UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-03970
HARSCO CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
| 23-1483991 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
| (I.R.S. employer identification number) |
|
|
|
350 Poplar Church Road, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania |
| 17011 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code 717-763-7064
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
| Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
| Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o
NO x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
| Outstanding at April 29, 2011 |
Common stock, par value $1.25 per share |
| 80,670,645 |
HARSCO CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
| Page | ||
| |||
|
| ||
| |||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) | 7 | |
| Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) | 8 – 22 | |
|
|
| |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 23 – 36 | ||
|
|
| |
36 | |||
|
|
| |
36 | |||
|
|
| |
| |||
|
|
| |
37 | |||
|
|
| |
37 | |||
|
|
| |
37 | |||
|
|
| |
37 | |||
|
|
| |
37 | |||
|
|
| |
38 | |||
|
|
| |
38 | |||
|
|
| |
39 | |||
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
HARSCO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Revenues from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Service revenues |
| $ | 653,527 |
| $ | 599,046 |
|
Product revenues |
| 125,528 |
| 143,360 |
| ||
Total revenues |
| 779,055 |
| 742,406 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Costs and expenses from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of services sold |
| 525,978 |
| 486,632 |
| ||
Cost of products sold |
| 84,441 |
| 92,801 |
| ||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| 137,789 |
| 136,327 |
| ||
Research and development expenses |
| 1,340 |
| 916 |
| ||
Other expenses (income) |
| 471 |
| (2,509 | ) | ||
Total costs and expenses |
| 750,019 |
| 714,167 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating income from continuing operations |
| 29,036 |
| 28,239 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest income |
| 720 |
| 461 |
| ||
Interest expense |
| (11,935 | ) | (16,119 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity income |
| 17,821 |
| 12,581 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income tax expense |
| (4,400 | ) | (3,034 | ) | ||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities, net |
| 211 |
| 130 |
| ||
Income from continuing operations |
| 13,632 |
| 9,677 |
| ||
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loss on disposal of discontinued business |
| (1,328 | ) | (163 | ) | ||
Income tax benefit related to discontinued business |
| 503 |
| 414 |
| ||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
| (825 | ) | 251 |
| ||
Net Income |
| 12,807 |
| 9,928 |
| ||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (1,376 | ) | (1,894 | ) | ||
Net income attributable to Harsco Corporation |
| $ | 11,431 |
| $ | 8,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Amounts attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
| $ | 12,256 |
| $ | 7,783 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| (825 | ) | 251 |
| ||
Net income attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders |
| $ | 11,431 |
| $ | 8,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding |
| 80,695 |
| 80,543 |
| ||
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Continuing operations |
| $ | 0.15 |
| $ | 0.10 |
|
Discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | — |
| ||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders |
| $ | 0.14 |
| $ | 0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding |
| 80,944 |
| 80,743 |
| ||
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Continuing operations |
| $ | 0.15 |
| $ | 0.10 |
|
Discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | — |
| ||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders |
| $ | 0.14 |
| $ | 0.10 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
| $ | 0.205 |
| $ | 0.205 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
HARSCO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
|
| March 31 |
| December 31 |
| ||
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 101,312 |
| $ | 124,238 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
| 643,390 |
| 585,301 |
| ||
Other receivables |
| 27,738 |
| 29,299 |
| ||
Inventories |
| 289,907 |
| 271,617 |
| ||
Other current assets |
| 134,711 |
| 144,491 |
| ||
Total current assets |
| 1,197,058 |
| 1,154,946 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| 1,403,548 |
| 1,366,973 |
| ||
Goodwill |
| 708,101 |
| 690,787 |
| ||
Intangible assets, net |
| 114,986 |
| 120,959 |
| ||
Other assets |
| 126,817 |
| 135,555 |
| ||
Total assets |
| $ | 3,550,510 |
| $ | 3,469,220 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Short-term borrowings |
| $ | 60,787 |
| $ | 31,197 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 3,868 |
| 4,011 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
| 285,149 |
| 261,509 |
| ||
Accrued compensation |
| 76,268 |
| 83,928 |
| ||
Income taxes payable |
| 8,464 |
| 9,718 |
| ||
Dividends payable |
| 16,535 |
| 16,505 |
| ||
Insurance liabilities |
| 25,769 |
| 25,844 |
| ||
Advances on contracts |
| 115,609 |
| 128,794 |
| ||
Other current liabilities |
| 216,888 |
| 206,358 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
| 809,337 |
| 767,864 |
| ||
Long-term debt |
| 854,495 |
| 849,724 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
| 42,541 |
| 35,642 |
| ||
Insurance liabilities |
| 61,517 |
| 62,202 |
| ||
Retirement plan liabilities |
| 215,862 |
| 223,777 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
| 65,828 |
| 61,866 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
| 2,049,580 |
| 2,001,075 |
| ||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
HARSCO CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Common stock |
| 139,732 |
| 139,514 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 143,263 |
| 141,298 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (150,558 | ) | (185,932 | ) | ||
Retained earnings |
| 2,068,803 |
| 2,073,920 |
| ||
Treasury stock |
| (738,114 | ) | (737,106 | ) | ||
Total Harsco Corporation stockholders’ equity |
| 1,463,126 |
| 1,431,694 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interests |
| 37,804 |
| 36,451 |
| ||
Total equity |
| 1,500,930 |
| 1,468,145 |
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
| $ | 3,550,510 |
| $ | 3,469,220 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
HARSCO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
| $ | 12,807 |
| $ | 9,928 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation |
| 67,929 |
| 71,857 |
| ||
Amortization |
| 8,593 |
| 9,078 |
| ||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities, net |
| (211 | ) | (130 | ) | ||
Dividends or distributions from unconsolidated entities |
| 88 |
| 88 |
| ||
Other, net |
| (4,372 | ) | (12,853 | ) | ||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions of businesses: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
| (38,681 | ) | (53,212 | ) | ||
Inventories |
| (14,313 | ) | 5,748 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
| 10,547 |
| 8,324 |
| ||
Accrued interest payable |
| 6,199 |
| 9,817 |
| ||
Accrued compensation |
| (9,704 | ) | 8,697 |
| ||
Harsco Infrastructure Segment Restructuring Program accrual |
| (9,116 | ) | — |
| ||
Other assets and liabilities |
| (16,626 | ) | (27,287 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| 13,140 |
| 30,055 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
| (67,257 | ) | (29,849 | ) | ||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
| 6,017 |
| 8,873 |
| ||
Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired |
| — |
| (27,584 | ) | ||
Proceeds from sale of businesses |
| 600 |
| — |
| ||
Other investing activities |
| 4,733 |
| (4,386 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash used by investing activities |
| (55,907 | ) | (52,946 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Short-term borrowings, net |
| 29,431 |
| 31,736 |
| ||
Current maturities and long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Additions |
| 70,482 |
| 96,577 |
| ||
Reductions |
| (66,566 | ) | (95,601 | ) | ||
Cash dividends paid on common stock |
| (16,507 | ) | (16,472 | ) | ||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests |
| (600 | ) | (1,825 | ) | ||
Contributions of equity from noncontrolling interests |
| 333 |
| 161 |
| ||
Common stock issued-options |
| 1,239 |
| 108 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| 17,812 |
| 14,684 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
| 2,029 |
| (583 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
| (22,926 | ) | (8,790 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| 124,238 |
| 94,184 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
| $ | 101,312 |
| $ | 85,394 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
HARSCO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (Unaudited)
|
| Harsco Corporation Stockholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
| Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per |
|
|
|
|
| Additional |
| Retained |
| Comprehensive |
| Noncontrolling |
|
|
| ||||||||
share amounts) |
| Issued |
| Treasury |
| Paid-in Capital |
| Earnings |
| Income (Loss) |
| Interests |
| Total |
| ||||||||
Beginning Balances, January 1, 2010 |
| $ | 139,234 |
| $ | (735,016 | ) | $ | 137,746 |
| $ | 2,133,297 |
| $ | (201,684 | ) | $ | 36,257 |
| $ | 1,509,834 |
| |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8,034 |
|
|
| 1,894 |
| 9,928 |
| ||||||||
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Common @ $0.205 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (16,602 | ) |
|
|
|
| (16,602 | ) | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1,825 | ) | (1,825 | ) | ||||||||
Translation adjustments, net of deferred income taxes of $11,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (35,013 | ) | (508 | ) | (35,521 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flow hedging instrument adjustments, net of deferred income taxes of $450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1,176 | ) |
|
| (1,176 | ) | ||||||||
Contributions of equity from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 161 |
| 161 |
| ||||||||
Pension liability adjustments, net of deferred income taxes of $(9,864) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22,670 |
|
|
| 22,670 |
| ||||||||
Marketable securities unrealized gains, net of deferred income taxes of $(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
| 5 |
| ||||||||
Stock options exercised, 47,420 shares |
| 59 |
| (836 | ) | 967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 190 |
| ||||||||
Net issuance of stock — vesting of restricted stock units, 69,515 shares |
| 136 |
| (1,254 | ) | (188 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1,306 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unearned compensation on restricted stock units, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
| 1,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,082 |
| ||||||||
Balances, March 31, 2010 |
| $ |
| 139,429 |
| $ | (737,106 | ) | $ | 139,607 |
| $ | 2,124,729 |
| $ | (215,198 | ) | $ | 35,979 |
| $ | 1,487,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| Harsco Corporation Stockholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
| Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per |
|
|
|
|
| Additional |
| Retained |
| Comprehensive |
| Noncontrolling |
|
|
| ||||||||
share amounts) |
| Issued |
| Treasury |
| Paid-in Capital |
| Earnings |
| Income (Loss) |
| Interests |
| Total |
| ||||||||
Beginning Balances, January 1, 2011 |
| $ | 139,514 |
| $ | (737,106 | ) | $ | 141,298 |
| $ | 2,073,920 |
| $ | (185,932 | ) | $ | 36,451 |
| $ | 1,468,145 |
| |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11,431 |
|
|
| 1,376 |
| 12,807 |
| ||||||||
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Common @ $0.205 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (16,548 | ) |
|
|
|
| (16,548 | ) | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (600 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||||||
Translation adjustments, net of deferred income taxes of $(6,508) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 34,568 |
| 244 |
| 34,812 |
| ||||||||
Cash flow hedging instrument adjustments, net of deferred income taxes of $(1,517) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5,777 |
|
|
| 5,777 |
| ||||||||
Contributions of equity from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 333 |
| 333 |
| ||||||||
Pension liability adjustments, net of deferred income taxes of $2,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (4,971 | ) |
|
| (4,971 | ) | ||||||||
Stock options exercised, 80,442 shares |
| 100 |
|
|
| 1,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,239 |
| ||||||||
Net issuance of stock — vesting of restricted stock units, 31,552 shares |
| 118 |
| (1,008 | ) | (118 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1,008 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unearned portion of stock-based compensation, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
| 944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 944 |
| ||||||||
Balances, March 31, 2011 |
| $ | 139,732 |
| $ | (738,114 | ) | $ | 143,263 |
| $ | 2,068,803 |
| $ | (150,558 | ) | $ | 37,804 |
| $ | 1,500,930 |
| |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
HARSCO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
| $ | 12,807 |
| $ | 9,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of deferred income taxes |
| 34,812 |
| (35,521 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net gain (loss) on cash flow hedging instruments, net of deferred income taxes of $(1,517) and $450 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
| 5,777 |
| (1,176 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pension liability adjustments, net of deferred income taxes of $2,105 and $(9,864) in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
| (4,971 | ) | 22,670 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of deferred income taxes of $0 and $(5) in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
| — |
| 7 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Reclassification adjustment for gain on marketable securities, net of deferred income taxes of $0 and $1 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
| — |
| (2 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
| 35,618 |
| (14,022 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| 48,425 |
| (4,094 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (1,620 | ) | (1,386 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Harsco Corporation |
| $ | 46,805 |
| $ | (5,480 | ) |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
HARSCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
Harsco Corporation (the “Company”) has prepared these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements based on Securities and Exchange Commission rules that permit reduced disclosure for interim periods. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (all of which are of a normal recurring nature) that are necessary for a fair presentation are reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The December 31, 2010 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet information contained in this Form 10-Q was derived from the 2010 audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for a year-end report. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Segment information for prior periods has been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2010, the Harsco Minerals businesses, which were previously a component of an “All Other” Category, are reported with the Harsco Metals Segment to form the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment. This reflects the increasing operating synergies of these businesses within the Company’s global markets as well as the combined management of these businesses. The remaining businesses of the “All Other” Category are reported as the Harsco Industrial operating segment, which also reflects the combined management of these businesses. The “All Other” Category is no longer utilized.
