UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission file number 1-9341
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 02-0377419 |
(State or other jurisdiction | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
of incorporation or organization) | | |
4 Townsend West, Suite 17, Nashua, NH | | 03063 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. YES xNO o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES xNO o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES o NO x.
As of the close of business on November 2, 2005 there were 36,766,270 shares outstanding of the issuer's Common Stock, $.01 par value.
iCAD, INC.
| | PAGE |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3 |
| | |
| | 4 |
| | |
| | 5 |
| | |
| | 6-9 |
| | |
| | 10-15 |
| | |
| | 15 |
| | |
| | 15 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 15 |
| | |
| | 16 |
| | |
| | 17 |
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | |
Assets | | (unaudited) | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 6,475,972 | | $ | 8,008,163 | |
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $548,000 in 2005 and $450,000 in 2004 | | | 2,724,205 | | | 5,006,333 | |
Inventory | | | 2,412,676 | | | 1,013,806 | |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | 375,430 | | | 261,286 | |
Total current assets | | | 11,988,283 | | | 14,289,588 | |
| | | | | | | |
Property and equipment: | | | | | | | |
Equipment | | | 2,714,027 | | | 2,078,306 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 113,662 | | | 37,904 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 149,802 | | | 135,544 | |
| | | 2,977,491 | | | 2,251,754 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | 1,347,284 | | | 944,121 | |
Net property and equipment | | | 1,630,207 | | | 1,307,633 | |
| | | | | | | |
Other assets: | | | | | | | |
Patents, net of accumulated amortization | | | 244,050 | | | 302,644 | |
Technology intangibles, net of accumulated amortization | | | 4,502,028 | | | 4,964,090 | |
Tradename, distribution agreements and other,net of accumulated amortization | | | 488,267 | | | 756,867 | |
Goodwill | | | 43,515,285 | | | 43,515,285 | |
Total other assets | | | 48,749,630 | | | 49,538,886 | |
Total assets | | $ | 62,368,120 | | $ | 65,136,107 | |
| | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 2,927,767 | | $ | 2,006,500 | |
Accrued interest | | | 54,072 | | | 671,154 | |
Accrued salaries and other expenses | | | 2,131,195 | | | 1,373,191 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 316,300 | | | 439,717 | |
Current maturities of note payable | | | 1,500,000 | | | 1,500,000 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 6,929,334 | | | 5,990,562 | |
| | | | | | | |
Convertible loan payable to related party | | | 300,000 | | | 300,000 | |
Note payable, less current maturities | | | 750,000 | | | 1,875,000 | |
Total liabilities | | | 7,979,334 | | | 8,165,562 | |
| | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | |
Convertible preferred stock, $ .01 par value: authorized 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 6,374 in 2005 and 7,435 in 2004, with an aggregate liquidation value of $1,127,000 and $1,257,500 plus 7% annual dividend, in 2005 and 2004, respectively. | | | 64 | | | 74 | |
Common stock, $ .01 par value: authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued 36,834,146 in 2005 and 36,410,170 shares in 2004; outstanding 36,766,270 in 2005 and 36,342,294 shares in 2004 | | | 368,341 | | | 364,101 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 130,690,090 | | | 130,271,515 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (75,719,445 | ) | | (72,714,881 | ) |
Treasury stock at cost (67,876 common shares in 2005 and 2004) | | | (950,264 | ) | | (950,264 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 54,388,786 | | | 56,970,545 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 62,368,120 | | $ | 65,136,107 | |
| | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | Nine Months | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 3,393,804 | | $ | 5,977,048 | | $ | 13,632,515 | | $ | 17,040,515 | |
Cost of sales | | | 926,042 | | | 1,617,788 | | | 3,214,979 | | | 5,108,481 | |
Gross margin | | | 2,467,762 | | | 4,359,260 | | | 10,417,536 | | | 11,932,034 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Engineering and product development | | | 1,406,486 | | | 1,072,636 | | | 3,407,942 | | | 3,869,033 | |
General and administrative | | | 1,841,110 | | | 1,252,077 | | | 4,516,470 | | | 3,796,245 | |
Marketing and sales | | | 1,741,036 | | | 1,529,995 | | | 5,338,476 | | | 5,302,534 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 4,988,632 | | | 3,854,708 | | | 13,262,888 | | | 12,967,812 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | (2,520,870 | ) | | 504,552 | | | (2,845,352 | ) | | (1,035,778 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense - net | | | 6,961 | | | 138,503 | | | 54,212 | | | 451,116 | |
Net income (loss) before provision for income taxes | | | (2,527,831 | ) | | 366,049 | | | (2,899,564 | ) | | (1,486,894 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for income taxes | | | 35,000 | | | – | | | 105,000 | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (2,562,831 | ) | $ | 366,049 | | $ | (3,004,564 | ) | $ | (1,486,894 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred dividend | | | 31,109 | | | 30,697 | | | 92,312 | | | 100,858 | |
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders | | $ | (2,593,940 | ) | $ | 335,352 | | $ | (3,096,876 | ) | $ | (1,587,752 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.01 | | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.01 | | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares used in computing income (loss) per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 36,737,096 | | | 34,056,589 | | | 36,580,641 | | | 33,879,913 | |
Diluted | | | 36,737,096 | | | 37,992,937 | | | 36,580,641 | | | 33,879,913 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months | | Nine Months | |
| | September 30, 2005 | | September 30, 2004 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (3,004,564 | ) | $ | (1,486,894 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 403,163 | | | 202,770 | |
Amortization | | | 789,256 | �� | | 767,443 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | – | | | 21,110 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 2,282,128 | | | (1,419,789 | ) |
Inventory | | | (1,398,870 | ) | | 1,122,149 | |
Other current assets | | | (114,144 | ) | | 28,498 | |
Accounts payable | | | 921,267 | | | (1,796,555 | ) |
Accrued interest | | | (617,082 | ) | | 275,016 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 665,692 | | | (535,744 | ) |
Deferred revenue | | | (123,417 | ) | | 187,704 | |
Total adjustments | | | 2,807,993 | | | (1,147,398 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net cash used for operating activities | | | (196,571 | ) | | (2,634,292 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | |
Additions to patents, software development and other | | | | | | (1,446 | ) |
Additions to property and equipment | | | (725,737 | ) | | (184,058 | ) |
Additional acquisition costs of CADx | | | | | | (47,979 | ) |
Net cash used for investing activities | | | (725,737 | ) | | (233,483 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock for cash | | | 515,117 | | | 1,060,499 | |
Payment of note payable | | | (1,125,000 | ) | | (858,390 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | | | (609,883 | ) | | 202,109 | |
| | | | | | | |
Decrease in cash and equivalents | | | (1,532,191 | ) | | (2,665,666 | ) |
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period | | | 8,008,163 | | | 5,101,051 | |
Cash and equivalents, end of period | | $ | 6,475,972 | | $ | 2,435,385 | |
| | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 760,022 | | $ | 134,114 | |
| | | | | | | |
Non-cash items from investing and financing activities: | | | | | | | |
Accrued dividends on convertible preferred stock | | $ | 92,312 | | $ | 100,858 | |
| | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. | | | | | | | |
iCAD, INC.
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2005
In the opinion of management all adjustments and accruals (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments), which are necessary for a fair presentation of operating results are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Reference should be made to iCAD, Inc.'s (“iCAD” or “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a summary of significant accounting policies. Interim period amounts are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full fiscal year.
(2) | Loan Payable to Related Party |
The Company has a Revolving Loan and Security Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") with Mr. Robert Howard, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, under which Mr. Howard has agreed to advance funds, or to provide guarantees of advances made by third parties in an amount up to $5,000,000. The Loan Agreement expires January 4, 2006, subject to extension by the parties, with an agreement from Mr. Howard that he will not call in the principal balance of the note until January 5, 2007. Accordingly, the outstanding borrowings related to the loan payable have been classified as a long term liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005. Outstanding advances are collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company and bear interest at prime interest rate (6.75% at September 30, 2005) plus 2% with a minimum of 8%. Mr. Howard is entitled to convert outstanding advances made by him under the Loan Agreement into shares of the Company's common stock at any time based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock at the lesser of the market price at the time each advance is made or at the time of conversion. At September 30, 2005, $300,000 was outstanding under the Loan Agreement and $4,700,000 was available for future borrowings.
