Provident Bankshares (PBKS) 10-Q 2008 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2008

Commission File Number 0-16421

PROVIDENT BANKSHARES CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland	52-1518642
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

114 East Lexington Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(410) 277-7000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer    x    Accelerated filer    ¨    Non-accelerated filer    ¨    Smaller reporting company    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

At November 5, 2008, the Registrant had 33,583,641 shares of $1.00 par value common stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition – Unaudited September  30, 2008 and 2007 and December 31, 2007		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations – Unaudited three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Unaudited nine month periods ended September  30, 2008 and 2007		6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	61
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	61
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	61
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	61
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	62
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	62
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	62
Item 5.	Other Information	62
Item 6.	Exhibits	63
SIGNATURES		64

2

Forward-looking Statements

This report, as well as other written communications made from time to time by Provident Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) (including, without limitation, the Corporation’s 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders) and oral communications made from time to time by authorized officers of the Corporation, may contain statements relating to the future results of the Corporation (including certain projections and business trends) that are considered “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). Such forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “intend” and “potential.” Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, possible or assumed estimates with respect to the financial condition, expected or anticipated revenue, and results of operations and business of the Corporation, including earnings growth determined using U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”); revenue growth in retail banking, lending and other areas; origination volume in the Corporation’s consumer, commercial and other lending businesses; asset quality and levels of non-performing assets; impairment charges with respect to investment securities; current and future capital management programs; non-interest income levels, including fees from services and product sales; tangible capital generation; market share; expense levels; and other business operations and strategies. For these statements, the Corporation claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the PSLRA.

The Corporation cautions you that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated in any forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the factors identified in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 under the headings “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” prevailing economic conditions, either nationally or locally in some or all areas in which the Corporation conducts business or conditions in the securities markets or the banking industry; changes in interest rates, deposit flows, loan demand, real estate values and competition, which can materially affect, among other things, consumer banking revenues, revenues from sales on non-deposit investment products, origination levels in the Corporation’s lending businesses and the level of defaults, losses and prepayments on loans made by the Corporation, whether held in portfolio or sold in the secondary markets; changes in the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios; the Corporation’s ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems and management personnel the Corporation may acquire into its operations and its ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames; the Corporation’s timely development of new and competitive products or services in a changing environment, and the acceptance of such products or services by customers; operational issues and/or capital spending necessitated by the potential need to adapt to industry changes in information technology systems, on which it is highly dependent; changes in accounting principles, policies, and guidelines; changes in any applicable law, rule, regulation or practice with respect to tax or legal issues; risks and uncertainties related to mergers and related integration and restructuring activities; conditions in the securities markets or the banking industry; changes in the quality or composition of the investment portfolio; litigation liabilities, including costs, expenses, settlements and judgments; or the outcome of other matters before regulatory agencies, whether pending or commencing in the future; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting the Corporation’s operations, pricing, products and services. Additionally, the timing and occurrence or non-occurrence of events may be subject to circumstances beyond the Corporation’s control. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which are made as of the date of this report, and, except as may be required by applicable law or regulation, the Corporation assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

3

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Provident Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition

(dollars in thousands, except per share and share amounts)	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007			September 30, 2007
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	127,491		$	140,348		$	123,417
Short-term investments		3,023			1,970			2,822
Mortgage loans held for sale		3,911			8,859			10,571
Securities available for sale		1,016,417			1,421,299			1,511,945
Securities held to maturity		311,806			47,265			47,654
Loans		4,264,201			4,215,326			4,047,715
Less allowance for loan losses		59,674			55,269			51,244
Net loans		4,204,527			4,160,057			3,996,471
Premises and equipment, net		60,652			59,979			60,630
Accrued interest receivable		27,370			33,883			36,091
Goodwill		252,095			253,906			253,906
Intangible assets		5,203			6,152			6,474
Other assets		397,981			331,328			314,029
Total assets	$	6,410,476		$	6,465,046		$	6,364,010
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	676,798		$	676,260		$	715,224
Interest-bearing		3,918,595			3,503,260			3,491,517
Total deposits		4,595,393			4,179,520			4,206,741
Short-term borrowings		509,393			861,395			734,748
Long-term debt		714,389			771,683			771,726
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		48,837			96,677			40,074
Total liabilities		5,868,012			5,909,275			5,753,289
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred Stock (par value $1.00) authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued 51,215 shares at September 30, 2008, liquidation preference $1,000 per share		51,215			—			—
Common stock (par value $1.00) authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued 33,338,972, 31,621,956 and 31,974,520 shares at September 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and September 30, 2007, respectively		33,339			31,622			31,975
Additional paid-in capital		360,541			347,603			354,836
Retained earnings		210,913			244,723			270,475
Net accumulated other comprehensive loss		(113,544	)		(68,177	)		(46,565	)
Total stockholders’ equity		542,464			555,771			610,721
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6,410,476		$	6,465,046		$	6,364,010

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

4

Provident Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations—Unaudited

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2008			2007		2008			2007
Interest Income:
Loans, including fees	$	59,254		$	72,363	$	185,575		$	211,895
Investment securities		18,905			20,565		58,234			63,829
Tax-advantaged loans and securities		1,617			1,907		4,868			5,125
Short-term investments		14			39		67			181
Total interest income		79,790			94,874		248,744			281,030
Interest Expense:
Deposits		26,626			27,242		79,846			79,511
Short-term borrowings		2,511			8,774		11,892			23,345
Long-term debt		6,821			11,021		22,182			32,854
Total interest expense		35,958			47,037		113,920			135,710
Net interest income		43,832			47,837		134,824			145,320
Less provision for loan losses		6,571			7,494		16,085			13,338
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		37,261			40,343		118,739			131,982
Non-Interest Income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		22,482			23,910		65,790			70,591
Commissions and fees		1,253			1,616		4,215			5,122
Impairment on investment securities		(24,570	)		—		(87,973	)		—
Net gains		947			4,902		8,907			6,525
Net derivative activities		9			397		105			183
Other non-interest income		4,432			4,478		14,702			13,836
Total non-interest income		4,553			35,303		5,746			96,257
Non-Interest Expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		26,703			26,390		79,647			81,018
Occupancy expense, net		5,947			5,978		17,616			17,973
Furniture and equipment expense		3,993			3,875		11,731			11,671
External processing fees		5,312			5,083		15,534			15,214
Restructuring activities		5			111		45			1,459
Other non-interest expense		11,233			11,248		30,424			32,746
Total non-interest expense		53,193			52,685		154,997			160,081
Income (loss) before income taxes		(11,379	)		22,961		(30,512	)		68,158
Income tax expense (benefit)		(5,987	)		6,993		(17,722	)		20,554
Net income (loss)	$	(5,392	)	$	15,968	$	(12,790	)	$	47,604
Net income (loss)	$	(5,392	)	$	15,968	$	(12,790	)	$	47,604
Beneficial conversion feature - preferred stock		—			—		1,463			—
Dividends - preferred stock		1,523			—		1,523			—
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	(6,915	)	$	15,968	$	(15,776	)	$	47,604
Net Income (Loss) Per Share Amounts:
Basic	$	(0.21	)	$	0.50	$	(0.49	)	$	1.48
Diluted		(0.21	)		0.50		(0.49	)		1.48

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5

Provident Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Unaudited

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2008			2007
Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(12,790	)	$	47,604
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		12,607			14,619
Provision for loan losses		16,085			13,338
Provision for deferred income tax benefit		(34,081	)		(7,190	)
Impairment on investment securities		87,973			—
Net gains		(8,907	)		(848	)
Gain on sale of branches and deposits		—			(5,677	)
Net derivative activities		(105	)		(183	)
Originated loans held for sale		(60,074	)		(90,166	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		65,317			90,728
Restructuring activities		45			1,459
Cash payments for restructuring activities		(165	)		(877	)
Share based payments		2,269			1,532
Net decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets		2,334			(24,489	)
Net increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,272			4,427
Total adjustments		88,570			(3,327	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		75,780			44,277
Investing Activities:
Principal collections and maturities of securities available for sale		92,915			115,923
Principal collections and maturities of securities held to maturity		3,030			52,048
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		9,643			82,938
Purchases of securities available for sale		(118,919	)		(171,654	)
Loan originations and purchases less principal collections		(58,263	)		(189,012	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(10,953	)		(6,156	)
Sale of branch facility		—			3,867
Net cash used by investing activities		(82,547	)		(112,046	)
Financing Activities:
Net increase in deposits		361,362			72,475
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings		(352,002	)		75,861
Proceeds from long-term debt		65,000			220,000
Payments and maturities of long-term debt		(170,169	)		(276,649	)
Net proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt		47,731			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		127			3,281
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		13,109			—
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		49,241			—
Tax (expenses) benefits associated with share based payments		(156	)		278
Purchase of treasury stock		(183	)		(21,141	)
Cash dividends paid on common stock		(17,574	)		(30,009	)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock		(1,523	)		—
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(5,037	)		44,096
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(11,804	)		(23,673	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		142,318			149,912
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	130,514		$	126,239
Supplemental Disclosures:
Interest paid, net of amount credited to deposit accounts	$	66,543		$	78,150
Income taxes paid		13,368			19,759
Beneficial conversion feature - Preferred stock		1,463			—
Impairment of premises and equipment		267			357

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

6

Provident Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—Unaudited

September 30, 2008

NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Provident Bankshares Corporation (“the Corporation”), a Maryland corporation, is the bank holding company for Provident Bank (“the Bank”), a Maryland chartered stock commercial bank. The Bank serves individuals and businesses through a network of banking offices and ATMs in Maryland, Virginia, and southern York County, Pennsylvania. Related financial services are offered through its wholly owned subsidiaries. Securities brokerage, investment management and related insurance services are available through Provident Investment Company and leases through Court Square Leasing.

The accounting and reporting policies of the Corporation conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and prevailing practices within the banking industry for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements and prevailing practices within the banking industry. The following summary of significant accounting policies of the Corporation is presented to assist the reader in understanding the financial and other data presented in this report. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future quarters or for the year ending December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 29, 2008.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Provident Bank and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of our results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

Certain prior periods and prior years’ amounts in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used for the current period. These reclassifications have no effect on stockholders’ equity or net income as previously reported.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities for the reporting periods. Management evaluates estimates on an on-going basis and believes the following represent its more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its consolidated financial statements: allowance for loan losses, non-accrual loans, other real estate owned, estimates of fair value and intangible assets associated with mergers, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, pension and post-retirement benefits, asset prepayment rates, goodwill and intangible assets, share-based payment, derivative financial instruments, litigation and income taxes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Each estimate and its financial impact, to the extent significant to financial results, is discussed in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements or in the notes to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements as included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. It is at least reasonably possible that each of the Corporation’s estimates could change in the near term or that actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could be material to the Corporation’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Changes in Accounting Principles

Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefits Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (“EITF 06-4”). The issue addresses the accounting for the liability and related compensation costs for endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements that provide benefits to employees that extend to postretirement periods. The Corporation has split-dollar arrangements that provide certain postretirement death benefits to certain employees. Under the provisions of EITF 06-4, the application of this guidance was recognized through a $461 thousand cumulative adjustment of beginning retained earnings.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 161”), which will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The statement amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 to provide an enhanced understanding of an entity’s uses of derivative

7

instruments, how the derivatives are accounted for and how the derivatives instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The Corporation is currently evaluating the disclosure requirements of this guidance and any implications it may have on the results of operations of the Corporation.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB staff position (“FSP”) EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities” (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”), which will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. This FSP requires unvested share-based payments to entitled employees that receive nonrefundable dividends to be considered participating securities. The Corporation is currently evaluating the requirements and implications of this guidance.

In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarifications of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161” (“FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4”), which will be effective for reporting periods ending after November 15, 2008. This FSP requires disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in hybrid instruments, additional disclosures concerning the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee and provides clarification concerning the FASB’s intent regarding the effective date of FASB No.161. The Corporation is evaluating the requirements, but does not believe this guidance will result in any additional disclosures in the Corporation’s financial statements.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is not Active”(“FSP FAS 157-3”), which was effective upon the date of issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. This FSP clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and provides illustrative examples regarding key considerations in determining the fair value of financial assets when the market for that asset is not considered active. The Corporation has evaluated this guidance and has incorporated the clarifications in its fair value measurement process for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. Further information on the Corporation’s fair value process is contained in Note 2 below.

NOTE 2—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted SFAS No. 157 – “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). This statement defines the concept of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies only to fair value measurements required or permitted under current accounting pronouncements, but does not require any new fair value measurements. Under FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, portions of SFAS No. 157 have been deferred until years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statement on a recurring basis. Therefore, the Corporation has partially adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157.

Fair value is defined as the price to sell an asset or to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants as of the measurement date. Market participants are assumed to be parties to a transaction that are both able and willing to enter into a transaction and are assumed to be sufficiently knowledgeable about the value and inherent risks associated with the asset or liability. FSP FAS 157-3 clarified the application of SFAS No. 157 if the market is not active. If there is limited market activity for an asset at the measurement date, the fair value is the price that would be received by the holder of the financial asset in an orderly transaction that is not a forced sale, liquidation sale or a distressed sale at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value that considers the attributes specific to particular assets or liabilities and establishes a three-level hierarchy for determining fair value based on the transparency of inputs to each valuation as of the fair value measurement date. The statement also expands disclosures about financial instruments that are measured at fair value and eliminates the use of large position discounts for financial instruments quoted in active markets. The disclosure’s emphasis is on the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect on the measurement on earnings for the period. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have any effect on the Corporation’s financial position or results of operations.

Fair Value Process

The Corporation has established a well documented process for determining fair value. Fair value may be based on quoted market prices in an active market when available, or through a combination of prices determined by an income valuation technique using fair value models and quoted prices. Pricing information obtained from third party pricing services is internally validated for reasonableness prior to being used in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Formal discussions with the pricing service vendors are conducted as part of the due diligence process in order to maintain a current understanding of the models and related assumptions and inputs that these vendors use in developing prices. If it is determined that a price provided is outside established parameters, further examination of the price, including conducting follow-up discussions with the pricing service or dealer will occur. If it is determined that the price lacks validity, that price will not be used. If listed prices or active market quotes are not readily available, fair value may be based on internal calculations or external fair value models that use market participant data, independently sourced market observable data or unobserved inputs that are corroborated by market data. Fair value models may be required when

8

trading activity has declined significantly, prices are not current or pricing variations are significant. Data may include, but are not limited to, discount rates, interest rate yield curves, prepayment rates, delinquencies, bond ratings, credit risk, loss severities, recovery timing, default and cumulative loss expectations that are implied by market prices for similar securities and collateral structure types, and expected cash flow assumptions. In addition, valuation adjustments may be made in the determination of fair value. These fair value adjustments may include, but are not limited to, amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, creditworthiness, liquidity and other unobservable inputs that are applied consistently over time. These adjustments are estimates, and therefore, subject to management’s judgment. When relevant observable inputs are not available, fair value models may use input assumptions from a market participants’ perspective that generate a series of cash flows that are discounted at an appropriate risk adjusted discount rate. The Corporation has various controls in place to ensure that the fair value measurements are appropriate and reliable, that they are based on observable inputs wherever possible and that valuation approaches are consistently applied and the assumptions used are reasonable. This includes a review and approval of the valuation methodologies and pricing models, benchmarking, comparison to similar products and/or review of actual cash settlements.

The Corporation’s valuation methodologies are continually refined as markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more or less transparent. While the Corporation believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different methods or assumptions to determine fair values could result in a materially different estimate of the fair value of some financial instruments.

Hierarchy Levels

SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based on the inputs used to value the particular asset or liability at the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

• Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices of identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

• Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Each financial instrument’s level assignment within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement for that particular instrument.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of each instrument under the valuation hierarchy.

Assets and Liabilities

Mortgage loans held for sale

Mortgage loans held for sale are valued based on the unobservable contractual terms established with a third party purchaser who processes and purchases the loans at their face amount and are classified as Level 3.

Investment securities

Securities are classified as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy when quoted prices are available in an active market. This includes securities, such as U.S. Treasuries, whose value is based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets.

Securities are generally classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy when fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows and include certain U.S. agency backed mortgage products, certain asset-backed securities and municipal debt obligations. If quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets are not available, fair values are estimated by using quoted market prices in active markets of securities with similar characteristics adjusted for observable market information.

Securities are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy in certain cases when there is limited activity or less transparency to the valuation inputs. These securities include certain asset-backed securities, non-agency mortgage-backed securities and pooled trust preferred securities. In the absence of observable or corroborated market data, internally developed estimates that incorporate market-based assumptions are used when such information is available.

Beginning in the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation no longer includes FHLB stock in the SFAS No. 157 disclosure due to FHLB stock being recorded at cost. Also, beginning in the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation began categorizing U.S. agency backed mortgage securities as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy because it was concluded that the fair values for these securities were based on Level 2 inputs.

Fair value of investment securities is based on quoted active market prices, when available. If listed prices or active market quotes are not available, fair value may be based on fair value models that use market observable or independently sourced market input data.

9

Fair value models may be required when trading activity has declined significantly or does not exist, prices are not current or pricing variations are significant. The Corporation’s fair value models utilize modeling software that uses market participant data and knowledge of the structures of each individual security to develop cash flows specific to each security. The fair values of the securities are determined by using the cash flows developed by the fair value model and applying appropriate market observable discount rates. The discount rates are developed by determining credit spreads above a benchmark rate, such as LIBOR, and adding premiums for illiquidity developed based on a comparison of initial issuance spread to LIBOR versus a financial sector curve for recently issued debt to LIBOR. Specific securities that have increased uncertainty regarding the receipt of cash flows are discounted at higher rates due to the addition of a deal specific credit premium. Finally, internal fair value model pricing and external pricing observations are combined by assigning weights to each pricing observation. Pricing is reviewed for reasonableness based on the direction of the specific markets and the general economic indicators.

Derivatives

The Corporation’s open derivative positions are considered within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Open derivative positions are valued using a third party developed model that uses as its basis observable market data or inputs provided by the third party. Examples of these derivatives include interest rate swaps, caps and floors where the indices, correlation and contractual rates may be observable. Exchange-traded derivatives, if applicable, are valued using quoted prices and classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation did not have any exchange-traded derivatives.

The derivative financial instruments valued at fair value at September 30, 2008 do not incorporate counterparty credit risk in the valuation of the financial instrument. Management has determined an adjustment to the fair value of the Corporation’s interest rate swaps for counterparty risk is not required because its believed that the credit risk is inherent in lending to the swap participants and the credit risk is not significantly different from the risk attributed to the interest rate swap curve itself, which is used to determine the fair value of the interest rate swaps.

Bank owned life insurance policies

Beginning in the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation no longer includes bank owned life insurance policies in the SFAS No. 157 disclosure because values of these policies are based on cash surrender values provided by the insurance carriers. The balances of these policies were $153.4 million at December 31, 2007 and $156.2 million at June 30, 2008.

The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008 on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition utilizing the SFAS No. 157 hierarchy discussed on the previous pages:

	At September 30, 2008
(in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Mortgage loans held for sale	$	3,911	$	—	$	—	$	3,911
U.S. Treasury		6,947		6,947		—		—
GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities		626,086		—		626,086		—
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities		67,772		—		—		67,772
Municipals		145,261		—		145,261		—
Asset-backed securities		131,982		—		43,662		88,320
Securities available for sale		978,048		6,947		815,009		156,092
Derivatives		2,920		—		2,920		—
Total assets at fair value	$	984,879	$	6,947	$	817,929	$	160,003
Other liabilities
Derivatives	$	710	$	—	$	710	$	—
Total liabilities at fair value	$	710	$	—	$	710	$	—

10

Changes in Level 3 fair value measurements

The following table provides a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2008. Level 3 financial instruments typically include unobservable components, but may also include some observable components that may be validated to external sources.

	Level 3 measurements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands)	Mortgage loans held for sale			Securities available for sale
Balance at June 30, 2008	$	8,080		$	486,815
Total net gains (losses) for the year included in:
Net gains (losses)		67			(20,409	)
Other comprehensive gain (loss)		—			40,644
Purchases, sales or settlements, net		(4,236	)		(4,228	)
Net transfer in (out) of Level 3		—			(346,730	)
Balance at September 30, 2008	$	3,911		$	156,092
Net realized gains (losses) included in net income for the year to date relating to assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2008	$	—		$	(20,409	)
	Level 3 measurements for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands)	Mortgage loans held for sale			Securities available for sale
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	8,859		$	519,278
Total net gains (losses) for the year included in:
Net gains (losses)		295			(83,812	)
Other comprehensive gain (loss)		—			11,351
Purchases, sales or settlements, net		(5,243	)		(13,180	)
Net transfer in (out) of Level 3		—			(277,545	)
Balance at September 30, 2008	$	3,911		$	156,092
Net realized gains (losses) included in net income for the year to date relating to assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2008	$	—		$	(83,812	)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, $277.5 million of net transfers were made out of Level 3, representing the transfer in of $121.5 million in non-agency mortgage backed securities and the transfer out of $346.7 million in bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities into the held to maturity portfolio and $52.3 million of corporate securities. The Corporation determined during the current year, that non-agency mortgage backed securities have become less liquid and pricing has become less reliable requiring the use of significant unobservable inputs to price these securities along with a currently inactive market. On July 1, 2008, the Corporation moved certain bank pooled trust preferred securities to the held to maturity portfolio. In addition, management has determined that corporate securities have a more active market and should be classified within the Level 2 compared to Level 3 as reported as of December 31, 2007.

