UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-33072
Leidos Holdings, Inc. | ||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Delaware | 20-3562868 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
11951 Freedom Drive, Reston, Virginia | 20190 | |
(Address of principal executive office) | (Zip Code) | |
(571) 526-6000 | ||
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | o | ||||||
Non-accelerated filer | o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | o | |||||
Emerging growth company | o |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The number of shares issued and outstanding of each issuer’s classes of common stock as of July 25, 2017, was 151,209,095 shares of common stock ($.0001 par value per share).
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||
Part I | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
Part II | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 1A. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
Item 5. | ||
Item 6. | ||
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 262 | $ | 376 | ||||
Receivables, net | 1,832 | 1,657 | ||||||
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets | 340 | 348 | ||||||
Total current assets | 2,434 | 2,381 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 215 | 259 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 1,006 | 1,589 | ||||||
Goodwill | 4,922 | 4,622 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | 13 | 16 | ||||||
Other assets | 292 | 265 | ||||||
$ | 8,882 | $ | 9,132 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 1,330 | $ | 1,427 | ||||
Accrued payroll and employee benefits | 475 | 483 | ||||||
Dividends payable | 17 | 23 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 4 | 21 | ||||||
Long-term debt, current portion | 84 | 62 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 1,910 | 2,016 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion | 3,147 | 3,225 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 362 | 540 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 222 | 204 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 15 and 16) | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 500 million shares authorized, 151 million and 150 million shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016, respectively | — | — | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 3,321 | 3,316 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (105 | ) | (177 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 8 | (4 | ) | |||||
Total Leidos stockholders’ equity | 3,224 | 3,135 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest | 17 | 12 | ||||||
Total equity | 3,241 | 3,147 | ||||||
$ | 8,882 | $ | 9,132 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 2,571 | $ | 1,288 | $ | 5,151 | $ | 2,600 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues | 2,233 | 1,141 | 4,503 | 2,295 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 143 | 56 | 287 | 116 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition and integration costs | 16 | 15 | 35 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses | 6 | 1 | 19 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Equity losses of non-consolidated subsidiaries | 7 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 166 | 75 | 307 | 164 | ||||||||||||
Interest income | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (36 | ) | (15 | ) | (74 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 3 | (2 | ) | 6 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | 135 | 60 | 243 | 138 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (37 | ) | (19 | ) | (71 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | 98 | 41 | 172 | 94 | ||||||||||||
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest | — | — | 2 | — | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Leidos common stockholders | $ | 98 | $ | 41 | $ | 170 | $ | 94 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 1.13 | $ | 1.31 | ||||||||
Diluted | 0.64 | 0.55 | 1.11 | 1.27 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.64 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 98 | $ | 41 | $ | 172 | $ | 94 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes: | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 2 | 2 | 13 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Unrecognized loss on derivative instruments | (2 | ) | — | (1 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of taxes | — | 2 | 12 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 98 | 43 | 184 | 98 | ||||||||||||
Less: comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest | — | — | 2 | — | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Leidos common stockholders | $ | 98 | $ | 43 | $ | 182 | $ | 98 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operations: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 172 | $ | 94 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 162 | 17 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 20 | 16 | ||||||
Bad debt expense | 12 | — | ||||||
Other | 15 | (3 | ) | |||||
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions: | ||||||||
Receivables | (179 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets | 35 | (7 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (123 | ) | 7 | |||||
Accrued payroll and employee benefits | (7 | ) | 2 | |||||
Deferred income taxes and income taxes receivable/payable | (44 | ) | 7 | |||||
Other long-term assets/liabilities | 26 | 1 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | 89 | 58 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Payments for property, plant and equipment | (23 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
Collections on promissory note | 2 | — | ||||||
Net proceeds from sale of assets | 7 | 3 | ||||||
Proceeds from disposition of business | — | 23 | ||||||
Other | — | (1 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities of continuing operations | (14 | ) | 18 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Payments of long-term debt | (69 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuances of stock | 7 | 6 | ||||||
Repurchases of stock and other | (25 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
Dividend payments | (102 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations | (189 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations | (114 | ) | 15 | |||||
Cash flows from discontinued operations: | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations | — | (1 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations | — | (1 | ) | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (114 | ) | 14 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 376 | 656 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 262 | $ | 670 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1–Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Leidos Holdings, Inc. ("Leidos") is a holding company whose direct 100%-owned subsidiaries and principal operating companies are Leidos, Inc. and Leidos Innovations Corporation ("Leidos Innovations"). Leidos is a FORTUNE 500® science and technology company that provides technology and engineering services and solutions in the defense, intelligence, civil and health markets. Leidos' domestic customers include the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"), the U.S. Intelligence Community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"), the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), U.S. Government civil agencies and state and local government agencies. Leidos' international customers include foreign governments and their agencies, primarily located in the United Kingdom, the Middle East and Australia. Unless indicated otherwise, references to the "Company," "we," "us" and "our" refer collectively to Leidos Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Leidos include the balances of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial information has been prepared in accordance with the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). Certain disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, including those relating to estimated profitability of long-term contracts, indirect billing rates, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventories, fair value and impairment of intangible assets and goodwill, income taxes, stock-based compensation expense and contingencies. These estimates have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current and best available information; however, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation thereof. The results reported in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2017.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company completed its business reorganization, which resulted in identification of three reportable segments (Defense Solutions, Civil, Health) and corporate expenses. The Company commenced operating and reporting under the new organizational structure effective the beginning of fiscal 2017. As a result of this change, prior year segment results and disclosures have been recast to reflect the new reportable segments (see "Note 14–Business Segments").
Amounts in the prior year condensed consolidated statements of income that have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation include, "Restructuring expenses," which were previously aggregated within "Selling, general and administrative expenses," and "Interest expense, net" which has been disaggregated into "Interest income" and "Interest expense."
5
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Changes in Estimates on Contracts
Changes in estimates related to long-term contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method of accounting are recognized in the period in which such changes are made for the inception-to-date effect of the changes, with the exception of contracts acquired through the acquisition of the IS&GS Business (see "Note 2–Acquisitions"), where the adjustment is made for the period commencing from the date of acquisition. Changes in these estimates can occur over the contract performance period for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope, contract cost estimates and estimated incentive or award fees.
Changes in estimates on contracts for the periods presented were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Net favorable impact to income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 40 | $ | 5 | $ | 62 | $ | 13 | ||||||||
Impact on diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to Leidos common stockholders | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.11 |
Accounting Standards Updates Adopted
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The ASU requires that an entity, (i) recognize excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to employee share-based payment transactions as an income tax expense or benefit in the income statement rather than in equity; (ii) present the excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows versus current guidance to present them as financing activities; and, (iii) elect to either recognize stock forfeitures as they occur or estimate them. During the quarter ended July 1, 2016, the Company elected to early adopt the provisions of the ASU prospectively from January 2, 2016, including continuation of estimating forfeitures instead of recording them as they occur. Consequently, the Company recognized a $3 million and $7 million discrete tax benefit for the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2016, respectively, and operating cash flows for the six months ended July 1, 2016, increased $7 million with a corresponding decrease to financing cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This ASU eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test and simplifies how the amount of an impairment loss is determined. The update is effective for public companies in the beginning of fiscal year 2020 and shall be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-04 prospectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and the standard did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. This ASU provides clarification on when to apply modification accounting for a stock-based award to reduce diversity in practice. The update is effective for public companies in the beginning of fiscal year 2018 and shall be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for public business entities. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-09 prospectively in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and the standard did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
6
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Accounting Standards Updates Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This ASU affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of non-financial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). This ASU will supersede all revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the codification. The guidance's core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control for promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying the revenue principles, an entity will identify the contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied (i.e., either over time or point in time). The ASU further states that an entity should disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company will adopt the new revenue standard in the beginning of fiscal 2018, under the modified retrospective method, where the cumulative effect is recognized at the date of initial adoption.
