Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the Quarterly Period Ended October 3, 2008 | ||
or | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the Transition Period from to |
Commission File Number000-17781
Symantec Corporation
(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 77-0181864 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. employer identification no.) | |
20330 Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, California (Address of principal executive offices) | 95014-2132 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(408) 517-8000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
þ Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Shares of Symantec common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of October 31, 2008: 836,013,435 shares.
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended October 3, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
October 3, | March 28, | |||||||
2008 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | * | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,262,157 | $ | 1,890,225 | ||||
Short-term investments | 42,485 | 536,728 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net | 645,179 | 758,200 | ||||||
Inventories | 26,590 | 34,138 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 196,273 | 193,775 | ||||||
Other current assets | 258,495 | 316,852 | ||||||
Total current assets | 3,431,179 | 3,729,918 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 942,754 | 1,001,750 | ||||||
Acquired product rights, net | 526,143 | 648,950 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net | 1,141,443 | 1,243,524 | ||||||
Goodwill | 11,323,506 | 11,207,357 | ||||||
Investment in joint venture | 133,073 | 150,000 | ||||||
Other long-term assets | 65,120 | 55,291 | ||||||
Long-term deferred income taxes | 58,781 | 55,304 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 17,621,999 | $ | 18,092,094 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 210,027 | $ | 169,631 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | 344,051 | 431,345 | ||||||
Current deferred revenue | 2,337,237 | 2,661,515 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 50,196 | 72,263 | ||||||
Short-term borrowing | — | 200,000 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 228,906 | 264,832 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 3,170,417 | 3,799,586 | ||||||
Convertible senior notes | 2,100,000 | 2,100,000 | ||||||
Long-term deferred revenue | 375,989 | 415,054 | ||||||
Long-term deferred tax liabilities | 194,728 | 219,341 | ||||||
Long-term income taxes payable | 491,612 | 478,743 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 95,961 | 106,187 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 6,428,707 | 7,118,911 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock | — | — | ||||||
Common stock | 8,357 | 8,393 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 9,121,142 | 9,139,084 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 182,580 | 159,792 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 1,881,213 | 1,665,914 | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 11,193,292 | 10,973,183 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 17,621,999 | $ | 18,092,094 | ||||
* | Derived from audited financials |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | October 3, | September 28, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except earnings per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Content, subscriptions, and maintenance | $ | 1,180,715 | $ | 1,117,165 | $ | 2,471,707 | $ | 2,203,683 | ||||||||
Licenses | 337,295 | 301,924 | 696,625 | 615,744 | ||||||||||||
Total net revenues | 1,518,010 | 1,419,089 | 3,168,332 | 2,819,427 | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Content, subscriptions, and maintenance | 212,070 | 205,572 | 430,644 | 415,238 | ||||||||||||
Licenses | 10,398 | 9,892 | 18,845 | 21,130 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired product rights | 86,602 | 89,062 | 171,563 | 178,422 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 309,070 | 304,526 | 621,052 | 614,790 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 1,208,940 | 1,114,563 | 2,547,280 | 2,204,637 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 596,983 | 595,162 | 1,259,802 | 1,163,692 | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 219,049 | 221,057 | 450,484 | 446,635 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 84,838 | 86,405 | 177,604 | 172,250 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of other purchased intangible assets | 55,651 | 56,926 | 111,030 | 113,851 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring | 9,790 | 9,578 | 26,795 | 28,578 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of assets | 26,204 | 86,546 | 26,204 | 86,546 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 992,515 | 1,055,674 | 2,051,919 | 2,011,552 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 216,425 | 58,889 | 495,361 | 193,085 | ||||||||||||
Interest income | 12,302 | 19,179 | 30,290 | 40,000 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (6,712 | ) | (6,617 | ) | (16,281 | ) | (12,908 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (8,782 | ) | 1,965 | (8,843 | ) | 3,231 | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes and loss from joint venture | 213,233 | 73,416 | 500,527 | 223,408 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 62,414 | 23,048 | 156,835 | 77,834 | ||||||||||||
Loss from joint venture | 10,746 | — | 16,927 | — | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 140,073 | $ | 50,368 | $ | 326,765 | $ | 145,574 | ||||||||
Earnings per share — basic | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||
Earnings per share — diluted | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding — basic | 838,489 | 875,662 | 838,537 | 883,652 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding — diluted | 852,334 | 892,759 | 853,174 | 901,683 |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 326,765 | $ | 145,574 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 411,567 | 417,493 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 89,495 | 81,734 | ||||||
Impairment of assets | 25,870 | 86,546 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (917 | ) | (103,900 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options | 17,929 | 17,268 | ||||||
Excess income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options | (16,007 | ) | (13,529 | ) | ||||
Loss from joint venture | 16,927 | — | ||||||
Realized and other than temporary impairment loss on investments | 2,330 | — | ||||||
Other | 11,235 | 3,076 | ||||||
Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: | ||||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net | 99,884 | 118,986 | ||||||
Inventories | 5,945 | 10,497 | ||||||
Accounts payable | (986 | ) | 7,647 | |||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | (81,905 | ) | (418 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue | (228,632 | ) | (229,013 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable | (51,477 | ) | 131,436 | |||||
Other assets | 72,683 | 50,404 | ||||||
Other liabilities | (38,839 | ) | (41,523 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 661,867 | 682,278 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (125,339 | ) | (138,029 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment | 39,547 | — | ||||||
Cash payments for business acquisitions, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired | (186,826 | ) | (852,286 | ) | ||||
Purchases ofavailable-for-sale securities | (172,891 | ) | (640,570 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales ofavailable-for-sale securities | 667,693 | 498,386 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 222,184 | (1,132,499 | ) | |||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (399,894 | ) | (899,984 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock benefit plans | 185,537 | 130,220 | ||||||
Repayment of short-term borrowing | (200,000 | ) | — | |||||
Excess income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options | 16,007 | 13,529 | ||||||
Repayment of other long-term liability | (3,716 | ) | (7,604 | ) | ||||
Tax payments related to restricted stock issuance | (14,830 | ) | (3,050 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (416,896 | ) | (766,889 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents | (95,223 | ) | 46,440 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 371,932 | (1,170,670 | ) | |||||
Beginning cash and cash equivalents | 1,890,225 | 2,559,034 | ||||||
Ending cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,262,157 | $ | 1,388,364 | ||||
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
Note 1. | Basis of Presentation |
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Symantec Corporation (“we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Symantec Corporation and all of its subsidiaries) as of October 3, 2008 and March 28, 2008 and for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 have been prepared in accordance with the instructions forForm 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, therefore, do not include all information and notes normally provided in audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, except as otherwise noted, necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 28, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, however it does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008. The results of operations for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year. Unless otherwise stated, references to three and six months ended in this report relate to fiscal periods ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007. The three months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 both consisted of 13 weeks. The six months ended October 3, 2008 consisted of 27 weeks while the six months ended September 28, 2007 consisted of 26 weeks.
Significant accounting policies
Effective July 4, 2008, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS No. 157”). Fair Value Measurements for all of our financial assets and liabilities are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis (FASB Staff Position (“FSP”). FAS No157-1 eliminates leasing transactions from scope and FSPFAS No. 157-2 defers the effective date for one year for nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis). See Note 2 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Other than this change, there have been no changes in our significant accounting policies during the six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In June 2008, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) IssueNo. 07-5,Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock. EITF IssueNo. 07-5 provides guidance on evaluating whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to the company’s own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. EITF IssueNo. 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of EITF IssueNo. 07-5 on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP Accounting Principles Board (“APB”)No. 14-1,Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). The FSP will require the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features to separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument. The debt will be recognized at the present value of its cash flows discounted using the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity component will be recognized as the difference between the proceeds from the issuance of the note and the fair value of the liability. The FSP will also require an accretion as interest expense of the resultant debt discount over
6
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the expected life of the debt. The transition guidance requires retrospective application to all periods presented, and does not grandfather existing instruments. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Upon adoption of the FSP, we expect the increase in non-cash interest expense recognized on our consolidated financial statements to be significant.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.The position amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The position applies to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets and in business combinations and asset acquisitions.FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not expect the adoption of FSPNo. 142-3 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires disclosures of how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51.The standard changes the accounting for noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements including the requirements to classify noncontrolling interests as a component of consolidated stockholders’ equity, to identify earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests reported as part of consolidated earnings, and to measure the gain or loss on the deconsolidated subsidiary using the fair value of a noncontrolling equity investment. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 revises the accounting for both increases and decreases in a parent’s controlling ownership interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,Business Combinations. This standard changes the accounting for business combinations by requiring that an acquiring entity measures and recognizes identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date fair value with limited exceptions. The changes include the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs, the valuation of any noncontrolling interest at the acquisition date fair value, the recording of acquired contingent liabilities at acquisition date fair value and the subsequent re-measurement of such liabilities after acquisition date, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals subsequent to the acquisition date, and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. If the current level of acquisitions activity continues, we expect the implementation of SFAS No. 141R to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements when it becomes effective. The accounting treatment related to pre-acquisition uncertain tax positions will change when SFAS No. 141R becomes effective, which will be in first quarter of our fiscal year 2010. At such time, any changes to the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions related to pre-acquisition periods will be recorded through income tax expense, where currently the accounting treatment would require any adjustment to be recognized through the purchase price.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. 157-2,The Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
7
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. These nonfinancial items include assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Effective March 29, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. The partial adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In October 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 157-3,Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.FSPNo. FAS 157-3 provides examples to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSPNo. FAS 157-3 is effective upon issuance. We do not expect the adoption of the FSP to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 2 for information and related disclosures regarding our fair value measurements.