11

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

The following table provides gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 for Level 3 and for assets measured in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition at fair value on a recurring basis that are still held at September 30, 2008.

	Changes in fair value for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands)	Net losses			Other non-interest income		Total changes in fair values included in current period earnings			Total changes in fair values included in unrealized gains or losses for assets still held
Mortgage loans held for sale	$	—		$	67	$	67		$	—
Securities		(20,409	)		—		(20,409	)		40,644
Total assets at fair value	$	(20,409	)	$	67	$	(20,342	)	$	40,644
	Changes in fair value for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands)	Net losses			Other non-interest income		Total changes in fair values included in current period earnings			Total changes in fair values included in unrealized gains or losses for assets still held
Mortgage loans held for sale	$	—		$	295	$	295		$	—
Securities		(83,812	)		—		(83,812	)		11,351
Total assets at fair value	$	(83,812	)	$	295	$	(83,517	)	$	11,351

Nonrecurring fair value changes

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment that may require write-downs. The write-downs for the Corporation’s more significant assets or liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis are based on the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value.

Impaired Loans

Impaired loans are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The Corporation considers loans to be impaired when it becomes probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. All non-accrual loans are considered impaired. The measurement of impaired loans is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Securities Held to Maturity

Impaired securities includes bank pooled trust preferred securities that are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. A review of the entire investment portfolio may indicate that certain securities held to maturity are impaired. If necessary, the Corporation performs fair value modeling and evaluations on these securities. All processes and controls associated with determination of the fair value of those securities are consistent with those performed for securities available for sale. These securities are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. The table below reflects securities held to maturity with realized losses due to OTTI.

	At September 30, 2008
(in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Assets
Securities held to maturity	$	3,476	$	—	$	—	$	3,476	$	(4,161	)
Loans		40,454		—		40,454		—		(8,051	)
Total	$	43,930	$	—	$	40,454	$	3,476	$	(12,212	)

12

NOTE 3—INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The following table presents the aggregate amortized cost and fair values of the investment securities portfolio as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
September 30, 2008
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and corporations	$	45,305	$	11	$	—	$	45,316
Mortgage-backed securities		705,699		2,641		14,482		693,858
Municipal securities		151,408		46		6,193		145,261
Other debt securities		213,436		662		82,116		131,982
Total securities available for sale		1,115,848		3,360		102,791		1,016,417
Securities held to maturity:
Other debt securities		311,806		417		108,890		203,333
Total securities held to maturity		311,806		417		108,890		203,333
Total investment securities	$	1,427,654	$	3,777	$	211,681	$	1,219,750
December 31, 2007
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and corporations	$	41,928	$	26	$	—	$	41,954
Mortgage-backed securities		724,744		1,295		19,664		706,375
Municipal securities		152,865		1,156		330		153,691
Other debt securities		601,837		348		82,906		519,279
Total securities available for sale		1,521,374		2,825		102,900		1,421,299
Securities held to maturity:
Other debt securities		47,265		770		495		47,540
Total securities held to maturity		47,265		770		495		47,540
Total investment securities	$	1,568,639	$	3,595	$	103,395	$	1,468,839
September 30, 2007
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and corporations	$	67,807	$	17	$	1,326	$	66,498
Mortgage-backed securities		697,715		616		22,153		676,178
Municipal securities		153,369		923		470		153,822
Other debt securities		652,221		1,331		38,105		615,447
Total securities available for sale		1,571,112		2,887		62,054		1,511,945
Securities held to maturity:
Other debt securities		47,654		793		75		48,372
Total securities held to maturity		47,654		793		75		48,372
Total investment securities	$	1,618,766	$	3,680	$	62,129	$	1,560,317

13

At September 30, 2008, a net unrealized after-tax loss of $105.2 million on the investment securities portfolio was reflected in net accumulated other comprehensive loss, an element of the Corporation’s capital. This compares to a net unrealized after-tax loss of $35.8 million at September 30, 2007 and a net unrealized after-tax loss of $60.0 million at December 31, 2007.

Impairment Analysis

Market prices may be affected by general market conditions which reflect prospects for the economy as a whole or by specific information pertaining to an industry or an individual company. Such declines are investigated by management. Acting upon the premise that a write-down may be required, the Corporation considers all available evidence in its evaluation of whether the decline is other-then-temporary.

Current market pricing, which reflects a significant discount to cost, has been adversely affected by a significant reduction to liquidity, credit quality of the underlying collateral and the market perception that defaults on the mortgages underlying some of these securities will increase significantly. As a result, the current fair value is substantially less than what the Corporation believes is indicated by the performance of the collateral underlying the securities and calculations of expected cash flows. Although the Corporation recognized other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) equal to the difference between the cost basis and fair value, the Corporation anticipates at this time, based on the expected cash flows of the securities that it will recover some of these impairment amounts.

Changes in current market conditions, such as interest rates and the economic uncertainties in the mortgage, housing and banking industries have severely constricted the structured securities market. The limited secondary market for various types of securities has negatively impacted securities values. Accordingly, the Corporation performs a quarterly review of each investment security within the segments noted in the table on the next page to determine the nature of the decline in the value of investment securities. The Corporation evaluates if any of the underlying securities have experienced OTTI. The Corporation begins by evaluating whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred in the quarter that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment (an “impairment indicator”). Impairment indicators include, but are not limited to:

• A significant deterioration in the earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality, or business prospects of the issuer

• A significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic, or technological environment of the issuer

• A significant adverse change in the general market condition of either the geographic area or the industry in which the issuer operates

• A bona fide offer to purchase (whether solicited or unsolicited), an offer by the issuer to sell, or a completed auction process for the same or similar security for an amount less than the cost of the investment

• Factors that raise significant concerns about the issuer’s ability to continue as a going concern, such as negative cash flows from operations, working capital deficiencies, or noncompliance with statutory capital requirements or debt covenants

Numerous factors are considered in such an evaluation and their relative significance varies from case to case. The Corporation believes that the following factors may, individually or in combination, indicate that a security should be evaluated further to determine if a decline may be other-than-temporary and that a write-down of the carrying value maybe required:

• The length of the time and the amount of price severity in which the market value has been less than cost.

• External credit rating declines.

• The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer such as changes in market conditions, technology that may impair the earnings potential of the investment or the discontinuance of a segment of the business that may affect the future earnings potential.

• The intent and ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

The Corporation’s OTTI evaluation process is performed in a consistent, systematic, and rational manner and includes a disciplined evaluation of all available evidence. This process is applied at the individual security level and considers the causes, severity, length of time and anticipated recovery period of the impairment. Consideration is also given to management’s intent and ability to hold the security over the anticipated recovery period. Documentation is vigorous and extensive as necessary to support a conclusion as to whether a decline in market value below cost is other-than-temporary and includes documentation supporting both observable and unobservable inputs and a rationale for conclusions reached.

14

The investment securities portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating the portfolio into two general segments and applying the appropriate OTTI guidelines provided by the pertinent authoritative literature. FSP FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1 “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments” (“FSP FAS 115-1”) is applied to address considerations of whether an investment is considered impaired, whether the impairment is other-than-temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss. Structured securities, including non-agency MBS, asset-backed securities, and collateralized debt obligations, that had credit ratings at the time of purchase of below AA or purchased at a significant premium are evaluated using the guidance of EITF Issue 99-20 “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to be Held by a Transfer in Securitized Financial Assets” (“EITF 99-20”). Securities determined to not have OTTI under EITF 99-20 are required to be evaluated using the guidance of SFAS No. 115. Impairment is assessed at the individual security level. An investment security is considered impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost basis. Once the security is considered impaired, a determination must be made to see if the impairment is other-than-temporary. If the security is considered other-than-temporarily impaired, an impairment loss is recorded to non-interest income. The OTTI assessment under the SFAS No. 115 segment is based on the performance of the issuer for corporate or municipal bonds, or the collateral in the case of structured securities. The financial performance is evaluated to determine if the financial performance will adversely affect the contractual cash flows of the related security. The second segment of the portfolio uses the OTTI guidance provided by EITF 99-20 that is specific to structured securities that, on the purchase date, were rated below AA or those purchased at a significant premium (generally 10% or more) which might result in the Corporation not recovering substantially all of its investment. The evaluation for OTTI utilizes the best estimate of cash flows from a market participant’s perspective to determine fair value incorporating the risk of defaults. The cash flows are considered to be adversely impacted if the present value of the future cash flows is less than the present value calculated in the prior period using the same methodology. For all securities evaluated under EITF 99-20 and SFAS No. 115, if the length of time needed to recover becomes longer and the magnitude of the decline in value becomes more significant, the evaluation for OTTI of the individual security is more extensive.

Fair values obtained from an independent third party or from third party pricing in combination with the internal pricing models are used as part of the evaluation of OTTI. If current pricing indicates a price decline, the Corporation considers securities with significant price declines or deterioration in fair value in conjunction with the duration of such to determine whether an OTTI evaluation is required. For structured bonds, an evaluation is performed internally using the modeling software. Other securities may require a separate credit evaluation performed internally unless the circumstances dictate the use of an external credit evaluation. The evaluation focuses on the expected cash flows from the individual security taking into consideration the credit quality of the security, including the anticipated inherent losses indicated from the underlying issuers or collateral, the probability of contractual cash flow shortfalls and the ability of the securities to absorb further economic declines. Credit support, if applicable and appropriate, shall also be considered when performing the OTTI evaluation. All relevant information is considered including the credit history of the security and the business sector. All assumptions used to perform an evaluation of projected cash flows will be corroborated from one or more market participants. The cash flows used for the OTTI assessment are obtained from a market participant or developed internally, based on events and information that management estimates a market participant would use in determining the current value. For securities not previously recognized as OTTI, a determination of adversely impacted cash flows will merit recognition as OTTI. Securities previously recognized as OTTI will have their cash flows tested and the result compared to their prior cash flows estimates to determine if further OTTI recognition is warranted.

Once the evaluation has been completed a determination is made whether an individual security is considered OTTI. The OTTI amount is recorded as impairment on investment securities in the period in which it occurs. Once the security is written down, it may not be written up unless the write-up is through yield accretion for the securities as permitted by the appropriate accounting guidance. Furthermore, securities may continue to incur further OTTI after an initial write-down. These further write-downs shall be analyzed with respect to the new basis of the security that was established from any previous write-down(s). The written down value of the investment in the company then becomes the new cost basis of the investment.

15

Discussion of Portfolio Types

The following table provides further detail of the investment securities portfolio at September 30, 2008.

Summary of Investment Securities by Portfolio Type at September 30, 2008

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
U.S. treasury and agency MBS	$	635,598	$	2,643	$	5,209	$	633,032
Municipal securities		151,408		46		6,193		145,261
Non-agency MBS		77,037		9		9,273		67,773
Bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities		404,087		—		165,962		238,125
REIT pooled trust preferred securities		22,671		623		8,202		15,092
Corporate securities		98,084		456		16,842		81,698
FHLB Stock		38,369		—		—		38,369
Sovereign		400		—		—		400
Total	$	1,427,654	$	3,777	$	211,681	$	1,219,750

Unrealized losses associated with the investment securities portfolio total $211.7 million. Of that amount, $154.3 million has existed for a period of twelve consecutive months or longer.

The unrealized losses associated with AAA rated U.S. treasury, agency and agency MBS securities are caused by changes in interest rates and are not considered credit related since the contractual cash flows of these investments are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Unrealized losses that are related to the prevailing interest rate environment will decline over time and recover as these securities approach maturity.

The unrealized losses in the municipal securities portfolio are due to widening credit spreads caused by concerns about the bond insurers associated with these securities. This portfolio segment is not experiencing any credit problems at September 30, 2008, and each security has a credit rating of at least single A. The Corporation believes that all contractual cash flows will be received on this portfolio.

The non-agency MBS securities portfolio has experienced various levels of price declines over the past twelve months. The non-agency MBS securities have experienced price declines due to the current securities market environment and the currently limited secondary market for such securities, in addition to issue specific credit deterioration. Certain non-agency MBS securities have been other-than-temporarily impaired and the value of these securities has been reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings was recognized. The non-agency MBS securities portfolio was written down by $19.8 million in the third quarter of 2008. Management determined through its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment that there is increased uncertainty as to whether the Corporation will receive all of its contractual principal and interest payments. As a result, the Corporation determined that there was not sufficient persuasive evidence to conclude that the impairment was temporary. Management monitors the actual mortgage delinquencies, foreclosures and losses for each security, as well as future expected losses in the underlying mortgage collateral to determine if there is a high probability for expected losses and contractual shortfalls of interest or principal, which could warrant further recognition of impairment. For each security, the credit support is also assessed to determine whether it can absorb the projected loan losses. All non-agency MBS securities that have not been written down appear to have enough credit support to cover the projected loan losses.

Prices in the bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities portfolio continue to decline due to reduced demand for these securities. Additionally, there has been no primary issuance and little secondary market trading for these types of securities. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation believes that the credit quality of most of these securities remains adequate to absorb further economic declines. However, three securities totaling $7.6 million were recognized as OTTI for September 30, 2008. After cash flow testing of these securities using default and loss assumptions derived from a third party credit source with expertise in bank credit quality, two securities failed the model’s projected cash flow test. The third security failed a stress test of the model’s loss expectations. As a result, all three were deemed OTTI. All three securities are current as to interest and principal payments. A limited number of issues have contractually deferred their interest payments. However, these securities have passed a cash flow stress test, as well as other credit evaluations, and as a result are not considered OTTI at September 30, 2008. All structured securities will be tested each quarter in accordance with appropriate accounting guidance.

As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation recognized that certain REIT pooled trust preferred securities were other-than-temporarily impaired and, accordingly, these securities have been written down to their fair value. The REIT pooled trust preferred securities portfolio was written down by $619 thousand in the third quarter of 2008. Management determined through its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment that there is increased uncertainty as to whether the Corporation will receive all of its contractual principal and interest payments. The remaining unrealized losses on these securities are considered temporary in nature. The Corporation

16

believes that these securities have sufficient credit subordination to withstand projected losses without impacting the securities cash flows. The Corporation analyzes the current level of defaults by issue, forecasts defaults of specific issuers and unspecified issuers along with determining the threshold of defaults necessary for interest to be curtailed. In addition, the credit ratings for these securities are also reviewed. This analysis is used to forecast each security’s ability to make its contractual interest and principal payments and assist in the impairment determination.

The unrealized losses in the corporate securities portfolio are associated with the widening spreads in the financial sector of the corporate bond market. At September 30, 2008, all of the securities are current as to principal and interest payments, and are expected to remain so in the future.

At September 30, 2008, many investment securities have unrealized losses that are considered temporary in nature because the decline in fair value was caused by the interest rate environment or widening spreads and not caused by cash flow impairment. The Corporation has the intent and ability to hold these securities until recovery, which may be maturity.

Other-than-Temporary Losses

Listed below is the impairment recognized as OTTI recorded on certain securities described above by the Corporation since the fourth quarter of 2007 and the related book value.

	Impairment on Investment Securities										Book Value 9/30/2008
	4Q 2007		1Q 2008		2Q 2008		3Q 2008		Total
REIT pooled trust preferred securities	$	47,488	$	19,439	$	14,817	$	619	$	82,363	$	22,671
Non-agency MBS securities		—		23,216		5,931		19,790		48,937		77,037
Bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities		—		—		—		4,161		4,161		404,087
Total	$	47,488	$	42,655	$	20,748	$	24,570	$	135,461	$	503,795

The additional write-downs of the securities in the nine months of 2008 were the result of the OTTI review discussed above as these securities have experienced high levels of mortgage delinquencies relative to the credit support remaining in the securities’ structures due to further credit impairment of certain home builders and mortgage REITs that represent the collateral for these securities, or in the case of the bank and insurance pooled trust portfolio, due to the inadequacy of credit support to withstand projected issuer defaults over the remaining life of the securities.

Other Information

On July 1, 2008, the Corporation transferred $346.7 million par value of primarily A-rated (or higher) bank pooled trust preferred securities from its securities available for sale portfolio to its securities held to maturity portfolio. The transferred securities had a fair value of $270.2 million at June 30, 2008, a weighted average maturity of twenty-seven years and a weighted average call date of seven years. The Corporation has the intent and ability to retain these securities until maturity. As a result of the transfer, $76.5 million of net unrealized pre-tax losses associated with the transferred securities, that were previously recorded in net accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will continue to be reflected in stockholders’ equity and be reflected as a discount on investment securities. The discount and amount reflected in net accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will be amortized using the effective interest method over the remaining life of the securities. These amortization amounts will increase the securities available for sale and stockholders’ equity balances over the maturity period of the securities with no impact to net income. Additionally, as a result of this transfer, it is expected that there will be no negative future impact on earnings, net accumulated other comprehensive income, or capital unless the transferred securities are determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired. In the third quarter 2008, the Corporation recorded $4.2 million of OTTI associated with bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities that were transferred to the held to maturity portfolio.

On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act grants the United States Treasury the authority to purchase debt securities from financial institutions. Neither the Corporation’s assessment of its intent to hold its securities to maturity nor its assessment for OTTI as of September 30, 2008 have considered the impact of the Act because the date of this report preceded the ratification date of the Act.

For further details regarding investment securities and impairment of investment securities at December 31, 2007, refer to Notes 1 and 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Corporation will continue to evaluate the investment ratings in the securities portfolio, severity in pricing declines, market price quotes along with timing and receipt of amounts contractually due. Based upon these and other factors, the securities portfolio may experience further impairment.

17

NOTE 4—LOANS

The table below presents a summary of loans outstanding as of the dates indicated.

(in thousands)	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007		September 30, 2007
Residential real estate:
Originated and acquired residential mortgage	$	256,823	$	296,783	$	292,129
Home equity		1,134,473		1,082,819		1,060,882
Other consumer:
Marine		355,779		352,604		355,267
Other		26,680		26,101		28,933
Total consumer		1,773,755		1,758,307		1,737,211
Commercial real estate:
Commercial mortgage		533,914		439,229		440,472
Residential construction		529,445		631,063		618,669
Commercial construction		455,663		447,394		405,249
Commercial business		971,424		939,333		846,114
Total commercial		2,490,446		2,457,019		2,310,504
Total loans	$	4,264,201	$	4,215,326	$	4,047,715

NOTE 5—ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The table below presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:

		Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)		2008		2007		2008		2007
Balance at beginning of period		$	58,174	$	45,769	$	55,269	$	45,203
Provision for loan losses			6,571		7,494		16,085		13,338
Less loans charged-off, net of recoveries:
Originated and acquired residential mortgage			524		175		982		493
Home equity			1,051		274		1,642		418
Marine and other consumer			924		961		1,889		1,932
Residential construction			413		368		2,083		368
Commercial business			2,159		241		5,084		4,086
Net charge-offs			5,071		2,019		11,680		7,297
Balance at end of period		$	59,674	$	51,244	$	59,674	$	51,244
	��

NOTE 6—INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The table below presents an analysis of the goodwill and deposit-based intangible activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

(in thousands)	Goodwill			Accumulated Amortization			Net Goodwill
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	254,528		$	(622	)	$	253,906
Adjustment of intangible related to 2004 merger		(1,811	)		—			(1,811	)
Balance at September 30, 2008	$	252,717		$	(622	)	$	252,095
(in thousands)	Deposit-based Intangible			Accumulated Amortization			Net Deposit-based Intangible
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	10,873		$	(4,721	)	$	6,152
Amortization expense		—			(949	)		(949	)
Balance at September 30, 2008	$	10,873		$	(5,670	)	$	5,203

18

Management tests goodwill for impairment annually unless a significant triggering event occurs. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation believes no impairment charge is required. The adjustment to goodwill during 2008 was primarily due to the resolution of deferred income tax items related to previous business combinations.

NOTE 7—DEPOSITS

The table below presents a summary of deposits as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007		September 30, 2007
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest-bearing demand	$	451,499	$	479,436	$	491,362
Money market		598,989		675,077		607,812
Savings		558,930		512,684		536,172
Direct time certificates of deposit		1,172,207		1,094,622		1,192,522
Brokered certificates of deposit		1,136,970		741,441		663,649
Total interest-bearing deposits		3,918,595		3,503,260		3,491,517
Noninterest-bearing deposits		676,798		676,260		715,224
Total deposits	$	4,595,393	$	4,179,520	$	4,206,741

NOTE 8—SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

The table below presents a summary of short-term borrowings as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007		September 30, 2007
Securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	216,605	$	309,712	$	312,116
Federal funds purchased		215,000		549,000		420,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances - fixed rate		75,000		—		—
Other short-term borrowings		2,788		2,683		2,632
Total short-term borrowings	$	509,393	$	861,395	$	734,748

NOTE 9—LONG-TERM DEBT

The table below presents a summary of long-term debt as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007		September 30, 2007
Federal Home Loan Bank advances - fixed rate	$	15,000	$	90,000	$	90,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances - variable rate		515,000		545,000		545,000
Junior Subordinated Debentures		136,553		136,683		136,726
Subordinated notes		47,836		—		—
Total long-term debt	$	714,389	$	771,683	$	771,726

On April 24, 2008, the Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, Provident Bank, completed a private placement of $50.0 million of subordinated unsecured notes that are rated BBB to qualified institutional buyers and accredited investors. The purchase price of the subordinated notes was 97.651% of the principal amount. The subordinated notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 9.5% and mature on May 1, 2018, with semi-annual interest payments payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year beginning on November 1, 2008. The subordinated notes are not convertible. Beginning on May 1, 2013, Provident Bank may redeem some or all of the subordinated notes, at any time, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of such notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. Proceeds from the debt offering, net of issuance costs, totaled $47.7 million and were used at that time to decrease brokered certificates of deposit and fed funds purchased. This debt qualifies as Tier II capital under regulatory capital guidelines.