The Company’s management has evaluated all activity of the Company and concluded that subsequent events are properly reflected in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes as required by U.S. GAAP.
Operating results and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
2. Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards were adopted in 2011:
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued changes related to the accounting for revenue recognition when multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements are present. The changes eliminated the residual method of revenue allocation and requires revenue to be allocated using the relative selling price method. This method requires a vendor to use its best estimate of selling price if neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence of selling price exists when evaluating multiple deliverable arrangements. The adoption of these changes did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted FASB issued changes to disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The changes required a reporting entity to disclose, in the reconciliation of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), separate information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). The adoption of these changes did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Additional accounting standards which have been issued and become effective for the Company at various future dates are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Acquisitions
Certain of the Company’s acquisitions in prior years included contingent consideration features for which defined goals needed to be met by the acquired business in order for payment of the consideration. Each quarter until settlement of these contingencies, the Company assessed the likelihood that an acquired business would achieve the goals and the resulting fair value of the contingency. In the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded a $4.0 million and $8.3 million reduction, respectively, to the previously recognized contingent consideration liability. The first quarter 2011 adjustment was the result of a settlement of the contingency and the first quarter 2010 adjustment was a result of the ongoing assessment of performance goals. In accordance with accounting standards for business combinations, these adjustments were recognized in operating income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as a component of the Other expenses (income) line item. All contingent consideration liabilities have been settled and there was no recorded contingent consideration liability as of March 31, 2011. The recorded contingent consideration liability was $3.9 million at December 31, 2010.
Dispositions - Assets Held-for-Sale
Throughout the past several years and in conjunction with the Fourth Quarter 2010 restructuring of the Harsco Infrastructure Segment, management approved the sale of certain long-lived assets throughout the Company’s operations. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, assets held-for-sale of $23.0 million and $24.8 million, respectively were recorded as Other current assets. Assets held-for-sale at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 represent the estimated net realizable value of the assets of two lines of business in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment.
4. Accounts Receivable and Inventories
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
|
| Accounts Receivable |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| March 31 |
| December 31 |
| ||
Trade accounts receivable |
| $ | 664,484 |
| $ | 605,584 |
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts |
| (21,094 | ) | (20,283 | ) | ||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
| $ | 643,390 |
| $ | 585,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other receivables (a) |
| $ | 27,738 |
| $ | 29,299 |
|
(a) Other receivables include insurance claim receivables, employee receivables, tax claim receivables and other miscellaneous receivables not included in Trade accounts receivable, net.
The provision for doubtful accounts related to trade accounts receivable was $2.2 million and $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Inventories consist of the following:
|
| Inventories |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| March 31 |
| December 31 |
| ||
Finished goods |
| $ | 127,718 |
| $ | 124,771 |
|
Work-in-process |
| 30,665 |
| 28,266 |
| ||
Raw materials and purchased parts |
| 90,803 |
| 79,420 |
| ||
Stores and supplies |
| 40,721 |
| 39,160 |
| ||
Total inventories |
| $ | 289,907 |
| $ | 271,617 |
|
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
|
| Property, Plant and Equipment |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| March 31 |
| December 31 |
| ||
Land |
| $ | 29,823 |
| $ | 29,456 |
|
Land improvements |
| 18,644 |
| 18,141 |
| ||
Buildings and improvements |
| 202,260 |
| 196,777 |
| ||
Machinery and equipment |
| 3,137,507 |
| 3,045,335 |
| ||
Uncompleted construction |
| 82,075 |
| 74,873 |
| ||
Gross property, plant and equipment |
| 3,470,309 |
| 3,364,582 |
| ||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
| (2,066,761 | ) | (1,997,609 | ) | ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| $ | 1,403,548 |
| $ | 1,366,973 |
|
6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table reflects the changes in carrying amounts of goodwill by segment (there is no goodwill associated with the Harsco Industrial Segment) for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Goodwill by Segment
(In thousands) |
| Harsco |
| Harsco |
| Harsco |
| Consolidated |
| ||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
| $ | 418,276 |
| $ | 263,212 |
| $ | 9,299 |
| $ | 690,787 |
|
Changes to Goodwill |
| — |
| 147 |
| — |
| 147 |
| ||||
Foreign currency translation |
| 8,916 |
| 8,240 |
| 11 |
| 17,167 |
| ||||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
| $ | 427,192 |
| $ | 271,599 |
| $ | 9,310 |
| $ | 708,101 |
|
The Company determined that as of March 31, 2011, no interim goodwill impairment testing was necessary. The Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2011. There can be no assurance that goodwill impairment testing will not result in a charge to earnings. Should the Company experience a further degradation in the overall markets served by the Harsco Infrastructure Segment, impairment losses for assets associated with this Segment may be required. Any necessary impairment could result in the write down of the carrying value of goodwill to its implied fair value.
Intangible Assets by Category
|
| March 31, 2011 |
| December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
| Gross Carrying |
| Accumulated |
| Gross Carrying |
| Accumulated |
| ||||
Customer related |
| $ | 187,683 |
| $ | 105,447 |
| $ | 184,864 |
| $ | 98,104 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
| 1,392 |
| 1,323 |
| 1,386 |
| 1,317 |
| ||||
Patents |
| 7,067 |
| 5,008 |
| 6,976 |
| 4,868 |
| ||||
Technology related |
| 30,144 |
| 12,733 |
| 29,821 |
| 11,863 |
| ||||
Trade names |
| 18,844 |
| 6,106 |
| 18,635 |
| 5,188 |
| ||||
Other |
| 8,166 |
| 7,693 |
| 8,095 |
| 7,478 |
| ||||
Total |
| $ | 253,296 |
| $ | 138,310 |
| $ | 249,777 |
| $ | 128,818 |
|
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $7.9 million and $8.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table shows the estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years based on current intangible assets. These estimated amortization expense amounts do not reflect the potential effect of future foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| |||||
Estimated amortization expense |
| $ | 31,000 |
| $ | 17,000 |
| $ | 15,000 |
| $ | 13,000 |
| $ | 8,000 |
|
7. Employee Benefit Plans
|
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| ||||||||||
Defined Benefit Net Periodic Pension Cost |
| U. S. Plans |
| International Plans |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
Defined benefit plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Service cost |
| $ | 392 |
| $ | 520 |
| $ | 1,094 |
| $ | 1,020 |
|
Interest cost |
| 3,389 |
| 3,510 |
| 11,983 |
| 11,821 |
| ||||
Expected return on plan assets |
| (4,147 | ) | (4,159 | ) | (12,533 | ) | (11,446 | ) | ||||
Recognized prior service costs |
| 62 |
| 85 |
| 104 |
| 92 |
| ||||
Recognized losses |
| 750 |
| 652 |
| 2,778 |
| 2,988 |
| ||||
Amortization of transition liability |
| — |
| — |
| 14 |
| 13 |
| ||||
Settlement loss |
| — |
| — |
| 30 |
| 17 |
| ||||
Defined benefit plans net periodic pension cost |
| $ | 446 |
| $ | 608 |
| $ | 3,470 |
| $ | 4,505 |
|
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company contributed $0.4 million and $16.9 million for the U.S. and international defined benefit pension plans, respectively. The Company currently anticipates contributing an additional $2.6 million and $12.5 million for the U.S. and international plans, respectively, during the remainder of 2011.
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company’s contributions to multi-employer and defined contribution pension plans were $5.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
8. Income Taxes
Income tax expense from continuing operations increased primarily due to higher earnings from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010. The effective income tax rate related to continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 24.7% compared with 24.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The effective income tax rate increased slightly due to changes in expected earnings mix within the geographies in which the Company conducts business.
An income tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on technical merits. The unrecognized income tax benefit at March 31, 2011 was $48.5 million including interest and penalties. Within the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that up to $10.5 million of such amount will be recognized upon settlement of tax examinations and the expiration of various statutes of limitation.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental
The Company is involved in a number of environmental remediation investigations and cleanups and, along with other companies, has been identified as a “potentially responsible party” for certain waste disposal sites. While each of these matters is subject to various uncertainties, it is probable that the Company will agree to make payments toward funding certain of these activities and it is possible that some of these matters will be decided unfavorably to the Company. The Company has evaluated its potential liability, and its financial exposure is dependent upon such factors as the continuing evolution of environmental laws and regulatory requirements, the availability and application of technology, the allocation of cost among potentially responsible parties, the years of remedial activity required and the remediation methods selected. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 include accruals in Other current liabilities of $2.4 million and $4.2 million, respectively, for environmental matters. The amounts charged against pre-tax income related to environmental matters totaled $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
In January 2010, the Company received a Notification of Penalty (“NOP”) from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) with respect to its Saxonburg, Pennsylvania (no longer in existence) and Sarver, Pennsylvania facilities of the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment. The EPA issued the NOP for the Company’s alleged failure to file certain reports relating to the storage of certain chemicals commonly used by the business, with the appropriate state and
local agencies. The Company settled the matter with the EPA pursuant to the terms of a Consent Agreement and Final Order, which included the Company paying a penalty of approximately $146,000.
In December 2010, the EPA issued a Notice of Violation in connection with the Warren, Ohio site of the Company’s Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment. The EPA and the Company have entered into negotiations to settle this matter. The penalties associated with settling this matter could exceed $100,000 but are not expected to be material.
The Company evaluates its liability for future environmental remediation costs on a quarterly basis. Actual costs to be incurred at identified sites in future periods may vary from the estimates, given inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures. The Company does not expect that any sum it may have to pay in connection with environmental matters in excess of the amounts recorded or disclosed above would have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Gas Technologies Divestiture
In October 2009, the Company and Taylor-Wharton International (“TWI”), the purchaser of the Company’s Gas Technologies business, satisfactorily resolved certain claims and counterclaims that had been submitted to arbitration. The claims and counterclaims related both to net working capital adjustments associated with the divestiture and to alleged breach of certain representations and warranties made by the Company. The settlement and related costs and fees were reflected in the $15.1 million after-tax loss from discontinued operations recorded by the Company for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.
In November 2009, TWI filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As part of its filing, TWI filed a motion to reject certain executory contracts, including the parties’ Asset and Stock Purchase Agreement dated at December 7, 2007 (the “ASPA”). TWI, however, did not seek to reject the settlement agreement finalized in October 2009 between the Company and TWI.
