SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 10 - Loans Receivable - Continued
The following tables present newly restructured loans that occurred during the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
| | Six months ended June 30, 2016 | |
| | Rate Modification | | | Contracts | | | Combination Modifications | | | Contracts | | | Total | | | Total Contracts | |
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 624 | | | | 3 | | | $ | 624 | | | | 3 | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total loans | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 624 | | | | 3 | | | $ | 624 | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 624 | | | | 3 | | | $ | 624 | | | | 3 | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total loans | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 624 | | | | 3 | | | $ | 624 | | | | 3 | |
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 10 - Loans Receivable - Continued
| | Three months ended June 30, 2016 | |
| | Rate Modification | | | Contracts | | | Combination Modifications | | | Contracts | | | Total | | | Total Contracts | |
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total loans | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total loans | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | |
In addition, the TDR is evaluated for impairment loss. A determination is made as to whether an impaired TDR is cash flow or collateral dependent. If the TDR is cash flow dependent, an allowance for loan losses specific reserve is calculated based on the difference in net present value of future cash flows between the original and modified loan terms. If the TDR is collateral dependent, the collateral securing the TDR, which is always real estate, is evaluated for impairment based on either an appraisal or broker price opinion. If a TDR’s collateral valuation is less than its current loan balance, the TDR is written down for accounting purposes by the amount of the difference between the current loan balance and the collateral value. If the borrower performs under the terms of the modification, generally six consecutive months, and the ultimate collectability of all amounts contractually due under the modified terms is not in doubt, the loan is returned to accrual status. There are no loans that have been modified due to the financial difficulties of the borrower that are not considered a TDR. There were no TDR defaults during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 10 - Loans Receivable - Continued
The following tables present newly restructured loans that occurred during the six and three months ended June 30, 2015 (dollars in thousands):
| | Six months ended June 30, 2015 | |
| | Rate Modification | | | Contracts | | | Combination Modifications | | | Contracts | | | Total | | | Total Contracts | |
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 91 | | | | 1 | | | $ | 91 | | | | 1 | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total loans | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 91 | | | | 1 | | | $ | 91 | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 200 | | | | 2 | | | $ | 200 | | | | 2 | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total loans | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 200 | | | | 2 | | | $ | 200 | | | | 2 | |
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 10 - Loans Receivable - Continued
| | Three months ended June 30, 2015 | |
| | Rate Modification | | | Contracts | | | Combination Modifications | | | Contracts | | | Total | | | Total Contracts | |
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | 1 | | | $ | - | | | | 1 | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total loans | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | 1 | | | $ | - | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 200 | | | | 2 | | | $ | 200 | | | | 2 | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total loans | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 200 | | | | 2 | | | $ | 200 | | | | 2 | |
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 10 - Loans Receivable - Continued
Interest on TDRs was accounted for under the following methods as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):
| | Number of Contracts | | | Accrual Status | | | Number of Contracts | | | Non- Accrual Status | | | Total Number of Contracts | | | Total Modifications | |
June 30, 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | 54 | | | $ | 19,833 | | | | 2 | | | $ | 887 | | | | 56 | | | $ | 20,720 | |
Construction, acquisition and Development | | | 1 | | | | 70 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | 70 | |
Land | | | 6 | | | | 876 | | | | 1 | | | | 6 | | | | 7 | | | | 882 | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | 4 | | | | 2,431 | | | | 2 | | | | 250 | | | | 6 | | | | 2,681 | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | 4 | | | | 96 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4 | | | | 96 | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | 1 | | | | 9 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | 9 | |
Total loans | | | 70 | | | $ | 23,315 | | | | 5 | | | $ | 1,143 | | | | 75 | | | $ | 24,458 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage | | | 55 | | | $ | 20,831 | | | | 3 | | | $ | 1,071 | | | | 58 | | | $ | 21,902 | |
Construction, acquisition and development | | | 1 | | | | 71 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | 71 | |
Land | | | 6 | | | | 907 | | | | 1 | | | | 6 | | | | 7 | | | | 913 | |
Lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate | | | 4 | | | | 2,464 | | | | 2 | | | | 252 | | | | 6 | | | | 2,716 | |
Commercial non-real estate | | | 4 | | | | 103 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4 | | | | 103 | |
Home equity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Consumer | | | 1 | | | | 10 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | 10 | |
Total loans | | | 71 | | | $ | 24,386 | | | | 6 | | | $ | 1,329 | | | | 77 | | | $ | 25,715 | |
Unless otherwise noted, the Bank requires collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance-sheet credit risk (dollars in thousands).
Financial Instruments Whose Contract | | Contract Amount At | |
Amounts Represent Credit Risk | | June 30, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | |
Standby letters of credit | | $ | 4,397 | | | $ | 5,937 | |
Home equity lines of credit | | | 7,641 | | | | 7,467 | |
Unadvanced construction commitments | | | 20,117 | | | | 21,101 | |
Mortgage loan commitments | | | 8,763 | | | | 3,233 | |
Lines of credit | | | 29,440 | | | | 27,189 | |
Loans sold with limited repurchase provisions | | | 32,288 | | | | 65,107 | |
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 10 - Loans Receivable - Continued
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank guaranteeing performance by a customer to various municipalities. These guarantees are issued primarily to support performance arrangements, limited to real estate transactions. The majority of these standby letters of credit expire within the next twelve months. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending other loan commitments. The Bank requires collateral supporting these letters of credit as deemed necessary. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of such collateral would be sufficient to cover the maximum potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The current amount of the liability as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued was $99,000 and $115,000, respectively.
Home equity lines of credit are loan commitments to individuals as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments under home equity lines expire ten years after the date the loan closes and are secured by real estate. The Bank evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis.
Unadvanced construction commitments are loan commitments made to borrowers for both residential and commercial projects that are either in process or are expected to begin construction shortly.
Mortgage loan commitments not reflected in the accompanying statements of financial condition at June 30, 2016 included thirteen loan commitments totaling $8,763,000 at a fixed interest rate range of 3.25% to 4.50% and none at floating interest rates and at December 31, 2015 included seven loan commitments totaling $3,233,000 at a fixed interest rate range of 3.75% to 8.00% and none at floating interest rates.
Lines of credit are loan commitments to individuals and companies as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Lines of credit have a fixed expiration date. The Bank evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis.
