Ames National (ATLO) 10-Q 2013 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[Mark One]

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number 0-32637

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

IOWA	42-1039071
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I. R. S. Employer Identification Number)

405 FIFTH STREET

AMES, IOWA 50010

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (515) 232-6251

NOT APPLICABLE

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this Chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes  x   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer  x Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yeso   No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

COMMON STOCK, $2.00 PAR VALUE	9,310,913
(Class)	(Shares Outstanding at July 29, 2013)

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION

INDEX

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013and December 31, 2012	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	5
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	44
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	44
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	45
Item 1.A.	Risk Factors	45
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	45
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	45
Item 5.	Other Information	46
Item 6.	Exhibits	46
	Signatures	47

2

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
ASSETS	2013			2012
Cash and due from banks	$	19,429,057		$	34,805,371
Interest bearing deposits in financial institutions		36,408,837			44,639,033
Securities available-for-sale		602,299,900			588,417,037
Loans receivable, net		506,139,036			510,125,880
Loans held for sale		1,257,924			1,030,180
Bank premises and equipment, net		12,185,791			12,233,464
Accrued income receivable		7,021,977			7,173,703
Other real estate owned		8,989,208			9,910,825
Deferred income taxes		5,798,827			-
Core deposit intangible, net		1,161,066			1,303,264
Goodwill		5,600,749			5,600,749
Other assets		621,132			2,452,593
Total assets	$	1,206,913,504		$	1,217,692,099
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Demand, noninterest bearing	$	172,564,005		$	182,033,279
NOW accounts		298,457,426			287,294,015
Savings and money market		287,124,558			279,774,197
Time, $100,000 and over		93,247,877			99,925,619
Other time		149,062,756			155,705,340
Total deposits		1,000,456,622			1,004,732,450
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		30,628,684			27,088,660
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances		14,576,061			14,611,035
Other long-term borrowings		20,000,000			20,000,000
Dividend payable		1,489,746			1,396,627
Deferred income taxes		-			1,632,560
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		3,377,173			3,495,032
Total liabilities		1,070,528,286			1,072,956,364
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, $2 par value, authorized 18,000,000 shares; issued 9,432,915 shares; outstanding 9,310,913 shares as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		18,865,830			18,865,830
Additional paid-in capital		22,651,222			22,651,222
Retained earnings		98,044,977			94,159,839
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)-net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale		(1,160,313	)		11,075,342
Treasury stock, at cost; 122,002 shares at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		(2,016,498	)		(2,016,498	)
Total stockholders' equity		136,385,218			144,735,735
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,206,913,504		$	1,217,692,099

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	6,146,761	$	6,245,560	$	12,305,274	$	12,056,317
Securities:
Taxable		1,399,811		1,593,490		2,779,773		3,218,134
Tax-exempt		1,746,378		1,698,430		3,474,811		3,349,145
Interest bearing deposits and federal funds sold		108,313		132,926		218,046		258,179
Total interest income		9,401,263		9,670,406		18,777,904		18,881,775
Interest expense:
Deposits		999,601		1,153,164		1,995,441		2,322,482
Other borrowed funds		294,939		319,638		590,850		649,136
Total interest expense		1,294,540		1,472,802		2,586,291		2,971,618
Net interest income		8,106,723		8,197,604		16,191,613		15,910,157
Provision for loan losses		60,000		64,412		73,574		115,705
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		8,046,723		8,133,192		16,118,039		15,794,452
Noninterest income:
Trust services income		498,689		530,942		985,943		1,035,714
Service fees		402,002		393,773		777,827		731,212
Securities gains, net		364,250		10,535		433,241		318,068
Gain on sale of loans held for sale		345,377		356,855		700,920		641,894
Merchant and card fees		272,612		239,292		613,098		536,250
Other noninterest income		206,090		199,535		420,959		368,382
Total noninterest income		2,089,020		1,730,932		3,931,988		3,631,520
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		3,231,314		3,200,188		6,447,396		6,180,807
Data processing		627,216		564,874		1,199,851		1,074,204
Occupancy expenses		339,457		348,071		745,181		707,755
FDIC insurance assessments		172,443		164,755		332,751		319,216
Professional fees		267,573		312,920		540,028		630,393
Business development		202,033		209,949		393,384		391,065
Other real estate owned, net		672,919		342,415		667,738		440,793
Core deposit intangible amortization		68,425		49,184		142,198		49,184
Other operating expenses, net		256,809		302,572		488,758		540,294
Total noninterest expense		5,838,189		5,494,928		10,957,285		10,333,711
Income before income taxes		4,297,554		4,369,196		9,092,742		9,092,261
Provision for income taxes		1,018,858		1,059,780		2,228,112		2,239,687
Net income	$	3,278,696	$	3,309,416	$	6,864,630	$	6,852,574
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.35	$	0.36	$	0.74	$	0.74
Dividends declared per share	$	0.16	$	0.15	$	0.32	$	0.30

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income	$	3,278,696		$	3,309,416		$	6,864,630		$	6,852,574
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities before tax:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		(17,374,504	)		1,610,451			(18,988,433	)		2,569,279
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		364,250			10,535			433,241			318,068
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax		(17,738,754	)		1,599,916			(19,421,674	)		2,251,211
Tax effect related to other comprehensive income (loss)		6,563,339			(591,968	)		7,186,019			(832,948	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(11,175,415	)		1,007,948			(12,235,655	)		1,418,263
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(7,896,719	)	$	4,317,364		$	(5,371,025	)	$	8,270,837

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in-Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive  Income (Loss), Net of Taxes			Treasury  Stock			Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	18,865,830	$	22,651,222	$	85,564,078		$	9,492,753		$	(2,016,498	)	$	134,557,385
Net income		-		-		6,852,574			-			-			6,852,574
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-			1,418,263			-			1,418,263
Cash dividends declared, $0.30 per share		-		-		(2,793,275	)		-			-			(2,793,275	)
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	18,865,830	$	22,651,222	$	89,623,377		$	10,911,016		$	(2,016,498	)	$	140,034,947
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	18,865,830	$	22,651,222	$	94,159,839		$	11,075,342		$	(2,016,498	)	$	144,735,735
Net income		-		-		6,864,630			-			-			6,864,630
Other comprehensive loss		-		-		-			(12,235,655	)		-			(12,235,655	)
Cash dividends declared, $0.32 per share		-		-		(2,979,492	)		-			-			(2,979,492	)
Balance, June 30, 2013	$	18,865,830	$	22,651,222	$	98,044,977		$	(1,160,313	)	$	(2,016,498	)	$	136,385,218

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

	2013			2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	6,864,630		$	6,852,574
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		73,574			115,705
Provision for off-balance sheet commitments		18,700			6,000
Amortization, net, securities available-for-sale		3,347,318			3,036,365
Amortization of core deposit intangible asset		142,198			49,184
Depreciation		382,079			363,147
Credit for deferred income taxes		(245,368	)		(200,810	)
Securities gains, net		(433,241	)		(318,068	)
Impairment of other real estate owned		670,000			296,141
Loss (gain) on sale of other real estate owned, net		(29,047	)		46,867
Change in assets and liabilities:
Increase in loans held for sale		(227,744	)		(668,606	)
Decrease in accrued income receivable		151,726			152,716
Decrease in other assets		1,825,983			82,645
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(136,559	)		68,587
Net cash provided by operating activities		12,404,249			9,882,447
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of securities available-for-sale		(119,770,411	)		(130,819,189	)
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale		15,618,009			10,032,564
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale		67,598,062			67,701,604
Net (increase) decrease in interest bearing deposits in financial institutions		8,230,196			(13,343,527	)
Net (increase) decrease in loans		3,924,528			(2,972,374	)
Net proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned		488,420			796,407
Purchase of bank premises and equipment, net		(328,928	)		(167,356	)
Cash acquired, net of cash paid, for acquired bank offices		-			44,303,137
Net cash used in investing activities		(24,240,124	)		(24,468,734	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase (decrease) in deposits		(4,159,116	)		27,662,695
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		3,540,024			(10,154,718	)
Proceeds from FHLB borrowings		2,000,000			-
Payments on FHLB borrowings		(2,034,974	)		(533,879	)
Dividends paid		(2,886,373	)		(2,607,057	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(3,540,439	)		14,367,041
Net decrease in cash and due from banks		(15,376,314	)		(219,246	)
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
Beginning		34,805,371			22,829,291
Ending	$	19,429,057		$	22,610,045

7

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

	2013		2012
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	2,852,749	$	2,999,826
Income taxes		2,549,386		2,515,403
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Transfer of loans receivable to other real estate owned	$	207,756	$	262,036
Business Combination:
Fair value of loans receivable acquired	$	-	$	46,103,022
Fair value of bank premises and equipment acquired		-		864,500
Fair value of other tangible assets acquired		-		514,760
Goodwill		-		5,600,749
Core deposit intangible asset		-		1,500,000
Deposits assumed		-		98,766,558
Other liabilities assumed		-		119,610

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

8

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

1. Significant Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are unaudited. In the opinion of the management of Ames National Corporation (the "Company"), these financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary to present fairly these consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results which may be expected for an entire year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted in accordance with the requirements for interim financial statements. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the year-end audited financial statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned banking subsidiaries (the “Banks”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Goodwill and core deposit intangible asset:  Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired.  Goodwill resulting from acquisitions is not amortized, but is tested for impairment annually or whenever events change and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that an impairment loss has occurred.  Goodwill is tested for impairment using a two-step process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of a reporting unit.  The second step, if necessary, measures the amount of impairment, if any.

Significant judgment is applied when goodwill is assessed for impairment.  This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, incorporating general economic and market conditions and selecting an appropriate control premium.  At June 30, 2013, Company management has performed a goodwill impairment analysis and determined goodwill was not impaired.

The only other significant intangible asset is a core deposit intangible.  The core deposit intangible asset is determined to have a definite life and is amortized over the estimated useful life.  The core deposit intangible asset is a customer based relationship valuation attributed to the expectation of a lower net cost of these deposits versus alternative sources of funds.  The core deposit intangible asset is reviewed for impairment whenever events occur or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  No such events have occurred and Company management continues to amortize over the original estimated useful life.

2. Office Acquisition

On April 27, 2012, Reliance State Bank (Reliance Bank) completed the purchase of two bank offices located in Garner and Klemme, Iowa (the “Acquisition”).  This Acquisition was consistent with the Bank’s strategy to strengthen and expand its Iowa market share.  The acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition.  These offices were purchased for cash consideration of $5.4 million.  As a result of the Acquisition, the Company recorded a core deposit intangible asset of $1,500,000 and goodwill of $5,601,000. The results of operations for this Acquisition have been included since the transaction date of April 27, 2012.

9

The following table summarizes the fair value of the total consideration transferred as a part of the Acquisition as well as the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the effective date of the transaction.

	April 27,
	2012
Cash consideration transferred	$	5,400,000
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash	$	49,703,137
Loans receivable		46,103,022
Accrued interest receivable		514,760
Bank premises and equipment		864,500
Core deposit intangible asset		1,500,000
Deposits		(98,766,558	)
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(119,610	)
Total identifiable net liabilities	$	(200,749	)
Goodwill	$	5,600,749

On April 27, 2012, the contractual balance of loans receivable acquired was $46,972,000 and the contractual balance of the deposits assumed was $98,109,000.  Loans receivable acquired include agricultural real estate, commercial real estate, 1-4 family real estate, commercial operating, agricultural operating and consumer loans determined to be pass rated.

The core deposit intangible asset is amortized to expense on a declining basis over a period of seven years.  The loan market valuation is accreted to income on a declining basis over a nine year period.  The time deposits market valuation is amortized to expense on a declining basis over a three year period.

3. Dividends

On May 8, 2013, the Company declared a cash dividend on its common stock, payable on August 15, 2013 to stockholders of record as of August 1, 2013, equal to $0.16 per share.

4. Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share amounts were calculated using the weighted average shares outstanding during the periods presented. The weighted average outstanding shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were 9,310,913.  The Company had no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented.

5. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.  No material changes in the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements have occurred since December 31, 2012.

10

6. Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are required to be classified and disclosed according to the process for determining fair value.  There are three levels of determining fair value.

Level 1:  Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices, unadjusted, for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.  A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.

Level 2:  Inputs to the valuation methodology include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted process for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatility, prepayment speeds, credit risk); or inputs derived principally from or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3:  Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.  Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

11

The following table presents the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
2013
U.S. government agencies	$	55,087,000	$	-	$	55,087,000	$	-
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		180,448,000		-		180,448,000		-
State and political subdivisions		316,332,000		-		316,332,000		-
Corporate bonds		46,731,000		-		46,731,000		-
Equity securities, financial industry common stock		696,000		696,000		-		-
Equity securities, other		3,006,000		-		3,006,000		-
	$	602,300,000	$	696,000	$	601,604,000	$	-
2012
U.S. government agencies	$	48,687,000	$	-	$	48,687,000	$	-
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		191,957,000		-		191,957,000		-
State and political subdivisions		309,573,000		-		309,573,000		-
Corporate bonds		34,761,000		-		34,761,000		-
Equity securities, financial industry common stock		630,000		630,000		-		-
Equity securities, other		2,809,000		-		2,809,000		-
	$	588,417,000	$	630,000	$	587,787,000	$	-

Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, as well as U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Other securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things.

12

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).  The following table presents the assets carried on the balance sheet (after specific reserves) by caption and by level with the valuation hierarchy as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
2013
Loans receivable	$	1,019,000	$	-	$	-	$	1,019,000
Other real estate owned		8,989,000		-		-		8,989,000
Total	$	10,008,000	$	-	$	-	$	10,008,000
2012
Loans receivable	$	2,732,000	$	-	$	-	$	2,732,000
Other real estate owned		9,911,000		-		-		9,911,000
Total	$	12,643,000	$	-	$	-	$	12,643,000

Loans Receivable:Loans in the tables above consist of impaired credits held for investment.  In accordance with the loan impairment guidance, impairment was measured based on the fair value of collateral less estimated selling costs for collateral dependent loans.  Fair value for impaired loans is based upon appraised values of collateral adjusted for trends observed in the market.  A valuation allowance was recorded for the excess of the loan’s recorded investment over the amounts determined by the collateral value method.  This valuation is a component of the allowance for loan losses.  The Company considers these fair value measurements as level 3.

Other Real Estate Owned:  Other real estate owned in the table above consists of real estate obtained through foreclosure.  Other real estate owned is recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs, at the date of transfer.  Subsequent to the transfer, other real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated selling costs.  The carrying value of other real estate owned is not re-measured to fair value on a recurring basis but is subject to fair value adjustments when the carrying value exceeds the fair value less estimated selling costs.  Management uses appraised values and adjusts for trends observed in the market and for disposition costs in determining the value of other real estate owned. A valuation allowance was recorded for the excess of the asset’s recorded investment over the amount determined by the fair value, less estimated selling costs.  This valuation allowance is a component of the allowance for other real estate owned.  The valuation allowance was $4,644,000 and $4,004,000 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  The Company considers these fair values level 3.

Fair value of financial instruments:

Disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, for which it is practicable to estimate that value, is required whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. In cases in which quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimate of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. Certain financial instruments with a fair value that is not practicable to estimate and all non-financial instruments are excluded from the disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent the underlying value of the Company.

13

The following disclosures represent financial instruments in which the ending balances at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are not carried at fair value in their entirety on the consolidated balance sheets.

Cash and due from banks and interest bearing deposits in financial institutions:  The recorded amount of these assets approximates fair value.

Securities available-for-sale:  Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available.  If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the securities credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions.

Loans held for sale:  The fair value of loans held for sale is based on prevailing market prices.

Loans receivable:  The fair value of loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates, which reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan.  The estimate of maturity is based on the historical experience, with repayments for each loan classification modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.  The effect of nonperforming loans is considered in assessing the credit risk inherent in the fair value estimate.

Deposit liabilities:  Fair values of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts, and money market accounts, are equal to the amount payable on demand as of the respective balance sheet date.  Fair values of certificates of deposit are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.  The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.  The fair value estimates do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:  The carrying amounts of securities sold under agreements to repurchase approximate fair value because of the generally short-term nature of the instruments.

FHLB advances and other long-term borrowings:  Fair values of FHLB advances and other long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates currently being offered with similar terms.

Accrued income receivable and accrued interest payable:  The carrying amounts of accrued income receivable and accrued interest payable approximate fair value.

Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit:  The fair values of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and credit worthiness of the counterparties.  The carry value and fair value of the commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are not considered significant.

Limitations:  Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors.  These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

14

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as described above were as follows:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2013				2012
	Fair Value
	Hierarchy	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Level	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	Level 1	$	19,429,057	$	19,429,000	$	34,805,371	$	34,805,000
Interest bearing deposits	Level 1		36,408,837		36,409,000		44,639,033		44,639,000
Securities available-for-sale	See previous table		602,299,900		602,300,000		588,417,037		588,417,000
Loans receivable, net	Level 2		506,139,036		503,844,000		510,125,880		514,047,000
Loans held for sale	Level 2		1,257,924		1,258,000		1,030,180		1,030,000
Accrued income receivable	Level 1		7,021,977		7,022,000		7,173,703		7,174,000
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	Level 2	$	1,000,456,622	$	1,002,871,000	$	1,004,732,450	$	1,008,013,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	Level 1		30,628,684		30,629,000		27,088,660		27,089,000
FHLB advances	Level 2		14,576,061		15,374,000		14,611,035		15,997,000
Other long-term borrowings	Level 2		20,000,000		22,255,000		20,000,000		22,404,000
Accrued interest payable	Level 1		602,679		603,000		752,425		752,000

The methodologies used to determine fair value as of June 30, 2013 did not change from the methodologies used in the December 31, 2012 Annual Report.

15

7. Debt and Equity Securities

The amortized cost of securities available-for-sale and their fair values are summarized below:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2013:
U.S. government agencies	$	54,957,062	$	1,385,063	$	(1,255,601	)	$	55,086,524
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		179,460,269		2,707,907		(1,719,756	)		180,448,420
State and political subdivisions		317,517,183		4,697,816		(5,882,946	)		316,332,053
Corporate bonds		48,571,255		735,881		(2,576,133	)		46,731,003
Equity securities, financial industry common stock		629,700		66,000		-			695,700
Equity securities, other		3,006,200		-		-			3,006,200
	$	604,141,669	$	9,592,667	$	(11,434,436	)	$	602,299,900

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
December 31, 2012:
U.S. government agencies	$	46,264,590	$	2,422,445	$	-		$	48,687,035
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		187,174,681		4,947,586		(165,076	)		191,957,191
State and political subdivisions		300,025,960		9,963,545		(416,544	)		309,572,961
Corporate bonds		33,933,600		1,098,168		(270,218	)		34,761,550
Equity securities, financial industry common stock		629,700		-		-			629,700
Equity securities, other		2,808,600		-		-			2,808,600
	$	570,837,131	$	18,431,744	$	(851,838	)	$	588,417,037

The proceeds, gains and losses from securities available-for-sale are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale	$	13,916,614	$	1,384,247	$	15,618,009	$	10,032,564
Gross realized gains on securities available-for-sale		364,251		10,535		434,753		318,298
Gross realized losses on securities available-for-sale		1		-		1,512		230
Tax provision applicable to net realized gains on securities available-for-sale		136,000		4,000		162,000		119,000

16

Unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are summarized as follows:

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
June 30, 2013:
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	19,630,582	$	(1,255,601	)	$	-	$	-		$	19,630,582	$	(1,255,601	)
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		82,205,955		(1,719,756	)		-		-			82,205,955		(1,719,756	)
State and political subdivisions		126,531,176		(5,792,778	)		1,947,934		(90,168	)		128,479,110		(5,882,946	)
Corporate bonds		32,706,449		(2,576,133	)		-		-			32,706,449		(2,576,133	)
	$	261,074,162	$	(11,344,268	)	$	1,947,934	$	(90,168	)	$	263,022,096	$	(11,434,436	)

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
December 31, 2012:
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities	$	20,972,453	$	(165,076	)	$	-	$	-		$	20,972,453	$	(165,076	)
State and political subdivisions		30,651,869		(410,357	)		578,145		(6,187	)		31,230,014		(416,544	)
Corporate bonds		13,979,171		(270,218	)		-		-			13,979,171		(270,218	)
	$	65,603,493	$	(845,651	)	$	578,145	$	(6,187	)	$	66,181,638	$	(851,838	)

Gross unrealized losses on debt securities totaled $11,434,436 as of June 30, 2013.  These unrealized losses are generally due to changes in interest rates or general market conditions.  In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and industry analysts’ reports. Management concluded that the gross unrealized losses on debt securities were temporary.  Due to potential changes in conditions, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in fair values and management’s assessments will occur in the near term and that such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements.

17

8. Loan Receivable and Credit Disclosures

Activity in the allowance for loan losses, on a disaggregated basis, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows: (in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential			Commercial			Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate			Real Estate			Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other			Total
Balance, March 31, 2013	$	326	$	1,492		$	3,075		$	524	$	1,305	$	904	$	160		$	7,786
Provision (credit) for loan losses		6		(13	)		(73	)		67		37		17		19			60
Recoveries of loans charged-off		-		17			-			-		1		-		4			22
Loans charged-off		-		(40	)		-			-		-		-		(9	)		(49	)
Balance, June 30 2013	$	332	$	1,456		$	3,002		$	591	$	1,343	$	921	$	174		$	7,819

	Six Months Ended June 30 2013
				1-4 Family
	Construction			Residential			Commercial		Agricultural								Consumer
	Real Estate			Real Estate			Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial			Agricultural			and Other			Total
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	375		$	1,433		$	2,859	$	523	$	1,461		$	945		$	177		$	7,773
Provision (credit) for loan losses		(43	)		48			143		68		(120	)		(24	)		2			74
Recoveries of loans charged-off		-			38			-		-		2			-			8			48
Loans charged-off		-			(63	)		-		-		-			-			(13	)		(76	)
Balance, June 30, 2013	$	332		$	1,456		$	3,002	$	591	$	1,343		$	921		$	174		$	7,819

	Three Months Ended June 30 2012
				1-4 Family
	Construction			Residential		Commercial		Agricultural								Consumer
	Real Estate			Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate			Commercial			Agricultural		and Other			Total
Balance, March 31, 2012	$	817		$	1,385	$	2,817	$	516		$	1,417		$	804	$	210		$	7,966
Provision (credit) for loan losses		(78	)		88		95		(50	)		-			16		(7	)		64
Recoveries of loans charged-off		-			-		-		-			1			-		12			13
Loans charged-off		-			-		-		-			(12	)		-		(10	)		(22	)
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	739		$	1,473	$	2,912	$	466		$	1,406		$	820	$	205		$	8,021

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
				1-4 Family
	Construction			Residential			Commercial		Agricultural								Consumer
	Real Estate			Real Estate			Real Estate		Real Estate			Commercial			Agricultural		and Other			Total
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	793		$	1,402		$	2,859	$	501		$	1,352		$	764	$	234		$	7,905
Provision (credit) for loan losses		(54	)		78			53		(35	)		61			56		(43	)		116
Recoveries of loans charged-off		-			3			-		-			5			-		33			41
Loans charged-off		-			(10	)		-		-			(12	)		-		(19	)		(41	)
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	739		$	1,473		$	2,912	$	466		$	1,406		$	820	$	205		$	8,021

18

Allowance for loan losses disaggregated on the basis of impairment analysis method as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows: (in thousands)

2013
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential		Commercial		Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	100	$	85	$	20	$	-	$	330	$	5	$	-	$	540
Collectively evaluated for impairment		232		1,371		2,982		591		1,013		916		174		7,279
Balance June 30, 2013	$	332	$	1,456	$	3,002	$	591	$	1,343	$	921	$	174	$	7,819
2012
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential		Commercial		Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	100	$	110	$	86	$	-	$	400	$	6	$	-	$	702
Collectively evaluated for impairment		275		1,323		2,773		523		1,061		939		177		7,071
Balance December 31, 2012	$	375	$	1,433	$	2,859	$	523	$	1,461	$	945	$	177	$	7,773

Loans receivable disaggregated on the basis of impairment analysis method as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

2013
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential		Commercial		Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,263	$	842	$	2,314	$	-	$	886	$	5	$	1	$	5,311
Collectively evaluated for impairment		13,801		106,201		181,644		44,396		81,335		66,298		14,997		508,672
Balance June 30, 2013	$	15,064	$	107,043	$	183,958	$	44,396	$	82,221	$	66,303	$	14,998	$	513,983
2012
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential		Commercial		Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,493	$	1,121	$	3,280	$	-	$	710	$	6	$	4	$	6,614
Collectively evaluated for impairment		15,584		103,147		175,380		43,868		79,554		77,477		16,336		511,346
Balance December 31, 2012	$	17,077	$	104,268	$	178,660	$	43,868	$	80,264	$	77,483	$	16,340	$	517,960

19

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payment of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  The Company will apply its normal loan review procedures to identify loans that should be evaluated for impairment.  The following is a recap of impaired loans, on a disaggregated basis, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012: (in thousands)

	June 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
			Unpaid						Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Principal		Related
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Balance		Allowance
With no specific reserve recorded:
Real estate - construction	$	873	$	873	$	-	$	1,060	$	1,060	$	-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		550		550		-		655		655		-
Real estate - commercial		2,268		2,268		-		1,381		1,381		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		60		60		-		80		80		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		1		1		-		4		4		-
Total loans with no specific reserve:		3,752		3,752		-		3,180		3,180		-
With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - construction		390		390		100		433		433		100
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		292		292		85		466		466		110
Real estate - commercial		46		46		20		1,899		1,899		86
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		826		826		330		630		630		400
Agricultural		5		5		5		6		6		6
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total loans with specific reserve:		1,559		1,559		540		3,434		3,434		702
Total
Real estate - construction		1,263		1,263		100		1,493		1,493		100
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		842		842		85		1,121		1,121		110
Real estate - commercial		2,314		2,314		20		3,280		3,280		86
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		886		886		330		710		710		400
Agricultural		5		5		5		6		6		6
Consumer and other		1		1		-		4		4		-
	$	5,311	$	5,311	$	540	$	6,614	$	6,614	$	702

20

The following is a recap of the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012: (in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013				2012
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
With no specific reserve recorded:
Real estate - construction	$	939	$	-	$	1,707	$	2
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		607		-		1,670		9
Real estate - commercial		1,440		-		785		5
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		65		-		-		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		2		-		-		-
Total loans with no specific reserve:		3,053		-		4,162		16
With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - construction		410		-		592		-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		419		-		481		-
Real estate - commercial		1,321		-		1,847		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		774		-		650		-
Agricultural		6		-		-		-
Consumer and other		1		-		4		-
Total loans with specific reserve:		2,931		-		3,574		-
Total
Real estate - construction		1,349		-		2,299		2
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		1,026		-		2,151		9
Real estate - commercial		2,761		-		2,632		5
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		839		-		650		-
Agricultural		6		-		-		-
Consumer and other		3		-		4		-
	$	5,984	$	-	$	7,736	$	16

21

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013				2012
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
With no specific reserve recorded:
Real estate - construction	$	979	$	-	$	1,635	$	2
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		623		-		1,790		14
Real estate - commercial		1,420		2		840		5
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		70		-		-		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		3		-		-		-
Total loans with no specific reserve:		3,095		2		4,265		21
With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - construction		417		-		618		-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		434		-		426		-
Real estate - commercial		1,514		-		1,815		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		726		-		630		-
Agricultural		6		-		-		-
Consumer and other		-		-		3		-
Total loans with specific reserve:		3,097		-		3,492		-
Total
Real estate - construction		1,396		-		2,253		2
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		1,057		-		2,216		14
Real estate - commercial		2,934		2		2,655		5
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		796		-		630		-
Agricultural		6		-		-		-
Consumer and other		3		-		3		-
	$	6,192	$	2	$	7,757	$	21

The interest foregone on nonaccrual loans for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $81,000 and $117,000, respectively.  The interest foregone on nonaccrual loans for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $166,000 and $233,000, respectively.

The Company had loans meeting the definition of a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) of $3,986,000 as of June 30, 2013, of which all were included in impaired loans, $3,796,000 was included as nonaccrual loans and $190,000 was on accrual status. The Company had TDR of $5,105,000 as of December 31, 2012, all of which were included in impaired loans, $4,058,000 was included as nonaccrual loans and $1,047,000 was on accrual status.

22

The following table sets forth information on the Company’s TDR, on a disaggregated basis, occurring in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012: (dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013						2012
			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification				Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment		Contracts		Investment		Investment
Real estate - construction		-	$	-	$	-		-	$	-	$	-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		-		-		-		2		391		401
Real estate - commercial		-		-		-		2		2,697		2,697
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		1		130		130		1		104		104
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-		-		-
		1	$	130	$	130		5	$	3,192	$	3,202

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013						2012
			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification				Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment		Contracts		Investment		Investment
Real estate - construction		-	$	-	$	-		-	$	-	$	-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		-		-		-		2		391		401
Real estate - commercial		-		-		-		2		2,697		2,697
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		1		130		130		1		104		104
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-		-		-
		1	$	130	$	130		5	$	3,192	$	3,202

There was no new TDR activity in the three months ended March 31, 2013.  However, during the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company restructured one loan by granting concessions to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties.  The loan was restructured with a collateral shortfall.

There was no new TDR activity in the three months ended March 31, 2012.  However, during the three months ended June 30 2012, the company restructured five loans by granting concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.  The commercial loan was restructured by reducing periodic payments and extending amortization.  One one-to-four family real estate loan was restructured at a below market interest rate.  One one-to-four family real estate loan was restructured to include previously unpaid interest in the new loan balance.  One commercial real estate loan was restructured to extend the amortization of the loan beyond normal terms.  One commercial real estate loans was restructured as an interest only loan for an extended period of time.

Two TDR loans modified during the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 had payment defaults.  These modified TDR loans had a balance as of June 30, 2013 of $138,000.  One TDR loan modified during the twelve months ended June 30, 2012 had a payment default.  The modified TDR loan had a balance as of June 30, 2012 of $298,000 and a specific reserve of $80,000.  In December 2012, the collateral securing this loan was repossessed and the balance of $100,000 charged off.  A TDR loan is considered to have payment default when it is past due 60 days or more.

23

There was no financial impact for specific reserves or from charge-offs for the TDR loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

An aging analysis of the recorded investments in loans, on a disaggregated basis, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, is as follows:  (in thousands)

2013
			90 Days								90 Days
	30-89		or Greater		Total						or Greater
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total		Accruing
Real estate - construction	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	15,064	$	15,064	$	-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		1,371		223		1,594		105,449		107,043		36
Real estate - commercial		-		47		47		183,911		183,958		-
Real estate - agricultural		27		-		27		44,369		44,396		-
Commercial		618		250		868		81,353		82,221		17
Agricultural		-		-		-		66,303		66,303		-
Consumer and other		904		-		904		14,094		14,998		-
	$	2,920	$	520	$	3,440	$	510,543	$	513,983	$	53

2012
			90 Days								90 Days
	30-89		or Greater		Total						or Greater
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total		Accruing
Real estate - construction	$	5	$	-	$	5	$	17,072	$	17,077	$	-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		973		275		1,248		103,020		104,268		-
Real estate - commercial		17		135		152		178,508		178,660		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		43,868		43,868		-
Commercial		449		-		449		79,815		80,264		-
Agricultural		71		-		71		77,412		77,483		-
Consumer and other		57		4		61		16,279		16,340		-
	$	1,572	$	414	$	1,986	$	515,974	$	517,960	$	-

The credit risk profile by internally assigned grade, on a disaggregated basis, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows:  (in thousands)

2013
	Construction		Commercial		Agricultural
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		Total
Pass	$	7,362	$	144,140	$	41,129	$	69,937	$	63,618	$	326,186
Watch		3,109		23,506		2,966		8,881		2,265		40,727
Special Mention		-		771		-		891		-		1,662
Substandard		3,330		13,096		301		1,756		415		18,898
Substandard-Impaired		1,263		2,445		-		756		5		4,469
	$	15,064	$	183,958	$	44,396	$	82,221	$	66,303	$	391,942

24

2012
	Construction		Commercial		Agricultural
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		Total
Pass	$	8,127	$	141,206	$	40,201	$	66,390	$	75,920	$	331,844
Watch		3,209		17,456		2,931		11,321		1,093		36,010
Special Mention		741		10,119		-		30		-		10,890
Substandard		3,507		6,599		736		1,813		464		13,119
Substandard-Impaired		1,493		3,280		-		710		6		5,489
	$	17,077	$	178,660	$	43,868	$	80,264	$	77,483	$	397,352

The credit risk profile based on payment activity, on a disaggregated basis, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows:

2013
	1-4 Family
	Residential		Consumer
	Real Estate		and Other		Total
Performing	$	106,448	$	14,998	$	121,446
Non-performing		595		-		595
	$	107,043	$	14,998	$	122,041

2012
	1-4 Family
	Residential		Consumer
	Real Estate		and Other		Total
Performing	$	103,342	$	16,336	$	119,678
Non-performing		926		4		930
	$	104,268	$	16,340	$	120,608

9. Other Real Estate Owned

The following table provides the composition of other real estate owned as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	2013		2012
Construction and land development	$	6,757,829	$	7,534,664
1 to 4 family residential real estate		1,417,000		1,561,784
Commercial real estate		814,379		814,377
	$	8,989,208	$	9,910,825

25

The Company is actively marketing the assets referred in the table above.  Management uses appraised values and adjusts for trends observed in the market and for disposition costs in determining the value of other real estate owned. The assets above are primarily located in the metropolitan Des Moines, Iowa and Ames, Iowa areas.

10. Goodwill

Goodwill recognized in the Acquisition was primarily attributable to an expanded market share and economies of scale expected from combining the operations of the Garner and Klemme offices with Reliance Bank.  The goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment at least annually.  For income tax purposes, goodwill is amortized over 15 years.

11. Core deposit intangible asset

In conjunction with the Acquisition, the Corporation recorded $1.5 million in core deposit intangible asset.  The following sets forth the carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of core deposit intangible assets:

	2013
	Gross		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization
Core deposit intangible asset	$	1,500,000	$	338,934

There were no additions of other significant acquired intangible assets during 2013 or 2012.

Amortization expense on core deposit intangible assets totaled $68,425 and $49,184 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Amortization expense on core deposit intangible assets totaled $142,198 and $49,184 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Estimated remaining amortization expense on core deposit intangible for the years ending is as follows:

2013	$	131,502
2014		244,000
2015		217,500
2016		193,864
2017		172,768
2018		152,732
2019 and thereafter		48,700

12. Subsequent Events

Management evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued.  There were no significant events or transactions occurring after June 30, 2013, but prior to August 9, 2013, that provided additional evidence about conditions that existed at June 30, 2013.  There were no significant events or transactions that provided evidence about conditions that did not exist at June 30, 2013.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Ames National Corporation (the “Company”) is a bank holding company established in 1975 that owns and operates five bank subsidiaries in central Iowa (the “Banks”).  The following discussion is provided for the consolidated operations of the Company and its Banks, First National Bank, Ames, Iowa (First National), State Bank & Trust Co. (State Bank), Boone Bank & Trust Co. (Boone Bank), Reliance State Bank (Reliance Bank), and United Bank & Trust NA (United Bank). The purpose of this discussion is to focus on significant factors affecting the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

26

The Company does not engage in any material business activities apart from its ownership of the Banks.  Products and services offered by the Banks are for commercial and consumer purposes including loans, deposits and trust services.  The Banks also offer investment services through a third-party broker-dealer.  The Company employs eleven individuals to assist with financial reporting, human resources, audit, compliance, marketing, technology systems and the coordination of management activities, in addition to 195 full-time equivalent individuals employed by the Banks.

The Company’s primary competitive strategy is to utilize seasoned and competent Bank management and local decision making authority to provide customers with faster response times and more flexibility in the products and services offered.  This strategy is viewed as providing an opportunity to increase revenues through creating a competitive advantage over other financial institutions.  The Company also strives to remain operationally efficient to provide better profitability while enabling the Company to offer more competitive loan and deposit rates.

The principal sources of Company revenues and cash flow are: (i) interest and fees earned on loans made by the Company and Banks; (ii) interest on fixed income investments held by the Company and Banks; (iii) fees on trust services provided by those Banks exercising trust powers; (iv) service charges on deposit accounts maintained at the Banks and (v) gain on sale of loans held for sale.  The Company’s principal expenses are: (i) interest expense on deposit accounts and other borrowings; (ii) provision for loan losses; (iii) salaries and employee benefits; (iv) data processing costs associated with maintaining the Banks’ loan and deposit functions; and (v) occupancy expenses for maintaining the Banks’ facilities.  The largest component contributing to the Company’s net income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on earning assets (primarily loans and investments) and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities (primarily deposits and other borrowings).  One of management’s principal functions is to manage the spread between interest earned on earning assets and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities in an effort to maximize net interest income while maintaining an appropriate level of interest rate risk.

The Company had net income of $3,279,000, or $0.35 per share, for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to net income of $3,309,000, or $0.36 per share, for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  Total equity capital as of June 30, 2013 totaled $136.4 million or 11.3% of total assets.

The decrease in quarterly earnings can be primarily attributed to higher other real estate owned costs and lower net interest income, offset in part by higher securities gains. The Acquisition contributed to increases in net interest income, noninterest income, excluding securities gains and noninterest expense.

Net loan charge-offs totaled $27,000 and $9,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The provision for loan losses totaled $60,000 and $64,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company had net income of $6,865,000, or $0.74 per share, for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to net income of $6,853,000, or $0.74 per share, for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

The increase in six month earnings can be primarily attributed to higher loan interest income, lower deposit interest expense and higher noninterest income, offset in part by higher other real estate owned costs.  The Acquisition contributed to increases in net interest income, noninterest income, excluding securities gains and noninterest expense.

27

Net loan charge-offs totaled $28,000 and $400 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The provision for loan losses totaled $75,000 and $116,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following management discussion and analysis will provide a review of important items relating to:

·Challenges

·Key Performance Indicators and Industry Results

·Critical Accounting Policies

·Income Statement Review

·Balance Sheet Review

·Asset Quality and Credit Risk Management

·Liquidity and Capital Resources

·Forward-Looking Statements and Business Risks

Challenges

Management has identified certain events or circumstances that may negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations in the future and is attempting to position the Company to best respond to those challenges.

·     If Interest rates increase significantly over a relatively short period of time due to improving national employment or higher inflationary pressures, the interest rate environment may present a challenge to the Company.  Increases in interest rates may negatively impact the Company’s net interest margin if interest expense increases more quickly than interest income.  The Company’s earning assets (primarily its loan and investment portfolio) have longer maturities than its interest bearing liabilities (primarily deposits and other borrowings); therefore, in a rising interest rate environment, interest expense may increase more quickly than interest income as the interest bearing liabilities reprice more quickly than earning assets.  In response to this challenge, the Banks model quarterly the changes in income that would result from various changes in interest rates.  Management believes Bank earning assets have the appropriate maturity and repricing characteristics to optimize earnings and the Banks’ interest rate risk positions.

·     If market interest rates in the three to five year time horizons remain at historically low levels as compared to the short term interest rates, the interest rate environment may present a challenge to the Company.   The Company’s earning assets will reprice at lower interest rates, but the deposit will not reprice at significantly lower interest rates, therefore, the net interest income may decrease.  Management believes Bank earning assets have the appropriate maturity and repricing characteristics to optimize earnings and the Banks’ interest rate risk positions.

·    Other real estate owned amounted to $9.0 million and $9.9 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  Other real estate owned expense amounted to $668,000 and $441,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Management obtains independent appraisals or performs evaluations to determine that these properties are carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell.  It is at least reasonably possible that change in fair values will occur in the near term and that such changes could have a negative impact on the Company’s earnings.

28

·The full compliance burden and impact on the Company’s operations and profitability with respect to the Dodd-Frank Act are currently unknown, as the Dodd-Frank Act delegates to various federal agencies the task of implementing its many provisions through regulation.  Hundreds of new federal regulations, studies and reports are required under the Dodd-Frank Act and not all of them have been finalized.  Although certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have been implemented, federal rules and policies in this area will be further developing for months and years to come.  Based on the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and anticipated implementing regulations, it is highly likely that Banks, as well as the Company, will be subject to significantly increased regulation and compliance obligations that will expose the Company to higher costs as well as noncompliance risk and consequences.

·The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, established under the Dodd-Frank Act, has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the purposes and objectives of the “Federal consumer financial laws, and to prevent evasions thereof” with respect to all financial institutions that offer financial products and services to consumers.  The Bureau is also authorized to prescribe rules, applicable to any covered person or service provider, identifying and prohibiting acts or practices that are “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service (“UDAAP authority”).  The term “abusive” is new and untested, and because Bureau officials have indicated that compliance will be achieved through enforcement rather than the issuance of regulations, the Company cannot predict to what extent the Bureau’s future actions will have on the banking industry or the Company.  The full reach and impact of the Bureau’s broad new rulemaking powers and UDAAP authority on the operations of financial institutions offering consumer financial products or services is currently unknown.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, insured depository institutions with assets of $10 billion or less (such as the Banks) will continue to be supervised and examined by their primary federal regulators, rather than the Bureau, with respect to compliance with federal consumer protection laws.

Key Performance Indicators and Industry Results

Certain key performance indicators for the Company and the industry are presented in the following chart.  The industry figures are compiled by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and are derived from 7,019 commercial banks and savings institutions insured by the FDIC.  Management reviews these indicators on a quarterly basis for purposes of comparing the Company’s performance from quarter-to-quarter against the industry as a whole.

Selected Indicators for the Company and the Industry

	3 Months			6 Months
	Ended			Ended			3 Months ended						Years Ended December 31,
	June 30, 2013						March 31, 2013						2012						2011
	Company			Company			Company			Industry*			Company			Industry*			Company			Industry
Return on assets		1.05	%		1.11	%		1.18	%		1.12	%		1.24	%		1.00	%		1.38	%		0.88	%
Return on equity		8.98	%		9.42	%		9.87	%		9.95	%		10.08	%		8.92	%		10.82	%		7.86	%
Net interest margin		3.07	%		3.10	%		3.13	%		3.27	%		3.35	%		3.42	%		3.60	%		3.60	%
Efficiency ratio		57.26	%		54.45	%		51.56	%		58.92	%		52.33	%		61.60	%		49.80	%		61.37	%
Capital ratio		11.73	%		11.82	%		11.91	%		9.26	%		12.31	%		9.15	%		12.75	%		9.09	%

*Latest available data

29

Key performances indicators include:

·Return on Assets

This ratio is calculated by dividing net income by average assets.  It is used to measure how effectively the assets of the Company are being utilized in generating income.  The Company's annualized return on average assets was 1.05% and 1.15% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The decrease in this ratio in 2013 from the previous period is primarily the result of an increase in average assets.  This increase in new or repriced earning assets generated less interest income given the low interest rate environment.

·Return on Equity

This ratio is calculated by dividing net income by average equity.  It is used to measure the net income or return the Company generated for the shareholders’ equity investment in the Company. The Company's return on average equity was 8.98% and 9.52% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The decrease in this ratio in 2013 from the previous period is primarily the result of higher average equity.

·Net Interest Margin

The net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 3.07% and 3.38%, respectively.  The ratio is calculated by dividing net interest income by average earning assets.  Earning assets are primarily made up of loans and investments that earn interest.  This ratio is used to measure how well the Company is able to maintain interest rates on earning assets above those of interest-bearing liabilities, which is the interest expense paid on deposits and other borrowings.  The decrease in this ratio in 2013 is primarily the result of higher interest earning average assets with lower market yields, offset in part by lower market cost of funds on interest bearing liabilities.

·Efficiency Ratio

This ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by net interest income and noninterest income.  The ratio is a measure of the Company’s ability to manage noninterest expenses.  The Company’s efficiency ratio was 57.26% and 55.34% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The change in the efficiency ratio in 2013 from the previous period is primarily the result of increased noninterest expense.

·Capital Ratio

The average capital ratio is calculated by dividing average total equity capital by average total assets.  It measures the level of average assets that are funded by shareholders’ equity.  Given an equal level of risk in the financial condition of two companies, the higher the capital ratio, generally the more financially sound the company.  The Company’s capital ratio of 11.73% as of June 30, 2013 is significantly higher than the industry average as of March 31, 2013.

Industry Results

The FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile reported the following results for the first quarter of 2013:

More Than 90% of Institutions Had Positive Net Income in First Quarter

30

Improvements in noninterest income and expense, plus broad-based reductions in loan loss provisions, outweighed declining net interest income and helped lift industry earnings to an all-time high of $40.3 billion in first quarter 2013. First-quarter net income was $5.5 billion (15.8%) higher than in first quarter 2012, as a reduction in expenses for litigation costs and proceeds from a legal settlement boosted reported earn­ings. Half of all insured institutions reported year-over-year improvement in quarterly earnings, the lowest proportion since fourth quarter 2009. The average return on assets (ROA) was 1.12%, up from 1% a year ago. This is the highest quarterly ROA for the industry since second quarter 2007. Only 8.4% of institutions reported negative net income, the lowest proportion of unprofitable banks since third quarter 2006.

Loss Provisions Fall to Pre-Crisis Level

Total noninterest income was $5.1 billion (8.3%) higher than a year ago. Trading revenue was $1.1 billion (17.8%) higher than in first quarter 2012, while gains from asset sales were up by $1 billion (30.1%). Noninterest expense was $4.2 billion (3.9%) lower, with more than half of the reduc­tion occurring at one large bank. Fewer than 40% of banks (39.9%) reported reductions in noninterest expense, while well over half (59.4%) reported rising expenses. Provisions for loan and lease losses fell to $11.0 billion, a decline of $3.3 billion (23.2%) from a year ago. This is the lowest quarterly loss provision since first quarter 2007. More than half of all institutions—53.1%— reported lower loss provisions than a year earlier.

Average Net Interest Margin Is at Lowest Level Since 2006

The combined positive effects of higher noninterest income, lower noninterest expense, and reduced loss provisions were offset somewhat by a $2.4 billion (2.2%) year-over-year decline in net interest income. This is the third time in the last four quarters that net interest income has been lower than in the year-earlier quarter. The industry’s net interest margin (NIM) fell to 3.27% from 3.35% in fourth quarter 2012 and 3.51% in first quarter 2012. This is the lowest average NIM for the industry since fourth quarter 2006. Total interest income in the first quarter was $6 billion (4.8%) lower than in first quarter 2012, even though average interest-earning assets were more than $589 billion (4.9%) higher. As older, higher-yielding assets mature and are replaced by lower-yield­ing current assets, average yields continue to fall more rapidly than the average expense of funding these assets.

Real Estate Loans Show Greatest Improvement in Noncurrent Levels

The amount of loans and leases that were noncurrent (90 days or more past due or in nonaccrual status) declined by $15.7 billion during the three months ended March 31. The improvement was led by residential mortgage loans, where noncurrent balances fell by $8.7 billion (5%). Noncurrent real estate construction and development loans declined by $2.2 billion (12.7%), and noncurrent real estate loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties fell by $2 billion (6.5%). At the end of March, noncurrent loan balances totaled $261.2 billion, the lowest level since year-end 2008.

Reserve Reductions Follow Improving Trend in Asset Quality

Insured institutions reduced their loss reserves by $6.6 billion (4%) in the quarter, as the $16 billion in charge-offs taken out of reserves exceeded the $11 billion in loss provisions added to reserves. This is the 12th consecutive quarter in which banks have lowered their reserves. The $155.5 billion that remained in reserves at the end of the quarter is $107.7 billion (40.9%) below the peak of $263.2 billion reached at the end of first quarter 2010. The industry’s coverage ratio of reserves to noncurrent loans improved from 58.5% to 59.5% because of the sizable reduction in noncurrent loan balances.

31

Loan Balances Post Seasonal Decline

Total assets of insured institutions declined by $26.3 billion (0.2%) during the quarter. This is the first quarterly decline in industry assets since fourth quarter 2010. Balances of securities purchased under resale agreements dropped by $57.5 billion (12.8%). Total loans and leases fell by $36.8 billion (0.5%). The decline in loan balances was caused in large part by a seasonal $35.9 billion (5.2%) drop in credit card balances. In addition, home equity lines fell by $16 billion (2.9%). Balances of residential mortgage loans declined by $18.3 billion (1%), as sales of mortgages during the quarter exceeded origina­tions by almost $24 billion. Agricultural production loan balances posted a seasonal $7.2 billion (10.7%) decline. Loan balances increased in commer­cial and industrial loans (up $24.8 billion, 1.6%), loans to foreign depository institutions (up $15.5 billion, 16.9%), auto loans (up $5.7 billion, 1.8%), and multifamily residential real estate loans (up $2.7 billion, 1.2%). Banks’ investment securi­ties portfolios declined by $11.5 billion (0.4%), as holdings of U.S. Treasury securities fell by $16.6 billion (8.1%), and mortgage-backed securities declined by $7.9 billion (0.5%). Institutions increased their holdings of state and municipal securities by $6 billion (2.3%). Balances with Federal Reserve banks rose by $184 billion (25.5%).

Numbers of Failures and Problem Banks Continue to Fall

The number of FDIC-insured institutions reporting financial results fell to 7,019 in the first quarter, down from 7,083 in fourth quarter 2012. Mergers absorbed 55 institutions during the quarter, and four institutions failed. This is the smallest number of failures in a quar­ter since second quarter 2008. For a seventh consecu­tive quarter, no new insured institutions were added. Except for charters created to absorb failed banks, there have been no new charters added since fourth quarter 2010. The number of insured institutions on the FDIC’s “Problem List” declined for an eighth consecutive quarter, from 651 to 612. Total assets of “problem” institutions declined from $233 billion to $213 billion. The number of full-time equivalent employees at insured institutions fell from 2,110,276 to 2,102,839 during the quarter.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion contained in this Item 2 and other disclosures included within this report are based, in part, on the Company’s audited December 31, 2012 consolidated financial statements.  These statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The financial information contained in these statements is, for the most part, based on the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. However, the preparation of these statements requires management to make certain estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in the Company’s Annual Report.  Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective estimates and judgments, management has identified its most critical accounting policies to be those related to the allowance for loan losses, valuation of other real estate owned, the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of certain securities available-for-sale and the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses that is treated as an expense and charged against earnings.  Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that collectability of the principal is unlikely. The Company has policies and procedures for evaluating the overall credit quality of its loan portfolio, including timely identification of potential problem loans.  On a quarterly basis, management reviews the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, incorporating a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative.  Quantitative factors include the Company’s historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, known information about individual loans and other factors.  Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in the Company’s market area.  To the extent actual results differ from forecasts and management’s judgment, the allowance for loan losses may be greater or lesser than future charge-offs.  Due to potential changes in conditions, it is at least reasonably possible that change in estimates will occur in the near term and that such changes could be material to the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements.

32

Other Real Estate Owned

Real estate properties acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure are initially recorded at the fair value less estimated selling cost at the date of foreclosure.  Any write-downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses.  After foreclosure, independent appraisals or evaluations are periodically performed by management and property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell.  Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a property exceeds its fair value, and any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the lower of its cost basis or fair value less cost to sell.  Costs of significant property improvements are capitalized, whereas costs relating to holding property are expensed.  The portion of interest costs relating to development of real estate is capitalized.  The appraisals or evaluations are inherently subjective and require estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.  Due to potential changes in conditions, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in fair values will occur in the near term and that such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Available-for-Sale Securities

Declines in the fair value of securities available-for-sale below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are generally reflected in earnings as realized losses.  In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers: (1) the intent to sell the investment securities and the more likely than not requirement that the Company will be required to sell the investment securities prior to recovery; (2) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; and (3) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer.  Due to potential changes in conditions, it is at least reasonably possible that change in management’s assessment of other-than-temporary impairment will occur in the near term and that such changes could be material to the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and the core deposit intangible asset arose in connection with the Acquisition.  These assets are tested annually for impairment or more often if conditions indicate a possible impairment.  For the purposes of goodwill impairment testing, determination of the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions.   Through June 30, 2013, no conditions indicated impairment has incurred.  The next annual test will be performed in the fourth quarter of 2013.  Actual future test results may differ from the present evaluation of impairment due to changes in the conditions used in the current evaluation.

33

Income Statement Review for the Three Months ended June 30, 2013

The following highlights a comparative discussion of the major components of net income and their impact for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES

The following two tables are used to calculate the Company’s net interest margin.  The first table includes the Company’s average assets and the related income to determine the average yield on earning assets.  The second table includes the average liabilities and related expense to determine the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.  The net interest margin is equal to the interest income less the interest expense divided by average earning assets.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES
	Three Months ended June 30,
	2013							2012
	Average		Revenue/		Yield/			Average		Revenue/		Yield/
	balance		expense		rate			balance		expense		rate
ASSETS
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Loans 1
Commercial	$	83,057	$	976		4.70	%	$	83,791	$	1,035		4.94	%
Agricultural		67,331		893		5.31	%		61,784		848		5.49	%
Real estate		354,301		4,082		4.61	%		320,787		4,115		5.13	%
Consumer and other		14,368		197		5.49	%		19,069		248		5.21	%
Total loans (including fees)		519,057		6,148		4.74	%		485,431		6,246		5.15	%
Investment securities
Taxable		306,358		1,400		1.83	%		285,733		1,593		2.23	%
Tax-exempt  2		300,654		2,687		3.57	%		249,107		2,612		4.19	%
Total investment securities		607,012		4,087		2.69	%		534,840		4,205		3.15	%
Interest bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold		54,042		108		0.80	%		57,282		133		0.93	%
Total interest-earning assets		1,180,111	$	10,343		3.51	%		1,077,553	$	10,584		3.93	%
Noninterest-earning assets		65,207							70,758
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,245,318						$	1,148,311

1 Average loan balance includes nonaccrual loans, if any.  Interest income collected on nonaccrual loans has been included.

2 Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental tax rate of 35%.

34

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES
	Three Months ended June 30,
	2013								2012
	Average		Revenue/			Yield/			Average		Revenue/			Yield/
	balance		expense			rate			balance		expense			rate
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-bearing liabilities
Deposits
NOW, savings accounts and money markets	$	614,247	$	309			0.20	%	$	527,576	$	298			0.23	%
Time deposits > $100,000		96,211		286			1.19	%		103,643		334			1.29	%
Time deposits < $100,000		150,659		405			1.07	%		156,218		521			1.33	%
Total deposits		861,117		1,000			0.46	%		787,437		1,153			0.59	%
Other borrowed funds		64,651		295			1.82	%		71,097		320			1.80	%
Total Interest-bearing liabilities		925,768		1,295			0.56	%		858,534		1,473			0.69	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Demand deposits		167,003								143,156
Other liabilities		6,445								7,636
Stockholders' equity		146,102								138,985
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,245,318							$	1,148,311
Net interest income			$	9,048			3.07	%			$	9,111			3.38	%
Spread Analysis
Interest income/average assets	$	10,343		3.32	%				$	10,584		3.69	%
Interest expense/average assets	$	1,295		0.42	%				$	1,473		0.51	%
Net interest income/average assets	$	9,048		2.91	%				$	9,111		3.17	%

Net Interest Income

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company's net interest margin adjusted for tax exempt income was 3.07% and 3.38%, respectively.  Net interest income, prior to the adjustment for tax-exempt income, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $8,107,000 compared to $8,198,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, interest income decreased $269,000, or 2.8%, when compared to the same period in 2012.  The decrease from 2012 was primarily attributable to lower average yields on loans and investment securities, offset in part by higher average balance of investment securities and loans.  The lower yields were due primarily to continued low market interest rates.  The higher average balances were due primarily to increased loan demand and the deployment of additional growth in average deposits into securities available-for-sale portfolio.

35

Interest expense decreased $178,000, or 12.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  The lower interest expense for the period is primarily attributable to lower average rates paid on deposits, offset in part by a higher average balance on deposits.  The lower yields were due primarily to continued low market interest rates.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company’s provision for loan losses was $60,000 and $64,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Net loan charge-offs were $27,000 and 9,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Noninterest Income and Expense

Noninterest income increased $358,000 or 20.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.   The increase in non-interest income is primarily due to securities gains for the three months ended June 30, 2013, of $364,000 compared to security gains of $11,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  Excluding net security gains, non-interest income increased $4,000, or 0.3%.

Noninterest expense increased $343,000 or 6.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily as a result of increased other real estate owned costs in 2013, due primarily to impairment write downs of $670,000 compared to $274,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1,019,000 and $1,060,000, representing an effective tax rate of 24% and 24%, respectively.

36

Income Statement Review for the Six Months ended June 30, 2013

The following highlights a comparative discussion of the major components of net income and their impact for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES

The following two tables are used to calculate the Company’s net interest margin.  The first table includes the Company’s average assets and the related income to determine the average yield on earning assets.  The second table includes the average liabilities and related expense to determine the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.  The net interest margin is equal to the interest income less the interest expense divided by average earning assets.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES
	Six Months ended June 30,
	2013							2012
	Average		Revenue/		Yield/			Average		Revenue/		Yield/
	balance		expense		rate			balance		expense		rate
ASSETS
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Loans 1
Commercial	$	81,528	$	1,913		4.69	%	$	81,407	$	2,008		4.93	%
Agricultural		66,990		1,797		5.37	%		55,116		1,504		5.46	%
Real estate		351,093		8,191		4.67	%		312,159		8,035		5.15	%
Consumer and other		14,961		404		5.41	%		19,402		510		5.26	%
Total loans (including fees)		514,572		12,305		4.78	%		468,084		12,057		5.15	%
Investment securities
Taxable		300,208		2,780		1.85	%		277,153		3,218		2.32	%
Tax-exempt  2		293,530		5,344		3.64	%		241,226		5,151		4.27	%
Total investment securities		593,738		8,124		2.74	%		518,379		8,369		3.23	%
Interest bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold		57,287		218		0.76	%		57,385		258		0.90	%
Total interest-earning assets		1,165,597	$	20,647		3.54	%		1,043,848	$	20,684		3.96	%
Noninterest-earning assets		67,121							64,744
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,232,718						$	1,108,592

1 Average loan balance includes nonaccrual loans, if any.  Interest income collected on nonaccrual loans has been included.

2 Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental tax rate of 35%.

37

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES
	Six Months ended June 30,
	2013								2012
	Average		Revenue/			Yield/			Average		Revenue/			Yield/
	balance		expense			rate			balance		expense			rate
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-bearing liabilities
Deposits
NOW, savings accounts and money markets	$	598,414	$	596			0.20	%	$	498,630	$	569			0.23	%
Time deposits > $100,000		97,759		567			1.16	%		105,716		699			1.32	%
Time deposits < $100,000		152,450		832			1.09	%		146,588		1,055			1.44	%
Total deposits		848,623		1,995			0.47	%		750,934		2,323			0.62	%
Other borrowed funds		65,079		591			1.82	%		73,302		649			1.77	%
Total Interest-bearing liabilities		913,702		2,586			0.57	%		824,236		2,972			0.72	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Demand deposits		166,388								139,070
Other liabilities		6,932								7,463
Stockholders' equity		145,696								137,823
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,232,718							$	1,108,592
Net interest income			$	18,061			3.10	%			$	17,712			3.39	%
Spread Analysis
Interest income/average assets	$	20,647		3.35	%				$	20,684		3.73	%
Interest expense/average assets	$	2,586		0.42	%				$	2,972		0.54	%
Net interest income/average assets	$	18,061		2.93	%				$	17,712		3.20	%

Net Interest Income

For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company's net interest margin adjusted for tax exempt income was 3.10% and 3.39%, respectively.  Net interest income, prior to the adjustment for tax-exempt income, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $16,192,000 compared to $15,910,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, interest income decreased $104,000, or 0.6%, when compared to the same period in 2012.  The decrease from 2012 was primarily attributable to lower average yields on loans and investment securities, offset in part by higher average balance of investment securities and loans.  The higher average balances of investments and loans were due primarily to the Acquisition.

Interest expense decreased $385,000, or 13.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.  The lower interest expense for the period is primarily attributable to lower average rates paid on deposits, offset in part by a higher average balance on deposits.  The higher average balances of deposits were due primarily to the Acquisition.

38

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company’s provision for loan losses was $74,000 and $116,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Net loan charge-offs were $28,000 and $400 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Noninterest Income and Expense

Noninterest income increased $300,000 or 8.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.  The increase in non-interest income is primarily due to higher securities gains, merchant and card fees and gains on the loans held for sale.  The increase in the gain on the sale of loans was due primarily to increased volume as a result of lower interest rates.  The increase in merchant and card fees was due primarily to the Acquisition.  Excluding net security gains, non-interest income increased $185,000, or 5.6%.

Noninterest expense increased $624,000 or 6.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily as a result of higher salaries and employee benefits and higher other real estate owned costs.  The higher salaries and benefits costs were due primarily to normal salary increases and the Acquisition.  Other real estate owned costs increased due to the impairment write downs of $670,000 compared to $296,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $2,228,000 and $2,240,000, representing an effective tax rate of 25% and 24%, respectively.

Balance Sheet Review

As of June 30, 2013, total assets were $1,206,914,000, a $10,779,000 decrease compared to December 31, 2012.  The decrease assets were primarily due to a decrease in cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits in financial institutions and loans were offset by an increase in securities available-for-sale.

Investment Portfolio

The investment portfolio totaled $602,300,000 as of June 30, 2013, an increase of $13,883,000 or 2.4% from the December 31, 2012 balance of $588,417,000.  The increase in the investment portfolio was primarily due to an increase in corporate bonds, state and political subdivisions bonds and corporate bonds and U.S. government agencies, offset in part by a decrease in U.S. government mortgage-backed securities.

On a quarterly basis, the investment portfolio is reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment.  As of June 30, 2013, gross unrealized losses of $11,434,000, are considered to be temporary in nature due to the general economic conditions and other factors.  As a result of the Company’s favorable liquidity position, the Company does not have the intent to sell impaired securities and management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will hold these securities until recovery of their fair value to cost basis and avoid considering an impairment to be other-than-temporary.

39

Loan Portfolio

The loan portfolio, net of the allowance for loan losses of $7,819,000, totaled $506,139,000 as of June 30, 2013, a decrease of $3,987,000, or 0.8%, from the December 31, 2012 balance of $510,126,000.  The decrease in the loan portfolio is primarily due to a decrease in the agricultural operating, offset in part by an increase in the commercial real estate portfolio.

Deposits

Deposits totaled $1,000,457,000 as of June 30, 2013, a decrease of $4,276,000, or 0.4%, from the December 31, 2012 balance of $1,004,732,000.  The decrease in deposits occurred in demand deposit and certificate of deposit accounts, offset in part by increases in NOW, savings and money market accounts.   These decreases occurred in the retail types of deposit accounts, offset in part by increases in the commercial and public types of deposit accounts.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $30,629,000 as of June 30, 2013, an increase of $3,540,000, or 13.1%, from the December 31, 2012 balance of $27,089,000.  The increase is primarily due to increases in existing customer account balances from December 31, 2012.

FHLB Advances and Other Long-Term Borrowings

FHLB advances and other long-term borrowings totaled $34,576,000 and $34,611,000 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the decrease in FHLB advances and other borrowings are due to payments on FHLB advances amounting to $2,035,000, offset by proceeds on FHLB borrowings amounting to $2,000,000.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.  No material changes in the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements have occurred since December 31, 2012.

Asset Quality Review and Credit Risk Management

The Company’s credit risk is historically centered in the loan portfolio, which on June 30, 2013 totaled $506,139,000 compared to $510,126,000 as of December 31, 2012.  Net loans comprise 41.9% of total assets as of June 30, 2013.  The object in managing loan portfolio risk is to reduce the risk of loss resulting from a customer’s failure to perform according to the terms of a transaction and to quantify and manage credit risk on a portfolio basis.  The Company’s level of problem loans (consisting of non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more) as a percentage of total loans was 0.99% at June 30, 2013, as compared to 1.27% at December 31, 2012 and 1.56% at June 30, 2012.  The Company’s level of problem loans as a percentage of total loans at June 30, 2013 of 0.99% is lower than the Company’s peer group (352 bank holding companies with assets of $1 billion to $3 billion) of 2.01% as of March 31, 2013.

Impaired loans, net of specific reserves, totaled $4,771,000 as of June 30, 2013 and were lower than impaired loans of $5,912,000 as of December 31, 2012 and $6,719,000 as of June 30, 2012.  The decrease in impaired loans from December 31, 2012 is due primarily to payments on impaired loans during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

40

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payment of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  The Company applies its normal loan review procedures to identify loans that should be evaluated for impairment.

The Company had TDRs of $3,986,000 as of June 30, 2013, of which all were included in impaired loans and $3,796,000 were on nonaccrual status. The Company had TDRs of $5,105,000 as of December 31, 2012, all of which were included in impaired loans and $4,058,000 were on nonaccrual status.

TDRs are monitored and reported on a quarterly basis.  Certain TDRs are on nonaccrual status at the time of restructuring.  These borrowings are typically returned to accrual status after the following:  sustained repayment performance in accordance with the restructuring agreement for a reasonable period of at least six months; and, management is reasonably assured of future performance. If the TDR meets these performance criteria and the interest rate granted at the modification is equal to or greater than the rate that the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk, then the loan will return to performing status.

For TDRs that were on nonaccrual status before the modification, a specific reserve may already be recorded. In periods subsequent to modification, the Company will continue to evaluate all TDRs for possible impairment and, as necessary, recognizes impairment through the allowance. The Company had no charge-offs related to TDRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Loans past due 90 days or more are reviewed that are still accruing interest no less frequently than quarterly to determine if there is a strong reason that the credit should not be placed on non-accrual.  As of June 30, 2013, non-accrual loans totaled $5,028,000; loans past due 90 days and still accruing totaled $53,000.  This compares to non-accrual loans of $5,567,000 and no loans past due 90 days and still accruing as of December 31, 2012.  Other real estate owned totaled $8,989,000 as of June 30, 2013 and $9,911,000 as of December 31, 2012.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of outstanding loans as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was 1.52% and 1.50%, respectively. The allowance for loan losses totaled $7,819,000 and $7,773,000 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  Net charge-offs of loans totaled $28,000 and $400 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The allowance for loan losses is management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date.  Factors considered in establishing an appropriate allowance include: an assessment of the financial condition of the borrower, a realistic determination of value and adequacy of underlying collateral, the condition of the local economy and the condition of the specific industry of the borrower, an analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories and a review of delinquent and classified loans.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity management is the process by which the Company, through its Banks’ Asset and Liability Committees (ALCO), ensures that adequate liquid funds are available to meet its financial commitments on a timely basis, at a reasonable cost and within acceptable risk tolerances. These commitments include funding credit obligations to borrowers, funding of mortgage originations pending delivery to the secondary market, withdrawals by depositors, maintaining adequate collateral for pledging for public funds, trust deposits and borrowings, paying dividends to shareholders, payment of operating expenses, funding capital expenditures and maintaining deposit reserve requirements.

41

Liquidity is derived primarily from core deposit growth and retention; principal and interest payments on loans; principal and interest payments, sale, maturity and prepayment of securities available-for-sale; net cash provided from operations; and access to other funding sources. Other funding sources include federal funds purchased lines, FHLB advances and other capital market sources.

As of June 30, 2013, the level of liquidity and capital resources of the Company remain at a satisfactory level.  Management believes that the Company's liquidity sources will be sufficient to support its existing operations for the foreseeable future.

The liquidity and capital resources discussion will cover the following topics:

· Review of the Company’s Current Liquidity Sources

· Review of Statements of Cash Flows

· Company Only Cash Flows

· Review of Commitments for Capital Expenditures, Cash Flow Uncertainties and Known Trends in Liquidity and Cash Flows Needs

· Capital Resources

Review of the Company’s Current Liquidity Sources

Liquid assets of cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 totaled $55,838,000 and $79,444,000, respectively, and provide a level of liquidity.

Other sources of liquidity available to the Banks as of June 30, 2013 include outstanding lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, Iowa of $107,870,000, with $14,576,000 of outstanding FHLB advances at June 30, 2013.  Federal funds borrowing capacity at correspondent banks was $109,807,000, with no outstanding federal fund balances as of June 30, 2013.  The Company had securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $30,629,000 and long-term repurchase agreements of $20,000,000 as of June 30, 2013.

Total investments as of June 30, 2013 were $602,300,000 compared to $588,417,000 as of December 31, 2012.  These investments provide the Company with a significant amount of liquidity since all of the investments are classified as available-for-sale as of June 30, 2013.

The investment portfolio serves an important role in the overall context of balance sheet management in terms of balancing capital utilization and liquidity. The decision to purchase or sell securities is based upon the current assessment of economic and financial conditions, including the interest rate environment, liquidity and credit considerations. The portfolio’s scheduled maturities represent a significant source of liquidity.

Review of Statements of Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $12,404,000 compared to the $9,882,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The increase of $2,522,000 in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a decrease in other assets related to the repayment of the unused prepaid FDIC insurance assessment at June 30, 2013.

42

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $24,240,000 and compares to $24,469,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease of $229,000 in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the changes in net loan activity, changes in securities available-for-sale, and interest bearing deposits in financial institutions, offset in part by the cash acquired, net of cash paid, for acquired bank offices.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $(3,540,000) compared to $14,367,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The change of $17,907,000 in net cash (used in) financing activities was primarily due to changes in deposits, offset in part by changes in securities sold under agreements to repurchase.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company did not have any external debt financing, off-balance sheet financing arrangements, or derivative instruments linked to its stock.

Company Only Cash Flows

The Company’s liquidity on an unconsolidated basis is heavily dependent upon dividends paid to the Company by the Banks. The Company requires adequate liquidity to pay its expenses and pay stockholder dividends. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, dividends paid by the Banks to the Company amounted to $3,600,000 compared to $5,164,000 for the same period in 2012.  Various federal and state statutory provisions limit the amounts of dividends banking subsidiaries are permitted to pay to their holding companies without regulatory approval.  Federal Reserve policy further limits the circumstances under which bank holding companies may declare dividends. For example, a bank holding company should not continue its existing rate of cash dividends on its common stock unless its net income is sufficient to fully fund each dividend and its prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with its capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. In addition, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have issued policy statements, which provide that insured banks and bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings.  Federal and state banking regulators may also restrict the payment of dividends by order.  The quarterly dividend declared by the Company increased to $0.16 per share in 2013 from $0.15 per share in 2012.

The Company, on an unconsolidated basis, has interest bearing deposits and marketable investment securities totaling $8,111,000 as of June 30, 2013 that are presently available to provide additional liquidity to the Banks.

Review of Commitments for Capital Expenditures, Cash Flow Uncertainties and Known Trends in Liquidity and Cash Flows Needs

No material capital expenditures or material changes in the capital resource mix are anticipated at this time.  The primary cash flow uncertainty would be a sudden decline in deposits causing the Banks to liquidate securities.  Historically, the Banks have maintained an adequate level of short-term marketable investments to fund the temporary declines in deposit balances.  There are no known trends in liquidity and cash flow needs as of June 30, 2013 that are of concern to management.

Capital Resources

The Company’s total stockholders’ equity as of June 30, 2013 totaled $136,385,000 and was lower than the $144,736,000 recorded as of December 31, 2012.  The decrease in stockholders’ equity was primarily the result of lower fair value caused by lower market interest rates in the securities available-for-sale portfolio as reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive (loss).  At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, stockholders’ equity as a percentage of total assets was 11.30% and 11.89%, respectively.  The capital levels of the Company exceed applicable regulatory guidelines as of June 30, 2013.

43

Forward-Looking Statements and Business Risks

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides the Company with the opportunity to make cautionary statements regarding forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report, including forward-looking statements concerning the Company’s future financial performance and asset quality.  Any forward-looking statement contained in this Quarterly Report is based on management’s current beliefs, assumptions and expectations of the Company’s future performance, taking into account all information currently available to management.  These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to management.  If a change occurs, the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, asset quality, plans and objectives may vary materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements.  The risks and uncertainties that may affect the actual results of the Company include, but are not limited to, the following:  economic conditions, particularly in the concentrated geographic area in which the Company and its affiliate banks operate; competitive products and pricing available in the marketplace; changes in credit and other risks posed by the Company’s loan and investment portfolios, including declines in commercial or residential real estate values or changes in the allowance for loan losses dictated by new market conditions or regulatory requirements; fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. government; changes in governmental regulations affecting financial institutions (including regulatory fees and capital requirements); changes in prevailing interest rates; credit risk management and asset/liability management; the financial and securities markets; the availability of and cost associated with sources of liquidity; and other risks and uncertainties inherent in the Company’s business, including those discussed under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements and Business Risks” in the Company’s Annual Report.  Management intends to identify forward-looking statements when using words such as “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “should” or similar expressions.  Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements.  The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update such forward-looking statements to reflect current events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company's market risk is comprised primarily of interest rate risk arising from its core banking activities of lending and deposit taking.  Interest rate risk results from the changes in market interest rates which may adversely affect the Company's net interest income.  Management continually develops and applies strategies to mitigate this risk.  Management does not believe that the Company's primary market risk exposure and how it has been managed year-to-date in 2013 changed significantly when compared to 2012.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).  Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

44

PART II.OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Not applicable

Item 1.A. Risk Factors

None.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In November, 2012, the Company approved a Stock Repurchase Plan which provided for the repurchase of up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  As of June 30, 2013, there were 100,000 shares remaining to be purchased under the plan.

The following table provides information with respect to purchase made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchases” (as defined in rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of the Company’s common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2013.

					Total
					Number		Maximum
					of Shares		Number of
					Purchased as		Shares that
	Total				Part of		May Yet Be
	Number		Average		Publicly		Purchased
	of Shares		Price Paid		Announced		Under
Period	Purchased		Per Share		Plans		The Plan
April 1, 2013 to April 30, 2013		-	$	-		-		100,000
May 1, 2013 to May 31, 2013		-	$	-		-		100,000
June 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013		-	$	-		-		100,000
Total		-				-

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

45

Item 5. Other information

Not applicable

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

101.INS XBRL Instance Document (1)

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (1)

(1)These interactive date files shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act o f1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act o f1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

46

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION
DATE: August 9, 2013	By:  /s/ Thomas H. Pohlman
	Thomas H. Pohlman, Chief Executive Officer and President
	By:  /s/ John P. Nelson
	John P. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President

47

EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document (1)
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (1)

(1)These interactive date files shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act o f1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

48