Note 2. | Financial Instruments |
We measure financial assets and liabilities at fair value based upon exit price, representing the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. SFAS No. 157 (as impacted by FSP Nos.157-1,157-2 and157-3) establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level. The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:
• | Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. | |
• | Level 2: Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. | |
• | Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available. |
8
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by level within the fair value hierarchy:
As of October 3, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 403,459 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 403,459 | ||||||||
Bank securities and deposits | — | 39,578 | — | 39,578 | ||||||||||||
Government notes | — | 249,964 | — | 249,964 | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper | — | 482,574 | — | 482,574 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments: | ||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | — | 21,985 | — | 21,985 | ||||||||||||
Corporate notes | — | 17,659 | — | 17,659 | ||||||||||||
Equity investments(1) | 2,841 | — | — | 2,841 | ||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan assets(2) | — | 13,035 | — | 13,035 | ||||||||||||
$ | 406,300 | $ | 824,795 | $ | — | $ | 1,231,095 | |||||||||
(1) | Equity investments relate to our investments in the securities of other public companies. Such investments are included in Short-term investments. | |
(2) | Deferred compensation plan assets are fund-of-funds and consist primarily of corporate equity securities. Such assets are included in Other current assets. |
Certain financial assets and liabilities are not included in the table above because they are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities include our non-public equity investments, convertible senior notes and bond hedge (including the derivative call option).
The effective date of FSPFAS No. 157-2 for measuring fair value of nonfinancial assets and liabilities which are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis is the fiscal year starting April 4, 2009 and interim periods within that fiscal year. This deferral applies to us for such items as nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods, nonfinancial long-lived and intangible asset groups measured at fair value for an impairment assessment, reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test, and nonfinancial restructuring liabilities.
9
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 3. | Balance Sheet Information |
As of | ||||||||
October 3, | March 28, | |||||||
2008 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net: | ||||||||
Computer hardware and software | $ | 979,678 | $ | 925,156 | ||||
Office furniture and equipment | 216,210 | 292,306 | ||||||
Buildings | 417,159 | 492,857 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 303,749 | 276,116 | ||||||
1,916,796 | 1,986,435 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (1,052,434 | ) | (1,079,468 | ) | ||||
864,362 | 906,967 | |||||||
Land | 78,392 | 94,783 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 942,754 | $ | 1,001,750 | ||||
Note 4. | Comprehensive Income |
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | October 3, | September 28, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 140,073 | $ | 50,368 | $ | 326,765 | $ | 145,574 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment relating to the legal liquidation of foreign entities | (188 | ) | — | (4,824 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Change in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax | 25,144 | 4,207 | 28,339 | 12,301 | ||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) onavailable-for-sale securities, net of tax | (1,013 | ) | 1,882 | (727 | ) | 580 | ||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income | 23,943 | 6,089 | 22,788 | 12,881 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 164,016 | $ | 56,457 | $ | 349,553 | $ | 158,455 | ||||||||
The reclassification adjustment relates to the realization of a foreign exchange translation adjustment relating to the legal liquidation of foreign entities.
Accumulated other comprehensive income as of October 3, 2008 and March 28, 2008 primarily consisted of foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes.
Note 5. | Acquisitions |
nSuite Purchase
On August 8, 2008, we completed the acquisition of nSuite Technologies, Inc. (“nSuite”), a Massachusetts-based provider of connection broker technology. The acquisition complements our endpoint virtualization portfolio and strategy. The connection broker technology of nSuite is utilized in an endpoint virtualization platform to validate users, perform basic security functions, connect users with the correct applications and manage the transfer
10
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
of virtual resources within the data center. In exchange for all voting equity interests, we purchased nSuite for $20 million, which included acquisition related costs. Cash was used to fund the transaction, and no equity interests were issued. Of the aggregate purchase price, $5 million was allocated to identified intangible assets, primarily developed technology, and the remaining $15 million resulted in goodwill. Goodwill, all of which was deductible for tax purposes, resulted primarily from our expectation of synergies from the integration of nSuite’s product offerings with our product offerings. The results of operations for nSuite, since the date of acquisition, are included as part of the Security and Compliance segment. Supplemental proforma information for nSuite is not material and was therefore not included.
AppStream Purchase
On April 18, 2008, we completed the acquisition of AppStream, Inc. (“AppStream”), a Palo Alto, California-based provider of endpoint virtualization software. AppStream was acquired to complement our endpoint management and virtualization portfolio and strategy. AppStream’s application streaming technology provides an on-demand delivery mechanism that leverages application virtualization to enable greater flexibility and control. In exchange for all voting equity interests, we purchased AppStream for $53 million, which included acquisition related costs. Cash was used to fund the transaction, and no equity interests were issued. Of the aggregate purchase price, $15 million was allocated to tangible assets, $11 million to identified intangible assets, primarily developed technology, and the remaining $27 million resulted in goodwill. Goodwill, none of which was deductible for tax purposes, resulted primarily from our expectation of synergies from the integration of AppStream’s product offerings with our product offerings. The results of operations for AppStream, since the date of acquisition, are included as part of the Security and Compliance segment. Supplemental proforma information for AppStream is not material and is therefore not included.
SwapDrive Purchase
On June 6, 2008, we completed the acquisition of SwapDrive, Inc. (“SwapDrive”), a Washington D.C.-based provider of online storage products. SwapDrive was acquired to strengthen and expand the Norton consumer portfolio by leveraging online backup and storage platform technologies. In exchange for all voting equity interests, we purchased SwapDrive for $124 million, which included acquisition related costs. Cash was used to fund the transaction, and no equity interests were issued. Of the aggregate purchase price, $6 million was allocated to tangible assets and $40 million was allocated to identified intangible assets, primarily developed technology and customer relationships, and the remaining $78 million resulted in goodwill. Goodwill resulted primarily from our expectation of synergies from the integration of SwapDrive’s product offerings with our product offerings. Goodwill is expected to be deductible in the State of California for tax purposes. The results of operations for SwapDrive, since the date of acquisition, are included as part of the Consumer Products segment. Supplemental proforma information for SwapDrive was not material and is therefore not included.
Note 6. | Investment in Joint Venture |
On February 5, 2008, Symantec formed Huawei-Symantec, Inc. (“joint venture”) with a subsidiary of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (“Huawei”). The joint venture is domiciled in Hong Kong with principal operations in Chengdu, China. We contributed cash of $150 million, licenses related to certain intellectual property and other intangible assets in exchange for 49% of the outstanding common shares of the joint venture. The joint venture will develop, manufacture, market and support security and storage appliances to global telecommunications carriers and enterprise customers. Huawei contributed its telecommunications storage and security business assets, engineering, sales and marketing resources, personnel, and licenses related to intellectual property in exchange for a 51% ownership interest in the joint venture.
The contribution of assets to the joint venture was accounted for at its carrying value. The historical carrying value of the assets contributed by Symantec comprised a significant portion of the net assets of the joint venture. As
11
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
a result, our carrying value of the investment in the joint venture exceeded our proportionate share in the underlying net assets of the joint venture by approximately $73 million upon formation of the joint venture. As the contributions for both Symantec and Huawei were recorded at historical carrying value by the joint venture, this basis difference is attributable to the contributed identified intangible assets. The basis difference is being amortized over a weighted-average period of 9 years, the estimated useful lives of the underlying identified intangible assets to which the basis difference is attributed.
We account for our investment in the joint venture under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, we record our proportionate share of the joint venture’s net income or loss based on the quarterly financial statements of the joint venture. We record our proportionate share of net income or loss one quarter in arrears. In determining our share of the joint venture’s net income or loss, we adjust the joint venture’s reported results to recognize the amortization expense associated with the basis difference. For the six months ended October 3, 2008, we recorded a loss of approximately $17 million related to our share of the joint venture’s net loss, including the amortization of the basis difference described above, for the joint venture’s period ended June 30, 2008. This loss is included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income under the caption “Loss from joint venture.” The carrying value of our investment in the joint venture as of October 3, 2008 was approximately $133 million.
Summarized unaudited statement of operations information for the joint venture and the calculation of our share of the joint venture’s loss are as follows:
For the Period from | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | February 5, 2008 to | |||||||
June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net revenues | $ | 455 | $ | 469 | ||||
Gross margin | (188 | ) | (386 | ) | ||||
Net loss, as reported by the joint venture | $ | (17,780 | ) | $ | (27,598 | ) | ||
Symantec’s ownership interest | 49 | % | 49 | % | ||||
Symantec’s proportionate share of net loss | (8,712 | ) | (13,523 | ) | ||||
Adjustment for amortization of basis difference | (2,034 | ) | (3,404 | ) | ||||
Loss from joint venture | $ | (10,746 | ) | $ | (16,927 | ) | ||
Note 7. | Goodwill, Acquired Product Rights, and Other Intangible Assets |
Goodwill
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we allocate goodwill to our reporting units, which are the same as our operating segments. Goodwill is allocated as follows:
Consumer | Security and | Storage and Server | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Products | Compliance | Management | Services | Company | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 28, 2008 | $ | 102,810 | $ | 4,080,717 | $ | 6,665,734 | $ | 358,096 | $ | 11,207,357 | ||||||||||
Goodwill acquired through business combinations(1) | 78,421 | 42,929 | — | — | 121,350 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill adjustments(2) | — | (2,851 | ) | (2,350 | ) | — | (5,201 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating segment reclassification(3) | — | (84,376 | ) | — | 84,376 | — | ||||||||||||||
Balance as of October 3, 2008 | $ | 181,231 | $ | 4,036,419 | $ | 6,663,384 | $ | 442,472 | $ | 11,323,506 | ||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(1) | Reflects goodwill of approximately $78 million in the Consumer Products segment resulting from the SwapDrive acquisition, and approximately $27 million and $15 million in the Security and Compliance segment resulting from the acquisition of AppStream and nSuite respectively. See Note 5 for further details. | |
(2) | Reflects adjustments made to goodwill of prior acquisitions as a result of tax adjustments, primarily related to stock-based compensation. | |
(3) | In the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, we moved Altiris services from the Security and Compliance segment to the Services segment. As a result of this reclassification, the above adjustment was made in accordance with SFAS No. 142. |
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis during the March quarter, or earlier if indicators of impairment exist. Based on our review as of October 3, 2008, no indicators of impairment were identified for our Goodwill, Acquired Product Rights, or Other Intangible Assets.