The Bank has entered into several agreements to sell mortgage loans to third parties. The loans sold under these agreements for the six month period ended June 30, 2016 and year ended December 31, 2015 were $32,163,000 and $157,309,000, respectively. These agreements contain limited provisions that require the Bank to repurchase a loan if the loan becomes delinquent within the terms specified by the agreement. The credit risk involved in these financial instruments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
Only loans originated specifically for sale are recorded as held for sale at the period ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
No amount was recognized in the consolidated statement of financial condition at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 as a liability for credit loss related to these loans.
Except for the liability recorded for standby letters of credit of $99,000 at June 30, 2016 and $115,000 at December 31, 2015, liabilities for credit losses associated with these commitments were not material.
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 11 - Fair Values of Financial Instruments
A fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods is used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair market hierarchy are as follows:
| Level 1: | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
| Level 2: | Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
| Level 3: | Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity). |
An asset or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of Bancorp since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of Bancorp’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between Bancorp’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of Bancorp’s financial instruments at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Impaired Loans:
Impaired loans are carried at the lower of cost or the present value of expected future cash flows of the loan. If it is determined that the repayment of the loan will be provided solely by the underlying collateral, and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, the loan is considered collateral dependent. Impaired loans that are considered collateral dependent are carried at the lower of cost or the fair value of the underlying collateral. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The use of independent appraisals and management’s best judgment are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value measure of the underlying collateral and impaired loans are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
For such loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. For such loans that are classified as collateral dependent impaired loans, an allowance is established when the current market value of the underlying collateral less its estimated disposal costs has not been finalized, but management determines that it is likely that the value is lower than the carrying value of that loan. Once the net collateral value has been determined, a charge-off is taken for the difference between the net collateral value and the carrying value of the loan.
Impaired loans are those for which Bancorp has measured impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows or on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value consisted of the loan balances of $13,589,000 and $16,166,000 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, less their valuation allowances of $1,948,000 and $2,282,000 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The fair value of five impaired collateral-dependent loans that were partially charged off during the six months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $3,232,000 net of charge-offs of $145,000. The fair value of seven impaired collateral-dependent loans that were partially charged off during the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $3,219,000 net of charge-offs of $622,000.
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 11 - Fair Values of Financial Instruments - Continued
Foreclosed Real Estate:
Real estate acquired through foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated disposal costs. Management periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of the real estate acquired through foreclosure using current estimates of fair value. In the event of a subsequent decline, management provides a specific allowance to reduce real estate acquired through foreclosure to fair value less estimated disposal cost. Expenses incurred on foreclosed real estate prior to disposition are charged to expense. Gains or losses on the sale of foreclosed real estate are recognized upon disposition of the property.
Foreclosed real estate totaled $1,112,000 and $1,744,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The carrying value of foreclosed residential real estate included within foreclosed real estate totaled $592,000 and $543,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
Consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction totaled $2,977,000 and $1,487,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 11 - Fair Values of Financial Instruments – Continued
The following table sets forth financial assets that were accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring and recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
| | | | | June 30, 2016 Fair Value Measurement Using: | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Nonrecurring fair value measurements | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 14,873 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 14,873 | |
Foreclosed real estate | | | 360 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 360 | |
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements | | $ | 15,233 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 15,233 | |
Recurring fair value measurements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | $ | 486 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 486 | |
Rate lock commitments | | | 598 | | | | - | | | | 598 | | | | - | |
Mandatory forward contracts | | | (80 | ) | | | - | | | | (80 | ) | | | - | |
Total recurring fair value measurements | | $ | 1,004 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 518 | | | $ | 486 | |
| | | | | December 31, 2015 Fair Value Measurement Using: | |
| | December 31, 2015 | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Nonrecurring fair value measurements | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 17,103 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 17,103 | |
Foreclosed real estate | | | 543 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 543 | |
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements | | $ | 17,646 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 17,646 | |
Recurring fair value measurements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | $ | 623 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 623 | |
Rate lock commitments | | | 141 | | | | - | | | | 141 | | | | - | |
Mandatory forward contracts | | | 111 | | | | - | | | | 111 | | | | - | |
Total recurring fair value measurements | | $ | 875 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 252 | | | $ | 623 | |
There were no liabilities that were required to be re-measured on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 11 - Fair Values of Financial Instruments - Continued
The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which Bancorp has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
| | Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements | |
| | Fair Value Estimate | | Valuation Techniques | | Unobservable Input | | Range (Weighted Average) | |
June 30, 2016 | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | $ | 486 | | Market approach | | Weighted average prepayment speed | | | 8.53% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | $ | 623 | | Market approach | | Weighted average prepayment speed | | | 9.91% | |
All appraisals are reviewed by the credit department.
The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Bancorp has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
| | Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements | |
| | Fair Value Estimate | | Valuation Techniques | | Unobservable Input | | Range (Weighted Average) | |
June 30, 2016 | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 11,641 | | PV of future cash flows (1) | | Discount rate | | | -6.00% | |
| | | 3,232 | | Appraisal of collateral (2) | | Liquidation expenses (3) | | | -6.00% | |
Foreclosed real estate | | $ | 360 | | Appraisal of collateral (2),(4) | | Appraisal adjustments (3) | | -6.54% to -15.11% (-14.66%) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 13,884 | | PV of future cash flows (1) | | Discount rate | | | -6.00% | |
| | $ | 3,219 | | Appraisal of collateral (2) | | Liquidation expenses (3) | | | -6.00% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreclosed real estate | | $ | 543 | | Appraisal of collateral (2),(4) | | Appraisal adjustments (3) | | -6.12% to -7.31% (-6.24%) | |
| (1) | Cash flow which generally includes various level 3 inputs which are not identifiable. |
| (2) | Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals for the underlying collateral, which generally include various level 3 inputs which are not identifiable. |
| (3) | Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal. |
| (4) | Includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses. |
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 11 - Fair Values of Financial Instruments – Continued
The estimated fair values of Bancorp's financial instruments as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:
| | | | | Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2016 | |
| | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Financial Assets | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 48,675 | | | $ | 48,675 | | | $ | 48,7675 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Investment securities (HTM) | | | 72,580 | | | | 73,987 | | | | - | | | | 73,987 | | | | | |
Loans held for sale | | | 13,380 | | | | 13,471 | | | | - | | | | 13,471 | | | | - | |
Loans receivable, net | | | 609,096 | | | | 613,252 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 613,252 | |
FHLB stock | | | 5,995 | | | | 5,995 | | | | - | | | | 5,995 | | | | - | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 2,262 | | | | 2,262 | | | | - | | | | 2,262 | | | | - | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | | 486 | | | | 486 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 486 | |
Rate lock commitments | | | 598 | | | | 598 | | | | - | | | | 598 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | $ | 539,677 | | | $ | 540,505 | | | | - | | | $ | 540,505 | | | | - | |
FHLB advances | | | 125,000 | | | | 121,175 | | | | - | | | | 121,175 | | | | - | |
Subordinated debentures | | | 24,119 | | | | 24,119 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 24,119 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 408 | | | | 408 | | | | - | | | | 408 | | | | - | |
Mandatory forward contracts | | | 80 | | | | 80 | | | | - | | | | 80 | | | | - | |
Off Balance Sheet Commitments | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2015 | |
| | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Financial Assets | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 43,591 | | | $ | 43,591 | | | $ | 43,591 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Investment securities (HTM) | | | 76,133 | | | | 76,310 | | | | - | | | | 76,310 | | | | - | |
Loans held for sale | | | 13,203 | | | | 13,295 | | | | - | | | | 13,295 | | | | - | |
Loans receivable, net | | | 589,656 | | | | 593,742 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 593,742 | |
FHLB stock | | | 5,626 | | | | 5,626 | | | | - | | | | 5,626 | | | | - | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 2,218 | | | | 2,218 | | | | - | | | | 2,218 | | | | - | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | | 623 | | | | 623 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 623 | |
Rate lock commitments | | | 141 | | | | 141 | | | | - | | | | 141 | | | | - | |
Mandatory forward contracts | | | 111 | | | | 111 | | | | - | | | | 111 | | | | - | |
Financial Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | $ | 523,771 | | | $ | 524,458 | | | | - | | | | 524,458 | | | | - | |
FHLB advances | | | 115,000 | | | | 110,759 | | | | - | | | | 110,759 | | | | - | |
Subordinated debentures | | | 24,119 | | | | 24,119 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 24,119 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 3,137 | | | | 3,137 | | | | - | | | | 3,137 | | | | - | |
Off Balance Sheet Commitments | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 11 - Fair Values of Financial Instruments – Continued
The following methods and assumptions were used to measure the fair value of financial instruments recorded at cost on Bancorp’s consolidated balance sheet:
Cash and cash equivalents:
The carrying amount reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets’ fair values.
Investment Securities:
Bancorp utilizes a third party source to determine the fair value of its securities. The methodology consists of pricing models based on asset class and includes available trade, bid, other market information, broker quotes, proprietary models, various databases and trading desk quotes. All Bancorp’s investments are considered Level 2.
Loans held for sale:
The fair value of loans held for sale is based primarily on investor quotes.
Loans receivable:
The fair values of loans receivable were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. These rates were used for each aggregated category of loans as reported on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Quarterly Report.
FHLB stock:
The carrying amount of FHLB stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the FHLB. There have been no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the FHLB stock. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that our FHLB stock was not impaired at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Accrued interest receivable and payable:
The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates their fair values.
Derivative Instruments:
Mortgage banking derivatives used in the ordinary course of business primarily consist of mandatory forward sales contracts (“forward contract”) and rate lock commitments. The fair value of Bancorp’s derivative instruments is primarily measured by obtaining pricing from broker-dealers recognized to be market participants. The pricing is derived from market observable inputs that can generally be verified and do not typically involve significant judgment by Bancorp. Forward contracts and rate lock loan commitments are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy
Mortgage servicing rights:
The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is determined using a valuation model administered by a third party that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The model incorporates assumptions that market participants use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, default rates, cost to service (including delinquency and foreclosure costs), escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income and other ancillary income such as late fees. Management reviews all significant assumptions on a monthly basis. Mortgage loan prepayment speed, a key assumption in the model, is the annual rate at which borrowers are forecasted to repay their mortgage loan principal. The discount rate used to determine the present value of estimated future net servicing income, another key assumption in the model, is an estimate of the required rate of return investors in the market would require for an asset with similar risk. Both assumptions can, and generally will, change as market conditions and interest rates change.
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 11 - Fair Values of Financial Instruments – Continued
Deposit liabilities:
The fair values disclosed for demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies market interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
FHLB advances:
Fair values of long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on rates currently available for advances from the FHLB with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Subordinated debentures:
Current economic conditions have rendered the market for this liability inactive. As such, Bancorp is unable to determine a good estimate of fair value. Since the rate paid on the debentures held is lower than what would be required to secure an interest in the same debt at year end and we are unable to obtain a current fair value, Bancorp has disclosed that the carrying value approximates the fair value.
Off-balance sheet financial instruments:
Fair values for Bancorp’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are not significant and are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.
Note 12 - Income Taxes
There was an $11,194,000 income tax benefit recorded for the second quarter of 2016 compared to a $35,000 tax expense for the second quarter of 2015. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the income tax benefit was $11,194,000 compared to income tax expense of $36,000 for the same period in 2015. The income tax benefit in 2016 was primarily due to the reversal of an $11,837,000 valuation allowance previously recorded against the net deferred tax asset. This valuation allowance was first recorded in the third quarter of 2013 due to the uncertainty of whether or not the Bancorp would be able to realize the asset.
In assessing Bancorp’s ability to realize its net deferred tax asset, Management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax asset will or will not be realized. Bancorp’s ultimate realization of the net deferred tax asset is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the nature and amount of historical and projected future taxable income, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and available tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The amount of net deferred taxes recognized could be impacted by changes to any of these variables.
Each quarter, Bancorp weighs both the positive and negative information and analyzes its position of whether or not a valuation allowance is required. Over the past several quarters, the positive information has been increasing while the negative information has been decreasing. Over the last eight quarters, the Bancorp has demonstrated consistent earnings while its level of non-performing assets has steadily decreased. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Bank and The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have terminated their formal agreements with Bancorp, reducing regulatory risk.
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 12 - Income Taxes - Continued
Given the consistent earnings and improving asset quality, Bancorp’s analysis has now concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, it is more likely than not that it will generate sufficient taxable income within the applicable carry-forward periods to realize its net deferred tax asset. As such, the full valuation allowance of $11,837,000 was reversed to income tax expense at June 30, 2016. Bancorp’s net deferred tax asset was $11,239,000 as of June 30, 2016.
