UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended July 3, 2009.
OR
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number (0-21767)
ViaSat, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | 33-0174996 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
6155 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, California 92009
(760) 476-2200
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value, as of August 6, 2009 was 31,610,466.
VIASAT, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of | | | As of | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | April 3, 2009 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | |
| | (In thousands) | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 104,272 | | | $ | 63,491 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 183,832 | | | | 164,106 | |
Inventories | | | 67,646 | | | | 65,562 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 26,724 | | | | 26,724 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 19,194 | | | | 18,941 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 401,668 | | | | 338,824 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property, equipment and satellite, net | | | 187,207 | | | | 170,225 | |
Other acquired intangible assets, net | | | 15,150 | | | | 16,655 | |
Goodwill | | | 65,429 | | | | 65,429 | |
Other assets | | | 33,781 | | | | 31,809 | |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 703,235 | | | $ | 622,942 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 51,198 | | | $ | 63,397 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 65,335 | | | | 72,037 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 116,533 | | | | 135,434 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Line of credit | | | 80,000 | | | | — | |
Other liabilities | | | 24,722 | | | | 24,718 | |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 221,255 | | | | 160,152 | |
| | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
ViaSat, Inc. stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock | | | 3 | | | | 3 | |
Paid-in capital | | | 284,953 | | | | 273,102 | |
Retained earnings | | | 195,740 | | | | 187,471 | |
Common stock held in treasury | | | (2,973 | ) | | | (1,701 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 192 | | | | (127 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total ViaSat, Inc. stockholders’ equity | | | 477,915 | | | | 458,748 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary | | | 4,065 | | | | 4,042 | |
| | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 481,980 | | | | 462,790 | |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 703,235 | | | $ | 622,942 | |
| | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | July 3,2009 | | | June 27,2008 | |
| | (In thousands, except per share | |
| | data) | |
Revenues | | $ | 158,408 | | | $ | 152,961 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | | 111,713 | | | | 108,020 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 26,916 | | | | 23,604 | |
Independent research and development | | | 7,003 | | | | 9,840 | |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | | | 1,505 | | | | 2,340 | |
| | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 11,271 | | | | 9,157 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 97 | | | | 731 | |
Interest expense | | | (179 | ) | | | (115 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 11,189 | | | | 9,773 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Provision for income taxes | | | 2,897 | | | | 3,403 | |
| | | | | | |
Net income | | | 8,292 | | | | 6,370 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest, net of tax | | | 23 | | | | 79 | |
| | | | | | |
Net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. | | $ | 8,269 | | | $ | 6,291 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic net income per share attributable to ViaSat, Inc. common stockholders | | $ | .27 | | | $ | .21 | |
Diluted net income per share attributable to ViaSat, Inc. common stockholders | | $ | .25 | | | $ | .20 | |
Shares used in computing basic net income per share | | | 31,198 | | | | 30,515 | |
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share | | | 32,683 | | | | 31,595 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | July 3,2009 | | | June 27,2008 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 8,292 | | | $ | 6,370 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 4,913 | | | | 4,376 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 1,513 | | | | 2,966 | |
Stock compensation expense | | | 2,562 | | | | 2,189 | |
Other non-cash adjustments | | | (129 | ) | | | 1,107 | |
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | (19,545 | ) | | | 3,139 | |
Inventories | | | (2,048 | ) | | | 2,524 | |
Other assets | | | 2,496 | | | | 3,019 | |
Accounts payable | | | (1,569 | ) | | | (9,986 | ) |
Accrued liabilities | | | (1,658 | ) | | | (16,375 | ) |
Other liabilities | | | 4 | | | | 1,034 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | | (5,169 | ) | | | 363 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property, equipment and satellite | | | (31,734 | ) | | | (12,301 | ) |
Cash paid for patents, licenses and other assets | | | (3,007 | ) | | | (727 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (34,741 | ) | | | (13,028 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from line of credit | | | 80,000 | | | | — | |
Payment of debt issuance costs | | | (2,339 | ) | | | — | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | 3,651 | | | | 1,345 | |
Purchase of common stock in treasury | | | (1,272 | ) | | | — | |
Payment on secured borrowing | | | — | | | | (4,720 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of stock of majority-owned subsidiary | | | — | | | | 1,500 | |
Incremental tax benefits from stock-based compensation | | | 400 | | | | 174 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 80,440 | | | | (1,701 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 251 | | | | 55 | |
| | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 40,781 | | | | (14,311 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 63,491 | | | | 125,176 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 104,272 | | | $ | 110,865 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of stock in satisfaction of certain accrued employee compensation liabilities | | | 5,090 | | | | — | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ViaSat, Inc. Stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Common Stock | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Common Stock | | | | | | | in Treasury | | | Other | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of | | | | | | | Paid-in | | | Retained | | | Number of | | | | | | | Comprehensive | | | Noncontrolling | | | | | | | Comprehensive | |
| | Shares Issued | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Earnings | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Income (Loss) | | | Interest | | | Total | | | Income | |
Balance at April 3, 2009 | | | 31,114,086 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 273,102 | | | $ | 187,471 | | | | (66,968 | ) | | $ | (1,701 | ) | | $ | (127 | ) | | $ | 4,042 | | | $ | 462,790 | | | | | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 180,104 | | | | — | | | | 1,917 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,917 | | | | | |
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options and release of restricted stock unit (RSU) awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | 548 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 548 | | | | | |
Issuance of stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | | 85,203 | | | | — | | | | 1,734 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,734 | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,562 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,562 | | | | | |
Shares issued in settlement of certain accrued employee compensation liabilities | | | 192,894 | | | | — | | | | 5,090 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,090 | | | | | |
RSU awards vesting | | | 135,704 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Purchase of treasury shares pursuant to vesting of certain RSU agreements | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (53,085 | ) | | | (1,272 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,272 | ) | | | | |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,269 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 23 | | | | 8,292 | | | $ | 8,292 | |
Foreign currency translation, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 319 | | | | — | | | | 319 | | | | 319 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 8,611 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at July 3, 2009 | | | 31,707,991 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 284,953 | | | $ | 195,740 | | | | (120,053 | ) | | $ | (2,973 | ) | | $ | 192 | | | $ | 4,065 | | | $ | 481,980 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
6
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 — Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at July 3, 2009, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008 and the condensed consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income for the three months ended July 3, 2009 have been prepared by the management of ViaSat, Inc. (the Company), and have not been audited. These financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009 and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. (TrellisWare), a majority-owned subsidiary of ViaSat. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.
The Company’s fiscal year is the 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to March 31 of the specified year. For example, references to fiscal year 2010 refer to the fiscal year ending on April 2, 2010. The Company’s quarters for fiscal year 2010 end on July 3, 2009, October 2, 2009, January 1, 2010 and April 2, 2010. This results in a 53 week fiscal year approximately every four to five years. Fiscal year 2010 is a 52 week year, compared with a 53 week year in fiscal year 2009. As a result of the shift in the fiscal calendar, the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 included an additional week. The Company does not believe that the extra week results in any material impact on its financial results.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates have been prepared on the basis of the most current and best available information and actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates made by management include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, self-insurance reserves, allowance for doubtful accounts, warranty accrual, valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, patents, orbital slots and orbital licenses, software development, property, equipment and satellite, long-lived assets, income taxes and valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.
On April 4, 2009, the beginning of the Company’s first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company adopted the provisions and disclosure requirements of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160 (SFAS 160), “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51.” The Company adopted SFAS 160 on a prospective basis, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which were applied retrospectively for all periods presented. As a result, the Company reclassified to noncontrolling interest, a component of stockholders’ equity which was previously reported as minority interest in consolidated subsidiary in the mezzanine section of the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets and reported as a separate caption within the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations, net income including noncontrolling interest, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest, and net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. In addition, the Company utilized net income including noncontrolling interest as the starting point on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows in order to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities, rather than beginning with net income, which was previously exclusive of the noncontrolling interest. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported consolidated income from operations, net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. or net cash (used in) provided by operating activities. Also, net income per share continues to be based on net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on August 11, 2009.
7
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Property, equipment and satellite
Equipment, computers and software, furniture and fixtures and the Company’s satellite under construction are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The Company generally computes depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from two to eleven years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the life of the improvement. Additions to property, equipment and satellite, together with major renewals and betterments, are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals and betterments are charged to expense. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized.
Satellite construction costs, including launch services and insurance, are generally procured under long-term contracts that provide for payments over the contract periods and are capitalized as incurred.
