Baylake 10Q 2013 Q2 Quarterly report

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


	FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________________to ____________________

Commission file number 001-16339




BAYLAKE CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Wisconsin	39-1268055
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

217 North Fourth Avenue, Sturgeon Bay, WI	54235
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(920) 743-5551
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filero	Accelerated filero	Non-accelerated filero	Smaller reporting companyx

		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yeso Nox

The number of outstanding shares of common stock, $5.00 par value per share, as of August 1, 2013 was 7,960,486 shares.

BAYLAKE CORP.
INDEX


		PAGE NO.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 -	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	3

ITEM 2 -	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	31

ITEM 3 -	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	49

ITEM 4 -	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	50

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 -	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	51

ITEM 1A -	RISK FACTORS	51

ITEM 2 -	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	51

ITEM 3 -	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	51

ITEM 4 -	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	51

ITEM 5 -	OTHER INFORMATION	51

ITEM 6 -	EXHIBITS	52

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements

BAYLAKE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Cash and due from financial institutions	$	37,343		$	109,621
Federal funds sold		1,152			1,018
Securities available for sale		234,739			242,019
Loans held for sale		1,246			894
Loans, net of allowance of $8,823 and $9,165 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		589,450			586,368
Cash surrender value of life insurance		23,230			23,061
Premises and equipment, net		20,742			20,818
Premises and equipment held for sale		1,068			1,068
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3,598			3,598
Other real estate owned, net		7,553			10,476
Goodwill		6,641			6,641
Deferred income taxes		7,134			6,358
Accrued interest receivable		2,845			2,752
Other assets		8,217			9,279
Total Assets	$	944,958		$	1,023,971

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	124,130		$	132,477
Interest-bearing		632,329			673,538
Total Deposits		756,459			806,015

Federal Home Loan Bank advances		40,000			40,000
Repurchase agreements		22,457			51,568
Subordinated debentures		16,100			16,100
Convertible promissory notes		9,400			9,400
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		7,077			7,744
Total Liabilities		851,493			930,827

Commitments and Contingencies - Note 15

Common stock, $5 par value, authorized 50,000,000 shares; Issued-8,191,499 shares at June 30, 2013 and 8,158,360 at December 31, 2012; Outstanding-7,960,486 shares at June 30, 2013 7,937,347 at December 31, 2012		40,957			40,792
Additional paid-in capital		12,229			12,192
Retained earnings		41,218			38,448
Treasury stock (231,013 shares at June 30, 2013 and 221,013 shares at December 31, 2012)		(3,648	)		(3,549	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		2,709			5,261
Total Stockholders’ Equity		93,465			93,144
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	944,958		$	1,023,971

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	6,998		$	7,875		$	14,019		$	15,885
Taxable securities		1,179			1,712			2,402			3,618
Tax exempt securities		372			372			746			744
Federal funds sold		15			23			50			53
Total Interest and Dividend Income		8,564			9,982			17,217			20,300
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		692			1,194			1,455			2,588
Repurchase agreements		15			13			35			36
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other debt		201			258			400			516
Subordinated debentures		66			74			133			152
Convertible promissory notes		244			245			488			490
Total Interest Expense		1,218			1,784			2,511			3,782
Net interest income		7,346			8,198			14,706			16,518
Provision for loan losses		600			2,275			1,200			4,025
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		6,746			5,923			13,506			12,493
NONINTEREST INCOME
Fees from fiduciary activities		286			283			537			523
Fees from loan servicing		143			141			293			300
Fees for other services to customers		1,096			1,220			2,199			2,388
Net gain on sale of loans		440			512			1,034			873
Net loss in valuation of mortgage servicing rights		(118	)		(87	)		(120	)		(69	)
Net realized gain on sale of securities		221			907			209			1,585
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment		5			619			5			621
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		91			107			169			200
Income in equity of UFS subsidiary		198			159			433			336
Other income (expense)		(3	)		481			99			630
Total Noninterest Income		2,359			4,342			4,858			7,387
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and employee benefits		3,908			4,228			8,093			8,655
Occupancy expense		483			553			1,007			1,177
Equipment expense		294			287			589			557
Data processing and courier expense		213			221			420			450
FDIC insurance expense		178			369			369			731
Operation of other real estate		364			1,817			563			2,413
Loan and collection expense		52			147			147			357
Other outside services		185			198			384			381
Other operating expenses		1,002			1,057			1,915			1,989
Total Noninterest Expense		6,679			8,877			13,487			16,710
Income before provision for income taxes		2,426			1,388			4,877			3,170
Provision for income taxes		695			94			1,391			544
Net Income	$	1,731		$	1,294		$	3,486		$	2,626
Basic earnings per share	$	0.22		$	0.16		$	0.44		$	0.33
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.19		$	0.15		$	0.38		$	0.30
Cash dividends paid per share	$	0.05		$	0.01		$	0.09		$	0.02

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)
Three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012

Net Income	$	1,731		$	1,294		$	3,486		$	2,626
Other comprehensive income (losses), net of tax
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period	$	(3,282	)	$	1,830		$	(4,030	)	$	3,610
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income		(221	)		(907	)		(209	)		(1,585	)
Tax effect		1,374			(365	)		1,687			(800	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(2,129	)		558			(2,552	)		1,225
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(398	)	$	1,852		$	934		$	3,851

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
Six months ended June 30, 2013
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Stockholders’ Equity


	Shares			Amount

Balance, January 1, 2013		7,937,347		$	40,792	$	12,192		$	38,448		$	(3,549	)	$	5,261		$	93,144

Net income for period										3,486									3,486
Net changes in unrealized gains on securities available for sale																(4,030	)		(4,030	)
Reclassification adjustment for net gains realized in income																(209	)		(209	)
Tax effect																1,687			1,687
Total comprehensive income																			934
Purchase of treasury stock		(10,000	)										(99	)					(99	)
Stock-based compensation expense recognized, net							141			—			—			—			141
Vesting of Restricted Stock Units		28,679			143		(143	)		—			—			—			—
Tax benefit from vesting of RSUs		—			—		47			—			—			—			47
Exercise of stock options		4,460			22		(4	)		—			—			—			18
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options/RSUs					—		4			—			—			—			4
Tax expense from forfeiture of unexercised stock options/RSUs					—		(8	)											(8	)
Cash dividends - ($0.09 per share)										(716	)								(716	)
Balance, June 30, 2013		7,960,486		$	40,957	$	12,229		$	41,218		$	(3,648	)	$	2,709		$	93,465

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	2013			2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net Income	$	3,486		$	2,626
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		644			640
Amortization of debt issuance costs		17			18
Provision for loan losses		1,200			4,025
Net amortization of premium/discount on securities		1,437			1,435
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		(169	)		(200	)
Net gain on life insurance death benefit		—			(501	)
Net realized gain on sale of securities		(209	)		(1,585	)
Net gain on sale of loans		(1,034	)		(873	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		48,281			46,447
Origination of loans held for sale		(47,765	)		(45,535	)
Change in valuation of mortgage servicing rights, net of payments and payoffs		120			69
Provision for valuation allowance on other real estate owned		445			2,202
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment		(5	)		(621	)
Net gain on disposals of other real estate owned		(128	)		(110	)
Provision (benefit) for deferred income tax expense		911			(461	)
Stock-based compensation expense		141			85
Tax benefit from exercise/forfeiture of options		(4	)		(4	)
Income in equity of UFS subsidiary		(433	)		(336	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Return of prepaid FDIC assessment		358			—
Accrued income taxes		1,070			(1,157	)
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		156			(637	)
Income tax refund		(316	)		—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(667	)		(2,147	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		7,536			3,380

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		3,937			45,823
Principal payments on securities available for sale		30,151			27,856
Purchase of securities available for sale		(32,275	)		(42,685	)
Proceeds from FHLB stock redemption		—			2,659
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		3,302			5,489
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		7			848
Loan originations and payments, net		(4,978	)		(10,370	)
Additions to premises and equipment		(606	)		(996	)
Proceeds from life insurance death benefit		—			870
Net change in federal funds sold		(134	)		(856	)
Dividend from UFS subsidiary		199			680
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(397	)		29,318

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	2013			2012
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in deposits	$	(49,556	)	$	(19,910	)
Net change in federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements		(29,111	)		(29,869	)
Tax benefit from vesting of restricted stock units		47			12
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		18			—
Purchase of treasury stock		(99	)		—
Cash dividends paid		(716	)		(158	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(79,417	)		(49,925	)
Net change in cash		(72,278	)		(17,227	)

Beginning cash	$	109,621		$	86,980
Ending cash	$	37,343		$	69,753

Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	2,568		$	3,696
Income taxes paid (refunded), net		(316	)		1,200
Supplemental noncash disclosure:
Transfers from loans and bank premises to other real estate owned	$	696		$	5,819
Mortgage servicing rights resulting from sale of loans		166			127
Transfers from premises and equipment to other real estate owned		36			—

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


1.	The consolidated financial statements of Baylake Corp. (the “Company”) include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary Baylake Bank (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries: Baylake Investments, Inc. and Baylake Insurance Agency, Inc. During the third quarter of 2012, operations of Baylake Insurance Agency, Inc. were discontinued and the book of business was sold to a third party. No cash proceeds were received in the transaction; however the Bank will receive future commissions for a three-year period based on insurance renewals on the sold book of business. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. These interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q, and accordingly do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial information included in this report reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals of operations for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2013 and 2012 necessary to make the unconsolidated financial information not misleading. The consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year. Management of the Company has evaluated all subsequent events to August 1, 2013, the date the interim consolidated financial statements were issued. Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events and determined that all subsequent events have been recognized and disclosed in the accompanying financial statements through the date of this report.

2.	Use of Estimates

	To prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, value of other real estate owned, other than temporary impairment of securities, mortgage servicing rights, income tax expense, and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change.

3.	Earnings Per Share

	Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share, which reflects the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding stock options were exercised, stock awards were fully vested, and promissory notes were converted, resulting in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the Company’s earnings, is computed by dividing net income as adjusted for the income impact of assumed conversions by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents. The following table shows the computation of the basic and diluted earnings per share:

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

EARNINGS PER SHARE
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
(Numerator):
Net income available to common stockholders	$	1,731		$	1,294		$	3,486		$	2,626
Plus: Income impact of assumed conversions Interest on 10% convertible debentures, net of income tax		148			149			296			297
Income available to common stockholders plus assumed conversions	$	1,879		$	1,443		$	3,782		$	2,923

(Denominator):
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding-basic		7,967,782			7,926,546			7,954,308			7,920,436
Plus: Incremental shares of assumed conversions:
Dilutive effect of stock options		25,502	⁽¹⁾		1,844	⁽¹⁾		23,186	⁽²⁾		—	⁽²⁾
Dilutive effect of restricted stock units		29,053			16,470			35,506			16,605	⁽³⁾
Dilutive effect of convertible promissory notes⁽⁴⁾		1,880,000			1,890,000			1,880,000			1,890,000
Dilutive potential common shares		1,934,555			1,908,314			1,938,692			1,906,605
Adjusted weighted-average shares		9,902,337			9,834,860			9,893,000			9,827,041

Basic Earnings Per Share	$	0.22		$	0.16		$	0.44		$	0.33
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.19		$	0.15		$	0.38		$	0.30


	⁽¹⁾	For the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, there were 53,176 and 68,572 outstanding stock options that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were considered anti-dilutive.

	⁽²⁾	For the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, there were 53,176 and 112,400 outstanding stock options that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were considered anti-dilutive.

	⁽³⁾	At June 30, 2012, there were 68,572 outstanding restricted stock units that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were considered anti-dilutive.

	⁽⁴⁾	At June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the Company had $9.40 million and $9.45 million of outstanding Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion ratio of one share of common stock for each $5.00 in aggregate principal amount held on the record date of the conversion subject to certain adjustments as described in the Convertible Notes. Beginning on July 1, 2014, the Company may redeem the notes in whole or in part. A notice of redemption supersedes and takes priority over any notice of conversion. Prior to October 1, 2014, each holder of the Convertible Notes may convert up to 100% (at the discretion of the holder) of the original principal amount into shares of the Company’s common stock at the conversion ratio. On October 1, 2014, one-half of the original principal amounts of the Convertible Notes are mandatorily convertible at the conversion ratio if voluntary conversion has not yet occurred. The principal amount of any Convertible Note that has not been converted will be payable at maturity on June 30, 2017. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the entire 1,880,000 and 1,890,000 of common shares are included since the average market price per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 exceeded the conversion price of $5.00 per share.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


4.	Recent Accounting Pronouncements

	In February 2013 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in this ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires is already required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under GAAP. The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. The provisions of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial condition, results of operation or liquidity of the Company.