In May and June 2010, the bankruptcy court entered orders confirming TWI’s plan of reorganization and approving TWI’s rejection of certain executory contracts, including the ASPA. On June 15, 2010, the reorganized TWI emerged from bankruptcy. On August 23, 2010, TWI commenced an adversary proceeding against the Company and certain third party tort plaintiffs in the Bankruptcy Court seeking an order declaring that the rejection order excuses TWI’s contractual assumption of the assumed liabilities. On November 23, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court issued an opinion and entered an order granting the Company’s motion to dismiss and holding that TWI’s assumption of certain assumed liabilities was not rejected during the bankruptcy. On February 8, 2011, TWI, the Company and certain insurers reached a settlement regarding these matters, the terms of which are confidential.
The Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $5.0 million in 2010 related to potential and contingent third party tort claims and this charge was recorded in Loss on disposal of discontinued business. The Company believes that sufficient coverage for claims relating to these matters exists, both as a result of the settlement and reserves established prior to the settlement. Claims are inherently uncertain and, as a result, potential claims could be resolved at an amount significantly above the amount recorded.
Value-Added Tax Dispute
The Company is involved in a value-added and services (“ICMS”) tax dispute with the State Revenue Authorities from the State of São Paulo, Brazil (the “SPRA”). In October 2009, the Company received notification of the SPRA’s administrative decision regarding the levying of ICMS in the State of São Paulo in relation to services provided to one of the Company’s customers in the State between January 2004 and May 2005. As of March 31, 2011, the tax assessment from the SPRA is approximately $4 million, with penalty, interest and fees assessed to date increasing such amount by an additional $29 million. All such amounts include the effect of foreign currency translation. The increase in such amount since the Company’s last Annual Report filed on Form 10-K is due primarily to an increase in the assessed interest (which increases at a statutorily determined amount per month), plus the inclusion by the SPRA of statutorily mandated legal fees, which are calculated as a percentage of the total assessed amounts due, inclusive of penalty and interest.
The Company continues to believe that it does not have liability for this assessment, believes that sufficient coverage for these claims exists as a result of certain third party indemnification obligations and will continue to evaluate its liability with regard to this dispute on a quarterly basis. The Company intends to vigorously contest this dispute under various alternatives, including judicial appeal. Although results of operations and cash flows for a given period could be adversely affected by this dispute, management believes that the ultimate outcome of this dispute will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Other
The Company has been named as one of many defendants (approximately 90 or more in most cases) in legal actions alleging personal injury from exposure to airborne asbestos over the past several decades. In their suits, the plaintiffs have named as defendants, among others, many manufacturers, distributors and installers of numerous types of equipment or products that allegedly contained asbestos.
The Company believes that the claims against it are without merit. The Company has never been a producer, manufacturer or processor of asbestos fibers. Any component within a Company product that may have contained asbestos would have been purchased from a supplier. Based on scientific and medical evidence, the Company believes
that any asbestos exposure arising from normal use of any Company product never presented any harmful levels of airborne asbestos exposure, and moreover, the type of asbestos contained in any component that was used in those products was protectively encapsulated in other materials and is not associated with the types of injuries alleged in the pending suits. Finally, in most of the depositions taken of plaintiffs to date in the litigation against the Company, plaintiffs have failed to specifically identify any Company products as the source of their asbestos exposure.
The majority of the asbestos complaints pending against the Company have been filed in New York. Almost all of the New York complaints contain a standard claim for damages of $20 million or $25 million against the approximately 90 defendants, regardless of the individual plaintiff’s alleged medical condition, and without specifically identifying any Company product as the source of plaintiff’s asbestos exposure.
At March 31, 2011, there are 19,293 pending asbestos personal injury claims filed against the Company. Of these cases, 18,786 are pending in the New York Supreme Court for New York County in New York State. The other claims, totaling 507, are filed in various counties in a number of state courts, and in certain Federal District Courts (including New York), and those complaints generally assert lesser amounts of damages than the New York State court cases or do not state any amount claimed.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company has obtained dismissal by stipulation, or summary judgment prior to trial, in 25,381 cases.
In view of the persistence of asbestos litigation nationwide, the Company expects to continue to receive additional claims. However, there have been developments during the past several years, both by certain state legislatures and by certain state courts, which could favorably affect the Company’s ability to defend these asbestos claims in those jurisdictions. These developments include procedural changes, docketing changes, proof of damage requirements and other changes that require plaintiffs to follow specific procedures in bringing their claims and to show proof of damages before they can proceed with their claim. An example is the action taken by the New York Supreme Court (a trial court), which is responsible for managing all asbestos cases pending within New York County in the State of New York. This Court issued an order in December 2002 that created a Deferred or Inactive Docket for all pending and future asbestos claims filed by plaintiffs who cannot demonstrate that they have a malignant condition or discernable physical impairment, and an Active or In Extremis Docket for plaintiffs who are able to show such medical condition. As a result of this order, the majority of the asbestos cases filed against the Company in New York County have been moved to the Inactive Docket until such time as the plaintiffs can show that they have incurred a physical impairment. At March 31, 2011, the Company has been listed as a defendant in 1,042 Active or In Extremis asbestos cases in New York County. The Court’s Order has been challenged by plaintiffs.
Except with regard to the legal costs in a few limited, exceptional cases, the Company’s insurance carrier has paid all legal and settlement costs and expenses to date. The Company has liability insurance coverage under various primary and excess policies that the Company believes will be available, if necessary, to substantially cover any liability that might ultimately be incurred on these claims.
The Company intends to continue its practice of vigorously defending these cases as they are listed for trial. It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related lawsuits, claims and proceedings due to the unpredictable nature of personal injury litigation. Despite this uncertainty, and although results of operations and cash flows for a given period could be adversely affected by asbestos-related lawsuits, claims and proceedings, management believes that the ultimate outcome of these cases will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is subject to various other claims and legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arose in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, all such matters are adequately covered by insurance or by accruals, and if not so covered, are without merit or are of such kind, or involve such amounts, as would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Insurance liabilities are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred for a particular event and the amount of loss associated with the event can be reasonably estimated. Insurance reserves have been estimated based primarily upon actuarial calculations and reflect the undiscounted estimated liabilities for ultimate losses including claims incurred but not reported. Inherent in these estimates are assumptions that are based on the Company’s history of claims and losses, a detailed analysis of existing claims with respect to potential value, and current legal and legislative trends. If actual claims differ from those projected by management, changes (either increases or decreases) to insurance reserves may be required and would be recorded through income in the period the change was determined. When a recognized liability is covered by third-party insurance, the Company records an insurance claim receivable to reflect the covered liability. Insurance claim receivables are included in Other receivables in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, for additional information on Accrued Insurance and Loss Reserves.
10. Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Shares
|
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| ||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders |
| $ | 12,256 |
| $ | 7,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - basic |
| 80,695 |
| 80,543 |
| ||
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation |
| 249 |
| 200 |
| ||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - diluted |
| 80,944 |
| 80,743 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings from continuing operations per common share, attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
| $ | 0.15 |
| $ | 0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diluted |
| $ | 0.15 |
| $ | 0.10 |
|
At March 31, 2011, all outstanding stock-based compensation units were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. At March 31, 2010, there were 36,318 restricted stock units outstanding that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was antidilutive.
11. Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities and Fair Value
The Company uses derivative instruments, including foreign currency forward exchange contracts, commodity contracts and cross-currency interest rate swaps, to manage certain foreign currency, commodity price and interest rate exposures. Derivative instruments are viewed as risk management tools by the Company and are not used for trading or speculative purposes.
All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives used to hedge foreign-currency-denominated balance sheet items are reported directly in earnings along with offsetting transaction gains and losses on the items being hedged. Derivatives used to hedge forecasted cash flows associated with foreign currency commitments or forecasted commodity purchases may be accounted for as cash flow hedges, as deemed appropriate and if the criteria for hedge accounting are met. Gains and losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are deferred as a separate component of equity and reclassified to earnings in a manner that matches the timing of the earnings impact of the hedged transactions. Generally, at March 31, 2011, these deferred gains and losses will be reclassified to earnings over 10 to 15 years from the balance sheet date. The ineffective portion of all hedges, if any, is recognized currently in earnings.
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts recorded as assets and liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
| Asset Derivatives |
| Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||
(In thousands) |
| Balance Sheet Location |
| Fair Value |
| Balance Sheet Location |
| Fair Value |
| ||
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| Other current assets |
| $ | 3 |
| Other current liabilities |
| $ | 4 |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
| Other assets |
| 23,516 |
| Other liabilities |
| 6,504 |
| ||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
| $ | 23,519 |
|
|
| $ | 6,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivates not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| Other current assets |
| $ | 1,199 |
| Other current liabilities |
| $ | 751 |
|
|
| Asset Derivatives |
| Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||
(In thousands) |
| Balance Sheet Location |
| Fair Value |
| Balance Sheet Location |
| Fair Value |
| ||
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| Other current assets |
| $ | — |
| Other current liabilities |
| $ | 29 |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
| Other assets |
| 31,803 |
| Other liabilities |
| 3,831 |
| ||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
| $ | 31,803 |
|
|
| $ | 3,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivates not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| Other current assets |
| $ | 2,787 |
| Other current liabilities |
| $ | 1,042 |
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
(In thousands) |
| Amount of Gain |
| Location of Gain |
| Amount of |
| Location of Gain |
| Amount of Gain |
| |||
For the three months ended March 31, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| $ | (527 | ) |
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
| 7,821 |
|
|
| — |
| Cost of services and products sold |
| (18,781 | )(a) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 7,294 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | (18,781 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
For the three months ended March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| $ | 139 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swap |
| (1,765 | ) |
|
| — |
| Cost of services and products sold |
| 14,504 | (a) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | (1,626 | ) |
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | 14,504 |
|
(a) These gains (losses) offset foreign currency fluctuation effects on the debt principal.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
| Location of Gain |
| Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| Income on Derivative |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| Cost of services |
| $ | (5,121 | ) | $ | 2,680 |
|
(a) These gains (losses) offset amounts recognized in cost of service and products sold principally as a result of intercompany or third party foreign currency exposures.
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
The Company conducts business in multiple currencies and, accordingly, is subject to the inherent risks associated with foreign exchange rate movements. The financial position and results of operations of substantially all of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates existing at the respective balance sheet dates, and income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates during the respective periods. The aggregate effects of translating the balance sheets of these subsidiaries are deferred and recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
The Company uses derivative instruments to hedge cash flows related to foreign currency fluctuations. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $270.3 million and $214.2 million of contracted amounts, respectively, of foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding. These contracts are part of a worldwide program to minimize foreign currency exchange-related operating income and balance sheet exposure by offsetting foreign currency exposures of certain future payments between the Company and its various subsidiaries, vendors or customers. The unsecured contracts outstanding at March 31, 2011 mature at various times within eight months and are with major financial institutions. The Company may be exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the contract counterparties. The Company evaluates the creditworthiness of the counterparties and does not expect default by them. Foreign currency forward exchange contracts are used to hedge commitments, such as foreign currency debt, firm purchase commitments and foreign currency cash flows for certain export sales transactions.
The following tables summarize, by major currency, the contractual amounts of the Company’s foreign currency forward exchange contracts in U.S. dollars at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The “Buy” amounts represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of commitments to purchase foreign currencies, and the “Sell” amounts represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of commitments to sell foreign currencies. The recognized gains and losses offset amounts recognized in cost of services and products sold principally as a result of intercompany or third party foreign currency exposures.
