Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-36293
Continental Building Products, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 61-1718923 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
12950 Worldgate Drive, Suite 700, Herndon VA | 20170 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (703) 480-3800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | x | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of October 31, 2015 was 42,199,848, which amount excludes 1,922,864 shares of common stock held by the Registrant as treasury shares.
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
Continental Building Products, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 108,150 | $ | 113,804 | $ | 311,322 | $ | 303,692 | ||||||||
Costs, expenses and other income: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 78,151 | 85,821 | 231,342 | 241,042 | ||||||||||||
Selling and administrative | 9,008 | 7,774 | 26,799 | 23,358 | ||||||||||||
Long Term Incentive Plan funded by Lone Star | 9,933 | — | 29,946 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total costs and operating expenses | 97,092 | 93,595 | 288,087 | 264,400 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Operating income | 11,058 | 20,209 | 23,235 | 39,292 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (283 | ) | (131 | ) | (700 | ) | (5,461 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net | (4,154 | ) | (4,945 | ) | (12,559 | ) | (24,518 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Income (loss) before loss on equity method investment and income tax | 6,621 | 15,133 | 9,976 | 9,313 | ||||||||||||
Loss from equity method investment | (278 | ) | (20 | ) | (530 | ) | (257 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax | 6,343 | 15,113 | 9,446 | 9,056 | ||||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit | (2,104 | ) | (5,627 | ) | (3,313 | ) | (3,526 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 4,239 | $ | 9,486 | $ | 6,133 | $ | 5,530 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 43,000 | 44,069 | 43,557 | 42,561 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 43,058 | 44,081 | 43,597 | 42,569 |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Continental Building Products, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 4,239 | $ | 9,486 | $ | 6,133 | $ | 5,530 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (1,430 | ) | (971 | ) | (2,568 | ) | (1,079 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges, net of tax | 292 | 56 | 790 | 56 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (1,138 | ) | (915 | ) | (1,778 | ) | (1,023 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 3,101 | $ | 8,571 | $ | 4,355 | $ | 4,507 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Continental Building Products, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands except share data)
As of September 30, 2015 (unaudited) | As of December 31, 2014 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 17,258 | $ | 15,627 | ||||
Receivables, net | 37,579 | 40,152 | ||||||
Inventories | 31,661 | 29,564 | ||||||
Prepaid and other current assets | 7,117 | 8,330 | ||||||
Deferred taxes, current | 5,282 | 3,157 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current assets | 98,897 | 96,830 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 329,456 | 353,652 | ||||||
Customer relationships and other intangibles, net | 98,289 | 110,809 | ||||||
Goodwill | 119,945 | 119,945 | ||||||
Equity method investment | 9,596 | 10,919 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs | 7,409 | 8,826 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Assets | 663,592 | $ | 700,981 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Liabilities and equity | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 26,214 | $ | 24,561 | ||||
Accrued and other liabilities | 10,720 | 11,428 | ||||||
Notes payable, current portion | — | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current liabilities | 36,934 | 35,989 | ||||||
Deferred taxes and other long-term liabilities | 13,986 | 12,494 | ||||||
Notes payable, non-current portion | 314,499 | 349,125 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities | 365,419 | 397,608 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Equity | ||||||||
Undesignated preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share; 190,000,000 shares authorized; 44,122,712 and 44,069,000 shares issued at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively; 42,199,848 and 44,069,000 shares outstanding at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively | 44 | 44 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 318,873 | 288,393 | ||||||
Less: Treasury stock | (40,035 | ) | — | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (4,838 | ) | (3,060 | ) | ||||
Accumulated earnings | 24,129 | 17,996 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total equity | 298,173 | 303,373 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 663,592 | $ | 700,981 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Continental Building Products, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 6,133 | $ | 5,530 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 38,931 | 41,324 | ||||||
Bad debt recovery | (250 | ) | — | |||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount | 1,742 | 8,560 | ||||||
Loss from equity method investment | 530 | 257 | ||||||
Share based compensation | 730 | 344 | ||||||
Deferred taxes | (491 | ) | 6,619 | |||||
Change in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Receivables | 2,654 | (7,202 | ) | |||||
Inventories | (2,401 | ) | (6,731 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 1,178 | (3,616 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable | 1,955 | 1,394 | ||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities | 275 | (1,154 | ) | |||||
Other long term liabilities | (142 | ) | 383 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 50,844 | 45,708 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (2,851 | ) | (2,910 | ) | ||||
Software purchased or developed | (880 | ) | (3,180 | ) | ||||
Capital contributions to equity method investment | (4 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from equity method investment | 797 | 1,754 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (2,938 | ) | (4,336 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | — | 151,354 | ||||||
Principal payments for First Lien Credit Agreement | (35,000 | ) | (36,975 | ) | ||||
Repayment of Second Lien Credit Agreement | — | (155,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from revolving credit facility, net | — | — | ||||||
Capital Contribution from Lone Star Funds | 29,750 | — | ||||||
Payments to repurchase common stock | (40,035 | ) | — | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (45,285 | ) | (40,621 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (990 | ) | (417 | ) | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 1,631 | 334 | ||||||
Cash, beginning of period | 15,627 | 11,822 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash, end of period | $ | 17,258 | $ | 12,156 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
CONTINENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
1. Background and Nature of Operations
Description of Business
Continental Building Products, Inc. (“CBP”, or the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation. Prior to the acquisition of the gypsum division of Lafarge North America Inc. (“Lafarge N.A.”) on August 30, 2013, further described below, CBP had no operating activity. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of CBP for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 contain activity of the acquired business.
The Company manufactures gypsum wallboard and related products for commercial and residential buildings and houses. The Company operates a network of three highly efficient wallboard facilities, all located in the eastern United States and produces joint compound at one plant in the United States and at another plant in Canada.
The Acquisition
On June 24, 2013, Lone Star Funds (“Lone Star”) entered into a definitive agreement with Lafarge N.A. to purchase the assets of its North American gypsum division for a total purchase price of approximately $703 million (the “Acquisition”) in cash. The closing of the Acquisition occurred on August 30, 2013.
Initial Public Offering
On February 10, 2014, the Company completed the initial public offering of 11,765,000 shares of its common stock par value $0.001 per share, at an offering price of $14.00 per share (the “Initial Public Offering”). Net proceeds from the Initial Public Offering after underwriting discounts and commissions, but before other closing costs, were approximately $154 million. The net proceeds were used to pay a $2 million one-time payment to Lone Star in consideration for the termination of the Company’s asset advisory agreement with affiliates of Lone Star (See Note 10, Related Party Transactions). The remaining $152 million of net proceeds and cash on hand of $6.1 million were used to repay the $155 million Second Lien Term Loan in full along with a prepayment premium of $3.1 million (See Note 13, Debt). In expectation of the Initial Public Offering, on February 3, 2014, the Company effected a 32,304 for one stock split of its common stock. The Company’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CBPX”.