(3) | Acquisition of Qualia Computing, Inc. |
On December 31, 2003, the Company completed the acquisition of Qualia Computing, Inc., a privately held company based in Beavercreek, Ohio, and its subsidiaries, including CADx Systems, Inc. (together “CADx”), bringing together two of the three companies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market computer aided detection of breast cancer solutions in the United States. To complete the acquisition, iCAD issued 4,300,000 shares of its common stock, representing approximately 13% of the outstanding shares of iCAD common stock after the merger. The value of the Company’s common stock issued was based upon a per share value of $5.70, equal to the closing price on November 28, 2003, the day the acquisition was announced. Additionally, iCAD paid $1,550,000 in cash and executed a 36-month secured promissory note at a 6.25% interest rate in the amount of $4,500,000 to purchase Qualia shares that were owned by two institutional investors. At September 30, 2005, $2,250,000 was outstanding under the secured promissory note.
iCAD, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2005
(4) | Stock-Based Compensation |
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock option plans. Under APB Opinion No. 25, when the number of shares and exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options are fixed and the exercise price equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation cost is recognized provided vesting is based solely on the passage of time.
The Company provides proforma disclosures of compensation expense under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure”. The Company estimates the fair value of each grant of options at the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2005: no dividends paid; expected volatility of 78.0%; risk-free interest rate of 3.69%, 3.91%, 4.18% and 4.03% and expected lives of 2 to 4 years. The weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2004 were: no dividends paid; expected volatility of 78.8%; risk-free interest rate of 3.03%, 3.10%, 3.72%, 3.26% and 2.89% and expected lives of 3 and 4 years.
Had compensation cost for the Company’s option plans been determined using the fair value method at the grant dates, the effect on the Company’s net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 would have been as follows:
| | Three Months | | Nine Months | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders as reported | | $ | (2,593,940 | ) | $ | 335,352 | | $ | (3,096,876 | ) | $ | (1,587,752 | ) |
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effect | | | (408,859 | | | (146,360 | ) | $ | (1,237,982 | ) | | (331,133 | ) |
Pro forma net income (loss) available to common stockholders | | $ | (3,002,799 | ) | $ | 188,992 | | $ | (4,334,858 | ) | $ | (1,918,885 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | (.07 | ) | $ | .01 | | $ | (.08 | ) | $ | (.05) | |
Pro forma basic | | $ | (.08 | ) | $ | .01 | | $ | (.12 | ) | $ | (.06) | |
Pro forma diluted | | $ | (.08 | ) | $ | .00 | | $ | (.12 | ) | $ | (.06) | |
iCAD, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2005
(5) | New Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which replaces SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values beginning with the first interim or annual period after June 15, 2005. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) postponed the effective date of SFAS 123R until the issuers first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. Under the current rules, the Company will be required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
Under SFAS 123R, pro forma disclosures previously permitted will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. The Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments to employees, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The transition methods include modified prospective and retrospective adoption options. Additionally, SFAS 123R clarifies the timing for recognizing compensation expense for awards subject to acceleration of vesting on retirement and also specifies the treatment of excess tax benefits associated with stock compensation.
In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) regarding the SEC's interpretation of SFAS 123R and the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R and SAB 107 and expects that the adoption of SFAS 123R may have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations and earnings per share.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (SFAS 154) which replaces APB Opinions No. 20 Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28. SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS 154 will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition, but does not expect it will have a material impact.
iCAD, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2005
On April 18, 2005, the Company received a letter from R2 Technology, Inc. (“R2”), the Company’s principal competitor, advising the Company of R2’s position that iCAD’s Second Look® product lines allegedly infringed on US Patents 6,266,435, 6,477,262 and 6,574,357, which are licensed to R2. These patents are continuations in part of the patents already licensed to iCAD by R2 under a September 2003 Settlement Agreement that resolved certain patent infringement litigation between iCAD and R2 (the “Settlement Agreement”). Under the Settlement Agreement, the rights of R2 to assert subsequent claims of infringement of this nature against iCAD are limited, and require reasonably detailed notice, the opportunity for negotiation and binding arbitration as a required alternative to litigation. A three member arbitration panel was named and the Company's patent dispute with R2 proceeded to a hearing before the panel on October 18 and 19, 2005. Post-trial briefing is due in January 2006 with a decision from the arbitrators expected in February 2006. While the Company remains confident that it does not infringe on any valid and enforceable R2 patent, and that R2 has infringed one or more of the Company's patents, the outcome of the arbitration can not be assured, and a negative finding by the arbitrators could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s business.
The Company performs their annual impairment test for goodwill in the fourth quarter of their fiscal year. The Company does not expect that an impairment loss will result from the annual impairment test, but there can be no assurance until the test is performed.
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:
Certain information included in this Item 2 and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts contain forward looking statements that involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievement expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, uncertainty of future sales levels, protection of patents and other proprietary rights, the impact of supply and manufacturing constraints or difficulties, product market acceptance, possible technological obsolescence of products, increased competition, litigation and/or government regulation, changes in Medicare reimbursement policies, competitive factors, the effects of a decline in the economy in markets served by the Company and other risks detailed in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The words “believe”, “demonstrate”, “intend”, “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “likely”, “seek”, “should” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on those forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.
Results of Operations
Overview
iCAD develops computer aided detection (CAD) products for the early detection of breast cancer and other healthcare related applications. The Company’s Second Look ® products for early detection of breast cancer are currently available for use with film based and digital mammography practices. Early detection of breast cancer can save lives and often permits less costly, less invasive and less disfiguring cancer treatment options than when the cancer is detected at a later stage.
iCAD is the only independent, integrated digitizer hardware and CAD software company offering computer aided detection solutions for the detection of breast cancer. As such, the Company believes it is able to reduce costs at each step in the CAD product design, production and assembly process. The Company believes that its vertical integration of CAD and hardware development results in better integration of software and film digitizer components, lower production costs and reduced administrative overhead. These factors have allowed iCAD to enhance its CAD product line, while reducing the costs of the Company’s CAD products to many customers and allowing more women to realize the benefits inherent in the early detection of breast cancer.
The Company’s CAD systems include proprietary software technology together with standard computer and display equipment. CAD systems for the film-based mammography market also include a radiographic film digitizer manufactured by the Company that utilizes the Company’s proprietary technology and offers what the Company believes is superior performance for the digitization of film based medical images. The Company’s headquarters are located in southern New Hampshire, with contract manufacturing facilities in New Hampshire and Connecticut.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s critical accounting policies are set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
Quarter Ended September 30, 2005 compared to Quarter Ended September 30, 2004 and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
Sales. Sales of the Company’s CAD and medical imaging products for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 were $3,393,804 and $13,632,515, respectively, compared with sales of CAD and medical imaging products for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 of $5,977,048 and $17,040,515, respectively. The Company’s orders and shipments in the first two months of the third quarter 2005 were at record levels. The Company reported in its second quarter financial report that it had already secured orders for seven SecondLook 700 systems in the third quarter of 2005, which exceeded the total number of SecondLook 700 systems sold in the second quarter of 2005. In mid-September, however, a major clinical study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, comparing the benefits of film-based and digital mammography. The study results revealed, among other findings, that digital mammography showed superior performance in detecting cancers in dense breasts and for younger women. The Company believes that the release of this study delayed capital budgeting and purchasing decisions for enough film-based clinics in the final stages of CAD acquisition to adversely impact its September 2005 and its third quarter 2005 sales because prospects planning the purchase of a film-based CAD solution delayed their purchase to review digital mammography options. This delay in purchasing along with the price competition experienced in the second quarter of 2005, adversely impacted the Company’s results for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Total sales during the month of October 2005 are higher than sales previously recorded by the Company for the first month of a quarter. The Company considers this to be a positive indicator that results in September reflected a pause, rather than a change, in the market for its film-based CAD solutions.
The Company believes that sales for the fourth quarter of 2005 will increase over the third quarter of 2005, as a result of recent actions taken by the Company to improve sales and marketing capabilities as well as the release of certain new products, including an updated SecondLook 700. Additionally, in response to the Digital Mammography Study released in September 2005 the Company instituted its “Gateway to Digital” program, which bundles the Second Look 300 with a Total Look upgrade. The Company currently intends to offer a similar bundle, incorporating TotalLook with Second Look Digital CAD which the Company believes will be an attractive offering to digital mammography buyers.
The table below presents the number of units and sales attributable to different product and service types, in 2004 and first, second and third quarters of 2005:
Product Type | | 2004 | | 2005 Q1 | | 2005 Q2 | | 2005 Q3 | |
Units | | | | | | | | | |
Digital Servers | | | 149 | | | 33 | | | 30 | | | 28 | |
Additional Device System Licenses | | | 50 | | | 14 | | | 16 | | | 15 | |
Total Digital | | | 199 | | | 47 | | | 46 | | | 43 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SL700 /500 /400 /402 | | | 139 | | | 25 | | | 5 | | | 8 | |
SL300/200 | | | 106 | | | 33 | | | 45 | | | 25 | |
ClickCAD | | | 21 | | | 18 | | | 15 | | | 6 | |
ClickCAD Prodedure Keys | | | 1 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Excludes Radiologists review stations and medical digitizers. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Digital Servers | | | 5,630,652 | | | 1,140,350 | | | 944,700 | | | 908,072 | |
Additional Device System Licenses | | | 815,400 | | | 217,250 | | | 257,900 | | | 239,300 | |
Total Digital | | | 6,446,052 | | | 1,357,600 | | | 1,202,600 | | | 1,147,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SL700 /500 /400 /402 | | | 10,633,282 | | | 2,054,985 | | | 439,400 | | | 379,885 | |
SL300/200 | | | 3,209,380 | | | 1,523,785 | | | 1,756,290 | | | 1,144,685 | |
ClickCAD | | | 98,250 | | | 111,200 | | | 101,650 | | | 85,000 | |
Viewers / Options | | | 518,484 | | | 333,362 | | | 209,615 | | | 83,480 | |
Total Analog | | | 14,459,396 | | | 4,023,332 | | | 2,506,955 | | | 1,693,050 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Digitizers | | | 1,069,763 | | | 158,652 | | | 162,144 | | | 139,098 | |
Supplies & Services | | | 1,333,251 | | | 468,023 | | | 359,405 | | | 414,284 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Sales | | $ | 23,308,462 | | $ | 6,007,607 | | $ | 4,231,104 | | $ | 3,393,804 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross Margin. Gross margin was 73% of sales for both the three month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. Gross margin increased in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 to 76% compared to 70% in the same period in 2004. The increase in gross margin for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 was due primarily to the increase in sales of the Company’s SecondLook 700 product. The Company’s SecondLook 700 product, which replaced previous SecondLook 500, 400 and 402 products in the Company’s product line, was engineered to reduce overall costs of goods and achieve higher gross margins on product sales. Moreover, the Company’s digital SecondLook 200 and SecondLook 300 product lines all reflect individual product gross margins in excess of aggregate gross margins reported in the nine month period of 2004.
Engineering and Product Development. Engineering and product development costs for the three month period ended September 30, 2005 increased by $333,850, from $1,072,636 in 2004 to $1,406,486 in 2005. The increase in engineering and product development costs was primarily related to hardware engineering associated with completion of new products which have been or will be announced soon, software engineering related to pending improved releases of the Company’s breast cancer detection algorithms, and the expansion of the Company’s efforts in product development for computed tomographic applications, especially early detection of colonic polyps.
Engineering and product development costs for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 decreased by $461,091 or 12%, from $3,869,033 in 2004 to $3,407,942 in 2005. The decrease primarily results from the action taken by the Company in the first quarter of 2004, following its merger with CADx, to reduce its workforce and close its office and software development group located in Tampa, Florida. In connection with these measures, the Company incurred approximately $280,000 in engineering severance benefits and office closure expenses in the nine month period ended September 30, 2004.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 increased by $589,033 and $720,225, respectively, from $1,252,077 and $3,796,245, respectively, in 2004 to $1,841,110 and $4,516,470, respectively, in 2005. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to the increase in legal expense, totaling approximately $574,000, principally associated with the Company’s current patent arbitration proceeding.
Marketing and Sales Expenses. Marketing and sales expenses in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 increased by $211,041 and $35,942, respectively, from $1,529,995 and $5,302,534, respectively, in 2004 to $1,741,036 and $5,338,476, respectively, in 2005. The increase in marketing and sales expenses primarily results from the increase in sales force and related travel expenses during the third quarter of 2005. In addition, the Company increased its advertising and promotional costs in 2005. The Company anticipates that marketing and sales expenses will remain relatively constant as a percentage of sales for the remainder of 2005.
Interest Expense. Net interest expense for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 decreased from $138,503 and $451,116, respectively, in 2004 to $6,961 and $54,212, respectively, in 2005. The decrease in net interest expense during 2005 is primarily due to the repayment of $3,330,000, in December 2004, that the Company had previously borrowed from its Chairman, Mr. Howard, pursuant to the Loan Agreement and the increase in interest income earned on its cash balance.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 consists of state income taxes based upon the estimated effective income tax rate for the full fiscal year. The Company did not have a provision for income taxes in the corresponding prior year periods.
Net Income (Loss). As a result of the foregoing, the Company recorded a net loss of ($2,562,831) or ($0.07) per share for the three month period ended September 30, 2005 on sales of $3,393,804, compared to net income of $366,049 or $0.01 per share from the same period in 2004 on sales of $5,977,048. The loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was ($3,004,564) or ($0.08) per share on sales of $13,632,515, compared with a net loss of ($1,486,894) or ($0.05) per share on sales of $17,040,515 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company believes that its current liquidity and capital resources are sufficient to support and sustain operations through at least the next 12 months, primarily due to continuing operations and the net proceeds of approximately $8,325,000 from a private placement of its securities to accredited investors that was completed in December 2004. The Company's ability to generate cash adequate to meet its future capital requirements beyond the next 12 months will depend primarily on operating cash flow. In addition, the Company has a $5,000,000 credit line under the Loan Agreement with its Chairman, Mr. Robert Howard, of which $4,700,000 was available at September 30, 2005.
At September 30, 2005 the Company had current assets of $11,988,283, current liabilities of $6,929,334 and working capital of $5,058,949. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 1.7:1
Net cash used for operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $196,571, compared to $2,634,292 for the same period in 2004. The cash used for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 resulted from the net loss of $3,004,564, increases in inventory of $1,398,870 and other current assets of $114,144, a decrease in deferred revenue of $123,417 and the payment of accrued interest of approximately $617,000 owed to Mr. Howard pursuant to the Loan Agreement, offset by the decrease in accounts receivable of $2,282,128 and increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses totaling $1,586,959, plus non-cash depreciation and amortization of $1,192,419.
The net cash used for investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $725,737 compared to $233,483 for the same period in 2004. The cash used in investing activities included the addition of $725,737 for tooling, computer equipment, and leasehold improvements.
Net cash used for financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $609,883 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $202,109 for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash used for financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was primarily due to the payment of the note payable in the amount of $1,125,000, offset by cash received due to the issuance of common stock relating to exercise of stock options in the amount of $515,117.
Intellectual Property
On April 18, 2005, the Company received a letter from R2 Technology, Inc. (“R2”), the Company’s principal competitor, advising the Company of R2’s position that iCAD’s Second Look® product lines allegedly infringed on US Patents 6,266,435, 6,477,262 and 6,574,357, which are licensed to R2. These patents are continuations in part of the patents already licensed to iCAD by R2 under a September 2003 Settlement Agreement that resolved certain patent infringement litigation between iCAD and R2 (the “Settlement Agreement”). Under the Settlement Agreement, the rights of R2 to assert subsequent claims of infringement of this nature against iCAD are limited, and require reasonably detailed notice, the opportunity for negotiation and binding arbitration as a required alternative
to litigation. A three member arbitration panel was named and the Company's patent dispute with R2 proceeded to a hearing before the panel on October 18 and 19, 2005. Post-trial briefing is due in January 2006 with a decision from the arbitrators expected in February 2006. While the Company remains confident that it does not infringe any valid R2 patent, and that R2 has infringed one or more of the Company's patents, the outcome of the arbitration can not be assured, and a negative finding by the arbitrators could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s business.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Not applicable.
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in reaching a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer conducted an evaluation of the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) to determine whether any changes in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2005, that have materially affected or which are reasonably likely to materially affect internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during such period.
See Part 1, Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Intellectual Property for a description of pending arbitration between the Company and R2.
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | |
11. | | Earnings Per Share Calculation |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| iCAD, INC. |
| | |
Date: November 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ W. Scott Parr |
|
|
| W. Scott Parr President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
| | |
Date: November 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ Annette L. Heroux |
|
|
| Annette L. Heroux Chief Financial Officer |