March 31, 2011 |
| ||||||||||
(In thousands) |
| Type |
| U.S. Dollar |
| Maturity |
| Recognized |
| ||
British pounds sterling |
| Sell |
| $ | 31,485 |
| April 2011 through June 2011 |
| $ | 93 |
|
British pounds sterling |
| Buy |
| 2,326 |
| April 2011 through May 2011 |
| (47 | ) | ||
Euros |
| Sell |
| 106,602 |
| April 2011 through June 2011 |
| 136 |
| ||
Euros |
| Buy |
| 69,818 |
| April 2011 through May 2011 |
| 153 |
| ||
Hong Kong dollar |
| Sell |
| 22,904 |
| April 2011 |
| — |
| ||
Hong Kong dollar |
| Buy |
| 22,909 |
| April 2011 |
| 1 |
| ||
Other currencies |
| Sell |
| 8,510 |
| April 2011 through November 2011 |
| (30 | ) | ||
Other currencies |
| Buy |
| 5,784 |
| April 2011 |
| 141 |
| ||
Total |
|
|
| $ | 270,338 |
|
|
| $ | 447 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||
(In thousands) |
| Type |
| U.S. Dollar |
| Maturity |
| Recognized |
| ||
British pounds sterling |
| Sell |
| $ | 54,479 |
| January 2011 through May 2011 |
| $ | 1,806 |
|
British pounds sterling |
| Buy |
| 208 |
| January 2011 through May 2011 |
| (2 | ) | ||
Euros |
| Sell |
| 93,831 |
| January 2011 through February 2011 |
| (104 | ) | ||
Euros |
| Buy |
| 44,571 |
| January 2011 through February 2011 |
| (338 | ) | ||
Other currencies |
| Sell |
| 5,314 |
| January 2011 through November 2011 |
| (86 | ) | ||
Other currencies |
| Buy |
| 15,748 |
| January 2011 |
| 441 |
| ||
Total |
|
|
| $ | 214,151 |
|
|
| $ | 1,717 |
|
In addition to foreign currency forward exchange contracts, the Company designates certain loans as hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries. The Company recorded pre-tax net losses of $6.9 million and pre-tax net gains of $19.2 million related to hedges of net investments during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, into Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps
The Company uses cross-currency interest rate swaps in conjunction with certain debt issuances in order to secure a fixed local currency interest rate. Under these cross-currency interest rate swaps, the Company receives interest based on a fixed U.S. dollar rate and pays interest on a fixed local currency rate based on the contractual amounts in dollars and the local currency, respectively. The cross-currency interest rate swaps are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, with changes in value attributed to the effect of the swaps’ interest spread recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a separate component of equity. Changes in value attributed to the effect of foreign currency fluctuations are recorded in the income statement and offset currency fluctuation effects on the debt principal.
Cross-Currency Interest |
| Contractual |
| Interest Rates |
| |||
Rate Swap |
| Amount |
| Receive |
| Pay |
| |
Maturing 2018 |
| $ | 250,000 |
| Fixed U.S. dollar rate |
| Fixed euro rate |
|
Maturing 2020 |
| 220,000 |
| Fixed U.S. dollar rate |
| Fixed British pound sterling rate |
| |
Fair Value of Derivative Assets and Liabilities and Other Financial Instruments
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that the Company believes market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique.
The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
· Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
· Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
· Level 3—Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
In instances in which multiple levels of inputs are used to measure fair value, hierarchy classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following table indicates the different financial instruments of the Company at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
(In thousands) |
| March 31 |
| December 31 |
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| $ | 1,202 |
| $ | 2,787 |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
| 23,516 |
| 31,803 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| 755 |
| 1,071 |
| ||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
| 6,504 |
| 3,831 |
| ||
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
(In thousands) |
| March 31 |
| December 31 |
| ||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Contingent consideration for acquisitions |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3,872 |
|
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances for liabilities measured on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31:
Level 3 Liabilities - Contingent Consideration for the Three Months Ended March 31
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Balance at beginning of period |
| $ | 3,872 |
| $ | 9,735 |
|
Acquisitions during the period |
| — |
| 4,618 |
| ||
Fair value adjustments included in earnings |
| (3,966 | ) | (8,264 | ) | ||
Effect of exchange rate changes |
| 94 |
| (317 | ) | ||
Balance at end of period |
| $ | — |
| $ | 5,772 |
|
The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavors to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs, such as forward rates, interest rates, the Company’s credit risk and counterparties’ credit risks, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company is able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. Commodity derivatives, foreign currency forward exchange contracts and cross-currency interest rate swaps are classified as Level 2 fair value based upon pricing models using market-based inputs. Model inputs can be verified, and valuation techniques do not involve significant management judgment.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, was $906.9 million and $905.0 million, respectively, compared to carrying value of $858.4 million and $853.7 million, respectively. Fair values for debt are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities.
12. Review of Operations by Segment
|
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Revenues From Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Harsco Metals & Minerals |
| $ | 391,737 |
| $ | 344,262 |
|
Harsco Infrastructure |
| 261,567 |
| 250,629 |
| ||
Harsco Rail |
| 62,602 |
| 95,402 |
| ||
Harsco Industrial |
| 63,149 |
| 52,053 |
| ||
Corporate |
| — |
| 60 |
| ||
Total Revenues From Continuing Operations |
| $ | 779,055 |
| $ | 742,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Harsco Metals & Minerals |
| $ | 28,605 |
| $ | 19,284 |
|
Harsco Infrastructure |
| (17,491 | ) | (19,273 | ) | ||
Harsco Rail |
| 8,123 |
| 20,414 |
| ||
Harsco Industrial |
| 10,674 |
| 8,378 |
| ||
Corporate |
| (875 | ) | (564 | ) | ||
Total Operating Income From Continuing Operations |
| $ | 29,036 |
| $ | 28,239 |
|
Reconciliation of Segment Operating Income to Consolidated Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Equity Income
|
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Segment operating income |
| $ | 29,911 |
| $ | 28,803 |
|
General Corporate expense |
| (875 | ) | (564 | ) | ||
Operating income from continuing operations |
| 29,036 |
| 28,239 |
| ||
Interest income |
| 720 |
| 461 |
| ||
Interest expense |
| (11,935 | ) | (16,119 | ) | ||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity income |
| $ | 17,821 |
| $ | 12,581 |
|
13. Other Expenses (Income)
This income statement classification includes restructuring costs for employee termination benefits and costs to exit activities; impaired asset write-downs; net gains or losses on the disposal of non-core assets; and business combination accounting adjustments related to recent acquisitions by the Company.
|
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Restructuring costs |
| $ | 4,836 |
| $ | 9,337 |
|
Net gains from sale of non-core assets |
| (1,056 | ) | (3,669 | ) | ||
Contingent consideration adjustments |
| (3,966 | ) | (8,264 | ) | ||
Other |
| 657 |
| 87 |
| ||
Other expenses (income) |
| $ | 471 |
| $ | (2,509 | ) |
14. Restructuring Programs
Fourth Quarter 2010 Harsco Infrastructure Program
On December 8, 2010, the Company approved a restructuring plan for the Harsco Infrastructure Segment (the “Fourth Quarter 2010 Harsco Infrastructure Program”). This restructuring initiative was in response to global economic and financial conditions that were adversely affecting this Segment’s end markets. These conditions included such factors as the following:
· a continued lack of meaningful commercial and multi-family construction activity in various regions of the world served by the Harsco Infrastructure Segment;
· pricing pressures as customers worldwide continued to seek lower cost solutions; and
· postponements, deferrals and cancellation of jobs and projects.
This restructuring initiative is part of an ongoing transformation strategy within the Harsco Infrastructure Segment to improve organizational efficiency and enhance profitability and stockholder value. The strategy includes optimizing the Segment as a more streamlined, efficient, cost-effective, disciplined and market-focused global platform. Objectives of the program include balancing short-term profitability goals with long-term strategies to establish a platform upon which the business can grow with limited fixed investment and generate annual operating expense savings to strengthen 2011 and future performance. Under this restructuring program, the Harsco Infrastructure Segment further reduced its branch structure; consolidated and/or closed administrative office locations; further reduced its global workforce; and rationalized its product lines.
At March 31, 2011, the Company completed workforce reductions of 309 employees of a total expected workforce reduction of 494 employees. The remaining workforce reductions and exit activities are targeted for completion during the remainder of 2011.
The restructuring accrual for the Fourth Quarter 2010 Harsco Infrastructure Program at March 31, 2011 and the activity for the three months then ended are as follows:
(In thousands) |
| Accrual |
| Adjustments |
| Cash |
| Foreign |
| Remaining |
| |||||
Employee termination benefit costs |
| $ | 9,254 |
| $ | (667 | ) | $ | (3,115 | ) | $ | 313 |
| $ | 5,785 |
|
Cost to exit activities |
| 21,449 |
| 2,631 |
| (7,141 | ) | 284 |
| 17,223 |
| |||||
Other |
| 97 |
| — |
| (56 | ) | — |
| 41 |
| |||||
Total |
| $ | 30,800 |
| $ | 1,964 |
| $ | (10,312 | ) | $ | 597 |
| $ | 23,049 |
|
(a) Adjustments to previously recorded restructuring charges resulted from changes in facts and circumstances in the implementation of these activities as well as the timing of additional expenses recognized under U.S. GAAP.
The majority of the remaining cash expenditures of $23.0 million related to these actions are expected to be paid throughout 2011 and 2012.
Prior Restructuring Programs
As a result of the continued financial and economic downturn, the Company implemented other actions throughout 2010 to further reduce its cost structure and close certain facilities. These actions were in addition to the Fourth Quarter 2010 Harsco Infrastructure Program, which is described above. Through March 31, 2011, the Company completed workforce reductions related to these actions of 232 employees of a total expected workforce reduction of 249 employees for the Harsco Infrastructure Segment; and reductions of 76 employees of a total expected workforce reduction of 242 employees for the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment. Remaining workforce reductions and costs to exit activities are targeted for completion during the remainder of 2011.
The restructuring accrual for the previous restructuring programs at March 31, 2011 and the activity for the three months then ended are as follows:
(In thousands) |
| Accrual |
| Cash |
| Foreign |
| Remaining |
| ||||
Harsco Infrastructure Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Employee termination benefit costs |
| $ | 905 |
| $ | (421 | ) | $ | 15 |
| $ | 499 |
|
Cost to exit activities |
| 413 |
| (246 | ) | 10 |
| 177 |
| ||||
Total Harsco Infrastructure Segment |
| 1,318 |
|
| (667 | ) |
| 25 |
| 676 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Employee termination benefit costs |
| 2,109 |
|
| (551 | ) |
| 8 |
| 1,566 |
| ||
Cost to exit activities |
| 864 |
| (68 | ) | 29 |
| 825 |
| ||||
Total Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment |
| 2,973 |
|
| (619 | ) |
| 37 |
| 2,391 |
| ||
Total |
| $ | 4,291 |
| $ | (1,286 | ) | $ | 62 |
| $ | 3,067 |
|
The majority of the remaining cash expenditures of $3.1 million related to these actions are expected to be paid throughout 2011.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as well as the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which includes additional information about the Company’s critical accounting policies, contractual obligations, practices and the transactions that support the financial results, and provides a more comprehensive summary of the Company’s outlook, trends and strategies for 2011 and beyond.
Throughout this discussion, segment information for prior periods has been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2010, the Harsco Minerals businesses, which were previously a component of an “All Other” Category, are reported with the Harsco Metals Segment to form the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment. This reflects the increasing operating synergies of these businesses within the Company’s global markets as well as the combined management of these businesses. The remaining businesses of the “All Other” Category are reported as the Harsco Industrial operating segment, which also reflects the combined management of these businesses. The “All Other” Category is no longer utilized.