Based on the ongoing assessments, the Company believes the timing of and amount of revenue recognition will largely remain consistent between the current revenue standard and the revised revenue standard for the majority of the Company's contracts. Specifically, for time-and-materials, fixed-price-level-of-effort, cost-plus-award-fee, cost-plus-incentive fee and fixed-price-incentive fee contracts, the Company will continue to recognize revenue over time as work progresses because of the continuous transfer of control to the customer, generally using an input measure (e.g., cost incurred) to reflect progress. The Company tentatively expects that differences, if any, in revenue recognition between the current and revised revenue standards will primarily occur within the firm-fixed-price contracts as a result of the identification of new performance obligations. As of the end of the second quarter, the Company is still in the process of reviewing contracts and assessing the financial statement impact of the adoption of the new standard, if any.
Note 2–Acquisitions
On August 16, 2016, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Leidos Holdings, Inc. merged with the Information Systems & Global Solutions business (the "IS&GS Business") of Lockheed Martin Corporation in a Reverse Morris Trust transaction (the "Transactions"). The acquired IS&GS Business was renamed Leidos Innovations Corporation.
The preliminary purchase consideration for the acquisition of the IS&GS Business was as follows (in millions):
Value of common stock issued to Lockheed Martin stockholders(1) | $ | 2,929 | |
Equity consideration for replacement awards(2) | 9 | ||
Preliminary working capital adjustments | 55 | ||
Preliminary purchase price | $ | 2,993 |
(1) Represents approximately 77 million new shares of Leidos common stock issued to those Lockheed Martin stockholders who elected to participate in the exchange offer, based on the Company's August 16, 2016, closing share price of $51.69, less the Leidos special cash dividend amount of $13.64, which the Lockheed Martin stockholders were not entitled to receive.
(2) The fair value of replacement equity-based awards attributable to pre-Merger service was recorded as part of the consideration transferred in the Merger.
7
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the Transactions were as follows (in millions):
Cash | $ | 25 | |
Receivables | 954 | ||
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets | 68 | ||
Property, plant and equipment | 91 | ||
Deferred tax assets | 8 | ||
Intangible assets | 1,202 | ||
Other assets | 57 | ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (713 | ) | |
Accrued payroll and employee benefits | (190 | ) | |
Long-term debt, current portion | (23 | ) | |
Deferred tax liabilities | (356 | ) | |
Long-term debt, net of current portion | (1,780 | ) | |
Other long-term liabilities | (52 | ) | |
Total identifiable net liabilities assumed | (709 | ) | |
Non-controlling interest | (13 | ) | |
Goodwill | 3,715 | ||
Preliminary purchase price | $ | 2,993 |
Due to the timing and complexity of the Transactions, the Company recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their preliminary estimated fair values. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had not finalized the determination of fair values allocated to various assets and liabilities, including, but not limited to, receivables; property, plant and equipment; deferred income taxes; intangible assets; accounts payable and accrued liabilities; contractual contingencies; loss contracts; the residual amount allocated to goodwill; and the allocation of goodwill to reporting units. The preliminary purchase price allocation is subject to change as the Company completes its analysis of the provisional fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed at the date of the Transactions.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company recorded a purchase accounting adjustment to decrease goodwill by $3 million. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a purchase accounting adjustment to increase goodwill by $303 million related to changes to the preliminary estimated fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Significant changes included program intangibles, receivables, property, plant and equipment, other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and deferred tax liabilities.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized a cumulative catch-up adjustment related to the valuation adjustments to intangible assets which resulted in a decrease in amortization expense of $8 million. This adjustment was offset by a $7 million increase in amortization expense as a result of the valuation adjustments to equity method investments. The Company recorded the cumulative catch-up adjustments in "Selling, general and administrative expenses" for the intangible assets and "Equity losses of non-consolidated subsidiaries" for the equity method investments in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a valuation adjustment to fair value the non-controlling interest acquired. The fair value of $13 million was determined by calculating the present value of future cash flows for the non-controlling interest. Significant assumptions inherent in the valuation of the non-controlling interest include the estimated after-tax cash flows expected to be received and an assessment of the appropriate discount rate.
The goodwill represents intellectual capital and the acquired assembled work force, none of which qualify for recognition as a separate intangible asset. The preliminary value of goodwill has been allocated to the new reporting units on a relative fair value approach (see "Note 6–Goodwill"). Of the total goodwill, $414 million is tax deductible.
8
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The Company identified $1.2 billion of intangible assets, representing programs and contract intangibles, backlog and software and technology. The fair value measurements were primarily based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market and represent a Level 3 measurement (see "Note 5–Fair Value Measurements"). The income approach was primarily used to value the intangible assets, consisting primarily of funded backlog and programs acquired. The income approach indicates value for an asset based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated by the asset. Projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flow and the time value of money.
The following table summarizes the preliminary fair value of intangible assets acquired at the date of acquisition and the related weighted average amortization period:
Weighted average amortization period | Fair value | |||||
(in years) | (in millions) | |||||
Programs and contract intangibles(1) | 9.0 | $ | 997 | |||
Backlog | 1.4 | 178 | ||||
Software and technology | 1.2 | 27 | ||||
Total | 7.8 | $ | 1,202 |
(1) The weighted average amortization period is estimated based on the projected economic benefits associated with these assets. Refer to "Note 7–Intangible Assets" for additional information.
The Company incurred the following expenses related to the acquisition and integration of the IS&GS Business:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs | $ | — | $ | 7 | $ | 1 | $ | 13 | ||||||||
Integration costs | 16 | 8 | 34 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Total acquisition and integration costs | $ | 16 | $ | 15 | $ | 35 | $ | 24 |
Pro Forma Financial Information (unaudited)
The following pro forma financial information presents condensed consolidated results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred on January 3, 2015. The pro forma financial information was prepared based on historical financial information and has been adjusted to give effect to the events that are directly attributable to the Transactions and factually supportable. The unaudited pro forma results below do not reflect future events that have occurred or may occur after the Transactions, including anticipated synergies or other expected benefits that may be realized from the Transactions. The pro forma financial information is not intended to reflect the actual results of operations that would have occurred if the acquisition had been completed on January 3, 2015, nor is it intended to be an indication of future operating results.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
(unaudited) | July 1, 2016 | July 1, 2016 | ||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
Revenues | $ | 2,624 | $ | 5,261 | ||||
Income from continuing operations | 103 | 150 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Leidos common stockholders | 102 | 147 | ||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.99 | ||||
Diluted | 0.68 | 0.97 |
9
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The unaudited pro forma financial information above excludes acquisition-related costs of $7 million and $13 million for the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2016, respectively, as a nonrecurring significant adjustment. This adjustment was made to account for certain costs incurred as if the Transactions had been completed on January 3, 2015.
Note 3–Divestitures
In April 2016, the Company disposed of a business, historically included within the Civil segment, that was primarily focused on providing design, build and heavy construction engineering services. The Company received cash proceeds of $23 million, resulting in a preliminary pre-tax gain on sale of $3 million. The major classes of assets and liabilities sold included $73 million of accounts receivable, net; $3 million of non-current assets and $63 million of accounts payable and accrued liabilities. In addition, the Company recorded a $6 million liability in connection with issuance of a performance guarantee on a contract sold and guarantee of collection of the accounts receivable transferred. The Company paid $1 million of selling costs related to the transaction. The Company recorded the preliminary pre-tax gain on sale in "Other income (expense), net" in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income during the quarter ended July 1, 2016.
On July 24, 2015, the Company completed the sale of its equity interests in Plainfield Renewable Energy Holdings LLC ("Plainfield") for an aggregate consideration of $102 million, subject to certain adjustments and contingent earn-out payments. The consideration received by the Company at closing consisted of a cash payment of $29 million and a secured promissory note for $73 million, net of discount (the “Note”). The Note is payable semi-annually with a final lump sum due in July 2018. The Company collected $6 million of principal and interest during the quarter ended March 31, 2017.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, Plainfield exercised the first of three one-year term extension options available under the original credit agreement, thereby extending the maturity date of the Note to July 24, 2018. Concurrent with this extension, the interest rate on the Note increased from 6% to 8%. Also, during the quarter ended June 30, 2017, Leidos and Plainfield entered into an amendment to the Note allowing Plainfield to defer up to $4 million of the interest and principal payments due in July 2017 and January 2018, until July 2018. In consideration of this deferment, Leidos received certain concessions and releases from obligations under the original transaction documents. As of June 30, 2017, the Company continues to expect the Note to be collectible in full.
Note 4–Restructuring Expenses
After the acquisition of the IS&GS Business, the Company began an initiative to align its cost structure, which includes optimization of its real estate portfolio by vacating certain facilities and consolidating others, and by reducing headcount.
The restructuring expenses related to this program were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 30, 2017 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Severance costs | $ | 2 | $ | 12 | ||||
Lease termination expenses | 4 | 7 | ||||||
Restructuring expenses related to the IS&GS Business | $ | 6 | $ | 19 |
These restructuring expenses have been recorded within corporate expenses and presented separately on the condensed consolidated statements of income.
10
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The restructuring liability related to this program at June 30, 2017, was:
Severance costs | Lease termination expenses | Total | ||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 30, 2016 | $ | 7 | $ | 1 | $ | 8 | ||||||
Charges | 12 | 7 | 19 | |||||||||
Cash payments | (17 | ) | (6 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2017 | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 |
The Company expects the remainder of the restructuring liability to be substantially settled within one year.
Note 5–Fair Value Measurements
The accounting standard for fair value measurements establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets (Level 1); inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are observable either directly or indirectly or quoted prices that are not active (Level 2); and unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data (e.g., discounted cash flow and other similar pricing models), which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions (Level 3).
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements requires that the Company maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The accounting guidance provides for the irrevocable option to elect, on a contract-by-contract basis, to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value at inception of the contract and record any subsequent changes in fair value in earnings. We have not made fair value option elections on any of our financial assets and liabilities.
The Company's assets measured on a recurring basis at fair value consisted of the following:
June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 30 | $ | 30 | $ | 29 | $ | 29 |
The Company's derivatives consisted of the fair value interest rate swaps on its $450 million fixed rate 4.45% senior secured notes maturing in December 2020, and cash flow interest rate swaps on $1.2 billion of the Company's variable rate senior secured term loans (see "Note 9–Derivative Instruments"). The fair value of the fair value interest rate swaps and cash flow interest rate swaps is determined based on observed values for underlying interest rates on the LIBOR yield curve and the underlying interest rate, respectively (Level 2 inputs).
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, other than derivatives, which include cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, are reasonable estimates of their related fair values. The carrying value of the Company's notes receivable as of June 30, 2017, of $91 million approximates fair value as the stated interest rates within the agreements are consistent with the current market rates used in notes with similar terms in the market (Level 2 inputs).
As of June 30, 2017, and December 30, 2016, the fair value of long-term debt was $3.3 billion for both periods and the carrying amount was $3.2 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively (see "Note 10–Debt"). The fair value of long-term debt is determined based on current interest rates available for debt with terms and maturities similar to the Company’s existing debt arrangements (Level 2 inputs).
The Company’s cash equivalents were primarily comprised of investments in several large institutional money market funds and bank deposits, with original maturity of three months or less.
At June 30, 2017, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, other than associated with purchase accounting (see "Note 2–Acquisitions").
11
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 6–Goodwill
During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company completed its business reorganization, which resulted in identification of three reportable segments (Defense Solutions, Civil, Health) and corporate expenses. The Company commenced operating and reporting under the new organizational structure effective the beginning of fiscal 2017 (see "Note 14–Business Segments").
Goodwill, including the amounts from the acquisition of the IS&GS Business, was allocated to the new reporting units on a relative fair value approach. The amount of goodwill from the acquisition of the IS&GS Business has been valued on a preliminary basis and may change as purchase accounting is finalized (see "Note 2–Acquisitions").
The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment as of June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016:
Defense Solutions | Civil | Health | Total | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill at January 1, 2016 | $ | 792 | $ | 244 | $ | 171 | $ | 1,207 | ||||||||
Acquisition of the IS&GS Business | 1,162 | 1,487 | 766 | 3,415 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill at December 30, 2016 | 1,954 | 1,731 | 937 | 4,622 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment to original purchase price allocation | 72 | 151 | 77 | 300 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill at June 30, 2017 | $ | 2,026 | $ | 1,882 | $ | 1,014 | $ | 4,922 |
In conjunction with the change in reportable segments, the Company evaluated goodwill for impairment, both before and after the segment change and determined that goodwill was not impaired.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the beginning of the fourth quarter and during interim periods whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. There were no goodwill impairments during the six months ended June 30, 2017, and July 1, 2016.
Note 7–Intangible Assets
Intangible assets, including the preliminary fair values of those acquired through the acquisition of the IS&GS Business, consisted of the following:
June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross carrying value | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying value | Gross carrying value | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying value | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finite-lived intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programs and contract intangibles | $ | 997 | $ | (91 | ) | $ | 906 | $ | 1,450 | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 1,425 | ||||||||||
Backlog | 178 | (113 | ) | 65 | 200 | (54 | ) | 146 | ||||||||||||||||
Software and technology | 89 | (59 | ) | 30 | 61 | (48 | ) | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | 6 | (5 | ) | 1 | 6 | (5 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Total finite-lived intangible assets | 1,270 | (268 | ) | 1,002 | 1,717 | (132 | ) | 1,585 | ||||||||||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade names | 4 | — | 4 | 4 | — | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 1,274 | $ | (268 | ) | $ | 1,006 | $ | 1,721 | $ | (132 | ) | $ | 1,589 |
12
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Amortization expense related to intangible assets, including those acquired through the Transactions, was $67 million and $136 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and $2 million and $3 million for the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2016, respectively. The acquired programs and contract intangible assets are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives in proportion to the pattern of economic benefit based on expected future discounted cash flows. The acquired backlog and software and technology intangible assets, as well as the Company's existing customer relationships and software and technology intangible assets, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
The estimated annual amortization expense as of June 30, 2017, was as follows:
Fiscal Year Ending | ||||
(in millions) | ||||
2017 (remainder of year) | $ | 149 | ||
2018 | 206 | |||
2019 | 180 | |||
2020 | 132 | |||
2021 | 111 | |||
2022 and thereafter | 224 | |||
$ | 1,002 |
The acquired asset balances related to the Transactions may change upon final valuation (see "Note 2–Acquisitions").
