UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2009
Commission file no: 1-6458
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORPORATION
Delaware |
| 36-2386361 |
1 East First Street, Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
(Address of principal executive offices)
Telephone Number: (775) 786-5527
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | o |
|
| Accelerated filer | o |
|
Non-accelerated filer | x |
|
| Smaller reporting company | o |
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x |
|
At April 30, 2009, 2,500 shares of common stock, without par value, of the registrant were outstanding, all of which were owned by John Deere Credit Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Deere & Company.
The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with certain reduced disclosures as permitted by those instructions.
Index to Exhibits: Page 24
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
Statements of Consolidated Income and Retained Earnings
(Unaudited)
(in millions)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| April 30, |
| April 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Finance income earned on retail notes |
| $ | 181.9 |
| $ | 215.0 |
| $ | 379.7 |
| $ | 437.8 |
|
Lease revenues |
| 76.6 |
| 81.0 |
| 158.6 |
| 164.4 |
| ||||
Revolving charge account income |
| 58.6 |
| 52.3 |
| 109.3 |
| 103.1 |
| ||||
Finance income earned on wholesale receivables |
| 85.0 |
| 80.8 |
| 148.8 |
| 158.3 |
| ||||
Operating loan income |
| 3.8 |
| 6.9 |
| 7.6 |
| 13.7 |
| ||||
Income on receivables sold |
| .8 |
| 1.9 |
| 1.2 |
| 4.3 |
| ||||
Crop insurance commissions |
| 5.5 |
| 27.0 |
| 12.1 |
| 56.0 |
| ||||
Other income |
| 13.7 |
| 22.3 |
| 46.2 |
| 46.1 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
| 425.9 |
| 487.2 |
| 863.5 |
| 983.7 |
| ||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
| 203.9 |
| 205.0 |
| 411.2 |
| 428.6 |
| ||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Administrative and operating expenses |
| 66.8 |
| 83.3 |
| 152.9 |
| 163.0 |
| ||||
Provision for credit losses |
| 41.8 |
| 15.6 |
| 74.2 |
| 30.7 |
| ||||
Fees paid to John Deere |
| 8.0 |
| 9.2 |
| 17.3 |
| 18.3 |
| ||||
Depreciation of equipment on operating leases |
| 50.9 |
| 53.0 |
| 104.8 |
| 107.8 |
| ||||
Total operating expenses |
| 167.5 |
| 161.1 |
| 349.2 |
| 319.8 |
| ||||
Total expenses |
| 371.4 |
| 366.1 |
| 760.4 |
| 748.4 |
| ||||
Income of consolidated group before income taxes |
| 54.5 |
| 121.1 |
| 103.1 |
| 235.3 |
| ||||
Provision for income taxes |
| 20.7 |
| 44.1 |
| 34.4 |
| 81.3 |
| ||||
Income of consolidated group |
| 33.8 |
| 77.0 |
| 68.7 |
| 154.0 |
| ||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
| .1 |
| .3 |
| .3 |
| .5 |
| ||||
Net income |
| 33.9 |
| 77.3 |
| 69.0 |
| 154.5 |
| ||||
Dividends paid |
|
|
| (285.1 | ) |
|
| (425.1 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings at beginning of period |
| 918.0 |
| 1,002.8 |
| 882.9 |
| 1,065.6 |
| ||||
Retained earnings at end of period |
| $ | 951.9 |
| $ | 795.0 |
| $ | 951.9 |
| $ | 795.0 |
|
See Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements.
2
John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in millions)
|
| April 30, |
| October 31, |
| April 30, |
| |||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2008 |
| |||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 2,131.3 |
| $ | 1,082.6 |
| $ | 162.2 |
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Retail notes |
| 7,502.5 |
| 10,136.6 |
| 9,362.1 |
| |||
Restricted securitized retail notes |
| 3,135.7 |
| 1,592.5 |
| 2,109.4 |
| |||
Revolving charge accounts |
| 1,824.7 |
| 1,825.1 |
| 1,495.6 |
| |||
Operating loans |
| 410.2 |
| 357.9 |
| 533.0 |
| |||
Wholesale receivables |
| 5,184.5 |
| 3,570.6 |
| 4,503.2 |
| |||
Financing leases |
| 372.5 |
| 417.9 |
| 430.7 |
| |||
Total receivables |
| 18,430.1 |
| 17,900.6 |
| 18,434.0 |
| |||
Allowance for credit losses |
| (119.5 | ) | (105.2 | ) | (102.0 | ) | |||
Total receivables — net |
| 18,310.6 |
| 17,795.4 |
| 18,332.0 |
| |||
Other receivables |
| 40.4 |
| 25.4 |
| 29.6 |
| |||
Equipment on operating leases — net |
| 981.3 |
| 1,053.4 |
| 964.1 |
| |||
Notes receivable from John Deere |
| 755.2 |
| 799.3 |
| 668.6 |
| |||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
| 5.9 |
| 5.4 |
| 6.3 |
| |||
Other assets |
| 936.3 |
| 552.1 |
| 421.4 |
| |||
Total Assets |
| $ | 23,161.0 |
| $ | 21,313.6 |
| $ | 20,584.2 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Short-term borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Commercial paper |
| $ | 654.3 |
| $ | 2,814.5 |
| $ | 2,793.8 |
|
Other notes payable |
| 3,118.9 |
| 1,622.2 |
| 2,230.5 |
| |||
John Deere |
| 207.4 |
| 315.6 |
| 6.0 |
| |||
Current maturities of long-term borrowings |
| 2,713.7 |
| 3,141.9 |
| 4,021.8 |
| |||
Total short-term borrowings |
| 6,694.3 |
| 7,894.2 |
| 9,052.1 |
| |||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
| 701.9 |
| 583.4 |
| 500.8 |
| |||
Deposits withheld from dealers and merchants |
| 160.3 |
| 173.5 |
| 169.1 |
| |||
Deferred income taxes |
| 38.1 |
| 67.9 |
| 38.0 |
| |||
Long-term borrowings |
| 13,454.9 |
| 10,529.7 |
| 9,163.4 |
| |||
Total liabilities |
| 21,049.5 |
| 19,248.7 |
| 18,923.4 |
| |||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Stockholder’s equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Common stock, without par value (issued and outstanding — 2,500 shares owned by John Deere Credit Company) |
| 1,212.8 |
| 1,212.8 |
| 812.8 |
| |||
Retained earnings |
| 951.9 |
| 882.9 |
| 795.0 |
| |||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cumulative translation adjustment |
| 11.1 |
| 9.2 |
| 77.6 |
| |||
Unrealized loss on derivatives |
| (64.3 | ) | (40.0 | ) | (24.6 | ) | |||
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
| (53.2 | ) | (30.8 | ) | 53.0 |
| |||
Total stockholder’s equity |
| 2,111.5 |
| 2,064.9 |
| 1,660.8 |
| |||
Total Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity |
| $ | 23,161.0 |
| $ | 21,313.6 |
| $ | 20,584.2 |
|
See Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements.