Forward-Looking Statements
The nature of the Company’s business and the many countries in which it operates subject it to changing economic, competitive, regulatory and technological conditions, risks and uncertainties. In accordance with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the following cautionary remarks regarding important factors that, among others, could cause future results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, expectations and assumptions expressed or implied herein. Forward-looking statements contained herein could include, among other things, statements about the Company’s management confidence and strategies for performance; expectations for new and existing products, technologies and opportunities; and expectations regarding growth, sales, cash flows, earnings and Economic Value Added (“EVA®”). These statements can be identified by the use of such terms as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe” or other comparable terms.
Factors that could cause results to differ include, but are not limited to: (1) changes in the worldwide business environment in which the Company operates, including general economic conditions; (2) changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates, commodity and fuel costs and capital costs; (3) changes in the performance of stock and bond markets that could affect, among other things, the valuation of the assets in the Company’s pension plans and the accounting for pension assets, liabilities and expenses; (4) changes in governmental laws and regulations, including environmental, tax and import tariff standards; (5) market and competitive changes, including pricing pressures, market demand and acceptance for new products, services and technologies; (6) unforeseen business disruptions in one or more of the many countries in which the Company operates due to political instability, civil disobedience, armed hostilities, public health issues or other calamities; (7) the seasonal nature of the business; (8) the Company’s ability to successfully enter into new contracts and complete new acquisitions or joint ventures in the timeframe contemplated or at all; (9) the integration of the Company’s strategic acquisitions; (10) the amount and timing of repurchases of the Company’s common stock, if any; (11) the recent global financial and credit crisis and economic conditions generally, which could result in the Company’s customers curtailing development projects, construction, production and capital expenditures, which, in turn, could reduce the demand for the Company’s products and services and, accordingly, the Company’s sales, margins and profitability; (12) the outcome of any disputes with customers; (13) the financial condition of the Company’s customers, including the ability of customers (especially those that may be highly leveraged and those with inadequate liquidity) to maintain their credit availability; (14) the Company’s ability to successfully implement and receive the expected benefits of cost-reduction and restructuring initiatives; and (15) other risk factors listed from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports. A further discussion of these, along with other potential factors, can be found in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company cautions that these factors may not be exhaustive and that many of these factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results. The Company undertakes no duty to update forward-looking statements except as may be required by law.
Executive Overview
Revenues for the Company during the first quarter of 2011 were $779.1 million compared with $742.4 million in the first quarter of 2010. Foreign currency translation increased revenues by $18.5 million for the first quarter of 2011 in comparison with the first quarter of 2010.
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Percentage Change |
| |||||||||||
Revenues by Segment |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Change |
| Price/ |
| Currency |
| Total |
| |||
Harsco Metals & Minerals |
| $ | 391.7 |
| $ | 344.3 |
| $ | 47.4 |
| 10.2 | % | 3.6 | % | 13.8 | % |
Harsco Infrastructure |
| 261.6 |
| 250.6 |
| 11.0 |
| 2.2 |
| 2.2 |
| 4.4 |
| |||
Harsco Rail |
| 62.6 |
| 95.4 |
| (32.8 | ) | (35.0 | ) | 0.6 |
| (34.4 | ) | |||
Harsco Industrial |
| 63.2 |
| 52.0 |
| 11.2 |
| 21.2 |
| 0.3 |
| 21.5 |
| |||
Corporate |
| — |
| 0.1 |
| (0.1 | ) | (100.0 | ) | — |
| (100.0 | ) | |||
Total Revenues |
| $ | 779.1 |
| $ | 742.4 |
| $ | 36.7 |
| 2.4 | % | 2.5 | % | 4.9 | % |
The Company generated higher revenues in the first quarter of 2011 in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment due to increased customer steel production and in the Harsco Industrial Segment due to increased demand. This was partially offset by the timing of shipments within the Harsco Rail Segment. The Company continues to execute on its geographic expansion strategy, as revenues from targeted growth markets were approximately 26% of total revenues in the first quarter of 2011, compared with 24% for the first quarter of 2010 and 25% for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Percentage Change |
| |||||||||||
Revenues by Region |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Change |
| Price/ |
| Currency |
| Total |
| |||
Western Europe |
| $ | 308.1 |
| $ | 293.9 |
| $ | 14.2 |
| 2.3 | % | 2.5 | % | 4.8 | % |
North America |
| 264.4 |
| 271.3 |
| (6.9 | ) | (2.9 | ) | 0.3 |
| (2.6 | ) | |||
Latin America (a) |
| 81.5 |
| 63.9 |
| 17.6 |
| 20.0 |
| 7.6 |
| 27.6 |
| |||
Middle East and Africa |
| 50.9 |
| 53.6 |
| (2.7 | ) | (7.0 | ) | 2.0 |
| (5.0 | ) | |||
Asia-Pacific |
| 45.3 |
| 36.1 |
| 9.2 |
| 14.8 |
| 10.6 |
| 25.4 |
| |||
Eastern Europe |
| 28.9 |
| 23.6 |
| 5.3 |
| 21.1 |
| 1.5 |
| 22.6 |
| |||
Total Revenues |
| $ | 779.1 |
| $ | 742.4 |
| $ | 36.7 |
| 2.4 | % | 2.5 | % | 4.9 | % |
(a) Includes Mexico.
Operating income from continuing operations for the first quarter of 2011 was $29.0 million compared with $28.2 million for the first quarter of 2010. The increase in operating income was driven by stabilizing market conditions in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment and the Harsco Industrial Segment. The Harsco Infrastructure Segment continued to experience weak market conditions in non-residential construction, but also realized initial cost savings benefits from restructuring initiatives implemented in 2010. Offsetting these increases in operating income was the impact of timing of shipments in the Harsco Rail Segment. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the first quarter of 2011 were $0.15 compared with $0.10 for the first quarter of 2010.
The Company continues to have significant available liquidity and remains well-positioned from a financial flexibility perspective. Net cash generated from operating activities was $13.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared with $30.1 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2011 were higher than in the first quarter of 2010 due to funding required for previously announced growth projects in our Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment. Balance sheet debt increased slightly from December 31, 2010 and the Company’s debt to capital ratio increased from 37.6% at December 31, 2010 (the lowest ratio in the last twelve years) to 38.0% at March 31, 2011. The Company’s debt to total capital ratio was 40.1% at March 31, 2010. See Liquidity and Capital Resources under Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Operating Results” for further discussion of cash flows.
Segment Financial Highlights
Revenues |
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| Change |
| |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Amount |
| Percent |
| |||||||
Harsco Metals & Minerals |
| $ | 391.7 |
| 50.3 | % | $ | 344.3 |
| 46.4 | % | $ | 47.4 |
| 13.8 | % |
Harsco Infrastructure |
| 261.6 |
| 33.6 |
| 250.6 |
| 33.8 |
| 11.0 |
| 4.4 |
| |||
Harsco Rail |
| 62.6 |
| 8.0 |
| 95.4 |
| 12.8 |
| (32.8 | ) | (34.4 | ) | |||
Harsco Industrial |
| 63.2 |
| 8.1 |
| 52.0 |
| 7.0 |
| 11.2 |
| 21.5 |
| |||
Corporate |
| — |
| — |
| 0.1 |
| — |
| (0.1 | ) | (100.0 | ) | |||
Total Revenues |
| $ | 779.1 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 742.4 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 36.7 |
| 4.9 | % |
Operating Income (Loss) |
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| Change |
| |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Amount |
| Percent |
| |||||||
Harsco Metals & Minerals |
| $ | 28.6 |
| 98.6 | % | $ | 19.3 |
| 68.4 | % | $ | 9.3 |
| 48.2 | % |
Harsco Infrastructure |
| (17.5 | ) | (60.3 | ) | (19.3 | ) | (68.4 | ) | 1.8 |
| 9.3 |
| |||
Harsco Rail |
| 8.1 |
| 27.9 |
| 20.4 |
| 72.3 |
| (12.3 | ) | (60.3 | ) | |||
Harsco Industrial |
| 10.7 |
| 36.9 |
| 8.4 |
| 29.8 |
| 2.3 |
| 27.4 |
| |||
Corporate |
| (0.9 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (50.0 | ) | |||
Total Operating Income |
| $ | 29.0 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 28.2 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 0.8 |
| 2.8 | % |
|
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| ||
Operating Margins |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
|
Harsco Metals & Minerals |
| 7.3 | % | 5.6 | % |
Harsco Infrastructure |
| (6.7 | ) | (7.7 | ) |
Harsco Rail |
| 13.0 |
| 21.4 |
|
Harsco Industrial |
| 16.9 |
| 16.2 |
|
Consolidated Operating Margin |
| 3.7 | % | 3.8 | % |
Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment:
The Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment generated higher revenues, operating income and margins in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2010 due principally to the increased global steel production of its customers and the overall weaker U.S. dollar.
Significant Effects on Revenues (In millions) |
| Three Months |
| |
Revenues — 2010 |
| $ | 344.3 |
|
Net increased price and volume |
| 35.1 |
| |
Impact of foreign currency translation |
| 12.3 |
| |
Revenues — 2011 |
| $ | 391.7 |
|
Significant Effects on Operating Income:
· An overall increase in global steel production which is expected to remain stable or gradually increase for the remainder of 2011. Customers’ production increased approximately 7% compared with the first quarter of 2010.
· Continued positive effects of cost control and business transformation initiatives.
· Higher commodity pricing within the Minerals business, partially offset by increased fuel costs.
· Foreign currency translation in the first quarter of 2011 increased operating income for this Segment by $0.8 million compared with the first quarter of 2010.
Harsco Infrastructure Segment:
The Harsco Infrastructure Segment generated higher revenue and a smaller operating loss in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2010, due to cost savings from restructuring initiatives implemented in 2010 and the overall weaker U.S. dollar.
Significant Effects on Revenues (In millions) |
| Three Months |
| |
Revenues — 2010 |
| $ | 250.6 |
|
Net increased cost reductions and volume |
| 5.6 |
| |
Impact of foreign currency translation |
| 5.4 |
| |
Revenues — 2011 |
| $ | 261.6 |
|
Significant Effects on Operating Loss:
· In the first quarter of 2011, the Segment’s operating results improved due to the realization of cost savings resulting from restructuring initiatives implemented in 2010.
· Rental rates decreased slightly from the first quarter of 2010, but operating income from rentals increased modestly due to increased equipment utilization, principally in Eastern Europe, France and Scandinavia. That increase was offset by lower margins on equipment sales and erection and dismantling services, principally in Europe.
· Net facilities discontinuance and restructuring expense, which includes property gains, costs for exit activities and termination benefits and other items, increased $2.2 million from the first quarter of 2010 due to the timing of certain expense recognition from the 2010 restructuring programs and a net reduction in contingent consideration adjustments. In the first quarter of 2011, this included favorable contingent consideration adjustments totaling $4.0 million compared with $8.3 million in the first quarter of 2010. For additional information regarding contingent consideration adjustments see Note 3. Acquisitions and Dispositions to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements.”
· Foreign currency translation in the first quarter of 2011 decreased operating results for this Segment by $0.9 million compared with the first quarter of 2010.
Harsco Rail Segment:
As expected, the Harsco Rail Segment generated lower revenues, operating income and margins in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2010 due principally to the timing of unit deliveries.