Secondary Public Offerings
On March 18, 2015, LSF8 Gypsum Holdings, L.P. (“LSF8”), an affiliate of Lone Star, sold 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $19.40. As a result of the sale, the aggregate beneficial ownership of Lone Star fell below 50% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock and the Company no longer qualified as a “Controlled Company” under the corporate governance standards of New York Stock Exchange. On May 15, 2015 and June 3, 2015, LSF8 sold an additional 4,600,000 and 361,747 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, at a price per share of $21.90. On September 16, 2015, LSF8 sold an additional 4,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $19.85. The decrease in ownership by Lone Star and its affiliates to below 50% and LSF8’s subsequent sales of common stock triggered an aggregate of $29.9 million in payments to certain officers and the estate of the Company’s former CEO under the LSF8 Gypsum Holdings, L.P. Long Term Incentive Plan, which is funded by LSF8 (See Note 10, Related Party Transaction).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements for CBP have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Basis of Presentation for Interim Periods
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included for the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted for the interim periods presented. Management believes that the unaudited interim financial statements include all adjustments (which are normal and recurring in nature) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
7
Table of Contents
The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015. Seasonal changes and other conditions can affect the sales volumes of the Company’s products. Therefore, the financial results for any interim period do not necessarily indicate the expected results for the year.
The financial statements should be read in conjunction with CBP’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2014 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year then ended (the “2014 10-K”). The Company has continued to follow the accounting policies set forth in those financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which provides accounting guidance for all revenue arising from contracts with customers and affects all entities that enter into contracts to provide goods or services to their customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The ASU requires retroactive application on either a full or modified basis. Early application is permitted as of the original effective date on December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2014-09 to determine its impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15,Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern : Presentation of Financial Statements— Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). This ASU defines when and how companies are required to disclose going concern uncertainties, which must be evaluated each interim and annual period. Specifically, it requires management to determine whether substantial doubt exists regarding the entity’s going concern presumption. Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). If substantial doubt exists, certain disclosures are required; the extent of those disclosures depends on an evaluation of management’s plans (if any) to mitigate the going concern uncertainty. The provisions of ASU 2014-15 will be effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and to annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The ASU should be applied on a prospective basis. The Company believes the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. Under the ASU, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. ASU 2015-03 will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, the guidance must be applied retroactively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The adoption of this guidance will result in a reclassification of debt issuance costs on the Company’s balance sheet, but will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.
3. Receivables
Receivables consist of the following:
(in thousands) | As of September 30, 2015 | As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Trade receivables | $ | 39,387 | $ | 42,460 | ||||
Total allowances | (1,808 | ) | (2,308 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total receivables, net | $ | 37,579 | $ | 40,152 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables are recorded net of credit memos issued during the normal course of business.
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
(in thousands) | As of September 30, 2015 | As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Finished products | $ | 8,856 | $ | 4,875 | ||||
Raw materials | 14,812 | 17,010 | ||||||
Supplies and other | 7,993 | 7,679 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total inventories | $ | 31,661 | $ | 29,564 | ||||
|
|
|
|
8
Table of Contents
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
(in thousands) | As of September 30, 2015 | As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Land | $ | 12,926 | $ | 12,930 | ||||
Buildings | 111,963 | 111,506 | ||||||
Plant machinery | 270,770 | 269,633 | ||||||
Mobile equipment | 3,518 | 3,448 | ||||||
Construction in progress | 3,752 | 3,165 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost | 402,929 | 400,682 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (73,473 | ) | (47,030 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 329,456 | $ | 353,652 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $8.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, $26.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $8.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and $26.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
6. Software and Other Intangibles
Customer relationships and other intangibles consist of the following:
(in thousands) | As of September 30, 2015 | As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 116,282 | $ | 117,243 | ||||
Purchased and internally developed software | 5,062 | 4,332 | ||||||
Trademarks | 14,785 | 14,905 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Customer relationships and other intangibles, at cost | 136,129 | 136,480 | ||||||
Accumulated amortization | (37,840 | ) | (25,671 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Customer relationships and other intangibles, net | $ | 98,289 | $ | 110,809 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, $12.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $4.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and $14.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Customer relationships are amortized over a 15-year period using an accelerated method that reflects the expected future cash flows from the acquired customer-related intangible asset. Trademarks are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of 15 years. Customer relationships and trademarks amortization expense is recorded in cost of goods sold expense.
Amortization expense related to capitalized software was $0.4 million and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $0.01 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Software development costs are amortized over a three-year life with the expense recorded in selling and administrative expense.
7. Accrued and Other Liabilities
Accrued and other liabilities consist of the following:
(in thousands) | As of September 30, 2015 | As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Employee-related costs | $ | 5,908 | $ | 7,945 | ||||
Income taxes | 1,310 | — | ||||||
Other taxes | 765 | 1,220 | ||||||
Other | 2,737 | 2,263 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total accrued and other liabilities | $ | 10,720 | $ | 11,428 | ||||
|
|
|
|
9
Table of Contents
8. Income Taxes
The Company’s annual estimated effective tax rate, before reporting the impact of foreign losses, is approximately 35%. The Company recognized discrete tax items of approximately $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. At both September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there was a valuation allowance of $0.4 million related to the Company’s Canadian operations.
The Company is subject to audit examinations at federal, state and local levels by tax authorities in those jurisdictions. In addition, the Canadian operations are subject to audit examinations at federal and provincial levels by tax authorities in those jurisdictions. The tax matters challenged by the tax authorities are typically complex; therefore, the ultimate outcome of these challenges is subject to uncertainty. The Company has not identified any issues that did not meet the recognition threshold or would be impacted by the measurement provisions of the uncertain tax position guidance.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases certain buildings and equipment. The Company’s facility and equipment leases may provide for escalations of rent or rent abatements and payment of pro rata portions of building operating expenses. Minimum lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the nine months ended September 30, 2015, three months ended September 30, 2014, and nine months ended September 30, 2014, total expenses under operating leases were $1.2 million, $3.3 million, $1.1 million, and $3.6 million, respectively. The Company also has noncapital purchase commitments that primarily relate to gas, gypsum, paper and other raw materials.
The table below shows the future minimum lease payments due under non-cancelable operating leases and purchase commitments at September 30, 2015:
(in thousands) | Total | Remaining 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases (1) | $ | 4,979 | $ | 366 | $ | 1,320 | $ | 1,183 | $ | 616 | $ | 1,494 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase commitments | 149,960 | 9,393 | 30,752 | 29,250 | 19,214 | 16,326 | 14,060 | 30,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total commitments | $ | 154,939 | $ | 9,759 | $ | 32,072 | $ | 30,433 | $ | 19,830 | $ | 17,820 | $ | 14,060 | $ | 30,965 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Future minimum lease payments over the non-cancelable lease terms of the operating leases. |
Under certain circumstances, the Company provides letters of credit related to its natural gas and other supply purchases. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $3.6 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company executes contracts involving indemnifications standard in the industry. These indemnifications might include claims relating to any of the following: environmental and tax matters; intellectual property rights; governmental regulations and employment-related matters; customer, supplier, and other commercial contractual relationships; and financial matters. While the maximum amount to which the Company may be exposed under such agreements cannot be estimated, it is the opinion of management that these indemnifications are not expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in certain legal actions and claims, including proceedings under laws and regulations relating to environmental and other matters. Because such matters are subject to many uncertainties and the outcomes are not predictable with assurance, the total liability for these legal actions and claims cannot be determined with certainty. When the Company determines that it is probable that a liability for environmental matters, legal actions or other contingencies has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable, an estimate of the costs to be incurred is recorded as a liability in the financial statements. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, such liabilities were not material to the Company’s financial statements. While management believes its accruals for such liabilities are adequate, the Company may incur costs in excess of the amounts provided. Although the ultimate amount of liability that may result from these matters or actions is not ascertainable, the Company believes that any amounts exceeding the recorded accruals will not materially affect its financial condition.
In March 2015, a group of homebuilders commenced a lawsuit against the Company and other US wallboard manufacturers, which was amended in October 2015, alleging that such manufacturers had conspired to fix the price of wallboard in violation of antitrust and unfair competition laws. The complaint also alleges that the manufacturers agreed to abolish the use of “job quotes” and agreed to restrict the supply of wallboard in order to support the allegedly collusive price increases. The Company denies any wrongdoing of the type alleged in the complaint and believes that it has meritorious defenses to the allegations and will vigorously defend itself in this case. The case has been transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings with existing antitrust litigation in that district. The Company does not believe the lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operation or liquidity.
10
Table of Contents
In July 2015, the Company received a grand jury subpoena directing it to provide certain documents in connection with an investigation being conducted by the Department of Justice regarding antitrust matters in the gypsum drywall industry. The Company is cooperating fully with the Department of Justice in responding to the subpoena. The Company does not believe the investigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
10. Related Party Transactions
Since the Acquisition, the Company is no longer part of Lafarge N.A. but had a Transition Services Agreement to help with certain ongoing back-office functions. These functions included, among others, accounting, treasury, tax, and information technology services. The Company paid Lafarge N.A. a fee for these services of $129,700 per month through September 2014. Thereafter, the Company reduced the services provided by Lafarge N.A. and the fees paid until the Agreement was terminated in December 2014.
On August 30, 2013, the Company entered into an asset advisory agreement with an affiliate of Lone Star to provide certain management oversight services to the Company, including assistance and advice on strategic plans, obtaining and maintaining certain legal documents, and communicating and coordinating with service providers. The Company paid 110% of actual costs for the services provided. No services were provided in 2014. The agreement was terminated upon the closing of the Initial Public Offering in the first quarter of 2014 and in connection therewith, the Company paid a termination fee of $2.0 million that is included in non-operating expense.
In connection with the March, May and September 2015 secondary public offerings, certain executives of the Company earned incentive payments in the aggregate amount of approximately $29.9 million. These payments were earned under the LSF8 Gypsum Holdings, L.P. Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”). Under the LTIP, certain of the Company’s officers and the estate of the Company’s former CEO are eligible to receive payments from LSF8 in the event of a monetization event, as further described in the 2014 10-K. LSF8 is responsible for funding any payments under the LTIP, including those paid in connection with the March, May and September 2015 secondary public offerings (See Note 1, Background and Nature of Operations). As these payments arose out of employment with the Company, the Company recognizes the payments made to the officers as an expense. The funding of the LTIP payments by LSF8 is recorded as additional paid-in capital. The $29.9 million in LTIP payments related to the March, May and September 2015 secondary public offerings were recorded as an expense to the Company, that will also be tax deductible, and capital contributions by LSF8 in the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2015.
11. Investment in Seven Hills
The Company is a party with an unaffiliated third-party to a paperboard liner venture named Seven Hills Paperboard, LLC (“Seven Hills”) that provides the Company with a continuous supply of high-quality recycled paperboard liner to meet its ongoing production requirements.
The Company has evaluated the characteristics of its investment and determined that Seven Hills would be deemed a variable interest entity, but that it did not have the power to direct the principal activities most impacting the economic performance of Seven Hills, and is thus not the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company accounts for this investment in Seven Hills under the equity method of accounting.
Paperboard purchased from Seven Hills was $11.8 million and $12.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. Paperboard purchased from Seven Hills was $34.2 million and $37.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, the Company has certain paper purchase commitments to Seven Hills totaling $33.0 million through 2018.
12. Fair Value Measurements
U.S. GAAP provides a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value and requires certain disclosures relating to fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in a market with sufficient activity.
The three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value is as follows:
• | Level 1—Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that a Company has the ability to access; |
• | Level 2—Inputs, other than the quoted market prices included in Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and |
• | Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability which is typically based on an entity’s own assumptions when there is little, if any, related market data available. |
The Company evaluates assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring and non-recurring basis to determine the appropriate level to classify them for each reporting period. This determination requires significant judgments to be made by the Company. The fair values of receivables, accounts payable, accrued costs and other current liabilities approximate the carrying values as a result of the short-term nature of these instruments.
11
Table of Contents
The Company estimates the fair value of its debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument using estimated market rates of debt instruments with similar maturities and credit profiles. These inputs are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value reported in the consolidated balance sheet for the Company’s notes payable approximated its fair value.
The only assets or liabilities the Company had at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are the interest rate cap that the Company entered into on March 31, 2014 that had zero fair value as of September 30, 2015 (see Note 13, Debt) and a fair value of $0.03 million as of December 31, 2014, and natural gas hedges that had a negative fair value of $0.1 million at September 30, 2015, net of tax amount of $0.04 million, and $0.9 million at December 31, 2014, net of tax amount of $0.5 million. Both the interest rate cap and the natural gas hedges are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as they are valued using third party pricing models which contain inputs that are derived from observable market data. Generally, the Company obtains its Level 2 pricing inputs from the counterparties. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include intangible assets and goodwill. These items are recognized at fair value when they are considered to be impaired.
There were no fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis. The Company discloses fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
13. Debt
Debt consists of the following:
(in thousands) | As of September 30, 2015 | As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||
First Lien Credit Agreement maturing on August 28, 2020; interest rate of LIBOR (with a 1% floor) plus 3.00% at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 | $ | 316,988 | $ | 351,988 | ||||
Less: Original issue discount (net of amortization) | (2,489 | ) | (2,863 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total debt | 314,499 | 349,125 | ||||||
Less: Current portion of long-term debt | — | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Long-term debt | $ | 314,499 | $ | 349,125 | ||||
|
|
|
|
On August 30, 2013, the Company and its subsidiary Continental Building Products Operating Company, LLC (“OpCo”) entered into a first lien credit agreement with Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and RBC Capital Markets, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, and Royal Bank of Canada, as syndication agent (as amended on December 2, 2013, the “First Lien Credit Agreement”). The First Lien Credit Agreement provided OpCo a term loan facility at an initial amount of $415.0 million and a U.S. dollar revolving loan facility of $40.0 million and a Canadian dollar and/or U.S. dollar revolving facility of $10.0 million (such aggregate $50.0 million revolving facilities together, the “Revolver”), which may be borrowed by OpCo or by its subsidiary, Continental Building Products Canada Inc. in Canadian dollars or U.S. dollars.
On August 30, 2013, the Company and OpCo entered into a second lien credit agreement with Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and RBC Capital Markets, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, and Royal Bank of Canada, as syndication agent (as amended on December 2, 2013, the “Second Lien Credit Agreement”). The Second Lien Credit Agreement provided OpCo a term loan facility of $155.0 million (the “Second Lien Term Loan”).
On February 10, 2014, the Company completed the Initial Public Offering and used $152 million of net proceeds from the Initial Public Offering and cash on hand of $6.1 million to repay the $155 million Second Lien Term Loan in full along with a prepayment premium of $3.1 million. The $3.1 million prepayment premium was recorded in other (expense) income. The prepayment of the Second Lien Term Loan also resulted in the write-off of $6.9 million in original issue discount and deferred financing fees that were recorded in interest expense.
Interest under the First Lien Credit Agreement is floating. The interest rate spread over LIBOR, which has a 1% floor, was reduced by 50 basis points on May 14, 2014, from 3.75% to 3.25%, as a result of the Company achieving a total leverage ratio of less than four times net debt to the trailing twelve months adjusted earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization, as of March 31, 2014, as calculated pursuant to the First Lien Credit Agreement. This reduced interest rate for the First Lien Credit Agreement will be in effect for as long as the leverage ratio, as calculated pursuant to the First Lien Credit Agreement, remains below four. The margin applicable to the borrowing was further reduced on August 26, 2014 by 25 basis points to 3.00% after the Company achieved a B2 rating with a stable outlook by Moody’s and will remain in effect as long as this rating and outlook are maintained or better.