	In February 2013, the FASB has issued ASU No. 2013-04,Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date(a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2013-04 provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this ASU is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this ASU also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The provisions of this guidance are not expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial condition, results of operation or liquidity of the Company.

	In April 2013 the FASB has issued ASU No. 2013-07,Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting). ASU 2013-07 requires an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces. The amendments in this ASU are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted. The provisions of this guidance are not expected to have any impact on the consolidated financial condition, results of operation or liquidity of the Company.

	In July 2013 the FASB has issued ASU No. 2013-11,Income Taxes (Topic740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists(a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2013-11 requires that an unrecognized tax benefit be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward except as follows: To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within in those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The provisions of this guidance are not expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial condition, results of operation or liquidity of the Company.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


5.	Fair Value

	Accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

	Level 1:	Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
	Level 2:	Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
	Level 3:	Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

	A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input within the valuation hierarchy that is significant to the fair value measurement.

	The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described below.

	Securities available for sale - the fair value of securities available for sale is determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). For other securities not able to be priced on matrix pricing, outside third parties are relied upon (Level 3 inputs). Two of the Company’s securities available for sale at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were measured using Level 3 inputs.

	Non-impaired loans and deposits - the fair value of fixed rate non-impaired loans and deposits and non-impaired variable rate loans and deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values. Fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes (Level 3 inputs).

	Mortgage servicing rights - the fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income. These assumptions include servicing costs, expected loan lives, discount rates, and the determination of whether the loan is likely to be refinanced. The Company compares the valuation model inputs and results to published industry data for reasonableness (Level 2 inputs).

	Other real estate owned - the fair value of other real estate owned is determined using a variety of market information including but not limited to, appraisals, professional market assessments and real estate tax assessment information. Properties obtained by the Bank in foreclosure are adjusted to fair value less estimated costs to sell upon their transfer to other real estate owned, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, other real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell (Level 3 inputs).

	Impaired loans - the fair value of impaired loans is based on review of comparable collateral in similar marketplaces (Level 3 inputs) or an analysis of expected cash flows of the loan in relationship to the contractual terms of the loan (Level 3 inputs). Impaired loans are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Impaired loans are not carried at fair value if there is sufficient collateral or if expected repayments exceed the recorded investments of such loans.

	Convertible promissory notes - fair value of convertible promissory notes is based on current rates for similar financing (Level 3 inputs).

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:


	June 30, 2013		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities	$	3,011	$	—	$	3,011	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		160,755		—		158,624		2,131
Asset-backed securities		4,190		—		4,190		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		59,130		—		59,130		—
Private placement and corporate bonds		5,999		2,488		3,511		—
Other securities		1,654		—		1,654		—
Total securities available for sale		234,739		2,488		230,120		2,131
Mortgage servicing rights		885		—		885		—
Total	$	235,624	$	2,488	$	231,005	$	2,131


	December 31, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities	$	2,011	$	—	$	2,011	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		169,121		—		166,018		3,103
Asset-backed securities		4,290		—		4,290		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		58,871		—		58,871		—
Private placement and corporate bonds		6,072		2,502		3,570		—
Other securities		1,654		—		1,654		—
Total securities available for sale		242,019		2,502		236,414		3,103
Mortgage servicing rights		839		—		839		—
Total	$	242,858	$	2,502	$	237,253	$	3,103

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):


	For the three months ended June 30, 2013			For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Balance, beginning of period	$	2,428		$	3,103
Transfer into Level 3		—			—
Net unrealized losses		(25	)		(49	)
Transfer out of Level 3		—			—
Principal payments		(272	)		(923	)
Balance, end of period	$	2,131		$	2,131

ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NON-RECURRING BASIS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:


		June 30, 2013		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Impaired loans with allocated allowances	��	$	2,483	$	—	$	—	$	2,483
Other real estate owned, net			7,553		—		—		7,553
Total		$	10,036	$	—	$	—	$	10,036


	December 31, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Impaired loans with allocated allowances	$	4,097	$	—	$	—	$	4,097
Other real estate owned, net		10,476		—		—		10,476
Total	$	14,573	$	—	$	—	$	14,573

Required Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The accounting guidance for financial instruments requires disclosures of estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate their fair values. Certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from the scope of this guidance. Accordingly, the fair value disclosures required by this guidance are only indicative of the value of individual financial instruments as of the dates indicated and should not be considered an indication of the Company’s fair value.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

The following table presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of certain financial instruments:


	(Dollar amounts in thousands)
	June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
FINANCIAL ASSETS
Cash	$	37,343	$	37,343	$	109,621	$	109,621
Federal funds sold		1,152		1,152		1,018		1,018
Securities available for sale		234,739		234,739		242,019		242,019
Loans held for sale		1,246		1,262		894		908
Loans, net		589,450		587,543		586,368		587,166
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3,598		3,598		3,598		3,598
Mortgage servicing rights		885		885		839		839
Other real estate owned, net		7,553		7,553		10,476		10,476
Accrued interest receivable		2,845		2,845		2,752		2,752

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Deposits	$	756,459	$	762,792	$	806,015	$	806,820
Repurchase agreements		22,457		22,457		51,568		51,568
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		40,000		40,112		40,000		40,404
Subordinated debentures		16,100		16,100		16,100		16,100
Convertible promissory notes		9,400		9,325		9,400		9,316
Accrued interest payable		709		709		766		766

The methods and assumptions that were used to estimate the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis have been previously disclosed. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

(a) Cash

The carrying amount of cash approximates fair value.

(b) Federal Funds Sold

The carrying amount of federal funds sold approximates fair value.

(c) Loans Held for Sale

The fair value of loans held for sale is based on actual market quotes from third party investors.

(d) Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

It is not practical to determine the fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. No secondary market exists for FHLB stock. The stock is bought and sold at par by the FHLB. Management believes that the recorded value is fair value.

(e) Accrued Interest Receivable

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates fair value.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

(f) Deposits

The carrying amount of demand deposits (interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing), savings deposits, and money market deposits approximates fair value. The carrying amount of variable rate time deposits, including certificates of deposit, approximates fair value. For fixed rate time deposits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market interest rates.

(g) Repurchase Agreements

The carrying amount of repurchase agreements approximates fair value.

(h) Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

The carrying amount of variable rate FHLB advances approximates fair value. For fixed rate advances, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market interest rates.

(i) Subordinated Debentures

The carrying amount of variable rate subordinated debentures approximates fair value.

(j) Convertible Promissory Notes

The fair value of fixed rate convertible promissory notes is based on discounted cash flows using current market interest rates.

(k) Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates fair value.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


6.	Investments

INVESTMENT SECURITY ANALYSIS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)

The fair value of securities available for sale and the related unrealized gains and losses as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:


	June 30, 2013
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities	$	3,011	$	—	$	(37	)
Mortgage-backed securities		160,755		2,576		(1,532	)
Asset-backed securities		4,190		143		(121	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		59,130		3,160		(110	)
Private placement and corporate bonds		5,999		388		(9	)
Other securities		1,654		—		—
Totals	$	234,739	$	6,267	$	(1,809	)


	December 31, 2012
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities	$	2,011	$	3	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		169,121		4,839		(510	)
Asset-backed securities		4,290		113		(229	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		58,871		4,042		(4	)
Private placement and corporate bonds		6,072		443		—
Other securities		1,654		—		—
Totals	$	242,019	$	9,440	$	(743	)

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the mortgage-backed securities portfolio was $160.8 million, (68.5%) and $169.1 million, (69.9%), respectively, of the investment portfolios. Approximately 9.8%, or $15.7 million, of the mortgage-backed securities outstanding at June 30, 2013 were issued and guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), or the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”); agencies of the United States government. An additional 72.8%, or $117.1 million, of the mortgage-backed securities outstanding at June 30, 2013 were issued by either the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), the FHLB or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”); United States government-sponsored agencies. Non-agency mortgage-backed securities present a level of credit risk that does not exist currently with United States government agency-backed securities and comprised approximately 17.4%, or $28.0 million of the outstanding mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2013. Management evaluates these non-agency mortgage-backed securities at least quarterly and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	June 30, 2013
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities	$	3,011	$	(37	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,011	$	(37	)
Mortgage-backed securities		50,884		(1,301	)		6,013		(231	)		56,897		(1,532	)
Asset-backed securities		—		—			589		(121	)		589		(121	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		4,740		(110	)		—		—			4,740		(110	)
Private placement and corporate bonds		3,511		(9	)		—		—			3,511		(9	)
Total securities temporarily impaired	$	62,146	$	(1,457	)	$	6,602	$	(352	)	$	68,748	$	(1,809	)


	December 31, 2012
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		14,502		(100	)		6,456		(410	)		20,958		(510	)
Asset-backed securities		—		—			3,210		(229	)		3,210		(229	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		529		(4	)		—		—			529		(4	)
Private placement and corporate bonds		—		—			—		—			—		—
Total securities temporarily impaired	$	15,031	$	(104	)	$	9,666	$	(639	)	$	24,697	$	(743	)

At June 30, 2013, the mortgage-backed securities category with continuous unrealized losses for twelve months or more comprised two securities. The asset-backed securities category with continuous unrealized losses for twelve months or more comprised one security.

At December 31, 2012, each of the mortgage-backed securities category and the asset-backed securities category with continuous unrealized losses for twelve months or more comprised two securities.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. As part of such monitoring, the credit quality of individual securities and their issuers is assessed. Adjustments to market value that are considered temporary are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income, net of tax. If an impairment of a security is identified as other-than-temporary based on information available, such as the decline in the creditworthiness of the issuer, external market ratings or the anticipated or realized elimination of associated dividends, such impairments are further analyzed to determine if a credit loss exists. If there is a credit loss, it will be recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. Unrealized losses other than credit losses will continue to be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax. Unrealized losses reflected in the preceding tables have not been included in the results of operations because the unrealized losses were not deemed other-than-temporary. Management does not have the intent to sell the securities and has determined that it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt securities before their anticipated recovery and therefore, there is no other-than-temporary impairment. The losses on these securities are expected to dissipate as they approach their maturity dates and/or if interest rates decline.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


7.	Loans
	Loans held for investment, including purchased loan participations from other financial institutions and in the syndicated loan market, are summarized as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012

Construction	$	43,979		$	40,901
Real estate-mortgage		129,910			127,315
Real estate-commercial		283,142			291,992
Commercial		114,974			108,890
Consumer		6,666			7,882
Municipal		20,053			18,970
Gross loans		598,724			595,950
Less: Deferred origination fees, net of costs		(451	)		(417	)
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(8,823	)		(9,165	)
Loans, net	$	589,450		$	586,368

Loans having a carrying value of $120.7 million and $97.5 million are pledged as collateral for borrowings from the FHLB at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

A breakdown of the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	Construction			Real Estate- Mortgage			Real Estate- Commercial			Commercial			Consumer			Municipal		Not Specifically Allocated			Total

Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning balance	$	652		$	1,658		$	5,787		$	678		$	102		$	—	$	288		$	9,165

Charge-offs		(64	)		(283	)		(1,267	)		(126	)		(46	)		—		—			(1,786	)
Recoveries		7			41			108			76			12			—		—			244
Provision		161			119			870			316			7			—		(273	)		1,200
Ending balance	$	756		$	1,535		$	5,498		$	944		$	75		$	—	$	15		$	8,823

Loans:
Ending balance	$	43,979		$	129,910		$	282,691		$	114,974		$	6,666		$	20,053	$	—		$	598,273
ALL		(756	)		(1,535	)		(5,498	)		(944	)		(75	)		—		(15	)		(8,823	)
Recorded investment	$	43,223		$	128,375		$	277,193		$	114,030		$	6,591		$	20,053	$	(15	)	$	589,450

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated	$	1,042		$	1,320		$	13,832		$	2,321		$	5		$	—	$	—		$	18,520
Collectively evaluated		42,937			128,590			268,859			112,653			6,661			20,053		—			579,753
Total	$	43,979		$	129,910		$	282,691		$	114,974		$	6,666		$	20,053	$	—		$	598,273

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

A breakdown of the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	Construction			Real Estate- Mortgage			Real Estate- Commercial			Commercial			Consumer			Municipal		Not Specifically Allocated			Total

Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,231		$	1,995		$	5,467		$	770		$	161		$	—	$	1,014		$	10,638


Charge-offs		(781	)		(1,216	)		(5,075	)		(492	)		(108	)		—		—			(7,672	)
Recoveries		25			74			557			87			31			—		—			774
Provision		177			805			4,838			313			18			—		(726	)		5,425
Ending balance	$	652		$	1,658		$	5,787		$	678		$	102		$	—	$	288		$	9,165

Loans:
Ending balance	$	40,901		$	127,315		$	291,575		$	108,890		$	7,882		$	18,970	$	–		$	595,533
ALL		(652	)		(1,658	)		(5,787	)		(678	)		(102	)		—		(288	)		(9,165	)
Recorded investment	$	40,249		$	125,657		$	285,788		$	108,212		$	7,780		$	18,970	$	(288	)	$	586,368

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated	$	1,243		$	1,488		$	21,010		$	1,666		$	26		$	—	$	–		$	25,433
Collectively evaluated		39,658			125,827			270,565			107,224			7,856			18,970		—			570,100
Total	$	40,901		$	127,315		$	291,575		$	108,890		$	7,882		$	18,970	$	–		$	595,533

A summary of past due loans at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	June 30, 2013
	30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)		90 Days Past Due & Over or on Non- accrual		Total

Construction	$	96	$	841	$	937
Real estate – mortgage		653		575		1,228
Real estate – commercial		2,597		5,671		8,268
Commercial		700		1,252		1,952
Consumer		24		6		30

Total	$	4,070	$	8,345	$	12,415

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


	December 31, 2012
	30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)		90 Days Past Due & Over or on Non- accrual		Total

Construction	$	—	$	1,042	$	1,042
Real estate – mortgage		618		988		1,606
Real estate – commercial		1,715		11,408		13,123
Commercial		903		984		1,887
Consumer		29		26		55

Total	$	3,265	$	14,448	$	17,713

Credit Quality: Management utilizes a risk grading matrix on each of the Company’s commercial loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 7. A description of the loan grades is as follows:

0001 - Excellent risk. Borrowers of highest quality and character. Almost no risk possibility. Balance sheets are very strong with superior liquidity, excellent debt capacity and low leverage. Cash flow trends are positive and stable. Excellent ratios.

0002 - Very good risk. Good ratios in all areas. High quality borrower. Normally quite liquid. Differs slightly from a 0001 customer.

0003 - Strong in most categories. Possible higher levels of debt or shorter track record. Minimal attention required. Good management.

0004 - Better than average risk. Adequate ratios, fair liquidity, desirable customer. Proactive management. Performance trends are positive. Any deviations are limited and temporary.

0005 - Satisfactory risk. Some ratios slightly weak. Overall ability to repay is adequate. Capable and generally proactive management in all critical positions. Margins and cash flow may lack stability but trends are stable to positive. Company is normally profitable year to year but may experience an occasional loss.

0006 A - Weakness detected in either management, capacity to repay or balance sheet. Erratic profitability and financial performance. Loan demands more attention. Includes loans deemed to have weaknesses and less than 90 days past due.

0006 B - Have weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or in the Bank’s collateral position at some future date. Loans with this rating do not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. Includes loans deemed to have weaknesses and less than 90 days past due.

0007 – Have well defined weaknesses and trends that jeopardize the repayment of the loan. Ranging from workout to legal. Includes loans that are nonaccrual and/or 90 days past due and over.

In addition to the risk grading on commercial loans, management utilizes a risk grading process on its real estate mortgage, consumer, and municipal loans when the loan becomes past due 90 days or more and/or is moved to nonaccrual status.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

Below is a breakdown of loans by risk grading as of June 30, 2013 (dollar amounts in thousands):


	0001-0005			0006A⁽¹⁾			0006B			0007⁽²⁾			Total

Commercial	$	109,260		$	2,933		$	438		$	2,343		$	114,974
Real estate – commercial		234,925			18,557			16,509			13,151			283,142
Construction		39,594			2,086			1,257			1,042			43,979
		383,779			23,576			18,204			16,536			442,095
Real estate - mortgage		126,336			1,219			423			1,932			129,910
Consumer		6,661			—			—			5			6,666
Municipal		20,053			—			—			—			20,053
Total	$	536,829		$	24,795		$	18,627		$	18,473			598,724
Deferred origination fees, net of costs														(451	)
Total loans													$	598,273
Percent of Total Loans		89.7	%		4.1	%		3.1	%		3.1	%		100.0	%

⁽¹⁾One impaired loan of $0.7 million is included in the 0006A rating category.

⁽²⁾Included in the 0007 rating category are $6.8 million of loans that are not impaired because fair value exceeds carrying cost.

Below is a breakdown of loss by risk grading as of December 31, 2012 (dollar amounts in thousands):


	0001-0005			0006A			0006B			0007⁽³⁾			Total

Commercial	$	102,038		$	1,835		$	3,351		$	1,666		$	108,890
Real estate – commercial		232,298			19,964			18,720			21,010			291,992
Construction		32,195			5,924			1,539			1,243			40,901
		366,531			27,723			23,610			23,919			441,783
Real estate - mortgage		123,343			1,159			630			2,183			127,315
Consumer		7,856			—			—			26			7,882
Municipal		18,970			—			—			—			18,970
Total	$	516,700		$	28,882		$	24,240		$	26,128			595,950
Deferred origination fees, net of costs														(417	)
Total loans													$	595,533
Percent of Total Loans		86.7	%		4.8	%		4.1	%		4.4	%		100.0	%

⁽³⁾Included in the 0007 rating category are $5.2 million of loans that are not impaired because fair value exceeds carrying cost.

As evidence of the continued improvement in the overall quality of the loan portfolio, loan balances with a risk grading of 0005 or better have risen to $536.8 million as of June 30, 2013, representing 89.7% of the total loan portfolio, from $516.7 million as of December 31, 2012, representing 86.7% of the total loan portfolio.

Loan balances with a risk grading of 0006B or 0007 have decreased by $13.3 million since December 31, 2012. The decrease consisted of $0.7 million of loan balances transferred to other real estate owned, $1.8 million of charge-offs, and $10.8 million of net payments and loan rating changes. Loans in these categories are existing or potential problem loans that require management’s close attention. The decline in these troubled assets continues to be an indication of improvement in the quality of the loan portfolio as management actively works to prudently resolve problem credits.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


8.	Allowance For Loan Losses (“ALL”)

	The ALL represents management’s estimate of probable and inherent credit losses in the loan portfolio. Estimating the amount of the ALL requires the exercise of significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of other qualitative factors such as current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Loan losses are charged off against the ALL, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the ALL. A provision for loan losses (“PFLL”) is charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.

	The ALL consists of specific reserves on certain impaired loans and general reserves for non-impaired loans. Specific reserves reflect estimated losses based on regular analyses of all impaired non-homogenous loans. These analyses involve a high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss associated with specific loans, including estimating the amount and timing of future cash flows and collateral values. The general reserve is based on the Bank’s historical loss experience which is updated quarterly. The general reserve portion of the ALL also includes consideration of certain qualitative factors such as 1) changes in the nature, volume and terms of loans, 2) changes in lending personnel, 3) changes in the quality of the loan review function, 4) changes in nature and volume of past-due, nonaccrual and/or classified loans, 5) changes in concentration of credit risk, 6) changes in economic and industry conditions, 7) changes in legal and regulatory requirements, 8) unemployment and inflation statistics, and 9) changes in underlying collateral values.

	There are many factors affecting the ALL; some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment. The process for determining the ALL (which management believes adequately considers potential factors that might possibly result in credit losses) includes subjective elements and, therefore, may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional PFLL could be required that could adversely affect the Company’s earnings or financial position in future periods. Allocations of the ALL may be made for specific loans, but the entire ALL is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off or for which an actual loss is realized. As an integral part of their examination process, various regulatory agencies review the ALL as well. Such regulators may require that changes in the ALL be recognized when such regulators’ credit evaluations differ from those of management based on information available to the regulators at the time of their examinations.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

Information regarding impaired loans is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

IMPAIRED LOANS AND ALLOCATED ALLOWANCE


June 30, 2013	Construction		Real Estate- Mortgage		Real Estate- Commercial		Commercial		Consumer		Municipal		Not Specifically Allocated		Totals

With an allowance recorded:
Recorded investment	$	40	$	291	$	1,506	$	646	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,483
Unpaid principal balance		63		538		2,321		1,053		—		—		—		3,975
Related allowance		23		247		815		407		—		—		—		1,492
With no related allowance recorded:
Recorded investment	$	778	$	117	$	7,308	$	199	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	8,407
Unpaid principal balance		778		117		7,308		199		5		—		—		8,407
Related allowance		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total:
Recorded investment	$	818	$	408	$	8,814	$	845	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	10,890
Unpaid principal balance		841		655		9,629		1,252		5		—		—		12,382
Related allowance		23		247		815		407		—		—		—		1,492

Average recorded investment during quarter	$	938	$	829	$	9,938	$	916	$	11	$	—	$	—	$	12,632

Interest income recognized while impaired	$	3	$	5	$	93	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	101


December 31, 2012	Construction		Real Estate- Mortgage		Real Estate- Commercial		Commercial		Consumer		Municipal		Not Specifically Allocated		Totals
With an allowance recorded:
Recorded investment	$	130	$	703	$	3,261	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	—	$	4,097
Unpaid principal balance		153		897		4,370		13		4		—		—		5,437
Related allowance		23		194		1,109		13		1		—		—		1,340
With no related allowance recorded:
Recorded investment	$	889	$	547	$	10,516	$	971	$	20	$	—	$	—	$	12,943
Unpaid principal balance		889		547		10,516		971		20		—		—		12,943
Related allowance		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total:
Recorded investment	$	1,019	$	1,250	$	13,777	$	971	$	23	$	—	$	—	$	17,040
Unpaid principal balance		1,042		1,444		14,886		984		24		—		—		18,380
Related allowance		23		194		1,109		13		1		—		—		1,340

Average recorded investment during quarter	$	2,889	$	2,582	$	22,518	$	791	$	18	$	—	$	—	$	28,798
Interest income recognized while impaired	$	2	$	87	$	230	$	6	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	325

Management regularly monitors impaired loan relationships. In the event facts and circumstances change, an additional PFLL may be necessary.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

Nonperforming loans are as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

NONPERFORMING LOANS


	June 30, 2013		March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		September 30, 2012		June 30, 2012
Nonaccrual loans	$	8,231	$	8,499	$	10,724	$	8,203	$	11,513
Loans restructured in a troubled debt restructuring, nonaccrual		114		140		3,724		3,812		8,159
Total nonperforming loans (“NPLs”)	$	8,345	$	8,639	$	14,448	$	12,015	$	19,672
Restructured loans, accruing	$	3,959	$	3,267	$	3,931	$	4,425	$	4,715

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, $0.1 million of nonaccrual loans were brought current, $0.1 million were charged off, and $0.5 million were transferred to other real estate owned. Partially offsetting those decreases were $0.5 million of additions to nonaccrual loans.


9.	Other Real Estate Owned, Net

	Other real estate owned is summarized as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012

Beginning balance	$	14,334		$	14,913
Transfer of net realizable value to other real estate owned		696			5,819
Sale proceeds		(3,302	)		(5,489	)
Net gain from disposal of other real estate owned		128			110
Valuation allowance related to properties disposed		(1,382	)		(1,579	)
Total other real estate owned		10,474			13,774
Valuation allowance for losses		(2,921	)		(3,417	)
Total other real estate owned, net	$	7,553		$	10,357

Changes in the valuation allowance for losses on total other real estate owned were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012

Beginning balance	$	3,858		$	2,794
Provision charged to operations		445			2,202
Amounts related to properties disposed		(1,382	)		(1,579	)
Balance at end of period	$	2,921		$	3,417

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


10.	Income Taxes

	In accordance with the accounting guidance for income taxes, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates that will apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date.

	A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% chance of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.

	Management regularly reviews the carrying amount of the Company’s deferred income tax assets to determine if the establishment of a valuation allowance is necessary. If, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized in future periods, a deferred income tax valuation allowance would be established. Consideration is given to various positive and negative factors that could affect the realization of the deferred income tax assets. In evaluating available evidence, management considers, among other things, historical financial performance, expectation of future earnings, the ability to carry back losses to recoup taxes previously paid, length of statutory carryforward periods, experience with operating loss and tax credit carryforwards not expiring unused, tax planning strategies and timing of reversals of temporary differences. Significant judgment is required in assessing future earning trends and the timing of reversals of temporary differences. The evaluation is based on current tax laws as well as management’s expectations of future performance. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company determined that no valuation allowance was required to be taken against the deferred income tax asset.