3
John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended April 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
(in millions)
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
| $ | 69.0 |
| $ | 154.5 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for credit losses |
| 74.2 |
| 30.7 |
| ||
Provision for depreciation and amortization |
| 108.0 |
| 110.0 |
| ||
Credit for deferred income taxes |
| (17.1 | ) | (1.0 | ) | ||
Undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
| (.3 | ) | (.5 | ) | ||
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
| 13.5 |
| (30.8 | ) | ||
Change in accrued income taxes payable/receivable |
| 8.4 |
| 14.0 |
| ||
Other |
| .3 |
| 20.6 |
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| 256.0 |
| 297.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of receivables acquired |
| (15,528.2 | ) | (15,512.1 | ) | ||
Collections of receivables |
| 14,920.8 |
| 14,894.9 |
| ||
Cost of equipment on operating leases acquired |
| (200.4 | ) | (220.8 | ) | ||
Proceeds from sales of equipment on operating leases |
| 159.3 |
| 152.5 |
| ||
Cost of notes receivable with John Deere |
| (181.0 | ) | (215.3 | ) | ||
Collection of notes receivable with John Deere |
| 225.1 |
| 133.2 |
| ||
Proceeds from sales of receivables |
| 18.0 |
| 52.3 |
| ||
Change in restricted cash |
| (17.3 | ) | (4.1 | ) | ||
Other |
| (22.1 | ) | (13.1 | ) | ||
Net cash used for investing activities |
| (625.8 | ) | (732.5 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Increase (decrease) in commercial paper - net |
| (2,117.4 | ) | 41.3 |
| ||
Increase in other notes payable - net |
| 1,497.0 |
| 30.8 |
| ||
Decrease in payable with John Deere - net |
| (109.1 | ) | (121.8 | ) | ||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings |
| 3,943.5 |
| 2,528.1 |
| ||
Payments of long-term borrowings |
| (1,695.7 | ) | (1,642.5 | ) | ||
Dividends paid |
|
|
| (425.1 | ) | ||
Debt issuance costs |
| (105.6 | ) | (11.3 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| 1,412.7 |
| 399.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
| 5.8 |
| 6.9 |
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| 1,048.7 |
| (28.6 | ) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| 1,082.6 |
| 190.8 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
| $ | 2,131.3 |
| $ | 162.2 |
|
See Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements.
4
John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries | |
Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements | |
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
(1) | The consolidated financial statements of John Deere Capital Corporation (Capital Corporation) and its subsidiaries (collectively called the Company) have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. All adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. Management believes that the disclosures are adequate to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those to be expected for the year. |
|
|
| The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
|
(2) | The Company provides and administers financing for retail purchases of new equipment manufactured by Deere & Company’s agricultural equipment, commercial and consumer equipment and construction and forestry divisions and used equipment taken in trade for this equipment. The Company generally purchases retail installment sales and loan contracts (retail notes) from Deere & Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively called John Deere). John Deere generally acquires these retail notes through John Deere retail dealers. The Company also purchases and finances a limited amount of non-Deere retail notes and continues to service a small portfolio of recreational products and other retail notes. In addition, the Company leases John Deere equipment and a limited amount of non-Deere equipment to retail customers (financing and operating leases). The Company also finances and services revolving charge accounts, in most cases acquired from and offered through merchants in the agricultural, commercial and consumer and construction and forestry markets (revolving charge accounts). Further, the Company finances and services operating loans, in most cases offered through and acquired from farm input providers, through direct relationships with agricultural producers or through agribusinesses (operating loans). The Company also provides wholesale financing for inventories of John Deere agricultural, commercial and consumer and construction and forestry equipment owned by dealers of those products (wholesale receivables). The Company also offers credit enhanced international export financing to select customers and dealers which generally involves John Deere products and offers certain crop risk mitigation products in the U.S. In addition, the Company makes loans to certain affiliated companies that directly invest in wind energy projects. Retail notes, revolving charge accounts, operating loans, financing leases and wholesale receivables are collectively called “Receivables.” Receivables and operating leases are collectively called “Receivables and Leases.” |
|
|
| In April 2009, John Deere announced it will combine the agricultural equipment segment with the commercial and consumer equipment segment effective at the beginning of the third quarter of 2009. |
|
|
(3) | Comprehensive income, which includes all changes in the Company’s equity during the period except transactions with the stockholder, was as follows (in millions of dollars): |
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| April 30, |
| April 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||
Net income |
| $ | 33.9 |
| $ | 77.3 |
| $ | 69.0 |
| $ | 154.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
| 10.6 |
| 15.2 |
| 1.9 |
| 15.9 |
| ||||
Unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
| (.5 | ) |
|
| (1.2 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives |
| 8.2 |
| 16.9 |
| (24.3 | ) | (16.3 | ) | ||||
Total comprehensive income |
| $ | 52.7 |
| $ | 108.9 |
| $ | 46.6 |
| $ | 152.9 |
|
5
(4) | Commitments and contingencies: |
|
|
| At April 30, 2009, John Deere Credit Inc., the John Deere finance subsidiary in Canada, had $257 million of commercial paper and $1,382 million of medium-term notes outstanding that were guaranteed by the Company. |
|
|
| At April 30, 2009, the Company had $38 million of guarantees issued to turbine manufacturers for John Deere Renewables, LLC wind turbine purchases. John Deere Renewables, LLC is an affiliated company that has commitments to purchase wind turbines related to its direct investments in wind energy projects. At April 30, 2009, the maximum remaining term of these purchase commitments was approximately one year. |
|
|
| The Company’s subsidiary, John Deere Risk Protection, Inc., offers crop insurance products through managing general agency agreements (Agreements) with insurance companies (Insurance Carriers) rated “Excellent” by A.M. Best Company. As a managing general agent, John Deere Risk Protection, Inc. will receive commissions from the Insurance Carriers for selling crop insurance to producers. The Company has guaranteed certain obligations under the Agreements, including the obligation to pay the Insurance Carriers for any uncollected premiums. At April 30, 2009, the maximum exposure for uncollected premiums was approximately $179 million. Substantially all of the Company’s crop insurance risk under the Agreements has been mitigated by a syndicate of private reinsurance companies. The reinsurance companies are rated “Excellent” or higher by A.M. Best Company. In the event of a widespread catastrophic crop failure throughout the U.S. and the default of these highly rated private reinsurance companies on their reinsurance obligations, the Company would be required to reimburse the Insurance Carriers for exposures under the Agreements of approximately $828 million at April 30, 2009. The Company believes that the likelihood of the occurrence of events that would give rise to the exposures under these Agreements is substantially remote and as a result, at April 30, 2009, the Company’s accrued liability under the Agreements was not material. |
|
|
| The Company has commitments to extend credit to customers and John Deere dealers through lines of credit and other pre-approved credit arrangements. The Company applies the same credit policies and approval process for these commitments to extend credit as it does for its Receivables. Collateral is not required for these commitments, but if credit is extended, collateral may be required upon funding. The amount of unused commitments to extend credit to John Deere dealers was $2.6 billion at April 30, 2009. The amount of unused commitments to extend credit to customers was $43.3 billion at April 30, 2009. A significant portion of these commitments is not expected to be fully drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts likely do not represent a future cash requirement. The Company generally has the right to unconditionally cancel, alter or amend the terms of these commitments at any time. Over 95 percent of these unused commitments to extend credit to customers relate to revolving charge accounts. |
|
|
| At April 30, 2009, the Company had restricted other assets of $3 million. See Note 5 for additional restricted assets associated with borrowings related to securitizations. |
|
|
| The Company also had other miscellaneous contingent liabilities totaling approximately $4 million at April 30, 2009, for which it believes the probability for payment is substantially remote. The accrued liability for these contingencies was not material at April 30, 2009. |
|
|
(5) | Securitization of receivables: |
|
|
| The Company, as a part of its overall funding strategy, periodically transfers certain receivables (retail notes) into variable interest entities (VIEs) that are special purpose entities (SPEs) as part of its asset-backed securities programs (securitizations). The structure of these transactions is such that the transfer of the retail notes did not meet the criteria of sales in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, and is, therefore, accounted for as secured borrowings. SPEs utilized in securitizations of retail notes differ from other entities included in the Company’s consolidated statements because the assets they hold are legally isolated. For bankruptcy analysis purposes, the Capital Corporation has sold the receivables to the SPEs in a true sale and the SPEs are separate legal entities. Use of the assets held by the SPEs is restricted by terms of the documents governing the securitization transaction. |
