United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
| | |
(Mark One) | | |
[ x ] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended: January 31, 2009 or |
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 0-21296
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
California | | 95-3759463 |
(State of incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
3450 E. Miraloma Ave., Anaheim, CA | | 92806 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(714) 414-4000
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | |
Title of Each Class | | Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share | | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq Global Select Market) |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
| |
• | Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X] |
|
• | Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] |
|
• | Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] |
|
• | Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K. [ ] |
|
• | Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): |
| | | |
Large accelerated filer [X] | Accelerated filer [ ] | Non-accelerated filer [ ] | Smaller reporting company [ ] |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
| |
• | Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X] |
The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 2, 2008, the last business day of the most recently completed second quarter, was approximately $562 million. All outstanding shares of voting stock, except for shares held by executive officers and members of the Board of Directors and their affiliates, are deemed to be held by non-affiliates.
On March 25, 2009, the registrant had 65,696,961 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates information by reference from the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year covered by thisForm 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, the “Company,” “Registrant,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a leading lifestyle specialty retailer rooted in the youth culture and fashion vibe of Southern California. We operate a nationwide, primarily mall-based chain of retail stores under the names “Pacific Sunwear” and “PacSun.”
The Company, a California corporation, was incorporated in August 1982. As of January 31, 2009, we leased and operated 932 stores among all 50 states and Puerto Rico, comprised of 3,587,683 square feet. At the beginning of fiscal 2008, we had operated 153 demo stores which specialized in fashion-focused streetwear apparel. On February 3, 2008, we began inventory liquidation sales in these stores and closed all our demo stores by the end of our first quarter of fiscal 2008 ended May 3, 2008 (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The general discussion of our business that follows focuses on our go-forward PacSun business.
Our executive offices are located at 3450 East Miraloma Avenue, Anaheim, California, 92806; the telephone number is(714) 414-4000; and our internet address iswww.pacsun.com. Through our website, we make available free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such information has been filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), our annual reports onForm 10-K, quarterly reports onForm 10-Q, current reports onForm 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
The Company’s fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal year-end dates for all periods presented or discussed herein are as follows:
| | | | |
Fiscal Year | | Year-End Date | | # of Weeks |
|
2009 | | January 30, 2010 | | 52 |
2008 | | January 31, 2009 | | 52 |
2007 | | February 2, 2008 | | 52 |
2006 | | February 3, 2007 | | 53 |
2005 | | January 28, 2006 | | 52 |
2004 | | January 29, 2005 | | 52 |
Our Mission and Strategies
Our mission is to be a leading lifestyle specialty retailer rooted in the youth culture and fashion vibe of Southern California. Our objective is to be a “Branded House of Brands” that sells casual apparel with a limited selection of accessories and footwear designed to meet the needs of teens and young adults. We believe our customers continually seek newness in their everyday wear and want to stay current with, or ahead of, emerging fashion trends. We offer a targeted assortment of apparel for Young Mens and Juniors (Girls), accessories and an edited assortment of footwear designed to meet the fashion needs of our customers. We believe the following items are the key strategic elements in executing to our stated mission:
Strong Focus on Apparel. In recent years, apparel has represented approximately two-thirds of our total merchandise assortment with the remaining one-third comprised of accessories and footwear. Much of our same-store sales growth had been driven by an expanding assortment of accessories and footwear. However, late in fiscal 2006, we determined that the inventory density in our stores was negatively impacting our ability to provide an effective merchandising presentation. As the performance of the accessory and footwear categories deteriorated in fiscal 2006 and 2007, we began actively reducing the overall penetration of these categories to our total merchandise assortment. For fiscal 2008, apparel represented approximately 83% of the then-current sales mix while non-apparel (accessories and footwear) represented the remaining 17% on a combined basis. Apparel has demonstrated significantly greater consistency in same-store sales and merchandise margin performance than accessories and footwear in the last two
2 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
years. While we believe that accessories and a limited assortment of footwear remain important to our overall merchandising presentation as a differentiating factor, we intend to place a greater emphasis on the apparel portion of our business in the future. We expect that apparel will represent approximately 85% of our total merchandise sales for fiscal 2009 with non-apparel (accessories and footwear) comprising no more than a combined 15%. Our goal is to deliver improved merchandise margins and inventory turns by focusing our efforts more heavily on apparel.
Drive Improved Store Productivity. We believe that over time there are significant opportunities to improve the productivity of our stores. For fiscal 2008, our sales per square foot were approximately $339, while many competitors in our peer group have exceeded $500 per square feet in recent years. Our ratio of Juniors apparel to Young Mens apparel within our stores is also significantly lower than our peer group. While our apparel assortment has historically been more heavily weighted toward Young Mens, our peer group has typically had a greater percentage of their assortments focused on Juniors. Our goal is to improve the overall productivity of our stores through our stronger emphasis on apparel versus accessories and footwear, rebalancing our merchandise assortment to be equally split between Juniors and Young Mens, improving the proprietary brand penetration within Juniors to at least 50%, and updating the appearance of our stores over time through our store refresh program (discussed in more detail below).
Deliver a Compelling Customer Shopping Experience. During the past five fiscal years, we have undertaken a store refresh program wherein we reinvest new capital into existing stores in order to update the appearance of these stores. Primary elements of the refresh program include a remodeled store front, upgraded sound and lighting systems, an iconic tee shirt rotunda that prominently displays our large assortment of branded tee shirts, redesigned fitting rooms that no longer open directly onto the sales floor, and improved fixtures that provide a more open presentation of folded merchandise on tables rather than hanging merchandise on racks and gondolas. To date, we have updated approximately 20% of our total store fleet. We have found that this reinvestment generally has produced higher sales, improved merchandise margins, and resulted in a larger penetration of sales to Juniors versus our non-refreshed store fleet. Due to the current economic environment, we have significantly scaled back our store refresh program from our target of approximately50-75 stores per year. In 2009, we currently plan to refresh three stores.
In addition to the refresh program, we promote the brand image of our stores through in-store marketing, in-store promotional events in cooperation with key vendors, and national print advertising in major magazines that target teens and young adults. In 2006, we began sponsoring the U.S. Amateur Surf Team and, in 2007, we added sponsorship of the U.S. Amateur Snowboarding Team. We believe these sponsorships reflect our commitment to the action-sports industry while also providing pertinent in-store marketing imagery. We also introduce new product to our stores on a regular basis that frequently coordinates with planned promotions or campaigns to highlight certain brands or product categories.
Merchandising
Merchandise. Our stores offer a broad selection of casual apparel, related accessories and footwear for Young Mens and Juniors, with the goal of being viewed by our customers as the dominant retailer for their lifestyle. The following tables set forth our merchandise assortment as a percentage of net sales for the most recent three fiscal years for our PacSun business:
| | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | |
Young Mens Apparel | | 41% | | 38% | | 37% |
Juniors Apparel | | 42% | | 33% | | 29% |
Accessories | | 13% | | 17% | | 20% |
Footwear | | 4% | | 12% | | 14% |
| | | | | | |
Total | | 100% | | 100% | | 100% |
| | | | | | |
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 3
Customer-focused Product Mix. While liquidating footwear during fiscal 2008, we found that stores located in lower-tiered malls or strip centers catered to a customer base with a preference for value in addition to fashion. Recognizing an opportunity in the current difficult economic environment, we began experimenting with a more value-oriented assortment in these stores to include additional apparel promotions and key opening price point products from our core PacSun stores. After making these adjustments in product mix, most of these locations experienced modest improvements in sales and gross margin. As a result, while we operate and manage one single business concept (PacSun), we allocate product for our stores under two distinct strategies: Core and Value. Our Core stores cater to a fashion-focused customer, are comprised of approximately 525 locations in A and B grade malls, and average approximately $1.5 million in annual sales. The remaining Value stores, including our Outlet stores, cater to a more value-focused customer. These stores are located in C and D grade malls and off-mall locations and average approximately $1.0 million in annual sales. Core and Value stores have similar merchandising assortments managed under the same merchandising leadership, but are targeted from a pricing perspective to meet the different needs of the fashion-focusedand/or value-focused customer. For fiscal 2008, our Core stores represented approximately two-thirds of our total sales while Value stores comprised the remaining one-third of our total sales.
Brands. We offer a wide selection of well-known action-sport inspired name brands, such as Billabong/Element (collectively, “Billabong brands”), Quiksilver/Roxy/DC Shoes (collectively, “Quik brands”), Fox Racing, Volcom and Hurley, among others. In addition, we continually cultivate relationships to add and supportup-and-coming new brands, even if they are not of sufficient size to deliver to our stores on a nationwide basis. As a percentage of total net sales during fiscal 2008, Billabong brands accounted for 11% and Quik brands accounted for 10%. The next largest brand, Fox Racing, accounted for 9% of total net sales during fiscal 2008.
We supplement our name brand offerings with our proprietary brands, including Bullhead, Kirra, Kirra Girl, Vurt and Nollie. Proprietary brands provide us with an opportunity to broaden our customer base by offering merchandise of comparable quality to brand name merchandise, capitalize on emerging fashion trends when branded merchandise is not available in sufficient quantities, and exercise a greater degree of control over the flow of our merchandise. Our own product design group, in collaboration with our buying staff, designs our proprietary brand merchandise. Our sourcing organization oversees the manufacture and delivery of our proprietary brand merchandise, with manufacturing sourced both domestically and internationally. Our proprietary brand merchandise sales accounted for approximately 38%, 30%, and 30% of total net sales in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
We believe there are opportunities to drive incremental sales by placing a greater emphasis on apparel, particularly within our Juniors business. We believe that the Juniors customer shops more frequently than the Young Mens customer, giving us additional sales opportunities with Juniors. We have also found that our Juniors customers are more fashion driven than brand driven, providing additional opportunities to increase our proprietary brand penetration within Juniors. As a result, during fiscal 2008, we began delivering a Juniors assortment that was approximately equally balanced between branded and proprietary goods versus our historical approach of being 65% or more branded. Same-store sales of Juniors apparel merchandise has increased 21% and 20% for fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively, as we have made this transition. We expect our Young Mens business to remain more heavily branded (approximately 70%). It is important to note that while we have increased our overall proprietary penetration within Juniors, our brands remain very important to us as a key differentiator versus our peer group that is largely proprietary in nature.
Vendor and Contract Manufacturer Relationships. We maintain and cultivate strong and interactive relationships with our vendors. We generally purchase merchandise from vendors that target distribution through specialty retailers, small boutiques and, in some cases, better department stores, rather than distribution through mass-market channels. To encourage the design and development of new merchandise, we frequently share ideas regarding fashion trends and merchandise sell-through information with our vendors. We also suggest merchandise design and fabrication to certain vendors.
4 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
We have cultivated our proprietary brand sources with a view toward high-quality merchandise, production reliability and consistency of fit. We source our proprietary brand merchandise both domestically and internationally in order to benefit from the lower costs associated with off-shore manufacturing and the shorter lead times associated with domestic manufacturing.
Buying, Planning, Allocation and Distribution. Our buyers are responsible for reviewing branded merchandise lines from new and existing vendors, identifying emerging fashion trends, and selecting branded and proprietary brand merchandise styles in quantities, colors and sizes to meet inventory levels established by Company management. Our planning and allocation department is responsible for management of inventory levels by store and by class, allocation of merchandise to stores and inventory replenishment based upon information generated by our merchandise management information systems. These systems provide the planning department with current inventory levels at each store and for the Company as a whole, as well as current selling history within each store by merchandise classification and by style. See “Information Technology.”
All merchandise is delivered to our distribution facility in Olathe, Kansas where it is inspected, received, allocated to stores, ticketed when necessary, and boxed for distribution to our stores or packaged for delivery to our internet customers. Each store is typically shipped merchandise three to five times a week, providing it with a steady flow of new merchandise. We use a national and a regional small package carrier to ship merchandise to our stores and internet customers. We may occasionally use air freight to ship merchandise to stores when necessary.
E-commerce. We sell essentially the same selection of merchandise carried in our stores online atwww.pacsun.com.We seek specific opportunities to expand our online assortments, so not all products carried online will always be found in our stores. We maintain a substantial database ofe-mail addresses that we use for marketing purposes. We also advertise our website as a shopping destination on certain internet portals and search engines and market our website in our stores using in-store signage, merchandise bags and receipts. Our internet strategy benefits from the nationwide retail presence of our stores, the strong brand recognition of PacSun, a loyal and internet-savvy customer base, the participation of our key brands and the ability to return merchandise to our stores. Internet sales represented just over 4% of our total sales during fiscal 2008.
Stores
Locations. We operate stores in each of the 50 states and Puerto Rico. For a geographical breakdown of stores by state, see Item 2, “Properties.”
Real Estate Strategy. Prior to fiscal 2007, the Company grew rapidly with over 50 new store openings per year. During fiscal 2008, the rate of new store growth slowed significantly (16 new stores) as we recognized that new opportunities for productive mall-based stores were decreasing due to the overall size of our PacSun store chain. While we continue to seek appropriate new store opportunities, we believe that we can, over time, more profitably operate our existing stores through our stronger focus on apparel and strategic reinvestment in our most productive locations through our store refresh program as opposed to continuing to open new stores in tertiary markets or lower-grade malls. We also continue to evaluate existing stores and will continue to close underperforming stores when appropriate. This shift in strategy will result in significantly fewer new store openings than in the recent past (likely five or less per year going forward) and an increased number of store closures (approximately35-50 per year in the normal course of business over the next three years). Specifically for fiscal 2009, we currently plan to open approximately three new stores, expand/relocate approximately nine stores and refresh three stores while closing35-50 stores at lease expiration or through available lease kick-out clauses. A kick-out clause relieves us of any future obligation under a lease if specified sales levels for our stores or mall occupancy targets are not achieved by a specified date. The actual number of store closures will be subject to our ongoing business performance review of our stores and specific negotiations with landlords.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 5
Our store site selection strategy is to locate our stores primarily in high-traffic, regional malls serving markets that meet our demographic criteria, including average household income and population density. We also consider mall sales per square foot, the performance of other retail tenants serving teens and young adult customers, anchor tenants and occupancy costs. We currently seek store locations of approximately 3,500-4,500 square feet. For details concerning average costs to build and stock new and relocated stores in fiscal 2008, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
We believe the key to improving our profitability is driving improved store productivity. Store productivity is dependent upon a number of factors, including sufficient demand for our merchandise, our ability to locate and obtain favorable store sites, negotiate acceptable lease terms, obtain adequate merchandise supply, and hire and train qualified management and other employees.
Store Operations. Our stores are open for business during mall shopping hours. Each store has a manager, one or more assistant managers, and approximately six to twelve part-time sales associates. District managers supervise approximately 12 stores and approximately 10 district managers report to a regional director. District and store managers participate in a bonus program based on achieving predetermined metrics, including sales and inventory shrinkage targets. We have well-established store operating policies and procedures and in-store training for new managers. We place great emphasis on loss prevention programs in order to control inventory shrinkage. These programs include the installation of electronic article surveillance systems in all stores, education of store personnel on loss prevention, and monitoring of returns, voids and employee sales. As a result of these programs, our historical inventory shrinkage rates have been below 1.9% of net sales at retail (0.6% at cost).
Competition
The retail apparel, accessory and footwear business is highly competitive. Our stores compete on a national level with certain leading specialty retail chains as well as certain department stores that offer the same or similar brands and styles of merchandise. Our PacSun stores compete nationally with Abercrombie and Fitch, Hollister, American Eagle Outfitters, Aeropostale, The Buckle, Urban Outfitters and others as well as a wide variety of regional and local specialty stores. Many of our competitors are larger than we are and have significantly greater resources available to them than we do. We believe the principal competitive factors in our industry are fashion, merchandise assortment, quality, price, store location, environment and customer service.
Trademarks and Service Marks
We are the owner in the United States of the marks “Pacific Sunwear of California,” “PacSun,” and “Pacific Sunwear.” We also use and have registered, or have a pending registration on, a number of other marks, including those attributable to our proprietary brands. We have also registered many of our marks outside of the United States. We believe our rights in our marks are important to our business and intend to maintain our marks and the related registrations.
Information Technology
Our merchandise, financial and store computer systems are fully integrated and operate using primarily IBM equipment. Our software is upgraded or modified as needs arise or change. Our information systems provide Company management, buyers and planners with data that helps them identify emerging trends and manage inventories. These systems include purchase order management, open order reporting, open-to-buy, receiving, distribution, merchandise allocation, basic stock replenishment, inter-store transfers, and inventory and price management. Company management uses daily and weekly item sales reports to enhance the timeliness and effectiveness of purchasing and markdown decisions. Merchandise purchases are based on planned sales and inventory levels and are frequently revised to reflect changes in demand for a particular item or classification.
6 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
All of our stores have a point-of-sale system operating on IBM in-store computer hardware. The system features bar-coded ticket scanning, automatic pricelook-up, electronic check and credit/debit authorization, and automatic nightly transmittal of data between the store and our corporate office. Each of the regional directors and district managers uses a laptop computer and can instantly access appropriate or relevant Company-wide information, including actual and budgeted sales by store, district and region, transaction information and payroll data. We believe our management information systems are adequate to support our business through the foreseeable future.
Seasonality
For details concerning the seasonality of our business, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Seasonality and Quarterly Results.”
Working Capital Concentration
A significant portion of our working capital is related to merchandise inventories available for sale to customers as well as in our distribution centers. For details concerning working capital and the merchandising risk associated with our inventories, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and “Working Capital” within Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Employees
At the end of fiscal 2008 and after giving effect to the cost reduction actions we announced on January 28, 2009 (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Cost Reduction Actions” included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report onForm 10-K), we had approximately 11,000 employees, of whom approximately 7,500 were part-time. Of the total employees, approximately 600 were employed at our corporate headquarters and distribution centers. A significant number of seasonal employees are hired during peak selling periods. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe that our relationships with our employees are good.
Executive Officers. Set forth below are the names, ages, titles, and certain background information of persons serving as executive officers of the Company as of March 31, 2009:
| | | | | | |
Executive Officer | | Age | | Title |
|
|
Sally Frame Kasaks | | | 64 | | | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
Michael L. Henry | | | 38 | | | Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
Sally Frame Kasaks was appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in June 2007. Prior to that, she served as Interim Chief Executive Officer from October 2006 to June 2007. Ms. Kasaks has been a Board member since 1997 and served as Lead Director from March 2006 through September 2006. She has served as a business consultant since January 1997. Previously, she served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ann Taylor Stores, Inc., a specialty apparel retailer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Abercrombie and Fitch, a specialty apparel retailing division of Limited Brands, Inc., and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Talbots, Inc., a specialty apparel retailing division of General Mills Co. She currently serves as a Director of The Children’s Place, Inc.
Michael L. Henry was appointed Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company in January 2008. In this position, he has responsibility for all aspects of the Company’s financial planning and reporting, treasury, tax, insurance, investor relations, real estate, facilities and loss prevention functions. Prior to that, he served as Interim Chief Financial Officer from November 2007 to January 2008, and Vice President, Controller from February 2006 to November 2007. Mr. Henry joined the Company in September 2000 as Controller. Prior to joining the Company, he served Deloitte & Touche LLP for six years in its audit practice. Mr. Henry is a certified public accountant.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 7
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report onForm 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and we intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. We are providing cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements contained herein. Any statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often, but not always identifiable by the use of words or phrases such as “will result,” “expects to,” “will continue,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “intends,” “estimated,” “projects” and “outlook”) are not historical facts and may be forward-looking and, accordingly, such statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, the following categories of expectations about:
| |
• | forecasts of future store closures, expansions, relocations and store refreshes, including planned fiscal 2009 activities |
|
• | forecasts of future comparable store net sales, gross margins, inventory levels and selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
• | the sufficiency of working capital, operating cash flows and available credit to meet our operating and capital expenditure requirements |
|
• | expectations regarding our capital expenditure plans for fiscal 2009 and for the following few years |
|
• | expectations regarding future borrowings and repayments under our credit facility and cash balances at fiscal year-end |
|
• | expectations regarding future increases in common area maintenance (CAM) expenses |
All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after such statements are made.
The current volatility in the U.S. economy has adversely affected consumer spending, which could negatively impact our business, operating results and stock price.Our business operations and financial performance depend significantly on general economic conditions and their impact on levels of consumer spending. Consumer spending is impacted by a number of factors, including consumer confidence in the strength of the general economy, fears of economic recession or depression, the availability and cost of consumer credit, the cost of basic necessities such as food, fuel and housing, inflation and unemployment levels. Current unfavorable economic conditions in the U.S. have resulted in an overall slowing in the retail sector because of decreased consumer spending, which may continue to decline for the foreseeable future. The cost of purchased merchandise may increase as economies of scale are eroded by decreased global demand, and as other costs increase. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on demand for our merchandise and on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are also dependent upon the continued popularity of malls as a shopping destination and the ability of shopping mall anchor tenants and other attractions to generate customer traffic. A continued slowdown in the U.S. economy or an uncertain economic outlook could continue to lower consumer spending levels and cause a decrease in shopping mall traffic, each of which would adversely affect our sales results and financial performance.
Our comparable store net sales results will fluctuate significantly, which can cause volatility in our operating performance and stock price. Our comparable store net sales results have fluctuated significantly on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis, and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. For example, over the past five
8 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
years, monthly comparable store net sales results for our stores have varied from a low of minus 16% to a high of plus 16%. A variety of factors affect our comparable store net sales results, including unfavorable economic conditions and decreases in consumer spending, changes in fashion trends and customer preferences, changes in our merchandise mix, calendar shifts of holiday periods, actions by competitors, and weather conditions. Our comparable store net sales results for any particular fiscal month, quarter or year may decrease. As a result of these or other factors, our comparable store net sales results, both past and future, are likely to have a significant effect on the market price of our common stock and our operating performance, including our use of markdowns and our ability to leverage operating and other expenses that are somewhat fixed.
Our failure to identify and respond appropriately to changing consumer preferences and fashion trends in a timely manner could have a material adverse impact on our business and profitability.Our success is largely dependent upon our ability to gauge the fashion tastes of our customers and to provide merchandise at competitive prices and in adequate quantities that satisfies customer demand in a timely manner. Our failure to anticipate, identify or react appropriately in a timely manner to changes in fashion trends could have a material adverse effect on our same store sales results, gross margins, operating margins, financial condition and results of operations. Misjudgments or unanticipated fashion changes could also have a material adverse effect on our image with our customers. Some of our vendors have limited resources, production capacities and operating histories and some have intentionally limited the distribution of their merchandise. The inability or unwillingness on the part of key vendors to expand their operations to accommodate our merchandising requirements, or the loss of one or more key vendors or proprietary brand sources for any reason, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our net sales, operating income and inventory levels fluctuate on a seasonal basis. We experience major seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating income, with a significant portion of our operating income typically realized during the third quarter back to school and fourth quarter holiday season. Any decrease in sales or margins during these periods could have a disproportionately adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Seasonal fluctuations also affect our inventory levels, since we usually order merchandise in advance of peak selling periods and sometimes before new fashion trends are confirmed by customer purchases. We generally carry a significant amount of inventory, especially before the holiday season selling period. If we are not successful in selling inventory during this period, we may have to sell the inventory at significantly reduced prices, which may adversely affect profitability.
We have stated our intention to place a greater emphasis on apparel, Juniors merchandise, and the proprietary brand penetration within the Juniors category in our merchandising assortments than we have in the past, which may not be successful in improving our store productivity or profitability.Our goal is to improve the productivity of our stores in terms of sales per square foot and the profitability of our business as a whole by placing a greater emphasis on apparel, Juniors merchandise, and the proprietary brand penetration within the Juniors category in our merchandising assortments than we have in the past. It is uncertain that this shift in merchandising strategy will result in higher sales per square foot in our stores or improved operating margins for our business as a whole. The failure of these strategies to improve sales per square foot and profitability could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.
Our reinvestment in our existing store base may not result in improved operating performance and the deceleration of our store refresh program in fiscal 2009 may cause many of our stores to become less attractive to customers. We believe that store design is an important element in the customer shopping experience. Many of our stores have been in operation for many years and have not been updated or renovated since opening. Some of our competitors are in the process of updating, or have updated, their store designs, which may make our stores appear less attractive in comparison. During the past five fiscal years, we have undertaken a store refresh program where we reinvest new capital into our existing stores in an attempt to update the look of our stores and improve their productivity. This process carries additional risks such as higher than anticipated construction costs, lack of customer acceptance, and lower store productivity than planned or anticipated, among others. There can be no
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 9
assurance that our refresh program will prove successful in improving operational results or that we can achieve meaningful results within our existing or planned capital budgets or in an adequate timeframe. Any inability on our part to successfully implement new store designs in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, due to the current economic environment, we have significantly scaled back our store refresh program from our target of approximately50-75 stores per year to three stores in fiscal 2009. This deceleration of our store refresh program may cause our stores to become less attractive to customers, which will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business depends on our ability to operate existing stores that achieve acceptable levels of profitability. Any failure to do so may negatively impact our stock price and operational performance.Our stores are located principally in enclosed regional shopping malls. PacSun is a relatively mature concept with limited domestic opportunities to open new stores in such malls. The rate of our new store openings has declined significantly over recent years, and we expect to open no more than five stores per year going forward. We believe that we can, over time, more profitably operate our existing stores through strategic reinvestment in our most productive locations as opposed to continuing to open new stores in tertiary markets or lower-grade malls. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to successfully operate existing stores in a manner that will enable us to achieve acceptable levels of profitability, especially due to the expected deceleration of our store refresh program during fiscal 2009. Any inability to profitably operate our existing stores will have a material adverse impact on our business, stock price, financial condition and results of operations.
We face significant competition from both vertically-integrated and brand-based competitors that are growing rapidly, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.The retail apparel business is highly competitive. All of our stores compete on a national level with a diverse group of retailers, including vertically-integrated and brand-based national, regional and local specialty retail stores, and certain leading department stores and off-price retailers that offer the same or similar brands and styles of merchandise as we do. Many of our competitors are larger and have significantly greater resources than we do. We believe the principal competitive factors in our industry are fashion, merchandise assortment, quality, price, store location, environment and customer service.
Our customers may not prefer our proprietary brand merchandise, which may negatively impact our profitability. Sales from proprietary brand merchandise accounted for approximately 38%, 30%, and 30% of net sales in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve increases in proprietary brand merchandise sales as a percentage of net sales. Because our proprietary brand merchandise generally carries higher merchandise margins than our other merchandise, our failure to anticipate, identify and react in a timely manner to fashion trends with our proprietary brand merchandise, particularly if the percentage of net sales derived from proprietary brand merchandise changes significantly (up or down), may have a material adverse effect on our same store sales results, operating margins, financial condition and results of operations.
Our current or prospective vendors may be unable or unwilling to supply us with adequate quantities of their merchandise in a timely manner or at acceptable prices, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.The success of our business is dependent upon developing and maintaining good relationships with our vendors. We work very closely with our vendors to develop and acquire appropriate merchandise at acceptable prices for our stores. We do not, however, have any contractual relationships with our vendors. In addition, some of our vendors are relatively unsophisticated or underdeveloped and may have difficulty in providing adequate quantities or quality of merchandise to us in a timely manner. Also, certain of our vendors sell their merchandise directly to retail customers in direct competition with us. Our vendors could discontinue their relationship with us or raise prices on their merchandise at any time. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire sufficient quantities of quality merchandise at acceptable prices in a timely manner in the future. Any inability to do so, or the loss of one or more of our key vendors, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, the current economic crisis is having a significant negative impact on businesses around the world, and the impact of this crisis on our major vendors cannot be predicted. Current unfavorable economic conditions have resulted in
10 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
a tightening in the credit markets, decreased the level of liquidity in many financial markets and resulted in significant volatility in the credit and equity markets. These conditions may make it difficult for our key vendors to obtain adequate or historical levels of capital to purchase necessary raw materials or otherwise finance their manufacturing activities. In addition, given the severity of the current economic downturn, key vendors may become insolvent, may seek bankruptcy protection or be forced to file for bankruptcy. If any of these conditions occur, we may experience delays in the delivery of, or our vendors may fail to deliver, our merchandise, which would a have an adverse impact on our results of operation.
Our foreign sources of production may not always be reliable, which may result in a disruption in the flow of new merchandise to our stores. We purchase merchandise directly in foreign markets for our proprietary brands. In addition, we purchase merchandise from domestic vendors, some of which is manufactured overseas. We do not have any long-term merchandise supply contracts and our imports are subject to existing or potential duties, tariffs and quotas. We face competition from other companies for production facilities and import quota capacity. We also face a variety of other risks generally associated with doing business in foreign markets and importing merchandise from abroad, such as: (i) political instability; (ii) enhanced security measures at United States ports, which could delay delivery of imports; (iii) imposition of new legislation relating to import quotas that may limit the quantity of goods which may be imported into the United States from countries in a region within which we do business; (iv) imposition of duties, taxes, and other charges on imports; (v) delayed receipt or non-delivery of goods due to the failure of foreign-source suppliers to comply with applicable import regulations; (vi) delayed receipt or non-delivery of goods due to organized labor strikes or unexpected or significant port congestion at United States ports; and (vii) local business practice and political issues, including issues relating to compliance with domestic or international labor standards which may result in adverse publicity. New initiatives may be proposed that may have an impact on the trading status of certain countries and may include retaliatory duties or other trade sanctions that, if enacted, would increase the cost of products purchased from suppliers in countries that we do business with. Any inability on our part to rely on our foreign sources of production due to any of the factors listed above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business at any time. Our continued success is dependent to a significant degree upon the services of our key personnel, particularly our executive officers. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our success in the future will also be dependent upon our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. In this regard, we have historically used stock awards as a component of our total employee compensation program in order to align employees’ interests with the interests of our shareholders, encourage employee retention and provide competitive compensation and benefit packages. As a result of the decline in our stock price in recent periods, most of our employee stock options have exercise prices in excess of our current stock price, which reduces their value and could affect our ability to retain present, or attract prospective employees. Our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Adverse outcomes of litigation matters could significantly affect our operating results. We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to our business. We believe that the outcome of current litigation will not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations or financial condition. However, our assessment of current litigation could change in light of the discovery of facts with respect to legal actions pending against us not presently known to us or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact which do not accord with our evaluation of the possible liability or outcome of such litigation.
Our dependence on a single distribution facility exposes us to significant operational risks. All of our current distribution functions reside within a single facility in Olathe, Kansas. Any significant interruption in the operation of our distribution facility due to natural disasters, accidents, system failures or other unforeseen causes would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Selling merchandise over the internet carries particular risks that can have a negative impact on our business. Our internet operations are subject to numerous risks that could have a material adverse effect on our operational results,
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 11
including unanticipated operating problems, reliance on third party computer hardware and software providers, system failures and the need to invest in additional computer systems. Specific risks include: (i) diversion of sales from our stores; (ii) rapid technological change; (iii) liability for online content; and (iv) risks related to the failure of the computer systems that operate the website and its related support systems, including computer viruses, telecommunication failures and electronic break-ins and similar disruptions. In addition, internet operations involve risks which are beyond our control that could have a material adverse effect on our operational results, including: (i) price competition involving the items we intend to sell; (ii) the entry of our vendors into the internet business, in direct competition with us; (iii) the level of merchandise returns experienced by us; (iv) governmental regulation; (v) online security breaches involving unauthorized access to Companyand/or customer information; (vi) credit card fraud; and (vii) competition and general economic conditions specific to the internet, online commerce and the apparel industry.
The effects of terrorism or war could significantly impact consumer spending and our operational performance. The majority of our stores are located in regional shopping malls. Any threat or actual act of terrorism, particularly in public areas, could lead to lower customer traffic in regional shopping malls. In addition, local authorities or mall management could close regional shopping malls in response to any immediate security concern. Mall closures, as well as lower customer traffic due to security concerns, could result in decreased sales. Additionally, war or the threat of war could significantly diminish consumer spending, resulting in decreased sales. Decreased sales would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As we source our product globally, any threat or actual act of terrorism or war could cause a disruption to our inventory supply which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our stock price can fluctuate significantly due to a variety of factors, which can negatively impact our total market value. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially and there can be no assurance that the market price of the common stock will not continue to fluctuate significantly. Future announcements or management discussions concerning us or our competitors, net sales and profitability results, quarterly variations in operating results or comparable store net sales, changes in earnings estimates made by management or analysts, or changes in accounting policies, unfavorable economic conditions, among other factors, could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. In addition, the recent distress in the financial markets has resulted in extreme price and volume volatility. This volatility has had a substantial effect on the market prices of securities of many public companies for reasons frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies.
Any material failure, interruption or security breach of our computer systems or information technology may adversely affect the operation of our business and our financial results.We are dependent on our computer systems and information technology to properly conduct business. A failure or interruption of our computer systems or information technology could result in the loss of data, business interruptions or delays in our operations. Also, despite our considerable efforts and technological resources to secure our computer systems and information technology, security breaches, such as unauthorized access and computer viruses, may occur resulting in system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Any security breach of our computer systems or information technology may result in adverse publicity, loss of sales and profits, damages, fines or other loss resulting from misappropriation of information.
In addition, while we regularly evaluate our information systems capabilities and requirements, there can be no assurance that our existing information systems will be adequate to support the existing or future needs of our business. We may have to undertake significant information system implementations, modificationsand/or upgrades in the future at significant cost to us. Such projects involve inherent risks associated with replacingand/or changing existing systems, such as system disruptions and the failure to accurately capture data, among others. Information system disruptions, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
*************
12 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
We caution that the risk factors described above could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on behalf of the Company. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We operate retail apparel stores in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. We lease our retail stores under operating lease agreements with initial terms of approximately ten years that expire at various dates through January 2021. For more information concerning our store operating lease commitments, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
Our corporate office is located in Anaheim, California and encompasses a total of approximately 150,000 square feet. In fiscal 2008, we consolidated our distribution function within our existing facility in Olathe, Kansas, which comprises approximately 400,000 square feet. We believe this facility is capable of servicing our operational needs through fiscal 2009. We sold our 300,000 square foot distribution center in Anaheim, California in November 2008.
At the end of fiscal 2008, the geographic distribution of our 932 stores was as follows:
| | | | |
Alabama | | | 13 | |
|
|
Alaska | | | 3 | |
|
|
Arizona | | | 22 | |
|
|
Arkansas | | | 5 | |
|
|
California | | | 118 | |
|
|
Colorado | | | 22 | |
|
|
Connecticut | | | 10 | |
|
|
Delaware | | | 4 | |
|
|
Florida | | | 70 | |
|
|
Georgia | | | 19 | |
|
|
Hawaii | | | 9 | |
|
|
Idaho | | | 6 | |
|
|
Illinois | | | 28 | |
|
|
Indiana | | | 18 | |
|
|
Iowa | | | 9 | |
|
|
Kansas | | | 7 | |
|
|
Kentucky | | | 8 | |
|
|
Louisiana | | | 11 | |
|
|
Maine | | | 5 | |
|
|
Maryland | | | 19 | |
|
|
Massachusetts | | | 23 | |
|
|
Michigan | | | 26 | |
|
|
Minnesota | | | 16 | |
|
|
Mississippi | | | 6 | |
|
|
Missouri | | | 17 | |
|
|
Montana | | | 4 | |
|
|
Nebraska | | | 4 | |
|
|
Nevada | | | 10 | |
|
|
New Hampshire | | | 7 | |
|
|
New Jersey | | | 24 | |
|
|
New Mexico | | | 7 | |
|
|
New York | | | 37 | |
|
|
North Carolina | | | 24 | |
|
|
North Dakota | | | 4 | |
|
|
Ohio | | | 33 | |
|
|
Oklahoma | | | 9 | |
|
|
Oregon | | | 13 | |
|
|
Pennsylvania | | | 51 | |
|
|
Rhode Island | | | 2 | |
|
|
South Carolina | | | 12 | |
|
|
South Dakota | | | 2 | |
|
|
Tennessee | | | 17 | |
|
|
Texas | | | 70 | |
|
|
Utah | | | 11 | |
|
|
Vermont | | | 4 | |
|
|
Virginia | | | 26 | |
|
|
Washington | | | 25 | |
|
|
West Virginia | | | 8 | |
|
|
Wisconsin | | | 18 | |
|
|
Wyoming | | | 2 | |
|
|
Puerto Rico | | | 14 | |
|
|
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to our business. We believe that the outcome of current litigation will not likely have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition and, from time to time, we may make provisions for probable litigation losses. Depending on the actual outcome of pending litigation, charges in excess of any provisions could be recorded in the future, which may have an adverse effect on our operating results.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 13
PART II
| |
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “PSUN”. The following table sets forth for the quarterly periods indicated the high and low sale prices per share of the common stock as reported by NASDAQ:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2008 | | | Fiscal 2007 | |
| | | |
| | High | | | Low | | | High | | | Low | |
| | | |
|
1st Quarter | | $ | 14.04 | | | $ | 10.62 | | | $ | 23.11 | | | $ | 16.94 | |
2nd Quarter | | $ | 13.23 | | | $ | 7.00 | | | $ | 23.06 | | | $ | 15.62 | |
3rd Quarter | | $ | 8.76 | | | $ | 2.54 | | | $ | 18.60 | | | $ | 13.00 | |
4th Quarter | | $ | 3.53 | | | $ | 0.72 | | | $ | 16.99 | | | $ | 8.87 | |
As of March 20, 2009, the number of holders of record of common stock of the Company was 159. We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock as our credit facility prohibits the payment of dividends.
14 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
THE FOLLOWING PERFORMANCE GRAPH SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE “SOLICITING MATERIAL” OR TO BE “FILED” WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN ANY DOCUMENT SO FILED.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the percentage change in the cumulative total return on the Company’s common stock with the cumulative total return of the CRSP Total Return Index for the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies) (“NASDAQ Market Index”) and the CRSP Total Return Industry Index for the NASDAQ Retail Trade Stocks (“Retail Index”) for the period commencing on January 31, 2004 and ending on January 31, 2009.
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return from January 31, 2004 through January 31, 2009(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Calculated Returns(1) | | 01/31/04 | | 01/29/05 | | 01/28/06 | | 02/03/07 | | 02/02/08 | | 01/31/09 |
|
|
Pacific Sunwear | | 100 | | 105 | | 105 | | 87 | | 52 | | 5 |
NASDAQ Market Index | | 100 | | 100 | | 113 | | 121 | | 117 | | 58 |
Retail Index | | 100 | | 121 | | 129 | | 143 | | 126 | | 81 |
(1) Returns are calculated based on the premise that $100 is invested in each of PacSun stock, the NASDAQ Market Index and the Retail Index on January 31, 2004, and that all dividends (if any) were reinvested. Over a five year period, and based on the actual price movement of these investments, the original $100 would have turned into the amounts shown as of the end of each PacSun fiscal year. Shareholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future shareholder returns.
Common Stock Repurchase and Retirement – The Company repurchased 5,347,544 shares of its common stock during fiscal 2008 but did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. Information regarding our common stock repurchase activity for fiscal 2008 is contained in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, which note is incorporated herein by this reference.
In its discretion, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan in July 2008 as a means to reduce our overall number of shares outstanding, thereby providing greater value to our shareholders through increased earnings per share. The Company ended fiscal 2008 with approximately $48 million available under the stock repurchase plan. The repurchase authorization does not expire until all authorized funds have been expended. We do not expect the impact of the stock repurchases we have made to be significant to our overall liquidity needs as we expect sufficient cash flows from operations in the future to finance our operations. The Company does not currently plan to make additional share repurchases during fiscal 2009.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 15
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated income statement data for each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, and consolidated balance sheet data as of the end of fiscal 2008 and 2007, are derived from audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements. Such data and the selected consolidated operating data below should also be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this report. The consolidated income statement data for all years presented excludes the financial impact of the Company’s former demo and One Thousand Steps concepts due to the designation of these operations as discontinued operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, respectively. The consolidated income statement data for fiscal 2005 and 2004, as well as the consolidated balance sheet data as of the end of fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, are derived from audited consolidated financial statements of the Company, which are not included herein. All amounts presented below are in millions, except per share and selected consolidated operating data.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year | |
| | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | | |
|
Consolidated Income Statement Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 1,255 | | | $ | 1,306 | | | $ | 1,241 | | | $ | 1,206 | | | $ | 1,081 | |
Gross margin (after buying, distribution and occupancy costs) | | | 320 | | | | 414 | | | | 407 | | | | 453 | | | | 404 | |
Operating (loss)/income from continuing operations | | | (61 | ) | | | 70 | | | | 101 | | | | 188 | | | | 160 | |
(Loss)/ income from continuing operations | | | (39 | ) | | | 46 | | | | 65 | | | | 120 | | | | 101 | |
(Loss)/ income from continuing operations per share, diluted | | $ | (0.59 | ) | | $ | 0.65 | | | $ | 0.91 | | | $ | 1.59 | | | $ | 1.30 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Operating Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comparable store net sales +/(-)(1) | | | (5.2 | )% | | | 3.4 | % | | | (4.2 | )% | | | 3.5 | % | | | 7.5 | % |
Average net sales($)/square foot(2) | | $ | 339 | | | $ | 350 | | | $ | 347 | | | $ | 370 | | | $ | 370 | |
Average net sales($)/store (000s)(2) | | $ | 1,298 | | | $ | 1,334 | | | $ | 1,263 | | | $ | 1,369 | | | $ | 1,339 | |
Stores open at end of period | | | 932 | | | | 954 | | | | 965 | | | | 907 | | | | 828 | |
Capital expenditures ($ million) | | $ | 81 | | | $ | 106 | | | $ | 158 | | | $ | 109 | | | $ | 82 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Working capital | | $ | 98 | | | $ | 187 | | | $ | 195 | | | $ | 304 | | | $ | 258 | |
Total assets | | $ | 570 | | | $ | 752 | | | $ | 773 | | | $ | 808 | | | $ | 678 | |
Long-term debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Shareholders’ equity(3) | | $ | 372 | | | $ | 483 | | | $ | 503 | | | $ | 547 | | | $ | 458 | |
(1) Stores are deemed comparable stores on the first day of the first month following the one-year anniversary of their opening, relocation, expansion or conversion.
(2) For purposes of calculating these amounts, the number of stores and the amount of square footage reflect the number of months during the period that new stores and closed stores were open.
(3) The Company repurchased and retired common stock of $53 million, $99 million, $66 million, and $110 million during fiscal 2008, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The Company did not repurchase any common stock during fiscal 2007.
16 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
| |
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto of the Company included elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K. This MD&A excludes the financial statement impact of the discontinued demo and One Thousand Steps concepts (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K). The MD&A contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” within Item 1A.
Executive Overview
We consider the following items to be key performance indicators in evaluating Company performance:
Comparable (or “same store”) sales – Stores are deemed comparable stores on the first day of the month following the one-year anniversary of their opening or expansion/relocation. We consider same store sales to be an important indicator of current Company performance. Same store sales results are important in achieving operating leverage of certain expenses such as store payroll, store occupancy, depreciation, general and administrative expenses, and other costs that are somewhat fixed. Positive same store sales results generate greater operating leverage of expenses while negative same store sales results negatively impact operating leverage. Same store sales results also have a direct impact on our total net sales, cash, and working capital.
Net merchandise margins – We analyze the components of net merchandise margins, specifically initial markups and markdowns as a percentage of net sales. Any inability to obtain acceptable levels of initial markups or any significant increase in our use of markdowns could have an adverse impact on our gross margin results and results of operations.
Operating margin – We view operating margin as a key indicator of our success. The key drivers of operating margins are comparable store net sales, net merchandise margins, and our ability to control operating expenses. For a discussion of the changes in the components comprising operating margins during fiscal 2008 and 2007, see “Results of Operations” in this section.
Store sales trends – We evaluate store sales trends in assessing the operational performance of our store expansion strategies. Important store sales trends include average net sales per store and average net sales per square foot. Average net sales per store for each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $1.3 million. Average net sales per square foot were $339, $350 and $347 in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Cash flow and liquidity (working capital) – We evaluate cash flow from operations, liquidity and working capital to determine our short-term operational financing needs. Cash flows from operations for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in millions) were $34, $116 and $162, respectively. Cash flows from operations for fiscal 2008 were significantly lower than in fiscal 2007 and 2006, primarily due to negative same-store sales results, higher markdown activity associated with those sales results, and lease termination charges associated with the closure of demo and One Thousand Steps stores. We believe that our working capital, cash flows from operating activities and intermittent credit facility borrowings will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America necessarily requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from these
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 17
estimates. The accounting policies that we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating reported financial results include the following:
Recognition of Revenue – Sales are recognized upon purchase by customers at our retail store locations or upon delivery to and acceptance by the customer for orders placed through our website. We accrue for estimated sales returns by customers based on historical sales return results. Actual return rates have historically been within our expectations and the reserves established. However, in the event that the actual rate of sales returns by customers increased significantly, our operational results could be adversely affected. We record the sale of gift cards as a current liability and recognize a sale when a customer redeems a gift card. The amount of the gift card liability is determined taking into account our estimate of the portion of gift cards that will not be redeemed or recovered (“gift card breakage”). Gift card breakage is recognized as revenue after 24 months, at which time the likelihood of redemption is considered remote based on our historical redemption data.
Valuation of Inventories – Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market utilizing the retail method. At any given time, inventories include items that have been marked down to management’s best estimate of their fair market value. These estimates are based on a combination of factors, including current selling prices, current and projected inventory levels, current and projected rates of sell-through, known markdownand/or promotional events expected to create a permanent decrease in inventory value, estimated inventory shrink and aging of specific items. Reserves of approximately $3.5 million have been accrued against existing inventory at January 31, 2009 in consideration of these factors. Actual results have historically been within our expectations and the reserves established for such items. While we do not expect actual results to differ materially from our estimates, to the extent they do differ for any of these factors, we may have to record additional reserves in subsequent periods, which could reduce our gross margins and operating results.
Determination of Stock-Based Compensation Expense – We recognize stock-based compensation expense under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), “Share Based Payment.” Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), we recognize stock-based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and only recognize compensation cost for those shares expected to vest using the graded vesting method over the requisite service period of the award. Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of stock-based compensation awards require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based compensation awards and stock price volatility. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine compensation expense. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based compensation awards represent management’s best estimates, but the estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. See “Stock-Based Compensation” within Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K for a further discussion on stock-based compensation.
Store Operating Lease Accounting – Rent expense from store operating leases represents one of the largest expenses incurred in operating our stores. We account for store rent expense in accordance with SFAS 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and FASB TechnicalBulletin 85-3, “Accounting for Operating Leases with Scheduled Rent Increases.” Accordingly, rent expense under our store operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the original term of each store’s lease, inclusive of rent holiday periods during store construction and exclusive of any lease renewal options. We expense pre-opening rent in accordance with FASB Staff Position13-1, “Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period.” We account for landlord allowances received in connection with store operating leases in accordance with SFAS 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and FASB TechnicalBulletin 88-1, “Issues Relating to Accounting for Leases.” Accordingly, all amounts received from landlords to fund tenant improvements are recorded as a deferred lease incentive liability, which is then amortized as a credit to rent expense over the related store’s lease term.
18 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
Evaluation of Long-Lived Assets – In the normal course of business, we acquire tangible and intangible assets. We periodically evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of our long-lived assets (including property, plant and equipment, and other intangible assets) whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Impairment is assessed when the undiscounted expected future cash flows derived from an asset or asset group are less than its carrying amount. The amount of impairment loss recognized is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the asset, with such estimated fair values determined using the best information available, generally the discounted future cash flows of the assets using a rate that approximates our weighted average cost of capital. Impairments are recognized in operating earnings. We use our best judgment based on the most current facts and circumstances surrounding our business when applying these impairment rules to determine the timing of the impairment test, the undiscounted cash flows used to assess impairments, and the fair value of a potentially impaired asset. Changes in assumptions used could have a significant impact on our assessment of recoverability. Numerous factors, including changes in our business, industry segment, and the global economy, could significantly impact our decision to retain, dispose of, or idle certain of our long-lived assets.
The estimation of future cash flows from operating activities requires significant estimates of factors that include future sales and gross margin performance. If our sales or gross margin performance or other estimated operating results are not achieved at or above our forecasted level, the carrying value of certain of our retail stores may prove unrecoverable and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.
Evaluation of Insurance Reserves – We are responsible for workers’ compensation and medical insurance claims up to a specified aggregate stop loss amount. We maintain reserves for estimated claims, both reported and incurred but not reported, based on historical claims experience and other estimated assumptions. Actual claims activity has historically been within our expectations and the reserves established. To the extent claims experience or our estimates change, additional charges may be recorded in the future up to the aggregate stop loss amount for each policy year.
Evaluation of Income Taxes – We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method as set forth in SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, in the judgment of our management, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including recent financial operations, projected future taxable income, scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies, and the length of tax asset carryforward periods. The realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable earnings in certain jurisdictions. If we subsequently determine that the carrying value of these assets, which had been written down, would be realized in the future, the value of the deferred tax assets would be increased, thereby increasing net income in the period when that determination was made.
Evaluation of Litigation Matters – We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to our business. We believe that the outcome of current litigation will not likely have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition and, from time to time, may make provisions for probable litigation losses. Depending on the actual outcome of pending litigation, charges in excess of any provisions could be recorded in the future, which may have an adverse effect on our operating results.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 19
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected income statement data from our continuing operations expressed as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal years indicated. The table and discussion that follows excludes the operations of the discontinued demo and One Thousand Steps concepts (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements). The discussion that follows should be read in conjunction with the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year | |
| | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | |
|
Net sales | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of goods sold (including buying, distribution and occupancy costs) | | | 74.5 | | | | 68.3 | | | | 67.3 | |
| | |
| | |
Gross margin | | | 25.5 | | | | 31.7 | | | | 32.7 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 30.4 | | | | 26.4 | | | | 24.6 | |
| | |
| | |
Operating (loss)/income from continuing operations | | | (4.9 | ) | | | 5.3 | | | | 8.1 | |
Other income, net | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.4 | |
| | |
| | |
(Loss)/Income from continuing operations before income tax expense | | | (4.7 | ) | | | 5.5 | | | | 8.5 | |
Income tax (benefit)/expense | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 2.1 | | | | 3.3 | |
| | |
| | |
(Loss)/Income from continuing operations | | | (3.2 | )% | | | 3.4 | % | | | 5.2 | % |
| | |
| | |
Number of stores open at end of period | | | 932 | | | | 954 | | | | 965 | |
Total square footage (in 000s) | | | 3,588 | | | | 3,658 | | | | 3,664 | |
Cost Reduction Actions
2008 was a difficult year for our Company and the retail industry as a whole. For fiscal 2009, we are expecting, and have planned for, continued negative same-store sales results throughout the year. We have implemented a series of actions to better position the Company in the current economic environment as follows:
| |
• | Reduced planned inventory levels by at least 20 percent throughout the year, thereby significantly reducing the amount of cash that will be invested in inventory at any one point in time; |
|
• | Reduced planned capital expenditures to not more than $30 million for the year, a reduction of over $50 million from the fiscal 2008 level; and |
|
• | Reduced planned selling, general and administrative expenses by approximately $35 million versus the fiscal 2008 level (2008 includes total non-recurring impairment charges for goodwill and the Anaheim distribution center of approximately $15 million). These reductions are most prominently within headquarters, field management and payroll expenses. As part of the reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses, we announced a workforce reduction resulting in the elimination of approximately 11 percent of our headquarters and field management staff. |
20 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Net Sales
Net sales decreased to $1.25 billion in fiscal 2008 from $1.31 billion in fiscal 2007, a decrease of $51 million, or 3.9%. The components of this $51 million decrease in net sales are as follows:
| | | | |
|
$millions | | | Attributable to |
|
$ | (63 | ) | | Negative (5)% decline in comparable store net sales in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. In percentage terms, the average sale transaction in a comparable store was down 9% partially offset by a 4% increase in total transactions. For fiscal 2008, comparable store net sales were down 1% in the first half and 9% in the second half. Same-store sales declined more significantly in the second half of the year consistent with the overall economic downturn. |
|
| (28 | ) | | Store closures. |
|
| 26 | | | Increase due to non-comparable sales from new, expanded or relocated stores not yet included in the comparable store base. |
|
| 14 | | | Increase in net sales attributable toe-commerce. |
|
$ | (51 | ) | | Total |
|
Comparable store net sales of Juniors apparel merchandise increased 21% and Young Mens apparel merchandise was flat as we shifted the merchandise mix away from accessories and footwear and expanded Juniors apparel. Comparable store net sales of accessories decreased approximately 27% and footwear decreased 76%. The decline in accessory comparable store net sales was primarily due to our decision to exit certain accessory categories during both fiscal 2008 and 2007 such as wallets, watches, belt buckles and home goods. The decline in the footwear business was primarily due to a significant decrease in comparable net store sales of sneakers. In January 2008, we announced our intention to largely exit the sneaker business. For fiscal 2008, footwear represented approximately 5% of total sales, which represents a 59% decrease in sales penetration versus the prior year. We expect apparel to represent approximately 85% of total sales for fiscal 2009 with non-apparel (consisting of accessories and limited footwear assortments) representing the remaining 15%.
Gross Margin
Gross margin, after buying, distribution and occupancy costs, decreased to $320 million in fiscal 2008 from $414 million in fiscal 2007, a decrease of $94 million, or 22.7%. As a percentage of net sales, gross margin was 25.5% in fiscal 2008, a 6.2% decrease from 31.7% in fiscal 2007. The primary components of this 6.2% net decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales were as follows:
| | | | |
|
% | | | Attributable to |
|
| (4.7 | ) | | Decline in merchandise margin from 50.1% in fiscal 2007 to 45.4% in fiscal 2008, or $85 million, due to increased markdowns and promotional activity associated with the precipitous decline in consumer spending and the overall economic environment, particularly in the latter half of fiscal 2008. |
|
| (1.4 | ) | | Increase in occupancy charges as a percentage of net sales to 15.5% ($194 million) in fiscal 2008 from 14.1% ($184 million) in fiscal 2007. Deleverage of occupancy costs as a result of the negative (5)% same-store sales result for fiscal 2008. |
|
| (0.1 | ) | | Increase in other costs. |
|
| (6.2 | ) | | Total |
|
We expect consumer spending to continue to be negatively impacted throughout fiscal 2009 and we plan to manage our inventories to respond to this environment. At the end of fiscal 2008, inventories per square foot were down 30% in dollars and 19% in total units versus the end of fiscal 2007. We ended fiscal 2008 with average weeks of supply in stores of approximately 17 weeks versus having ended fiscal 2007 with average weeks of supply in stores of
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 21
approximately 22 weeks, a decline of just over 20%. We intend to maintain significantly reduced inventory levels versus the prior year (at least 20%) throughout fiscal 2009 until sales trends improve appreciably and consistently.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $381 million in fiscal 2008 from $344 million in fiscal 2007, an increase of $37 million, or 10.8%. As a percentage of net sales, these expenses increased to 30.4% from 26.4%. The components of this 4.0% net increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were as follows:
| | | | |
|
% | | | Attributable to |
|
| 2.3 | | | Increase in asset impairment charges, including a $15 million increase in store impairments, $8 million related to the materials handling equipment in the Company’s former Anaheim distribution center, and $6 million related to the impairment of goodwill. |
|
| 0.7 | | | Increase in payroll and payroll-related expenses ($2 million) due to deleveraging these expenses against the negative five percent same-store sales results. In dollars, store payroll expenses were down $0.6 million. |
|
| 0.5 | | | Increase in depreciation expense ($4 million), primarily due to the impact of accelerated depreciation associated with store closures and relocations, and new depreciation on existing stores from our refresh program. |
|
| 0.5 | | | Increase in other SG&A expenses. |
|
| 4.0 | | | Total |
|
We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of long-lived assets for all stores (primarily property, plant and equipment) whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Should comparable store net sales and gross margin continue to decline, we may record additional non-cash impairment charges for underperforming stores in fiscal 2009.
Goodwill Impairment
With the significant deterioration in the retail business climate as well as a large decline in the market value of our common stock during the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we determined an evaluation of goodwill recoverability was warranted. As a result of our assessment, we determined that the goodwill created in connection with our 1986 four-store acquisition in California and our 1997 fifteen-store acquisition in Florida was fully impaired and we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of approximately $6 million during fiscal 2008. After recording the impairment charge, we have no goodwill remaining on our consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2009.
Other Income, Net
For fiscal 2008, we recorded a gain on the sale of our former Anaheim distribution center of approximately $9 million. The sale of the distribution center closed in November 2008. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we committed to a plan to sell a parcel of land that had been held for future development. In connection with the planned sale, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $5 million associated with a reduction in the fair value of this land less estimated selling costs.
As of January 31, 2009, we held deferred compensation assets associated with our executive deferred compensation plan that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is determined by the most recent publicly quoted market price of the securities at the balance sheet date. For fiscal 2008, we recorded a charge of $2 million to reflect the decline in fair value associated with these assets.
Net interest income was $0.1 million for fiscal 2008 compared to approximately $3 million for fiscal 2007. Interest income was lower in fiscal 2008 due to the Company having increased direct borrowings under our credit facility and
22 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
lower average cash balances compared to the prior year due to share repurchases, the payment of demo lease terminations and losses from continuing operations.
Income Taxes
Income tax benefit was $19 million in fiscal 2008 compared to income tax expense of $27 million in fiscal 2007. The effective income tax rate was 33.0% in fiscal 2008 and 36.9% in fiscal 2007, a decrease of 3.9%. The decrease in the effective income tax rate is primarily attributable to operating losses incurred in fiscal 2008 and to the establishment of a valuation allowance of $2.7 million against our state deferred tax assets related to Kansas state investment tax credits that may not be utilized before expiration. Our determination that we would not fully realize this deferred tax asset was based on the significant deterioration in the retail business climate resulting in revisions to our projected future taxable earnings in this jurisdiction. Our weighted average effective income tax rate will vary over time depending on a number of factors, such as differing average state income tax rates and changes in forecasted annual earnings.
Fiscal 2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Net Sales
Net sales increased to $1.31 billion in fiscal 2007 from $1.24 billion in fiscal 2006, an increase of $64 million, or 5.2%. The components of this $64 million increase in net sales are as follows:
| | | | |
|
$millions | | | Attributable to |
|
$ | 39 | | | 3.4% increase in comparable store net sales in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. |
|
| 37 | | | Net sales from stores opened in fiscal 2006 while not yet included in the comparable store base in 2007. |
|
| 10 | | | Net sales from expanded or relocated stores not yet included in the comparable store base. |
|
| 10 | | | Increase in net sales attributable toe-commerce. |
|
| 6 | | | 14 new stores opened in fiscal 2007 not yet included in the comparable store base. |
|
| (38 | ) | | 25 closed stores in fiscal 2007 and 3 closed stores in fiscal 2006. |
|
$ | 64 | | | Total |
|
Total transactions in a comparable store were up mid-single digits and the average unit retail was down low single digits.
Comparable store net sales of Juniors apparel merchandise increased 19.8% and Young Mens apparel merchandise increased 6.7% as we shifted the emphasis of our merchandising assortments towards apparel. Comparable store net sales of accessories decreased 12.3% and footwear decreased 16.0%. The decline in accessory comparable store net sales was primarily due to our decision to exit certain accessory categories during both fiscal 2007 and 2006 such as wallets, watches, belt buckles and home goods. The decline in the footwear business was primarily due to a significant decrease in comparable net store sales of sneakers.
Gross Margin
Gross margin, after buying, distribution and occupancy costs, increased to $414 million in fiscal 2007 from $407 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of $7 million, or 1.8%. As a percentage of net sales, gross margin was 31.7% in fiscal 2007, a
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 23
1.0% decrease from 32.7% in fiscal 2006. The primary components of this 1.0% net decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales were as follows:
| | | | |
|
% | | | Attributable to |
|
| (0.5 | ) | | Increase in occupancy charges as a percentage of net sales to 14.1% ($184 million) in fiscal 2007 from 13.6% ($168 million) in fiscal 2006. Occupancy expenses increased pursuant to store operating lease terms at a higher rate of sales than the 3.4% same-store sales result for fiscal 2007. |
|
| (0.3 | ) | | Increase in buying expenses as a percentage of net sales to 1.6% ($21 million) in fiscal 2007 from 1.3% ($16 million) in fiscal 2006, primarily due to increased headcount in the Company’s design and allocation departments. |
|
| (0.2 | ) | | Increase in distribution expenses as a percentage of net sales to 2.6% ($33 million) in fiscal 2007 from 2.4% ($29 million) in fiscal 2006, primarily due to operating two distribution centers in fiscal 2007 versus one in fiscal 2006. |
|
| (1.0 | ) | | Total |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $344 million in fiscal 2007 from $305 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of $39 million, or 12.8%. As a percentage of net sales, these expenses increased to 26.4% from 24.6%. The components of this 1.8% net increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were as follows:
| | | | |
|
% | | | Attributable to |
|
| 0.2 | | | Increase in asset impairment and loss on disposal charges to $6 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $3 million in fiscal 2006. |
|
| 0.5 | | | Increase in direct store expenses as a percentage of net sales to 7.1% ($93 million) in fiscal 2007 from 6.6% ($82 million) in fiscal 2006, primarily due to increased depreciation expenses associated with the Company’s store refresh program and new store openings as well as increased credit authorization charges due to higher penetration of credit card sales in fiscal 2007. |
|
| 0.2 | | | Increase in general and administrative payroll expenses as a percentage of net sales to 3.0% ($39 million) in fiscal 2007 from 2.8% ($35 million) in fiscal 2006 due to planned headcount additions. |
|
| 0.2 | | | Increase in store payroll expenses as a percentage of net sales to 11.8% ($154 million) in fiscal 2007 from 11.6% ($144 million) for fiscal 2006. In absolute dollars, these expenses were up primarily due to the addition of 14 new stores during fiscal 2007 and 61 new stores during fiscal 2006. As a percentage of net sales, these expenses were up primarily due to deleveraging them against the 3.4% same-store sales results in fiscal 2007. |
|
| 0.3 | | | Increase in consulting expenses as a percentage of net sales to 0.4% ($5 million) in fiscal 2007 from 0.1% ($2 million) in fiscal 2006. The consulting expenses for fiscal 2007 were targeted primarily at the Company’s strategic positioning, supply chain and real estate portfolio assessment. |
|
| 0.4 | | | Increase in all other general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales to 3.5% ($47 million) in fiscal 2007 from 3.1% ($39 million) for fiscal 2006, primarily due to planned increases ine-commerce and system support expenses designed at improving operating efficiencies. |
|
| 1.8 | | | Total |
|
Other Income, Net
Other income, net was $3 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $5 million in fiscal 2006. Other income was lower in fiscal 2007 as a result of falling interest rates and having lower average cash and short-term investment balances during
24 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
fiscal 2007 versus fiscal 2006. The lower cash and investment balances were the result of reduced net income during fiscal 2007.
Income Tax (Benefit)/Expense
Income tax expense was $27 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $41 million in fiscal 2006. The effective income tax rate was 36.9% in fiscal 2007 and 38.9% in fiscal 2006. The decrease in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to the generation of state income tax credits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically financed our operations primarily from internally generated cash flow, with occasional short-term and long-term borrowings and equity financing in past years. Our primary capital requirements have been for the construction of newly opened, remodeled, expanded or relocated stores, the financing of inventories and, in the past, construction of corporate facilities. We believe that our working capital, cash flows from operating activities, and intermittent credit facility borrowings will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities for each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in millions) was $34, $116 and $162, respectively. The $82 million decrease in cash provided by operations in fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007 was primarily attributable to the discontinued demo concept (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements). Additional details regarding the decrease in cash from operating activities are as follows:
| | | | |
|
$millions | | | Attributable to |
|
$ | (33 | ) | | Net loss, primarily due to negative (5)% comparable store net sales in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, asset impairments and lease termination charges associated with discontinued operations. |
|
| (24 | ) | | Decrease in cash flows from non-cash asset impairments and loss on disposals primarily due to the discontinued demo concept. |
|
| (21 | ) | | Decrease in cash flows from other current liabilities due to reduced compensation and lease termination accruals primarily associated with the discontinued demo concept. |
|
| (11 | ) | | Decrease in operating cash flows primarily due to a gain on the sale of the Anaheim distribution center. The $25 million of cash proceeds are classified in investing cash flows. |
|
| 15 | | | Decrease in merchandise inventories, net of accounts payable, due primarily to our strategy to reduce overall ending inventory at the end of fiscal 2008 given current economic conditions. |
|
| (8 | ) | | Decrease in cash flows from other changes in working capital items. |
|
$ | (82 | ) | | Total |
|
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 25
Working Capital
Working capital at the end of each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in millions) was $98, $187 and $195, respectively. The $89 million decrease in working capital at January 31, 2009 compared to February 2, 2008 was attributable to the following:
| | | | |
|
$millions | | | Description |
|
$ | 187 | | | Working capital at February 2, 2008 |
|
| (73 | ) | | Decrease in cash and cash equivalents, primarily due to $53 million of share repurchases and $47 million of demo lease termination payments, among other items (see cash flows statement). |
|
| (46 | ) | | Decrease in inventories, net of accounts payable, primarily as a result of our efforts during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 to reduce overall inventory levels in response to the current economic environment. |
|
| 24 | | | Net decrease in other current liabilities from reduced compensation accruals primarily due to lower store counts as a result of the discontinued demo concept and a decrease in our accrued gift card liability as a result of current year redemptions net of new gift card issuances. |
|
| 6 | | | Net increase in other current assets. |
|
$ | 98 | | | Working capital at January 31, 2009 |
|
Investing Cash Flows
Net cash used in investing activities in each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in millions) was $56, $98 and $114, respectively. Investing cash flows for fiscal 2008 were comprised of capital expenditures of $81 million offset by proceeds from the sale of the Anaheim distribution center of approximately $25 million. Investing cash flows for fiscal 2007 were comprised of capital expenditures of $106 million and purchases of a long-term investment of $23 million associated with the Company’s new Olathe, Kansas distribution center (see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K), partially offset by $31 million in net maturities of short-term marketable securities. Capital expenditures were predominantly for refreshing existing stores and the opening of new, relocated and expanded stores during fiscal 2008 and 2007.
Fiscal 2008 New Store Costs
Our average cost to build a new, relocated, or refreshed store in fiscal 2008, including leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures was approximately $0.7 million. We expect the average cost for these stores to be slightly lower in the future. The average total cost to build new stores or relocate or expand stores will vary in the future depending on various factors, including square footage, changes in store design, and local construction costs. The average landlord allowance, which is shown in the consolidated financial statements as a deferred lease incentive, was approximately $0.2 million in each of fiscal 2008 and 2007 (where an allowance was granted). Our average cost for initial inventory for new stores opened in fiscal 2008 was approximately $0.2 million. Our initial inventory for new stores will vary in the future depending on various factors, including store concept and square footage.
In fiscal 2009, we expect total capital expenditures to be approximately $30 million, broken down as follows:
| | | | |
|
$millions | | | Description |
|
$ | 19 | | | Store capital expenditures. |
|
| 10 | | | Investments in new information technology capabilities, particularly with regard to supply chain, and store systems. |
|
| 1 | | | Other corporate capital expenditures, including maintenance capital. |
|
$ | 30 | | | Total |
|
26 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
We currently expect total annual capital expenditure requirements for future years to be approximately $50 million per year as we continue remodeling existing stores and investing in new information technology capabilities. We have not entered into any material purchase commitments for capital expenditures related to our store opening or relocation/expansion plans.
Financing Cash Flows
Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2008 was $51 million compared to cash provided in fiscal 2007 and cash used in fiscal 2006 of $28 million and $90 million, respectively. The primary source of financing outflows in fiscal 2008 was a repurchase and retirement of $53 million in common stock. Proceeds from employee exercises of stock options accounted for the remaining source of financing cash inflows for fiscal 2008.
Information regarding our common stock repurchase program is contained in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, which note is incorporated herein by reference.
Credit Facility
On April 29, 2008, we entered into a new, asset-backed credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders (the “New Credit Facility”) which expires April 29, 2013. The New Credit Facility provides for a secured revolving line of credit of up to $150 million, which can be increased to up to $225 million subject to lender approval. Extensions of credit under the New Credit Facility are limited to a borrowing base consisting of specified percentages of eligible categories of assets, primarily cash and inventory (generally, 75% of inventories). The New Credit Facility is available for direct borrowing and, subject to borrowing base availability ($77 million at January 31, 2009), up to $75 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit and up to $15 million is available for swing-line loans. The New Credit Facility is secured by our cash, cash equivalents, deposit accounts, securities accounts, credit card receivables and inventory. Direct borrowings under the New Credit Facility bear interest at the Administrative Agent’s alternate base rate (as defined, 1.7% at January 31, 2009) or at optional interest rates that are primarily dependent upon LIBOR or the Federal Funds Effective Rate for the time period chosen. The New Credit Facility replaces a $200 million unsecured credit agreement, dated as of September 14, 2005, by and between us and a syndicate of lenders (the “Prior Credit Facility”). The Prior Credit Facility, which was scheduled to mature on September 14, 2010, was terminated concurrently with the execution of the New Credit Facility. We currently believe that the New Credit Facility, existing cash balances and cash flows from operations during fiscal 2009 will be sufficient to meet our operating needs for at least the next 12 months. At January 31, 2009, we had no direct borrowings and $11 million in letters of credit outstanding under the New Credit Facility. Our remaining availability at January 31, 2009 was $66 million and our weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings during fiscal 2008 was 4.0%.
We are not subject to any financial covenant restrictions under the New Credit Facility unless total remaining borrowing availability under the facility falls below $15 million at any point in time, or 10% of the aggregate lender commitments in the event the facility are increased beyond $150 million. We are restricted from incurring additional indebtedness or liens in excess of certain levels specified by the New Credit Facility. In general, we are not allowed to incur additional secured indebtedness, but can obtain unsecured indebtedness outside of the New Credit Facility up to $150 million. Additionally, the New Credit Facility contains specific limits on particular kinds of indebtedness, as defined in the facility agreement.
Contractual Obligations
We have minimum annual rental commitments under existing store leases as well as a minor amount of capital leases for computer equipment. We lease all of our retail store locations under operating leases. We lease equipment, from time to time, under both capital and operating leases. In addition, at any time, we are contingently liable for commercial
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 27
letters of credit with foreign suppliers of merchandise. At January 31, 2009, our future financial commitments under all existing contractual obligations were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period |
| | |
Contractual Obligations
| | | | Less than
| | 1-3
| | 3-5
| | More than
|
(In $millions) | | Total | | 1 year | | years | | years | | 5 years |
|
|
Operating lease obligations | | $525 | | $96 | | $169 | | $122 | | $138 |
Capital lease obligations | | <0.1 | | <0.1 | | <0.1 | | — | | — |
FIN 48 obligations including interest and penalties | | 1 | | — | | 1 | | — | | — |
Letters of credit | | 11 | | 11 | | — | | — | | — |
| | |
Total | | $537 | | $107 | | $170 | | $122 | | $138 |
| | |
| | |
We expect approximately 100 store operating leases per year to reach the end of their original lease term in each of the next 5 years. These leases will need to be renewed, extended or allowed to expire. As a result, actual future rental commitments may be significantly higher than that shown in the table above due to newly adjusted lease rates for renewals or extensions that are more expensive than current lease rates on expiring leases.
The contractual obligations table above does not include common area maintenance (CAM) charges, which are also a required contractual obligation under our store operating leases. In many of our leases, CAM charges are not fixed and can fluctuate significantly from year to year for any particular store. Total store rental expenses, including CAM, for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in millions) were $165, $158 and $149, respectively. We expect total CAM expenses to continue to increase from year to year or as long-term leases come up for renewal at current market rates in excess of original lease terms.
Operating Leases – We lease our retail stores and certain equipment under operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through January 2021. Substantially all of our retail store leases require us to pay CAM charges, insurance, property taxes and percentage rent ranging from 3% to 14% based on sales volumes exceeding certain minimum sales levels. The initial terms of such leases are typically 8 to 10 years, many of which contain renewal options exercisable at our discretion. Most leases also contain rent escalation clauses that come into effect at various times throughout the lease term. Rent expense is recorded under the straight-line method over the life of the lease (see “Straight-Line Rent” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K). Other rent escalation clauses can take effect based on changes in primary mall tenants throughout the term of a given lease. Most leases also contain cancellation or kick-out clauses in our favor that relieve us of any future obligation under a lease if specified sales levels are not achieved by a specified date. None of our retail store leases contain purchase options.
We review the operating performance of our stores on an ongoing basis to determine which stores, if any, to expand, relocate or close. We closed 38 PacSun stores in fiscal 2008. We currently anticipate closing approximately35-50 stores in fiscal 2009. See “Real Estate Strategy” within the “Stores” discussion in Part I, Item 1 captioned, “Business,” of this report.
The FIN 48 obligations shown in the table above represent uncertain tax positions related to temporary differences. The years for which the temporary differences related to the uncertain tax positions will reverse have been estimated in scheduling the obligations within the table.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of such agreements, services to be provided by us, or intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our
28 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
directors and certain of our officers that will require us, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our directors and officers in certain circumstances.
It is not possible to determine our maximum potential liability under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby the Company has financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments, or other contingent arrangements that expose the Company to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligation under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk, or credit risk support to the Company.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Information regarding new accounting pronouncements is contained in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, which note is incorporated herein by reference.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation or changing prices has had a material effect on the results of operations in the recent past. There can be no assurance that our business will not be affected by inflation or changing prices in the future.
