Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended August 29, 2009
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-6365
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota | 41-0919654 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
7900 Xerxes Ave S. – Suite 1800, Minneapolis, MN | 55431 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (952) 835-1874
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of October 5, 2009, 27,975,028 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.33 1/3 per share, were outstanding.
Table of Contents
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Page | ||||
PART I | Financial Information | |||
Item 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited): | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 29, 2009 and February 28, 2009 | 3 | |||
Consolidated Results of Operations for the three and six months ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008 | 4 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008 | 5 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 6 | |||
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 15 | ||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 21 | ||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 21 | ||
PART II | Other Information | |||
Item 1. | �� | Legal Proceedings | 21 | |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 21 | ||
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 22 | ||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holder | 22 | ||
Item 6. | Exhibits | 23 | ||
24 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data) | August 29, 2009 | February 28, 2009 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 30,362 | $ | 12,994 | ||||
Short-term investments | 21,985 | 14,066 | ||||||
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | 150,285 | 148,608 | ||||||
Inventories | 32,938 | 39,484 | ||||||
Refundable income taxes | 166 | 5,482 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | 4,066 | 4,066 | ||||||
Other current assets | 3,513 | 3,988 | ||||||
Total current assets | 243,315 | 228,688 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 195,884 | 203,514 | ||||||
Marketable securities available for sale | 17,087 | 20,160 | ||||||
Goodwill | 58,518 | 58,518 | ||||||
Intangible assets | 14,823 | 16,302 | ||||||
Other assets | 307 | 502 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 529,934 | $ | 527,684 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 38,575 | $ | 45,022 | ||||
Accrued payroll and related benefits | 22,881 | 25,530 | ||||||
Accrued self-insurance reserves | 8,326 | 8,317 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses | 18,732 | 22,432 | ||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | 1,125 | 1,146 | ||||||
Billings in excess of costs and earnings on uncompleted contracts | 52,853 | 54,845 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 142,492 | 157,292 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 8,400 | 8,400 | ||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits | 15,322 | 15,614 | ||||||
Long-term self-insurance reserves | 12,294 | 11,849 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 4,729 | 4,254 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 10,227 | 10,254 | ||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations | 3,113 | 3,397 | ||||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 13) | ||||||||
Shareholders’ equity | ||||||||
Common stock of $0.33-1/3 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 27,953,328 and 27,781,488, respectively | 9,318 | 9,260 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 99,526 | 97,852 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 224,465 | 209,537 | ||||||
Common stock held in trust | (983 | ) | (1,046 | ) | ||||
Deferred compensation obligations | 983 | 1,046 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 48 | (25 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 333,357 | 316,624 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 529,934 | $ | 527,684 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | August 29, 2009 | August 30, 2008 | August 29, 2009 | August 30, 2008 | ||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 187,442 | $ | 244,970 | $ | 368,292 | $ | 483,439 | ||||||
Cost of sales | 138,904 | 196,433 | 278,312 | 385,904 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 48,538 | 48,537 | 89,980 | 97,535 | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 30,672 | 29,740 | 60,424 | 62,104 | ||||||||||
Operating income | 17,866 | 18,797 | 29,556 | 35,431 | ||||||||||
Interest income | 213 | 232 | 443 | 470 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 140 | 334 | 313 | 826 | ||||||||||
Other income, net | 72 | 50 | 102 | 121 | ||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies | — | 293 | — | (86 | ) | |||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 18,011 | 19,038 | 29,788 | 35,110 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense | 5,322 | 6,747 | 9,579 | 12,540 | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 12,689 | 12,291 | 20,209 | 22,570 | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 334 | (74 | ) | 335 | (151 | ) | ||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 13,023 | $ | 12,217 | $ | 20,544 | $ | 22,419 | ||||||
Earnings per share – basic | ||||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||
Earnings from discontinued operations | 0.02 | — | 0.01 | — | ||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||
Earnings per share – diluted | ||||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.79 | ||||||
Earnings from discontinued operations | 0.01 | — | 0.01 | — | ||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.79 | ||||||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding | 27,347 | 27,992 | 27,368 | 28,103 | ||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding | 27,585 | 28,441 | 27,617 | 28,606 | ||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.0815 | $ | 0.0740 | $ | 0.1630 | $ | 0.1480 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
(In thousands) | August 29, 2009 | August 30, 2008 | ||||||
Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 20,544 | $ | 22,419 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Net (earnings) loss from discontinued operations | (335 | ) | 151 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 14,818 | 13,305 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 1,727 | 3,522 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 436 | 191 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | (62 | ) | (1,219 | ) | ||||
Equity in loss of affiliated companies | — | 86 | ||||||
Gain on disposal of assets | (3 | ) | (81 | ) | ||||
Other, net | 235 | 60 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Receivables | (1,677 | ) | 7,491 | |||||
Inventories | 6,546 | (2,856 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (12,239 | ) | (19,262 | ) | ||||
Billings in excess of costs and earnings on uncompleted contracts | (1,992 | ) | 19,062 | |||||
Refundable and accrued income taxes | 4,855 | (3,130 | ) | |||||
Other, net | 495 | (258 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities | 33,348 | 39,481 | ||||||
Investing Activities | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (5,923 | ) | (39,235 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment | 27 | 84 | ||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | — | (24 | ) | |||||
Purchases of short-term investments and marketable securities | (19,011 | ) | (28,223 | ) | ||||
Sales/maturities of short-term investments and marketable securities | 14,277 | 29,364 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (10,630 | ) | (38,034 | ) | ||||
Financing Activities | ||||||||
Net proceeds from revolving credit agreement | — | 5,500 | ||||||
Stock issued to employees, net of shares withheld | (1,081 | ) | (2,363 | ) | ||||
Repurchase and retirement of common stock | — | (8,060 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | 62 | 1,219 | ||||||
Dividends paid | (4,552 | ) | (4,246 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (5,571 | ) | (7,950 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows of Discontinued Operations | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 221 | (231 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | 221 | (231 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 17,368 | (6,734 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 12,994 | 12,264 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 30,362 | $ | 5,530 | ||||
Noncash Activity | ||||||||
Capital expenditures in accounts payable | $ | 55 | $ | 895 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. | Basis of Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (we, us, our or the Company) included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as permitted by the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-Q) and do not contain certain information included in the Company’s annual financial statements and notes. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009. The results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended August 29, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of August 29, 2009 and February 28, 2009, and the results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008 and cash flows for the six-month periods ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008.
