UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33881
MEDASSETS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
DELAWARE | | 51-0391128 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
100 North Point Center East, Suite 200 Alpharetta, Georgia | | 30022 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (678) 323-2500
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer þ | | Accelerated filer ¨ | | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
| | | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes ¨ No þ
As of July 26, 2012, the registrant had 58,488,255 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
MEDASSETS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MedAssets, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
ASSETS | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 5,382 | | | $ | 62,947 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $3,475 and $3,891 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | | | 93,779 | | | | 104,039 | |
Deferred tax asset, current portion | | | 15,462 | | | | 15,434 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 21,624 | | | | 18,488 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 136,247 | | | | 200,908 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 113,504 | | | | 101,471 | |
Other long term assets | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | 1,027,847 | | | | 1,027,847 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 365,682 | | | | 403,371 | |
Other | | | 57,112 | | | | 61,381 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other long term assets | | | 1,450,641 | | | | 1,492,599 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,700,392 | | | $ | 1,794,978 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 16,099 | | | $ | 21,185 | |
Accrued revenue share obligation and rebates | | | 71,434 | | | | 70,906 | |
Accrued payroll and benefits | | | 26,772 | | | | 33,265 | |
Other accrued expenses | | | 17,913 | | | | 17,811 | |
Current portion of deferred revenue | | | 51,160 | | | | 48,459 | |
Deferred purchase consideration (Note 3) | | | - | | | | 120,136 | |
Current portion of notes payable | | | 6,350 | | | | 6,350 | |
Current portion of finance obligation | | | 223 | | | | 213 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 189,951 | | | | 318,325 | |
Notes payable, less current portion | | | 599,125 | | | | 572,300 | |
Bonds payable | | | 325,000 | | | | 325,000 | |
Finance obligation, less current portion | | | 9,169 | | | | 9,287 | |
Deferred revenue, less current portion | | | 14,057 | | | | 14,148 | |
Deferred tax liability | | | 128,357 | | | | 129,635 | |
Other long term liabilities | | | 8,955 | | | | 7,670 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 1,274,614 | | | | 1,376,365 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized; 58,366,000 and 57,857,000 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | | | 584 | | | | 579 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 676,509 | | | | 670,618 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 12) | | | (4,804) | | | | (4,061) | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (246,511) | | | | (248,523) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 425,778 | | | | 418,613 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,700,392 | | | $ | 1,794,978 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
MedAssets, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Administrative fees, net | | $ | 66,695 | | | $ | 59,815 | | | $ | 132,111 | | | $ | 116,397 | |
Other service fees | | | 96,315 | | | | 87,559 | | | | 180,789 | | | | 161,536 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | | 163,010 | | | | 147,374 | | | | 312,900 | | | | 277,933 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Cost of revenue (inclusive of certain amortization expense) | | | 34,730 | | | | 30,488 | | | | 66,013 | | | | 61,043 | |
Product development expenses | | | 6,638 | | | | 6,202 | | | | 13,560 | | | | 12,875 | |
Selling and marketing expenses | | | 19,178 | | | | 18,000 | | | | 33,726 | | | | 30,601 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 56,574 | | | | 46,770 | | | | 110,410 | | | | 95,911 | |
Acquisition and integration-related expenses | | | 2,028 | | | | 6,828 | | | | 3,277 | | | | 18,971 | |
Depreciation | | | 7,281 | | | | 5,228 | | | | 13,695 | | | | 10,907 | |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 18,481 | | | | 20,232 | | | | 37,411 | | | | 40,472 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 144,910 | | | | 133,748 | | | | 278,092 | | | | 270,780 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 18,100 | | | | 13,626 | | | | 34,808 | | | | 7,153 | |
Other (expense) income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest (expense) | | | (16,871) | | | | (18,075) | | | | (34,050) | | | | (36,124) | |
Other income | | | 228 | | | | 109 | | | | 335 | | | | 280 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 1,457 | | | | (4,340) | | | | 1,093 | | | | (28,691) | |
Income tax benefit | | | (794) | | | | (1,852) | | | | (919) | | | | (10,033) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,251 | | | $ | (2,488) | | | $ | 2,012 | | | $ | (18,658) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic net income (loss) per share | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | (0.04) | | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | (0.33) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted net income (loss) per share | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | (0.04) | | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | (0.33) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares—basic | | | 57,174 | | | | 57,357 | | | | 57,102 | | | | 57,295 | |
Weighted average shares—diluted | | | 58,678 | | | | 57,357 | | | | 58,637 | | | | 57,295 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,251 | | | $ | (2,488) | | | $ | 2,012 | | | $ | (18,658) | |
Unrealized loss from hedging activities for the period | | | (661) | | | | (1,753) | | | | (1,158) | | | | (1,753) | |
Income tax expense related to hedging activities for the period | | | 228 | | | | 671 | | | | 415 | | | | 671 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 1,818 | | | $ | (3,570) | | | $ | 1,269 | | | $ | (19,740) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
MedAssets, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' EquityCondensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | Additional Paid-In | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | | | Accumulated | | | Total Stockholders’ | |
| Shares | | | Par Value | | | Capital | | | Loss | | | Deficit | | | Equity | |
| (In thousands) | |
Balances at December 31, 2011 | | | 57,857 | | | $ | 579 | | | $ | 670,618 | | | $ | (4,061) | | | $ | (248,523) | | | $ | 418,613 | |
| | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock from stock option and SSAR exercises and restricted stock issuances, net | | | 571 | | | | 6 | | | | 1,790 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,796 | |
Stock compensation expense | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,015 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,015 | |
Excess tax benefit from equity award exercises, net | | | - | | | | - | | | | (315) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (315) | |
Repurchase of common stock | | | (62) | | | | (1) | | | | (599) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (600) | |
Unrealized loss from hedging activities | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (743) | | | | - | | | | (743) | |
Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,012 | | | | 2,012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balances at June 30, 2012 | | | 58,366 | | | $ | 584 | | | $ | 676,509 | | | $ | (4,804) | | | $ | (246,511) | | | $ | 425,778 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
MedAssets, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Operating activities | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,012 | | | $ | (18,658) | |
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Bad debt expense | | | 275 | | | | 240 | |
Depreciation | | | 14,512 | | | | 11,417 | |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 37,689 | | | | 40,751 | |
Loss on sale of assets | | | 338 | | | | - | |
Noncash stock compensation expense | | | 5,015 | | | | 822 | |
Excess tax benefit from exercise of equity awards | | | (295) | | | | (943) | |
Amortization of debt issuance costs | | | 3,791 | | | | 3,724 | |
Noncash interest expense, net | | | 270 | | | | 2,034 | |
Deferred income tax benefit | | | (1,384) | | | | (17,987) | |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 9,984 | | | | 2,096 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | (3,136) | | | | 2,946 | |
Other long-term assets | | | 1,625 | | | | (2,750) | |
Accounts payable | | | (4,906) | | | | 67 | |
Accrued revenue share obligation and rebates | | | 528 | | | | 4,055 | |
Accrued payroll and benefits | | | (6,493) | | | | 1,759 | |
Other accrued expenses | | | 258 | | | | (3,757) | |
Deferred revenue | | | 2,610 | | | | 11,491 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by operating activities | | | 62,693 | | | | 37,307 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property, equipment and software | | | (7,892) | | | | (5,361) | |
Capitalized software development costs | | | (20,208) | | | | (10,677) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash used in investing activities | | | (28,100) | | | | (16,038) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Borrowings from revolving credit facility | | | 55,000 | | | | - | |
Repayment of notes payable | | | (28,175) | | | | (28,175) | |
Repayment of finance obligations | | | (338) | | | | (329) | |
Payment of deferred purchase consideration | | | (120,136) | | | | - | |
Excess tax benefit from exercise of equity awards | | | 295 | | | | 943 | |
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs | | | 1,796 | | | | 1,615 | |
Purchase of treasury shares | | | (600) | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash used in financing activities | | | (92,158) | | | | (25,946) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (57,565) | | | | (4,677) | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 62,947 | | | | 46,836 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 5,382 | | | $ | 42,159 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this Quarterly Report to “MedAssets,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” mean MedAssets, Inc., and its subsidiaries and predecessor entities.
1. | BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
We provide technology-enabled products and services which together deliver solutions designed to improve operating margin and cash flow for hospitals, health systems and other ancillary healthcare providers. Our client-specific solutions are designed to efficiently analyze detailed information across the spectrum of revenue cycle and spend management processes. Our solutions integrate with existing operations and enterprise software systems of our clients and provide financial improvement with minimal upfront costs or capital expenditures. Our operations and clients are primarily located throughout the United States and to a lesser extent, Canada.
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011, derived from audited financial statements, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures required for complete financial statements are not included herein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information have been included. When preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in our Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2012. These financial statements include the accounts of MedAssets, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts and returns, product development costs, share-based payments, business combinations, impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets, and accounting for income taxes have the greatest potential impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All of our highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are carried at cost which approximates fair value and are considered to be cash equivalents. Currently, our excess cash is voluntarily used to repay our swing-line credit facility, if any, on a daily basis and applied against our revolving credit facility on a routine basis when our swing-line credit facility is undrawn. Refer to Note 6 for additional information. In addition, we may periodically make voluntary repayments on our term loan. Cash and cash equivalents were $5,382 and $62,947 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and our revolver and swing-line balances were $55,000 and zero, respectively, as of such dates. In the event our cash balance is zero at the end of a period, any outstanding checks are recorded as accrued expenses. See Note 6 for immediately available cash under our revolving credit facility.
Additionally, we have a concentration of credit risk arising from cash deposits held in excess of federally insured amounts totaling $4,882 as of June 30, 2012.
2. | RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
Intangibles — Goodwill and Other
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standards update amending the guidance on the annual testing of goodwill for impairment. The update will allow companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. We adopted this update on January 1, 2012.
Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update relating to comprehensive income. The update would require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. We adopted this update on January 1, 2012.
Fair Value
In May 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update relating to fair value measurements and disclosures. The update provides a consistent definition of fair value and ensures that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The update changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted this update on January 1, 2012.
7
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Broadlane Acquisition
In 2011, we finalized the acquisition purchase price and related purchase price allocation of Broadlane Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (“Broadlane”), formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadlane Holdings, LLC, which was acquired on November 16, 2010. In January 2012, the final adjusted deferred purchase consideration amount of $120,136 was paid to Broadlane Holdings, LLC.
4. | RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES |
During 2010, in connection with the Broadlane Acquisition, our management approved and initiated a plan to restructure our operations resulting in certain management, system and organizational changes within our SCM segment. During 2011, our management approved and initiated a plan to restructure our operations resulting in certain management changes within our RCM segment. During 2012, our management approved and initiated a plan to restructure our operations resulting in certain additional management changes within our RCM segment and our corporate segment. During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we expensed restructuring and exit and integration related costs of approximately $2,028 and $6,828, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we expensed restructuring and exit and integration related costs of approximately $3,277 and $18,971, respectively. These costs were attributable to management changes, restructuring activities of the acquired operations consisting of employee costs, system migration and standardization, facilities consolidation and other restructuring and integration costs. These costs are included within the acquisition and integration-related expenses line on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
As of June 30, 2012, the components of our restructuring plans are as follows:
| — | | Employee-related costs — we reorganized our workforce and eliminated redundant or unneeded positions in connection with our SCM, RCM and corporate business operations. In connection with the workforce restructuring, we expect to incur severance, benefits and other employee related costs in the range of $500 to $1,000 over the nine months following June 30, 2012. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we expensed approximately $1,151 and $1,841, respectively, primarily related to severance, salaries relating to redundant positions, certain bonuses and other employee benefits in connection with these activities. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $2,180 included in current liabilities for these costs. |
| — | | System migration and standardization — we are integrating and standardizing certain software platforms of the combined SCM business operations. In connection with the system migration and standardization, we expect to incur costs in the range of $2,000 to $3,000 over the nine months following June 30, 2012. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we expensed approximately $864 and $1,396, respectively, primarily related to consulting and other third-party services in connection with these activities. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $122 included in current liabilities for these costs. |
| — | | Facilities consolidation — we are consolidating our SCM office space in areas where we have common or redundant locations. We expect to incur costs in the range of $0 to $535 over the nine months following June 30, 2012 relating to ceasing to use certain facilities. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we expensed approximately $13 and $40, respectively, relating to exit costs associated with our office space consolidation. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $260 included in current liabilities for these costs. |
| — | | In addition, in November 2011, we entered into a new lease agreement for approximately 225,000 square feet of office space together with certain surface parking areas in Plano, Texas. The lease term commences on or around March 1, 2013 with an initial term of fifteen years plus an option to extend the lease term for up to ten years. In connection with this new lease agreement, we expect to incur estimated exit costs (inclusive of estimated sub-lease income) in the range of $3,000 and $4,000 to exit from our existing SCM and RCM leased facilities in Plano, Texas. |
The following table summarizes the details of the Company’s restructuring activities during the six months ended June 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Employee-related costs | | | System migration and integration | | | Facility consolidation | | | Total | |
Restructuring Reserve | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrued, December 31, 2011 | | $ | 2,908 | | | $ | 216 | | | $ | 1,946 | | | $ | 5,070 | |
Charges incurred | | | 1,841 | | | | 1,396 | | | | 40 | | | | 3,277 | |
Cash payments | | | (2,569) | | | | (1,490) | | | | (1,726) | | | | (5,785) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrued, June 30, 2012 | | $ | 2,180 | | | $ | 122 | | | $ | 260 | | | $ | 2,562 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred revenue consists of unrecognized revenue related to advanced client billing or client payments received prior to revenue being realized and earned. Substantially all of our deferred revenue consists of: (i) deferred administrative fees, net; (ii) deferred service fees; (iii) deferred software and implementation fees; and (iv) other deferred fees, including receipts for our annual customer and vendor meeting prior to the event.
8
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the deferred revenue categories and balances as of:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | | | |
Software and implementation fees | | $ | 24,108 | | | $ | 22,255 | | |
Service fees | | | 26,974 | | | | 26,641 | | |
Administrative fees | | | 11,869 | | | | 12,201 | | |
Other fees | | | 2,266 | | | | 1,510 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Deferred revenue, total | | | 65,217 | | | | 62,607 | | |
Less: Deferred revenue, current portion | | | (51,160) | | | | (48,459) | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Deferred revenue, non-current portion | | $ | 14,057 | | | $ | 14,148 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, deferred revenue included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets that was contingent upon meeting performance targets was $5,848 and $4,344, respectively. Advance billings on arrangements that include contingent performance targets are recorded in accounts receivable and deferred revenue when billed. Only certain contingent performance targets are billed in advance of meeting the target.