6
| In securitizations of retail notes related to secured borrowings, the retail notes are transferred to certain SPEs which in turn issue debt to investors. The resulting secured borrowings are included in short-term borrowings on the balance sheet as shown in the table below. The securitized retail notes are recorded as “Restricted securitized retail notes” on the balance sheet. The total restricted assets on the balance sheet related to these securitizations include the restricted securitized retail notes less an allowance for credit losses, and other assets primarily representing restricted cash as shown in the following table. The SPEs supporting the secured borrowings to which the retail notes are transferred are consolidated unless the Company is not the primary beneficiary in accordance with FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. No additional support to these SPEs beyond what was previously contractually required has been provided during the first six months of 2009. |
|
|
| In certain securitizations, the Company is the primary beneficiary of the SPEs and, as such, consolidates the entities. The restricted assets (retail notes, allowance for credit losses and other assets) of the consolidated SPEs totaled $1,246 million, $1,303 million and $1,700 million at April 30, 2009, October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively. The liabilities (other notes payable and accounts payable and accrued expenses) of these SPEs totaled $1,241 million, $1,287 million and $1,744 million at April 30, 2009, October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively. The credit holders of these SPEs do not have legal recourse to the Company’s general credit. |
|
|
| In other securitizations, the Company transfers retail notes into bank-sponsored, multi-seller, commercial paper conduits, which are SPEs that are not consolidated. The Company is not considered to be the primary beneficiary of these conduits, because the Company’s variable interests in the conduits will not absorb a majority of the conduits’ expected losses, residual returns, or both. This is primarily due to these interests representing significantly less than a majority of the conduits’ total assets and liabilities. These conduits provide a funding source to the Company (as well as other transferors into the conduit) as they fund the retail notes through the issuance of commercial paper. The Company’s carrying values and variable interests related to these conduits were restricted assets (retail notes, allowance for credit losses and other assets) of $1,983 million, $334 million and $448 million at April 30, 2009, October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively. The liabilities (other notes payable and accounts payable and accrued expenses) related to these conduits were $1,884 million, $334 million and $459 million at April 30, 2009, October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively. |
|
|
| The Company’s carrying amount of the liabilities to the unconsolidated conduits, compared to the maximum exposure to loss related to these conduits, which would only be incurred in the event of a complete loss on the restricted assets was as follows (in millions of dollars): |
|
| April 30, 2009 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Carrying value of liabilities |
| $ | 1,884.1 |
|
Maximum exposure to loss |
| 1,982.6 |
| |
| The assets of unconsolidated conduits related to securitizations in which the Company’s variable interests were considered significant were approximately $41 billion at April 30, 2009. |
7
| The components of consolidated restricted assets related to secured borrowings in securitization transactions were as follows (in millions of dollars): |
|
| April 30, |
| October 31, |
| April 30, |
| |||
Restricted securitized retail notes |
| $ | 3,135.7 |
| $ | 1,592.5 |
| $ | 2,109.4 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
| (10.8 | ) | (10.9 | ) | (14.5 | ) | |||
Other assets |
| 104.1 |
| 55.0 |
| 53.0 |
| |||
Total restricted securitized assets |
| $ | 3,229.0 |
| $ | 1,636.6 |
| $ | 2,147.9 |
|
| The components of consolidated secured borrowings and other liabilities related to securitizations were as follows (in millions of dollars): |
|
| April 30, |
| October 31, |
| April 30, |
| |||
Other notes payable |
| $ | 3,118.9 |
| $ | 1,618.3 |
| $ | 2,199.9 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
| 6.1 |
| 3.0 |
| 3.1 |
| |||
Total liabilities related to restricted securitized assets |
| $ | 3,125.0 |
| $ | 1,621.3 |
| $ | 2,203.0 |
|
| The secured borrowings related to these restricted securitized retail notes are obligations that are payable as the retail notes are liquidated. Repayment of the secured borrowings depends primarily on cash flows generated by the restricted assets. Due to the Company’s short-term credit rating, cash collections from these restricted assets are not required to be placed into a restricted collection account until immediately prior to the time payment is required to the secured creditors. At April 30, 2009, the maximum remaining term of all restricted receivables was approximately six years. |
|
|
(6) | Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in millions of dollars): |
|
| April 30, 2009 |
| ||||
|
| Total |
| Level 2 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| $ | 525.5 |
| $ | 525.5 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
| 9.4 |
| 9.4 |
| ||
Cross-currency interest rate contracts |
| 40.1 |
| 40.1 |
| ||
Total assets |
| $ | 575.0 |
| $ | 575.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| $ | 162.4 |
| $ | 162.4 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
| 8.4 |
| 8.4 |
| ||
Cross-currency interest rate contracts |
| .5 |
| .5 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
| $ | 171.3 |
| $ | 171.3 |
|
| Financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the losses during the period were as follows (in millions of dollars): |
|
| April 30, 2009 |
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| |||
|
| Level 3 |
| Losses |
| Losses |
| |||
Receivables |
| $ | 20.6 |
| $ | 3.7 |
| $ | 8.7 |
|
8
| Level 1 measurements consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 measurements include significant other observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets; observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves; and other market-corroborated inputs. Level 3 measurements include significant unobservable inputs. There were no assets or liabilities valued using level 1 measurements at April 30, 2009. |
|
|
| FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market and income approaches. The Company utilizes valuation models and techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs. The models are industry-standard models that consider various assumptions including time values and yield curves as well as other economic measures. These valuation techniques are consistently applied. |
|
|
| The following is a description of the valuation methodologies the Company uses to measure financial instruments at fair value: |
|
|
| Derivative Instruments — The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of interest rate swaps and caps, foreign currency forwards and cross-currency interest rate swaps. The portfolio is valued based on a discounted cash flow approach using market observable inputs, including swap curves and both forward and spot exchange rates for currencies. |
|
|
| Receivables — Receivables with specific reserves established due to payment defaults are valued based on a discounted cash flow approach or realizable values for the underlying collateral. The related credit allowances represent cumulative adjustments to measure those specific receivables at fair value. |
|
|
(7) | It is the Company’s policy that derivative transactions are executed only to manage exposures arising in the normal course of business and not for the purpose of creating speculative positions or trading. The Company manages the relationship of the types and amounts of its funding sources to its receivable and lease portfolio in an effort to diminish risk due to interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations, while responding to favorable financing opportunities. The Company also has foreign currency exposures at some of its foreign and domestic operations related to financing in currencies other than the local currencies. |
|
|
| All derivatives are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet. Each derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, a fair value hedge, or remains undesignated. All designated hedges are formally documented as to the relationship with the hedged item as well as the risk-management strategy. Both at inception and on an ongoing basis the hedging instrument is assessed as to its effectiveness, when applicable. If and when a derivative is determined not to be highly effective as a hedge, or the underlying hedged transaction is no longer likely to occur, or the derivative is terminated, hedge accounting is discontinued. Any past or future changes in the derivative’s fair value that will not be effective as an offset to the income effects of the item being hedged are recognized currently in the income statement. |
|
|
| Certain of the Company’s derivative agreements contain credit support provisions that require the Company to post collateral based on reductions in credit ratings. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position at April 30, 2009 was $24 million. The Company, due to its credit rating, has not posted any collateral. If the credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered, the Company would be required to post full collateral for this liability position. |
9
| Derivative instruments are subject to significant concentrations of credit risk to the banking sector. The Company manages individual counterparty exposure by setting limits that consider the credit rating of the counterparty and the size of other financial commitments and exposures between the Company and the counterparty banks. All interest rate derivatives are transacted under International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) documentation. Some of these agreements include collateral support arrangements or mutual put options at fair value. Each master agreement permits the net settlement of amounts owed in the event of early termination. The maximum amount of loss that the Company would incur if counterparties to derivative instruments fail to meet their obligations, not considering collateral received or netting arrangements, was $575 million as of April 30, 2009. The amount of collateral received at April 30, 2009 to offset this potential maximum loss was $7 million. The netting provisions of the agreements would reduce the maximum amount of loss the Company would incur if the counterparties to derivative instruments fail to meet their obligations by an additional $135 million as of April 30, 2009. None of the concentrations of risk with any individual counterparty was considered significant at April 30, 2009. |
|
|
| Cash flow hedges |
|
|
| Certain interest rate contracts (swaps) were designated as hedges of future cash flows from variable interest rate borrowings. The total notional amount of these receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate contracts at April 30, 2009 was $3,511 million. The effective portions of the fair value gains or losses on these cash flow hedges were recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI) and subsequently reclassified into interest expense as payments were accrued and the contracts approached maturity. These amounts offset the effects of interest rate changes on the related borrowings. Any ineffective portions of the gains or losses on all cash flow interest rate contracts designated as hedges were recognized currently in interest expense. The cash flows from these contracts were recorded in operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. |
|
|
| The amount of loss recorded in OCI at April 30, 2009 that is expected to be reclassified to interest expense in the next twelve months if interest rates remain unchanged is approximately $18 million after-tax. These contracts mature in up to 25 months. There were no significant gains or losses reclassified from OCI to earnings based on the probability that the original forecasted transaction would not occur. |
|
|
| Fair value hedges |
|
|
| Certain interest rate contracts (swaps) were designated as fair value hedges of fixed-rate, long-term borrowings. The total notional amount of these receive-fixed/pay-variable interest rate contracts at April 30, 2009 was $5,204 million. The effective portions of the fair value gains or losses on these contracts were offset by fair value gains or losses on the hedged items (fixed-rate borrowings). Any ineffective portions of the gains or losses on these interest rate contracts designated as hedges were recognized currently in interest expense. The ineffective portions totaled a $2 million loss in the second quarter of 2009 and a $1 million gain in the first six months of 2009. The cash flows from these contracts were recorded in operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. |
|
|
| The gains (losses) including interest on these contracts and the underlying borrowings recorded in interest expense were as follows (in millions of dollars): |
|
| Three Months |
| Six Months |
| ||
|
| Ended |
| Ended |
| ||
|
| April 30, 2009 |
| April 30, 2009 |
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| $ | 10.1 |
| $ | 281.2 |
|
Borrowings |
| (43.7 | ) | (357.0 | ) | ||
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
| The Company has certain interest rate contracts (swaps and caps), foreign exchange contracts (forwards and swaps) and cross-currency interest rate contracts (swaps), which were not formally designated as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. These derivatives were held as economic hedges for underlying interest rate or foreign currency exposures primarily for certain borrowings. The total notional amount of the interest rate swaps was $913 million, the foreign exchange contracts was $1,164 million and the cross-currency interest rate contracts was $855 million at April 30, 2009. There were also $2,264 million of interest rate caps |
10
| purchased and $2,264 million sold at the same capped interest rate to facilitate borrowings through securitization of retail notes at April 30, 2009. The fair value gains or losses from the interest rate contracts were recognized currently in interest expense and the gains or losses from foreign exchange contracts in administrative and operating expenses, generally offsetting over time the expenses on the exposures being hedged. The cash flows from these non-designated contracts were recorded in operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. |
|
|
| Fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet were as follows (in millions of dollars): |
|
| April 30, 2009 |
| ||||
|
| Other |
| Accounts Payable |
| ||
Designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| $ | 466.9 |
| $ | 111.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| 58.6 |
| 50.6 |
| ||
Foreign exchange contracts |
| 9.4 |
| 8.4 |
| ||
Cross-currency interest rate contracts |
| 40.1 |
| .5 |
| ||
Total not designated |
| 108.1 |
| 59.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total derivatives |
| $ | 575.0 |
| $ | 171.3 |
|
| The effects of derivative instruments on the statement of consolidated income consisted of the following (in millions of dollars): |
|
| Classification of |
| Three Months |
| Six Months |
| ||
Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| Interest expense |
| $ | 10.1 |
| $ | 281.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Recognized in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| OCI (pretax) |
| $ | (19.5 | ) | $ | (69.2 | ) |
Reclassified from OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| Interest expense |
| $ | (24.5 | ) | $ | (32.4 | ) |
Recognized Directly in Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
| Interest expense |
| $ | .1 |
| $ | .1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Not Designated as Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts * |
| Interest expense |
| $ | 8.6 |
| $ | .2 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts * |
| Administrative and operating expenses |
| (2.3 | ) | 52.3 |
| ||
Total |
|
|
| $ | 6.3 |
| $ | 52.5 |
|
| * Includes interest and foreign exchange expenses from cross-currency interest rate contracts. |
11
(8) New accounting standards adopted in the first quarter of 2009 were as follows:
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value (see Note 6). This Statement defines fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. These definitions apply to other accounting standards that use fair value measurements and may change the application of certain measurements used in current practice. For nonfinancial assets and liabilities, the effective date is the beginning of fiscal year 2010, except items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This Statement permits entities to measure most financial instruments at fair value if desired. It may be applied on a contract by contract basis and is irrevocable once applied to those contracts. The standard may be applied at the time of adoption for existing eligible items, or at initial recognition of eligible items. After election of this option, changes in fair value are reported in earnings. The items measured at fair value must be shown separately on the balance sheet. The cumulative effect of adoption would be reported as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings. The Company did not change the valuation of any financial instruments based on this Statement and, therefore, the adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This Statement increases the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments (see Note 7). Most disclosures are required on an interim and annual basis. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This Statement identifies the sources for generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the U.S. and lists the categories in descending order. An entity should follow the highest category of GAAP applicable for each of its accounting transactions. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position Financial Accounting Statement 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities (see Note 5). The new standard requires additional disclosure for transfers of financial assets in securitization transactions and an entity’s involvement with variable interest entities. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
New accounting standards to be adopted are as follows:
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, and Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. Statement No. 141 (revised 2007) requires an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net identifiable assets acquired. Statement No. 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated net income should include the net income for both the parent and the noncontrolling interest with disclosure of both amounts on the consolidated statement of income. The effective date for both Statements is the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The Company has currently not determined the potential effects on the consolidated financial statements.
12
(9) The Company is a participating employer in certain Deere & Company sponsored defined benefit pension plans for employees in the U.S. and certain defined benefit pension plans outside the U.S. These pension plans provide for benefits that are based primarily on years of service and employee compensation. Pension expense is actuarially determined based on the Company’s employees included in the plan. The Company’s pension expense amounted to $1.9 million in the first six months of 2009. The accumulated benefit obligation and plan net assets for the employees of the Company are not determined separately from Deere & Company. The Company generally provides defined benefit health care and life insurance plans for retired employees in the U.S. as a participating employer in Deere & Company’s sponsored plans. Health care and life insurance benefits expense is actuarially determined based on the Company’s employees included in the plans and amounted to $1.5 million during the first six months of 2009. Further disclosure for these plans is included in Deere & Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Results of Operations
Overview
Organization
The Company primarily generates revenues and cash by financing John Deere dealers’ sales and leases of new and used agricultural, commercial and consumer and construction and forestry equipment. In addition, the Company provides wholesale financing to dealers of the foregoing equipment, provides operating loans, finances retail revolving charge accounts, offers certain crop risk mitigation products and makes loans to certain affiliated companies that directly invest in wind energy projects.