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of February. Each interim quarter ends on the Saturday closest to the end of the months of May, August and November.
2. | New Accounting Standards |
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141R,Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141R), which replaces SFAS No. 141. SFAS No. 141R requires assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination, contingent consideration and certain acquired contingencies to be measured at their fair values as of the date of acquisition. SFAS No. 141R is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, the Company’s fiscal 2010. The Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 141R as of the beginning of fiscal 2010 had no impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition as of August 29, 2009; however, future business combinations will be recorded and disclosed in accordance with this statement.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). This standard requires all entities to report minority interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements, and requires that transactions between entities and noncontrolling interests be treated as equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, the Company’s fiscal year 2010. The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 as of the beginning of fiscal 2010, which had no impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition as presented herein.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, (FSP FAS No. 157-2), that partially deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for one year for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The Company adopted FSP FAS No. 157-2 on March 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 157-2 did not impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition as presented herein.
In April 2009, the FASB issued three FASB Staff Positions intended to provide additional application guidance and enhanced disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities. FSP FAS No. 157-4,Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, provides additional guidelines for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements.FSP FAS No. 115-2,Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, provides additional guidance related to the disclosure of impairment losses on securities and the accounting for impairment losses on debt securities. FSP FAS No. 115-2 does not amend existing guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP FAS No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-1,Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, increases the frequency of fair value disclosures. These FSPs are effective for fiscal years and interim periods ended after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted these FSPs in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of these FSPs did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition as presented herein.
6
Table of Contents
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal 2010, and shall be applied prospectively. The Company adopted this standard in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and has evaluated any subsequent events through October 8, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued. As of October 8, 2009, there were no subsequent events which required recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No. 167). This Statement amends certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, the Company’s fiscal 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 167 to have any impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (SFAS No. 168). SFAS No. 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and establishes the FASB Accounting Standard Codification (Codification) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. On the effective date of SFAS No. 168, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. SFAS No. 168 will be effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, the third quarter of the Company’s fiscal 2010. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
3. | Stock-Based Compensation |
Stock Incentive Plan
The 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan, the 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and the 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the Plans) provide for the issuance of 1,400,000, 150,000, 3,400,000 and 2,500,000 shares, respectively, for various forms of stock-based compensation to employees and non-employee directors. Awards under these Plans, either in the form of incentive stock options, nonstatutory options or stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of award. Nonvested share awards and nonvested share unit awards are also included in these Plans. Outstanding options issued to employees generally vested over a four-year period, outstanding SARs vest over a three-year period and outstanding options issued to non-employee directors vested at the end of six months. Outstanding options and SARs have a 10-year term. Nonvested share awards and nonvested share unit awards generally vest over a two, three or four-year period.
The 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was terminated in June 2009 and the 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was terminated in January 2006; no new grants may be made under either of these plans, although vesting and exercises of SARs and options, and vesting of nonvested share awards previously granted thereunder will still occur in accordance with the terms of the various grants.
Total stock-based compensation expense included in the results of operations for the six months ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008, was $1.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively. At August 29, 2009, there was $1.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to SAR awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 15 months.
Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008, respectively.
7
Table of Contents
There were no options or SARs issued in the first six months of fiscal 2010. The weighted average fair value per option or SAR at the date of grant for those granted in fiscal 2009 was $7.37. The aggregate intrinsic value of these securities (the amount by which the stock price on the date of exercise exceeded the stock price of the award on the date of grant) exercised during the six months ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008 was $0.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
The fair value of each award grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants through the first six months of fiscal 2009.
Six months ended | ||
August 30, 2008 | ||
Dividend yield | 1.3% | |
Expected volatility | 41.9% | |
Risk-free interest rate | 3.2% | |
Expected lives | 4.5 years |
The expected stock price volatility is based on historical experience. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Strip rate, whose term is consistent with the expected life of the Company’s stock options. The expected life, the average time an option grant is outstanding, and forfeiture rates are estimated based on historical experience.
The following table summarizes the stock option and SARs transactions under the Plans for the six months ended August 29, 2009:
Options/SARs Outstanding | |||||||||||
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||
Outstanding at Feb. 28, 2009 | 1,648,876 | $ | 17.15 | ||||||||
Options exercised | (32,899 | ) | 9.03 | ||||||||
Options canceled | (11,813 | ) | 12.87 | ||||||||
Outstanding at Aug. 29, 2009 | 1,604,164 | $ | 17.35 | 6.0 years | $ | 1,202,516 | |||||
Vested or expected to vest at Aug. 29, 2009 | 1,578,977 | $ | 17.27 | 6.0 years | $ | 1,202,516 | |||||
Exercisable at Aug. 29, 2009 | 1,374,629 | $ | 16.52 | 5.6 years | $ | 1,202,516 |
The Amended and Restated 1987 Partnership Plan (the Partnership Plan), a plan designed to increase the ownership of Apogee stock by key employees, allowed participants selected by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to defer earned incentive compensation through the purchase of Apogee common stock. The purchased stock was then matched by an equal award of nonvested shares, which vested over a predetermined period. This program was eliminated for fiscal 2006 and beyond, although vesting of nonvested shares will still occur according to the vesting period of the grants made prior to fiscal 2006.
Executive Compensation Program
In fiscal 2006, the Company implemented an executive compensation program to provide for a greater portion of total compensation to be delivered to key employees selected by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors through long-term incentives using performance shares, SARs and nonvested shares. Performance shares have been issued at the beginning of each fiscal year in the form of nonvested share awards. Starting in fiscal 2010, the Company issued performance shares in the form of nonvested share unit awards, which give the recipient the right to receive shares earned at the vesting date. The number of shares or share units issued at grant is equal to the target number of performance shares and allows for the right to receive an additional number of shares based on meeting pre-determined Company performance goals.
8
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the nonvested share award transactions, including performance shares and performance share units, under the Plans and the Company’s Partnership Plan for the six months ended August 29, 2009:
Nonvested Shares and Units | ||||||
Number of Shares and | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Nonvested at February 28, 2009 | 694,702 | $ | 17.45 | |||
Granted* | 450,392 | 13.59 | ||||
Vested | (248,198 | ) | 15.30 | |||
Canceled | (639 | ) | 18.70 | |||
Nonvested at August 29, 2009** | 896,257 | $ | 16.11 |
*Includes 196,957 performance share units granted at target in fiscal 2010.
**Includes a total of 460,853 performance shares and performance share units granted and outstanding at target for fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010.
At August 29, 2009, there was $5.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share and performance share unit awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 26 months. The total fair value of shares vested during the current period was $3.3 million.
4. | Earnings per Share |
The following table presents a reconciliation of the denominators used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share – weighted common shares outstanding | 27,347 | 27,992 | 27,368 | 28,103 | ||||||||
Weighted common shares assumed upon exercise of stock options | 85 | 167 | 42 | 195 | ||||||||
Unvested shares for deferred compensation plans | 153 | 282 | 207 | 308 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share – weighted common shares and potential common shares outstanding | 27,585 | 28,441 | 27,617 | 28,606 | ||||||||
Earnings per share – basic | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.80 | ||||
Earnings per share – diluted | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.74 | 0.79 | ||||||||
Stock options excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares | 1,176 | 630 | 1,307 | 630 |
5. | Inventories |
(In thousands) | Aug. 29, 2009 | Feb. 28, 2009 | ||||
Raw materials | $ | 12,534 | $ | 15,385 | ||
Work-in-process | 7,785 | 9,878 | ||||
Finished goods | 11,717 | 13,558 | ||||
Costs and earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts | 902 | 663 | ||||
Total inventories | $ | 32,938 | $ | 39,484 |
6. | Equity Investment |
In fiscal 2001, the Company and PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) combined their U.S. automotive replacement glass distribution businesses into a joint venture, PPG Auto Glass, LLC (PPG Auto Glass), of which the Company had a 34 percent interest. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, in connection with PPG’s sale of its automotive replacement glass businesses, Apogee exercised its right to sell its minority interest in the PPG Auto Glass joint venture, resulting in cash proceeds of $27.1 million and a pretax gain on sale of approximately $2.0 million.
7. | Financial Assets |
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 as of March 2, 2008. This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
9
Table of Contents
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of August 29, 2009 are summarized below:
(In thousands) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets | Other Inputs (Level 2) | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Fair Value | ||||||||
Cash equivalents | $ | 27,856 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 27,856 | ||||
Short-term investments | 1,993 | 19,992 | — | 21,985 | ||||||||
Marketable debt securities | — | 17,087 | — | 17,087 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 29,849 | $ | 37,079 | $ | — | $ | 66,928 |
Cash equivalents
Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, and consist primarily of money market funds. The cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value, and are classified as Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy.
Short-term investments
The Company has marketable securities of $22.0 million as of August 29, 2009, consisting of variable rate demand note (VRDN) securities, commercial paper and U.S. Treasury Bills. The Company’s VRDN investments are of high credit quality and secured by direct-pay letters of credit from major financial institutions. These investments have variable rates tied to short-term interest rates. Interest rates are reset weekly and these VRDN securities can be tendered for sale upon notice (every seven days) to the trustee. Although the Company’s VRDN securities are issued and rated as long-term securities (with maturities ranging from 2025 through 2052), they are priced and traded as short-term instruments. The Company classifies these short-term investments as “available-for-sale” in accordance with SFAS No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. The VRDN securities are carried at fair market value based on prices from recent trades of similar securities and are classified as Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy. The commercial paper is carried at fair market value based on prices from recent trades of similar securities and is classified as Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy. The U.S. Treasury Bills are carried at fair market value and are classified as Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy.
Marketable securities available for sale
The Company’s wholly owned insurance subsidiary, Prism, insures a portion of the Company’s workers’ compensation, general liability and automobile liability risks using reinsurance agreements to meet statutory requirements. The reinsurance carrier requires Prism to maintain fixed-maturity investments, which are generally high-quality municipal bonds, for the purpose of providing collateral for Prism’s obligations under the reinsurance agreement. Prism’s fixed maturity investments are classified as “available-for-sale” and are carried at fair value as prescribed by SFAS No. 115 and are reported as marketable securities available for sale in the consolidated balance sheet. Unrealized gains and losses are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes, until the investments are sold or upon impairment. These investments are carried at fair value based on prices from recent trades of similar securities and are classified as Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy.
10
Table of Contents
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair values of investments available for sale at August 29, 2009 and February 28, 2009 are as follows:
(In thousands) | Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||
August 29, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Commercial paper | $ | 1,993 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,993 | |||||
U.S. Treasury bills | 5,980 | — | — | 5,980 | |||||||||
Variable rate demand notes | 14,012 | — | — | 14,012 | |||||||||
Municipal bonds | 17,138 | 286 | (337 | ) | 17,087 | ||||||||
Total investments | $ | 39,123 | $ | 286 | $ | (337 | ) | $ | 39,072 | ||||
February 28, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Variable rate demand notes | $ | 14,066 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14,066 | |||||
Municipal bonds | 20,323 | 382 | (545 | ) | 20,160 | ||||||||
Total investments | $ | 34,389 | $ | 382 | $ | (545 | ) | $ | 34,226 |
In accordance with SFAS No. 115, the Company tests for other than temporary losses on a quarterly basis and has considered the unrealized losses indicated above to be temporary in nature. The Company intends to hold the investments until it can recover the full principal amount and has the ability to do so based on other sources of liquidity. The Company expects such recoveries to occur prior to the contractual maturities.
The following table presents the length of time that available for sale securities were in continuous unrealized loss positions, but were not deemed to be other than temporarily impaired, as of August 29, 2009:
Less Than 12 Months | Greater Than or Equal to 12 Months | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | $ | 2,326 | $ | (4) | $ | 2,291 | $ | (333) | $ | 4,617 | $ | (337) | ||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 2,326 | $ | (4) | $ | 2,291 | $ | (333) | $ | 4,617 | $ | (337) |
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments at August 29, 2009 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
(In thousands) | Amortized Cost | Estimated Market Value | ||||
Due within one year | $ | 21,985 | $ | 21,985 | ||
Due after one year through five years | 1,879 | 1,885 | ||||
Due after five years through 10 years | 8,334 | 8,525 | ||||
Due after 10 years through 15 years | 1,971 | 1,938 | ||||
Due beyond 15 years | 4,954 | 4,739 | ||||
Total | $ | 39,123 | $ | 39,072 |
There were immaterial amounts of realized gains and realized losses during the three and six-month periods of fiscal 2010 and 2009.
8. | Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets |
The carrying amount of goodwill, net of accumulated amortization, attributable to each business segment as of the six months ended August 29, 2009 is detailed below.
(In thousands) | Architectural | Large-Scale Optical | Total | ||||||
Balance at February 28, 2009 and August 29, 2009 | $ | 47,961 | $ | 10,557 | $ | 58,518 |
11
Table of Contents
The Company’s identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are being amortized over their estimated useful lives and were as follows:
August 29, 2009 | February 28, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net | ||||||||||||||
Debt issue costs | $ | 2,068 | $ | (1,662 | ) | $ | 406 | $ | 2,068 | $ | (1,601 | ) | $ | 467 | ||||||
Non-compete agreements | 5,839 | (3,638 | ) | 2,201 | 5,839 | (3,187 | ) | 2,652 | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships | 12,092 | (4,678 | ) | 7,414 | 12,092 | (3,908 | ) | 8,184 | ||||||||||||
Purchased intellectual property | 5,800 | (998 | ) | 4,802 | 5,800 | (801 | ) | 4,999 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 25,799 | $ | (10,976 | ) | $ | 14,823 | $ | 25,799 | $ | (9,497 | ) | $ | 16,302 |
Amortization expense on these identifiable intangible assets was $1.5 million and $1.9 million for the six months ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008, respectively. The amortization expense associated with the debt issue costs is included in interest expense while the remainder is in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated results of operations. At August 29, 2009, the estimated future amortization expense for identifiable intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2010 and all of the following four fiscal years is as follows:
(In thousands) | Remainder of Fiscal 2010 | Fiscal 2011 | Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2013 | Fiscal 2014 | ||||||||||
Estimated amortization expense | $ | 1,453 | $ | 2,334 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 1,701 | $ | 1,051 |
9. | Long-Term Debt |
The Company maintains a $100.0 million revolving credit facility, which expires in November 2011. No borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of August 29, 2009 or February 28, 2009. The credit facility requires the Company to maintain a minimum level of net worth as defined in the credit facility based on certain quarterly financial calculations. The minimum required net worth computed in accordance with the credit agreement at August 29, 2009 was $259.2 million, whereas the Company’s net worth as defined in the credit facility was $333.4 million. The credit facility also requires that the Company maintain a debt-to-cash flow ratio of no more than 2.75. This ratio is computed daily, with cash flow computed on a rolling 12-month basis. The Company’s ratio was 0.08 at August 29, 2009. If the Company is not in compliance with either of these covenants, the lender may terminate the commitment and/or declare any loan then outstanding to be immediately due and payable. At August 29, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants of the credit facility. Long-term debt also includes $8.4 million of industrial development bonds at August 29, 2009 and February 28, 2009 that mature in fiscal years 2021 through 2023.
Interest payments were $0.6 million and $1.6 million for the six-month periods ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008, respectively. As a portion of the total interest expense related to funds borrowed to purchase major facilities, information systems and equipment installations, the Company capitalized a portion of the interest payments and will depreciate them over the lives of the related assets. Capitalized interest for the six months ended August 30, 2008 was $0.5 million, and no interest was capitalized during the six months ended August 29, 2009.
12
Table of Contents
10. | Employee Benefit Plans |
Components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s Officers’ Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) and Tubelite, Inc. Hourly Employees’ Pension Plan (Tubelite Plan) for the three and six-month periods ended August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008, were as follows:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | August 29, 2009 | August 30, 2008 | August 29, 2009 | August 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | — | $ | 13 | $ | — | $ | 26 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 171 | 184 | 342 | 368 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on assets | (44 | ) | (63) | (88 | ) | (126) | ||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized transition amount | (1 | ) | (6) | (2 | ) | (12) | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | — | 59 | — | 118 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized net loss | 15 | 27 | 30 | 54 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 141 | $ | 214 | $ | 282 | $ | 428 |
On October 8, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted an amendment to the SERP providing that no more benefits will accrue to plan participants as of December 31, 2008. Plan participants will continue to earn service for the purpose of becoming vested in the benefits they had accrued as of December 31, 2008.
11. | Income Taxes |
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various U.S. state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to fiscal 2004. The Internal Revenue Service has audited the Company through fiscal 2002. The Company is currently under examination by the IRS for fiscal years 2004 through 2007.
The total gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits at August 29, 2009 and February 28, 2009 was approximately $15.3 million and $15.6 million, respectively. The Company records the impact of penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, which is consistent with past practices. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits was reduced by $0.9 million during the six months ended August 29, 2009 due to a change in estimate of penalties and interest for previous tax positions taken. The total liability for unrecognized tax benefits is not expected to change materially during the next 12 months.
The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the second quarter was 29.5 percent compared to 35.4 percent in the prior-year period, and was 32.2 percent for the year-to-date period compared to 35.7 percent in the prior year. The decrease in the effective tax rate for both the three and six-month periods was primarily due to a reduction in unrecognized tax benefits as noted above.
12. | Discontinued Operations |
In several transactions in fiscal years 1998 through 2000, the Company completed the sale of its large-scale domestic curtainwall business, the sale of the Company’s detention/security business and its exit from international curtainwall operations. The remaining estimated cash expenditures related to these discontinued operations are recorded as liabilities of discontinued operations, and a majority of the remaining cash expenditures related to discontinued operations is expected to be paid within the next three years. The majority of these liabilities relate to the international curtainwall operations, including bonds outstanding, of which the precise degree of liability related to these matters will not be known until they are settled within the U.K. courts. The reserve for discontinued operations also covers other liability issues, consisting of warranty issues relating to these and other international construction projects.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a favorable resolution of an outstanding lease claim resulted in income from discontinued operations of $0.3 million.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | ||||||||||
Condensed Statement of Operations from Discontinued Businesses | ||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (11) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes | — | (117) | — | (236) | ||||||||||
Income expense (benefit) | — | (43) | — | (85) | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations, net of income taxes | — | (74) | — | (151) | ||||||||||
Gain (loss) on disposal, net of income taxes | 334 | — | 335 | — | ||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 334 | $ | (74) | $ | 335 | $ | (151) |
13
Table of Contents
(In thousands) | August 29, 2009 | February 28, 2009 | ||||
Summary Balance Sheets of Discontinued Businesses | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 1,125 | $ | 1,146 | ||
Long-term liabilities | 3,113 | 3,397 |
13. | Commitments and Contingent Liabilities |
Operating lease commitments.As of August 29, 2009, the Company was obligated under noncancelable operating leases for buildings and equipment. Certain leases provide for increased rentals based upon increases in real estate taxes or operating costs. Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases are:
(In thousands) | Remainder of Fiscal 2010 | Fiscal 2011 | Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2013 | Fiscal 2014 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||
Total minimum payments | $ | 3,441 | $ | 5,593 | $ | 4,179 | $ | 2,935 | $ | 2,124 | $ | 3,366 | $ | 21,638 |
Bond commitments. In the ordinary course of business, predominantly in the Company’s installation business, the Company is required to provide a surety or performance bond that commits payments to its customers for any non-performance by the Company. At August 29, 2009, $149.6 million of the Company’s backlog was bonded by performance bonds with a face value of $424.8 million. Performance bonds do not have stated expiration dates, as the Company is released from the bonds upon completion of the contract. The Company has never been required to pay on these performance-based bonds with respect to any of the current portfolio of businesses.
Guarantees and warranties. The Company accrues for warranty and claim costs as a percentage of sales based on historical trends. Actual warranty and claim costs are deducted from the accrual when incurred. The Company’s warranty and claim accruals are detailed below.
Six months ended | ||||||||
(In thousands) | August 29, 2009 | August 30, 2008 | ||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 5,073 | $ | 4,617 | ||||
Additional accruals | 2,061 | 2,724 | ||||||
Claims paid | (2,517 | ) | (3,495 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 4,617 | $ | 3,846 |
Letters of credit.At August 29, 2009, the Company had ongoing letters of credit related to its construction contracts and certain industrial development bonds. The total value of letters of credit under which the Company was obligated as of August 29, 2009 was approximately $10.1 million. The Company’s total availability under its $100.0 million credit facility is reduced by borrowings under the facility and also by letters of credit issued under the facility. As of August 29, 2009, letters of credit in the amount of $8.9 million had been issued under the facility.
Purchase obligations.The Company has purchase obligations for raw material commitments and capital expenditures. As of August 29, 2009, these obligations totaled $3.8 million.
Non-compete agreements.The Company has entered into a number of non-compete and consulting agreements associated with current and former employees. As of August 29, 2009, future payments of $0.5 million were committed under such agreements.
Litigation. The Company is a party to various legal proceedings incidental to its normal operating activities. In particular, like others in the construction supply industry, the Company’s construction supply businesses are routinely involved in various disputes and claims arising out of construction projects, sometimes involving significant monetary damages or product replacement. The Company is subject to litigation arising out of employment practices, workers compensation, general liability and automobile claims. Although it is very difficult to accurately predict the outcome of such proceedings, facts currently available indicate that no such claims will result in losses that would have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
14
Table of Contents
14. | Comprehensive Earnings |
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | |||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 13,023 | $ | 12,217 | $ | 20,544 | $ | 22,419 | |||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives, net of $(27) and $9 tax (benefit) expense, respectively | — | (46 | ) | — | 17 | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of $43, $(35), $39 and $39 tax expense (benefit), respectively | 80 | (65 | ) | 73 | 72 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings | $ | 13,103 | $ | 12,106 | $ | 20,617 | $ | 22,508 |
15. | Segment Information |
The following table presents sales and operating income data for the Company’s two segments, and on a consolidated basis, for the three and six months ended August 29, 2009, as compared to the corresponding period a year ago.
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||
Net Sales from Continuing Operations | ||||||||||||||||||
Architectural | $ | 170,593 | $ | 228,631 | $ | 337,294 | $ | 449,351 | ||||||||||
Large-Scale Optical | 16,849 | 16,340 | 31,004 | 34,089 | ||||||||||||||
Intersegment eliminations | — | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 187,442 | $ | 244,970 | $ | 368,292 | $ | 483,439 | ||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | ||||||||||||||||||
Architectural | $ | 14,879 | $ | 15,246 | $ | 25,635 | $ | 30,089 | ||||||||||
Large-Scale Optical | 3,864 | 3,475 | 5,847 | 6,746 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate and other | (877 | ) | 76 | (1,926 | ) | (1,404 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 17,866 | $ | 18,797 | $ | 29,556 | $ | 35,431 |
Due to the varying combinations of individual window systems and curtainwall, the Company has determined that it is impractical to report product and service revenues generated by the Architectural segment by class of product, beyond the segment revenues currently reported.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This discussion contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forecasts and projections in this document are “forward-looking statements,” and are based on management’s current expectations or beliefs of the Company’s near-term results, based on current information available pertaining to the Company, including the risk factors noted under Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009. From time to time, we may also provide oral and written forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public such as press releases, presentations to securities analysts or investors, or other communications by the Company. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report and in any public statements we make could be materially different from actual results.
Accordingly, we wish to caution investors that any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. These uncertainties and other risk factors include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties set forth under Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
We wish to caution investors that other factors might in the future prove to be important in affecting the Company’s results of operations. New factors emerge from time to time; it is not possible for management to predict all such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or a combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
15
Table of Contents
Overview
We are a leader in certain technologies involving the design and development of value-added glass products, services and systems. The Company is comprised of two segments: Architectural Products and Services (Architectural) and Large-Scale Optical (LSO). Our Architectural segment companies design, engineer, fabricate, install, maintain and renovate the walls of glass, windows, storefront and entrances comprising the outside skin of commercial and institutional buildings. Businesses in this segment are: Viracon, Inc., a fabricator of coated, high-performance architectural glass for global markets; Harmon, Inc., one of the largest U.S. full-service building glass installation, maintenance and renovation companies; Wausau Window and Wall Systems, a manufacturer of custom aluminum window systems and curtainwall; Linetec, a paint and anodizing finisher of architectural aluminum and PVC shutters; and Tubelite, Inc, a fabricator of aluminum storefront, entrance and curtainwall products for the U.S. commercial construction industry. Our LSO segment consists of Tru Vue, Inc., a manufacturer of value-added glass and acrylic for the custom picture framing and commercial optics markets.
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009 and the consolidated financial statements, including the notes to consolidated financial statements, included therein.
Sales and Earnings
The relationship between various components of operations, stated as a percent of net sales, is illustrated below for the three and six-month periods of the current and past fiscal year.
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||
(Percent of net sales) | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | ||||||||
Net sales | 100.0 | % | 100.0% | 100.0 | % | 100.0% | ||||||
Cost of sales | 74.1 | 80.2 | 75.6 | 79.8 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 25.9 | 19.8 | 24.4 | 20.2 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 16.4 | 12.1 | 16.4 | 12.9 | ||||||||
Operating income | 9.5 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 7.3 | ||||||||
Interest income | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||
Interest expense | — | 0.1 | — | 0.2 | ||||||||
Other income, net | — | — | — | 0.1 | ||||||||
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies | — | 0.1 | — | — | ||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 9.6 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 7.3 | ||||||||
Income tax expense | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | ||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 6.8 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 4.7 | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | (0.1) | ||||||||
Net earnings | 6.9 | % | 5.0% | 5.6 | % | 4.6% | ||||||
Effective tax rate for continuing operations | 29.5 | % | 35.4% | 32.2 | % | 35.7% |
Highlights of Second Quarter and First Six Months of Fiscal 2010 Compared to Second Quarter and First Six Months of Fiscal 2009
• | Consolidated net sales decreased $57.5 million, or 23.5 percent, during the second quarter ended August 29, 2009 compared to the prior-year period, and decreased 23.8 percent or $115.1 million during the six-month period. The architectural glass and installation businesses were the primary drivers of the decrease for both the quarter and year-to-date periods, consistent with the decline in the commercial construction market, which continues to be impacted by tight commercial real estate credit and decreasing employment levels. |
• | Gross profit as a percent of sales for the quarter ended August 29, 2009 increased to 25.9 percent from 19.8 percent in the prior-year period, an increase of 6.1 percentage points. For the six-month period, gross profit as a percent of sales was 24.4 percent, an increase of 4.2 percentage points over the prior-year period. The increase in gross margins for the current-year quarter was primarily due to operational improvements in the installation, architectural glass and window businesses. Improved margins were a result of execution of work that was largely bid in stronger markets with higher pricing; improved productivity; an increased level of change orders in our |
16
Table of Contents
installation business as compared to last year; and cost management. The increase in gross margins for the six-month period was primarily due to improvements in margins in the installation and window businesses as a result of project mix and execution of work that was largely bid in stronger markets with higher pricing, as well as cost management and productivity improvements through out the Company. The prior-year quarter and six-month period gross margins were negatively impacted by operational challenges in our architectural glass business, which led to higher than planned labor costs to overcome production bottlenecks. |
• | Selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter increased as a percent of net sales to 16.4 percent from 12.1 percent in the prior-year period and were up $0.9 million. The increase in spending primarily relates to increased bonus and incentive expenses due to our expected performance against preset targets, compared to prior-year expenses that were lower based on expected performance against higher targets that were set before the impact of the economic downturn on our businesses was fully known. The increase as a percent of sales was largely due to our inability to leverage expenses over a lower level of sales dollars. |
• | Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six-month period increased to 16.4 percent of net sales compared to 12.9 percent in the prior-year period, but were down $1.7 million. The decrease in spending relates to lower sales and marketing expenses, and reduced salaries and employee-related expenses as a result of headcount reductions, partially offset by the bonus and incentive increases noted above. The increase as a percent of sales was largely due to our inability to leverage expenses over a lower level of sales dollars. |
• | Interest expense decreased $0.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from the prior-year period and $0.5 million in the six-month period due to reduced debt levels and lower interest rates. |
• | During the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and in connection with PPG’s sale of its automotive replacement glass businesses, we exercised our right to sell our minority interest in the PPG Auto Glass joint venture; therefore we had no impact from the joint venture in the current-year quarter or year-to-date period. During fiscal 2009, the joint venture reported income of $0.3 million in the second quarter and a loss of $0.1 million in the six-month period. |
• | The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the second quarter was 29.5 percent compared to 35.4 percent in the prior-year period, and was 32.2 percent for the year-to-date period compared to 35.7 percent in the prior year. The decrease in the effective tax rate for both the three and six-month periods was primarily due to a reduction of reserves as a result of a change in estimate for previous tax positions taken. |
Segment Analysis
The following table presents sales and operating income data for our two segments and on a consolidated basis for the three and six-month periods ended August 29, 2009, when compared to the corresponding periods a year ago.
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | % Change | Aug. 29, 2009 | Aug. 30, 2008 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||
Net Sales from Continuing Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Architectural | $ | 170,593 | $ | 228,631 | (25.4 | )% | $ | 337,294 | $ | 449,351 | (24.9)% | ||||||||||||
Large-Scale Optical | 16,849 | 16,340 | 3.1 | 31,004 | 34,089 | (9.0) | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment eliminations | — | (1 | ) | NM | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 187,442 | $ | 244,970 | (23.5 | )% | $ | 368,292 | $ | 483,439 | (23.8)% | ||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Architectural | $ | 14,879 | $ | 15,246 | (2.4 | )% | $ | 25,635 | $ | 30,089 | (14.8)% | ||||||||||||
Large-Scale Optical | 3,864 | 3,475 | 11.2 | 5,847 | 6,746 | (13.3) | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other | (877 | ) | 76 | NM | (1,926 | ) | (1,404 | ) | (37.2) | ||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 17,866 | $ | 18,797 | (5.0 | )% | $ | 29,556 | $ | 35,431 | (16.6)% |
NM = not meaningful
Due to the varying combinations of individual window systems and curtainwall, the Company has determined that it is impractical to report product and service revenues generated by the Architectural segment by class of product, beyond the segment revenues currently reported.
Architectural Products and Services (Architectural)
• | Second-quarter net sales of $170.6 million decreased 25.4 percent from the prior-year period, and net sales of $337.3 million for the six-month period decreased 24.9 percent from the prior-year period. Both the quarter and year-to-date periods were impacted by difficult market conditions with continued tight commercial real estate credit. The architectural glass and installation businesses both saw decreases in revenue year-over-year consistent with the decline in the commercial construction market, which continues to be impacted by tight commercial real estate credit and decreasing employment levels. |
17
Table of Contents
• | Operating income of $14.9 million in the current quarter was down 2.4 percent from the prior-year period, while operating margins increased 2.0 percentage points, to 8.7 percent from 6.7 percent in the prior-year period. On a year-to-date basis, operating income of $25.6 million for the six-month period was down 14.8 percent from the prior-year period, while operating margins increased 0.9 percentage points to 7.6 percent from 6.7 percent in the prior-year period. While operating income was down due to the lower sales levels, operating margins were up due to higher pricing on projects bid in stronger markets, solid project execution, productivity improvements, an increased level of change orders in our installation business as compared to last year, and ongoing cost-cutting measures at all businesses within the segment. In addition, operating margins were favorably impacted by decreases in some material costs. The prior-year quarter gross margins were negatively impacted by operational challenges in our architectural glass business, which led to higher than planned labor costs. |
• | Architectural backlog at August 29, 2009 decreased to $295.0 million from $446.7 million in the prior-year period, and was relatively flat compared to the $310.0 million reported at the end of first quarter. Slow bid-to-award timing is impacting backlog, despite steady bidding activity. We expect approximately $170.9 million of this backlog to flow during the remainder of fiscal 2010. |
Large-Scale Optical Technologies (LSO)
• | Second quarter revenues were $16.8 million, up 3.1 percent over the prior-year period. For the six months ended August 29, 2009, revenues were $31.0 million, down 9.0 percent from the prior-year. The increase in the quarter was due to converting customers to our best value-added picture framing products as total square feet decreased slightly. Although we continue to convert customers to our value-added picture framing products, the six-month period was negatively impacted by weak custom picture framing market conditions. |
• | Operating income of $3.9 million in the quarter was up 11.2 percent from the prior-year period and operating margins increased to 22.9 percent compared to 21.3 percent in the prior year. For the six-month period, operating income of $5.8 million was down 13.3 percent from the prior year and operating margins decreased to 18.9 percent compared to 19.8 percent in the prior year. The increase in operating income and margins during the quarter was due to a strong mix of our best value-added products. The decrease in the six-month period was due to the impact of lower volume, which was partially offset by a strong mix of better value-added picture framing products as our efforts to convert this market continued. |
Consolidated Backlog
• | At August 29, 2009, our consolidated backlog was $299.3 million, down 33.3 percent from the prior-year period and down 3.8 percent compared to the $311.2 million reported at the end of the first quarter. |
• | The backlog of the Architectural segment represented more than 98 percent of consolidated backlog. |
• | We view backlog as an important statistic in evaluating the level of sales activity and short-term sales trends in our business. However, as backlog is only one indicator, and is not an effective indicator, of the ultimate profitability of our sales, we do not believe that backlog should be used as the sole indicator of future earnings of the Company. |
Discontinued Operations
In several transactions in fiscal years 1998 through 2000, we completed the sale of our large-scale domestic curtainwall business, the sale of our detention/security business and the exit from international curtainwall operations. The remaining estimated cash expenditures related to these discontinued operations are recorded as liabilities of discontinued operations, and a majority of the remaining cash expenditures related to discontinued operations is expected to be paid within the next three years. The majority of these liabilities relate to the international curtainwall operations, including bonds outstanding, of which the precise degree of liability related to these matters will not be known until they are settled within the U.K. courts. The reserve for discontinued operations also covers other liability issues, consisting of warranty issues relating to these and other international construction projects.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a favorable resolution of an outstanding lease claim resulted in income from discontinued operations of $0.3 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Six months ended | ||||||||
(Cash effect, in thousands) | August 29, 2009 | August 30, 2008 | ||||||
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities | $ | 33,348 | $ | 39,481 | ||||
Capital expenditures | (5,923 | ) | (39,235 | ) | ||||
Net change in borrowings | — | 5,500 |
18
Table of Contents
Operating activities.Cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations was $33.3 million for the first six months of fiscal 2010, compared to $39.5 million in the prior-year period, on lower current-year earnings.
Non-cash working capital (current assets, excluding cash and short-term investments, less current liabilities) was $48.5 million at August 29, 2009, or 6.0 percent of last 12-month sales, our key metric. This compares to 4.8 percent at February 28, 2009 and 7.8 percent at August 30, 2008. The deterioration from year-end was due to the seasonally high cash outflow experienced in the first half of the year to fund annual incentive compensation and retirement plan contributions. We believe this metric will continue to be negatively impacted by current commercial construction market conditions. The improvement over the prior-year period is largely the result of initiatives to expedite billings and collections.
Investing Activities.Through the first six months of fiscal 2010, investing activities used $10.6 million of cash, compared to $38.0 million in the same period last year. New capital investments through the first six months of fiscal 2010 totaled $5.9 million, compared to $39.2 million in the prior-year period. Prior-year spending was primarily for productivity improvements and capacity expansions in both operating segments, while in the current year our expenditures have been focused on safety and maintenance projects as well as some productivity improvements. The net position of our investments resulted in $4.7 million in net purchases versus $1.1 million in net proceeds in the prior year.
We expect fiscal 2010 capital expenditures to be less than $20 million for productivity improvements, new green products, maintenance and safety. Our factories are modern and have excess capacity given current market conditions; accordingly we are also focusing on productivity improvements and product enhancements, including “green” product offerings, with minimal use of capital.
We continue to review our portfolio of businesses and their assets in comparison to our internal strategic and performance objectives. As part of this review, we may acquire other businesses, further invest in, fully divest and/or sell parts of our current businesses.
Financing Activities.Total outstanding borrowings remained consistent at $8.4 million as of August 29, 2009, compared to the February 28, 2009 levels, and consisted solely of industrial development bonds. Total outstanding borrowings at August 30, 2008 were $63.7 million. Through cash generated from operations and the sale of our interest in PPG Auto Glass, we have reduced outstanding debt compared to the prior-year period. Our debt-to-total-capital ratio was 2.5 percent at August 29, 2009, compared to 2.6 percent at February 28, 2009.
We paid dividends of $4.6 million and $4.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. We expect to continue to make quarterly dividend payments and spend approximately $9.1 million on dividends for the year.
During fiscal 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of 1,500,000 shares of common stock. The Board of Directors increased this authorization by 750,000 shares in January 2008 and by 1,000,000 in October 2008. We repurchased 535,324 shares in the open market under this program, for a total of $7.2 million, through February 25, 2006. No share repurchases were made under this plan during fiscal 2007. We repurchased 338,569 shares in the open market during fiscal 2008 for $5.4 million. During fiscal 2009, we repurchased 1,130,230 shares in the open market for $14.6 million under the program. There have been no share repurchases during the first six months of fiscal 2010. Therefore, we have purchased a total of 2,004,123 shares, at a total cost of $27.3 million, since the inception of this program. We have remaining authority to repurchase 1,245,877 shares under this program, which has no expiration date; we do not expect to repurchase any shares during the remainder of fiscal 2010.
Other Financing Activities.The following summarizes our significant contractual obligations that impact our liquidity as of August 29, 2009:
Future Cash Payments Due by Fiscal Period | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 Remaining | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial revenue bonds | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,400 | $ | 8,400 | |||||||
Operating leases (undiscounted) | 3,441 | 5,593 | 4,179 | 2,935 | 2,124 | 3,366 | 21,638 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations | 2,746 | 1,039 | — | — | — | — | 3,785 | ||||||||||||||
Other obligations | 499 | 39 | — | — | — | — | 538 | ||||||||||||||
Total cash obligations | $ | 6,686 | $ | 6,671 | $ | 4,179 | $ | 2,935 | $ | 2,124 | $ | 11,766 | $ | 34,361 |
19
Table of Contents
We maintain a $100.0 million revolving credit facility, which expires in November 2011. No borrowings were outstanding as of August 29, 2009. The credit facility requires that we maintain a minimum level of net worth as defined in the credit facility based on certain quarterly financial calculations. The minimum required net worth computed in accordance with the credit agreement at August 29, 2009 was $259.2 million, whereas our net worth as defined in the credit facility was $333.4 million. The credit facility also requires that we maintain a debt-to-cash flow ratio of no more than 2.75. This ratio is computed daily, with cash flow computed on a rolling 12-month basis. Our ratio was 0.08 at August 29, 2009. If we are not in compliance with either of these covenants, the lender may terminate the commitment and/or declare any loan then outstanding to be immediately due and payable. At August 29, 2009, we were in compliance with all of the financial covenants of the credit facility. Long-term debt also includes $8.4 million of industrial development bonds that mature in fiscal years 2021 through 2023.
From time to time, we acquire the use of certain assets, such as warehouses, automobiles, forklifts, vehicles, office equipment, hardware, software and some manufacturing equipment through operating leases. Many of these operating leases have termination penalties. However, because the assets are used in the conduct of our business operations, it is unlikely that any significant portion of these operating leases would be terminated prior to the normal expiration of their lease terms. Therefore, we consider the risk related to termination penalties to be minimal.
We have purchase obligations for raw material commitments and capital expenditures. As of August 29, 2009, these obligations totaled $3.8 million.
The other obligations relate to non-compete and consulting agreements with current and former employees.
We expect to make contributions of $0.5 million to our defined benefit pension plans in fiscal 2010. The fiscal 2010 expected contributions will equal or exceed our minimum funding requirements.
As of August 29, 2009, we had $15.3 million and $2.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits and environmental liabilities, respectively. We are unable to reasonably estimate in which future periods these amounts will ultimately be settled.
At August 29, 2009, we had ongoing letters of credit related to construction contracts and certain industrial development bonds. The letters of credit by expiration period were as follows at August 29, 2009:
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Fiscal Period | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 Remaining | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit | $ | 1,492 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,653 | $ | 10,145 |
In addition to the above standby letters of credit, which were predominantly issued for our industrial development bonds, we are required, in the ordinary course of business, to provide a surety or performance bond that commits payments to our customers for any non-performance by us. At August 29, 2009, $149.6 million of our backlog was bonded by performance bonds with a face value of $424.8 million. Performance bonds do not have stated expiration dates, as we are released from the bonds upon completion of the contract. We have never been required to pay on these performance-based bonds with respect to any of our current portfolio of businesses.
We self-insure our third-party product liability coverages. As a result, a material construction project rework event would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
For fiscal 2010, we believe that current cash on hand, cash generated from operating activities and available capacity under our committed revolving credit facility should be adequate to fund our working capital requirements, planned capital expenditures and dividend payments.
Outlook
We are facing an unprecedented level of uncertainty in fiscal 2010. The following statements are based on our current expectations for full-year fiscal 2010 results. These statements are forward-looking, and actual results may differ materially.
• | Overall revenues for the year are expected to be down 20 to 25 percent compared to fiscal 2009. |
• | Operating margins are expected to be in the mid-single digits. |
• | Full-year capital expenditures are projected to be less than $20 million. |
20
Table of Contents
Related Party Transactions
No material changes have occurred in the disclosure with respect to our related party transactions set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
No material changes have occurred in the disclosure with respect to our critical accounting policies set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
No material changes have occurred to the disclosures of quantitative and qualitative market risk set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report (the Evaluation Date), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
b) | Changes in internal controls: There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended August 29, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
The Company has been a party to various legal proceedings incidental to its normal operating activities. In particular, like others in the construction supply industry, the Company’s construction supply businesses are routinely involved in various disputes and claims arising out of construction projects, sometimes involving significant monetary damages or product replacement. The Company has also been subject to litigation arising out of employment practices, workers compensation, general liability and automobile claims. Although it is difficult to accurately predict the outcome of such proceedings, facts currently available indicate that no such claims will result in losses that would have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
There were no material changes or additions to our risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
21
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information with respect to purchases made by the Company of its own stock during the second quarter of fiscal 2010:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (a) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (b) | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2009 through June 27, 2009 | 7,956 | $ 13.77 | — | 1,245,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 28, 2009 through July 25, 2009 | — | — | — | 1,245,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||
July 26, 2009 through August 29, 2009 | 1,151 | 13.96 | — | 1,245,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 9,107 | 13.83 | — | 1,245,877 |
(a) | The shares in this column represent shares that were surrendered to us by plan participants to satisfy stock-for-stock option exercises or withholding tax obligations related to stock-based compensation. |
(b) | In April 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 1,500,000 shares of Company stock, which was announced on April 10, 2003. In January 2008, the Board of Directors increased the authorization by 750,000 shares, which was announced on January 24, 2008. In October 2008, the Board of Directors increased the authorization by 1,000,000 shares, which was announced on October 8, 2008. The Company’s repurchase program does not have an expiration date. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on June 24, 2009. The number of outstanding shares on the record date for the Annual Meeting was 27,909,638. Ninety percent of the outstanding shares were represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. The four candidates for election as Class II Directors listed in the proxy statement were elected to serve three-year terms, expiring at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The proposals to approve the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan were approved. Additionally, the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2010 fiscal year was approved. The results of these matters voted upon by the shareholders are listed below.
Number of Shares | ||||||||
In Favor | Withheld/ Against | Abstained/ Unvoted | Broker Non-vote | |||||
Election of three Class II Directors | ||||||||
Bernard P. Aldrich | 24,498,506 | 704,319 | — | — | ||||
Sara L. Hays | 24,864,764 | 338,061 | — | — | ||||
Russell Huffer | 24,582,452 | 620,373 | — | — | ||||
John T. Manning | 24,622,458 | 580,367 | — | — | ||||
Approval of the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan | 20,408,334 | 1,829,380 | 197,180 | 2,767,931 | ||||
Approval of the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan | 20,931,308 | 1,248,663 | 254,923 | 2,767,931 | ||||
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm | 24,728,733 | 446,803 | 27,289 | — |
22
Table of Contents
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
23
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. | ||||
Date: October 8, 2009 | By: | /S/ RUSSELL HUFFER | ||
Russell Huffer | ||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
Date: October 8, 2009 | By: | /S/ JAMES S. PORTER | ||
James S. Porter | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
24
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index to Form 10-Q for the Period Ended August 29, 2009
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
25