6. | NOTES AND BONDS PAYABLE |
The balances of our notes and bonds payable are summarized as follows as of:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | | | |
Notes payable—senior | | $ | 550,475 | | | $ | 578,650 | | |
Revolving credit facility | | | 55,000 | | | | - | | |
Bonds payable | | | 325,000 | | | | 325,000 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total notes and bonds payable | | | 930,475 | | | | 903,650 | | |
Less: current portions | | | (6,350) | | | | (6,350) | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total long-term notes and bonds payable | | $ | 924,125 | | | $ | 897,300 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Notes Payable
As of June 30, 2012, our long-term notes payable consists of a senior term loan facility with an outstanding balance of $550,475 and a revolving credit facility with an outstanding balance of $55,000. We have classified the $55,000 outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility as a long term liability given the maturity date of November 15, 2015. No amounts were drawn on our swing line component, which resulted in approximately $94,000 of availability under our revolving credit facility inclusive of the swing line (after giving effect to $1,000 of outstanding but undrawn letters of credit on such date) as of June 30, 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we made payments on our term loan which included a voluntary prepayment of $25,000 and scheduled principal payments of $3,175. The applicable weighted average interest rates (inclusive of the applicable bank margin) on our senior term loan facility and revolving credit facility at June 30, 2012 were 5.25% and 4.22%, respectively.
We are a party to a credit agreement dated November 16, 2010, with Barclays Bank PLC and JP Morgan Securities LLC. The credit agreement contains certain customary negative covenants, including but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of debt, limitations on liens, limitations on fundamental changes, limitations on asset sales and sale leasebacks, limitations on investments, limitations on dividends or distributions on, or redemptions of, equity interests, limitations on prepayments or redemptions of unsecured or subordinated debt, limitations on negative pledge clauses, limitations on transactions with affiliates and limitations on changes to the Company’s fiscal year. The credit agreement also includes certain maintenance covenants, including but not limited to, a maximum total leverage ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense (as defined in the credit agreement). The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2012.
We are also required to prepay our debt obligations based on an excess cash flow calculation for the applicable fiscal year which is determined in accordance with the terms of our credit agreement. Our current portion of notes payable does not include an amount with respect to any 2013 excess cash flow payment. We will reclassify a portion of our long-term notes payable to a current classification at such time that any 2013 excess cash flow payment becomes estimable. We will be required to make any necessary cash flow payment within the first quarter of 2013.
First Amendment to the Credit Agreement
On March 31, 2011, we entered into the first amendment to the credit agreement (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment redefined the swing line lender as Bank of America, N.A. from Barclays Bank. In connection with the First Amendment, we executed an auto borrowing plan with Bank of America, N.A. This enabled the Company to reinstitute our cash management practice of voluntarily applying any excess cash to repay our swing line credit facility, if any, on a daily basis or against our revolving credit facility on a routine basis when our swing line credit facility is undrawn.
Bonds Payable
In November 2010, we closed the offering of an aggregate principal amount of $325,000 of senior notes due 2018 (the “Notes”) in a private placement (the “Notes Offering”). In October 2011, our Notes were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of our existing domestic subsidiaries and each of our future domestic restricted subsidiaries in each case that guarantees our obligations under the credit agreement. Each of the subsidiary guarantors is 100% owned by us; the guarantees by the subsidiary guarantors are full and unconditional; the guarantees by the subsidiary guarantors are joint and several; we have no independent assets or operations; and any subsidiaries of ours other than the subsidiary guarantors are minor. The Notes and the guarantees are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and the subsidiary guarantors, respectively.
9
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of November 16, 2010 (the “Indenture”) among the Company, its subsidiary guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. Pursuant to the Indenture, the Notes will mature on November 15, 2018 and bear 8% annual interest. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning on May 15, 2011.
The Indenture contains certain customary negative covenants, including but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of debt, limitations on liens, limitations on consolidations or mergers, limitations on asset sales, limitations on certain restricted payments and limitations on transactions with affiliates. The Indenture does not contain any significant restrictions on the ability of the Company or any subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from the Company or any other subsidiary guarantor by dividend or loan. The Indenture also contains customary events of default. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2012.
The Company has the option to redeem all or part of the Notes as follows: (i) at any time prior to November 15, 2013, the Company may at its option redeem up to 35% of the aggregate original principal amount of Notes issued; and (ii) on or after November 15, 2014, the Company may at its option, redeem all or a part of the Notes after the required notification procedures have been performed, at the following redemption prices:
| | | | | | |
Year | | Percentage | | | |
2014 | | | 104% | | |
2015 | | | 102% | | |
2016 and thereafter | | | 100% | | |
The Notes also contain a redemption feature that would require the repurchase of 101% of the aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest at the option of the holders upon a change in control.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company’s 8% senior notes due 2018 were trading at approximately 105.1% of par value (Level 1).
As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $34,882 of debt issuance costs related to our credit agreement and Notes which will be amortized into interest expense generally using the effective interest method until the maturity date. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recognized approximately $1,886 and $1,859, respectively, in interest expense related to the amortization of debt issuance costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recognized approximately $3,791 and $3,724, respectively, in interest expense related to the amortization of debt issuance costs.
The following table summarizes our stated debt maturities and scheduled principal repayments as of June 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year | | Term Loan | | | Revolving Credit Facility | | | Senior Unsecured Notes | | | Total | |
2012 | | $ | 3,175 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,175 | (1) |
2013 | | | 6,350 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 6,350 | |
2014 | | | 6,350 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 6,350 | |
2015 | | | 6,350 | | | | 55,000 | | | | - | | | | 61,350 | |
2016 | | | 528,250 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 528,250 | |
Thereafter | | | - | | | | - | | | | 325,000 | | | | 325,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 550,475 | | | $ | 55,000 | | | $ | 325,000 | | | $ | 930,475 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Represents the remaining quarterly principal payments due during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. |
Total interest paid on our notes and bonds payable during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $29,287 and $31,523, respectively.
7. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Performance Targets
In the ordinary course of contracting with our clients, we may agree to make some or all of our fees contingent upon the client’s achievement of financial improvement targets from the use of our services and software. These contingent fees are not recognized as revenue until the client confirms achievement of the performance targets. We generally receive client acceptance as and when the performance targets are achieved. If we invoice contingent fees prior to client confirmation that a performance target has been achieved, we record invoiced contingent fees as deferred revenue on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Often, recognition of this revenue occurs in periods subsequent to the recognition of the associated costs.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2012, we are not presently involved in any legal proceedings, the outcome of which, if determined adversely to us, would have a material adverse affect on our business, operating results or financial condition.
10
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
8. | STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION |
Common Stock
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we issued approximately 238,000 shares of common stock in connection with employee stock option exercises for aggregate exercise proceeds of $1,796.
Repurchase of Common Stock
On August 23, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $25,000 of our common stock. The share repurchase program expires the earlier of twelve months from the authorization by our Board of Directors or the repurchase of $25,000 of our common stock. The following table shows the amount and cost of shares of common stock we repurchased for the six months ended June 30, 2012 under the share repurchase program. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2012.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | |
Number of shares repurchased | | | 62,334 | | | | - | | |
Cost of shares repurchased | | $ | 600 | | | | - | | |
As of June 30, 2012, $19,094 remained available for additional purchases under our share repurchase program. The repurchased shares have not been retired and constitute authorized but unissued shares.
Share-Based Compensation
As of June 30, 2012, we had restricted common stock, stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSARs”) and common stock option equity awards outstanding under three share-based compensation plans. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately 2,529,000 shares reserved (inclusive of equity award forfeitures) and available for grant under the 2008 MedAssets, Inc. Long-Term Performance Incentive Plan.
The total share-based compensation expense (benefit) related to equity awards was $2,456 and ($2,521) for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The total income tax benefit (expense) recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for share-based compensation arrangements related to equity awards was $923 and ($965) for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The total share-based compensation expense related to equity awards was $5,015 and $822 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for share-based compensation arrangements related to equity awards was $1,884 and $315 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. There were no capitalized share-based compensation expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
Total share-based compensation expense (inclusive of restricted common stock, SSARs and common stock options) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 as reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | |
Cost of revenue | | $ | 362 | | | $ | (425) | | | $ | 863 | | | $ | 594 | | |
Product development | | | (4) | | | | 25 | | | | 89 | | | | 80 | | |
Selling and marketing | | | 329 | | | | (540) | | | | 787 | | | | (250) | | |
General and administrative | | | 1,769 | | | | (1,581) | | | | 3,276 | | | | 398 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total share-based compensation expense | | $ | 2,456 | | | $ | (2,521) | (1) | | $ | 5,015 | | | $ | 822 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we reversed approximately $6,537 of share-based compensation expense because we did not achieve specific performance criteria relating to certain performance-based restricted stock grants and SSAR grants. |
Equity Award Expense Attribution
For service-based equity awards with graded-vesting, compensation cost is recognized using an accelerated method over the vesting or service period and is net of estimated forfeitures. For service-based equity awards with cliff-vesting, compensation cost is recognized using a straight-line method over the vesting or service period and is net of estimated forfeitures. For performance-based equity awards, compensation cost is recognized using a straight-line method over the vesting or performance period and is adjusted each reporting period in which a change in performance achievement is determined and is net of estimated forfeitures. We evaluate the probability of performance achievement each reporting period and, if necessary, adjust share-based compensation expense based on expected performance achievement.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In 2010, we established the MedAssets, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, eligible employees may purchase shares of our common stock at a discounted price through payroll deductions. The price per share of the common stock sold to participating employees will be 95% of the fair market value of our common stock on the applicable purchase date. The Plan requires that all stock purchased be held by participants for a period of 18 months from the purchase date. A total of 500,000 shares of our common stock are authorized for purchase under the Plan. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we purchased approximately 15,000 shares and 19,100 shares of our common stock under the Plan which amounted to approximately $204 and $257, respectively.
11
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Equity Award Grants
Information regarding equity awards for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:
Common Stock Option Awards
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we did not grant any stock option awards.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, approximately 119,000 stock option awards were forfeited.
As of June 30, 2012, there was approximately $584 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to all outstanding stock option awards that will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.
Restricted Common Stock Awards
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we granted approximately 392,000 shares of restricted common stock. Approximately 59,000 shares vest over five years; 20,000 shares vest over four years; 240,000 shares (inclusive of 120,000 shares that include certain additional performance vesting criteria) vest over three years; and 73,000 vest ratably each month through December 31, 2012. The weighted-average grant date fair value of each restricted common stock share was $13.75.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, approximately 59,000 shares of restricted common stock were forfeited.
As of June 30, 2012, there was approximately $7,503 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to all unvested restricted common stock awards that will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
SSARs Awards
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we granted approximately 515,000 SSARs. Approximately 276,000 have a service vesting period of five years; 190,000 (inclusive of 80,000 SSARs that include certain additional performance vesting criteria) have a service vesting period of four years; and approximately 49,000 vest ratably each month through December 31, 2012. The weighted-average grant date base price of each SSAR was $13.64 and the weighted-average grant date fair value of each SSAR granted during the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $5.85.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, approximately 310,000 SSARs were forfeited.
As of June 30, 2012, there was approximately $7,574 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to all unvested SSARs that will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we realigned our legal entities for tax reporting purposes to fully reflect the integration of the Broadlane acquisition into our operations. The realignment required us to recognize a reduction in our state income tax rate and as a result, we recognized a $1,400 discrete tax benefit during the three months ended June 30, 2012. As a result, income tax benefit recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 reflected an effective income tax rate of (54.5%) and (84.1%), respectively. Income tax benefit recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflected an effective income tax rate of 42.7% and 35.0%, respectively.
10. | INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE |
We calculate earnings per share (or “EPS”) in accordance with GAAP relating to earnings per share. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing reported net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the reported period following the two-class method. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if our stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights, unvested restricted stock and stock warrants were exercised and converted into our common shares during the reporting periods.
12
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
A reconciliation of basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding for basic and diluted EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | |
Numerator for Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share: | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 2,251 | | | | (2,488) | | |
Denominator for basic income (loss) per share weighted average shares | | | 57,174,000 | | | | 57,357,000 | | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 869,000 | | | | - | | |
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights | | | 3,000 | | | | - | | |
Restricted stock and stock warrants | | | 632,000 | | | | - | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per share—adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions | | | 58,678,000 | | | | 57,357,000 | | |
Basic income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | (0.04) | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | (0.04) | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | |
Numerator for Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share: | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 2,012 | | | | (18,658) | | |
Denominator for basic income (loss) per share weighted average shares | | | 57,102,000 | | | | 57,295,000 | | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 900,000 | | | | - | | |
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights | | | 3,000 | | | | - | | |
Restricted stock and stock warrants | | | 632,000 | | | | - | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per share—adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions | | | 58,637,000 | | | | 57,295,000 | | |
Basic income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | (0.33) | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | (0.33) | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the effect of certain dilutive securities have been excluded because the impact is anti-dilutive as a result of certain securities being “out of the money” with strike prices greater than the average market price during the periods presented. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, basic and diluted EPS are the same as all potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS given our net loss for the periods. The following table provides a summary of those potentially dilutive securities that have been excluded from the above calculation of diluted EPS:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | |
Stock options | | | 100,000 | | | | 1,185,000 | | | | 100,000 | | | | 1,359,000 | | |
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights | | | 1,194,000 | | | | 110,000 | | | | 1,198,000 | | | | 168,000 | | |
Restricted stock and stock warrants | | | - | | | | 440,000 | | | | - | | | | 464,000 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 1,294,000 | | | | 1,735,000 | | | | 1,298,000 | | | | 1,991,000 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We deliver our solutions and manage our business through two reportable business segments, Spend and Clinical Resource Management (or “SCM”) and Revenue Cycle Management (or “RCM”).
| — | | Spend and Clinical Resource Management. Our SCM segment provides a comprehensive suite of technology-enabled services that help our clients manage their expense categories. Our solutions lower supply and medical device pricing and utilization by managing the procurement process through our group purchasing organization (“GPO”) portfolio of contracts, consulting services and business intelligence tools. |
13
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| — | | Revenue Cycle Management. Our RCM segment provides a comprehensive suite of software and services spanning the hospital, health system and other ancillary healthcare provider revenue cycle workflow — from patient admission and financial responsibility, patient financial liability estimation, charge capture, case management, contract management and health information management through claims processing and accounts receivable management. Our workflow solutions, together with our data management and business intelligence tools, increase revenue capture and cash collections, reduce accounts receivable balances and increase regulatory compliance. |
GAAP relating to segment reporting, defines reportable segments as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing financial performance. The guidance indicates that financial information about segments should be reported on the same basis as that which is used by the chief operating decision maker in the analysis of performance and allocation of resources. Management of the Company, including our chief operating decision maker, uses what we refer to as Segment Adjusted EBITDA as its primary measure of profit or loss to assess segment performance and to determine the allocation of resources. We define Segment Adjusted EBITDA as segment net income (loss) before net interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) as adjusted for other non-recurring, non-cash or non-operating items. Our chief operating decision maker uses Segment Adjusted EBITDA to facilitate a comparison of our operating performance on a consistent basis from period to period. Segment Adjusted EBITDA includes expenses associated with sales and marketing, general and administrative and product development activities specific to the operation of the segment. General and administrative corporate expenses that are not specific to the segments are not included in the calculation of Segment Adjusted EBITDA. These expenses include the costs to manage our corporate offices, interest expense on our credit facilities and expenses related to being a publicly-held company. All reportable segment revenues are presented net of inter-segment eliminations and represent revenues from external clients.
The following tables present Segment Adjusted EBITDA and financial position information as utilized by our chief operating decision maker. A reconciliation of Segment Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated net income is included. General corporate expenses are included in the “Corporate” column. “SCM” represents the Spend and Clinical Resource Management segment and “RCM” represents the Revenue Cycle Management segment. Other assets and liabilities are included to provide a reconciliation to total assets and total liabilities.
The following tables represent our results of operations, by segment, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | |
| | SCM | | | RCM | | | Corporate | | | Total | |
Results of Operations: | | | | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross administrative fees(1) | | $ | 107,512 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 107,512 | |
Revenue share obligation(1) | | | (40,817) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (40,817) | |
Other service fees | | | 35,420 | | | | 60,895 | | | | - | | | | 96,315 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | | 102,115 | | | | 60,895 | | | | - | | | | 163,010 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 77,173 | | | | 56,011 | | | | 11,726 | | | | 144,910 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 24,942 | | | | 4,884 | | | | (11,726) | | | | 18,100 | |
Interest expense | | | - | | | | - | | | | (16,871) | | | | (16,871) | |
Other income | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 226 | | | | 228 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | 24,943 | | | $ | 4,885 | | | $ | (28,371) | | | $ | 1,457 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 8,385 | | | | 1,851 | | | | (11,030) | | | | (794) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 16,558 | | | | 3,034 | | | | (17,341) | | | | 2,251 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 44,558 | | | $ | 12,079 | | | $ | (7,631) | | | $ | 49,006 | |
| (1) | These are non-GAAP measures. See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of June 30, 2012 | |
| | SCM | | | RCM | | | Corporate | | | Total | |
Financial Position: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | $ | 42,879 | | | $ | 50,900 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 93,779 | |
Other assets | | | 1,028,289 | | | | 481,281 | | | | 97,043 | | | | 1,606,613 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 1,071,168 | | | | 532,181 | | | | 97,043 | | | | 1,700,392 | |
Accrued revenue share obligation | | | 71,434 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 71,434 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 26,274 | | | | 38,943 | | | | - | | | | 65,217 | |
Notes payable | | | - | | | | - | | | | 605,475 | | | | 605,475 | |
Bonds payable | | | - | | | | - | | | | 325,000 | | | | 325,000 | |
Other liabilities | | | 19,929 | | | | 19,791 | | | | 167,768 | | | | 207,488 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 117,637 | | | $ | 58,734 | | | $ | 1,098,243 | | | $ | 1,274,614 | |
14
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | | | |
| | SCM | | | RCM | | | Corporate | | | Total | | |
Results of Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross administrative fees(1) | | $ | 93,799 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 93,799 | | |
Revenue share obligation(1) | | | (33,984) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (33,984) | | |
Other service fees | | | 31,297 | | | | 56,262 | | | | - | | | | 87,559 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | | 91,112 | | | | 56,262 | | | | - | | | | 147,374 | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 78,672 | | | | 48,208 | | | | 6,868 | | | | 133,748 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 12,440 | | | | 8,054 | | | | (6,868) | | | | 13,626 | | |
Interest (expense) | | | (14) | | | | - | | | | (18,061) | | | | (18,075) | | |
Other (expense) income | | | (11) | | | | 7 | | | | 113 | | | | 109 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | 12,415 | | | $ | 8,061 | | | $ | (24,816) | | | $ | (4,340) | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 4,318 | | | | 2,883 | | | | (9,053) | | | | (1,852) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 8,097 | | | | 5,178 | | | | (15,763) | | | | (2,488) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 37,355 | | | $ | 14,251 | | | $ | (7,328) | | | $ | 44,278 | | | |
| (1) | These are non-GAAP measures. See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 | | | |
| | SCM | | | RCM | | | Corporate | | | Total | | |
Results of Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross administrative fees(1) | | $ | 212,016 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 212,016 | | |
Revenue share obligation(1) | | | (79,905) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (79,905) | | |
Other service fees | | | 63,269 | | | | 117,520 | | | | - | | | | 180,789 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | | 195,380 | | | | 117,520 | | | | - | | | | 312,900 | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 148,223 | | | | 108,191 | | | | 21,678 | | | | 278,092 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 47,157 | | | | 9,329 | | | | (21,678) | | | | 34,808 | | |
Interest expense | | | - | | | | - | | | | (34,050) | | | | (34,050) | | |
Other (expense) income | | | (21) | | | | 3 | | | | 353 | | | | 335 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | 47,136 | | | $ | 9,332 | | | $ | (55,375) | | | $ | 1,093 | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 17,575 | | | | 3,748 | | | | (22,242) | | | | (919) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 29,561 | | | | 5,584 | | | | (33,133) | | | | 2,012 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 86,506 | | | $ | 23,697 | | | $ | (14,791) | | | $ | 95,412 | | | |
| (1) | These are non-GAAP measures. See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information. |
15
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | | | |
| | SCM | | | RCM | | | Corporate | | | Total | | |
Results of Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross administrative fees(1) | | $ | 184,124 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 184,124 | | |
Revenue share obligation(1) | | | (67,727) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (67,727) | | |
Other service fees | | | 54,049 | | | | 107,487 | | | | - | | | | 161,536 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | | 170,446 | | | | 107,487 | | | | - | | | | 277,933 | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 159,482 | | | | 95,391 | | | | 15,907 | | | | 270,780 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 10,964 | | | | 12,096 | | | | (15,907) | | | | 7,153 | | |
Interest expense | | | (14) | | | | - | | | | (36,110) | | | | (36,124) | | |
Other income | | | 40 | | | | 13 | | | | 227 | | | | 280 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | 10,990 | | | $ | 12,109 | | | $ | (51,790) | | | $ | (28,691) | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 3,843 | | | | 4,235 | | | | (18,111) | | | | (10,033) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 7,147 | | | | 7,874 | | | | (33,679) | | | | (18,658) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 73,505 | | | $ | 25,721 | | | $ | (14,003) | | | $ | 85,223 | | | |
| (1) | These are non-GAAP measures. See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information. |
GAAP for segment reporting requires that the total of the reportable segments’ measures of profit or loss be reconciled to the Company’s consolidated operating results. The following table reconciles Segment Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated net income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | |
SCM Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 44,558 | | | $ | 37,355 | | | $ | 86,506 | | | $ | 73,505 | | |
RCM Adjusted EBITDA | | | 12,079 | | | | 14,251 | | | | 23,697 | | | | 25,721 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total reportable Segment Adjusted EBITDA | | | 56,637 | | | | 51,606 | | | | 110,203 | | | | 99,226 | | |
Depreciation | | | (4,876) | | | | (3,959) | | | | (9,235) | | | | (8,573) | | |
Depreciation (included in cost of revenue) | | | (407) | | | | (254) | | | | (817) | | | | (509) | | |
Amortization of intangibles | | | (18,481) | | | | (20,232) | | | | (37,411) | | | | (40,472) | | |
Amortization of intangibles (included in cost of revenue) | | | (139) | | | | (139) | | | | (278) | | | | (278) | | |
Interest expense, net of interest income(1) | | | 5 | | | | (7) | | | | 5 | | | | - | | |
Income tax expense | | | (10,237) | | | | (7,201) | | | | (21,323) | | | | (8,077) | | |
Share-based compensation expense(2) | | | (882) | | | | 788 | | | | (2,722) | | | | (1,379) | | |
Purchase accounting adjustments(3) | | | - | | | | (499) | | | | - | | | | (6,063) | | |
Acquisition and integration-related expenses(4) | | | (2,028) | | | | (6,828) | | | | (3,277) | | | | (18,851) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total reportable segment net income | | | 19,592 | | | | 13,275 | | | | 35,145 | | | | 15,024 | | | |
Corporate net loss | | | (17,341) | | | | (15,763) | | | | (33,133) | | | | (33,682) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net income (loss) | | $ | 2,251 | | | $ | (2,488) | | | $ | 2,012 | | | $ | (18,658) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Interest income is included in other income (expense) and is not netted against interest expense in our condensed consolidated statement of operations. |
| (2) | Represents non-cash share-based compensation to both employees and directors. We believe excluding this non-cash expense allows us to compare our operating performance without regard to the impact of share-based compensation, which varies from period to period based on amount and timing of grants. |
| (3) | Upon acquiring Broadlane, we made certain purchase accounting adjustments that reflect the fair value of administrative fees related to client purchases that occurred prior to November 16, 2010 but were reported to us subsequent to that date. Under our revenue recognition accounting policy, which is in accordance with GAAP, these administrative fees would be ordinarily recorded as revenue when reported to us; however, the acquisition method of accounting requires us to estimate the amount of purchases occurring prior to the transaction date and to record the fair value of the administrative fees to be received from those purchases as an account receivable (as opposed to recognizing revenue when these transactions are reported to us) and record any corresponding revenue share obligation as a liability. |
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the $499 represents the net amount of: (i) $544 in gross administrative fees and $178 in other service fees based on vendor reporting received from April 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011 related to purchases made prior to the acquisition date; and (ii) a corresponding revenue share obligation of $223.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the $6,063 represents the net amount of: (i) $9,157 in gross administrative fees and $1,572 in other service fees based on vendor reporting received from January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011 related to purchases made prior to the acquisition date; and (ii) a corresponding revenue share obligation of $4,666.
16
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| (4) | Represents the amount attributable to acquisition and integration-related costs which include costs such as severance, retention, salaries relating to redundant positions, certain performance-related salary-based compensation, and operating infrastructure costs. We expect to incur costs in future periods related to our plans including but not limited to aligning service offerings and standardizing and migrating certain Broadlane operational systems and transactional data sets into our operational systems. |
12. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
We have interest rate risk relative to the outstanding borrowings under our credit agreement. Loans under the credit agreement bear interest, at the Company’s election, either at the prime rate or the London Interchange Bank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a percentage point spread based on certain specified financial ratios. The Company’s policy has been to manage interest cost using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt. To manage this risk in a cost efficient manner, we entered into the derivative financial instruments described below.
On May 5, 2011, we entered into three separate derivative financial instruments to convert 50% of our variable rate debt to a fixed or maximum rate debt, as required by our credit agreement. The derivative instruments consisted of: (i) a 3% LIBOR interest rate cap (exclusive of the applicable bank margin charged by our lenders) on a $317,500 notional amount beginning May 13, 2011 and ending on February 16, 2013; (ii) a forward starting interest rate swap which fixes three-month LIBOR at 2.80% (exclusive of the applicable bank margin charged by our lenders) on a $158,750 notional amount beginning February 19, 2013 and ending February 16, 2015; and (iii) a forward starting interest rate swap which fixes three-month LIBOR at 2.78% (exclusive of the applicable bank margin charged by our lenders) on a $158,750 notional amount beginning February 19, 2013 and ending February 16, 2015. Our interest rate swaps are designated as a cash flow hedging relationship and considered highly effective. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (“AOCI”). If we assess any portion to be ineffective, we will reclassify the ineffective portion to current period earnings or loss accordingly.
We have not treated the interest rate cap as a hedging instrument as defined by GAAP for derivatives and hedging. As a result, we will record the fair value adjustment on the interest rate cap through earnings each reporting period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded a charge to interest expense of zero and approximately $20, respectively, relating to the decrease in fair value of the interest rate cap.
We have treated our interest rate swaps as hedging instruments in accordance with GAAP for derivatives and hedging. As of June 30, 2012, we recorded the fair value of the interest rate swaps on our balance sheet as a liability of approximately $7,680 in other long-term liabilities, and the offsetting loss ($4,804 net of tax) was recorded in AOCI in our stockholders’ equity.
We determined the fair values of the swaps using Level 2 inputs as defined under GAAP for fair value measurements and disclosures because our valuation techniques included inputs that are considered significantly observable in the market, either directly or indirectly. Our valuation technique assessed each swap by comparing each fixed interest payment, or cash flow, to a hypothetical cash flow utilizing an observable market three-month floating LIBOR rate as of June 30, 2012. Future hypothetical cash flows utilize projected market-based LIBOR rates. Each fixed cash flow and hypothetical cash flow is then discounted to present value utilizing a market observable discount factor for each cash flow. The discount factor fluctuates based on the timing of each future cash flow. The fair value of each swap represents a cumulative total of the differences between the discounted cash flows that are fixed from those that are hypothetical using floating rates.
We considered the creditworthiness of each counterparty of the swaps and believe the performance of the counterparties of the swaps is probable given the size, international presence and past performance of the counterparties under the obligations of the contracts and that the counterparties are not at risk of default (which would change the highly effective status of the hedged instruments). We also assessed the Company’s creditworthiness and ability to deliver under the terms of the contracts. Given the availability under our revolving credit facility, our historical ability to generate positive cash flow and our expectation for the continuing ability to generate positive cash from operations, we expect to be able to perform all of our obligations under the interest rate swap arrangements.
As of June 30, 2012, our forward starting interest rate swaps were highly effective and, as a result, we did not record any gain or loss from ineffectiveness in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
The following table presents the fair value of our outstanding derivative instruments as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value of Financial Instruments | | | |
| | | | As of June 30, 2012 | | | As of December 31, 2011 | | |
Derivative Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments - interest rate contracts | | Other long term liabilities | | $ | 7,680 | | | $ | 6,522 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
17
MedAssets, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The effects of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on income and AOCI are summarized below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount of Loss Recognized in OCI | | | Amount of Loss Recognized in OCI | | | |
| | on Derivative (Effective Portion) | | | on Derivative (Effective Portion) | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | |
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | |
Total loss recognized in other comprehensive loss - interest rate contracts | | $ | (433) | | | $ | (1,082) | | | $ | (743) | | | $ | (1,082) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We do not expect to reclassify the existing losses that are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income as earnings within the next twelve months.
13. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
We measure fair value for financial instruments when a valuation is necessary, such as for impairment of long-lived and indefinite-lived assets when indicators of impairment exist in accordance with GAAP for fair value measurements and disclosures. This defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value measures required under other accounting pronouncements, but does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value.
Refer to Note 12 for information and fair values of our derivative instruments measured on a recurring basis under GAAP for fair value measurements and disclosures.
In estimating our fair value disclosures for financial instruments, we use the following methods and assumptions:
| — | | Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying value reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for these items approximates fair value due to the high credit standing of the financial institutions holding these items and their liquid nature; |
| — | | Accounts receivable, net: The carrying value reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets is net of allowances for doubtful accounts which includes a degree of counterparty non-performance risk; |
| — | | Accounts payable and current liabilities: The carrying value reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for these items approximates fair value, which is the likely amount for which the liability with short settlement periods would be transferred to a market participant with a similar credit standing as the Company; |
| — | | Notes payable: The carrying value of our long-term notes payable reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value since they bear interest at variable rates. Refer to Note 6 for further information; and |
| — | | Bonds payable: The carrying value of our long-term bonds payable reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value. Refer to Note 6 for further information. |
14. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION |
We have an agreement with John Bardis, our chief executive officer, for the use of an airplane owned by JJB Aviation, LLC, a limited liability company, owned by Mr. Bardis. We pay Mr. Bardis at market-based rates for the use of the airplane for business purposes. The audit committee of the board of directors reviews such usage of the airplane annually. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred charges of $1,117 and $905, respectively, related to transactions with Mr. Bardis.
We have evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements filed on Form 10-Q with the SEC and no events have occurred that require disclosure.
18
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking statements” (as defined in Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that reflect our expectations regarding our future growth, results of operations, performance and business prospects and opportunities. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “targets,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions have been used to identify these forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying these statements. For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current beliefs and expectations and are based on information currently available to us. As such, no assurance can be given that our future growth, results of operations, performance and business prospects and opportunities covered by such forward-looking statements will be achieved. We have no intention or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events, information or circumstances.
A number of important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including those described herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2012.
Overview
We provide technology-enabled products and services which together deliver solutions designed to improve operating margin, cash flow and overall operational effectiveness for hospitals, health systems and other ancillary or non-acute healthcare providers. Our solutions are designed to efficiently analyze detailed information across the spectrum of revenue cycle, spend and clinical resource management processes. Our solutions integrate with existing operations and enterprise software systems of our clients and provide financial improvement with minimal upfront costs or capital expenditures. Our operations and clients are primarily located throughout the United States and to a lesser extent, Canada.
Management’s primary metrics to measure the consolidated financial performance of the business are net revenue, non-GAAP gross fees, non-GAAP revenue share obligation, non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA margin and non-GAAP diluted adjusted EPS.
The table below highlights our primary results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | Change | | | | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | Change | | | | |
| | Amount | | | Amount | | | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | Amount | | | Amount | | | % | |
| | (Unaudited, in millions) | | | (Unaudited, in millions) | |
Gross fees(1) | | $ | 203.8 | | | $ | 181.4 | | | $ | 22.4 | | | | 12.3% | | | $ | 392.8 | | | $ | 345.7 | | | $ | 47.1 | | | | 13.6% | |
Revenue share obligation(1) | | | (40.8) | | | | (34.0) | | | | (6.8) | | | | 20.0 | | | | (79.9) | | | | (67.7) | | | | (12.2) | | | | 18.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | | 163.0 | | | | 147.4 | | | | 15.6 | | | | 10.6 | | | | 312.9 | | | | 278.0 | | | | 34.9 | | | | 12.6 | |
Operating income | | | 18.1 | | | | 13.6 | | | | 4.5 | | | | 33.1 | | | | 34.8 | | | | 7.2 | | | | 27.6 | | | | 383.3 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2.2 | | | $ | (2.5) | | | $ | 4.7 | | | | 188.0% | | | $ | 2.0 | | | $ | (18.7) | | | $ | 20.7 | | | | 110.7% | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | | $ | 49.0 | | | $ | 44.3 | | | $ | 4.7 | | | | 10.6% | | | $ | 95.4 | | | $ | 85.2 | | | $ | 10.2 | | | | 12.0% | |
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) | | | 30.1% | | | | 30.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | 30.5% | | | | 30.6% | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted Adjusted EPS(1) | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | | 21.7% | | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 0.11 | | | | 27.5% | |
| (1) | These are non-GAAP measures. See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information. |
The increases in non-GAAP gross fees and total net revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011 were primarily attributable to:
| — | | growth in our Spend and Clinical Resource Management segment from our medical device consulting and strategic sourcing services, and vendor administrative fees as well as revenue related to achievement of certain client financial performance targets earned during the quarter; and |
| — | | growth in our Revenue Cycle Management segment from our revenue cycle technology tools partially offset by a decrease in our comprehensive revenue cycle services due to a performance fee received during 2011 that did not recur in 2012. |
The increases in non-GAAP gross fees and total net revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011 were primarily attributable to:
| — | | growth in our Spend and Clinical Resource Management segment from our medical device consulting and strategic sourcing services, and vendor administrative fees as well as revenue related to achievement of certain client financial performance targets earned during the quarter; and |
| — | | growth in our Revenue Cycle Management segment from our revenue cycle technology tools and revenue cycle services. |
The increase in operating income during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, was primarily attributable to the growth in net revenue discussed above in addition to a $4.8 million decrease in acquisition and integration-related expenses partially offset by the following operating expenses:
| — | | increased cost of revenue within our Revenue Cycle Management segment attributable to a higher percentage of net revenue being derived from service-based engagements; |
19
| — | | higher operating expenses primarily related to increased compensation expense for new and existing personnel and higher professional fees; |
| — | | higher share-based compensation expense primarily due to the reversal of $6.5 million of share-based compensation during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as the specific performance criteria for certain restricted stock grants and SSAR grants were not met; and |
| — | | an increase in depreciation expense from additions to property and equipment including purchased software. |
The increase in operating income during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, was primarily attributable to the growth in net revenue discussed above in addition to a $15.7 million decrease in acquisition and integration-related expenses partially offset by the following operating expenses:
| — | | increased cost of revenue within our Revenue Cycle Management segment attributable to a higher percentage of net revenue being derived from service-based engagements; |
| — | | higher operating expenses primarily related to increased compensation expense for new and existing personnel and higher professional fees; |
| — | | higher share-based compensation expense primarily due to the reversal of $6.5 million of share-based compensation during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as the specific performance criteria for certain restricted stock grants and SSAR grants were not met; and |
| — | | an increase in depreciation expense from additions to property and equipment including purchased software. |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, increases in consolidated non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were primarily attributable to the net revenue increase discussed above, as well as lower overall expense growth.
Segment Structure and Revenue Streams
We deliver our solutions through two business segments, Spend and Clinical Resource Management (“SCM”) and Revenue Cycle Management (“RCM”). Management’s primary metrics to measure consolidated and segment financial performance are net revenue, non-GAAP gross fees, non-GAAP revenue share obligation, non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA margin, non-GAAP diluted adjusted EPS and Segment Adjusted EBITDA. All of our revenues are from external clients and inter-segment revenues have been eliminated. See Note 11 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein for discussion on Segment Adjusted EBITDA and certain items of our segment results of operations and financial position.
Spend and Clinical Resource Management
Our SCM segment provides a comprehensive suite of cost management services and supply chain analytics and data capabilities that help our clients manage many of their high and low expense categories. Our solutions lower supply and medical device costs and help to improve clinical resource utilization by managing the procurement process through our strategic sourcing of supplies and purchased services, discounted pricing through our group purchasing organization’s portfolio of contracts, consulting services and business analytics and intelligence tools. Our SCM segment revenue consists of the following components:
| — | | Administrative fees and revenue share obligation. We earn administrative fees from manufacturers, distributors and other vendors (collectively referred to as “vendors”) of products and services with whom we have contracts under which our group purchasing organization clients may purchase products and services. Administrative fees represent a percentage, which we refer to as our administrative fee ratio, typically ranging from 0.25% to 3.00% of the purchases made by our group purchasing organization clients through contracts with our vendors. |
Our group purchasing organization clients make purchases, and receive shipments, directly from the vendors. Generally on a monthly or quarterly basis, vendors provide us with a report describing the purchases made by our clients through our group purchasing organization vendor contracts, including associated administrative fees. We recognize revenue upon the receipt of these reports from vendors.
Some client contracts require that a portion of our administrative fees be contingent upon achieving certain financial improvements, such as lower supply costs, which we refer to as performance targets. Contingent administrative fees are not recognized as revenue until we receive customer acceptance on the achievement of those contractual performance targets. Prior to receiving client acceptance of performance targets, we record contingent administrative fees as deferred revenue on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Often, recognition of this revenue occurs in periods subsequent to the recognition of the associated costs. Should we fail to meet a performance target, we may be contractually obligated to refund some or all of the contingent fees. Additionally, in many cases, we are contractually obligated to pay a portion of the administrative fees to our hospital and health system clients. Typically this amount, which we refer to as our revenue share obligation, is calculated as a percentage of administrative fees earned on a particular client’s purchases from our vendors. Our total net revenue on our condensed consolidated statements of operations is shown net of the revenue share obligation.
| — | | Other service fees. The following items are included as “Other service fees” in our condensed consolidated statement of operations: |
| — | | Consulting fees. We consult with our clients regarding the costs and utilization of medical devices and physician preference items (“PPI”) and the efficiency and quality of their key clinical service lines. Our consulting projects are typically fixed fee projects with an average duration of six to nine months, and the related revenues are earned as services are rendered. We generate revenue from consulting contracts that also include performance targets. The performance targets generally relate to committed financial improvement to our clients from the use and implementation of initiatives that result from our consulting services. Performance targets are measured as our strategic initiatives are identified and implemented, and the financial improvement can be quantified by the client. Prior to receiving client acceptance of performance targets, we record contingent consulting fees as deferred revenue on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Often, recognition of this revenue occurs in periods subsequent to the recognition of the associated costs. Should we fail to meet a performance target, we may be contractually obligated to refund some or all of the contingent fees. |
| — | | Subscription fees. We also offer technology-enabled services that provide spend management analytics and data services to improve operational efficiency, reduce supply costs, and increase transparency across spend management processes. We earn fixed subscription fees on a monthly basis for these Company-hosted SaaS-based solutions. |
20
Revenue Cycle Management
Our RCM segment provides a comprehensive suite of products and services spanning the hospital revenue cycle workflow — from patient access and financial responsibility, charge capture and integrity, pricing analysis, claims processing and denials management, payor contract management, revenue recovery and accounts receivable services. Our workflow solutions, together with our data management, compliance and audit tools, increase revenue capture and cash collections, reduce accounts receivable balances and increase regulatory compliance. Our RCM segment revenue is listed under the caption “Other service fees” on our condensed consolidated statements of operations and consists of the following components:
| — | | Subscription and implementation fees. We earn fixed subscription fees on a monthly or annual basis on multi-year contracts for client access to our SaaS-based solutions. We may also charge our clients non-refundable upfront fees for implementation of our SaaS-based services. These non-refundable upfront fees are earned over the subscription period or estimated customer relationship period, whichever is longer. |
We defer costs related to implementation services and expense these costs in proportion to the revenue earned over the subscription period or customer relationship period, as applicable.
In addition, we defer upfront sales commissions related to subscription and implementation fees and expense these costs ratably over the related contract term.
| — | | Transaction fees. For certain of our revenue cycle management solutions, we earn fees that vary based on the volume of client transactions or enrolled members. |
| — | | Service fees. For certain of our RCM solutions, we earn fees based on a percentage of cash remittances collected, fixed-fee and cost-plus consulting arrangements. The related revenues are earned as services are rendered. |
Operating Expenses
We classify our operating expenses as follows:
| — | | Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue primarily consists of the direct labor costs incurred to generate our revenue. Direct labor costs consist primarily of salaries, benefits, incentive compensation and other direct costs and share-based compensation expenses related to personnel who provide services to implement our solutions for our clients (indirect labor costs for these personnel are included in general and administrative expenses). As the majority of our services are generated internally, our costs to provide these services are primarily labor-driven. A less significant portion of our cost of revenue consists of costs of third-party products and services and client reimbursed out-of-pocket costs. Cost of revenue does not include certain expenses relating to hosting our services and providing support and related data center capacity (which is included in general and administrative expenses), and allocated amounts for rent, depreciation, amortization or other indirect operating costs because we do not consider the inclusion of these items in cost of revenue relevant to our business. However, cost of revenue does include the amortization for the cost of software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed. As a result of the Broadlane Acquisition and related integration, there may be some re-allocation of expenses primarily between cost of revenue and general and administrative expense resulting from the implementation of our accounting expense allocation policies that could affect period over period comparability. In addition, any changes in revenue mix between our SCM and RCM segments, including changes in revenue mix towards SaaS-based revenue and consulting services, may cause significant fluctuations in our cost of revenue and have a favorable or unfavorable impact on operating income. |
| — | | Product development expenses. Product development expenses primarily consist of the salaries, benefits, incentive compensation and share-based compensation expense of the technology professionals who develop, support and maintain our software-related products and services. Product development expenses are net of capitalized software development costs for both internal and external use. |
| — | | Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of costs related to marketing programs (including trade shows and brand messaging), personnel-related expenses for sales and marketing employees (including salaries, benefits, incentive compensation and share-based compensation expense), certain meeting costs and travel-related expenses. |
| — | | General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related expenses for administrative employees and indirect time related to operational service-based employees (including salaries, benefits, incentive compensation and share-based compensation expense) and travel-related expenses, occupancy and other indirect costs, insurance costs, professional fees, and other general overhead expenses. |
| — | | Acquisition and integration-related expenses. Acquisition and integration-related expenses may consist of: (i) costs incurred to complete acquisitions including due diligence, consulting and other related fees; (ii) integration and restructuring-type costs relating to our completed acquisitions; and (iii) acquisition-related fees associated with unsuccessful acquisition attempts. |
| — | | Depreciation. Depreciation expense consists primarily of depreciation of fixed assets and the amortization of software, including capitalized costs of software developed for internal use. |
| — | | Amortization of intangibles. Amortization of intangibles includes the amortization of all identified intangible assets (with the exception of software), primarily resulting from acquisitions. |
21
Results of Operations
Consolidated Tables
The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations grouped by segment for the periods shown:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Unaudited, in thousands) | | | (Unaudited, in thousands) | |
Net revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross administrative fees(1) | | $ | 107,512 | | | $ | 93,799 | | | $ | 212,016 | | | $ | 184,124 | |
Revenue share obligation(1) | | | (40,817) | | | | (33,984) | | | | (79,905) | | | | (67,727) | |
Other service fees | | | 35,420 | | | | 31,297 | | | | 63,269 | | | | 54,049 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 102,115 | | | | 91,112 | | | | 195,380 | | | | 170,446 | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | | 60,895 | | | | 56,262 | | | | 117,520 | | | | 107,487 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | | 163,010 | | | | 147,374 | | | | 312,900 | | | | 277,933 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 77,173 | | | | 78,672 | | | | 148,223 | | | | 159,482 | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | | 56,011 | | | | 48,208 | | | | 108,191 | | | | 95,391 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total segment operating expenses | | | 133,184 | | | | 126,880 | | | | 256,414 | | | | 254,873 | |
Operating income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 24,942 | | | | 12,440 | | | | 47,157 | | | | 10,964 | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | | 4,884 | | | | 8,054 | | | | 9,329 | | | | 12,096 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total segment operating income | | | 29,826 | | | | 20,494 | | | | 56,486 | | | | 23,060 | |
Corporate expenses(2) | | | 11,726 | | | | 6,868 | | | | 21,678 | | | | 15,907 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 18,100 | | | | 13,626 | | | | 34,808 | | | | 7,153 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | (16,871) | | | | (18,075) | | | | (34,050) | | | | (36,124) | |
Other income | | | 228 | | | | 109 | | | | 335 | | | | 280 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 1,457 | | | | (4,340) | | | | 1,093 | | | | (28,691) | |
Income tax benefit | | | (794) | | | | (1,852) | | | | (919) | | | | (10,033) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 2,251 | | | | (2,488) | | | | 2,012 | | | | (18,658) | |
Reportable segment adjusted EBITDA(3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 44,558 | | | | 37,355 | | | | 86,506 | | | | 73,505 | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | $ | 12,079 | | | $ | 14,251 | | | $ | 23,697 | | | $ | 25,721 | |
Reportable segment adjusted EBITDA margin(4): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 43.6% | | | | 41.0% | | | | 44.3% | | | | 43.1% | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | | 19.8% | | | | 25.3% | | | | 20.2% | | | | 23.9% | |
| (1) | These are non-GAAP measures. See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information. |
| (2) | Represents the expenses of corporate office operations. |
| (3) | Management’s primary metric of segment profit or loss is segment adjusted EBITDA. See Note 11 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| (4) | Reportable segment adjusted EBITDA margin represents each reportable segment’s adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of each segment’s respective net revenue. |
22
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | Change | |
| | Amount | | | % of Revenue | | | Amount | | | % of Revenue | | | Amount | | | % | |
| | (Unaudited, in thousands) | |
Net revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross administrative fees(1) | | $ | 107,512 | | | | 66.0% | | | $ | 93,799 | | | | 63.6% | | | $ | 13,713 | | | | 14.6% | |
Revenue share obligation(1) | | | (40,817) | | | | (25.0) | | | | (33,984) | | | | (23.1) | | | | (6,833) | | | | 20.1 | |
Other service fees | | | 35,420 | | | | 21.7 | | | | 31,297 | | | | 21.2 | | | | 4,123 | | | | 13.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 102,115 | | | | 62.6 | | | | 91,112 | | | | 61.8 | | | | 11,003 | | | | 12.1 | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | | 60,895 | | | | 37.4 | | | | 56,262 | | | | 38.2 | | | | 4,633 | | | | 8.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | $ | 163,010 | | | | 100.0% | | | $ | 147,374 | | | | 100.0% | | | $ | 15,636 | | | | 10.6% | |
(1) | These are non-GAAP measures. See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information. |
Total net revenue. Total net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $163.0 million, an increase of approximately $15.6 million, or 10.6%, from total net revenue of $147.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in total net revenue was comprised of an $11.0 million increase in SCM revenue and a $4.6 million increase in RCM revenue. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, performance-related revenue as a percentage of consolidated net revenue amounted to approximately 3.1% and 3.7%, respectively. Revenue may fluctuate significantly from period to period based upon achieving and receiving customer acknowledgement of our achievement of the financial performance targets.
Spend and Clinical Resource Management net revenue. SCM net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $102.1 million, an increase of $11.0 million, or 12.1%, from net revenue of $91.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was the result of an increase in gross administrative fees of $13.7 million, or 14.6%, partially offset by an approximate $6.8 million increase in non-GAAP revenue share obligation, and an increase in other service fees of $4.1 million.
| — | | Gross administrative fees. Non-GAAP gross administrative fee revenue increased by $13.7 million, or 14.6%, as compared to the prior period, primarily due to higher purchasing volumes by new and existing clients under our group purchasing organization contracts with our manufacturer and distributor vendors. We may have fluctuations in our non-GAAP gross administrative fee revenue in future periods as the timing of vendor reporting and client acknowledgement of achieved performance targets varies. |
| — | | Revenue share obligation. Non-GAAP revenue share obligation increased $6.8 million, or 20.1%, as compared to the prior period. We analyze the impact of our non-GAAP revenue share obligation on our results of operations by calculating the ratio of non-GAAP revenue share obligation to non-GAAP gross administrative fees including administrative fees not subject to a variable revenue share obligation (or the “revenue share ratio”). Our revenue share ratio was 38.0% and 36.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our revenue share ratio increased during the three months ended June 30, 2012 as a result of gross administrative fee growth driven by clients that are entitled to a higher revenue share percentage. We may continue to experience fluctuations in our revenue share ratio based on the mix of clients who are entitled to a higher revenue share percentage due to increased purchasing volume in addition to an increase in the number of fixed-fee arrangements. |
| — | | Other service fees. The $4.1 million, or 13.2%, increase in other service fees primarily related to $4.3 million in higher revenues from medical device consulting and strategic sourcing services. The growth in supply chain consulting was mainly due to an increased number of engagements from new and existing clients. The increase was partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in revenue relating to our decision support services business. In addition, we recorded $5.1 million in revenue associated with our annual client and vendor meeting for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $5.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. |
Revenue Cycle Management net revenue. RCM net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $60.9 million, an increase of $4.6 million, or 8.2%, from net revenue of $56.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was attributable to a $5.3 million increase in revenue from our revenue cycle technology tools partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in revenue from our comprehensive revenue cycle service engagements. As we engage new clients, renew with existing clients and complete existing contracts, we will continue to experience fluctuations in our revenue cycle services financial performance as the business is characterized by fewer agreements, which each relate to large amounts of revenue.
23
Total Operating Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | Change | |
| | Amount | | | % of Revenue | | | Amount | | | % of Revenue | | | Amount | | | % | |
| | (Unaudited, in thousands) | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | $ 34,730 | | | | 21.3% | | | | $ 30,488 | | | | 20.7% | | | | $ 4,242 | | | | 13.9% | |
Product development expenses | | | 6,638 | | | | 4.1 | | | | 6,202 | | | | 4.2 | | | | 436 | | | | 7.0 | |
Selling and marketing expenses | | | 19,178 | | | | 11.8 | | | | 18,000 | | | | 12.2 | | | | 1,178 | | | | 6.5 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 56,574 | | | | 34.7 | | | | 46,770 | | | | 31.7 | | | | 9,804 | | | | 21.0 | |
Acquisition and integration-related expenses | | | 2,028 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 6,828 | | | | 4.6 | | | | (4,800) | | | | (70.3) | |
Depreciation | | | 7,281 | | | | 4.5 | | | | 5,228 | | | | 3.5 | | | | 2,053 | | | | 39.3 | |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 18,481 | | | | 11.3 | | | | 20,232 | | | | 13.7 | | | | (1,751) | | | | (8.7) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 144,910 | | | | 88.9 | | | | 133,748 | | | | 90.8 | | | | 11,162 | | | | 8.3 | |
Operating expenses by segment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 77,173 | | | | 47.3 | | | | 78,672 | | | | 53.4 | | | | (1,499) | | | | (1.9) | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | | 56,011 | | | | 34.4 | | | | 48,208 | | | | 32.7 | | | | 7,803 | | | | 16.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total segment operating expenses | | | 133,184 | | | | 81.7 | | | | 126,880 | | | | 86.1 | | | | 6,304 | | | | 5.0 | |
Corporate expenses | | | 11,726 | | | | 7.2 | | | | 6,868 | | | | 4.7 | | | | 4,858 | | | | 70.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | $ 144,910 | | | | 88.9% | | | | $ 133,748 | | | | 90.8% | | | | $ 11,162 | | | | 8.3% | |
Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $34.7 million, or 21.3% of total net revenue, an increase of $4.2 million, or 13.9%, from cost of revenue of $30.5 million, or 20.7% of total net revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in service-related engagements in our RCM segment, which resulted in a higher cost of revenue given these activities are more labor intensive. In addition, for our engagements that include achieving financial performance targets, we recognize revenue based on when the financial performance targets are achieved and such achievement is acknowledged by our customers. There are instances during a reporting period where we incur a higher amount of direct costs with no associated revenue for these types of engagements, which affects period over period comparability and profitability.
Product development expenses. Product development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $6.6 million, or 4.1% of total net revenue, an increase of $0.4 million, or 7.0%, from product development expenses of $6.2 million, or 4.2% of total net revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
The increase was primarily attributable to a $0.6 million increase in professional fees partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in compensation expense to new and existing employees. Our product development capitalization rate for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was 62.7% and 46.4%, respectively. The higher capitalization rate for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to: (i) an increase in product development within our SCM segment attributable to investments in integration-related activities in connection with combining the operations of Broadlane with our existing operations; and (ii) an increase in RCM investments in product development primarily due to new product features and functionality, new technologies, and upgrades to our service offerings.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $19.2 million, or 11.8% of total net revenue, an increase of $1.2 million, or 6.5%, from selling and marketing expenses of $18.0 million, or 12.2% of total net revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was attributable to a $0.9 million increase in share-based compensation expense primarily due to the reversal of share-based compensation during the three months ended June 30, 2011 relating to certain performance-based restricted stock grants and SSAR grants (as discussed in the “Overview”); a $0.8 million increase in compensation expense relating to new and existing employees; and a $0.3 million increase in other operating infrastructure expense. The increase was partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in expenses associated with our client and vendor meeting. Total expenses related to our client and vendor meeting amounted to $6.2 million and $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were approximately $56.6 million, or 34.7% of total net revenue, an increase of $9.8 million, or 21.0%, from general and administrative expenses of $46.8 million, or 31.7% of total net revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was attributable to a $4.5 million increase in compensation expense to new and existing employees, primarily operations-based employees; a $3.3 million increase in share-based compensation expense (for the reason described under “Selling and marketing expenses”); a $1.0 million increase in professional fees; a $0.5 million increase in telecommunications expense; and a $0.5 million increase in other operating infrastructure expense.
Acquisition-related expenses. Acquisition and integration-related expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $2.0 million, or 1.2% of total net revenue, a decrease of $4.8 million, from acquisition-related expenses of $6.8 million, or 4.6% of total net revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was attributable to the decrease in costs relating to our integration and restructuring associated with our restructuring plans which include costs such as severance, retention, salaries relating to redundant positions, certain performance-related salary-based compensation, and operating infrastructure costs.
We expect to continue to incur costs in future periods related to our plans including aligning service offerings and standardizing and migrating certain Broadlane operational systems and transactional data sets into our operational systems. However, we expect these additional costs will be substantially less than those incurred in 2011.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $7.3 million, or 4.5% of total net revenue, an increase of $2.1 million, or 39.3%, from depreciation of $5.2 million, or 3.5% of total net revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to depreciation resulting from purchases of property and equipment inclusive of increases to capitalized software development.
Amortization of intangibles. Amortization of intangibles for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $18.5 million, or 11.3% of total net revenue, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 8.7%, from amortization of intangibles of $20.2 million, or 13.7% of total net revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in amortization expense compared to the prior year was due to certain identified intangible assets that are nearing the end of their useful life under an accelerated method of amortization.
24
Segment Operating Expenses
Spend and Clinical Resource Management expenses. SCM operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $77.2 million, or 47.3% of total net revenue, a decrease of $1.5 million, or 1.9%, from $78.7 million, or 53.4% of total net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011. As a percentage of SCM segment net revenue, segment expenses were 75.6% and 86.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The decrease was primarily attributable to a $4.8 million decrease in integration and restructuring costs associated with the Broadlane Acquisition, including severance, retention, certain performance-related salary-based compensation, and operating infrastructure costs; a $1.6 million decrease in cost of revenue in connection with lower direct labor costs; a $1.2 million decrease in the amortization of intangibles as certain of these intangible assets reached the end of their useful life; and a $0.7 million decrease in expenses associated with our client and vendor meeting. The decrease was partially offset by a $5.2 million increase in compensation expense to new and existing employees, primarily operations-based employees; a $0.8 million increase in share-based compensation expense (for the reason described under “Selling and marketing expenses”); a $0.4 million increase in depreciation expense; and a $0.4 million increase in other operating infrastructure expense.
Revenue Cycle Management expenses. RCM operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $56.0 million, or 34.4% of total net revenue, an increase of $7.8 million, or 16.2%, from $48.2 million, or 32.7% of total net revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. As a percentage of RCM segment net revenue, segment expenses were 92.0% and 85.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
RCM operating expenses increased as a result of a $5.0 million increase in cost of revenue in connection with higher direct labor costs related to more service-based engagements; a $1.3 million increase in professional fees; a $1.0 million increase in telecommunications expense; a $0.9 million increase in share-based compensation expense (for the reason described under “Selling and marketing expenses”); and a $0.7 million increase in depreciation expense. The increase was partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in amortization of intangibles as certain of these intangible assets reached the end of their useful life; and a $0.5 million decrease in other operating infrastructure expense.
Corporate expenses. Corporate expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $11.7 million, an increase of $4.8 million, or 70.7%, from $6.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, or 7.2% and 4.7% of total net revenue, respectively. The increase in corporate expenses was primarily attributable to a $3.3 million increase in share-based compensation expense (for the reason described under “Selling and marketing expenses”); a $1.1 million increase in depreciation expense and a $0.4 million increase in professional fees.
Non-operating Expenses
Interest expense. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $16.9 million, a decrease of $1.2 million from interest expense of $18.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to: (i) a lower level of indebtedness compared to the prior period and (ii) our revolving credit facility having a lower interest rate as it is not subject to the minimum 1.50% LIBOR floor. As of June 30, 2012, we had total indebtedness of $930.5 million compared to $931.8 million as of June 30, 2011. See Note 6 of the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein for more details.
Other income. Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.2 million, comprised of $0.1 million in rental income and $0.1 million from a gain on the sale of certain assets. Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $0.1 million, primarily comprised of rental income.
Income tax benefit. Income tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.8 million, a decrease of $1.0 million from an income tax benefit of $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, which was primarily attributable to increased income before taxes. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we realigned our legal entities for tax reporting purposes to fully reflect the integration of the Broadlane acquisition into our operations. The realignment required us to recognize a reduction in our state income tax rate and as a result, we recognized a $1.4 million discrete tax benefit during the three months ended June 30, 2012. As a result, income tax benefit recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 reflected an effective income tax rate of (54.5%) and 42.7%, respectively.
In August 2011, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service that the 2009 federal income tax returns for both MedAssets, Inc. and its subsidiaries and Broadlane and its subsidiaries had been selected for examination. Fieldwork commenced in September 2011. No conclusion or preliminary results have been communicated to us. We do not expect any material assessment to be realized from these examinations. We anticipate that the examinations will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2012.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | Change | |
| | Amount | | | % of Revenue | | | Amount | | | % of Revenue | | | Amount | | | % | |
| | (Unaudited, in thousands) | |
Net revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross administrative fees(1) | | $ | 212,016 | | | | 67.8% | | | $ | 184,124 | | | | 66.2% | | | $ | 27,892 | | | | 15.1% | |
Revenue share obligation(1) | | | (79,905) | | | | (25.5) | | | | (67,727) | | | | (24.4) | | | | (12,178) | | | | 18.0 | |
Other service fees | | | 63,269 | | | | 20.2 | | | | 54,049 | | | | 19.4 | | | | 9,220 | | | | 17.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 195,380 | | | | 62.4 | | | | 170,446 | | | | 61.3 | | | | 24,934 | | | | 14.6 | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | | 117,520 | | | | 37.6 | | | | 107,487 | | | | 38.7 | | | | 10,033 | | | | 9.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | $ | 312,900 | | | | 100.0% | | | $ | 277,933 | | | | 100.0% | | | $ | 34,967 | | | | 12.6% | |
(1) | These are non-GAAP measures. See “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information. |
25
Total net revenue. Total net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $312.9 million, an increase of approximately $35.0 million, or 12.6%, from total net revenue of $277.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Total net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 excludes $6.1 million of revenue due to purchase accounting revenue adjustments required under GAAP (refer to footnote 4 of the Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation table included in the “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for additional information). Had this amount been included in total net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, our total net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 would have reflected an increase of 10.2% as compared to the prior period. The increase in total net revenue was comprised of a $25.0 million increase in SCM revenue and a $10.0 million increase in RCM revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, performance-related revenue as a percentage of consolidated net revenue amounted to approximately 3.2% and 2.4%, respectively. Revenue may fluctuate significantly from period to period based upon achieving and receiving customer acknowledgement of our achievement of the financial performance targets.
Spend and Clinical Resource Management net revenue. SCM net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $195.4 million, an increase of $25.0 million, or 14.6%, from net revenue of $170.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. SCM net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 excludes $6.1 million of revenue due to purchase accounting revenue adjustments required under GAAP. Had this amount been included in total SCM net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, our SCM net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 would have reflected an increase of 10.7% as compared to the prior period. The increase was the result of an increase in gross administrative fees of $27.9 million, or 15.1%, partially offset by an approximate $12.1 million increase in non-GAAP revenue share obligation, and an increase in other service fees of $9.2 million.
| — | | Gross administrative fees. Non-GAAP gross administrative fee revenue increased by $27.9 million, or 15.1%, as compared to the prior period, primarily due to higher purchasing volumes by new and existing clients under our group purchasing organization contracts with our manufacturer and distributor vendors. Non-GAAP gross administrative revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 excludes $9.2 million of revenue due to purchase accounting revenue adjustments required under GAAP. Had this amount been included in non-GAAP gross administrative fee revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, our non-GAAP gross administrative fee revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 would have reflected an increase of 9.7% as compared to the prior period. We may have fluctuations in our non-GAAP gross administrative fee revenue in future periods as the timing of vendor reporting and client acknowledgement of achieved performance targets varies. |
| — | | Revenue share obligation. Non-GAAP revenue share obligation increased $12.1 million, or 18.0%, as compared to the prior period. Non-GAAP revenue share obligation for the six months ended June 30, 2011 excludes $4.7 million of purchase accounting revenue adjustments required under GAAP. Had this amount been included in non-GAAP revenue share obligation for the six months ended June 30, 2011, our non-GAAP revenue share obligation for the six months ended June 30, 2012 would have reflected an increase of 10.4% as compared to the prior period. We analyze the impact of our non-GAAP revenue share obligation on our results of operations by calculating the ratio of non-GAAP revenue share obligation to non-GAAP gross administrative fees including administrative fees not subject to a variable revenue share obligation (or the “revenue share ratio”). Our revenue share ratio was 37.7% and 36.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our revenue share ratio increased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 as a result of gross administrative fee growth driven by clients that are entitled to a higher revenue share percentage. We may continue to experience fluctuations in our revenue share ratio based on the mix of clients who are entitled to a higher revenue share percentage due to increased purchasing volume in addition to an increase in the number of fixed-fee arrangements. |
| — | | Other service fees. The $9.2 million, or 17.1%, increase in other service fees primarily related to $9.9 million in higher revenues from medical device consulting and strategic sourcing services. Other service fees for the six months ended June 30, 2011 excludes $1.6 million of revenue due to purchase accounting revenue adjustments required under GAAP. Had this amount been included in other service fees for the six months ended June 30, 2011, our other service fee revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 would have reflected an increase of 13.8% as compared to the prior period. The growth in supply chain consulting was mainly due to an increased number of engagements from new and existing clients. The increase was partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in revenue relating to our decision support services business. In addition, we recorded $5.1 million in revenue associated with our annual client and vendor meeting for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. |
Revenue Cycle Management net revenue. RCM net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $117.5 million, an increase of $10.0 million, or 9.3%, from net revenue of $107.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was attributable to a $9.0 million increase in revenue from our revenue cycle technology tools and a $1.0 million increase in revenue from our comprehensive revenue cycle service engagements. As we engage new clients, renew with existing clients and complete existing contracts, we will continue to experience fluctuations in our revenue cycle services financial performance as the business is characterized by fewer agreements, which each relate to large amounts of revenue.
26
Total Operating Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | Change | |
| | Amount | | | % of Revenue | | | Amount | | | % of Revenue | | | Amount | | | % | |
| | (Unaudited, in thousands) | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | $ 66,013 | | | | 21.1% | | | | $ 61,043 | | | | 22.0% | | | | $ 4,970 | | | | 8.1% | |
Product development expenses | | | 13,560 | | | | 4.3 | | | | 12,875 | | | | 4.6 | | | | 685 | | | | 5.3 | |
Selling and marketing expenses | | | 33,726 | | | | 10.8 | | | | 30,601 | | | | 11.0 | | | | 3,125 | | | | 10.2 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 110,410 | | | | 35.3 | | | | 95,911 | | | | 34.5 | | | | 14,499 | | | | 15.1 | |
Acquisition and integration-related expenses | | | 3,277 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 18,971 | | | | 6.8 | | | | (15,694) | | | | (82.7) | |
Depreciation | | | 13,695 | | | | 4.4 | | | | 10,907 | | | | 3.9 | | | | 2,788 | | | | 25.6 | |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 37,411 | | | | 12.0 | | | | 40,472 | | | | 14.6 | | | | (3,061) | | | | (7.6) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 278,092 | | | | 88.9 | | | | 270,780 | | | | 97.4 | | | | 7,312 | | | | 2.7 | |
Operating expenses by segment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spend and Clinical Resource Management | | | 148,223 | | | | 47.4 | | | | 159,482 | | | | 57.4 | | | | (11,259) | | | | (7.1) | |
Revenue Cycle Management | | | 108,191 | | | | 34.6 | | | | 95,391 | | | | 34.3 | | | | 12,800 | | | | 13.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total segment operating expenses | | | 256,414 | | | | 81.9 | | | | 254,873 | | | | 91.7 | | | | 1,541 | | | | 0.6 | |
Corporate expenses | | | 21,678 | | | | 6.9 | | | | 15,907 | | | | 5.7 | | | | 5,771 | | | | 36.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | $ 278,092 | | | | 88.9% | | | | $ 270,780 | | | | 97.4% | | | | $ 7,312 | | | | 2.7% | |
Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $66.0 million, or 21.1% of total net revenue, an increase of $5.0 million, or 8.1%, from cost of revenue of $61.0 million, or 22.0% of total net revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in service-related engagements in our RCM segment, which resulted in a higher cost of revenue given these activities are more labor intensive. In addition, for our engagements that include achieving financial performance targets, we recognize revenue based on when the financial performance targets are achieved and such achievement is acknowledged by our customers. There are instances during a reporting period where we incur a higher amount of direct costs with no associated revenue for these types of engagements, which affects period over period comparability and profitability.
Product development expenses. Product development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $13.6 million, or 4.3% of total net revenue, an increase of $0.7 million, or 5.3%, from product development expenses of $12.9 million, or 4.6% of total net revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The increase was primarily attributable to a $1.2 million increase in professional fees partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in compensation expense to new and existing employees. Our product development capitalization rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was 59.8% and 45.3%, respectively. The higher capitalization rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to: (i) an increase in product development within our SCM reporting unit attributable to investments in integration-related activities in connection with combining the operations of Broadlane with our existing operations; and (ii) an increase in RCM investments in product development primarily due to new product features and functionality, new technologies, and upgrades to our service offerings.
Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $33.7 million, or 10.8% of total net revenue, an increase of $3.1 million, or 10.2%, from selling and marketing expenses of $30.6 million, or 11.0% of total net revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was attributable to a $2.1 million increase in compensation expense relating to new and existing employees; a $1.0 million increase in share-based compensation expense primarily due to the reversal of share-based compensation during the three months ended June 30, 2011 relating to certain performance-based restricted stock grants and SSAR grants (as discussed in the “Overview”); and a $0.8 million increase in other operating infrastructure expense. The increase was partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in expenses associated with our client and vendor meeting. Total expenses related to our client and vendor meeting amounted to $6.2 million and $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were approximately $110.4 million, or 35.3% of total net revenue, an increase of $14.5 million, or 15.1%, from general and administrative expenses of $95.9 million, or 34.5% of total net revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was attributable to a $7.3 million increase in compensation expense to new and existing employees, primarily operations-based employees; a $2.8 million increase in share-based compensation expense (for the reason described under “Selling and marketing expenses”); a $2.0 million increase in professional fees; a $1.2 million increase in telecommunications expense; and a $1.2 million increase in other operating infrastructure expense.
Acquisition-related expenses. Acquisition and integration-related expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $3.3 million, or 1.0% of total net revenue, a decrease of $15.7 million, from acquisition-related expenses of $19.0 million, or 6.8% of total net revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was attributable to the decrease in costs relating to our integration and restructuring associated with our restructuring plans which include costs such as severance, retention, salaries relating to redundant positions, certain performance-related salary-based compensation, and operating infrastructure costs.
We expect to continue to incur costs in future periods related to our plans including aligning service offerings and standardizing and migrating certain Broadlane operational systems and transactional data sets into our operational systems. However, we expect these additional costs will be substantially less than those incurred in 2011.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $13.7 million, or 4.4% of total net revenue, an increase of $2.8 million, or 25.6%, from depreciation of $10.9 million, or 3.9% of total net revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to depreciation resulting from purchases of property and equipment inclusive of increases to capitalized software development.
Amortization of intangibles. Amortization of intangibles for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $37.4 million, or 12.0% of total net revenue, a decrease of $3.1 million, or 7.6%, from amortization of intangibles of $40.5 million, or 14.6% of total net revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in amortization expense compared to the prior year was due to certain identified intangible assets that are nearing the end of their useful life under an accelerated method of amortization.
27
Segment Operating Expenses
Spend and Clinical Resource Management expenses. SCM operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $148.2 million, or 47.4% of total net revenue, a decrease of $11.3 million, or 7.1%, from $159.5 million, or 57.4% of total net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011. As a percentage of SCM segment net revenue, segment expenses were 75.9% and 93.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The decrease was primarily attributable to a $15.6 million decrease in integration and restructuring costs associated with the Broadlane Acquisition, including severance, retention, certain performance-related salary-based compensation, and operating infrastructure costs; a $3.7 million decrease in cost of revenue in connection with lower direct labor costs; a $2.1 million decrease in the amortization of intangibles as certain of these intangible assets reached the end of their useful life; a $0.7 million decrease in expenses associated with our client and vendor meeting; and a $0.4 million decrease in rent expense. The decrease was partially offset by an $9.8 million increase in compensation expense to new and existing employees, primarily operations-based employees; a $0.5 million increase in share-based compensation expense (for the reason described under “Selling and marketing expenses”); a $0.5 million increase in other operating infrastructure expense; and a $0.4 million increase in professional fees.
Revenue Cycle Management expenses. RCM operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $108.2 million, or 34.6% of total net revenue, an increase of $12.8 million, or 13.4%, from $95.4 million, or 34.3% of total net revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. As a percentage of RCM segment net revenue, segment expenses were 92.1% and 88.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
RCM operating expenses increased as a result of a $8.3 million increase in cost of revenue in connection with higher direct labor costs related to more service-based engagements; a $2.5 million increase in professional fees; a $2.1 million increase in telecommunications expense; a $0.9 million increase in depreciation expense; and a $0.8 million increase in share-based compensation expense (for the reason described under “Selling and marketing expenses”). The increase was partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in amortization of intangibles as certain of these intangible assets reached the end of their useful life; a $0.6 million decrease in compensation expense to new and existing employees; and a $0.2 million decrease in other operating infrastructure expense.
Corporate expenses. Corporate expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $21.7 million, an increase of $5.8 million, or 36.3%, from $15.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, or 6.9% and 5.7% of total net revenue, respectively. The increase in corporate expenses was attributable to a $2.9 million increase in share-based compensation expense (for the reason described within “Selling and marketing expenses”); a $2.1 million increase in depreciation expense; and a $0.8 million increase in other operating infrastructure expense.
Non-operating Expenses
Interest expense. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $34.0 million, a decrease of $2.1 million from interest expense of $36.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to: (i) a lower level of indebtedness compared to the prior period and (ii) our revolving credit facility having a lower interest rate as it is not subject to the minimum 1.50% LIBOR floor. As of June 30, 2012, we had total indebtedness of $930.5 million compared to $931.8 million as of June 30, 2011. See Note 6 of the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein for more details.
Other income. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.3 million, primarily comprised of $0.2 million in rental income and $0.1 million from a gain on the sale of certain assets. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $0.3 million, comprised of rental income.
Income tax benefit. Income tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.9 million, a decrease of $9.1 million from an income tax benefit of $10.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, which was primarily attributable to increased income before taxes. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we realigned our legal entities for tax reporting purposes to fully reflect the integration of the Broadlane acquisition into our operations. The realignment required us to recognize a reduction in our state income tax rate and as a result, we recognized a $1.4 million discrete tax benefit during the three months ended June 30, 2012. As a result, income tax benefit recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 reflected an effective income tax rate of (84.1%) and 35.0%, respectively.
In August 2011, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service that the 2009 federal income tax returns for both MedAssets, Inc. and its subsidiaries and Broadlane and its subsidiaries had been selected for examination. Fieldwork commenced in September 2011. No conclusion or preliminary results have been communicated to us. We do not expect any material assessment to be realized from these examinations. We anticipate that the examinations will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2012.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other assumptions that we find reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from such estimates under different conditions.
Management considers an accounting policy to be critical if the accounting policy requires management to make particularly difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) of Part II, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary cash requirements involve payment of ordinary expenses, working capital fluctuations, debt service obligations and capital expenditures. Our capital expenditures typically consist of software purchases, internal product development capitalization and computer hardware purchases. Historically, the acquisition of complementary businesses has resulted in a significant use of cash. Our principal sources of funds have primarily been cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our credit facilities.
We believe we currently have adequate cash flow from operations, capital resources, available credit facilities and liquidity to meet our cash flow requirements including the following near term obligations (next 12 months): (i) our working capital needs; (ii) our debt service obligations; (iii) planned capital expenditures; (iv) our revenue share obligation and rebate payments; and (v) estimated federal and state income tax payments.
28
On November 16, 2010, we entered into a credit agreement with Barclays Bank PLC and JP Morgan Securities LLC. The credit agreement consists of a six-year $635.0 million senior secured term loan facility and a five-year $150.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility that contains a letter of credit sub-facility of $25.0 million and a swing line sub-facility of $25.0 million. On March 31, 2011, we entered into the first amendment to the credit agreement to redefine the swing line lender as Bank of America, N.A. from Barclays Bank.
In November 2010, we closed the offering of an aggregate principal amount of $325.0 million of senior notes due 2018 (the “Notes”). The Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s existing domestic subsidiaries and each of the Company’s future domestic restricted subsidiaries in each case that guarantees the Company’s obligations under the credit agreement. Each of the subsidiary guarantors is 100% owned by the Company; the guarantees by the subsidiary guarantors are full and unconditional; the guarantees by the subsidiary guarantors are joint and several; the Company has no independent assets or operations; and any subsidiaries of the Company other than the subsidiary guarantors are minor. The Notes and the guarantees are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and the subsidiary guarantors, respectively. The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of November 16, 2010 (the “Indenture”) among the Company, its subsidiary guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. Pursuant to the Indenture, the Notes will mature on November 15, 2018 and bear 8% annual interest. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning on May 15, 2011.
Historically, we have utilized federal net operating loss carryforwards to reduce both regular and Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) cash payments. Consequently, our federal cash tax payments in past reporting periods have been minimal. In 2011, we exhausted our federal net operating loss carryforwards for both regular and AMT payments purposes and expect to exhaust our remaining federal credits for regular tax purposes. As a result, for tax years 2012 and later, we expect our federal cash tax payments to increase significantly.
We have not historically utilized borrowings available under our existing credit agreement to fund operations. We have an auto-borrowing plan which causes excess cash on hand to be used to repay our swing-line credit facility on a daily basis. See Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
As of June 30, 2012, we had $55.0 million drawn on our revolving credit facility resulting in $94.0 million of availability under our revolving credit facility inclusive of the swing-line (netted for a $1.0 million letter of credit). We may observe fluctuations in cash flows provided by operations from period to period. Certain events may cause us to draw additional amounts under our swing-line or revolving facility and may include the following:
| — | | changes in working capital due to inconsistent timing of cash receipts and payments for major recurring items such as trade accounts payable, revenue share obligation, incentive compensation, changes in deferred revenue, and other various items; |
| — | | transaction and integration related costs associated with the Broadlane Acquisition; |
| — | | unforeseeable events or transactions. |
We may continue to pursue other acquisitions or investments in the future. We may also increase our capital expenditures consistent with our anticipated growth in infrastructure, software solutions, and personnel, and as we expand our market presence. Cash provided by operating activities may not be sufficient to fund such expenditures. Accordingly, in addition to the use of our available revolving credit facility, we may need to engage in additional equity or debt financings to secure additional funds for such purposes. Any debt financing obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters including higher interest costs, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain required financing on terms satisfactory to us, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be limited.
Discussion of Cash Flow
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $5.4 million and $62.9 million, respectively.
Operating Activities.
The following table summarizes the cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | Change | | |
| | Amount | | | Amount | | | Amount | | | % | | |
| | (Unaudited, in millions) | | |
| | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | $ 2.0 | | | | $ (18.7) | | | | $ 20.7 | | | | 110.7% | | |
Non-cash items | | | 60.2 | | | | 40.1 | | | | 20.1 | | | | 50.1 | | |
Net changes in working capital | | | 0.5 | | | | 15.9 | | | | (15.4) | | | | -96.9 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net cash provided by operations | | | $ 62.7 | | | | $ 37.3 | | | | $ 25.4 | | | | 68.1% | | | |
Net loss represents the loss attained during the periods presented and is inclusive of certain non-cash expenses. These non-cash expenses include depreciation for fixed assets, amortization of intangible assets, stock compensation expense, bad debt expense, deferred income tax expense, excess tax benefit from the exercise of stock options, loss on sale of assets, amortization of debt issuance costs and non-cash interest expense. Refer to our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for details regarding these non-cash items. The total for these non-cash expenses was $60.2 million and $40.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in non-cash expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to June 30, 2011 was primarily attributable to: (i) an increase in deferred income taxes primarily associated with the Broadlane acquisition; (ii) an increase in share-based compensation; and (iii) an increase in the depreciation of property and equipment. The increase was partially offset by: (i) a decrease in amortization of intangibles; and (ii) a decrease in non-cash interest expense primarily associated with the deferred payment that was made in January 2012. Refer to our Management Discussion and Analysis for more detail.
29
Working capital is a measure of our liquid assets. Changes in working capital are included in the determination of cash provided by operating activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the working capital changes resulting in an increase to cash flow from operations of $0.5 million primarily consisted of the following:
Increase to cash flow
| — | | a decrease in accounts receivable of $10.0 million primarily related to the timing of invoicing and cash collections; |
| — | | a decrease in other long-term assets of $1.6 million related to the timing of cash payments for our deferred sales expenses partially offset by an increase in deferred implementation costs; |
| — | | an increase in deferred revenue of $2.6 million for cash receipts not yet recognized as revenue; and |
| — | | a $0.5 million increase in accrued revenue share obligation and rebates due to the timing of cash payments and client purchasing volume for our GPO. |
The working capital changes resulting in increases to cash flow from operations discussed above were partially offset by the following changes in working capital resulting in decreases to cash flow:
Decrease to cash flow
| — | | an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $3.1 million primarily related to an increase in software maintenance costs and higher prepaid taxes partially offset by lower prepaid insurance; |
| — | | a $4.9 million working capital decrease in trade accounts payable due to the timing of various payment obligations; and |
| — | | a $6.5 million decrease in accrued payroll and benefits due to payroll cycle timing and the payment of our 2011 performance-based compensation expense. |
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the working capital changes resulting in an increase to cash flow from operations of $15.9 million primarily consisted of the following:
Increase to cash flow
| — | | a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $2.9 million primarily related to an income tax refund received during the year; |
| — | | a decrease in accounts receivable of $2.1 million primarily related to the timing of invoicing and cash collections; |
| — | | a $11.5 million increase in deferred revenue for cash receipts not yet recognized as revenue; |
| — | | an increase in accrued revenue share obligation and rebates of $4.1 million due to the timing of cash payments and customer purchasing volume at our GPO; and |
| — | | a $1.8 million increase in accrued payroll and benefits due to payroll cycle timing. |
The working capital changes resulting in increases to cash flow from operations discussed above were partially offset by the following changes in working capital resulting in a reduction to cash flow:
Decrease of cash flow
| — | | an increase in other long-term assets of $2.8 million related to the timing of cash payments for our deferred sales expenses and an increase in our deferred implementation costs; and |
| — | | a $3.8 million decrease in other accrued expenses due to the timing of various payment obligations. |
Investing Activities.
Investing activities used $28.1 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2012 which included: $20.2 million for investment in software development; and $7.9 million of capital expenditures. The increase in cash used for investing activities compared to the prior period was primarily due to: (i) investments in software development in connection with combining the operations of Broadlane with our existing operations; and (ii) RCM software development primarily due to new product features and functionality, new technologies, and upgrades to our service offerings.
Investing activities used $16.0 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2011 which included: $10.7 million for investment in software development; and $5.3 million of capital expenditures.
We believe that cash used in investing activities will continue to be materially impacted by continued growth in investments in property and equipment, future acquisitions and capitalized software. Our property, equipment, and software investments consist primarily of SaaS-based technology infrastructure to provide capacity for expansion of our customer base, including computers and related equipment and software purchased or implemented by outside parties. Our software development investments consist primarily of company-managed design, development, testing and deployment of new application functionality.
Financing Activities.
Financing activities used $92.1 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2012. We borrowed $55.0 million from our revolving credit facility to partially fund the deferred payment obligation made in January 2012. We also received $1.8 million from the issuance of common stock; and $0.3 million from the excess tax benefit from the exercise of stock options. This was offset by $120.1 million for the payment of the deferred purchase consideration made in connection with the Broadlane Acquisition; payments made on our credit facility of $28.2 million in addition to payments of $0.3 million that were made on our finance obligation (as discussed below). In addition, we repurchased approximately 62,000 shares of our common stock under our share repurchase program totaling $0.6 million. We are required to prepay our debt obligations based on an excess cash flow calculation for the applicable fiscal year which is determined in accordance with the terms of our credit agreement. We will be required to make any necessary cash flow payment within the first quarter of 2013.
30
Financing activities used $26.0 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2011. We made payments on our credit facility of $28.2 million in addition to payments of $0.3 million that were made on our finance obligation described below in “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commitments”. This was offset by $1.6 million we received from the issuance of common stock and $0.9 million from the excess tax benefit for the exercise of stock options.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commitments
We have provided a $1.0 million letter of credit to guarantee our performance under the terms of a ten-year lease agreement. The letter of credit is associated with the capital lease of a building located in Cape Girardeau, Missouri under a finance obligation. We do not believe that this letter of credit will be drawn.
We lease office space and equipment under operating leases. Some of these operating leases include rent escalations, rent holidays, and rent concessions and incentives. However, we recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term utilizing total future minimum lease payments. Our consolidated future minimum rental payments under our operating leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms of at least one year are as follows as of June 30, 2012 for each respective year (Unaudited, in thousands):
| | | | | | |
| | Amount | | | |
2012 | | $ | 6,243(1) | | | |
2013 | | | 13,259 | | | |
2014 | | | 13,356 | | | |
2015 | | | 11,673 | | | |
2016 | | | 9,129 | | | |
Thereafter | | | 67,750 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Total future minimum rental payments | | $ | 121,410 | | | |
| | | | | | |
(1) Represents the remaining rental payments due during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.
As of June 30, 2012, we did not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future significant effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In order to provide investors with greater insight, promote transparency and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the information used by management and the Board in its financial and operational decision-making, we supplement our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented on a GAAP basis herein with the following non-GAAP financial measures: gross fees, gross administrative fees, revenue share obligation, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share.
These non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. We compensate for such limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using non-GAAP financial measures only supplementally. We provide reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measures, where possible. Investors are encouraged to carefully review those reconciliations. In addition, because these non-GAAP measures are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and are susceptible to varying calculations, these measures, as defined by us, may differ from and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
Gross Fees, Gross Administrative Fees and Revenue Share Obligation. Gross fees include all gross administrative fees we receive pursuant to our vendor contracts and all other fees we receive from clients. Our revenue share obligation represents the portion of the gross administrative fees we are contractually obligated to share with certain of our GPO clients. Total net revenue (a GAAP measure) reflects our gross fees net of our revenue share obligation. These non-GAAP measures assist management and the Board and may be helpful to investors in analyzing our growth in the Spend and Clinical Resource Management segment given that administrative fees constitute a material portion of our revenue and are paid to us by over 1,150 vendors contracted by our GPO, and that our revenue share obligation constitutes a significant outlay to certain of our GPO clients. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measure can be found in the “Overview” and “Results of Operations” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations herein.
EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin. We define: (i) EBITDA, as net income (loss) before net interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization; (ii) adjusted EBITDA, as net income (loss) before net interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization and other non-recurring, non-cash or non-operating items; and (iii) adjusted EBITDA margin, as adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue. We use EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin to facilitate a comparison of our operating performance on a consistent basis from period to period and provide for a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business than GAAP measures alone. These measures assist management and the Board and may be useful to investors in comparing our operating performance consistently over time as it removes the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest charges and amortization of debt issuance costs), asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) and items outside the control of the management team (taxes), as well as other non-cash (purchase accounting adjustments, and imputed rental income) and non-recurring items, from our operational results. Adjusted EBITDA also removes the impact of non-cash share-based compensation expense.
Our Board and management also use these measures as; i) one of the primary methods for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating, on at least a quarterly and annual basis, actual results against such expectations; and ii) as a performance evaluation metric in determining achievement of certain executive incentive compensation programs, as well as for incentive compensation plans for employees generally.
Additionally, research analysts, investment bankers and lenders may use these measures to assess our operating performance. For example, our credit agreement requires delivery of compliance reports certifying compliance with financial covenants certain of which are, in part, based on an adjusted EBITDA measurement that is similar to the adjusted EBITDA measurement reviewed by our management and our Board. The principal difference is that the measurement of adjusted EBITDA considered by our lenders under our credit agreement allows for certain adjustments (e.g., inclusion of interest income, franchise taxes and other non-cash expenses, offset by the deduction of our capitalized lease payments for one of our office leases) that result in a higher adjusted EBITDA than the adjusted EBITDA measure reviewed by our Board and management and disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, our credit agreement contains provisions that utilize other measures, such as excess cash flow, to measure liquidity.
31
EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin are not measures of liquidity under GAAP, or otherwise, and are not alternatives to cash flow from continuing operating activities. Despite the advantages regarding the use and analysis of these measures as mentioned above, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, as disclosed herein, have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider these measures in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP; nor are these measures intended to be measures of liquidity or free cash flow for our discretionary use. Some of the limitations of EBITDA are:
| — | | EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
| — | | EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
| — | | EBITDA does not reflect the interest expense, or the cash requirements to service interest or principal payments under our credit agreement; |
| — | | EBITDA does not reflect income tax payments we are required to make; and |
| — | | Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized often will have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements. |
Adjusted EBITDA has all the inherent limitations of EBITDA. To properly and prudently evaluate our business, we encourage you to review the GAAP financial statements included elsewhere herein, and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. We also strongly urge you to review the reconciliation of net income to adjusted EBITDA in this section, along with our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA to net income, a comparable GAAP-based measure. All of the items included in the reconciliation from net income to EBITDA to adjusted EBITDA are either (i) non-cash items (e.g., depreciation and amortization, impairment of intangibles and share-based compensation expense) or (ii) items that management does not consider in assessing our on-going operating performance (e.g., income taxes, interest expense and expenses related to the cancellation of an interest rate swap and acquisition and integration-related expenses). In the case of the non-cash items, management believes that investors may find it useful to assess our comparative operating performance because the measures without such items are less susceptible to variances in actual performance resulting from depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges and more reflective of other factors that affect operating performance. In the case of the other non-recurring items, management believes that investors may find it useful to assess our operating performance if the measures are presented without these items because their financial impact does not reflect ongoing operating performance.
The following table reconciles net income to Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Unaudited, in thousands) | | | (Unaudited, in thousands) | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,251 | | | $ | (2,488) | | | $ | 2,012 | | | $ | (18,658) | |
Depreciation | | | 7,281 | | | | 5,228 | | | | 13,695 | | | | 10,907 | |
Depreciation (included in cost of revenue) | | | 407 | | | | 254 | | | | 817 | | | | 509 | |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 18,481 | | | | 20,232 | | | | 37,411 | | | | 40,472 | |
Amortization of intangibles (included in cost of revenue) | | | 139 | | | | 139 | | | | 278 | | | | 278 | |
Interest expense, net of interest income(1) | | | 16,866 | | | | 18,068 | | | | 34,045 | | | | 36,110 | |
Income tax benefit | | | (794) | | | | (1,852) | | | | (919) | | | | (10,033) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | | 44,631 | | | | 39,581 | | | | 87,339 | | | | 59,585 | |
Share-based compensation expense(2) | | | 2,456 | | | | (2,521) | | | | 5,015 | | | | 822 | |
Rental income from capitalizing building lease(3) | | | (109) | | | | (109) | | | | (219) | | | | (218) | |
Purchase accounting adjustments(4) | | | — | | | | 499 | | | | — | | | | 6,063 | |
Acquisition and integration-related expenses(5) | | | 2,028 | | | | 6,828 | | | | 3,277 | | | | 18,971 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 49,006 | | | $ | 44,278 | | | $ | 95,412 | | | $ | 85,223 | |
| (1) | Interest income is included in other income (expense) and is not netted against interest expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. |
| (2) | Represents non-cash share-based compensation to both employees and directors. We believe excluding this non-cash expense allows us to compare our operating performance without regard to the impact of share-based compensation expense, which varies from period to period based on the amount and timing of grants. |
| (3) | The imputed rental income recognized with respect to a capitalized building lease is deducted from net loss due to its non-cash nature. We believe this income is not a useful measure of continuing operating performance. See our Consolidated Financial Statements filed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for further discussion of this rental income. |
| (4) | Upon acquiring Broadlane on November 16, 2010, we made certain purchase accounting adjustments that reflect the fair value of administrative fees related to client purchases that occurred prior to November 16, 2010 but were reported to us subsequent to that. Under our revenue recognition accounting policy, which is in accordance with GAAP, these administrative fees would be ordinarily recorded as revenue when reported to us; however, the acquisition method of accounting requires us to estimate the amount of purchases occurring prior to the transaction date and to record the fair value of the administrative fees to be received from those purchases as an account receivable (as opposed to recognizing revenue when these transactions are reported to us and recording any corresponding revenue share obligation as a liability). |
32
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the $0.5 million represents the net amount of: (i) approximately $0.7 million in gross administrative fees and $1.4 million in other service fees primarily based on vendor reporting received from April 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011 relating to purchases made prior to the acquisition date, and (ii) a corresponding revenue share obligation of $0.2 million relating to the same period.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the $6.1 million represents the net amount of: (i) approximately $10.8 million in gross administrative fees and other service fees primarily based on vendor reporting received from January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011 relating to purchases made prior to the acquisition date, and (ii) a corresponding revenue share obligation of $4.7 million relating to the same period.
| (5) | Represents the amount attributable to acquisition and integration-related costs which include costs such as severance, retention, salaries relating to redundant positions, certain performance-related salary-based compensation, and operating infrastructure costs. We expect to incur costs in future periods related to our plans including but not limited to aligning service offerings and standardizing and migrating certain Broadlane operational systems and transactional data sets into our operational systems. |
Adjusted Net Income and Diluted Adjusted Earnings Per Share. The Company defines: i) adjusted net income as net income excluding non-cash acquisition-related intangible amortization and depreciation, and non-recurring expense items on a tax-adjusted basis, non-cash share-based compensation and certain acquisition and integration-related expenses on a tax adjusted basis; and ii) diluted adjusted EPS as earnings per share excluding non-cash acquisition-related intangible amortization and depreciation, and non-recurring expense items, non-cash share-based compensation and certain acquisition and integration-related expenses on a tax-adjusted basis. Adjusted net income and diluted adjusted EPS are not measures of liquidity under GAAP, or otherwise, and are not alternatives to cash flow from continuing operating activities. Diluted adjusted EPS growth has been used historically by the Company as the financial performance metric that determines whether certain equity awards granted pursuant to the Company’s Long-Term Performance Incentive Plan will vest. Use of these measures allows management and the Board to analyze the Company’s operating performance on a consistent basis by removing the impact of certain non-cash and non-recurring items from our operations and assess organic growth and accretive business transactions. As a significant portion of senior management’s incentive based compensation has been based on the achievement of certain diluted adjusted EPS growth over time, which is intended to reward them for organic growth and accretive business transactions, investors may find such information useful; however, as non-GAAP financial measures, adjusted net income and diluted adjusted EPS are not the sole measures of the Company’s financial performance and may not be the best measures for investors to gauge such performance.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
Per share data | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | | (Unaudited) | | | | |
EPS - diluted | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | (0.04) | | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | (0.33) | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax non-cash, acquisition-related intangible amortization and depreciation | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.36 | | | | 0.66 | | | | 0.73 | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax non-cash, share-based compensation(1) | | | 0.04 | | | | (0.04) | | | | 0.09 | | | | 0.02 | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax acquisition and integration-related expenses(2) | | | 0.03 | | | | 0.12 | | | | 0.06 | | | | 0.33 | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax purchase accounting adjustment(3) | | | — | | | | 0.01 | | | | — | | | | 0.11 | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax deferred payment interest expense accretion(4) | | | — | | | | 0.01 | | | | — | | | | 0.02 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Tax effect on pre-tax adjustments(5) | | | (0.16) | | | | (0.19) | | | | (0.33) | | | | (0.48) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Non-GAAP adjusted EPS - diluted | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.40 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Weighted average shares - diluted (in 000s)(6) | | | 58,678 | | | | 57,357 | | | | 58,637 | | | | 57,295 | |
33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Unaudited, in thousands) | | | (Unaudited, in thousands) | |
| | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 2,251 | | | $ | (2,488) | | | $ | 2,012 | | | $ | (18,658) | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax non-cash, acquisition-related intangible amortization and depreciation | | | 19,093 | | | | 20,917 | | | | 38,635 | | | | 41,841 | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax non-cash, share-based compensation(1) | | | 2,456 | | | | (2,521) | | | | 5,015 | | | | 822 | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax acquisition and integration-related expenses(2) | | | 2,028 | | | | 6,828 | | | | 3,277 | | | | 18,971 | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax purchase accounting adjustment(3) | | | — | | | | 499 | | | | — | | | | 6,063 | |
| | | | |
Pre-tax deferred payment interest expense accretion(4) | | | — | | | | 837 | | | | — | | | | 1,654 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Tax effect on pre-tax adjustments(5) | | | (9,430) | | | $ | (10,624) | | | | (18,770) | | | $ | (27,740) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Non-GAAP adjusted net income | | $ | 16,398 | | | $ | 13,448 | | | $ | 30,169 | | | $ | 22,953 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Represents the amount and the per share impact, on a pre-tax basis, of non-cash share-based compensation to employees and directors. We believe excluding this non-cash expense allows us to compare our operating performance without regard to the impact of share-based compensation expense, which varies from period to period based on the amount and timing of grants. |
| (2) | Represents the amount and the per share impact, on a pre-tax basis, of acquisition and integration-related costs which include costs such as severance, retention, salaries relating to redundant positions, certain performance-related salary-based compensation, and operating infrastructure costs. We consider these charges to be non-operating expenses and unrelated to our underlying results of operations. |
| (3) | The amount represents the per share impact, on a pre-tax basis, of certain purchase accounting adjustments associated with the Broadlane Acquisition that reflect the fair value of gross administrative fee receivables and other service fees less revenue share obligation primarily related to client purchases that were reported to us subsequent to the consummation of the Broadlane Acquisition. |
| (4) | The amount represents the per share impact, on a pre-tax basis, of interest expense on the accretion of the $120.1 million deferred payment associated with the Broadlane Acquisition, which was made in January 2012. We believe such expenses are infrequent in nature and are not indicative of continuing operating performance. |
| (5) | Reflects the tax impact on the adjustments used to derive Non-GAAP diluted adjusted EPS. The Company generally utilizes its effective tax rate for each respective period to calculate the tax effect of each adjustment. Given the impact of the Broadlane Acquisition on the Company’s 2011 actual effective tax rate, the Company used a tax rate of 40.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was (54.5%) and 42.7%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was (84.1%) and 35.0%, respectively. |
| (6) | Given the Company’s net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, basic and diluted weighted average shares are the same for EPS and Non-GAAP diluted adjusted EPS. |
New Pronouncements
Intangibles — Goodwill and Other
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standards update amending the guidance on the annual testing of goodwill for impairment. The update will allow companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. We adopted this update on January 1, 2012.
Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update relating to comprehensive income. The update would require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. We adopted this update on January 1, 2012.
Fair Value
In May 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update relating to fair value measurements and disclosures. The update provides a consistent definition of fair value and ensures that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The update changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted this update on January 1, 2012.
34
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign currency exchange risk. Certain of our contracts are denominated in Canadian dollars. As our Canadian sales have not historically been significant to our operations, we do not believe that changes in the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will have a significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We currently do not transact any other business in any currency other than the U.S. dollar. As we continue to grow our operations, we may increase the amount of our sales to foreign clients. Although we do not expect foreign currency exchange risk to have a significant impact on our future operations, we will assess the risk on a case-specific basis to determine whether any forward currency hedge instrument would be warranted.
Interest rate risk. We had outstanding borrowings on our term loan of $550.5 million and on our revolving credit facility of $55.0 million as of June 30, 2012. The term loan bears interest at LIBOR, subject to a floor of 1.5% plus an applicable margin. The revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin. We also had outstanding an aggregate principal amount of our Notes of $325.0 million as of June 30, 2012, which bears interest at 8% per annum.
Due to the additional indebtedness we incurred under the credit agreement and in connection with the issuance of the Notes, we expect to incur a significant increase in our interest expense in future periods. To the extent we do not hedge it, we expect our interest rate risk to rise accordingly. As required by our credit agreement, we entered into certain derivative instruments in 2011 to convert a portion of our variable rate term loan facility to a fixed rate debt. Refer to Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in LIBOR, which would represent potential interest rate change exposure on our outstanding term loan and revolving credit facility, would have resulted in a $3.0 million increase to our interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any control and procedure, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship regarding the potential utilization of certain controls and procedures.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and were operating at a reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the three months ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently involved in any legal proceedings, the outcome of which, if determined adversely to us, would have a material adverse affect on our business, operating results or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
35
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Stock repurchases during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were as follows (unaudited):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | | Average Price Paid per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) | | | | |
January 1-31, 2012 | | | 62 | | | $ | 9.76 | | | | 62 | | | | 19,094 | |
February 1-29, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 19,094 | |
March 1-31, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 19,094 | |
April 1-30, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 19,094 | |
May 1-31, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 19,094 | |
June 1-30, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 19,094 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 62 | | | $ | 9.76 | | | | 62 | | | | | |
For additional information regarding our stock repurchase program, see Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable
Item 6. Exhibits
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description of Exhibit | | |
10.1* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2011, between MedAssets Services, LLC and | | |
| | Gregory A. Stobel | | |
31.1* | | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302 Certification for President and Chief Executive Officer | | |
31.2* | | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302 Certification for Chief Financial Officer | | |
32.1* | | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906 Certification for President and Chief Executive Officer | | |
| | and Chief Financial Officer | | |
101.INS* | | XBRL Instance Document | | |
101.SCH* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | |
101.CAL* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | |
101.DEF* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | |
101.LAB* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | |
101.PRE* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | |
* Filed herewith
36
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date | | |
/s/ JOHN A. BARDIS | | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer | | August 3, 2012 | |
Name: John A. Bardis | | (Principal Executive Officer) | | | |
/s/ CHARLES O. GARNER | | Chief Financial Officer | | August 3, 2012 | |
Name: Charles O. Garner | | (Principal Financial Officer) | | | |
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description of Exhibit | | |
10.1* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2011, between MedAssets Services, LLC and | | |
| | Gregory A. Stobel | | |
31.1* | | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302 Certification for President and Chief Executive Officer | | |
31.2* | | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302 Certification for Chief Financial Officer | | |
32.1* | | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906 Certification for President and Chief Executive Officer | | |
| | and Chief Financial Officer | | |
101.INS* | | XBRL Instance Document | | |
101.SCH* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | |
101.CAL* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | |
101.DEF* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | |
101.LAB* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | |
101.PRE* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | |
* Filed herewith
38