12
Table of Contents
The First Lien Credit Agreement is secured by the underlying property and equipment of the Company. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company pre-paid $15.0 million and $35.0 million of principal payments, respectively, and no further quarterly mandatory principal payments are required until the final payment of $317 million due on August 28, 2020. The annual effective interest rate on the First Lien Credit Agreement including original issue discount and amortization of debt issuance costs was 4.6 % at September 30, 2015.
There were no amounts outstanding under the Revolver as of September 30, 2015. The interest rate on amounts outstanding under the Revolver is floating, based on LIBOR (with a floor of 1%), plus 225 basis points. In addition, CBP pays a facility fee of 50 basis points per annum on the total Revolver. Availability under the Revolver, based on draws and outstanding letters of credit and non-existence of violations of covenants, was $46.4 million at September 30, 2015.
Total cash interest paid for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $3.4 million and $10.4 million, respectively. Total cash interest paid for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $4.2 million and $15.6 million, respectively.
The table below shows the future minimum principal payments due under the First Lien Credit Agreement.
(in thousands) | Amount Due | |||
2015 | — | |||
2016 | — | |||
2017 | — | |||
2018 | — | |||
2019 | — | |||
Thereafter | $ | 316,988 |
Under the terms of the First Lien Credit Agreement, the Company is required to comply with certain covenants, including among others, a limitation of indebtedness, limitation on liens, and limitations on certain cash distributions. One single financial covenant governs all of the Company’s debt and applies only if the outstanding borrowings of the Revolver plus outstanding letters of credit are greater than $12.5 million as of the end of the quarter. The financial covenant is a total leverage ratio calculation, in which total debt less outstanding cash is divided by adjusted earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization. If the financial covenant were applicable, it would require a leverage ratio below 6.0 as of September 30, 2015. As the sum of outstanding borrowings under the Revolver and outstanding letters of credit were less than $12.5 million at September 30, 2015, the financial covenant was not applicable for the quarter.
14. Derivative Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments to manage selected commodity price and interest rate exposures. The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative trading purposes, and typically does not hedge beyond two years. Cash flows from derivative instruments are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Commodity Derivative Instruments
As of September 30, 2015, the Company had 100 thousand millions of British Thermal Units (“mmBTUs”) in aggregate notional amount outstanding natural gas swap contracts to manage natural gas price exposures. All of these contracts mature by October 31, 2015. The Company elected to designate these derivative instruments as cash flow hedges in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-20,Derivatives - Hedging . For derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income, and is reclassified to earnings when the underlying forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in cost of goods sold. The net unrealized loss that remained in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2015 was $0.1 million, net of tax of $0.04 million. No ineffectiveness was recorded on these contracts during the fiscal year 2014 and the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Gains and losses on these contracts that are designated as cash flow hedges are reclassified into earnings when the underlying forecasted transactions affect earnings. The Company reassesses the probability of the underlying forecasted transactions occurring on a quarterly basis.
Approximately $0.3 million and $0.8 million of gains, net of tax, were recognized in other comprehensive income for the commodity contracts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. For the same periods, the amount of gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income was nominal. As of September 30, 2015, $0.1 million was recorded in other current liabilities.
In October 2015, the Company entered into two new gas swap contracts in the aggregate notional amount of 1,280 thousand mmBTUs covering approximately 25% of its gas needs. One of these contracts matures by March 31, 2016 and one matures by October 31, 2016. Both contracts are effective as of November 1, 2015. The Company elected to designate these derivative instruments as cash flow hedges in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-20,Derivatives - Hedging.
13
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Derivative Instrument
At September 30, 2015, the Company had an interest rate cap on three month U.S. Dollar LIBOR of 2% for a notional amount of $203.4 million, representing 64.2% of the principal amount outstanding under the First Lien Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2015. The notional amount of the interest rate cap declines by $0.5 million each quarter through December 31, 2015. The objective of the hedge is to protect the cash flows from adverse extreme market interest rate changes for a portion of the First Lien Credit Agreement through September 30, 2016. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap are expected to be perfectly effective in offsetting the changes in cash flow of interest payments attributable to fluctuations for three month U.S. Dollar LIBOR interest rates above 2%. The hedge is being accounted for as a cash flow hedge.
Changes in the time value of the interest rate cap are reflected directly in earnings through “other income / expense” in non-operating income. CBP recorded $0.03 million loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. No loss was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and the fair value of the time value of the interest rate cap was $0 as of September 30, 2015.
Counterparty Risk
The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the Company’s derivative instruments. As of September 30, 2015, the Company’s derivatives were in a $0.1 million net liability position. All of the Company’s counterparties have investment grade credit ratings; accordingly, the Company anticipates that the counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their obligations under the contracts. The Company’s agreements outline the conditions upon which it or the counterparties are required to post collateral. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had no collateral posted with its counterparties related to the derivatives.
15. Segment Reporting
Segment information is presented in accordance with ASC 280,Segment Reporting, which establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and geographic areas. The Company’s primary reportable segment is wallboard which represented approximately 97% of the Company’s revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and approximately 97% and 96% of the Company’s revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. This segment produces wallboard for the commercial and residential construction sectors. The Company also operates other business activities, primarily finishing products, which complement the Company’s full range of wallboard products.
Revenues from the major products sold to external customers include gypsum wallboard and finishing products.
The Company’s two geographic areas consist of the United States and Canada for which it reports net sales, fixed assets and total assets.
The Company evaluates operating performance based on profit or loss from operations before certain adjustments as shown below. Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the customer. The Company did not provide asset information by segment as the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker does not use such information for purposes of allocating resources and assessing segment performance.
14
Table of Contents
Reportable segment information consists of the following:
(in thousands) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Net Sales: | ||||||||||||||||
Wallboard | 104,624 | 110,072 | 300,936 | 292,212 | ||||||||||||
Other | 3,526 | 3,732 | 10,386 | 11,480 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total net sales | 108,150 | 113,804 | 311,322 | 303,692 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Operating income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Wallboard | 11,122 | 20,479 | 23,318 | 39,819 | ||||||||||||
Other | (64 | ) | (270 | ) | (83 | ) | (527 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total operating income (loss) | 11,058 | 20,209 | 23,235 | 39,292 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense | (4,154 | ) | (4,945 | ) | (12,559 | ) | (24,518 | ) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) from Equity Investment | (278 | ) | (20 | ) | (530 | ) | (257 | ) | ||||||||
Other non-operating expenses | (283 | ) | (131 | ) | (700 | ) | (5,461 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax benefit | 6,343 | 15,113 | 9,446 | 9,056 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Wallboard | 12,376 | 13,211 | 38,058 | 40,423 | ||||||||||||
Other | 285 | 300 | 873 | 901 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization | 12,661 | 13,511 | 38,931 | 41,324 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Table of Contents
16. Share Repurchase
On May 15, 2015, the Company repurchased 913,200 shares of its common stock from LSF8 in a private transaction at a price per share of $21.90, or an aggregate of approximately $20.0 million, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement dated May 11, 2015. On September 16, 2015, the Company repurchased an additional 1,007,500 shares of its common stock from LSF8 in a private transaction at a price per share of $19.85, or an aggregate of approximately $20.0 million, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement dated September 10, 2015. The repurchased shares are held in treasury and the effect thereof reduces the number of shares of common stock outstanding is reflected in the Company’s earnings per share calculation.
