Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2008
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-33378
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 36-2517428 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
2500 Lake Cook Road Riverwoods, Illinois 60015 | (224) 405-0900 | |
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) | (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ | |
Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes ¨ No x
As of June 30, 2008 there were 479,346,225 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
Table of Contents
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2008
Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, “Discover Financial Services,” “Discover,” “DFS,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company” refer to Discover Financial Services and its subsidiaries.
We own or have rights to use the trademarks, trade names and service marks that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business, including, but not limited to: Discover, PULSE, Cashback Bonus, Discover More Card, Discover Motiva Card, Discover Open Road Card, Discover Network and Diners Club International. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks included in this quarterly report are the property of their respective owners.
2
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 423,373 | $ | 362,697 | ||||
Federal Funds sold | 2,765,800 | 6,270,600 | ||||||
Interest-earning deposits in other banks | 5,576,211 | 1,440,979 | ||||||
Commercial paper | — | 11,191 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 8,765,384 | 8,085,467 | ||||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||
Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $978,224 and $425,681 at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively) | 958,784 | 420,837 | ||||||
Held-to-maturity (market value $90,555 and $100,769 at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively) | 96,371 | 104,602 | ||||||
Total investment securities | 1,055,155 | 525,439 | ||||||
Loan receivables: | ||||||||
Loans held for sale | 714,632 | — | ||||||
Loan portfolio: | ||||||||
Credit card | 18,683,242 | 20,345,787 | ||||||
Commercial loans | 387,540 | 234,136 | ||||||
Other consumer loans | 716,649 | 251,194 | ||||||
Total loan portfolio | 19,787,431 | 20,831,117 | ||||||
Total loan receivables | 20,502,063 | 20,831,117 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (846,775 | ) | (759,925 | ) | ||||
Net loan receivables | 19,655,288 | 20,071,192 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 131,388 | 123,292 | ||||||
Amounts due from asset securitization | 2,705,638 | 3,041,215 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 556,030 | 575,229 | ||||||
Goodwill | 255,421 | 255,421 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 56,030 | 59,769 | ||||||
Other assets | 839,911 | 712,678 | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations | 213,297 | 3,926,403 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 34,233,542 | $ | 37,376,105 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Deposits: | ||||||||
Interest-bearing deposit accounts | $ | 24,716,104 | $ | 24,643,517 | ||||
Non-interest bearing deposit accounts | 51,545 | 67,796 | ||||||
Total deposits | 24,767,649 | 24,711,313 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings | — | 250,000 | ||||||
Long-term borrowings | 1,889,909 | 2,134,093 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable | 244,344 | 264,965 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 1,481,409 | 1,317,842 | ||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations | 540 | 3,098,470 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 28,383,851 | 31,776,683 | ||||||
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 10) | ||||||||
Stockholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 479,609,403 and 477,762,018 shares issued at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively | 4,796 | 4,777 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 2,908,676 | 2,846,127 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 2,966,053 | 2,717,905 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (25,429 | ) | 32,032 | |||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 263,178 and 73,795 shares at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively | (4,405 | ) | (1,419 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 5,849,691 | 5,599,422 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 34,233,542 | $ | 37,376,105 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans | $ | 515,908 | $ | 502,795 | $ | 1,065,926 | $ | 1,072,188 | ||||||||
Commercial loans | 4,018 | 406 | 7,221 | 601 | ||||||||||||
Federal Funds sold | 26,062 | 75,689 | 67,341 | 80,710 | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper | — | 211 | 77 | 415 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities | 11,626 | 1,294 | 17,613 | 2,477 | ||||||||||||
Deposits in other banks | 34,239 | — | 56,676 | — | ||||||||||||
Other interest income | 20,210 | 57,261 | 60,011 | 93,471 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | 612,063 | 637,656 | 1,274,865 | 1,249,862 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits | 292,441 | 267,929 | 602,240 | 455,187 | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 45 | 25,572 | 135 | 77,906 | ||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 20,762 | 9,921 | 50,314 | 22,136 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 313,248 | 303,422 | 652,689 | 555,229 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 298,815 | 334,234 | 622,176 | 694,633 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 210,969 | 144,676 | 516,601 | 291,874 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 87,846 | 189,558 | 105,575 | 402,759 | ||||||||||||
Other income: | ||||||||||||||||
Securitization income | 628,031 | 584,566 | 1,341,528 | 1,092,866 | ||||||||||||
Loan fee income | 53,839 | 70,303 | 142,097 | 159,344 | ||||||||||||
Discount and interchange revenue | 65,523 | 65,964 | 117,419 | 145,545 | ||||||||||||
Insurance | 47,186 | 40,468 | 94,955 | 84,431 | ||||||||||||
Merchant fees | 17,849 | 23,853 | 36,693 | 49,179 | ||||||||||||
Transaction processing revenue | 30,405 | 25,187 | 56,359 | 49,697 | ||||||||||||
Loss on investments | (31,280 | ) | — | (32,464 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Other income | 33,339 | 19,445 | 63,849 | 39,073 | ||||||||||||
Total other income | 844,892 | 829,786 | 1,820,436 | 1,620,135 | ||||||||||||
Other expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits | 218,290 | 215,447 | 435,660 | 430,614 | ||||||||||||
Marketing and business development | 132,038 | 131,959 | 273,591 | 266,501 | ||||||||||||
Information processing and communications | 79,449 | 82,396 | 157,725 | 161,240 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees | 81,392 | 102,853 | 155,064 | 178,918 | ||||||||||||
Premises and equipment | 19,803 | 20,557 | 39,444 | 40,132 | ||||||||||||
Other expense | 75,853 | 70,546 | 147,684 | 138,194 | ||||||||||||
Total other expense | 606,825 | 623,758 | 1,209,168 | 1,215,599 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | 325,913 | 395,586 | 716,843 | 807,295 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 124,370 | 145,330 | 276,471 | 297,221 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 201,543 | 250,256 | 440,372 | 510,074 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | 32,605 | (41,014 | ) | (125,010 | ) | (67,200 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 234,148 | $ | 209,242 | $ | 315,362 | $ | 442,874 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.92 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | 0.07 | (0.08 | ) | (0.26 | ) | (0.13 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.93 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.92 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | 0.06 | (0.08 | ) | (0.27 | ) | (0.13 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.93 | ||||||||
Dividends paid per common share | $ | 0.06 | $ | — | $ | 0.12 | $ | — |
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Treasury Stock | Total Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars and shares in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at November 30, 2006 | 1 | $ | 100 | $ | 2,636,265 | $ | 3,008,421 | $ | 129,986 | $ | — | $ | 5,774,772 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 442,874 | — | — | 442,874 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation (accumulated amount of $130,404 at May 31, 2007) | — | — | — | — | 419 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized losses on investment securities | — | — | — | — | (132 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | — | — | — | 31 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | 318 | — | 318 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | — | 443,192 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital contribution from Morgan Stanley | — | — | 62,320 | — | — | — | 62,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid to Morgan Stanley | — | — | — | (500,000 | ) | — | — | (500,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at May 31, 2007 | 1 | $ | 100 | $ | 2,698,585 | $ | 2,951,295 | $ | 130,304 | $ | — | $ | 5,780,284 | ||||||||||||
Balance at November 30, 2007 | 477,762 | $ | 4,777 | $ | 2,846,127 | $ | 2,717,905 | $ | 32,032 | $ | (1,419 | ) | $ | 5,599,422 | |||||||||||
Adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48 | — | — | — | (8,743 | ) | — | — | (8,743 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 315,362 | — | — | 315,362 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation (accumulated amount of $0 at May 31, 2008) | — | — | — | — | (48,358 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized losses on investment securities | — | — | — | — | (9,103 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | — | — | — | — | (57,461 | ) | — | (57,461 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | — | 257,901 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock | — | — | — | — | — | (2,986 | ) | (2,986 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under employee 401(k) plan | 1,138 | 12 | 16,125 | — | — | — | 16,137 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued and stock-based compensation expense | 709 | 7 | 46,559 | — | — | — | 46,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | — | — | — | (58,471 | ) | — | — | (58,471 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other | — | — | (135 | ) | — | — | — | (135 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at May 31, 2008 | 479,609 | $ | 4,796 | $ | 2,908,676 | $ | 2,966,053 | $ | (25,429 | ) | $ | (4,405 | ) | $ | 5,849,691 | ||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended May 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 315,362 | $ | 442,874 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Gains on sale of mortgages and installment loans | — | (1,773 | ) | |||||
Net principal disbursed on loans originated for sale | — | (54,709 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale | — | 56,102 | ||||||
Loss on sale of Goldfish business | 152,060 | — | ||||||
Loss on investments | 32,464 | — | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 62,703 | — | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (22,867 | ) | (6,775 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization on premises and equipment | 55,621 | 61,490 | ||||||
Other depreciation and amortization | 60,801 | 63,199 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 536,612 | 398,673 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred revenues | (9,350 | ) | (9,550 | ) | ||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in amounts due from asset securitization | 333,254 | (400,528 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets | (47,866 | ) | (102,564 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities | 97,472 | 55,442 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,566,266 | 501,881 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of Goldfish business | 69,529 | — | ||||||
Payments for business and other acquisitions | — | (5,000 | ) | |||||
Maturities of investment securities | 28,706 | 4,449 | ||||||
Purchases of investment securities | (20,367 | ) | (16,847 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from securitization and sale of loans held for investment | 4,394,802 | 5,294,240 | ||||||
Net principal disbursed on loans held for investment | (4,802,649 | ) | (4,795,355 | ) | ||||
Purchases of premises and equipment | (45,434 | ) | (58,915 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities | (375,413 | ) | 422,572 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
Net (decrease) in short-term borrowings | (759,312 | ) | (2,621,768 | ) | ||||
Repayment of long-term debt and bank notes | (243,642 | ) | (563,579 | ) | ||||
Purchases of treasury stock | (2,986 | ) | — | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits | 59,820 | 9,779,434 | ||||||
Dividends paid to Morgan Stanley | — | (500,000 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid | (58,471 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | (1,004,591 | ) | 6,094,087 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (24,592 | ) | 45 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 161,670 | 7,018,585 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period | 8,787,095 | 874,357 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period | $ | 8,948,765 | $ | 7,892,942 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
Interest expense | $ | 718,970 | $ | 536,824 | ||||
Income taxes, net of income tax refunds | $ | 129,020 | $ | 191,471 | ||||
Non-cash transactions: | ||||||||
Exchange of retained seller’s interest for certificated beneficial interests in DCENT | $ | 585,000 | $ | — | ||||
Capital contributions from Morgan Stanley | $ | — | $ | 62,320 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. | Background and Basis of Presentation |
Description of Business.Discover Financial Services (“DFS” or the “Company”) is a leading credit card issuer and electronic payment services company. The Company’s business segments include U.S. Card and Third-Party Payments. The U.S. Card segment includes Discover Card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses over Discover’s signature card network (the “Discover Network”) and other consumer products and services business, including prepaid and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through the Company’s Discover Bank subsidiary. The Third-Party Payments segment includes the PULSE Network (“PULSE”), an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network, and the Company’s third-party payments business.
On February 7, 2008, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement to sell the Company’s U.K. credit card business (“Goldfish”) which represented substantially all of the Company’s International Card segment. As a result, the International Card segment is presented in discontinued operations in this report. The Company completed the sale of the Goldfish business to Barclays Bank PLC on March 31, 2008. See Note 2: Discontinued Operations for further details.
Distribution.On December 19, 2006, Morgan Stanley announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the spin-off of its Discover segment. On June 30, 2007, the Company was spun-off from Morgan Stanley through the distribution of DFS shares to holders of Morgan Stanley common stock (the “Distribution”). Prior to the Distribution, the Discover segment comprised Discover Financial Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, as well as certain other subsidiaries and assets related to credit card operations in the United Kingdom, which are presented in discontinued operations, that were contributed to the Discover segment by Morgan Stanley in conjunction with the Distribution.
Basis of Presentation.The accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated or combined financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated and combined financial statements and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These interim consolidated and combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2007 audited consolidated and combined financial statements filed with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007.
The financial statements presented in this quarterly report for periods on or after the Distribution are presented on a consolidated basis and include the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The financial statements for the periods prior to the Distribution are presented on a combined basis and reflect the historical combined results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the Morgan Stanley subsidiaries that comprised its Discover segment (as described in the preceding section) for the periods presented. The combined statements of income for periods prior to the Distribution reflect intercompany expense allocations made to the Discover segment by Morgan Stanley for certain corporate functions such as treasury, financial control, human resources, internal audit, legal, investor relations and various other functions historically provided by Morgan Stanley. Where possible, these allocations were made on a specific identification basis. Otherwise, such expenses were allocated by Morgan Stanley based on relative percentages of headcount or some other basis depending on the nature of the cost that was allocated. These historical cost allocations may not be indicative of costs the Company has incurred since the spin-off and will incur in the future to obtain these same services as an independent entity. See Note 13: Related Party Transactions for further information on expenses allocated by Morgan Stanley.
7
Table of Contents
The historical financial results in the combined financial statements presented for periods prior to the Distribution may not be indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the Company operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during those periods. The combined financial statements presented for those periods do not reflect any changes that have occurred or may yet occur in the financing and operations of the Company as a result of the Distribution. The Company has a capital structure different from the capital structure in the combined financial statements and accordingly, interest expense is not necessarily indicative of the interest expense the Company would have incurred as a separate, independent company. However, management believes that the combined financial statements presented for periods prior to the Distribution include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the business. All intercompany balances and transactions of the Company have been eliminated.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162,The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“Statement No. 162”). Statement No. 162 supersedes the existing hierarchy contained in the U.S. auditing standards. The existing hierarchy was carried over to Statement No. 162 essentially unchanged. The Statement becomes effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to the auditing literature. The new hierarchy is not expected to change current accounting practice in any area.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing assumptions about renewal or extension used in estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“Statement No. 142”). This standard is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under Statement No. 141R (discussed below) and other GAAP. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The measurement provisions of this standard will apply only to intangible assets of the Company acquired after the effective date.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“Statement No. 161”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial condition, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Statement No. 161 will impact disclosures only and will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations (“Statement No. 141R”), which replaces Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,Business Combinations(“Statement No. 141”) issued in 2001. Whereas its predecessor applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained by transferring consideration, the revised standard applies to all transactions or other events in which one entity obtains control over another. Statement No. 141R defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control over one or more other businesses and defines the acquisition date as the date the acquirer achieves control. Statement No. 141R requires the acquirer to recognize assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. The revised standard changes the treatment of acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs related to an acquisition that the acquirer expects but is not obligated to incur, contingent consideration associated with the purchase price and preacquisition contingencies associated with acquired assets and liabilities. Statement No. 141R retains the guidance in Statement No. 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets apart from goodwill. The revised standard applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply the provisions of Statement No. 141R to any business acquisition which occurs on or after the date the standard becomes effective.
8
Table of Contents
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51, (“Statement No. 160”). Statement No. 160 will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. A noncontrolling interest (orminority interest) is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Statement No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, topics for which there had been limited authoritative guidance. Statement No. 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements rather than a liability or a “mezzanine equity” item. Statement No. 160 is effective on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company does not currently have any subsidiaries that get deconsolidated or for which a noncontrolling interest exists. As such, the adoption of Statement No. 160 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2007, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) ratified Issue No. 06-11,Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards(“EITF 06-11”), which clarifies the accounting for income tax benefits related to dividends paid on stock-based awards. The issue is effective for awards declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years. EITF 06-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
2. | Discontinued Operations |
On February 7, 2008, the Company and Barclays Bank PLC entered into a definitive sale and purchase agreement relating to the sale of £129 million of net assets (equivalent to approximately $258 million) of the Company’s Goldfish business, previously reported as the International Card segment. The Company completed the sale of the Goldfish business to Barclays Bank PLC on March 31, 2008. The aggregate sale price under the agreement was £35 million (equivalent to approximately $70 million), which was paid in cash at closing and is subject to a potential post-closing adjustment.
The Company has reclassified the net assets of the Goldfish business to discontinued operations and restated prior periods for comparability. The Company recorded after tax income from discontinued operations of $32.6 million and an after tax loss from discontinued operations of $125.0 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, respectively. The income for the three months ended May 31, 2008 included pretax income from operations of $21.3 million ($12.2 million after tax) and a pretax gain on the sale of the business of $14.8 million ($20.4 million after tax), which included $27.1 million from the realization of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, offset in part by indemnification and transaction costs. The results for the six months ended May 31, 2008 included a pretax loss on the sale of the business of $220.8 million ($152.0 million after tax), which included the write-down of $36.7 million of other intangibles that had previously been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, partially offset by pretax income of the U.K. operations of $44.9 million ($27.0 million after tax) which included gains from the sale of other assets.
9
Table of Contents
Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations related to the sale of the Company’s Goldfish business were as follows (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||
Assets: | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 183,381 | $ | 701,628 | ||
Loan receivables and other assets | 29,916 | 3,224,775 | ||||
Total assets | 213,297 | 3,926,403 | ||||
Liabilities: | ||||||
Borrowings | — | 2,925,426 | ||||
Other liabilities(1) | 540 | 173,044 | ||||
Total liabilities | 540 | 3,098,470 | ||||
Net assets | $ | 212,757 | $ | 827,933 | ||
(1) | Included in this amount at May 31, 2008 is the fair value of outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts with an aggregate notional value of £100.0 million, entered into during the second quarter of 2008 to economically hedge substantially all of the remaining non-dollar denominated net assets of the Goldfish business. Subsequent to May 31, 2008 a substantial portion of these contracts was settled. |
The following table provides summary financial information for discontinued operations related to the sale of the Company’s Goldfish business (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 29,791 | $ | 74,785 | $ | 128,355 | $ | 146,060 | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 21,282 | $ | (63,061 | ) | $ | 44,912 | $ | (103,309 | ) | |||||
Gain (loss) on the sale of discontinued operations(2) | 14,800 | — | (220,830 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Pretax income (loss) from discontinued operations | 36,082 | (63,061 | ) | (175,918 | ) | (103,309 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)(2) | 3,477 | (22,047 | ) | (50,908 | ) | (36,109 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | 32,605 | $ | (41,014 | ) | $ | (125,010 | ) | $ | (67,200 | ) | ||||
(1) | Revenues are the sum of net interest income and other income. |
(2) | Gain (loss) on the sale of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2008 includes a $27.1 million realization of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments which were previously recorded net of tax. As a result, there is no tax impact in the current periods related to the realization of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments. |
3. | Loan Receivables |
Loan receivables consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||||
Loans held for sale | $ | 714,632 | $ | — | ||||
Loan portfolio: | ||||||||
Credit card | 18,683,242 | 20,345,787 | ||||||
Commercial loans | 387,540 | 234,136 | ||||||
Total credit card, including consumer and commercial | 19,070,782 | 20,579,923 | ||||||
Other consumer loans | 716,649 | 251,194 | ||||||
Total loan portfolio | 19,787,431 | 20,831,117 | ||||||
Total loan receivables | 20,502,063 | 20,831,117 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (846,775 | ) | (759,925 | ) | ||||
Net loan receivables | $ | 19,655,288 | $ | 20,071,192 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
Net proceeds from loan sales are as follows (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from credit card securitizations | $ | 1,846,152 | $ | 3,718,075 | $ | 4,394,802 | $ | 5,294,240 | ||||
Net proceeds from mortgage and installment loan sales | — | 28,780 | — | 54,329 | ||||||||
Total net proceeds from loan sales | $ | 1,846,152 | $ | 3,746,855 | $ | 4,394,802 | $ | 5,348,569 | ||||
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 860,378 | $ | 663,172 | $ | 759,925 | $ | 703,917 | ||||||||
Additions: | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 210,969 | 144,676 | 516,601 | 291,874 | ||||||||||||
Deductions: | ||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (269,013 | ) | (204,384 | ) | (514,641 | ) | (433,509 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries | 44,441 | 41,237 | 84,890 | 82,419 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs | (224,572 | ) | (163,147 | ) | (429,751 | ) | (351,090 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 846,775 | $ | 644,701 | $ | 846,775 | $ | 644,701 | ||||||||
Information regarding net charge-offs of interest and fee revenues on credit card loans is as follows (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Interest accrued subsequently charged off, net of recoveries (recorded as a reduction of interest income) | $ | 62,153 | $ | 43,449 | $ | 119,126 | $ | 90,140 | ||||
Loan fees accrued subsequently charged off, net of recoveries (recorded as a reduction to loan fee income) | $ | 26,916 | $ | 20,061 | $ | 50,985 | $ | 41,614 |
Information regarding loan receivables that are over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest and loan receivables that are not accruing interest is as follows (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||
Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest | $ | 322,479 | $ | 271,227 | ||
Loans not accruing interest | $ | 114,442 | $ | 102,286 |
4. | Investment Securities |
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency obligations | $ | 17,514 | $ | 23,160 | ||
State and political subdivisions of states | 60,572 | 61,091 | ||||
Certificated retained interests in DCENT | 881,112 | 310,861 | ||||
Asset-backed commercial paper notes | 77,408 | 108,681 | ||||
Other securities | 18,549 | 21,646 | ||||
Total investment securities | $ | 1,055,155 | $ | 525,439 | ||
11
Table of Contents
During the six months ended May 31, 2008, the Company exchanged $585 million of its seller’s interest in the Discover Card Master Trust I for the issuance of certificated Class B and Class C notes issued by the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”), which the Company now holds as other retained beneficial interests. The seller’s interest was included in loan receivables, which was reduced as a result of this transaction. These certificated notes are classified as investment securities available-for-sale on the Company’s statement of financial condition.
At May 31, 2008, the Company had $77.4 million of asset-backed commercial paper notes of Golden Key U.S. LLC, for which the Company recorded a $31.3 million other-than-temporary impairment during the three and six months ended May 31, 2008. These notes are no longer traded, and as such, fair value of the notes is determined utilizing a valuation analysis, reflecting an estimate of the market value of the assets held by the issuer. The Company expects that these notes may be restructured later in 2008, which, depending on the terms, may result in further impairment of the Company’s investment.
5. | Deposits |
The Company’s deposits consist of brokered and direct certificates of deposits, money market deposit accounts, and, to a lesser degree, deposits payable upon demand.
A summary of interest-bearing deposit accounts is as follows (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||||
Certificates of deposit in amounts less than $100,000 | $ | 19,441,068 | $ | 19,385,024 | ||||
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or greater | 917,155 | 775,717 | ||||||
Savings deposits, including money market deposit accounts | 4,357,881 | 4,482,776 | ||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | $ | 24,716,104 | $ | 24,643,517 | ||||
Average annual interest rate | 4.85 | % | 5.18 | % |
Certificates of deposit had the following maturities at May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Year | Amount | ||
2008 | $ | 5,893,405 | |
2009 | $ | 5,831,219 | |
2010 | $ | 3,644,590 | |
2011 | $ | 1,424,221 | |
2012 | $ | 1,937,219 | |
Thereafter(1) | $ | 1,627,569 |
(1) | Includes certificates of deposits which may be called by the Company prior to their contractual maturity at specific intervals of time. |
12
Table of Contents
6. | Long-Term Borrowings |
Long-term borrowings consist of borrowings and capital leases having original maturities of one year or more. The following table provides a summary of the outstanding amounts and general terms of the Company’s long-term borrowings (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | Maturity | ||||||||||||
Funding source | Outstanding | Interest Rate | Outstanding | Interest Rate | ||||||||||
Bank notes | $ | 249,917 | 2.87 | % | $ | 249,856 | 5.03 | % | February 2009 | |||||
Secured borrowings | 836,420 | 3.15 | % | 1,080,063 | 5.67 | % | various (final maturity December 2010) | |||||||
Unsecured borrowings: | ||||||||||||||
Floating rate senior notes | 400,000 | 3.43 | % | 400,000 | 6.23 | % | June 2010 | |||||||
Fixed rate senior notes | 399,263 | 6.45 | % | 399,222 | 6.45 | % | June 2017 | |||||||
Total unsecured borrowings | 799,263 | 799,222 | ||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations | 4,309 | 6.26 | % | 4,952 | 6.26 | % | various | |||||||
Total long-term borrowings | $ | 1,889,909 | $ | 2,134,093 | ||||||||||
The Company negotiated a 59-month $2.5 billion unsecured credit agreement that became effective July 2, 2007. The credit agreement provides for a revolving credit commitment of up to $2.5 billion (of which the parent may borrow up to 30% and Discover Bank may borrow up to 100% of the revolving credit commitment). The credit agreement provides for a commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility, which can range from 0.07% to 0.175% depending on the index debt ratings. Loans outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a margin above the Federal Funds rate, LIBOR, EURIBOR or the Euro Reference rate. The terms of the credit agreement include various affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants related to the maintenance of certain capitalization and tangible net worth levels, and certain double leverage, delinquency and tier 1 capital to managed loans ratios. The credit agreement also includes customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money and bankruptcy-related defaults. The commitments may be terminated upon an event of default. As of May 31, 2008, the Company had no outstanding balances due under the facility.
7. | Employee Benefit Plans |
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans for its eligible U.S. employees. Net periodic benefit cost expensed by the Company included the following components (dollars in thousands):
Pension | ||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Service cost, benefits earned during the period | $ | 4,206 | $ | 4,825 | $ | 8,412 | $ | 9,650 | ||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 4,998 | 4,951 | 9,996 | 9,902 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (6,009 | ) | (5,474 | ) | (12,018 | ) | (10,948 | ) | ||||||||
Net amortization | (560 | ) | 515 | (1,120 | ) | 1,030 | ||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 2,635 | $ | 4,817 | $ | 5,270 | $ | 9,634 | ||||||||
13
Table of Contents
Postretirement | ||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Service cost, benefits earned during the period | $ | 269 | $ | 274 | $ | 538 | $ | 548 | ||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 361 | 328 | 722 | 656 | ||||||||||||
Net amortization | (116 | ) | (138 | ) | (232 | ) | (276 | ) | ||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 514 | $ | 464 | $ | 1,028 | $ | 928 | ||||||||
8. | Income Taxes |
Income tax expense from continuing operations consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Current: | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. federal | $ | 161,997 | $ | 140,497 | $ | 289,697 | $ | 267,399 | ||||||||
U.S. state and local | 19,622 | 11,689 | 41,374 | 22,832 | ||||||||||||
International | 9 | 1 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total | 181,628 | 152,187 | 331,075 | 290,234 | ||||||||||||
Deferred: | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. federal | (51,661 | ) | (6,372 | ) | (49,414 | ) | 7,179 | |||||||||
U.S. state and local | (5,597 | ) | (485 | ) | (5,190 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||||||
Total | (57,258 | ) | (6,857 | ) | (54,604 | ) | 6,987 | |||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 124,370 | $ | 145,330 | $ | 276,471 | $ | 297,221 | ||||||||
The following table reconciles the Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations to the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate:
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||
U.S. state and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefits | 3.1 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 1.8 | ||||||||
Other | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | 0.5 | — | |||||||
Effective income tax rate | 38.2 | % | 36.7 | % | 38.6 | % | 36.8 | % | ||||
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(“FIN 48”) on December 1, 2007. As a result of adoption, the Company recorded an $8.7 million reduction to the December 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at the date of adoption on December 1, 2007, was $242.8 million, of which $51.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits would favorably affect the effective tax rate if recognized.
14
Table of Contents
The Company continues to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense, consistent with its policy prior to the adoption of FIN 48. The accrued balance of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits at December 1, 2007, was $41.0 million.
The Company is under continuous examination by the IRS and the tax authorities for various states. The tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction; for example, the current IRS examination covers 1999 through 2005. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the taxing jurisdictions resulting from these and subsequent years’ examinations. A liability for unrecognized tax benefits has been established that the Company believes is adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments. Once established, unrecognized tax benefits are adjusted only when there is more information available or when an event occurs necessitating a change. It is reasonably possible that the unrecognized tax benefit will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. Based on current progress with the federal audit, it is not possible to quantify the impact such changes may have on the effective tax rate.
9. | Earnings Per Share |
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities. On June 30, 2007, the Distribution by Morgan Stanley was completed to the Morgan Stanley stockholders of one share of DFS common stock for every two shares of Morgan Stanley common stock held on June 18, 2007. As a result, on July 2, 2007, the Company had 477,235,927 shares of common stock outstanding and this share amount is being utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007. The same number of shares is being used for diluted EPS as for basic EPS as no common stock of DFS was traded prior to July 2, 2007, and no DFS equity awards were outstanding for the prior periods.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Numerator: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 201,543 | $ | 250,256 | $ | 440,372 | $ | 510,074 | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | 32,605 | (41,014 | ) | (125,010 | ) | (67,200 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 234,148 | $ | 209,242 | $ | 315,362 | $ | 442,874 | |||||||
Denominator: | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 479,270 | 477,236 | 478,896 | 477,236 | |||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock units | 4,483 | — | 3,839 | — | |||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents | 483,753 | 477,236 | 482,735 | 477,236 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.92 | $ | 1.06 | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | 0.07 | (0.08 | ) | (0.26 | ) | (0.13 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.93 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.92 | $ | 1.06 | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | 0.06 | (0.08 | ) | (0.27 | ) | (0.13 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.93 | |||||||
15
Table of Contents
The following securities were considered anti-dilutive and therefore were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS (shares in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||
Number of anti-dilutive securities (stock options and restricted stock units) | 4,336 | — | 4,464 | — |
10. | Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees |
Lease commitments. The Company leases various office space and equipment under capital and non-cancelable operating leases which expire at various dates through 2018. At May 31, 2008, future minimum payments on leases with remaining terms in excess of one year, consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | ||||||
Capitalized Leases | Operating Leases | |||||
2008 | $ | 790 | $ | 2,932 | ||
2009 | 1,579 | 6,162 | ||||
2010 | 1,579 | 4,459 | ||||
2011 | 790 | 2,983 | ||||
2012 | — | 2,900 | ||||
Thereafter | — | 17,067 | ||||
Total minimum lease payments | 4,738 | $ | 36,503 | |||
Less: amount representing interest | 429 | |||||
Present value of net minimum lease payments | $ | 4,309 | ||||
Unused commitments to extend credit. At May 31, 2008, the Company had unused commitments to extend credit for consumer and commercial loans of approximately $215 billion. Such commitments arise primarily from agreements with customers for unused lines of credit on certain credit cards, provided there is no violation of conditions established in the related agreement. These commitments, substantially all of which the Company can terminate at any time and which do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, are periodically reviewed based on account usage and customer creditworthiness.
Guarantees. The Company has certain obligations under certain guarantee arrangements, including contracts and indemnification agreements that contingently require the Company to make payments to the guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying (such as a security) related to an asset or a liability of a guaranteed party. Also included as guarantees are contracts that contingently require the Company to make payments to the guaranteed party based on another entity’s failure to perform under an agreement. The Company’s use of guarantees is disclosed below by type of guarantee.
Discontinued Operations. Under the sale and purchase agreement to sell the Company’s Goldfish business, the Company indemnified the purchasers of the Goldfish business, including Barclays Bank PLC, against certain liabilities and losses. Such indemnities are customary in sale and purchase transactions and are contingent upon the purchasers incurring liabilities or losses that are not otherwise recoverable from third parties. Indemnification obligations of the Company include those related to the enforceability and transferability of the Goldfish credit card receivables. The maximum potential payments by the Company under the enforceability and transferability indemnification obligations is £129 million, and Barclays Bank PLC must provide notice to the Company of any such claims within 12 months of the transaction closing date, March 31, 2008. At May 31, 2008, there were no material amounts recorded in the Company’s
16
Table of Contents
consolidated statement of financial condition related to indemnification obligations under the agreement for the sale of the Goldfish business, and management believes that there is a low probability of any material payments under these arrangements.
Securitized Asset Representations and Warranties. As part of the Company’s securitization activities, the Company provides representations and warranties that certain securitized assets conform to specified guidelines. The Company may be required to repurchase such assets or indemnify the purchaser against losses if the assets do not meet certain conforming guidelines. Due diligence is performed by the Company to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make would be equal to the current outstanding balances of all assets subject to such securitization activities. The Company has not recorded any contingent liability in the consolidated and combined financial statements for these representations and warranties, and management believes that the probability of any payments under these arrangements is remote.
Merchant Chargeback Guarantees. The Company issues credit cards and owns and operates the Discover Network in the United States. The Company is contingently liable for certain transactions processed on the Discover Network in the event of a dispute between the cardholder and a merchant. The contingent liability arises if the disputed transaction involves a merchant or merchant acquirer with whom Discover Network has a direct relationship. If a dispute is resolved in the cardholder’s favor, the Discover Network will credit or refund the disputed amount to the Discover Network card issuer, who in turn credits its cardholder’s account. Discover Network will then charge back the transaction to the merchant or merchant acquirer. If the Discover Network is unable to collect the amount from the merchant or merchant acquirer, it will bear the loss for the amount credited or refunded to the cardholder. In most instances, a payment requirement by the Discover Network is unlikely to arise because most products or services are delivered when purchased, and credits are issued by merchants on returned items in a timely fashion. However, where the product or service is not provided until some later date following the purchase, the likelihood of payment by the Discover Network increases. The maximum potential amount of future payments related to these contingent liabilities is estimated to be the portion of the total Discover Network transaction volume processed to date for which timely and valid disputes may be raised under applicable law and relevant issuer and cardholder agreements. However, the Company believes that amount is not representative of the Company’s actual potential loss exposure based on the Company’s historical experience. The actual amount of the potential exposure cannot be quantified as the Company cannot determine whether the current or cumulative transaction volumes may include or result in disputed transactions.
The table below summarizes certain information regarding merchant chargeback guarantees from continuing operations:
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Losses related to merchant chargebacks (in thousands) | $ | 1,357 | $ | 1,835 | $ | 3,253 | $ | 3,602 | ||||
Aggregate transaction volume(1) (in millions) | $ | 24,287 | $ | 22,863 | $ | 48,834 | $ | 45,704 |
(1) | Represents period transactions processed on Discover Network to which a potential liability exists, which, in aggregate, can differ from credit card sales volume. |
As of May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, there were no material amounts recorded for this guarantee in the Company’s consolidated and combined statements of financial condition. The Company mitigates this risk by withholding settlement from merchants and merchant acquirers or obtaining escrow deposits from certain merchant acquirers or merchants that are considered higher risk due to various factors such as time delays in the delivery of products or services and certain merchant behavior.
17
Table of Contents
The table below provides information regarding the settlement withholdings and escrow deposits (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||
Settlement withholdings and escrow deposits | $ | 60,890 | $ | 52,683 |
Settlement withholdings and escrow deposits are recorded in interest-bearing deposit accounts and accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition.
11. | Fair Value Disclosures |
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107,Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, the Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate fair value.
The following table provides the estimated fair values of financial instruments (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||||||||
Carrying Value | Estimated Fair Value | Carrying Value | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||
Financial Assets | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 8,765,384 | $ | 8,765,384 | $ | 8,085,467 | $ | 8,085,467 | ||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | $ | 958,784 | $ | 958,784 | $ | 420,837 | $ | 420,837 | ||||
Held-to-maturity | $ | 96,371 | $ | 90,555 | $ | 104,602 | $ | 100,769 | ||||
Net loan receivables | $ | 19,655,288 | $ | 19,797,618 | $ | 20,071,192 | $ | 20,215,713 | ||||
Amounts due from asset securitization | $ | 2,705,638 | $ | 2,705,638 | $ | 3,041,215 | $ | 3,041,215 | ||||
Other assets: | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | $ | 4,307 | $ | 4,307 | $ | 2,643 | $ | 2,643 | ||||
Financial Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | 24,767,649 | $ | 25,033,395 | $ | 24,711,313 | $ | 24,782,822 | ||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 250,000 | $ | 250,000 | ||||
Long-term borrowings | $ | 1,889,909 | $ | 1,866,633 | $ | 2,134,093 | $ | 2,091,902 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | $ | 3,210 | $ | 3,210 | $ | 19,532 | $ | 19,532 |
The Company estimates the fair value of its financial instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (“Statement No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. If available, observable market prices are used for identical or comparable assets or liabilities. For instances in which observable market prices are not readily available, the Company estimates fair value using present value or other techniques appropriate for a particular financial instrument. These techniques involve some degree of judgment and as a result are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange. The use of different assumptions or estimation techniques may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The following is a summary of the techniques utilized by the Company to derive fair value estimates of its assets and liabilities.
Cash and cash equivalents. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to maturities of less than three months.
18
Table of Contents
Investment securities available-for-sale. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are recorded at their fair values. Fair values of retained interests in Class B and C notes issued by DCENT are estimated utilizing information obtained from investment banks for investments with similar terms, capturing current market spreads. Fair values of other investments are based on quoted market prices utilizing public information for similar transactions or information provided through third-party advisors.
Investment securities held-to-maturity. The estimated fair values of investment securities classified as held-to-maturity are based on quoted market prices utilizing public information for the same or comparable transactions or information provided through third-party advisors.