Acquired product rights, net
Acquired product rights subject to amortization are as follows:
As of October 3, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | ||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Net Carrying | Weighted-Average | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Remaining Life | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Developed technology | $ | 1,705,025 | $ | (1,213,173 | ) | $ | 491,852 | 2 years | ||||||||
Patents | 75,595 | (41,304 | ) | 34,291 | 3 years | |||||||||||
$ | 1,780,620 | $ | (1,254,477 | ) | $ | 526,143 | 2 years | |||||||||
As of March 28, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | ||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Net Carrying | Weighted-Average | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Remaining Life | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Developed technology | $ | 1,655,895 | $ | (1,045,383 | ) | $ | 610,512 | 2 years | ||||||||
Patents | 71,313 | (32,875 | ) | 38,438 | 3 years | |||||||||||
$ | 1,727,208 | $ | (1,078,258 | ) | $ | 648,950 | 2 years | |||||||||
During the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, amortization expense for acquired product rights was $87 million and $89 million, respectively. During the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, amortization expense for acquired product rights was $172 million and $178 million, respectively. Amortization of acquired product rights is included in Cost of revenues in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
13
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Amortization expense for acquired product rights, based upon our existing acquired product rights and their current useful lives as of October 3, 2008, is estimated to be as follows(in thousands):
Remainder of fiscal 2009 | $ | 173,955 | ||
2010 | 210,512 | |||
2011 | 79,657 | |||
2012 | 37,307 | |||
2013 | 13,198 | |||
Thereafter | 11,514 | |||
Total | $ | 526,143 | ||
Other intangible assets, net
Other intangible assets are as follows:
As of October 3, 2008 | ||||||||||||||
Gross | ||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Net Carrying | Weighted-Average | |||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Remaining Life | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Customer base | $ | 1,670,523 | $ | (631,120 | ) | $ | 1,039,403 | 5 years | ||||||
Trade name | 125,310 | (45,353 | ) | 79,957 | 7 years | |||||||||
Norton tradename | 22,083 | — | 22,083 | Indefinite | ||||||||||
Partnership agreements | 2,300 | (2,300 | ) | — | Fully amortized | |||||||||
$ | 1,820,216 | $ | (678,773 | ) | $ | 1,141,443 | 5 years | |||||||
As of March 28, 2008 | ||||||||||||||
Gross | ||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Net Carrying | Weighted-Average | |||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Remaining Life | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Customer base | $ | 1,661,683 | $ | (526,512 | ) | $ | 1,135,171 | 5 years | ||||||
Tradename | 125,203 | (38,933 | ) | 86,270 | 7 years | |||||||||
Norton tradename | 22,083 | — | 22,083 | Indefinite | ||||||||||
Partnership agreements | 2,300 | (2,300 | ) | — | Fully amortized | |||||||||
$ | 1,811,269 | $ | (567,745 | ) | $ | 1,243,524 | 6 years | |||||||
During the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, amortization expense for other intangible assets was $56 million and $57 million, respectively. During the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, amortization expense for other intangible assets was $111 million and $114 million, respectively. Amortization of other intangible assets is included in Operating expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
14
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Amortization expense for other intangible assets, based upon our existing other intangible assets and their current useful lives as of October 3, 2008, is estimated to be as follows(in thousands):
Remainder of fiscal 2009 | $ | 110,984 | ||
2010 | 220,254 | |||
2011 | 219,492 | |||
2012 | 217,413 | |||
2013 | 215,446 | |||
Thereafter | 135,771 | |||
Total(1) | $ | 1,119,360 | ||
(1) | The Norton tradename has an indefinite life and is not subject to amortization. |
Note 8. | Line of Credit |
In July 2006, we entered into a five-year $1 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility that expires in July 2011. Borrowings under the facility bear interest, at our option, at either a rate equal to the bank’s base rate or a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on our leverage ratio, as defined in the credit facility agreement. In connection with the credit facility, we must maintain certain covenants, including a specified ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as well as various other non-financial covenants.
On November 29, 2007, we borrowed $200 million under this credit agreement to partially finance our acquisition of Vontu with an interest rate of 4.7075% per annum due and payable quarterly. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we repaid the entire Line of Credit principal amount of $200 million plus accrued interest of $3 million. Total interest expense associated with this borrowing was approximately $6 million. As of October 3, 2008, we were in compliance with all required covenants, and there was no outstanding balance on the credit facility.
Note 9. | Assets Held for Sale |
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, (“SFAS No. 144”) land and buildings held for sale are classified on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as Other current assets. The following table summarizes the changes in assets held for sale:
As of March 28, | Added | Sold | As of October 3, | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | Properties | Properties | Adjustments | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | $ | 39,568 | $ | 53,346 | $ | (38,203 | ) | $ | 335 | $ | 55,046 |
SFAS No. 144 provides that a long-lived asset classified as held for sale should be measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and thus we have recorded an impairment loss of $26 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. We believe that these sales will be completed no later than the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
During the three months ended October 3, 2008, we sold two of our properties previously classified as assets held for sale for cash proceeds of $40 million. The gain and loss on the sales were not significant.
Note 10. | Stock repurchases |
For the three months ended October 3, 2008, we repurchased 9.3 million shares of our common stock at prices ranging from $19.92 to $22.64 per share for an aggregate amount of $200 million. For the six months ended October 3, 2008, we repurchased 19.0 million shares of our common stock at prices ranging from $19.35 to $22.64
15
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
per share for an aggregate amount of $400 million. As of October 3, 2008, an aggregate of $600 million remained authorized for future repurchases from the June 14, 2007 stock repurchase plan.
Note 11. | Earnings Per Share |
The components of earnings per share are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | October 3, | September 28, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share — basic: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 140,073 | $ | 50,368 | $ | 326,765 | $ | 145,574 | ||||||||
Earnings per share — basic | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||
Weighted average outstanding common shares | 838,489 | 875,662 | 838,537 | 883,652 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share — diluted: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 140,073 | $ | 50,368 | $ | 326,765 | $ | 145,574 | ||||||||
Earnings per share — diluted | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||
Weighted average outstanding common shares | 838,489 | 875,662 | 838,537 | 883,652 | ||||||||||||
Shares issuable from assumed exercise of options | 12,313 | 15,952 | 12,715 | 16,799 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive impact of restricted stock and restricted stock units | 1,532 | 1,145 | 1,621 | 1,232 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive impact of assumed conversion of Senior Notes using the treasury stock method(1) | — | — | 301 | — | ||||||||||||
Total shares for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share | 852,334 | 892,759 | 853,174 | 901,683 | ||||||||||||
(1) | See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008 for an explanation of the impact of the Senior Notes on Earnings per share - diluted. |
The following potential common shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | October 3, | September 28, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock options | 47,158 | 64,828 | 49,409 | 64,972 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock units | 96 | 10 | 60 | 13 | ||||||||||||
47,254 | 64,838 | 49,469 | 64,985 | |||||||||||||
For the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, the effect of the convertible senior notes, warrants issued and options purchased in connection with the convertible senior notes were excluded for the reasons discussed in Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.
16
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 12. | Stock-based Compensation |
We currently have in effect certain stock purchase plans, stock award plans, and equity incentive plans, as described in detail in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008. These plans were amended in several respects during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. At our 2008 Annual Meeting held in September 2008, our stockholders approved (a) the amendment of our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan to reserve an additional 50,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for issuance thereunder, and (b) the adoption of our 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan including the reservation of 20,000,000 shares of common stock became reserved for issuance thereunder, with the first purchase period thereunder to commence on February 16, 2009. The 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan replaces the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, which terminates pursuant to its terms on January 1, 2009 subject to completion of the final purchase period under the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan on February 15, 2009.
The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | October 3, | September 28, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except earnings per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues — Content, subscriptions, and maintenance | $ | 3,298 | $ | 3,542 | $ | 6,142 | $ | 6,953 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues — Licenses | 942 | 957 | 1,734 | 1,942 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 18,172 | 13,957 | 37,532 | 28,421 | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 14,026 | 14,842 | 27,153 | 29,008 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 8,210 | 7,692 | 16,934 | 15,410 | ||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation | 44,648 | 40,990 | 89,495 | 81,734 | ||||||||||||
Tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation expense | 13,310 | 10,484 | 25,385 | 19,712 | ||||||||||||
Net effect of stock-based compensation expense on net income | $ | 31,338 | $ | 30,506 | $ | 64,110 | $ | 62,022 | ||||||||
Net effect of stock-based compensation expense on earnings per share — basic | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||
Net effect of stock-based compensation expense on earnings per share — diluted | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||
As of October 3, 2008, total unrecognized compensation cost adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock options, Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”), and Restricted Stock Agreements (“RSAs”), was $112 million, $141 million, and $0.4 million, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting periods of 2.4 years for stock options, 2.4 years for RSUs, and 0.3 years for RSAs.
The weighted-average fair value per option granted during the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, including assumed options, was $5.30 and $6.20, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, including assumed options, was $97 million and $89 million, respectively.
The weighted-average fair value per RSU granted during the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, including assumed RSUs, was $19.96 and $19.44, respectively. The fair value of RSUs granted for the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 was $181 million and $68 million,
17
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
respectively. The total fair value of RSUs that vested during the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, including assumed RSUs, was $49 million and $12 million, respectively.
Note 13. | Restructuring |
Our restructuring costs consist of severance, benefits, facilities and other costs. Severance and benefits generally include severance, stay-put or one-time bonuses, outplacement services, health insurance coverage, effects of foreign currency exchange and legal costs. Facilities costs generally include rent expense less expected sublease income, lease termination costs, asset abandonment costs and the effects of foreign currency exchange. Other costs include relocation and transition costs and consulting services. Restructuring expenses generally do not impact a particular reporting segment and are included in the “Other” reporting segment.
2008 Restructuring Plan
In fiscal 2008, management approved and initiated a restructuring plan (the “2008 Plan”) to reduce costs, outsource certain back office functions, implement management structure changes, optimize the business structure and discontinue certain products. Projects within the 2008 Plan began in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Severance payments related to the 2008 Plan are expected to be completed in fiscal 2010 and excess facility obligations are to be paid through the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Costs during the six months ended October 3, 2008 were $15 million related to severance and benefit costs, $2 million related to facilities costs and $6 million related to other associated costs. Total remaining costs of the 2008 Plan, consisting of severance, benefits, excess facilities and other costs, are estimated to range between approximately $55 million and $85 million.
2007 Restructuring Plans
In fiscal 2007, management entered into restructuring plans to consolidate facilities and reduce operating costs. As part of the plan, we consolidated certain facilities and exited facilities related to earlier acquisitions. Excess facilities obligations are expected to be paid through the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Future costs for exited facilities associated with these events are not expected to be significant.
Prior and Acquisition-Related Restructuring Plans
2006 Restructuring Plans
In fiscal 2006, management entered into restructuring plans to reduce operating costs and consolidate facilities. Restructuring liabilities related to these events as of October 3, 2008 are $3 million primarily related to excess facilities and are expected to be paid through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018.
18
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Acquisition-Related Restructuring Plans
Restructuring liabilities related to acquisitions as of October 3, 2008 were $6 million, consisting primarily of excess facilities obligations. Of the $6 million restructuring liability, $3 million relates to the Vontu acquisition and $3 million relates to the Veritas acquisition. These amounts are expected to be paid through the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2014, respectively. Costs during the six months ended October 3, 2008 were not significant and primarily represent adjustments to previously recorded costs. Further severance and benefit costs are not expected to be recognized in future periods.
Restructuring Liability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs, | Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||||||||
March 28, | Net of | Cash | Non-Cash | October 3, | Incurred | |||||||||||||||||||
2008 | Adjustments(1) | Payments | Settlements | 2008 | to Date | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 Restructuring Plan: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance | $ | 16,337 | $ | 15,439 | $ | (23,052 | ) | $ | — | $ | 8,724 | $ | 57,064 | |||||||||||
Facilities | 1,031 | 2,337 | (1,254 | ) | — | 2,114 | 3,620 | |||||||||||||||||
Asset impairments | — | 1,769 | — | (1,769 | ) | — | 1,769 | |||||||||||||||||
Other(2) | — | 5,509 | (5,509 | ) | — | — | 5,509 | |||||||||||||||||
2007 Restructuring Plans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance | 20 | 1,189 | (946 | ) | — | 263 | 86,361 | |||||||||||||||||
Facilities | 2,585 | (379 | ) | (2,137 | ) | — | 69 | 9,594 | ||||||||||||||||
Prior & Acquisition Restructuring Plans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance | — | — | — | — | — | 32,536 | ||||||||||||||||||
Facilities | 10,647 | 931 | (2,906 | ) | — | 8,672 | 22,042 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchase price adjustments | 3,786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 30,620 | $ | 26,795 | $ | (35,804 | ) | $ | (1,769 | ) | $ | 19,842 | ||||||||||||
Balance Sheet: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other current liabilities | $ | 24,062 | $ | 14,557 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 6,558 | 5,285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 30,620 | $ | 19,842 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Total net adjustments or reversals during the six months ended October 3, 2008 were not significant. | |
(2) | Other consists mainly of legal fees which were expensed as incurred. |
Note 14. | Income Taxes |
The effective tax rate was approximately 29% and 31% for the three month periods and 31% and 35% for the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively. The effective tax rates for all periods reflect the benefits of lower-taxed foreign earnings, domestic manufacturing tax incentives, and research and development credit, offset by state income taxes and non-deductible stock-based compensation. We recognized a $7 million tax benefit in the September 2008 quarter as a result of the IRS agreement on the treatment of the 2005 dividend from a Veritas international subsidiary. That agreement permitted us to apply $110 million of a $130 million payment to the outstanding2000-2001 transfer pricing matter, thereby reducing accumulated interest accrued for that matter. We recognized an additional $5 million tax benefit in the September 2008 quarter from favorable prior year items, including the retroactive reinstatement of the U.S. federal research and development credit. Further, the tax expense for the six months ended October 3, 2008 includes a $5 million tax benefit related to a favorable Irish settlement that was recorded in the June 2008 quarter. The September 2007 quarter includes a full 40% tax benefit related to the write-down of intangible and tangible assets related to the Storage and Server Management segment (formerly the Data Center Management segment).
19
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We file income tax returns in the U.S. on a federal basis and in many U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. Our two most significant tax jurisdictions are the U.S. and Ireland. Our tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. Our 2000 through 2007 tax years remain subject to examination by the IRS for U.S. federal tax purposes, and our 2003 through 2007 tax years remain subject to examination by the appropriate governmental agencies for Irish tax purposes. Other significant jurisdictions include California and Japan. As of October 3, 2008, we are under examination by the IRS, for the Veritas U.S. federal income taxes for the 2002 through 2005 tax years.
On March 29, 2006, we received a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS claiming that we owe additional taxes, plus interest and penalties, for the 2000 and 2001 tax years based on an audit of Veritas. The incremental tax liability asserted by the IRS was $867 million, excluding penalties and interest. On June 26, 2006, we filed a petition with the U.S. Tax Court protesting the IRS claim for such additional taxes. The IRS answered our petition on August 30, 2006, at which point the dispute was docketed for trial. In the March 2007 quarter, we agreed to pay $7 million out of $35 million originally assessed by the IRS in connection with several of the lesser issues covered in the assessment. The IRS also agreed to waive the assessment of penalties. During July 2008, we completed the trial phase of the Tax Court case, which dealt with the remaining issue covered in the assessment. At trial, the IRS changed its position with respect to this remaining issue, which decreased the remaining amount at issue from $832 million to $545 million, excluding interest. In October 2008, we filed our post-trial brief with the U.S. Tax Court.
We strongly believe the IRS’ position with regard to this matter is inconsistent with applicable tax laws and existing Treasury regulations, and that our previously reported income tax provision for the years in question is appropriate. If, upon resolution, we are required to pay an amount in excess of our provision for this matter, based upon current accounting authority, the incremental amounts due would be accounted for principally as additions to the cost of Veritas purchase price. Any incremental interest accrued subsequent to the date of the Veritas acquisition would be recorded as an expense in the period the matter is resolved.
The accounting treatment related to pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits will change when SFAS No. 141R becomes effective, which will be in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2010. At such time, any changes to the recognition or measurement of unrecognized tax benefits related to pre-acquisition periods will be recorded through income tax expense, where currently the accounting treatment would require any adjustment to be recognized through the purchase price as an increase or decrease to goodwill.
In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the IRS concerning our eligibility to claim a lower tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign subsidiary prior to the July 2005 acquisition. The distribution was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise the subject of the tax years2000-2001 transfer pricing dispute which in turn is being addressed in the U.S. Tax Court. To the extent that we owe taxes as a result of the transfer pricing dispute, we anticipate that the incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome from this negotiated agreement will be $13 million or less, for which an accrual has already been made. As previously disclosed inForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008, we made a payment of $130 million to the IRS for this matter in May 2006. We have applied $110 million of this payment as a deposit on the outstanding transfer pricing matter for the tax years2000-2001.
We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing income tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expected tolling of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions. Considering these facts, we do not currently believe there is a reasonable possibility of any significant change to our total unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.
20
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 15. | Litigation |
See Note 14 for a discussion of our tax litigation with the IRS relating to the 2000 and 2001 tax year of Veritas.
On July 7, 2004, a purported class action complaint entitled Paul Kuck, et al. v. Veritas Software Corporation, et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The lawsuit alleges violations of federal securities laws in connection with Veritas’ announcement on July 6, 2004 that it expected results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 to fall below earlier estimates. The complaint generally seeks an unspecified amount of damages. Subsequently, additional purported class action complaints have been filed in Delaware federal court, and, on March 3, 2005, the Court entered an order consolidating these actions and appointing lead plaintiffs and counsel. A consolidated amended complaint (“CAC”), was filed on May 27, 2005, expanding the class period from April 23, 2004 through July 6, 2004. The CAC also named another officer as a defendant and added allegations that Veritas and the named officers made false or misleading statements in press releases and SEC filings regarding the company’s financial results, which allegedly contained revenue recognized from contracts that were unsigned or lacked essential terms. The defendants to this matter filed a motion to dismiss the CAC in July 2005; the motion was denied in May 2006. In April 2008, the parties filed a stipulation of settlement, which if approved by the Court will resolve the matter. On July 31, 2008, the Court held a final approval hearing and, on August 5, 2008, the Court entered an order approving the settlement. An objector to the fees portion of the settlement has lodged an appeal. As of March 28, 2008, we have recorded an accrual in the amount of $21.5 million for this matter and, pursuant to the terms of the settlement, we established a settlement fund of $21.5 million on May 1, 2008.
After Veritas announced in January 2003 that it would restate its financial results as a result of transactions entered into with AOL Time Warner in September 2000, numerous separate complaints purporting to be class actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that Veritas and some of its officers and directors violated provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaints contain varying allegations, including that Veritas made materially false and misleading statements with respect to its 2000, 2001 and 2002 financial results included in its filings with the SEC, press releases and other public disclosures. A consolidated complaint entitled In Re VERITAS Software Corporation Securities Litigation was filed by the lead plaintiff on July 18, 2003. On February 18, 2005, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in the class action. On March 18, 2005, the Court entered an order preliminarily approving the class action settlement. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, a $35 million settlement fund was established on March 25, 2005. Veritas’ insurance carriers provided for the entire amount of the settlement fund. In July 2007, the Court of Appeals vacated the settlement, finding that the notice of settlement was inadequate. The matter was returned to the District Court for further proceedings, including reissuance of the notice, and the District Court again approved the settlement and dismissed the matter.
We are also involved in a number of other judicial and administrative proceedings that are incidental to our business. Although adverse decisions (or settlements) may occur in one or more of the cases, it is not possible to estimate the possible loss or losses from each of these cases. The final resolution of these lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Note 16. | Segment Information |
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we changed our reporting segments to better align our operating structure. Altiris services that were formerly included in the Security and Compliance segment were moved to the Services segment. This move is a result of operational changes in our Services segment and the continued integration of our Altiris business. We revised the segment information for the prior year to conform to the new presentation. As of October 3, 2008, our five operating segments are:
• | Consumer Products. Our Consumer Products segment focuses on delivering our Internet security, PC tuneup, and backup products to individual users and home offices. |
21
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
• | Security and Compliance. Our Security and Compliance segment focuses on providing large, medium, and small-sized businesses with solutions for compliance and security management, endpoint security, messaging management, and data protection management software solutions that allow our customers to secure, provision, and remotely access their laptops, PCs, mobile devices, and servers. | |
• | Storage and Server Management. Our Storage and Server Management segment focuses on providing enterprise and large enterprise customers with storage and server management, backup, and data protection solutions across heterogeneous storage and server platforms. | |
• | Services. Our Services segment provides customers with leading IT risk management services and solutions to manage security, availability, performance and compliance risks across multi-vendor environments. In addition, our services including managed security services, consulting, education, and threat and early warning systems, help customers optimize and maximize the value of their Symantec technology investments. | |
• | Other. Our Other segment is comprised of sunset products and products nearing the end of their life cycle. It also includes general and administrative expenses; amortization of acquired product rights, other intangible assets, and other assets and charges, such as acquired in-process research and development, stock-based compensation, restructuring and certain indirect costs that are not charged to the other operating segments. |
Our reportable segments are the same as our operating segments. The accounting policies of the segments are described in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008. There are no intersegment sales. Our chief operating decision maker evaluates performance based on direct profit or loss from operations before income taxes not including nonrecurring gains and losses, foreign exchange gains and losses, and miscellaneous other income and expenses. Except for goodwill, as disclosed in Note 7, the majority of our assets are not discretely identified by segment. The depreciation and amortization of our property, equipment, and leasehold improvements are allocated based on headcount, unless specifically identified by segment.
22
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Segment information
The following table presents a summary of our operating segments:
Storage and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | Security and | Server | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Products | Compliance | Management | Services | Other | Company | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended October 3, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues | $ | 437,654 | $ | 400,992 | $ | 572,309 | $ | 106,624 | $ | 431 | $ | 1,518,010 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 29 | % | 26 | % | 38 | % | 7 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 235,303 | 62,427 | 307,716 | 680 | (389,701 | ) | 216,425 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating margin of segment | 54 | % | 16 | % | 54 | % | 1 | % | * | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 4,401 | 6,367 | 12,630 | 2,830 | 185,283 | 211,511 | ||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 28, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues | $ | 433,508 | $ | 388,522 | $ | 507,957 | $ | 88,774 | $ | 328 | $ | 1,419,089 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 31 | % | 27 | % | 36 | % | 6 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 226,372 | 49,148 | 151,375 | (14,126 | ) | (353,880 | ) | 58,889 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating margin of segment | 52 | % | 13 | % | 30 | % | (16 | )% | * | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 1,783 | 6,332 | 14,989 | 2,778 | 178,166 | 204,048 | ||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended period over period comparison: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | 8,931 | $ | 13,279 | $ | 156,341 | $ | 14,806 | $ | (35,821 | ) | $ | 157,536 | |||||||||||
Operating income percentage year over year change | 4 | % | 27 | % | 103 | % | * | 10 | % | |||||||||||||||
Six months ended October 3, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues | $ | 909,985 | $ | 846,639 | $ | 1,187,465 | $ | 223,337 | $ | 906 | $ | 3,168,332 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 29 | % | 27 | % | 37 | % | 7 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 510,808 | 143,587 | 614,056 | (2,779 | ) | (770,311 | ) | 495,361 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating margin of segment | 56 | % | 17 | % | 52 | % | (1 | )% | * | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 6,008 | 13,002 | 26,208 | 5,734 | 360,615 | 411,567 | ||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended September 28, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues | $ | 857,258 | $ | 776,191 | $ | 1,013,537 | $ | 171,872 | $ | 569 | $ | 2,819,427 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 30 | % | 28 | % | 36 | % | 6 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 460,159 | 109,250 | 373,991 | (32,742 | ) | (717,573 | ) | 193,085 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating margin of segment | 54 | % | 14 | % | 37 | % | (19 | )% | * | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 3,391 | 13,180 | 30,357 | 5,424 | 365,141 | 417,493 | ||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended period over period comparison: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | 50,649 | $ | 34,337 | $ | 240,065 | $ | 29,963 | $ | (52,738 | ) | $ | 302,276 | |||||||||||
Operating income percentage year over year change | 11 | % | 31 | % | 64 | % | 92 | % | 7 | % |
* | Percentage not meaningful |
23
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 17. | Subsequent Events |
On October 6, 2008, we completed the acquisition of PC Tools, an Australia-based provider of innovative software products designed to protect the privacy and security of computer users. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $250 million in cash. Should PC Tools meet certain bookings and expense targets within six months of the acquisition date, we would increase the purchase price by up to $30 million.
On October 8, 2008, we announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire MessageLabs, a United Kingdom-based provider of online messaging and Web security services. We expect to acquire MessageLabs for a purchase price of approximately $695 million in cash based on exchange rates as of October 8, 2008, subject to foreign currency adjustments, payable in approximately £310 million and $154 million. The acquisition is expected to close by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
24
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results
The discussion below contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to safe harbors under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include references to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, as well as statements including words such as “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “projects,” and similar expressions. In addition, statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and in our industries, the anticipated impacts of acquisitions, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions, based on our current expectations about future events and may not prove to be accurate. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events occurring or circumstances arising after the date of this report. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements on the basis of several factors, including those that we discuss in Risk Factors, set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our annual report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008. We encourage you to read that section carefully.
OVERVIEW
Our Business
Symantec is a global leader in providing security, storage and systems management solutions to help businesses and consumers secure and manage their information. We provide customers worldwide with software and services that protect, manage and control information risks related to security, data protection, storage, compliance, and systems management. We help our customers manage cost, complexity and compliance by protecting their IT infrastructure as they seek to maximize value from their IT investments.
We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year. Unless otherwise stated, references to three and six month ended periods in this report relate to fiscal periods ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007. The October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 quarters both consisted of 13 weeks. The six months ended October 3, 2008 consisted of 27 weeks while the six months ended September 28, 2007 consisted of 26 weeks.
Our Operating Segments
Our operating segments are significant strategic business units that offer different products and services, distinguished by customer needs. Since the March 2008 quarter, we have operated in five operating segments: Consumer Products, Security and Compliance, Storage and Server Management, Services, and Other. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we changed our reporting segments to better align our operating structure. Altiris services that were formerly included in the Security and Compliance segment were moved to the Services segment. This move is a result of operational changes in our Services segment and the continued integration of our Altiris business. We revised the segment information for the prior year to conform to the new presentation. For further descriptions of our operating segments, see Note 16 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this quarterly report. Our reportable segments are the same as our operating segments.
Financial Results and Trends
Our net income was $140 million and $327 million, for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008, respectively, as compared to our net income of $50 million and $146 million for the three and six months ended September 28, 2007, respectively. The higher net income for the fiscal 2009 periods as compared to the same period last year was primarily due to higher revenues in each fiscal 2009 period.
Revenue for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 was 7% and 12% higher than revenue for the three and six months ended September 28, 2007, respectively. During the three and six months ended October 3, 2008, we delivered revenue growth across all of our geographic regions as compared to the same periods last year and
25
Table of Contents
experienced revenue growth in all of our segments. In addition to the foreign currency effects described below, we believe our increased revenue was largely driven by continued demand for our products as a result of the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, the need to simplify and standardize data center infrastructures, the convergence of endpoint security and management, and increased adoption of our Consumer Products suites. Our revenue growth is also attributable to increased awareness of Internet-related security threats around the world and demand for storage solutions. While we reported increased revenue year over year, we are not immune to macroeconomic conditions. For example, if the challenging economic conditions affecting global markets continue or deteriorate further, we may experience slower or negative revenue growth and our business and operating results might suffer. Our expectation is that currency changes may have a negative impact on year-to-year revenue and deferred revenue in the coming quarter. In light of these economic conditions, we will continue to align our cost structure with our revenue expectations.
Weakness in the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies positively impacted our international revenue growth by approximately $51 million and $153 million, respectively, during the three and six month periods ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year, although this impact has been less than we experienced in recent quarters due to a relative strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies during the September 2008 quarter. We are unable to predict the extent to which revenues in future periods will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If international sales become a greater portion of our total sales in the future, changes in foreign exchange rates may have a potentially greater impact on our revenues and operating results.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Income Taxes
The section entitled “Income Taxes” in our Critical Accounting Estimates section of ourForm 10-K for fiscal year 2008 is hereby updated as follows:
In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) concerning our eligibility to claim a lower tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign subsidiary prior to the July 2005 acquisition. The distribution was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise the subject of the tax years2000-2001 transfer pricing dispute which in turn is being addressed in the U.S. Tax Court. To the extent that we owe taxes as a result of the transfer pricing dispute, we anticipate that the incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome from this negotiated agreement will be $13 million or less, for which an accrual has already been made. As previously disclosed inForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008, we made a payment of $130 million to the IRS for this matter in May 2006. We applied $110 million of this payment as a deposit on the outstanding transfer pricing matter for the tax years2000-2001.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Beginning in the first fiscal quarter of 2009, the assessment of fair value for our financial instruments is based on the provisions of SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that is based on three levels of inputs and requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
As of October 3, 2008, our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis included $1.2 billion of assets. Our cash equivalents, which primarily consist of commercial paper, money market funds and government notes, total $1.1 billion which is 93% of our total financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
As of October 3, 2008, $406 million were classified as Level 1, $403 million (33% of total financial instruments fair valued on a recurring basis) of which represent investments in money market funds. These were classified as Level 1 because their valuations were based on quoted prices for identical securities in active markets. Determining fair value for Level 1 instruments generally does not require significant management judgment.
26
Table of Contents
As of October 3, 2008, $825 million were classified as Level 2, $483 million and $249 million (60% together of total financial instruments fair valued on a recurring basis) of which represent investments in commercial paper and government notes, respectively. These were classified as Level 2 because their valuations were based on pricing models with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market prices for identical securities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets). Level 2 inputs also generally include non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated by observable market data; quoted prices for similar instruments; model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities or quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities. The level of judgment and subjectivity involved with Level 2 instruments generally includes:
• | Determining which instruments are most similar to the instrument being priced and identifying a sample of similar securities based on the coupon rates, maturity, issuer, credit rating, and instrument type, and subjectively selecting an individual security or multiple securities that are deemed most similar to the security being priced. For most of our financial instruments classified as Level 2 at October 3, 2008, identical securities were used for determining fair value. | |
• | Determining whether a market is considered active. An assessment of an active market for marketable securities generally takes into consideration trading volume for each instrument type or whether a trading market exists for a given instrument. Our Level 2 financial instruments were so classified due to either low trading activity in active markets or no active market existed. Where no active market existed, amortized cost was used and was assumed to equate to fair value because of the short maturities. | |
• | Determining which model-derived valuations to use in determining fair value. When observable market prices for identical securities or similar securities are not available, we may price marketable securities using: non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with observable market data; or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow approaches, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data. In addition, the credit ratings for issuers of debt instruments in which we are invested could change, which could lead to lower fair values. During the second quarter of 2009, the fair value of $22 million of fixed-income securities was determined using benchmark pricing models for identical or similar securities. |
As of October 3, 2008, we have no financial instruments with unobservable inputs as classified in Level 3 under the SFAS No. 157 hierarchy. Level 3 instruments generally would include unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities. The determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments requires the most management judgment and subjectivity.
Other than these changes, there have been no changes in our critical accounting estimates during the six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the critical accounting estimates disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Total Net Revenues
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues | $ | 1,518,010 | $ | 1,419,089 | $ | 98,921 | 7 | % | $ | 3,168,332 | $ | 2,819,427 | $ | 348,905 | 12 | % |
Net revenues increased for the three months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to $73 million in increased sales related to our Storage Foundation, Net Backup, Cluster Server and Information Risk Management products. The increase in demand for these product lines is driven by continued demand for products related to the standardization and simplification of data center infrastructures, demand for
27
Table of Contents
products related to archiving solutions and the proliferation of structured and unstructured data. In addition, we realized revenues of approximately $20 million for the three months ended October 3, 2008 from sales of products gained from our fiscal 2008 acquisitions for which there is no comparable revenue in the same period last year.
The increase in revenues for the six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year is primarily due to $171 million in increased sales related to our Storage Foundation, Net Backup, and core Consumer products. The increase in demand for these product lines is driven by continued demand for products related to the standardization and simplification of data center infrastructures, the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, and increased adoption of our Consumer Products suites. We realized net revenues of approximately $35 million for the six months ended October 3, 2008 from the contribution of sales of products acquired from our fiscal 2008 acquisitions for which there is no comparable revenue in the same period last year. In addition, revenues for the six months ended October 3, 2008 benefited from additional amortization of deferred revenue of approximately $75 million as a result of the July 4, 2008 quarter being comprised of 14 weeks as compared to 13 weeks for the same period last year.
The revenue increases for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 discussed above are further described in the segment discussions that follow.
Content, subscriptions, and maintenance revenues
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Content, subscriptions, and maintenance revenues | $ | 1,180,715 | $ | 1,117,165 | $ | 63,550 | 6 | % | $ | 2,471,707 | $ | 2,203,683 | $ | 268,024 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 78 | % | 79 | % | 78 | % | 78 | % |
Content, subscriptions, and maintenance revenues increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year primarily due to an increase of $61 million and $223 million, respectively, in revenue related to enterprise products and services. This increase in enterprise product and services revenue is largely attributable to demand for our Storage Foundation, Net Backup, Backup Exec, Cluster Server and Information Risk Management products, and consulting services as a result of increased demand for security and storage solutions. This increased demand was driven by the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, and increasing sales of services in conjunction with our license sales as a result of our focus on offering our customers a more comprehensive IT solution. To a lesser extent, content, subscriptions, and maintenance revenues for the six months ended October 3, 2008 benefited from an additional week of deferred revenue amortization as a result of the July 4, 2008 quarter being comprised of 14 weeks compared to 13 weeks for the same period last year.
Licenses revenues
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Licenses revenues | $ | 337,295 | $ | 301,924 | $ | 35,371 | 12 | % | $ | 696,625 | $ | 615,744 | $ | 80,881 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 22 | % | 21 | % | 22 | % | 22 | % |
Licenses revenues increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year primarily due to an increase of $39 million and $63 million, respectively, in revenue related to our Storage Foundation and Net Backup products. These increases are a result of increased demand for storage solutions driven by the proliferation of structured and unstructured data.
28
Table of Contents
Net revenue and operating income by segment
Consumer Products segment
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Products revenues | $ | 437,654 | $ | 433,508 | $ | 4,146 | 1 | % | $ | 909,985 | $ | 857,258 | $ | 52,727 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 29 | % | 31 | % | 29 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Products operating income | $ | 235,303 | $ | 226,372 | $ | 8,931 | 4 | % | $ | 510,808 | $ | 460,159 | $ | 50,649 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Consumer Products revenues | 54 | % | 52 | % | 56 | % | 54 | % |
Consumer Products revenues increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to an increase of $82 million and $180 million, respectively, in revenue from our new Consumer Products suite and to a lesser extent by a favorable impact of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. This revenue increase is due to the increased electronic order demand for Norton 360 offset by declining retail sales during fiscal 2008. The revenue from our consumer products is generally recognized ratably over the 12 months after the product is sold. This increase is partially offset by aggregate decreases for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year of $76 million and $127 million, respectively, in revenue from our Norton Internet Security and Norton AntiVirus products. This decrease results from our customers’ continued migration to our Norton 360 product, which offers broader protection and backup features to address the rapidly changing threat environment. Our electronic orders include sales derived from OEMs, subscriptions, upgrades, online sales, and renewals. Revenue from electronic orders (which includes sales of the aforementioned products) grew by $32 million and $95 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year. Electronic orders constituted 79% and 78% of Consumer Products revenues for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to 72% and 72%, respectively, for the same periods last year.
Operating income for this segment increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year as revenue growth exceeded the growth in total expenses. Total expenses in our Consumer Products segment decreased for the three month ended October 3, 2008 by $5 million and increased for the six months ended October 3, 2008 by $2 million as compared to the same periods last year. Our operating expenses for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 benefited from our continued cost containment measures.
Security and Compliance segment
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security and Compliance revenues | $ | 400,992 | $ | 388,522 | $ | 12,470 | 3 | % | $ | 846,639 | $ | 776,191 | $ | 70,448 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 26 | % | 27 | % | 27 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security and Compliance operating income | $ | 62,427 | $ | 49,148 | $ | 13,279 | 27 | % | $ | 143,587 | $ | 109,250 | $ | 34,337 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Security and Compliance revenues | 16 | % | 13 | % | 17 | % | 14 | % |
29
Table of Contents
Security and Compliance revenues increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year by $12 million and $70 million, respectively, in revenue as a result of increased demand for endpoint management, increased demand for archiving solutions, and the successful integration of acquired products into our product portfolio.
Operating income for the Security and Compliance segment increased, as revenue growth exceeded the growth in total expenses for the segment. Total expenses from our Security and Compliance segment decreased for the three months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year by $1 million. This was primarily as a result of continued cost containment measures. Total expenses increased for the six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year by $36 million. This was primarily due to higher overall sales and R&D expenses in addition to the inclusion of the Vontu acquisition in this segment.
Storage and Server Management segment
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Storage and Server Management revenues | $ | 572,309 | $ | 507,957 | $ | 64,352 | 13 | % | $ | 1,187,465 | $ | 1,013,537 | $ | 173,928 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 38 | % | 36 | % | 37 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Storage and Server Management operating income | $ | 307,716 | $ | 151,375 | $ | 156,341 | 103 | % | $ | 614,056 | $ | 373,991 | $ | 240,065 | 64 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Storage and Server Management revenues | 54 | % | 30 | % | 52 | % | 37 | % |
Storage and Server Management revenues increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year by $66 million and $176 million, respectively, in revenue driven by increased demand for products related to the standardization and simplification of data center infrastructures, increased demand for products supporting high availability and disaster recovery and due to the proliferation of structured and unstructured data.
Operating income for the Storage and Server Management segment increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year, as revenue growth exceeded the growth in total expenses for the segment. Total expenses in our Storage and Server Management segment decreased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year by $92 million and $66 million, respectively. These decreases primarily related to the asset impairment on the Application Performance Management (“APM”) business divestiture of $87 million that occurred in the quarter ended September 28, 2007. Also, our operating expenses for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 benefited from our continued cost containment measures.
30
Table of Contents
Services segment
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services revenues | $ | 106,624 | $ | 88,774 | $ | 17,850 | 20 | % | $ | 223,337 | $ | 171,872 | $ | 51,465 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 7 | % | 6 | % | 7 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services operating income (loss) | $ | 680 | $ | (14,126 | ) | $ | 14,806 | * | $ | (2,779 | ) | $ | (32,742 | ) | $ | 29,963 | 92 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of Services revenues | 1 | % | (16 | )% | (1 | )% | (19 | )% |
* | Percentage not meaningful |
Services revenues increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to an increase in consulting services and Business Critical Services of $14 million and $42 million, respectively, as a result of increased demand for more comprehensive software implementation assistance and increased demand for our Business Critical Services. Customers are increasingly purchasing our service offerings in conjunction with the purchase of our products and augmenting the capabilities of their own IT staff with our onsite consultants.
Profitability for the Services segment increased, as revenue growth exceeded the growth in total expenses for the segment. The Services operating margin improvement was the result of financial and operational efficiencies aimed at driving profitability. Total expenses from our Services segment increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year by $3 million and $22 million, respectively. This increase for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 is primarily due to higher wages and outside services costs required to support the segment’s revenue growth.
Other segment
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues | $ | 431 | $ | 328 | $ | 103 | 31 | % | $ | 906 | $ | 569 | $ | 337 | 59 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating loss | $ | (389,701 | ) | $ | (353,880 | ) | $ | (35,821 | ) | 10 | % | $ | (770,311 | ) | $ | (717,573 | ) | $ | (52,738 | ) | 7 | % |
* | Percentage not meaningful |
Revenue from our Other segment is comprised primarily of sunset products and products nearing the end of their life cycle. The operating loss of our Other segment also includes general and administrative expenses; amortization of acquired product rights, other intangible assets, and other assets; charges such as stock-based compensation and restructuring; and certain indirect costs that are not charged to the other operating segments.
31
Table of Contents
Net revenues by geographic region
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas (U.S., Canada and Latin America) | $ | 821,823 | $ | 764,470 | $ | 57,353 | 8 | % | $ | 1,683,277 | $ | 1,515,919 | $ | 167,358 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 54 | % | 54 | % | 53 | % | 54 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa) | $ | 480,182 | $ | 460,485 | $ | 19,697 | 4 | % | $ | 1,038,021 | $ | 918,289 | $ | 119,732 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 32 | % | 32 | % | 33 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific/Japan | $ | 216,005 | $ | 194,134 | $ | 21,871 | 11 | % | $ | 447,034 | $ | 385,220 | $ | 61,814 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 14 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net revenues | $ | 1,518,010 | $ | 1,419,089 | $ | 3,168,332 | $ | 2,819,427 |
Americas revenues increased in the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year primarily due to increased revenues related to our Storage and Server Management, Security and Compliance, and Services segments of $46 million and $128 million, respectively, as a result of increased demand as discussed above coupled with the convergence of endpoint security and management. In addition, for the six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year, Americas revenues increased related to our Consumer segment by $39 million, driven by demand for our Consumer Products Suites. EMEA and Asia Pacific/Japan revenues increased for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to increased revenues related to our Storage and Server Management and Services segments of $45 million and $133 million, respectively, as a result of increased demand for products related to the standardization and simplification of data center infrastructures, the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, and increasing sales of services in conjunction with our license sales as a result of our focus on offering our customers a more comprehensive IT solution.
Foreign currencies had a favorable impact on net revenues for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year although, as noted above, the recent strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies during the September 2008 quarter has dampened this impact to some extent. We are unable to predict the extent to which revenues in future periods will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If international sales become a greater portion of our total sales in the future, changes in foreign currency exchange rates may have a potentially greater impact on our revenues and operating results.
Cost of Revenues
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues | $ | 309,070 | $ | 304,526 | $ | 4,544 | 1 | % | $ | 621,052 | $ | 614,790 | $ | 6,262 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross margin | 80 | % | 79 | % | 80 | % | 78 | % |
Cost of revenues consists primarily of the amortization of acquired product rights, fee-based technical support costs, the costs of billable services, payments to OEMs under revenue-sharing arrangements, manufacturing and direct material costs, and royalties paid to third parties under technology licensing agreements.
Gross margin increased by one percentage point and two percentage points, respectively, for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year primarily due to higher revenues and, to a lesser extent, lower OEM royalty payments, partially offset by a year over year increase in technical support costs.
32
Table of Contents
Cost of content, subscriptions, and maintenance
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of content, subscriptions, and maintenance | $ | 212,070 | $ | 205,572 | $ | 6,498 | 3 | % | $ | 430,644 | $ | 415,238 | $ | 15,406 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
As a percentage of related revenue | 18 | % | 18 | % | 17 | % | 19 | % |
Cost of content, subscriptions, and maintenance consists primarily of fee-based technical support costs, costs of billable services, and payments to OEM’s under revenue-sharing agreements. Cost of content, subscriptions, and maintenance as a percentage of related revenue remained stable for the three months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year and decreased by two percentage points for the six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year. The year over year increase in margin is primarily driven by higher revenues and lower OEM royalties more than offsetting increases in technical support and services expenses.
Cost of licenses
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of licenses | $ | 10,398 | $ | 9,892 | $ | 506 | 5 | % | $ | 18,845 | $ | 21,130 | $ | (2,285 | ) | (11 | )% | |||||||||||||||
As a percentage of related revenue | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % |
Cost of licenses consists primarily of royalties paid to third parties under technology licensing agreements and manufacturing and direct material costs. Cost of licenses remained stable as a percentage of the related revenue for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year. Increases in royalties were offset by lower manufacturing and distribution costs.
Amortization of acquired product rights
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired product rights | $ | 86,602 | $ | 89,062 | $ | (2,460 | ) | (3 | )% | $ | 171,563 | $ | 178,422 | $ | (6,859 | ) | (4 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 6 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % |
Acquired product rights are comprised of developed technologies and patents from acquired companies. The decrease in amortization for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year is primarily due to the APM business divestiture in the fiscal 2008 periods, which was offset, in part, by amortization associated with the Vontu acquisition during the fiscal 2009 periods.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses overview
As discussed above under “Our Business,” our operating expenses for the six months ended October 3, 2008 compared to the same period last year were adversely impacted by an additional week during the first half of fiscal 2009. In addition, our international expenses during the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 were adversely impacted by the weakness of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies during the same periods last year.
33
Table of Contents
However, to a more significant extent, our ongoing cost and expense discipline positively contributed to our increased operating margins for the periods.
Sales and marketing expenses
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 596,983 | $ | 595,162 | $ | 1,821 | 0 | % | $ | 1,259,802 | $ | 1,163,692 | $ | 96,110 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 39 | % | 42 | % | 40 | % | 41 | % |
As a percent of net revenues, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 39% and 40% for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to 42% and 41% for the three and six months ended September 28, 2007, respectively, after taking into account the items discussed above under “Operating expenses overview.”
Research and development expenses
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | $ | 219,049 | $ | 221,057 | $ | (2,008 | ) | (1 | )% | $ | 450,484 | $ | 446,635 | $ | 3,849 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 14 | % | 16 | % | 14 | % | 16 | % |
As a percent of net revenues, research and development expenses decreased to 14% for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to 16% for the three and six months ended September 28, 2007, respectively, after taking into account the items discussed above under “Operating expenses overview.”
General and administrative expenses
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | $ | 84,838 | $ | 86,405 | $ | (1,567 | ) | (2 | )% | $ | 177,604 | $ | 172,250 | $ | 5,354 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 6 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % |
As a percent of net revenues, general and administrative expenses remained relatively constant for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively, after taking into account the items discussed above under “Operating expenses overview.”
Amortization of other purchased intangible assets
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of other purchased intangible assets | $ | 55,651 | $ | 56,926 | $ | (1,275 | ) | (2 | )% | $ | 111,030 | $ | 113,851 | $ | (2,821 | ) | (2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % |
34
Table of Contents
Other purchased intangible assets are comprised of customer bases and tradenames. Amortization for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 compared to the same periods last year remained relatively stable.
Restructuring
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance | $ | 5,522 | $ | (1,503 | ) | $ | 16,627 | $ | 16,464 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Facilities & Other | $ | 4,268 | $ | 11,081 | $ | 10,168 | $ | 12,114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring | $ | 9,790 | $ | 9,578 | $ | 212 | 2 | % | $ | 26,795 | $ | 28,578 | $ | (1,783 | ) | (6 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % |
In fiscal 2008, we approved and initiated a restructuring plan to reduce costs, outsource certain back office functions, implement management structure changes, optimize the business structure and discontinue certain products. Projects within the 2008 Plan began in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Costs in the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 are primarily related to severance and benefit costs of the 2008 Plan. Severance payments related to the 2008 Plan are expected to be completed by fiscal 2010 and excess facility obligations are to be paid through the first quarter of fiscal 2012. We estimate total remaining costs of the 2008 Plan, consisting of both severance and benefits and excess facilities costs, to be range between approximately $55 million and $85 million which will directly impact future net income and operating cash flows for the above periods mentioned. We do not expect costs relating to previous restructuring events to have a significant impact on future net income.
In fiscal 2007, we entered into restructuring plans (“2007 Plans”) to consolidate facilities and reduce operating costs through headcount reductions. We also consolidated certain facilities and exited facilities as a result of earlier acquisitions. Costs in the three and six months ended September 28, 2007 are primarily related to severance and benefit costs of the 2007 Plan.
Impairment of assets
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of assets | $ | 26,204 | $ | 86,546 | $ | (60,342 | ) | (70 | )% | $ | 26,204 | $ | 86,546 | $ | (60,342 | ) | (70 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 2 | % | 6 | % | 1 | % | 3 | % |
During the three months ended October 3, 2008, we recognized an impairment of $26 million on certain land and buildings classified as held for sale. SFAS No. 144 provides that a long-lived asset classified as held for sale should be measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
During the three months ended September 28, 2007, we determined that the APM business in the Storage and Server Management segment (formerly the Data Center Management segment) did not meet the long-term strategic objectives of the segment. As a result, we recognized losses related to the impairment of assets of $87 million.
35
Table of Contents
Non-operating Income and Expense
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 12,302 | $ | 19,179 | $ | 30,290 | $ | 40,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (6,712 | ) | (6,617 | ) | (16,281 | ) | (12,908 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (8,782 | ) | 1,965 | (8,843 | ) | 3,231 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (3,192 | ) | $ | 14,527 | $ | (17,719 | ) | (122 | )% | $ | 5,166 | $ | 30,323 | $ | (25,157 | ) | (83 | )% | |||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenues | 0 | % | 1 | % | 0 | % | 1 | % |
The decrease in interest income during the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same periods last year is primarily due to a lower average yield on our invested cash and short-term investment balances.
Interest expense for the three months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the same period last year remained relatively constant. For the six months ended October 3, 2008, the increase in interest expense was primarily due to the interest associated with our $200 million borrowing on our senior unsecured revolving credit facility, which was repaid by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Provision for income taxes
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 62,414 | $ | 23,048 | $ | 39,366 | 171 | % | $ | 156,835 | $ | 77,834 | $ | 79,001 | 101 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Effective income tax rate | 29 | % | 31 | % | 31 | % | 35 | % |
The effective tax rate was approximately 29% and 31% for the three month periods and 31% and 35% for the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively. The effective tax rates for all periods reflect the benefits of lower-taxed foreign earnings, domestic manufacturing tax incentives, and research and development credits, offset by state income taxes and non-deductible stock-based compensation. We recognized a $7 million tax benefit in the September 2008 quarter as a result of the IRS agreement on the treatment of the 2005 dividend from a Veritas international subsidiary. That agreement permitted us to apply $110 million of a $130 million payment to the outstanding2000-2001 transfer pricing matter, thereby reducing accumulated interest accrued for that matter. We recognized an additional $5 million tax benefit in the September 2008 quarter from favorable prior year items, including the retroactive reinstatement of the U.S. federal research and development credit. Further, the tax expense for the six months ended October 3, 2008 includes a $5 million tax benefit related to a favorable Irish settlement that was recorded in the June 2008 quarter. The September 2007 quarter includes a full 40% tax benefit related to the write-down of intangible and tangible assets related to the Storage and Server Management segment (formerly the Data Center Management segment). The increase in the tax expense related to the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 relates to higher pre-tax earnings.
36
Table of Contents
Loss from joint venture
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | Change in | October 3, | September 28, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from joint venture | $ | (10,746 | ) | $ | — | $ | (10,746 | ) | NA | $ | (16,927 | ) | $ | — | $ | (16,927 | ) | NA |
On February 5, 2008, Symantec formed Huawei-Symantec, Inc. (“joint venture”) with a subsidiary of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (“Huawei”). The joint venture is domiciled in Hong Kong with principal operations in Chengdu, China. The joint venture develops, manufactures, markets and supports security and storage appliances to global telecommunications carriers and enterprise customers.
We account for our investment in the joint venture under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, we record our proportionate share of the joint venture’s net income or loss based on the quarterly financial statements of the joint venture. We record our proportionate share of net income or loss one quarter in arrears. For the six months ended October 3, 2008, we recorded a loss of approximately $17 million related to our share of the joint venture’s net loss incurred for the period from February 5, 2008 (its date of inception) to June 30, 2008.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources of Cash
We have historically relied on cash flow from operations, borrowings under a credit facility and issuances of convertible notes and equity securities for our liquidity needs. Key sources of cash are provided by operations, existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and our revolving credit facility.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we entered into a five-year $1 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility that expires in July 2011. In order to be able to draw on the credit facility, we must maintain certain covenants, including a specified ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization as well as various other non-financial covenants. As of October 3, 2008, we were in compliance with all required covenants, and there was no outstanding balance on the credit facility.
As of October 3, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2.3 billion and short-term investments of $42 million resulting in a net liquidity position defined as unused availability of the credit facility, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $3.3 billion.
We believe that our existing cash balances, the cash that we generate from operations and our borrowing capacity will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months.
Uses of Cash
Our principal cash requirements include working capital, capital expenditures and payments of taxes. In addition, we regularly evaluate our ability to repurchase stock, pay long-term debts and acquire other businesses.
Line of Credit. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we repaid the entire $200 million principal amount plus $3 million of accrued interest related to our senior unsecured revolving credit facility.
Acquisition-Related. We generally use cash to fund the acquisition of other businesses and, from time to time, use our revolving credit facility when necessary. For the three months ended October 3, 2008, we acquired nSuite for $20 million, net of cash acquired. For the three months ended July 4, 2008, we acquired AppStream for $49 million and SwapDrive for $117 million, net of cash acquired. We expect to use approximately $950 million (subject to foreign currency adjustments) in cash for the completion of our acquisitions in the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
37
Table of Contents
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we acquired the outstanding common stock of Altiris, Inc. and paid $841 million, net of cash acquired, which reflects $165 million of cash acquired and $17 million of cash paid for transaction costs.
Stock Repurchases. During the first half of fiscal 2009, we repurchased 19 million shares, or $400 million, of our common stock. As of October 3, 2008, $600 million remained authorized for future repurchases from the 2007 Stock Repurchase Plan.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
October 3, | September 28, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) | ||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 661,867 | $ | 682,278 | ||||
Investing activities | 222,184 | (1,132,499 | ) | |||||
Financing activities | (416,896 | ) | (766,889 | ) |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended October 3, 2008 resulted largely from net income of $327 million, plus non-cash depreciation and amortization charges of $412 million, non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $89 million, collection of trade accounts receivable of $100 million and net receipt of litigation settlements of $58.5 million which are included in the change in other assets and other liabilities. These amounts were partially offset by a decrease in accrued compensation and benefits of $82 million due to the payment of commissions and a decrease in deferred revenue of $229 million as deferred revenue amortization seasonally outpaced new deferrals.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the first half of fiscal 2008 resulted from net income of $146 million, adjusted for non-cash depreciation and amortization charges of $417 million, an impairment of assets of $87 million and non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $82 million. Cash flow from trade accounts receivable decreased $119 million due to strong cash collections. This was substantially offset by decreases in deferred revenue of $229 million, reflecting amortization of deferred revenue. Income taxes payable also increased by $131 million primarily due to the FIN 48 implementation and Altiris acquisition during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Investing Activities
Cash provided by investing activities was $222 million for the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to cash used of $1.1 billion during the same period last year. In fiscal 2009, we received net proceeds of $495 million from the sale of short-term investments in preparation for the acquisitions of MessageLabs and PC Tools expected to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. We also received $40 million from the sale of two properties. These amounts were partially offset by $187 million paid for acquisitions and $125 million paid for capital expenditures.
The $1.1 billion cash used in investing activities for the first half of fiscal 2008 was primarily due to $841 million used to fund the purchase of Altiris, net of cash acquired, purchases of short-term investments of $641 million and capital expenditures of $138 million; partially offset by sales of short-term investments of $498 million.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $417 million for the first half of fiscal 2009. In fiscal 2009, we repurchased 19 million shares of our common stock for $400 million and paid $200 million outstanding under the
38
Table of Contents
senior unsecured revolving credit facility. These amounts were partially offset by the net proceeds of $186 million received from the issuance of our common stock through employee stock plans.
Cash used in financing was $767 million for the first half of fiscal 2008. In 2008, we repurchased 47 million shares of our common stock for $900 million, partially offset by the net proceeds of $130 million received from the issuance of our common stock through employee stock plans.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations during the six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the contractual obligations disclosed inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7, of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
There have been no significant changes in our market risk exposures during the six months ended October 3, 2008 as compared to the market risk exposures disclosed inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7A, of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
The SEC defines the term “disclosure controls and procedures” to mean a company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. “Disclosure controls and procedures” include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
(b) | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended October 3, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
(c) | Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls |
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected.
39
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
Information with respect to this Item may be found in Note 15 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in thisForm 10-Q, which information is incorporated into this Part II, Item 1 by reference.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
A description of the risks associated with our business, financial condition, and results of operations is set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008. There have been no material changes in our risks from such description.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Stock repurchases during the three months ended October 3, 2008 were as follows:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Total Number of | Maximum Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | Value of Shares That | |||||||||||||||
Under Publicly | May Yet Be | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price | Announced Plans | Purchased Under the | |||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | Paid per Share | or Programs | Plans or Programs | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
July 5, 2008 to August 1, 2008 | — | $ | — | — | $ | 800 | ||||||||||
August 2, 2008 to August 29, 2008 | 4,194,400 | $ | 21.92 | 4,194,400 | $ | 708 | ||||||||||
August 30, 2008 to October 3, 2008 | 5,120,600 | $ | 21.08 | 5,120,600 | $ | 600 | ||||||||||
Total | 9,315,000 | $ | 21.46 | 9,315,000 | ||||||||||||
For information with regard to our stock repurchase programs, including programs completed during the period covered by this report, see Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on September 22, 2008. At the meeting, our stockholders voted on the five proposals described below. All ten of our board nominees were elected under Proposal 1, and Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5 were also approved. Our stockholders cast their votes as follows:
Proposal 1: To elect ten directors to our Board of Directors, each to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal:
Nominee | For | Withheld | ||||||
John W. Thompson | 701,126,588 | 33,211,373 | ||||||
Michael A. Brown | 697,722,469 | 36,615,492 | ||||||
William T. Coleman | 703,903,233 | 30,434,728 | ||||||
Frank E. Dangeard | 710,240,835 | 24,097,126 | ||||||
Geraldine B. Laybourne | 704,745,816 | 29,592,145 | ||||||
David L. Mahoney | 703,894,050 | 30,443,911 | ||||||
Robert S. Miller | 664,207,570 | 70,130,391 | ||||||
George Reyes | 710,143,755 | 24,194,206 | ||||||
Daniel H. Schulman | 703,905,774 | 30,432,187 | ||||||
V. Paul Unruh | 704,056,857 | 30,281,104 |
40
Table of Contents
Proposal 2: To approve the amendment and restatement of our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, including the reservation of an additional 50,000,000 shares for issuance thereunder:
For | Against | Abstain | Broker Non-Votes | |||||||||||
488,969,755 | 134,981,882 | 6,423,130 | 103,963,194 |
Proposal 3: To approve the adoption of our 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, including the reservation of 20,000,000 shares for issuance thereunder:
For | Against | Abstain | Broker Non-Votes | |||||||||||
601,716,739 | 22,390,687 | 6,267,842 | 103,962,693 |
Proposal 4: To approve the material terms of the amended and restated Symantec Senior Executive Incentive Plan to preserve the deductibility under federal tax rules of awards made under the plan:
For | Against | Abstain | Broker Non-Votes | |||||||||||
605,367,770 | 18,641,008 | 6,366,490 | 103,962,693 |
Proposal 5: To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as Symantec’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2009 fiscal year:
For | Against | Abstain | Broker Non-Votes | |||||||||||
724,915,425 | 3,663,304 | 5,759,232 | — |
41
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exhibit | File | File | Filed with | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | Form | Number | Exhibit | Date | this 10-Q | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | .01* | Symantec Corporation 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended | 8-K | 000-17781 | 10.1 | 09/25/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | .02* | Symantec Corporation 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | 8-K | 000-17781 | 10.2 | 09/25/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | .03* | Symantec Senior Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | .04* | Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2004, between Symantec Corporation and Greg Hughes | S-4/A | 333-122724 | 10.08 | 05/18/05 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | .05* | Employment Agreement, dated January 26, 2007, between Symantec Corporation and Gregory Butterfield | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | .01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | .02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | .01† | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | .02† | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X |
* | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. | |
† | This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance with Item 601 ofRegulation S-K. |
42
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
(Registrant)
(Registrant)
By: | /s/ John W. Thompson |
John W. Thompson
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
By: | /s/ James A. Beer |
James A. Beer
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 7, 2008
43
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exhibit | File | File | Filed with | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | Form | Number | Exhibit | Date | this 10-Q | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | .01* | Symantec Corporation 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended | 8-K | 000-17781 | 10.1 | 09/25/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | .02* | Symantec Corporation 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | 8-K | 000-17781 | 10.2 | 09/25/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | .03* | Symantec Senior Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | .04* | Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2004, between Symantec Corporation and Greg Hughes | S-4/A | 333-122724 | 10.08 | 05/18/05 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | .05* | Employment Agreement, dated January 26, 2007, between Symantec Corporation and Gregory Butterfield | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | .01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | .02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | .01† | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | .02† | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X |
* | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. | |
† | This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance with Item 601 ofRegulation S-K. |