19

NOTE 10—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Share-Based Payment Plan Description

The Corporation issues nonqualified stock options and restricted stock grants to certain of its employees and directors pursuant to the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), which has been approved by the Corporation’s shareholders. The Plan allows for a maximum of 12.5 million shares of common stock to be issued. At September 30, 2008, 2.7 million shares were available to be granted by the Corporation pursuant to the plan.

Stock Option Awards

Stock options (“options”) are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Corporation’s shares at the date of the grant. All options issued prior to January 1, 2005 have contractual terms of ten years and are vested. Options granted subsequent to January 1, 2005 vest based on four years of continuous service and have eight-year contractual terms.

All options provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control (as defined in the Plan). Stock options exercised result in the issuance of new shares.

On the date of each grant, the fair value of each award is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on assumptions made by the Corporation as follows:

• Dividend yield is based on the dividend rate of the Corporation’s stock at the date of the grant

• Risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bond rate with a term equaling the expected life of the granted options

• Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock price

• Expected life represents the period of time that granted options are expected to be outstanding based on historical trends

Below is a tabular presentation of the option pricing assumptions and the estimated fair value of the options granted during the periods indicated using these assumptions.

	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008	2007	2008	2007
Weighted average dividend yield	3.84%	4.96%	6.74%	3.64%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate	3.03%	4.39%	2.99%	4.67%
Weighted average expected volatility	40.80%	17.40%	24.47%	16.80%
Weighted average expected life	5.25 years	5.25 years	5.25 years	5.25 years
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$1.95	$3.68	$1.38	$5.18

The Corporation recognized compensation expense related to options of $327 thousand and $217 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compensation expense related to options was $856 thousand compared to $642 thousand for the same period in 2007. There were no options exercised for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The intrinsic value of options exercised for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $61 thousand. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the intrinsic value of the options exercised was $49 thousand and $1.1 million, respectively. Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options was $3.8 million and $2.7 million at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.0 years and 3.0 years, respectively.

The table below presents a summary option activity for the period indicated:

	Common Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Contractual Remaining Life (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007	2,323,946		$	29.18
Granted	1,630,065		$	14.06
Exercised	(9,450	)	$	13.48
Cancelled or expired	(234,099	)	$	27.70
Options outstanding at September 30, 2008	3,710,462		$	22.67	5.89	$	1,412
Options exercisable at September 30, 2008	1,706,618		$	28.00	4.26	$	16

20

Restricted Stock Awards

The Corporation issues restricted stock grants, in the form of new shares, to its directors and certain key employees. The restricted stock grants are issued at the fair market value of the common shares on the date of each grant. The Corporation grants shares of restricted stock to directors of the Corporation as part of director compensation, and as such, those restricted stock grants vest immediately. The restricted stock grants to the directors may not be sold or otherwise divested until six months subsequent to their departure from the board of directors. The restricted stock grants to employees vest ratably over four years. Certain amounts of restricted share grants to key executives are performance based and may vest ratably over a period of two years once the market price of the Corporation’s stock achieves specified benchmarks for a required period of time.

Expense recorded relating to restricted stock grants to directors and employees is presented in the following table:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2008		2007		2008		2007
Grants to directors	$	—	$	—	$	280	$	320
Grants to employees	$	423	$	341	$	1,119	$	841
Fair value of grants vested	$	—	$	—	$	1,420	$	1,059

The following table presents a summary of the activity related to restricted stock grants for the period indicated:

	Common Shares		Weighted Average Grant Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2007	107,152		$	35.48
Granted	304,887		$	11.14
Vested	(57,519	)	$	24.69
Cancelled	(8,581	)	$	32.47
Unvested at September 30, 2008	345,939		$	15.90

At September 30, 2008, unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock grants was $4.6 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7 years.

Common Stock and Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock Offering

On April 9, 2008, the Corporation entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with certain institutional and individual accredited investors and certain officers of the Corporation and members of the Corporation’s Board of Directors in connection with the private placement of approximately $64.8 million of its capital stock. The Agreement provided for the sale of 1,422,110 shares of common stock at a price of $9.50 per share ($10.80 for officers and directors of the Corporation, which was the closing bid price on April 8, 2008, the date prior to the execution of the Agreement), and 51,215 shares of a newly created class of Series A Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred”) at a purchase price and liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The transaction closed on April 14, 2008. Net proceeds from the common and preferred stock offering totaled $62.4 million. Proceeds from the capital issuance was used to decrease brokered certificates of deposit and fed funds purchased.

Each share of Series A Preferred will automatically convert into 95.238 shares of common stock on April 1, 2011. Holders may elect to convert their preferred shares at any time prior to that date. The conversion rate will be subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. The discount on the preferred stock conversion feature provides a benefit to the preferred stockholders which was recognized as a non-cash dividend in the financial statements in the second quarter of 2008. This recognition did not result in any impact on the Corporation’s capital.

The Series A Preferred will pay dividends in cash, when declared by the Board of Directors, at a rate of 10.0% per annum on the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, payable quarterly in arrears. In the event that the Corporation increases its quarterly dividend on its common stock above $0.165, the holders of the Series A Preferred will be entitled to an additional dividend at a rate per annum equal to the percentage increase above $0.165 multiplied by 10.0%. No dividends may be paid on the Corporation’s common stock unless dividends have been paid in full on the Series A Preferred.

21

NOTE 11—DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value hedges that meet the criteria for effectiveness have changes in the fair value of the derivative and the designated hedged item recognized in earnings. In the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation entered into eight swaps with a notional amount of $98.2 million that hedge the fair value of certain brokered certificates of deposit. Derivatives designated as fair value hedges were deemed to be effective within the high-effectiveness requirement. These designated hedges and associated hedged items were marked to fair value by nearly equal and offsetting amounts of $330 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2008. A charge to earnings of $7 thousand for the ineffectiveness portion of the fair value hedges was recognized in earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2008. At December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007 there were no derivatives designated as fair value hedges.

Cash flow hedges have the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative, net of taxes, recorded in net accumulated other comprehensive loss. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation recorded a decrease in the value of derivatives of $138 thousand compared to an increase of $2.2 million for the same period in 2007, net of taxes, in net accumulated other comprehensive loss to reflect the effective portion of cash flow hedges. Amounts recorded in net accumulated other comprehensive loss are recognized into earnings concurrent with the impact of the hedged item on earnings. The ineffectiveness portion of cash flow hedges resulted in credits to earnings of $5 thousand and $4 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, there was a credit to earnings of $20 thousand compared to a $1 thousand charge for the same period in 2007.

Non-designated derivatives may represent interest rate protection on the Corporation’s net interest income or derivative products provided to customers but do not meet the requirements to receive hedge accounting treatment. During the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation closed out a $40.0 million non-designated derivative and added two non-designated derivatives totaling $8.0 million. In the second quarter of 2008, two additional non-designated derivatives totaling $22.2 million were added. Typically, interest rate swaps that are classified as non-designated derivatives are marked-to-market and any gains or losses are recorded in non-interest income at the end of each reporting period. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 the value of the non-designated derivatives are recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Corporation recorded net gains of $200 thousand to reflect the change in value of the non-designated interest rate swaps. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation recorded net losses of $266 thousand and $415 thousand, respectively, to reflect the change in the value of the non-designated interest rate swaps.

The net cash settlements on these interest rate swaps are recorded in non-interest income. The net cash benefit from these interest rate swaps was $4 thousand and $193 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the net cash benefit from these interest rate swaps was $351 thousand and $599 thousand, respectively. These transactions are recorded in net derivative activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The derivative financial instruments valued at fair value at September 30, 2008 do not incorporate counterparty credit risk in the valuation of the financial instrument. Management has determined that it does not need to adjust the fair value of the Corporation’s interest rate swaps for counterparty risk because its believed that the credit risk is inherent in lending to the swap participants and the credit risk is not significantly different from the risk attributed to the interest rate swap curve itself, which is used to determine the fair value of the interest rate swaps.

Where appropriate, the Corporation obtains collateral to reduce counterparty risk associated with interest rate swaps. At September 30, 2008, cash collateral of $2.0 million was included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Condition. This amount has not been netted against the derivative position for purposes of presentation.

22

The table below presents the Corporation’s open derivative positions as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands) Derivative Type	Objective	Notional Amount		Credit Risk Amount			Market Risk
September 30, 2008 Designated Derivatives
Interest rate swaps:
Receive fixed/pay variable	Hedge investment rate risk	$	128,250	$	2,833		$	2,833
Receive fixed/pay variable	Hedge borrowing cost		98,200		102			(337	)
Interest rate caps/corridors	Hedge borrowing cost		25,000		—			—
Total designated derivatives			251,450		2,935			2,496
Non-designated Derivatives
Interest rate swaps:
Receive variable/pay fixed			15,050		65			(154	)
Receive fixed/pay variable			15,050		247			195
Total non-designated derivatives			30,100		312			41
Total derivatives		$	281,550	$	3,247		$	2,537
December 31, 2007 Designated Derivatives
Interest rate swaps:						��
Receive fixed/pay variable	Hedge investment rate risk	$	272,450	$	5,002		$	4,968
Interest rate caps/corridors	Hedge borrowing cost		25,000		71			71
Total designated derivatives			297,450		5,073			5,039
Non-designated Derivatives
Interest rate swaps:
Receive fixed/pay variable			40,000		2,095			2,095
Total non-designated derivatives			40,000		2,095			2,095
Total derivatives		$	337,450	$	7,168		$	7,134
September 30, 2007 Designated Derivatives
Interest rate swaps:
Receive fixed/pay variable	Hedge investment rate risk	$	277,450	$	1,232		$	1,084
Interest rate caps/corridors	Hedge borrowing cost		75,000		321			321
Total designated derivatives			352,450		1,553			1,405
Non-designated Derivatives
Interest rate swaps:
Receive fixed/pay variable			40,000		2,880			2,880
Total non-designated derivatives			40,000		2,880			2,880
Total derivatives		$	392,450	$	4,433		$	4,285

Credit risk represents the amount that is due from the counterparty, including accrued interest, associated with the open derivatives positions at September 30, 2008. The amounts are recorded as an asset on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Condition and are not netted against any amounts payable to the counterparty. Market risk represents the net fair value of amounts due or payable to the counterparty, net of accrued interest. The Corporation’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Condition reflects the fair value of its derivatives outstanding totaling $2.9 million as a derivative asset and $710 thousand as a derivative liability. Also, $328 thousand in associated accrued interest receivable is outstanding at September 30, 2008.

23

NOTE 12—CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

Commitments

The table below presents commitments to extend credit in the form of consumer, commercial real estate and business loans at the date indicated:

(in thousands)	September 30, 2008
Commercial business and real estate	$	835,865
Consumer revolving credit		840,876
Residential mortgage credit		9,316
Performance standby letters of credit		140,293
Commercial letters of credit		4,667
Total loan commitments	$	1,831,017

Historically, many of the commitments expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent realizable future cash requirements.

Litigation

The Corporation is involved in various legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of its business. All active lawsuits entail amounts which management believes to be, individually and in the aggregate, immaterial to the financial condition and the results of operations of the Corporation.

In 2005, a lawsuit captioned Bednar v. Provident Bank of Maryland was initiated by a former Bank customer against the Bank in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Maryland) asserting that, upon early payoff, the Bank’s recapture of home equity loan closing costs initially paid by the Bank on the borrower’s behalf constituted a prepayment charge prohibited by state law. The Baltimore City Circuit Court ruled in the Bank’s favor, finding that the recapture of loan closing costs was not an unlawful charge, a position consistent with that taken by the State of Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation. However, on appeal, the Maryland Court of Appeals reversed this ruling and found in favor of the borrower. The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. The potential damages for this individual matter are not material to the Corporation’s results of operations. However, the complaint is styled as a class action complaint. To date, no class has been certified. Management believes that the Bank has meritorious defense against this action and intends to vigorously defend the litigation. On April 8, 2008, the Governor of Maryland signed legislation that limits the potential recovery of Bank customers in the Bednar litigation to the amount of closing costs recovered by the Bank upon early payoff. As a result, the Bank believes that any potential settlements or damages in the Bednar litigation would not be material to the Bank’s results of operations.

NOTE 13—NET GAINS

Net gains include the following components for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30						Nine Months Ended September 30
(in thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net gains (losses):
Sale of MasterCard shares	$	—		$	—		$	8,690		$	—
Securities related activity		953			—			953			399
Asset sales		(16	)		(8	)		(76	)		1,063
Sale of branches		—			4,910			—			4,910
Extinguishment of debt and early redemption of brokered CDs		10			—			(660	)		153
Net gains	$	947		$	4,902		$	8,907		$	6,525

24

NOTE 14—RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES

Costs associated with restructuring activities are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as they are incurred. The costs include incremental expenses associated with corporate-wide efficiency and infrastructure initiatives focused on the rationalization of the branch network, the composition and execution of fee generation activities and the creation of efficiencies in the Corporation’s business model.

All amounts accrued with respect to the initiatives discussed above have been recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

The incurred costs for all restructuring activities are reflected in the following tables:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008						For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands)	Branch Closures		Efficiency Initiatives		Total		Branch Closures		Efficiency Initiatives			Total
Severance and employee-related charges	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(15	)	$	(15	)
Contract terminations		—		—		—		—		—			—
Impairment of fixed assets		—		—		—		—		—			—
Other related costs		5		—		5		60		—			60
Total restructuring activities	$	5	$	—	$	5	$	60	$	(15	)	$	45
	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007						For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
(in thousands)	Branch Closures		Efficiency Initiatives		Total		Branch Closures		Efficiency Initiatives			Total
Severance and employee-related charges	$	—	$	111	$	111	$	—	$	592		$	592
Contract terminations		—		—		—		473		—			473
Impairment of fixed assets		—		—		—		357		—			357
Other related costs		—		—		—		37		—			37
Total restructuring activities	$	—	$	111	$	111	$	867	$	592		$	1,459

The following table reflects a roll-forward of the accrued liability associated with the restructuring activities:

	At September 30, 2008
(in thousands)	Branch Closures			Efficiency Initiatives			Total
Balance December 31, 2007	$	—		$	147		$	147
Branch closure costs		60			—			60
Efficiency initiatives costs		—			(15	)		(15	)
Cash payments		(60	)		(105	)		(165	)
Balance at September 30, 2008	$	—		$	27		$	27

The Corporation’s efficiency initiatives were substantially completed at September 30, 2008. As part of the continued focus on cost efficiency and control, the Corporation will continue to incur occasional future expense relating to cost control initiatives as opportunities present themselves. These costs, if applicable, will be presented in non-interest expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

NOTE 15—INCOME TAXES

Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN No. 48”), which prescribes the recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN No. 48 provides guidance for de-recognition and classification of previously recognized tax positions that did not meet the certain recognition criteria in addition to recognition of interest and penalties, if necessary. The Corporation did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption. The Corporation’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. At January 1, 2007, no interest and penalties were required to be recognized. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits and no interest and penalties were required to be recognized. The tax years that remain subject to examination are 2005 through 2007 for both the Federal and State of Maryland tax authorities.

25

NOTE 16—EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table presents a summary of per share data and amounts for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended September 30					Nine Months Ended September 30
(in thousands, except per share data)	2008			2007		2008			2007
Net income (loss)	$	(5,392	)	$	15,968	$	(12,790	)	$	47,604
Less: Beneficial conversion feature on preferred stock		—			—		1,463			—
Dividends - preferred stock		1,523			—		1,523			—
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	(6,915	)	$	15,968	$	(15,776	)	$	47,604
Basic EPS shares		32,993			31,932		32,443			32,063
Basic EPS	$	(0.21	)	$	0.50	$	(0.49	)	$	1.48
Dilutive common stock equivalents		—			160		—			196
Dilutive EPS shares		32,993			32,092		32,443			32,259
Dilutive EPS	$	(0.21	)	$	0.50	$	(0.49	)	$	1.48
Antidilutive shares		3,218			1,372		3,062			936

Dilutive common stock equivalents are composed of potentially convertible preferred stock and shares associated with stock-based compensation. Dilutive common stock equivalents have been excluded from the computation of dilutive EPS if the result would be anti-dilutive. Inclusion of dilutive common stock equivalents in the diluted EPS calculation will only occur in circumstances where net income is high enough to result in dilution.

26

NOTE 17—COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Presented below is a reconciliation of net income (loss) to comprehensive income (loss) including the components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008									2007
(in thousands)	Before Income Tax			Tax Expense (Benefit)			Net of Tax			Before Income Tax			Tax Expense (Benefit)			Net of Tax
Securities available for sale:
Net unrealized losses arising during the year	$	(39,861	)	$	(16,182	)	$	(23,679	)	$	(22,536	)	$	(9,172	)	$	(13,364	)
Reclassification of gains realized in net income		7,237			3,182			4,055			—			—			—
Net unrealized losses on securities arising during the year		(32,624	)		(13,000	)		(19,624	)		(22,536	)		(9,172	)		(13,364	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) from derivative activities arising during the year		(1,454	)		(587	)		(867	)		4,110			1,626			2,484
Other comprehensive loss	$	(34,078	)	$	(13,587	)		(20,491	)	$	(18,426	)	$	(7,546	)		(10,880	)
Net income								(5,392	)								15,968
Comprehensive income (loss)							$	(25,883	)							$	5,088
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008									2007
(in thousands)	Before Income Tax			Tax Expense (Benefit)			Net of Tax			Before Income Tax			Tax Expense (Benefit)			Net of Tax
Securities available for sale:
Net unrealized losses arising during the year	$	(144,950	)	$	(56,749	)	$	(88,201	)	$	(44,027	)	$	(17,643	)	$	(26,384	)
Reclassification of net gains (losses) realized in net income		70,640			27,655			42,985			(399	)		(157	)		(242	)
Net unrealized losses on securities arising during the year		(74,310	)		(29,094	)		(45,216	)		(44,426	)		(17,800	)		(26,626	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) from derivative activities arising during the year		(302	)		(151	)		(151	)		3,286			1,118			2,168
Other comprehensive loss	$	(74,612	)	$	(29,245	)		(45,367	)	$	(41,140	)	$	(16,682	)		(24,458	)
Net income (loss)								(12,790	)								47,604
Comprehensive income (loss)							$	(58,157	)							$	23,146

27

NOTE 18—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The actuarially estimated net benefit cost includes the following components for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	Qualified Pension Plan						Non-qualified Pension Plan				Postretirement Benefit Plan
(in thousands)	2008			2007			2008		2007		2008			2007
Service cost - benefits earned during the period	$	382		$	558		$	188	$	258	$	1		$	1
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		491			639			95		215		5			5
Expected return on plan assets		(731	)		(977	)		—		—		—			—
Net amortization and deferral of loss (gain)		143			186			106		67		(1	)		(2	)
Net pension cost included in employee benefits expense	$	285		$	406		$	389	$	540	$	5		$	4
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Qualified Pension Plan						Non-qualified Pension Plan				Postretirement Benefit Plan
(in thousands)	2008			2007			2008		2007		2008			2007
Service cost - benefits earned during the period	$	1,654		$	1,823		$	565	$	771	$	3		$	4
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		2,125			2,087			285		645		15			16
Expected return on plan assets		(3,165	)		(3,191	)		—		—		—			—
Net amortization and deferral of loss (gain)		619			607			318		203		(3	)		(6	)
Net pension cost included in employee benefits expense	$	1,233		$	1,326		$	1,168	$	1,619	$	15		$	14

The minimum required contribution in 2008 for the qualified plan is estimated to be zero. The decision to contribute further amounts is dependent on other factors, including the actual investment performance of the plan assets and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. The Corporation contributed $2.8 million to the qualified pension plan during the second quarter of 2008. No contributions were made during the first or third quarter of 2008. The Corporation continues to monitor the funding level of the pension plan and may make additional contributions as deemed necessary.

For the unfunded non-qualified pension and postretirement benefit plans, the Corporation will contribute the minimum required amount in 2008, which is equal to the benefits paid under the plans.

NOTE 19—BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Corporation’s lines of business are structured according to the channels through which its products and services are delivered to its customers. For management purposes the lines are divided into the following segments: Consumer Banking, Commercial Banking, and Treasury and Administration.

The Corporation offers consumer and commercial banking products and services through its wholly owned subsidiary, Provident Bank. The Bank offers its services to customers in the key metropolitan areas of Baltimore, Washington D.C. and Richmond, Virginia, through 79 traditional and 63 in-store banking offices in Maryland, Virginia and southern York County, Pennsylvania. Additionally, the Bank offers its customers 24-hour banking services through 195 Bank owned ATMs, telephone banking and the Internet. The Bank is also a member of the MoneyPass network, which provides customers with free access to more than 11,000 ATMs nationwide. Consumer banking services include a broad array of small business and consumer loan, deposit and investment products offered to retail and commercial customers through the retail branch network and direct channel sales center. Commercial Banking provides an array of commercial financial services including asset-based lending, equipment leasing, real estate financing, cash management and structured financing to middle market commercial customers. Treasury and Administration is comprised of balance sheet management activities that include managing the investment portfolio, discretionary funding, utilization of derivative financial instruments and optimizing the Corporation’s equity position.