Net loan receivables. The Company’s loan receivables consist of loans held for sale and the loan portfolio, which includes loans to consumers and commercial loans. The carrying value of loans held for sale, which consists entirely of consumer loans, approximates fair value as a result of the short-term nature of these assets. To estimate the fair value of the remaining loan receivables, loans are aggregated into pools of similar loan types, characteristics and expected repayment terms. The fair values of the loans are estimated by discounting future cash flows using a rate at which similar loans could be made under current market conditions.
Amounts due from asset securitization. Carrying values of the portion of amounts due from asset securitization that are short-term in nature approximate their fair values. Fair values of the remaining assets recorded in amounts due from asset securitization reflect the present value of estimated future cash flows utilizing management’s best estimate of key assumptions with regard to credit card receivable performance and interest rate environment projections.
Deposits. The carrying values of money market deposit, non-interest bearing deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits and savings accounts approximates fair value due to the liquid nature of these deposits. For time deposits for which readily available market rates do not exist, fair values are estimated by discounting future cash flows using market rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.
Short-term borrowings. Short-term borrowings have original maturities of less than one year. As a result of their short-term nature, the carrying values of short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.
Long-term borrowings. Long-term borrowings include fixed and floating rate debt. The fair values of long-term borrowings having fixed rates are determined by discounting cash flows of future interest accruals at market rates currently offered for borrowings with similar remaining maturities or repricing terms. The carrying values of long-term borrowings having floating rates approximate their fair values due to their automatic ability to reprice with changes in the interest rate environment.
Derivative financial instruments. As part of its interest rate risk management program, the Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements with institutions that are established dealers and that maintain certain minimum credit criteria established by the Company. The values of these agreements are provided through third-party advisors and are recorded in other assets at their gross positive fair values and accrued expenses and other liabilities at their gross negative fair values.
19
Table of Contents
The table that follows summarizes the interest rate swap agreements outstanding (dollars in thousands):
Notional Amount | Weighted Average Years to Maturity | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||
May 31, 2008 | |||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements | $ | 713,000 | 10.3 | ||||||
Gross positive fair value | — | $ | 4,307 | ||||||
Gross negative fair value | — | (3,210 | ) | ||||||
Total interest rate swap agreements | $ | 713,000 | 10.3 | $ | 1,097 | ||||
November 30, 2007 | |||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements | $ | 1,000,500 | 10.1 | ||||||
Gross positive fair value | $ | 2,643 | |||||||
Gross negative fair value | (10,112 | ) | |||||||
Total interest rate swap agreements | $ | 1,000,500 | 10.1 | $ | (7,469 | ) | |||
For the three months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, other income included losses of $2.8 million and $13.4 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of these contracts that did not qualify as fair value hedges. For the six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, other income included losses of $0.9 million and $15.9 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of these contracts that did not qualify as fair value hedges. Interest expense includes amortization related to the fair value adjustment to interest-bearing deposits existing prior to de-designation and the basis adjustment existing on the hedged interest-bearing deposits relating to the risk being hedged. Interest expense also includes any ineffectiveness related to certain derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges. For the three months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, interest expense included $4.6 million in contra-expense and $0.9 million in expense, respectively, related to these contracts. For the six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, interest expense included $11.3 million in contra-expense and $2.1 million in expense, respectively, related to these contracts.
At November 30, 2007, the Company had an outstanding foreign currency exchange contract with a notional amount of £226 million entered into during 2007 to economically hedge short-term funding provided to a U.K. subsidiary of the Company with a non-dollar currency denomination, the borrowing of which is eliminated in consolidation. The fair value of the contract was a negative $9.4 million at November 30, 2007, and was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company had no outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts at May 31, 2008 recorded in continuing operations. For information on foreign currency exchange contracts related to discontinued operations, see Note 2: Discontinued Operations.
In accordance with Statement No. 157, the following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2008, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety has been determined is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a
20
Table of Contents
particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. Disclosures concerning assets and liabilities measured at fair value are as follows:
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis at May 31, 2008
(dollars in thousands)
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Balance at May 31, 2008 | |||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Investment securities—available-for-sale | $ | 264 | $ | 881,112 | $ | 77,408 | $ | 958,784 | ||||
Amounts due from asset securitization(1) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,780,128 | $ | 1,780,128 | ||||
Derivative financial instruments(2) | $ | — | $ | 4,307 | $ | — | $ | 4,307 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments(2) | $ | — | $ | 3,210 | $ | — | $ | 3,210 |
(1) | Balances represent only the portion of amounts due from asset securitization measured at fair value. |
(2) | The Company does not offset the fair value of derivative contracts with a negative fair value against the fair value of contracts with a positive fair value. |
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
(dollars in thousands)
Balance at February 29, 2008 | Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Income | Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net | Net Transfers In and/or Out of Level 3 | Balance at May 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||
Amounts due from asset securitization(1) | $ | 1,952,901 | $ | (43,825) | (2) | $ | (128,948) | $ | — | $ | 1,780,128 | |||||
Investment securities—available-for-sale | $ | — | $ | (31,273) | (3) | $ | — | $ | 108,681 | $ | 77,408 |
(1) | Balances represent only the portion of amounts due from asset securitization measured at fair value. |
(2) | This unrealized loss is recorded in securitization income in the consolidated statement of income. |
(3) | This unrealized loss is recorded in loss from investments in the consolidated statement of income. |
21
Table of Contents
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
(dollars in thousands)
Balance at November 30, 2007 | Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Income | Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net | Net Transfers In and/or Out of Level 3 | Balance at May 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||
Amounts due from asset securitization(1) | $ | 2,029,220 | $ | 31,172 | (2) | $ | (280,264 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1,780,128 | |||||
Investment securities—available-for-sale | $ | — | $ | (31,273 | )(3) | $ | — | $ | 108,681 | $ | 77,408 |
(1) | Balances represent only the portion of amounts due from asset securitization measured at fair value. |
(2) | This unrealized gain is recorded in securitization income in the consolidated statement of income. |
(3) | This unrealized loss is recorded in the loss from investments in the consolidated statement of income. |
Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that the Company has classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category presented in the tables above may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.
At May 31, 2008, the Company also had assets that under certain conditions would be subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis, which consisted of those associated with acquired businesses, including goodwill and other intangible assets. For these assets, measurement at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition would be applicable if one or more of these assets was determined to be impaired; however, no impairment losses have occurred relative to any of these assets since they were initially recorded at acquisition. When and if recognition of these assets at their fair value is necessary, such measurements would be determined utilizing Level 3 inputs. For information on assets subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis relating to the Company’s Goldfish business, see Note 2: Discontinued Operations.
As of May 31, 2008, the Company has not made any fair value elections with respect to any of its eligible assets or liabilities as permitted under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.
12. | Segment Disclosures |
The Company’s business activities are managed in two segments: U.S. Card and Third-Party Payments.
• | U.S. Card. The U.S. Card segment includes Discover Card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses over Discover’s signature card network and other consumer products and services business, including prepaid and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through the Company’s Discover Bank subsidiary. |
• | Third-Party Payments. The Third-Party Payments segment includes PULSE Network, an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network, and the third-party payments business. |
On February 7, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Goldfish business, which represented substantially all of the Company’s International Card segment, to Barclays Bank PLC. Therefore, segment disclosures do not include the International Card segment as the U.K. credit card business is now accounted for as discontinued operations. The Company completed the sale of the Goldfish business to Barclays Bank PLC on March 31, 2008. See Note 2: Discontinued Operations for further discussion.
22
Table of Contents
The business segment reporting provided to and used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker is prepared using the following principles and allocation conventions:
• | Segment information is presented on a managed basis because management considers the performance of the entire managed loan portfolio in managing the business. |
• | Other accounting policies applied to the operating segments are consistent with the accounting policies described in Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007. |
• | Corporate overhead is not allocated between segments; all corporate overhead is included in the U.S. Card segment. |
• | Discover Network fixed marketing, servicing and infrastructure costs are retained in the U.S. Card segment. |
• | The assets of the Company are not allocated among the operating segments in the information reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. |
• | Income taxes are not specifically allocated among the operating segments in the information reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. |
Because the Company’s chief operating decision maker evaluates performance in the lending business using data on a managed portfolio basis, segment information is provided here on a managed basis.
23
Table of Contents
The following table presents segment data on a managed basis and a reconciliation to a GAAP presentation (dollars in thousands):
Managed Basis | GAAP Basis | |||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | U.S. Card | Third- Party Payments | Total | Securitization Adjustment(1) | Total | |||||||||||
May 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 1,572,164 | $ | 533 | $ | 1,572,697 | $ | (960,634 | ) | $ | 612,063 | |||||
Interest expense | 550,629 | — | 550,629 | (237,381 | ) | 313,248 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 1,021,535 | 533 | 1,022,068 | (723,253 | ) | 298,815 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 581,537 | — | 581,537 | (370,568 | ) | 210,969 | ||||||||||
Other income | 455,074 | 37,133 | 492,207 | 352,685 | 844,892 | |||||||||||
Other expense | 585,949 | 20,876 | 606,825 | — | 606,825 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | $ | 309,123 | $ | 16,790 | $ | 325,913 | $ | — | $ | 325,913 | ||||||
May 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 1,601,324 | $ | 558 | $ | 1,601,882 | $ | (964,226 | ) | $ | 637,656 | |||||
Interest expense | 693,837 | 4 | 693,841 | (390,419 | ) | 303,422 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 907,487 | 554 | 908,041 | (573,807 | ) | 334,234 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 444,249 | — | 444,249 | (299,573 | ) | 144,676 | ||||||||||
Other income | 526,304 | 29,248 | 555,552 | 274,234 | 829,786 | |||||||||||
Other expense | 601,966 | 21,792 | 623,758 | — | 623,758 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | $ | 387,576 | $ | 8,010 | $ | 395,586 | $ | — | $ | 395,586 | ||||||
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 3,224,151 | $ | 1,161 | $ | 3,225,312 | $ | (1,950,447 | ) | $ | 1,274,865 | |||||
Interest expense | 1,219,580 | 2 | 1,219,582 | (566,893 | ) | 652,689 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 2,004,571 | 1,159 | 2,005,730 | (1,383,554 | ) | 622,176 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,208,605 | — | 1,208,605 | (692,004 | ) | 516,601 | ||||||||||
Other income | 1,057,485 | 71,401 | 1,128,886 | 691,550 | 1,820,436 | |||||||||||
Other expense | 1,168,925 | 40,243 | 1,209,168 | — | 1,209,168 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | $ | 684,526 | $ | 32,317 | $ | 716,843 | $ | — | $ | 716,843 | ||||||
May 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 3,083,316 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 3,084,448 | $ | (1,834,586 | ) | $ | 1,249,862 | |||||
Interest expense | 1,287,447 | 19 | 1,287,466 | (732,237 | ) | 555,229 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 1,795,869 | 1,113 | 1,796,982 | (1,102,349 | ) | 694,633 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 850,325 | — | 850,325 | (558,451 | ) | 291,874 | ||||||||||
Other income | 1,016,307 | 59,930 | 1,076,237 | 543,898 | 1,620,135 | |||||||||||
Other expense | 1,174,486 | 41,113 | 1,215,599 | — | 1,215,599 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | $ | 787,365 | $ | 19,930 | $ | 807,295 | $ | — | $ | 807,295 | ||||||
(1) | The Securitization Adjustment column presents the effect of loan securitizations by recharacterizing as securitization income the portions of the following items that relate to the securitized loans: interest income, interest expense, provision for loan losses, discount and interchange revenue and loan fee revenues. Securitization income is reported in other income. |
24
Table of Contents
13. | Related Party Transactions |
Related Party Transactions with Morgan Stanley
Effective upon the Distribution on June 30, 2007, Morgan Stanley ceased to be a related party to the Company. Prior to the Distribution, Morgan Stanley provided a variety of products and services to the Company or on the Company’s behalf and the Company provided certain products and services to Morgan Stanley. Subsequent to the Distribution, certain arrangements with Morgan Stanley have continued in accordance with the Transition Services Agreement and other agreements by and between Morgan Stanley and the Company (see the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007). Transactions with Morgan Stanley subsequent to the Distribution are not isolated from those conducted with other unrelated third parties and are thus not included in the information provided below.
Information provided below includes the amounts of transactions with Morgan Stanley for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007. Amounts due from or to Morgan Stanley are not provided for November 30, 2007 or May 31, 2008, as Morgan Stanley was not a related party at either date.
In 2006, the Company began purchasing Federal Funds from Morgan Stanley Bank. There was no interest expense on Federal Funds purchased from Morgan Stanley Bank for the three months ended May 31, 2007. For the six months ended May 31, 2007, interest expense on Federal Funds purchased from Morgan Stanley Bank was $29.5 million.
In 2006, the Company began participating in the Morgan Stanley Global Wealth Management Bank Deposit Program launched by Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (“MSDW”). Under the program, MSDW swept excess client cash into interest-bearing deposit accounts at FDIC-insured banks participating in the program. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, the Company paid servicing and administrative fees of $10.5 million and $17.9 million, respectively, to MSDW.
The Company paid brokerage commissions to Morgan Stanley for the sales of certificates of deposit. These commissions totaled $21.0 million and $34.0 for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively, and are amortized to interest expense over the lives of the related certificates of deposit. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, amortization of the prepaid commissions was $7.4 million and $13.9 million, respectively.
For the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, the Company paid underwriting fees on credit card securitizations to Morgan Stanley of $4.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively. Amortization of such underwriting fees was $2.5 million and $4.9 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively.
For the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, the Company sold $17.8 million and $34.1 million, respectively, of mortgage loans to Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation (“MSCC”). The gains recognized on these sales for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, were $1.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company entered into interest rate swap and foreign currency exchange contracts with various counterparties, including Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, which serves as Morgan Stanley’s principal U.S. swaps dealer, to economically hedge interest rate and currency exchange risks as part of its risk management program and under terms consistent with those that would have been offered to an unrelated third-party.
The Company had short-term and long-term debt obligations to Morgan Stanley prior to the Distribution which had all been repaid as of November 30, 2007. Interest expense on short-term obligations to Morgan Stanley was $40.7 million and $110.7 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively. Interest expense on long-term obligations to Morgan Stanley was $14.5 million and $31.1 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively.
25
Table of Contents
MSCC provided transaction processing and other support services related to consumer loan products offered by the Company. The cost of providing these services was $1.5 million and $2.5 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively.
For the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, the Company received $1.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively, in sublease rental income for subleasing office space to Morgan Stanley in Riverwoods, Illinois; New Albany, Ohio; and West Valley City, Utah.
For the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, the Company recorded $1.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in rent expense for subleasing office space from Morgan Stanley in London, England and Glasgow, Scotland.
As a subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, the Company was charged for certain corporate functions such as Company IT, Company Management, Finance, Legal and Compliance, and Strategy, Administration and other. The primary allocation methodologies utilized by Morgan Stanley included level of support, headcount and a formula that considered revenues, expenses and capital. Each corporate function separately determined the methodology to employ for their allocable expenses.
The table below summarizes intercompany expense allocations by functional area(1) (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||
May 31, 2007 | May 31, 2007 | |||||
Company IT | $ | 1,158 | $ | 2,608 | ||
Company Management(2) | 5,825 | 11,273 | ||||
Finance | 6,431 | 11,815 | ||||
Legal and Compliance | 3,571 | 5,996 | ||||
Strategy, Administration and other | 5,689 | 11,775 | ||||
Total Morgan Stanley allocations | $ | 22,674 | $ | 43,467 | ||
(1) | Allocations based on percentage of total expenses of each functional area versus line item specific allocations. Majority of allocations relates to compensation expense. |
(2) | Represents allocations of Morgan Stanley senior management costs. |
The Company paid dividends to Morgan Stanley during the six months ended May 31, 2007 of $500.0 million.
While a subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, the Company received an allocation of capital from Morgan Stanley to maintain a level of capital that management believed was appropriate to support the International Card segment. For the six months ended May 31, 2007, capital allocated to the Company from Morgan Stanley was $62.3 million. These amounts are reflected as non-cash contributions from Morgan Stanley in the supplemental disclosures of cash flow information in the consolidated and combined statements of cash flows.
Other Related Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, the Company offers consumer loan products to its directors, executive officers and certain members of their immediate families. These products are offered on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties, and these receivables are included in the loan receivables in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition. They were not material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
26
Table of Contents
14. | Subsequent Events |
On June 26, 2008, the Company announced a cash dividend of $0.06 per share. The cash dividend is payable on July 22, 2008 to stockholders of record at the close of business on July 1, 2008.
On July 1, 2008, the Company announced its purchase of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Diners Club International for $165 million in cash from Citibank, N.A. The Company acquired the Diners Club International network, brand, trademarks, employees, and license agreements with 44 network participants that issue Diners Club cards and that maintain an acceptance network consisting of merchant and cash access locations in 185 countries worldwide. Diners Club licensees are not included in this acquisition. Under the terms of the purchase, Citibank has agreed to remain a significant long-term international issuer on the Diners Club network. Discover will not issue cards or extend consumer credit in international markets as a result of the transaction. Diners Club International will be included in the Company’s Third-Party Payments segment.
27
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report. This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of Discover Financial Services’ management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report, and there is no undertaking to update or revise them as more information becomes available. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: the actions and initiatives of current and potential competitors; our ability to manage credit risks and securitize our receivables at acceptable rates and under sale accounting treatment; changes in economic variables, such as the number and size of personal bankruptcy filings, the rate of unemployment and the levels of consumer confidence and consumer debt; the level and volatility of equity prices, commodity prices and interest rates, currency values, investments, other market fluctuations and other market indices; the availability and cost of funding and capital; access to U.S. debt and deposit markets; losses in our investment portfolio; the ability to increase or sustain Discover Card usage or attract new cardmembers and introduce new products or services; our ability to attract new merchants and maintain relationships with current merchants; our ability to successfully integrate the Diners Club International network and maintain relationships with network participants; material security breaches of key systems; unforeseen and catastrophic events; our reputation; the potential effects of technological changes; the effect of political, economic and market conditions and geopolitical events; unanticipated developments relating to lawsuits, investigations or similar matters; the impact of current, pending and future legislation, regulation and regulatory and legal actions, including the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed amendments limiting certain credit card practices; our ability to attract and retain employees; the ability to protect our intellectual property; the impact of our separation from Morgan Stanley; the impact of any potential future acquisitions; investor sentiment; and the restrictions on our operations resulting from indebtedness incurred during our separation from Morgan Stanley. Additional factors that could cause Discover Financial Services’ results to differ materially from those described below can be found under “Part II. Other Information — 1A. Risk Factors” in this quarterly report and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007 filed with the SEC and available at the SEC’s internet site (http://www.sec.gov).
Introduction and Overview
We are a leading credit card issuer and electronic payment services company with one of the most recognized brands in U.S. financial services. We offer credit and prepaid cards and other financial products and services to qualified customers and provide payment processing and related services to merchants and financial institutions. Our year ends on November 30 of each year.
We strive to increase net income and achieve other business objectives by growing loan receivables and increasing volume on our payments networks to generate interest and fee revenue, while controlling loan losses and expenses. Our primary revenues come from interest income earned on loan receivables, securitization income derived from the transfer of credit card loan receivables and subsequent issuance of beneficial interests through securitization transactions, and fees earned from cardmembers, merchants and issuers. Our primary expenses include funding costs (interest expense), loan losses, cardmember rewards, and expenses incurred to grow and service our loan receivables (e.g., compensation expense and marketing).
We continue to make progress on our strategy to partner with third-party acquirers to increase acceptance of Discover Network cards among small and mid-size merchants in the United States. We are also pursuing a strategy to increase acceptance worldwide. On July 1, 2008, we announced our purchase of Diners Club International. Over the next two to three years, we expect to integrate the Diners Club International network with the Discover Network to allow Discover Network cardholders to use their cards at merchants that accept Diners Club cards around the world, and Diners Club cardholders to use their cards on the Discover Network in North America. Diners Club International is part of our Third-Party Payments segment.
28
Table of Contents
Our business activities have been funded primarily through the process of asset securitization, the raising of consumer deposits, and prior to our spin-off from Morgan Stanley, intercompany lending from Morgan Stanley which has been replaced with asset-backed financing and both secured and unsecured debt. In a credit card securitization, loan receivables are first transferred to securitization trusts, from which beneficial interests are issued to investors. We continue to own and service the accounts that generate the securitized loans. The trusts utilized by us to facilitate asset securitization transactions are not our subsidiaries. These trusts are excluded from our consolidated and combined financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Because our securitization activities qualify as sales under GAAP and accordingly are not treated as secured financing transactions, we remove credit card loan receivables equal to the amount of the investor interests in securitized loans from the consolidated statements of financial condition. As a result, asset securitizations have a significant effect on our consolidated and combined financial statements in that the portions of interest income, provision for loan losses and certain components of other income related to the securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued are no longer recorded in our consolidated and combined statements of income; however, they remain significant factors in determining the securitization income we receive on our retained beneficial interests in those transactions.
Our senior management evaluates business performance and allocates resources using financial data that is presented on a managed basis. Managed loans consist of our on-balance sheet loan portfolio, loans held for sale and loan receivables that have been securitized and against which beneficial interests have been issued. Owned loans, a subset of managed loans, refer to our on-balance sheet loan portfolio and loans held for sale and include the undivided seller’s interest we retain in our securitizations. A managed basis presentation, which is a non-GAAP presentation, involves reporting securitized loans with our owned loans in the managed basis statements of financial condition and reporting the earnings on securitized loans in the same manner as the owned loans instead of as securitization income. The managed basis presentation generally reverses the effects of securitization transactions; however, there are certain assets that arise from securitization transactions that are not reversed. Specifically, these assets are the cash collateral accounts that provide credit enhancement to the investors in the transactions and cardmember payments allocated to the securitized loans, both of which are held at the trusts. These assets also include the interest-only strip receivable, reflecting the estimated fair value of the excess cash flows allocated to securitized loans and retained certificated beneficial interests. Income derived from these assets representing interest earned on accounts at the trusts, changes in the fair value of the interest-only strip receivable and interest income on investment securities also are not reversed in a managed presentation. See “— Qualifying Special Purpose Entities” below for more information.
Management believes it is useful for investors to consider the credit performance of the entire managed loan portfolio to understand the quality of loan originations and the related credit risks inherent in the owned portfolio and retained interests in our securitizations. Managed loan data is also relevant because we service the securitized and owned loans, and the related accounts, in the same manner without regard to ownership of the loans.
Financial measures using managed data are non-GAAP financial measures. Whenever managed data is presented in this quarterly report, a reconciliation of the managed data to the most directly comparable GAAP-basis financial measure is provided. See “—GAAP to Managed Data Reconciliations.”
Key Developments Impacting Reported Results
• | On February 7, 2008, we entered into a definitive sale and purchase agreement with Barclays Bank PLC relating to the sale of £129 million of net assets (equivalent to approximately $258 million) of our U.K. credit card business (“Goldfish”), which represented substantially all of our International Card segment. We completed the sale of our Goldfish business to Barclays Bank PLC on March 31, 2008. The aggregate sale price under the agreement was £35 million (equivalent to approximately $70 million), which was paid in cash at closing and is subject to a potential post-closing adjustment. |
29
Table of Contents
In the three months ended May 31, 2008, we reported after tax income from discontinued operations of $32.6 million largely as a result of the realization of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and income from the U.K. operations, including gains from the sale of other assets, partially offset by transaction and indemnification costs. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, we recorded an after tax loss of $125.0 million from the U.K. operations largely due to a loss of $152.0 million on the sale of the business partially offset by income from the U.K. operations of $27.0 million, including gains from the sale of other assets. Additionally, as of the first quarter of 2008, assets and liabilities of the U.K. operations have been reclassified to discontinued operations and historical periods have been restated for comparability.
• | During the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, the Federal Reserve decreased the Federal Funds target rate by 100 and 250 basis points, respectively, to 2.00%. This led to a similar 100 and 250 basis point decrease in the prime rate for the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, respectively, as compared to a constant Federal Funds target rate of 5.25% throughout the three and six months ended May 31, 2007. Certain of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have floating rates which move closely with these short-term market indices. As a result, the interest yield on variable rate interest-earning assets and the cost of floating rate interest-bearing liabilities decreased during the current period. In addition, the yield on interest-earning assets was impacted by a higher mix of lower yielding assets, as compared to the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, related to the maintenance of our $8.4 billion liquidity reserve. To mitigate margin compression, we reduced low-rate balance transfer volume and implemented higher promotional pricing on new balance transfers, reflecting a shift toward tighter marketing and credit criteria. |
• | During the first half of 2008, the U.S. economic environment deteriorated, the credit environment worsened and the economy suffered the negative impacts of downturns in the U.S. housing markets and mortgage industry. As a result, we experienced rising charge-offs and delinquencies during the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, we increased our loan loss reserve rate to 4.28% and for the three months ended May 31, 2008, we recorded a $44.5 million unfavorable net revaluation of our retained interest in securitizations. The unfavorable net revaluation of our retained interest in securitization included a decline in the value of our cash collateral accounts as a result of higher long-term interest rate projections. |
• | In the three months ended May 31, 2008, we concluded there had been an other-than-temporary impairment in our investment in the asset-backed commercial paper notes of Golden Key U.S. LLC, which invested in mortgage-backed securities. This impairment resulted in a $31.3 million write-down of the notes to $77.4 million. We expect this investment may be restructured by the issuer later in 2008 which could result in further impairment. |
Qualifying Special Purpose Entities
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has projects underway to amend and clarify Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,as amended (“Statement No. 140”) and FASB Interpretation No. 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46R”). As part of these projects, in April 2008, FASB members proposed the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity (“QSPE”) which is defined in Statement No. 140. QSPEs are currently exempt from the consolidation provisions of FIN 46R and as a result, amendments to that standard are being considered as well. Revised guidance has not been finalized for either standard. The FASB will issue its proposed amendments for public comment and, based upon public comments received and other considerations, may revise the amendments before issuing final guidance. The proposed changes may make it more difficult for us to maintain or establish sale accounting treatment in connection with transfers of financial assets in securitization transactions and could result in consolidation of the securitization entities by us. This would have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. For example, the impact of the potential consolidation, if applied as of May 31, 2008, may require us to add approximately $26 billion of securitized receivables to our assets, add the related debt issued to third-party investors to our
30
Table of Contents
liabilities, and reclassify amounts due from securitization. The effective dates of amended standards have not yet been determined but could be as early as December 2008. For more information, see“Future guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board may impact the accounting treatment of the securitization of our credit card receivables, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition, reserve requirements, capital requirements, liquidity, cost of funds and operations”under “Part II. Other Information—Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this quarterly report.
Federal Reserve Board Proposed Amendments
The Federal Reserve Board has proposed amendments to regulations that would place limitations on certain credit card practices, including, but not limited to, restrictions on applying rate increases to existing balances, payment allocation and default pricing. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated it hopes to publish final rules by the end of the year. For more information, see “The Federal Reserve Board’s proposed amendments to regulations, if adopted as proposed, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations” under “Part II. Other Information—Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this quarterly report.
The remaining discussion provides a summary of the results of operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, as well as the financial condition at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007. All information and comparisons are based on continuing operations.
Segments
We manage our business activities in two segments: U.S. Card and Third-Party Payments. In compiling the segment results that follow, the U.S. Card segment bears all overhead costs that are not specifically associated with a particular segment and all costs associated with Discover Network marketing, servicing and infrastructure, with the exception of an allocation of direct and incremental costs driven by the Third-Party Payments segment.
U.S. Card.The U.S. Card segment includes Discover Card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses over Discover’s signature card network and other consumer products and services business, including prepaid and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through our Discover Bank subsidiary.
Third-Party Payments.The Third-Party Payments segment includes PULSE Network (“PULSE”), an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network, and our third-party payments business.
31
Table of Contents
The following table presents segment data on a managed basis and a reconciliation to a GAAP presentation (dollars in thousands):
Managed Basis | Securitization Adjustment(1) | GAAP Basis | ||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | U.S. Card | Third- Party Payments | Total | Total | ||||||||||||
May 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 1,572,164 | $ | 533 | $ | 1,572,697 | $ | (960,634 | ) | $ | 612,063 | |||||
Interest expense | 550,629 | — | 550,629 | (237,381 | ) | 313,248 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 1,021,535 | 533 | 1,022,068 | (723,253 | ) | 298,815 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 581,537 | — | 581,537 | (370,568 | ) | 210,969 | ||||||||||
Other income | 455,074 | 37,133 | 492,207 | 352,685 | 844,892 | |||||||||||
Other expense | 585,949 | 20,876 | 606,825 | — | 606,825 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | $ | 309,123 | $ | 16,790 | $ | 325,913 | $ | — | $ | 325,913 | ||||||
May 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 1,601,324 | $ | 558 | $ | 1,601,882 | $ | (964,226 | ) | $ | 637,656 | |||||
Interest expense | 693,837 | 4 | 693,841 | (390,419 | ) | 303,422 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 907,487 | 554 | 908,041 | (573,807 | ) | 334,234 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 444,249 | — | 444,249 | (299,573 | ) | 144,676 | ||||||||||
Other income | 526,304 | 29,248 | 555,552 | 274,234 | 829,786 | |||||||||||
Other expense | 601,966 | 21,792 | 623,758 | — | 623,758 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | $ | 387,576 | $ | 8,010 | $ | 395,586 | $ | — | $ | 395,586 | ||||||
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 3,224,151 | $ | 1,161 | $ | 3,225,312 | $ | (1,950,447 | ) | $ | 1,274,865 | |||||
Interest expense | 1,219,580 | 2 | 1,219,582 | (566,893 | ) | 652,689 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 2,004,571 | 1,159 | 2,005,730 | (1,383,554 | ) | 622,176 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,208,605 | — | 1,208,605 | (692,004 | ) | 516,601 | ||||||||||
Other income | 1,057,485 | 71,401 | 1,128,886 | 691,550 | 1,820,436 | |||||||||||
Other expense | 1,168,925 | 40,243 | 1,209,168 | — | 1,209,168 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | $ | 684,526 | $ | 32,317 | $ | 716,843 | $ | — | $ | 716,843 | ||||||
May 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 3,083,316 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 3,084,448 | $ | (1,834,586 | ) | $ | 1,249,862 | |||||
Interest expense | 1,287,447 | 19 | 1,287,466 | (732,237 | ) | 555,229 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 1,795,869 | 1,113 | 1,796,982 | (1,102,349 | ) | 694,633 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 850,325 | — | 850,325 | (558,451 | ) | 291,874 | ||||||||||
Other income | 1,016,307 | 59,930 | 1,076,237 | 543,898 | 1,620,135 | |||||||||||
Other expense | 1,174,486 | 41,113 | 1,215,599 | — | 1,215,599 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | $ | 787,365 | $ | 19,930 | $ | 807,295 | $ | — | $ | 807,295 | ||||||
(1) | The Securitization Adjustment column presents the effect of loan securitizations by recharacterizing as securitization income the portions of the following items that relate to the securitized loans: interest income, interest expense, provision for loan losses, discount and interchange revenue and loan fee revenues. Securitization income is reported in other income. |
32
Table of Contents
The segment discussions that follow for the three and six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 are on a managed basis.
U.S. Card
The U.S. Card segment reported pretax income of $309.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2008, down 20%, as compared to May 31, 2007. The decrease in pretax income was driven by higher provision for loan losses and lower other income, which was partially offset by an increase in net interest income. Provision for loan losses increased $137.3 million, or 31%, as a result of higher net charge-offs, which reflects current economic conditions and recent delinquency trends. Other income decreased $71.2 million, or 14%, due to a $44.5 million unfavorable net revaluation of our retained interest in securitizations as compared to a $36.4 million favorable net revaluation in the second quarter of 2007, and a $31.3 million write-down of our investment in asset-backed commercial paper notes in Golden Key U.S. LLC, partially offset by higher discount and interchange revenue due to growth in sales volume and lower rewards costs related to revised forfeiture assumptions. Net interest income increased $114.0 million, or 13%, reflecting widening net interest margins benefiting from lower cost of funds and a reduction in, and higher rates on, promotional balances.
The U.S. Card segment reported pretax income of $684.5 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008, down 13%, as compared to May 31, 2007. The decrease in pretax income was driven by higher provision for loan losses, which was partially offset by increased net interest income. Provision for loan losses increased $358.3 million, or 42%, as a result of higher charge-offs and a higher allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses increased due to loan growth and an increase in the loan loss reserve rate, which is reflective of the current credit environment and recent delinquency trends. Net interest income increased $208.7 million, or 12%, as interest income benefited from higher average loan receivables as well as an increase in the level of interest-earning assets related to the liquidity reserve, partially offset by an increase in borrowings to support the asset growth.
For the three months ended May 31, 2008, managed loans grew 2%, to $47.8 billion. This increase in loans is attributable to an increase in installment loans and an increase in sales volume of $22.5 billion, up 2% over last year. The weakening economic environment adversely impacted cardmember delinquencies and charge-offs. The managed over 30 day delinquency rate for the segment, including non-credit card loans, was 3.81%, 84 basis points higher than last year, and the managed credit card over 30 day delinquency rate was 3.85%, up 88 basis points from last year. For the three months ended May 31, 2008, the managed segment and credit card charge-off rates were 4.99% and 5.05%, up 102 and 108 basis points from the three months ended May 31, 2007, respectively. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, the managed segment and credit card charge-off rates were 4.66% and 4.70%, up 75 and 78 basis points from the comparable prior year period, respectively.
Third-Party Payments
The Third-Party Payments segment reported pretax income of $16.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2008, more than double the pretax income of $8.0 million reported for the three months ended May 31, 2007. The increase in pretax income was driven by increased revenues from transaction growth and an increase in fee revenue along with a decline in transaction processing and consulting costs. Third-Party Payment debit and credit volume was $29.4 billion, up 33% compared to last year, reflecting the impact of new issuer signings in 2007 as well as increased volumes from existing issuers.
The Third-Party Payments segment reported pretax income of $32.3 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008, up 62%, as compared to May 31, 2007. The increase in pretax income was driven by increased revenues from transaction growth, $3 million in revenue related to one-time contractual payment, a decline in transaction processing and consulting costs and an increase in fee revenue, partially offset by marketing and pricing incentives. Third-Party Payments debit and credit volume was $55.8 billion, up 29% compared to last year, reflecting the impact of new issuer signings in 2007 as well as increased volumes from existing issuers.
33
Table of Contents
GAAP to Managed Data Reconciliations
Securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued to third parties are removed from our statements of financial condition. Instances in which we retain certificated beneficial interests in the securitization transactions result in a reduction to loan receivables of the amount of the retained interest and a corresponding increase in investment securities—available-for-sale. The portions of interest income, provision for loan losses and certain components of other income related to the securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued are no longer recorded in our statements of income; however, they remain significant factors in determining the securitization income we receive on our retained beneficial interests in those transactions. Management believes it is useful for investors to consider the credit performance of the entire managed loan portfolio to understand the quality of loan originations and the related credit risks inherent in the owned portfolio and retained interests in securitization. Loan receivables on a GAAP (or owned) basis and related performance measures, including yield, charge-offs and delinquencies can vary from those presented on a managed basis. Generally, loan receivables included in the securitization trusts are derived from accounts that are more seasoned, while owned loan receivables represent a greater concentration of newer accounts, occurring as a result of the degree to which receivables from newer accounts are added to the trusts. The seasoning of an account is measured by the age of the account relationship. In comparison to more seasoned accounts, loan receivables of newer accounts typically carry lower interest yields resulting from introductory offers to new cardmembers and lower charge-offs and delinquencies.
Beginning with “—Earnings Summary,” the discussion of GAAP results is presented on a consolidated and combined basis with any material differences between segment performance specifically identified. The table that follows provides a GAAP to managed data reconciliation of loan receivables and related statistics that are impacted by asset securitization:
34
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of GAAP to Managed Data
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Loan Receivables | ||||||||||||||||
Total Loans | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | $ | 20,502,063 | $ | 19,938,986 | $ | 20,502,063 | $ | 19,938,986 | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 27,339,428 | 27,014,916 | 27,339,428 | 27,014,916 | ||||||||||||
Managed Basis | $ | 47,841,491 | $ | 46,953,902 | $ | 47,841,491 | $ | 46,953,902 | ||||||||
Average Total Loans | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | $ | 19,890,330 | $ | 18,673,525 | $ | 20,702,505 | $ | 20,287,228 | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 27,581,747 | 27,622,771 | 27,461,315 | 26,340,183 | ||||||||||||
Managed Basis | $ | 47,472,077 | $ | 46,296,296 | $ | 48,163,820 | $ | 46,627,411 | ||||||||
Interest Yield | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | 10.40 | % | 10.69 | % | 10.37 | % | 10.61 | % | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 13.86 | % | 13.85 | % | 14.21 | % | 13.97 | % | ||||||||
Managed Basis | 12.41 | % | 12.58 | % | 12.56 | % | 12.50 | % | ||||||||
Net Principal Charge-off Rate | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | 4.49 | % | 3.47 | % | 4.15 | % | 3.47 | % | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 5.34 | % | 4.30 | % | 5.04 | % | 4.25 | % | ||||||||
Managed Basis | 4.99 | % | 3.97 | % | 4.66 | % | 3.91 | % | ||||||||
Delinquency Rate (over 30 days) | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | 3.54 | % | 2.71 | % | 3.54 | % | 2.71 | % | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 4.01 | % | 3.16 | % | 4.01 | % | 3.16 | % | ||||||||
Managed Basis | 3.81 | % | 2.97 | % | 3.81 | % | 2.97 | % | ||||||||
Delinquency Rate (over 90 days) | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | 1.81 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.31 | % | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 2.07 | % | 1.54 | % | 2.07 | % | 1.54 | % | ||||||||
Managed Basis | 1.96 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.96 | % | 1.44 | % | ||||||||
Credit Card Loans | ||||||||||||||||
Credit Card Loans | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | $ | 19,785,414 | $ | 19,849,401 | $ | 19,785,414 | $ | 19,849,401 | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 27,339,428 | 27,014,916 | 27,339,428 | 27,014,916 | ||||||||||||
Managed Basis | $ | 47,124,842 | $ | 46,864,317 | $ | 47,124,842 | $ | 46,864,317 | ||||||||
Average Credit Card Loans | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | $ | 19,275,733 | $ | 18,581,153 | $ | 20,206,876 | $ | 20,193,248 | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 27,581,747 | 27,622,771 | 27,461,315 | 26,340,183 | ||||||||||||
Managed Basis | $ | 46,857,480 | $ | 46,203,924 | $ | 47,668,191 | $ | 46,533,431 | ||||||||
Interest Yield | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | 10.40 | % | 10.72 | % | 10.37 | % | 10.63 | % | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 13.86 | % | 13.85 | % | 14.21 | % | 13.97 | % | ||||||||
Managed Basis | 12.43 | % | 12.59 | % | 12.58 | % | 12.52 | % | ||||||||
Net Principal Charge-off Rate | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | 4.63 | % | 3.48 | % | 4.25 | % | 3.48 | % | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 5.34 | % | 4.30 | % | 5.04 | % | 4.25 | % | ||||||||
Managed Basis | 5.05 | % | 3.97 | % | 4.70 | % | 3.92 | % | ||||||||
Delinquency Rate (over 30 days) | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | 3.63 | % | 2.71 | % | 3.63 | % | 2.71 | % | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 4.01 | % | 3.16 | % | 4.01 | % | 3.16 | % | ||||||||
Managed Basis | 3.85 | % | 2.97 | % | 3.85 | % | 2.97 | % | ||||||||
Delinquency Rate (over 90 days) | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP Basis | 1.87 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.87 | % | 1.31 | % | ||||||||
Securitization Adjustment | 2.07 | % | 1.54 | % | 2.07 | % | 1.54 | % | ||||||||
Managed Basis | 1.99 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.99 | % | 1.44 | % |
35
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
In preparing the consolidated and combined financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management must make judgments and use estimates and assumptions about the effects of matters that are uncertain. For estimates that involve a high degree of judgment and subjectivity, it is possible that different estimates could reasonably be derived for the same period. For estimates that are particularly sensitive to changes in economic or market conditions, significant changes to the estimated amount from period to period are also possible. Management believes the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in the consolidated and combined financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts in the consolidated and combined financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations and, in certain cases, could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition. Management has identified the policies related to the estimation of the allowance for loan losses, the accounting for asset securitization transactions, interest income recognition, the accrual of cardmember rewards cost, the evaluation of goodwill for potential impairment and accrual of income taxes as critical accounting policies.
These critical accounting policies are discussed in greater detail in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007. That discussion can be found within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading Critical Accounting Policies. There have not been any material changes in the critical accounting policies from those discussed in our 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007.
Earnings Summary
The following table outlines changes in the consolidated and combined statements of income for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 612,063 | $ | 637,656 | $ | (25,593 | ) | (4 | %) | $ | 1,274,865 | $ | 1,249,862 | $ | 25,003 | 2 | % | |||||||||
Interest expense | 313,248 | 303,422 | 9,826 | 3 | % | 652,689 | 555,229 | 97,460 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | 298,815 | 334,234 | (35,419 | ) | (11 | %) | 622,176 | 694,633 | (72,457 | ) | (10 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 210,969 | 144,676 | 66,293 | 46 | % | 516,601 | 291,874 | 224,727 | 77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 87,846 | 189,558 | (101,712 | ) | (54 | %) | 105,575 | 402,759 | (297,184 | ) | (74 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Other income | 844,892 | 829,786 | 15,106 | 2 | % | 1,820,436 | 1,620,135 | 200,301 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense | 606,825 | 623,758 | (16,933 | ) | (3 | %) | 1,209,168 | 1,215,599 | (6,431 | ) | (1 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | 325,913 | 395,586 | (69,673 | ) | (18 | %) | 716,843 | 807,295 | (90,452 | ) | (11 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 124,370 | 145,330 | (20,960 | ) | (14 | %) | 276,471 | 297,221 | (20,750 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 201,543 | $ | 250,256 | $ | (48,713 | ) | (19 | %) | $ | 440,372 | $ | 510,074 | $ | (69,702 | ) | (14 | %) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations for the three months ended May 31, 2008 was $201.6 million, down 19% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007, driven by lower net interest income and higher provision for loan losses. Net interest income decreased $35.4 million due to a decrease in interest income and an increase in interest expense. The provision for loan losses increased reflecting higher net charge-offs as a result of the weakening economic environment.
Income from continuing operations for the six months ended May 31, 2008 was $440.4 million, down 14% compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, driven by lower net interest income and higher provision for loan losses, partially offset by higher other income. Net interest income decreased $72.5 million due to an increase in
36
Table of Contents
interest expense, partially offset by an increase in interest income. The provision for loan losses increased reflecting higher net charge-offs and a higher allowance for loan losses as a result of the weakening economic environment. Other income increased primarily due to higher securitization income which resulted from higher excess spread on securitized loans.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income represents the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets which we own and the interest expense incurred to finance those assets. Net interest margin states the interest income, net of interest expense, as a percentage of total interest-earning assets. Our interest-earning assets consist primarily of loan receivables, certain retained interests in securitization transactions included in amounts due from asset securitization and investment securities, and our liquidity reserve which includes Federal Funds sold and bank deposits. Investor interests in securitization transactions that have been transferred to third parties are not assets which we own, and accordingly, have been excluded from interest-earning assets. Similarly, interest income does not include the interest yield on the related loans.
Interest income is influenced by the amount of interest-earning assets we own, the most significant of which is our loan receivables. Our loan receivables can be influenced by portfolio growth strategies, cardmember spending and payment behavior, and changes in the amount of our securitized loans. Typically, new securitization transactions have the effect of decreasing loan receivables, whereas maturities of existing securitization transactions increase loan receivables. Interest income is also influenced by changes in certain amounts due from asset securitization, which are the largest component of other interest-earning assets. The levels of these assets are impacted by securitization maturities and can vary in relation to the level of securitized loans. Additionally, the liquidity reserve, which may vary based on market conditions and liquidity targets, has an impact on interest income.
Changes in the interest rate environment can influence the interest yield earned on interest rate sensitive assets, and accordingly impact interest income. Credit card loan receivables earn interest at both fixed rates as well as floating rates tied to the prime rate, the mix of which can vary over time. During the three months and six months ended May 31, 2008, average credit card loan receivables earning interest at floating rates decreased to 40% and 42%, respectively, of average loan receivables as compared to 56% and 58% during the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively. The decreases in the percentage of floating rate credit card loan receivables helped to minimize the adverse impact on interest yield of the declining interest rate environment. Other interest rate sensitive assets, specifically our liquidity reserve and certain retained interests in securitization transactions, also were adversely impacted by the declining interest rate environment.
Credit performance is another factor which influences interest yield of loan receivables. Charge-offs related to finance charge balances are recorded as a reduction to interest income. Accordingly, an increase in the level of finance charge charge-offs can adversely impact interest yield and interest income.
Interest-bearing liabilities reflect our funding requirements and consist primarily of deposits and, to a lesser degree, borrowings. We incur interest expense on our interest-bearing liabilities at fixed rates as well as floating rates which are tied to various short-term market indices. Accordingly, changes in the interest rate environment, changes in the percentage of floating rate interest-bearing liabilities and the replacement of maturing debt can impact interest expense. Interest expense also includes the effects of certain interest rate swaps we enter into as part of our interest rate risk management program. During the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, floating rate average interest-bearing liabilities as a percentage of total average interest-bearing liabilities were 34% and 36%, respectively, as compared to 45% and 52% for the respective prior year comparisons. The decreasing interest rate environment favorably impacted our funding costs during the three month and six months ended May 31, 2008.
37
Table of Contents
Net interest income for the three months ended May 31, 2008 decreased $35.4 million, or 11%, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007, due to a decrease in interest income as well as an increase in interest expense. Net interest income for the six months ended May 31, 2008 decreased $72.5 million, or 10%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, due to an increase in interest expense, partially offset by an increase in interest income.
For the three months ended May 31, 2008, interest income decreased $25.6 million, or 4%, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007, due to a 144 basis point decrease in the interest yield, offset in part by an increase of $4.2 billion in average interest-earning assets. The decrease in the interest yield reflected a higher mix of lower yielding assets related to a higher liquidity reserve as well as the impact of a declining interest rate environment on floating rate interest-earning assets. The interest yield was also adversely impacted, but to a lesser degree, by an increase in finance charge charge-offs related to recent higher charge-off rates on our credit card loan receivables. The increase in interest-earning assets reflected a higher liquidity reserve.
For the three months ended May 31, 2008, interest expense increased $9.8 million, or 3%, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007, due to a $4.1 billion higher level of funding to support the increase in interest-earning assets, offset in part by a 64 basis point decrease in the average cost of funds. The decrease in the cost of funds reflected the impact of a declining interest rate environment on floating rate interest-bearing liabilities as well as a decrease in the cost of issuing new certificates of deposits as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007.
For the six months ended May 31, 2008, interest income increased $25.0 million, or 2%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, due to $5.7 billion higher average interest-earning assets, offset in part by a 152 basis point decrease in the interest yield. The increase in average interest-earning assets reflected a higher average liquidity reserve level as we maintain a higher liquidity reserve in response to current economic conditions. During the six months ended May 31, 2007, our average liquidity reserve level was lower as we established our initial liquidity reserve in anticipation of the spin-off. Similar to the three months ended May 31, 2008, the decrease in the interest yield reflected the impact of a declining interest rate environment.
For the six months ended May 31, 2008, interest expense increased $97.5 million, or 18%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, due to a $5.7 billion higher level of funding to support the increase in interest-earning assets, offset in part by a 39 basis point decrease in the average cost of funds. Similar to the three months ended May 31, 2008, the cost of funds was favorably impacted by a declining interest rate environment as well as a decrease in the cost of issuing new certificates of deposits as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007.
The higher level of interest-earning assets and the lower yield resulted in a 102 basis point decline in net interest margin for the three months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the prior year respective period. The higher level of interest-earning assets and the lower yield caused a 137 basis point decrease in net interest margin for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to prior year respective period.
38
Table of Contents
The following tables provide further analysis of net interest income, net interest margin and the impact of rate and volume changes (dollars in thousands):
Average Balance Sheet Analysis
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2008 | May 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance | Rate | Interest | Average Balance | Rate | Interest | |||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning deposits in other banks | $ | 5,192,545 | 2.62 | % | $ | 34,239 | $ | — | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Federal Funds sold | 4,086,777 | 2.54 | % | 26,062 | 5,648,347 | 5.32 | % | 75,689 | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper | — | — | — | 15,642 | 5.35 | % | 211 | |||||||||||||
Investment securities | 882,891 | 5.24 | % | 11,626 | 94,247 | 5.45 | % | 1,294 | ||||||||||||
Loans:(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credit cards | 19,275,733 | 10.40 | % | 503,756 | 18,581,153 | 10.72 | % | 502,049 | ||||||||||||
Other consumer loans | 614,597 | 10.47 | % | 16,170 | 92,372 | 4.95 | % | 1,152 | ||||||||||||
Total loans | 19,890,330 | 10.40 | % | 519,926 | 18,673,525 | 10.69 | % | 503,201 | ||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets | 2,566,561 | 3.13 | % | 20,210 | 4,001,696 | 5.68 | % | 57,261 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | 32,619,104 | 7.46 | % | 612,063 | 28,433,457 | 8.90 | % | 637,656 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (831,552 | ) | (631,227 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 2,882,551 | 2,235,756 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets of discontinued operations | 1,300,309 | 3,283,844 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 35,970,412 | $ | 33,321,830 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits(2) | $ | 20,578,953 | 5.00 | % | 258,808 | $ | 16,317,534 | 5.15 | % | 211,824 | ||||||||||
Money market deposits | 4,525,554 | 2.95 | % | 33,538 | 4,145,122 | 5.33 | % | 55,735 | ||||||||||||
Other interest-bearing deposits | 46,777 | 0.81 | % | 95 | 41,252 | 3.56 | % | 370 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 25,151,284 | 4.63 | % | 292,441 | 20,503,908 | 5.18 | % | 267,929 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 5,469 | 3.27 | % | 45 | 1,790,960 | 5.66 | % | 25,572 | ||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 1,908,354 | 4.33 | % | 20,762 | 669,982 | 5.87 | % | 9,921 | ||||||||||||
Total borrowings | 1,913,823 | 4.33 | % | 20,807 | 2,460,942 | 5.72 | % | 35,493 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 27,065,107 | 4.60 | % | 313,248 | 22,964,850 | 5.24 | % | 303,422 | ||||||||||||
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations | 919,685 | 2,515,251 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity | 7,985,620 | 7,841,729 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total other liabilities and stockholders’ equity | 8,905,305 | 10,356,980 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 35,970,412 | $ | 33,321,830 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 298,815 | $ | 334,234 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin(3) | 3.64 | % | 4.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread(4) | 2.86 | % | 3.66 | % |
39
Table of Contents
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2008 | May 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance | Rate | Interest | Average Balance | Rate | Interest | |||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning deposits in other banks | $ | 3,715,761 | 3.05 | % | $ | 56,676 | $ | — | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Federal Funds sold | 4,169,247 | 3.23 | % | 67,341 | 3,044,790 | 5.32 | % | 80,710 | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper | 3,326 | 4.63 | % | 77 | 15,534 | 5.36 | % | 415 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities | 707,063 | 4.98 | % | 17,613 | 90,199 | 5.51 | % | 2,477 | ||||||||||||
Loans:(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credit cards | 20,206,876 | 10.37 | % | 1,047,745 | 20,193,248 | 10.63 | % | 1,070,091 | ||||||||||||
Other consumer loans | 495,629 | 10.25 | % | 25,402 | 93,980 | 5.76 | % | 2,698 | ||||||||||||
Total loans | 20,702,505 | 10.37 | % | 1,073,147 | 20,287,228 | 10.61 | % | 1,072,789 | ||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets | 3,057,975 | 3.92 | % | 60,011 | 3,237,061 | 5.79 | % | 93,471 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | 32,355,877 | 7.88 | % | 1,274,865 | 26,674,812 | 9.40 | % | 1,249,862 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (813,979 | ) | (669,265 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 2,846,410 | 2,442,993 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets of discontinued operations | 2,586,507 | 3,312,791 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 36,974,815 | $ | 31,761,331 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits(2) | $ | 20,442,755 | 5.10 | % | 521,161 | $ | 13,929,968 | 5.10 | % | 354,171 | ||||||||||
Money market deposits | 4,523,320 | 3.57 | % | 80,810 | 3,781,688 | 5.32 | % | 100,251 | ||||||||||||
Other interest-bearing deposits | 46,089 | 1.17 | % | 269 | 42,135 | 3.64 | % | 765 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 25,012,164 | 4.82 | % | 602,240 | 17,753,791 | 5.14 | % | 455,187 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 7,087 | 3.81 | % | 135 | 2,853,825 | 5.47 | % | 77,906 | ||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 1,989,415 | 5.06 | % | 50,314 | 743,867 | 5.97 | % | 22,136 | ||||||||||||
Total borrowings | 1,996,502 | 5.05 | % | 50,449 | 3,597,692 | 5.58 | % | 100,042 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 27,008,666 | 4.83 | % | 652,689 | 21,351,483 | 5.22 | % | 555,229 | ||||||||||||
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations | 1,932,518 | 2,546,776 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity | 8,033,631 | 7,863,072 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total other liabilities and stockholders’ equity | 9,966,149 | 10,409,848 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 36,974,815 | $ | 31,761,331 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 622,176 | $ | 694,633 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin(3) | 3.85 | % | 5.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread(4) | 3.05 | % | 4.18 | % |
(1) | Average balances of loan receivables include non-accruing loans and these loans are therefore included in the yield calculations. If these balances were excluded, there would not be a material impact on the amounts reported above. |
(2) | Includes the impact of interest rate swap agreements used to change a portion of fixed rate funding to floating rate funding. |
(3) | Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of total interest-earning assets. |
(4) | Interest rate spread represents the difference between the rate on total interest-earning assets and the rate on total interest-bearing liabilities. |
40
Table of Contents
Rate/Volume Variance Analysis(1)
For the Three Months Ended May 31, 2008 vs. May 31, 2007 | For the Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 vs. May 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in net interest income due to changes in: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning deposits in other banks | $ | 34,239 | $ | — | $ | 34,239 | $ | 56,676 | $ | — | $ | 56,676 | ||||||||||||
Federal Funds sold | (17,166 | ) | (32,461 | ) | (49,627 | ) | 55,103 | (68,472 | ) | (13,369 | ) | |||||||||||||
Commercial paper | (106 | ) | (105 | ) | (211 | ) | (288 | ) | (50 | ) | (338 | ) | ||||||||||||
Investment securities | 10,677 | (345 | ) | 10,332 | 15,863 | (727 | ) | 15,136 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit cards | 67,376 | (65,669 | ) | 1,707 | 2,212 | (24,558 | ) | (22,346 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other consumer loans | 12,543 | 2,475 | 15,018 | 19,198 | 3,506 | 22,704 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans | 79,919 | (63,194 | ) | 16,725 | 21,410 | (21,052 | ) | 358 | ||||||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets | (16,469 | ) | (20,582 | ) | (37,051 | ) | (4,903 | ) | (28,557 | ) | (33,460 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | 91,094 | (116,687 | ) | (25,593 | ) | 143,861 | (118,858 | ) | 25,003 | |||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | 85,607 | (38,623 | ) | 46,984 | 167,044 | (54 | ) | 166,990 | ||||||||||||||||
Money market deposits | 29,900 | (52,097 | ) | (22,197 | ) | 42,072 | (61,513 | ) | (19,441 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other interest-bearing deposits | 295 | (570 | ) | (275 | ) | 193 | (689 | ) | (496 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 115,802 | (91,290 | ) | 24,512 | 209,309 | (62,256 | ) | 147,053 | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | (17,933 | ) | (7,594 | ) | (25,527 | ) | (59,600 | ) | (18,171 | ) | (77,771 | ) | ||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 27,631 | (16,790 | ) | 10,841 | 38,233 | (10,055 | ) | 28,178 | ||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings | 9,698 | (24,384 | ) | (14,686 | ) | (21,367 | ) | (28,226 | ) | (49,593 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 125,500 | (115,674 | ) | 9,826 | 187,942 | (90,482 | ) | 97,460 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | (34,406 | ) | $ | (1,013 | ) | $ | (35,419 | ) | $ | (44,081 | ) | $ | (28,376 | ) | $ | (72,457 | ) | ||||||
(1) | The rate/volume variance for each category has been allocated on a consistent basis between rate and volume variances based on the percentage of the rate or volume variance to the sum of the two absolute variances. |
Provision for Loan Losses
Provision for loan losses is the expense related to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level adequate to absorb the estimated probable losses in the loan portfolio at each period end date. Factors that influence the provision for loan losses include the level and direction of loan delinquencies and charge-offs, changes in consumer spending and payment behaviors, bankruptcy trends, regulatory changes or new regulatory guidance, the seasoning of our loan portfolio, interest rate movements and their impact on consumer behavior, and changes in our loan portfolio, including the overall mix of accounts, products and loan balances within the portfolio. We also consider the credit quality of the loan portfolio in determining the allowance for loan losses. Credit quality at any time reflects, among other factors, our credit granting practices and effectiveness of collection efforts, the impact of general economic conditions on the consumer, and the seasoning of the loans.
For the three months ended May 31, 2008, the provision for loan losses increased $66.3 million, or 46%, compared with the three months ended May 31, 2007, primarily reflecting higher net charge-offs as a result of the deteriorating economic environment. Despite the decline in credit performance, the level of the allowance for
41
Table of Contents
loan losses decreased $13.6 million during the three months ended May 31, 2008, due to lower owned loans as a result of securitization activity, offset in part by an increase in the reserve rate. In the three months ended May 31, 2007, we decreased the level of allowance for loan losses by $18.5 million, reflecting improved credit performance.
For the six months ended May 31, 2008, the provision for loan losses increased $224.7 million, or 77%, compared with the six months ended May 31, 2007, reflecting an increase in the level of allowance for loan losses and higher net charge-offs. In the six months ended May 31, 2008, we added $86.8 million to the allowance for loan losses, reflecting loan growth and an increase in the loan loss reserve rate due to higher delinquencies which we believe is primarily attributable to the downturns in the U.S. housing markets and mortgage industry and a deteriorating economic environment. In the six months ended May 31, 2007, we decreased the level of allowance for loan losses by $59.2 million, reflecting improved credit performance and slightly lower loan balances.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table provides a summary of the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 860,378 | $ | 663,172 | $ | 759,925 | $ | 703,917 | ||||||||
Additions: | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 210,969 | 144,676 | 516,601 | 291,874 | ||||||||||||
Deductions: | ||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (269,013 | ) | (204,384 | ) | (514,641 | ) | (433,509 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries | 44,441 | 41,237 | 84,890 | 82,419 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs | (224,572 | ) | (163,147 | ) | (429,751 | ) | (351,090 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 846,775 | $ | 644,701 | $ | 846,775 | $ | 644,701 | ||||||||
The allowance for loan losses increased $202.1 million, or 31%, at May 31, 2008, as compared to May 31, 2007. The higher level was attributable to rising delinquency and charge-off rates on credit card loan receivables, as well as higher loan portfolio balances driven by growth in credit card loan receivables and other consumer loans. The factors impacting the changes in credit quality across these periods are discussed further in “–Net Charge-offs” and “–Delinquencies” below.
Net Charge-offs
Our net charge-offs include the principal amount of losses charged off less current period principal recoveries and exclude charged-off interest and fees, current period recoveries of interest and fees and fraud losses. Charged-off and recovered interest and fees are recorded in interest and loan fee income for loan receivables and in securitization income for securitized loans while fraud losses are recorded in other expense. Credit card loans are charged off at the end of the month during which an account becomes 180 days contractually past due, except in the case of cardmember bankruptcies and probate accounts. Cardmember bankruptcies and probate accounts are charged off at the end of the month 60 days following the receipt of notification of the bankruptcy or death but not later than the 180-day contractual time frame. The net charge-off rate is calculated by dividing net charge-offs for the period by the average loan receivables for the period.
The following table presents amounts and rates of net charge-offs of loan receivables (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs | $ | 224,572 | 4.49 | % | $ | 163,147 | 3.47 | % | $ | 429,751 | 4.15 | % | $ | 351,090 | 3.47 | % |
42
Table of Contents
The net charge-off rate on our loan receivables increased 102 basis points and 68 basis points for the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, respectively, as compared to the respective prior year periods. The higher net charge-off rate in both periods was due to higher delinquencies beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007, reflecting the weakening economic environment, the downturns in the U.S. housing markets and mortgage industry and an increase in bankruptcy-related charge-offs.
Delinquencies
Delinquencies are an indicator of credit quality at any point in time. Loan balances are considered delinquent when contractual payments on the loan become 30 days past due.
The following table presents the amounts and delinquency rates of loan receivables over 30 days delinquent, loans receivables over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest and loan receivables that are not accruing interest, regardless of delinquency (dollars in thousands):
May 31, 2008 | November 30, 2007 | |||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | |||||||||
Loans over 30 days delinquent | $ | 725,741 | 3.54 | % | $ | 678,963 | 3.26 | % | ||||
Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest | $ | 322,479 | 1.57 | % | $ | 271,227 | 1.30 | % | ||||
Loans not accruing interest | $ | 114,442 | 0.56 | % | $ | 102,286 | 0.49 | % |
The delinquency rates of loans over 30 days delinquent and loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest increased 28 basis points and 27 basis points, respectively, at May 31, 2008, as compared to November 30, 2007. This increase in both measures reflected a weaker economic environment and the downturns in the U.S. housing markets and mortgage industry.
Loan receivables are placed on non-accrual status upon receipt of notification of the bankruptcy or death of a cardmember and as part of certain collection management processes. Loan receivables not accruing interest at May 31, 2008 increased 7 basis points to 0.56%, as compared to November 30, 2007, as a result of an increase in bankruptcy notifications.
Other Income
The following table presents the components of other income for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Securitization income | $ | 628,031 | $ | 584,566 | $ | 43,465 | 7 | % | $ | 1,341,528 | $ | 1,092,866 | $ | 248,662 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||
Loan fee income | 53,839 | 70,303 | (16,464 | ) | (23 | %) | 142,097 | 159,344 | (17,247 | ) | (11 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Discount and interchange revenue(1) | 65,523 | 65,964 | (441 | ) | (1 | %) | 117,419 | 145,545 | (28,126 | ) | (19 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance | 47,186 | 40,468 | 6,718 | 17 | % | 94,955 | 84,431 | 10,524 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Merchant fees | 17,849 | 23,853 | (6,004 | ) | (25 | %) | 36,693 | 49,179 | (12,486 | ) | (25 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Transaction processing revenue | 30,405 | 25,187 | 5,218 | 21 | % | 56,359 | 49,697 | 6,662 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss on investments | (31,280 | ) | — | (31,280 | ) | NM | (32,464 | ) | — | (32,464 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||||||
Other income | 33,339 | 19,445 | 13,894 | 71 | % | 63,849 | 39,073 | 24,776 | 63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Total other income | $ | 844,892 | $ | 829,786 | $ | 15,106 | 2 | % | $ | 1,820,436 | $ | 1,620,135 | $ | 200,301 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Net of rewards, including Cashback Bonus rewards, of $147.8 million and $174.4 million for the three months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $331.1 million and $361.5 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
43
Table of Contents
Total other income increased $15.1 million, or 2%, for the three months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007, primarily due to an increase in securitization income, partially offset by losses on investments and a decline in loan fee income. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, total other income increased $200.3 million, or 12%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, largely because of an increase in securitization income, partially offset by losses on investments, lower discount and interchange revenue and a decrease in loan fee income.
For securitization transactions completed on or after November 3, 2004, in accordance with governing securitization documents, we allocate portions of our discount and interchange revenue to new securitization transactions. Within other income, this change to allocating discount and interchange revenue has the effect of decreasing discount and interchange revenue and increasing securitization income. The amount of discount and interchange revenue allocated to securitization transactions has increased since this change was made in 2004 and is expected to continue increasing as new transactions which include such allocations are completed and securitizations transactions that did not receive allocations mature. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, approximately 83% and 81%, respectively, of total securitized loans were allocated discount and interchange revenue compared to 64% and 61% for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively.
Securitization Income
Securitization income is a significant source of our income and is derived through asset securitizations and continued servicing of a portion of the credit card receivables we originated. The issuance of asset-backed securities to investors has the effect of removing the owned loan receivables from the consolidated statements of financial condition. Also, portions of interest income, provision for loan losses and certain components of other income related to the securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued are no longer reported in our statements of income; however, they remain significant factors in determining securitization income we receive on our retained beneficial interest in those transactions. Investors in securitizations are allocated the cash flows derived from interest and loan fee revenue earned on securitized loans. In addition, for securitization transactions completed on or after November 3, 2004, in accordance with governing securitization documents, we allocate portions of our discount and interchange revenue to new securitization transactions. These cash flows are used to pay the investors in the transactions a contractual fixed or floating rate of return on their investment, to reimburse investors for losses of principal resulting from charged-off loans, net of recoveries, and to pay us a contractual fee for servicing the securitized loans. Any excess cash flows remaining are paid to us. Both servicing fees and excess spread are recorded in securitization income. Securitization income also includes the net revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable and certain other retained interests, reflecting adjustments to the fair values of the retained interests that result from changes in the level of securitized loans and assumptions used to value the retained interests.
Securitization income is significantly influenced by the level of average securitized loans. For both the three months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, the average securitized loans were $27.6 billion. For the six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, the average securitized loans were $27.5 billion and $26.3 billion, respectively. The higher average securitized loans for the six months ended May 31, 2008 reflected a higher beginning level of securitized loans, which was offset in part by a higher level of deal maturities. In addition, lower average securitized loans in the six months ended May 31, 2007 reflected the timing of new securitization transactions later in the period.
44
Table of Contents
The table below presents the components of securitization income (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess spread | $ | 539,297 | $ | 415,840 | $ | 123,457 | 30 | % | $ | 1,044,330 | $ | 801,201 | $ | 243,129 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||
Servicing fees on securitized loans | 138,393 | 137,441 | 952 | 1 | % | 276,656 | 263,496 | 13,160 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net revaluation of retained interests(1) | (44,473 | ) | 36,354 | (80,827 | ) | NM | 30,524 | 37,775 | (7,251 | ) | (19 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (principally transaction costs) | (5,186 | ) | (5,069 | ) | (117 | ) | (2 | %) | (9,982 | ) | (9,606 | ) | (376 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Securitization income | $ | 628,031 | $ | 584,566 | $ | 43,465 | 7 | % | $ | 1,341,528 | $ | 1,092,866 | $ | 248,662 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Net of issuance discounts, as applicable. |
For the three months ended May 31, 2008, securitization income increased $43.5 million, or 7%, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007. The increase reflects higher excess spread on securitized loans, offset in part by lower net revaluation of retained interests. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, securitization income increased $248.7 million, or 23%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007 reflecting higher excess spread on securitized loans.
Excess spread. The following table provides the components of excess spread (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income on securitized loans | $ | 960,634 | $ | 964,226 | $ | (3,592 | ) | 0 | % | $ | 1,950,447 | $ | 1,834,586 | $ | 115,861 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||
Interest paid to investors in asset-backed securities | (237,381 | ) | (390,419 | ) | 153,038 | 39 | % | (566,893 | ) | (732,237 | ) | 165,344 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | 723,253 | 573,807 | 149,446 | 26 | % | 1,383,554 | 1,102,349 | 281,205 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other fee revenue on securitized loans | 325,005 | 279,047 | 45,958 | 16 | % | 629,436 | 520,799 | 108,637 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs on securitized loans | (370,568 | ) | (299,573 | ) | (70,995 | ) | (24 | %) | (692,004 | ) | (558,451 | ) | (133,553 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Net revenues on securitized loans | 677,690 | 553,281 | 124,409 | 22 | % | 1,320,986 | 1,064,697 | 256,289 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing fees on securitized loans | �� | (138,393 | ) | (137,441 | ) | (952 | ) | (1 | %) | (276,656 | ) | (263,496 | ) | (13,160 | ) | (5 | %) | |||||||||||||
Excess spread | $ | 539,297 | $ | 415,840 | $ | 123,457 | 30 | % | $ | 1,044,330 | $ | 801,201 | $ | 243,129 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||
For the three months ended May 31, 2008, excess spread on securitized loans increased $123.5 million, or 30%, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, excess spread on securitized loans increased $243.1 million, or 30%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007. The increase in both periods was attributable to higher net interest income and higher other fee revenue on securitized loans, offset in part by higher net charge-offs. The increase in net interest income related largely to a decrease in interest paid to investors reflective of the impact of a lower average LIBOR on floating rate investor interests, offset in part by wider spreads paid to investors on newer transactions. Higher other fee revenue was attributable to the higher level of outstanding securitized loans receiving discount and interchange revenue. The higher net charge-offs reflected a higher rate of charge-offs on securitized loans as a result of the weakening economic environment. The increase in excess spread in the six month period was also attributable to the higher level of average securitized loans.
45
Table of Contents
Net revaluation of retained interests. The components of net revaluation of retained interests are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | 2008 | 2007 | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
Initial gain on new securitization transactions(1) | $ | 25,332 | $ | 56,914 | $(31,582 | ) | $ | 62,087 | $ | 80,703 | $ (18,616 | ) | |||||||||||
Revaluation of retained interests | (69,805 | ) | (20,560 | ) | (49,245 | ) | (31,563 | ) | (42,928 | ) | 11,365 | ||||||||||||
Net revaluation of retained interests | $ | (44,473 | ) | $ | 36,354 | $ | (80,827 | ) | $ | 30,524 | $ | 37,775 | $ (7,251 | ) | |||||||||
(1) | Net of issuance discounts, as applicable. |
The net revaluation of retained interests includes the initial gain on securitized loan receivables and changes in the fair value of retained interests, including the interest-only strip receivable and the cash collateral accounts provided as credit enhancement to certain securitization transactions. Gains are not recorded on securitized loan receivables against which certificated beneficial interests have been retained by us, and such certificated retained beneficial interests are classified as investment securities available-for-sale and reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The net revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable represents changes in the estimated present value of certain components of excess spread on the securitized loans to be earned in the future. Changes in the maturity profile and the estimate of performance measures of the securitized loans, such as interest yield and charge-offs, as well as changes in the interest rate environment, can affect future excess spread projections and, accordingly, the net revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable. Changes in the interest rate environment can also affect the estimated present value of future interest and principal cash flows on the cash collateral accounts which is reflected in net revaluation of retained interests.
The net revaluation of retained interests for the three months ended May 31, 2008 decreased $80.8 million, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007. The decrease reflected lower initial gains on new securitization transactions related to $1.9 billion in new securitization transactions for the three months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to $3.7 billion in new securitization transactions for the three months ended May 31, 2007. The unfavorable net revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable in the three months ended May 31, 2008 related to lower projected excess spread, as compared to February 29, 2008, offset in part by net gain amortization related to the maturity of securitization transactions. The lower projected excess spread reflected higher projected charge-offs and a lower projected net interest spread. The three months ended May 31, 2008 also reflected an unfavorable net revaluation of cash collateral accounts reflective of higher long-term interest rate projections. The unfavorable net revaluation of retained interests in the comparable prior year period was primarily due to net gain amortization related to the maturity of securitization transactions.
The net revaluation of retained interests for the six months ended May 31, 2008 decreased $7.3 million, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007. The decrease reflected lower initial gains on new securitization transactions related to $4.4 billion in new securitization transactions for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to $5.3 billion in new securitization transactions for the six months ended May 31, 2007. This was offset in part by a lower unfavorable net revaluation of retained interests in the six months ended May 31, 2008 related to net gain amortization associated with the maturity of securitization transactions, offset in part by higher projected excess spread. The higher projected excess spread reflected the decrease in the absolute interest rate environment, as compared to that assumed at November 30, 2007, offset in part by lower projected yield and higher projected charge-offs. The six months ended May 31, 2008 also reflected an unfavorable net revaluation of cash collateral accounts due to higher long-term interest rate projections. The unfavorable net revaluation of retained interests in the comparable period in prior year was primarily due to net gain amortization related to the maturity of securitization transactions.
Loan Fee Income
Loan fee income consists primarily of fees on credit card loans and includes late, overlimit, balance transfer, cash advance and other miscellaneous fees. Loan fee income decreased $16.5 million, or 23%, and $17.2 million, or 11%,
46
Table of Contents
for the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to May 31, 2007, respectively, as a result of deferrals of balance transfer fees in 2008 historically accounted for in loan fee income which will be accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.
Discount and Interchange Revenue
Discount and interchange revenue includes discount revenue and acquirer interchange net of interchange paid to third-party issuers in the United States. We earn discount revenue from fees charged to merchants with whom we have entered into card acceptance agreements for processing cardholder purchase transactions and acquirer interchange revenue from merchant acquirers on all Discover Network card transactions made by cardholders at merchants with whom merchant acquirers have entered into card acceptance agreements for processing cardholder purchase transactions. We incur an interchange cost to card issuing entities that have entered into contractual arrangements to issue cards on the Discover Network. This cost is contractually established and is based on the card issuing organizations’ transaction volume and is reported as a reduction to discount and interchange revenue. We offer our cardmembers various reward programs, including the Cashback Bonus reward program, pursuant to which we pay certain cardmembers a percentage of their purchase amounts based on the type and volume of the cardmember’s purchases. Reward costs are recorded as a reduction to discount and interchange revenue. For securitization transactions completed on or after November 3, 2004, in accordance with governing securitization documents, we allocate portions of discount and interchange revenue to new securitization transactions, which results in a decrease in discount and interchange revenue and an increase in securitization income. However, cardmember rewards costs associated with the securitized loans are not allocated to investor interests, and as such, do not impact securitization income.
Discount and interchange revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2008 was relatively flat when compared to May 31, 2007, as lower rewards costs related to revised forfeiture assumptions, largely offset lower discount and interchange revenue related to higher allocations to securitized loans which have the effect of reclassifying discount and interchange revenue to securitization income. Discount and interchange revenue decreased $28.1 million, or 19%, for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to May 31, 2007, due to higher allocations to securitized loans, partially offset by lower cardmember rewards costs related to revised forfeiture assumptions and higher discount and interchange revenue related to increased sales volume. The increase in allocations to securitized loans was due to a higher level of outstanding securitized loans receiving such allocations in the current year than in 2007.
Loss on Investments
In the three months ended May 31, 2008, we concluded there had been an other-than-temporary impairment in our investment in the asset-backed commercial paper notes of Golden Key U.S. LLC which invested in mortgage-backed securities. This impairment resulted in a $31.3 million write-down of the notes to $77.4 million. We expect this investment may be restructured by the issuer later in 2008 which could result in further impairment. In comparison, there were no losses on investment securities for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007.
Other Income
Other income includes revenues on various fee-based products, revenues from the referral of declined applications to certain third-party issuers on the Discover Network, unrealized gains and losses related to derivative contracts, gains on sales of mortgage loans and other miscellaneous revenue items. Other income increased $13.9 million, or 71%, primarily due to $10.6 million in lower unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements and a $6.2 million increase in gains on the sales of merchant portfolios. Other income increased $24.8 million, or 63%, for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, primarily due to $15.0 million in lower unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements and a $10.2 million increase in gains on the sale of merchant portfolios.
47
Table of Contents
Other Expense
The following table represents the components of other expense for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | 2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits | $ | 218,290 | $ | 215,447 | $ | 2,843 | 1 | % | $ | 435,660 | $ | 430,614 | $ | 5,046 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
Marketing and business development | 132,038 | 131,959 | 79 | 0 | % | 273,591 | 266,501 | 7,090 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Information processing and communications | 79,449 | 82,396 | (2,947 | ) | (4 | %) | 157,725 | 161,240 | (3,515 | ) | (2 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Professional fees | 81,392 | 102,853 | (21,461 | ) | (21 | %) | 155,064 | 178,918 | (23,854 | ) | (13 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment | 19,803 | 20,557 | (754 | ) | (4 | %) | 39,444 | 40,132 | (688 | ) | (2 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Other expense | 75,853 | 70,546 | 5,307 | 8 | % | 147,684 | 138,194 | 9,490 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total other expense | $ | 606,825 | $ | 623,758 | $ | (16,933 | ) | (3 | %) | $ | 1,209,168 | $ | 1,215,599 | $ | (6,431 | ) | (1 | %) | ||||||||
Total other expense decreased $16.9 million, or 3%, for the three months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007, primarily related to lower legal fees incurred related to the Visa and MasterCard litigation and lower consulting fees during the three months ended May 31, 2007, partially offset by higher fraud expenses in the current period.
Total other expense decreased $6.4 million, or 1%, for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, primarily related to lower legal fees incurred related to the Visa and MasterCard litigation and lower consulting fees during the six months ended May 31, 2007, partially offset by higher television advertising and higher fraud expenses in the current period.
Income Tax Expense
The following table reconciles our effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate:
For the Three Months Ended May 31, | For the Six Months Ended May 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||
U.S. state and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefits | 3.1 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 1.8 | ||||||||
Other | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | 0.5 | — | |||||||
Effective income tax rate | 38.2 | % | 36.7 | % | 38.6 | % | 36.8 | % | ||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We seek to maintain liquidity, capital and funding policies that ensure our credit ratings and bank capitalization levels are sufficient to provide cost effective access to debt and deposit markets thus providing sufficient liquidity to fund our business. Our liquidity and funding risk management policies are designed to mitigate the risk that we may be unable to access adequate financing to service our financial obligations when they come due. Liquidity risk is addressed through various funding criteria and targets that guide our access to the long-term and short-term debt capital markets, the maturity profile of our liabilities, the diversity of our funding sources and investor base, as well as the level of our liquidity reserve as part of a contingency funding plan.
48
Table of Contents
Liquidity risk is assessed by several measures including the liquidity position, which measures funding in various maturity tranches. The maturities of the various funding instruments are reviewed during the funding planning and execution process to ensure the maturities are staggered. The mix of funding sources and the composition of our investor base are also reviewed during the funding process to ensure appropriate diversification. Funding sources include externally derived short-term borrowings, asset-backed commercial paper conduit financing, long-term asset-backed securitizations, bank deposits and bank notes.
We monitor and review liquidity and capital management policies and execute strategies to maintain prudent levels of liquidity and capital. Our senior management reviews financial performance relative to these policies, monitors the availability of alternative financing sources, evaluates liquidity risk and capital adequacy, and assesses the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities.
Management has implemented liquidity and capital management policies which seek to provide us with adequate access to and supply of funding through the business cycle. Accordingly, Discover Bank has maintained an investment grade rating and Discover Financial Services received an investment grade rating following the Distribution. Discover Bank has maintained its BBB rating from S&P and has been assigned a Baa2 deposit and Baa2 senior unsecured rating from Moody’s and a BBB rating from Fitch. Discover Financial Services has been assigned a BBB- long-term rating from S&P, a Baa3 senior unsecured rating from Moody’s and a BBB long-term rating from Fitch.
Our Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”) is designed to withstand a Discover stress event characterized by limited access to the asset-backed securitization and deposit markets over a defined period. Our CFP model incorporates a wide range of potential cash outflows during a liquidity stress event, including, but not limited to: (i) repayment of all debt maturing within an assumed stress period; (ii) expected funding requirements from receivable growth and/or volatility; and (iii) customer cash withdrawals from interest-bearing deposits. If we are unable to continue to securitize our credit card receivables at acceptable pricing levels, or at all, including by reason of the early amortization of any of our securitization transactions, we would seek to liquidate investments, increase bank deposits and use alternative funding sources (such as Federal Reserve Bank sources, Federal Funds, bank notes and unsecured debt) to fund increases in loan receivables and meet our other liquidity needs.
During the first half of 2008, the ongoing disruptions in the debt and asset-backed capital markets caused credit spreads to widen materially and reduced the availability of new issuance in some funding markets. As a result, we retained a portion of the subordinated notes issued during the period as investment securities available-for-sale. At May 31, 2008, our contingent sources included approximately $8.4 billion in our liquidity reserve (primarily invested in Federal Funds sold and bank deposits), $1.7 billion of unutilized commitments from third-party commercial paper asset-backed conduits for securitization funding, and $2.5 billion of unsecured committed credit. In addition, we had AAA-rated note issuance capacity of $4.5 billion in the Discover Card Execution Note Trust, subject to market availability.
Our consolidated statement of financial condition at May 31, 2008 consisted primarily of credit card loan receivables, the balance of which fluctuates from time to time due to trends in credit card spending and payments, as well as the issuance of new securitization transactions and maturities of existing securitization transactions. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, we executed $1.9 billion and $3.5 billion of public securitization transactions, respectively.
Equity Capital Management. Management views equity capital as an important source of financial strength. We determine the level of capital necessary to support our business based on our managed credit card loan receivables, goodwill and other intangible assets, taking into account, among other things, regulatory requirements, rating agency guidelines and internally managed requirements to sustain growth.
Under regulatory capital requirements adopted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and other bank regulatory agencies, FDIC-insured financial institutions must maintain minimum levels of capital that are dependent upon the risk of the financial institutions assets, specifically (a) 3% to 5% of Tier 1 capital, as
49
Table of Contents
defined, to average assets (“leverage ratio”), (b) 4% to 6% of Tier 1 capital, as defined, to risk-weighted assets (“Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio”) and (c) 8% to 10% of total capital, as defined, to risk-weighted assets (“total risk-weighted capital ratio”). At May 31, 2008, the leverage ratio, Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio and total risk-weighted capital ratio of Discover Bank as well as our other FDIC-insured financial institution, Bank of New Castle, exceeded these regulatory minimums.
Dividend Policy.Although we intend to reinvest a substantial portion of our earnings in our business, we intend to continue to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common stock, subject to the approval of our Board of Directors. The declaration and payment of dividends, as well as the amount thereof, are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will declare and pay any dividends. In addition, as a result of applicable banking regulations and provisions that may be contained in our borrowing agreements or the borrowing agreements of our subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders may further be limited.
Stock Repurchase Program.On December 3, 2007, Discover Financial Services announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of Discover Financial Services’ outstanding stock under a new share repurchase program. This share repurchase program expires on November 30, 2010, and may be terminated at any time. At May 31, 2008, we had not repurchased any stock under this program.
Special Dividend.On June 19, 2007, we declared a special dividend to Morgan Stanley. Pursuant to the special dividend, upon resolution of our outstanding litigation with Visa U.S.A., Inc. and MasterCard Inc., after expenses, we are required to pay Morgan Stanley (1) the first $700 million of value of cash or non-cash proceeds (increased at the rate of 6% per annum until paid in full) (the “minimum proceeds”) and (2) 50% of any proceeds in excess of $1.5 billion, subject to certain limitations and a maximum potential payment to Morgan Stanley of $1.5 billion. All payments by us to Morgan Stanley will be net of taxes payable by us with respect to such proceeds. If, in connection with or following a change in control of our company, the litigation is settled for an amount less than minimum proceeds, we are required to pay Morgan Stanley an amount equal to the minimum proceeds. As a result of our agreement to pay the value of non-cash proceeds, we may be required to pay amounts to Morgan Stanley in excess of cash received in connection with the litigation. The value of non-cash proceeds will be determined by an independent third party.
Current Funding Sources
Securitization Financing. We generate a significant portion of our funding through the securitization of credit card loan receivables utilizing non-consolidated securitization trusts. Securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued to third parties are accounted for as sold and are removed from the consolidated statements of financial condition. Certain securitized loans against which certificated beneficial interests have been retained by us result in the removal of credit card loan receivables from the consolidated statements of financial condition and are re-characterized as investment securities. We have historically securitized between approximately 50% and 60% of our managed credit card loan receivables.
We utilize both the term securitization market as well as the privately placed asset-backed commercial paper conduit financing market. Outstanding term financing and asset-backed commercial paper conduit financing at May 31, 2008 were $22.6 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively, with the $4.4 billion being net of $0.4 billion funded during May for repayment in June.
The following table summarizes expected maturities of the investors’ interests in securitizations at May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Total | Less Than One Year | One Year Through Three Years | Four Years Through Five Years | After Five Years | |||||||||||
Expected maturities of the investors’ interest in securitizations | $ | 26,996,955 | $ | 5,341,685 | $ | 15,552,636 | $ | 3,776,317 | $ | 2,326,317 |
50
Table of Contents
We access the term asset securitization market through the Discover Card Master Trust I and, beginning July 26, 2007, the Discover Card Execution Note Trust. Through the Discover Card Master Trust I, we have been using a structure utilizing Class A, triple-A rated certificates and Class B, single-A rated certificates held by third parties, with credit enhancement provided by the subordinated Class B certificates and a cash collateral account. The Discover Card Execution Note Trust includes three classes of securities sold to investors, the most senior class generally receiving a triple-A rating. In this structure, in order to issue senior, higher rated, classes of notes, it is necessary to obtain the appropriate amount of credit enhancement, generally through the issuance of junior, lower rated classes of notes.
At May 31, 2008, cash collateral accounts underlying the securitization transactions of Discover Card Master Trust I had a balance of $1.6 billion, of which we financed $1.4 billion (reflected in amounts due from asset securitization in the consolidated statements of financial condition). The rights to repayment of a portion of the cash collateral account loans have been sold to a special purpose subsidiary, DRFC Funding LLC, as part of a secured financing and are not expected to be available to creditors of DFS. At May 31, 2008, $0.8 billion is owed related to this secured financing.
The following table summarizes estimated maturities of the cash collateral accounts at May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Total | Less Than One Year | One Year Through Three Years | Four Years Through Five Years | After Five Years | |||||||||||
Estimated maturities of cash collateral accounts | $ | 1,373,131 | $ | 386,025 | $ | 713,158 | $ | 189,474 | $ | 84,474 |
The securitization structures include certain features designed to protect investors that could result in earlier-than-expected amortization of the transactions, accelerating the need for alternative funding. The primary feature relates to the availability and adequacy of cash flows in the securitized pool of receivables to meet contractual requirements (“economic early amortization”). In the event of an economic early amortization (which would occur if the excess spread falls below 0% for a contractually specified period, generally a three-month average), the receivables that otherwise would have been subsequently purchased by the trust from us would instead continue to be recognized on our statement of financial condition since the cash flows generated in the trust would instead be used to repay investors in the asset-backed securities. As of May 31, 2008, no economic early amortization events have occurred. The table below provides information concerning investor interest and related excess spreads at May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Investor Interest | # of Series Outstanding | 3-Month Rolling Average Excess Spread | ||||||
Interchange series(1) | $ | 16,064,217 | 18 | 8.80 | % | |||
Non-interchange series | 3,982,738 | 5 | 5.39 | % | ||||
Discover Card Master Trust I | 20,046,955 | 23 | 5.39 | % | ||||
Discover Card Execution Note Trust(1) | 6,950,000 | 16 | 8.08 | % | ||||
Total investor interest | $ | 26,996,955 | 39 | |||||
(1) | Discover Card Master Trust I certificates issued on or after November 4, 2004 and all notes issued by DCENT include cash flows derived from discount and interchange revenue earned by Discover Card. |
51
Table of Contents
Deposits. We utilize deposits to diversify funding sources and to reduce our reliance on short-term credit-sensitive funding sources, thus enhancing our liquidity position. We obtain our deposits through various channels: direct retail certificates of deposit and money market accounts, retail and institutional brokerage arrangements and money market accounts, under which we receive funds swept through external third-parties. Direct consumer retail deposits are marketed to and received from individual customers, without the use of a third-party intermediary, and are an important, stable funding source that typically reacts more slowly to interest rate changes than other deposits. Brokered deposits are deposits placed to consumers through registered brokers.
Our certificates of deposits have maturities ranging from one month to fifteen years, having a weighted average maturity of 22 months at May 31, 2008. Total interest-bearing deposits at May 31, 2008 were $24.7 billion, the remaining maturities of which are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):
Total | Three Months or Less | Over Three Months Through Six Months | Over Six Months Through Twelve Months | Over Twelve Months | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit in amounts less than $100,000 | $ | 19,441,068 | $ | 3,550,377 | $ | 2,006,814 | $ | 4,086,288 | $ | 9,797,589 | |||||
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or greater | 917,155 | 237,498 | 98,716 | 261,600 | 319,341 | ||||||||||
Savings deposits, including money market deposit accounts | 4,357,881 | 4,357,881 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | $ | 24,716,104 | $ | 8,145,756 | $ | 2,105,530 | $ | 4,347,888 | $ | 10,116,930 | |||||
Long-Term Borrowings and Bank Notes. On June 12, 2007, we received proceeds on the issuance of $800 million par value of unsecured debt to external third parties. The financing is comprised of $400 million having a three-year maturity with a floating coupon and $400 million with a ten-year maturity with a fixed coupon. The transaction provided additional liquidity to us to support funding requirements of our subsidiaries.
At May 31, 2008, we had $250 million par value in bank notes outstanding which mature in February 2009. We may issue additional bank notes under our Global Bank Note Program given that certain credit criteria are met.
Available Credit Facilities
Secured Committed Credit Facilities.The maintenance of revolving committed credit agreements serves to further diversify our funding sources. In connection with our asset securitization program, we have access to committed undrawn funding capacity through third-party bank-sponsored securitization conduits to support credit card loan receivables funding requirements. At May 31, 2008, these conduits totaled $6.5 billion, of which $1.7 billion was unused. The original commitments of these facilities range from 364-day renewable agreements to multi-year extendable commitments.
Unsecured Committed Credit Facilities.As of May 31, 2008, our unsecured committed credit facility of $2.5 billion had a remaining life of 48-months. This facility serves to diversify our funding sources and enhance our liquidity. This facility became effective at the time of the Distribution, is provided by a group of major global banks, and is available to both Discover Financial Services and Discover Bank. We anticipate that the facility will support general liquidity needs and may be drawn to meet short-term funding needs from time to time. At May 31, 2008, we had no outstanding balances due under the facility.
52
Table of Contents
Federal Reserve.Discover Bank may access the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s discount window or participate in the Federal Reserve’s Term Auction Facility (“TAF”), if additional liquidity needs arise. In December 2007, the Federal Reserve announced the establishment of a temporary TAF. All depository institutions that are judged to be in generally sound financial condition by their local Reserve Bank and that are eligible to borrow under the primary credit discount window program are eligible to participate in TAF auctions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Current Funding Sources—Securitization Financing.”
Guarantees
Guarantees are contracts or indemnification agreements that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying asset, liability, equity security of a guaranteed party, rate or index. Our guarantees relate to certain representations and warranties made with regard to securitized loans, transactions processed through the Discover Network and indemnifications made in conjunction with the sale of the Goldfish business. Also included in guarantees are contracts that contingently require the guarantor to make payments to the guaranteed party based on another entity’s failure to perform under an agreement. See Note 10: Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to the consolidated and combined financial statements for further discussion regarding our guarantees.
Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
In the normal course of business, we enter into various contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. Contractual obligations at May 31, 2008, which include deposits, long-term borrowings and operating and capital lease obligations, were $27.2 billion. For a description of our contractual obligations as of November 30, 2007, see our annual report on Form 10-K from the fiscal year ending November 30, 2007 under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments.”
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on December 1, 2007 at which date we had approximately $283.8 million of tax liabilities, including interest and penalties, related to uncertain tax positions. Because of the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with these liabilities, we are unable to estimate the years in which settlement will occur with the respective taxing authorities.
At May 31, 2008, we extended credit for consumer and commercial loans of approximately $215 billion. Such commitments arise primarily from agreements with customers for unused lines of credit on certain credit cards, provided there is no violation of conditions established in the related agreement. These commitments, substantially all of which we can terminate at any time and which do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, are periodically reviewed based on account usage and customer creditworthiness. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we guarantee payment on behalf of subsidiaries relating to contractual obligations with external parties. The activities of the subsidiaries covered by these guarantees, if any, are included in our consolidated and combined financial statements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Market risk refers to the risk that a change in the level of one or more market prices, rates, indices, correlations or other market factors will result in losses for a position or portfolio. We are exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates.
Interest Rate Risk. Changes in interest rates impact interest-earning assets, principally credit card loan receivables, as well as excess spread received in connection with the securitized loan receivables against which beneficial interests have been issued. Changes in interest rates also impact interest sensitive liabilities that finance these assets, including asset-backed securitizations, short-term and long-term borrowings and deposits.
53
Table of Contents
Our interest rate risk management policies are designed to reduce the potential volatility of earnings that may arise from changes in interest rates by having a financing portfolio that reflects the existing repricing schedules of credit card loan receivables as well as our right, with notice to cardmembers, to reprice certain fixed or floating rate credit card loan receivables to a new interest rate in the future. To the extent that asset and related financing repricing characteristics of a particular portfolio are not matched effectively, we may utilize interest rate derivative contracts, such as swap agreements, to achieve our objectives. Interest rate swap agreements effectively convert the underlying asset or financing from fixed to floating rate or from floating to fixed rate.
We use an interest rate sensitivity simulation to assess our interest rate risk exposure. For purposes of presenting the possible earnings effect of a hypothetical, adverse change in interest rates over the 12-month period from our reporting date, we assume that all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities will be impacted by a hypothetical, immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates as of the beginning of the period.
Interest rate sensitive assets are assumed to be those for which the stated interest rate is not contractually fixed for the next 12-month period. Our interest rate sensitive assets include certain loan receivables, Federal Funds sold, certain amounts due from asset securitizations, interest-earning deposits in other banks and certain investment securities. Portions of our credit card loan receivables have fixed interest rates, although we have the right, with notice to cardmembers, to subsequently reprice these receivables to a new interest rate unless the account has been closed or the cardmember opts out of repricing actions. Therefore, we consider a portion of the credit card loan receivables with a fixed interest rate to be interest rate sensitive. We measured the earnings sensitivity for these assets from the expected repricing date, which takes into consideration the required notice period. In addition, assets with rates that are fixed at period end but which will mature, or otherwise contractually reset to a market-based indexed or other fixed rate prior to the end of the 12-month period, also are considered to be rate sensitive. The latter category includes certain credit card loans that may be offered at below-market rates for an introductory period, such as balance transfers and special promotional programs, after which the loans will contractually reprice in accordance with our normal market-based pricing structure. For purposes of measuring rate sensitivity for such loans, only the effect of the hypothetical 100 basis point change in the underlying market-based indexed or other fixed rate has been considered rather than the full change in the rate to which the loan would contractually reprice. For assets that have a fixed interest rate at the fiscal period end but which contractually will, or are assumed to, reset to a market-based indexed or other fixed rate during the next 12 months, earnings sensitivity is measured from the expected repricing date. In addition, for all interest rate sensitive assets, earnings sensitivity is calculated net of expected loan losses.
Interest rate sensitive liabilities are assumed to be those for which the stated interest rate is not contractually fixed for the next 12-month period. Thus, liabilities that vary with changes in a market-based index, such as Federal Funds or LIBOR, which will reset before the end of the 12-month period, or liabilities whose rates are fixed at the fiscal period end but which will mature and are assumed to be replaced with a market-based indexed rate prior to the end of the 12-month period, also are considered to be rate sensitive. For these fixed rate liabilities, earnings sensitivity is measured from the expected repricing date.
Assuming an immediate 100 basis point increase in the interest rates affecting all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities at May 31, 2008, we estimate that the pretax income of lending and related activities over the following 12-month period would be reduced by approximately $93.2 million. We estimate the comparable reduction of pretax income for the 12-month period following November 30, 2007, to be approximately $108.0 million. The hypothetical decline in pretax income was less than the prior year due to lower market-based indexes and their impact to the replacement cost of maturing debt as well as fewer interest rate sensitive liabilities. This was offset in part by widened credit spreads in some funding markets as well as fewer interest rate sensitive credit card receivables.
The model assumes that the balances of interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities at the period end will remain constant over the next 12-month period. It does not assume any growth, strategic change in business focus, change in asset pricing philosophy or change in asset/liability funding mix. Thus, this model represents a
54
Table of Contents
static analysis that cannot adequately portray how we would respond to significant changes in market conditions such as those recently experienced. Furthermore, the analysis does not necessarily reflect our expectations regarding the movement of interest rates in the near term, including the likelihood of an immediate 100 basis point change in market interest rates, nor necessarily the actual effect on earnings if such rate changes were to occur.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. At November 30, 2007, we had foreign currency exchange risk as a result of credit card loan receivables from our U.K. business which were denominated in pounds sterling. These receivables were primarily funded by the issuance of debt by unrelated conduit providers and intercompany lending. We mitigated this risk by using forward contracts to hedge our net investment in international operations. As of May 31, 2008, substantially all of the remaining net assets of discontinued operations were denominated in pounds sterling. We mitigated this risk by using forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the net assets through the date these assets are expected to be dividended to its parent as well as through the date of any potential post-closing adjustments.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Historically, we have relied on certain financial, administrative and other resources of Morgan Stanley to operate our business, including portions of human resources, information technology, accounting, tax, corporate services and treasury. In conjunction with our separation from Morgan Stanley, we are currently in the process of enhancing our own financial, administrative and other support systems or contracting with third parties to replace Morgan Stanley’s systems. We are establishing our own accounting and auditing policies and systems on a stand-alone basis. We have entered into agreements with Morgan Stanley under which Morgan Stanley is providing some of these services to us on a transitional basis, which are expected to end within the third quarter of 2008. We are making these changes as part of our separation from Morgan Stanley and in anticipation of reporting on our internal control over financial reporting.
Other than those noted above, there have been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
In the normal course of business, the Company has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. The Company has historically relied on the arbitration
55
Table of Contents
clause in its cardmember agreements, which has limited the costs of, and its exposure to, litigation. The Company is also involved, from time to time, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies regarding its business, including, among other matters, accounting and operational matters, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions, or other relief. Litigation and regulatory actions could also adversely affect the Company’s reputation.
The Company contests liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigation and proceedings are in the early stages, the Company cannot predict with certainty the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters, how such matters will be resolved, when they will ultimately be resolved, or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, might be. Subject to the foregoing, the Company believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of the pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, although the outcome of such matters could be material to our operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, our level of income for such period.
The Company filed a lawsuit captionedDiscover Financial Services, Inc. v. Visa USA Inc., MasterCard Inc. et al. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 4, 2004. Through this lawsuit the Company seeks to recover substantial damages and other appropriate relief in connection with Visa’s and MasterCard’s illegal anticompetitive practices that, among other things, foreclosed the Company from the credit and debit network services markets. Trial is currently scheduled for September 9, 2008. This lawsuit follows the U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2004 denial of Visa’s and MasterCard’s petition for review of the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals affirming a lower court decision in a case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice in which the court found that Visa’s and MasterCard’s exclusionary rules violated the antitrust laws and harmed competition and consumers by foreclosing the Company and American Express from offering credit and debit network services to banks. The Company also has challenged certain practices engaged in by Visa in the debit network services market as violative of the antitrust laws.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in recovering any damages in this action. Upon resolution of the litigation, after expenses, the Company will be required to pay Morgan Stanley the first $700 million of value of cash or non-cash proceeds (increased at the rate of 6% per annum until paid in full) (the “minimum proceeds”), plus 50% of any proceeds in excess of $1.5 billion, subject to certain limitations and a maximum potential payment to Morgan Stanley of $1.5 billion. All payments by the Company to Morgan Stanley will be net of taxes payable by the Company with respect to such proceeds. If, in connection with or following a change of control of the Company, the litigation is settled for an amount less than the minimum proceeds, the Company will be required to pay Morgan Stanley an amount equal to the minimum proceeds. As a result of our agreement to pay the value of non-cash proceeds, we may be required to pay amounts to Morgan Stanley in excess of cash received in connection with the litigation. The value of non-cash proceeds will be determined by an independent third party.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
You should carefully consider each of the risks described below, which supplement the risks disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007. You should also consider all of the other risks disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K in evaluating us. Our business, financial condition, cash flows and/or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks.
56
Table of Contents
Future guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board may impact the accounting treatment of the securitization of our credit card receivables, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition, reserve requirements, capital requirements, liquidity, cost of funds and operations.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) is currently engaged in projects to amend Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,as amended (“FAS 140”), and FASB Interpretation No. 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46R”). Currently under FAS 140, the transfers of our credit card receivables in securitization transactions qualify for sale accounting treatment. The trusts used in our securitizations are not consolidated with the Company for financial reporting purposes because the trusts are qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) under FAS 140. Because the transfers qualify as sales and the trusts are not subject to consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the trusts are not reported on our balance sheet under GAAP.
In April 2008, the FASB proposed the elimination of the QSPE concept from GAAP, but it has not formally issued proposed amendments to FAS 140 or FIN 46R. If the QSPE concept is eliminated, our securitization structure will have to be evaluated under FIN 46R for potential consolidation. The FASB will issue its proposed amendments for public comment and, based upon public comments received and other considerations, may revise the amendments before issuing final guidance. Amendments could become effective as early as for our fiscal year beginning December 1, 2008. Although we cannot at this time predict the content of the proposed or final amendments, we may lose sale accounting treatment for previous and future transfers of securitized receivables and we may be required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the trusts, which would materially affect our statement of financial condition. For example, the impact of the potential consolidation, if applied as of May 31, 2008, may require us to add approximately $26 billion of securitized receivables to our assets, add the related debt issued to third-party investors to our liabilities, and reclassify amounts due from securitization.
As a result of the addition of the securitized receivables to our balance sheet, we may be required to increase capital for Discover Bank to satisfy regulatory capital requirements. If Discover Bank were to fail to meet its regulatory capital requirements, it would become subject to restrictions that could materially adversely affect our ability to conduct normal operations, our liquidity and our cost of funds, such as limiting our ability to issue brokered deposits. See “An inability to accept or obtain brokered deposits in the future could materially adversely affect our liquidity position and funding costs” in the “Risk Factors” section in our annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, changes to the accounting treatment for securitizations may impact the market for securitizations, which could result in a weakening in investor demand for our securitized receivables. See “We may be unable to securitize our receivables at acceptable rates or at all, which could materially adversely affect our liquidity, cost of funds, reserves and capital requirements”in the “Risk Factors” section in our annual report on Form 10-K.
As noted above, we cannot at this time predict the proposed or final amendments to FAS 140 and FIN 46R, including whether our current securitization structure will satisfy any new requirements for sale accounting treatment; whether, when and in what form any transfers that currently qualify as sales will be recognized on our balance sheet; what effect the recognition of transfers would have on capital, capital requirements, the ability to maintain a sufficient level of receivables in the trust, or our results of operations; whether the amendments will cause Discover Bank to sponsor fewer securitizations; whether the amendments will trigger any financial covenants in our credit facility; or what effect the amendments will have on our credit ratings. See “We rely in part on unsecured and secured debt for our funding and the inability to access the U.S. or U.K. debt markets could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations” in the “Risk Factors” section in our annual report on Form 10-K.
For the reasons discussed above, if future guidance from FASB impacts the accounting treatment of our securitizations, it could materially adversely affect our financial condition, reserve requirements, capital requirements, liquidity, cost of funds and operations.
57
Table of Contents
The success of our acquisition of Diners Club International depends upon our ability to maintain the full operability of the Diners Club International network and integrate the network with the Discover Network. If we are unsuccessful in doing so, we may be unable to sustain and grow our international network business.
On July 1, 2008, we announced our purchase of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Diners Club International for $165 million in cash from Citibank, N.A. (“Citi”). We acquired the Diners Club International network, brand, trademarks, employees, and license agreements with 44 network participants that issue Diners Club cards and that maintain an acceptance network consisting of merchant and cash access locations in 185 countries worldwide. Diners Club licensees are not included in this acquisition. Under the terms of the purchase, Citibank has agreed to remain a significant long-term international issuer on the Diners Club network. Discover will not issue cards or extend consumer credit in international markets as a result of the transaction. Over the next two to three years, we expect to integrate the Diners Club International network with the Discover Network to allow Discover Network cardholders to use their cards at merchants that accept Diners Club cards around the world, and Diners Club cardholders to use their cards on the Discover Network in North America.
The success of our acquisition of Diners Club International in the immediate term depends upon our ability to maintain the full operability of the Diners Club International network for existing Diners Club International cardholders, network participants and merchants. We rely on existing Diners Club International infrastructure to support Diners Club International network operations and the assistance of Citi during a transition period for certain network and operational support services. If we were to lose the assistance of key Diners Club personnel or Citi during the transition, we may face difficulty maintaining operations at the same level. We rely upon numerous network partners in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean for merchant acceptance for existing Diners Club International cardholders. We also rely on the Diners Club International network’s current availability of cash access locations for its existing cardholders. If we are unable to continue to offer either acceptable North American merchant acceptance or sufficient cash access locations to existing Diners Club International cardholders, we may experience decreased transaction volume, which would reduce our revenues.
The long-term success of our acquisition of Diners Club International depends upon the successful integration of the technologies of the Discover Network and the Diners Club International network. We may face difficulties in achieving interoperability between the networks, including higher overall costs or longer timeframes than anticipated, as a result of the complexity of international operations, the potential loss of key Diners Club personnel in the transition, or other factors that we cannot predict at this time. If we are unable to integrate the networks well and at a reasonable cost, we may be unable to achieve the synergies we anticipate and grow our business internationally.
If we are unable to maintain relationships with the network participants that issue Diners Club International cards and that maintain a merchant acceptance network, we may be unable to sustain and grow our international network business.
The success of our acquisition of Diners Club International largely depends upon the cooperation and support of the network participants that issue Diners Club cards and that maintain a merchant acceptance network. Unlike the Discover Network, we have minimal direct merchant relationships in the Diners Club International network, instead relying on network participants located outside the United States to help us sustain and grow our international business. As a result of a number of factors, including any difficulties in the transition and integration process, network participants may choose not to renew the license agreements with us when their terms expire. In addition, the increasingly competitive marketplace for cross-border issuance and acceptance of credit cards may result in lower participation fees for networks like the Diners Club International network. In addition, many of the merchants in the acceptance network, primarily small and mid-size merchants, may not be contractually committed to the network participants for any period of time and may cease to participate in the Diners Club International network at any time on short notice. If we are unable to continue our relationships with network participants or if the network participants are unable to continue their relationships with merchants, our ability to maintain or increase revenues and to remain competitive would be adversely affected.
58
Table of Contents
The Federal Reserve Board’s proposed amendments to regulations, if adopted as proposed, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
The Federal Reserve Board has proposed amendments to Regulation AA (Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices) and Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) that place limitations on certain credit card practices and mandate increased disclosures to consumers including, but not limited to, the following:
• | Applying rate increases to existing balances. The proposed amendments would prohibit interest rate increases on outstanding balances except under limited circumstances. |
• | Payment allocation. The proposed amendments would require allocation of payments in excess of the required minimum payment to non-promotional balances before promotional balances. For accounts with different annual percentage rates (APRs) on different balances, payments cannot be applied to the lowest-rate balances first. |
• | Default pricing. The proposed amendments would restrict imposition of a higher or default APR on existing balances unless an account is 30 days past due. |
The comment periods for the proposed amendments expire in August 2008 for Regulation AA and July 2008 for Regulation Z. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated it hopes to publish final rules by the end of the year. We do not know the content of the final amendments nor the resulting impact from the amendments at this time. If the amendments are adopted as proposed, the amendments would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of the Company of its common stock during the three months ended May 31, 2008:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2) | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||
March 1-31, 2008 | 119,483 | $ | 16.37 | — | $ | 1 billion | ||||
April 1-30, 2008 | 1,010 | $ | 18.60 | — | $ | 1 billion | ||||
May 1-31, 2008 | 440 | $ | 17.52 | — | $ | 1 billion | ||||
Total | 120,933 | $ | 16.39 | — | $ | 1 billion | ||||
(1) | Reflects shares withheld (under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans) to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon the delivery of outstanding shares underlying restricted stock units or upon the exercise of stock options. |
(2) | On December 3, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of the Company’s outstanding stock under a new share repurchase program. This share repurchase program expires on November 30, 2010, and may be terminated at any time. At May 31, 2008, we had not repurchased any stock under this program. |
Item 3. | Default Upon Senior Securities |
None
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
The Company held its annual shareholders’ meeting on April 10, 2008. At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders of the Company (i) elected the persons listed below to serve as directors of the Company for a term that will continue until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal and (ii) ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for the Company and its subsidiaries for 2008.
59
Table of Contents
The Company’s independent inspector of election reported the vote of the shareholders as follows:
Proposal 1: Election of Directors.
Nominees | Votes FOR | Votes AGAINST | Votes ABSTAIN | |||
Jeffrey S. Aronin | 386,053,061 | 35,376,687 | 4,962,055 | |||
Mary K. Bush | 378,008,549 | 43,496,544 | 4,886,710 | |||
Gregory C. Case | 386,664,450 | 34,762,496 | 4,964,857 | |||
Dennis D. Dammerman | 386,757,986 | 34,711,762 | 4,922,055 | |||
Robert M. Devlin | 385,305,209 | 36,183,839 | 4,902,755 | |||
Philip A. Laskawy | 386,499,493 | 34,954,886 | 4,937,424 | |||
Michael H. Moskow | 386,225,218 | 38,493,745 | 1,672,840 | |||
David W. Nelms | 387,435,965 | 34,091,626 | 4,864,212 | |||
Michael L. Rankowitz | 385,356,705 | 36,083,122 | 4,951,976 | |||
E. Follin Smith | 386,408,235 | 34,964,643 | 5,018,925 | |||
Lawrence A. Weinbach | 382,602,329 | 38,772,008 | 5,017,466 |
Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Votes FOR | Votes AGAINST | Votes ABSTAIN | ||
420,170,002 | 1,655,804 | 4,565,997 |
Item 5. | Other Information |
None
Item 6. | Exhibits |
See “Exhibit Index” for documents filed herewith and incorporated herein by reference.
60
Table of Contents
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Discover Financial Services (Registrant) | ||
By: | /S/ ROY GUTHRIE | |
Roy Guthrie Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: July 10, 2008
61
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number | Description | |
2.1* | Amended and Restated Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of the Goldfish Credit Card Business, dated March 31, 2008, among Discover Financial Services, Goldfish Bank Limited, Discover Bank, SCFC Receivables Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC, and Barclays Group US Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference thereto). | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Discover Financial Services pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Discover Financial Services pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
* | We agree to furnish supplementally to the Commission a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to such agreement upon the request of the Commission in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. |
62