	The Company is subject to the income tax laws of the U.S., its states and municipalities. These tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant Governmental taxing authorities. Accounting guidance related to uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a comprehensive model for how companies should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under the guidance, tax positions shall initially be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon the examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions shall initially and subsequently be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% chance of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. The guidance also revises disclosure requirements to include an annual tabular roll forward of unrecognized tax benefits. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, the Company must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws within the framework existing under GAAP. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

	The Company is no longer subject to examination by U.S. Federal taxing authorities for years before 2009 and for Wisconsin state income taxes for years before 2008. Subsequent to June 30, 2013, the IRS began an audit of the Company’s 2011 federal income tax return. Management anticipates this audit will be concluded by the end of 2013.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


	Changes in the deferred income tax balances were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES – AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES


	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012

Balances at beginning of period	$	(3,435	)	$	(2,468	)
Net change during period		1,687			(800	)
Balances at end of period	$	(1,748	)	$	(3,268	)

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES – OTHER THAN AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES


	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012

Balances at beginning of period	$	9,793		$	9,613
Net change during period		(911	)		461
Balances at end of period	$	8,882		$	10,074


11.	Equity Investment

	The Bank owns a 49.8% interest (500 shares) in United Financial Services, Inc. (“UFS”), a data processing service. In addition to the ownership interest, the Bank and UFS have a common member on each of their respective Boards of Directors. The investment in this entity is carried on the Bank’s balance sheet under the equity method of accounting and the pro rata share of its net income is included in noninterest income in the consolidated statement of operations and increases the Bank’s investment. As dividends are received from UFS, the investment is reduced. The carrying value of the investment in UFS was $3.6 million at June 30, 2013 and $3.3 million at December 31, 2012. The current book value of UFS was approximately $7,159 per share and $6,691 per share at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

	On June 28, 2013, UFS acquired a similar data processing entity located in St. Louis, Missouri, expanding its service base from Wisconsin to four additional states.

12.	Mortgage Servicing Rights

	The Company has obligations to service residential first mortgage loans and commercial loans that have been sold in the secondary market with servicing retained. Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are recorded at fair value when loans are sold in the secondary market with servicing retained. On a quarterly basis, MSRs are valued based on a valuation model that calculates the fair value using assumptions that market participants would use in estimating the present value of future net servicing income.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

Changes in the carrying value of MSRs are as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS


	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012

Balance at beginning of period	$	948		$	697		$	839		$	634
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained		55			83			166			128
Loan payments and payoffs		(38	)		(59	)		(91	)		(95	)
Changes in valuation		(80	)		(28	)		(29	)		26
Fair value of MSRs at the end of period	$	885		$	693		$	885		$	693

Unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others was $128.1 million and $83.1 million at June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively.


13.	Promissory Notes

	During 2009 and 2010, the Company issued 10% Convertible Notes due June 30, 2017 totaling $9.45 million. The Convertible Notes were offered and sold in reliance on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder.

	The Convertible Notes accrue interest at a fixed rate of 10% per annum upon issuance and until maturity or earlier conversion or redemption. Interest is payable quarterly, in arrears, on January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year. The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion ratio of one share of common stock for each $5.00 in aggregate principal amount held on the record date of the conversion, subject to certain adjustments as described in the Convertible Notes. Beginning on July 1, 2014, the Company may redeem the notes in whole or in part. A notice of redemption supersedes and takes priority over any notice of conversion. Prior to October 1, 2014, each holder of the Convertible Notes may convert up to 100% (at the discretion of the holder) of the original principal amount into shares of common stock at the conversion ratio. On October 1, 2014, one-half of the original principal amounts are mandatorily convertible into common stock at the conversion ratio if voluntary conversion has not occurred. The principal amount, along with accrued, but unpaid interest, of any Convertible Note that has not been converted will be payable at maturity on June 30, 2017. The outstanding principal balance at June 30, 2013 is $9.40 million.

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013


14.	Troubled Debt Restructuring

	A troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) includes a loan modification where a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Bank grants a concession to that borrower that would not otherwise be considered except for the borrower’s financial difficulties. A TDR may be either accrual or nonaccrual status based upon the performance of the borrower and management’s assessment of collectability. If a TDR is placed on nonaccrual status, it remains there until a sufficient period of performance under the restructured terms has occurred at which time it is returned to accrual status, generally six months.

	Changes in troubled debt restructurings for the six months ended June 30, 2013 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Construction		Real Estate- Mortgage			Real Estate- Commercial			Commercial			Consumer		Municipal		Total
Accruing
December 31, 2012	$	—	$	455		$	3,476		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	3,931
Principal payments		—		—			(41	)		—			—		—		(41	)
Charge-offs		—		—			—			—			—		—		—
Advances		—		—			—			—			—		—		—
New restructured		—		—			1,490			—			—		—		1,490
Transferred out of TDRs		—		(385	)		(966	)		—			—		—		(1,351	)
Transfers to nonaccrual		—		(70	)		—			—			—		—		(70	)
June 30, 2013	$	—	$	—		$	3,959		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	3,959

Nonaccrual
December 31, 2012	$	—	$	—		$	3,710		$	14		$	—	$	—	$	3,724
Principal payments		—		—			(3,024	)		(1	)		—		—		(3,025	)
Charge-offs		—		—			(655	)		—			—		—		(655	)
Advances		—		—			—			—			—		—		—
New restructured		—		—			—			—			—		—		—
Transfers to other real estate owned		—		—			—			—			—		—		—
Transfers from accruing		—		70			—			—			—		—		70
June 30, 2013	$	—	$	70		$	31		$	13		$	—	$	—	$	114

Totals
December 31, 2012	$	—	$	455		$	7,186		$	14		$	—	$	—	$	7,655
Principal payments		—		—			(3,065	)		(1	)		—		—		(3,066	)
Charge-offs		—		—			(655	)		—			—		—		(655	)
Advances		—		—			—			—			—		—		—
New restructured		—		—			1,490			—			—		—		1,490
Transfers out of TDRs		—		(385	)		(966	)		—			—		—		(1,351	)
Transfers to other real estate owned		—		—			—			—			—		—		—
June 30, 2013	$	—	$	70		$	3,990		$	13		$	—	$	—	$	4,073

Table of Contents

BAYLAKE CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, $1.5 million of loan balances relating to three loans were transferred to restructured status. One loan for $0.7 million was restructured as an A/B split structure. Two loans totaling $0.8 million were restructured with changes to their payment schedules. Also during the six months, $3.6 million of nonaccrual restructured loans were reduced when the collateral securing the loans was sold within the six months and principal payments of $3.1 million were received. The remaining balance of $0.5 million was charged off.

A summary of troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment		Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment

Construction		—	$	—		—	$	—
Real estate – mortgage		1		70		5		455
Real estate – commercial		8		3,990		12		7,186
Commercial		1		13		1		14
Consumer		—		—		—		—
Municipal		—		—		—		—
Total		10	$	4,073		18	$	7,655

A summary of troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2013 by restructure type is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	Accruing		Nonaccruing		Total
A/B split	$	680	$	70	$	750
Payment schedule changes		1,257		44		1,301
Interest rate reduction		2,022		—		2,022
Total	$	3,959	$	114	$	4,073


15.	Commitments and Contingencies

The following is a summary of the Company’s off-balance sheet commitments, all of which were lending-related commitments:

LENDING RELATED COMMITMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012

Commitments to fund unused home equity line loans	$	57,568	$	55,891
Commitments to fund 1-4 family loans		9,431		12,931
Commitments to fund residential real estate construction loans		2,449		2,435
Commitments unused on commercial lines of credit loans		148,430		149,569
Commitments unused on consumer lines of credit loans		9,977		9,525
Total commitments to extend credit	$	227,855	$	230,351
Financial standby letters of credit	$	9,851	$	15,499

Table of Contents

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

Baylake Corp. (“we,” “us” or “our”) is a Wisconsin corporation that is registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”) as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Our wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Baylake Bank (the “Bank”), is a Wisconsin state-chartered bank that provides a wide variety of loan, deposit and other banking products and services to its business, retail, and municipal customers, as well as a full range of trust, investment and cash management services. The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago.

The following sets forth management’s discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. This discussion and analysis should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained in Part I of this Form 10-Q, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Forward-Looking Information

This discussion and analysis of consolidated financial condition and results of operations, and other sections of this report, may contain forward-looking statements that are based on the current expectations of management. Such expressions of expectations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “is likely,” “plans,” “projects,” and other such words are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. The statements contained herein and in such forward-looking statements involve or may involve certain assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control that may cause actual future results to differ materially from what may be expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Readers should not place undue expectations on any forward-looking statements. In addition to the assumptions and other factors referenced specifically in connection with such statements, the following factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: the factors described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are incorporated herein by reference, and other risks that may be identified or discussed in this Form 10-Q.

Branch Closure

In the normal course of business, the Bank continually evaluates efficiencies of operations. In doing so, it determined that it would be prudent to discontinue the operations of its only branch in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. These operations were absorbed into the Bank’s remaining branches. The associated real estate was transferred to other real estate owned.

Critical Accounting Policies

In the course of our normal business activity, management must select and apply many accounting policies and methodologies that lead to the financial results presented in our consolidated financial statements. The following is a summary of what management believes are our critical accounting policies.

Allowance for Loan Losses (“ALL”): The ALL represents management’s estimate of probable and inherent credit losses in the loan portfolio. Estimating the amount of the ALL requires the exercise of significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of other qualitative factors such as current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset on our consolidated balance sheet. Loan losses are charged off against the ALL while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the ALL. A Provision for Loan Losses (“PFLL”) is charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.

The ALL consists of specific reserves on certain impaired loans and general reserves for non-impaired loans. Specific reserves reflect estimated losses on impaired loans from analyses developed through specific credit allocations for individual loans. The specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of all impaired non-homogenous loans. These analyses involve a high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss associated with specific loans, including estimating the amount and timing of future cash flows and collateral values. The general reserve is based on our historical loss experience which is updated quarterly. The general reserve portion of the ALL also includes consideration of certain qualitative factors such as (i) changes in the nature, volume and terms of loans, (ii) changes in lending personnel, (iii) changes in the quality of the loan review function, (iv) changes in nature and volume of past-due, nonaccrual and/or classified loans, (v) changes in concentration of credit risk, (vi) changes in economic and industry conditions, (vii) changes in legal and regulatory requirements, (viii) unemployment and inflation statistics, and (ix) changes in underlying collateral values.

Table of Contents

There are many factors affecting the ALL, some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment. The process for determining the ALL (which management believes adequately considers potential factors which might possibly result in credit losses) includes subjective elements and, therefore, may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional PFLL could be required that could adversely affect our earnings or financial position in future periods. Allocations of the ALL may be made for specific loans but the entire ALL is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off or for which an actual loss is realized.

As an integral part of their examination process, various regulatory agencies review the ALL as well. Such agencies may require that changes in the ALL be recognized when such regulatory credit evaluations differ from those of management based on information available to the regulators at the time of their examinations.

Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at the lower of carrying cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell, establishing a new cost basis. Fair value is determined using a variety of market information including, but not limited to, appraisals, professional market assessments and real estate tax assessment information. If the fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Costs incurred after acquisition are expensed.

Income Tax Accounting: The assessment of income tax assets and liabilities involves the use of estimates, assumptions, interpretations, and judgments concerning certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes. There can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or positions of federal and state taxing authorities, will not differ from management’s current assessment, the impact of which could be significant to the consolidated results of our operations and reported earnings.

Goodwill: Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over fair value of net identifiable assets at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment tests on an annual basis or more frequently if deemed appropriate. Goodwill is subject to a periodic assessment by applying a fair value test based upon a two-step method. The first step of the process compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including any goodwill. During 2012, we, with the assistance of a third party valuation firm determined an estimated cash fair value of our common stock. Consideration was given to our nature and history, the competitive and economic outlook for our trade area and for the banking industry in general, our book value and financial condition, our future earnings and dividend paying capacity, the size of the block valued, and the prevailing market prices of bank stocks. The following valuation methodologies were considered: (i) net asset value – defined as our net worth, (ii) market value – defined as the price at which knowledgeable buyers and sellers would agree to buy and sell our common stock, and (iii) investment value – defined as an estimate of the present value of the future benefits, usually earnings, cash flow, or dividends, that will accrue to our common stock. When consideration was given to the three valuation methodologies, as well as all other relevant valuation variables and factors, the fully-diluted cash fair value range of our common shares was considered to be in excess of the book value. Since the valuation range obtained from that firm exceeded our carrying value including goodwill, we did not fail step one of the impairment test established under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, therefore, no goodwill impairment was recognized. If the carrying amount would have exceeded fair value, we would have performed the second step to measure the amount of impairment loss. Based on the valuation obtained as of September 30, 2012, our valuation exceeded our carrying value by a range of 47% to 58%. As of June 30, 2013, there are no conditions that would require goodwill impairment to be reevaluated.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our results of operations and related summary information for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

SUMMARY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012

Net income, as reported	$	1,731		$	1,294		$	3,486		$	2,626
Earnings per share-basic, as reported	$	0.22		$	0.16		$	0.44		$	0.33
Earnings per share-diluted, as reported	$	0.19		$	0.15		$	0.38		$	0.30
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.05		$	0.01		$	0.09		$	0.02


Return on average assets		0.73	%		0.50	%		0.73	%		0.50	%
Return on average equity		7.31	%		5.93	%		7.45	%		6.07	%
Efficiency ratio⁽¹⁾		68.46	%		78.71	%		67.78	%		75.19	%

⁽¹⁾ Noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding net investment securities gains, net gains on the sale of fixed assets, and net gain on sale of branches. A lower ratio indicates greater efficiency.

Net income of $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased from net income of $1.3 million for the comparable period in 2012. Net interest income was $7.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 and $8.2 million for the comparable quarter last year, resulting from a $1.4 million reduction in interest income partially offset by a $0.5 million reduction in interest expense. A PFLL of $0.6 million was charged to operations for the second quarter of 2013, which is $1.7 million lower than the $2.3 million PFLL taken during the comparable quarter of 2012. Noninterest income decreased by $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2013 versus the comparable quarter of 2012, primarily due to reduced net securities gains of $0.7 million, a $0.4 million gain on sale of land held for sale recorded in the second quarter of 2012 and $0.5 million of life insurance death benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2012. Noninterest expense declined to $6.7 million for the second quarter of 2013 compared to $8.9 million in the similar quarter last year primarily due to reduced costs associated with four branches sold in the third quarter of 2012, reduced costs of $1.5 million related to the operation of other real estate as well as reduced loan and collection costs.

Net income of $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased from net income of $2.6 million for the comparable period in 2012. Net interest income was $14.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $16.5 million for the comparable period last year, resulting from a $3.1 million reduction in interest income partially offset by a $1.3 million reduction in interest expense. A PFLL of $1.2 million was charged to operations for the six months of 2013, which is $2.8 million lower than the $4.0 million PFLL taken during the comparable period of 2012. Noninterest income decreased by $2.5 million in the six months of 2013 versus the comparable period of 2012, primarily due to reduced net securities gains of $1.4 million, $0.4 million in gain on sale of land held for sale recorded in 2012 and $0.5 million of life insurance death benefit recorded in 2012. Noninterest expense declined to $13.5 million for the first six months of 2013 compared to $16.7 million in the comparable period last year primarily due to reduced costs associated with four branches sold in the third quarter of 2012, reduced costs of $1.9 million related to the operation of other real estate as well as reduced loan and collection costs.

Net Interest Income:

Net interest income is the largest component of our operating income and represents the difference between interest earned on loans, investments and other interest-earning assets offset by the interest expense attributable to the deposits and borrowings that fund such assets. Interest rate fluctuations, together with changes in the volume and types of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, combine to affect total net interest income. This analysis discusses net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis in order to provide comparability among the various types of earned interest income. Tax-exempt interest income is adjusted to a level that reflects such income as if it were fully taxable.

Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was $7.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $8.5 million for the same period in 2012. The decrease for the second quarter of 2013 resulted primarily from a $1.4 million decrease in interest income on interest earning assets partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Contributing to the reduction in funding costs, average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased from $105.7 million during the second quarter of 2012 to $115.3 million for the comparable period in 2013.

Table of Contents

Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was $15.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $17.0 million for the same period in 2012. The decrease for the six months of 2013 resulted primarily from a $3.1 million decrease in interest income on interest-earning assets partially offset by a $1.3 million decrease in interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Contributing to the reduction in funding costs, average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased from $102.1 million during the second quarter of 2012 to $115.9 million for the comparable period in 2013.

Interest rate spread is the difference between the interest rate earned on average interest-earning assets and the rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate spread remained stable at 3.45% for the second quarter of 2013 and 2012, resulting primarily from a 17 bps decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from 0.84% to 0.67%, offset by a 17 bps decrease in the yield on earning assets from 4.29% to 4.12%. We continue to be positively impacted by the interest rate floors on a large number of loans on our balance sheet, which has resulted in the recognition of a greater amount of interest income than would have been recognized had the floors not existed.

Interest rate spread decreased 4 bps to 3.40% for the first six months of 2013 compared to 3.44% for the same period in 2012, resulting primarily from a 20 bps decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from 0.88% to 0.68%, more than offset by a 24 bps decrease in the yield on earning assets from 4.32% to 4.08%.

Net interest margin represents net interest income expressed as an annualized percentage of average interest-earning assets. Net interest margin exceeds the interest rate spread because of the use of noninterest-bearing sources of funds (demand deposits and equity capital) to fund a portion of earning assets. Net interest margin for the second quarter of 2013 was 3.55%, unchanged from the comparable period in 2012.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, average interest-earning assets decreased $97.6 million from the same period in 2012. Decreases in average loans of $43.8 million (6.9%), taxable securities of $30.4 million (13.2%) and federal funds sold and interest-bearing due from financial institutions balances of $24.7 million (56.8%), partially offset by an increase in tax exempt securities of $1.3 million (2.9%) account for the net decrease. The decrease in loans is primarily attributable to the sale of $36.8 million of loans in conjunction with the sale of four branches in the third quarter of 2012.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, average interest-earning assets decreased $92.5 million from the same period in 2012. Decreases in average loans of $42.1 million (6.6%), taxable securities of $38.5 million (15.8%) and federal funds sold and interest-bearing due from financial institutions balances of $13.1 million (28.8%), partially offset by an increase in tax exempt securities of $1.2 million (2.6%) account for the net decrease. The decrease in loans is primarily attributable to the sale of $36.8 million of loans in conjunction with the sale of four branches in the third quarter of 2012.

Table of Contents

NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS ON A TAX-EQUIVALENT BASIS (Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Three months ended June 30, 2013							Three months ended June 30, 2012
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate
ASSETS
Average Earning Assets:
Loans, net^1,2	$	594,883	$	7,074		4.77	%	$	638,684	$	7,950		5.01	%
Taxable securities		200,698		1,179		2.35	%		231,116		1,712		2.96	%
Tax exempt securities¹		45,805		563		4.92	%		44,534		563		5.06	%
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing due from financial institutions		18,739		15		0.32	%		43,406		23		0.21	%
Total earning assets		860,125		8,831		4.12	%		957,740		10,248		4.29	%
Noninterest earning assets		85,343							93,051
Total assets	$	945,468						$	1,050,791

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Total interest-bearing deposits	$	633,865		691		0.44	%	$	742,178		1,195		0.65	%
Short-term borrowings		—		—		—	%		96		—		0.67	%
Customer repurchase agreements		28,416		15		0.21	%		26,829		13		0.20	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		40,000		201		2.02	%		55,000		258		1.88	%
Convertible promissory notes		9,400		244		10.38	%		9,450		245		10.37	%
Subordinated debentures		16,100		66		1.63	%		16,100		74		1.82	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		727,781		1,217		0.67	%		849,653		1,785		0.84	%
Demand deposits		115,273							105,695
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		7,464							7,665
Stockholders’ equity		94,950							87,778
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	945,468						$	1,050,791
Net interest income			$	7,614						$	8,463
Interest rate spread⁽³⁾						3.45	%						3.45	%
Net interest margin⁽⁴⁾						3.55	%						3.55	%


(1)	The interest income on tax exempt securities and loans is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34% for all periods presented.
(2)	The average loan balances and rates include nonaccrual loans.
(3)	Interest rate spread is the difference between the annualized average yield earned on average interest-earning assets for the period and the annualized average rate of interest accrued on average interest-bearing liabilities for the period.
(4)	Net interest margin is the annualized effect of net interest income for a period divided by average interest-earning assets for the period.

Table of Contents

NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS ON A TAX-EQUIVALENT BASIS (Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Six months ended June 30, 2013							Six months ended June 30, 2012
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ Rate
ASSETS
Average Earning Assets:
Loans, net^1,2	$	594,261	$	14,170		4.81	%	$	636,408	$	16,029		5.06	%
Taxable securities		204,500		2,402		2.35	%		242,960		3,618		2.98	%
Tax exempt securities¹		45,534		1,129		4.96	%		44,371		1,127		5.08	%
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing due from financial institutions		32,425		49		0.30	%		45,525		53		0.23	%
Total earning assets		876,720		17,750		4.08	%		969,264		20,827		4.32	%
Noninterest earning assets		86,016							92,139
Total assets	$	962,736						$	1,061,403

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Average Interest-Bearing
Liabilities:
Total interest-bearing deposits	$	647,150		1,455		0.45	%	$	752,237		2,589		0.69	%
Short-term borrowings		—		—		—	%		48		—		0.67	%
Customer repurchase agreements		31,882		35		0.22	%		30,953		36		0.24	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		40,000		400		2.02	%		55,000		516		1.88	%
Convertible promissory notes		9,400		488		10.38	%		9,450		490		10.37	%
Subordinated debentures		16,100		133		1.65	%		16,100		152		1.87	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		744,532		2,511		0.68	%		863,788		3,783		0.88	%
Demand deposits		115,868							102,081
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		8,025							8,500
Stockholders’ equity		94,311							87,034
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	962,736						$	1,061,403
Net interest income			$	15,239						$	17,044
Interest rate spread⁽³⁾						3.40	%						3.44	%
Net interest margin⁽⁴⁾						3.50	%						3.53	%


(1)	The interest income on tax exempt securities and loans is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34% for all periods presented.
(2)	The average loan balances and rates include nonaccrual loans.
(3)	Interest rate spread is the difference between the annualized average yield earned on average interest-earning assets for the period and the annualized average rate of interest accrued on average interest-bearing liabilities for the period.
(4)	Net interest margin is the annualized effect of net interest income for a period divided by average interest-earning assets for the period.

Table of Contents

RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS⁽¹⁾
(Dollar amounts in thousands)

The following table presents an analysis of changes in net interest income resulting from changes in average volumes in interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and average rates earned and paid for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012:


	Increase (Decrease) due to⁽¹⁾
	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Loans	$	(524	)	$	(352	)	$	(876	)
Taxable securities		(223	)		(310	)		(533	)
Tax exempt securities		16			(16	)		—
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing due from financial institutions		(17	)		9			(8	)
Total interest-earning assets	$	(748	)	$	(669	)	$	(1,417	)

Interest expense:
Total interest-bearing deposits	$	(278	)	$	(226	)	$	(504	)
Repurchase agreements/short-term borrowings		1			1			2
FHLB advances		(75	)		18			(57	)
Convertible promissory notes		(1	)		—			(1	)
Subordinated debentures		—			(8	)		(8	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	(353	)	$	(215	)	$	(568	)
Net interest income	$	(395	)	$	(454	)	$	(849	)


⁽¹⁾	The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the relationship to the dollar amounts of the change in each.

Management’s ability to employ overall assets for the production of interest income can be measured by the ratio of average interest-earning assets to average total assets. This ratio was 91.0% and 91.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS⁽¹⁾
(Dollar amounts in thousands)

The following table presents an analysis of changes in net interest income resulting from changes in average volumes in interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and average rates earned and paid for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012:


	Increase (Decrease) due to⁽¹⁾
	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Loans	$	(1,095	)	$	(764	)	$	(1,859	)
Taxable securities		(545	)		(671	)		(1,216	)
Tax exempt securities		29			(27	)		2
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing due from financial institutions		(18	)		14			(4	)
Total interest-earning assets	$	(1,629	)	$	(1,448	)	$	(3,077	)

Interest expense:
Total interest-bearing deposits	$	(565	)	$	(569	)	$	(1,134	)
Repurchase agreements/short-term borrowings		1			(2	)		(1	)
FHLB advances		(151	)		35			(116	)
Convertible promissory notes		(3	)		1			(2	)
Subordinated debentures		—			(19	)		(19	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	(718	)	$	(554	)	$	(1,272	)
Net interest income	$	(911	)	$	(894	)	$	(1,805	)


⁽¹⁾	The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the relationship to the dollar amounts of the change in each.

Table of Contents

The ratio of average interest-earning assets to average total assets was 91.1% and 91.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Provision for Loan Losses:

The PFLL is the periodic cost of providing an allowance for probable and inherent losses in our loan portfolio. The ALL consists of specific and general components. Our internal risk system is used to identify loans that meet the criteria for being “impaired” as defined in the accounting guidance. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired and where expected cash flows are less than carrying value. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. These qualitative factors include: 1) changes in the nature, volume and terms of loans, 2) changes in lending personnel, 3) changes in the quality of the loan review function, 4) changes in nature and volume of past-due, nonaccrual and/or classified loans, 5) changes in concentration of credit risk, 6) changes in economic and industry conditions, 7) changes in legal and regulatory requirements, 8) unemployment and inflation statistics, and 9) changes in underlying collateral values.

The PFLL for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 was $0.6 million compared to $2.3 million for the second quarter of 2012. Impairments of $1.2 million on loans not previously identified with associated loan balances of $3.0 million were recorded during the second quarter of 2013. Of the new impairments identified in the second quarter of 2013, $1.1 million related to a single loan relationship consisting of two loans with $2.5 million in balances outstanding at June 30, 2013. Subsequent to June 30, 2013, a formal offer was received on the collateral securing the loan, with a closing expected to occur in the near future. No additional impairment is anticipated based on the offer.

Loan charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively. During the first six months of 2013, a $0.7 million charge off was taken related to a sale of a commercial customer’s business. This sale also reduced nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets by $3.2 million. Net annualized charge-offs to average loans were 0.52% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 0.61% for the same period in 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, nonperforming loans decreased by $6.1 million (42.2%) to $8.3 million from $14.4 million at December 31, 2012. Refer to the “Financial Condition - Risk Management and the Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Financial Condition - Nonperforming Loans, Potential Problem Loans and Other Real Estate Owned” sections below for more information related to nonperforming loans. Our management believes that the ALL at June 30, 2013 and the related PFLL charged to earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 are appropriate in light of the present condition of the loan portfolio and the amount and quality of the collateral supporting nonperforming loans. We continue to monitor nonperforming loan relationships and will make additional PFLLs, as necessary, if the facts and circumstances change. In addition, a decline in the quality of our loan portfolio as a result of general economic conditions, factors affecting particular borrowers or our market area, or otherwise, could affect the adequacy of the ALL. If there are significant charge-offs against the ALL, or we otherwise determine that the ALL is inadequate or our estimates are different than our regulators’ estimates, we will need to make additional PFLLs in the future.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Income:

The following table reflects the various components of noninterest income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

NONINTEREST INCOME
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Three months ended									Six months ended
	June 30, 2013			June 30, 2012			% Change			June 30, 2013			June 30, 2012			% Change

Fees from fiduciary services	$	286		$	283			1.1	%	$	537		$	523			2.7	%
Fees from loan servicing		143			141			1.4	%		293			300			(2.3	)%
Service charges on deposit accounts		699			810			(13.7	)%		1,326			1,582			(16.2	)%
Other fee income		153			178			(14.0	)%		316			366			(13.7	)%
Financial services income		244			232			5.2	%		557			440			26.6	%
Net gains on sales of loans		440			512			(14.1	)%		1,034			873			18.4	%
Net change in valuation of mortgage servicing		(118	)		(87	)		(35.6	)%		(120	)		(69	)		(73.9	)%
Net gains from sale of securities		221			907			(75.6	)%		209			1,585			(86.8	)%
Gains from sale of fixed assets		5			619			(99.2	)%		5			621			(99.2	)%
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		91			107			(15.0	)%		169			200			(15.6	)%
Equity in income of UFS subsidiary		198			159			24.5	%		433			336			28.9	%
Other income		(3	)		481			(100.6	)%		99			630			(84.3	)%
Total Noninterest Income	$	2,359		$	4,342			(45.7	)%	$	4,858		$	7,387			(34.2	)%

Noninterest income decreased $2.0 million (45.7%) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 versus the comparable period in 2012 primarily due to decreased gains from the sale of securities of $0.7 million (75.6%), a reduction of gain on sale of fixed assets of $0.6 million (99.2%) resulting primarily from gains on land held for sale of $0.4 million, and a $0.5 million life insurance death benefit received in the second quarter of 2012.

Noninterest income decreased $2.5 million (34.2%) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the comparable period in 2012 primarily due to decreased gains from the sale of securities of $1.4 million (86.8%), a reduction of gain on sale of fixed assets of $0.6 million (99.2%) resulting primarily from gains on land held for sale of $0.4 million, and a $0.5 million life insurance death benefit received in the second quarter of 2012.

Included in the fees for other services to customers in noninterest income are service charges on deposit accounts, other fee income and financial services income.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense:

The following table reflects the various components of noninterest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Three months ended							Six months ended
	June 30, 2013		June 30, 2012		% Change			June 30, 2013		June 30, 2012		% Change

Salaries and employee benefits	$	3,908	$	4,228		(7.6	)%	$	8,093	$	8,655		(6.5	)%
Occupancy		483		553		(12.7	)%		1,007		1,177		(14.4	)%
Equipment		294		287		2.4	%		589		557		5.7	%
Data processing and courier		213		221		(3.6	)%		420		450		(6.7	)%
Operation of other real estate owned		364		1,817		(80.0	)%		563		2,413		(76.7	)%
Business development and advertising		190		179		6.1	%		347		350		(0.9	)%
Charitable contributions		16		19		(15.8	)%		34		35		(2.9	)%
Stationery and supplies		112		145		(22.8	)%		214		277		(22.7	)%
Director fees		93		105		(11.4	)%		187		206		(9.2	)%
FDIC insurance		178		369		(51.8	)%		369		731		(49.5	)%
Legal and professional		168		161		4.3	%		343		262		30.9	%
Loan and collection		52		147		(64.6	)%		147		357		(58.8	)%
Other outside services		185		198		(6.6	)%		384		381		0.8	%
Other operating expenses		423		448		(5.6	)%		790		859		(8.0	)%
Total Noninterest Expense	$	6,679	$	8,877		(24.8	)%	$	13,487	$	16,710		(19.3	)%

Total noninterest expense decreased $2.2 million (24.8%) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The noninterest expense to average assets ratio was 2.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 3.4% for the same period in 2012. The decrease in expense was primarily attributable to a $1.5 million (80.0%) decrease in expenses related to other real estate owned, a $0.1 million (64.6%) decrease in loan and collection costs as well as a decrease in overall operating costs associated with the sale of four branches in third quarter 2012. FDIC insurance expense was down $0.2 million.

Total noninterest expense decreased $3.2 million (19.3%) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The noninterest expense to average assets ratio was 2.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 3.2% for the same period in 2012. The decrease in expense was primarily attributable to a $1.9 million (76.7%) decrease in expenses related to other real estate owned, a $0.2 million (8.8%) decrease in loan and collection costs as well as a decrease in overall operating costs associated with the sale of four branches in third quarter 2012. FDIC insurance expense was down $0.4 million.

Net overhead expense is total noninterest expense less total noninterest income. The net overhead expense to average assets ratio was at 1.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 1.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The efficiency ratio represents total noninterest expense as a percentage of the sum of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis and total noninterest income (excluding net gains on the sale of securities, premises and equipment, branch sales, and land held for sale). A lower efficiency ratio indicates a more efficient operation. The efficiency ratio decreased to 68.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from 78.7% for the comparable period last year. This is primarily due to the $2.2 million decrease in noninterest expense discussed above.

The $1.8 million decrease in expenses related to the operation of other real estate owned held for sale by the Bank for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 resulted almost exclusively from a $1.8 million decrease in write-downs due to the revaluation of properties held. We continue to evaluate all other real estate owned values and attempt to reduce the holding periods of these properties and, as a result, the related holding costs, to the extent possible. Such expenses include, but are not limited to, insurance, maintenance, real estate taxes, management fees, utilities and legal fees. A majority of the other real estate owned have valuations that have been updated within the last twelve months.

Salaries and employee benefits were $8.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The number of full-time equivalent employees decreased from 291 at June 30, 2012 to 264 at June 30, 2013 primarily related to the sale of four branches in third quarter 2012. Commission expense for commissioned salespersons, including financial advisors and mortgage originators, may impact future salary expense based on the levels of production attained. Included in 2013 salary expense is $0.1 million of expense related to our long-term equity incentive plan.

Table of Contents

Included in noninterest expense are FDIC insurance premiums of $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $0.7 million for the same period a year ago, a decrease of $0.3 million (49.5%). This decrease is attributable to the reduction in net assets resulting from the sale of four branches in the third quarter of 2012 as well as a reduction by the FDIC in the assessment rate applied in the calculation of our premium.

Income Taxes:

We recorded an income tax expense of $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 versus an expense of $0.1 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in tax expense is primarily attributable to a $1.0 million year-over-year increase in pre-tax taxable income for the second quarter of 2013 versus the comparable quarter of 2012.

We maintain net deferred income tax assets for deductible temporary tax differences, such as allowance for loan losses, nonaccrual loan interest, and other real estate owned valuations as well as net operating loss carry forwards. Our determination of the amount of our deferred income tax assets to be realized is highly subjective and is based on several factors, including projected future income, income tax planning strategies, and federal and state income tax rules and regulations. At June 30, 2013, we determined that no valuation allowance was required to be taken against our deferred income tax assets. We continue to assess the amount of tax benefits we may realize.

Financial Condition

Loans:

The following table reflects the composition (mix) of the loan portfolio:


	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012			Percent Change

Amount of Loans by Type:
Real estate-mortgage:
Commercial	$	283,142		$	291,992			(3.0	)%
1-4 Family residential
First liens		86,397			83,579			3.4	%
Junior liens		6,371			6,482			(1.7	)%
Home equity		37,142			37,254			(0.3	)%
Commercial, financial and agricultural		114,974			108,890			5.6	%
Real estate-construction		43,979			40,901			7.5	%
Installment
Credit cards and related plans		1,419			1,433			(1.0	)%
Other		5,247			6,449			(18.6	)%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		20,053			18,970			5.7	%
Less: Deferred origination fees, net of costs		(451	)		(417	)		(8.2	)%
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(8,823	)		(9,165	)		3.7	%
Total	$	589,450		$	586,368			0.5	%

Net loans increased $3.1 million (0.5%) from $586.4 million at December 31, 2012 to $589.5 million at June 30, 2013. In addition to originating loans, we buy and sell loan participations with other financial institutions located in markets we serve. These loans are underwritten to the same lending standards as the loans we originate. Additionally, we purchase syndicated loans in the national market which represent small portions of large national credits. These credits are also subject to our normal underwriting guidelines.

Risk Management and the Allowance for Loan Losses:

The loan portfolio is our primary asset subject to credit risk. To address this credit risk, we maintain an ALL for probable and inherent credit losses through periodic charges to our earnings. These charges are shown in our consolidated statements of operations as PFLL. See the “Provision for Loan Losses” section discussed earlier. We attempt to control, monitor and minimize credit risk through the use of prudent lending standards, a thorough review of potential borrowers prior to lending and ongoing and timely review of payment performance. Asset quality administration, including early identification of loans performing in a substandard manner, as well as timely and active resolution of problems, further enhances management of credit risk and minimization of loan losses. Any losses that occur and that are charged off against the ALL are periodically reviewed with specific efforts focused on achieving maximum recovery of both principal and interest.

Table of Contents

The ALL at June 30, 2013 was $8.8 million, compared to $9.2 million at December 31, 2012. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the adequacy of the ALL. The analysis of the ALL consists of three components: (i) specific reserves established for expected losses relating to impaired loans for which the recorded investment in the loans exceeds its fair value; (ii) general reserves based on historical loan loss experience for significant loan classes; and (iii) general reserves based on qualitative factors such as concentrations and changes in portfolio mix and volume. Allocations of the ALL may be made for specific loans but the entire ALL is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off or for which an actual loss is realized.

On a regular basis, loan officers review all commercial credit relationships. The loan officers grade commercial credits and the loan review function validates the grades assigned. In the event that the loan review function downgrades a loan, it is included in the ALL analysis process at the lower grade. This grading system is in compliance with regulatory classifications. At least quarterly, all commercial loans that have been deemed impaired are evaluated. In compliance with accounting guidance for impaired loans, the fair value of the loan is determined based on either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the market price of the loan or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral less the estimated costs to sell. This evaluation may include obtaining supplemental market data and/or routine site visits to offer support to the evaluation process. If the carrying value of the loan exceeds the fair value less estimated cost to sell, a specific reserve is established. Such reserves are reviewed by the Delinquent Account Review Team.

We have two other major components of the ALL that do not pertain to specific loans: “General Reserves – Historical” and “General Reserves – Other.” We determine General Reserves – Historical based on our historical recorded charge-offs of loans in particular classes, analyzed as a group. We determine General Reserves – Other by taking into account such qualitative factors as 1) changes in the nature, volume and terms of loans, 2) changes in lending personnel, 3) changes in the quality of the loan review function, 4) changes in nature and volume of past-due, nonaccrual and/or classified loans, 5) changes in concentration of credit risk, 6) changes in economic and industry conditions, 7) changes in legal and regulatory requirements, 8) unemployment and inflation statistics, and 9) changes in underlying collateral values.

Nonperforming Loans, Potential Problem Loans and Other Real Estate Owned:

Management encourages early identification of nonaccrual and problem loans in order to minimize the risk of loss. Nonperforming loans are defined as nonaccrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing, and nonaccrual loans restructured in a troubled debt restructuring that have not shown a sufficient period of performance with the restructured terms. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collection of principal or interest on loans, it is the practice of management to place such loans on nonaccrual status immediately rather than waiting until the loans become 90 days past due. The accrual of interest income is discontinued when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest or earlier as deemed appropriate. When interest accruals are discontinued, interest credited to income is reversed. If collection is in doubt, cash received on nonaccrual loans is used to reduce principal rather than recorded as interest income. Restructuring a loan typically involves the granting of some concession to the borrower involving a loan modification such as payment schedule or interest rate changes. Restructured loans may involve loans that have had a charge-off taken against the loan to reduce the carrying amount of the loan to fair market value as determined pursuant to accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings.

Table of Contents

NONPERFORMING ASSETS
(Dollars amounts in thousands)


	June 30, 2013		March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		September 30, 2012		June 30, 2012

Nonperforming Assets:
Nonaccrual loans	$	8,231	$	8,499	$	10,724	$	8,203	$	11,513
Nonaccrual loans, restructured		114		140		3,724		3,812		8,159
Total nonperforming loans (“NPLs”)	$	8,345	$	8,639	$	14,448	$	12,015	$	19,672
Foreclosed properties, net		7,553		8,579		10,476		10,451		10,357
Total nonperforming assets (“NPAs”)	$	15,898	$	17,218	$	24,924	$	22,466	$	30,029
Restructured loans, accruing⁽¹⁾	$	3,959	$	3,267	$	3,931	$	4,425	$	4,715


Ratios:
ALL to Net Charge-offs (“NCOs”) (annualized)	2.84	x	1.41	x	1.33	x	1.56	x	3.28	x
NCOs to average loans (annualized)	0.52	%	0.99	%	1.11	%	1.08	%	0.61	%
ALL to total loans	1.47	%	1.40	%	1.54	%	1.77	%	2.00	%
NPLs to total loans	1.39	%	1.45	%	2.42	%	1.99	%	3.10	%
NPAs to total assets	1.68	%	1.80	%	2.44	%	2.28	%	2.89	%
ALL to NPLs	105.73	%	96.23	%	63.44	%	88.71	%	64.73	%

⁽¹⁾ Restructured loans on nonaccrual status are returned to accruing when a sufficient period of performance in accordance with the restructured terms, generally six months, has passed.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, NPLs were reduced by $0.3 million and other real estate owned declined by $1.0 million. $1.3 million of other real estate owned was sold, $0.5 million of properties were transferred to other real estate owned and $0.3 million of write downs were taken during the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Additionally, $0.1 million of non-performing loans were brought current and $0.1 million was charged off.

Restructured loans accruing at June 30, 2013 were $4.0 million. There was one accruing restructured loan of $0.1 million transferred to nonaccrual during the second quarter of 2013. No restructured loans with modified terms were transferred out of the restructured loan category during the second quarter of 2013.

Nonperforming loans decreased $6.1 million from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013.

Table of Contents

The following table presents an analysis of our past due loans excluding nonaccrual loans:

PAST DUE LOANS (EXCLUDING NONACCRUALS)
30-89 DAYS PAST DUE


	June 30, 2013			March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012			September 30, 2012			June 30, 2012
Secured by real estate	$	3,346		$	4,290		$	2,333		$	5,549		$	2,831
Commercial and industrial loans		700			699			903			—			182
Loans to individuals		24			39			29			38			51
Total	$	4,070		$	5,028		$	3,265		$	5,587		$	3,064

Percentage of total loans		0.69	%		0.85	%		0.55	%		0.93	%		0.48	%

As indicated above, loan balances 30-89 days past due have increased by $0.8 million and $1.0 million when compared to December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively, but have decreased by $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2013. During the second quarter of 2013, $0.5 million of loans 30-89 days past due at March 31, 2013 transferred to nonaccrual status. Additionally, $2.9 million of loans were brought current and $2.4 million of loans became 30-89 days past due.

Information regarding other real estate owned is as follows:


	Six months ended June 30, 2013			Twelve months ended December 31, 2012			Six months ended June 30, 2012

Beginning balance	$	14,334		$	14,913		$	14,913
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned		696			9,487			5,819
Sales proceeds, net		(3,302	)		(8,040	)		(5,489	)
Net gain from sale of other real estate owned		128			194			110
Valuation allowance related to other real estate owned disposed		(1,382	)		(2,220	)		(1,579	)
Total other real estate owned, net		10,474			14,334			13,774
Valuation allowance for losses		(2,921	)		(3,858	)		(3,417	)
Total other real estate owned, net	$	7,553		$	10,476		$	10,357

VALUATION ALLOWANCE ON OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED


	Six months ended June 30, 2013			Twelve months ended December 31, 2012			Six months ended June 30, 2012

Beginning balance	$	3,858		$	2,794		$	2,794
Provision charged to operations		445			3,284			2,202
Allowance recovered on properties disposed		(1,382	)		(2,220	)		(1,579	)
Ending balance	$	2,921		$	3,858		$	3,417

Table of Contents

Investment Portfolio:

The investment portfolio is intended to provide us with adequate liquidity, flexibility in asset/liability management and an increase in our earning potential.

At June 30, 2013, the investment portfolio (comprising investment securities available for sale) decreased $7.3 million (3.0%) to $234.7 million compared to $242.0 million at December 31, 2012. At June 30, 2013, the investment portfolio represented 24.8% of total assets compared to 23.6% at December 31, 2012. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, principal payments of $14.3 million were received on investments, including $1.1 million from the maturity of a security. For the three months ended, June 30, 2013, we purchased $11.2 million of securities for a net cash increase of $3.1 million.

We closely monitor securities we hold in our investment portfolio that remain in an unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months. Total gross unrealized losses on these securities were $0.4 million at June 30, 2013, representing 19.5% of total gross unrealized securities losses and 0.2% of the total investment portfolio. Based on an in-depth analysis of the specific instruments, which may include ratings from external rating agencies and/or brokers, as well as the creditworthiness of the related issuers, including their ability to continue payments under the terms of the security agreements, no unrealized losses were deemed to be other-than-temporary. Additionally, we do not have the intent to sell the securities and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery. If at any point in time any losses are considered other-than-temporary, we would be required to recognize other-than-temporary impairment. This would require us to assess the cash flows expected to be collected from the security. The difference between cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis would result in a credit loss for the amount of the impairment. This amount would reduce our earnings. The remaining portion of the impairment related to factors other than credit loss would be recognized through other comprehensive income (loss). At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we did not hold securities of any one issuer, other than the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), or United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), each an agency or corporation of the United States government, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity. As of June 30, 2013, the highest concentration of loans underlying mortgage-backed securities issued in any state was issued in California, representing approximately 21.3% of the total amount invested in residential mortgage-backed securities.

Deposits:

Total deposits at June 30, 2013 decreased $49.5 million (6.1%) to $756.5 million from $806.0 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease for the six months was a result of a $28.7 million (12.6%) decrease in time deposits from $227.7 million at December 31, 2012 to $199.0 million at June 30, 2013 and a $26.9 million (9.5%) decrease in our non-interest bearing and interest bearing demand deposits from $282.6 million at December 31, 2012 to $255.7 million at June 30, 2013, partially offset by an increase of $6.0 million (2.0%) in our savings deposits from $295.7 million at December 31, 2012 to $301.7 million at June 30, 2013. Total interest-bearing deposits decreased $41.2 million (6.1%) while non-interest-bearing deposits decreased $8.3 million (6.3%) from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013. During the quarter ended June 2013, $7.5 million of brokered certificates of deposit matured and were not renewed.

The decrease in total deposits from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013 is partially related to usual seasonal customer withdrawals. We continue to focus on expanding customer deposit relationships and attracting core deposit accounts by emphasizing customer service while maintaining competitive pricing. If liquidity concerns arise, we have alternative sources of funds such as lines of credit with correspondent banks and borrowing arrangements with the FHLB and through the discount window at the Federal Reserve.

Other Funding Sources:

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased $29.1 million (56.4%) from $51.6 million at December 31, 2012 to $22.5 million at June 30, 2013. We did not have any federal funds purchased at either June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

FHLB advances were $40.0 million at June 30, 2013, unchanged from December 31, 2012. The availability of deposits also determines the amount of funds we need to borrow in order to fund loan demand.

Long Term Debt:

In March 2006, we issued $16.1 million of variable rate, trust preferred securities (“TruPS”) and $0.5 million of trust common securities through Baylake Capital Trust II (the “Trust”) that adjust quarterly at a rate equal to 1.35% over the three month LIBOR and mature on June 30, 2036. At June 30, 2013, the interest rate on these securities was 1.62%. These securities were issued to replace trust preferred securities issued in 2001 through Baylake Capital Trust I. For bank regulatory purposes, these securities are considered Tier 1 capital.

Table of Contents

The Trust’s ability to pay amounts due on the TruPS is solely dependent upon us making payment on the related subordinated debentures (“Debentures”) to the Trust. Under the terms of the Debentures, we would be precluded from paying dividends on our common stock if we were in default under the Debentures, if we exercised our right to defer payment of interest on the Debentures or if certain related defaults occurred. At June 30, 2013, we are current on all interest payments on the TruPS.

During 2009 and 2010, we completed several separate closings of a private placement of Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes were offered and sold in reliance on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 promulgated there under. The total amount of the Convertible Notes outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $9.4 million.

The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion ratio of one share of common stock for each $5.00 in aggregate principal amount held on the record date of the conversion subject to certain adjustments as described in the Convertible Notes. Beginning on July 1, 2014, we may redeem the notes in whole or in part. A notice of redemption supersedes and takes priority over any notice of conversion. Prior to October 1, 2014, each holder of the Convertible Notes may convert up to 100% (at the discretion of the holder) of the original principal amount into shares of our common stock at the conversion ratio. On October 1, 2014, one-half of the original principal amounts of the Convertible Notes are mandatorily convertible at the conversion ratio if voluntary conversion has not yet occurred. The principal amount of any Convertible Note that has not been converted will be payable at maturity on June 30, 2017.

Contractual Obligations:

We use a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit, and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans. Please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for quantitative and qualitative disclosures about our fixed and determinable contractual obligations. Contractual obligations disclosed in the 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K have not materially changed since that report was filed.

The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commitments at June 30, 2013:

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS


	Within 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		After 5 Years		Total

Certificates of deposit and other time deposit obligations	$	133,105	$	63,083	$	2,817	$	—	$	199,005
Repurchase agreements		22,457		—		—		—		22,457
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		15,000		25,000		—		—		40,000
Subordinated debentures		—		—		—		16,100		16,100
Convertible promissory notes⁽¹⁾		—		9,400		—		—		9,400
Total	$	170,562	$	97,483	$	2,817	$	16,100	$	286,962


⁽¹⁾	Table of Contents One-half of the Convertible Notes are mandatorily converted to shares of our common stock by October 1, 2014. The principal amount of any Convertible Note that has not been converted or redeemed will be payable at maturity on June 30, 2017.

Table of Contents

Off- Balance Sheet Arrangements:

The following is a summary of our off-balance sheet commitments, all of which were lending-related commitments:

LENDING RELATED COMMITMENTS


	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012

Commitments to fund unused home equity line loans	$	57,568	$	55,891
Commitments to fund 1-4 family loans		9,431		12,931
Commitments to fund residential real estate construction loans		2,449		2,435
Commitments unused on commercial lines of credit loans		148,430		149,569
Commitments unused on consumer lines of credit loans		9,977		9,525
Total commitments to extend credit	$	227,855	$	230,351
Financial standby letters of credit	$	9,851	$	15,499

Liquidity:

Liquidity management refers to our ability to ensure that cash is available on a timely basis to meet loan demand and depositors’ needs and to service other liabilities as they become due without undue cost or risk and without causing a disruption to normal operating activities. We and the Bank have different liquidity considerations.

Our primary sources of funds are dividends from the Bank and net proceeds from borrowings and the offerings of subordinated debentures and convertible promissory notes. We may also undertake offerings of debt and issue our common stock if and when we deem it prudent to do so, subject to regulatory approval. We generally manage our liquidity position in order to provide funds necessary to meet interest obligations of our Trups and Convertible Notes, pay dividends to our shareholders, subject to regulatory restrictions, and repurchase shares. Such restrictions, which govern all state chartered banks, preclude the payment of dividends without the prior written consent of the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions if dividends declared and paid by such bank in either of the two immediately preceding years exceeded that bank’s net income for those years.

The Bank meets its cash flow needs by having funding sources available to satisfy the credit needs of customers as well as having available funds to satisfy deposit withdrawal requests. Liquidity is derived from deposit growth, payments on and maturities of loans, payments on and maturities of the investment portfolio, access to other funding sources, marketability of certain assets, the ability to use loan and investment portfolios as collateral for secured borrowings and a strong capital position.

Maturing investments have historically been a primary source of liquidity. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, principal payments totaling $30.2 million were received on investments. In addition, we purchased $32.3 million in investments in the same period. Approximately 9.8%, or $15.7 million, of the mortgage-backed securities outstanding at June 30, 2013 were issued and guaranteed by GNMA or the VA, agencies of the United States government. An additional 72.8%, or $117.1 million, of the mortgage-backed securities outstanding at June 30, 2013 were issued by either FNMA or FHLMC, United States government-sponsored agencies. Non-agency mortgage-backed securities present a level of credit risk that does not exist currently with United States government agency-backed securities, and comprised approximately 17.4%, or $28.0 million, of the outstanding mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2013. Management evaluates these non-agency mortgage-backed securities at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. These securities tend to be highly marketable.

Deposit decreases, reflected as a financing activity in the June 30, 2013 unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows, resulted in $49.6 million of cash outflow during the first six months of 2013. Deposit growth is normally the most stable source of liquidity, although brokered deposits, which are inherently less stable than locally-generated core deposits, are sometimes used. Our reliance on brokered certificates of deposit decreased $14.9 million from $31.3 million at December 31, 2012 to $16.4 million at June 30, 2013, due to brokered certificate of deposits that matured in the first six months of 2013 that were not renewed. If at any point in the future we fall below the “well capitalized” regulatory capital threshold, it will become more difficult for us to obtain brokered deposits. Also affecting liquidity are core deposit growth levels, certificate of deposit maturity structure and retention, and characteristics and diversification of wholesale funding sources affecting the channels by which brokered deposits are acquired. Conversely, deposit outflow will cause a need to develop alternative sources of funds, which may not be as liquid and potentially a more costly alternative.

The scheduled payments and maturities of loans can provide a source of additional liquidity. There are $141.7 million, or 23.7% of total loans, maturing within one year of June 30, 2013. Factors affecting liquidity relative to loans are loan origination volumes, loan prepayment rates and the maturity structure of existing loans. The liquidity position is influenced by changes in interest rates, economic conditions and competition. Conversely, loan demand creates a need for liquidity that may cause us to acquire other sources of funding, some of which could be more difficult to find and more costly to secure.

Table of Contents

Within the classification of short-term borrowings at June 30, 2013, securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $22.5 million compared to $51.6 million at the end of 2012. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are obtained from a base of business customers. Short-term and long-term borrowings from the FHLB are another source of funds, totaling $40.0 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

We continue to focus on expanding customer deposit relationships and attracting core deposit accounts by emphasizing customer service while maintaining competitive pricing. In the event that core deposit growth goals are not accomplished, we will continue to look at other wholesale sources of funds. In addition, we may acquire additional brokered deposits as funding for short-term liquidity needs. Short-term liquidity needs will also be addressed by growth in short-term borrowings, maturing federal funds sold and portfolio investments, and loan maturities and prepayments.

In assessing liquidity, historical information such as seasonality, local economic cycles and the economy in general are considered along with our current financial position and projections. We believe that in the current economic environment our liquidity position is adequate. To our knowledge, there are no known trends nor any known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result or are reasonably likely to result in material increases or decreases in our liquidity.

Capital Resources:

Stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $93.5 million and $93.1 million, respectively, reflecting an increase of $0.4 million (0.3%) during the first six months of 2013. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily related to our net income of $3.5 million, net of a decrease in comprehensive income of $2.6 million (as a result of a decrease in unrealized gains on available for sale securities) and dividends of $0.09 per share declared and paid during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The ratio of stockholders’ equity to assets was 9.9% and 9.1% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

In July 2013, we declared a $0.06 per share dividend. Our ability to pay dividends is subject to various factors including, among other things, sufficient earnings, available capital, board discretion and regulatory compliance.

On May 23, 2013, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”), which was designed to allow us to proactively manage our capital position and return excess capital to shareholders. Pursuant to the Repurchase Program, we may buy up to 400,000 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 5.0% of our outstanding common shares. During the second quarter of 2013, we repurchased 10,000 shares pursuant to the Repurchase Program. See Part II, Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, included elsewhere in this report for details of the stock repurchases during the quarter.

We regularly review the adequacy of our capital to ensure that sufficient capital is available for our current and future needs and it is in compliance with regulatory guidelines. The assessment of overall capital adequacy depends upon a variety of factors, including asset quality, liquidity, stability of earnings, changing competitive forces, economic conditions in markets served and strength of management.

The Federal Reserve has established capital adequacy rules which take into account risk attributable to balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet activities. All banks and bank holding companies must meet a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8% of which at least half must comprise core capital elements defined as Tier 1 capital. The federal banking agencies also have adopted leverage capital guidelines that banks and bank holding companies must meet. Under these guidelines, the most highly rated banking organizations must meet a leverage ratio of at least 3% Tier 1 capital to assets, while lower rated banking organizations must maintain a minimum ratio of 4% or 5%, depending on their rating. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, as well as possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our consolidated financial statements. At June 30, 2013, we maintained capital in excess of the minimum ratios required to be categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for the prompt corrective action categorization. There are no conditions or events since that date that we believe have changed our category. To be “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework, the Tier 1 capital ratio must meet or exceed 6%, the total capital ratio must meet or exceed 10% and the leverage ratio must meet or exceed 5%.

On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve Board approved a final rule that implements changes to the regulatory capital framework for all banking organizations. The rule, Basel III, implements the reforms proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act will increase minimum requirements as to the quantity and quality of capital required to be held by banking organizations. We are in the process of evaluating the full impact of the new regulation to which we will be subject beginning January 1, 2015, but believe we would be considered “well capitalized” under the new regulation if it were in effect as of June 30, 2013.

Table of Contents

The total capital ratios for the previous four quarters are as follows:


	June 30, 2013	March 31, 2013	December 31, 2012	September 30, 2012
Company	16.82%	16.39%	15.96%	15.28%
Bank	16.26%	16.20%	15.89%	15.22%

A strong capital position is necessary to take advantage of opportunities for profitable expansion of product and market share and to provide depositor and investor confidence. We believe our capital level is strong, but also must be maintained at an appropriate level to provide the opportunity for an adequate return on the capital employed. We actively review our capital strategies to ensure that capital levels are appropriate based on the perceived business risks, further growth opportunities, industry standards, and regulatory requirements.

The following tables present our and the Bank’s capital ratios as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

CAPITAL RATIOS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Actual					Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes					Required To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of June 30, 2013
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Company	$	113,535		16.82	%	$	54,009		8.00	%	$	N/A		N/A
Bank		109,756		16.26	%		53,996		8.00	%		67,495		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Company	$	95,692		14.17	%	$	27,005		4.00	%	$	N/A		N/A
Bank		101,315		15.01	%		26,998		4.00	%		40,497		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Company	$	95,692		10.24	%	$	37,372		4.00	%	$	N/A		N/A
Bank		101,315		10.84	%		37,385		4.00	%		46,732		5.00	%


	Actual					Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes					Required To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2012
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Company`	$	109,932		15.96	%	$	55,111		8.00	%	$	N/A		N/A
Bank		109,358		15.89	%		55,047		8.00	%		68,809		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Company	$	91,914		13.34	%	$	27,556		4.00	%	$	N/A		N/A
Bank		100,750		14.64	%		27,524		4.00	%		41,286		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Company	$	91,914		9.41	%	$	39,056		4.00	%	$	N/A		N/A
Bank		100,750		10.31	%		39,101		4.00	%		48,876		5.00	%

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that our earnings and capital will be adversely affected by changes in interest rates. Historically, we have not used derivatives to mitigate our interest rate risk.

Our earnings are derived from the operations of our direct and indirect subsidiaries with particular reliance on net interest income, calculated as the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and the interest expense paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities, including advances from FHLB and other subordinated debentures. Like other financial institutions, our interest income and interest expense are affected by general economic conditions and by the policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve. Changes in the economic environment may influence, among other matters, the growth rate of loans and deposits, the quality of the loan portfolio and loan and deposit pricing. Fluctuations in interest rates are not predictable or controllable.

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with our management policies with respect to interest rate risk. We have not experienced any material changes to our market risk position since December 31, 2012, as described in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our overall interest rate sensitivity is demonstrated by net interest income shock analysis which measures the change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in interest rates. This analysis assesses the risk of change in net interest income in the event of sudden and sustained 100 bp and 200 bp increases and decreases in market interest rates. The table below presents our projected changes in net interest income for the various rate shock levels at June 30, 2013.

INTEREST SENSITIVITY


	Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
	At June 30, 2013						At December 31, 2012
	Dollar change (in thousands)			Percentage change			Dollar change (in thousands)			Percentage change
Change in levels of interest rates
+200 bp	$	(1,190	)		(4.0	)%	$	(211	)		(0.7	)%
+100 bp		(1,062	)		(3.6	)%		(398	)		(1.4	)%
Base		—			—			—			—
-100 bp		(1,076	)		(3.7	)%		(1,089	)		(3.7	)%
-200 bp		(1,815	)		(6.2	)%		(1,733	)		(5.9	)%

As shown above, at June 30, 2013, the effect of an immediate 200 bp increase in interest rates would have decreased our net interest income by $1.2 million or 4.0% versus by $0.2 million or 0.7% at December 31, 2012. The increase in the impact of an immediate 200 bp increase in interest rates from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013 was a result of a reduction in interest-bearing cash balances offset in part by a decline in interest-bearing deposit balances. The effect of an immediate 200 bp reduction in rates would have decreased our net interest income by $1.8 million or 6.2% versus by $1.7 million or 5.9% at December 31, 2012. However, a 200 bp reduction in rates is not realistic given the low interest rate environment that currently exists. An interest rate floor of zero is used rather than assuming a negative interest rate.

Computations of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including the relative levels of market interest rates and loan prepayments, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Actual values may differ from those projections set forth above, should market conditions vary from the assumptions used in preparing the analyses. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions we may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Disclosures Controls and Procedures:Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of June 30, 2013. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

We and our subsidiaries may be involved from time to time in various routine legal proceedings incidental to our respective businesses. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are currently engaged in any legal proceedings that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There have been no material changes to the risk factors since then.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We repurchased 10,000 shares of our common stock during the second quarter of 2013.


	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publically Announced Plans or Programs⁽¹⁾		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
May 23, 2013-May 31, 2013		10,000	$	9.95		10,000		390,000
June 1, 2013-June 30, 2013		—		—		—		—
Total		10,000	$	9.95		10,000		390,000


(1)	On May 23, 2013, our Board of Directors approved the Repurchase Program, which authorized us to repurchase up to 400,000 shares of our stock through May 30, 2014. 10,000 shares were repurchased on the open market during the second quarter of 2013 at an average price of $9.95 per share.

We have several limitations on our ability to pay dividends. The Federal Reserve has adopted regulations that deal with the measure of capitalization for bank holding companies. The Federal Reserve has also issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, wherein the Federal Reserve has stated that a bank holding company experiencing earnings weaknesses should not pay cash dividends exceeding its net income or which could only be funded in ways that weaken the bank holding company’s financial health, such as by borrowing.

Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is largely dependent upon the Bank’s ability to pay dividends on its stock held by us. The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is restricted by both state and federal laws and regulations. The Bank is subject to policies and regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, as the Bank’s primary federal regulator, and the Division of Banking of the WDFI, which, in part, establish minimum acceptable capital requirements for banks, thereby limiting the ability of such banks to pay dividends. In addition, Wisconsin law provides that state chartered banks may declare and pay dividends out of undivided profits but only after provision has been made for all expenses, losses, required reserves, taxes and interest accrued or due from the bank.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.Other Information

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

Item 6.Exhibits

The following exhibits are furnished herewith:


Exhibit Number		Description
31.1		Certification under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley by Robert J. Cera, Chief Executive Officer, is attached hereto.

31.2		Certification under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley by Kevin L. LaLuzerne, Chief Financial Officer, is attached hereto.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley is attached hereto.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley is attached hereto.

101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		BAYLAKE CORP.

Date:	August 1, 2013	/s/ Robert J. Cera
		Robert J. Cera
		President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:	August 1, 2013	/s/ Kevin L. LaLuzerne
		Kevin L. LaLuzerne
		Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. freshman Avg

Baylake (BYLK) Inactive 10-Q2013 Q2 Quarterly report

Content analysis