Significant Impacts on Revenues (In millions) |
| Three Months |
| |
Revenues — 2010 |
| $ | 95.4 |
|
Net decreased volume |
| (33.4 | ) | |
Impact of foreign currency translation |
| 0.6 |
| |
Revenues — 2011 |
| $ | 62.6 |
|
Significant Impacts on Operating Income:
· This Segment’s operating income for the first quarter of 2011 was lower than the first quarter of 2010 due principally to timing of shipments of equipment. Shipments for the first quarter of 2011 were expected to be less than previous quarters due to the scheduled timing of deliveries. The majority of rail equipment shipments for 2011 are expected to occur in the third and fourth quarter. Conversely, in 2010 the majority of rail equipment shipments occurred in the first half of the year.
· Decreased customer demand for contract grinding services also contributed to the decrease in operating income compared to the first quarter of 2010.
Harsco Industrial Segment:
The Harsco Industrial Segment generated higher revenues, operating income and margins in the first quarter of 2011 compared with first quarter of 2010. The increase in revenues was primarily due to increased market demand for industrial products, primarily in the industrial grating business.
Significant Impacts on Revenues (In millions) |
| Three Months |
| |
Revenues — 2010 |
| $ | 52.0 |
|
Net increased price and volume |
| 10.9 |
| |
Impact of foreign currency translation |
| 0.3 |
| |
Revenues — 2011 |
| $ | 63.2 |
|
Significant Effects on Operating Income:
· The industrial grating business experienced an increase in operating income in the first quarter of 2011 due to increased demand and higher pricing.
· The air-cooled heat exchangers business operating income was comparable to the first quarter of 2010, with year-over-year market improvements offset by higher raw material costs.
· Continuous improvement initiatives targeting expense reduction, revenue enhancement and asset optimization continue to be implemented in these businesses, positively contributing to operating income and operating margins in the first quarter of 2011.
Outlook, Trends and Strategies
Despite the still fragile U.S. economy and continued uncertainties throughout several major global economies particularly in non-residential construction markets in the U.K. and key Western European countries, the Company believes it is well-positioned to capitalize on opportunities in the near to long-term based on its strong balance sheet, available liquidity and ability to generate strong operating cash flows, as well as its demonstrated ability to execute appropriate countermeasures. Countermeasures such as ongoing cost-reduction initiatives; the Company’s “OneHarsco” initiative; and the Company’s continuous improvement program have significantly reduced, and should continue to reduce, the Company’s cost structure and further enhance its financial strength without sacrificing its solution-based services and products. The Company’s expansion of its global footprint in targeted growth markets; its diversity of services and products in industries that are fundamental to global growth; its long-term mill services and minerals supply contracts; the portability and mobility of its Harsco Infrastructure services equipment; and its large Harsco Infrastructure services customer base help mitigate the Company’s overall long-term exposure to changes in the economic outlook in any single economy. However, any further deterioration of global economies could still have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In addition to items noted in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, the following significant items, risks, trends and strategies are expected to affect the Company for the remainder of 2011 and beyond:
· The Company will continue to place a strong focus on corporate-wide expansion into targeted emerging markets to grow and improve the balance of its geographic footprint. More specifically, the Company’s global growth strategies include steady, targeted expansion, particularly in the Gulf Region of the Middle East and Africa, Asia-Pacific and Latin America to further complement the Company’s already strong presence throughout Europe and North America. Growth is also expected to be achieved through the provision of additional services to existing customers; new contracts in both developed and targeted growth markets; and targeted joint ventures and partnerships in strategic countries and market sectors. This strategy is expected to result in approximately 35% of revenue from emerging markets by 2015. This growth will come both organically and through targeted joint venture investments. Over time, a balanced geographic footprint should also benefit the Company through further diversification of its customer base.
· The Company expects continued strong and sustainable cash flows from operating activities. The Company also expects to maintain discipline to limit capital expenditures through its ability to redeploy Harsco Infrastructure equipment to new projects, without jeopardizing growth opportunities. The Company believes that, in the current economic environment, the mobile nature of its capital investment pool will facilitate strategic growth initiatives in the near-term, lessening the need for growth capital expenditures, particularly for the Harsco Infrastructure Segment. New or renewed contracts in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment may require incremental capital investments. Strategic geographic expansion such as joint ventures in emerging markets, in any Segment, may also require higher levels of capital investments. Due to normal business seasonality, once again in 2011, the Company expects to generate most of its cash from operations in the second half of the year.
· Management will continue to be very selective and disciplined in allocating capital, choosing projects with the highest EVA® potential.
· The Company announced in 2010 that it has embarked upon a business transformation strategy as part of its OneHarsco initiative, which is designed to create significant operating and cost efficiencies by improving the Company’s internal supply chain planning, logistics, scheduling and integration throughout its worldwide operations. This project is expected to contribute to the Company’s EVA® growth but could result in near-term cost increases and capital expenditures.
· The Company has maintained a capital structure with a balance sheet debt to capital ratio approximating 40% for the last several years. That ratio was 38% at March 31, 2011 primarily due to prudent cash management. This will provide financial flexibility for investing in strategic initiatives, including joint ventures and capital outlays, particularly for growth initiatives; however, such future spending may require short-term borrowing.
· A majority of the Company’s revenue is currently generated from customers located outside of the United States, and a substantial portion of the Company’s assets and employees are also located outside of the United States. United States’ income tax and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on undistributed earnings for certain non-U.S. subsidiaries as the Company considers such earnings as indefinitely reinvested in the operations of those subsidiaries. The Executive Branch of the U.S. Government (the “Administration”) has indicated that future tax reform may be structured with more of the business community’s concerns in mind; however, the Administration has provided no indication that intended reform will be any more favorable to U.S. multi-national corporations with earnings indefinitely reinvested abroad. Any tax reform that reduces the Company’s ability to defer U.S. taxes on earnings indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States could have a negative impact on the Company’s ability to compete in the global marketplace.
· Fluctuations in the U.S. dollar can have significant impacts in the Harsco Metals & Minerals and Harsco Infrastructure Segments, as approximately 80% of the revenues generated in these Segments are outside the United States. If the U.S. dollar weakens, sales and operating income would generally improve. If the U.S. dollar strengthens, sales and operating income would generally be lower.
· Volatility in energy and commodity costs (e.g., diesel fuel, natural gas, steel, etc.) and worldwide demand for these commodities could impact the Company’s operations, both in cost increases or decreases to the extent that such increases or decreases are not passed on to customers. However, volatility in energy and commodity costs may provide additional service opportunities for the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment as customers may outsource more services to reduce overall costs. Volatility may also affect opportunities in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment for additional plant maintenance and capital improvement projects, and in the Harsco Industrial Segment for natural gas projects.
· The Company may be required to record future impairment charges to the extent it cannot generate future cash flows at a level sufficient to recover the net book value of a reporting unit. As part of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing, estimates of fair value are based on assumptions regarding future operating cash flows and growth rates of each reporting unit, discount rates applied to these cash flows and current market estimates of value. Based on the uncertainty of future growth rates and other assumptions used to estimate goodwill recoverability, future reductions in a reporting unit’s cash flows could cause a material non-cash impairment charge of goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment:
· For the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment, the Company expects stable or gradually increasing customer steel production for the remainder of 2011. The outlook for the full-year 2011 is positive resulting from new contract start-ups and contract renewals with increased volumes. Increased fuel costs are expected to somewhat mitigate the benefits of higher volume.
· The new 25-year joint venture relationship currently being finalized with TISCO and also subject to Chinese government approval, as announced in December 2010, will effectively address the environmentally beneficial processing and metal recovery of TISCO’s stainless and carbon steel slag production by-products across a range of potential commercial applications. The Company anticipates that the joint venture has the potential to generate new revenues of an estimated $30 million per year initially, ramping up to a projected run rate of approximately $50 million to $60 million per year when fully operational. Harsco and TISCO will respectively share a 60%-40% relationship in the partnership.
· The Company anticipates that tightening environmental regulations will compel customers to address their production waste streams as an opportunity to maximize environmental compliance. This should provide additional revenue opportunities for the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment. The Company will continue to pursue growth opportunities in environmental services as increasing regulatory and public demand for environmental solutions creates additional outsourced opportunities in slag management.
· The industrial abrasives and roofing granules business within the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment generates value by collecting and processing boiler slag, a coal combustion by-product (“CCP”) into commercially useful products that put this material to beneficial use in products such as roofing materials and blasting abrasives. In May 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) released a proposed rule that set out two different options with regard to the
regulation of CCPs produced by coal-fired utility boilers. One option would regulate CCPs as hazardous waste when the CCPs are destined for disposal in landfills and surface impoundments. The second option would regulate the disposal of CCPs as solid waste by issuing minimum national criteria for proper management of these nonhazardous, solid wastes. Neither proposal changes the EPA’s prior determination that beneficially used CCPs, including the Company’s products, are exempt from the hazardous waste regulations. The adoption, terms and timing of any new regulation controlling disposal of CCPs remain uncertain, however, and there can be no assurance that any CCP regulation will continue to provide for an exemption for beneficial use of CCPs. The Company will continue to closely monitor the EPA’s proposal.
Harsco Infrastructure Segment:
· The Company has substantially completed a comprehensive restructuring plan, which was announced in the fourth quarter of 2010, for the Harsco Infrastructure Segment. The Company anticipates pre-tax Harsco Infrastructure Segment benefits of approximately $43 million in 2011 from restructuring actions and fully annualized benefits of over $60 million beginning in 2012. The restructuring savings are expected to increase sequentially during each quarter of this year with the full annualized rate effective by the fourth quarter of the year. This sets the stage for improved results for this business starting in the second quarter of 2011 and, with some end-market improvement, a return to full-year profitability in 2012 and beyond. Additionally, during 2011 the Company expects to dispose of non-core product lines that are part of the restructuring program.
· With early signs of increased quoting activity and new awards, a stabilizing rental rate and the effect of increasing restructuring cost savings as the year progresses, the Company anticipates sequential operating income improvements for the remainder of 2011. However, the main positive effect on the full-year 2011 results in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment is expected to be the benefit from the restructuring program.
· The Company has initiated strategies to reposition the Harsco Infrastructure Segment and is focusing increasingly on projects in the global industrial maintenance and the civil infrastructure construction sectors; and developing this business in economies outside the United States and Western Europe that have greater prospects for both near-term and long-term growth. The Segment is shifting from small, essentially independent branches that serve smaller projects to an integrated business with resources able to focus on larger projects that will have a longer duration and which requires highly engineered solutions. Local focus on the customer will continue, but customer service will improve through coordinated logistics, engineering and product management.
Harsco Rail Segment:
· The Company expects that the Harsco Rail Segment will continue to perform well for the full-year 2011 as backlog and quoting activity remain strong. However, due to the timing of shipments, sales and income will be weighted much more heavily to the second half of 2011. Conversely, in 2010, the majority of the rail business sales and income were recorded in first half of the year.
· International demand for Harsco Rail’s track maintenance services, solutions and equipment has been strong as reflected in global bidding activity. This is expected to continue in the long-term. The Harsco Rail Segment expects to develop a larger presence in certain developing countries as track construction and maintenance needs grow. Additionally, new higher-margin service and sales opportunities along with strategic acquisitions and/or joint ventures in the Harsco Rail Segment will be considered if the appropriate strategic opportunities arise.
Harsco Industrial Segment:
· The Company expects gradually improving results from the Harsco Industrial Segment in 2011, compared with 2010, as its presence in emerging markets increases through joint ventures, increased efficiencies and market share gains.
· Worldwide supply and demand for steel and other commodities impact raw material costs for the Harsco Industrial Segment. The Company has implemented strategies to help mitigate, but not eliminate, the potential impact that changes in steel and other commodity prices could have on operating income. If steel or other commodity costs associated with the Company’s manufactured products increase and the costs cannot be passed on to the Company’s customers, operating income would be adversely affected. Conversely, reduced steel and other commodity costs would improve operating income to the extent such savings do not have to be transferred to customers.
Results of Operations
|
| Three Months Ended March 31 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Change |
| |||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Amount |
| % |
| |||
Revenues from continuing operations |
| $ | 779.1 |
| $ | 742.4 |
| $ | 36.7 |
| 4.9 |
|
Cost of services and products sold |
| 610.4 |
| 579.4 |
| 31.0 |
| 5.3 |
| |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| 137.8 |
| 136.3 |
| 1.5 |
| 1.1 |
| |||
Other expenses (income) |
| 0.5 |
| (2.5 | ) | 3.0 |
| 118.8 |
| |||
Operating income from continuing operations |
| 29.0 |
| 28.2 |
| 0.8 |
| 2.8 |
| |||
Interest expense |
| 11.9 |
| 16.1 |
| (4.2 | ) | (26.0 | ) | |||
Income tax expense from continuing operations |
| 4.4 |
| 3.0 |
| 1.4 |
| 45.0 |
| |||
Income from continuing operations |
| 13.6 |
| 9.7 |
| 3.9 |
| 40.9 |
| |||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
| (0.8 | ) | 0.3 |
| (1.1 | ) | (428.7 | ) | |||
Net income attributable to Harsco Corporation |
| 11.4 |
| 8.0 |
| 3.4 |
| 42.3 |
| |||
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders |
| 0.15 |
| 0.10 |
| 0.05 |
| 50.0 |
| |||
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Harsco Corporation common stockholders |
| 0.14 |
| 0.10 |
| 0.04 |
| 40.0 |
| |||
Effective income tax rate for continuing operations |
| 24.7 | % | 24.1 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Comparative Analysis of Consolidated Results
Revenues
Revenues for the first quarter of 2011 increased $36.7 million or 4.9% from the first quarter of 2010. This increase was attributable to the following significant items:
Change in Revenues — 2011 vs. 2010 |
| Three Months |
| |
(In millions) |
|
|
| |
Net increase in volumes in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment due principally to increased steel production by the Company’s customers and higher commodity pricing. |
| $ | 35.1 |
|
Effect of foreign currency translation. |
| 18.5 |
| |
Net increase in volumes in Harsco Industrial Segment due principally to improved markets in the natural gas industry and the industrial grating business. |
| 10.9 |
| |
Net increase in revenues in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment. |
| 5.6 |
| |
Net decrease in revenues in the Harsco Rail Segment due principally to the timing of and an overall higher level of rail equipment shipments in the first quarter of 2010. |
| (33.4 | ) | |
Total Change in Revenues — 2011 vs. 2010 |
| $ | 36.7 |
|
Cost of Services and Products Sold
Cost of services and products sold for the first quarter of 2011 increased $31.0 million or 5.3% from the first quarter of 2010. This increase was attributable to the following significant items:
Change in Cost of Services and Products Sold — 2011 vs. 2010 |
| Three Months |
| |
(In millions) |
|
|
| |
Effect of foreign currency translation. |
| $ | 15.5 |
|
Increased costs due to changes in revenues (exclusive of the effect of foreign currency translation, and including the impact of increased commodity and energy costs included in selling prices). |
| 10.6 |
| |
Other, net. |
| 4.9 |
| |
Total Change in Cost of Services and Products Sold — 2011 vs. 2010 |
| $ | 31.0 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2011 increased $1.5 million or 1.1% from the first quarter of 2010, lower than the revenue increase of 4.9%. This increase was attributable to the following significant items:
Change in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses — 2011 vs. 2010 |
| Three Months |
| |
(In millions) |
|
|
| |
Increase in compensation. |
| $ | 3.7 |
|
Effect of foreign currency translation. |
| 2.9 |
| |
Lower space and equipment rentals. |
| (1.0 | ) | |
Lower commissions primarily due to an overall lower level of rail equipment shipments in 2011. |
| (1.4 | ) | |
Other, net (including reduction in professional fees and depreciation). |
| (2.7 | ) | |
Total Change in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses — 2011 vs. 2010 |
| $ | 1.5 |
|
Other Expenses (Income)
This income statement classification includes restructuring costs for employee termination benefits and costs to exit activities; impaired asset write-downs; net gains or losses on the disposal of non-core assets; and business combination accounting adjustments related to recent acquisitions by the Company. Net other expenses for the first quarter of 2011 of $0.5 million includes restructuring costs of $4.8 million, primarily in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment, offset by a $4.0 million contingent consideration adjustment in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment and $1.0 million of gains from the sale of non-core assets. Net other income for the first quarter of 2010 of $2.5 million included restructuring costs of $9.3 million, primarily in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment, offset by an $8.3 million contingent consideration adjustment in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment and $3.7 million of gains from the sale of non-core assets.
Interest Expense
This decrease of $4.2 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2010 was primarily due to the October 2010 debt refinancing which resulted in a significantly lower interest rate than the prior debt.
Income Tax Expense from Continuing Operations
This increase was due to higher earnings from continuing operations and a slight increase in the effective income tax rate from continuing operations. The effective income tax rate relating to continuing operations for the first quarter of 2011 was 24.7% versus 24.1% for the first quarter of 2010.
Income from Continuing Operations
This increase resulted from net higher volumes in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment due principally to increased steel production by the Company’s customers and higher commodity pricing, net increased volumes in the Harsco Industrial Segment, partially offset by an overall lower level of rail equipment shipments in 2011 in the Harsco Rail Segment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
The Company continues to have sufficient available liquidity and has been able to obtain all necessary financing. The Company currently expects operational and business needs to be covered by cash from operations for the remainder of 2011, although borrowings may be made from time to time due to historical patterns of seasonal cash flow and for the funding of various projects.
Global financial markets, which have been under stress since 2008 due to poor financial institution lending and investment practices and sharp declines in real estate values, have improved for certain highly rated credit issuers. However, tightened credit conditions for the funding of non-residential construction projects, particularly commercial construction, along with the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and the Middle East and economic austerity measures implemented in the United Kingdom have restrained growth in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment. These unfavorable conditions in the credit markets continue to affect some of the Company’s current and potential customers. In response to these changes in global economic conditions, the Company continues to implement capital efficiency initiatives to enhance liquidity including the following: prudently managing capital spending to projects where the highest returns can be achieved while redeploying existing capital investments; optimizing worldwide cash positions; reducing discretionary spending; and frequent evaluation of customer and business-partner credit risk.
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company generated $13.1 million in operating cash flow, a decrease from the $30.1 million generated in the first quarter of 2010. Approximately $10.3 million of cash was disbursed in the first quarter of 2011 for the Harsco Infrastructure Segment’s fourth quarter 2010 restructuring program. The Company estimates that an additional net cash of approximately $8 million will be disbursed for the program during the remainder of 2011. In the first quarter of 2011, the Company invested $67.3 million in capital expenditures (42% of which were for revenue-growth projects), compared with $29.9 million invested in the first quarter of 2010. The Company paid $16.5 million in stockholder dividends in the first quarters of 2011 and 2010.
The Company’s net cash borrowings increased by $33.3 million in the first quarter of 2011 to fund capital expenditures and reflected seasonal cash fluctuations for the Company. The Company’s debt to total capital ratio increased slightly to 38.0% at March 31, 2011 from 37.6% at December 31, 2010 due to the higher debt levels. The Company’s debt to total capital ratio was 40.1% at March 31, 2010.
Despite the difficult end markets for the Harsco Infrastructure Segment, the Company expects to generate strong operating cash flows for the remainder of 2011. The Company plans to sustain its balanced portfolio through its strategy of redeploying discretionary cash for disciplined organic growth and international or market-segment diversification; for potential strategic joint ventures and partnerships; for growth in long-term, high-return and high-renewal-rate services contracts for the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment, principally in targeted growth markets or for customer diversification; and for strategic investments or possible acquisitions in the Harsco Rail Segment. The Company also foresees continuing its long and consistent history of paying dividends to stockholders.
The Company continues its focus on improving working capital efficiency. Globally integrated enterprise initiatives, such as OneHarsco, are being used to continue to further improve the effective and efficient use of working capital, particularly accounts receivable and inventories in the Harsco Infrastructure, Harsco Metals & Minerals and Harsco Rail Segments.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations and borrowings under its various credit agreements, augmented periodically by cash proceeds from non-core asset or business sales. The primary drivers of the Company’s cash flow from operations are the Company’s sales and income. The Company’s long-term Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment’s contracts, in addition to the backlog of certain equipment orders and the long-term nature of certain service contracts within the Harsco Rail Segment, provide predictable cash flows for the near-term years. Cash returns on capital investments made in prior years, for which no cash is currently required, are a significant source of cash from operations. Depreciation expense related to these investments is a non-cash charge. The Company also continues to maintain working capital at a manageable level based upon the requirements and seasonality of the businesses.
Major uses of operating cash flows and borrowed funds include: capital investments, principally in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment; payroll costs and related benefits; dividend payments; pension funding payments; inventory purchases for the Harsco Rail and Industrial Segments; income tax payments; debt principal and interest payments; insurance premiums and payments of self-insured casualty losses; and machinery, equipment, automobile and facility lease payments. Cash is also used for targeted, strategic acquisitions as appropriate opportunities arise.
Resources available for cash requirements — The Company meets its ongoing cash requirements for operations and growth initiatives by utilizing cash from operations, by accessing the public debt markets and by borrowing from banks. Public markets in the United States and Europe are accessed through the Company’s commercial paper programs and through discrete-term note issuance to investors. Various bank credit facilities are available throughout the world. The Company expects to utilize public debt markets, bank facilities and cash from operations to meet its cash requirements in the future.
The following table illustrates the amounts outstanding under credit facilities and commercial paper programs and available credit at March 31, 2011:
Summary of Credit Facilities and |
| At March 31, 2011 |
| |||||||
Commercial Paper Programs |
|
|
| Outstanding |
| Available |
| |||
(In millions) |
| Facility Limit |
| Balance |
| Credit |
| |||
U.S. commercial paper program |
| $ | 550.0 |
| $ | 57.2 |
| $ | 492.8 |
|
Euro commercial paper program |
| 282.5 |
| — |
| 282.5 |
| |||
Multi-year revolving credit facility (a) |
| 570.0 |
| — |
| 570.0 |
| |||
Bilateral credit facility (b) |
| 30.0 |
| — |
| 30.0 |
| |||
Totals at March 31, 2011 |
| $ | 1,432.5 |
| $ | 57.2 |
| $ | 1,375.3 | (c) |
(a) U.S.-based program.
(b) International-based program.
(c) Although the Company has significant available credit, for practical purposes, the Company limits aggregate commercial paper and credit facility borrowings at any one-time to a maximum of $600 million (the aggregate amount of the back-up facilities).
For more information on the Company’s credit facilities and long-term notes, see Note 6, Debt and Credit Agreements, to the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Credit Ratings and Outlook — The following table summarizes the Company’s current debt ratings:
|
| Long-term Notes |
| U.S.-Based |
| Outlook |
|
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) |
| BBB+ |
| A-2 |
| Stable |
|
Moody’s |
| Baa2 |
| P-2 |
| Stable |
|
Fitch |
| A- |
| F2 |
| Stable |
|
The Company’s euro-based commercial paper program has not been rated since the euro market does not require it. In March 2011, Standard & Poor’s downgraded the Company’s Long-term notes to BBB+ from A- but upgraded its Outlook to Stable from Negative. The change did not have any impact on the Company’s borrowing costs. Any additional downgrades to the Company’s credit ratings may increase borrowing costs to the Company, while an improvement in the Company’s credit ratings may decrease borrowing costs to the Company. Additionally, future downgrades in the Company’s credit ratings may result in reduced access to credit markets.
Working Capital Position — Changes in the Company’s working capital are reflected in the following table:
(Dollars in millions) |
| March 31 |
| December 31 |
| Increase |
| |||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 101.3 |
| $ | 124.2 |
| $ | (22.9 | ) |
Trade accounts receivable, net |
| 643.4 |
| 585.3 |
| 58.1 |
| |||
Other receivables, net |
| 27.7 |
| 29.3 |
| (1.6 | ) | |||
Inventories |
| 289.9 |
| 271.6 |
| 18.3 |
| |||
Other current assets |
| 134.7 |
| 144.5 |
| (9.8 | ) | |||
Total current assets |
| 1,197.1 | (b) | 1,154.9 |
| 42.2 | (b) | |||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Notes payable and current maturities |
| 64.6 |
| 35.2 |
| 29.4 |
| |||
Accounts payable |
| 285.1 |
| 261.5 |
| 23.6 |
| |||
Accrued compensation |
| 76.3 |
| 83.9 |
| (7.6 | ) | |||
Income taxes payable |
| 8.5 |
| 9.7 |
| (1.2 | ) | |||
Other current liabilities |
| 374.8 |
| 377.6 |
| (2.8 | ) | |||
Total current liabilities |
| 809.3 |
| 767.9 |
| 41.4 |
| |||
Working Capital |
| $ | 387.8 |
| $ | 387.0 |
| $ | 0.8 |
|
Current Ratio (a) |
| 1.5:1 |
| 1.5:1 |
|
|
|
(a) Calculated as Current assets / Current liabilities
(b) Does not total due to rounding
Working capital increased $0.8 million in the first quarter of 2011 due principally to the following factors:
· Net trade accounts receivable increased $58.1 million primarily due to improved business activity (first quarter 2011 compared with fourth quarter 2010) in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment, Harsco Infrastructure Segment and Harsco Rail Segment, as well as a $16.7 million increase due to foreign currency translation; and
· Inventories increased $18.3 million primarily due to the increased business activity in the Harsco Industrial Segment and Harsco Rail Segment.
These working capital increases were offset by the following:
· Notes payable and current maturities increased by $29.4 million primarily due to higher outstanding commercial paper balances and, in conjunction with a decrease in cash of $22.9 million, reflected seasonal fluctuations in the cash needs of the Company; and
· Accounts payable increased $23.6 million primarily due to increased business activity in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment and the Harsco Industrial Segment, as well as a $7.2 million increase due to foreign currency translation.
Certainty of Cash Flows — The certainty of the Company’s future cash flows is underpinned by the long-term nature of the Company’s metals services contracts, the order backlog for the Company’s railway track maintenance services and equipment, and the strong discretionary cash flows (operating cash flows in excess of the amounts necessary for capital expenditures to maintain current revenue levels) generated by the Company. Historically, the Company has utilized these discretionary cash flows for growth-related capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions and for debt repayment. As the Company has demonstrated since the end of 2008, it has the ability to substantially reduce its capital expenditures in the Harsco Infrastructure Segment due to the mobility of its existing capital investment base as well as a more disciplined globally integrated capital allocation approach. The existing capital base can be redeployed for use in growth projects, thus limiting the need for new investment, especially for the Harsco Infrastructure Segment. The Company has continued to grow in countries with increased demand through prudent redeployment of its existing equipment.
The types of products and services that the Company provides are not subject to rapid technological change, which increases the stability of related cash flows. Additionally, each of the Company’s businesses, in its balanced portfolio, is
among the top three companies (relative to sales) in the industries and markets the Company serves. Due to these factors, the Company is confident in its future ability to generate positive cash flows from operations.
Cash Flow Summary
The Company’s cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, are summarized in the following table.
Summarized Cash Flow Information |
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In millions) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating activities |
| $ | 13.1 |
| $ | 30.1 |
|
Investing activities |
| (55.9 | ) | (52.9 | ) | ||
Financing activities |
| 17.8 |
| 14.7 |
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
| 2.0 |
| (0.6 | ) | ||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | (22.9 | )(a) | $ | (8.8 | )(a) |
(a) Does not total due to rounding
Cash From Operating Activities — Net cash provided by operating activities in the first quarter of 2011 was $13.1 million, a decrease of $16.9 million from the first quarter of 2010. The decrease reflected increased Notes and accounts receivable and Inventories related to increased business activity. Also negatively impacting cash from operating activities were cash outflows of $10.3 million associated with the Fourth Quarter 2010 Harsco Infrastructure Program restructuring and $11.4 million for required international defined benefit pension plan payments that were not present in the first quarter of 2010.
Cash Used in Investing Activities — In the first quarter of 2011, cash used in investing activities totaled $55.9 million. Capital investments totaled $67.3 million and increased $37.4 million compared with the first quarter of 2010. Growth capital investment expenditures constituted 42% of investments made in the first quarter of 2011, and were predominantly in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment. Throughout the remainder of 2011, the Company plans to continue to manage its balanced portfolio and consider opportunities to invest in value creation projects. The Company intends to increase growth investments, including joint ventures in the Harsco Metals & Minerals Segment for the remainder of 2011 and beyond, as these businesses continue to expand globally.
Cash Used in Financing Activities — Net cash provided by financing activities in the first quarter of 2011 was $17.8 million, an increase of $3.1 million from the first quarter of 2010. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding commercial paper balances at the end of the quarter. The following table summarizes the Company’s debt and capital positions at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(Dollars in millions) |
| March 31 |
| December 31 |
| ||
Notes payable and current maturities |
| $ | 64.6 |
| $ | 35.2 |
|
Long-term debt |
| 854.5 |
| 849.7 |
| ||
Total debt |
| 919.2 | (b) | 884.9 |
| ||
Total equity |
| 1,500.9 |
| 1,468.1 |
| ||
Total capital |
| $ | 2,420.1 |
| $ | 2,353.0 |
|
Total debt to total capital (a) |
| 38.0 | % | 37.6 | % |
(a) Calculated as Total debt/Total capital
(b) Does not total due to rounding
The Company’s debt as a percent of total capital increased slightly in the first quarter of 2011 due to higher outstanding commercial paper balances at the end of the quarter.
Debt Covenants
The Company’s credit facilities contain a covenant stipulating a maximum debt to capital ratio of 60%. One credit facility also contains a covenant requiring a minimum net worth of $475 million and another limits the proportion of subsidiary consolidated indebtedness to 10% of consolidated tangible assets. The Company’s 5.75% and 2.70% notes include covenants that permit the note holders to redeem their notes at 101% of par in the event of a change of control of the
Company or disposition of a significant portion of the Company’s assets in combination with the Company’s credit rating downgraded to non-investment grade. At March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with these covenants with a debt to capital ratio of 38.0% and total net worth of $1.5 billion. Based on balances at March 31, 2011, the Company could increase borrowings by approximately $1.3 billion and still be within its debt covenants. Alternatively, keeping all other factors constant, the Company’s equity could decrease by approximately $0.9 billion and the Company would still be within its debt covenants. The Company expects to continue to be compliant with these debt covenants one year from now.
Cash and Value-Based Management
The Company has various cash management systems throughout the world that centralize cash at various bank accounts where it is economically justifiable and legally permissible to do so. These centralized cash balances are then redeployed to other operations to reduce short-term borrowings and to finance working capital needs or capital expenditures. Due to the transitory nature of cash balances, they are normally invested in bank deposits that can be withdrawn at will or in very liquid short-term bank time deposits and government obligations. The Company’s policy is to use banks located in the various countries in which the Company operates rated “A” or better, or if no such banks exist, to use the largest banks within those countries. The Company monitors the creditworthiness of its banks and when appropriate will adjust its banking operations to reduce or eliminate exposure to less creditworthy banks.
The Company plans to continue with its strategy of targeted, prudent investing for strategic purposes for the foreseeable future, continuing to make more efficient use of existing investments. The long-term goal of this strategy is to create stockholder value by improving the Company’s EVA®. Under this program, the Company evaluates strategic investments based upon the investment’s economic profit. EVA® equals after-tax operating profits less a charge for the use of the capital employed to create those profits. Therefore, value is created when a project or initiative produces a return above the cost of capital. In the first quarter of 2011, EVA® was higher compared with the first quarter of 2010 due to overall higher operating profits.
The Company currently expects to continue paying dividends to stockholders. In February 2011, the Company paid its 243rd consecutive quarterly cash dividend. In February 2011, the Company also declared its 244th consecutive quarterly cash dividend.
The Company’s financial position and debt capacity should enable it to meet current and future requirements. As additional resources are needed, the Company should be able to obtain funds readily and at competitive costs. The Company is well-positioned financially and intends to: continue investing in high-return, organic growth projects and prudent, strategic alliances and joint ventures; reduce debt; and pay cash dividends as a means of enhancing stockholder value.
Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Information on recently adopted and recently issued accounting standards is included in Note 2, “Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards,” in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2011. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter of 2011.
Information on legal proceedings is included in Note 9, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements.
In the normal course of business, the Company is routinely subjected to a variety of risks. In addition to the market risk associated with interest rate and currency movements on outstanding debt and non-U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities, other examples of risk include adverse economic conditions and increased competition in the global non-residential construction markets; customer concentration in the Harsco Metals & Minerals and Harsco Rail Segments; collectability of receivables; volatility of the financial markets and their effect on pension plans and the availability of funding of non-residential construction projects; and global economic and political conditions.
For a full disclosure of risk factors that affect the Company, see the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Part I, Item 1A).
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the period covered by the report.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Period |
| Total |
| Average |
| Total Number of |
| Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2011 – January 31, 2011 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,000,000 |
|
February 1, 2011 – February 28, 2011 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,000,000 |
|
March 1, 2011 – March 31, 2011 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,000,000 |
|
Total |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
The Company’s share repurchase program was extended by the Board of Directors in November 2010. The repurchase program expires January 31, 2012. At March 31, 2011, there are 2,000,000 authorized shares remaining in the program. When and if appropriate, repurchases are made in open market transactions, depending on market conditions. Repurchases may not be made and may be discontinued at any time.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
DIVIDEND INFORMATION
On February 22, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.205 per share, payable May 16, 2011, to stockholders of record as of April 14, 2011.
COMMON STOCK OPTION DISCLOSURE
Salvatore D. Fazzolari, the Company’s Chairman, President and CEO, holds options that were granted in January 2002 to purchase 48,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that will expire on January 20, 2012. Mr. Fazzolari executed a 10(b)(5)(1) trading plan on February 25, 2011. This plan established criteria for the exercise of such options prior to their expiration date.
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibit |
| Description |
|
|
|
|
|
31(a) |
| Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
31(b) |
| Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
| Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
| The following financial statements from Harsco Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity; (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
| HARSCO CORPORATION |
|
|
| (Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE | May 5, 2011 |
| /S/ Stephen J. Schnoor |
|
|
| Stephen J. Schnoor |
|
|
| Senior Vice President, |
|
|
| Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer) |