17. Share-Based Compensation
In conjunction with the Initial Public Offering, the Company granted certain employees and independent members of the Board of Directors an aggregate of 142,000 stock options and 75,000 shares of restricted stock (“RSAs”) that vest over four years. The fair value of stock options was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (a) a risk free interest rate assumption of 2.15%, based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant; (b) a dividend yield of 0% as the Company currently has no plans to pay a dividend; (c) a volatility assumption of 50.34%, based on historical volatilities of comparable publicly traded companies, and (d) an expected life of 6.25 years based on the assumption that the options will be exercised evenly from time of vesting to the expiration date.
On March 2, 2015, the Company granted certain employees and independent members of the Board of Directors 62,070 Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) and 40,050 RSUs that are subject to certain performance conditions (“PRSUs”). Of the 62,070 RSUs granted in March, 7,581 fully vest after one year, and 54,489 vest ratably over four years. On May 5, 2015, the Company granted certain employees an additional 9,205 RSUs and 6,280 PRSUs which vest ratably over four years. The PRSUs vest on December 31, 2017, with the exact number of PRSUs vested subject to the achievement of certain performance conditions through December 31, 2016. The number of PRSUs earned will vary from 0% to 200% of the number of PRSUs awarded, depending on the Company’s performance relative to a cumulative two year EBITDA target for fiscal years 2015 and 2016. The fair value of each RSU and PRSU is equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of the grant.
The following table summarizes RSAs, RSUs and PRSUs activity for the nine months ending September 30, 2015:
Number of RSAs | Number of RSUs | Number of PRSUs | Weighted Average Grant Date Value | |||||||||||||
Non-Vested, December 31, 2014 | 55,000 | — | — | $ | 14.00 | |||||||||||
Granted | — | 71,275 | 46,330 | $ | 21.19 | |||||||||||
Cancelled/Forfeited | (3,619 | ) | (1,103 | ) | — | $ | 14.00 | |||||||||
Vested | (13,750 | ) | — | — | $ | 14.00 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-Vested, September 30, 2015 | 37,631 | 70,172 | 46,330 | $ | 19.49 |
As of September 30, 2015, there was $2.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock. This expense is subject to future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and is being recognized on a straight-line basis.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the nine months ending September 30, 2015:
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in Years) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, January 1, 2015 | 142,000 | $ | 14.00 | |||||||||||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (2,300 | ) | $ | 14.00 | ||||||||||||
Exercised | (2,331 | ) | 14.00 | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2015 | 137,369 | $ | 14.00 | $ | 898,393 | 8.36 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Exercisable, September 30, 2015 | 79,131 | $ | 14.00 | $ | 517,517 | 8.36 | ||||||||||
Vested and Expected to Vest, September 30, 2015 | 137,369 | $ | 14.00 | $ | 898,393 | 8.36 |
16
Table of Contents
Unearned compensation related to stock options as of September 30, 2015 of $0.3 million will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of approximately three years. Compensation expense of $0.2 million and $0.6 million was recorded for share-based awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Compensation expense of $0.1 million and $0.3 million was recorded for share-based awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On February 18, 2015, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders, the Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) enabling employees to purchase the Company’s shares at a discount. On May 20, 2015, the Company’s stockholders approved the ESPP at the Company’s 2015 annual meeting. The ESPP authorizes the issuance of up to 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, but actual shares issued will depend on plan participation. Shares issued under the ESPP will reduce, on a share-for-share basis, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock already available for issuance pursuant to the Company’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. Employees contribute to the ESPP through payroll deductions over a twelve month offering period and are limited to the lower of 10% of the employee’s salary or $10,000 per employee. The purchase price of the shares is equal to the lower of 85 percent of the closing price of our common stock on either the first or last trading day of a given offering period. The first offering period commenced on May 1, 2015.
18. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding assuming the 32,304 for one stock split occurred as of January 1, 2014 and taking into account the issuance of 11,765,000 new shares on February 10, 2014 in connection with the Initial Public Offering. Diluted earnings and loss per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options.
Earnings Per Share
(in thousands, except per share data) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share: | $ | 4,239 | $ | 9,486 | $ | 6,133 | $ | 5,530 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic | 43,000 | 44,069 | 43,557 | 42,561 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive impact of RSAs | 13 | 12 | 11 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive impact of PRSUs | 5 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Dilutive impact of RSUs | 10 | — | 1 | — | ||||||||||||
Dilutive impact of Stock Options | 30 | — | 28 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted | 43,058 | 44,081 | 43,597 | 42,569 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 |
17
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis is intended to help the reader understand our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. You should read this discussion in conjunction with “Risk Factors,” “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Selected Historical Financial and Operating Data,” and our financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2015 (the “2014 10-K”) and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as applicable.
Overview
We are a leading manufacturer of gypsum wallboard and complementary finishing products in the eastern United States and eastern Canada. We operate highly efficient and automated manufacturing facilities that produce a full range of gypsum wallboard products for our diversified customer base. We sell our products in the new residential, repair and remodel (“R&R”) and commercial construction markets. We believe our operating efficiencies, favorable plant locations, manufacturing expertise and focus on delivering superior customer service position us to benefit from an anticipated increase in gypsum wallboard demand as the housing market recovers from historic lows.
Our primary reportable segment is wallboard, which accounted for approximately 97% of our net sales in each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 97% and 96% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. We also operate other business activities, primarily finishing products, which complement our full range of wallboard products. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Information – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 15, Segment Reporting.
Due to our limited history as a stand-alone company and changes in connection with our Initial Public Offering, the historical financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not necessarily indicative of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the future.
Paper and synthetic gypsum are our principal wallboard raw materials. Paper constitutes our most significant input cost and the most significant driver of our variable manufacturing costs. Energy costs, consisting of natural gas and electricity, are the other key input costs. In total, manufacturing cash costs represented 61% of our costs of goods sold for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014. Depreciation and amortization represented 16% and 17% of our costs of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. Distribution costs to deliver product to our customers represented the remaining portion of our costs of goods sold, or approximately 23% and 22% of our costs of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively.
Variable manufacturing costs, including inputs such as paper, gypsum, natural gas, and other raw materials, represented 67% and 70% of our manufacturing cash costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. Fixed production costs excluding depreciation and amortization consisted of labor, maintenance, and other costs that represented 33% and 30% of manufacturing cash costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively.
We currently purchase substantially all of our paperboard liner from Seven Hills, a joint venture between the Company and West-Rock Company, formerly known as RockTenn Company (“WestRock”). Under the agreement with Seven Hills, the price of paper adjusts based on changes in the underlying costs of production of the paperboard liner, of which the two most significant are recovered waste paper and natural gas. The largest waste paper source used by the operation is old cardboard containers (known as OCC). Seven Hills has the capacity to supply us with approximately 75% of our paper needs at our full capacity utilization and substantially all of our needs at current capacity utilization on market-based pricing terms that we consider favorable. We believe we can also purchase additional paper on the spot market at competitive prices. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Information – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11, Investment in Seven Hills.
18
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The table below highlights our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands, except per share data and mill net sales price):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 108,150 | $ | 113,804 | $ | 311,322 | $ | 303,692 | ||||||||
Costs, expenses and other income: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 78,151 | 85,821 | 231,342 | 241,042 | ||||||||||||
Selling and administrative | 9,008 | 7,774 | 26,799 | 23,358 | ||||||||||||
Long Term Incentive Plan funded by Lone Star | 9,933 | — | 29,946 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total costs and operating expenses | 97,092 | 93,595 | 288,087 | 264,400 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 11,058 | 20,209 | 23,235 | 39,292 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (283 | ) | (131 | ) | (700 | ) | (5,461 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net | (4,154 | ) | (4,945 | ) | (12,559 | ) | (24,518 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Income (loss) before loss on equity method investment and income tax | 6,621 | 15,133 | 9,976 | 9,313 | ||||||||||||
Loss from equity method investment | (278 | ) | (20 | ) | (530 | ) | (257 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax | 6,343 | 15,113 | 9,446 | 9,056 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) | (2,104 | ) | (5,627 | ) | (3,313 | ) | (3,526 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 4,239 | $ | 9,486 | $ | 6,133 | $ | 5,530 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 43,000 | 44,069 | 43,557 | 42,561 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 43,058 | 44,081 | 43,597 | 42,569 | ||||||||||||
Other Financial and Operating Data: | ||||||||||||||||
EBITDA (1) | $ | 23,719 | $ | 33,720 | $ | 62,166 | $ | 80,616 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) | $ | 33,652 | $ | 33,720 | $ | 92,112 | $ | 80,616 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures and software purchased or developed | $ | 1,444 | $ | 3,219 | $ | 3,731 | $ | 6,090 | ||||||||
Wallboard sales volume (MSF) | 567 | 590 | 1,603 | 1,552 | ||||||||||||
Mill net sales price (2) | $ | 153.05 | $ | 154.10 | $ | 155.68 | $ | 155.57 |
(1) | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” below for how we calculate and define EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as non-GAAP measures, reconciliations thereof to operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, and a description as to why we believe these measures are important. |
(2) | Mill net sales price represents average selling price per thousand square feet net of freight and delivery costs. |
19
Table of Contents
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Net Sales. Net sales decreased by $5.7 million, down 5.0% from $113.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, to $108.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower volume, which had approximately $4.3 million unfavorable impact on net sales. Total volume decreased 3.9% compared to the prior year period, driven by a U.S. volume decrease of 5.1%. Foreign exchange rates and lower sales of our other products reduced net sales by an additional $1.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The increase in the average net selling price for gypsum wallboard at constant exchange rates had a $0.5 million favorable impact on net sales.
Net sales increased by $7.6 million, up 2.5% from $303.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, to $311.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to the increase in volume, which contributed approximately $9.5 million of additional net sales. Total volume increased 3.3% compared to the prior year period, driven by a U.S. volume increase of 2.4% and improved Canadian volumes. The decrease in the average net selling price for gypsum wallboard at constant exchange rates had a $3.2 million favorable impact on net sales. An unfavorable $4.0 million impact of foreign currency and $1.1 million in lower sales of our other products contributed to the remaining difference.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold decreased $7.7 million, down 8.9% from $85.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, to $78.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Approximately $2.5 million of the decrease in cost of goods sold was due to lower manufacturing and freight costs, primarily helped by lower energy prices. Lower wallboard and non-wallboard sales volumes reduced cost of goods sold by $2.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. A favorable $1.5 million impact of foreign exchange rates and $1.3 million in lower amortization contributed to the remaining difference.
Cost of goods sold decreased $9.7 million, down 4.0% from $241.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, to $231.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Approximately $6.1 million of the decrease in cost of goods sold was due to lower manufacturing costs, primarily helped by lower energy prices. Lower amortization and favorable foreign exchange rates reduced costs by an additional $3.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively. Lower sales volumes of our non-wallboard products reduced cost of goods sold by $1.2 million. Higher wallboard volumes increased costs by $4.8 million and higher freight to customers increased costs by $0.1 million.
Selling and Administrative Expense. Selling and administrative expense increased $1.2 million, up 15.9% to $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $7.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. This increase was primarily driven by $0.4 million higher amortization for the recently implemented information technology system, $0.2 million in professional fees for the secondary public offering in the third quarter of 2015 and $0.6 million related to additional costs of being a standalone company.
Selling and administrative expense increased $3.4 million, up 14.7% to $26.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $23.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. This increase was primarily driven by $1.3 million higher amortization for the recently implemented information technology system, $0.9 million in professional fees for the secondary public offerings in the first nine months of 2015, $0.9 million related to additional costs of being a standalone company and $0.3 million in Delaware franchise tax.
Long Term Incentive Plan Funded by Lone Star.Under the LSF8 Gypsum Holdings, LP. Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), certain of our officers and the estate of our former CEO are eligible to receive payments from LSF8 Gypsum Holdings, L.P., an affiliate of Lone Star Funds (“LSF8”), in the event of a monetization event, as further described in our 2014 10-K. LSF8 is responsible for funding any payments under the LTIP. The secondary public offering in March 2015 triggered a monetization event for the first time and resulted in aggregate payments of $4.2 million, and the secondary public offerings in May and September 2015 resulted in aggregate payments of $15.8 million and $9.9 million, respectively. As these payments arose out of employment with the Company, the $9.9 million and $29.9 million expenses were recorded on the Company’s books for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and will also be deductible for tax purposes. The funding of LTIP is recorded as capital contributions from LSF8 in the statement of cash flows under financing activities.
Operating (Loss) Income. Operating income of $11.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $9.2 million from operating income of $20.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The difference was driven mostly by the $9.9 million LTIP expense, $5.7 million lower net sales and $1.2 million higher selling and administrative expense, partially offset by $7.7 million lower cost of goods sold.
Operating income of $23.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $16.1 million from operating income of $39.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The difference was driven mostly by the $29.9 million LTIP expense and $3.4 million higher selling and administrative expense, partially offset by $7.6 million higher net sales and $9.7 million lower cost of goods sold.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income (expense), net, was a net expense of $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, slightly higher than other expense of $0.1 million in the prior year period.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, other income (expense), net, was a net expense of $0.7 million, a decrease from the $5.5 million other expense in the prior year period. The decrease is primarily due to non-recurring costs incurred in the first quarter 2014, including the prepayment premium of $3.1 million for the repayment of the Second Lien Term Loan and $2.0 million for the payment of termination fees to affiliates of Lone Star.
20
Table of Contents
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net, was $4.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $4.9 million for the prior year period, and relates to the First Lien Credit Agreement. This decrease was driven by lower borrowings during the third quarter of 2015 and a reduced interest rate on the First Lien Term Loan. During the third quarter of 2015, the Company prepaid $15.0 million of the First Lien Term Loan.
Interest expense was $12.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease from $24.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, reflecting lower borrowings during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, a reduced interest rate on the First Lien Term Loan and non-recurring costs that occurred in 2014 and not in 2015. The non-recurring costs include a write-off of the original issue discount and deferred financing fees associated with the early repayment of the Second Lien Term Loan on February 10, 2014.
The Company prepaid $59.9 million in the course of 2014 and $35 million during the first nine months of 2015, in each case under the First Lien Credit Agreement. In May 2014, the interest rate on the First Lien Credit Agreement was reduced by 0.5% due to the Company reaching lower leverage ratios as outlined in the First Lien Credit Agreement. In August 2014, the interest rate on the First Lien Credit Agreement was further reduced by 0.25% due to a ratings upgrade by Moody’s (See Part I, Item 1, Financial Information – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13). As a result, the effective interest rate on the First Lien Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2015 was 4.77% and the effective interest rate on the Revolver was 3.25%.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense). Income tax expense was $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to an income tax expense of $5.6 million in the prior year period.
Income tax expense was $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to an income tax expense of $3.5 million in the prior year period.
Net Income (Loss). Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $4.2 million, compared to a net income of $9.5 million in the prior year period. The decrease was primarily driven by the $9.9 million LTIP expense, $5.6 million lower net sales and $1.2 higher selling, general and administrative expense, partly offset by $3.5 million lower income tax expense and $7.7 million lower cost of goods sold.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $6.1 million, compared to a net income of $5.5 million in the prior year period. The increase was primarily driven by $7.6 million higher net sales, $9.7 million lower cost of goods sold, $12.0 million lower interest expense and $4.8 million lower other expense, partly offset by the $29.9 million LTIP expense and $3.4 million higher selling, general and administrative expense.
21
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have been presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as supplemental measures of financial performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. We have presented EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as supplemental performance measures because we believe that they facilitate a comparative assessment of our operating performance relative to our performance based on our results under GAAP while isolating the effects of some items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance and eliminate certain charges that we believe do not reflect our operations and underlying operational performance. Management also believes that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful to investors because they present a better reflection of our performance as an independent company following the Acquisition and allow investors to view our business through the eyes of management and the Board of Directors, facilitating comparison of results across historical periods.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies because other companies may not calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner as we do. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as alternatives to operating income determined in accordance with GAAP or any other financial statement data presented as indicators of financial performance or liquidity, each as calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
The following table reconciles the non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures:
(in thousands) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Operating Income - GAAP Measure | $ | 11,058 | $ | 20,209 | $ | 23,235 | $ | 39,292 | ||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 12,661 | 13,511 | 38,931 | 41,324 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
EBITDA—Non-GAAP Measure | 23,719 | 33,720 | 62,166 | 80,616 | ||||||||||||
Long Term Incentive Plan funded by Lone Star (a) | 9,933 | — | 29,946 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA—Non-GAAP Measure | $ | 33,652 | $ | 33,720 | $ | 92,112 | $ | 80,616 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Represents expense recognized pursuant to the LTIP funded by LSF8, an affiliate of Lone Star. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since the Acquisition, our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash from operations, and borrowings under the debt financing arrangements that we entered into in connection with the Acquisition. We believe these sources will be sufficient to fund our planned operations and capital expenditures. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Information – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13, Debt, and the 2014 10-K for a more detailed discussion of our debt financing arrangements.
The following table sets forth a summary of the net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:
(in thousands) | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 50,844 | $ | 45,708 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (2,938 | ) | (4,336 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (45,285 | ) | (40,621 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (990 | ) | (417 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,631 | $ | 334 | ||||
|
|
|
|
22
Table of Contents
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $50.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $45.7 million. This improvement was primarily due to an increase in net working capital.
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $2.9 million and $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 reflects an aggregate of $3.7 million in capital expenditures and software purchased or developed, partially offset by $0.8 million in distributions received from our equity investment in Seven Hills. The decrease in cash used for investing activity in for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to lower expenditures for software purchased or developed as we implemented a new information technology system in 2014. Lower capital expenditures were offset by lower distributions received from our equity investment in Seven Hills.
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $45.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Net cash used in financing activities was $40.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. In May 2015, the Company repurchased 913,200 shares of its common stock from LSF8 for an aggregate amount of approximately $20.0 million. In September 2015, the Company repurchased an additional 1,007,500 shares of its common stock from LSF8 for an aggregate amount of approximately $20.0 million. The Company made voluntary prepayments of $35.0 million on the First Lien Credit Agreement in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The next required mandatory principal payment on the First Lien Credit Agreement is the amount due at maturity on August 28, 2020. In addition, the Company received $29.8 million of LTIP funding from Lone Star.
In the first quarter 2014, net proceeds of $151.4 million from the Initial Public Offering were used to repay a portion of the Second Lien Credit Agreement of $155 million.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Our 2014 10-K includes a summary of the critical accounting policies we believe are the most important to aid in understanding our financial results. There have been no changes to those critical accounting policies that have had a material impact on our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses during the first nine months of 2015.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking statements are included throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and relate to matters such as our industry, business strategy, goals and expectations concerning our market position, future operations, margins, profitability, capital expenditures, liquidity, capital resources and other financial and operating information. We have used the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will” and similar terms and phrases to identify forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All of our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that we are expecting, including:
• | cyclicality in our markets, especially the new residential construction market; |
• | the highly competitive nature of our industry and the substitutability of competitors’ products; |
• | disruptions in our supply of synthetic gypsum due to regulatory changes or coal-fired power plants switching to natural gas; |
• | changes to environmental and safety laws and regulations requiring modifications to our manufacturing systems; |
• | disruptions to our supply of paperboard liner; |
• | potential losses of customers; |
• | changes in affordability of energy and transportation costs; |
• | material disruptions at our facilities or the facilities of our suppliers; |
• | changes in, cost of compliance with or the failure or inability to comply with governmental laws and regulations, in particular environmental regulations; |
• | our involvement in legal and regulatory proceedings; |
• | our ability to attract and retain key management employees; |
23
Table of Contents
• | disruptions in our information technology systems; |
• | labor disruptions; |
• | seasonal nature of our business; |
• | the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; |
• | increased costs and demands on management as a public company; |
• | our limited public company operating experience; |
• | our relationship, and actual and potential conflicts of interest, with Lone Star; and |
• | additional factors discussed under the sections captioned “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” in our 2014 10-K, as applicable. |
The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on historical performance and management’s current plans, estimates and expectations in light of information currently available to us and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. Actual results may differ materially from these expectations due to changes in global, regional or local political, economic, business, competitive, market, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We believe that these factors include those described in “Risk Factors.” Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary in material respects from what we may have expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We caution that you should not place undue reliance on any of our forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speaks only as of the date on which we make it. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable securities laws.
24
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to financial risks such as changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity price risk associated with our input costs. We use derivative instruments to manage certain commodity price and interest rate exposures. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative trading purposes, and we typically do not hedge beyond two years. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Information – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 14, Derivative Instruments, for additional information regarding our financial exposures.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our outstanding debt, and cash and cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2015, we had $17.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. The interest expense associated with First Lien Credit Agreement and any loans under the Revolver will vary with market rates.
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates related to our outstanding debt is somewhat mitigated as the First Lien Term Loan and the Revolver have a LIBOR floor of 1%. A rise of current interest rate levels to above the 1% floor would be required to increase our interest expense and a reduction in interest rates would have no impact on our interest expense. As of September 30, 2015, we elected to use three month LIBOR with a rate of 0.25%. A hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates would have increased interest expense by approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015.
At March 31, 2014, the Company entered into an interest rate cap on three months US Dollar LIBOR of 2% for a notional amount of $206.5 million, which represented one-half of the principal amount due under our First Lien Credit Agreement at March 31, 2014. The notional amount of the interest rate cap declines by approximately $0.5 million each quarter through December 31, 2015, and was $203.4 million as of September 30, 2015. The objective of the hedge is to protect our cash flows for a portion of the First Lien Credit Agreement from adverse extreme market interest rate changes through September 30, 2016. As U.S. Dollar LIBOR interest rates remain below 2%, the contract had a fair value of $0 at September 30, 2015.