Note 13 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Under ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries under U.S. GAAP, including those that previously followed industry-specific guidance. The revenue standard’s core principal is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. The new standard applies to all public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that year. Bancorp has evaluated the effect of ASU 2014-09 and believes adoption will not have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Under ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, the new revenue standard clarifies the principal versus agent implementation guidance, but does not change the core principle of the new standard. The updates to the principal versus agent guidance:
| • | require an entity to determine whether it is a principal or an agent for each distinct good or service (or a distinct bundle of goods or services) to be provided to the customer; |
| • | illustrate how an entity that is a principal might apply the control principle to goods, services, or rights to services, when another party is involved in providing goods or services to a customer; |
| • | clarify that the purpose of certain specific control indicators is to support or assist in the assessment of whether an entity controls a good or service before it is transferred to the customer, provide more specific guidance on how the indicators should be considered, and clarify that their relevance will vary depending on the facts and circumstances; and |
| • | revise existing examples and add two new ones to more clearly depict how the guidance should be applied. |
Bancorp is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Under ASU 2016-01, Amendment to the Recognition and Measurement Guidance for Financial Instruments, an entity is required to: (i) measure equity investments at fair value through net income, with certain exceptions; (ii) present in Other Comprehensive Income the changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured using the fair value option; (iii) present financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset; (iv) calculate the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes based on an exit price and; (v) assess a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses of Available For Sale debt securities in combination with other deferred tax assets. The Amendment provides an election to subsequently measure certain nonmarketable equity investments at cost less any impairment and adjusted for certain observable price changes. The Amendment also requires a qualitative impairment assessment of such equity investments and amends certain fair value disclosure requirements. The new standard takes effect in 2018 for public companies. Early adoption is only permitted for the provision related to instrument-specific credit risk and the fair value disclosure exemption provided to nonpublic entities. Bancorp has evaluated the effect of ASU 2016-01 and believes adoption will not have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
SEVERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Annapolis, Maryland
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED
Note 13 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Continued
Under ASU 2016-09 Stock Compensation, introduces targeted amendments intended to simplify the accounting for stock compensation. Specifically, the ASU requires all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The tax effects of exercised or vested awards should be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. An entity also should recognize excess tax benefits, and assess the need for a valuation allowance, regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. That is, off balance sheet accounting for net operating losses stemming from excess tax benefits would no longer be required and instead such net operating losses would be recognized when they arise. Existing net operating losses that are currently tracked off balance sheet would be recognized, net of a valuation allowance if required, through an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. Entities will no longer need to maintain and track an “APIC pool.” The ASU also requires excess tax benefits to be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows.
In addition, the ASU elevates the statutory tax withholding threshold to qualify for equity classification up to the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdiction(s). The ASU also clarifies that cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity.
The ASU provides an optional accounting policy election (with limited exceptions), to be applied on an entity-wide basis, to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (consistent with existing U.S. GAAP) or account for forfeitures when they occur.
Bancorp is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Bancorp is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Under ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses the ASU sets forth a “current expected credit loss” (CECL) model which requires Bancorp to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and applies to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Bancorp is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The Company
Bancorp is a savings and loan holding company chartered as a corporation in the state of Maryland in 1990. It conducts business primarily through two subsidiaries, Severn Savings Bank, FSB (“Bank”) and SBI Mortgage Company (“SBI”). The Bank’s principal subsidiary Louis Hyatt, Inc. (“Hyatt Commercial”), conducts business as Hyatt Commercial, a commercial real estate brokerage and property management company. SBI holds mortgages that do not meet the underwriting criteria of the Bank, and is the parent company of Crownsville Development Corporation (“Crownsville”), which is doing business as Annapolis Equity Group, which acquires real estate for syndication and investment purposes. The Bank has four branches in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, which offer a full range of deposit products, and originate mortgages in its primary market of Anne Arundel County, Maryland and, to a lesser extent, in other parts of Maryland, Delaware and Virginia.
Bank Competition
The Annapolis, Maryland area has a high density of financial institutions, many of which are significantly larger and have greater financial resources than the Bank, and all of which are competitors of the Bank to varying degrees. The Bank’s competition for loans comes primarily from savings and loan associations, savings banks, mortgage banking companies, insurance companies and commercial banks. Its most direct competition for deposits has historically come from savings and loan associations, savings banks, commercial banks and credit unions. The Bank faces additional competition for deposits from money market mutual funds and corporate and government securities funds and investments. The Bank also faces increased competition for deposits from other financial institutions such as brokerage firms and insurance companies. The Bank is a community-oriented financial institution serving its market area with a wide selection of mortgage loan products. Management considers the Bank’s reputation and customer service to be a major competitive advantage in attracting and retaining customers in its market area. The Bank also believes it benefits from its community orientation.
Forward Looking Statements
In addition to the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein include, but are not limited to, those with respect to the Bank’s strategy; management’s determination of the amount of the loan loss allowance; the effect of changes in interest rates; changes in deposit insurance premiums; ability to meet obligations; and legal proceedings. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “guidance,” “potential,” “continue,” “project,” “forecast,” “confident,” and similar expressions are typically used to identify forward-looking statements. Bancorp’s operations and actual results could differ significantly from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to: changes in general economic conditions and political conditions and by governmental monetary and fiscal policies; changes in the economic conditions of the geographic areas in which Bancorp conducts business; changes in interest rates; a downturn in the real estate markets in which Bancorp conducts business; the high degree of risk exhibited by Bancorp’s loan portfolio; environmental liabilities with respect to properties Bancorp has title; changes in federal and state regulation; the effects of the supervisory agreements entered into by each of Bancorp and the Bank; Bancorp’s ability to estimate loan losses; competition; breaches in security or interruptions in Bancorp’s information systems; Bancorp’s ability to timely develop and implement technology; Bancorp’s ability to retain its management team; perception of Bancorp in the market place; Bancorp’s ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures; and terrorist attacks and threat of actual war; and other factors detailed from time to time in Bancorp’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including “Item 1A. Risk Factors” contained in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
Critical Accounting Policies
Bancorp’s significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 1 of the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015 which were included in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Of these significant accounting policies, Bancorp considers its policies regarding the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of foreclosed real estate, the evaluation of other than temporary impairment of investment securities and the valuation of the deferred tax asset to be its most critical accounting policies, given the uncertainty in evaluating the level of the allowance required to cover credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio and the material effect that such judgments can have on the results of operations and future taxable income. In addition, changes in economic conditions can have a significant impact on real estate values of underlying collateral affecting the allowance for loan losses and therefore the provision for loan losses and results of operations as well as the valuation of foreclosed real estate. Bancorp has developed policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio. Bancorp’s assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of regulatory examinations, and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers that is not known to management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements.