Patents, orbital slots and orbital licenses
The Company capitalizes the costs of obtaining or acquiring patents, orbital slots and orbital licenses. Amortization of intangible assets that have finite lives is provided for by the straight-line method over the shorter of the legal or estimated economic life. The Company capitalized $2.1 million and $1.8 million of costs related to patents which are included in other assets as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively. Accumulated amortization related to these patents was $0.2 million as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009. Amortization expense related to these patents was less than $0.1 million for each of the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008. The Company also capitalized $2.8 million and $2.6 million of costs in other assets as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively, related to orbital slots and orbital licenses that have not yet been placed into service. If a patent, orbital slot or orbital license is rejected, abandoned or otherwise invalidated, the unamortized cost is expensed in that period. During the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, the Company did not write off any costs due to abandonment or impairment.
Debt issuance costs
Debt issuance costs are amortized and recognized as interest expense on a straight-line basis over the expected term of the related debt. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company paid and capitalized approximately $2.3 million in additional debt issuance costs related to its amended and restated revolving line of credit agreement. Unamortized debt issuance costs are recorded in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Software development
Costs of developing software for sale are charged to research and development expense when incurred, until technological feasibility has been established. Software development costs incurred from the time technological feasibility is reached until the product is available for general release to customers are capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Once the product is available for general release, the software development costs are amortized based on the ratio of current to future revenue for each product with an annual minimum equal to straight-line amortization over the remaining estimated economic life of the product not to exceed five years. The Company capitalized $0.4 million of costs related to software developed for resale for the three months ended July 3, 2009. The Company capitalized no costs related to software development for resale for the three months ended June 27, 2008. The amortization expense of software development costs was zero and $0.6 million for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively.
Self-insurance liabilities
The Company has a self-insurance plan to retain a portion of the exposure for losses related to employee medical benefits. The Company also has a self-insurance plan for a portion of the exposure for losses related to workers’ compensation costs. The self-insurance policies provide for both specific and aggregate stop-loss limits. The Company utilizes internal actuarial methods, as well as other historical information for the purpose of estimating ultimate costs for a particular policy year. Based on these actuarial methods, along with currently available information and insurance industry statistics, the Company recorded self-insurance liabilities of $1.4 million as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009. The Company’s estimate, which is subject to inherent variability, is based on average claims experience in the Company’s industry and its own experience in terms of frequency and severity of claims, including asserted and unasserted claims incurred but not reported, with no explicit provision for adverse fluctuation from year to year. This variability may lead to ultimate payments being either greater or less than the amounts presented above. Self-insurance liabilities have been classified as current in accordance with the estimated timing of the projected payments.
8
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Secured borrowings
Occasionally, the Company enters into secured borrowing arrangements in connection with customer financing in order to provide additional sources of funding. As of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, the Company had no secured borrowing arrangements. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company paid all obligations related to its secured borrowing, under which the Company pledged a note receivable from a customer to serve as collateral for the obligation under the borrowing arrangement, totaling $4.7 million plus accrued interest.
During fiscal year 2008, due to the customer’s payment default under the note receivable, the Company wrote down the note receivable by approximately $5.3 million related to the principal and interest accrued to date. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company entered into certain agreements with the note receivable insurance carrier providing the Company approximately $1.7 million in cash payments and recorded a current asset of approximately $1.7 million and a long-term asset of approximately $1.5 million as of April 3, 2009. Pursuant to these agreements, as of July 3, 2009 the Company recorded a current asset of approximately $1.8 million and a long-term asset of approximately $1.5 million.
Indemnification provisions
In the ordinary course of business, the Company includes indemnification provisions in certain of its contracts, generally relating to parties with which the Company has commercial relations. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company will indemnify, hold harmless and agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including but not limited to losses relating to third-party intellectual property claims. To date, there have not been any costs incurred in connection with such indemnification clauses. The Company’s insurance policies do not necessarily cover the cost of defending indemnification claims or providing indemnification, so if a claim was filed against the Company by any party the Company has agreed to indemnify, the Company could incur substantial legal costs and damages. A claim would be accrued when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. At July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, no such amounts were accrued.
Noncontrolling interest
A noncontrolling interest, previously referred to as minority interest, represents the equity interest in a subsidiary that is not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to the Company and is reported as equity of the Company, separately from the Company’s controlling interest. Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, net income or loss and other comprehensive income is reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements at the consolidated amounts, which include the amounts attributable to both the controlling and noncontrolling interest.
In April 2008, the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare, issued additional shares of preferred stock in which the Company invested $1.8 million in order to retain a constant ownership interest. As a result of the transaction, TrellisWare also received $1.5 million in cash proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock to its other principal stockholders.
Common stock held in treasury
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and during fiscal year 2009, the Company delivered 135,704 and 94,181 shares of common stock, respectively, based on the vesting terms of certain restricted stock unit agreements. In order for employees to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements related to the delivery of common stock underlying these restricted stock unit agreements, the Company repurchased 53,085 and 33,730 shares of common stock with a total value of $1.3 million and $0.7 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and during fiscal year 2009, respectively. Repurchased shares of common stock of 120,053 and 66,968 were held in treasury as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively.
Derivatives
The Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts from time to time to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency transactions. Gains and losses arising from foreign currency forward and option contracts not designated as hedging instruments are recorded in interest income (expense) as gains (losses) on derivative instruments. Gains and losses arising from the effective portion of foreign currency forward and option contracts that are designated as cash-flow hedging instruments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments until the underlying
9
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
transaction affects the Company’s earnings, at which time they are then recorded in the same income statement line as the underlying transaction.
During the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, the Company did not settle any foreign exchange contracts; therefore, there were no realized gains or losses during the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008 related to derivative instruments. The Company had no foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of July 3, 2009 or April 3, 2009.
Stock-based payments
The Company records compensation expense associated with stock options, restricted stock unit awards and other stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” The Company recognizes these compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The Company recognized $2.6 million and $2.2 million of stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively.
The Company recorded incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised and restricted stock unit awards vesting of $0.4 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively, which are classified as part of cash flows from financing activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Income taxes
Accruals for uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance with the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” Under FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and income tax disclosures.
Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is established for the expected future tax consequences resulting from differences in the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax credit and loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) is the net change during the year in the deferred income tax asset or liability.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations.” The purpose of issuing the statement is to replace current guidance in SFAS 141 to better represent the economic value of a business combination transaction. The changes to be effected with SFAS 141R from the current guidance include, but are not limited to: (1) acquisition costs will be recognized as expenses separately from the acquisition; (2) known contractual contingencies at the time of the acquisition will be considered part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair value; all other contingencies will be part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair value only if it is more likely than not that they meet the definition of a liability; (3) contingent consideration based on the outcome of future events will be recognized and measured at the time of the acquisition; (4) business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisitions) will need to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as non-controlling interests, in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values; and (5) a bargain purchase (defined as a business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any non-controlling interest in the acquiree) will require that excess to be recognized as a gain attributable to the acquirer. SFAS 141R became effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The standard applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after April 4, 2009, except that resolution of certain tax contingencies and adjustments to valuation allowances related to business combinations, which previously were adjusted to goodwill, will be adjusted to income tax expense for all such adjustments after April 4, 2009, regardless of the date of the original business combination. The Company adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 without a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R” (SFAS 167). SFAS 167 amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities and will significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FIN 46R. SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 167 may have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
10
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 2 — Revenue Recognition
A substantial portion of the Company’s revenues are derived from long-term contracts requiring development and delivery of complex equipment built to customer specifications. Sales related to long-term contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting under the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.” Sales and earnings under these contracts are recorded either based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to total estimated costs expected to be incurred related to the contract or as products are shipped under the units-of-delivery method. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full in the period in which losses become probable and estimable. Changes in estimates of profit or loss on contracts are included in earnings on a cumulative basis in the period the estimate is changed. During the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, the Company recorded losses of approximately $1.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, related to loss contracts.
The Company also has contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of products in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), “Revenue Recognition.” In this situation, contracts and customer purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. The Company assesses whether the sales price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment, and assesses collectability based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history.
When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair value in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), “Accounting for Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements,” and recognized when the applicable revenue recognition criteria for each element have been met. The amount of product and service revenue recognized is impacted by the Company’s judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether sufficient objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for those elements. Changes to the elements in an arrangement and the Company’s ability to establish evidence for those elements could affect the timing of the revenue recognition.
In accordance with EITF 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs,” the Company records shipping and handling costs billed to customers as a component of revenues, and shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company for inbound and outbound freight are recorded as a component of cost of revenues.
Collections in excess of revenues represent cash collected from customers in advance of revenue recognition and are recorded as an accrued liability.
Contract costs on United States government contracts, including indirect costs, are subject to audit and negotiations with United States government representatives. These audits have been completed and agreed upon through fiscal year 2002. Contract revenues and accounts receivable are stated at amounts which are expected to be realized upon final settlement.
Note 3 — Fair Value Measurement
Effective March 29, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and establishes a hierarchy that categorizes and prioritizes the sources to be used to estimate fair value. As a basis for categorizing inputs, SFAS 157 establishes the following hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value from market based assumptions to entity specific assumptions:
• | | Level 1 — Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date. |
|
• | | Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
• | | Level 3 — Inputs which reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instruments valuation. |
11
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Effective April 4, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS 157 for its non-financial assets and liabilities that are remeasured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The adoption of SFAS 157 for the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities that are remeasured at fair value on a non-recurring basis did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
The following tables present the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair value at | | | | | | | | | | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash equivalents | | $ | 2,028 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 2,024 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis | | $ | 2,028 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 2,024 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair value at | | | | | | | | | | |
| | April 3, 2009 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash equivalents | | $ | 2,029 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 2,023 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis | | $ | 2,029 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 2,023 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following section describes the valuation methodologies the Company uses to measure financial instruments at fair value:
Cash equivalents— The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Certain money market funds are valued using quoted prices for identical assets in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions (Level 1). The remaining portion of money market funds are valued based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or brokers’ model driven valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be obtained from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets (Level 2).
The Company had no foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009.
Note 4 — Earnings Per Share Attributable to ViaSat, Inc. Common Stockholders
Potential common stock of 1,485,542 and 1,079,375 shares for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively, were included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share attributable to ViaSat, Inc. common stockholders. Antidilutive shares excluded from the calculation were 1,555,114 and 2,704,917 shares for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively. Potential common stock includes options granted of 1,098,593 and 1,014,444, and restricted stock units awarded of 215,262 and 39,146 for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively, under the Company’s equity compensation plan which are included in the earnings per share attributable to ViaSat, Inc. common stockholders calculations using the treasury stock method; 171,687 and 25,785 of common shares for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively, expected to be issued under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan, shares potentially issuable under the amended ViaSat 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan for the Company’s discretionary match which may be settled in common stock or cash at the Company’s election and shares related to other conditions denoted in the Company’s agreements with the predecessor stockholders of certain acquired companies.
12
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 5 — Composition of Certain Balance Sheet Captions
| | | | | | | | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | April 3, 2009 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Accounts receivable, net: | | | | | | | | |
Billed | | $ | 79,054 | | | $ | 76,999 | |
Unbilled | | | 104,932 | | | | 87,469 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (154 | ) | | | (362 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 183,832 | | | $ | 164,106 | |
| | | | | | |
Inventories: | | | | | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 38,320 | | | $ | 33,607 | |
Work in process | | | 14,859 | | | | 14,876 | |
Finished goods | | | 14,467 | | | | 17,079 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 67,646 | | | $ | 65,562 | |
| | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses | | $ | 12,960 | | | $ | 13,521 | |
Other | | | 6,234 | | | | 5,420 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 19,194 | | | $ | 18,941 | |
| | | | | | |
Property, equipment and satellite, net: | | | | | | | | |
Machinery and equipment (estimated useful life 2-5 years) | | $ | 58,976 | | | $ | 56,053 | |
Computer equipment and software (estimated useful life 3 years) | | | 44,304 | | | | 43,591 | |
Furniture and fixtures (estimated useful life 7 years) | | | 9,933 | | | | 9,918 | |
Leasehold improvements (estimated useful life 2-11 years) | | | 17,835 | | | | 17,573 | |
Land | | | 3,124 | | | | 3,124 | |
Satellite under construction | | | 128,233 | | | | 110,588 | |
Construction in progress | | | 5,118 | | | | 5,272 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 267,523 | | | | 246,119 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (80,316 | ) | | | (75,894 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 187,207 | | | $ | 170,225 | |
| | | | | | |
Other acquired intangible assets, net: | | | | | | | | |
Technology | | $ | 44,392 | | | $ | 44,392 | |
Contracts and relationships | | | 18,898 | | | | 18,898 | |
Non-compete agreement | | | 9,076 | | | | 9,076 | |
Other intangibles | | | 9,323 | | | | 9,323 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 81,689 | | | | 81,689 | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | (66,539 | ) | | | (65,034 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 15,150 | | | $ | 16,655 | |
| | | | | | |
Other assets: | | | | | | | | |
Capitalized software costs, net | | $ | 1,058 | | | $ | 672 | |
Patents, orbital slots and other licenses, net | | | 4,648 | | | | 4,144 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 13,752 | | | | 13,771 | |
Other | | | 14,323 | | | | 13,222 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 33,781 | | | $ | 31,809 | |
| | | | | | |
Accrued liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Current portion of warranty reserve | | $ | 6,784 | | | $ | 6,853 | |
Accrued vacation | | | 11,533 | | | | 10,935 | |
Accrued employee compensation | | | 3,789 | | | | 16,768 | |
Collections in excess of revenues | | | 32,659 | | | | 26,811 | |
Other | | | 10,570 | | | | 10,470 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 65,335 | | | $ | 71,837 | |
| | | | | | |
Other liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued warranty | | $ | 4,418 | | | $ | 4,341 | |
Unrecognized tax position liabilities | | | 10,773 | | | | 10,773 | |
Deferred rent, long-term portion | | | 6,210 | | | | 6,191 | |
Other | | | 3,321 | | | | 3,413 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 24,722 | | | $ | 24,718 | |
| | | | | | |
13
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 6 — Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for its goodwill under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The SFAS 142 goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to them. Reporting units within the Company’s government systems and commercial networks segments have goodwill assigned to them. The Company estimates the fair values of the reporting units using discounted cash flows. The cash flow forecasts are adjusted by an appropriate discount rate in order to determine the present value of the cash flows. If the fair value is determined to be less than book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In this process, a fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the reporting unit used in the first step, and is compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying value, if any, represents the amount of goodwill impairment.
The Company will continue to make assessments of impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year or more frequently if specific triggering events occur. In assessing the value of goodwill, the Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the reporting units. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges that would negatively impact operating results.
The other acquired intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of eight months to ten years. The technology intangible asset has several components with estimated useful lives of five to nine years, contracts and relationships intangible asset has several components with estimated useful lives of three to ten years, non-compete agreements have useful lives of three to five years and other amortizable assets have several components with estimated useful lives of eight months to ten years. Amortization expense was $1.5 million and $2.3 million for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively.
Current and expected amortization expense for each of the following periods is as follows:
| | | | |
| | Amortization | |
| | (In thousands) | |
For the three months ended July 3, 2009 | | $ | 1,505 | |
| | | | |
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 | | $ | 4,083 | |
Expected for fiscal year 2011 | | | 4,826 | |
Expected for fiscal year 2012 | | | 3,600 | |
Expected for fiscal year 2013 | | | 1,047 | |
Expected for fiscal year 2014 | | | 646 | |
Thereafter | | | 948 | |
| | | |
| | $ | 15,150 | |
| | | |
Note 7 — Line of Credit
On July 1, 2009, the Company amended and restated its revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility) in the form of the Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement, which increased the Company’s revolving line of credit from $85.0 million to $170.0 million and extended the maturity date of the facility until July 1, 2012. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are permitted up to a maximum amount of $170.0 million, including up to $25.0 million of letters of credit, and bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either (a) the highest of the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, the administrative agent’s prime rate as announced from time to time or the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%, or (b) at the Eurodollar rate plus, in the case of each of (a) and (b), an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of the Company’s debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). At July 3, 2009, the effective interest rate on the Company’s outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 4.59%. The Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets. At July 3, 2009, the Company had $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and $6.0 million outstanding under standby letters of credit, leaving borrowing availability under the Credit Facility of $84.0 million.
The Credit Facility contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. In addition the Credit Facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, the Company’s ability to incur additional debt, sell
14
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
assets, make investments and acquisitions, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments. The Company was in compliance with its financial loan covenants under the Credit Facility as of July 3, 2009.
The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates its carrying amount due to its variable interest rate and the timing of the borrowing.
Note 8 — Product Warranty
The Company provides limited warranties on its products for periods of up to five years. The Company records a liability for its warranty obligations when products are shipped or they are included in long-term construction contracts based upon an estimate of expected warranty costs. Amounts expected to be incurred within twelve months are classified as a current liability. For mature products, the warranty cost estimates are based on historical experience with the particular product. For newer products that do not have a history of warranty costs, the Company bases its estimates on its experience with the technology involved and the type of failures that may occur. It is possible that the Company’s underlying assumptions will not reflect the actual experience and in that case, future adjustments will be made to the recorded warranty obligation. The following table reflects the change in the Company’s warranty accrual during the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008.
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | June 27, 2008 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 11,194 | | | $ | 11,679 | |
Change in liability for warranties issued in period | | | 1,966 | | | | 2,123 | |
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period | | | (1,958 | ) | | | (1,566 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 11,202 | | | $ | 12,236 | |
| | | | | | |
Note 9 — Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property claims, breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax and other matters. Although claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the resolution of its current pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Note 10 — Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate for the three months ended July 3, 2009, was 25.9% compared to the 15.0% annual effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009. The higher rate for the three months ended July 3, 2009 reflects the December 31, 2009 expiration of the federal research and development tax credit. In addition, the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, included fifteen months of the credit as a result of the October 2008, retroactive reinstatement of the previously expired credit from January 1, 2008. The estimated effective tax rate is different from the expected statutory rate due primarily to research and development tax credits and the manufacturing deduction.
For the three months ended July 3, 2009, the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits increased by $0.6 million. In the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $3.5 million as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for previously filed tax returns.
15
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 11 — Segment Information
The Company’s government systems, commercial networks and satellite services segments are primarily distinguished by the type of customer and the related contractual requirements. The more regulated government environment is subject to unique contractual requirements and possesses economic characteristics which differ from the commercial networks and satellite services segments. The Company’s satellite services segment is comprised of its expanding maritime and airborne broadband and enterprise VSAT services and ViaSat-1 satellite-related activities. The Company’s commercial networks segment comprises its former satellite networks and antenna systems segments, except for the satellite services segment. The Company’s reporting segments, comprised of the government systems, commercial networks and satellite services segments, are determined consistently with the way management currently organizes and evaluates financial information internally for making operating decisions and assessing performance.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | June 27, 2008 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | |
Government Systems | | $ | 92,577 | | | $ | 88,645 | |
Commercial Networks | | | 63,330 | | | | 62,948 | |
Satellite Services | | | 2,501 | | | | 1,368 | |
Elimination of intersegment revenues | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 158,408 | | | $ | 152,961 | |
| | | | | | |
Operating profits (losses) | | | | | | | | |
Government Systems | | | 12,143 | | | | 12,097 | |
Commercial Networks | | | 1,335 | | | | 1,477 | |
Satellite Services | | | (707 | ) | | | (2,058 | ) |
Elimination of intersegment operating profits | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Segment operating profit before corporate and amortization | | | 12,771 | | | | 11,516 | |
Corporate | | | 5 | | | | (19 | ) |
Amortization of acquired intangibles | | | (1,505 | ) | | | (2,340 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Income from operations | | $ | 11,271 | | | $ | 9,157 | |
| | | | | | |
Amortization of acquired intangibles by segment for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | June 27, 2008 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Government Systems | | $ | 272 | | | $ | 272 | |
Commercial Networks | | | 1,233 | | | | 2,068 | |
Satellite Services | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Total amortization of acquired intangibles | | $ | 1,505 | | | $ | 2,340 | |
| | | | | | |
Assets identifiable to segments include: accounts receivable, unbilled accounts receivable, inventory, acquired intangible assets and goodwill. Segment assets as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | April 3, 2009 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Segment assets | | | | | | | | |
Government Systems | | $ | 154,414 | | | $ | 145,568 | |
Commercial Networks | | | 175,187 | | | | 164,844 | |
Satellite Services | | | 2,173 | | | | 1,278 | |
| | | | | | |
Total segment assets | | | 331,774 | | | | 311,690 | |
Corporate assets | | | 371,461 | | | | 311,252 | |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 703,235 | | | $ | 622,942 | |
| | | | | | |
16
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Net acquired intangible assets and goodwill included in segment assets as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net acquired intangible | | | | |
| | assets | | | Goodwill | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | April 3, 2009 | | | July 3, 2009 | | | April 3, 2009 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Government Systems | | $ | 2,520 | | | $ | 2,792 | | | $ | 22,161 | | | $ | 22,161 | |
Commercial Networks | | | 12,630 | | | | 13,863 | | | | 43,268 | | | | 43,268 | |
Satellite Services | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 15,150 | | | $ | 16,655 | | | $ | 65,429 | | | $ | 65,429 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue information by geographic area for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | June 27, 2008 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
United States | | $ | 126,042 | | | $ | 128,424 | |
Europe, Middle East and Africa | | | 23,387 | | | | 8,857 | |
Asia, Pacific | | | 6,402 | | | | 9,898 | |
North America other than United States | | | 1,211 | | | | 4,762 | |
Central and Latin America | | | 1,366 | | | | 1,020 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 158,408 | | | $ | 152,961 | |
| | | | | | |
The Company distinguishes revenues from external customers by geographic areas based on customer location.
The net book value of long-lived assets located outside the United States was $0.3 million at July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009.
Note 12 — Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions
Michael Targoff, a director of the Company since February 2003, currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice Chairman of the board of directors of Loral Space & Communications, Inc. (Loral), the parent of Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L), and is also a director of Telesat Holdings Inc., a joint venture company formed by Loral and the Public Sector Pension Investment Board to acquire Telesat Canada in October 2007. John Stenbit, a director of the Company since August 2004, also currently serves on the board of directors of Loral.
Under the satellite construction contract with SS/L, the Company purchased a new broadband satellite (ViaSat-1) designed by the Company and currently under construction by SS/L for approximately $209.1 million, subject to purchase price adjustments based on satellite performance. In addition, the Company entered into a beam sharing agreement with Loral, whereby Loral is responsible for contributing 15% of the total costs (estimated at approximately $57.6 million) associated with the ViaSat-1 satellite project. The Company’s purchase of the ViaSat-1 satellite from SS/L was approved by the disinterested members of the Company’s Board of Directors, after a determination by the disinterested members of the Company’s Board that the terms and conditions of the purchase were fair to the Company and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
During the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, related to the construction of the Company’s anticipated high-capacity satellite system, the Company paid $23.3 million and $13.9 million, respectively, to SS/L and had no outstanding payables and a $9.7 million payable related to SS/L as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively. In the normal course of business, the Company recognized $0.1 million and $0.9 million of revenue related to Telesat Canada for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively. Accounts receivable due from Telesat Canada as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009 were $2.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
17
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. We use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” variations of such words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, statements that refer to projections of earnings, revenue, costs or other financial items; anticipated growth and trends in our business or key markets; future growth and revenues from our products; future economic conditions and performance; anticipated performance of products or services; plans, objectives and strategies for future operations; and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, elsewhere in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Overview
We are a leading producer of innovative satellite and other wireless communications and networking systems to government and commercial customers. Our ability to apply technologies between government and commercial customers, combined with our diversification of technologies, products and customers, provides us with a strong foundation to sustain and enhance our leadership in advanced wireless communications and networking technologies. Based on our history and extensive experience in complex defense communications systems, we have developed the capability to design and implement innovative communications solutions, which enhance bandwidth utilization by applying our sophisticated networking and digital signal processing techniques. Our goal is to leverage our advanced technology and capabilities to capture a considerable share of the networking and global satellite communications equipment and services market for both government and commercial customers.
Our internal growth to date has historically been driven largely by our success in meeting the need for advanced communications products for our government and commercial customers. By developing cost-effective communications solutions incorporating our advanced technologies, we have continued to grow the markets for our products and services.
We conduct our business through three segments: government systems, commercial networks and satellite services.
Government Systems
Our government systems business encompasses specialized products principally serving defense customers and includes:
| • | | Data links, including Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) terminals, MIDS Joint Tactical Radio System (MIDS JTRS) development and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technologies, |
|
| • | | Information security and assurance products and services, which enable military and government users to communicate secure information over secure and non-secure networks, and |
|
| • | | Government satellite communication systems and products, including UHF DAMA satellite communications products consisting of modems, terminals and network control systems, and innovative broadband solutions to government customers to increase available bandwidth using existing satellite capacity. |
Serving government customers with cost-effective products and solutions continues to be a critical and core element of our overall business strategy.
Commercial Networks
Our commercial networks segment offers an end-to-end capability to provide customers with a broad range of satellite communication and other wireless communications equipment solutions, including:
| • | | Consumer broadband products and solutions, |
18
| • | | Mobile broadband products and systems for airborne, maritime and ground mobile broadband applications, |
|
| • | | Enterprise Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) networks products, |
|
| • | | Satellite networking systems design and technology development, and |
|
| • | | Antenna systems for commercial and defense applications. |
With expertise in commercial satellite network engineering, gateway construction, and remote terminal manufacturing for all types of interactive communications services, we have the ability to take overall responsibility for designing, building, initially operating, and then handing over a fully operational, customized satellite network serving a variety of markets and applications. In addition, based on our advanced satellite technology and systems integration experience, we have developed products addressing five key broadband markets: enterprise, consumer, in-flight, maritime and ground mobile applications.
Satellite Services
Our satellite services segment encompasses three primary areas: managed broadband services, mobile broadband services and, in the future, wholesale bandwidth services. For everyday enterprise networking or backup protection for primary networks, our managed broadband service provides a combination of terrestrial and satellite connections through an around-the-clock call center and network management operation to ensure customer network availability and reliable digital satellite communications. Our mobile broadband service includes network management services for our customers who utilize our Arclight-based mobile communication systems, also through our network management center. In 2008, we began construction of a high-speed Ka-band satellite in order to provide wholesale broadband services over North America, which we anticipate will become available beginning in 2011.
Sources of Revenues
To date, our ability to grow and maintain our revenues has depended on our ability to identify and target markets where the customer places a high priority on the technology solution, and our ability to obtain additional sizable contract awards. Due to the nature of this process, it is difficult to predict the probability and timing of obtaining awards in these markets.
Our products are provided primarily through three types of contracts: fixed-price, time-and-materials and cost-reimbursement contracts. Fixed-price contracts, which require us to provide products and services under a contract at a specified price, comprised approximately 89% and 86% of our revenues for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively. The remainder of our annual revenue was derived from cost-reimbursement contracts (under which we are reimbursed for all actual costs incurred in performing the contract to the extent such costs are within the contract ceiling and allowable under the terms of the contract, plus a fee or profit) and from time-and-materials contracts (which reimburse us for the number of labor hours expended at an established hourly rate negotiated in the contract, plus the cost of materials utilized in providing such products or services).
Historically, a significant portion of our revenues has been derived from contracts for the research and development of products. The research and development efforts are conducted in direct response to the customer’s specific requirements and, accordingly, expenditures related to such efforts are included in cost of sales when incurred and the related funding (which includes a profit component) is included in revenues. Revenues for our funded research and development were approximately $30.2 million or 19% and $28.9 million or 19% of our total revenues in the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively.
We also incur independent research and development expenses, which are not directly funded by a third party. Independent research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, supplies, prototype materials, testing and certification related to research and development programs. Independent research and development expenses were approximately 4% and 6% of revenues during the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, respectively. As a government contractor, we are able to recover a portion of our independent research and development expenses pursuant to our government contracts.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
19
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We consider the policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of our financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on management’s judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We describe the specific risks for these critical accounting policies in the following paragraphs. For all of these policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and even the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Revenue recognition
A substantial portion of our revenues is derived from long-term contracts requiring development and delivery of complex equipment built to customer specifications. Sales related to these contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting under the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.” Sales and earnings under these contracts are recorded either based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to total estimated costs expected to be incurred related to the contract or as products are shipped under the units-of-delivery method.
The percentage-of-completion method of accounting requires management to estimate the profit margin for each individual contract and to apply that profit margin on a uniform basis as sales are recorded under the contract. The estimation of profit margins requires management to make projections of the total sales to be generated and the total costs that will be incurred under a contract. These projections require management to make numerous assumptions and estimates relating to items such as the complexity of design and related development costs, performance of subcontractors, availability and cost of materials, labor productivity and cost, overhead and capital costs and manufacturing efficiency. These contracts often include purchase options for additional quantities and customer change orders for additional or revised product functionality. Purchase options and change orders are accounted for either as an integral part of the original contract or separately depending upon the nature and value of the item. For contract claims or similar items, we apply judgment in estimating the amounts and assessing the potential for realization. These amounts are only included in contract value when they can be reliably estimated and realization is considered probable. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full in the period in which losses become probable and estimable. During the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008, we recorded losses of approximately $1.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, related to loss contracts.
Assuming the initial estimates of sales and costs under a contract are accurate, the percentage-of-completion method results in the profit margin being recorded evenly as revenue is recognized under the contract. Changes in these underlying estimates due to revisions in sales and future cost estimates or the exercise of contract options may result in profit margins being recognized unevenly over a contract as such changes are accounted for on a cumulative basis in the period estimates are revised.
We believe we have established appropriate systems and processes to enable us to reasonably estimate future cost on our programs through regular quarterly evaluations of contract costs, scheduling and technical matters by business unit personnel and management. Historically, in the aggregate, we have not experienced significant deviations in actual costs from estimated program costs, and when deviations that result in significant adjustments arise, we would disclose the related impact in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. However, these estimates require significant management judgment and a significant change in future cost estimates on one or more programs could have a material effect on our results of operations. A one percent variance in our future cost estimates on open fixed-price contracts as of July 3, 2009 would change our income before income taxes by approximately $0.1 million.
We also have contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of products in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), “Revenue Recognition.” In this situation, contracts and customer purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. We assess whether the sales price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment, and assess collectability based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history.
When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair value in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), “Accounting for Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements,” and recognized when the applicable revenue recognition criteria for each element have been met. The amount of product and service revenue recognized is impacted by our judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether sufficient objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for those
20
elements. Changes to the elements in an arrangement and our ability to establish evidence for those elements could affect the timing of revenue recognition.
Accounting for stock-based compensation
We grant options to purchase our common stock and award restricted stock units to our employees and directors under our equity compensation plans. Eligible employees can also purchase shares of our common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each six-month offering period under our employee stock purchase plan. The benefits provided under these plans are stock-based payments subject to the provisions of revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (SFAS 123R), “Share-Based Payment.” Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123R for the three months ended July 3, 2009 and June 27, 2008 was $2.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We make estimates of the collectability of our accounts receivable based on historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Historically, our bad debts have been minimal; a contributing factor to this is that a significant portion of our sales has been to the United States government. More recently, commercial customers have comprised a larger part of our revenues. Our accounts receivable balance was $183.8 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.2 million, and $164.1 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.4 million, as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively.
Warranty reserves
We provide limited warranties on our products for periods of up to five years. We record a liability for our warranty obligations when we ship the products or they are included in long-term construction contracts based upon an estimate of expected warranty costs. Amounts expected to be incurred within twelve months are classified as a current liability. For mature products, we estimate the warranty costs based on historical experience with the particular product. For newer products that do not have a history of warranty costs, we base our estimates on our experience with the technology involved and the types of failures that may occur. It is possible that our underlying assumptions will not reflect the actual experience, and in that case, we will make future adjustments to the recorded warranty obligation.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
We account for our goodwill under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The SFAS 142 goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to them. Reporting units within our government systems and commercial networks segments have goodwill assigned to them. If the fair value is determined to be less than book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In this process, a fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the reporting unit used in the first step, and is compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying value, if any, represents the amount of goodwill impairment. We test goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter every fiscal year, and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist.
We estimate the fair values of the related operations using discounted cash flows and other indicators of fair value. We base the forecast of future cash flows on our best estimate of the future revenues and operating costs, which we derive primarily from existing firm orders, expected future orders, contracts with suppliers, labor agreements and general market conditions. Changes in these forecasts could cause a particular reporting unit to either pass or fail the first step in the SFAS 142 goodwill impairment model, which could significantly influence whether a goodwill impairment needs to be recorded. We adjust the cash flow forecasts by an appropriate discount rate derived from our market capitalization plus a suitable control premium at the date of evaluation. In applying the first step, which is identification of any impairment of goodwill, no impairment of goodwill has resulted.
Property, equipment and satellite
Equipment, computers and software, furniture and fixtures and our satellite under construction are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Costs are capitalized as incurred and for our satellite include construction, launch and insurance. Satellite construction costs, including launch services and insurance, are generally procured under long-term contracts that provide for payments by us over the contract periods. Satellite construction and launch services costs are capitalized to reflect progress toward
21
completion, which typically coincides with contract milestone payment schedules. Insurance premiums related to satellite launches and subsequent in-orbit testing are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the satellite. Performance incentives payable in future periods are dependent on the continued satisfactory performance of the satellite in service.
Impairment of long-lived assets (property, equipment and satellite, and other intangible assets)
In accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets, including property, equipment and satellite and other intangible assets, when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss when the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset (or group of assets) are less than the asset’s carrying value. Any required impairment loss would be measured as the amount by which the asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, and would be recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and charged to results of operations. We have not identified any such impairment.
Income taxes
Management evaluates the realizability of our deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. In accordance with SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” net deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on all the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Accruals for uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance with the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” Under FIN 48, we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and income tax disclosures.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. In the ordinary course of business, there are calculations and transactions where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. In addition, changes in tax laws and regulations as well as adverse judicial rulings could adversely affect the income tax provision. We believe we have adequately provided for income tax issues not yet resolved with federal, state and foreign tax authorities. However, if these provided amounts prove to be more than what is necessary, the reversal of the reserves would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period in which we determine that provision for the liabilities is no longer necessary. If an ultimate tax assessment exceeds our estimate of tax liabilities, an additional charge to expense would result.
Results of Operations
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenues, income statement data for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended |
| | July 3, 2009 | | June 27, 2008 |
Revenues | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | | 70.5 | | | | 70.6 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 17.0 | | | | 15.5 | |
Independent research and development | | | 4.4 | | | | 6.4 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 1.0 | | | | 1.5 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 7.1 | | | | 6.0 | |
Income before income taxes | | | 7.1 | | | | 6.4 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 5.2 | | | | 4.2 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. | | | 5.2 | | | | 4.1 | |
| | | | | | | | |
22
Three Months Ended July 3, 2009 vs. Three Months Ended June 27, 2008
Revenues
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Revenues | | $ | 158.4 | | | $ | 153.0 | | | $ | 5.4 | | | | 3.6 | % |
Revenues increased from $153.0 million to $158.4 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last year. Increased revenues were experienced in all three segments: our government systems segment, which increased by $3.9 million, our satellite services segment, which increased by $1.1 million, and our commercial networks segment, which increased by $0.4 million. Revenue increases in our government systems segment were primarily derived from higher sales of $2.6 million in next generation military satellite communication systems, $1.5 million in next generation tactical data link development and $1.1 million from our majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare, offset by a $1.3 million decrease in video datalink systems sales. Our satellite services segment revenue increase was primarily derived from additional services provided to the mobile broadband services market. Our commercial networks segment revenues increased primarily due to a $7.6 million increase in enterprise VSAT product sales, offset by decreases of $4.2 million in consumer broadband product sales, decreased sales of antenna systems products of approximately $2.6 million and a $0.4 million decrease in sales spread across various other product groups.
Cost of revenues
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Cost of revenues | | $ | 111.7 | | | $ | 108.0 | | | $ | 3.7 | | | | 3.4 | % |
Percentage of revenues | | | 70.5 | % | | | 70.6 | % | | | | | | | | |
The increase in cost of revenues from $108.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $111.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 is primarily due to our increased revenues. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues stayed relatively flat at 70.6% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 and 70.5% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. This is a result of product cost reductions of approximately $1.0 million in our government systems segment mainly from information assurance and development programs and next generation tactical data link development, offset by product cost increases of $1.5 million in our commercial networks segment mainly from enterprise VSAT products and lower margin next generation broadband development programs in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same period last year. Cost of revenues for the first quarters of both fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2009 included approximately $0.6 million in stock-based compensation expense. Cost of revenues may fluctuate in future periods depending on the mix of products sold and services provided, competition, new product introduction costs and other factors.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Selling, general and administrative | | $ | 26.9 | | | $ | 23.6 | | | $ | 3.3 | | | | 14.0 | % |
Percentage of revenues | | | 17.0 | % | | | 15.5 | % | | | | | | | | |
The increase in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses of $3.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 was primarily attributable to new business proposal costs for new contract awards of approximately $2.1 million, higher selling costs of approximately $0.5 million, increased support costs related to business growth of approximately $0.4 million and an increase of approximately $0.3 million in stock-based compensation expense. SG&A expenses consisted primarily of personnel costs and expenses for business development, marketing and sales, bid and proposal, facilities, finance, contract administration and general management. Some SG&A expenses are difficult to predict and vary based on specific government, commercial and satellite service sales opportunities.
23
Independent research and development
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Independent research and development | | $ | 7.0 | | | $ | 9.8 | | | $ | (2.8 | ) | | | (28.8 | )% |
Percentage of revenues | | | 4.4 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | | | | | | |
The decrease in independent research and development (IR&D) expenses primarily reflects a $1.6 million reduction in the commercial networks segment development activities for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 and a decrease in IR&D expenses in the government systems segment of $1.3 million. The lower IR&D expenses were principally due to a shift in our efforts from internal development projects to customer-funded programs.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets.We amortize our intangible assets from prior acquisitions over their estimated useful lives ranging from eight months to ten years. Amortization of intangible assets will decrease each year as the intangible assets with shorter lives become fully amortized. Current and expected amortization expense for each of the following periods is as follows:
| | | | |
| | Amortization | |
| | (In thousands) | |
For the three months ended July 3, 2009 | | $ | 1,505 | |
| | | | |
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 | | $ | 4,083 | |
Expected for fiscal year 2011 | | | 4,826 | |
Expected for fiscal year 2012 | | | 3,600 | |
Expected for fiscal year 2013 | | | 1,047 | |
Expected for fiscal year 2014 | | | 646 | |
Thereafter | | | 948 | |
| | | |
| | $ | 15,150 | |
| | | |
Interest income.Interest income decreased to $0.1 million for the three months ended July 3, 2009, from $0.7 million for the three months ended June 27, 2008, due primarily to lower interest rates on our investments and lower average invested cash balances during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Interest expense.Interest expense remained relatively flat from the three months ended June 27, 2008 to the three months ended July 3, 2009 as we borrowed $80.0 million under our revolving line of credit on July 3, 2009 and had no outstanding borrowings under our revolving line of credit at June 27, 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes.Our effective tax rate for the three months ended July 3, 2009 was approximately 25.9%, which approximates the 26.9% estimated annual effective tax rate for the fiscal year 2010, compared to an effective tax rate of 34.8% for the three months ended June 27, 2008, which reflected the December 31, 2007 expiration of the federal research and development tax credit. Our estimated annual effective tax rate of approximately 26.9% for fiscal year 2010 reflects the expiration of the federal research and development tax credit at December 31, 2009. If the federal research and development tax credit is reinstated after December 31, 2009, we may have a lower annual effective tax rate for fiscal year 2010 and the amount of the tax rate reduction will depend on the effective date of any such reinstatement, the terms of the reinstatement as well as the amount of eligible research and development expenses in the reinstated period.
Segment Results for the Three Months Ended July 3, 2009 vs. Three Months Ended June 27, 2008
Government systems segment
Revenues
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Revenues | | $ | 92.6 | | | $ | 88.6 | | | $ | 3.9 | | | | 4.4 | % |
The revenue increase in our government systems segment was primarily derived from a $2.6 million increase in next generation military satellite communication systems sales, a $1.5 million increase in next generation tactical data link development revenues and
24
higher sales of $1.1 million from our majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare, offset by decreased sales of video datalink systems totaling $1.3 million.
Segment operating profit
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Operating profit | | $ | 12.1 | | | $ | 12.1 | | | $ | — | | | | 0.4 | % |
Percentage of segment revenue | | | 13.1 | % | | | 13.6 | % | | | | | | | | |
Government systems segment operating profits stayed relatively flat in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Increased revenues and related product contributions of $2.3 million and lower IR&D costs of $1.3 million were offset by $3.6 million in higher selling, support and new business proposal costs.
Commercial networks segment
Revenues
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Revenues | | $ | 63.3 | | | $ | 62.9 | | | $ | 0.4 | | | | 0.6 | % |
Our commercial networks segment revenue increase was attributable to a $7.6 million increase in enterprise VSAT product sales, offset by a decrease of $4.2 million in consumer broadband product sales, decreased antenna systems product sales of approximately $2.6 million and a $0.4 million decrease in sales spread across various other product groups.
Segment operating profit
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Operating profit | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 1.5 | | | $ | (0.1 | ) | | | (9.6 | )% |
Percentage of segment revenues | | | 2.1 | % | | | 2.3 | % | | | | | | | | |
Our commercial networks segment operating profit decreased in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last fiscal year primarily due to operating profit decreases of approximately $1.5 million from a lower margin product mix of VSAT product sales compared to prior fiscal year, offset by better program performance in our mobile satellite systems programs of approximately $1.0 million and lower IR&D costs.
Satellite services segment
Revenues
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | increase | | increase |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | (decrease) | | (decrease) |
Revenues | | $ | 2.5 | | | $ | 1.4 | | | $ | 1.1 | | | | 82.8 | % |
Our satellite services segment revenue increase of approximately $1.1 million was primarily derived from service arrangements supporting the mobile broadband services markets.
25
Segment operating loss
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | Dollar | | Percentage |
| | July 3, | | June 27, | | (increase) | | (increase) |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | decrease | | decrease |
Operating loss | | $ | (0.7 | ) | | $ | (2.1 | ) | | $ | 1.4 | | | | 65.6 | % |
Percentage of segment revenues | | | (28.3 | )% | | | (150.4 | )% | | | | | | | | |
The decrease in satellite services segment operating loss of $1.4 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 was primarily due to increased revenues and related product contributions of $0.9 million from the expansion of satellite services provided in the mobile broadband market and a reduction in legal and support costs related to our ViaSat-1 satellite of $0.4 million.
Backlog
As reflected in the table below, funded backlog increased and firm backlog decreased during the first three months of fiscal year 2010. The decrease in firm backlog was primarily due to the delay in expected contract awards shifting to the later part of fiscal year 2010.
| | | | | | | | |
| | July 3, 2009 | | | April 3, 2009 | |
| | (In millions) | |
Firm backlog | | | | | | | | |
Government Systems segment | | $ | 211.0 | | | $ | 225.6 | |
Commercial Networks segment | | | 214.5 | | | | 238.7 | |
Satellite Services segment | | | 11.3 | | | | 10.3 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 436.8 | | | $ | 474.6 | |
| | | | | | |
Funded backlog | | | | | | | | |
Government Systems segment | | $ | 201.1 | | | $ | 209.1 | |
Commercial Networks segment | | | 214.5 | | | | 187.1 | |
Satellite Services segment | | | 11.2 | | | | 10.3 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 426.8 | | | $ | 406.5 | |
| | | | | | |
Contract options | | $ | 27.9 | | | $ | 25.6 | |
| | | | | | |
The firm backlog does not include contract options. Of the $436.8 million in firm backlog, approximately $245.8 million is expected to be delivered during the remaining nine months of fiscal year 2010, and the balance is expected to be delivered in fiscal year 2011 and thereafter. We include in our backlog only those orders for which we have accepted purchase orders.
Our total new awards were $120.6 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $205.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Backlog is not necessarily indicative of future sales. A majority of our contracts can be terminated at the convenience of the customer. Orders are often made substantially in advance of delivery, and our contracts typically provide that orders may be terminated with limited or no penalties. In addition, purchase orders may present product specifications that would require us to complete additional product development. A failure to develop products meeting such specifications could lead to a termination of the related contract.
Firm backlog amounts as presented are comprised of funded and unfunded components. Funded backlog represents the sum of contract amounts for which funds have been specifically obligated by customers to contracts. Unfunded backlog represents future amounts that customers may obligate over the specified contract performance periods. Our customers allocate funds for expenditures on long-term contracts on a periodic basis. Our ability to realize revenues from contracts in backlog is dependent upon adequate funding for such contracts. Although we do not control the funding of our contracts, our experience indicates that actual contract fundings have ultimately been approximately equal to the aggregate amounts of the contracts.
26
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations to date primarily with cash flows from operations, bank line of credit financing and equity financing. The general cash needs of our government systems, commercial networks and satellite services segments can vary significantly and depend on the type and mix of contracts in backlog (i.e., product or service, development or production, and timing of payments), the quality of the customer (i.e., government or commercial, domestic or international) and the duration of the contract. In addition, for all three of our segments, program performance significantly impacts the timing and amount of cash flows. If a program is performing and meeting its contractual requirements, then the cash flow requirements are usually lower. The cash needs of the government systems segment tend to be more a function of the type of contract rather than customer quality. Also, United States government procurement regulations tend to restrict the timing of cash payments on the contract. In the commercial networks and satellite services segments, our cash needs are driven primarily by the quality of the customer and the type of contract. The quality of the customer can affect the specific contract cash flow and whether financing instruments are required by the customer. In addition, the commercial networks and satellite services financing environments tend to provide for more flexible payment terms with customers, including advance payments.
Cash used in operating activities for the first three months of fiscal year 2010 was $5.2 million as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $0.4 million for the first three months of fiscal year 2009. The $5.5 million increase in cash used in operating activities for the first three months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the first three months of fiscal year 2009 was primarily attributed to a year-over-year net increase in cash used for net operating assets of $5.7 million, offset by higher year-over-year net income of $1.9 million. The net operating asset growth was predominantly due to growth in the Company’s combined billed and unbilled accounts receivable, net, which increased $19.7 million from the prior fiscal year-end. Receivables growth in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 was largely due to the timing of certain contract billing milestones on ground and mobile satellite systems projects in our commercial networks segment and programs in our government systems segment.
Cash used in investing activities in the first three months of fiscal year 2010 was $34.7 million as compared to $13.0 million for the first three months of fiscal year 2009. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily related to construction payments for our ViaSat-1 satellite of approximately $26.9 million and other additional capital expenditures for equipment of approximately $4.9 million for the first three months of fiscal year 2010 compared to approximately $10.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the same period of fiscal year 2009.
Cash provided by financing activities for the first three months of fiscal year 2010 was $80.4 million as compared to cash used by financing activities for the first three months of fiscal year 2009 of $1.7 million. The approximate $82.1 million increase in cash inflows for the first three months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same period of last fiscal year is primarily related to the $80.0 million in proceeds from borrowings under our revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility). In addition, cash provided by (used in) financing activities for both periods included cash received from stock option exercises and cash inflows related to the incremental tax benefit from stock-based compensation. Cash provided by financing activities in the first three months of fiscal year 2010 was also higher due to cash received from employee stock purchase plan purchases, slightly offset by the repurchase of common stock related to net share settlement of certain employee tax liabilities in connection with the vesting of restricted stock unit awards.
In January 2008, we entered into several agreements with Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L), Loral Space & Communications, Inc. (Loral) and Telesat Canada (Telesat) related to our anticipated high-capacity satellite system. Under the satellite construction contract with SS/L, we purchased a new broadband satellite (ViaSat-1) designed by us and currently under construction by SS/L for approximately $209.1 million, subject to purchase price adjustments based on satellite performance. The total cost of the satellite is $246.0 million, but, as part of the satellite purchase arrangements, Loral executed a separate contract with SS/L whereby Loral is purchasing the Canadian beams on the ViaSat-1 satellite for approximately $36.9 million (15% of the total satellite cost). We have entered into a beam sharing agreement with Loral, whereby Loral has agreed to reimburse us for 15% of the total costs associated with launch and launch insurance, which is estimated to be approximately $20.7 million, and in-orbit insurance and satellite operating costs post launch.
In November 2008, we entered into a launch services agreement with Arianespace to procure launch services for the ViaSat-1 satellite at a cost estimated to be $107.8 million, depending on the mass of the satellite at launch. In March 2009, we substituted ILS International Launch Services, Inc. for Arianespace as the primary provider of launch services for ViaSat-1 and, accordingly, we entered into a contract for launch services with ILS to procure launch services for the ViaSat-1 satellite at an estimated cost of approximately $80.0 million, subject to certain adjustments, resulting in a net savings of approximately $20.0 million on the ViaSat-1 satellite.
27
On May 7, 2009, we entered into an Amended and Restated Launch Services Agreement with Arianespace. Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Launch Services Agreement, Arianespace has agreed to perform certain launch services to maintain the launch capability for the ViaSat-1 high-capacity satellite, should the need arise, or for launch services of a future ViaSat satellite launch prior to December 2015. This amendment and restatement also provides for certain cost adjustments depending on fluctuations in foreign currencies, mass of the satellite launched and launch period timing.
The projected total cost of the ViaSat-1 project, including the satellite, launch, insurance and related gateway infrastructure, through in-service of the satellite is estimated to be approximately $400.0 million, and will depend on the timing of the gateway infrastructure roll-out. We continually evaluate alternative strategies that would limit our total required investment. We believe we have adequate sources of funding for the project, which includes our cash on hand, the cash we expect to generate from operations over the next few years, and additional borrowing ability based on our financial position and low debt leverage ratio. We believe this provides us flexibility to execute this project in an appropriate manner and/or obtain outside equity under terms that we consider reasonable.
We invest our cash in excess of current operating requirements in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities. At July 3, 2009, we had $104.3 million in cash and cash equivalents, $285.1 million in working capital and $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility. At April 3, 2009, we had $63.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, $203.4 million in working capital and no outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility. Our cash and cash equivalents are held in accounts managed by third party financial institutions. To date, we have experienced no loss of access to our cash equivalents; however, there can be no assurance that access to our cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.
On July 1, 2009, we amended and restated our Credit Facility in the form of the Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement, which increased our revolving line of credit from $85.0 million to $170.0 million and extended the maturity date of the facility until July 1, 2012. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are permitted up to a maximum amount of $170.0 million, including up to $25.0 million of letters of credit, and bear interest, at our option, at either (a) the highest of the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, the administrative agent’s prime rate as announced from time to time or the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%, or (b) at the Eurodollar rate plus, in the case of each of (a) and (b), an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of our debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). At July 3, 2009, the effective interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 4.59%. We anticipate capitalizing certain amounts of interest expense on our Credit Facility in connection with the satellite construction. The Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of our assets. At July 3, 2009, we had $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and $6.0 million outstanding under standby letters of credit, leaving borrowing availability under the Credit Facility of $84.0 million.
The Credit Facility contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. In addition, the Credit Facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability to incur additional debt, sell assets, make investments and acquisitions, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments.
To further enhance our liquidity position, we may obtain additional financing, which could consist of debt, convertible debt or equity financing from public and/or private capital markets. In April 2007, we filed a new universal shelf registration statement with the SEC, for the future sale of up to an additional $200.0 million of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants, bringing the aggregate available under our universal shelf registration statements to up to $400.0 million. The securities may be offered from time to time, separately or together, directly by us or through underwriters at amounts, prices, interest rates and other terms to be determined at the time of the offering. The sale of additional securities could result in additional dilution of our stockholders.
Our future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including the timing and amount of cash required for the ViaSat-1 satellite project pursuant to our contractual commitments, other future broadband satellite projects we may engage in, expansion of our research and development and marketing efforts, and the nature and timing of orders. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of, or investments in complementary businesses, products and technologies which may require the use of cash. We believe that our current cash balances and net cash expected to be provided by operating activities along with availability under our Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements for at least the next twelve months.
28
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth a summary of our obligations at July 3, 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | For the | | | | |
| | | | | | remainder of | | | | |
| | | | | | fiscal year | | | For the fiscal years ending | |
(In thousands) | | Total | | | 2010 | | | 2011-2012 | | | 2013-2014 | | | Thereafter | |
Operating leases | | $ | 100,691 | | | $ | 10,633 | | | $ | 28,505 | | | $ | 24,573 | | | $ | 36,980 | |
Line of credit | | | 80,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 80,000 | | | | — | |
Standby letters of credit | | | 5,966 | | | | 3,011 | | | | 2,955 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Purchase commitments including satellite-related agreements | | | 383,421 | | | | 113,205 | | | | 104,372 | | | | 26,462 | | | | 139,382 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 570,078 | | | $ | 126,849 | | | $ | 135,832 | | | $ | 131,035 | | | $ | 176,362 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several subcontractors and contract manufacturers to provide design and manufacturing services for our products. During the normal course of business, we enter into agreements with subcontractors, contract manufacturers and suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria defined by us or that establish the parameters defining our requirements. We have also entered into agreements with suppliers for the construction, operation and launch of our ViaSat-1 satellite. In addition, we have contracted for an additional launch which can be used as a back-up launch for our ViaSat-1 satellite or for a future satellite. In certain instances, these agreements allow us the option to cancel, reschedule and adjust our requirements based on our business needs prior to firm orders being placed. Consequently, only a portion of our reported purchase commitments arising from these agreements are firm, non-cancelable and unconditional commitments.
Our condensed consolidated balance sheets included $24.7 million as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009 classified as “Other liabilities.” This caption primarily consists of our long-term warranty obligations, deferred lease credits and long-term unrecognized tax position liabilities. These remaining liabilities have been excluded from the above table as the timing and/or the amount of any cash payment is uncertain. See Note 10 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our income taxes and related tax positions and Note 8 for a discussion of our product warranties.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations.” The purpose of issuing the statement is to replace current guidance in SFAS 141 to better represent the economic value of a business combination transaction. The changes to be effected with SFAS 141R from the current guidance include, but are not limited to: (1) acquisition costs will be recognized as expenses separately from the acquisition; (2) known contractual contingencies at the time of the acquisition will be considered part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair value; all other contingencies will be part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair value only if it is more likely than not that they meet the definition of a liability; (3) contingent consideration based on the outcome of future events will be recognized and measured at the time of the acquisition; (4) business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisitions) will need to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as non-controlling interests, in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values; and (5) a bargain purchase (defined as a business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any non-controlling interest in the acquiree) will require that excess to be recognized as a gain attributable to the acquirer. SFAS 141R became effective for us as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The standard applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after April 4, 2009, except that resolution of certain tax contingencies and adjustments to valuation allowances related to business combinations, which previously were adjusted to goodwill, will be adjusted to income tax expense for all such adjustments after April 4, 2009, regardless of the date of the original business combination. We adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 without a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R” (SFAS 167). SFAS 167 amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities and will significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FIN 46R. SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 167 may have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements at July 3, 2009 as defined in Regulation S-K Item 303(a)(4) other than as discussed under Contractual Obligations above or disclosed in the notes to our financial statements included in this Quarterly Report or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2009.
29
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, and short-term and long-term obligations, including the revolving line of credit. We consider investments in highly liquid instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of July 3, 2009, we had $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under our line of credit and we held no short-term investments. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to borrowings under our line of credit, cash equivalents, short-term investments and short-term obligations. As a result, we do not expect fluctuations in interest rates to have a material impact on the fair value of these financial instruments.
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. To minimize this risk, we maintain a significant portion of our cash balance in money market funds. In general, money market funds are not subject to interest rate risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. Our cash and cash equivalents earn interest at variable rates. Given recent declines in interest rates, our interest income has been and may continue to be negatively impacted. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. If the underlying weighted average interest rate on our cash and cash equivalents balances changed by 50 basis points in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, interest income would have increased or decreased by less than $0.1 million. Because our investment policy restricts us to invest in conservative, interest-bearing investments and because our business strategy does not rely on generating material returns from our investment portfolio, we do not expect our market risk exposure on our investment portfolio to be material.
As of July 3, 2009, we had $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility. Our primary interest rate under the Credit Facility is the Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of our debt to EBITDA. As of July 3, 2009, the effective interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 4.59%. Assuming the outstanding balance remains constant over the remainder of the year, a 50 basis point increase in the interest rate would decrease pre-tax income and cash flow by approximately $0.3 million.
Foreign Exchange Risk
We generally conduct our business in United States dollars. However, as our international business is conducted in a variety of foreign currencies and we pay some of our vendors in Euros, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our objective in managing our exposure to foreign currency exchanges is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Accordingly, from time to time, we may enter into foreign exchange contracts to mitigate risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities, commitments and anticipated foreign currency transactions.
As of July 3, 2009, we had no foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the objective that information in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified and pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. We carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 3, 2009, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of July 3, 2009.
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
30
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property claims, breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax and other matters. Although claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the resolution of our current pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity in a particular period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity or future results. The risks described in our reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity or future results.
Item 6. Exhibits
The Exhibit Index on page 33 is incorporated herein by reference as the list of exhibits required as part of this Quarterly Report.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
August 11, 2009 | VIASAT, INC. | |
| /s/Mark D. Dankberg | |
| Mark D. Dankberg | |
| Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |
|
| | |
| /s/Ronald G. Wangerin | |
| Ronald G. Wangerin | |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |
32
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
Exhibit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Filed |
Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit | | Filing Date | | Herewith |
10.1† | | Amended and Restated Launch Services Agreement dated May 7, 2009 between ViaSat, Inc. and Arianespace. | | 10-K | | 000-21767 | | | 10.13 | | | 5/28/2009 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
10.2 | | Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2009 among ViaSat, Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Union Bank, N.A. and the lenders party thereto | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
32.1 | | Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| | |
† | | Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted and separately filed with the SEC pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
33