The return on our cash equivalents balance was less than one percent. Therefore, although investment interest rates may further decrease in the future, the corresponding impact to our interest income, and likewise to our income and cash flow, would not be material.
Foreign Currency Risk
Approximately 8% and 9% of our sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and 7 % and 9% of our sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, were in Canada. As a result, we are exposed to movements in foreign exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar. We estimate that a 1% change in the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian currencies would impact net sales by approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million based on 2015 results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. This may differ from actual results depending on the level of sales volumes in Canada. During the reported periods we did not use foreign currency hedges to manage this risk.
Commodity Price Risk
Some of our key production inputs, such as paper and natural gas, are commodities whose prices are determined by the market’s supply and demand for such products. Price fluctuations on our key input costs have a significant effect on our financial performance. The markets for most of these commodities are cyclical and are affected by factors such as global economic conditions, changes in or disruptions to industry production capacity, changes in inventory levels and other factors beyond our control.
We use natural gas swap contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices associated with anticipated purchases of natural gas. Currently, a portion of our anticipated purchases of natural gas for 2015 is hedged. The aggregate notional amount of these hedge contracts in place as of September 30, 2015 was 100 thousand mmBTUs. We review our positions regularly and make adjustments as market and business conditions warrant. The fair value of the outstanding quarter-end contracts was an unrealized loss of $0.1 million as of September 30, 2015. In October 2015, the Company entered into two new gas swap contracts in the aggregate notional amount of 1,280 thousand mmBTUs covering approximately 25% of its gas needs. One of these contracts matures by March 31, 2016 and one matures by October 31, 2016. Both contracts are effective as of November 1, 2015.
Seasonality
Sales of our wallboard products are, similar to many building products, seasonal in that sales are generally slightly higher from spring through autumn when construction activity is greatest in our markets.
25
Table of Contents
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
The design of any system of control is based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives under all future events, no matter how remote, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may not deteriorate. Because of its inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
26
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
We have been from time to time, and may in the future become, party to litigation or other legal proceedings that we consider to be part of the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings that could be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or our results of operations. We may become involved in material legal proceedings in the future.
For a description of our legal proceedings, see Part I, Item 1, Financial Information – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9, Commitments and Contingencies, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
We are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ from expectations are described under Item 1A. Risk Factors in the 2014 10-K, as supplemented by the update in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, to which there were no material changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Effective August 4, 2015, our Board of Directors and Audit Committee approved the repurchase of up to $20.0 million of our common stock from LSF8 in connection with a future secondary public offering by LSF8. On September 10, 2015, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with LSF8 pursuant to which we agreed to repurchase, in a private, non-underwritten transaction, a number of shares of our common stock held by LSF8 with an aggregate value of $20.0 million, at a price per share equal to the per share price paid by the underwriter to LSF8 in the related secondary public offering, rounded down to the nearest 100 shares. The repurchase transaction closed along with the offering on September 16, 2015. There is no remaining capacity under this repurchase authorization.
Common stock repurchase activity during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2015 was as follows:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid Per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Dollar Value That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
July 1 - July 31, 2015 | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
August 1 - August 31, 2015 | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
September 1 - September 31, 2015 | 1,007,500 | $ | 19.85 | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | 1,007,500 | $ | 19.85 | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. | Other Information |
Stock Repurchase Program
On November 3, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our common stock at such times and prices as determined by management as market conditions warrant. The stock repurchase authorization expires on December 31, 2016. The repurchase program does not obligate us to repurchase any dollar amount or number of shares.
Share Ownership Guidelines
On November 3, 2015, our Board of Directors formally approved share ownership guidelines previously recommended by the Compensation Committee pursuant to which our executive officers are expected to establish and maintain ownership of a specified amount of our common stock. Pursuant to the guidelines, the Chief Executive Officer is expected to hold common stock with a value of five times salary, the Chief Financial Officer is expected to hold common stock with a value of two and one-half times salary and all other executive officers are expected to hold common stock with a value equal to such executive officer’s salary, in each case based on compensation levels as of the time the executive officer became subject to the applicable guideline. Executive officers have five years from the date of becoming subject to the applicable guideline to reach the requisite ownership level. Shares of common stock held outright and in retirement accounts as well as the after-tax value of unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested but earned performance shares are counted towards attaining the requisite ownership level.
27
Table of Contents
Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan
On November 3, 2015, our Board of Directors approved the Continental Building Products, Inc. Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan (the “Plan”), which has an initial term of two years. The Plan provides benefits to a total of seven officers of the Company, including our Chief Executive Officer, other Named Executive Officers and certain other executive officers of the Company, both (i) in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan) of the Company and (ii) in certain circumstances in connection with the termination of employment not in anticipation of a Change in Control. In both cases, in the event of a termination of employment, plan participants would receive earned salary, accrued but unpaid bonus and accrued but unpaid vacation time (the “Accrued Obligations”).
In the event of a termination of employment in connection with a Change of Control (as defined in the Plan), in addition to the Accrued Obligations, plan participants would receive (i) a severance payment equal to the participant’s Benefit Multiplier (as defined in the Plan) and the sum of the participant’s base salary and target bonus opportunity, plus (ii) a pro- rata portion of the participant’s bonus based on the number of days of employment during the bonus plan year in which the termination occurs, and based on actual performance, plus (iii) all life, disability, medical, dental and/or vision insurance programs in which the participant or family members were participating, for a period of twenty four months for the Company’s CEO and a period of twelve months for all other plan participants. The “Benefit Multiplier” under the Plan is two for the Company’s CEO and one for each other plan participant. In the event of a termination in connection with a Change in Control, outstanding equity awards are generally treated as follows: (i) outstanding and unvested stock options immediately vest and are exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days; (ii) restrictions on outstanding shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units lapse and they become non-forfeitable; and (iii) unearned performance share units shall be deemed to have earned and paid out in full assuming achievement of 100% of target level performance.
In the event, not in connection with a Change in Control, a participant is terminated without Cause (as defined in the Plan) or the participant terminates for Good Reason (as defined in the Plan), in addition to the Accrued Obligations, plan participants would receive (i) a severance payment equal to the product of the Benefit Multiplier and the participant’s base salary, plus (ii) a pro- rata portion of the participant’s bonus based on the number of days of employment during the bonus plan year in which the termination occurs, and based on actual performance, plus (iii) all life, disability, medical, dental and/or vision insurance programs in which the participant or family members were participating, for a period of twenty four months for the Company’s CEO and a period of twelve months for all other plan participants. In the event of such a termination without Cause or for Good Reason, outstanding equity awards are generally treated as follows: (i) outstanding and unvested stock options immediately vest on a pro-rata basis based on the number of days the participant was employed through the date of termination and are exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days; (ii) all unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units are forfeited back to the Company, and (iii) unearned performance share units are deemed to have been earned and paid out on a pro-rata basis based on the number of days the participant was employed through the termination, measuring actual performance achieved as of the completion of the applicable performance cycle.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
10.1 | Stock Purchase Agreement dated September 10, 2015 between Continental Building Products, Inc. and LSF8 Gypsum Holdings, L.P. | |
10.2# | Continental Building Products, Inc. Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
# | Denotes management compensatory plan or arrangement |
28
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Continental Building Products, Inc. | ||
By: | /s/ James Bachmann | |
Name: | James Bachmann | |
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
By: | /s/ Dennis Schemm | |
Name: | Dennis Schemm | |
Title: | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 5, 2015
29