Overview
Bancorp provides a wide range of personal and commercial banking services. Personal services include various lending services as well as checking, individual retirement accounts, money market, savings and time deposit accounts. Commercial services include commercial secured and unsecured lending services as well as business internet banking, corporate cash management services and deposit services. Bancorp also provides ATMs, debit cards, internet banking including on-line bill pay, mortgage lending, safe deposit boxes, and telephone banking, among other products and services.
Bancorp had net income of $13,382,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $2,230,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, primarily due to an $11,194,000 income tax benefit as a result of the reversal of the valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax asset previously recorded. The reversal resulted in the recognition of a one-time tax benefit in the second quarter of approximately $11,837,000. Bancorp has now concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, it is more likely than not that it will generate sufficient taxable income within the applicable carry-forward periods to realize its net deferred tax assets.
Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income from earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the interest expense incurred on interest bearing liabilities, such as deposits, borrowings and subordinated debentures. We also generate non-interest income, including, among other sources, mortgage banking activities, real estate commissions and management fees, and service charges on deposit accounts. Our non-interest expense consists primarily of employee compensation and benefits, net occupancy expense and other operating expenses.
If interest rates increase, demand for borrowing may decrease and Bancorp’s interest rate spread could decrease. Bancorp will continue to manage loan and deposit pricing against the risks of rising costs of its deposits and borrowings. Interest rates are outside the control of Bancorp, so it must attempt to balance its pricing and duration of its loan portfolio against the risks of rising costs of its deposits and borrowings.
The continued success and attraction of Anne Arundel County, Maryland, and vicinity, will also be important to Bancorp’s ability to originate and grow mortgage loans and deposits, as will Bancorp’s continued focus on maintaining a low overhead.
If the volatility in the market and the economy worsens, our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to funds and the price of our stock could be materially and adversely impacted.
Results of Operations
Net income increased by $11,110,000 to net income of $12,475,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to net income of $1,365,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $1.02 for the second quarter of 2016 compared to $0.08 for the second quarter of 2015. Net income increased by $11,152,000 to net income of $13,382,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to net income of $2,230,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $1.13 and $1.12, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $0.10 for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Net interest income, which is interest earned net of interest expense, increased by $5,000, or 0.1%, to $5,541,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $5,536,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Net interest income decreased $419,000, or 3.7%, to $10,776,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $11,195,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The primary reason for this decrease was a decrease in the yield on the loan portfolio.
Bancorp’s loan portfolio is subject to varying degrees of credit risk and an allowance for loan losses is maintained to absorb losses inherent in its loan portfolio. Credit risk includes, but is not limited to, the potential for borrower default and the failure of collateral to be worth what Bancorp determined it was worth at the time of the granting of the loan. Bancorp monitors its loan delinquencies at least monthly. All loans that are delinquent and all loans within the various categories of Bancorp’s portfolio as a group are evaluated. Bancorp’s Board, with the advice and recommendation of Bancorp’s management, estimates an allowance to be set aside for loan losses. Included in determining the calculation are such factors as historical losses for each loan portfolio, current market value of the loan’s underlying collateral, inherent risk contained within the portfolio after considering the state of the general economy, economic trends, consideration of particular risks inherent in different kinds of lending and consideration of known information that may affect loan collectability.
The provision for loan losses stayed the same at $100,000 for the second quarter of 2016 and for the second quarter of 2015. The provision for loan losses decreased by $100,000, or 50.0%, to $100,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $200,000 for the same period in 2015. This decrease was primarily due to an improvement in the loan portfolio quality, a lower level of net charge-offs and lower loan delinquencies in 2016 compared to 2015.
Total non-interest income decreased by $489,000, or 21.0%, to $1,843,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $2,332,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Total non-interest income decreased by $168,000, or 5.2%, to $3,064,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $3,232,000 for the same period in 2015. The primary reasons for these decreases in non-interest income were a decrease in mortgage banking activities partially offset by an increase in real estate commissions and management fees, and an increase in fair value of interest rate lock commitments and mandatory contracts entered into by the Bank. Mortgage banking activities decreased $609,000, or 64.2%, to $340,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $949,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Mortgage banking activities decreased $387,000, or 27.3%, to $1,032,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $1,419,000 for the same period in 2015. These decreases were the result of lower mortgage origination production and a decrease in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights. Real estate commissions increased by $182,000, or 37.1%, to $673,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $491,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Real estate commissions increased $193,000, or 32.3%, to $791,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $598,000 for the same period in 2015. The increase in real estate commissions was due to increased commercial sales and leasing activity in 2016 compared to 2015. Real estate management fees increased by $18,000, or 10.8%, to $185,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $167,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Real estate management fees increased $25,000, or 7.7%, to $350,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $325,000 for the same period in 2015. These increases are due to a higher level of commercial property under management in 2016 compared to 2015. Other non-interest income decreased $80,000, or 11.0%, to $645,000 for the second quarter of 2015, compared to $725,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Other non-interest income increased $1,000, or 0.1%, to $891,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $890,000 for the for the same period in 2015. The primary reason for the second quarter decrease was due to the timing of certain fees collected from borrowers and income booked in 2016 for the change in fair value of interest rate lock commitments and mandatory contracts entered into by the Bank.