Trends and Economic Conditions
The Company’s business is closely related to John Deere’s business. Industry farm machinery sales for 2009 are forecast to be flat to down slightly for the year in the U.S. and Canada with support from an increase in four-wheel-drive tractors, combines, sprayers and seeding equipment. In other parts of the world, industry farm machinery sales are forecast to be down for the year. North American industry sales of turf equipment and compact utility tractors are expected to be down about 20 percent for the year. John Deere’s agricultural equipment sales were down 4 percent for the second quarter and up 4 percent for the first six months of 2009. John Deere’s commercial and consumer equipment sales declined 24 percent for the second quarter and first six months of 2009. John Deere’s agriculture and turf sales, which combines agricultural equipment and commercial and consumer equipment sales, are forecast to decrease about 14 percent for the full year. This forecast includes a negative effect of about 6 percent for currency translation. John Deere’s construction and forestry sales declined 55 percent in the second quarter and 44 percent in the first six months of 2009. These sales are expected to decrease approximately 42 percent for the year, largely as a consequence of a declining global economy and historically low levels of construction activity in the U.S. The Company’s net income in 2009 is forecast to decrease to approximately $160 million, compared to $282 million in 2008. The forecast decrease from 2008 is primarily due to narrower financing spreads related to the current funding environment, a higher provision for credit losses and lower commissions from crop insurance.
Items of concern for the Company include the sharp downturn in global economic activity, the turmoil in financial markets and the effectiveness of governmental policies to promote economic recovery and the availability of credit for the Company’s customers. Significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could also impact the Company’s results.
The deepening global recession and volatile foreign exchange rates have put downward pressure on the Company’s financial results. However, the Company has continued to benefit from a strong liquidity position and access to global capital markets on a competitive basis.
13
2009 Compared with 2008
Net income was $33.9 million for the second quarter and $69.0 million for the first six months of 2009, compared with $77.3 million and $154.5 million, respectively, last year. Results were lower for both periods primarily due to narrower financing spreads, a higher provision for credit losses and lower commissions from crop insurance.
Revenues totaled $425.9 million for the second quarter and $863.5 million for the first six months of 2009, compared to $487.2 million and $983.7 million, respectively, last year. The decreases were primarily due to lower financing rates and lower commissions from crop insurance. Finance income earned on retail notes totaled $379.7 million for the first six months of 2009, down $58.1 million compared to $437.8 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to lower financing rates and a 5 percent decrease in the average retail note portfolio balances. Lease revenues totaled $158.6 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to $164.4 million in the first six months of 2008. This decrease was primarily due to lower financing rates. Revenues earned on revolving charge accounts amounted to $109.3 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to $103.1 million during the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of revolving charge accounts, partially offset by lower financing rates in the first six months of 2009, compared with the same period last year. Finance income earned on wholesale receivables totaled $148.8 million for the first six months of 2009, compared to $158.3 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to lower financing rates, partially offset by an 11 percent increase in the average balance of wholesale receivables. Operating loan income amounted to $7.6 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to $13.7 million in the first six months of 2008. The decrease was primarily due to lower financing rates and a 13 percent decrease in the average balance of operating loans. Revenues earned from John Deere totaled $137.2 million for the second quarter and $270.4 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to $143.0 million and $275.7 million for the same periods last year.
Crop insurance commissions totaled $5.5 million for the second quarter and $12.1 million for the first six months of 2009, compared to $27.0 million and $56.0 million for the same periods in 2008. The decreases were primarily due to less favorable underwriting experience that resulted in lower contingent commissions in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008.
Interest expense totaled $203.9 million for the second quarter and $411.2 million for the first six months of 2009, compared to $205.0 million and $428.6 million for the same periods in 2008. The decreases were due to lower average interest rates, partially offset by an increase in average borrowings.
Administrative and operating expenses were $66.8 million in the second quarter and $152.9 million for the first six months of 2009, compared with $83.3 million and $163.0 million for the same periods in 2008. The decreases were primarily due to lower employment costs.
During the second quarter and first six months of 2009, the provision for credit losses totaled $41.8 million and $74.2 million, respectively, compared with $15.6 million and $30.7 million for the same periods in 2008. For the first six months of 2009, the Company has experienced higher write-offs of construction and forestry equipment retail notes and revolving charge accounts. Total net write-offs of Receivables financed were $33.3 million and $59.9 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2009, compared with $15.3 million and $28.5 million for the same periods in 2008. The annualized provision for credit losses, as a percentage of the average balance of total Receivables financed, was .94 percent for the second quarter and .83 percent first six months of 2009, compared with .35 percent and .36 percent for the same periods in 2008. See the Company’s most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the Company’s allowance for credit losses policies.
The Company’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 1.26 to 1 for the second quarter of 2009, compared with 1.59 to 1 for the second quarter of 2008. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 1.25 to 1 for the first six months of 2009, compared with 1.55 to 1 for the first six months of 2008. “Earnings” consist of income before income taxes, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting and fixed charges excluding capitalized interest. “Fixed charges” consist of interest on indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, interest related to uncertain tax positions, an estimated amount of rental expense under capitalized leases that is deemed to be representative of the interest factor and rental expense under operating leases, and capitalized interest.
14
Receivable and Lease acquisition volumes were as follows (in millions of dollars):
|
| Three Months |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| $ Change |
| % Change |
| |||
Retail notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Agricultural equipment |
| $ | 1,184.2 |
| $ | 1,271.2 |
| $ | (87.0 | ) | (7 | )% |
Construction and forestry equipment |
| 98.6 |
| 205.2 |
| (106.6 | ) | (52 | ) | |||
Commercial and consumer equipment |
| 81.0 |
| 105.3 |
| (24.3 | ) | (23 | ) | |||
Total retail notes |
| 1,363.8 |
| 1,581.7 |
| (217.9 | ) | (14 | ) | |||
Revolving charge accounts |
| 1,137.1 |
| 1,056.3 |
| 80.8 |
| 8 |
| |||
Operating loans |
| 249.3 |
| 744.7 |
| (495.4 | ) | (67 | ) | |||
Wholesale receivables |
| 5,756.2 |
| 5,975.8 |
| (219.6 | ) | (4 | ) | |||
Financing leases |
| 37.7 |
| 62.8 |
| (25.1 | ) | (40 | ) | |||
Equipment on operating leases |
| 116.8 |
| 129.8 |
| (13.0 | ) | (10 | ) | |||
Total Receivables and Leases |
| $ | 8,660.9 |
| $ | 9,551.1 |
| $ | (890.2 | ) | (9 | )% |
|
| Six Months |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| $ Change |
| % Change |
| |||
Retail notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Agricultural equipment |
| $ | 2,008.4 |
| $ | 2,323.0 |
| $ | (314.6 | ) | (14 | )% |
Construction and forestry equipment |
| 229.8 |
| 432.5 |
| (202.7 | ) | (47 | ) | |||
Commercial and consumer equipment |
| 129.8 |
| 165.9 |
| (36.1 | ) | (22 | ) | |||
Total retail notes |
| 2,368.0 |
| 2,921.4 |
| (553.4 | ) | (19 | ) | |||
Revolving charge accounts |
| 2,133.2 |
| 1,887.6 |
| 245.6 |
| 13 |
| |||
Operating loans |
| 799.8 |
| 1,228.9 |
| (429.1 | ) | (35 | ) | |||
Wholesale receivables |
| 10,151.8 |
| 9,360.6 |
| 791.2 |
| 8 |
| |||
Financing leases |
| 75.4 |
| 113.6 |
| (38.2 | ) | (34 | ) | |||
Equipment on operating leases |
| 200.4 |
| 220.8 |
| (20.4 | ) | (9 | ) | |||
Total Receivables and Leases |
| $ | 15,728.6 |
| $ | 15,732.9 |
| $ | (4.3 | ) | 0 | % |
Retail note volumes for agricultural equipment decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, when compared to last year, primarily due to a decrease in financed market share. Retail note volumes for construction and forestry equipment and commercial and consumer equipment decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, when compared to last year, primarily due to decreases in retail sales of John Deere construction and forestry equipment and John Deere commercial and consumer equipment. Revolving charge account volumes increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, when compared to last year, primarily as a result of increased market coverage. Operating loan volumes decreased during the second quarter and first six months of 2009, when compared to last year, primarily due to decreased borrowings by farm input providers. Wholesale receivable volumes decreased during the second quarter due to lower volumes for construction and forestry equipment and commercial and consumer equipment but increased during the first six months of 2009, when compared to last year, due to increased shipments of John Deere agricultural equipment as a result of increased retail sales activity.
15
Total Receivables and Leases held were as follows (in millions of dollars):
|
| April 30, |
| October 31, |
| April 30, |
| |||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2008 |
| |||
Retail notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Agricultural equipment |
| $ | 8,214.1 |
| $ | 8,836.6 |
| $ | 8,379.3 |
|
Construction and forestry equipment |
| 1,643.4 |
| 1,986.5 |
| 2,174.3 |
| |||
Commercial and consumer equipment |
| 773.1 |
| 896.8 |
| 907.4 |
| |||
Recreational products |
| 7.6 |
| 9.2 |
| 10.5 |
| |||
Total retail notes |
| 10,638.2 |
| 11,729.1 |
| 11,471.5 |
| |||
Revolving charge accounts |
| 1,824.7 |
| 1,825.1 |
| 1,495.6 |
| |||
Operating loans |
| 410.2 |
| 357.9 |
| 533.0 |
| |||
Wholesale receivables |
| 5,184.5 |
| 3,570.6 |
| 4,503.2 |
| |||
Financing leases |
| 372.5 |
| 417.9 |
| 430.7 |
| |||
Equipment on operating leases |
| 981.3 |
| 1,053.4 |
| 964.1 |
| |||
Total Receivables and Leases |
| $ | 19,411.4 |
| $ | 18,954.0 |
| $ | 19,398.1 |
|
Receivables and Leases administered by the Company were as follows (in millions of dollars):
|
| April 30, |
| October 31, |
| April 30, |
| |||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2008 |
| |||
Receivables and Leases administered: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Owned by the Company |
| $ | 16,275.7 |
| $ | 17,361.5 |
| $ | 17,288.7 |
|
Owned by the Company — restricted due to securitization |
| 3,135.7 |
| 1,592.5 |
| 2,109.4 |
| |||
Total Receivables and Leases owned by the Company |
| 19,411.4 |
| 18,954.0 |
| 19,398.1 |
| |||
Administered — with limited recourse* |
| 119.9 |
| 118.7 |
| 112.9 |
| |||
Administered — without recourse** |
| 42.7 |
| 44.0 |
| 43.0 |
| |||
Total Receivables and Leases administered |
| $ | 19,574.0 |
| $ | 19,116.7 |
| $ | 19,554.0 |
|
* The Company’s maximum exposure under all Receivable and Lease recourse provisions at April 30, 2009, October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008 was $9 million, $8 million and $9 million, respectively. The Company does not record the recourse obligations as liabilities as they are contingent liabilities that are remote at this time. However, the probable loss on receivables that have been sold was accrued at the time of sale, and any subsequent necessary adjustments are made as part of ongoing reviews.
** Represents Receivables and Leases that the Company has sold but continues to administer for a fee.
16
Total Receivable amounts 60 days or more past due in the table below represent the amount of all customer payments past due 60 days or more, by product, and as a percent of the respective receivables. They were as follows (in millions of dollars):
|
| April 30, |
| October 31, |
| April 30, |
| |||||||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2008 |
| |||||||||
|
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| |||
Retail notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Agricultural equipment |
| $ | 17.1 |
| .21 | % | $ | 11.9 |
| .13 | % | $ | 14.2 |
| .17 | % |
Construction and forestry equipment |
| 10.2 |
| .62 |
| 8.3 |
| .42 |
| 9.1 |
| .42 |
| |||
Commercial and consumer equipment |
| 2.1 |
| .27 |
| 1.8 |
| .20 |
| 1.8 |
| .20 |
| |||
Recreational products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total retail notes |
| 29.4 |
| .28 |
| 22.0 |
| .19 |
| 25.1 |
| .22 |
| |||
Revolving charge accounts* |
| 29.3 |
| 1.61 |
| 14.6 |
| .80 |
| 19.1 |
| 1.28 |
| |||
Operating loans |
|
|
|
|
| .5 |
| .14 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Wholesale receivables |
| 5.1 |
| .10 |
| 2.3 |
| .06 |
| 1.4 |
| .03 |
| |||
Financing leases |
| 6.4 |
| 1.72 |
| 5.4 |
| 1.29 |
| 5.5 |
| 1.28 |
| |||
Total Receivables |
| $ | 70.2 |
| .38 | % | $ | 44.8 |
| .25 | % | $ | 51.1 |
| .28 | % |
* |
| Due to the nature of revolving charge accounts, the customer payments past due 60 days or more also represent the total balance. |
The balance of retail notes held (principal plus accrued interest) with any installment 60 days or more past due represents the total retail note balance for a customer who has any portion of their note 60 days or more past due. These amounts were $214 million, $163 million and $198 million at April 30, 2009, October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively. The balances of retail notes held on which any installment was 60 days or more past due as a percentage of the ending retail notes receivable was 2.01 percent, 1.39 percent and 1.72 percent at April 30, 2009, October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively.
Total non-performing Receivables, which represent loans the Company has ceased accruing interest for, by product, and as a percent of the respective receivables were as follows (in millions of dollars):
|
| April 30, |
| October 31, |
| April 30, |
| |||||||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2008 |
| |||||||||
|
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| |||
Retail notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Agricultural equipment |
| $ | 19.4 |
| .24 | % | $ | 17.7 |
| .20 | % | $ | 15.6 |
| .19 | % |
Construction and forestry equipment |
| 20.2 |
| 1.23 |
| 15.4 |
| .78 |
| 12.9 |
| .59 |
| |||
Commercial and consumer equipment |
| 5.8 |
| .75 |
| 4.8 |
| .54 |
| 3.7 |
| .41 |
| |||
Recreational products |
| .2 |
| 2.63 |
| .2 |
| 2.17 |
| .1 |
| .95 |
| |||
Total retail notes |
| 45.6 |
| .43 |
| 38.1 |
| .32 |
| 32.3 |
| .28 |
| |||
Revolving charge accounts |
| 1.1 |
| .06 |
| .7 |
| .04 |
| .6 |
| .04 |
| |||
Operating loans |
| 34.0 |
| 8.29 |
| 27.6 |
| 7.71 |
| 2.5 |
| .47 |
| |||
Wholesale receivables |
| 8.6 |
| .17 |
|
|
|
|
| 1.4 |
| .03 |
| |||
Financing leases |
| 14.1 |
| 3.78 |
| 13.2 |
| 3.16 |
| 11.3 |
| 2.62 |
| |||
Total Receivables |
| $ | 103.4 |
| .56 | % | $ | 79.6 |
| .44 | % | $ | 48.1 |
| .26 | % |
The increases in the balance of non-performing construction and forestry equipment retail notes at April 30, 2009 and October 31, 2008 were primarily due to the continued weak U.S. construction market. The increases in non-performing operating loans at April 30, 2009 and October 31, 2008 were due to payment defaults on operating loans to a commercial and consumer equipment customer. The increase in non-performing wholesale receivables at April 30, 2009 was primarily due to payment defaults on wholesale receivables to a commercial and consumer equipment dealer. Loan loss provisions were recorded for the estimated uncollectible amounts.
At April 30, 2009, the Company had a $55 million secured operating loan outstanding to an agribusiness customer in the poultry industry that filed for bankruptcy protection in December 2008. The customer continues to operate and is remitting interest payments while a plan for debt restructuring is being finalized by the bankruptcy court.
17
Total Receivable write-off amounts, net of recoveries, by product, and as an annualized percentage of average balances held during the period, were as follows (in millions of dollars):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||||
|
| April 30, |
| April 30, |
| ||||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||||
|
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| ||
Retail notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Agricultural equipment |
| $ | .4 |
| .02 | % | $ | .5 |
| .02 | % |
Construction and forestry equipment |
| 15.6 |
| 3.63 |
| 6.8 |
| 1.22 |
| ||
Commercial and consumer equipment |
| .7 |
| .36 |
| .4 |
| .18 |
| ||
Recreational products |
| .2 |
| 9.90 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total retail notes |
| 16.9 |
| .63 |
| 7.7 |
| .27 |
| ||
Revolving charge accounts |
| 14.7 |
| 3.56 |
| 7.7 |
| 2.30 |
| ||
Operating loans |
|
|
|
|
| (.3 | ) | (.26 | ) | ||
Wholesale receivables |
| .4 |
| .03 |
| .2 |
| .02 |
| ||
Financing leases |
| 1.3 |
| 1.41 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Receivables |
| $ | 33.3 |
| .75 | % | $ | 15.3 |
| .35 | % |
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||
|
| April 30, |
| April 30, |
| ||||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||||
|
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| Dollars |
| Percent |
| ||
Retail notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Agricultural equipment |
| $ | 1.0 |
| .02 | % | $ | .7 |
| .02 | % |
Construction and forestry equipment |
| 30.3 |
| 3.32 |
| 13.1 |
| 1.17 |
| ||
Commercial and consumer equipment |
| 1.0 |
| .24 |
| .9 |
| .20 |
| ||
Recreational products |
| .6 |
| 14.00 |
| .3 |
| 5.43 |
| ||
Total retail notes |
| 32.9 |
| .59 |
| 15.0 |
| .26 |
| ||
Revolving charge accounts |
| 24.6 |
| 2.96 |
| 12.6 |
| 1.88 |
| ||
Operating loans |
| (.4 | ) | (.21 | ) | (.3 | ) | (.14 | ) | ||
Wholesale receivables |
| .6 |
| .03 |
| .1 |
| .01 |
| ||
Financing leases |
| 2.2 |
| 1.13 |
| 1.1 |
| .54 |
| ||
Total Receivables |
| $ | 59.9 |
| .67 | % | $ | 28.5 |
| .33 | % |
Deposits withheld from dealers and merchants, representing mainly the aggregate dealer retail note and lease withholding accounts from individual John Deere dealers to which losses from retail notes and leases originating from the respective dealers can be charged, amounted to $160 million at April 30, 2009 compared with $174 million at October 31, 2008 and $169 million at April 30, 2008.
The Company’s allowance for credit losses on all Receivables financed totaled $120 million at April 30, 2009, $105 million at October 31, 2008 and $102 million at April 30, 2008. The allowance for credit losses represented .65 percent of the total Receivables financed at April 30, 2009, .59 percent at October 31, 2008 and .55 percent at April 30, 2008. The level of the allowance is based on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including historical loss experience by product category, portfolio duration, delinquency trends, economic conditions and credit risk quality. The Company believes its allowance is sufficient to provide for losses in its existing receivable portfolio.
Safe Harbor Statement
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements herein that relate to future operating periods are subject to important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Forward-looking statements involve certain factors that are subject to change, including changing worldwide economic conditions. Actions by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and other central banks and agencies may affect the costs and expenses of financing the Company and the rates it is able to offer. The Company’s business is affected by general economic conditions in and the political instability of the global markets in which the Company operates because deteriorating economic conditions and political instability can result in decreased customer confidence, lower demand for equipment, higher loan losses and greater currency risk. The Company’s business is also affected by actions of banks, financing and leasing companies and other lenders that compete with the Company for customers; capital market disruptions; significant changes in capital market liquidity and associated funding costs; interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; and the credit market crisis.
18
With respect to the current global economic downturn, changes in governmental banking, monetary and fiscal policies to restore liquidity and increase the availability of credit may not be effective and could have a material impact on the Company’s customers and markets. Recent significant changes in market liquidity conditions could impact access to funding and associated funding costs, which could reduce the Company’s earnings and cash flows. The Company’s operations could be impaired by changes in the equity and bond markets, which could negatively affect earnings.
The current economic downturn and market volatility have adversely affected the financial industry in which the Company operates. The Company’s liquidity and ongoing profitability depend largely on timely access to capital to meet future cash flow requirements and fund operations and the costs associated with engaging in diversified funding activities. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen or access to governmental liquidity programs decreases, funding could be unavailable or insufficient. Additionally, under current market conditions customer confidence levels may result in declines in credit applications and increases in delinquencies and default rates, which could materially impact the Company’s write-offs and provision for credit losses.
In addition, the Company’s business is closely related to John Deere’s business. Further information, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company’s and John Deere’s financial results, is included in the most recent Deere & Company Form 10-K and 10-Q (including the factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors) and other Deere & Company and Capital Corporation filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Critical Accounting Policies
See the Company’s critical accounting policies discussed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the most recent annual report filed on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to these policies.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
For additional information on the Company’s dependence on and relationships with Deere & Company, see the Company’s most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K.
During the first six months of 2009, the aggregate net cash provided by operating and financing activities was used primarily to increase cash and cash equivalents and to increase Receivables. Net cash provided by operating activities was $256 million in the first six months of 2009. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $1,413 million in the first six months of 2009, resulting primarily from a net increase in total external borrowings, partially offset by a decrease in payables to Deere & Company. Net cash used for investing activities totaled $626 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily due to the cost of Receivables and Leases acquired exceeding collections. Cash and cash equivalents increased $1,049 million during the first six months of 2009.
During the first six months of 2008, the aggregate net cash provided by operating and financing activities was used primarily to increase Receivables. Net cash provided by operating activities was $298 million in the first six months of 2008. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $400 million in the first six months of 2008, resulting primarily from a net increase in total external borrowings, partially offset by dividends paid to John Deere Credit Company, which in turn paid comparable dividends to Deere & Company, and a decrease in payables to Deere & Company. Net cash used for investing activities totaled $733 million in the first six months of 2008, primarily due to the cost of Receivables and Leases acquired exceeding collections and the cost of notes receivables with John Deere exceeding collections. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $29 million during the first six months of 2008.
The financing of retail purchases and leases of John Deere products and of wholesale receivables owed by John Deere dealers represented approximately 80 percent of the Company’s acquisition volume for the six months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Any extended reduction or suspension of John Deere’s sale or production of products due to a decline in demand or production, governmental actions or other events could have an adverse effect on the Company’s acquisition volume of Receivables and Leases.
19
The Company relies on its ability to raise substantial amounts of funds to finance its Receivable and Lease portfolios. Given the downturn in global economic activity and the recent significant changes in credit market liquidity, sources of funds for the Company have been impacted. However, the Company expects to have sufficient sources of liquidity to meet its funding needs. The Company’s ability to meet its debt obligations is supported in a number of ways. The assets of the Company are self-liquidating in nature. A solid equity position is available to absorb unusual losses on these assets and all commercial paper is backed by unsecured, committed borrowing lines from various banks. Liquidity is also provided by the Company’s ability to securitize these assets and through the issuance of term debt. Additionally, liquidity may also be provided through loans from John Deere. The Company’s commercial paper outstanding at April 30, 2009, October 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008 was approximately $654 million, $2,814 million and $2,794 million, respectively, while the total cash and cash equivalents position was approximately $2,131 million, $1,083 million and $162 million, respectively.
On December 4, 2008, John Deere Capital Corporation (Capital Corporation) and FPC Financial, f.s.b., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital Corporation, elected to continue to participate in the debt guaranty program that is part of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC’s) Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). During December 2008, Capital Corporation issued $2.0 billion of fixed-rate medium-term notes due June 19, 2012 at a rate of 2.875%, which are guaranteed by the FDIC under the TLGP. The FDIC has notified Capital Corporation that it needs additional review and written determination from the FDIC prior to issuing additional guaranteed debt. Accordingly, Capital Corporation has submitted documentation to the FDIC and will continue to seek further guidance.
During January 2009, the Capital Corporation entered into a new revolving credit agreement to utilize bank conduit facilities to securitize retail notes (see Note 5). At April 30, 2009, this facility had a total capacity, or “financing limit,” of up to $2,500 million of secured financings at any time. After a 364 day revolving period, unless the banks and the Capital Corporation agree to renew for an additional 364 days, the Capital Corporation would liquidate the secured borrowings over time as payments on the retail notes are collected. At April 30, 2009, $2,092 million of secured short-term borrowings was outstanding under the agreement.
During the first six months of 2009, the Company issued $3,941 million of medium-term notes, obtained $2,400 million of secured borrowings and maintained an average commercial paper balance of $1,734 million. At April 30, 2009, the Company’s funding profile included $654 million of commercial paper, $3,119 million of notes payable related to on-balance sheet securitization funding, $16,169 million of unsecured term debt, and $2,112 million of equity capital. The Company’s funding profile may be altered to reflect such factors as relative costs of funding sources, assets available for securitizations and capital market accessibility.
During the first six months of 2009, the Company issued $3,944 million and retired $1,696 million of long-term borrowings. The issuances were primarily medium-term notes. The retirements included $300 million of 6% Notes due 2009 and the remainder consisted primarily of medium-term notes.
Total interest-bearing indebtedness amounted to $20,149 million at April 30, 2009, compared with $18,424 million at October 31, 2008, and $18,216 million at April 30, 2008. Included in this debt are secured borrowings of $3,119 million, $1,618 million and $2,200 million for the same periods (see Note 5). Total external borrowings increased during the first six months of 2009 and increased in the past 12 months, generally corresponding with the level of cash and cash equivalents, the level of the Receivable and Lease portfolio and the change in payable to John Deere. Total short-term indebtedness amounted to $6,694 million at April 30, 2009, which included $3,119 million of secured borrowings, compared with $7,894 million at October 31, 2008, which included $1,618 million of secured borrowings and $9,052 million at April 30, 2008, which included $2,200 million of secured borrowings, while total long-term indebtedness amounted to $13,455 million, $10,530 million and $9,163 million at these dates, respectively. The ratio of total interest-bearing debt, including securitization indebtedness, to stockholder’s equity was 9.5 to 1 at April 30, 2009, compared with 8.9 to 1 at October 31, 2008 and 11.0 to 1 at April 30, 2008.
Stockholder’s equity was $2,112 million at April 30, 2009, compared with $2,065 million at October 31, 2008 and $1,661 million at April 30, 2008. The increase in the first six months of 2009 resulted primarily from net income of $69 million, which was partially offset by a $24 million unrealized loss on derivatives.
20
Lines of Credit
The Company also has access to bank lines of credit with various banks throughout the world. Some of the lines are available to both the Company and Deere & Company. Worldwide lines of credit totaled $4,512 million at April 30, 2009, $2,379 million of which was unused. For the purpose of computing unused credit lines, commercial paper and short-term bank borrowings, excluding secured borrowings and the current portion of long-term borrowings, of the Company and Deere & Company were considered to constitute utilization. Included in the total credit lines at April 30, 2009 was the long-term credit facility agreement of $3,750 million, expiring in February 2012. The credit agreement requires the Company to maintain its consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges at not less than 1.05 to 1 for each fiscal quarter and its ratio of senior debt, excluding securitization indebtedness, to capital base (total subordinated debt and stockholder’s equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)) at not more than 11 to 1 at the end of any fiscal quarter. All of these requirements of the credit agreement have been met during the periods included in the consolidated financial statements.
Debt Ratings
The Company’s ability to obtain funding is affected by its debt ratings, which are closely related to the outlook for and the financial condition of John Deere, and the nature and availability of support facilities, such as its lines of credit and the support agreement from Deere & Company.
To access public debt capital markets, the Company relies on credit rating agencies to assign short-term and long-term credit ratings to the Company’s securities as an indicator of credit quality for fixed income investors. A credit rating agency may change or withdraw Company ratings based on its assessment of the Company’s current and future ability to meet interest and principal repayment obligations. Each agency’s rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Lower credit ratings generally result in higher borrowing costs and reduced access to debt capital markets.
The senior long-term and short-term debt ratings and outlook currently assigned to unsecured Company securities by the rating agencies engaged by the Company are the same as those for John Deere. Those ratings are as follows:
|
| Senior Long-Term |
| Short-Term |
| Outlook |
|
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. |
| A2 |
| Prime-1 |
| Stable |
|
Standard & Poor’s |
| A |
| A-1 |
| Stable |
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
See the Company’s most recent annual report filed on Form 10-K (Part II, Item 7A). There has been no material change in this information.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
The Company’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Act”)) were effective as of April 30, 2009, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) of the Act. During the second quarter, there were no changes that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. |
| Legal Proceedings. |
|
|
|
|
| The Company is subject to various unresolved legal actions which arise in the normal course of its business, the most prevalent of which relate to state and federal laws and regulations concerning retail credit. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these unresolved legal actions or the range of possible loss, the Company believes these unresolved legal actions will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
| Risk Factors. |
|
|
|
|
| See the Company’s most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K (Part I, Item 1A). There has been no material change in this information. |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
| Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
|
| Omitted pursuant to instruction H. |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
| Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
|
|
|
|
| Omitted pursuant to instruction H. |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
| Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
|
|
|
|
| Omitted pursuant to instruction H. |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
| Other Information. |
|
|
|
|
| None. |
|
|
|
Item 6. |
| Exhibits. |
|
|
|
|
| See the index to exhibits immediately preceding the exhibits filed with this report. |
|
|
|
|
| Certain instruments relating to long-term debt, constituting less than 10% of the registrant’s total assets, are not filed as exhibits herewith pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. The registrant will file copies of such instruments upon request of the Commission. |
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
| JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORPORATION | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Date: | June 1, 2009 |
| By: | /s/ M. J. Mack, Jr. |
|
|
|
| M. J. Mack, Jr. |
|
|
|
| Senior Vice President, |
|
|
|
| Principal Financial Officer |
23
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
| Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended October 31, 1999, Securities and Exchange Commission file number 1-6458*) |
|
|
|
3.2 |
| Bylaws, as amended (Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended October 31, 1999, Securities and Exchange Commission file number 1-6458*) |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
99 |
| Part I of Deere & Company Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 (Securities and Exchange Commission file number 1-4121*) |
* Incorporated by reference. Copies of these exhibits are available from the Company upon request.
24