contingent restricted stock awarded during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was $34.95 per share.
Performance-contingent restricted stock activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 is presented below:
Weighted | |||||||||
Average | |||||||||
Grant Date | |||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | ||||||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2007 | 110,000 | $ | 32.87 | ||||||
Granted | 89,100 | $ | 29.99 | ||||||
Vested | — | $ | — | ||||||
Forfeited | (20,000 | ) | $ | 33.15 | |||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2008 | 179,100 | $ | 31.40 |
During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company awarded 23,250 shares of time-vested restricted stock to executives and key employees at a weighted average grant date fair value of $34.25 per share. These shares were awarded on December 5, 2007 and vest in December 2010. In the interim, participants receive full dividends and voting rights.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made a special award of 15,000 time-vested restricted stock units to an executive officer at a weighted average grant date fair value of $28.49 per share. Each restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of Laclede Group common stock. The units were awarded on February 14, 2008 and vest in December 2011. The participant is required to retain the shares acquired upon vesting for twelve months from the date of delivery of the shares. No dividends are paid or accrue during the vesting period. Furthermore, the participant has no voting rights in the interim.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company awarded 12,500 shares of time-vested restricted stock to non-employee directors at a weighted average grant date fair value of $33.77 per share. These shares were awarded on January 31, 2008. The weighted average fair value of restricted stock awarded to non-employee directors during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was $32.74 per share. These shares vest depending on the participant’s age upon entering the plan and years of service as a director. The plan’s trustee acquires the shares for the awards in the open market and holds the shares as trustee for the benefit of the non-employee directors until the restrictions expire. In the interim, the participants receive full dividends and voting rights.
10
Time-vested restricted stock and time-vested restricted stock unit activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 is presented below:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Shares/ | Grant Date | |||||||
Units | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2007 | 9,000 | $ | 32.44 | |||||
Granted | 50,750 | $ | 32.43 | |||||
Vested | (2,900 | ) | $ | 33.77 | ||||
Forfeited | — | $ | — | |||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2008 | 56,850 | $ | 32.36 |
No stock options were granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was $8.07 per option.
Stock option activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 is presented below:
Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Exercise | Term | Value | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price | (Years) | ($000) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2007 | 617,100 | $ | 30.04 | ||||||||||||
Granted | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Exercised | (157,000 | ) | $ | 27.98 | |||||||||||
Forfeited | (15,000 | ) | $ | 30.88 | |||||||||||
Expired | (7,750 | ) | $ | 31.14 | |||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2008 | 437,350 | $ | 30.73 | 6.6 | $ | 4,217 | |||||||||
Fully Vested and Expected to Vest at June 30, 2008 | 424,705 | $ | 30.67 | 6.6 | $ | 4,119 | |||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2008 | 256,725 | $ | 29.42 | 6.0 | $ | 2,812 |
The closing price of the Company’s common stock was $40.37 at June 30, 2008.
Compensation cost for performance-contingent restricted stock awards is based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. For shares that do not vest or are not expected to vest due to the outcome of the performance conditions, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed.
The fair value of awards of performance-contingent and time-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units, not subject to the TSR provision, is estimated using the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. For those awards that do not pay dividends during the vesting period, the estimate of fair value is reduced by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the Company’s common stock during the performance period, discounted using an appropriate U.S. Treasury yield. For shares subject to the TSR provision, the estimated impact of this market condition is reflected in the grant date fair value per share of the awards. Accordingly, compensation cost is not reversed to reflect any actual reductions in the awards that may result from the TSR provision. However, if the Company’s TSR during the performance period ranks in the bottom quartile relative to a comparator group of companies and the Committee elects not to reduce the award (or reduce by a lesser amount), this election would be accounted for as a modification of the original award and additional compensation cost would be recognized at that time. The grant date fair value per share of the awards subject to the TSR provision awarded during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was valued by a Monte Carlo simulation model that assessed the probabilities of various TSR outcomes.
11
The amounts of compensation cost recognized for share-based compensation arrangements are presented below:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Total compensation cost | $ | 508 | $ | 584 | $ | 1,930 | $ | 1,816 | ||||||
Compensation cost capitalized | (112 | ) | (127 | ) | (410 | ) | (388 | ) | ||||||
Compensation cost recognized in net income | 396 | 457 | 1,520 | 1,428 | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit recognized in net income | (153 | ) | (177 | ) | (587 | ) | (552 | ) | ||||||
Compensation cost recognized in net income, | ||||||||||||||
net of income tax | $ | 243 | $ | 280 | $ | 933 | $ | 876 |
As of June 30, 2008, there was $4.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements (options and restricted stock). That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS - In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from a tax position only if it is at least more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the taxing authorities. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of October 1, 2007. For details regarding the cumulative effect of adoption and other pertinent information, see Note 7, Income Taxes.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement applies to fair value measurements required under other accounting guidance that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. The guidance in this Statement does not apply to the Company’s stock-based compensation plans accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” Except as described below, SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. In February 2008, the FASB issued two Staff Positions that amend SFAS No. 157. The first FASB Staff Position (FSP), No. FAS 157-1, excludes from the scope of SFAS No. 157 accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification and measurement. The second FSP, No. FAS 157-2, delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Application of SFAS No. 157 to these items will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this Statement, as amended by these Staff Positions, on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K, Laclede Group adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of this Statement effective September 30, 2007. The Statement also requires that plan assets and benefit obligations be measured as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position. This requirement is effective for the Company as of the end of fiscal year 2009. In conjunction with adoption of this provision of SFAS No. 158, the Company will be required to change its valuation date for its pension and other postretirement plans from June 30 to September 30. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of the change in measurement date on its consolidated financial statements.
12
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This Statement does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, entities are permitted to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value (fair value option). Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each reporting date. The decision about whether to elect the fair value option is applied instrument by instrument with few exceptions. The decision is also irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs) and must be applied to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS No. 159 requires that cash flows related to items measured at fair value be classified in the statement of cash flows according to their nature and purpose as required by SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows” (as amended). SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this Statement.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards.” This Issue addresses how an entity should recognize the tax benefit received on dividends that are (a) paid to employees holding equity-classified nonvested shares, equity-classified nonvested share units, or equity-classified outstanding share options and (b) charged to retained earnings under SFAS No. 123(R). The Task Force reached a consensus that such tax benefits should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital. This EITF Issue also addresses how the accounting for these tax benefits is affected if an entity’s estimate of forfeitures changes in subsequent periods. This EITF Issue is effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this EITF Issue.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements.” A noncontrolling interest, sometimes called a minority interest, is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that noncontrolling interests should be separately reported as equity in the balance sheet. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 requires certain changes in presentation to income statements. SFAS No. 160 also addresses accounting for changes in the parent’s ownership interest of a subsidiary, accounting for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, and disclosure requirements. This Statement is effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. Currently, all of Laclede Group’s consolidated subsidiaries are wholly owned and therefore adoption of this Statement is not expected to have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (141(R)), “Business Combinations.” This Statement revises SFAS No. 141 but retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method (formerly known as purchase method) of accounting be used for all business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. SFAS 141(R) requires acquisition-related costs to be accounted for separately instead of being allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. SFAS No. 141(R) also amends the guidance related to the recognition of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed that relate to contingencies, research and development assets acquired that have no alternative future use, and negative goodwill arising from a bargain purchase. Laclede Group is required to adopt SFAS No. 141(R) prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates on or after October 1, 2009 (fiscal 2010). Because this Statement is only applicable to future business combinations, existing amounts reported on the Company’s consolidated financial statements will not be impacted by adoption of this Statement.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This Statement amends SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement will be effective for the Company’s interim and annual financial statements beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this Statement.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the preparation and presentation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This statement will be effective 60 days after the Securities and Exchange Commission approves the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 162 will have any effect on its consolidated financial statements.
13
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” This Statement provides clarification to the guidance in SFAS No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises,” and expands disclosure requirements. This Statement is effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. Because SFAS No. 163 is primarily applicable to insurance enterprises that issue financial guarantee insurance contracts, the Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this Statement will have any effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described by SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” The guidance in this FSP states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. This FSP is effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The FSP requires that the guidance be applied retrospectively to all prior-period EPS data presented. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of this FSP on its EPS calculations.
2. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
On March 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of 100% of its interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary, SM&P, to Stripe Acquisition, Inc. (an affiliate of Kohlberg Management VI, LLC) for $85 million in cash, subject to certain closing and post-closing adjustments. SM&P is an underground facilities locating and marking business that comprised Laclede Group’s Non-Regulated Services operating segment. The sales agreement included representations, warranties, and indemnification provisions customary for such transactions and was filed as an exhibit to the March 31, 2008 Form 10-Q. For information concerning Laclede Group’s obligations under these provisions, see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the operating results of SM&P have been aggregated and reported on the Statements of Consolidated Income as Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax. The Company has reported in discontinued operations interest expense based on amounts previously recorded by SM&P. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, discontinued operations includes pre-tax interest expense of $0.9 million. For the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, discontinued operations includes pre-tax interest expense of $1.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Discontinued operations does not include general corporate overheads. Income from Discontinued Operations reported in the Statements of Consolidated Income consists of the following:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues | $ | — | $ | 51,707 | $ | 65,423 | $ | 118,270 | ||||||
Income (loss) from operations | — | 7,363 | (9,387 | ) | 1,799 | |||||||||
Gain on disposal | — | — | 44,491 | — | ||||||||||
Pre-tax income | — | 7,363 | 35,104 | 1,799 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (158 | ) | 2,864 | 14,285 | 811 | |||||||||
Income from Discontinued Operations | $ | 158 | $ | 4,499 | $ | 20,819 | $ | 988 |
Income from Discontinued Operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was $0.2 million due to minor income tax adjustments related to the gain on disposal.
14
The assets and liabilities of SM&P have been segregated from continuing operations and have been reported as assets or liabilities of discontinued operations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Assets and liabilities of SM&P reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as discontinued operations consist of the following:
Sept. 30, | June 30, | |||||||
(Thousands) | 2007 | 2007 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Property and Investments: | ||||||||
Goodwill | $ | 33,595 | $ | 33,595 | ||||
Property, plant, and equipment – net | 7,204 | 7,420 | ||||||
Other investments | 1,802 | 1,733 | ||||||
Total Property and Investments | 42,601 | 42,748 | ||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable – net | 28,816 | 30,639 | ||||||
Other | 1,940 | 2,212 | ||||||
Total Current Assets | 30,756 | 32,851 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 73,357 | $ | 75,599 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 7,720 | $ | 4,998 | ||||
Wages and compensation accrued | 3,950 | 5,879 | ||||||
Other | 10,060 | 7,396 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 21,730 | 18,273 | ||||||
Deferred credits and other liabilities | 3,118 | 3,925 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | $ | 24,848 | $ | 22,198 |
3. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS does not include potentially dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS assumes the issuance of common shares pursuant to the Company’s stock-based compensation plans at the beginning of each respective period, or at the date of grant or award, if later. Shares attributable to stock options and time-vested restricted stock are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share if the effect would be antidilutive. For both the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2008, there were no shares attributable to antidilutive outstanding stock options or time-vested restricted stock excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2007, there were 207,500 and 114,500 antidilutive shares, respectively. Performance-contingent restricted stock awards are only included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share to the extent the underlying performance conditions are satisfied (a) prior to the end of the reporting period or (b) would be satisfied if the end of the reporting period were the end of the related contingency period and the result would be dilutive. For both the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2008, 149,000 shares of nonvested performance-contingent restricted stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For both the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2007, 110,000 shares were excluded.
15
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Basic EPS: | ||||||||||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | $ | 9,101 | $ | 4,763 | $ | 60,697 | $ | 48,180 | ||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | 21,701 | 21,478 | 21,614 | 21,434 | ||||||||||
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock from | ||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 2.81 | $ | 2.24 | ||||||
Diluted EPS: | ||||||||||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | $ | 9,101 | $ | 4,763 | $ | 60,697 | $ | 48,180 | ||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | 21,701 | 21,478 | 21,614 | 21,434 | ||||||||||
Dilutive Effect of Stock Options | ||||||||||||||
and Restricted Stock | 114 | 41 | 93 | 49 | ||||||||||
Weighted Average Diluted Shares | 21,815 | 21,519 | 21,707 | 21,483 | ||||||||||
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock from | ||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 2.80 | $ | 2.24 |
4. | PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS |
Laclede Gas has non-contributory defined benefit, trusteed forms of pension plans covering substantially all employees. Benefits are based on years of service and the participant’s compensation during the highest three years of the last ten years of employment. Plan assets consist primarily of corporate and U.S. government obligations and pooled equity funds.
Pension costs for the quarters ending June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction. Pension costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $4.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction.
The net periodic pension costs include the following components:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Service cost – benefits earned | ||||||||||||||
during the period | $ | 3,243 | $ | 3,106 | $ | 9,728 | $ | 9,317 | ||||||
Interest cost on projected | ||||||||||||||
benefit obligation | 4,670 | 4,482 | 14,010 | 13,447 | ||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (5,162 | ) | (5,074 | ) | (15,487 | ) | (15,222 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 272 | 284 | 816 | 851 | ||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss | 791 | 920 | 2,373 | 2,761 | ||||||||||
Sub-total | 3,814 | 3,718 | 11,440 | 11,154 | ||||||||||
Loss on lump sum settlement | — | — | — | 945 | ||||||||||
Regulatory adjustment | (2,280 | ) | (2,364 | ) | (6,840 | ) | (8,037 | ) | ||||||
Net pension cost | $ | 1,534 | $ | 1,354 | $ | 4,600 | $ | 4,062 |
Pursuant to the provisions of the Laclede Gas pension plans, pension obligations may be satisfied by lump-sum cash payments. Pursuant to a Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) Order, lump-sum payments are recognized as settlements (which can result in gains or losses) only if the total of such payments exceeds 100% of the sum of service and interest costs. No lump sum payments were recognized as settlements during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. Lump sum payments recognized as settlements during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were $2.8 million.
16
Pursuant to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related value of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains or losses not yet includible in pension cost are amortized only to the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active participants. The recovery in rates for the Utility’s qualified pension plans is based on an allowance of $4.1 million annually effective October 1, 2005 and $4.8 million annually effective August 1, 2007. The difference between this amount and pension expense as calculated pursuant to the above and that otherwise would be included in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Consolidated Comprehensive Income is deferred as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.
SM&P maintains a non-qualified, defined benefit plan with four participants that was frozen to new participants in 2002. The plan is a non-qualified plan and therefore has no assets held in trust. Net pension cost related to the plan is not material. The Company sold 100% of its interest in SM&P on March 31, 2008, and the liabilities for this plan remain with SM&P.
Laclede Gas provides certain life insurance benefits at retirement. Medical insurance is available after early retirement until age 65. The transition obligation not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost is being amortized over 20 years. Postretirement benefit costs for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $1.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction. Postretirement benefit costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $5.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction.
Net periodic postretirement benefit costs consisted of the following components:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Service cost – benefits earned | ||||||||||||||
during the period | $ | 1,140 | $ | 1,016 | $ | 3,420 | $ | 3,047 | ||||||
Interest cost on accumulated | ||||||||||||||
postretirement benefit obligation | 977 | 899 | 2,931 | 2,699 | ||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (509 | ) | (430 | ) | (1,528 | ) | (1,292 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of transition obligation | 34 | 34 | 102 | 102 | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | (582 | ) | (582 | ) | (1,746 | ) | (1,746 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss | 746 | 811 | 2,238 | 2,434 | ||||||||||
Sub-total | 1,806 | 1,748 | 5,417 | 5,244 | ||||||||||
Regulatory adjustment | 104 | 222 | 314 | 668 | ||||||||||
Net postretirement benefit cost | $ | 1,910 | $ | 1,970 | $ | 5,731 | $ | 5,912 |
Missouri state law provides for the recovery in rates of SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” accrued costs provided that such costs are funded through an independent, external funding mechanism. Laclede Gas established Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) and Rabbi trusts as its external funding mechanisms. VEBA and Rabbi trusts’ assets consist primarily of money market securities and mutual funds invested in stocks and bonds.
Pursuant to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related value of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains and losses not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost are amortized only to the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active participants. Previously, the recovery in rates for the postretirement benefit costs was based on an alternative methodology for amortization of unrecognized gains and losses as ordered by the MoPSC. The Commission ordered that the recovery in rates be based on an annual allowance of $7.6 million, effective August 1, 2007. The difference between this amount and postretirement benefit cost based on the above and that otherwise would be included in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Consolidated Comprehensive Income is deferred as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.
17
5. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
In the course of its business, Laclede Group’s non-regulated gas marketing affiliate, Laclede Energy Resources, Inc. (LER), enters into fixed-price commitments associated with the purchase or sale of natural gas. LER manages the price risk associated with these commitments by either closely matching the offsetting physical purchase or sale of natural gas at fixed prices or through the use of exchange-traded futures contracts to lock in margins. At June 30, 2008, LER’s unmatched positions were not material to Laclede Group’s financial position or results of operations.
Settled and open futures positions were as follows at June 30, 2008:
Position Month | MMBtu (millions) | Average Price per MMBtu | |||||||
Settled short positions | July 2008 | 1.07 | $ | 12.12 | |||||
Settled long positions | July 2008 | 0.16 | 10.82 | ||||||
Open short futures positions | August 2008 | 1.12 | 11.67 | ||||||
September 2008 | 0.45 | 9.40 | |||||||
October 2008 | 0.18 | 9.82 | |||||||
November 2008 | 0.81 | 10.02 | |||||||
December 2008 | 0.34 | 9.55 | |||||||
January 2009 | 0.31 | 9.76 | |||||||
February 2009 | 0.31 | 9.74 | |||||||
March 2009 | 0.27 | 9.69 | |||||||
April 2009 | 0.03 | 10.72 | |||||||
November 2009 | 0.10 | 8.80 | |||||||
December 2009 | 0.15 | 8.83 | |||||||
January 2010 | 0.15 | 8.83 | |||||||
February 2010 | 0.15 | 8.83 | |||||||
March 2010 | 0.10 | 8.80 | |||||||
Open long futures positions | August 2008 | 0.06 | 7.60 | ||||||
September 2008 | 0.06 | 7.60 | |||||||
October 2008 | 0.06 | 7.60 | |||||||
November 2008 | 0.06 | 7.60 | |||||||
December 2008 | 0.06 | 7.60 | |||||||
April 2009 | 0.30 | 8.94 |
The above futures contracts are derivative instruments, and management has designated these items as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions. The fair values of the instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in the fair value of the effective portion of these hedge instruments is recorded, net of tax, in Other Comprehensive Income. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income is a component of Total Common Stock Equity. These amounts will reduce or be charged to Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues or Expenses in the Statements of Consolidated Income as the hedged transactions occur. As of June 30, 2008, it is expected that approximately $10.0 million of pre-tax unrealized losses will be reclassified into the Consolidated Statement of Income during the next twelve months. The ineffective portions of these hedge instruments are charged or credited to Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues or Expenses. The net amount of pre-tax losses recognized in earnings for the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges was $0.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and $1.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008. The net amount of pre-tax gains recognized in earnings for the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges was $0.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The net amount of ineffectiveness recognized for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was not material. Cash flows from hedging transactions are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the items that are being hedged in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.
18
6. | LONG-TERM DEBT TO UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE TRUST |
In fiscal year 2003, Laclede Group formed Laclede Capital Trust I (Trust), its affiliated, nonconsolidated trust, for the sole purpose of issuing trust securities and investing the gross proceeds of the sale of the trust securities in debt securities of Laclede Group. All of the Trust securities had a liquidation value of $25 per share and a dividend rate of 7.70%, with all of its common securities being owned by Laclede Group and all of its preferred securities being sold to the public. The Trust’s sole asset was the Company’s $46.4 million aggregate principal amount of 7.70% debentures due December 1, 2032, which had the same economic terms as the Trust securities and were reflected as Long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s investment in the Trust common securities was included on the Other investments line on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On May 5, 2008, Laclede Group redeemed in full its $46.4 million subordinated debentures, which also triggered the redemption of all of the Trust common and preferred securities on the same date. Interest on the debentures and distributions on the Trust securities ceased on and after the redemption date. Upon redemption, Laclede Group recognized a pre-tax loss of $1.4 million, primarily attributable to unamortized issuance costs. A portion of the proceeds received from the sale of SM&P was used to fund the redemption. The Trust was dissolved on June 16, 2008.
7. | INCOME TAXES |
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” as of October 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Pursuant to FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from a tax position only if it is at least more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.
Upon adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized a reduction to beginning retained earnings as a cumulative-effect adjustment totaling $1.1 million, reclassified $2.5 million of income tax liabilities from current to non-current liabilities, and increased its liabilities for accrued interest and penalties. Total unrecognized tax benefits as of October 1, 2007 were $2.1 million, all of which would have favorably impacted the effective tax rate, if recognized. The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to its uncertain tax positions as interest expense and other income deductions, respectively. Potential interest and penalties accrued (net of income tax benefit) associated with the Company’s uncertain tax positions were $1.5 million at October 1, 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits, accrued interest payable, and accrued penalties payable are included in the Other line of the Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of state and local jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to examination for fiscal years prior to 2005. The federal statute of limitations remains open until June 15, 2009 and 2010 for fiscal years 2005 and 2006, respectively. However, during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company effectively settled an audit with the Internal Revenue Service for those periods. Completion of the audit represents an event requiring the Company to re-evaluate its uncertain tax positions. As a result, the Company recognized fiscal years 2005 and 2006 unrecognized tax benefits of $1.0 million, which favorably impacted the effective tax rate, and reversed $1.6 million of accrued interest and penalties (net of income tax benefit). During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the statute of limitations for the Company’s fiscal year 2004 expired. As a result, previously unrecognized tax benefits of $0.3 million were recognized by the Company, which favorably impacted the effective tax rate, and $0.1 million of related accrued interest and penalties were reversed (net of income tax benefit).
Total FIN 48 unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2008 were $0.9 million, all of which would favorably impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. Potential interest and penalties associated with these liabilities were immaterial. The Company does not expect to make any significant tax payment related to any of the above obligations within the next twelve months.
19
8. | OTHER INCOME AND (INCOME DEDUCTIONS) – NET |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Allowance for funds used during construction | $ | (21 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (46 | ) | $ | (18 | ) | ||
Interest income | 738 | 835 | 3,558 | 4,072 | ||||||||||
Other income | 472 | 376 | 1,192 | 922 | ||||||||||
Other income deductions | (2,025 | ) | (182 | ) | (1,815 | ) | 427 | |||||||
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net | $ | (836 | ) | $ | 1,027 | $ | 2,889 | $ | 5,403 |
The decrease in Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2007, was primarily due to higher investment losses, a loss on the redemption of long-term debt (primarily unamortized issuance costs), lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs, and reduced income associated with changes in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies. These factors were partially offset by a reversal of tax-related expenses and additional proceeds related to the Company’s interest, as a policyholder, in the sale of a mutual insurance company. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause.
9. | INFORMATION BY OPERATING SEGMENT |
All of Laclede Group’s subsidiaries are wholly owned. The Regulated Gas Distribution segment consists of the regulated operations of Laclede Gas and is the core business segment of Laclede Group. Laclede Gas is a public utility engaged in the retail distribution and sale of natural gas serving an area in eastern Missouri, with a population of approximately 2.1 million, including the City of St. Louis and parts of ten other counties in eastern Missouri. The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment includes the results of LER, a subsidiary engaged in the non-regulated marketing of natural gas and related activities. Other includes Laclede Pipeline Company’s transportation of liquid propane regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as well as non-regulated activities, including real estate development, the compression of natural gas, and financial investments in other enterprises. These operations are conducted through five subsidiaries. Other also includes Laclede Gas’ non-regulated merchandise sales business. Certain intersegment revenues with Laclede Gas are not eliminated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” Those types of transactions include sales of natural gas from Laclede Gas to LER, sales of natural gas from LER to Laclede Gas, and transportation services provided by Laclede Pipeline Company to Laclede Gas. These revenues are shown on the Intersegment Revenues lines in the table under Regulated Gas Distribution, Non-Regulated Gas Marketing, and Other columns, respectively.
Previously, SM&P comprised the Non-Regulated Services segment and its financial information was presented separately. As discussed in Note 2, Discontinued Operations, the Company sold SM&P on March 31, 2008. Accordingly, financial information for this segment has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Under generally accepted accounting principles, general corporate overhead expenses may not be reported in discontinued operations. Amounts of such expenses that were previously reported by SM&P but that are required to be reported in continuing operations are reflected in the Unallocated & Eliminations column of the table below. Prior periods reported in the table below have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation of segment information.
20
Non- | ||||||||||||||||
Regulated | Regulated | Unallocated | ||||||||||||||
Gas | Gas | & | ||||||||||||||
(Thousands) | Distribution | Marketing | Other | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues from external | ||||||||||||||||
customers | $ | 189,597 | $ | 311,609 | $ | 984 | $ | — | $ | 502,190 | ||||||
Intersegment revenues | 1 | 3,037 | 260 | — | 3,298 | |||||||||||
Total operating revenues | 189,598 | 314,646 | 1,244 | — | 505,488 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing | ||||||||||||||||
operations | 5,501 | 4,267 | (667 | ) | — | 9,101 | ||||||||||
Total assets of continuing | ||||||||||||||||
operations | 1,382,002 | 177,893 | 113,369 | (112,078 | ) | 1,561,186 | ||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues from external | ||||||||||||||||
customers | $ | 1,016,302 | $ | 728,017 | $ | 2,995 | $ | — | $ | 1,747,314 | ||||||
Intersegment revenues | 1,277 | 7,814 | 779 | — | 9,870 | |||||||||||
Total operating revenues | 1,017,579 | 735,831 | 3,774 | — | 1,757,184 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing | ||||||||||||||||
operations | 46,579 | 14,782 | (400 | ) | (264 | ) | 60,697 | |||||||||
Total assets of continuing | ||||||||||||||||
operations | 1,382,002 | 177,893 | 113,369 | (112,078 | ) | 1,561,186 | ||||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues from external | ||||||||||||||||
customers | $ | 168,673 | $ | 213,036 | $ | 1,493 | $ | — | $ | 383,202 | ||||||
Intersegment revenues | 17,023 | 5,735 | 260 | — | 23,018 | |||||||||||
Total operating revenues | 185,696 | 218,771 | 1,753 | — | 406,220 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing | ||||||||||||||||
operations | 846 | 3,854 | 292 | (229 | ) | 4,763 | ||||||||||
Total assets of continuing | ||||||||||||||||
operations | 1,288,098 | 130,417 | 78,208 | (68,428 | ) | 1,428,295 | ||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues from external | ||||||||||||||||
customers | $ | 992,383 | $ | 508,561 | $ | 3,408 | $ | — | $ | 1,504,352 | ||||||
Intersegment revenues | 35,394 | 39,527 | 779 | — | 75,700 | |||||||||||
Total operating revenues | 1,027,777 | 548,088 | 4,187 | — | 1,580,052 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing | ||||||||||||||||
operations | 37,214 | 10,971 | 580 | (585 | ) | 48,180 | ||||||||||
Total assets of continuing | ||||||||||||||||
operations | 1,288,098 | 130,417 | 78,208 | (68,428 | ) | 1,428,295 |
21
10. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Laclede Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission, and storage facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws, regulations, and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from such operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not materially affected the Company’s or Laclede Gas’ financial position and results of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K for information relative to environmental matters generally. There have been no significant changes relative to environmental matters during the nine months ended June 30, 2008.
On December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2005. On September 14, 2007, the Staff withdrew its pursuit of $5.5 million of the disallowance it had originally proposed. Laclede Gas believes that the remaining $1.7 million of the MoPSC Staff’s proposed disallowance lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC.
On December 31, 2007, the MoPSC Staff filed a memorandum with the Commission proposing a disallowance of $2.8 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2006. Laclede Gas believes that the MoPSC Staff’s position lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC. In addition, the MoPSC’s Staff’s memorandum raised questions regarding whether certain sales and capacity release transactions subject to the FERC’s oversight were consistent with the FERC’s regulations and policies regarding capacity release. The Company commenced an internal review of the questions raised by the MoPSC Staff and notified the FERC Staff that it took this action. Subsequently, as a result of the internal review, the Company has provided the FERC Staff with a report regarding compliance of sales and capacity release activities with the FERC’s regulations and policies. On July 23, 2008, the FERC Staff requested additional information, which will be provided by the Company.
As reported in Note 2, Discontinued Operations, during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company sold 100% of its interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary SM&P. The sales agreement (Agreement) includes representations and warranties customary for such transactions, including, among others, representations and warranties of the parties as to brokers’ fees; of SM&P as to its financial status, contracts, title to and condition of personal and real property, taxes, legal compliance, environmental matters, employee benefits, and intellectual property. The Agreement also includes customary indemnification provisions under which Laclede’s aggregate indemnification obligations are limited to a maximum of $7.0 million for most claims. Obligations subject to this maximum apply only in the event claims exceed a stated deductible, both individually and in the aggregate. However, this maximum limitation and deductible do not apply to obligations associated with taxes, employee benefits, title to personal property, and certain other fundamental representations and warranties. A maximum potential future payment amount cannot be estimated for these obligations. The terms of the indemnifications in the Agreement are generally dependent upon the statute of limitations applicable to the particular representations and warranties made by the Company, although certain representations and warranties have an indefinite life under the Agreement. As of June 30, 2008, the carrying amount of the liability recognized for these indemnification obligations was $0.2 million, based on the Company’s assessment of risk.
Laclede Group is involved in other litigation, claims, and investigations arising in the normal course of business. While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management, after discussion with counsel, believes that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.
Laclede Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the longest of which extends through 2014. At June 30, 2008, the maximum guarantees under these leases were $1.7 million. However, the Utility estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At June 30, 2008, the carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3 million.
Laclede Gas and LER have entered into various contracts, expiring on dates through 2017, for the storage, transportation, and supply of natural gas. Minimum payments required under the contracts in place at June 30, 2008 are estimated at approximately $2.7 billion. Additional contracts are generally entered into prior to or during the heating season.
Laclede Group had guarantees totaling $57.5 million for performance and payment of certain wholesale gas supply purchases by LER, as of June 30, 2008. Since that date, total guarantees issued by Laclede Group on behalf of LER increased by $1.0 million bringing the total to $58.5 million in guarantees outstanding at August 4, 2008. No amounts have been recorded for these guarantees in the financial statements.
Laclede Gas Company’s Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements are included in Exhibit 99.1 to this report.
22
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
This management’s discussion analyzes the financial condition and results of operations of The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and its subsidiaries. It includes management’s view of factors that affect its business, explanations of past financial results including changes in earnings and costs from the prior year periods, and their effects on overall financial condition and liquidity.
Certain matters discussed in this report, excluding historical information, include forward-looking statements. Certain words, such as “may,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” and similar words and expressions identify forward-looking statements that involve uncertainties and risks. Future developments may not be in accordance with our expectations or beliefs and the effect of future developments may not be those anticipated. Among the factors that may cause results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statement are:
• | weather conditions and catastrophic events, particularly severe weather in the natural gas producing areas of the country; | |
• | volatility in gas prices, particularly sudden and sustained spikes in natural gas prices; | |
• | the impact of higher natural gas prices on our competitive position in relation to suppliers of alternative heating sources, such as electricity; | |
• | changes in gas supply and pipeline availability; particularly those changes that impact supply for and access to our market area; | |
• | legislative, regulatory and judicial mandates and decisions, some of which may be retroactive, including those affecting | |
• | allowed rates of return | |
• | incentive regulation | |
• | industry structure | |
• | purchased gas adjustment provisions | |
• | rate design structure and implementation | |
• | franchise renewals | |
• | environmental or safety matters | |
• | taxes | |
• | pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities and funding obligations | |
• | accounting standards; | |
• | the results of litigation; | |
• | retention of, ability to attract, ability to collect from and conservation efforts of customers; | |
• | capital and energy commodity market conditions, including the ability to obtain funds for necessary capital expenditures and general operations and the terms and conditions imposed for obtaining sufficient gas supply; | |
• | discovery of material weakness in internal controls; and | |
• | employee workforce issues. |
Readers are urged to consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could affect our business as described in this report. All forward-looking statements made in this report rely upon the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We do not, by including this statement, assume any obligation to review or revise any particular forward-looking statement in light of future events.
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.
23
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Laclede Group’s earnings are primarily derived from the regulated activities of its largest subsidiary, Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility), Missouri’s largest natural gas distribution company. Laclede Gas is regulated by the Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) and serves the City of St. Louis and parts of ten other counties in eastern Missouri. Laclede Gas delivers natural gas to retail customers at rates, and in accordance with tariffs, authorized by the MoPSC. The Utility’s earnings are primarily generated by the sale of heating energy. The Utility’s innovative weather mitigation rate design lessens the impact of weather volatility on Laclede Gas customers during cold winters and stabilizes the Utility’s earnings by recovering fixed costs more evenly during the heating season. Due to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, Laclede Group’s earnings are seasonal in nature and are typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds with the heating season.
On March 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of 100% of its interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary SM&P Utility Resources, Inc. (SM&P) to Stripe Acquisition, Inc. (an affiliate of Kohlberg Management VI, LLC) for $85 million in cash, subject to certain closing and post-closing adjustments. SM&P is an underground facilities locating and marking business that comprised Laclede Group’s Non-Regulated Services operating segment. The sales agreement included representations, warranties, and indemnification provisions customary for such transactions and was filed as an exhibit to the March 31, 2008 Form 10-Q. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the results of operations for SM&P are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income and its associated assets and liabilities are classified separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Laclede Energy Resources, Inc. (LER) is engaged in the non-regulated marketing of natural gas and related activities. LER markets natural gas to both on-system Utility transportation customers and customers outside of Laclede Gas’ traditional service territory, including large retail and wholesale customers. As such, LER’s operations and customer base are subject to fluctuations in market conditions.
Other subsidiaries provide less than 10% of consolidated revenues.
Laclede Group’s strategy continues to include efforts to stabilize and improve the performance of its core Utility, while developing non-regulated businesses and taking a measured approach in the pursuit of additional growth opportunities that complement the Utility business.
As for the Utility, mitigating the impact of weather fluctuations on Laclede Gas customers while improving the ability to recover its authorized distribution costs and return continues to be a fundamental component of Laclede Group’s strategy. The Utility’s distribution costs are the essential, primarily fixed expenditures it must incur to operate and maintain a more than 16,000 mile natural gas distribution system and related storage facilities. With regard to the storage facilities owned by Laclede Gas, management is currently undertaking an evaluation of the Utility’s natural gas storage field, which was developed more than 50 years ago, to assess the field’s current and future capabilities. In addition, Laclede Gas is working to continually improve its ability to provide reliable natural gas service at a reasonable cost, while maintaining and building a secure and dependable infrastructure. The settlement of the Utility’s 2007 rate case resulted in enhancements to the Utility’s weather mitigation rate design that better ensure the recovery of its fixed costs and margins despite variations in sales volumes due to the impacts of weather and other factors that affect customer usage. The Utility’s income from off-system sales remains subject to fluctuations in market conditions. In conjunction with the settlement of the 2005 rate case, effective October 1, 2005, the Utility retained all pre-tax income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues up to $12 million annually. Pre-tax amounts in excess of $12 million were shared with customers, with the Utility retaining 50% of amounts exceeding that threshold. The Stipulation & Agreement approved by the MoPSC in the Utility’s 2007 rate case increases the portion of pre-tax income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues that is shared with customers. Effective October 1, 2007, the Utility is allowed to retain 15% to 25% of the first $6 million in annual income earned (depending on the level of income earned) and 30% of income exceeding $6 million annually. Some of the factors impacting the level of off-system sales include the availability and cost of the Utility’s natural gas supply, the weather in its service area, and the weather in other markets. When Laclede Gas’ service area experiences warmer-than-normal weather while other markets experience colder weather or supply constraints, some of the Utility’s natural gas supply is available for off-system sales and there may be a demand for such supply in other markets.
24
Laclede Gas continues to work actively to reduce the impact of higher costs associated with wholesale natural gas prices by strategically structuring its natural gas supply portfolio and through the use of financial instruments. Nevertheless, the cost of purchased gas remains high, relative to historical levels. The Utility’s Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies, including costs, cost reductions, and related carrying costs associated with the use of financial instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas, as well as gas inventory carrying costs. The Utility believes it will continue to be able to obtain sufficient gas supply. The generally higher price levels may continue to affect sales volumes (due to the conservation efforts of customers) and cash flows (associated with the timing of collection of gas costs and related accounts receivable from customers).
Laclede Group continues to develop its other subsidiaries. LER continues to focus on growing its markets on a long-term and sustainable basis by providing both on-system Utility transportation customers and customers outside of Laclede Gas’ traditional service area with another choice in non-regulated natural gas suppliers. Nevertheless, income from LER’s operations is subject to fluctuations in market conditions.
Quarter Ended June 30, 2008
Earnings
Overview – Net Income (Loss) by Operating Segment | Quarter Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | |||||||||
(Millions, After-tax) | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Regulated Gas Distribution | $ | 5.5 | $ | 0.9 | |||||
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing | 4.3 | 3.9 | |||||||
Other | (0.7 | ) | — | ||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | 9.1 | 4.8 | |||||||
Income from Discontinued Operations | 0.2 | 4.5 | |||||||
Net Income | $ | 9.3 | $ | 9.3 |
Laclede Group’s consolidated net income was $9.3 million for both the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.43 and $0.42, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.43 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Results for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 included the effect of SM&P’s seasonal operating income, reported as discontinued operations this year as a result of the sale of SM&P on March 31, 2008. Consolidated net income was unchanged from the same period last year despite the absence of earnings this year from SM&P, the impact of which was offset by higher income reported by both Laclede Group’s regulated gas distribution and non-regulated gas marketing segments.
Income from Continuing Operations
Laclede Group’s income from continuing operations was $9.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with $4.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $0.42 and $0.41, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.22 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Earnings results reported by both Laclede Group’s regulated gas distribution and non-regulated gas marketing segments increased over the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Variations in income from continuing operations were primarily attributable to the factors described below.
Regulated Gas Distribution net income increased by $4.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The increase in net income was primarily due to the following factors, quantified on a pre-tax basis:
• | the benefit of the general rate increase, effective August 1, 2007, totaling $8.7 million; and, |
• | interim benefits of a rate design change, effective August 1, 2007, and other variations totaling $5.1 million. |
25
These factors were partially offset by:
• | increases in operation and maintenance expenses, excluding the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $3.1 million; |
• | an increase in the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $2.6 million; and, |
• | lower income from off-system sales and capacity release, totaling $2.0 million, primarily due to a reduction in the Utility’s share of such income (pursuant to the 2007 rate case). |
The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment reported an increase in earnings of $0.4 million, compared with the same quarter last year, primarily due to higher margins on sales of natural gas by LER and slightly higher sales volumes.
Regulated Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses
Laclede Gas passes on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review) increases and decreases in the wholesale cost of natural gas in accordance with its PGA Clause. The volatility of the wholesale natural gas market results in fluctuations from period to period in the recorded levels of, among other items, revenues and natural gas cost expense. Nevertheless, increases and decreases in the cost of gas associated with system gas sales volumes have no direct effect on net revenues and net income.
Regulated gas distribution operating revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 were $189.6 million, or $3.9 million more than the same quarter last year. Temperatures experienced in the Utility’s service area during the quarter were 16.1% colder than the same quarter last year and 28.4% colder than normal. Total system therms sold and transported were 0.13 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.14 billion for the same quarter last year. Total off-system therms sold and transported were 0.03 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.05 billion for the same quarter last year. The increase in regulated operating revenues was primarily attributable to the following factors:
Quarter Ended | ||||
(Millions) | June 30, 2008 | |||
Lower off-system sales volumes | $ | (15.4 | ) | |
Higher prices charged for off-system sales | 11.2 | |||
General rate increase, effective August 1, 2007 | 8.7 | |||
Higher charges for system gas sales and other variations | 4.0 | |||
Lower wholesale gas costs passed on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review by the MoPSC) | (4.0 | ) | ||
Lower Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge (ISRS) revenues | (0.6 | ) | ||
Total Variation | $ | 3.9 |
Regulated operating expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 decreased $1.4 million from the same quarter last year. Natural and propane gas expense decreased $8.6 million, or 7.1%, from last year’s level, primarily attributable to lower rates charged by our suppliers, lower off-system gas expense, and lower system volumes purchased for sendout. Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $5.7 million, or 16.3%, primarily due to a higher provision for uncollectible accounts, increased maintenance and distribution charges, higher legal fees, and increased group insurance charges. These factors were partially offset by decreased injuries and damages expenses. Taxes, other than income, increased $1.2 million, or 8.9%, primarily due to higher gross receipts taxes (attributable to the increased revenues).
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses
Non-regulated gas marketing operating revenues increased $95.9 million, primarily due to increased per unit gas sales prices charged by LER and increased sales volumes. The increase in non-regulated gas marketing operating expenses totaling $95.1 million was primarily associated with higher prices charged by suppliers and increased volumes purchased.
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net
The $1.9 million decrease in other income and (income deductions) – net was primarily due to a loss on the redemption of long-term debt (primarily unamortized issuance costs), higher investment losses, and lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s PGA Clause.
26
Interest Charges
The $1.1 million decrease in interest charges was primarily due to a reduction in interest on long-term debt resulting from the November 2007 maturity of $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds.
Income Taxes
The $1.0 million increase in income taxes was primarily due to higher pre-tax income, partially offset by the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits recorded pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” and the net effect of various property-related deductions.
Income from Discontinued Operations
Laclede Group closed on the sale of 100% of its interest in SM&P on March 31, 2008. Income from discontinued operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $4.5 million, attributable to SM&P’s seasonal operating income. Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were $0.21.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008
Earnings
Overview – Net Income (Loss) by Operating Segment | Nine Months Ended | �� | |||||||
June 30, | |||||||||
(Millions, After-tax) | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Regulated Gas Distribution | $ | 46.6 | $ | 37.2 | |||||
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing | 14.8 | 11.0 | |||||||
Other | (0.7 | ) | — | ||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | 60.7 | 48.2 | |||||||
Income from Discontinued Operations | 20.8 | 1.0 | |||||||
Net Income | $ | 81.5 | $ | 49.2 |
Laclede Group’s consolidated net income was $81.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $49.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $3.77 and $3.76, respectively, for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $2.29 for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Earnings per share increased compared to last year largely due to the one-time gain realized on the sale of Laclede Group’s wholly-owned subsidiary, SM&P. Earnings results reported by both Laclede Group’s regulated gas distribution segment and its non-regulated gas marketing segment also increased over the nine months ended June 30, 2007.
Income from Continuing Operations
Laclede Group’s income from continuing operations was $60.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $48.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $2.81 and $2.80, respectively, for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $2.24 for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Earnings results reported by both Laclede Group’s regulated gas distribution segment and its non-regulated gas marketing segment increased over the same period last year. Variations in income from continuing operations were primarily attributable to the factors described below.
27
Regulated Gas Distribution net income increased by $9.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in net income was primarily due to the following factors, quantified on a pre-tax basis:
• | the benefit of the general rate increase, effective August 1, 2007, totaling $30.4 million; |
• | the effect of higher system gas sales volumes and other variations totaling $2.3 million; and, |
• | the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits and the reversal of related expenses, totaling $1.5 million. |
These factors were partially offset by:
• | lower income from off-system sales and capacity release, totaling $9.5 million, primarily due to a reduction in the Utility’s share of such income (pursuant to the 2007 rate case); |
• | an increase in the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $4.9 million; and, |
• | increases in operation and maintenance expenses, excluding the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $4.9 million. |
The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment reported an increase in earnings of $3.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the same period last year, primarily due to higher margins on sales of natural gas by LER, increased sales volumes, and the reversal of tax-related expenses.
Regulated Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses
Regulated gas distribution operating revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 were $1.0 billion, or $10.2 million less than the same period last year. Temperatures experienced in the Utility’s service area during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 were 6.8% colder than the same period last year, but 0.6% warmer than normal. Total system therms sold and transported were 0.85 billion for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.82 billion for the same period last year. Total off-system therms sold and transported were 0.14 billion for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.21 billion for the same period last year. Increases and decreases in the cost of gas associated with system gas sales volumes have no direct effect on net revenues and net income. The decrease in regulated operating revenues was primarily attributable to the following factors:
Nine Months | ||||
Ended | ||||
(Millions) | June 30, 2008 | |||
Lower off-system sales volumes | $ | (48.6 | ) | |
Lower wholesale gas costs passed on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review by the MoPSC) | (47.2 | ) | ||
Higher system sales volumes, primarily due to colder weather, and other variations | 34.0 | |||
General rate increase, effective August 1, 2007 | 30.4 | |||
Higher prices charged for off-system sales | 22.8 | |||
Lower ISRS revenues | (1.6 | ) | ||
Total Variation | $ | (10.2 | ) |
Regulated operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $22.8 million from the same period last year. Natural and propane gas expense decreased $33.3 million, or 4.5%, from last year’s level, primarily attributable to lower rates charged by our suppliers and lower off-system gas expense, partially offset by increased system volumes purchased for sendout. Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $9.8 million, or 8.4%, primarily due to a higher provision for uncollectible accounts, increased maintenance and distribution expenses, higher legal fees, increased pension costs, the effect of a gain on the disposal of assets recorded last year, and higher wage rates. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.7 million, or 2.6%, primarily due to additional depreciable property.
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses
Non-regulated gas marketing operating revenues increased $187.7 million, primarily due to higher per unit gas sales prices charged by LER and increased sales volumes. The increase in non-regulated gas marketing operating expenses totaling $183.4 million was primarily associated higher prices charged by suppliers and increased volumes purchased.
28
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net
The $2.5 million decrease in other income and (income deductions) – net was primarily due to higher investment losses, a loss on the redemption of long-term debt (primarily unamortized issuance costs), lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs, and reduced income associated with changes in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies. These factors were partially offset by a reversal of tax-related expenses and additional proceeds related to the Company’s interest, as a policyholder, in the sale of a mutual insurance company. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s PGA Clause.
Interest Charges
The $2.5 million decrease in interest charges was primarily due to a reduction in interest on long-term debt resulting from the November 2007 maturity of $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds and the reversal of tax-related expenses.
Income Taxes
The $4.6 million increase in income taxes was primarily due to higher pre-tax income, partially offset by the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits recorded pursuant to FIN 48.
Income from Discontinued Operations
The sale of SM&P on March 31, 2008 resulted in after-tax earnings of approximately $26 million, net of associated costs of disposal. Income from discontinued operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $20.8 million, consisting of the net effect of the sale and SM&P’s seasonal operating loss through the March 31 sale date. Income from discontinued operations was $1.0 million for the same period last year, reflecting SM&P’s operating income for the period. Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations were $0.96 for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.05 for the same period last year.
Labor Agreement
Laclede Gas’ labor agreement with Locals 11-6 and 11-194 of the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union (Union), which represents approximately 65% of Laclede Gas’ employees, expired at midnight, July 31, 2008. On August 4, 2008, Laclede Gas and Union representatives reached a new four-year labor agreement replacing the prior agreement. The new contract will expire at midnight on July 31, 2012.
REGULATORY MATTERS
During fiscal 2006, the MoPSC approved permanent modifications to the Cold Weather Rule affecting the disconnection and reconnection practices of utilities during the winter heating season. Those modifications included provisions to allow the Utility to obtain accounting authorizations and defer for future recovery certain costs incurred with the modifications. During fiscal 2007, the Utility deferred for future recovery $2.7 million of costs associated with the fiscal 2007 heating season. On October 31, 2007, the Utility filed for determination and subsequent recovery of the deferred amount. On November 16, 2007, the MoPSC directed the MoPSC Staff and the Missouri Office of Public Counsel (Public Counsel) to submit their positions regarding the Utility’s filing by February 28, 2008. On February 28, 2008, the Utility and the MoPSC Staff filed a Non-unanimous Stipulation & Agreement in which these parties agreed to a recovery of $2.5 million of costs. The Non-unanimous Stipulation & Agreement was opposed by Public Counsel, and a hearing in this matter was held before the Commission on March 31, 2008. On April 17, 2008, the Commission issued its Report and Order approving the $2.5 million cost recovery recommended by the Utility and the MoPSC Staff. Consistent with the approved amount, the Utility recorded a reduction in its deferral totaling $0.2 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. On May 29, 2008, Public Counsel appealed the MoPSC’s April 17 Order to the Cole County, Missouri Circuit Court. Laclede Gas believes that Public Counsel’s appeal is without merit and intends to vigorously oppose the appeal.
29
On November 9, 2007, the Utility made an ISRS filing with the Commission designed to increase revenues by $1.6 million annually. On January 15, 2008, the Commission approved implementation of the surcharge to be effective January 18, 2008. On April 25, 2008, the Utility made an ISRS filing with the Commission designed to increase revenues by $1.9 million annually. On June 24, 2008, the Commission approved implementation of the surcharge in the full amount requested, effective June 30, 2008.
On December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2005. On September 14, 2007, the Staff withdrew its pursuit of $5.5 million of the disallowance it had originally proposed. Laclede Gas believes that the remaining $1.7 million of the MoPSC Staff’s proposed disallowance lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC.
On December 31, 2007, the MoPSC Staff filed a memorandum with the Commission proposing a disallowance of $2.8 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2006. Laclede Gas believes that the MoPSC Staff’s position lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC. In addition, the MoPSC’s Staff’s memorandum raised questions regarding whether certain sales and capacity release transactions, subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)’s oversight, were consistent with the FERC’s regulations and policies regarding capacity release. The Company commenced an internal review of the questions raised by the MoPSC Staff and notified the FERC Staff that it took this action. Subsequently, as a result of the internal review, the Company has provided the FERC Staff with a report regarding compliance of sales and capacity release activities with the FERC’s regulations and policies. On July 23, 2008, the FERC Staff requested additional information, which will be provided by the Company.
On July 9, 2008, Laclede Gas made a tariff filing with the MoPSC that would make the payment provisions for the restoration of gas service under the Utility’s Cold Weather Rule available to customers in the summer of 2008 and enable the Utility to increase or decrease its PGA rates to correct for any shortfall or surplus created by the difference between the gas cost portion of the Utility’s actual net bad debt write-offs and the amount of such cost that is embedded in its existing rates. Such filing is pending before the MoPSC.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Generally accepted accounting principles require that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following represent the more significant items requiring the use of judgment and estimates in preparing our consolidated financial statements:
Allowances for doubtful accounts – Estimates of the collectibility of trade accounts receivable are based on historical trends, age of receivables, economic conditions, credit risk of specific customers, and other factors. The Utility’s provision for uncollectible accounts is dependent on the regulatory treatment provided for such costs. As approved by the MoPSC, the Utility is allowed to defer for future recovery certain costs associated with amendments to the Cold Weather Rule. | |
Employee benefits and postretirement obligations – Pension and postretirement obligations are calculated by actuarial consultants that utilize several statistical factors and other assumptions related to future events, such as discount rates, returns on plan assets, compensation increases, and mortality rates. For the Utility, the amount of expense recognized and the amounts reflected in other comprehensive income are dependent upon the regulatory treatment provided for such costs, as discussed further below. Certain liabilities related to group medical benefits and workers’ compensation claims, portions of which are self-insured and/or contain “stop-loss” coverage with third-party insurers to limit exposure, are established based on historical trends. |
30
Laclede Gas accounts for its regulated operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” This Statement sets forth the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for those companies whose rates are established by or are subject to approval by an independent third-party regulator. The provisions of SFAS No. 71 require, among other things, that financial statements of a regulated enterprise reflect the actions of regulators, where appropriate. These actions may result in the recognition of revenues and expenses in time periods that are different than non-regulated enterprises. When this occurs, costs are deferred as assets in the balance sheet (regulatory assets) and recorded as expenses when those amounts are reflected in rates. Also, regulators can impose liabilities upon a regulated company for amounts previously collected from customers and for recovery of costs that are expected to be incurred in the future (regulatory liabilities). Management believes that the current regulatory environment supports the continued use of SFAS No. 71 and that all regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are recoverable or refundable through the regulatory process. Management believes the following represent the more significant items recorded through the application of SFAS No. 71:
The Utility’s PGA Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies, including the costs, cost reductions, and related carrying costs associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas. The difference between actual costs incurred and costs recovered through the application of the PGA are recorded as regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities that are recovered or refunded in a subsequent period. The PGA Clause also authorizes the Utility to recover costs it incurs to finance its investment in gas supplies that are purchased during the storage injection season for sale during the heating season. The PGA Clause also permits the application of carrying costs to all over- or under-recoveries of gas costs, including costs and cost reductions associated with the use of financial instruments. Effective October 1, 2007, the PGA Clause also provides for a portion of income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues to be flowed through to customers. | |
The Company records deferred tax liabilities and assets measured by enacted tax rates for the net tax effect of all temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes, and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Changes in enacted tax rates, if any, and certain property basis differences will be reflected by entries to regulatory asset or liability accounts for regulated companies, and will be reflected as income or loss for non-regulated companies. Pursuant to the direction of the MoPSC, Laclede Gas’ provision for income tax expense for financial reporting purposes reflects an open-ended method of tax depreciation. Laclede Gas’ provision for income tax expense also records the income tax effect associated with the difference between overheads capitalized to construction for financial reporting purposes and those recognized for tax purposes without recording an offsetting deferred income tax expense. These two methods are consistent with the regulatory treatment prescribed by the MoPSC. | |
Asset retirement obligations are recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” and FIN 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” Asset retirement obligations are calculated using various assumptions related to the timing, method of settlement, inflation, and profit margins that third parties would demand to settle the future obligations. These assumptions require the use of judgment and estimates and may change in future periods as circumstances dictate. As authorized by the MoPSC, Laclede Gas accrues future removal costs associated with its property, plant and equipment through its depreciation rates, even if a legal obligation does not exist as defined by SFAS No. 143 and FIN 47. The difference between removal costs recognized in depreciation rates and the accretion expense and depreciation expense recognizable under SFAS No. 143 and FIN 47 is a timing difference between the recovery of these costs in rates and their recognition for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, consistent with SFAS No. 71, these differences are deferred as regulatory liabilities. |
The amount of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit cost recognized in the financial statements related to the Utility’s qualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans is based upon allowances, as approved by the MoPSC, which have been established in the rate-making process for the recovery of these costs from customers. The differences between these amounts and actual pension and other postretirement benefit costs incurred for financial reporting purposes are deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” requires that changes that affect the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans, but that are not yet required to be recognized as components of pension and other postretirement benefit cost, be reflected in other comprehensive income. For the Utility’s qualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans, amounts that would otherwise be reflected in other comprehensive income are deferred with entries to regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. |
31
For further discussion of significant accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Company has evaluated or is in the process of evaluating the impact that recently issued accounting standards will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations upon adoption. For disclosures related to the adoption of new accounting standards, see the New Accounting Standards section of Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
CREDIT RATINGS
As of June 30, 2008, credit ratings for outstanding securities for Laclede Group and Laclede Gas issues were as follows:
Type of Facility | S&P | Moody’s | Fitch |
Laclede Group Corporate Rating | A | A- | |
Laclede Gas First Mortgage Bonds | A | A3 | A+ |
Laclede Gas Commercial Paper | A-1 | P-2 |
The Company has investment grade ratings, and believes that it will have adequate access to the financial markets to meet its capital requirements. These ratings remain subject to review and change by the rating agencies.
CASH FLOWS
The Company’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during colder months when Laclede Gas borrows money to cover the lag between when it purchases its natural gas and when its customers pay for that gas. Changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas, variations in the timing of collections of gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause, the seasonality of accounts receivable balances, and the utilization of storage gas inventories cause short-term cash requirements to vary during the year, and can cause significant variations in the Utility’s cash provided by or used in operating activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $193.3 million, compared with $152.0 million for the same period last year. The variation is primarily attributable to differences in the timing of the collections of gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause, including the effects of this year’s reduction in net cash payments associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments, and higher operating income this year. These variations are partially offset by an increase in cash paid for income taxes.
Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $43.4 million, compared with net cash used in investing activities of $43.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The variation is primarily attributable to the proceeds from the sale of SM&P recorded this year.
Net cash used in financing activities was $256.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $123.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The variation is primarily attributable to increased repayments of short-term debt, the redemption of the Company’s long-term debt to an unconsolidated affiliate trust, and the maturity of long-term debt this year. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the aforementioned sale of SM&P to fund the redemption of the long-term debt to the unconsolidated affiliate trust.
32
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As indicated above, the Company’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during the colder months. These short-term cash requirements have traditionally been met through the sale of commercial paper supported by lines of credit with banks. Laclede Gas has a line of credit in place of $320 million. During the second quarter, the expiration of this line was extended one year to December 2011 from December 2010. In November 2007, the Utility established a seasonal line of credit of $40 million, which expired in March 2008. The Utility had short-term borrowings aggregating to a maximum of $304.5 million at any one time during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. Short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2008 were $58.6 million. The weighted average interest rate on these short-term borrowings was 3.0% per annum at June 30, 2008. Based on total short-term borrowings at June 30, 2008, a change in interest rates of 100 basis points would increase or decrease pre-tax earnings and cash flows of Laclede Group by approximately $0.6 million on an annual basis. Portions of such increases or decreases may be offset through the application of PGA carrying costs. In addition, Laclede Gas had borrowings from Laclede Group totaling $44.4 million at June 30, 2008.
Laclede Gas’ lines of credit include covenants limiting total debt, including short-term debt, to no more than 70% of total capitalization and requiring earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to be at least 2.25 times interest expense. On June 30, 2008, total debt was 53% of total capitalization. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, EBITDA was 3.97 times interest expense.
Laclede Gas has on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) an effective shelf registration on Form S-3 for issuance of $350 million of securities. The full amount of this shelf registration remains available to Laclede Gas at this time. The Utility has authority from the MoPSC to issue up to $500 million in First Mortgage Bonds, unsecured debt, and equity securities. In May 2008, pursuant to this authority, the Utility sold 26 shares of its common stock to Laclede Group for $0.9 million, leaving $493.3 million remaining under this authorization as of the date of this filing. The amount, timing, and type of additional financing to be issued will depend on cash requirements and market conditions.
On November 1, 2007, Laclede Gas paid at maturity $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds. This maturity was funded through short-term borrowings. At June 30, 2008, Laclede Gas had fixed-rate long-term debt totaling $310 million. While these long-term debt issues are fixed-rate, they are subject to changes in fair value as market interest rates change. However, increases or decreases in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Laclede Gas were to reacquire any of these issues in the open market prior to maturity.
On May 5, 2008, Laclede Group redeemed in full its $46.4 million subordinated debentures, which also triggered the redemption of all of the Laclede Capital Trust I (Trust) common and preferred securities on the same date. Interest on the debentures and distributions on the Trust securities ceased on and after the redemption date. Upon redemption, Laclede Group recognized a pre-tax loss of $1.4 million, primarily attributable to unamortized issuance costs. A portion of the proceeds received from the sale of SM&P was used to fund the redemption. The Trust was dissolved on June 16, 2008.
Laclede Group has on file a shelf registration on Form S-3 with the SEC that allows for the issuance of equity securities, other than preferred stock, and debt securities. Of the $500 million of securities originally registered under this Form S-3, $362.4 million remain registered and unissued as of June 30, 2008. The amount, timing, and type of additional financing to be issued under this shelf registration will depend on cash requirements and market conditions.
Short-term cash requirements outside of Laclede Gas have generally been met with internally-generated funds. However, Laclede Group has $50 million in working capital lines of credit, $40 million of which expires in August 2009 and $10 million of which expires in October 2008, to meet short-term liquidity needs of its subsidiaries. These lines of credit have covenants limiting the total debt of the consolidated Laclede Group to no more than 70% of the Company’s total capitalization. This ratio stood at 43% on June 30, 2008. These lines were previously used to provide letters of credit on behalf of SM&P, and have been used to provide for seasonal funding needs of the various other subsidiaries from time to time. Just prior to the SM&P sale, the letters of credit provided on behalf of SM&P totaled $2.8 million. Such letters have been released and extinguished. There were no borrowings under Laclede Group’s lines during the quarter.
Laclede Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the longest of which extends through 2014. At June 30, 2008, the maximum guarantees under these leases were $1.7 million. However, the Utility estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At June 30, 2008, the carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3 million.
33
Laclede Group had guarantees totaling $57.5 million for performance and payment of certain wholesale gas supply purchases by LER, as of June 30, 2008. Since that date, total guarantees issued by Laclede Group on behalf of LER increased by $1.0 million bringing the total to $58.5 million in guarantees outstanding at August 4, 2008. No amounts have been recorded for these guarantees in the financial statements.
Utility capital expenditures were $40.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $41.5 million for the same period last year. Non-utility capital expenditures were $1.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $1.5 million for the same period last year.
Consolidated capitalization at June 30, 2008, excluding current obligations of preferred stock, consisted of 60.9% Laclede Group common stock equity, 0.1% Laclede Gas preferred stock equity, and 39.0% Laclede Gas long-term debt.
It is management’s view that the Company has adequate access to capital markets and will have sufficient capital resources, both internal and external, to meet anticipated capital requirements.
The seasonal nature of Laclede Gas’ sales affects the comparison of certain balance sheet items at June 30, 2008 and at September 30, 2007, such as Accounts Receivable - Net, Gas Stored Underground, Notes Payable, Accounts Payable, Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities, and Delayed and Advance Customer Billings. The Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2007 is presented to facilitate comparison of these items with the corresponding interim period of the preceding fiscal year.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
As of June 30, 2008, Laclede Group had contractual obligations with payments due as summarized below (in millions):
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Fiscal Years | |||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Fiscal Year 2008 | Fiscal Years 2009-2010 | Fiscal Years 2011-2012 | 2013 and thereafter | |||||||||||
Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt | $ | 310.0 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 25.0 | $ | 285.0 | ||||||
Interest Payments on Long-Term Debt | 382.4 | 1.2 | 39.0 | 36.5 | 305.7 | |||||||||||
Operating Leases (a) | 11.1 | 1.3 | 7.6 | 2.2 | — | |||||||||||
Purchase Obligations – Natural Gas (b) | 2,706.3 | 375.7 | 1,621.9 | 590.6 | 118.1 | |||||||||||
Purchase Obligations – Other (c) | 119.1 | 6.4 | 25.9 | 19.2 | 67.6 | |||||||||||
Total (d) | $ | 3,528.9 | $ | 384.6 | $ | 1,694.4 | $ | 673.5 | $ | 776.4 |
(a) | Operating lease obligations are primarily for office space, vehicles, and power operated equipment in the gas distribution segment. Additional payments will be incurred if renewal options are exercised under the provisions of certain agreements. |
(b) | These purchase obligations represent the minimum payments required under existing natural gas transportation and storage contracts and natural gas supply agreements in the utility gas distribution and non-regulated gas marketing segments. These amounts reflect fixed obligations as well as obligations to purchase natural gas at future market prices, calculated using June 30, 2008 New York Mercantile Exchange futures prices. Laclede Gas recovers the costs related to its purchases, transportation, and storage of natural gas through the operation of its PGA Clause, subject to prudence review; however, variations in the timing of collections of gas costs from customers affect short-term cash requirements. Additional contractual commitments are generally entered into prior to or during the heating season. |
(c) | These purchase obligations reflect miscellaneous agreements for the purchase of materials and the procurement of services necessary for normal operations. |
(d) | The categories of Capital Leases and Other Long-Term liabilities have been excluded from the table above because there are no applicable amounts of contractual obligations under these categories. Also, commitments related to pension and postretirement benefit plans have been excluded from the table above. The Company does not expect to make any contributions to its qualified, trusteed pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. Laclede Gas anticipates a $0.1 million contribution relative to its non-qualified pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. With regard to the postretirement benefits, the Company anticipates Laclede Gas will contribute $4.1 million to the qualified trusts and $0.1 million directly to participants from Laclede Gas’ funds during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. For further discussion of the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, refer to Note 4, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
34
MARKET RISK
Laclede Gas adopted a risk management policy that provides for the purchase of natural gas financial instruments with the goal of managing price risk associated with purchasing natural gas on behalf of its customers. This policy prohibits speculation. Costs and cost reductions, including carrying costs, associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments are allowed to be passed on to the Utility’s customers through the operation of its PGA Clause, through which the MoPSC allows the Utility to recover gas supply costs. Accordingly, Laclede Gas does not expect any adverse earnings impact as a result of the use of these financial instruments. At June 30, 2008, the Utility held 7.4 million MMBtu of futures contracts at an average price of $9.03 per MMBtu. Additionally, 13.8 million MMBtu of other price risk mitigation was in place through the use of option-based strategies. These positions have various expiration dates, the longest of which extends through March 2009.
In the course of its business, Laclede Group’s non-regulated gas marketing affiliate, LER, enters into fixed price commitments associated with the purchase or sale of natural gas. As part of LER’s risk management policy, LER manages the price risk associated with these commitments by either closely matching the offsetting physical purchase or sale of natural gas at fixed prices or through the use of exchange-traded futures contracts to lock in margins. At June 30, 2008, LER’s unmatched positions are not material to Laclede Group’s financial position or results of operations.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Laclede Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission, and storage facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws, regulations, and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from such operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not materially affected the Company’s or Laclede Gas’ financial position and results of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. For information relative to environmental matters, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. There have been no significant changes relative to environmental matters during the nine months ended June 30, 2008.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Laclede Group has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Laclede Gas Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition is included in Exhibit 99.1 of this report.
35
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
For this discussion, see the “Market Risk” subsection in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, on page 35 of this report.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15e and Rule 15d-15e under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our third fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For a description of environmental matters and legal proceedings, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. For a description of pending regulatory matters of Laclede Gas, see Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Regulatory Matters, on page 29 of this report.
Laclede Group and its subsidiaries are involved in litigation, claims, and investigations arising in the normal course of business. While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management, after discussion with counsel, believes that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On May 12, 2008, the Board of Directors of Laclede Gas approved the sale of 26 shares of Laclede Gas common stock to Laclede Group. The proceeds from the sale, totaling $0.9 million, were used to reduce short-term borrowings. Exemption from registration was claimed under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Item 5. Other Information
(a) | On August 1, 2008, Laclede Group executed an amendment to its $40 million line of credit with U.S. Bank, National Association to extend its term for an additional year, expiring on August 3, 2009. In addition, the parties amended certain terms related to rates and fees. The amendment is filed with this Form 10-Q as exhibit 10.1. |
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) | See Exhibit Index |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The Laclede Group, Inc. | |||||
Dated: | August 4, 2008 | By: | /s/ Mark D. Waltermire | ||
Mark D. Waltermire | |||||
Chief Financial Officer | |||||
(Authorized Signatory and Chief Financial Officer) |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Laclede Gas Company | |||||
Dated: | August 4, 2008 | By: | /s/ Mark D. Waltermire | ||
Mark D. Waltermire | |||||
Senior Vice President and | |||||
Chief Financial Officer | |||||
(Authorized Signatory and Chief Financial Officer) |
39
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | ||
10.1 | - | Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement between the Company and U.S. Bank, National Association executed on August 1, 2008. |
12 | - | Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
31 | - | CEO and CFO Certifications under Exchange Act Rule 13a – 14(a). |
32 | - | CEO and CFO Section 1350 Certifications. |
99.1 | - | Laclede Gas Company - Financial Statements, Notes to Financial Statements, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
40