Total non-interest expenses decreased $365,000, or 5.7%, to $6,003,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $6,368,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Total non-interest expenses decreased $409,000, or 3.4%, to $11,552,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $11,961,000 for the same period in 2015. Compensation and related expenses decreased by $277,000, or 6.8%, to $3,814,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $4,091,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Compensation and related expenses decreased by $451,000, or 5.7%, to $7,450,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $7,901,000 for the same period in 2015. This was primarily due to lower commissions paid on lower mortgage banking activities in 2016 compared to 2015. Net occupancy costs decreased by $4,000, or 0.9%, to $449,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $453,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Net occupancy costs increased by $23,000, or 2.6%, to $901,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $878,000 for the same period in 2015. These variances were the result of the timing of maintenance costs in 2016 compared to 2015, partially offset by an increase in rents collected from tenants. Legal fees decreased by $61,000, or 91.0%, to $6,000 for the second quarter of 2015, compared to $67,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Legal fees increased $7,000, or 5.4%, to $136,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $129,000 for the same period in 2015. These variances were primarily due to the timing of services needed from outside legal firms in 2016 compared to 2015. Foreclosed real estate, net increased by $46,000, or 88.5%, to $98,000 for the second quarter of 2015 compared to $52,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Foreclosed real estate, net increased by $156,000 to $143,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to ($13,000) for the same period in 2015. These increases were primarily due to higher losses and expenses on properties sold in 2016, compared to 2015. FDIC assessments and regulatory expense decreased by $128,000, or 43.8% to $164,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $292,000 for the second quarter of 2015. FDIC assessments and regulatory expense decreased by $316,000, or 51.8% to $294,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $610,000 for the same period in 2015. These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in the risk-based assessment charged by the FDIC due to Bancorp’s release from its regulatory agreements. Professional fees stayed constant at $235,000 for the second quarter of 2016 and for the second quarter of 2015. Professional fees decreased by $94,000, or 18.8% to $407,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $501,000 for the same period in 2015. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in consulting related fees during the first quarter of 2016. Advertising increased $7,000, to $208,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $201,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Advertising decreased by $2,000, or 0.6% to $341,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $343,000 for the same period in 2015. Online charges increased $45,000, or 22.7%, to $243,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $198,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Online charges increased by $93,000, or 22.9% to $500,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $407,000 for the same period in 2015. These increases were primarily due to additional online products offered to customers in 2016 compared to 2015. Credit report and appraisal fees decreased $117,000, or 33.8%, to $229,000 for the second quarter of 2016, compared to $346,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Credit report and appraisal fees decreased by $144,000, or 30.3% to $332,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $476,000 for the same period in 2015. These decreases were primarily due to a lower volume of credit reports and appraisals ordered due to the decrease in mortgage banking activities in 2016 compared to 2015. Other non-interest expenses increased by $124,000, or 28.6%, to $557,000 for the second quarter of 2016 compared to $433,000 for the second quarter of 2015. Other non-interest expenses increased by $319,000, or 43.8% to $1,048,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $729,000 for the same period in 2015. These increases were primarily due to a decrease in the provision for contingent liabilities and the fair value of mandatory contracts.
Income Taxes
There was an $11,194,000 income tax benefit recorded for the second quarter of 2016 compared to a $35,000 tax expense for the second quarter of 2015. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the income tax benefit was $11,194,000 compared to income tax expense of $36,000 for the same period in 2015. The income tax benefit in 2016 was primarily due to the reversal of an $11,837,000 valuation allowance previously recorded against the net deferred tax asset. This valuation allowance was first recorded in the third quarter of 2013.
In assessing the Bancorp’s ability to realize its net deferred tax asset, Management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax asset will or will not be realized. Bancorp’s ultimate realization of the net deferred tax asset is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the nature and amount of historical and projected future taxable income, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and available tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The amount of net deferred taxes recognized could be impacted by changes to any of these variables.
Bancorp has now concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, it is more likely than not that it will generate sufficient taxable income within the applicable carry-forward periods to realize its net deferred tax asset. The Bancorp’s net deferred tax asset was $11,239,000 as of June 30, 2016 and is included in the other assets category within the financial statements.
Analysis of Financial Condition
Total assets increased $32,063,000, or 4.2%, to $794,142,000 at June 30, 2016, compared to $762,079,000 at December 31, 2015. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $5,084,000, or 11.7%, to $48,675,000 at June 30, 2015, compared to $43,591,000 at December 31, 2015. This increase was primarily due to a higher level of deposits at June 30, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015. Loans receivable, net increased $19,440,000, or 3.3%, to $609,096,000 at June 30, 2016, compared to $589,656,000 at December 31, 2015. This increase was due to a continued higher demand for commercial loans during 2016 compared to 2015. Loans held for sale increased $177,000, or 1.3%, to $13,380,000 at June 30, 2016, compared to $13,203,000 at December 31, 2015. This increase was primarily due to the timing of loans sold through June 30, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015. Foreclosed real estate decreased $632,000, or 36.2%, to $1,112,000 at June 30, 2016 compared to $1,744,000 at December 31, 2015. This decrease was the result of additional properties sold and less properties foreclosed on during 2016 compared to 2015.
Total liabilities increased $18,998,000 or 2.8%, to $694,621,000 from $675,623,000 at December 31, 2015. Total deposits increased $15,906,000, or 3.0%, to $539,677,000 at June 30, 2016 compared to $523,771,000 at December 31, 2015. This increase was primarily due to an increase in deposits from commercial relationships. Long-term and short-term borrowings increased by $10,000,000, or 8.7%, to $125,000,000 at June 30, 2016 compared to $115,000,000 at December 31, 2015. The increase was due to a $10,000,000 90-day FHLB short-term advance obtained in May 2016 to help fund increased loan demand. This advance, as well as other borrowings, will begin to mature in August, 2016. Accrued interest payables and other liabilities decreased $6,908,000, or 54.3%, to $5,825,000 at June 30, 2016 compared to $12,733,000 at December 31, 2015. This decrease is due to the payment of the TARP and Trust Preferred accruals for dividends and interest.
Stockholders’ Equity
Total stockholders’ equity increased $13,065,000 to $99,521,000 at June 30, 2016 compared to $86,456,000 as of December 31, 2015. This increase was primarily a result of Bancorp raising $10,510,000 of new common equity by entering into subscription agreements with various purchasers under which it issued a total of 2,015,500 shares of its common stock at a price of $5.50 per share, and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016, partially offset by the redemption of $10,000,000 of its Series B Preferred Stock and dividends declared on Bancorp’s preferred stock.
Liquidity
Bancorp’s liquidity is determined by its ability to raise funds through several sources including borrowed funds, capital, deposits, loan repayments, maturing investments and the sale of loans.
In assessing its liquidity, the management of Bancorp considers operating requirements, anticipated deposit flows, expected funding of loans, deposit maturities and borrowing availability, so that sufficient funds may be available on short notice to meet obligations as they arise or to permit Bancorp to take advantage of business opportunities.
Management believes Bancorp has sufficient cash flow and liquidity to meet its current commitments through the next 12 months. Certificates of deposit, which are scheduled to mature in less than one year, totaled $164,379,000 at June 30, 2016. Based on past experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with Bancorp. At June 30, 2016, Bancorp had commitments to originate mortgage loans of $8,763,000, unadvanced home equity lines of credit of $7,641,000, unadvanced construction commitments of $20,117,000, unused lines of credit of $29,440,000 and commitments under standby letters of credit of $4,397,000. Bancorp has the ability to reduce its commitments for new loan originations, adjust other cash outflows, and borrow from FHLB Atlanta should the need arise. As of June 30, 2016, outstanding FHLB Atlanta borrowings totaled $125,000,000, and Bancorp had available to it an additional $65,458,000 in borrowing availability from FHLB Atlanta.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,861,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to net cash provided by operating activities in the amount of $909,000 for the same period in 2015, an increase in cash provided by operating activities of $952,000. This change was primarily the result of the reversal of the allowance on the net deferred tax asset, partially offset by an increase in net income and a decrease in accrued interest and dividend payables for the payment of the Series B Preferred Stock and 2035 Debentures for cumulative dividends and interest. Net cash used in investing activities was $15,721,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $14,111,000 of net cash provided by investing activities for the same period in 2015, a decrease in cash provided by investing of $29,832,000. This change was primarily due to a net increase in loans receivable of $20,025,000. Net cash provided by financing activities increased $18,550,000 to $18,944,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $394,000 used in financing activities for the same period in 2015. This increase was primarily due to net proceeds received from the issuance of common stock in 2016 and the FHLB advance, and an increase in customer deposits, partially offset by the redemption of $10,000,000 of Series B Preferred Stock and dividends paid on Preferred Stock in the amount of $7,472,000.