The financial performance of each business segment is monitored using an internal profitability measurement system. This system utilizes policies that ensure the results reflect the economics for each segment compiled on a consistent basis. Line of business information is based on management accounting practices that support the current management structure and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions. This profitability measurement system uses internal management accounting policies that generally follow the policies described in Note 1. The Corporation’s funds transfer pricing system utilizes a matched maturity methodology that assigns a cost of funds to earning assets and a value to the liabilities of each business segment

28

with an offset in the Treasury and Administration business segment. The provision for loan losses is charged to the consumer and commercial segments based on actual charge-offs with the balance to the Treasury and Administration segment. Operating expense is charged on a fully absorbed basis. Income tax expense is calculated based on the segment’s taxable income and the Corporation’s effective tax rate. Revenues from no individual customer exceeded 10% of consolidated total revenues.

The table below summarizes results by each business segment for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended September 30,

	2008										2007
(in thousands)	Commercial Banking		Consumer Banking		Treasury and Administration			Total			Commercial Banking		Consumer Banking		Treasury and Administration			Total
Net interest income	$	16,111	$	23,858	$	3,863		$	43,832		$	16,228	$	25,300	$	6,309		$	47,837
Provision for loan losses		1,875		2,682		2,014			6,571			615		1,261		5,618			7,494
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		14,236		21,176		1,849			37,261			15,613		24,039		691			40,343
Non-interest income		5,329		23,778		(24,554	)		4,553			5,112		30,620		(429	)		35,303
Non-interest expense		7,036		37,505		8,652			53,193			6,530		37,499		8,656			52,685
Income (loss) before income taxes		12,529		7,449		(31,357	)		(11,379	)		14,195		17,160		(8,394	)		22,961
Income tax expense (benefit)		6,377		3,768		(16,132	)		(5,987	)		4,323		5,226		(2,556	)		6,993
Net income (loss)	$	6,152	$	3,681	$	(15,225	)	$	(5,392	)	$	9,872	$	11,934	$	(5,838	)	$	15,968
Total assets	$	2,444,284	$	2,968,080	$	998,112		$	6,410,476		$	2,298,379	$	3,012,101	$	1,053,530		$	6,364,010
Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008										2007
	Commercial Banking		Consumer Banking		Treasury and Administration			Total			Commercial Banking		Consumer Banking		Treasury and Administration			Total
Net interest income	$	49,942	$	70,574	$	14,308		$	134,824		$	47,611	$	75,727	$	21,982		$	145,320
Provision for loan losses		5,588		5,160		5,337			16,085			4,381		2,523		6,434			13,338
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		44,354		65,414		8,971			118,739			43,230		73,204		15,548			131,982
Non-interest income (loss)		15,872		70,380		(80,506	)		5,746			15,124		82,398		(1,265	)		96,257
Non-interest expense		20,018		111,182		23,797			154,997			20,164		114,771		25,146			160,081
Income (loss) before income taxes		40,208		24,612		(95,332	)		(30,512	)		38,190		40,831		(10,863	)		68,158
Income tax expense (benefit)		23,354		14,295		(55,371	)		(17,722	)		11,517		12,313		(3,276	)		20,554
Net income (loss)	$	16,854	$	10,317	$	(39,961	)	$	(12,790	)	$	26,673	$	28,518	$	(7,587	)	$	47,604
Total assets	$	2,444,284	$	2,968,080	$	998,112		$	6,410,476		$	2,298,379	$	3,012,101	$	1,053,530		$	6,364,010

29

NOTE 20—SUBSEQUENT EVENT

U.S. government agencies have initiated a number of actions designed to provide or improve stability to the financial system. One such action is the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. This program offers qualifying institutions the opportunity to issue and sell preferred stock, along with warrants to purchase common stock to the U.S. Treasury on what it believes to be favorable terms. The Corporation has been granted preliminary approval by the U.S. Treasury to participate in this program and the Corporation’s board of directors has approved participation in the program. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation’s capital levels are above the minimum required for regulatory status as a “well capitalized” institution.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

GENERAL

Provident Bankshares Corporation (the “Corporation”), a Maryland corporation, is the holding company for Provident Bank (“Provident” or the “Bank”); a Maryland chartered stock commercial bank. At September 30, 2008, the Bank is the largest independent commercial bank, in asset size, headquartered in Maryland, with $6.4 billion in assets. Provident is a regional bank serving Maryland, Virginia and Southern York County, PA, with emphasis on the key urban centers within these states – the Baltimore, Washington, D.C. and Richmond metropolitan areas.

Provident’s principal business is to acquire deposits from individuals and businesses and to use these deposits to fund loans to individuals and businesses. Provident focuses on providing its products and services to three segments of customers – individuals, small businesses and middle market businesses. The Corporation offers consumer and commercial lending products and services through the Consumer Banking group and the Commercial Banking group. Provident also offers related financial services through wholly-owned subsidiaries. Securities brokerage, investment management and related insurance services are available through Provident Investment Company and leases through Court Square Leasing.

Provident’s mission is to exceed customer expectations by delivering superior service, products and banking convenience. Every employee’s commitment to serve the Bank’s customers in this fashion will assist in establishing Provident as the primary bank of choice of individuals, families, small businesses and middle market businesses throughout its chosen markets. To achieve this mission and to improve financial fundamentals, the strategic priorities of the organization are to:

Maximize Provident’s position as the right size bank in the marketplace. Provident’s position as the largest bank headquartered in Maryland provides a unique opportunity as the “right size” bank in its market areas, or footprint. The Bank provides the service of a community bank combined with the convenience and wide array of products and services that a major regional bank offers. In addition, the 63 in-store banking offices throughout its footprint reinforce its right size strategy through convenient locations, hours and a full line of products and services. Provident currently has 142 banking offices concentrated in the Baltimore-Washington, D.C. corridor and beyond to Richmond, Virginia. Of the 142 banking offices, 49% are located in the Greater Baltimore region and 51% are located in the Greater Washington, D.C. and Central Virginia regions, reflecting the successful development of the Bank into a highly competitive regional commercial bank. Provident also offers its customers 24-hour banking services through ATMs, telephone banking and the Internet. The Bank’s network of 195 ATMs enhances the banking office network by providing customers increased opportunities to access their funds. In addition, the Bank is a member of the MoneyPass network, which provides free access to more than 11,000 ATMs nationwide for its customers.

Profitably grow and deepen customer relationships in all four key market segments: Commercial Business, Commercial Real Estate, Consumer and Business Banking. Consumer banking continues to be an important component of the Bank’s strategic priorities. Consumer banking services include a broad array of consumer loan, deposit and investment products offered to consumer and commercial customers through Provident’s banking office network and ProvidentDirect, the Bank’s direct channel sales center. In addition, the Bank has significantly expanded its online deposit account capabilities, including the introduction of mobile banking services in early 2008, allowing customers to perform banking transactions via mobile devices such as cellular phones. The business banking segment is further supported by relationship managers who provide comprehensive business product and sales support to expand existing customer relationships and acquire new clients. Commercial banking is the other key component to the Corporation’s regional presence in its market area. Commercial banking provides lending services through its commercial business division and its commercial real estate division. The commercial business division provides customized banking solutions to middle market commercial customers while the commercial real estate division provides lending expertise and financing options to real estate customers. The Bank has an experienced team of relationship managers with expertise in business and real estate lending to companies in various industries in the region. It also has a suite of cash management products managed by responsive account teams that deepen customer relationships through competitively priced deposit based services, responsive service and frequent personal contact with each customer.

Consistently execute a higher-performance, customer relationship-focused sales culture.The Corporation’s transition to a customer relationship driven sales culture requires deepening relationships through cross-selling and the continuing emphasis on retention of valued customers. The Bank has segmented its customers to better understand and anticipate their financial needs

30

and provide Provident’s sales force with a targeted approach to customers and prospects. The successful execution of this strategic priority will be centered on the right size bank commitment—providing the service of a community bank combined with the convenience and wide array of products and services that a major regional bank offers. This strategy is measured and monitored by a number of actions such as the utilization of individual performance and incentive plans.

Sustain a culture that attracts and retains employees who provide the differentiating “Provident Way” customer experience.Provident has always placed a high priority on its employees and has approached employee development and training with renewed emphasis. Employee development is viewed as a critical part of executing Provident’s strategic priority as the right size bank and transforming the Corporation’s sales culture with a focus on the employee’s development and approach with Provident’s customers. This strategy is measured and monitored by a number of actions, such as utilization of individual development plans for every employee and tracking individual employee learning activities through our learning management system.

Expand delivery (branch and non-branch) within the market Provident serves.Provident supplements organic growth opportunities with acquisitions if they are a strategic fit and are within the Corporation’s pricing model. Over the past five years, Provident has expanded its branch network by a net 28 in-store or traditional branches.

FINANCIAL REVIEW

The principal objective of this Financial Review is to provide an overview of the financial condition and results of operations of Provident Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries year over year, unless otherwise indicated. This discussion and tabular presentations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.

Overview of Income and Expenses

Income

The Corporation has two primary sources of pre-tax income. The first is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income—which is the income that the Corporation earns on its loans and investments—and interest expense—which is the interest that the Corporation pays on its deposits and borrowings.

The second principal source of pre-tax income is non-interest income—the compensation received from providing products and services. The majority of the non-interest income comes from service charges on deposit accounts. The Corporation also earns income from insurance commissions, mortgage banking fees and other fees and charges.

The Corporation recognizes gains or losses as a result of sales of investment securities or the disposition of loans, foreclosed property, fixed assets or early extinguishment of debt. In addition, the Corporation also recognizes gains or losses on its outstanding derivative financial instruments or impairment on investment securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired. Gains and losses are not a regular part of the Corporation’s primary source of income.

Expenses

The expenses the Corporation incurs in operating its business consist of salaries and employee benefits expense, occupancy expense, furniture and equipment expense, external processing fees, deposit insurance premiums, advertising expenses, and other miscellaneous expenses.

Salaries and employee benefits expense consists primarily of the salaries and wages paid to employees, payroll taxes, and expenses for health care, retirement and other employee benefits.

Occupancy expenses, which are fixed or variable costs associated with premises and equipment, consist primarily of lease payments, real estate taxes, depreciation charges, maintenance and cost of utilities.

Furniture and equipment include expenses and depreciation charges related to office and banking equipment. Depreciation of furniture and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based on the useful lives of related assets. Estimated lives are 2 to 15 years for building and leasehold improvements, and 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment.

External processing fees are fees paid to third parties mainly for data processing services.

Restructuring activities are incremental expenses associated with corporate-wide efficiency and infrastructure initiatives implemented to simplify the Corporation’s business model as is discussed further in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other expenses include expenses for attorneys, accountants and consultants, fees paid to directors, franchise taxes, charitable contributions, insurance, office supplies, postage, telephone and other miscellaneous operating expenses.

31

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities for the reporting periods. Management evaluates estimates on an on-going basis, and believes the following represent its more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its consolidated financial statements: allowance for loan losses, non-accrual loans, other real estate owned, estimates of fair value and intangible assets associated with mergers, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, pension and post-retirement benefits, asset prepayment rates, goodwill and intangible assets, share-based payment, derivative financial instruments, litigation and income taxes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: allowance for loan losses, fair value, other-than-temporary-impairment of investment securities, derivative financial instruments, goodwill and intangible assets, and income taxes. Each estimate and its financial impact, to the extent significant to financial results, are discussed in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. It is at least reasonably possible that each of the Corporation’s estimates could change in the near term or that actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Capital growth, liquidity and earnings along with maintaining a strong balance sheet in this current economic environment are the top priorities of the Corporation. During the first nine months of 2008, the Corporation was successful in raising capital and maintaining strong regulatory capital ratios along with increasing the Corporation’s liquidity position. In addition, the financial condition of the Corporation reflects the strengthening of the Corporation’s franchise in the key major markets of Greater Baltimore, Greater Washington, D.C. and Central Virginia, through expanded business development and the execution of the Corporation’s strategic priorities including growing loans and deposits. Growth in relationship-based loan portfolios (loans other than the Corporation’s originated and acquired residential mortgage loans) is a reflection of the Corporation’s ability to grow the loan portfolio in these key markets through its lending expertise and focus on its premier loan programs – home equity, commercial real estate, and commercial business. The Corporation also grew deposits, mainly from the use of brokered certificates of deposit, which offset the decline in deposits resulting from the sale of six branches and associated deposits to Union Bankshares in September 2007, increased competition for deposits and the significant decline in real estate related activity, which affects the related escrow deposits. During the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation increased its liquidity position and reduced its reliance on short-term borrowings by increasing its brokered certificates of deposit balances. Over the past twelve months, loan credit quality has declined and is primarily related to the weakness in the residential construction industry, but is still believed to be at manageable levels. In addition, values of investment securities have been negatively impacted by the economic down turn and turmoil in the financial markets.

The core banking performance has resulted in an increase in average relationship-based loans of $282.1million, or 7.7%, manageable loan credit quality levels and only a slight increase in non-interest expense of $508 thousand for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 when compared to the same period a year ago. In addition, the Corporation increased its total risk-based capital ratio, which was already considered “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes in the third quarter of 2008 when compared to the third quarter of 2007. At September 30, 2008, total assets were $6.4 billion, while total loans and deposits were $4.3 billion and $4.6 billion, respectively.

Stockholders’ Equity and Capital

In 2008, long-term capital growth is a specific focus for the Corporation. To provide capital growth, the Corporation successfully completed a multi-tiered capital plan in April 2008 to strengthen the Corporation’s capital base, including the issuance of $64.8 million in equity securities and $50 million in subordinated debt. In addition, beginning with the dividend that was paid in May 2008, the quarterly dividend payment was reduced by 66% and is expected to result in an annual savings of approximately $29 million, providing the least costly source to re-build tangible common equity.

On April 9, 2008, the Corporation entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with certain institutional and individual accredited investors and certain officers of the Corporation and members of the Corporation’s Board of Directors in connection with the private placement of approximately $64.8 million of its capital stock. The Agreement provided for the sale of 1,422,110 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at a price of $9.50 per share ($10.80 for officers and directors of the Corporation, which was the closing bid price on April 8, 2008, the date prior to the execution of the Agreement), and 51,215 shares of a newly created class of Series A Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred”) at a purchase price and liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The transaction closed on April 14, 2008. Net proceeds from the equity offering totaled $62.4 million.

32

On April 24, 2008, the Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, Provident Bank, completed a private placement of $50.0 million of subordinated unsecured notes that are rated BBB to qualified institutional buyers and accredited investors. The purchase price of the subordinated notes was 97.651% of the principal amount. The subordinated notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 9.5% and mature on May 1, 2018, with semi-annual interest payments payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year beginning on November 1, 2008. The subordinated notes are not convertible. The net proceeds from the debt offering totaled $47.7 million and qualifies for Tier II regulatory capital.

The equity raised from the capital activities discussed above and the equity preserved from the dividend reduction, partially offset by the year-to-date net loss in 2008 improved the Corporation’s Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios at September 30, 2008, when compared to December 31, 2007.

Total stockholders’ equity was $542.5 million at September 30, 2008, a decrease of $13.3 million from December 31, 2007. Stockholders’ equity increased by $13.6 million from the issuance of common stock and $51.2 million from the issuance of preferred stock, partially offset by $2.5 million of costs associated with the issuance of the equity raised. Net accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $45.4 million during the period primarily due to the decline in the market value of the debt securities portfolio. Stockholders’ equity was further impacted by the $12.8 million net loss for the nine months ended September, 2008, common stock dividends of $17.6 million, preferred stock dividends of $1.5 million, a $2.2 million increase due to share based payment activity and approximately $500 thousand decline in other activities.

The Company’s tangible common equity ratio decreased from 5.86% at December 31, 2007 to 5.65% at September 30, 2008. The decline is mainly associated with the $12.8 million net loss recorded in the first nine months of 2008. The tangible common equity ratio is a non-GAAP measure used by management to evaluate capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is total equity excluding net accumulated other comprehensive loss (“OCI”), less goodwill and deposit-based intangibles and preferred stock. Tangible assets are total assets less goodwill and deposit-based intangibles. The tangible common equity ratio is calculated by removing the impact of OCI, preferred stock and certain intangible assets from total equity and total assets. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Management believes this is an important benchmark for the Corporation and for investors. Neither tangible common equity, tangible assets nor the related measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets and the related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. The following table is a reconciliation of the Corporation’s tangible common equity and tangible assets for the periods ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007			September 30, 2007
Total equity capital per consolidated financial statements	$	542,464		$	555,771		$	610,721
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		113,544			68,177			46,565
Goodwill		(252,095	)		(253,906	)		(253,906	)
Deposit-based intangible		(5,203	)		(6,152	)		(6,474	)
Preferred stock		(51,215	)		—			—
Tangible common equity	$	347,495		$	363,890		$	396,906
Total assets per consolidated financial statements	$	6,410,476		$	6,465,046		$	6,364,010
Goodwill		(252,095	)		(253,906	)		(253,906	)
Deposit-based intangible		(5,203	)		(6,152	)		(6,474	)
Tangible assets	$	6,153,178		$	6,204,988		$	6,103,630
Tangible common equity ratio		5.65%			5.86%			6.50%

33

The Corporation is required to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of core capital to adjusted quarterly average assets (“leverage ratio”) and of Tier 1 and total regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets. The actual regulatory capital ratios and required ratios for capital adequacy purposes under FIRREA and the ratios to be categorized as “well capitalized” under prompt corrective action regulations are summarized in the following table.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
Total equity capital per consolidated financial statements	$	542,464		$	555,771
Qualifying trust preferred securities		129,000			129,000
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		113,544			68,177
Adjusted capital		785,008			752,948
Adjustments for tier 1 capital:
Goodwill and disallowed assets		(266,539	)		(260,186	)
Total tier 1 capital		518,469			492,762
Adjustments for tier 2 capital:
Allowance for loan losses		59,674			55,269
Subordinated debt		50,000			—
Allowance for letter of credit losses		724			635
Total tier 2 capital adjustments		110,398			55,904
Total regulatory capital	$	628,867		$	548,666
Risk-weighted assets	$	5,248,843		$	5,057,463
Quarterly regulatory average assets		6,177,557			6,145,549
Ratios:							Minimum Regulatory Requirements		To be “Well Capitalized”
Tier 1 leverage		8.39	%		8.02	%	4.00	%	5.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		9.88			9.74		4.00		6.00
Total regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets		11.98			10.85		8.00		10.00

As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation is considered “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes.

In October 2008, U.S. government agencies have initiated a number of actions designed to provide or improve stability to the financial system. One such action is the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. This program offers qualifying institutions the opportunity to issue and sell preferred stock, along with warrants to purchase common stock to the U.S. Treasury on what it believes to be favorable terms. Capital raised from this program is considered Tier 1 capital. The Corporation has been granted preliminary approval by the U.S. Treasury to participate in this program and the Corporation’s board of directors has approved participation in the program. Participation in the program would provide additional capital that would improve the Corporation’s already “well capitalized” regulatory capital ratios.

Liquidity

An important component of the Corporation’s asset/liability structure is the level of liquidity available to meet the needs of customers and creditors. Traditional sources of bank liquidity include deposit growth, loan repayments, investment maturities, asset sales, borrowings and interest received. Management believes the Corporation has sufficient liquidity to meet future funding needs.

The Corporation’s chief source of liquidity is the assets it possesses, which can either be pledged as collateral for secured borrowings or sold outright. At September 30, 2008, over $180 million of the Corporation’s investment portfolio was immediately saleable at a market value equaling or exceeding its amortized cost basis. As an alternative to asset sales, the Corporation has the ability to pledge assets to raise secured borrowings. At September 30, 2008, $821.6 million of secured borrowings were employed, with sufficient collateral available to raise additional secured borrowings of over $970 million from the FHLB—Atlanta, the Federal Reserve’s term auction facility, and securities sold under repurchase agreements. Additionally, over $396 million of borrowing capacity exists at the Federal Reserve discount window as a contingent funding source. The Corporation also employs unsecured funding sources such as fed funds and brokered certificates of deposit. At September 30, 2008, $215.0 million of fed funds were employed, compared with funding lines in place of $885 million. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation had $1.1 billion of brokered certificates of deposit outstanding.

34

A significant use of the Corporation’s liquidity is the dividends paid to stockholders. The Corporation is a one-bank holding company that relies upon the Bank’s performance to generate capital growth through Bank earnings. A portion of the Bank’s earnings is passed to the Corporation in the form of cash dividends. As a commercial bank under the Maryland Financial Institution Law, the Bank may declare cash dividends from undivided profits or, with the prior approval of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation, out of paid-in capital in excess of 100% of its required capital stock, and after providing for due or accrued expenses, losses, interest and taxes. The dividends paid to the Corporation by the Bank are utilized to pay dividends to stockholders, repurchase shares and pay interest on junior subordinated debentures. The Corporation and the Bank, in declaring and paying dividends, are also limited by the minimum regulatory capital requirements. The Corporation and the Bank are in compliance with these capital requirements. If the Corporation or the Bank were unable to comply with the minimum capital requirements, it could result in regulatory actions that could have a material impact on the Corporation.

Lending

Total average loan balances increased to $4.2 billion in the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $246.5 million, or 6.2%, over the third quarter of 2007. The following table summarizes the composition of the Corporation’s average loans for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				$ Variance			% Variance
(dollars in thousands)	2008		2007
Residential real estate:
Originated and acquired residential mortgage	$	262,372	$	298,019	$	(35,647	)	(12.0	) %
Home equity		1,117,718		1,050,442		67,276		6.4
Other consumer:
Marine		356,623		357,217		(594	)	(0.2	)
Other		26,068		29,533		(3,465	)	(11.7	)
Total consumer		1,762,781		1,735,211		27,570		1.6
Commercial real estate:
Commercial mortgage		528,565		441,685		86,880		19.7
Residential construction		538,543		609,537		(70,994	)	(11.6	)
Commercial construction		443,772		383,775		59,997		15.6
Commercial business		946,563		803,537		143,026		17.8
Total commercial		2,457,443		2,238,534		218,909		9.8
Total loans	$	4,220,224	$	3,973,745	$	246,479		6.2

The Corporation continues to produce solid loan growth in its internally generated loan portfolios, mainly in the commercial portfolio. Relationship-based loans increased in the aggregate $282.1 million, or 7.7%, over the same quarter in 2007. The Corporation’s focus on developing lending relationships provided by the market opportunity, combined with the experience of lending officers in the market, has been demonstrated by the consistent growth in the commercial real estate and commercial business loan portfolios.

Total average loans increased by 6.2%, primarily due to an increase of $67.3 million, or 6.4%, in average home equity loans, $60.0 million, or 15.6%, in commercial construction loans, $86.9 million, or 19.7%, in average commercial mortgage loans and $143.0 million, or 17.8%, in average commercial business loans. These increases more than offset the $71.0 million market driven decline in average residential construction loans and $35.6 million in the run-off portfolios of originated and acquired residential loans. These results reflect the effectiveness of the Corporation’s strategy to enhance customer relationships in all four key market segments: commercial, commercial real estate, consumer and small business. The overall result is a strategically balanced mix of lending revenue sources between consumer and commercial loan products with $1.8 billion, or 41.8%, in consumer loans, and $2.5 billion, or 58.2%, in commercial loans. The diversity of lending products should provide the Corporation with opportunities to emphasize or de-emphasize certain product lines as market conditions change.

Commercial loans are a key component to the Corporation’s regional presence in its market area. Average total commercial loans increased $218.9 million, or 9.8%, compared to the third quarter of 2007. Commercial construction loans posted an increase compared to the same quarter of 2007 of $60.0 million and residential construction loans declined by $71.0 million reflecting the contraction in the regional residential construction markets. During this same period, commercial business loans increased by $143.0 million, or 17.8%. Commercial mortgage loans grew by $86.9 million, or 19.7%, reflecting the Corporation’s success in retaining the permanent financing on completed commercial projects. The overall loan growth is largely within the Corporation’s market footprint and is a

35

reflection of the relative strength in the Corporation’s markets and its ability to deepen lending relationships with seasoned borrowers in familiar markets and the creation of new lending relationships. These expanded relationships and associated risks are managed through disciplined loan administration and credit monitoring by an experienced credit management staff.

The variety of home equity loan products, along with the Corporation’s relationship sales approach and competitive pricing have proven to be successful in the markets of Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Virginia. Over 82% of the production of direct consumer loans, primarily home equity loans and lines, is generated through the Bank’s retail banking offices, phone center and internet channels. This strategy resulted in the increase in average home equity lending balances over the same period a year ago. The growth in home equity lending was partially offset by a decline in marine and other consumer loans. Currently, management has chosen to limit marine lending loan growth due to low margins in the industry.

Asset Quality

The following table presents information with respect to non-performing assets and 90-day delinquencies as of the dates indicated.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
Non-Performing Assets:
Originated and acquired residential mortgage	$	7,516		$	7,511
Home equity		2,574			1,737
Commercial mortgage		1,743			1,335
Residential real estate construction		16,754			7,923
Commercial business		11,867			12,742
Total non-accrual loans		40,454			31,248
Total renegotiated loans		—			—
Total non-performing loans		40,454			31,248
Non-performing investments		13,163			—
Total other assets and real estate owned		13,567			2,664
Total non-performing assets	$	67,184		$	33,912
90-Day Delinquencies:
Originated and acquired residential mortgage	$	4,846		$	2,149
Home equity		2,651			1,281
Other consumer		3,718			321
Residential real estate construction		314			—
Commercial business		16			79
Total 90-day delinquencies	$	11,545		$	3,830
Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing loans to loans		0.95	%		0.74	%
Non-performing investments to investments		0.99	%		—
Non-performing assets to assets		1.05	%		0.52	%
Allowance for loan losses to loans		1.40	%		1.31	%
Net charge-offs in quarter to average loans		0.48	%		0.58	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		147.51	%		176.87	%

36

Recent economic data has shown that the Mid-Atlantic region, while sluggish, continues to remain one of the better performing markets in the nation in terms of preserving real estate values and lower delinquency levels. In comparison to the second quarter of 2008, new housing inventories are down in both Maryland and Virginia while unemployment levels in the region continue to be below the national average. With the majority of the home equity and commercial real estate portfolios concentrated with in the Washington D.C., Virginia and Maryland region, the overall loan credit quality for the third quarter of 2008 did not reveal any unanticipated deterioration.

Non-performing loans to loans were 0.95% at September 30, 2008 compared to 0.74% at December 31, 2007, while net charge-offs to average loans was 0.48%, a decline from 0.58% for the quarter ending December 31, 2007 and an increase from 0.33% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. The increase in non-performing loans is due mainly to the transfer of two significant residential construction loans into non-performing status that totaled $15.8 million, offset by the transfer of foreclosed properties to other real estate owned totaling $6.7 million. At September 30, 2008, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.40%, while the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 147.5%. At December 31, 2007 these ratios were 1.31% and 176.9%, respectively. The level of 90-day delinquent loans increased during the same period, increasing $7.7 million to $11.5 million over the $3.8 million level at December 31, 2007. The increase in 90-day delinquent loans was reflected mainly in the originated and acquired residential mortgage portfolio, home equity and the other consumer loan portfolios.

As of September 30, 2008, non-performing loans other than residential construction loans remained stable or increased modestly from December 31, 2008 and are consistent with the decline in general economic conditions. The diversification of the commercial real estate portfolio between commercial mortgages, commercial construction and residential construction along with the geographically different markets of Baltimore, suburban Washington, D.C. and Richmond, Virginia continue to support these results. In addition, the home equity portfolio has continued to perform reasonably well in comparison to the decline in general economic conditions as non-performing home equity loans increased from 0.16% at December 31, 2007 to 0.23% at September 30, 2008. The success in maintaining loan asset quality above the national average is a reflection of management’s high credit standards, in-house administration and strong oversight procedures along with the majority of the portfolio focused within the Washington D.C, Virginia and Maryland region which remains one of the better performing markets in the nation. Because events affecting borrowers and collateral are constantly changing and cannot be reliably predicted, present portfolio quality may not be an indication of future performance.

Non-performing loans as a percentage of each portfolio’s outstanding balance were as follows:

	September 30, 2008	December 31, 2007
Originated & acquired residential mortgage	2.93%	2.53%
Home equity	0.23	0.16
Other consumer	—	—
Total consumer	0.57	0.53
Commercial mortgage	0.33	0.30
Residential real estate construction	3.16	1.26
Commercial real estate construction	—	—
Commercial business	1.22	1.36
Total commercial	1.22	0.90
Total loans	0.95	0.74

Overall asset quality of the Corporation declined as of September 30, 2008 when compared to December 31, 2007. Asset quality ratios increased to levels anticipated during these uncertain economic times when compared to December 31, 2007. Non-performing assets were $67.2 million at September 30, 2008, a 98.1% increase over the level at December 31, 2007. The level of non-performing assets to total assets was 1.05% at September 30, 2008, up from 0.52% at December 31, 2007. The increase in non-performing assets was mainly attributable to the increase in non-performing residential real estate construction loans, real estate owned properties and the investment securities that were classified as non-performing during the first nine months of 2008. Non-performing investment balances were $13.2 million at September 30, 2008 and relate to certain investment securities in which their contractual payments have been deferred.

37

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses (“the allowance”), which is intended to be management’s best estimate of probable inherent losses in the outstanding loan portfolio. The allowance is reduced by actual credit losses and is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries of previous losses. The provisions for loan losses are charges to earnings to bring the total allowance to a level considered necessary by management.

The allowance is based on management’s continuing review and credit risk evaluation of the loan portfolio. This process provides an allowance consisting of two components, allocated and unallocated. To arrive at the allocated component of the allowance, the Corporation combines estimates of the allowances needed for loans analyzed individually and on a pooled basis. The allocated component of the allowance is supplemented by an unallocated component.

The portion of the allowance that is allocated to individual internally criticized and non-accrual loans is determined by estimating the inherent loss on each problem credit after giving consideration to the value of underlying collateral. Management emphasizes loan quality and close monitoring of potential problem credits. Credit risk identification and review processes are utilized in order to assess and monitor the degree of risk in the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s lending and credit administration staff are charged with reviewing the loan portfolio and identifying changes in the economy or in a borrower’s circumstances which may affect the ability to repay debt or the value of pledged collateral. A loan classification and review system exists that identifies those loans with a higher than normal risk of uncollectibility. Each commercial loan is assigned a grade based upon an assessment of the borrower’s financial capacity to service the debt and the presence and value of collateral for the loan.

In addition to being used to categorize risk, the Bank’s internal ten-point risk rating system is used to determine the allocated allowance for the commercial portfolio. Reserve factors, based on the actual loss history for a 5-year period for criticized loans, are assigned. If the factor, based on loss history for classified credits is lower than the minimum established factor, the higher factor is applied. For loans with satisfactory risk profiles, the factors are based on the rating profile of the portfolio and the consequent historic losses of bonds with equivalent ratings.

For the consumer portfolios, the determination of the allocated allowance is conducted at an aggregate, or pooled, level. Each quarter, historical rolling loss rates for homogenous pools of loans in these portfolios provide the basis for the allocated reserve. For any portfolio where the Bank lacks sufficient historic experience, industry loss rates are used. If recent history is not deemed to reflect the inherent losses existing within a portfolio, older historic loss rates during a period of similar economic or market conditions are used.

The Bank’s credit administration group adjusts the indicated loss rates based on qualitative factors. Factors that are considered in adjusting loss rates include risk characteristics, credit concentration trends and general economic conditions, including job growth and unemployment rates. For commercial and real estate portfolios, additional factors include the level and trend of watched and criticized credits within those portfolios; commercial real estate vacancy, absorption and rental rates; and the number and volume of syndicated credits, construction loans, or other portfolio segments deemed to carry higher levels of risk. Upon completion of the qualitative adjustments, the overall allowance is allocated to the components of the portfolio based on the adjusted loss factors.

The unallocated component of the allowance exists to mitigate the imprecision inherent in management’s estimates of expected credit losses and includes its judgmental determination of the amounts necessary for concentrations, economic uncertainties and other subjective factors that may not have been fully considered in the allocated allowance. The relationship of the unallocated component to the total allowance may fluctuate from period to period. Although management has allocated the majority of the allowance to specific loan categories, the evaluation of the allowance is considered in its entirety.

Lending management meets at least quarterly with executive management to review the credit quality of the loan portfolios and to evaluate the allowance. The Corporation has an internal risk analysis and review staff that continuously reviews loan quality and reports the results of its reviews to executive management and the Board of Directors. Such reviews also assist management in establishing the level of the allowance.

Management believes that it uses relevant information available to make determinations about the allowance and that it has established its existing allowance in accordance with GAAP. If circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making determinations, adjustments to the allowance may be necessary and results of operations could be affected. Because events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that increases to the allowance will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate.

The FDIC examines the Bank periodically and, accordingly, as part of this examination, the allowance is reviewed for adequacy utilizing specific guidelines. Based upon their review, the regulators may from time to time require reserves in addition to those previously provided.

38

At September 30, 2008, the allowance for loan losses was $59.7 million, or 1.40% of total loans outstanding, compared to an allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2007 of $55.3 million, or 1.31% of total loans outstanding. The allowance coverage was 147.5% of non-performing loans at September 30, 2008 compared to 176.9% at December 31, 2007. Portfolio-wide, net charge-offs represented 0.48% of average loans in third quarter of 2008, compared to 0.20% in third quarter of 2007 and 0.58% in the fourth quarter of 2007.

Deposits

The following table summarizes the composition of the Corporation’s average deposit balances for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				$ Variance			% Variance
(dollars in thousands)	2008		2007
Transaction accounts:
Noninterest-bearing	$	653,428	$	709,492	$	(56,064	)	(7.9	)%
Interest-bearing		448,715		487,435		(38,720	)	(7.9	)
Savings/money market:
Savings		564,848		557,239		7,609		1.4
Money market		602,625		583,856		18,769		3.2
Certificates of deposit:
Direct		1,146,158		1,218,368		(72,210	)	(5.9	)
Brokered		1,059,362		528,841		530,521		100.3
Total deposits	$	4,475,136	$	4,085,231	$	389,905		9.5
Deposits by source:
Consumer	$	2,663,292	$	2,769,227	$	(105,935	)	(3.8	)
Commercial		752,482		787,163		(34,681	)	(4.4	)
Brokered		1,059,362		528,841		530,521		100.3
Total deposits	$	4,475,136	$	4,085,231	$	389,905		9.5

Average total deposits increased $389.9 million, or 9.5%, in the third quarter of 2008 compared to the same period a year ago. Consumer deposits declined by 3.8%, or $105.9 million to $2.7 billion and commercial deposits declined $34.7 million, or 4.4%. Brokered deposits increased $530.5 million during this period, as these deposits provided funding for loan growth as a result of the decline in consumer and commercial deposits along with the strategic decision to lengthen the maturity of liabilities to enhance the Corporation’s longer-term liquidity position. The decline in consumer deposits of $105.9 million includes $33.7 million of consumer deposits that were sold in September 2007. Market conditions and the intense competition for deposits also contributed to the decline in consumer deposits. During the third quarter of 2008, consumer savings increased by $7.9 million from the same period a year ago and were offset by a $113.8 million net decline in all other sources of consumer deposits. During the past twelve months, the Corporation has been successful in growing its online savings balances to mitigate the decline in other consumer deposits. For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the online savings increased $60.4 million over the same period a year ago. Commercial deposits declined $34.7 million in the quarter ending September 30, 2008 when compared to the same period a year ago. During the third quarter of 2008, commercial money market accounts increased $25.0 million and were offset by a decline in all other sources of deposits. The decline in total average commercial deposits is mainly attributed to lower real estate related activity, repo sweeps and the increase in customer utilization of their deposits versus obtaining financing.

Treasury Activities

The Treasury Division manages the wholesale segments of the balance sheet, including investments, purchased funds, long-term debt and derivatives. Management’s objective is to achieve the maximum level of stable earnings over the long term, while controlling the level of interest rate, credit risk and liquidity risk, and optimizing capital utilization. In managing the investment portfolio to achieve its stated objective, the Corporation invests predominately in U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), asset-backed securities (“ABS”), including trust preferred securities, corporate bonds and municipal bonds. Treasury strategies and activities are overseen by the Bank’s Asset / Liability Committee (“the ALCO”), which also reviews all investment and funding transactions. ALCO activities are summarized and reviewed monthly with the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

39

At September 30, 2008, the investment securities portfolio totaled $1.3 billion, or 20.7% of total assets, compared to 22.7% of total assets at year-end 2007. The portfolio declined $140.3 million from the level at year-end 2007, primarily from write-downs recorded in 2008 associated with securities that were other-than-temporarily impaired and from the decline in market values in the investment portfolio. In the first nine months of 2008, management invested $105.4 million in fixed rate U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, $6.9 million in U.S. Treasuries, and $6.6 million in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Stock offsetting investment prepayments and maturities totaling $95.9 million.

Management wrote-down the value of investment securities by $24.6 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 due to other-than-temporary impairment of its non-agency mortgage backed securities, REIT pooled trust preferred securities and bank pooled trust preferred securities portfolios. The REIT pooled trust preferred securities were written down by $619 thousand, the non-agency MBS were written down by $19.8 million, and the bank pooled trust preferred stocks were written down by $4.2 million.

Management wrote-down the value of investment securities by $88.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to other-than-temporary impairment of its non-agency mortgage backed securities, REIT pooled trust preferred securities and bank pooled trust preferred securities portfolios. The REIT pooled trust preferred securities were written down by $34.9 million, the non-agency MBS were written down by $48.9 million, and the bank pooled trust preferred stocks were written down by $4.2 million.

40

Investment Portfolio Credit Quality

Investment allocations at September 30, 2008 include agency MBS (51.3%), ABS (20.8%), municipal (11.9%), corporate (6.7%), non-agency MBS (5.6%) and U.S. Government securities (3.7%). The charts below summarize the credit quality of the Corporation’s investment portfolio, using the average of the ratings of Moody’s, Standard and Poors, or Fitch Ratings and the portfolio distribution.

Investment Securities Portfolio September 30, 2008 ($ in thousands)
	Par Value		%		Fair Value		%		Amortized Cost		%
Treasuries	$	7,000	0.4	%	$	6,947	0.6	%	$	6,936	0.5	%
Sovereign		400	—			400	—			400	—
FHLB Stock		38,369	2.3			38,369	3.1			38,369	2.7
Agency MBS/ARM		623,101	38.1			626,085	51.3			628,662	44.0
Municipals:
AAA		73,425	4.5			71,213	5.8			73,759	5.2
AA		58,655	3.6			56,162	4.6			58,894	4.1
A		18,690	1.1			17,886	1.5			18,755	1.3
Total Municipals		150,770	9.2			145,261	11.9			151,408	10.6
Bank pooled trust preferred securities:
AAA		31,551	1.9			16,585	1.4			31,555	2.2
AA		41,089	2.5			18,196	1.5			40,827	2.9
A		238,093	14.5			115,323	9.5			183,712	12.9
BBB		97,608	6.0			45,492	3.7			73,327	5.1
Total bank pooled trust preferred securities		408,341	24.9			195,596	16.1			329,421	23.1
Insurance pooled trust preferred securities:
AAA		43,166	2.6			26,500	2.2			43,166	3.0
AA		10,810	0.7			5,752	0.5			10,812	0.8
A		20,673	1.3			10,277	0.8			20,688	1.4
Total insurance pooled trust preferred securities		74,649	4.6			42,529	3.5			74,666	5.2
REIT pooled trust preferred securities:
AA		15,000	0.9			4,905	0.4			11,340	0.8
A		14,000	0.9			2,678	0.2			4,096	0.3
BBB		14,000	0.9			2,674	0.2			2,436	0.2
BB		42,760	2.6			3,913	0.3			3,521	0.2
B		20,671	1.3			922	0.1			1,278	0.1
Total REIT pooled trust preferred securities		106,431	6.6			15,092	1.2			22,671	1.6
Non-agency MBS:
AAA		59,708	3.6			51,589	4.2			57,337	4.0
AA		12,453	0.8			5,392	0.4			8,328	0.6
A		20,290	1.2			5,273	0.4			5,273	0.4
BBB		6,729	0.4			3,156	0.3			3,156	0.2
BB		9,445	0.6			889	0.1			1,367	0.1
B		7,859	0.5			689	0.1			703	—
CCC		9,815	0.6			785	0.1			873	0.1
Total non-agency MBS		126,299	7.7			67,773	5.6			77,037	5.4
Corporate securities:
AA		3,498	0.2			2,198	0.2			3,002	0.2
A		72,750	4.5			59,637	4.8			70,796	5.0
BBB		19,103	1.2			15,497	1.3			18,598	1.3
BB		5,000	0.3			3,630	0.3			5,098	0.4
NR (Not Rated)		700	—			736	0.1			590	—
Total corporate securities		101,051	6.2			81,698	6.7			98,084	6.9
Total Investment Portfolio	$	1,636,411	100.0	%	$	1,219,750	100.0	%	$	1,427,654	100.0	%

41

Investment securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. Considerations such as the Corporation’s intent and ability to hold securities, recoverability of invested amount over the Corporation’s intended holding period and receipt of amounts contractually due, for example, are applied in determining whether the value of a security is other-than-temporarily impaired. Once a decline in value is determined to be other–than-temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation determined certain securities to be OTTI, and accordingly, recognized a $24.6 million write-down of the securities portfolio. The write-down was determined based on the individual securities’ credit performance and its ability to make its contractual principal and interest payments. Should credit quality of certain securities continue to deteriorate, it is possible that additional write-downs may be required. If economic conditions continue to deteriorate, it is possible that the securities that are currently performing satisfactorily could suffer impairment and could potentially require write-downs. The entire securities portfolio is evaluated each quarter to determine if additional write-downs are warranted.

The Corporation reviews all investment securities with unrealized losses to determine the duration and severity of the price declines. Management evaluates securities for OTTI based on the severity and duration of each security’s market value decline. For the quarter ending September 30, 2008, investment securities with price declines exceeding 35% or lasting 24 months or more, which was before the financial liquidity crisis that began in mid-2007, bore greater scrutiny from management.

As of September 30, 2008, the investment securities portfolio contained $418.9 million (face value) of securities with unrealized losses for 12 months or greater, but less than 24 months, with an aggregate loss of $137.4 million. Of the total face value, $150.9 million consists of U.S. agency backed MBS, with a loss of $3.4 million. The remaining $269.4 million, with an aggregate loss of $134.0 million, consists almost entirely of bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities. Each of these securities was tested for credit-based price declines using the Intex cash-flow model using a methodology compliant with FAS-115 and EITF 99-20. Securities failing the cash flow projection test were determined to be OTTI, and written-down accordingly. Securities with particularly low prices were stress tested more rigorously to determine if their credit quality remains sound. In management’s judgment, securities with sound credit quality are not being written-down based solely on the severity or duration of their price declines at this time, due to the extreme illiquidity evident in their respective markets and uncertainty surrounding the impact of the U.S. Treasury Department’s TARP program. Management believes the TARP program has the potential to significantly improve liquidity and prices in the bank pooled trust preferred securities market, and within the pooled trust preferred securities markets, over the next 6-9 months. For further discussion on other-than-temporary impairment, refer to Note 3.

As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation’s investment portfolio had unrealized losses of $207.9 million, or 14.6%, up from $99.8 million, or 6.4% at December 31, 2007. The increased loss position stemmed primarily from deterioration in the market valuations of pooled trust preferred securities and non-agency MBS. The pricing for these securities has been distressed by the mortgage foreclosure crisis affecting mortgage-backed securities and the ensuing liquidity crisis affecting asset-backed securities markets. The Corporation continually evaluates the credit quality and market pricing of the securities portfolio. Based upon these and other factors, the securities portfolio may experience further impairment. At September 30, 2008, management has the intent and ability to retain investment securities with unrealized losses until the decline in value has been recovered.

The $693.9 million MBS portfolio includes $626.1 million of agency-backed securities, $53.7 million of senior non-agency MBS securities originally rated AAA, and $14.1 million of mezzanine non-agency MBS securities originally rated AA. There are thirteen mezzanine level securities and three senior level securities with a current market value of $21.3 million that have been categorized as OTTI. The mezzanine non-agency MBS securities have been written down to $11.4 million from a par value of $57.3 million. On average, the OTTI securities experienced 60 day+ delinquencies of 7.78% at September 30, 2008. In contrast, the remaining non-agency MBS experienced 60 day+ delinquencies of 0.98%, on average, at September 30, 2008. The average subordination level on the remaining non-agency MBS securities is 4.37%, or greater than four times the level of 60+ delinquencies.

The market value of the ABS portfolio includes $195.6 million of securities backed primarily by banking institutions, $42.5 million of securities backed by insurance companies, and $15.1 million of securities backed by real estate investment trusts (“REITs”).

A total of twelve REIT trust preferred securities have been classified as OTTI since the fourth quarter of 2007. In the third quarter of 2008, three REIT bonds previously written down had an additional write down of $619 thousand. Two REIT securities, rated AA and single A respectively, with a market value of $3.0 million have not been written down due to their strong levels of credit support. As of September 30, 2008, the REIT pooled trust preferred securities portfolio has been written down from $105 million to $22.7 million. Six REIT pooled trust preferred securities with a book value of $2.2 million are classified as non-performing investments; these six securities deferred their third quarter 2008 interest payments. The remaining six securities made their payments in the third quarter of 2008.

42

Three Bank pooled trust preferred securities were written down in the third quarter of 2008. The securities were written down from a face value of $7.6 million to $3.5 million. The three securities are currently paying interest, but are not projected to completely repay principal. The break in principal is based on cash flow projections. Cash flows were modeled using a third party thirty-year estimate of defaults. On average, the thirty-year cumulative estimate of default approximated the worst cumulative 30 year default rate banks have experienced in the history of the FDIC.

The municipal bond portfolio has a market value of $145.3 million. The portfolio consists of federal tax-exempt general obligation securities which are geographically diversified. The portfolio has no exposure to Florida and less than 2% exposure to California and Nevada combined. The portfolio includes $128.1 million of securities insured by one of the major bond insurers. Additionally, all of the municipalities have underlying ratings of A, AA, or AAA and none of the issuers have experienced a downgrade as of the end of the third quarter. The Corporation has not experienced any OTTI associated with the municipal bond portfolio.

The corporate bond portfolio is composed of single issuer corporate bonds rated investment grade by Moody’s or S&P. The portfolio, totaling $81.7 million (market value), consists of commercial bank trust preferred securities. Ninety seven percent of the bonds are from the largest 75 banks in the country. Other debt securities include U.S. Treasury, Agency, and sovereign securities. The Corporation has not experienced any OTTI associated with the corporate bond portfolio.

In addition to credit risk, the other significant risk in the investment portfolio is duration risk. Duration measures the expected change in the market value of an investment for a 100 basis point (or 1%) change in interest rates. The higher an investment’s duration, the longer the time until its rate is reset to current market rates. The Bank’s risk tolerance, as measured by the duration of the investment portfolio, is currently 4.0%.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants as of the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value that considers the attributes specific to particular assets or liabilities and establishes a three-level hierarchy for determining fair value based on the transparency of inputs to each valuation as of the fair value measurement date. The statement also expands disclosures about financial instruments that are measured at fair value and eliminates the use of large position discounts for financial instruments quoted in active markets. If there is limited market activity for an asset or liability at the measurement date, the fair value is the price that would be received between a buyer and a seller, rather than a forced liquidation or distressed sale. A transaction is forced if transaction occurs under duress or the seller otherwise is forced to accept a price that a willing market participant would not accept.

Hierarchy Levels

SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based on the inputs used to value the particular asset or liability at the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

• Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 – inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices of identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

• Level 3 – inputs that are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

At the end of each quarter, the Corporation assesses the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. From time to time, assets or liabilities may be transferred within hierarchy levels due to changes in availability of observable market inputs to measure fair value at the measurement date. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies and other relevant information to provide the investors with a better understanding of how the Corporation determines fair value and the methods and assumptions underlying these measurements.

Mortgage Loans held for sale – Loans held for sale are first mortgage loans that are originated by the Corporation under loan programs offered by a third party who has contractual rights to process and purchase the loans at their face value.

• Hierarchy – Level 3

• Market – The market for the mortgages originated and subsequently sold to a third party is considered active, due to the contractual agreement and the ability to sell the loans in an open market, if necessary.

• Fair Value – Loans are valued based on the unobservable contractual terms established with a third party purchaser. Credit risk is not incorporated in fair values due to the contractual terms with the party to purchase the asset at the agreed upon price.

43

Investment Securities – The investment securities portfolio consists of U.S. treasuries, agency mortgage-backed securities, non-agency mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities, bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities, REIT pooled trust preferred securities and corporate securities. These securities are classified within each of the three level hierarchies established by SFAS No. 157. The following is a description of how the Corporation determines fair value and the valuation hierarchy for each security type.

U.S. Treasuries – Debt issued and backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

• Hierarchy – Level 1

• Market – The market is considered active for these securities as they trade routinely each business day.

• Fair Value – The Corporation uses an independent third party pricing service in establishing the fair value measurement for this security type and the prices are non-binding. Pricing is made available from industry participants who report bid/ask markets that represent an executable trade level for these securities. The securities are priced using a market pricing approach incorporating trades of the same securities and market quotes.

Agency mortgage-backed-securities – Securities issued by U.S. government agencies and backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

• Hierarchy – Level 2

• Market – The market is considered active for these securities as they trade routinely each business day.

• Fair Value – The Corporation uses an independent third party pricing service in establishing the fair value measurement for this security type and the prices are non-binding. The securities are priced using a market pricing approach incorporating market quotes for identical or similar securities and/or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for these securities.

Municipal Securities – Debt issued by state and local governments, which issue less than $10 million in annual debt issuance, are considered bank-qualified municipal investments.

• Hierarchy – Level 2

• Market – The market is considered active, as municipal securities trade daily. Additionally, new issuances have continued in the third quarter of 2008 as indicated by broker/dealers.

• Fair Value – The Corporation uses an independent third party pricing service in establishing the fair value measurement for this security type and the prices are non-binding. The securities are priced using a market pricing approach using trade data, including but not limited, to trades of the same securities and market quotes, and comparable secondary market and new issue trades.

Corporate Securities – Single issuer trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions.

• Hierarchy – Level 2

• Market – The market is considered active, as broker/dealers have provided confirmation that the corporate securities portfolio or similar securities trade routinely.

• Fair Value – The Corporation uses an independent third party pricing service in establishing the fair value measurement for this security type and the prices are non-binding. The securities are priced using a market pricing approach, which combines an independent third party pricing service’s proprietary pricing models with trade data, including but not limited to, trades of the same securities and market quotes, comparable new issue and secondary market trades, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for these securities.

Non-agency mortgage-backed securities – Mortgage-backed securities issued by financial institutions other than the U.S. government agencies.

• Hierarchy – Level 3

• Market – The market for these securities is currently considered inactive, with limited number of trade activity over the past quarter. Market participants have informed the Corporation that there has been no new fixed issuance and severe reduction of ARM issuance in 2008. Additionally, there have been few observed secondary trades in the AAA-rated sector and there have been even fewer secondary trades in the AA-rated sector.

• Fair Value – The Corporation uses an independent third party pricing service in establishing the fair value measurements for the non-agency portfolio and the prices are non-binding. The securities are priced using a market pricing approach, which combines the use of an independent third party pricing service’s proprietary pricing models with inputs such as spreads to benchmarks, prepayment speeds, loss, and recovery and default rates that are implied by market prices for similar securities and collateral structure types. Because this valuation technique involves some level 3 inputs, the Corporation classifies securities that are valued in this manner as level 3.

REIT pooled trust preferred securities – Collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) issued by a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”) and backed by a diverse pool of debt, known as CDO collateral.

The underlying portfolio is selected and managed by an independent asset manager. The purchase of the CDO collateral is financed through the issuance of debt obligations and equity by the SPV. The bonds issued by the SPV’s are generally segregated into several classes known as tranches. The typical structure will include senior, mezzanine, and equity tranches. The equity

44

tranche represents the first loss position. Interest and principal collected from the portfolio of collateral are distributed to the holders of the debt obligations of the CDO via a waterfall with a priority of payments that provides the highest level of protection to the senior-most tranches. In order to provide a high level of protection to the senior tranches, the cash flow waterfall includes coverage tests that divert cash flow if such coverage tests are not met. If the tests are failed, senior tranches receive higher allocations of cash flows until the applicable tests are satisfied. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation owned senior and mezzanine tranches.

The collateral is generally trust preferred securities and subordinated debt securities issued by real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). The standard structure for these securities is a 30-year security, callable quarterly after 5 years. Subordinated debt securities are issued by banks or bank holding companies that typically have payoff bullets with 10 or 20-year maturities.

The term of most trust preferred CDOs is 30 years. Generally, starting after 10 years, the collateral manager is required to hold auctions of the collateral portfolio in order to redeem the CDO notes. The auction will only be completed if the proceeds of the auction are sufficient to pay all cumulative interest and principal relating the notes then outstanding. Similarly, the holders of the preferred shares may redeem the notes after five years, but only if the redemption proceeds are sufficient to pay all cumulative interest and principal relating to the notes then outstanding.

• Hierarchy– Level 3

• Market – The market for these securities is currently considered inactive because of limited market activity or little to no price transparency.

• Fair Value – The Corporation uses an independent third party pricing service in establishing the fair value measurements for the REIT portfolio and the prices are non-binding. The securities are priced using a market pricing approach, which combines the use of an independent third party pricing service’s proprietary pricing models with inputs such as spreads to benchmarks, prepayment speeds, loss, and recovery and default rates that are implied by market prices for similar securities and collateral structure types. Because this valuation technique involves some level 3 inputs, the Corporation classifies securities that are valued in this manner as level 3.

Bank and Insurance pooled trust preferred securities – Collateralized debt obligation issued by a special purpose vehicle and backed by a diverse pool of debt, known as CDO collateral.

The underlying portfolio is selected and managed by an asset manager. The purchase of the CDO collateral is financed through the issuance of debt obligations and equity by the SPV. The bonds issued by the CDO are generally segregated into several classes known as tranches. The typical structure will include senior, mezzanine, and equity tranches. The equity tranche represents the first loss position. Interest and principal collected from the portfolio of collateral are distributed to the holders of the debt obligations of the CDO via a waterfall with a priority of payments that provides the highest level of protection to the senior-most tranches. In order to provide a high level of protection to the senior tranches, the cash flow waterfall includes coverage tests that divert cash flow if such coverage tests are not met. If the tests are failed, senior tranches receive higher allocations of cash flows until the applicable tests are satisfied. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation owned senior and mezzanine tranches.

The collateral is generally trust preferred securities and subordinated debt securities issued by banks and bank holding companies, insurance companies and mortgage REITs. The standard structure for these securities is a 30-year term, callable quarterly after 5 years. Additionally, preferred securities dividend payments may be deferred for up to 5 years; however, payments are cumulative. Subordinated debt securities are issued by banks or bank holding companies and typically have 10 or 20-year maturities.

In order to provide a high level of protection to the senior tranches, the cash flow waterfall includes coverage tests that divert cash flows to higher-level tranches if such coverage tests are not met. The legal final maturity date of most trust preferred CDOs is 30 years. Generally, starting after 10 years, the collateral manager is required to hold auctions of the collateral portfolio in order to redeem the CDO notes. The auction will only be completed if the proceeds of the auction are sufficient to pay all cumulative interest and principal relating the notes then outstanding. Similarly, the holders of the preferred shares may redeem the notes after five years, but only if the redemption proceeds are sufficient to pay all cumulative interest and principal relating to the notes then outstanding.

• Hierarchy – Level 3

45

• Market – The market for these securities is currently considered inactive because of limited market activity or little to no price transparency.

• Fair Value – The Corporation uses a combination of prices estimated by an income valuation approach and prices provided by an independent third party pricing service weighted based on management’s judgment regarding the level of data available to support the weighting. The prices received from the independent third party are non-binding.

o The independent third party pricing service uses pricing service’s proprietary pricing models that incorporate inputs such as spreads to benchmarks, prepayment speeds, loss, and recovery and default rates that are implied by market prices for similar securities and collateral structure types.

o Corporation’s income valuation technique used to estimate the fair value uses market participant or independently sourced market input data, which includes discount rate, interest rate yield curves, liquidity premiums, prepayment rates, credit risk, loss severities, default rates and expected cash flow assumptions. These estimates are based on pertinent information available to the Corporation at the measurement date. The markets for these securities are inactive, as few to no trades have been transacted over the past three months. Due to the current illiquid market, a premium is added to estimate the illiquidity of the bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities. In active markets, this premium would be observable. To determine the illiquidity premium, management specifically looked to the premiums that were in effect at the time the market developed these types of securities and at that time the secondary market was considered inactive. The premiums were developed by observing the initial spread to LIBOR and the contemporaneous financial sector curve to LIBOR. These spreads were added to the current index spread and the current LIBOR rate to determine the discount rate to be applied to the cash flows. Fair values are not subject to precise quantifications and may fluctuate as economic and market factors vary, and the Corporation’s evaluation of those factors change. Due to the ongoing effects of the extreme disruption in the market and severe reduction in market liquidity for these types of securities, management believes this approach is the most appropriate and applicable.

46

The table below summarizes the investment securities at September 30, 2008 reported in Note 2 that were obtained by using a third party pricing service or a combination of third party pricing and a fair value model:

	Fair Value
($ in thousands)	Available for Sale		Held to Maturity		Total		%
Third party pricing service
Treasuries	$	6,947	$	—	$	6,947	0.7	%
Sovereign		400		—		400	—
Agency MBS/ARM		626,086		—		626,086	63.9
Municipals		145,261		—		145,261	14.8
Bank & insurance pooled trust preferred securities		72,825		—		72,825	7.4
REIT pooled trust preferred securities		15,092		—		15,092	1.5
Non-agency MBS		67,772		—		67,772	6.9
Corporate securities		43,665		—		43,665	4.4
	$	978,048	$	—	$	978,048	99.6	%
Combination of third party pricing service and a fair value model
Bank pooled trust preferred securities		—		3,476		3,476	0.4
	$	—	$	3,476	$	3,476	0.4	%
Total Investment Portfolio	$	978,048	$	3,476	$	981,524	100.0	%

Derivatives – The Corporation uses various derivative financial instruments as part of its interest rate risk management strategy to mitigate the exposure to changes in market interest rates. The derivative financial instruments used separately or in combination are interest rate swaps and caps.

• Hierarchy – Level 2

• Market – Fair values are based on active market quotes from brokers.

• Fair value – The payment the Corporation would receive or pay if the item were sold or bought in a current transaction. The Corporation’s open derivative positions are valued using third party developed models that use as their basis observable market data or inputs developed by the third party. These values are corroborated by the Corporation. Examples of these derivatives include interest rate swaps, caps and floors where the indices, correlation and contractual rates may be unobservable.

The derivative financial instruments valued at fair value at September 30, 2008 do not incorporate credit risk in the valuation of the financial instrument. Management has determined that it does not need to adjust the fair value of the Corporation’s interest rate swaps for counterparty risk because its believed that the credit risk is inherent in lending to the swap participants and the credit risk is not significantly different from the risk attributed to the interest rate swap curve itself, which is used to determine the fair value of the interest rate swaps.

Fair Values of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, assets classified as Level 3 realized $83.8 million in impairment losses on certain securities that were considered other-than-temporarily impaired. The charge was recorded to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Also, an $11.4 million of other comprehensive loss was recorded to net accumulated other comprehensive losses for the nine months ending September 30, 2008 and is reflected in stockholders’ equity. At September 30, 2008, management has reviewed the severity and duration of the Level 3 securities and has determined it has the ability and intent to hold these securities until the unrealized loss is recovered.

47

At September 30, 2008, the Corporation had $160.0 million, or 16.2% of total assets and liabilities valued at fair value that are considered Level 3 valuations using unobservable inputs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Level 3 assets declined $368.1 million or 69.7%. The decline was mainly due to the net change resulting from write-downs in the investment securities portfolio recorded in 2008, market value declines, transfer of securities to held to maturity and principal payments.

As disclosed in Note 2, $277.5 million of net transfers were made into Level 3, which represents $121.5 million in non-agency mortgage backed and $346.7 million in bank and insurance pooled trust preferred securities transferred into Level 3 and $52.3 million of corporate securities transferred out of Level 3. The Corporation determined during the current year, that non-agency mortgage backed securities have become less liquid and pricing has become less reliable along with a currently inactive market. On July 1, 2008, the Corporation moved certain bank pooled trust preferred securities to held to maturity. In addition, management has determined that corporate securities have a more active market and should be classified within the Level 2 compared to Level 3 as reported as of December 31, 2008.

Borrowings

Treasury funding, representing brokered certificates of deposit, short-term borrowings excluding repurchase agreements (“repo”), long-term debt, subordinated debt, and junior subordinated debentures, totaled $2.1 billion in September 2008, compared to $2.1 billion at year-end 2007.Throughout 2008, management has lengthened the maturity profile of its Treasury Funding to reduce liquidity risk in the current uncertain economic environment. Specifically, brokered certificates of deposit have been increased by $395.5 million while overnight Fed Funds have been reduced by $334 million. The brokered certificates of deposit portfolio has an average term of 31 months.

Provident’s funds management objectives are two-fold: to minimize the cost of borrowings while assuring sufficient funding availability to meet current and future customer requirements, and to contribute to interest rate risk management goals through match-funding loan and investment activity. Management utilizes a variety of sources to raise borrowed funds at competitive rates, including federal funds purchased (“fed funds”), Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings, Federal Reserve Term Auction Facility (“TAF”) borrowings, securities sold under repo agreements, subordinated notes and brokered and jumbo certificates of deposit (“CDs”). FHLB borrowings, TAF borrowings, and repos typically are borrowed at rates approximating the LIBOR rate for the equivalent term because they are secured with investments or high quality loans. Fed funds, which are generally overnight borrowings, are typically purchased at the Federal Reserve target rate.

The Corporation formed wholly owned statutory business trusts in 1998, 2000 and 2003. In 2004, the Corporation also acquired three wholly owned statutory business trusts from Southern Financial as part of the merger. In all cases, the trusts issued trust preferred securities that were sold to outside third parties. The junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation to the trusts are presented net of unamortized issuance costs as long-term debt in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition and are includable in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations. Any of the junior subordinated debentures are redeemable at any time in whole, but not in part, from the date of issuance on the occurrence of certain events. There are $121.0 million of issuances callable within the next twelve months.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Corporation has various contractual obligations, such as long-term borrowings, that are recorded as liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Other items, such as certain minimum lease payments for the use of banking and operations offices under operating lease agreements, are not recognized as liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but are required to be disclosed. Each of these arrangements affects the Corporation’s determination of sufficient liquidity.

The following table summarizes significant contractual obligations at September 30, 2008 and the future periods in which such obligations are expected to be settled in cash. In addition, the table reflects the timing of principal payments on outstanding borrowings.

	Contractual Payments Due by Period
(in thousands)	Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years		Total
Lease commitments	$	12,049	$	24,428	$	20,056	$	23,860	$	80,393
Certificates of deposit		1,179,249		821,595		276,122		32,211		2,309,177
Long-term debt		285,000		245,000		—		184,389		714,389
Total contractual payment obligations	$	1,476,298	$	1,091,023	$	296,178	$	240,460	$	3,103,959

48

Arrangements to fund credit products or guarantee financing take the form of loan commitments (including lines of credit on revolving credit structures) and letters of credit. Approvals for these arrangements are obtained in the same manner as loans. Generally, cash flows, collateral value and a risk assessment are considered when determining the amount and structure of credit arrangements. Commitments to extend credit in the form of consumer, commercial real estate and business loans at September 30, 2008 were as follows:

(in thousands)	September 30, 2008
Commercial business and real estate	$	835,865
Consumer revolving credit		840,876
Residential mortgage credit		9,316
Performance standby letters of credit		140,293
Commercial letters of credit		4,667
Total loan commitments	$	1,831,017

Historically, many of the commitments expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Obligations also take the form of commitments to purchase loans. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation did not have any firm commitments to purchase loans.

Risk Management

Interest Rate Risk

The nature of the banking business, which involves paying interest on deposits at varying rates and terms and charging interest on loans at other rates and terms, creates interest rate risk. As a result, net interest margin and earnings and the market value of assets and liabilities are subject to fluctuations arising from the movement of interest rates. The Corporation manages several forms of interest rate risk, including asset/liability mismatch, basis risk and prepayment risk. A key management objective is to maintain a risk profile in which variations in net interest income stay within the limits and guidelines of the bank’s Asset/Liability Management Policy.

Management continually monitors basis risk such as Prime/LIBOR spread and asset/liability mismatch. Basis risk exists as a result of having much of the Bank’s earning assets priced using the Prime rate, while much of the liability portfolio is priced using the certificate of deposit or LIBOR yield curve. Historically, the various pricing indices and yield curves have been highly correlated, however, in recent months some of these relationships have moved outside of their normal boundaries. As an example, the spread between Prime and 1-Month LIBOR moved in a range between 2.63% and 2.93% for the two years ending June 30, 2007 – a difference of 0.30% from high to low. In contrast, for the period from June 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008, the Prime/LIBOR spread posted a low of 1.07% at September 30, 2008 and a high of 3.44% at March 17, 2008 – a range of 2.37%. Such volatility in the Prime/Libor basis has contributed a measure of uncertainty to the modeling of interest rate risk in 2008.

The Corporation purchases and originates loans along with purchasing investment securities in which the underlying assets are residential mortgage loans subject to prepayments. The actual principal reduction on these assets varies from the expected contractual principal reduction due to principal prepayments resulting from borrowers’ elections to refinance the underlying mortgages based on market and other conditions. Prepayment rate projections utilize actual prepayment speed experience and available market information on like-kind instruments. The prepayment rates form the basis for income recognition of premiums or discounts on the related assets. Changes in prepayment estimates may cause the earnings recognized on these assets to vary over the term that the assets are held creating volatility in the net interest margin. Prepayment rate assumptions are monitored and updated monthly to reflect actual activity and the most recent market projections.

Measuring and managing interest rate risk is a dynamic process that management performs continually to meet the objective of maintaining a stable net interest margin. This process relies chiefly on the simulation of net interest income over multiple interest rate scenarios or “shocks.” The modeled scenarios begin with a base case in which rates are unchanged and include parallel and non-parallel rate shocks. The non-parallel shifts include yield curve flattening and steepening scenarios as well as a move to the implied-forward yield curve. The results of these shocks are measured in two forms: first, the impact on the net interest margin and earnings over one and two year time frames; and second, the impact on the market value of equity. In addition to measuring the basis risks and prepayment risks noted above, simulations also quantify the earnings impact of rate changes and the cost / benefit of hedging strategies.

49

The following table shows the anticipated effect on net interest income in parallel shift (up or down) interest rate scenarios. These shifts are assumed to begin on October 1, 2008 for the September 30, 2008 data and on January 1, 2008 for the December 31, 2007 data and evenly increase or decrease over a 6-month period. The effect on net interest income would be for the next twelve months.

Interest Rate Scenario	At September 30, 2008 Projected Percentage Change in Net Interest Income	At December 31, 2007 Projected Percentage Change in Net Interest Income
-200 basis points	-5.30%	-4.80%
-100 basis points	-2.10%	-2.60%
No change	—	—
+100 basis points	+1.30%	-0.50%
+200 basis points	+2.40%	-0.70%

The isolated modeling environment, assuming no action by management, shows that the Corporation’s net interest income volatility is less than 5.4% under the assumed single direction scenarios. Management routinely models several yield curve flattening and steepening scenarios as part of its interest rate risk management function, and this modeling discloses little risk under most yield curve twisting scenarios. The current economic environment includes concerns about the dramatic reshaping of financial firms and the impact of the U.S. government’s plans to resuscitate the housing market and financial system. At this point in time, there is some reason to believe that short-term rates will remain low and possibly move lower in the near term. Various basis relationships and the overall shape of the yield curve remain difficult to predict.

Management employs the investment, borrowing, and derivative portfolios in implementing the interest rate strategies. To protect against falling short-term interest rates, the Corporation has over $226 million of receive fixed/pay floating interest rate swaps in position as of September 30. In the borrowings portfolio, $205 million of funds reset their rates quarterly based upon long-term interest rates to mitigate the impact of accelerating prepayment activity due to a decline in long-term interest rates. Additionally, a combined $525 million of Fed Funds and FHLB advances re-price no less than quarterly and thus will benefit in falling rate scenarios. Lastly, the Corporation has entered into a $200 million program of receive fixed/pay 1-month LIBOR interest rate swaps. As of September 30, 2008, $98.2 million of this program was transacted, with the balance to be completed in fourth quarter of 2008.

Credit Risk

In addition to managing interest rate risk, which applies to both assets and liabilities, the Corporation must understand and manage risks specific to lending. Much of the fundamental lending business of Provident is based upon understanding, measuring and controlling credit risk. Credit risk entails both general risks, which are inherent in the process of lending, and risk specific to individual borrowers. Each consumer and residential lending product has a generally predictable level of credit loss based on historical loss experience. Home mortgage and home equity loans and lines generally have the lowest credit loss experience. Loans with medium credit loss experience are primarily secured products such as auto and marine loans. Unsecured loan products such as personal revolving credit have the highest credit loss experience; therefore the Bank has chosen not to engage in a significant amount of this type of lending. Credit risk in commercial lending varies significantly, as losses as a percentage of outstanding loans can shift widely from period to period and are particularly sensitive to changing economic conditions. Generally improving economic conditions result in improved operating results on the part of commercial customers, enhancing their ability to meet debt service requirements. However, this improvement in operating cash flow is often at least partially offset by rising interest rates often seen in an improving economic environment. In addition, changing economic conditions often impact various business segments differently, giving rise to the need to manage industry concentrations within the loan portfolio.

To control and manage credit risk, management has set high credit standards along with an in-house administration and strong oversight procedures and a cautious approach to adopting products before they have been sufficiently tested in the market place. In addition, the Corporation maintains a fairly balanced portfolio concentration between home equity, commercial and residential real estate and commercial business loans. The Corporation’s assessment of the loan portfolio’s credit risk and asset quality is measured by its levels of delinquencies, non-performing asset levels and net-charge-offs. For the quarter ending September 30, 2008, the 90-day delinquency level was $11.5 million, or 0.27% of loans, up by $7.7 million from December 31, 2007. Non-performing loans were $40.5 million, or 0.95% of total loans compared to 0.74% as of December 31, 2007. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 were 0.48% compared to 0.58% for the fourth quarter of 2007. Overall, the asset quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio has declined to levels that were expected during these uncertain economic times. The Mid-Atlantic region continues to remain one of the better performing markets in the nation in terms of preserving real estate values and lower delinquency levels.

50

Managing credit risk is an integral part of the investment portfolio management process for the Corporation. The investment portfolio contains three distinct types of credit risks: risk to residential mortgage borrowers, risk to corporate entities, and risk to municipalities. Each risk is monitored and controlled separately.

Risk to residential mortgage borrowers is inherent in the non-agency MBS portfolio. This risk is controlled by purchasing securities in which the underlying loans have favorable risk characteristics, such as low loan-to-value ratios and high borrower credit scores. The risk is further controlled through purchasing only the top two (AAA and AA) classes of securities, which contain greater levels of credit support than the lower rated classes. Management monitors the risk through tracking the delinquencies and foreclosures of the underlying loans monthly and monitoring primary and secondary market activity for similar securities.

Risk to corporate entities is inherent in the REIT, Bank, and Insurance pooled trust preferred securities portfolios, and the individual bank trust preferred stock investments. Risk is controlled in the pooled securities through identifying the issuer exposures for each pool, and limiting purchases to securities in the top three rating classes (AAA, AA, and A), which have significant levels of credit support. Risk is monitored through tracking the financial performance of large issuers and issuers considered to be at risk to deferral or default of payment. Additionally, issuers’ actual default and deferral experience and expected future outlook are measured against the credit support levels to evaluate the extent of risk to the securities. Market activity is monitored on an ongoing basis. Risk to individual bank debt is controlled by purchasing securities of high quality issuers as assessed internally and corroborated by external ratings. Management monitors risk through tracking the issuers’ financial performance quarterly or more frequently as needed, and monitoring market activity on an ongoing basis.

Risk to municipalities is controlled through limiting purchases to general obligation bonds of municipalities rated AAA, AA, or A, limiting exposure to individual municipalities, and limiting state concentrations. Risk is further controlled by limits placed on the exposure to individual bond insurers that provide credit enhancements. Management monitors risk through tracking the credit ratings of each municipality monthly and tracking the financial condition of bond insurers. Market activity is also tracked on an ongoing basis.

Credit criteria and purchase limits for all investments containing credit risk are defined in documented and frequently reviewed investment policies and subject to approval by the Asset / Liability Committee (“ALCO”). The ALCO also monitors the portfolio credit risk monthly.

Other Lending Risks

Other lending risks include liquidity risk and specific risk. The liquidity risk of the Corporation arises from its obligation to make payment in the event of a customer’s contractual default. The evaluation of specific risk is a basic function of underwriting and loan administration, involving analysis of the borrower’s ability to service debt as well as the value of pledged collateral. In addition to impacting individual lending decisions, this analysis may also determine the aggregate level of commitments the Corporation is willing to extend to an individual customer or a group of related customers.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2007

Financial Highlights

The Corporation reported a net loss of $5.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The net loss available to common stockholders was $6.9 million, or $(0.21) per diluted share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $16.0 million net income, or $0.50 per diluted share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. The Corporation’s key performance measurements such as return on assets and return on common equity were (0.34)%, and (4.50)%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, compared to 1.01% and 9.82%, respectively, for the same period a year ago.

The financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 includes a $24.6 million write-down of the investment securities portfolio for securities that were other-than-temporarily impaired during the quarter. Following its credit review for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation wrote down twelve non-agency mortgage-backed securities, three REIT pooled trust preferred securities and three bank pooled trust preferred securities, reducing their carrying values to current market values. In comparison, the third quarter 2007 included an increase in the provision for loan losses of $4.1 million relating to a specific reserve on a non-performing commercial business loan, a $4.9 million gain associated with the sale of six branch facilities and associated deposits and $844 thousand in costs associated with restructuring activities and direct costs relating to this program.

The decrease in earnings was also impacted by the decline in net interest income of $4.0 million, an increase in non-interest expense of $508 thousand and a decline in non-interest income of $30.8 million. These declines were offset by a decrease in the provision for loan losses of $923 thousand and a decline in income tax expense of $13.0 million, resulting in a $21.4 million decline in net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, net interest margin decreased to 3.09% from 3.45%; average total loans increased $246.5 million or 6.2% and average deposits increased $389.9 million or 9.5%. Asset credit quality declined from the same quarter a

51

year ago as non-performing assets to total assets increased to 1.05% from 0.42%. The increase is directly related to the $16.8 million increase in non-performing residential real estate construction loans, $13.2 million in non-performing investment securities and a $9.3 million increase in other assets owned. Non-performing loans to total loans increased to 0.95% from 0.56%, while net charge-offs to average loans increased to 0.48% for the quarter compared to 0.20% for the same period a year ago.

Net Interest Income

The Corporation’s principal source of revenue is net interest income, the difference between interest income on earning assets and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis to recognize associated tax benefits in order to provide a basis for comparison of yields with taxable earning assets. The following table presents information regarding the average balance of assets and liabilities, as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing annualized income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances; however, accrued interest income has been excluded from these loans. The tables on the following pages also analyze the reasons for the changes from year-to-year in the principal elements that comprise net interest income. Rate and volume variances presented for each component will not total the variances presented on totals of interest income and interest expense because of shifts from year-to-year in the relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

52

Consolidated Average Balances and Analysis of Changes in Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income

Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2008						Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands) (tax-equivalent basis)	Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate		Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Originated and acquired residential	$	262,372	$	4,010	6.08	%	$	298,019	$	4,571	6.09	%
Home equity		1,117,718		13,908	4.95			1,050,442		18,076	6.83
Marine		356,623		4,900	5.47			357,217		4,988	5.54
Other consumer		26,068		421	6.42			29,533		546	7.33
Commercial mortgage		528,565		8,125	6.12			441,685		7,938	7.13
Residential construction		538,543		7,249	5.35			609,537		13,400	8.72
Commercial construction		443,772		5,617	5.04			383,775		7,685	7.94
Commercial business		946,563		15,042	6.32			803,537		15,155	7.48
Total loans		4,220,224		59,272	5.59			3,973,745		72,359	7.22
Loans held for sale		6,159		96	6.20			11,318		203	7.12
Short-term investments		2,456		14	2.27			1,905		39	8.12
Taxable investment securities		1,354,411		18,905	5.55			1,430,269		20,565	5.70
Tax-advantaged investment securities		157,324		2,305	5.83			179,497		2,528	5.59
Total investment securities		1,511,735		21,210	5.58			1,609,766		23,093	5.69
Total interest-earning assets		5,740,574		80,592	5.59			5,596,734		95,694	6.78
Less: allowance for loan losses		58,032						46,147
Cash and due from banks		101,392						110,954
Other assets		660,162						617,812
Total assets	$	6,444,096					$	6,279,353
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	448,715		434	0.38		$	487,435		637	0.52
Money market deposits		602,625		2,713	1.79			583,856		5,016	3.41
Savings deposits		564,848		944	0.66			557,239		538	0.38
Direct time deposits		1,146,158		10,131	3.52			1,218,368		14,148	4.61
Brokered time deposits		1,059,362		12,404	4.66			528,841		6,903	5.18
Short-term borrowings		527,058		2,511	1.90			748,807		8,774	4.65
Long-term debt		733,087		6,821	3.70			758,878		11,021	5.76
Total interest-bearing liabilities		5,081,853		35,958	2.81			4,883,424		47,037	3.82
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		653,428						709,492
Other liabilities		46,204						41,541
Stockholders’ equity		662,611						644,896
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6,444,096					$	6,279,353
Net interest-earning assets	$	658,721					$	713,310
Net interest income (tax-equivalent)				44,634						48,657
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment				802						820
Net interest income			$	43,832					$	47,837
Net yield on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis					3.09	%					3.45	%

53

Consolidated Average Balances and Analysis of Changes in Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income (Continued)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

	2008 Quarter to 2007 Quarter Increase/(Decrease)										2008/2007 Income/Expense Variance Due to Change In
(dollars in thousands) (tax-equivalent basis)	Average Balance			% Change		Income/ Expense			% Change		Average Rate			Average Volume
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Originated and acquired residential	$	(35,647	)	(12.0	)%	$	(561	)	(12.3	)%	$	(4	)	$	(557	)
Home equity		67,276		6.4			(4,168	)	(23.1	)		(5,253	)		1,085
Marine		(594	)	(0.2	)		(88	)	(1.8	)		(78	)		(10	)
Other consumer		(3,465	)	(11.7	)		(125	)	(22.9	)		(64	)		(61	)
Commercial mortgage		86,880		19.7			187		2.4			(1,229	)		1,416
Residential construction		(70,994	)	(11.6	)		(6,151	)	(45.9	)		(4,725	)		(1,426	)
Commercial construction		59,997		15.6			(2,068	)	(26.9	)		(3,129	)		1,061
Commercial business		143,026		17.8			(113	)	(0.7	)		(2,558	)		2,445
Total loans		246,479		6.2			(13,087	)	(18.1	)
Loans held for sale		(5,159	)	(45.6	)		(107	)	(52.7	)		(24	)		(83	)
Short-term investments		551		28.9			(25	)	(64.1	)		(34	)		9
Taxable investment securities		(75,858	)	(5.3	)		(1,660	)	(8.1	)		(554	)		(1,106	)
Tax-advantaged investment securities		(22,173	)	(12.4	)		(223	)	(8.8	)		104			(327	)
Total investment securities		(98,031	)	(6.1	)		(1,883	)	(8.2	)
Total interest-earning assets		143,840		2.6			(15,102	)	(15.8	)		(17,466	)		2,364
Less: allowance for loan losses		11,885		25.8
Cash and due from banks		(9,562	)	(8.6	)
Other assets		42,350		6.9
Total assets	$	164,743		2.6
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	(38,720	)	(7.9	)		(203	)	(31.9	)		(155	)		(48	)
Money market deposits		18,769		3.2			(2,303	)	(45.9	)		(2,458	)		155
Savings deposits		7,609		1.4			406		75.5			399			7
Direct time deposits		(72,210	)	(5.9	)		(4,017	)	(28.4	)		(3,213	)		(804	)
Brokered time deposits		530,521		100.3			5,501		79.7			(757	)		6,258
Short-term borrowings		(221,749	)	(29.6	)		(6,263	)	(71.4	)		(4,175	)		(2,088	)
Long-term debt		(25,791	)	(3.4	)		(4,200	)	(38.1	)		(3,835	)		(365	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		198,429		4.1			(11,079	)	(23.6	)		(12,901	)		1,822
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		(56,064	)	(7.9	)
Other liabilities		4,663		11.2
Stockholders’ equity		17,715		2.7
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	164,743		2.6
Net interest-earning assets	$	(54,589	)	(7.7	)
Net interest income (tax-equivalent)							(4,023	)	(8.3	)	$	(4,565	)	$	542
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment							(18	)	(2.2	)
Net interest income						$	(4,005	)	(8.4	)

54

The net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis decreased 36 basis points to 3.09% from 3.45% for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The decline was primarily caused by the 119 basis point decline in asset yields that were negatively impacted by the 275 basis point decline in the benchmark interest rates during the past twelve months. This decline was not fully offset by the 101 basis point decline in interest-bearing liabilities. Aggressive competition for deposits throughout the industry and the issuance of $50.0 million in subordinated debt at 9.50% in April 2008 resulted in the slower decline in rates on interest-bearing liabilities as compared to yields on interest-earning assets. In addition, higher cost brokered certificates of deposit increased during the current quarter as it was used to fund asset growth due to the decline in customer deposits and used to increase the Corporation’s liquidity position by freeing up other available borrowing sources.

Year over year average earning assets increased to $5.7 billion as a result of strong internally generated loan growth. The net average loan growth of $282.1 million in relationship-based loans was offset by the run-off of $35.6 million in originated and acquired portfolios and a $98.0 million reduction in investment securities due mainly to the investment write-downs over the past twelve months. The yields on investments and loans declined 11 and 163 basis points, respectively. The yield decline in the loan and investment portfolios resulted from the decrease in year over year market interest rates and the composition of these portfolios. Interest income for the quarter was negatively impacted by a reversal of $194 thousand in interest income or 1 basis point related to certain investment securities that were considered other-than-temporarily impaired. Interest-bearing liabilities increased by $198.4 million while the average rate paid decreased by 101 basis points. The decrease in the average rate paid was primarily due to the shift in deposit and borrowing mix in addition to the decline in interest rates that impacted interest bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, time deposits and short and long-term debt. Savings rates increased over the same period a year ago as a result of an increase in higher cost online saving deposit balances. Interest expense was also negatively impacted by a $56.1 million decline in average noninterest-bearing demand deposit balances during the year as customers shifted their deposits to interest-bearing deposits or outside the institution.

The 5.59% yield on earning assets decreased 119 basis points from the third quarter of 2007 as a result of declining interest rates and the change in asset mix and the reversal of interest income associated with the investment securities, while total interest-bearing liabilities decreased by only 101 basis points to 2.81%. Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was $44.6 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $48.7 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2007. Total interest income decreased by $15.1 million and total interest expense decreased by $11.1 million resulting in a net decline in net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis of $4.0 million. Growth in the key loan portfolios of home equity, commercial real estate and commercial banking were not enough to offset the $15.1 million decline in total interest income that was negatively impacted from the net decline in interest rates. The impact from declining rates and the change in deposit and borrowing mix were the primary causes of the decline in interest expense of $11.1 million.

Future growth in net interest income will depend upon consumer and commercial loan demand, growth in deposits and the general level of interest rates.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses declined $923 thousand to $6.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $7.5 million for the same quarter a year ago. The current quarter provision for loan losses includes the impact from the increase in non-performing loans, overall loan growth and the increased uncertainties in the regional markets. The prior year included a provision of $4.1 million, which related to a specific reserve on a non-performing commercial business loan. The allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.40% at September 30, 2008, compared to 1.27% at September 30, 2007. The Corporation continues to emphasize quality underwriting as well as aggressive management of charge-offs and potential problem loans within this uncertain market to minimize the exposure to charge-offs. In the quarter ended September 30, 2008, net charge-offs were $5.1 million, or 0.48% of average loans, compared to $2.0 million, or 0.20% of average loans in the quarter ended September 30, 2007. Total consumer loan net charge-offs as a percentage of average total consumer loans were 0.56% in the quarter ended September 30, 2008, compared to 0.32% in the same period a year ago. Total commercial loan net charge-offs as a percentage of average commercial loans were 0.42%, an increase from 0.10% in the same period a year ago.

Non-Interest Income

Total non-interest income decreased $30.8 million to $4.6 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The current quarter includes the $24.6 million loss associated with impairment on investment securities. The Corporation wrote-down $619 thousand in its REIT pooled trust preferred securities portfolio, $19.8 million in the non-agency mortgage-backed portfolio and $4.2 million in the bank pooled trust preferred security portfolio in the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The third quarter 2007 included a $4.9 million gain associated with the sale of six branch facilities and their associated deposits.

Exclusive of the impairment on investment securities and net gains, non-interest income declined $2.2 million to $28.2 million in the quarter ending September 30, 2008. The decline was primarily caused by a decline in deposit fee income of $1.4 million, or 6.0%, to $22.5 million in

55

the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in deposit fee income reflects a $1.8 million decline in consumer deposit fees, mainly associated with NSF fees and to a lesser extent the September 2007 sale of deposits, offset by an increase in commercial deposit fees of $336 thousand.

Commissions and fees declined 22.5%, or $363 thousand, to $1.3 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to decrease in check fees of $208 thousand and from $158 thousand decline in investment and insurance income.

The quarter ending September 30, 2008 included $947 thousand in net gains primarily from a $875 thousand gain from the termination of swaps associated with securities that were written down and $72 thousand gain from other asset sales. The prior year same quarter included $4.9 million gain from the deposit and facility sale.

In the quarters ending September 30, 2008 and 2007, certain derivative transactions did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and as a result, the gains and losses associated with these derivatives are recorded in non-interest income. The net cash settlement also related to these derivatives, which represents interest income and expense on non-designated interest rate swaps are recorded as part of non-interest income. The net derivative activities associated with these derivatives were a net gain of $9 thousand for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, compared to a net gain of $397 thousand in the quarter ended September 30, 2007.

Other non-interest income decreased $46 thousand to $4.4 million, due to increased income associated with commercial loan fees of $143 thousand, lease income of $238 thousand, offset by lower mortgage banking fees of $147 thousand and $157 thousand in bank owned life insurance income.

Non-Interest Expense

Total non-interest expense increased $508 thousand, or 1.0%, to $53.2 million in the quarter ending September 30, 2008. The increase in non-interest expense in the current quarter include increases of $313 thousand in salaries and employee benefits, $229 thousand in external processing fees and $118 thousand in furniture and equipment costs, offset by declines in restructuring activities expense of $106 thousand.

The $313 thousand increase in salaries and benefits resulted from increases in base salary expense of $742 thousand due to the impact of annual merit increases, which were offset by the lower number of full time equivalent employees of approximately 50 positions concentrated in the consumer banking, organizational support and credit administration groups. Salary and employee benefits expense were positively impacted by declines of $306 thousand in health care costs, $286 thousand in pension related expenses and $217 thousand in incentives, offset by increases of $193 thousand in share-based payment expense and declines in other benefit related expenses.

Occupancy expense decreased $31 thousand for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. Restructuring activities costs were $5 thousand in the third quarter of 2008 compared to $111 thousand for the same period a year ago. In addition, external processing fees increased by $229 thousand while other non-interest expense decreased by $15 thousand from the same period a year ago.

Income Taxes

The Corporation accounts for income taxes under the asset/liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when in the judgment of management, it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not become realizable. It is at least reasonably possible that management’s judgment about the need for a valuation allowance for deferred taxes could change in the near term. The valuation allowance was $4.1 million at September 30, 2008 versus $3.0 million at September 30, 2007. The Corporation’s valuation allowance relates to state net operating losses that are unlikely to be utilized in the foreseeable future.

In the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $6.0 million on a pre-tax loss of $11.4 million, an effective tax benefit rate of 52.6%. In the quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Corporation recorded income tax expense of $7.0 million on pre-tax income of $23.0 million, an effective tax rate of 30.5%. The change in the effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was mainly due to the significant declines in year-to-date pre-tax income and the related impact on the effective tax rate.

For Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007

Financial Highlights

The Corporation reported a net loss of $12.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The net loss available to common stockholders was $15.8 million, or $(0.49) per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net income of $47.6 million, or $1.48 per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The Corporation’s key performance measurements such as return on assets, return on common equity were (0.27)%, and (3.43)%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to 1.02% and 9.90%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

56

The financial results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 include a $8.7 million gain on the sale of MasterCard stock, offset by a $88.0 million write-down of the investment securities portfolio for securities that were other-than-temporarily impaired and an increase in the provision for loan losses of $2.7 million due to increased net charge-offs, loan growth and the increased uncertainties in the economic environment. The decrease in earnings was also impacted by reversals of $782 thousand of interest income associated with securities that are other-than-temporary impaired and the decline in asset yields that were negatively impacted by the decline in interest rates during the past twelve months that were not fully offset by the decreased expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Year-to-date 2007 pretax income included an additional provision for loan losses of $7.6 million that was associated with two commercial business loans classified as non-performing and subsequently charged-off along with a $767 thousand gain from the sale of a branch facility that was completed as part of the branch rationalization effort and a $4.9 million gain on sale of the deposits and facilities of six branches in September 2007. In addition, the nine months ended September 30, 2007 included $3.7 million of expenses associated with restructuring related activities.

Earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 include the following significant transactions and are included in subsequent discussions regarding the results of operations:

• Investment securities write-down: In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation recorded $88.0 million pre-tax write-down relating to its REIT pooled trust preferred securities portfolio, non-agency mortgage-backed portfolio and bank pooled trust preferred securities portfolio. Following its credit review at each quarter end, the Corporation wrote down the values of certain securities by by reducing their carrying values to current market values at those dates. The $88.0 million was comprised of $34.9 million in the REIT pooled trust preferred securities portfolio, $48.9 million in the non-agency mortgage-backed securities portfolio and $4.2 million in bank pooled trust preferred securities portfolio.

• Voluntary sale of MasterCard stock:In May 2008, the Corporation elected to convert and sell a portion of its MasterCard Class B common stock through a voluntary program offered by MasterCard Incorporated to all holders of Class B common stock. The Corporation recorded an $8.7 million pre-tax gain relating to this transaction.

Net Interest Income

Tax equivalent net interest income for the nine months of 2008 decreased $10.1 million to $137.4 million compared to 2007, a 6.8% decrease from period to period. Tax equivalent interest income decreased $31.8 million and interest expense decreased $21.8 million. The decline was primarily caused by the 99 basis point decline in asset yields that were negatively impacted by the decline in interest rates over the past 12 months and the reversal of $782 thousand of interest income related to certain investment securities that were considered other-than-temporarily impaired. The decline in asset yields was not fully offset by the 77 basis point decline in interest-bearing liabilities due to aggressive competition for deposits throughout the industry and from a number of steps taken to re-position the Corporation’s non-customer funding sources in light of the currently volatile market for funds. Interest expense was also negatively impacted by a $71.7 million decline in average noninterest-bearing demand deposit balances during the year as customers shifted their deposits to interest-bearing deposits or outside the institution. The overall impact on the net yield on earning assets was a decrease of 37 basis points to 3.18% in 2008 from 3.55% in 2007.

57

Consolidated Average Balances and Analysis of Changes in Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands) (tax-equivalent basis)	Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate		Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Originated and acquired residential	$	275,559	$	12,620	6.12	%	$	311,406	$	14,527	6.24	%
Home equity		1,098,104		43,446	5.28			1,020,822		52,537	6.88
Marine		358,289		14,745	5.50			366,064		14,919	5.45
Other consumer		24,411		1,306	7.15			27,987		1,622	7.75
Commercial mortgage		492,128		23,210	6.30			446,297		23,878	7.15
Residential construction		576,617		25,610	5.93			593,501		38,742	8.73
Commercial construction		457,353		18,893	5.52			377,122		22,366	7.93
Commercial business		933,800		45,736	6.54			773,392		43,345	7.49
Total loans		4,216,261		185,566	5.88			3,916,591		211,936	7.23
Loans held for sale		8,897		411	6.17			11,678		572	6.55
Short-term investments		2,455		67	3.65			2,802		181	8.64
Taxable investment securities		1,386,703		58,234	5.61			1,466,973		63,829	5.82
Tax-advantaged investment securities		155,413		7,028	6.04			160,415		6,634	5.53
Total investment securities		1,542,116		65,262	5.65			1,627,388		70,463	5.79
Total interest-earning assets		5,769,729		251,306	5.82			5,558,459		283,152	6.81
Less: allowance for loan losses		56,128						45,610
Cash and due from banks		101,399						113,552
Other assets		648,759						616,778
Total assets	$	6,463,759					$	6,243,179
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	461,622		1,436	0.42		$	511,594		2,095	0.55
Money market deposits		632,700		10,397	2.20			575,200		14,704	3.42
Savings deposits		550,166		2,284	0.55			584,305		1,692	0.39
Direct time deposits		1,118,238		32,176	3.84			1,200,980		41,232	4.59
Brokered time deposits		922,335		33,553	4.86			518,678		19,788	5.10
Short-term borrowings		662,306		11,892	2.40			668,091		23,345	4.67
Long-term debt		761,057		22,182	3.89			773,690		32,854	5.68
Total interest-bearing liabilities		5,108,424		113,920	2.98			4,832,538		135,710	3.75
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		654,073						725,771
Other liabilities		56,145						41,862
Stockholders’ equity		645,117						643,008
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6,463,759					$	6,243,179
Net interest-earning assets	$	661,305					$	725,921
Net interest income (tax-equivalent)				137,386						147,442
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment				2,562						2,122
Net interest income			$	134,824					$	145,320
Net yield on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis					3.18	%					3.55	%

58

Consolidated Average Balances and Analysis of Changes in Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income (Continued)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

	YTD 2008 to YTD 2007 Increase/(Decrease)										2008/2007 Income/Expense Variance Due to Change In
(dollars in thousands) (tax-equivalent basis)	Average Balance			% Change		Income/ Expense			% Change		Average Rate			Average Volume
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Originated and acquired residential	$	(35,847	)	(11.5	)%	$	(1,907	)	(13.1	)%	$	(272	)	$	(1,635	)
Home equity		77,282		7.6			(9,091	)	(17.3	)		(12,857	)		3,766
Marine		(7,775	)	(2.1	)		(174	)	(1.2	)		136			(310	)
Other consumer		(3,576	)	(12.8	)		(316	)	(19.5	)		(120	)		(196	)
Commercial mortgage		45,831		10.3			(668	)	(2.8	)		(2,997	)		2,329
Residential construction		(16,884	)	(2.8	)		(13,132	)	(33.9	)		(12,060	)		(1,072	)
Commercial construction		80,231		21.3			(3,473	)	(15.5	)		(7,648	)		4,175
Commercial business		160,408		20.7			2,391		5.5			(5,924	)		8,315
Total loans		299,670		7.7			(26,370	)	(12.4	)
Loans held for sale		(2,781	)	(23.8	)		(161	)	(28.1	)		(31	)		(130	)
Short-term investments		(347	)	(12.4	)		(114	)	(63.0	)		(94	)		(20	)
Taxable investment securities		(80,270	)	(5.5	)		(5,595	)	(8.8	)		(2,210	)		(3,385	)
Tax-advantaged investment securities		(5,002	)	(3.1	)		394		5.9			605			(211	)
Total investment securities		(85,272	)	(5.2	)		(5,201	)	(7.4	)
Total interest-earning assets		211,270		3.8			(31,846	)	(11.2	)		(42,347	)		10,501
Less: allowance for loan losses		10,518		23.1
Cash and due from banks		(12,153	)	(10.7	)
Other assets		31,981		5.2
Total assets	$	220,580		3.5
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	(49,972	)	(9.8	)		(659	)	(31.5	)		(469	)		(190	)
Money market deposits		57,500		10.0			(4,307	)	(29.3	)		(5,666	)		1,359
Savings deposits		(34,139	)	(5.8	)		592		35.0			696			(104	)
Direct time deposits		(82,742	)	(6.9	)		(9,056	)	(22.0	)		(6,362	)		(2,694	)
Brokered time deposits		403,657		77.8			13,765		69.6			(978	)		14,743
Short-term borrowings		(5,785	)	(0.9	)		(11,453	)	(49.1	)		(11,253	)		(200	)
Long-term debt		(12,633	)	(1.6	)		(10,672	)	(32.5	)		(10,145	)		(527	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		275,886		5.7			(21,790	)	(16.1	)		(29,225	)		7,435
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		(71,698	)	(9.9	)
Other liabilities		14,283		34.1
Stockholders’ equity		2,109		0.3
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	220,580		3.5
Net interest-earning assets	$	(64,616	)	(8.9	)
Net interest income (tax-equivalent)							(10,056	)	(6.8	)	$	(13,122	)	$	3,066
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment							440		20.7
Net interest income						$	(10,496	)	(7.2	)

59

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $16.1 million for the nine months ending September 30, 2008 compared to $13.3 million for the same period a year ago. The $2.7 million growth in the provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 resulted from increased net charge-offs and non-performing loans along with overall loan growth. In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net charge-offs were $11.7 million, or 0.37% of average loans, compared to $7.3 million, or 0.25% of average loans in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Non-Interest Income

Total non-interest income declined $90.5 million to $5.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The current year includes an $8.7 million gain on the sale of MasterCard stock, offset by the $88.0 million write-down of the Corporation’s investment securities portfolio described above. Net gains in the prior year of $6.5 million include a $767 thousand gain from the sale of a branch facility in the first quarter of 2007 and a $4.9 million gain from the sale of deposits and facilities of six branches in September 2007 that were completed as part of the branch rationalization effort.

Total non-interest income, excluding net gains and the impairment on investment securities declined $4.9 million to $84.8 million for the nine months ending September 30, 2008. The decline was primarily caused by lower deposit fee income, which declined $4.8 million, or 6.8%, to $65.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in deposit fee income is mainly associated with consumer deposit fees, which declined $5.1 million, caused by declines in NSF fees, service fees and ATM fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decline in consumer deposit fees was also negatively impacted by the September 2007 sale of deposits, which negatively impacted deposit fee income by $505 thousand during the current nine month period. During the first nine months of 2008, commercial deposit fees increased $327 thousand when compared to the same period a year ago.

Commissions and fees declined 17.7%, or $907 thousand, to $4.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to decreased check fees and sales of insurance and investment products.

The Corporation also recorded $8.9 million in net gains from sale or disposition of assets or liabilities in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to net gains of $6.5 million in the same period a year ago. The $8.9 million in net gains includes an $8.7 million pre-tax gain from the sale of MasterCard stock, an $875 thousand gain from termination of swaps associated with securities that were written down, partially offset by a $660 thousand loss on early redemption of brokered certificates of deposit. The nine months ended September 30, 2007 included security sale gains of $399 thousand, a $767 thousand gain from the sale of a branch facility, $4.9 million gain on sale of deposits and facilities of six branches and $1.2 million from other asset sales or debt extinguishments.

Net derivative activities were a net gain of $105 thousand for the first nine months ending September 30, 2008, compared to a net gain of $183 thousand for the same period in 2007. Other non-interest income increased $866 thousand to $14.7 million, due to increased income associated mainly with commercial loan fees of $1.1 million, lease income of $340 thousand, offset by declines in mortgage banking related activities of $254 thousand and declines in other non-interest income of $369 thousand.

Non-Interest Expense

Total non-interest expense declined $5.1 million, or 3.2%, to $155.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The significant declines in non-interest expense in the current year include declines of $1.4 million in salaries and employee benefits, $357 thousand in occupancy expense, $2.3 million in other non-interest expense and $1.4 million in restructuring activities expense, offset by increase in external processing fees of $320 thousand.

The $1.4 million decrease in salaries and benefits was primarily caused by lower average year-to-date staffing levels of approximately 160 positions as a result of actions taken as part of the corporate-wide efficiency program in 2007. Base salary expense declined $840 thousand due to the lower number of full time equivalent employees concentrated in the consumer banking, organizational support and credit administration groups, partially offset by annual merit increases. Salary and employee benefits expense were also positively impacted by declines of $263 thousand in payroll taxes, $302 thousand in incentives, $228 thousand in 401K match expense and $604 thousand in pension related benefits. These declines in expenses were partially offset by increases of $545 thousand in share-based payment expense, $588 thousand decrease in deferred salary expense associated with a decline in new loan originations. In addition, the nine months ended September 30, 2007 included a severance expense of $400 thousand.

Occupancy expense decreased $357 thousand in the nine months ending September 30, 2008 due to lower occupancy repairs and maintenance and lower building and leasehold depreciation resulting from the closure and sale of branches in 2007. Restructuring activities costs were $45 thousand during the nine months ending September 30, 2008 compared to $1.5 million for the same period a year ago. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the restructuring costs were directly related to seven branch closures and severance costs associated with staff reductions as part of the corporate-wide efficiency program. Other non-interest expense decreased by $2.3 million from the same period a year ago mainly as a result of a reduction in consulting fees, legal, communication, postage, operational losses and amortization of deposit intangibles. These declines were partially offset by higher legal settlements, other real estate owned expenses and professional fees.

60

Income Taxes

The Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $17.7 million in the first nine months of 2008 based on a pre-tax loss of $30.5 million, a 58.1% effective tax benefit rate, as compared to pre-tax income of $68.2 million and an effective tax rate of 30.2% for 2007. The change in the effective tax rate is due to a decline in the level of year-to-date pre-tax earnings and comparable permanent differences in 2008 when compared to 2007, resulting in the change in the effective tax rate for 2008.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

For information regarding market risk at December 31, 2007, see “Interest Sensitivity Management” and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Corporation’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008. For the market risk of the Corporation refer to Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional quantitative and qualitative discussions about market risk at September 30, 2008.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Corporation files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, based on that evaluation, no change in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Corporation is involved in various legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of its business. All active lawsuits entail amounts which management believes to be, individually and in the aggregate, immaterial to the financial condition and the results of operations of the Corporation.

In 2005, a lawsuit captioned Bednar v. Provident Bank of Maryland was initiated by a former Bank customer against the Bank in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Maryland) asserting that, upon early payoff, the Bank’s recapture of home equity loan closing costs initially paid by the Bank on the borrower’s behalf constituted a prepayment charge prohibited by state law. The Baltimore City Circuit Court ruled in the Bank’s favor, finding that the recapture of loan closing costs was not an unlawful charge, a position consistent with that taken by the State of Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation. However, on appeal, the Maryland Court of Appeals reversed this ruling and found in favor of the borrower. The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. The potential damages for this individual matter are not material to the Corporation’s results of operations. However, the complaint is styled as a class action complaint. To date, no class has been certified. Management believes that the Bank has meritorious defense against this action and intends to vigorously defend the litigation. On April 8, 2008, the Governor of Maryland signed legislation that limits the potential recovery of Bank customers in the Bednar litigation to the amount of closing costs recovered by the Bank upon early payoff. As a result, the Bank believes that any potential settlements or damages in the Bednar litigation would not be material to the Bank’s results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Further decline in value in certain investment securities held by the Corporation could require further write-downs, which would reduce the Corporation’s earnings.

The Corporation’s investment securities that have been written down include non-agency mortgage backed securities and pooled trust preferred securities backed by banks, insurance companies, and REITs. In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Corporation determined that the loss in value on certain of the Corporation’s REIT pooled trust preferred securities was other-than-temporary, and accordingly, recognized a $47.5 million impairment write-down related to those securities. The Corporation recognized additional impairment write-downs of $42.7 million in the first quarter of 2008, $20.7 million in the second quarter of 2008 and $24.6 in the third quarter of

61

2008 relating to non-agency securities, REIT pooled trust preferred and pooled bank issued trust preferred securities. Further loss in value in the securities held by the Corporation could result in further impairment write-downs, which would, in turn, reduce the Corporation’s earnings.

The securities in the municipal bond portfolio consist of geographically diversified securities that are insured by major bond insurers. Some of the bond insurers have been downgraded and others may follow. The recent downgrades reflect concerns about their ability to cover potential claims on issuers unable to make their principal or interest payments. Currently, all securities in this portfolio are rated AAA, AA, or single A by the three major rating agencies.

For further information regarding the Corporation’s investment portfolio, please see the Form 8-K furnished to the SEC on April 17, 2008 and“Investment Portfolio Credit Quality” on pages 8-10 in Item 1 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and on pages 41-43 in the Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The Corporation will continue to monitor the investment ratings in the securities portfolio and the dealer price quotes. Based upon these and other factors, the securities portfolio may experience further impairment. Management currently has the intent and ability to retain its investment securities with unrealized losses until the decline in value has been recovered.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, the reader should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that the Corporation faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Corporation or that the Corporation currently deem to be immaterial also may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During 1998, the Corporation initiated a stock repurchase program for its outstanding stock. Under this plan, the Corporation approved the repurchase of specific additional amounts of shares without any specific expiration date. As the Corporation fulfilled each specified repurchase amount, additional amounts were approved. On June 17, 2005, and on January 17, 2007 the Corporation approved an additional stock repurchase of up to 1.3 million and 1.6 million shares, respectively. Currently, the maximum number of shares remaining to be purchased under this plan is 740,343. All shares have been repurchased pursuant to the publicly announced plan. The repurchase plan is currently suspended. The timing of repurchasing shares in the future will depend on the Corporation meeting its targeted capital ratios. No plans expired during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The quarter ended September 30, 2008 reflects no shares repurchased for the quarter.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased Under Plan	Maximum Number of Shares Remaining to be Purchased Under Plan
July 1 – July 31	—	$	—	—	740,343
August 1 – August 31	—		—	—	740,343
September 1 – September 30	—		—	—	740,343
Total	—	$	—	—	740,343

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None

Item 5. Other Information – None

62

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits and financial statements filed as a part of this report are as follows:

(3.1)	Articles of Incorporation of Provident Bankshares Corporation (1)
(3.2)	Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Provident Bankshares Corporation (1)
(3.3)	Seventh Amended and Restated By-Laws of Provident Bankshares Corporation (2)
(4.1)	Articles Supplementary to the Articles of Incorporation of Provident Bankshares Corporation. (3)
(4.2)	Registrant will furnish, upon request, copies of all instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt instruments of the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries.
(11.0)	Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings (4)
(31.1)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
(31.2)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(32.1)	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
(32.2)	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

(1) Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-58881) filed with the Commission on July 10, 1998.

(2) Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-16421) filed with the Commission on October 18, 2007.

(3) Incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-16421) filed with the Commission on April 11, 2008.

(4) Included in Note 16 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

63

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Principal Executive Officer:
November 10, 2008	By	/s/ Gary N. Geisel
		Gary N. Geisel
		Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
	Principal Financial Officer:
November 10, 2008	By	/s/ Dennis A. Starliper
		Dennis A. Starliper
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

64

EXHIBIT	DESCRIPTION
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer