| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three Months Ended | | | | | Nine Months Ended | | | | |
| | | September 30, | | | | | | September 30, | | | | | |
($ in millions) | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | % Change | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | % Change | | |
Net sales | | | $ | 79.5 | | | $ | 104.2 | | | (24) | % | | $ | 217.5 | | | $ | 340.9 | | | (36) | % | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $ | (2.2) | | | $ | 7.4 | | | (130) | % | | $ | (14.7) | | | $ | 29.1 | | | (151) | % | |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | | | | (3) | % | | | 7 | % | | | | | | (7) | % | | | 9 | % | | | | |
Three Months Ended – September 30, 2020 vs. September 30, 2019
Of the 24% decrease in net sales, 24% was due to lower pricing from the pass through of lower raw material costs, mainly from styrene and butadiene. An additional decrease of 3% was due to decreased sales volumes from lingering weaker demand in the global tire market due to COVID-19. These impacts were partially offset by an increase of 3% due to foreign exchange rates.
The $9.6 million, or 130%, decrease in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower margins, including the impact of higher spot sales in ESBR, which resulted in a $5.2 million, or 70%, decrease, and an additional $2.5 million, or 34%, decrease due to higher fixed costs from a lower level of fixed cost absorption due to inventory reduction initiatives. Additionally, lower sales volume as described above, resulted in a $1.3 million, or 18%, decrease.
Nine Months Ended – September 30, 2020 vs. September 30, 2019
Of the 36% decrease in net sales, 22% was due to decreased sales volume from weaker demand in the global tire market due to COVID-19. An additional decrease of 14% was primarily due to lower pricing driven by the pass through of lower raw material costs, mainly from styrene and butadiene.
The $43.8 million, or 151%, decrease in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower sales volume as described above, which resulted in a $33.2 million, or 114%, decrease. An additional $11.9 million, or 41%, decrease was due to lower margins, mainly from net raw material timing impacts. These impacts were partially offset by an increase of $2.3 million, or 8%, due to lower fixed costs.
Performance Plastics Segment
Our Performance Plastics segment includes a variety of highly engineered compounds and blends, our ABS, SAN, and PC businesses, and engineered materials applications, which includes consumer electronics, medical, and TPE applications.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three Months Ended | | | | | Nine Months Ended | | | | |
| | | September 30, | | | | | | September 30, | | | | | |
($ in millions) | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | % Change | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | % Change | | |
Net sales | | | $ | 290.1 | | | $ | 324.8 | | | (11) | % | | $ | 784.3 | | | $ | 1,041.7 | | | (25) | % | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | | $ | 50.9 | | | $ | 36.3 | | | 40 | % | | $ | 82.0 | | | $ | 106.1 | | | (23) | % | |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | | | | 18 | % | | | 11 | % | | | | | | 10 | % | | | 10 | % | | | | |
Three Months Ended – September 30, 2020 vs. September 30, 2019
The 11% decrease in net sales was primarily due to lower pricing from the pass through of lower raw material costs, primarily styrene.
The $14.8 million, or 41%, increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due higher margins of $12.5 million, or 34%, as well as an increase of $3.5 million, or 10%, due to lower fixed costs from the Company’s overall cost reduction initiatives. These impacts were partially offset by lower sales volume resulting in a $2.0 million, or 6%, decrease.
Nine Months Ended – September 30, 2020 vs. September 30, 2019
Of the 25% decrease in net sales, 15% was due to lower sales volume, attributable to weak market conditions driven by COVID-19. An additional 9% decrease was due to lower pricing from the pass through of lower raw material costs, primarily styrene.