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta Line of Credit
The Bank has an available line of credit, secured by various loans in its portfolio, in the amount of twenty five percent of its total assets, with the FHLB Atlanta. As of June 30, 2016, the total available line of credit with the FHLB Atlanta was approximately $190,458,000, of which $125,000,000 was outstanding in the form of long-term and short-term borrowings. The Bank, from time to time, utilizes the line of credit when interest rates are more favorable than obtaining deposits from the public.
The following table sets forth information concerning the interest rates and maturity dates of the advances from the FHLB Atlanta as of June 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Principal Amount | | | Rate | | | Maturity | |
$ | 25,000 | | | 0.51% to 1.83% | | | | 2016 | |
| 70,000 | | | 2.43% to 4.05% | | | | 2017 | |
| 15,000 | | | 2.58% to 3.43% | | | | 2018 | |
| 15,000 | | | | 4.00% | | | | 2019 | |
$ | 125,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Subordinated Debentures
As of June 30, 2016, Bancorp had outstanding $20,619,000 principal amount of Junior Subordinated Debt Securities Due 2035 (the “2035 Debentures”). The 2035 Debentures were issued pursuant to an Indenture dated as of December 17, 2004 (the “2035 Indenture”) between Bancorp and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. The 2035 Debentures pay interest quarterly at a floating rate of interest of LIBOR (0.63% as of June 30, 2016) plus 200 basis points, and mature on January 7, 2035. Payments of principal, interest, premium and other amounts under the 2035 Debentures are subordinated and junior in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all senior indebtedness of Bancorp, as defined in the 2035 Indenture. The 2035 Debentures became redeemable, in whole or in part, by Bancorp on January 7, 2010.
The 2035 Debentures were issued and sold to Severn Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), of which 100% of the common equity is owned by Bancorp. The Trust was formed for the purpose of issuing corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable Capital Securities (“Capital Securities”) to third-party investors and using the proceeds from the sale of such Capital Securities to purchase the 2035 Debentures. The 2035 Debentures held by the Trust are the sole assets of the Trust. Distributions on the Capital Securities issued by the Trust are payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the interest rate being earned by the Trust on the 2035 Debentures. The Capital Securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the 2035 Debentures. Bancorp has entered into an agreement which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantees the Capital Securities subject to the terms of the guarantee. Under the terms of the 2035 Indenture, Bancorp is permitted to defer the payment of interest on the 2035 Debentures for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods provided that no event of default has occurred and is continuing. At December 31, 2015, the 2035 Debenture had deferred interest of $1,863,000. As of June 30, 2016, Bancorp is current on all interest due on the 2035 Debenture.
Under the terms of Bancorp’s 2035 Indenture, if Bancorp defers payments of interest on the 2035 Debentures, Bancorp may not, among other things, declare or pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire, or make a liquidation payment with respect to, any of its capital stock, including common stock until all such deferred interest has been paid.
On November 15, 2008, Bancorp completed a private placement offering consisting of a total of 70 units, at an offering price of $100,000 per unit, for gross proceeds of $7.0 million. Each unit consists of 6,250 shares of Bancorp's Series A 8.0% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock and Bancorp's Subordinated Note in the original principal amount of $50,000.
The aggregate principal amount of Subordinated Notes outstanding at June 30, 2016 was $3,500,000. The Subordinated Notes earn interest at an annual rate of 8.0%, payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of March, June, September and December commencing December 31, 2008. The Subordinated Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at the option of Bancorp at any time beginning on December 31, 2009 until maturity, which is December 31, 2018. Debt issuance costs totaled $245,000 and are being amortized over 10 years. Interest payments on the Subordinated Notes were current as of June 30, 2016.
Common Stock
In April 2016, Bancorp issued a total of 2,015,500 shares of its common stock at a price of $5.50 per share to various purchasers in a private placement exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Regulation D of the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The offering resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $11,085,000. Costs related to the issuance of the common stock totaled approximately $575,000 and were netted against the proceeds. Proceeds from the private placement were used in part to pay all accrued and unpaid interest on 2035 Debentures and Series B Preferred Stock, and dividends on Bancorp’s Series B Preferred Stock, partially redeem its Series B Preferred Stock, and for general corporate and working capital purposes.
Preferred Stock
Bancorp issued a total of 437,500 shares of its Series A 8.0% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) as part of the private placement offering completed on November 15, 2008. The liquidation preference is $8.00 per share. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holder into one share of Bancorp’s common stock, subject to adjustment upon certain corporate events. The initial conversion rate is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $8.00 per share of Bancorp’s common stock. At the option of Bancorp, on and after December 31, 2013, at any time and from time to time, some or all of the Series A Preferred Stock may be converted into shares of Bancorp’s common stock at the then-applicable conversion rate. Costs related to the issuance of the preferred stock totaled $247,000 and were netted against the proceeds.
If declared by Bancorp's board of directors, cash dividends at an annual rate of 8.0% will be paid quarterly in arrears on the last day of March, June, September and December commencing December 31, 2008. Dividends will not be paid on Bancorp’s common stock in any quarter until the dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock has been paid for such quarter; however, there is no requirement that Bancorp's board of directors declare any dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock and any unpaid dividends shall not be cumulative. On June 30, 2016, Bancorp declared and paid a dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock in the aggregate amount of $70,000. Prior to that, Bancorp had not paid a dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock since the first quarter of 2012.
On November 21, 2008, Bancorp entered into an agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), pursuant to which Bancorp issued and sold (i) 23,393 shares of its Series B Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share and liquidation preference $1,000 per share, (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) and (ii) a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 556,976 shares of Bancorp’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $23,393,000. Costs related to the issuance of the preferred stock and warrants totaled $45,000 and were netted against the proceeds. On September 25, 2013, the Treasury sold all of its 23,393 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to outside investors as part of their ongoing efforts to wind down and recover its remaining investments under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP’). The terms of the Series B Preferred Stock remain the same. The Treasury continues to hold a warrant to purchase 556,976 shares of Bancorp’s common stock.
The Series B Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative compounding dividends at a rate of 9% per annum. The Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed by Bancorp. On May 11, 2016, Bancorp redeemed 10,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock for a payment of $10,000,000 and has 13,393 shares still outstanding as of June 30, 2016.
On April 15, 2016, Bancorp paid all unpaid cumulative dividends and interest in arrears on the Series B Preferred Stock totaling $7,590,000. On May 11, 2016, Bancorp declared and paid a dividend of $326,000 on the Series B Preferred Stock.
The Series B Preferred Stock has no maturity date and ranks pari passu with Bancorp’s existing Series A Preferred Stock, in terms of dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of Bancorp.
The Series B Preferred Stock is non-voting, other than class voting rights on certain matters that could adversely affect the Series B Preferred Stock. If dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock have not been paid for an aggregate of six quarterly dividend periods or more, whether consecutive or not, Bancorp’s authorized number of directors will be automatically increased by two and the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock, voting together with holders of any then outstanding voting parity stock, will have the right to elect those directors at Bancorp’s next annual meeting of stockholders or at a special meeting of stockholders called for that purpose. These preferred share directors will be elected annually and serve until all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock have been paid. In connection with the sale by the Treasury of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Federal Reserve obtained waivers from the outside investors who purchased the Series B Preferred Stock in which such investors agreed not to exercise their right to elect directors, and certain other voting or control rights, without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve.
The Warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $6.30 per share of Common Stock. The exercise price and number of shares subject to the Warrant are both subject to anti-dilution adjustments. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Treasury has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of Common Stock issued upon exercise of the Warrant.
Bancorp’s ability to declare dividends on its common stock are limited by the terms of Bancorp’s Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock. Bancorp may not declare or pay any dividend on, make any distributions relating to, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make a liquidation payment relating to, or make any guarantee payment with respect to its common stock in any quarter until the dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock has been declared and paid for such quarter, subject to certain minor exceptions. Additionally Bancorp may not declare or pay any dividend or distribution on its common stock, and Bancorp may not purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration any of its common stock, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods, including the latest completed dividend period, on all outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock have been or are contemporaneously declared and paid in full (or have been declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof has been set aside), subject to certain minor exceptions.
Effects of Inflation
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial condition and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.
Average Balance Sheet
The following table presents Bancorp’s distribution of the average consolidated balance sheets and net interest analysis for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015:
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 | | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | |
| | Average Volume | | | Interest | | | Yield/Cost | | | Average Volume | | | Interest | | | Yield/Cost | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans (1) | | $ | 604,699 | | | $ | 14,368 | | | | 4.75 | % | | $ | 630,620 | | | $ | 14,992 | | | | 4.75 | % |
Held to maturity securities (2) | | | 74,993 | | | | 610 | | | | 1.63 | % | | | 59,742 | | | | 474 | | | | 1.59 | % |
Other interest-earning assets (3) | | | 9,699 | | | | 168 | | | | 3.46 | % | | | 11,724 | | | | 173 | | | | 2.95 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 689,391 | | | | 15,146 | | | | 4.39 | % | | | 702,086 | | | | 15,639 | | | | 4.46 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-interest earning assets | | | 77,951 | | | | | | | | | | | | 73,784 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 767,342 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 775,870 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Savings and checking deposits | | $ | 249,043 | | | | 308 | | | | 0.25 | % | | $ | 244,205 | | | | 326 | | | | 0.27 | % |
Certificates of deposit | | | 278,812 | | | | 1,675 | | | | 1.20 | % | | | 297,322 | | | | 1,697 | | | | 1.14 | % |
Borrowings | | | 141,537 | | | | 2,387 | | | | 3.37 | % | | | 139,130 | | | | 2,421 | | | | 3.48 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 669,392 | | | | 4,370 | | | | 1.31 | % | | | 680,657 | | | | 4,444 | | | | 1.31 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-interest bearing liabilities | | | 10,959 | | | | | | | | | | | | 12,660 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 86,991 | | | | | | | | | | | | 82,553 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 767,342 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 775,870 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income and interest rate spread | | | | | | $ | 10,776 | | | | 3.08 | % | | | | | | $ | 11,195 | | | | 3.15 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest margin | | | | | | | | | | | 3.13 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 3.19 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | 102.99 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 103.15 | % |
| (1) | Non-accrual loans and loans held for sale are included in the average balances and in the computation of yields. |
| (2) | Bancorp does not have any tax-exempt securities. |
| (3) | Other interest-earning assets include interest-bearing deposits in other banks, federal funds sold and FHLB stock investments. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For information concerning recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 12 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
There has been no material change in market risk since December 31, 2015, as reported in Bancorp’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2016.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of Bancorp's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Bancorp has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2016. Disclosure controls and procedures are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act as those controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Bancorp’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there were no such changes during the quarter ended June 30, 2016.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Bancorp have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
There are various claims pending involving Bancorp, arising in the normal course of business. Management believes, based upon consultation with legal counsel, that liabilities arising from these proceedings, if any, will not be material to Bancorp’s consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.
The risk factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 should be carefully considered by you. If any of the risks actually occur, Bancorp’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing Bancorp. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Bancorp’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including the risks faced by Bancorp described in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
In April 2016, Bancorp issued a total of 2,015,500 shares of its common stock at a price of $5.50 per share to various purchasers in a private placement exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Regulation D of the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The offering resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $11,085,000. Costs related to the issuance of the common stock totaled approximately $575,000 and were netted against the proceeds. Proceeds from the private placement were used in part to pay all accrued and unpaid interest and dividends on Bancorp’s Series B Preferred Stock, partially redeem its Series B Preferred Stock, and for general corporate and working capital purposes..
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not applicable.
None.
| Exhibit No. | Description |
| | |
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
| 32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
| 101 | The following financial statements from the Severn Bancorp, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of June 30, 2016 and for the six months ended June 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) The Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | SEVERN BANCORP, INC. | |
| | | |
August 11, 2016 | | Alan J. Hyatt | |
| | Alan J. Hyatt, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| | | |
August 11, 2016 | | Paul B. Susie | |
| | Paul B. Susie, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | |
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No. | Description |
| |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
101 | The following financial statements from the Severn Bancorp, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of June 30, 2016 and for the six months ended June 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |