CONMED (CNMD) 10-Q 2007 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended	Commission File Number 0-16093
June 30, 2007

CONMED CORPORATION

(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)

New York (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	16-0977505 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
525 French Road, Utica, New York (Address of principal executive offices)	13502 (Zip Code)

(315) 797-8375

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one).

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o      No ý

The number of shares outstanding of registrant's common stock, as of August 1, 2007 is 28,587,035 shares.

CONMED CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007

Item Number				Page
	Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)
		-	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007	1
		-	Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2007	2
		-	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007	3
		-	Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements	4
	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		27
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		28
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		28
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		28
	Item 6.	Exhibits		30
	Signatures			31

PART I                      FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

CONMED CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2006		2007		2006		2007
Net sales	$	163,473	$	169,258	$	321,939	$	340,272
Cost of sales		85,699		83,398		166,265		169,187
Gross profit		77,774		85,860		155,674		171,085
Selling and administrative expense		58,123		58,207		116,497		118,012
Research and development expense		7,498		7,453		15,323		15,047
Other expense (income)		1,584		1,312		2,154		(4,102	)
		67,205		66,972		133,974		128,957
Income from operations		10,569		18,888		21,700		42,128
Loss on early extinguishment
of debt		678		-		678		-
Interest expense		4,675		4,329		9,541		8,845
Income before income taxes		5,216		14,559		11,481		33,283
Provision for income taxes		1,802		5,214		3,727		12,016
Net income	$	3,414	$	9,345	$	7,754	$	21,267
Per share data:
Net Income
Basic	$	.12	$	.33	$	.28	$	.76
Diluted		.12		.32		.27		.74
Weighted average common shares
Basic		28,061		28,180		28,068		27,988
Diluted		28,266		28,831		28,312		28,608

See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

1

CONMED CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited, in thousands except share and per share amounts)

	December 31,			June 30,
	2006			2007
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,831		$	3,879
Accounts receivable, net		75,120			77,044
Inventories		151,687			161,819
Income taxes receivable		747			2,732
Deferred income taxes		15,212			15,205
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,286			3,129
Total current assets		249,883			263,808
Property, plant and equipment, net		116,480			118,959
Goodwill		290,512			291,178
Other intangible assets, net		191,135			188,397
Other assets		13,561			12,768
Total assets	$	861,571		$	875,110
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	3,148		$	3,247
Accounts payable		41,823			39,008
Accrued compensation and benefits		17,712			15,324
Accrued interest		727			786
Other current liabilities		11,795			13,772
Total current liabilities		75,205			72,137
Long-term debt		264,676			237,780
Deferred income taxes		51,004			61,678
Other long-term liabilities		30,332			27,210
Total liabilities		421,217			398,805
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share;
authorized 500,000 shares; none outstanding		-			-
Common stock, par value $.01 per share;
100,000,000 shares authorized; 31,304,203 and
31,299,203 shares issued in 2006 and 2007,
respectively		313			313
Paid-in capital		284,858			286,280
Retained earnings		247,425			264,875
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(8,612	)		(6,382	)
Less 3,321,545 and 2,731,749 shares of common stock in
treasury, at cost in 2006 and 2007, respectively		(83,630	)		(68,781	)
Total shareholders’ equity		440,354			476,305
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	861,571		$	875,110

See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

2

CONMED CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 (Unaudited, in thousands)

 

	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2006			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	7,754		$	21,267
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		5,522			6,134
Amortization		9,148			9,266
Stock-based compensation expense		1,585			1,885
Deferred income taxes		3,650			10,470
Loss on extinguishment of debt		203			-
Increase (decrease) in cash flows
from changes in assets and liabilities:
Sale of accounts receivable		-			2,000
Accounts receivable		2,407			(3,924	)
Inventories		(6,361	)		(15,150	)
Accounts payable		1,373			(2,579	)
Income taxes receivable		(1,979	)		(1,809	)
Accrued compensation and benefits		559			(2,388	)
Accrued interest		13			59
Other assets		(551	)		619
Other liabilities		4,142			(52	)
		19,711			4,531
Net cash provided by operating activities		27,465			25,798
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment		(10,247	)		(9,556	)
Proceeds from sale of equity investment		1,205			-
Payments related to business acquisitions		(2,458	)		(1,278	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(11,500	)		(10,834	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from common stock issued
under employee plans		1,238			10,604
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		32			-
Repurchase of common stock		(7,848	)		-
Payments on senior credit agreement		(141,484	)		(26,326	)
Proceeds of senior credit agreement		135,000			-
Payments on mortgage notes		(412	)		(471	)
Payments related to issuance of long-term debt		(1,260	)		-
Net change in cash overdrafts		(604	)		(236	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(15,338	)		(16,429	)
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash and cash equivalents		999			1,513
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		1,626			48
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,454			3,831
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	5,080		$	3,879

See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

3

CONMED CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)

Note 1 – Operations and Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and operations

The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of CONMED Corporation and its controlled subsidiaries (“CONMED”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. CONMED is a medical technology company with an emphasis on surgical devices and equipment for minimally invasive procedures and monitoring.  The Company’s products serve the clinical areas of arthroscopy, powered surgical instruments, electrosurgery, cardiac monitoring disposables, endosurgery and endoscopic technologies.  They are used by surgeons and physicians in a variety of specialties including orthopedics, general surgery, gynecology, neurosurgery, and gastroenterology.

Note 2 - Interim financial information

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Results for the period ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007.

The consolidated condensed financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the year-ended December 31, 2006 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Note 3 – Other comprehensive income

Comprehensive income consists of the following:

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2006		2007		2006		2007
Net income	$	3,414	$	9,345	$	7,754	$	21,267
Other comprehensive income:
Adjustment to net amortization
and deferral of pension cost		-		144		-		289
Foreign currency
translation adjustment		1,149		1,452		1,322		1,941
Comprehensive income	$	4,563	$	10,941	$	9,076	$	23,497

4

Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the following:

						Accumulated
	Minimum			Cumulative		Other
	Pension			Translation		Comprehensive
	Liability			Adjustments		Income (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	(12,386	)	$	3,774	$	(8,612	)
Adjustment to net amortization
and deferral of pension cost		289			-		289
Foreign currency translation
adjustments		-			1,941		1,941
Balance, June 30, 2007	$	(12,097	)	$	5,715	$	(6,382	)

Note 4 – Income Taxes

The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” ("FIN 48") on January 1, 2007.  The impact of this pronouncement was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  As of the date of adoption the Company's unrecognized tax benefits totaled approximately $1.4 million; $1.3 million in taxes and $0.1 million in interest.  If recognized, the entire amount of unrecognized tax benefits would decrease the effective income tax rate.

The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") has completed examinations of our United States federal income tax returns through 2004.  Tax years subsequent to 2004 are subject to future examination.  Tax years 1998-2000 are subject to limited examination by the IRS.  Substantially all material state jurisdictions are closed for examination for tax years through 2002.

It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could change in the next 12 months as a result of the anticipated completion of the 2005, 2006 and 2007 IRS examinations and expiration of statutes of limitations on prior tax returns.  Unrecognized tax benefits for these years relate to permanent deductions and tax credits.  A reasonable estimate of the range of change in unrecognized tax benefits cannot be made at this time.

The Company's policy is to classify interest and penalties related to income tax matters as income tax expense.

Note 5 - Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	December 31,		June 30,
	2006		2007
Raw materials	$	50,225	$	58,839
Work-in-process		17,815		21,513
Finished goods		83,647		81,467
Total	$	151,687	$	161,819

5

Note 6 – Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share (“basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reported period. Diluted earnings per share (“diluted EPS”) gives effect to all dilutive potential shares outstanding resulting from employee stock options, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights during the period. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007.

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2006		2007		2006		2007
Net income	$	3,414	$	9,345	$	7,754	$	21,267
Basic – weighted average shares
outstanding		28,061		28,180		28,068		27,988
Effect of dilutive potential
securities		205		651		244		620
Diluted – weighted average
shares outstanding		28,266		28,831		28,312		28,608
Basic EPS	$	.12	$	.33	$	.28	$	.76
Diluted EPS		.12		.32		.27		.74

The shares used in the calculation of diluted EPS exclude options and SARs to purchase shares where the exercise price was greater than the average market price of common shares for the period.  Shares excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS aggregated 1.9 and 1.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Shares excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS aggregated 0.3 and 0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.  Upon  conversion of our 2.50% convertible senior subordinated notes (the "Notes"), the holder of each Note will receive the conversion value of the Note payable in cash up to the principal amount of the Note and CONMED common stock for the Note's conversion value in excess of such principal  amount.  As of June 30, 2007, our share price has not exceeded the conversion price of the Notes, therefore the conversion value was less than the principal amount of the Notes.  Under the net share settlement method and in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 04-8, “The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share”, there were no potential shares issuable under the Notes to be used in the calculation of diluted EPS.The maximum number of shares we may issue with respect to the Notes is 5,750,000.

Note 7 – Goodwill and other intangible assets

The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:

Balance as of January 1, 2007	$	290,512
Adjustments to goodwill resulting from
business acquisitions finalized		397
Foreign currency translation		269
Balance as of June 30, 2007	$	291,178

6

Goodwill associated with each of our principal operating units is as follows:

	December 31,		June 30,
	2006		2007
CONMED Electrosurgery	$	16,645	$	16,645
CONMED Endosurgery		42,419		42,424
CONMED Linvatec		173,007		173,276
CONMED Patient Care		58,441		58,833
Balance	$	290,512	$	291,178

During the fourth quarter 2006 goodwill impairment testing, we determined that the goodwill of our Endoscopic Technologies operating unit was impaired and consequently we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $46.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2006.

Other intangible assets consist of the following:

	December 31, 2006					June 30, 2007
	Gross					Gross
	Carrying		Accumulated			Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amortization
Amortized intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	113,376	$	(24,498	)	$	113,708	$	(26,237	)
Patents and other intangible assets		39,609		(24,696	)		39,096		(25,514	)
Unamortized intangible assets:
Trademarks and tradenames		87,344		-			87,344		-
	$	240,329	$	(49,194	)	$	240,148	$	(51,751	)

Other intangible assets primarily represent allocations of purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of acquired businesses.  The weighted average amortization period for intangible assets which are amortized is 25 years.  Customer relationships are being amortized over a weighted average life of 36 years.  Patents and other intangible assets are being amortized over a weighted average life of 11 years.

Amortization expense related to intangible assets which are subject to amortization totaled $1,286 and $2,564 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, and $1,402 and $2,557 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and is included in selling and administrative expense on the consolidated condensed statement of income.

7

The estimated amortization expense for the year ending December 31, 2007, including the six month period ended June 30, 2007 and for each of the five succeeding years is as follows:

2007	$	5,608
2008		5,608
2009		5,608
2010		5,105
2011		4,840
2012		4,772

Note 8 — Guarantees

We provide warranties on certain of our products at the time of sale.  The standard warranty period for our capital and reusable equipment is generally one year.  Liability under service and warranty policies is based upon a review of historical warranty and service claim experience.  Adjustments are made to accruals as claim data and historical experience warrant.

Changes in the carrying amount of service and product warranties for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:

Balance as of January 1, 2007	$	3,617
Provision for warranties		2,844
Claims made		(2,855	)
Balance as of June 30, 2007	$	3,606

Note 9 – Pension plan

Net periodic pension costs consist of the following:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2006			2007			2006			2007
Service cost	$	1,405		$	1,381		$	2,810		$	2,763
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation		827			737			1,654			1,474
Expected return on plan assets		(795	)		(683	)		(1,590	)		(1,367	)
Net amortization and deferral		298			229			596			458
Net periodic pension cost	$	1,735		$	1,664		$	3,470		$	3,328

We previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006 that we expect to make $12.0 million in contributions to our pension plan in 2007.  We made $6.0 million in contributions for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

8

Note 10 – Other expense (income)

Other expense (income) consists of the following:

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2006		2007		2006		2007
Acquisition-related costs	$	962	$	-	$	1,476	$	-
Termination of product offering		27		58		83		148
Write-off of inventory in
settlement of a patent dispute		595		-		595		-
Facility closure costs		-		1,254		-		1,822
Litigation settlement		-		-		-		(6,072	)
Other expense (income)	$	1,584	$	1,312	$	2,154	$	(4,102	)

On September 30, 2004, we acquired the business operations of the Endoscopic Technologies Division of C.R. Bard, Inc. (the “Endoscopic Technologies acquisition”).  As part of the acquisition, manufacturing of the acquired products was conducted in various C.R. Bard facilities under a transition agreement.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, we incurred $1.0 million and $1.5 million of acquisition and transition-integration related charges associated with the Endoscopic Technologies acquisition which have been recorded in other expense (income).  The Endoscopic Technologies acquisition transition was completed during 2006.

During 2004, we elected to terminate our surgical lights product line.  We instituted a customer replacement program whereby all currently installed surgical lights were replaced by CONMED.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 we incurred $27 and $83, respectively, in costs related to the surgical lights customer replacement program. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, we incurred an additional $58 and $148, respectively, which were recorded in other expense (income).  We anticipate incurring an additional $200 in 2007 as the surgical lights customer replacement program is completed.

During 2006, we were notified by Dolphin Medical, Inc. (“Dolphin”), that it would discontinue its Dolphin ONE® product line as a result of an agreement between Dolphin and Masimo Corporation in which Masimo agreed to release Dolphin and its affiliates from certain patent infringement claims.  We have sold the Dolphin ONE® and certain other pulse oximetry products manufactured by Dolphin under a distribution agreement.  As a result of the product line discontinuation, we recorded a $0.6 million charge to other expense to write-off on-hand inventory of the discontinued product line.  The discontinuation of Dolphin ONE® did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.  This matter did not affect the majority of our pulse oximetry products and also did not affect sales of our proprietary Pro2® pulse oximetry product line.

During 2006, we elected to close our facility in Montreal, Canada which manufactured products for our CONMED Linvatec line of integrated operating room systems and equipment.  The products which had been manufactured in the Montreal facility will now largely be purchased from a third party vendor.  The closing of this facility was completed in the first quarter of 2007.  We incurred a total of $2.2 million in costs associated with this closure, of which $1.3 million related to the write-off of inventory and was included in cost of goods sold during 2006.  The remaining $0.9 million (including $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2007) primarily relates to severance expense and the disposal of fixed assets which we have recorded in other expense (income).

9

During 2007, we elected to close our Endoscopic Technologies sales office in France.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, we incurred $1.3 million and $1.5 million in costs associated with this closure primarily related to severance expense.  We have recorded such costs in other expense (income); no further expenses are expected to be incurred.

In November 2003, we commenced litigation against Johnson & Johnson and several of its subsidiaries, including Ethicon, Inc. for violations of federal and state antitrust laws. In the lawsuit we claimed that Johnson & Johnson engaged in illegal and anticompetitive conduct with respect to sales of product used in endoscopic surgery, resulting in higher prices to consumers and the exclusion of competition.  We sought relief including an injunction restraining Johnson & Johnson from continuing its anticompetitive practices as well as receiving the maximum amount of damages allowed by law.  During the litigation, Johnson & Johnson represented that the marketing practices which gave rise to the litigation had been altered with respect to CONMED.  On March 31, 2007, CONMED and Johnson & Johnson settled the litigation.  Under the terms of the final settlement agreement, CONMED received a payment of $11.0 million from Johnson & Johnson in return for which we terminated the lawsuit.  After deducting legal and other related costs, we recorded a pre-tax gain of $6.1 million related to the settlement which we have recorded in other expense (income).

Note 11 — Business Segments and Geographic Areas

CONMED conducts its business through five principal operating units, CONMED Endoscopic Technologies, CONMED Endosurgery, CONMED Electrosurgery, CONMED Linvatec and CONMED Patient Care.  We believe each of our segments are similar in the nature of products, production processes, customer base, distribution methods and regulatory environment.  In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”), our CONMED Endosurgery, CONMED Electrosurgery and CONMED Linvatec operating units also have similar economic characteristics and therefore qualify for aggregation under SFAS 131.  Our CONMED Patient Care and CONMED Endoscopic Technologies operating units do not qualify for aggregation under SFAS 131 since their economic characteristics do not meet the criteria for aggregation as a result of the lower overall operating income (loss) in these segments.

CONMED Endosurgery, CONMED Electrosurgery and CONMED Linvatec consist of a single aggregated segment comprising a complete line of endo-mechanical instrumentation for minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures, electrosurgical generators and related surgical instruments, arthroscopic instrumentation for use in orthopedic surgery and small bone, large bone and specialty powered surgical instruments.  CONMED Patient Care product offerings include a line of vital signs and cardiac monitoring products as well as suction instruments & tubing for use in the operating room.  CONMED Endoscopic Technologies product offerings include a comprehensive line of minimally invasive endoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic instruments used in procedures in the digestive tract.

10

The following is net sales information by product line and reportable segment:

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2006		2007		2006		2007
Arthroscopy		58,852		64,949		113,614		127,192
Powered Surgical Instruments		33,276		35,993		67,414		73,543
Electrosurgery		24,228		22,123		47,603		46,149
Endosurgery		13,291		15,465		25,136		29,040
CONMED Linvatec, Endosurgery,
and Electrosurgery		129,647		138,530		253,767		275,924
CONMED Patient Care		19,107		17,315		38,720		37,676
CONMED Endoscopic Technologies		14,719		13,413		29,452		26,672
Total	$	163,473	$	169,258	$	321,939	$	340,272

Total assets, capital expenditures, depreciation and amortization information are not available by segment.

The following is a reconciliation between segment operating income and income before income taxes:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2006			2007			2006			2007
CONMED Endosurgery, Electrosurgery
and Linvatec	$	19,531		$	24,916		$	35,972		$	43,709
CONMED Patient Care		(1,712	)		(1,265	)		(1,448	)		(238	)
CONMED Endoscopic Technologies		(4,019	)		(2,432	)		(6,391	)		(3,643	)
Corporate		(3,231	)		(2,331	)		(6,433	)		2,300
Income from operations		10,569			18,888			21,700			42,128
Loss on early extinguishment
of debt		678			-			678			-
Interest expense		4,675			4,329			9,541			8,845
Total income before income taxes	$	5,216		$	14,559		$	11,481		$	33,283

Note 12 – Legal proceedings

On April 7, 2006, CONMED received a copy of a complaint filed in the United States District for the Northern District of New York on behalf of a purported class of former CONMED Linvatec sales representatives.  The complaint alleges that the former sales representatives were entitled to, but did not receive, severance in 2003 when CONMED Linvatec restructured its distribution channels.  We believe that the exposure related to this complaint ranges from $0 to $3.0 million, not including any interest, fees or costs that might be awarded if the five named plaintiffs were to prevail on their own behalf as well as on behalf of the approximately 70 (or 90 as alleged by the plaintiffs) other members of the purported class.   CONMED Linvatec did not generally pay severance during the 2003 restructuring because the former sales representatives were offered sales positions with CONMED Linvatec’s new manufacturer’s representatives.  Other than three of the five named plaintiffs in the class action, nearly all of CONMED Linvatec’s former sales representatives accepted such positions.

           The Company’s motions to dismiss and for summary judgment, which were heard at a hearing held on January 5, 2007, were denied by a Memorandum Decision and Order

11

dated May 22, 2007.  The District Court also granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class of former CONMED Linvatec sales representatives whose employment with CONMED Linvatec was involuntarily terminated in 2003 and who did not receive severance benefits.   The Court’s ruling on the motions to dismiss, for summary judgment and the motion to certify the class do not represent final rulings on the merits, the Company has filed a motion seeking reconsideration of the motions to dismiss and for summary judgment, and has sought to appeal to the United State Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the class certification ruling.  There is no fixed time frame within the Courts must rule on the motions.  The Company believes there is no merit to the claims asserted in the Complaint, and plans to vigorously defend the case.  There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will prevail in the litigation.

Note 13 – New accounting pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those years. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure requirements. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this statement.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115" ("SFAS 159"). SFAS 159 expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to use fair value to measure accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities, equity method investments, accounts payable, guarantees, issued debt and other eligible financial instruments. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial statements. 

12

Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
	AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

In this Report on Form 10-Q, we make forward-looking statements about our financial condition, results of operations and business. Forward-looking statements are statements made by us concerning events that may or may not occur in the future.  These statements may be made directly in this document or may be “incorporated by reference” from other documents.  Such statements may be identified by the use of words such as “anticipated”, “expects”, “estimates”, “intends” and “believes” and variations thereof and other terms of similar meaning.

Forward-Looking Statements are not Guarantees of Future Performance

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Such factors include those identified under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006 and the following, among others:

· cyclical customer purchasing patterns due to budgetary and other constraints;

· changes in customer preferences;

· competition;

· changes in technology;

· the ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses, products and companies;

· the introduction and acceptance of new products;

· changes in business strategy;

· the availability and cost of materials;

· the possibility that United States or foreign regulatory and/or administrative agencies may initiate enforcement actions against us or our distributors;

· future levels of indebtedness and capital spending;

· changes in foreign exchange and interest rates;

· quality of our management and business abilities and the judgment of our personnel;

· the risk of litigation, especially patent litigation as well as the cost associated with patent and other litigation;

· changes in regulatory requirements;

· the availability, terms and deployment of capital; and

· general economic and business conditions.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below and “Risk Factors” and “Business” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006 for a further discussion of these factors. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,

13

which speak only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview:

CONMED Corporation (“CONMED”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) is a medical technology company with six principal product lines.  These product lines and the percentage of consolidated revenues associated with each, are as follows:

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2006			2007			2006			2007
Arthroscopy		36.0	%		38.3	%		35.2	%		37.4	%
Powered Surgical Instruments		20.4			21.2			21.0			21.6
Patient Care		11.7			10.3			12.1			11.1
Electrosurgery		14.8			13.1			14.8			13.5
Endosurgery		8.1			9.2			7.8			8.6
Endoscopic Technologies		9.0			7.9			9.1			7.8
Consolidated Net Sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

A significant amount of our products are used in surgical procedures with the majority of our revenues derived from the sale of disposable products.  We manufacture substantially all of our products in facilities located in the United States, Mexico, and Finland.  We market our products both domestically and internationally directly to customers and through distributors.  International sales represent a significant portion of our business.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, sales to purchasers outside of the United States approximated 42% of total net sales.

Business Environment and Opportunities

The aging of the worldwide population along with lifestyle changes, continued cost containment pressures on healthcare systems and the desire of clinicians and administrators to use less invasive (or noninvasive) procedures are important trends which are driving the growth in our industry.  We believe that with our broad product offering of high quality surgical and patient care products, we can capitalize on this growth for the benefit of the Company and our shareholders.

In order to further our growth prospects, we have historically used strategic business acquisitions and exclusive distribution relationships to continue to diversify our product offerings, increase our market share and realize economies of scale.  

We have a variety of research and development initiatives focused in each of our principal product lines.  Among the most significant of these efforts is the Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (“ECOM”).  Our ECOM product offering is expected to provide an innovative alternative to catheter monitoring of cardiac output with a specially designed endotracheal tube which utilizes proprietary bio-impedance technology.  Also of significance are our research and development efforts in the area of tissue-sealing for electrosurgery.

14

Continued innovation and commercialization of new proprietary products and processes are essential elements of our long-term growth strategy.  In February 2007, we unveiled several new products at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting which we believe further enhance our product offerings and reputation as an innovator as exemplified by the IM4000 High Definition Camera System, our first high definition camera system designed for use in both arthroscopic and multi-specialty endoscopy.

Business Challenges

In September 2004, we acquired the business operations of the Endoscopic Technologies Division of C.R. Bard, Inc. (the “Endoscopic Technologies acquisition”) for aggregate consideration of $81.3 million in cash.  The acquired business has enhanced our product offerings by adding a comprehensive line of single-use medical devices employed by gastro-intestinal and pulmonary physicians to diagnose and treat diseases of the digestive tract and lungs using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques.  The transfer of the Endoscopic Technologies production lines from C.R. Bard facilities to CONMED facilities proved to be more time-consuming, costly and complex than was originally anticipated.  Operational issues associated with the transfer of production lines resulted in backorders, which combined with increased competition and pricing pressures in the marketplace resulted in decreased sales, lower than anticipated gross margins and continuing operating losses.  As a result of these factors, during our fourth quarter 2006 goodwill impairment testing, we determined that the goodwill of our Endoscopic Technologies business was impaired and consequently we recorded an impairment charge of $46.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2006 to reduce the carrying amount of this business to its fair value.  We have taken and are continuing to take corrective action to address the business and operational issues associated with the Endoscopic Technologies business in an effort to ensure a return to sales growth and profitability.

Our facilities are subject to periodic inspection by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for, among other things, conformance to Quality System Regulation and Current Good Manufacturing Practice (“CGMP”) requirements.  We are committed to the principles and strategies of systems-based quality management for improved CGMP compliance, operational performance and efficiencies through our Company-wide quality systems initiative.  However, there can be no assurance that our actions will ensure that we will not receive a warning letter or other regulatory action which may include consent decrees or fines.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.  Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006 describes the significant accounting policies used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements.  The most significant areas involving management judgments and estimates are described below and are considered by management to be critical to understanding the financial condition and results of operations of CONMED Corporation.  There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting estimates during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when title has been transferred to the customer which is at the time of shipment.  The following policies apply to our major categories of

15

revenue transactions:

· Sales to customers are evidenced by firm purchase orders. Title and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the customer when product is shipped under our stated shipping terms.  Payment by the customer is due under fixed payment terms.

· We place certain of our capital equipment with customers in return for commitments to purchase disposable products over time periods generally ranging from one to three years.  In these circumstances, no revenue is recognized upon capital equipment shipment and we recognize revenue upon the disposable product shipment.  The cost of the equipment is amortized over the term of the individual commitment agreements.

· Product returns are only accepted at the discretion of the Company and in accordance with our “Returned Goods Policy”.  Historically the level of product returns has not been significant.  We accrue for sales returns, rebates and allowances based upon an analysis of historical customer returns and credits, rebates, discounts and current market conditions.

· Our terms of sale to customers generally do not include any obligations to perform future services.  Limited warranties are provided for capital equipment sales and provisions for warranty are provided at the time of product sale based upon an analysis of historical data.

· Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling have been included in net sales.  Shipping and handling costs are included in selling and administrative expense.

· We sell to a diversified base of customers around the world and, therefore, believe there is no material concentration of credit risk.

· We assess the risk of loss on accounts receivable and adjust the allowance for doubtful accounts based on this risk assessment.  Historically, losses on accounts receivable have not been material.  Management believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.3 million at June 30, 2007 is adequate to provide for probable losses resulting from accounts receivable.

Inventory Reserves

We maintain reserves for excess and obsolete inventory resulting from the inability to sell our products at prices in excess of current carrying costs.  The markets in which we operate are highly competitive, with new products and surgical procedures introduced on an on-going basis.  Such marketplace changes may result in our products becoming obsolete.  We make estimates regarding the future recoverability of the costs of our products and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventories based on historical experience, expiration of sterilization dates and expected future trends.  If actual product life cycles, product demand or acceptance of new product introductions are less favorable than projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.  We believe that our current inventory reserves are adequate.

16

Business Acquisitions

We have a history of growth through acquisitions.  Assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are recorded under the purchase method of accounting at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition.  Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired businesses.  Other intangible assets primarily represent allocations of purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of acquired businesses.  We have accumulated goodwill of $291.2 million and other intangible assets of $188.4 million as of June 30, 2007.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” (“SFAS 142”), goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized, but are subject to at least annual impairment testing.  The identification and measurement of goodwill impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of our business.  Estimates of fair value are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, which primarily incorporate management assumptions about expected future cash flows and contemplate other valuation techniques.  Future cash flows may be affected by changes in industry or market conditions or the rate and extent to which anticipated synergies or cost savings are realized with newly acquired entities.

Intangible assets with a finite life are amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset.  Intangible assets which continue to be subject to amortization are also evaluated to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization.  An intangible asset is determined to be impaired when estimated undiscounted future cash flows indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  An impairment loss is recognized by reducing the recorded value to its current fair value.  Although no goodwill or other intangible asset impairment has been recorded in the current year, there can be no assurance that future impairment will not occur.  It is our policy to perform annual impairment tests in the fourth quarter.

During the fourth quarter of 2006, after completing our annual goodwill impairment analysis, we determined that the goodwill of our CONMED Endoscopic Technologies business was impaired and consequently we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $46.7 million.

Pension Plan

We sponsor a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all our employees.  Major assumptions used in accounting for the plan include the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, rate of increase in employee compensation levels and expected mortality.  Assumptions are determined based on Company data and appropriate market indicators, and are evaluated annually as of the plan’s measurement date.  A change in any of these assumptions would have an effect on net periodic pension costs reported in the consolidated financial statements.

Higher market interest rates have resulted in us increasing the discount rate used in determining pension expense from 5.55% in 2006 to 5.90% in 2007.  This rate was determined by using the Citigroup Pension Liability Index rate which, we believe, is a reasonable indicator of our plan’s future payment stream.

We have used an expected rate of return on pension plan assets of 8.0% for purposes of determining the net periodic pension benefit cost.  In determining the expected return on pension plan assets, we consider the relative weighting of plan assets, the historical performance of total plan assets and individual asset classes and economic and other indicators of future performance.  In addition, we consult with financial and investment management professionals in developing appropriate targeted rates of return.

17

We have estimated our rate of increase in employee compensation levels at 3.0% consistent with our internal budgeting.

Based on these and other factors, pension expense for the year-ended December 31, 2007 is estimated at approximately $6.7 million as compared to $6.9 million in 2006.  Actual expense may vary significantly from this estimate.  For the six month period ended June 30, 2007 we recorded $3.3 million in pension expense.

Stock Based Compensation

We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”) effective January 1, 2006.  SFAS 123R requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.

SFAS 123R was adopted using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, the provisions of SFAS 123R apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. In addition, compensation expense must be recognized for any nonvested stock option awards outstanding as of the date of adoption.  We recognize such expense using a straight-line method over the vesting period.

We elected to adopt the alternative transition method, as permitted by FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3 “Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards,” to calculate the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS 123R for those employee awards that were outstanding upon adoption of SFAS 123R.  The alternative transition method allows the use of a simplified method to calculate the beginning pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R.

Income Taxes

The recorded future tax benefit arising from net deductible temporary differences and tax carryforwards is approximately $35.0 million at June 30, 2007.  Management believes that our earnings during the periods when the temporary differences become deductible will be sufficient to realize the related future income tax benefits.

We operate in multiple taxing jurisdictions, both within and outside the United States.  We face audits from these various tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due.  Such audits can involve complex issues and may require an extended period of time to resolve.  The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has completed examinations of our United States federal income tax returns through 2004.  Tax years subsequent to 2004 are currently under examination.  Substantially all material state jurisdictions are closed for examination for tax years through 2002.  

We have established a valuation allowance to reflect the uncertainty of realizing the benefits of certain net operating loss carryforwards recognized in connection with an acquisition.  Any subsequently recognized tax benefits associated with the valuation allowance would be allocated to reduce goodwill.  In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we estimate future taxable income, considering the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies and the realizability of tax loss carryforwards.  Valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets may be impacted by changes to tax laws, changes to statutory tax rates and future taxable income levels.

18

We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” ("FIN 48") on January 1, 2007.  The impact of this pronouncement was not material to our consolidated financial statements (See Note 4 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for further discussion).

Results of Operations

The following table presents, as a percentage of net sales, certain categories included in our consolidated statements of income for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2006			2007			2006			2007
Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales		52.4			49.3			51.6			49.7
Gross profit		47.6			50.7			48.4			50.3
Selling and administrative expense		35.5			34.4			36.2			34.7
Research and development expense		4.6			4.4			4.8			4.4
Other expense		1.0			0.7			0.7			(1.2	)
Income from operations		6.5			11.2			6.7			12.4
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		0.4			0.0			0.2			0.0
Interest expense		2.9			2.6			2.9			2.6
Income before income taxes		3.2			8.6			3.6			9.8
Provision for income taxes		1.1			3.1			1.2			3.5
Net income		2.1	%		5.5	%		2.4	%		6.3	%

Three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to three months ended June 30, 2006 –

Sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were $169.3 million, an increase of $5.8 million (3.5%) compared to sales of $163.5 million in the same period a year ago.  Favorable foreign currency exchange rates (when compared to the foreign currency exchange rates in the same period a year ago) increased sales by approximately $3.0 million.

Cost of sales decreased to $83.4 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared to $85.7 million in the same period a year ago despite overall increased sales volumes.  Gross profit margins increased to 50.7% in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 47.6% in the same period a year ago. The increase of 3.1 percentage points is comprised of improved gross margins in our Endoscopic Technologies product lines (1.0 percentage points) as a result of the completion of the transfer of production lines from C.R. Bard to CONMED during 2006, higher selling prices and lower production variances in each of the remaining product lines (1.5 percentage points), and improved product mix (0.6 percentage points).

Selling and administrative expense remained relatively flat at $58.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $58.1 million in the same period a year ago.  Selling and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales decreased 1.1 percentage points to 34.4% in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 35.5% in the same period a year ago.  The decrease of 1.1 percentage points is attributable to greater leveraging of our cost structure as total selling and administrative expenses remained level on higher overall sales as reductions in

19

legal expenses (0.5 percentage points) due in part as a result of the settlement of the Johnson & Johnson litigation as discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, benefit costs (0.2 percentage points) and other administrative costs (0.4 percentage points) offset higher sales force and distribution costs associated with the increase in sales.

Research and development expense remained flat at $7.5 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the same period a year ago. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense decreased to 4.4% in the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as compared to 4.6% in the same period a year ago.  The decrease in research and development expense is a result of lower spending in the Endoscopic Technologies business as certain biliary and other projects near completion.

As discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, other expense (income) in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 consisted of $1.3 million in costs related to the closing of our Endoscopic Technologies sales office in France and $0.1 million in charges related to the termination of a product line.  In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, other expense consisted of $0.6 million in costs related to the write-off of inventory in settlement of a patent dispute and $1.0 million in Endoscopic Technologies acquisition-related costs.

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $0.7 million in losses on the early extinguishment of debt in connection with the refinancing of our senior credit agreement.

Interest expense in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $4.3 million compared to $4.7 million in the same period a year ago.  The decrease in interest expense is due to lower weighted average borrowings outstanding in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the same period a year ago, offsetting an increase in the weighted average interest rates on our borrowings (inclusive of the finance charge on our accounts receivable sale facility) to 5.87% in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 5.47% in the same period a year ago due to higher market interest rates on our variable rate debt.

A provision for income taxes has been recorded at an effective tax rate of 35.8% for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, an increase from 34.5% recorded in the same period a year ago.  The increase in the effective rate is primarily due to the elimination of the extraterritorial income exclusion benefit in 2007.  A reconciliation of the United States statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006, Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to six months ended June 30, 2006

Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $340.3 million, an increase of $18.3 million (5.7%) compared to sales of $321.9 million in the same period a year ago.  Favorable foreign currency exchange rates (when compared to the foreign currency exchange rates in the same period a year ago) increased sales by approximately $5.9 million.

Cost of sales increased $2.9 million in the six months ended 2007 to $169.2 million from $166.3 million in the same period a year ago on overall increased sales volumes.  Gross profit margins increased to 50.3% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 48.4% in the same period a year ago.  The increase of 1.9 percentage points is comprised of improved gross margins in our Endoscopic Technologies product lines (0.7 percentage points) as a result of the completion of the transfer of production lines from C.R. Bard to CONMED during 2006, higher selling prices and lower production variances in each of the remaining product lines (0.8 percentage points), and improved product mix (0.4 percentage points).

20

Selling and administrative expense increased $1.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $118.0 million from $116.5 million in the same period a year ago.  As a percentage of sales, selling and administrative expense decreased to 34.7% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 36.2% in the same period a year ago.  The decrease of 1.5 percentage points is attributable to greater leveraging of our cost structure as reductions principally in benefit costs (0.7  percentage points), legal expenses (0.5 percentage points) due in part as a result of the settlement of the Johnson & Johnson litigation as discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and other administrative costs (0.3 percentage points) offset higher sales force and distribution costs associated with the increase in sales.

Research and development expense totaled $15.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $15.3 million in the same period a year ago.  As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense decreased to 4.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to 4.8% in the same period a year ago.  The decrease in research and development expense is a result of lower spending in the Endoscopic Technologies business as certain biliary and other projects near completion.

As discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, other expense (income) in the six months ended June 30, 2007 consisted of a $1.8 million charge related to the closing of a manufacturing facility in Montreal, Canada and a sales office in France, a $0.1 million charge related to the termination of our surgical lights product offering, and $6.1 million in income related to the settlement of the antitrust case with Johnson & Johnson.  In the six months ended June 30, 2006, other expense (income) consisted of $0.6 million in costs related to the write-off of inventory in settlement of a patent dispute, $0.1 million in charges related to the termination of a product line and $1.5 million in Endoscopic Technologies acquisition-related costs.

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $0.7 million in losses on the early extinguishment of debt in connection with the refinancing of our senior credit agreement.

Interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $8.8 million compared to $9.5 million in the same period a year ago.  The decrease in interest expense is due to lower weighted average borrowings outstanding in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the same period a year ago, offsetting an increase in the weighted average interest rates on our borrowings (inclusive of the finance charge on our accounts receivable sale facility) to 5.60% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 5.40% in the same period a year ago due to higher market interest rates on our variable rate debt.

A provision for income taxes has been recorded at an effective tax rate of 36.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 32.5% for the same period a year ago.  The effective tax rate for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 is higher than that recorded in the same period a year ago primarily as a result of the settlement in the first quarter of 2006 of the 2001 through 2003 IRS income tax return examinations which resulted in a reduction to income tax expense as well as the elimination in 2007 of the extraterritorial income exclusion benefit.  A reconciliation of the United States statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006, Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

21

Operating Segment Results:

Segment information is prepared on the same basis that we review financial information for operational decision-making purposes.  We conduct our business through five principal operating units: CONMED Endoscopic Technologies, CONMED Endosurgery, CONMED Electrosurgery, CONMED Linvatec and CONMED Patient Care.  Based upon the aggregation criteria for segment reporting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”), we have grouped our CONMED Endosurgery, CONMED Electrosurgery and CONMED Linvatec operating units into a single segment.  The economic characteristics of CONMED Patient Care and CONMED Endoscopic Technologies do not meet the criteria for aggregation due to the lower overall operating loss of these segments.

The following tables summarize the Company’s results of operations by segment for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007.

CONMED Linvatec, CONMED Electrosurgery and CONMED Endosurgery

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2006			2007			2006			2007
Net sales	$	129,647		$	138,530		$	253,767		$	275,924
Income from
operations		19,531			24,916			35,972			43,709
Operating Margin		15.1	%		18.0	%		14.2	%		15.8	%

Product offerings include a complete line of endo-mechanical instrumentation for minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures, electrosurgical generators and related surgical instruments, arthroscopic instrumentation for use in orthopedic surgery and small bone, large bone and specialty powered surgical instruments.

· Arthroscopy sales increased $6.1 million (10.4%) in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 to $64.9 million from $58.8 million in the same period a year ago. Arthroscopy sales increased $13.6 million (12.0%) in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $127.1 million from $113.5 million in the same period a year ago. These increases are principally a result of increased sales of our procedure specific, resection and video imaging products for arthroscopy and general surgery.

· Powered surgical instrument sales increased $2.7 million (8.1%) in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 to $36.0 million from $33.3 million in the same period a year ago.  Powered surgical instrument sales increased $6.1 million (9.0%) in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $73.6 million from $67.5 million in the same period a year ago.  These increases are principally a result of increased sales of our small bone and large bone powered instrument products.

· Electrosurgery sales decreased $2.1 million (8.7%) in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 to $22.1 million from $24.2 million in the same period a year ago.  Electrosurgery sales decreased $1.4 million (3.2%) in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $46.1 million from $47.5 million in the same period a year ago.  These decreases were principally a result of decreased sales of our System 5000™ electrosurgical generator, ground pads and ABC® Equipment which offset increased sales of our ABC® handpieces and UltraClean® products.

22

· Endosurgery sales increased $2.2 million (16.5%) in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 to $15.5 million from $13.3 million in the same period a year ago.  Endosurgery sales increased $3.9 million (15.5%) in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $29.1 million from $25.2 million in the same period a year ago.  These increases are principally a result of increased sales of hand held instruments, suction irrigation products and skin staplers.

· Operating margins as a percentage of net sales increased 2.9 percentage points to 18.0% in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared to 15.1% in 2006 while operating margins increased 1.6 percentage points to 15.8% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 14.2% in the same period a year ago.  The increases in operating margins in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007 are due to increases in gross margins of 1.4 and 0.6 percentage points, respectively, compared to the same periods a year ago as a result of higher selling prices and lower production variances.  The remaining increases in operating margins in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007 of 1.5 and 1.0 percentage points, respectively, compared to the same periods a year ago are attributable to greater leverage of our cost structure as administrative expenses remained level offsetting higher sales force and distribution costs associated with the increase in sales.

CONMED Patient Care

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2006			2007			2006			2007
Net sales	$	19,107		$	17,315		$	38,720		$	37,676
Loss from
operations		(1,712	)		(1,265	)		(1,448	)		(238	)
Operating Margin		(9.0%	)		(7.3%	)		(3.7%	)		(0.6%	)

Product offerings include a line of vital signs and cardiac monitoring products including pulse oximetry equipment and sensors, ECG electrodes and cables, cardiac defibrillation and pacing pads and blood pressure cuffs.  We also offer a complete line of reusable surgical patient positioners and suction instruments and tubing for use in the operating room, as well as a line of IV products and hydrogel-based wound care dressings.

· Patient care sales decreased $1.8 million (9.4%) in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 to $17.4 million from $19.2 million in the same period a year ago. Patient care sales decreased $1.0 million (2.6%) in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $37.8 million from $38.8 million in the same period a year ago. These decreases are principally a result of decreased sales of our suction instruments and ECG electrodes.

· Operating margins as a percentage of net sales increased 1.7 percentage points to -7.3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared to -9.0% in 2006 while

23

operating margins increased 3.1 percentage points to -0.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to -3.7% in the same period a year ago.  The increases in operating margins in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007 are primarily due to increases in gross margins of 3.9 and 3.2 percentage points, respectively, compared to the same periods a year ago as a result of higher selling prices and lower production variances, offset by higher selling, administrative and research and development costs (2.2 and 0.1 percentage points, respectively), in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period a year ago.

CONMED Endoscopic Technologies

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2006			2007			2006			2007
Net sales	$	14,719		$	13,413		$	29,452		$	26,672
Loss from
operations		(4,019	)		(2,432	)		(6,391	)		(3,643	)
Operating Margin		(27.3%	)		(18.1%	)		(21.7%	)		(13.7%	)

Product offerings include a comprehensive line of minimally invasive endoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic instruments used in procedures which require examination of the digestive tract.

· Endoscopic Technologies sales decreased $1.3 million (8.8%) in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 from $14.7 million to $13.4 million in the same period a year ago. Endoscopic Technologies sales decreased $2.8 million (9.5%) in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $26.6 million from $29.4 million in the same period a year ago.  These decreases are principally a result of decreased sales of forceps, biliary and pulmonary products as a result of increased competition and pricing pressures as well as production and operational issues which resulted in product shortages and backorders.

· Operating margins as a percentage of net sales increased 9.2 percentage points to -18.1% in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared to -27.3% in 2006 while operating margins increased 8.0 percentage points to -13.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to -21.7% in the same period a year ago.  The increases in operating margins in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007 are primarily due to increases in gross margins of 12.4 and 8.5 percentage points, respectively, compared to the same periods a year ago as a result of the completion of the transfer of production lines from C.R. Bard to CONMED during 2006, offset by the effect of lower sales levels on administrative expenses (resulting in an increase as a percentage of sales of 3.2 and 0.5 percentage points, respectively, in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007) compared to the same period a year ago.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity needs arise primarily from capital investments, working capital requirements and payments on indebtedness under our senior credit agreement.  We have historically met these liquidity requirements with funds generated from operations, including sales of accounts receivable and borrowings under our

24

revolving credit facility.  In addition, we use term borrowings, including borrowings under our senior credit agreement and borrowings under separate loan facilities, in the case of real property purchases, to finance our acquisitions.  We also have the ability to raise funds through the sale of stock or we may issue debt through a private placement or public offering.  We generally attempt to minimize our cash balances on-hand and use available cash to pay down debt or repurchase our common stock.

Cash provided by operations

Our net working capital position was $191.7 million at June 30, 2007.  Net cash provided by operating activities was $25.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and $27.5 million in the same period a year ago.

           Net cash provided by operating activities declined $1.7 million in 2007 as compared to 2006 on higher net income primarily as a result of increases in inventory levels from their December 31, 2006 levels in our arthroscopy and powered instrument product lines in anticipation of continued sales growth and to accommodate sales orders for new products.   

Investing cash flows

Net cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2007 consisted of capital expenditures and additional cash consideration paid for a business acquisition as a result of a purchase price adjustment.  Capital expenditures were $10.2 million and $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.  The decrease in capital expenditures in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the same period a year ago is primarily due to the completion of certain manufacturing and distribution infrastructure improvements.

Financing cash flows

Net cash used in financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2007 consisted primarily of the following:  $10.6 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan and $26.3 million in repayments of term borrowings under our senior credit agreement.

           Our $235.0 million senior credit agreement (the "senior credit agreement") consists of a $100.0 million revolving credit facility and a $135.0 million term loan.  There were no borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2007.  Our available borrowings on the revolving credit facility at June 30, 2007 were $95.0 million with approximately $5.0 million of the facility set aside for outstanding letters of credit.  There were $76.7 million in borrowings outstanding on the term loan at June 30, 2007.

The scheduled principal payments on the term loan portion of the senior credit agreement are $1.4 million annually through December 2011, increasing to $70.6 million in 2012 with the remaining balance outstanding due and payable on April 12, 2013.  We may also be required, under certain circumstances, to make additional principal payments based on excess cash flow as defined in the senior credit agreement.  Interest rates on the term loan portion of the senior credit agreement are at LIBOR plus 1.75% (7.07% at June 30, 2007) or an alternative base rate; interest rates on the revolving credit facility portion of the senior credit agreement are at LIBOR plus 1.50% or an alternative base rate.  For those borrowings where the Company elects to use the alternative base rate, the base rate is the greater of the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate in effect on such date plus 0.50%, plus a margin of 0.75% for term loan borrowings or 0.50% for borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

25

The senior credit agreement is collateralized by substantially all of our personal property and assets, except for our accounts receivable and related rights which are pledged in connection with our accounts receivable sales agreement.  The senior credit agreement contains covenants and restrictions which, among other things, require the maintenance of certain financial ratios, and restrict dividend payments and the incurrence of certain indebtedness and other activities, including acquisitions and dispositions.  We were in full compliance with these covenants and restrictions as of June 30, 2007.  We are also required, under certain circumstances, to make mandatory prepayments from net cash proceeds from any issue of equity and asset sales.

Mortgage notes outstanding in connection with the property and facilities utilized by our CONMED Linvatec subsidiary consist of a note bearing interest at 7.50% per annum with semiannual payments of principal and interest through June 2009 (the "Class A note"); and a note bearing interest at 8.25% per annum compounded semiannually through June 2009, after which semiannual payments of principal and interest will commence, continuing through June 2019 (the "Class C note").  The principal balances outstanding on the Class A note and Class C note aggregated $4.4 million and $10.0 million, respectively, at June 30, 2007.  These mortgage notes are secured by the CONMED Linvatec property and facilities.

We have outstanding $150.0 million in 2.50% convertible senior subordinated notes (the “Notes”) due 2024.  The Notes represent subordinated unsecured obligations and are convertible under certain circumstances, as defined in the bond indenture, into a combination of cash and CONMED common stock.  Upon conversion, the holder of each Note will receive the conversion value of the Note payable in cash up to the principal amount of the Note and CONMED common stock for the Note’s conversion value in excess of such principal amount.  Amounts in excess of the principal amount are at an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of 26.1849 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the Note (which represents an initial conversion price of $38.19 per share).  The Notes mature on November 15, 2024 and are not redeemable by us prior to November 15, 2011.  Holders of the Notes will be able to require that we repurchase some or all of the Notes on November 15, 2011, 2014 and 2019.

Our Board of Directors has authorized a share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $50.0 million of our common stock in any calendar year.  We did not repurchase any shares during the first six months of 2007.  We have financed the repurchases and may finance additional repurchases through the proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock option plans, from operating cash flow and from available borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Management believes that cash flow from operations, including accounts receivable sales, cash and cash equivalents on hand and available borrowing capacity under our senior credit agreement will be adequate to meet our anticipated operating working capital requirements, debt service, funding of capital expenditures and common stock repurchases in the foreseeable future.

26

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We have an accounts receivable sales agreement pursuant to which we and certain of our subsidiaries sell on an ongoing basis certain accounts receivable to CONMED Receivables Corporation (“CRC”), a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose subsidiary of CONMED Corporation.  CRC may in turn sell up to an aggregate $50.0 million undivided percentage ownership interest in such receivables (the “asset interest”) to a bank (the “purchaser”).  The purchaser’s share of collections on accounts receivable are calculated as defined in the accounts receivable sales agreement, as amended.  Effectively, collections on the pool of receivables flow first to the purchaser and then to CRC, but to the extent that the purchaser’s share of collections may be less than the amount of the purchaser’s asset interest, there is no recourse to CONMED or CRC for such shortfall.  For receivables which have been sold, CONMED Corporation and its subsidiaries retain collection and administrative responsibilities as agent for the purchaser.  As of June 30, 2007, the undivided percentage ownership interest in receivables sold by CRC to the purchaser aggregated $46.0 million, which has been accounted for as a sale and reflected in the balance sheet as a reduction in accounts receivable.  Expenses associated with the sale of accounts receivable, including the purchaser’s financing costs to purchase the accounts receivable were $1.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and are included in interest expense.

There are certain statistical ratios, primarily related to sales dilution and losses on accounts receivable, which must be calculated and maintained on the pool of receivables in order to continue selling to the purchaser.  The pool of receivables is in full compliance with these ratios.  Management believes that additional accounts receivable arising in the normal course of business will be of sufficient quality and quantity to meet the requirements for sale under the accounts receivables sales agreement.  In the event that new accounts receivable arising in the normal course of business do not qualify for sale, then collections on sold receivables will flow to the purchaser rather than being used to fund new receivable purchases.  To the extent that such collections would not be available to CONMED in the form of new receivables purchases, we would need to access an alternate source of working capital, such as our $100 million revolving credit facility.  Our accounts receivable sales agreement, as amended, also requires us to obtain a commitment (the “purchaser commitment”) from the purchaser to fund the purchase of our accounts receivable.  The purchaser commitment was amended effective October 23, 2006 whereby it was extended through October 31, 2008 under substantially the same terms and conditions.

New accounting pronouncements

See Note 13 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no significant changes in our primary market risk exposures or in how these exposures are managed during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007.  Reference is made to Item 7A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006 for a description of Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

27

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer (“the Certifying Officers”) as of June 30, 2007.  Based on that evaluation, the Certifying Officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.  There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Reference is made to Item 3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006 and to Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in Part I of this Report for a description of certain legal matters.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The annual meeting of stockholders of CONMED Corporation was held on May 17, 2007 (the “Annual Meeting”).  Holders of Common Stock were entitled to elect eight directors.  On all matters which came before the Annual Meeting, holders of Common Stock were entitled to one vote for each share held.  Proxies for 26,853,417 of the 28,173,442 shares of Common Stock entitled to vote were received in connection with the Annual Meeting.

The following table sets forth the names of the eight persons elected at the Annual Meeting to serve as directors until the first annual meeting of stockholders following the end of the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 and the number of votes cast for, against or withheld with respect to each person.

Election of Directors

Director	Votes Received	Votes Withheld
Eugene R. Corasanti	26,424,991	428,426
Joseph J. Corasanti	26,426,317	427,100
Bruce F. Daniels	25,274,062	1,579,355
Jo Ann Golden	26,677,708	175,709
Stephen M. Mandia	26,632,851	220,566
William D. Matthews	26,632,397	221,020
Stuart J. Schwartz	26,650,617	202,800
Mark E. Tryniski	26,655,657	197,760

28

Management Proposals	For		Against		Abstain		Broker Non-votes
Approval of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007;		26,267,985		578,680		6,752		-
Approval of 2007 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan		19,660,850		4,620,530		56,883		2,515,154

29

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit
31.1	Certification of Joseph J. Corasanti pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), of the Securities Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Robert D. Shallish, Jr. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), of the Securities Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Joseph J. Corasanti and Robert D. Shallish, Jr. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

30

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CONMED CORPORATION
	(Registrant)
Date:  August 3, 2007
	/s/ Robert D. Shallish, Jr.
	Robert D. Shallish, Jr.
	Vice President – Finance and
	Chief Financial Officer

31

Exhibit Index

		Sequential Page
Exhibit		Number
31.1	Certification of Joseph J. Corasanti pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	E-1
31.2	Certification of Robert D. Shallish, Jr. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	E-2
32.1	Certification of Joseph J. Corasanti and Robert D. Shallish, Jr. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	E-3

32