Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2007
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-12456
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia | 58-1098795 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
470 East Paces Ferry Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia | 30305 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(404) 261-4381
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Classes | Outstanding at September 7, 2007 | |
Class A Common Stock, $.10 par value | 22,556,768 Shares | |
Class B Common Stock, $.10 par value | 2,963,824 Shares |
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form 10-Q
Quarter ended July 31, 2007
Page No. | ||
Part I - Financial Information | ||
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) | ||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | 3 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | 4 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 5 | |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited | 6 | |
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 15 | |
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 25 | |
Item 4.Controls and Procedures | 25 | |
Part II - Other Information | ||
Item 1.Legal Proceedings | 27 | |
Item 1A.Risk Factors | 27 | |
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 27 | |
28 | ||
28 | ||
Item 5.Other Information | 28 | |
Item 6.Exhibits | 28 |
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
American Software, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
July 31, 2007 | April 30, 2007 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 58,500 | $ | 45,627 | ||||
Investments | 17,108 | 27,142 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $156 at July 31, 2007 and $162 at April 30, 2007: | ||||||||
Billed | 11,880 | 12,489 | ||||||
Unbilled | 5,185 | 3,860 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 2,474 | 2,560 | ||||||
Total current assets | 95,147 | 91,678 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 7,055 | 7,080 | ||||||
Capitalized software, net | 6,029 | 6,137 | ||||||
Goodwill | 11,503 | 11,210 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net | 1,388 | 1,472 | ||||||
Other assets | 241 | 239 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 121,363 | $ | 117,816 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,334 | $ | 1,138 | ||||
Accrued compensation and related costs | 1,998 | 3,308 | ||||||
Dividends payable | 2,039 | 1,984 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 3,712 | 5,545 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 900 | 911 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 16,176 | 15,441 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 26,159 | 28,327 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,667 | 1,697 | ||||||
Minority interest | 5,403 | 5,061 | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock: | ||||||||
Class A, $.10 par value. Authorized 50,000,000 shares: Issued 26,290,848 shares at July 31, 2007 and 25,418,913 shares at April 30, 2007 | 2,629 | 2,542 | ||||||
Class B, $.10 par value. Authorized 10,000,000 shares: Issued and outstanding 2,973,825 shares at July 31, 2007 and 3,157,294 shares at April 30, 2007; convertible into Class A shares on a one-for-one basis | 297 | 315 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 85,609 | 81,614 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 68 | 67 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 20,036 | 18,698 | ||||||
Class A treasury stock, 3,782,185 shares at July 31, 2007 and April 30, 2007 | (20,505 | ) | (20,505 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 88,134 | 82,731 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 121,363 | $ | 117,816 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements - unaudited.
3
Table of Contents
American Software, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
(in thousands, except earnings per share data)
Three Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
License | $ | 5,120 | $ | 4,373 | ||||
Services and other | 9,787 | 9,263 | ||||||
Maintenance | 6,815 | 6,545 | ||||||
Total revenues | 21,722 | 20,181 | ||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||
License | 1,685 | 1,454 | ||||||
Services and other | 6,823 | 6,644 | ||||||
Maintenance | 1,761 | 1,777 | ||||||
Total cost of revenues | 10,269 | 9,875 | ||||||
Gross margin | 11,453 | 10,306 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Research and development | 1,910 | 1,719 | ||||||
Sales and marketing | 3,392 | 3,517 | ||||||
General and administrative | 3,482 | 3,265 | ||||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles | 88 | 88 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | 35 | 43 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 8,907 | 8,632 | ||||||
Operating income | 2,546 | 1,674 | ||||||
Other income: | ||||||||
Interest income | 855 | 624 | ||||||
Other income (expense), net | 61 | (19 | ) | |||||
Earnings before income taxes | 3,462 | 2,279 | ||||||
Income taxes | (1,271 | ) | (905 | ) | ||||
Minority interest expense | (236 | ) | (127 | ) | ||||
Net earnings | $ | 1,955 | $ | 1,247 | ||||
Earnings per common share: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Shares used in the calculation of earnings per common share: | ||||||||
Basic | 25,126 | 24,508 | ||||||
Diluted | 26,819 | 25,266 |
(a) | Basic per share amounts are the same for Class A and Class B shares. Diluted per share amounts for Class A shares are shown above. Diluted per share for Class B shares under the two-class method are $.08 and $.05 for the periods ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. See Note F to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements - unaudited.
4
Table of Contents
American Software, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 1,955 | $ | 1,247 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,041 | 1,117 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 182 | 225 | ||||||
Bond amortization | — | (75 | ) | |||||
Tax benefit of stock options exercised | 1,342 | 117 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation | (1,160 | ) | (447 | ) | ||||
Net loss on investments | 142 | 325 | ||||||
Minority interest in net earnings of subsidiary | 236 | 127 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (41 | ) | 342 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Purchases of trading securities | (3,372 | ) | (7,435 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of trading securities | 92 | 7,371 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of trading securities | 3,969 | 1,000 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | (716 | ) | 1,610 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 86 | 42 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities | (1,517 | ) | (1,023 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue | 735 | (256 | ) | |||||
Other | — | 9 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 2,974 | 4,296 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Capitalized computer software development costs | (552 | ) | (596 | ) | ||||
Intangible assets | (46 | ) | — | |||||
Goodwill | (293 | ) | — | |||||
Purchases of property and equipment, net of disposals | (226 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 31,108 | 32,738 | ||||||
Purchases of investments | (21,904 | ) | (34,551 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options by subsidiary | 195 | 38 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 8,282 | (2,470 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds from Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Stock Purchase Plan | 10 | 4 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation | 1,160 | 447 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 2,441 | 91 | ||||||
Dividends paid | (1,994 | ) | (1,720 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 1,617 | (1,178 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 12,873 | 648 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 45,627 | 29,425 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 58,500 | $ | 30,073 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements - unaudited.
5
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
A. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-1 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of our management, these condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position at July 31, 2007, the results of operations for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 and cash flows for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006. The results for the three months ended July 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year. These statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis and results of operations included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2007.
The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Note 1 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, describes the significant accounting policies that we have used in preparing our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to those related to revenue/vendor specific object evidence (VSOE), bad debts, capitalized software costs, goodwill, intangible asset impairment, income taxes and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
B. | Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American Software, Inc., and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
C. | Revenue Recognition |
We recognize revenue in accordance with Statement of Position No. 97-2:Software Revenue Recognition, (SOP 97-2) and Statement of Position No. 98-9:Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition With Respect to Certain Transactions (SOP 98-9).
License. License revenue in connection with license agreements for standard proprietary software is recognized upon delivery of the software, providing collection is considered probable, the fee is fixed or determinable, there is evidence of an arrangement, and vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) exists with respect to any undelivered elements of the arrangement. For multiple-element arrangements, we recognize revenue under the residual method as permitted by SOP 98-9, whereby (1) the total fair value of the undelivered elements, as indicated by VSOE, is deferred and subsequently recognized in accordance with SOP 97-2 and (2) the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered elements is recognized as revenue related to the delivered elements. We record revenues from sales of third-party products in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 99-19,Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent (EITF 99-19). Furthermore, in accordance with EITF 99-19, we evaluate sales through our indirect channel on a case-by-case basis to determine whether the transaction should be recorded gross or net, including but not limited to assessing whether or not we: 1) act as principal in the transaction, 2) take title to the products, 3) have risks and rewards of ownership, such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery, or returns, and 4) act as an agent or broker with compensation on a commission or fee basis. Accordingly, our sales through the DMI channel are typically recorded on a gross basis.
Maintenance. Revenue derived from maintenance contracts primarily includes telephone consulting, product updates, and releases of new versions of products previously purchased by the customer, as well as error
6
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
reporting and correction services. Typically, we sell maintenance contracts for a separate fee with initial contractual periods ranging from one to three years with renewal for additional periods thereafter. We generally bill maintenance fees annually in advance. We recognize maintenance revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement. In situations where we bundle all or a portion of the maintenance fee with the license fee, VSOE for maintenance is determined based on prices when sold separately.
Services. Revenue derived from services primarily includes consulting, implementation, and training. We primarily bill fees under time and materials arrangements and recognize them as services are performed. In accordance with the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-14:Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred (EITF No. 01-14), we recognize amounts received for reimbursement of travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred as revenue in the consolidated statements of operations under services and other. Reimbursements received from customers for out-of-pocket expenses were recorded in revenue and totaled approximately $488,000 and $295,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Indirect Channel Revenue. We recognized revenues for sales made through indirect channels principally when the distributor makes the sale to an end-user, when the license fee is fixed or determinable, the license fee is nonrefundable, and the sale meets all other conditions of SOP 97-2 and SOP 98-9.
Deferred Revenue. Deferred revenue represents advance payments or billings for software licenses, services, and maintenance billed in advance of the time revenue is recognized.
D. | Major Customer |
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2007. One customer accounted for approximately 12% our total revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2006. The related accounts receivable balance for this customer as of July 31, 2006 was approximately $948,000.
E. | Declaration of Dividend Payable |
On June 6, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.08 per share of American Software Class A and Class B common stock. The cash dividend is payable on September 12, 2007 to Class A and Class B shareholders of record at the close of business on August 21, 2007.
F. | Earnings Per Common Share |
The Company has two classes of common stock of which Class B common shares are convertible into Class A common shares at any time, on a one-for-one basis. Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, if dividends are declared, holders of Class A common shares shall receive a $.05 dividend per share prior to the Class B common stock receiving any dividend and holders of Class A common stock shall receive a dividend at least equal to Class B common stock dividends on a per share basis. As a result, the Company has computed the earnings per share in compliance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, “Earnings per Share”, which requires companies that have multiple classes of equity securities to use the “two-class” method in computing earnings per share.
For the Company’s basic earnings per share calculation, the Company uses the “two-class” method. Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to each class of common stock by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. All undistributed earnings are allocated evenly between Class A and B common stock in the earnings per share calculation to the extent that earnings equal or exceed $.05 per share. This allocation is based on management’s judgment after considering the dividend rights of the two-classes of common stock, the control of the Class B shareholders and the convertibility rights of the Class B shares to Class A shares.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated similar to basic earnings per share, except that the calculation includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of options issuable under the Company’s stock incentive plans. For the Company’s diluted earnings per share calculation for Class A shares, the Company uses the “if-converted” method. This calculation assumes that all Class B common shares are converted into Class A common shares and, as a result, assumes there are no holders of Class B common shares to participate in undistributed earnings.
7
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
For the Company’s diluted earnings per share calculation for Class B shares, the Company uses the “two-class” method. This calculation does not assume that all Class B common shares are converted into Class A common shares. In addition, this method assumes the dilutive effect of Class A stock options were converted to Class A shares and the undistributed earnings are allocated evenly to both Class A and B shares including Class shares issued pursuant to those converted stock options. This allocation is based on management’s judgment after considering the dividend rights of the two classes of common stock, the control of the Class B shareholders and the convertibility rights of the Class B shares into Class A shares.
The following tables set forth the computation of basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands except for per share amounts):
Basic earnings per common share:
Three Months Ended July 31, 2007 | Three Months Ended July 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Class A | Class B | |||||||||||||
Distributed earnings | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||
Undistributed loss | — | — | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||
Distributed earnings | $ | 1,802 | $ | 237 | $ | 1,485 | $ | 232 | ||||||||
Undistributed loss | (75 | ) | (9 | ) | (406 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | 1,727 | $ | 228 | $ | 1,079 | $ | 168 | ||||||||
Basic weighted average common shares | 22,045 | 3,081 | 21,186 | 3,322 |
8
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
Diluted EPS for Class A common shares using the If-Converted Method
Three Months Ended July 31, 2007
Undistributed & Distributed earnings to Class A Common | Class A Common Shares | EPS | |||||||
Per Basic | $ | 1,727 | 22,045 | $ | 0.08 | ||||
Common Stock Equivalents | — | 1,693 | (0.01 | ) | |||||
1,727 | 23,738 | 0.07 | |||||||
Class B Conversion | 228 | 3,081 | — | ||||||
Diluted EPS for Class A | $ | 1,955 | 26,819 | $ | 0.07 | ||||
Three Months Ended July 31, 2006 | |||||||||
Undistributed & Distributed earnings to Class A Common | Class A Common Shares | EPS | |||||||
Per Basic | $ | 1,079 | 21,186 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Common Stock Equivalents | — | 758 | — | ||||||
1,079 | 21,944 | 0.05 | |||||||
Class B Conversion | 168 | 3,322 | — | ||||||
Diluted EPS for Class A | $ | 1,247 | 25,266 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Diluted EPS for Class B common shares using the Two-Class Method
Three Months Ended July 31, 2007
Undistributed & Distributed earnings to Class B Common | Class B Common Shares | EPS | ||||||
Per Basic | $ | 228 | 3,081 | $ | 0.08 | |||
Reallocation of undistributed earnings to Class A shares from Class B shares | — | — | — | |||||
Diluted EPS for Class B | $ | 228 | 3,081 | $ | 0.08 | |||
Three Months Ended July 31, 2006 | ||||||||
Undistributed & Distributed earnings to Class B Common * | Class B Common Shares | EPS | ||||||
Per Basic | $ | 168 | 3,322 | $ | 0.05 | |||
Reallocation of undistributed earnings to Class A shares from Class B shares | 2 | — | — | |||||
Diluted EPS for Class B | $ | 170 | 3,322 | $ | 0.05 | |||
* | Reallocation of undistributed shares is anti-dilutive |
9
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
For the three months ended July 31, 2007 and July 31, 2006, we excluded options to purchase 80,000 and 197,050 Class A Common Shares from the computation of diluted earnings per Class A Common Shares. We excluded these option share amounts because the exercise prices of those options were greater than the average market price of the Class A Common Shares during the applicable period. As of July 31, 2007, we had a total of 2,414,203 options outstanding and as of July 31, 2006, we had a total of 3,265,402 options outstanding.
G. | Acquisitions |
Logility Share Repurchase
On June 28, 2007, Logility, Inc., our approximately 88% owned subsidiary, purchased 30,000 shares of its common stock for $337,800. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” we have accounted for this transaction under the purchase method of accounting. The total amount allocated from this transaction was $365,289, which includes approximately $27,000 related to the non-cash tax effects of this treasury stock purchase. We have allocated the $365,289 to capitalized software development costs, totaling approximately $27,000, intangible assets, totaling approximately $45,000, and goodwill, totaling approximately $293,000, based on management’s estimates of fair value at the date of the transaction. The costs allocated to capitalized software development costs and intangible assets are being amortized ratably based on the projected revenues associated with the related assets of Logility, Inc. or on a straight-line basis over three to six years, whichever method results in a higher level of amortization. Amortization of these capitalized costs is included in the cost of license revenues and general and administrative costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for capitalized software development costs and intangible assets, respectively.
H. | Stock-Based Compensation |
As of July 31, 2007, we had three stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described below. Effective May 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (“SFAS 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment” using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized on or after May 1, 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of May 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted on or after May 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with SFAS 123(R).
We recorded stock option compensation cost of $182,139 and $224,913 and related income tax benefits of $40,169 and $49,507 during the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the vesting period directly to additional paid-in capital.
SFAS 123(R) requires that cash flows resulting from the tax benefits generated by tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. During the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, we realized excess tax benefits of approximately $1,160,000 and $447,000, respectively.
During the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, we issued 683,259 and 36,898 shares of common stock, respectively, resulting from the exercise of stock options. During the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, our subsidiary issued 63,776 and 15,505 shares of common stock, respectively, resulting from the exercise of stock options. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 based on market value at the exercise dates was approximately $4,600,000 and $183,000, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised at our subsidiary during the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 based on market value at the exercised dates was approximately $500,000 and $125,000, respectively. As of July 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards approximated $1.3 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years. As of July 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards at our subsidiary approximated $653,000 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.
10
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
I. | Comprehensive Income |
We have adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. SFAS No. 130 establishes standards for reporting and presentation of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of financial statements. We have not included condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements since comprehensive income and net earnings presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations would be substantially the same.
J. | Industry Segments |
We have adopted SFAS No. 131,Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. We operate and manage our business in three segments based on software and services provided in three key product markets: (i) Collaborative Supply Chain Management, which provides collaborative supply chain solutions to streamline and optimize the production, distribution and management of products between trading partners; (ii) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), which automates customers’ internal financing, human resources, and manufacturing functions; and (iii) IT Consulting, which consists of IT staffing and consulting services. The Collaborative Supply Chain Management segment represents the business of our 88%-owned subsidiary Logility, Inc., including its subsidiary, DMI. In the following table, we have broken down the intersegment transactions applicable to the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006:
11
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
Three Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
Enterprise Resource Planning | $ | 4,488 | $ | 5,648 | ||||
Collaborative Supply Chain Management | 11,965 | 9,594 | ||||||
IT Consulting | 5,269 | 4,939 | ||||||
$ | 21,722 | $ | 20,181 | |||||
Operating income (loss) before intersegment eliminations: | ||||||||
Enterprise Resource Planning | $ | (637 | ) | $ | 261 | |||
Collaborative Supply Chain Management | 3,000 | 1,236 | ||||||
IT Consulting | 183 | 177 | ||||||
$ | 2,546 | $ | 1,674 | |||||
Intersegment eliminations: | ||||||||
Enterprise Resource Planning | $ | (426 | ) | $ | (433 | ) | ||
Collaborative Supply Chain Management | 426 | 433 | ||||||
IT Consulting | — | |||||||
$ | — | $ | — | |||||
Operating income (loss) after intersegment eliminations: | ||||||||
Enterprise Resource Planning | $ | (1,063 | ) | $ | (172 | ) | ||
Collaborative Supply Chain Management | 3,426 | 1,669 | ||||||
IT Consulting | 183 | 177 | ||||||
$ | 2,546 | $ | 1,674 | |||||
Capital expenditures: | ||||||||
Enterprise Resource Planning | $ | 180 | $ | 48 | ||||
Collaborative Supply Chain Management | 46 | 50 | ||||||
IT Consulting | — | — | ||||||
$ | 226 | $ | 98 | |||||
Capitalized Software: | ||||||||
Enterprise Resource Planning | $ | 27 | $ | — | ||||
Collaborative Supply Chain Management | 525 | 596 | ||||||
IT Consulting | — | — | ||||||
$ | 552 | $ | 596 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization: | ||||||||
Enterprise Resource Planning | $ | 228 | $ | 296 | ||||
Collaborative Supply Chain Management | 813 | 821 | ||||||
IT Consulting | — | — | ||||||
$ | 1,041 | $ | 1,117 | |||||
12
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
K. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In July 2006, the FASB issued SFAS Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of SFAS Statement No. 109.FIN 48 applies to all “tax provisions” accounted for under SFAS 109. FIN 48 refers to “tax positions” as positions taken in previously filed tax return or positions expected to be taken in a future tax return that are reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities reported in the financial statements. FIN 48 further clarifies a tax position to include the following:
• | A decision not to file a tax return in a particular jurisdiction for which a return might be required, |
• | An allocation or a shift of income between taxing jurisdictions, |
• | The characterization of income or a decision to exclude reporting taxable income in a tax return, or |
• | A decision to classify a transaction, entity, or other position in a tax return as tax exempt. |
FIN 48 clarifies that a tax benefit may be reflected in the financial statements only if it is “more likely than not” that a company will be able to sustain the tax return position, based on its technical merits. If a tax benefit meets this criterion, it should be measured and recognized based on the largest amount of benefit that is cumulatively greater than 50% likely to be realized. This is a change from prior practice, whereby companies were able to recognize a tax benefit only if it is probable a tax position will be sustained.
On May 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized a decrease of approximately $1.4 million to current income taxes payable and recorded a corresponding increase to the May 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. As of the date of adoption, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits totaled $120,000, inclusive of interest and penalties of approximately $52,000, mainly related to state income taxes, all of which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. An additional accrual of $3,000 was made for the three months ended July 31, 2007.
The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within its operations in income taxes. To the extent interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to uncertain tax positions, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.
The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, files income tax returns in the United States Federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2000.
The Company does not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months due to the expiration of statute of limitations prior to March 31, 2008.
In June 2006, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 06-03:How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That is, Gross Versus Net Presentation). EITF 06-03 provides that any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer may include, but is not limited to, sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes. EITF also provides that the presentation of taxes on either a gross (included in revenues and costs) or a net (excluded from revenues) basis is an accounting policy decision that a company should make and disclose in its financial statements. Any such taxes that are reported on a gross basis, if material, a company should disclose the amounts of those taxes in interim and annual financial statements for each period for which an income statement is presented. The disclosure of those taxes can be done on an aggregate basis. EITF 06-03 is effective for financial statements for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company recognizes taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis therefore no additional disclosure are deemed necessary.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which becomes effective for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS No. 157 addresses the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement of a company’s assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 requires that the fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company does not expect this Issue to have a material impact on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which becomes effective for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007. Under SFAS No. 159, companies may elect to measure specified financial instruments and warranty and insurance contracts at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each reporting period. The election called the “fair value option”, will enable some companies to reduce volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The Company does not expect this issue to have a material impact on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
13
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited
July 31, 2007
L. | Subsequent Event |
On May 15, 2007, the Logility Board of Directors adopted the Logility, Inc. 2007 Stock Plan. The 2007 Stock Plan was approved by Shareholders on August 21, 2007, at the Logility annual meeting of Shareholders. The 2007 Stock Plan replaced the Logility’s 1997 Stock Plan, which expires on August 7, 2007 and provides for the granting of options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of common stock and up to 300,000 stock appreciation rights units, on terms similar to those in the 1997 Stock Plan. Options previously granted under the 1997 Stock Plan will continue to be exercisable in accordance with their terms.
On June 21, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase in authorized shares under the 2001 Stock Plan for the granting of options to purchase an additional 800,000 shares of common stock. This motion was approved by Shareholders on August 20, 2007 at the annual meeting of Shareholders.
On July 17, 2007, the Company exercised its right to extend the term of the Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Logility for an additional ten years, expiring August 7, 2017.
On August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a 12.5% increase to the Company’s quarterly dividend from $0.08 per share to $0.09 per share. In addition our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per share of American Software Class A and Class B common stock. The cash dividend is payable on November 30, 2007 to Class A and Class B shareholders of record at the close of business on November 12, 2007.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements relating to our future financial performance, business strategy, financing plans and other future events that involve uncertainties and risks. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “continue”, “could”, “grow”, “may”, “potential”, “predict”, “strive”, “will”, “seek”, “estimate”, “believe”, “expect”, and similar expressions that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Any forward-looking statements we make herein are pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning future:
• | results of operations; |
• | liquidity, cash flow and capital expenditures; |
• | demand for and pricing of our products and services; |
• | acquisition activities and the effect of completed acquisitions; |
• | industry conditions and market conditions; and |
• | general economic conditions. |
Although we believe that the goals, plans, expectations, and prospects that our forward-looking statements reflect are reasonable in view of the information currently available to us, those statements are not guarantees of performance. There are many factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by forward-looking statements made herein. These factors include, but are not limited to, continuing economic uncertainty, the timing and degree of business recovery, unpredictability and the irregular pattern of future revenues, competitive pressures, delays and other risks associated with new product development, the difficulty of predicting the effectiveness and duration of third-party marketing agreements, undetected software errors, and risks associated with market acceptance of our products and services. We discuss certain factors in greater detail in “Business Overview”, below. The terms “fiscal 2008” and “fiscal 2007” refer to our fiscal years ending April 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
Corporate capital spending trends and commitments are the primary determinants of the size of the market for business software. Corporate capital spending is, in turn, a function of general economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad. In recent years, the weakness in the overall world economy, and the U.S. economy in particular, has resulted in reduced expenditures in the business software market. Overall information technology spending continues to be relatively weak when compared to the period prior to the last economic downturn.
However, we believe information technology spending has incrementally improved and will continue to improve as increased global competition forces companies to improve productivity by upgrading their technology environment systems. Although this improvement could slow or regress at any time, we believe that our organizational and financial structure will enable us to take advantage of any sustained economic rebound. While our sales pipelines are improving, customers continue to take longer to evaluate discretionary software purchases than generally was the case prior to the economic downturn.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
American Software, Inc. (“American Software” or the “Company”) was incorporated as a Georgia corporation in 1970. We develop, market and support a portfolio of software and services that deliver enterprise management and collaborative supply chain solutions to the global marketplace. We have designed our software and services to bring business value to enterprises by supporting their operations over intranets, extranets, client/servers or the Internet. References to “the Company,” “our products,” “our software,” “our services” and similar references include the appropriate business unit actually providing the product or service.
We provide our software solutions through three major business segments, which are further broken down into a total of four major product and service groups. The three business segments are (1) Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”), (2) Collaborative Supply Chain Management (“SCM”), and (3) Information Technology (“IT”) Consulting. The Collaborative Supply Chain Management segment consists of Logility, Inc., an 88% owned subsidiary that provides collaborative supply chain solutions to streamline and optimize the production, distribution and management of products between trading partners. The ERP segment consists of (i) American Software ERP, which provides purchasing and materials management, customer order processing, financial, e-commerce, Flow Manufacturing and traditional manufacturing solutions, and (ii) New Generation Computing (NGC), which provides industry specific business software to both retailers and manufacturers in the Apparel, Sewn Products and Furniture industries. The IT Consulting segment consists of The Proven Method, an IT staffing and consulting services firm.
15
Table of Contents
On September 30, 2004, Logility acquired certain assets and the distribution channel of privately-held Demand Management, Inc. (DMI), a St. Louis-based provider of supply chain planning systems marketed under the Demand Solutions® brand. The acquisition provided more than 800 active customers, which brought the Logility customer base to approximately 1,100 companies, located in 70 countries, and gives Logility what we believe to be the largest installed base of supply chain planning customers among application software vendors. Since the acquisition, Logility has continued to market and sell the Demand Solutions product line through Demand Management’s existing value-added reseller (VAR) distribution network. Logility also continues to offer the Logility Voyager Solutions™ suite to its traditional target market of upper-midsize to Fortune 1000 companies with distribution-intensive supply chains.
We derive revenues primarily from three sources: software licenses, services and other, and maintenance. We generally determine software license fees based on the number of modules, servers, users and/or sites licensed. Services and other revenues consist primarily of fees from software implementation, training, consulting and customization services. We primarily bill under time and materials arrangements and recognize revenues as we perform services. We typically enter into maintenance agreements for a one- to three-year term at the time of the initial product license. We generally bill maintenance fees annually in advance and then recognize the resulting revenues ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement. Deferred revenues represent advance payments or billings for software licenses, services and maintenance billed in advance of the time we recognize the related revenues.
Our cost of revenue for licenses includes amortization of capitalized computer software development costs, salaries and benefits, and royalties paid to third-party software vendors as well as agent commission expenses related to license revenues generated by the indirect channel primarily from DMI. Costs for maintenance and services include the cost of personnel to conduct implementations and customer support, consulting, and other personnel-related expenses as well as agent commission expenses related to maintenance revenues generated by the indirect channel primarily from DMI. We account for the development costs of software intended for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 86,“Accounting for Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed.”We monitor the net realizable value of our capitalized software on a quarterly basis based on an estimate of future product revenues. We currently expect to fully recover the value of the capitalized software asset recorded on our consolidated balance sheet; however, if future product revenues are less than management’s current expectations, we may incur a write-down of capitalized software costs.
Our selling expenses generally include the salary and commissions paid to our sales professionals, along with marketing, promotional, travel and associated costs. Our general and administrative expenses generally include the salary and benefits paid to executive, corporate and support personnel, as well as facilities related costs, utilities, communications expenses, and various professional fees. DMI sells its products primarily through indirect channels.
We currently view the following factors as the primary opportunities and risks associated with our business:
Strategic Relationships. We intend to expand the depth and number of strategic relationships with leading enterprise software, systems integrators and service providers to integrate our solutions into their services and products and to create joint marketing opportunities. We have a number of marketing alliances, including those with SAP and IBM. In addition, we have developed a network of international agents who assist in the sale and support of our products. We intend to utilize these and future relationships with software and service organizations to enhance our sales and marketing position.
Dependence on Capital Spending Patterns. There is risk associated with our dependence on, and the risks associated with, the capital spending patterns of U.S. and international businesses, which in turn are functions of economic trends and conditions over which we have no control.
Acquisition Opportunities. There are opportunities for select acquisitions or investments to provide opportunities to expand our sales distribution channels and/or broaden our product offering by providing additional solutions for our target markets.
Acquisition Risks. There are risks associated with acquisitions of complementary companies, products and technologies, including the risks that we will not achieve the financial and strategic goals that we contemplate at the time of the transaction. More specifically, in any acquisition we will face risks and challenges associated with the uncertain value of the acquired business or assets, the difficulty of assimilating operations and personnel, integrating acquired technologies and products and maintaining the loyalty of the customers of the acquired business.
Competitive Technologies. There is a risk that our competitors may develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology.
16
Table of Contents
Competition in General. There are risks inherent in the market for business application software and related services, which has been and continues to be intensely competitive; for example, some of our competitors may become more aggressive with their prices and/or payment terms, which may adversely affect our profit margins.
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to include our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our annual reports. Our independent registered public accounting firm is also required to attest to whether or not our assessment is fairly stated in all material respects and to separately report on whether or not they believe that we maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting. If for any fiscal year we fail to timely complete this assessment, or if our independent registered public accounting firm cannot timely attest to our assessment, we could be subject to regulatory sanctions and a possible loss of public confidence in the reliability of our financial reporting. Such a failure, as well as difficulties in implementing required new or improved controls, could result in our inability to provide timely and reliable financial information and could adversely affect our business.
A discussion of a number of additional risk factors associated with our business is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007.
17
Table of Contents
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three-Month Comparisons. The following table sets forth certain revenue and expense items as a percentage of total revenues and the percentage changes in those items for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006:
Percentage of Total Revenues | Pct. Change in Dollars | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 vs 2006 | |||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||
License | 24 | % | 22 | % | 17 | % | |||
Services and other | 45 | 46 | 6 | ||||||
Maintenance | 31 | 32 | 4 | ||||||
Total revenues | 100 | 100 | 8 | ||||||
Cost of revenues: | |||||||||
License | 8 | 7 | 16 | ||||||
Services and other | 31 | 33 | 3 | ||||||
Maintenance | 8 | 8 | (1 | ) | |||||
Total cost of revenues | 47 | 49 | 4 | ||||||
Gross margin | 53 | 51 | 11 | ||||||
Research and development | 9 | 9 | 11 | ||||||
Sales and marketing | 16 | 17 | (4 | ) | |||||
General and administrative | 16 | 16 | 7 | ||||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles | — | — | — | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | — | — | (19 | ) | |||||
Total operating expenses | 41 | 42 | 3 | ||||||
Operating income | 12 | 9 | 52 | ||||||
Other income: | |||||||||
Interest income | 4 | 3 | 37 | ||||||
Other, net | — | — | nm | ||||||
Earnings before income taxes | 16 | 12 | 52 | ||||||
Income taxes | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | 40 | ||||
Minority interest expense | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 86 | ||||
Net earnings | 9 | % | 7 | % | 57 | % | |||
nm - not meaningful |
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2007 AND 2006
REVENUES:
For the three months ended July 31, 2007, the increase in revenues from the three months ended July 31, 2006 was attributable to an increase in license fees, service and other revenues, and to a lesser extent an increase in maintenance revenues. International revenues represented approximately 10% of total revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our revenues, in particular our international revenues, may fluctuate substantially from period to period primarily because we derive most of our license fee revenues from a relatively small number of customers in a given period.
18
Table of Contents
LICENSES. For the three months ended July 31, 2007, the license fee revenues increased 17% to $5.1 million when compared to the same periods in the prior year, due primarily to increased license fees from our Logility subsidiary as a result of an improved selling environment and better sales execution. In the three months ended July 31, 2007, license fee revenues from Logility increased 42% to $4.7 million. Logility constituted 91% of total license fee revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2007, compared to 75% for the three months ended July 31, 2006. Our ERP business unit license fees decreased by 59% to $0.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2007 when compared to the same period in the prior year due to timing of closing sales.
The direct sales channel provided approximately 63% of license fee revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2007, compared to approximately 78% in the comparable quarter a year ago. This decrease was due primarily to improved sales execution and sales environment within our indirect channel. For the three months ended July 31, 2007 and July 31 2006, our margins after commissions on direct sales were approximately 85% and 80%, and our margins after commissions on indirect sales were approximately 51% and 46%. These margin calculations include only commission expense for comparative purposes and do not include other costs of license fees such as amortization of capitalized software.
SERVICES AND OTHER. For the three months ended July 31, 2007, the increase in services and other revenues were due primarily to increased services revenues from our SCM and IT consulting segments which were partially offset by decrease in the ERP segment. For the three months ended July 31, 2007, our IT Consulting segment’s revenues increased 7% when compared to the prior year quarter, to $5.3 million from $4.9 million due to increased project work. For the three months ended July 31, 2007, our ERP segment’s revenues decreased 14% when compared to the prior year quarter, to $2.5 million due to lower implementation services. For the three months ended July 31, 2007, services and other revenues from Logility increased 42%, to $2.0 million compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2006. This increase was due primarily to increased implementation projects from higher license fees sales in the pervious quarters. We have observed that there is a tendency for services and other revenues, other than IT consulting, to lag changes in license revenues by one to three quarters, as new licenses in one quarter often involve implementation and consulting services in subsequent quarters, for which we recognize revenues only as we perform those services.
MAINTENANCE. For the three months ended July 31, 2007, maintenance revenues increased 4% to $6.8 million compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily from Logility which increased 8% to $5.3 million compared to the same period in the prior year. Logility constituted 77% of total maintenance revenues for the three month period ended July 31, 2007, compared to 75% of total maintenance for the corresponding prior year period. The increases in maintenance revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2007 were due primarily to increased maintenance revenues resulting from increased license fees in prior periods resulting in new maintenance revenue in the current quarter. Typically, our maintenance revenues have had a direct relationship to current and historic license fee revenues, since new licenses are the potential source of new maintenance customers.
GROSS MARGIN:
The following table provides both dollar amounts and percentage measures of gross margin:
($000’s omitted) | Three months ended July 31, | |||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||
Gross margin on license fees: | $ | 3,435 | 67 | % | $ | 2,919 | 67 | % | ||||
Gross margin on services and other: | 2,964 | 30 | % | 2,619 | 28 | % | ||||||
Gross margin on maintenance: | 5,054 | 74 | % | 4,768 | 73 | % | ||||||
Total gross margin: | $ | 11,453 | 53 | % | $ | 10,306 | 51 | % | ||||
For the three months ended July 31, 2007, total gross margin percentage increased when compared to the same period in the prior year due to increases in services and other and maintenance gross margins.
LICENSES. For the three months ended July 31, 2007, gross margin on license fees was relatively consistent when compared to the same period in the prior year. License fee gross margin percentage tends to be directly related to the level of license fee revenues due to the relatively fixed cost of computer software amortization expense, amortization of acquired software and the sales mix between our direct and indirect channel.
SERVICES AND OTHER For the three months ended July 31, 2007, percentage increased when compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year due to better billing utilization rates at Logility and the IT Consulting segment’s TPM. Services
19
Table of Contents
and other gross margin normally are directly related to the level of services and other revenues. The primary component of cost of services and other revenues is services staffing, which is relatively fixed in the short term.
MAINTENANCE. Maintenance gross margin percentage was slightly higher for three months ended July 31, 2007 when compared to the same period last year due to the increase in overall maintenance revenue.
EXPENSES
Research and Development
Gross product research and development costs include all non-capitalized and capitalized software development costs. A breakdown of the research and development costs is as follows:
Three months ended (in thousands) | |||||||||||
July 31, 2007 | Percent Change | July 31, 2006 | |||||||||
Total capitalized computer software development costs | $ | 525 | (12 | )% | $ | 596 | |||||
Percentage of gross product research and development costs | 22 | % | 26 | % | |||||||
Purchase accounting impact on share repurchases by subsidiary and related tax effect | 27 | nm | — | ||||||||
Percentage of total revenues | 0 | % | 0 | % | |||||||
Total research and development expense | 1,883 | 10 | % | 1,719 | |||||||
Percentage of total revenues | 8 | % | 9 | % | |||||||
Total research and development expense and capitalized computer software development costs | $ | 2,435 | 5 | % | $ | 2,315 | |||||
Percentage of total revenues | 11 | % | 11 | % | |||||||
Total amortization of capitalized computer software development costs * | $ | 638 | (21 | )% | $ | 806 |
nm: not meaningful
* | Included in cost of license fees |
For the three months ended July 31, 2007, gross product research and development costs increased when compared to the same periods last year and capitalized software development costs decreased when compared to the same periods last year. These changes were primarily due to increased research and development costs of our SCM segment, which added gross R&D costs but did not capitalize any R&D costs during the period. We expect capitalized product development costs to be lower in coming quarters as a result of fewer capitalizable R&D projects; however, we expect capitalized software amortization expense to remain relatively consistent when compared to the three months ended July 31, 2007.
Capitalized computer software development costs include the effects of applying purchase accounting as a result of Logility, Inc.’s share repurchases.
Sales and Marketing
For the three months ended July 31, 2007, the decrease in sales and marketing expenses when compared to the same period a year ago was due primarily to a decrease in direct sales commissions. This was partially offset by increased marketing expenses. We generally include commissions on indirect sales in cost of sales.
General and Administrative
For the three months ended July 31, 2007, the increases in general and administrative expenses were primarily due to bonus compensation, audit related and annual report expenses when compared to three months ended July 31, 2006.
At July 31, 2007, the total number of employees was 328 compared to 302 at July 31, 2006.
20
Table of Contents
Other Income
Other income is comprised of interest and dividend income, rental income and realized and unrealized gains and losses from investments. For the three months ended July 31, 2007, the increase in other income was due primarily to increased interest income, lower unrealized losses on investments when compared to the prior year period. This was partially offset by lower rental income when compared to the same period last year.
Income Taxes
In the three months ended July 31, 2007, we recorded income tax expense of approximately $1.3 million compared to $905,000 recorded in the three month period ended July 31, 2006 due to increased pretax earnings before income taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their tax bases. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using statutory tax rates in effect in the year in which we expect the differences to reverse. We establish a deferred tax asset for the expected future benefit of net operating loss and credit carry-forwards. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“SFAS No. 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes”, we cannot recognize a deferred tax asset for the future benefit of our net operating losses, tax credits and temporary differences unless we can establish that it is “more likely than not” that the deferred tax asset would be realized. We expect the Company’s effective rate to range between 36% and 39% during fiscal year 2008.
Minority Interest
Minority interest is a function of our majority-owned subsidiaries’ earnings or losses, with minority interest losses recorded when these subsidiaries have earnings, and minority interest earnings recorded when they have losses. Due to Logility’s net earnings in the three months ended July 31, 2007, we recorded minority interest expenses of approximately $236,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and $127,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2006.
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
Sources and Uses of Cash
We have historically funded, and continue to fund, our operations and capital expenditures primarily with cash generated from operating activities. The changes in net cash that our operating activities provide generally reflect the changes in net earnings and non-cash operating items plus the effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities, such as investment trading securities, trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue. We have no debt obligations or off-balance sheet financing arrangements, and therefore we used no cash for debt service purposes.
The following tables show information about our cash flows and liquidity positions during the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006. You should read this table and the discussion that follows in conjunction with our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows contained in “Item 1. Financial Statements” in Part I of this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007.
Three Months Ended July 31, (in thousands) | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 2,974 | $ | 4,296 | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 8,282 | (2,470 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 1,617 | (1,178 | ) | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 12,873 | $ | 648 | |||
For the three months ended July 31, 2007, the net decrease in cash provided by operating activities when compared to the same period last year was due primarily to the decrease in collections of customer accounts receivables and accounts payable and an increase in the excess tax benefit from stock options exercised partially offset by an increase in deferred revenues. The increase in cash provided by investing activities when compared to the same period in the prior year was due primarily to the proceeds from the maturities of investments . Cash provided by financing activities increased when compared to the same period in the prior year, due primarily to proceeds from exercise of stock options and excess tax benefits from stock based compensation in the current quarter partially offset by payment of the quarterly dividend.
21
Table of Contents
The following table shows net changes in total cash, cash equivalents, and investments, which is one measure management uses to view net total cash generated by our activities:
As of July 31, (in thousands) | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 58,500 | $ | 30,073 | ||
Short and Long-Term Investments | 17,108 | 33,851 | ||||
Total cash and short and long-term investments | $ | 75,608 | $ | 63,924 | ||
Net increase (decrease) in total cash and investments (three months ended July 31) | $ | 2,839 | $ | 1,276 |
Our total activities added cash and investments during the three months ended July 31, 2007, when compared to the prior year period, due primarily to the changes in operating assets and liabilities noted above.
Days Sales Outstanding in accounts receivable were 71 days as of July 31, 2007, compared to 64 days as of July 31, 2006. This increase was due primarily to timing of closing license fees sales. Our current ratio on July 31, 2007 was 3.6 to 1 and on July 31, 2006 was 3.3 to 1.
As a result of the positive cash flow from operations our business has generated in recent periods, and because we have $75.6 million in cash and investments with no debt, we believe that our sources of liquidity and capital resources will be sufficient to satisfy our presently anticipated requirements during at least the next twelve months for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate needs. However, at some future date we may need to seek additional sources of capital to meet our requirements. If such need arises, we may be required to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing. Neither we nor Logility currently have a bank line of credit. We can provide no assurance that bank lines of credit or other financing will be available on terms acceptable to us. If available, such financing may result in dilution to our shareholders or higher interest expense.
The sources of free cash flow that we have used for dividend payments include cash we generate through our operations (exclusive of cash that Logility generates), supplemented by our cash and investments (exclusive of Logility’s cash and investments).
On August 22, 2002, our Board of Directors approved a resolution authorizing the repurchase of up to 2.0 million shares of our Class A common stock. These repurchases have been and will be made through open market purchases at prevailing market prices. The timing of any repurchases will depend upon market conditions, the market price of our common stock and management’s assessment of our liquidity and cash flow needs. For this repurchase plan, through September 10, 2007, we have repurchased 247,232 shares of common stock at a cost of approximately $1.1 million. We did not make any repurchases of our common stock in the quarter ended July 31, 2007.
On December 15, 1997, Logility Board of Directors approved a resolution authorizing Logility to repurchase up to 350,000 shares of our common stock through open market purchases at prevailing market prices. Logility completed this repurchase plan in November 1998, at which time Logility adopted an additional repurchase plan for up to 800,000 shares. In February 2003, Logility’s Board of Directors approved a resolution authorizing it to repurchase an additional 400,000 shares for a total authorized repurchase amount of 1,550,000 shares. The timing of any repurchases depends on market conditions, the market price of Logility’s common stock and Logility’s assessment of its liquidity and cash flow needs. For all repurchase plans, through September 10, 2007, Logility had purchased a cumulative total of 1,326,104 shares at a total cost of $8.1 million. In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, Logility purchased 30,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of $11.26 per share for a total price of $338,000. See Part II, Item 2 for a table summarizing stock repurchases in the last quarter and the number of remaining shares available for purchase under the Company’s and Logility’s existing repurchase program.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which becomes effective for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS No. 157 addresses the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement of a company’s assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 requires that the fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company does not expect this Issue to have a material impact on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which becomes effective for fiscal periods beginning after
22
Table of Contents
November 15, 2007. Under SFAS No. 159, companies may elect to measure specified financial instruments and warranty and insurance contracts at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each reporting period. The election called the “fair value option”, will enable some companies to reduce volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The Company does not expect this issue to have a material impact on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
We have based the following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations on our financial statements, which we have prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Note 1 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarter ended July 31, 2007, describes the significant accounting policies that we have used in preparing our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to those related to revenue/vendor specific object evidence (VSOE), bad debts, capitalized software costs, goodwill, intangible asset impairment, stock-based compensation, income taxes and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the critical accounting policies listed below affect significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP 98-9, Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions. We recognize license revenues in connection with license agreements for standard proprietary software upon delivery of the software, provided we deem collection to be probable, the fee is fixed or determinable, there is evidence of an arrangement, and vendor specific objective evidence exists with respect to any undelivered elements of the arrangement. We generally bill maintenance fees annually in advance and recognize the resulting revenues ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement. We derive revenues from services which primarily include consulting, implementation, and training. We bill for these services primarily under time and materials arrangements and recognize fees as we perform the services. Deferred revenues represent advance payments or billings for software licenses, services, and maintenance billed in advance of the time we recognize revenues. We record revenues from sales of third-party products in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent (EITF 99-19). Furthermore, in accordance with EITF 99-19, we evaluate sales through our indirect channel on a case-by-case basis to determine whether the transaction should be recorded gross or net, including but not limited to assessing whether or not the Company 1) acts as principal in the transaction, 2) takes title to the products, 3) has risks and rewards of ownership, such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery, or returns, and 4) acts as an agent or broker with compensation on a commission or fee basis. Accordingly, our sales through the DMI channel are typically recorded gross.
Generally, our software products do not require significant modification or customization. Installation of the products is routine and is not essential to the functionality of the product. Our sales frequently include maintenance contracts and professional services with the sale of our software licenses. We have established vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (VSOE) for our maintenance contracts and professional services. We determine fair value based upon the prices we charge to customers when we sell these elements separately. We defer maintenance revenues, including those sold with the initial license fee, based on VSOE, and recognize the revenue ratably over the maintenance contract period. We recognize consulting and training service revenues, including those sold with license fees, as we perform the services based on their established VSOE. We determine the amount of revenue we allocate to the licenses sold with services or maintenance using the “residual method” of accounting. Under the residual method, we allocate the total value of the arrangement first to the undelivered elements based on their VSOE and allocate the remainder to license fees.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of these customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, we may require additional allowances or we may defer revenue until we determine that collectibility is probable. We specifically analyze accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when we evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
23
Table of Contents
Valuation of Acquired Business. In fiscal 2005, Logility made a business acquisition. We are required to allocate the purchase price of an acquired business to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at date of acquisition. Prior to this allocation, we are required to identify intangible assets and assign a value to these intangible assets based on their fair value. Determining the fair value of identifiable intangible assets requires management to estimate future cash flows for the related assets and the useful life of such assets. We recognize the excess of the cost of the acquired business over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as goodwill. We amortize intangible assets over their useful lives and evaluate goodwill on an annual basis. Consequently, our estimates determine the timing and the amount of expense recognized in our financial statements.
Valuation of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”), we do not amortize goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives. Our goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests, which require us to estimate the fair value of our business compared to the carrying value. The impairment reviews require an analysis of future projections and assumptions about our operating performance. Should such review indicate the assets are impaired, we would record an expense for the impaired assets.
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”), long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for Impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability would be measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The determination of estimated future cash flows, however, requires management to make estimates. Future events and changes in circumstances may require us to record a significant impairment charge in the period in which such events or changes occur. Impairment testing requires considerable analysis and judgment in determining results. If other assumptions and estimates were used in our evaluations, the results could differ significantly.
Annual tests or other future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that our goodwill is impaired. For example, if we had reason to believe that our recorded goodwill and intangible assets had become impaired due to decreases in the fair market value of the underlying business, we would have to take a charge to income for that portion of goodwill or intangible assets that we believed was impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations. At July 31, 2007, our goodwill balance was $11.5 million and our intangible assets with definite lives balance was $1.4 million, net of accumulated amortization.
Valuation of Capitalized Software Assets. We capitalize certain computer software development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Costs incurred internally to create a computer software product or to develop an enhancement to an existing product are charged to expense when incurred as research and development expense until technological feasibility for the respective product is established. Thereafter, all software development costs are capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalization ceases when the product or enhancement is available for general release to customers. We make ongoing evaluations of the recoverability of our capitalized software projects by comparing the amount capitalized for each product to the estimated net realizable value of the product. If such evaluations indicate that the unamortized software development costs exceed the net realizable value, we write off the amount by which the unamortized software development costs exceed net realizable value. We amortize capitalized computer software development costs ratably based on the projected revenues associated with the related software or on a straight-line basis over three years, whichever method results in a higher level of amortization. Amortization of capitalized computer software development costs is included in the cost of license revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation. Effective May 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized on or after May 1, 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of May 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted on or after May 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with SFAS 123(R). Results for prior periods have not been restated. SFAS 123(R) requires that cash flows resulting from the tax benefits generated by tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows.
Management judgments and assumptions related to volatility, the expected term and the forfeiture rate are made in connection with the calculation of stock compensation expense. We periodically review all assumptions used in our stock option pricing model. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the amount of stock compensation expense.
24
Table of Contents
Income Taxes. We provide for the effect of income taxes on our financial position and results of operations in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes including the recently adopted SFAS Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an an interpretation of SFAS Statement No. 109. Under this accounting pronouncement, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of income taxes payable or refundable for the current year and for the change in net deferred tax assets or liabilities resulting from events that are recorded for financial reporting purposes in a different reporting period than recorded in the tax return. Management must make significant assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine our current provision for income taxes and also our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be recorded against our net deferred tax asset. Our judgments, assumptions and estimates relative to the current provision for income tax take into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws, allowable deductions, and projected tax credits. Changes in tax law or our interpretation of tax laws could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in our financial position and results of operations. Our assumptions, judgments and estimates relative to the value of our net deferred tax asset take into account our expectations of the amount and category of future taxable income. Actual operating results and the underlying amount and category of income in future years, which could significantly increase tax expense, could render inaccurate our current assumptions, judgments and estimates of recoverable net deferred taxes.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Foreign Currency. In the three months ended July 31, 2007, we generated approximately 10% of our revenues outside the United States. We typically make international sales through our foreign subsidiaries or our Logility subsidiary and denominated those sales typically in U.S. Dollars, British Pounds Sterling or Euros. However, expenses incurred in connection with these sales are typically denominated in the local currencies. The effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on us in the three months of fiscal 2007 were not material. We estimate that a 10% movement in foreign currency rates would have up to $241,000 exchange gain or loss on our financial condition or results of operations for the three months ended July 31, 2007. We have not engaged in any hedging activities.
Interest rates and other market risks. We have no debt, so we have limited our discussion of interest rate risk to risk associated with our investment profile. We manage our interest rate risk by maintaining an investment portfolio of trading and held-to-maturity investments with high credit quality and relatively short average maturities. These instruments include, but are not limited to, money-market instruments, bank time deposits, and taxable and tax-advantaged variable rate and fixed rate obligations of corporations, municipalities, and national, state, and local government agencies, in accordance with an investment policy approved by our Board of Directors. These instruments are denominated in U.S. dollars. The fair market value of securities as of July 31, 2007 were approximately $72.5 million.
We also hold cash balances in accounts with commercial banks in the United States and foreign countries. These cash balances represent operating balances only and are invested in short-term time deposits of the local bank. Such operating cash balances held at banks outside the United States are denominated in the local currency and are minor.
Many of our investments carry a degree of interest rate risk. When interest rates fall, our income from investments in variable-rate securities declines. When interest rates rise, the fair market value of our investments in fixed-rate securities declines. In addition, our investments in equity securities are subject to stock market volatility. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities, which have seen a decline in market value due to changes in interest rates. We attempt to mitigate risk by holding fixed-rate securities to maturity, but, if our liquidity needs force us to sell fixed-rate securities prior to maturity, we may experience a loss of principal.
Inflation. Although we cannot accurately determine the amounts attributable thereto, we have been affected by inflation through increased costs of employee compensation and other operational expenses. To the extent permitted by the marketplace for our products and services, we attempt to recover increases in costs by periodically increasing prices.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based on and as of the date of such evaluation, the aforementioned officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
25
Table of Contents
Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with the assistance of our Disclosure Committee, have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 31, 2007. We perform this evaluation on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures can be reported in our annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of July 31, 2007.
We believe our financial statements fairly present in all material respects our financial position, results of operations and cash in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
26
Table of Contents
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
We are not currently involved in legal proceedings requiring disclosure under this item.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended April 30, 2007.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
(a) | Not applicable |
(b) | Not applicable |
(c) | The following table summarizes repurchases of our stock in the three months ended July 31, 2007: |
Fiscal Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid Per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs* | |||||
May 1, 2007 through May 31, 2007 | 0 | $ | 0.00 | 0 | 1,752,768 | ||||
June 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007 | 0 | $ | 0.00 | 0 | 1,752,768 | ||||
July 1, 2007 through July 31, 2007 | 0 | $ | 0.00 | 0 | 1,752,768 | ||||
Total Fiscal 2008 First Quarter | 0 | $ | 0.00 | 0 | 1,752,768 | ||||
* | Our Board of Directors approved the above share purchase authority on August 19, 2002, when the Board approved a resolution authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 2.0 million shares of Class A common stock. This action was announced on August 22, 2002. The authorization has no expiration date. |
27
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes repurchases of stock made by our Logility subsidiary in the three months ended July 31, 2007:
Fiscal Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid Per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs* | |||||
May 1, 2007 through May 31, 2007 | 30,000 | $ | 11.26 | 30,000 | 223,896 | ||||
June 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007 | 0 | $ | 0.00 | 0 | 223,896 | ||||
July 1, 2007 through July 31, 2007 | 0 | $ | 0.00 | 0 | 223,896 | ||||
Total Fiscal 2008 First Quarter | 30,000 | $ | 0.00 | 30,000 | 223,896 | ||||
* | The Logility Board of Directors approved the above share purchase authority in December 1997, November 1998 and in February 2003, when the Logility Board approved resolutions authorizing Logility to repurchase an aggregate of up to 1.6 million shares of common stock. These actions were announced in November 1998 and on February 19, 2003, respectively. The authorizations have no expiration dates. |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
Not applicable.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
Item 5. | Other Information |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit 10.1 | Logility, Inc’s 2007 Stock Plan dated August 21, 2007 | |
Exhibit 10.2 | Notice of Election to Extend Term of Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Logility, Inc. dated July 17, 2007. | |
Exhibits 31.1-31.2. | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications | |
Exhibit 32.1. | Section 906 Certifications |
28
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. | ||||||||
Date: September 10, 2007 | By: | /s/ James C. Edenfield | ||||||
James C. Edenfield | ||||||||
President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer | ||||||||
Date: September 10, 2007 | By: | /s/ Vincent C. Klinges | ||||||
Vincent C. Klinges | ||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||
Date: September 10, 2007 | By: | /s/ Herman L. Moncrief | ||||||
Herman L. Moncrief | ||||||||
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |
29