For the three months ended March 31, 2005 | | | Coal | | | Natural Gas Midstream | | | Consolidated | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) contribution | | $ | 9.5 | | $ | (12.0 | ) | $ | (2.5 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (summarized) | | | 4.8 | | | 15.1 | | | 19.9 | |
Net change in operating assets and liabilities | | | (2.5 | ) | | (3.5 | ) | | (6.0 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | $ | 11.8 | | $ | (0.4 | ) | | 11.4 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to property and equipment | | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | | (9.3 | ) | | (195.7 | ) | | (205.0 | ) |
Other | | | — | | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (9.4 | ) | $ | (195.8 | ) | | (205.2 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
PVR distributions paid | | | | | | | | | (10.4 | ) |
PVR debt proceeds, net of repayments | | | | | | | | | 80.3 | |
Proceeds received from the issuance of partners’ capital | | | | | | | | | 127.7 | |
Other | | | | | | | | | (2.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | | | | | | | 195.6 | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | | 1.8 | |
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period | | | | | | | | | 21.0 | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period | | | | | | | | $ | 22.8 | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
The overall increase in cash provided by operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the same period of 2005 was primarily attributable to higher average gross coal royalties per ton and accretive cash flows from our natural gas midstream business, which was acquired in March 2005.
We made cash investments during the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily for coal reserve acquisitions, coal loadout facility construction and natural gas midstream gathering systems. Other investments in the same period of 2005 included the acquisition of our natural gas midstream business, net of cash acquired, and coal reserve acquisitions.
Capital expenditures, including non-cash items, for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, were as follows:
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | (in millions) | |
Coal | | | | | | | |
Acquisitions | | $ | 2.7 | | $ | 9.3 | |
Maintenance expenditures | | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | |
Other property and equipment expenditures | | | 2.1 | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | | 4.9 | | | 9.4 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Natural gas midstream | | | | | | | |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | | — | | | 195.7 | |
Maintenance expenditures | | | 0.6 | | | 0.2 | |
Other property and equipment expenditures | | | 2.0 | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | | 2.6 | | | 195.9 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total capital expenditures | | $ | 7.5 | | $ | 205.3 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operations funded our capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2006. To finance our acquisitions in the three months ended March 31, 2005, we borrowed $80.3 million, net of repayments, received proceeds of $125.2 million from our secondary public offering and received a $2.5 million contribution from our general partner. Distributions to partners increased to $15.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2006, from $10.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005, because we increased the quarterly unit distribution.
Long-Term Debt
As of March 31, 2006, we had outstanding borrowings of $251.7 million, consisting of $172.0 million borrowed under our revolving credit facility and $79.7 million of senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”). The current portion of the Notes as of March 31, 2006, was $9.8 million.
Revolving Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2006, we had $172.0 million outstanding under our $300 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) that matures in March 2010. The Revolver is available for general Partnership purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions, and includes a $10 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. We have a one-time option to expand the Revolver by $150 million upon receipt by the credit facility’s administrative agent of commitments from one or more lenders. The Revolver’s interest rate fluctuates based on our ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA. Interest is payable at a base rate plus an applicable margin of up to 1.00 percent if we select the base rate borrowing option under the credit agreement or at a rate derived from the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.00 percent to 2.00 percent if we select the LIBOR-based borrowing option.
The financial covenants under the Revolver require us to maintain specified levels of debt to consolidated EBITDA and consolidated EBITDA to interest. The financial covenants restricted our additional borrowing capacity under the Revolver to approximately $145.9 million as of March 31, 2006. The Revolver prohibits us from making certain distributions, including distributions to unitholders if any potential default or event of default occurs or would result from such unitholder distributions. In addition, the Revolver contains various covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to incur indebtedness, grant liens, make certain loans, acquisitions and investments, make any material change to the nature of our business, acquire another company or enter into a merger or sale of assets, including the sale or transfer of interests in our subsidiaries. As of March 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all of our covenants under the Revolver.
14
Senior Unsecured Notes. As of March 31, 2006, we owed $79.7 million under the Notes. The Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.02 percent and mature over a ten-year period ending in March 2013, with semi-annual principal and interest payments. The Notes contain various covenants similar to those contained in the Revolver. The Notes are equal in right of payment with all other unsecured indebtedness, including the Revolver. As of March 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all of our covenants under the Notes. The Notes require us to obtain an annual confirmation of our credit rating, with a 1.00 percent increase in the interest rate payable on the Notes in the event our credit rating falls below investment grade. In March 2006, our investment grade credit rating was confirmed by Dominion Bond Rating Services.
Interest Rate Swaps. In September 2005, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $60 million to establish a fixed rate on the LIBOR-based portion of the outstanding balance of the Revolver until March 2010 (the “Revolver Swaps”). We pay a fixed rate of 4.22 percent on the notional amount, and the counterparties pay a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR. Settlements on the Revolver Swaps are recorded as interest expense. The Revolver Swaps were designated as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the swap transactions is recorded each period in other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value, if any, is recorded to current period earnings in interest expense. After considering the applicable margin of 1.25 percent in effect as of March 31, 2006, the total interest rate on the $60 million portion of Revolver borrowings covered by the Revolver Swaps was 5.47 percent at March 31, 2006.
Future Capital Needs and Commitments
Part of our strategy is to make acquisitions which increase cash available for distribution to our unitholders. Long-term cash requirements for asset acquisitions are expected to be funded by several sources, including cash flows from operating activities, borrowings under credit facilities and the issuance of additional equity and debt securities. Our ability to make these acquisitions in the future will depend in part on the availability of debt financing and on our ability to periodically use equity financing through the issuance of new common units, which will depend on various factors, including prevailing market conditions, interest rates and our financial condition and credit rating at the time.
In 2006, we anticipate making capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, of $16 to $18 million for coal services related projects and other property and equipment and $8 to $10 million for natural gas midstream system expansion projects. Management believes that cash flow provided by operating activities will be sufficient to fund these capital expenditures. Additional funding will be provided as needed from the Revolver, under which we had $145.9 million of borrowing capacity as of March 31, 2006. We believe that we will continue to have adequate liquidity to fund future recurring operating and investing activities. Short-term cash requirements, such as operating expenses and quarterly distributions to our general partner and unitholders, are expected to be funded through operating cash flows.
15
Results of Operations
Selected Financial Data – Consolidated
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | (in millions, except per unit data) | |
Revenues | | $ | 135.2 | | $ | 46.2 | |
Expenses | | $ | 116.9 | | $ | 31.9 | |
Operating income | | $ | 18.2 | | $ | 14.3 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 8.3 | | $ | (2.5 | ) |
Net income (loss) per limited partner unit, basic and diluted | | $ | 0.19 | | $ | (0.13 | ) |
Cash flows provided by operating activities | | $ | 13.3 | | $ | 11.4 | |
The increase in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005 was primarily attributable to a $3.9 million increase in operating income and a $7.8 million decrease in non-cash derivative losses, partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in interest expense for borrowings used to fund 2005 acquisitions. Operating income increased in the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to the contribution of the natural gas midstream segment that was acquired in March 2005 and increased coal royalty revenue resulting from higher coal prices.
Coal Segment
The coal segment includes coal reserves, coal services, timber assets and other land assets. We enter into leases with various third-party operators for the right to mine coal reserves on our properties in exchange for royalty payments. We do not operate any mines. In addition to coal royalty revenues, we generate coal services revenues from fees charged to lessees for the use of coal preparation and loading facilities and from equity earnings from the Massey joint venture. We also generate revenues from the sale of standing timber on our properties, the collection of wheelage fees and oil and natural gas well royalties.
Coal royalties are impacted by several factors that we generally cannot control. The number of tons mined annually is determined by an operator’s mining efficiency, labor availability, geologic conditions, access to capital, ability to market coal and ability to arrange reliable transportation to the end-user. The possibility exists that new legislation or regulations may be adopted which may have a significant impact on the mining operations of our lessees or their customers’ ability to use coal and which may require us, our lessees or our lessee’s customers to change operations significantly or incur substantial costs.
16
Operations and Financial Summary – Coal Segment
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006, Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |
| | % | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | Change | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | (in millions, except as noted) | | | | |
Financial Highlights | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | | |
Coal royalties | | $ | 22.4 | | $ | 18.1 | | | 24 | % |
Coal services | | | 1.4 | | | 1.3 | | | 8 | % |
Other | | | 1.5 | | | 0.4 | | | 275 | % |
| |
| |
| | | |
Total revenues | | | 25.3 | | | 19.8 | | | 28 | % |
| |
| |
| | | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating | | | 1.0 | | | 1.0 | | | — | |
Taxes other than income | | | 0.3 | | | 0.3 | | | — | |
General and administrative | | | 2.2 | | | 2.4 | | | (8 | %) |
| |
| |
| | | |
Operating expenses before non-cash charges | | | 3.5 | | | 3.7 | | | (5 | %) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 4.7 | | | 3.8 | | | 24 | % |
| |
| |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 8.2 | | | 7.5 | | | 9 | % |
| |
| |
| | | |
Operating income | | $ | 17.1 | | $ | 12.3 | | | 39 | % |
| |
| |
| | | |
Operating Statistics | | | | | | | | | | |
Royalty coal tons produced by lessees (tons in millions) | | | 7.7 | | | 6.7 | | | 15 | % |
Average royalty per ton ($/ton) | | $ | 2.90 | | $ | 2.69 | | | 8 | % |
Revenues. Coal royalty revenues increased due to a higher average royalty per ton and increased production. The average royalty per ton increased to $2.90 in the first quarter of 2006 from $2.69 in the first quarter of 2005. The increase in the average royalty per ton was primarily due to a greater percentage of coal being produced from certain price-sensitive leases and stronger market conditions for coal resulting in higher prices. Coal production by our lessees increased primarily due to new production on our Illinois Basin property, which we acquired in the third quarter of 2005.
Other revenues increased primarily due to the following factors. In the three months ended March 31, 2006, we received approximately $0.4 million in revenues for the management of certain coal properties, approximately $0.2 million of rental income from railcars purchased in the second quarter of 2005 and approximately $0.1 million of royalty income from oil and natural gas royalty interests acquired in March 2005. We also received approximately $0.2 million of additional wheelage fees in the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily as a result of an April 2005 acquisition.
Expenses. Operating expenses did not increase despite the increase in production because production on our subleased properties decreased by 29 percent to 0.8 million tons in the first quarter of 2006 due to the movement of longwall mining operations at one of these properties. Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased due to the increase in production and a higher depletion rate on reserves acquired in 2005.
17
Natural Gas Midstream Segment
We purchased our natural gas midstream business on March 3, 2005. The results of operations of the natural gas midstream segment since that date are included in the operations and financial summary table below.
The natural gas midstream segment derives revenues primarily from gas processing contracts with natural gas producers and from fees charged for gathering natural gas volumes and providing other related services. Revenues, profitability and the future rate of growth of the natural gas midstream segment are highly dependent on market demand and prevailing NGL and natural gas prices. Historically, changes in the prices of most NGL products have correlated with changes in the price of crude oil. NGL and natural gas prices have been subject to significant volatility in recent years in response to changes in the supply and demand for NGL products and natural gas market uncertainty.
Operations and Financial Summary – Natural Gas Midstream Segment
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006, Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2006 | | 2005 (1) | | 2006 | | 2005 (1) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | (in millions, except as noted) | | (per Mcf) | |
Financial Highlights | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residue gas | | $ | 78.5 | | $ | 17.0 | | | | | | | |
Natural gas liquids | | | 28.0 | | | 8.3 | | | | | | | |
Condensate | | | 2.3 | | | — | | | | | | | |
Gathering and transportation fees | | | 0.4 | | | 1.0 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total natural gas midstream revenues | | | 109.2 | | | 26.3 | | | | | | | |
Marketing revenue, net | | | 0.6 | | | 0.1 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 109.8 | | | 26.4 | | $ | 9.11 | | $ | 6.75 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of midstream gas purchased | | | 98.7 | | | 21.9 | | | 8.18 | | | 5.59 | |
Operating | | | 2.5 | | | 0.8 | | | 0.21 | | | 0.20 | |
Taxes other than income | | | 0.4 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.03 | | | 0.03 | |
General and administrative | | | 3.0 | | | 0.4 | | | 0.25 | | | 0.11 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 4.1 | | | 1.2 | | | 0.34 | | | 0.31 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total operating expenses | | | 108.7 | | | 24.4 | | | 9.01 | | | 6.24 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating income | | $ | 1.1 | | $ | 2.0 | | $ | 0.10 | | $ | 0.51 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Statistics | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Inlet volumes (billion cubic feet) | | | 12.1 | | | 3.9 | | | | | | | |
Midstream processing margin (2) | | $ | 10.5 | | $ | 4.4 | | $ | 0.87 | | $ | 1.14 | |
|
(1) | Represents the results of operations of the natural gas midstream segment since March 3, 2005, the closing date of the Cantera Acquisition. |
(2) | Midstream processing margin consists of total natural gas midstream revenues minus the cost of midstream gas purchased. Excluding the effect of a $4.6 million non-cash reserve charge, the midstream processing margin per Mcf for the three months ended March 31, 2006, would have been $1.25 per Mcf. |
18
Revenues. Revenues included residue gas sold from processing plants after NGLs were removed, NGLs sold after being removed from inlet volumes received, condensate collected and sold, gathering and other fees primarily from natural gas volumes connected to our gas processing plants and the purchase and resale of natural gas not connected to our gathering systems and processing plants. The increase in average realized sales price from $6.75 per Mcf in the first quarter of 2005 to $9.11 per Mcf in the first quarter of 2006 is consistent with overall market increases in NGL and natural gas prices.
Expenses. Operating costs and expenses primarily consisted of the cost of midstream gas purchased and also included operating expenses, taxes other than income, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization.
Cost of midstream gas purchased consisted of amounts payable to third-party producers for gas purchased under percentage of proceeds and keep-whole contracts. The increase in the average purchase price for gas from $5.59 in the first quarter of 2005 to $8.18 in the first quarter of 2006 is primarily due to overall market increases in natural gas prices. Included in cost of midstream gas purchased for the three months ended March 31, 2006, was a $4.6 million non-cash charge to reserve for amounts related to balances assumed as part of the Cantera Acquisition for which we are still evaluating the possibility of collection. Excluding this non-cash charge, the midstream processing margin per Mcf would have been $1.25 per Mcf, an increase of seven percent from $1.13 in the first quarter of 2005.
General and administrative expenses per Mcf increased from $0.11 in the first quarter of 2005 to $0.25 in the first quarter of 2006, primarily due to additional personnel added to support the business and increased reimbursement to our general partner for corporate overhead costs.
Other
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2006, was higher than interest expense in the same period in 2005 primarily due to interest incurred on additional borrowings under the Revolver to finance the Cantera Acquisition and coal property acquisitions in 2005.
Derivative Losses. Non-cash derivative losses of $6.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily resulted from mark-to-market adjustments on certain derivatives that no longer qualified for hedge accounting. The $13.9 million in derivative losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005, represented the change in the market value of derivative agreements between the time we entered into the agreements in January 2005 and the time they qualified for hedge accounting after closing the Cantera Acquisition in March 2005.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, in addition to the $6.1 million derivative losses discussed above, we recognized a net derivative gain of $0.3 million which is reflected primarily in natural gas midstream revenues and cost of midstream gas purchased. We made net cash disbursements of $2.9 million on derivative settlements during the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Environmental
The operations of our coal lessees and our natural gas midstream segment are subject to environmental laws and regulations adopted by various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which these operations are conducted. The terms of our coal property leases impose liability for all environmental and reclamation liabilities arising under those laws and regulations on the relevant lessees. The lessees are bonded and have indemnified us against any and all future environmental liabilities. We regularly visit coal properties to monitor lessee compliance with environmental laws and regulations and to review mining activities. Management believes that the operations of our coal lessees and our natural gas midstream segment comply with existing regulations and does not expect any material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, our environmental liabilities included $2.4 million and $1.5 million, which represents our best estimate of the liabilities as of those dates related to our coal and natural gas midstream businesses. We have reclamation bonding requirements with respect to certain unleased and inactive properties. Given the uncertainty of when a reclamation area will meet regulatory standards, a change in this estimate could occur in the future.
19
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
No accounting pronouncements issued in the first quarter of 2006 are expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained herein that are not descriptions of historical facts are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ( the “Exchange Act”). Because such statements include risks, uncertainties and contingencies, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies include, but are not limited to, the following:
| • | our ability to generate sufficient cash from our midstream and coal businesses to pay the minimum quarterly distribution to our general partner and our unitholders; |
| | |
| • | energy prices generally and specifically, the respective prices of natural gas, NGLs and coal; |
| | |
| • | the relationship between natural gas and NGL prices; |
| | |
| • | the relationship between the price of coal and the prices of natural gas and oil; |
| | |
| • | the volatility of commodity prices for coal, natural gas and NGLs; |
| | |
| • | the projected supply of and demand for coal, natural gas and NGLs; |
| | |
| • | the ability to successfully integrate and manage our new midstream business; |
| | |
| • | the ability to acquire new coal reserves on satisfactory terms; |
| | |
| • | the price for which new coal reserves can be acquired; |
| | |
| • | the ability to lease new and existing coal reserves; |
| | |
| • | the ability to continually find and contract for new sources of natural gas supply; |
| | |
| • | the ability to retain our existing or acquire new midstream customers; |
| | |
| • | the ability of our coal lessees to produce sufficient quantities of coal on an economic basis from our reserves; |
| | |
| • | the ability of our coal lessees to obtain favorable contracts for coal produced from our reserves; |
| | |
| • | competition among producers in the coal industry generally and among midstream companies; |
| | |
| • | exposure to the credit risk of our coal lessees and our midstream customers; |
| | |
| • | the experience and financial condition of our coal lessees, including their ability to satisfy their royalty, environmental, reclamation and other obligations to us and others; |
| | |
| • | the ability to expand our midstream business by constructing new gathering systems, pipelines and processing facilities on an economic basis and in a timely manner; |
| | |
| • | the extent to which the amount and quality of actual coal production differs from estimated recoverable proved coal reserves; |
20
| • | unanticipated geological problems; |
| | |
| • | the dependence of our midstream business on having connections to third party pipelines; |
| | |
| • | availability of required materials and equipment; |
| | |
| • | the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions, including force majeure events; |
| | |
| • | the failure of our coal infrastructure or our coal lessees’ mining equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations; |
| | |
| • | delays in anticipated start-up dates of our coal lessees’ mining operations and related coal infrastructure projects; |
| | |
| • | environmental risks affecting the mining of coal reserves and the production, gathering and processing of natural gas; |
| | |
| • | the timing of receipt of necessary governmental permits by our coal lessees; |
| | |
| • | the risks associated with having or not having price risk management programs; |
| | |
| • | labor relations and costs; |
| | |
| • | accidents; |
| | |
| • | changes in governmental regulation or enforcement practices, especially with respect to environmental, health and safety matters; |
| | |
| • | uncertainties relating to the outcome of litigation regarding permitting of the disposal of coal overburden; |
| | |
| • | risks and uncertainties relating to general domestic and international economic (including inflation and interest rates) and political conditions (including the impact of potential terrorist attacks); |
| | |
| • | coal handling joint venture operations; |
| | |
| • | changes in financial market conditions; and |
| | |
| • | other risks set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
Additional information concerning these and other factors can be found in our press releases and public periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Many of the factors that will determine our future results are beyond the ability of management to control or predict. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s views only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, or to make any other forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. The principal market risks to which we are exposed are NGL, crude oil, natural gas and coal price risks and interest rate risk.
21
We are also indirectly exposed to the credit risk of our customers and lessees. If our customers or lessees become financially insolvent, they may not be able to continue operating or meet their payment obligations to us.
Interest Rate Risk
As of March 31, 2006, our $172.0 million of outstanding indebtedness under the Revolver carried a variable interest rate throughout its term. We executed interest rate derivative transactions in September 2005 to effectively convert the interest rate on $60 million of the amount outstanding under the Revolver from a LIBOR-based floating rate to a fixed rate of 4.22 percent plus the applicable margin. The interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133.
Price Risk Management
Our price risk management program permits the utilization of derivative financial instruments (such as futures, forwards, option contracts and swaps) to seek to mitigate the price risks associated with fluctuations in natural gas, NGL and crude oil prices as they relate to our natural gas midstream business. These financial instruments were historically designated as cash flow hedges and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137, SFAS No. 138 and SFAS No. 139. The derivative financial instruments are placed with major financial institutions that we believe are of minimum credit risk. The fair value of our price risk management assets is significantly affected by energy price fluctuations. During the first quarter of 2006, we reported a $6.1 million derivative loss for mark-to-market adjustments on certain derivatives that no longer qualified for hedge accounting effective January 1, 2006.
Because our natural gas derivatives and a large portion of our NGL derivatives no longer qualify for hedge accounting and to increase clarity in our financial statements, we elected to discontinue hedge accounting prospectively for our remaining commodity derivatives beginning May 1, 2006. Consequently, from that date forward, we will recognize mark-to-market gains and losses in earnings currently, rather than deferring such amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (partners’ capital). The net mark-to-market loss on our outstanding derivatives at April 30, 2006, included in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reported in future earnings through 2008 as the original hedged transactions occur. This change in reporting will have no impact on our reported cash flows, although future results of operations will be affected by mark-to-market gains and losses which fluctuate with volatile oil and gas prices.
See the discussion and tables in Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our derivative program and a listing of open derivative agreements and their fair value as of March 31, 2006.
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we performed an evaluation of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2006. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately and on a timely basis. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2006, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, except that we evaluated the controls in our natural gas midstream business that we acquired in March 2005 and have integrated those controls into our existing internal control structure.
22
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.
Item 6 | Exhibits |
| |
12.1 | Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Calculation. |
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. |
| | |
| By: PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE GP, LLC |
| | |
| | |
Date: May 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ Frank A. Pici |
| |
|
| | Frank A. Pici |
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| | |
| | |
Date: May 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ Forrest W. McNair |
| |
|
| | Forrest W. McNair |
| | Vice President and Controller |
24