UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-33203
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
| 43-1930755 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
| (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
800 Poyntz Avenue, Manhattan, Kansas 66502
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(785) 565-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: As of November 2, 2005, the Registrant had outstanding 2,122,679 shares of its common stock, $0.01 par value per share.
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Table of Contents
PART I |
| |
|
|
|
Item 1. | Financial Statements and Related Notes |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
| |
| ||
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
|
|
|
2
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
| September 30, |
| December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 7,834,688 |
| $ | 7,845,438 |
| ||
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value |
| 145,975,496 |
| 133,604,335 |
| ||||
Loans, net |
| 269,440,338 |
| 277,413,963 |
| ||||
Loans held for sale |
| 1,538,499 |
| 846,003 |
| ||||
Premises and equipment, net |
| 7,685,215 |
| 5,864,258 |
| ||||
Goodwill |
| 7,651,892 |
| 7,651,892 |
| ||||
Other intangible assets, net |
| 2,550,195 |
| 1,339,832 |
| ||||
Accrued interest and other assets |
| 8,560,117 |
| 7,525,173 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total assets |
| $ | 451,236,440 |
| $ | 442,090,894 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Deposits |
| $ | 329,012,713 |
| $ | 302,867,721 |
| ||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
| 59,252,135 |
| 81,053,321 |
| ||||
Other borrowings |
| 14,598,000 |
| 13,518,000 |
| ||||
Accrued expenses, taxes and other liabilities |
| 4,471,246 |
| 2,482,875 |
| ||||
Total liabilities |
| 407,334,094 |
| 399,921,917 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock, $0.01 par, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 2,244,327 and 2,232,218 shares issued, respectively |
| 22,443 |
| 22,322 |
| ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 20,279,425 |
| 19,969,551 |
| ||||
Retained earnings |
| 27,136,671 |
| 25,228,826 |
| ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income |
| (329,839 | ) | 154,101 |
| ||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 121,648 and 121,630 shares, respectively |
| (3,206,354 | ) | (3,205,823 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity |
| 43,902,346 |
| 42,168,977 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
| $ | 451,236,440 |
| $ | 442,090,894 |
| ||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loans |
| $ | 4,431,829 |
| $ | 4,181,628 |
|
Investment securities |
| 1,246,246 |
| 1,129,283 |
| ||
Other |
| 38,958 |
| 14,093 |
| ||
Total interest income |
| 5,717,033 |
| 5,325,004 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deposits |
| 1,450,819 |
| 1,006,231 |
| ||
Borrowed funds |
| 897,937 |
| 905,624 |
| ||
Total interest expense |
| 2,348,756 |
| 1,911,855 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net interest income |
| 3,368,277 |
| 3,413,149 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for loan losses |
| 100,000 |
| 130,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
| 3,268,277 |
| 3,283,149 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fees and service charges |
| 906,294 |
| 993,549 |
| ||
Gains on sale of loans |
| 162,759 |
| 174,515 |
| ||
Gains on repayments of FHLB borrowings |
| 406,572 |
| — |
| ||
Other |
| 108,752 |
| 210,647 |
| ||
Total non-interest income |
| 1,584,377 |
| 1,378,711 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Compensation and benefits |
| 1,567,125 |
| 1,577,400 |
| ||
Occupancy and equipment |
| 504,612 |
| 505,423 |
| ||
Data processing |
| 130,490 |
| 100,218 |
| ||
Amortization of intangibles |
| 116,669 |
| 101,416 |
| ||
Professional fees |
| 63,803 |
| 69,523 |
| ||
Advertising |
| 110,680 |
| 44,248 |
| ||
Other |
| 581,642 |
| 584,245 |
| ||
Total non-interest expense |
| 3,075,021 |
| 2,982,473 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings before income taxes |
| 1,777,633 |
| 1,679,387 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income tax expense |
| 544,377 |
| 543,456 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings |
| $ | 1,233,256 |
| $ | 1,135,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
| $ | 0.58 |
| $ | 0.52 |
|
Diluted |
| $ | 0.58 |
| $ | 0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Dividends per share |
| $ | 0.17 |
| $ | 0.1619 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loans |
| $ | 12,822,321 |
| $ | 11,539,772 |
|
Investment securities |
| 3,404,758 |
| 3,145,546 |
| ||
Other |
| 92,203 |
| 33,194 |
| ||
Total interest income |
| 16,319,282 |
| 14,718,512 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deposits |
| 3,966,316 |
| 2,974,800 |
| ||
Borrowed funds |
| 2,653,547 |
| 2,135,293 |
| ||
Total interest expense |
| 6,619,863 |
| 5,110,093 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net interest income |
| 9,699,419 |
| 9,608,419 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for loan losses |
| 325,000 |
| 310,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
| 9,374,419 |
| 9,298,419 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fees and service charges |
| 2,617,168 |
| 2,457,706 |
| ||
Gains on sale of loans |
| 534,153 |
| 632,545 |
| ||
Gains on repayments of FHLB borrowings |
| 406,572 |
| - |
| ||
Gains on sale of investments |
| 40,540 |
| 129,790 |
| ||
Other |
| 323,379 |
| 399,663 |
| ||
Total non-interest income |
| 3,921,812 |
| 3,619,704 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Compensation and benefits |
| 4,529,987 |
| 4,310,278 |
| ||
Occupancy and equipment |
| 1,478,954 |
| 1,360,221 |
| ||
Data Processing |
| 400,723 |
| 309,583 |
| ||
Amortization of intangibles |
| 299,631 |
| 284,782 |
| ||
Professional fees |
| 248,859 |
| 230,439 |
| ||
Advertising |
| 292,527 |
| 135,486 |
| ||
Other |
| 1,733,511 |
| 1,609,466 |
| ||
Total non-interest expense |
| 8,984,192 |
| 8,240,255 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings before income taxes |
| 4,312,039 |
| 4,677,868 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income tax expense |
| 1,325,743 |
| 1,518,389 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings |
| $ | 2,986,296 |
| $ | 3,159,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
| $ | 1.41 |
| $ | 1.45 |
|
Diluted |
| $ | 1.40 |
| $ | 1.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Dividends per share |
| $ | 0.51 |
| $ | 0.49 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| $ | 4,524,534 |
| $ | 3,998,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net decrease in loans |
| 6,929,364 |
| 1,298,559 |
| ||
Maturities and prepayments of investments |
| 35,013,396 |
| 24,699,893 |
| ||
Purchase of investment securities |
| (48,935,454 | ) | (5,259,465 | ) | ||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities |
| 140,540 |
| 241,874 |
| ||
Proceeds from sale of premises, equipment, and foreclosed assets |
| 387,132 |
| 1,014,874 |
| ||
Net cash received in acquisition of Great Bend branches |
| 30,410,720 |
| — |
| ||
Net cash paid in First Kansas acquisition |
| — |
| (8,788,732 | ) | ||
Net cash paid in Beloit and Phillipsburg branch sales |
| — |
| (8,714,311 | ) | ||
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
| (1,020,113 | ) | (904,264 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
| 22,925,585 |
| 3,588,428 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net decrease in deposits |
| (7,127,815 | ) | (6,008,815 | ) | ||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
| 91,300,000 |
| 28,600,000 |
| ||
Federal Home Loan Bank repayments |
| (111,867,504 | ) | (30,827,576 | ) | ||
Proceeds from other borrowings |
| 3,450,000 |
| 8,585,000 |
| ||
Repayments on other borrowings |
| (2,370,000 | ) | (4,045,000 | ) | ||
Purchase of 18 and 65,910 shares of treasury stock |
| (531 | ) | (1,973,553 | ) | ||
Issuance of 12,109 and 22,628 shares of common stock under stock option plan |
| 196,088 |
| 195,506 |
| ||
Net tax benefit related to stock option plans |
| 37,344 |
| 126,954 |
| ||
Payment of dividends |
| (1,078,451 | ) | (1,065,142 | ) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (27,460,869 | ) | (6,412,626 | ) | ||
Net (decrease)/increase in cash |
| (10,750 | ) | 1,174,333 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| 7,845,438 |
| 7,708,115 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
| $ | 7,834,688 |
| $ | 8,882,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid during period for interest |
| $ | 6,086,000 |
| $ | 4,466,000 |
|
Cash paid during period for taxes |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Transfer of loans to real estate owned |
| $ | 534,000 |
| $ | 916,000 |
|
Acquisition of Great Bend branches: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fair value of liabilities assumed |
| $ | 33,299,000 |
| $ | — |
|
Fair value of assets acquired |
| $ | 2,888,000 |
| $ | — |
|
First Kansas acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fair value of liabilities assumed |
| $ | — |
| $ | 140,619,000 |
|
Fair value of assets acquired, including goodwill |
| $ | — |
| $ | 149,408,000 |
|
Beloit and Phillipsburg branch sales: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fair value of liabilities transferred |
| $ | — |
| $ | (12,489,000 | ) |
Fair value of assets sold |
| $ | — |
| $ | (3,774,000 | ) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Interim Financial Statements
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiary have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. To the extent that information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements are contained in or consistent with the consolidated audited financial statements incorporated by reference in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, such information and footnotes have not been duplicated herein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial statements have been reflected herein. The December 31, 2004, condensed consolidated balance sheet has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that date. The results of the interim periods ended September 30, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2005.
2. Acquisition of UMB Branches in Great Bend
On August 19, 2005, the Company acquired two branch locations in Great Bend, Kansas from UMB Financial Corporation. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the Company purchased approximately $33.3 million in deposits along with the branch premises and equipment for cash. The Company recorded a core deposit intangible of $1.4 million which is not deductible for tax purposes.
3. Stock Based Compensation
The Company utilizes the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123 establishes a fair-value method of accounting for employee stock options or similar equity instruments. The fair value of stock-based awards to employees is calculated through the use of option pricing models, even though such models were developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly differ from the Company’s stock option awards. These models also require subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of its stock options. The fair value is recognized as compensation expense over the option vesting period, typically five years.
In December 2004, The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (revised), Shared-Based Payment. The revision disallows the expense recognition alternatives permitted in the original statement and requires entities to recognize stock-based compensation
7
cost in their statements of earnings. The revision contains additional guidance in several areas including award modifications and forfeitures, measuring fair value, classifying an award as equity or as a liability, and attributing compensation cost to reporting periods. It also contains additional disclosure requirements. The Company does not expect that adoption of the revised Statement on January 1, 2006, will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
4. Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share have been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share include the effect of all potential common shares outstanding during each period. Earnings and dividends per share for all periods presented have been adjusted to give effect to the 5% stock dividend paid by the Company in December 2004.
The shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted income per share are shown below:
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic) |
| 2,122,570 |
| 2,172,818 |
| 2,115,199 |
| 2,185,725 |
|
Dilutive stock options |
| 7,548 |
| 11,711 |
| 10,292 |
| 14,733 |
|
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
| 2,130,118 |
| 2,184,529 |
| 2,125,491 |
| 2,200,458 |
|
5. Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
The Company’s other comprehensive income/(loss) consists of the unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and an interest rate swap as shown below.
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||||||
Net earnings |
| $ | 1,233,256 |
| $ | 1,135,931 |
| $ | 2,986,296 |
| $ | 3,159,479 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Unrealized holding (gains)/losses |
| (697,479 | ) | 947,140 |
| (803,009 | ) | (308,815 | ) | ||||||
Less — reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income |
| — |
| — |
| 40,540 |
| 129,790 |
| ||||||
Net unrealized losses/(gains) on securities |
| (697,479 | ) | 947,140 |
| (843,549 | ) | (438,605 | ) | ||||||
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap |
| 54,000 |
| 11,000 |
| 63,000 |
| 11,000 |
| ||||||
Income (tax expense)/benefit |
| (244,522 | ) | 364,094 |
| (296,609 | ) | (162,490 | ) | ||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| $ | 834,299 |
| $ | 1,729,977 |
| $ | 2,502,356 |
| $ | 2,894,364 |
| ||
8
6. Other Intangible Assets
The following table presents information about the Company’s other intangible assets, which are being amortized in accordance with SFAS No. 142:
|
| September 30, 2005 |
| December 31, 2004 |
| ||||||||
|
| Gross |
| Accumulated |
| Gross |
| Accumulated |
| ||||
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Core deposit premium |
| $ | 2,818,601 |
| $ | (664,677 | ) | $ | 1,385,000 |
| $ | (491,501 | ) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
| 775,400 |
| (379,129 | ) | 766,892 |
| (320,559 | ) | ||||
Total |
| $ | 3,594,001 |
| $ | (1,043,806 | ) | $ | 2,151,892 |
| $ | (812,060 | ) |
Aggregate amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2005, and September 30, 2004, was $117,000 and $101,000, respectively. Aggregate amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, and September 30, 2004, was $300,000 and $285,000, respectively. The following depicts estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31:
Year |
| Amount |
| |
2005 |
| $ | 464,000 |
|
2006 |
| 604,000 |
| |
2007 |
| 459,000 |
| |
2008 |
| 322,000 |
| |
2009 |
| 271,000 |
| |
7. Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings
On August 22, 2005, the Company repaid FHLB advances with $10.0 million in outstanding principal acquired in the First Kansas acquisition prior to their scheduled maturities. The repayment resulted in $407,000 of gains on the repayment of borrowings as an adjustment to the fair value adjustment recorded on the date of acquisition from First Kansas. On September 26, 2005, the Company repaid another $5.0 million FHLB advance according to its scheduled maturity, resulting in no gain or loss.
8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (SOP) 03-03, “Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer”. SOP 03-03 addresses the accounting for acquired loans that show evidence of having deteriorated in terms of credit quality since their origination. SOP 03-03 requires acquired loans to be recorded at their fair value, defined as the present value of future cash flows. SOP 03-03 prohibits the carryover of an allowance for loan loss on certain acquired loans, as credit losses are considered in the future cash flows assessment. SOP 03-03 is effective for loans that are acquired in fiscal years
9
beginning after December 15, 2004. The Company has evaluated the applicability of this SOP for all prospective loans and currently does not expect this Statement to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements associated with any pending transactions.
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”. The Statement changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Instead of including the cumulative effect of the change in net income, a change in accounting principle must be applied retrospectively to prior periods’ financial statements. In addition, the Statement gives specific guidance when it is impracticable to determine the effects of the change in accounting principle. The Statement carries forward previously issued guidance on reporting changes in accounting estimate and errors in previously issued financial statements. For calendar year companies, the Statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made after January 1, 2006. The Company does not expect that adoption of the Statement will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
9. Other Events
The Company has entered into an agreement to construct a new branch location in Topeka, Kansas which is anticipated to be completed in mid 2006.
On September 7, 2005, the Company announced the acquisition of First Manhattan Bancorporation (First Manhattan), a single thrift holding company based in Manhattan, Kansas. At September 30, 2005, First Manhattan had total assets of $132.4 million, including net loans and deposits of $110.6 million and $110.8 million, respectively. The Company will pay approximately $12.9 million in cash for the issued and outstanding shares of First Manhattan common stock, subject to adjustment for certain circumstances. The acquisition, which is subject to regulatory approval, is expected to close in late 2005 or early 2006.
10
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview. Landmark Bancorp, Inc. is a one-bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and is engaged in the banking business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Landmark National Bank. Landmark Bancorp is listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market National Market System under the symbol “LARK”. Landmark National Bank is dedicated to providing quality financial and banking services to its local communities. Landmark National Bank originates commercial real estate and non-real estate loans, one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, multi-family residential mortgage loans, and home equity loans.
On August 19, 2005, we acquired two branch locations in Great Bend, Kansas from UMB Financial Corporation. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, we acquired approximately $33.3 million in deposits along with the branch premises and equipment for cash. We recorded a core deposit intangible of $1.4 million which is being amortized on an accelerated basis over ten years.
On April 1, 2004, we completed the cash acquisition of First Kansas Financial Corporation (“First Kansas”), which had total assets of approximately $150 million, including loans and deposits of $74 million and $84 million, respectively. First Kansas had branches in Osawatomie, Paola, Louisburg, Fort Scott, Beloit, and Phillipsburg, Kansas. Our acquisition of First Kansas was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The cost in excess of the tangible and identifiable intangible net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. We recorded a core deposit intangible of $710,000, which is being amortized on an accelerated basis over ten years, and goodwill attributable to the acquisition of First Kansas of $6.1 million, none of which is deductible for tax purposes. The operating results presented for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, include the accounts and results of First Kansas while the corresponding nine months ended September 30, 2004, include First Kansas beginning April 1, 2004.
During the third quarter of 2004, we sold our newly acquired Beloit and Phillipsburg branches. Upon consummation of the transactions, we sold approximately $7.7 million in deposits and approximately $2.4 million in loans and premises and equipment associated with the Beloit branch and approximately $4.7 million in deposits and approximately $846,000 in loans and premises and equipment related to the Phillipsburg branch. The net proceeds received from the buyers of these branches were recorded as a reduction of goodwill of approximately $466,000 and other intangible assets of approximately $105,000.
Critical accounting policies are those which are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require our management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting policies relate to the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of investment securities, and accounting for income taxes, all of which involve significant judgment by our management.
11
We perform periodic and systematic detailed reviews of our lending portfolio to assess overall collectability. The level of the allowance for loan losses reflects our estimate of the collectability of the loan portfolio. While these estimates are based on substantive methods for determining allowance requirements, nevertheless, actual outcomes may differ significantly from estimated results. Additional explanation of the methodologies used in establishing this reserve is provided in the “Asset Quality and Distribution” section.
We report our investment securities at estimated fair values based on readily ascertainable values which are obtained from independent sources. Our management performs periodic reviews of the investment securities to determine if any investment securities have declined in value which might be considered other than temporary. Although we believe that our estimates of the fair values of investment securities to be reasonable, economic and market factors may affect the amounts that will ultimately be realized from these investments.
The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences, including the effects of IRS examinations and examinations by other state agencies, could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.
Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors that influence interest rates, loan demand and deposit flows. In addition, we are subject to interest rate risk to the degree that our interest-earning assets mature or reprice at different times, or at different speeds, than our interest-bearing liabilities. Our results of operations are also affected by non-interest income, such as service charges, loan fees and gains and losses from the sale of newly originated loans and investments. Our principal operating expenses, aside from interest expense, consist of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy costs, federal deposit insurance costs, data processing expenses and provision for loan losses.
We are significantly impacted by prevailing economic conditions including federal monetary and fiscal policies and federal regulations of financial institutions. Deposit balances are influenced by numerous factors such as competing personal investments, the level of personal income and the personal rate of savings within our market areas. Factors influencing lending activities include the demand for housing and the interest rate pricing competition from other lending institutions.
Summary of Results. Net earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2005, increased $97,000, or 8.6%, to $1.2 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2004. This improvement in net earnings was generally attributable to increased non-interest income primarily associated with gains associated with the repayment of FHLB borrowings.
12
Net earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, decreased $173,000, or 5.5%, to $3.0 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This decline in net earnings was generally attributable to reduced gains on sale of loans and investments and increased non-interest expense which was partially offset by the gains on repayment of FHLB borrowings.
The three months ended September 30, 2005 resulted in diluted earnings per share of $0.58 compared to $0.52 for the same period in 2004. Return on average assets was 1.09% for the period compared to 0.96% for the same period in 2004. Return on average stockholders’ equity was 11.33% for the period compared to 10.68% for the same period in 2004.
The nine months ended September 30, 2005 resulted in diluted earnings per share of $1.40 compared to $1.44 for the same period in 2004. Return on average assets was 0.89% for the period compared to 0.99% for the same period in 2004. Return on average stockholders’ equity was 9.33% for the period compared to 9.91% for the same period in 2004.
We continued our stock repurchase program during the first nine months of 2005, resulting in the repurchase of an additional 18 shares. Under the current stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors, as of September 30, 2005, we can repurchase an additional 77,036 shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2005, we held 121,648 shares as treasury stock at an average cost per share of $26.36.
The following table summarizes net earnings and key performance measures for the periods presented.
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||||
Net earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per share |
| $ | 0.58 |
| $ | 0.52 |
| $ | 1.41 |
| $ | 1.45 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
| $ | 0.58 |
| $ | 0.52 |
| $ | 1.40 |
| $ | 1.44 |
|
Earnings ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Return on average assets (1) |
| 1.09 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.89 | % | 0.99 | % | ||||
Return on average equity (1) |
| 11.33 | % | 10.68 | % | 9.33 | % | 9.91 | % | ||||
Dividend payout ratio |
| 29.31 | % | 30.91 | % | 36.17 | % | 33.77 | % | ||||
Net interest margin (1) |
| 3.20 | % | 3.09 | % | 3.12 | % | 3.20 | % |
(1) The ratio has been annualized and is not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.
Interest Income. Interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2005, increased $392,000, or 7.4%, to $5.7 million from $5.3 million in the same period of 2004, resulting from increased interest income on investment securities and loans. Average loans for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 decreased to $277.2 million from $291.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004. The decrease in average loans was primarily due to the
13
continued payoffs and refinancings in our fixed-rate residential loan portfolio, of which the vast majority of originations are being sold to the secondary market at a faster pace than we have been able to grow our commercial lending portfolios. Despite the decrease in average loans, interest income on loans increased $250,000, or 6.0%, to $4.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to an upward adjustment of interest rates on variable rate loans. Average investment securities decreased from $146.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, to $144.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Despite the decline in average assets for the comparable periods, interest income on investment securities increased $117,000, or 10.4%, to $1.2 million for the third quarter of 2005, as compared to the same period of 2004, due to the increase in interest rates which allowed the yields on our investments purchased in 2005 to be higher than the yields on our maturing investments.
Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 increased $1.6 million, or 10.9%, to $16.3 million from $14.7 million in the same period of 2004. This increase was primarily the result of a higher level of interest earning assets obtained in the First Kansas acquisition in addition to the rise in interest rates during the past twelve months. Average loans for the first nine months of 2005 were $278.6 million as compared to $264.4 million for the first nine months of 2004. Interest income on loans increased $1.3 million, or 11.1%, to $12.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Average investment securities increased from $134.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, to $136.7 million for the same period of 2005, primarily as a result of the First Kansas acquisition in April 2004. Interest income on investment securities increased $259,000, or 8.2%, to $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 due to the increase in interest rates which allowed the yields on our investments purchased in 2005 to be higher than the yields on our maturing investments.
Interest Expense. Interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2005, increased $437,000, or 22.9%, as compared to the same period of 2004. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, interest expense on deposits increased $445,000, or 44.2%. The increase in interest expense on deposits resulted from the addition of approximately $33.3 million in deposits that we acquired through the acquisition of two UMB branches in August 2005 and from the rise in interest rates and the associated repricing of deposits as they matured. Interest expense on borrowings decreased $8,000, or 0.9%. The decrease in interest expense on borrowings resulted primarily from the repayment of $10.0 million of FHLB advances prior to their scheduled maturities in August 2005, in addition to scheduled principal payments.
Interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, increased $1.5 million, or 29.5%, as compared to the same period of 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, interest expense on deposits increased $992,000, or 33.3%. The increase in interest expense on deposits resulted primarily from the rise in interest rates beginning in June 2004 and the repricing of maturing deposits at these higher rates. Interest expense on borrowings increased $518,000, or 24.3%. The increase in interest expense on borrowings resulted primarily from additional advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of approximately $56.4 million which we assumed through the acquisition of First Kansas in April 2004 and the $7.0 million that we borrowed in April 2004 to consummate the acquisition of First Kansas.
14
Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2005, totaled $3.4 million and remained relatively flat, decreasing only 1.3%, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2004. This decrease resulted primarily from a lower level of average interest earning assets. Average earning assets decreased during the third quarter of 2005, decreasing to $422.2 million from $439.7 million for the third quarter of 2004. The net interest margin on earning assets was 3.20% for the third quarter of 2005, up from 3.09% during the third quarter of 2004.
Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, totaled $9.7 million, a 1.0% increase, as compared to $9.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, due primarily to a higher level of interest earning assets obtained through the First Kansas acquisition in April 2004. Average earning assets increased during the first nine months of 2005 to $416.3 million from $401.1 million for the same period of 2004. The net interest margin on earning assets was 3.12% for the first nine months of 2005, down from 3.20% during the first nine months of 2004. The decline in our net interest margin was primarily the result of the increased FHLB advances acquired with the First Kansas acquisition which are priced relatively higher than deposit rates. Additionally, the residential mortgage loans acquired from First Kansas are also at rates that are relatively lower than the average of our loan portfolio prior to the acquisition. Also contributing to the decline in the net interest margin was a continued reduction in loans arising from payoffs and refinancings in the one-to-four family residential loan portfolio exceeding our ability to generate new commercial and consumer loans. We believe the increase in Federal Funds rates over the past year by the Federal Open Market Committee will have a positive impact on our net interest margin during the remainder of 2005 as our interest rates on earning assets reprice to higher rates and at a faster rate than our liabilities reprice.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2005, was $100,000, compared to a provision of $130,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2004. Our continuous review of the loan portfolio prompted a decrease in our provision primarily as a result of improvement in the asset quality of the commercial loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, was $325,000 compared to a provision of $310,000 for the same period in 2004. One measure of the adequacy of the allowance for estimated losses on loans is the ratio of the allowance to the total loan portfolio. At September 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the allowance for loan losses was $3.1 million and $2.9 million, or 1.1% and 1.0%, respectively, of gross loans outstanding.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $206,000, or 14.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2005, to $1.6 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2004. The increase in non-interest income reflected a $407,000 gain on the repayment of $10.0 million of FHLB advances prior to their scheduled maturities, which was partially offset by decreased fees and service charges of $87,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004. Also offsetting the increase in non-interest income was a decline of 6.7% in the gains on sale of loans from $175,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, to $163,000 for the same period of 2005.
15
Non-interest income increased $302,000, or 8.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, to $3.9 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in non-interest income reflected a $407,000 gain on the repayment of $10.0 million of FHLB advances. Also contributing to this increase was increased fees and service charges of $159,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to the same period of 2004, relating primarily to increased deposit service charges as a result of the First Kansas acquisition in April 2004. Partially offsetting these increases to non-interest income was a 15.6% decline in the gains on sale of loans from $633,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, to $534,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. A decrease of $89,000 in gains on sale of investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to the same period of 2004, also offset the overall increase in non-interest income.
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||||
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Fees and service charges |
| $ | 906,294 |
| $ | 993,549 |
| $ | 2,617,168 |
| $ | 2,457,706 |
|
Gains on sales of loans |
| 162,759 |
| 174,515 |
| 534,153 |
| 632,545 |
| ||||
Gains on repayment of FHLB borrowings |
| 406,572 |
| — |
| 406,572 |
| — |
| ||||
Gains on sale of investments |
| — |
| — |
| 40,540 |
| 129,790 |
| ||||
Other |
| 108,752 |
| 210,647 |
| 323,379 |
| 399,663 |
| ||||
Total non-interest income |
| $ | 1,584,377 |
| $ | 1,378,711 |
| $ | 3,921,812 |
| $ | 3,619,704 |
|
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $93,000, or 3.1%, to $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2004. Increases of $66,000 in advertising expense and $30,000 in data processing expense for the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004 were offset by decreases of $26,000 in stationery, printing and office supplies.
Non-interest expense increased $744,000, or 9.0%, to $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The increase in non-interest expense for the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004 resulted primarily from compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment and data processing expenses associated with the operations of the branches acquired from First Kansas. In addition, advertising expense increased $157,000 for this nine month period related to the advertising initiative that was implemented in early 2004. Offsetting these increases in non-interest expense was an $18,000 decrease in stationery, printing and office supplies for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
16
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||||
|
| September 30, |
| September 30, |
| ||||||||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||||||
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Compensation and benefits |
| $ | 1,567,125 |
| $ | 1,577,400 |
| $ | 4,529,987 |
| $ | 4,310,278 |
| ||
Occupancy and equipment |
| 504,612 |
| 505,423 |
| 1,478,954 |
| 1,360,221 |
| ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
| 116,669 |
| 101,416 |
| 299,631 |
| 284,782 |
| ||||||
Professional fees |
| 63,803 |
| 69,523 |
| 248,859 |
| 230,439 |
| ||||||
Data processing |
| 130,490 |
| 100,218 |
| 400,723 |
| 309,583 |
| ||||||
Advertising |
| 110,680 |
| 44,248 |
| 292,527 |
| 135,486 |
| ||||||
Other |
| 581,642 |
| 584,245 |
| 1,733,511 |
| 1,609,466 |
| ||||||
Total non-interest expense |
| $ | 3,075,021 |
| $ | 2,982,473 |
| $ | 8,984,192 |
| $ | 8,240,255 |
| ||
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense remained relatively flat, increasing only $1,000, or 0.2%, from $543,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, to $544,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The slight increase in income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2005, resulted primarily from a slight increase in taxable income for the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2005 decreased slightly to 30.6% as compared to 32.4% for the third quarter of 2004 as a result of an increase in non-taxable investments.
Income tax expense decreased $193,000, or 12.7%, from $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, resulted primarily from a decrease in taxable income. In addition, the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, decreased to 30.7% as compared to 32.5% for the same period of 2004 as a result of an increase in non-taxable investments and the utilization of investment tax credits.
Asset Quality and Distribution. Total assets increased to $451.2 million at September 30, 2005, compared to $442.1 million at December 31, 2004. Our primary ongoing sources of funds are deposits, proceeds from principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities and proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, competition, and the restructuring of the financial services industry.
Net loans, excluding loans held for sale, decreased to $269.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This decline was primarily the result of refinancings and paydowns in our residential mortgage portfolio. Our loan portfolio composition continues to diversify as a result of paydowns and our plan to continue expansion of commercial lending activities. This is evidenced by our one-to-four family residential loans comprising 46.8% and 43.6% of totals loans as of December 31, 2004, and September 30, 2005, respectively.
17
Our primary investing activities are the origination of mortgage, consumer, and commercial loans and the purchase of investment and mortgage-backed securities. Generally, we originate fixed-rate, residential mortgage loans with maturities in excess of ten years for sale in the secondary market. We do not originate and warehouse these fixed-rate residential loans for resale in order to speculate on interest rates.
The allowance for losses on loans is established through a provision for losses on loans based on our evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of its loan activity. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans with respect to which full collectibility may not be reasonably assured, considers the fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical loan loss experience, level of classified loans and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an adequate allowance for losses on loans.
A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
| $ | 2,893,603 |
| |
Provision for loan losses |
| 325,000 |
| ||
Charge-offs |
| (151,642 | ) | ||
Recoveries |
| 51,161 |
| ||
Balance at September 30, 2005 |
| $ | 3,118,122 |
| |
We believe that the quality of the loan portfolio continues to be strong as evidenced by our low levels of past due and non-accrual loans which increased slightly, however, remain relatively low overall. As of September 30, 2005, loans with a balance of $1.5 million were on non-accrual status, or 0.54% of total loans, compared to a balance of $1.1 million loans on non-accrual status, or 0.41% of total loans, as of December 31, 2004. In addition, the ratio of non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets increased from 0.36% as of December 31, 2004, to 0.48% as of September 30, 2005. While the non-accrual loans have increased, the majority of the increase occurred in the one-to-four family residential loan portfolio. Residential home loans comprised 95.9% of the $1.5 million non-accrual balance at September 30, 2005. These loans have been underwritten according to our residential lending policies and are well secured by real estate collateral, and in many instances, private mortgage insurance or government guarantees. We have historically incurred minimal losses on mortgage loans based upon collateral values and underlying insurance or guarantees. We are aggressively pursuing collection activity of these loans which should enable the collection of principal.
Management believes that there are numerous indications of emerging strength in the economy, including the Federal Open Market Committee raising the target for the Federal Funds rate by 250 basis points since the June 30, 2004 meeting. Even though there are numerous indications of emerging strength, it is not certain that this strength is sustainable. We believe that we use the best information available to determine the allowance for losses on loans, unforeseen market conditions could result in adjustment to the allowance for losses on loans. In addition, net earnings could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in establishing the allowance for losses on loans.
18
Liability Distribution. Total deposits increased $26.1 million to $329.0 million at September 30, 2005, from $302.9 million at December 31, 2004. The amount of deposits acquired in the August 2005 acquisition of the two UMB branches in Great Bend approximated $33.3 million. Borrowings decreased $20.7 million to $73.9 million at September 30, 2005, from $94.6 million at December 31, 2004. In August 2005, we retired $10.0 million of FHLB advances prior to their scheduled maturities.
Non-interest bearing demand accounts at September 30, 2005, were $35.1 million, or 10.7% of deposits, compared to $28.5 million, or 9.4% of deposits, at December 31, 2004. Certificates of deposit increased to $166.5 million at September 30, 2005, from $154.5 million at December 31, 2004. Money market and NOW demand accounts increased to $100.8 million at September 30, 2005, from $96.6 million at December 31, 2004, and were 30.6% of total deposits. Savings accounts increased to $26.6 million at September 30, 2005, from $23.2 million at December 31, 2004.
Certificates of deposit at September 30, 2005, which were scheduled to mature in one year or less, totaled $122.8 million. Historically, maturing deposits have generally remained with our bank and we believe that a significant portion of the deposits maturing in one year or less will remain with us upon maturity.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments. The following table presents our contractual obligations, defined as operating lease obligations and principal payments due on non-deposit obligations with maturities in excess of one year as of September 30, 2005, for the periods indicated.
Contractual Cash |
|
|
| One Year |
| One to |
| Four to |
| More than |
| |||||
Obligations |
| Total |
| or Less |
| Three Years |
| Five Years |
| Five Years |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Operating leases |
| $ | 1,198,706 |
| $ | 1,018,060 |
| $ | 101,520 |
| $ | 79,126 |
| $ | — |
|
Service contracts |
| 1,690,000 |
| 780,000 |
| 910,000 |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
FHLB advances |
| 59,252,135 |
| 1,300,000 |
| — |
| 51,594,531 |
| 6,357,604 |
| |||||
Other borrowings |
| 14,098,000 |
| 1,750,000 |
| — |
| 4,100,000 |
| 8,248,000 |
| |||||
Total contractual obligations |
| $ | 76,238,841 |
| $ | 4,848,060 |
| $ | 1,011,520 |
| $ | 55,773,657 |
| $ | 14,605,604 |
|
Liquidity. Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and investment securities available for sale. The levels of these assets are dependent on the operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. These liquid assets totaled $153.8 million at September 30, 2005, and $141.4 million at December 31, 2004. During periods in which we are not able to originate a sufficient amount of loans and/or periods of high principal prepayments, we increase our liquid assets by investing in short-term U. S. Government and agency securities or high-grade municipal securities.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of our strategy. Excess funds are generally invested in short-term investments. In the event we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, additional funds are generally available through the use of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank or through
19
sales of securities. At September 30, 2005, we had outstanding Federal Home Loan Bank advances of $59.0 million and $300,000 borrowed against our line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank. At September 30, 2005, our total borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank was $93.5 million. We also had other borrowings of $14.6 million at September 30, 2005, which included $8.2 million of subordinated debentures, $4.1 million of long-term debt and $2.3 million in repurchase agreements.
At September 30, 2005, we had outstanding loan commitments, excluding standby letters of credit, of $52.2 million. We anticipate that sufficient funds will be available to meet current loan commitments. These commitments consist of letters of credit, unfunded lines of credit and commitments to finance real estate loans.
Capital. The Federal Reserve Board has established capital requirements for bank holding companies which generally parallel the capital requirements for national banks under the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulations. The regulations provide that such standards will generally be applied on a consolidated (rather than a bank-only) basis in the case of a bank holding company with more than $150 million in total consolidated assets.
At September 30, 2005, we continued to maintain a sound leverage ratio of 9.6% and a total risk based capital ratio of 16.1%. As shown by the following table, our capital exceeded the minimum capital requirements at September 30, 2005 (dollars in thousands):
Company |
| Actual |
| Actual |
| Required |
| Required |
| ||
Leverage |
| $ | 42,634 |
| 9.6 | % | 4.0 | % | $ | 17,787 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
| $ | 42,634 |
| 15.0 | % | 4.0 | % | $ | 11,347 |
|
Total Risk Based Capital |
| $ | 45,752 |
| 16.1 | % | 8.0 | % | $ | 22,693 |
|
At September 30, 2005, our subsidiary bank continued to maintain a sound leverage ratio of 10.3% and a total risk based capital ratio of 17.2%. As shown by the following table, our bank’s capital exceeded the minimum capital requirements at September 30, 2005 (dollars in thousands):
Landmark National Bank |
| Actual |
| Actual |
| Required |
| Required |
| ||
Leverage |
| $ | 45,504 |
| 10.3 | % | 4.0 | % | $ | 17,724 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
| $ | 45,504 |
| 16.1 | % | 4.0 | % | $ | 11,317 |
|
Total Risk Based Capital |
| $ | 48,622 |
| 17.2 | % | 8.0 | % | $ | 22,635 |
|
Banks and bank holding companies are generally expected to operate at or above the minimum capital requirements. The above ratios are well in excess of regulatory minimums and should allow us to operate without capital adequacy concerns. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 establishes a bank rating system based on the capital levels of banks. As of September 30, 2005, we were rated “well capitalized”, which is the highest rating available under this capital-based rating system.
20
Effective April 11, 2005, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System amended the risk-based capital standards for bank holding companies to allow the continued inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred securities in the tier 1 capital of bank holding companies, subject to stricter standards. The new regulations limit the amount of trust preferred securities (combined with all other restricted core capital elements) that a bank holding company may include as tier 1 capital to 25% of the sum of all core capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. Amounts in excess of the limits described above generally may be included in tier 2 capital. The regulations also provide a transition period for bank holding companies to conform their capital structures to the revised quantitative limits. These limits will first become applicable to bank holding companies beginning on March 31, 2009. We do not anticipate the amended risk-based capital standards will have a material impact on our capital structures.
21
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. Our assets and liabilities are principally financial in nature and the resulting net interest income thereon is subject to changes in market interest rates and the mix of various assets and liabilities. Interest rates in the financial markets affect our decision on pricing our assets and liabilities which impacts net interest income, a significant cash flow source for us. As a result, a substantial portion of our risk management activities relates to managing interest rate risk.
Our Asset/Liability Management Committee monitors the interest rate sensitivity of our balance sheet using earnings simulation models and interest sensitivity gap analysis. We have set policy limits of interest rate risk to be assumed in the normal course of business and monitor such limits through our simulation process.
We have been successful in meeting the interest rate sensitivity objectives set forth in our policy. Simulation models are prepared to determine the impact on net interest income for the coming twelve months, including one using rates at September 30, 2005, and forecasting volumes for the twelve-month projection. This position is then subjected to a shift in interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points rising and 100 basis points falling with an impact to our net interest income on a one year horizon as follows:
Scenario |
| $ Change in Net Interest Income |
| % of Net Interest Income |
| |
100 basis point rising |
| $ | 652,000 |
| 4.6 | % |
200 basis point rising |
| 1,294,000 |
| 9.1 | % | |
100 basis point falling |
| (773,000 | ) | (5.4 | )% | |
200 basis point falling |
| (1,681,000 | ) | (11.81 | )% | |
We believe that no significant changes in our interest rate sensitivity position have occurred since September 30, 2005. We also believe we are appropriately positioned for future interest rate movements, although we may experience some fluctuations in net interest income due to short-term timing differences between the repricing of assets and liabilities.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 - Forward-Looking Statements. This document contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.
22
Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, the following:
• The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct our operations which may be less favorable than expected and may result in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality and value of our assets.
• The economic impact of past and future terrorist attacks, acts of war or threats thereof, and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks.
• The effects of, and changes in, federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies affecting banking, securities, insurance and monetary and financial matters.
• The effects of changes in interest rates (including the effects of changes in the rate of prepayments our assets) and the policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
• Our ability to compete with other financial institutions as effectively as we currently intend due to increases in competitive pressures in the financial services sector.
• Our inability to obtain new customers and to retain existing customers.
• The timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative delivery channels such as the Internet.
• Technological changes implemented by us and by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to us and our customers.
• Our ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems.
• Our ability to retain key executives and employees and the difficulty that we may experience in replacing key executives and employees in an effective manner.
• Consumer spending and saving habits which may change in a manner that affects our business adversely.
• Business combinations and the integration of acquired businesses which may be more difficult or expensive than expected.
23
• The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation.
• Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
• Our ability to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning us and our business, including other factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
24
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2005. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls.
25
LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None
None
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1 |
| Certificate of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
Exhibit 31.2 |
| Certificate of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant toRule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
Exhibit 32.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Exhibit 32.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
26
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| LANDMARK BANCORP, INC. | |
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2005 | /s/ Patrick L. Alexander | |
| Patrick L. Alexander | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | |
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2005 | /s/ Mark A. Herpich | |
| Mark A. Herpich | |
| Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer | |
| and Chief Financial Officer |
27