Note 8—Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, net, including preliminary fair value of those acquired through the acquisition of the IS&GS Business, consisted of the following:
June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Computers and other equipment | $ | 191 | $ | 172 | ||||
Leasehold improvements | 167 | 161 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements | 54 | 104 | ||||||
Office furniture and fixtures | 35 | 35 | ||||||
Land | 49 | 57 | ||||||
Construction in progress | 8 | 12 | ||||||
504 | 541 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (289 | ) | (282 | ) | ||||
$ | 215 | $ | 259 |
Depreciation expense was $13 million and $26 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and $7 million and $14 million for the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2016, respectively. The acquired asset balances related to the Transactions may change upon final valuation (see "Note 2–Acquisitions").
Note 9–Derivative Instruments
The Company manages its risk to changes in interest rates through the use of derivative instruments. The Company does not hold derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. For fixed rate borrowings, the Company uses variable interest rate swaps, effectively converting fixed rate borrowings to variable rate borrowings. These swaps are designated as fair value hedges. For variable rate borrowings, the Company uses fixed interest rate swaps, effectively converting a portion of the variable rate borrowings to fixed rate borrowings. These swaps are designated as cash flow hedges.
13
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Fair Value Hedges
The Company has interest rate swap agreements to hedge the fair value of the $450 million fixed rate 4.45% senior secured notes maturing in December 2020 (the “Notes”). The objective of these instruments is to hedge the Notes against changes in fair value due to the variability in the six-month LIBOR rate (the benchmark interest rate). Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, the Company will receive semi-annual interest payments at the coupon rate of 4.45% and will pay variable interest based on the six-month LIBOR rate.
The interest rate swaps were accounted for as a fair value hedge of the Notes and qualified for the shortcut method of hedge accounting, which allows for the assumption of no ineffectiveness reported in earnings. The resulting changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are fully offset by the changes in the fair value of the underlying debt (the hedged item).
The fair value of the Notes is stated at an amount that reflects changes in the benchmark interest rate, the six-month LIBOR rate, subsequent to the inception of the interest rate swaps through the reporting date.
Cash Flow Hedges
In August 2016, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge the cash flows with respect to $1.2 billion of the Company's variable rate senior secured term loans (the "Variable Rate Loans"). The objective of these instruments is to reduce variability in the forecasted interest payments of the Company's Variable Rate Loans, which is based on the LIBOR rate. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, which mature in December 2021, the Company will receive monthly variable interest payments based on the one-month LIBOR rate and will pay interest at a fixed rate of 1.08%. The counterparties to these agreements are financial institutions.
The interest rate swaps were accounted for as a cash flow hedge of the Variable Rate Loans and qualified for hedge accounting treatment through the application of the long-haul method, which involves the comparison of cumulative changes in the fair value of the swap to the cumulative change in fair value of scheduled interest payments on the notional value (the perfectly effective hypothetical or "PEH"). The effective portion of the gain/loss on the swap is reported as a component of other comprehensive income/loss and will be reclassified into earnings on the dates the interest payments impact earnings. The amount of ineffectiveness recorded in the earnings is equal to the excess of the cumulative change in fair value of the swap over the cumulative change in the fair value of the PEH.
The fair value of the interest rate swaps was as follows:
Balance sheet line item | June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | ||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||
Fair value interest rate swaps | Other assets | $ | 5 | $ | 3 | |||||
Cash flow interest rate swaps | Other assets | 25 | 26 |
The effect of the Company's cash flow hedge on other comprehensive income and earnings for the periods presented was as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 30, 2017 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Effective portion recognized in other comprehensive income | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | ||
Effective portion reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings | — | 1 | ||||||
Ineffective portion recognized in earnings | 1 | 1 |
The Company expects to reclassify gains of $3 million from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings during the next 12 months.
The cash flows associated with both interest rate swaps are classified as operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
14
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 10–Debt
The Company's long-term debt consisted of the following:
Stated interest rate | Effective interest rate | June 30, 2017(1) | December 30, 2016(1) | |||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||
Senior secured notes: | ||||||||||||
$450 million notes, due December 2020 | 4.45% | 4.53% | $ | 453 | $ | 451 | ||||||
$300 million notes, due December 2040 | 5.95% | 6.03% | 216 | 216 | ||||||||
Senior secured term loans: | ||||||||||||
$400 million Term Loan A, due August 2019 | 3.06% | 4.04% | 89 | 123 | ||||||||
$690 million Term Loan A, due August 2021 | 3.06% | 3.63% | 661 | 676 | ||||||||
$310 million Term Loan A, due August 2021 | 3.06% | 3.60% | 297 | 304 | ||||||||
$1,131 million Term Loan B, due August 2023 | 3.31% | 3.67% | 1,105 | 1,110 | ||||||||
Senior unsecured notes: | ||||||||||||
$250 million notes, due July 2032 | 7.13% | 7.43% | 246 | 246 | ||||||||
$300 million notes, due July 2033 | 5.50% | 5.88% | 158 | 158 | ||||||||
Capital leases due on various dates through fiscal 2020 | 0%-5.94% | Various | 6 | 3 | ||||||||
Total long-term debt | 3,231 | 3,287 | ||||||||||
Less: current portion | 84 | 62 | ||||||||||
Total long-term debt, net of current portion | $ | 3,147 | $ | 3,225 |
(1) | The carrying amounts of the senior secured term loans and notes and unsecured notes as of June 30, 2017, and December 30, 2016, include the remaining principal outstanding of $3,270 million and $3,336 million, respectively, plus $5 million and $3 million, respectively, related to the fair value of the interest rate swaps (see "Note 9–Derivative Instruments"), less unamortized debt discounts of $41 million and $46 million, respectively, less deferred debt issuance costs of $9 million for both periods. |
The interest rate on the Company's senior secured term loans is determined based on the LIBOR rate plus a margin. The margin for the Term Loan A loans ranges from 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on the Company's senior secured leverage ratio, and is computed on a quarterly basis. At June 30, 2017, the current margin on Term Loan A was 2.00%.
In February 2017, Leidos repriced the Company's senior secured $1.1 billion Term Loan B, due August 2023. As a result, the margin on Term Loan B was reduced by 50 basis points to 2.25% and the six month call provision was extended an additional six months. The repricing of the term loan became effective on February 16, 2017.
In addition to the required quarterly payments on the Company's term loans, the Company prepaid $25 million of its senior secured $400 million Term Loan A, due August 2019, on June 30, 2017.
Principal of the Company's variable rate senior secured term loans is payable on a quarterly basis, with the majority of the principal due at maturity. Interest on the variable rate senior secured term loans is payable on a periodic basis, which must be at least quarterly. Interest on the senior fixed rate secured notes and unsecured notes is payable on a semi-annual basis with principal payments due at maturity.
Amortization for the senior secured term loans and notes and unsecured notes was $3 million and $7 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. Amortization for the senior secured notes and unsecured notes was immaterial for the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2016.
The Company has a revolving credit facility providing up to $750 million in secured borrowing capacity at interest rates determined based upon the LIBOR rate plus a margin that is subject to step-down provisions based on the Company's senior secured leverage ratio. The maturity date of this credit facility is August 2021. As of June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016, there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility.
The senior secured term loans and notes, unsecured notes and revolving credit facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed and contain certain customary restrictive covenants, including among other things, restrictions on the Company's ability to create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions under certain circumstances. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of June 30, 2017.
15
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 11–Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
Foreign currency translation adjustments | Unrecognized (loss) gain on derivative instruments | Pension liability adjustments | Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income | (8 | ) | 26 | 1 | 19 | |||||||||||
Taxes | 1 | (10 | ) | 2 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | — | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at December 30, 2016 | (7 | ) | 10 | (7 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 15 | (1 | ) | — | 14 | |||||||||||
Taxes | (2 | ) | 1 | — | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | — | (1 | ) | — | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2017 | $ | 6 | $ | 9 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 8 |
Reclassifications for unrecognized (loss) gain on derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt are recorded in "Interest expense" in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income.
Reclassifications for pension liability adjustments are recorded in "Selling, general and administrative expenses" in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income.
Note 12–Earnings Per Share ("EPS")
The following table provides a reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding | 151 | 73 | 151 | 72 | ||||||||
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding | 153 | 74 | 153 | 74 |
Anti-dilutive stock-based awards are excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute diluted EPS. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017 and July 1, 2016, there were a total of 1 million of outstanding stock options and vesting stock awards that were antidilutive.
16
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 13–Supplementary Cash Flow Information
Supplementary cash flow information, including non-cash activities, for the periods presented was as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Supplementary cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 59 | $ | 43 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds | 107 | 38 | ||||||
Non-cash financing activity: | ||||||||
Capital lease obligation | 6 | — |
Note 14–Business Segments
During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company completed its business reorganization, which resulted in identification of three reportable segments and corporate expenses. The Company's operations and the new reportable segments are aligned around the the nature of work and customers it serves. The Company commenced operating and reporting under the new organizational structure effective the beginning of fiscal 2017.
At June 30, 2017, the Company's reportable segments and corporate expenses were:
• | Defense Solutions – delivers cutting edge technology and services to the DoD, military services, the U.S. Intelligence Community, DHS, agencies of U.S. allies abroad and other federal and civilian customers. The Company's Defense Solutions business is focused on cybersecurity, data analytics, IT modernization and software development, as well as technology to support intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance services. |
• | Civil – provides services and solutions to civil agencies of the U.S. Government and commercial customers. The Company's Civil business is focused on software development, operations and sustainment, enterprise IT modernization, systems engineering and cyber services. |
• | Health – provides services and solutions to the Defense Health Agency, Veterans Administration, HHS, other civil health agencies of the U.S. Government and commercial healthcare providers. The Company's Health business is focused on enterprise IT modernization, software development, data analytics, electronic health record implementation, mission critical operations and sustainment, life sciences and public health. |
• | Corporate expenses – includes the operations of various corporate activities and certain expense items that are not reimbursed by the Company's U.S. Government customers. |
17
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The segment information for the periods presented, of which the prior period has been recast to reflect the Company's current reportable segment structure, was as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Defense Solutions | $ | 1,243 | $ | 785 | $ | 2,537 | $ | 1,565 | ||||||||
Civil | 875 | 300 | 1,717 | 661 | ||||||||||||
Health | 454 | 203 | 897 | 374 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses | (1 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 2,571 | $ | 1,288 | $ | 5,151 | $ | 2,600 | ||||||||
Operating income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Defense Solutions | $ | 63 | $ | 60 | $ | 142 | $ | 131 | ||||||||
Civil | 66 | 20 | 120 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Health | 74 | 18 | 121 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses | (37 | ) | (23 | ) | (76 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 166 | $ | 75 | $ | 307 | $ | 164 |
The financial performance measures used to evaluate segment performance are revenues and operating income. As a result, "Other income (expense), net," "Interest income," "Interest expense" and "Income tax expense," as reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements are not allocated to the Company's segments. Under U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards, indirect costs including depreciation expense are collected in numerous indirect cost pools, which are then collectively allocated out to the Company’s reportable segments based on a representative causal or beneficial relationship of the costs in the pool to the costs in the base.
Asset information by segment is not a key measure of performance used by the Company's chief operating decision maker, currently the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Note 15–Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
MSA Venture
On November 10, 2015, Mission Support Alliance, LLC ("MSA"), a joint venture with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. and Centerra Group, LLC, received a final decision of the Department of Energy ("DoE") contracting officer for the Mission Support Contract concluding that certain payments to MSA by DoE for the performance of IT services by Lockheed Martin Services, Inc. (“LMSI”) under a subcontract to MSA constituted alleged affiliate fees in violation of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (the "FAR"). Lockheed Martin Integrated Technology LLC (now known as Leidos Integrated Technology LLC) is a member entity of MSA. At the same time, the contracting officer advised MSA that he would not approve certain provisional fee payments to MSA pending resolution of the matters set forth in his decision. Subsequent to the contracting officer's final decision, MSA, LMSI, and Lockheed Martin Corporation received notice from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Washington that the U.S. Government had initiated a False Claims Act investigation into the facts surrounding this dispute, and each of MSA, LMSI and Lockheed Martin Corporation have produced information in response to Civil Investigative Demands from the U.S. Attorney's Office. In addition, the U.S. Attorney's office has advised that a parallel criminal investigation is open, although no subjects or targets of the investigation have been identified.
18
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Since this issue first was raised by the DoE, MSA has asserted that the IT services performed by LMSI under a fixed price/fixed unit rate subcontract approved by the DoE meet the definition of a "commercial item" under the FAR and any profits earned on that subcontract are permissible. MSA filed an appeal of the contracting officer's decision with the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals and that appeal is pending, but has been stayed pending resolution of the False Claims Act investigation. Subsequent to the filing of MSA's appeal, the contracting officer demanded that MSA reimburse the DoE in the amount of $64 million, which was his estimate of the profits earned during the period from 2010 to 2014 by LMSI. The DoE has deferred that demand, pending resolution of the appeal, but to date the demand has not been rescinded. MSA and the other members of MSA have indicated they believe if MSA incurs a liability in this matter, then Leidos Integrated Technology, LLC is responsible to MSA for the loss. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Lockheed Martin has agreed to indemnify the Company for 100% of any damages in excess of $38 million up to $64 million, and 50% of any damages in excess of $64 million, with respect to claims asserted against MSA related to this matter. At June 30, 2017, the Company has a liability of $39 million and an indemnification asset of $1 million recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Securities Litigation
Between February and April 2012, alleged stockholders filed three putative securities class actions. One case was withdrawn and two cases were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in In Re: SAIC, Inc. Securities Litigation. The consolidated securities complaint named as defendants the Company, a former chief financial officer, two former chief executive officers, a former group president and the former program manager on the Company's contract to develop and implement an automated time and attendance and workforce management system for certain agencies of the City of New York ("CityTime") and was filed purportedly on behalf of all purchasers of the Company's common stock from April 11, 2007, through September 1, 2011. The consolidated securities complaint asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegations that the Company and individual defendants made misleading statements or omissions about the Company’s revenues, operating income and internal controls in connection with disclosures relating to the CityTime project. The plaintiffs sought to recover from the Company and the individual defendants an unspecified amount of damages class members allegedly incurred by buying Leidos' stock at an inflated price. On October 1, 2013, the District Court dismissed many claims in the complaint with prejudice and on January 30, 2014, the District Court entered an order dismissing all remaining claims with prejudice and without leave to replead. The plaintiffs then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On March 29, 2016, the Second Circuit issued an opinion affirming in part, and vacating in part, the District Court's ruling. In particular, the Second Circuit held that the plaintiffs should be permitted to pursue omissions claims against the Company with respect to the annual report the Company filed on Form 10-K on March 25, 2011; the Second Circuit affirmed dismissal of all other claims, including all the claims against the individual defendants, and the case was remanded to the District Court. On September 23, 2016, the District Court issued an order clarifying that the applicable class period relating to the March 2011 Form 10-K ends on June 2, 2011, not September 1, 2011, as plaintiffs argued. The Company filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, which was granted on March 27, 2017. A decision is expected by June 2018. The District Court granted the Company’s request to stay all proceedings, including discovery, pending the outcome at the Supreme Court.
Any potential loss relating to this matter is not reasonably estimable due to unresolved questions of fact and law. However, the Company does not expect any ultimate liability to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, liquidity or capital resources.
19
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Greek Government Contract
In 2003, the Company entered into a firm-fixed-price contract with the Hellenic Republic of Greece to provide a Command, Control, Communications, Coordination and Integration System. The Greek government disputed the contract balance owed to the Company and has not paid the Company’s final invoice. In 2013, the Company received an arbitral award by the International Chamber of Commerce for $45 million, which has not been satisfied. In January 2017, the U.S. District Court granted an order to enforce the arbitration award and entered judgment in the Company's favor, for which the award was subsequently increased to $63 million. The Greek government sought to annul the award through separate litigation in the Greek courts, however, on July 27, 2017, the Athens Court of Appeals issued a final decision rejecting the government's position. Based on the complex nature of this contractual situation and the difficulties encountered to date, significant uncertainties exist and the Company is unable to reliably estimate the ultimate outcome.
Other
The Company is also involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of its business, none of which, in the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon current information, will likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Other Contingencies
VirnetX, Inc.
In fiscal 2007, the Company transferred several patents to VirnetX Inc., a subsidiary of VirnetX Holding Corp. In consideration of this transfer, the Company received certain license rights and the right to receive a percentage of the consideration received in patent infringement or enforcement claims against third parties. In November 2012, a jury found that Apple Corporation infringed two of the patents that the Company previously transferred to VirnetX and awarded $368 million to VirnetX, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated this award. Although VirnetX petitioned the appeals court for an en banc review, this request was denied and the case was remanded to the Federal District Court for further proceedings, including a new jury trial which began on January 25, 2016.
On February 3, 2016, the jury in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, awarded VirnetX $626 million in a verdict against Apple for willful infringement of four VirnetX patents. However, on July 29, 2016, the court issued a new order in the pending litigation against Apple, Case No. 6:10-cs-417 ("Apple I") and Case No. 6:12-cv-855 ("Apple II"), vacating its previous order consolidating the two cases and ordering the parties to retry them as separate cases. On September 30, 2016, a jury in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, in the Apple I case, awarded VirnetX $302 million in a verdict against Apple for infringing four VirnetX patents. A jury trial in the Apple II case is expected to be scheduled by the court shortly after the conclusion of the Apple I case. Under its agreements with VirnetX, Leidos would receive 25% of the proceeds obtained by VirnetX after reduction for attorneys' fees and costs. However, it is expected that Apple will appeal the verdict and no assurances can be given when or if the Company will receive any proceeds in connection with this jury award. In addition, if the Company receives any proceeds, the Company is required to pay a royalty to the customer who paid for the development of the technology.
The Company does not have any assets or liabilities recorded in connection with this matter as of June 30, 2017.
Government Investigations and Reviews
The Company is routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations with respect to its role as a contractor to federal, state and local government customers and in connection with performing services in countries outside of the United States. Adverse findings could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows due to its reliance on government contracts.
Indirect cost audits by the Defense Contract Audit Agency remain open for fiscal 2012 and subsequent years for Leidos, Inc., and fiscal 2010 and subsequent years for Leidos Innovations. Although the Company has recorded contract revenues upon an estimate of costs that the Company believes will be approved upon final audit or review, the Company cannot predict the outcome of any ongoing or future audits or reviews and adjustments, and if future adjustments exceed the Company’s estimates, its profitability would be adversely affected.
20
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
As of June 30, 2017, the Company believes it has adequately reserved for potential adjustments from audits or reviews of contract costs.
Note 16–Commitments
The Company has outstanding letters of credit of $82 million as of June 30, 2017, principally related to guarantees on contracts. The Company also has outstanding surety bonds in the amount of $157 million, principally related to performance and subcontractor payment bonds on the Company’s contracts. The outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds have various terms with the majority of the letters of credit and bonds expiring over the next four fiscal years.
Additionally, the Company has outstanding performance guarantees and cross-indemnity agreements in connection with certain aspects of its business. As of June 30, 2017, the Company is not aware of any existing event of default that would require it to satisfy any of these guarantees.
21
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s ("Leidos") financial condition, results of operations and quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk should be read in conjunction with Leidos' condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our intent, belief, or current expectations with respect to, among other things, trends affecting our financial condition or results of operations, backlog, our industry, government budgets and spending, the impact of competition and the performance and carrying value of our assets. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Some of these factors include, but are not limited to, the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated periodically through our subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Due to such uncertainties and risks, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake any obligation to update these factors or to publicly announce the results of any changes to our forward-looking statements due to future events or developments.
Unless indicated otherwise, references in this report to the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer collectively to Leidos and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Overview
We are a FORTUNE 500® science and technology company that provides technology and engineering services and solutions in the defense, intelligence, civil and health markets. We bring domain-specific capability and cross-market innovations to customers in each of these markets by leveraging seven core capabilities: command, control, computing, communications and intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance ("C4ISR"); cybersecurity; systems engineering; large-scale agile software development; data analytics; enterprise IT modernization; and operations and sustainment. Our domestic customers include the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"), the U.S. Intelligence Community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"), the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), U.S. Government civil agencies and state and local government agencies. Our international customers include foreign governments and their agencies, primarily located in the United Kingdom, the Middle East and Australia.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, we completed our business reorganization, which resulted in identification of three reportable segments (Defense Solutions, Civil, Health) and corporate expenses. We commenced operating and reporting under the new organizational structure effective the beginning of fiscal 2017. As a result of this change, prior year segment results and disclosures have been recast to reflect the new reportable segments (see "Note 14–Business Segments").
Business Environment and Trends
U.S. Government Markets
For fiscal 2016, we generated approximately 81% of our total revenues from contracts with the U.S. Government. Accordingly, our business performance is affected by the overall level of U.S. Government spending, especially on national security, homeland security and intelligence, and the alignment of our service and product offerings and capabilities with current and future budget priorities of the U.S. Government.
The following are updates based on events that have occurred in the political and economic environment since the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As Congress had enacted only one of its 12 appropriations bills for the current government fiscal year ("GFY 2017"), a continuing resolution ("CR") was enacted allowing the government to operate under the previous year’s spending levels, with some exceptions, until April 28, 2017. Prior to the expiration of the April 28, 2017 CR, Congress passed another short term CR with an expiration date of May 5, 2017. The second short-term CR was necessary to allow Congress the time to complete action on a GFY 2017 Omnibus Appropriation bill to fund the entire government through the last day of September 2017. Prior to expiration of the second short-term CR, Congress approved the GFY 2017 Omnibus Appropriation bill, providing discretionary funding for the federal government for the current fiscal year. The administration has submitted its budget request for GFY 2018 and Congress is currently in the process of considering a budget resolution. Congress is also moving forward on all 12 appropriations bills for the fiscal year beginning in October 2017. This process is expected to continue through the summer and into the fall.
22
International Markets
Sales to customers in international markets represented 9% of total revenues for fiscal 2016. Our acquisition of the IS&GS Business has increased the relative contribution from international business, particularly in the United Kingdom ("U.K.") and Australia, and has therefore increased our exposure to international markets and the associated international regulatory and geopolitical risks.
Lockheed Martin Transaction
On August 16, 2016, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Leidos Holdings, Inc. merged with the Information Systems & Global Solutions business (the "IS&GS Business") of Lockheed Martin Corporation in a Reverse Morris Trust transaction (the "Transactions"). The acquired IS&GS Business was renamed Leidos Innovations Corporation.
We incurred acquisition and integration costs of $16 million and $35 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and $15 million and $24 million during the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, respectively, and expect to incur additional integration costs in connection with the Transactions through fiscal 2019.
Key Performance Measures
The primary financial performance measures we use to manage our business and monitor results of operations are revenue, operating income, cash flows from operations and diluted EPS. We also believe that bookings and backlog are useful measures for management and investors to evaluate our performance and potential future revenues.
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our condensed consolidated results of operations for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 2,571 | $ | 1,288 | $ | 1,283 | 99.6 | % | $ | 5,151 | $ | 2,600 | $ | 2,551 | 98.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating income | 166 | 75 | 91 | 121.3 | % | 307 | 164 | 143 | 87.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-operating expense, net | (31 | ) | (15 | ) | (16 | ) | 106.7 | % | (64 | ) | (26 | ) | (38 | ) | 146.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | 135 | 60 | 75 | 125.0 | % | 243 | 138 | 105 | 76.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (37 | ) | (19 | ) | (18 | ) | 94.7 | % | (71 | ) | (44 | ) | (27 | ) | 61.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net income | 98 | 41 | 57 | 139.0 | % | 172 | 94 | 78 | 83.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest | — | — | — | NM | 2 | — | 2 | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Leidos common stockholders | $ | 98 | $ | 41 | $ | 57 | 139.0 | % | $ | 170 | $ | 94 | $ | 76 | 80.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating margin | 6.5 | % | 5.8 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.3 | % |
NM - Not meaningful
The results of operations include revenues of $1,371 million and $2,735 million and operating income of $95 million and $169 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, attributable to the acquired IS&GS Business.
The revenue increases in constant currency(1) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, were 100.2% and 98.8%, respectively, as compared to an overall increase of 99.6% and 98.1% for the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, respectively. The adverse foreign currency impact was attributable to our U.K. business in the Civil segment.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(1) The non-GAAP measure of constant currency revenues is used to assess the performance of revenue activity without the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We calculate revenues on a constant currency basis by translating current period revenue using the comparable period's foreign currency exchange rates. This calculation is performed for all subsidiaries where the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.
23
Segment results and corporate expenses
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defense Solutions | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,243 | $ | 785 | $ | 458 | 58.3 | % | $ | 2,537 | $ | 1,565 | $ | 972 | 62.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating income | 63 | 60 | 3 | 5.0 | % | 142 | 131 | 11 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income margin | 5.1 | % | 7.6 | % | 5.6 | % | 8.4 | % |
The revenue increases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, were primarily attributable to the acquired IS&GS Business of $468 million and $993 million, respectively, and growth in airborne programs. The increase was partially offset by reduced scope and completion of certain contracts.
The increase in operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended July 1, 2016, was primarily due to strong performance on certain contracts.
The increase in operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the six months ended July 1, 2016, was primarily due to net operating income from the acquired IS&GS Business of $16 million and strong performance on certain contracts, partially offset by reduced scope and completion of certain contracts.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Civil | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 875 | $ | 300 | $ | 575 | 191.7 | % | $ | 1,717 | $ | 661 | $ | 1,056 | 159.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating income | 66 | 20 | 46 | NM | 120 | 42 | 78 | 185.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income margin | 7.5 | % | 6.7 | % | 7.0 | % | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NM - Not meaningful |
The revenue increases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, were primarily attributable to the acquired IS&GS Business of $632 million and $1,218 million, respectively, partially offset by the divestiture of the heavy construction business in fiscal 2016 of $17 million and $103 million, respectively, reduced scope and completion of certain contracts, and the adverse impact of foreign currency of $7 million and $17 million, respectively.
The adverse impact of foreign currency was primarily due to the movement of the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the British pound.
The increase in operating income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, were primarily due to net operating income from the acquired IS&GS Business of $41 million and $72 million, respectively.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 454 | $ | 203 | $ | 251 | 123.6 | % | $ | 897 | $ | 374 | $ | 523 | 139.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating income | 74 | 18 | 56 | NM | 121 | 34 | 87 | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income margin | 16.3 | % | 8.9 | % | 13.5 | % | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NM - Not meaningful |
The revenue increase for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended July 1, 2016, was primarily attributable to the acquired IS&GS Business of $271 million, partially offset by lower revenues from our commercial health business due to timing.
24
The revenue increase for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the six months ended July 1, 2016, was primarily attributable to the acquired IS&GS Business of $524 million and growth in our federal health business, partially offset by lower revenues from our commercial health business due to timing.
The increases in operating income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, were primarily due to net operating income from the acquired IS&GS Business of $58 million and $90 million, respectively.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | Dollar change | Percent change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | (1 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1 | ) | NM | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | NM | ||||||||||||||
Operating loss | (37 | ) | (23 | ) | (14 | ) | 60.9 | % | (76 | ) | (43 | ) | (33 | ) | 76.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
NM - Not meaningful |
The increases in operating loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, were primarily driven by increases of $5 million and $18 million, respectively, of restructuring expenses due to severance costs and lease termination expenses and increases of $1 million and $11 million, respectively, of acquisition and integration costs related to the acquired IS&GS Business.
Restructuring expenses include costs associated with optimization of our real estate portfolio and severance costs associated with reducing headcount. We anticipate this restructuring program to last through fiscal 2020, and expect to incur a total of approximately $112 million in connection with these restructuring activities.
Non-Operating Expense, net
Non-operating expense, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, increased $16 million and $38 million, respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, primarily due to interest expense associated with our term loans secured in connection with the Transactions. The increase in expense was partially offset by an increase in foreign currency exchange gains, mostly due to the movement of the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the British pound.
Provision for Income Taxes
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, our effective tax rate was 27.4% compared to 31.7% for the three months ended July 1, 2016. The decrease was primarily related to the settlement of share based awards in accordance with ASU 2016-09 and the impact of foreign and state related items.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, our effective tax rate was 29.2% compared to 31.9% for the six months ended July 1, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the settlement of share based awards in accordance with ASU 2016-09 and the impact of foreign related items, partially offset by state related items.
Non-controlling Interest
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest of $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, relates to our interest in Mission Support Alliance, LLC, a joint venture with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. and Centerra Group, LLC, acquired as part of the Transactions.
Bookings and Backlog
We received net bookings worth an estimated $2.7 billion and $4.4 billion during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to $1.0 billion and $2.2 billion for the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, respectively.
25
Backlog estimates are subject to change and may be affected by factors including modifications of contracts and foreign currency movements. The estimated value of our total backlog was as follows:
June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Defense Solutions: | ||||||||
Funded backlog | $ | 2,326 | $ | 3,171 | ||||
Negotiated unfunded backlog | 5,064 | 4,936 | ||||||
Total Defense Solutions backlog | $ | 7,390 | $ | 8,107 | ||||
Civil: | ||||||||
Funded backlog | $ | 2,007 | $ | 1,950 | ||||
Negotiated unfunded backlog | 4,883 | 5,250 | ||||||
Total Civil backlog | $ | 6,890 | $ | 7,200 | ||||
Health: | ||||||||
Funded backlog | $ | 660 | $ | 854 | ||||
Negotiated unfunded backlog | 2,151 | 1,575 | ||||||
Total Health backlog | $ | 2,811 | $ | 2,429 | ||||
Total: | ||||||||
Funded backlog | $ | 4,993 | $ | 5,975 | ||||
Negotiated unfunded backlog | 12,098 | 11,761 | ||||||
Total backlog | $ | 17,091 | $ | 17,736 |
Total backlog at June 30, 2017 included $120 million of benefit due to the impact of foreign currency movement between the U.S. dollar and the British pound.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
As of June 30, 2017, we had $262 million in cash and cash equivalents. In addition, we have a secured revolving credit facility which can provide up to $750 million in secured borrowing capacity, if required. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility and we were in compliance with related financial covenants.
At June 30, 2017, and December 30, 2016, we had outstanding debt of $3.2 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively. In addition to the required quarterly payments on our term loans, we repaid $25 million of our senior secured $400 million Term Loan A, due August 2019, on June 30, 2017. The notes outstanding as of June 30, 2017, contain financial covenants and customary restrictive covenants. We were in compliance with all covenants as of June 30, 2017.
We paid dividends of $52 million and $102 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and $23 million and $46 million during the three and six months ended July 1, 2016, respectively.
For the next 12 months, we anticipate that we will be able to meet our liquidity needs, including servicing our debt, through cash generated from operations, available cash balances and, if needed, borrowings from our revolving credit facility.
26
Summary of Cash Flows
The following table summarizes cash flow information for the periods presented:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, 2017 | July 1, 2016 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | $ | 89 | $ | 58 | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities of continuing operations | (14 | ) | 18 | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations | (189 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations | (114 | ) | 15 | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations | — | (1 | ) | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (114 | ) | $ | 14 |
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations increased $31 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, when compared to the prior year, primarily due to the favorable timing of working capital changes, partially offset by higher payments for taxes and interest, restructuring and integration expenses.
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities of continuing operations increased $32 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, when compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher purchases of property, plant and equipment and proceeds received from the divestiture of the heavy construction business in fiscal 2016.
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations increased $128 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, when compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher dividend payments of $56 million and increased payments of long-term debt of $67 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have outstanding performance guarantees and cross-indemnity agreements in connection with certain aspects of our business. We also have letters of credit outstanding principally related to guarantees on contracts and surety bonds outstanding principally related to performance and payment bonds as described in "Note 16–Commitments" of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These arrangements have not had, and management does not believe it is likely that they will in the future have, a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, operations or financial condition.
Commitments and Contingencies
We are subject to a number of reviews, investigations, claims, lawsuits, other uncertainties and future obligations related to our business. For a discussion of these items, see "Note 15–Contingencies" and "Note 16–Commitments" of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Critical Accounting Policies
There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies, estimates or judgments that occurred in the quarterly period covered by this report from those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016.
Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of these items, see "Note 1–Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, there were no material changes in our market risk exposure. For a discussion of our market risk associated with interest rate risk and foreign currency risk as of December 30, 2016, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016.
27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer (our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) and principal financial officer (our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of Leidos’ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2017. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As part of our integration of the IS&GS Business, we continue to integrate controls and related procedures with respect to the acquired operations. Other than incorporating the IS&GS Business controls, there have been no other changes in Leidos' internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the quarterly period covered by this report that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Leidos' internal control over financial reporting.
28
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We have furnished information relating to legal proceedings, and any investigations and reviews that we are involved with in "Note 15–Contingencies" of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There were no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a) | None |
(b) | None |
(c) | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company |
In December 2013, our Board of Directors authorized us to establish a stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to 20 million shares of Leidos common stock. Stock repurchases may be made on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions with third parties including through accelerated share repurchase agreements. The timing and number of share repurchases depends on a variety of factors including price, corporate capital requirements, other market conditions and regulatory requirements. The repurchase authorization may be accelerated, suspended, delayed or discontinued at any time. Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement entered into in connection with the Transactions, we are generally restricted from repurchasing our stock for a two-year period following the closing date of the Transactions.
The following table presents repurchases of Leidos common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2017:
Period | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Repurchase Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |||||||||
April 1, 2017 - April 30, 2017 | 15,139 | $ | 50.65 | — | 5,718,172 | ||||||||
May 1, 2017 - May 31, 2017 | 24,447 | 52.87 | — | 5,718,172 | |||||||||
June 1, 2017 - June 30, 2017 | 21,845 | 55.32 | — | 5,718,172 | |||||||||
Total | 61,431 | 53.20 | — |
(1) | The total number of shares purchased includes: (i) shares surrendered to satisfy statutory tax withholdings obligations related to vesting of restricted stock units; and (ii) shares purchased upon surrender by stockholders of previously owned shares in payment of the exercise price of non-qualified stock options and/or to satisfy statutory tax withholdings obligations. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
29
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit | |
10.1 | Amended and Restated Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | |
10.2 | Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on June 1, 2017. | |
10.3 | Retirement Agreement dated June 5, 2017, between Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Vincent A. Maffeo. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 9, 2017. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101 | Interactive Data File. |
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 4, 2017
Leidos Holdings, Inc. |
/s/ James C. Reagan |
James C. Reagan Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and as a duly authorized officer |
31