Seasonality and Quarterly Results
Our business is seasonal by nature. Our first quarter historically accounts for the smallest percentage of annual net sales with each successive quarter contributing a greater percentage than the last. In recent years, approximately 45% of our net sales have occurred in the first half of the fiscal year and 55% have occurred in the second half, with the back-to-school and Christmas selling periods accounting for approximately30-34% of our annual net sales and a higher percentage of our operating income on a combined basis. Our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including the timing of store openings; the amount of revenue contributed by new stores; the timing and level of markdowns; the timing of store closings, expansions and relocations; competitive factors; and general economic conditions.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
To the extent we borrow under our credit facility, we are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. At January 31, 2009, there were no direct borrowings outstanding under our credit facility. Based on the interest rate of 1.7% on our credit facility at January 31, 2009, if interest rates on the credit facility were to increase by 10%, and to the extent borrowings were outstanding, for every $1 million outstanding on our credit facility, net income would be reduced by approximately $1 thousand per year. We are not a party with respect to derivative financial instruments.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Information with respect to this item is set forth in “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements,” which appears immediately following the “Signatures” section of this report and which section is incorporated herein by reference.
| |
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN, AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH, ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 29
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined underRule 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Commission’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of January 31, 2009.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 31, 2009.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
30 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
Anaheim, California
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanyingManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009, based on the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended January 31, 2009, of the Company, and our report dated March 31, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 31, 2009
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 31
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the sections captioned “Proposal 1 Election of Directors — Nominees and Continuing Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance,” and “Board of Directors and Committees of the Board — Committees of the Board of Directors” in the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the sections captioned “Board of Directors and Committees of the Board — Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation and Related Matters” in the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
| |
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the sections captioned “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Security Ownership of Principal Shareholders and Management” in the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the sections captioned “Related Party Transactions Policy” and “Board of Directors and Committees of the Board — Committees of the Board of Directors” in the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information with respect to this item is incorporated by reference from the section captioned “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
| |
(a) 1. | The financial statements listed in the “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” atpage F-1 are filed as a part of this report. |
| | |
| 2. | Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. |
|
| 3. | Exhibits included or incorporated herein: See “Index to Exhibits” at end of consolidated financial statements. |
32 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed, on March 31, 2009, on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
| | |
| By: | /s/ Sally Frame Kasaks |
Sally Frame Kasaks
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
|
| | | | |
/s/ Sally Frame Kasaks Sally Frame Kasaks | | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ Michael L. Henry Michael L. Henry | | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ Peter Starrett Peter Starrett | | Non-Employee Lead Director | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ Brett Brewer Brett Brewer | | Non-Employee Director | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ William C. Cobb William C. Cobb | | Non-Employee Director | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ Pearson C. Cummin III Pearson C. Cummin III | | Non-Employee Director | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ Michael Goldstein Michael Goldstein | | Non-Employee Director | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ George R. Mrkonic George R. Mrkonic | | Non-Employee Director | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ Thomas M. Murnane Thomas M. Murnane | | Non-Employee Director | | March 31, 2009 |
| | | | |
/s/ Grace Nichols Grace Nichols | | Non-Employee Director | | March 31, 2009 |
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 33
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED:
JANUARY 31, 2009 (“Fiscal 2008”)
FEBRUARY 2, 2008 (“Fiscal 2007”)
FEBRUARY 3, 2007 (“Fiscal 2006”)
| | | | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | | F-2 | |
| | | | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 | | | F-3 | |
| | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Operations for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2009 | | | F-4 | |
| | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2009 | | | F-5 | |
| | | | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2009 | | | F-6 | |
| | | | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | | F-7 | |
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
Anaheim, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2009, and February 2, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 31, 2009, and February 2, 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009, based on the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 31, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 31, 2009
F-2 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| |
(In thousands, except share amounts) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 24,776 | | | $ | 97,587 | |
Merchandise inventories | | | 107,205 | | | | 170,182 | |
Other current assets | | | 58,943 | | | | 52,818 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 190,924 | | | | 320,587 | |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET: | | | | | | | | |
Gross property and equipment | | | 665,236 | | | | 688,241 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (341,892 | ) | | | (311,998 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total property and equipment, net | | | 323,344 | | | | 376,243 | |
Assets held for sale | | | 3,682 | | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 21,984 | | | | 15,231 | |
Other assets | | | 29,575 | | | | 40,082 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 569,509 | | | $ | 752,143 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 45,263 | | | $ | 62,349 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 47,564 | | | | 71,107 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 92,827 | | | | 133,456 | |
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Deferred lease incentives | | | 52,313 | | | | 74,012 | |
Deferred rent | | | 23,008 | | | | 27,669 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 29,374 | | | | 33,661 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total long-term liabilities | | | 104,695 | | | | 135,342 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, $.01 par value; 170,859,375 shares authorized; 65,174,144 and 70,026,510 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | | | 652 | | | | 700 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 2,306 | | | | 16,761 | |
Retained earnings | | | 369,029 | | | | 465,884 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 371,987 | | | | 483,345 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 569,509 | | | $ | 752,143 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-3
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| | | February 3,
| |
FISCAL YEAR ENDED | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| |
|
Net sales | | $ | 1,254,886 | | | $ | 1,306,028 | | | $ | 1,241,294 | |
Cost of goods sold, including buying, distribution and occupancy costs | | | 934,779 | | | | 892,102 | | | | 834,783 | |
| | |
| | |
Gross margin | | | 320,107 | | | | 413,926 | | | | 406,511 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 381,008 | | | | 344,295 | | | | 305,205 | |
| | |
| | |
Operating (loss)/income from continuing operations | | | (60,901 | ) | | | 69,631 | | | | 101,306 | |
Other income, net | | | 2,369 | | | | 3,012 | | | | 4,620 | |
| | |
| | |
(Loss)/income from continuing operations before income tax (benefit)/expense | | | (58,532 | ) | | | 72,643 | | | | 105,926 | |
Income tax (benefit)/expense | | | (19,287 | ) | | | 26,836 | | | | 41,171 | |
| | |
| | |
(Loss)/income from continuing operations | | | (39,245 | ) | | | 45,807 | | | | 64,755 | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax effects | | | (24,577 | ) | | | (76,174 | ) | | | (25,134 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Net (loss)/income | | $ | (63,822 | ) | | $ | (30,367 | ) | | $ | 39,621 | |
| | |
| | |
Comprehensive (loss)/income | | $ | (63,822 | ) | | $ | (30,367 | ) | | $ | 39,621 | |
| | |
| | |
(Loss)/income from continuing operations per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.59 | ) | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 0.91 | |
| | |
| | |
Diluted | | $ | (0.59 | ) | | $ | 0.65 | | | $ | 0.91 | |
| | |
| | |
Net (loss)/income per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.96 | ) | | $ | (0.44 | ) | | $ | 0.56 | |
| | |
| | |
Diluted | | $ | (0.96 | ) | | $ | (0.44 | ) | | $ | 0.56 | |
| | |
| | |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 66,652,088 | | | | 69,749,536 | | | | 70,800,912 | |
| | |
| | |
Diluted | | | 66,652,088 | | | | 70,020,500 | | | | 71,170,181 | |
| | |
| | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common
| | | | | | Additional
| | | | | | | |
| | Stock
| | | Common
| | | Paid-in
| | | Retained
| | | | |
(In thousands, except share amounts) | | Shares | | | Stock | | | Capital | | | Earnings | | | Total | |
| |
|
BALANCE, January 28, 2006 | | | 73,751,249 | | | $ | 737 | | | $ | 23,866 | | | $ | 522,187 | | | $ | 546,790 | |
Exercise of stock options and shares issued under employee stock purchase plan | | | 724,828 | | | | 8 | | | | 8,562 | | | | — | | | | 8,570 | |
Repurchase and retirement of common stock | | | (4,916,000 | ) | | | (49 | ) | | | (99,297 | ) | | | — | | | | (99,346 | ) |
Stock compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,220 | | | | — | | | | 6,220 | |
Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,498 | | | | — | | | | 1,498 | |
Reclassify negative additional paid-in capital to retained earnings(1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 64,934 | | | | (64,934 | ) | | | — | |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 39,621 | | | | 39,621 | |
| | |
| | |
BALANCE, February 3, 2007 | | | 69,560,077 | | | | 696 | | | | 5,783 | | | | 496,874 | | | | 503,353 | |
Exercise of stock options and shares issued under employee stock purchase plan | | | 466,433 | | | | 4 | | | | 4,291 | | | | — | | | | 4,295 | |
Stock compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,398 | | | | — | | | | 6,398 | |
Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 289 | | | | — | | | | 289 | |
FIN 48 adoption adjustment (see Note 6) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (623 | ) | | | (623 | ) |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (30,367 | ) | | | (30,367 | ) |
| | |
| | |
BALANCE, February 2, 2008 | | | 70,026,510 | | | | 700 | | | | 16,761 | | | | 465,884 | | | | 483,345 | |
Exercise of stock options and shares issued under employee stock purchase plan | | | 345,349 | | | | 3 | | | | 1,846 | | | | — | | | | 1,850 | |
Repurchase and retirement of common stock | | | (5,347,544 | ) | | | (53 | ) | | | (52,858 | ) | | | — | | | | (52,911 | ) |
Restricted stock award, vesting of shares | | | 149,829 | | | | 2 | | | | (47 | ) | | | — | | | | (46 | ) |
Stock compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,167 | | | | — | | | | 5,167 | |
Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,596 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,596 | ) |
Reclassify negative additional paid-in capital to retained earnings(1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 33,033 | | | | (33,033 | ) | | | — | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (63,822 | ) | | | (63,822 | ) |
| | |
| | |
BALANCE, January 31, 2009 | | | 65,174,144 | | | $ | 652 | | | $ | 2,306 | | | $ | 369,029 | | | $ | 371,987 | |
| | |
| | |
(1) Share repurchases in fiscal 2008 and 2006 exceeded the value of additional paid-in capital. Accordingly, at the end of each of those quarters, negative additional paid-in capital was reclassified against retained earnings.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-5
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands)
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| | | February 3,
| |
FISCAL YEAR ENDED | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss)/income | | $ | (63,822 | ) | | $ | (30,367 | ) | | $ | 39,621 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 76,433 | | | | 80,323 | | | | 72,529 | |
Stock compensation | | | 5,167 | | | | 6,398 | | | | 6,220 | |
Asset impairment (including goodwill) | | | 35,348 | | | | 59,829 | | | | 24,409 | |
Loss on disposal of equipment | | | 4,668 | | | | 4,507 | | | | 1,127 | |
Gain on sale of Anaheim distribution center | | | (10,768 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Tax (deficiencies)/benefits related to stock-based compensation | | | (1,596 | ) | | | 289 | | | | 1,498 | |
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation | | | (5 | ) | | | (292 | ) | | | (942 | ) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Merchandise inventories | | | 62,977 | | | | 35,031 | | | | 9,927 | |
Other current assets | | | (6,125 | ) | | | (6,563 | ) | | | (4,770 | ) |
Other assets | | | (2,738 | ) | | | (14,891 | ) | | | 7,896 | |
Accounts payable | | | (17,086 | ) | | | (4,232 | ) | | | 19,031 | |
Other current liabilities | | | (17,887 | ) | | | 3,552 | | | | (5,687 | ) |
Deferred lease incentives | | | (21,699 | ) | | | (15,359 | ) | | | 7,931 | |
Deferred rent | | | (4,661 | ) | | | (2,950 | ) | | | 1,553 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | (4,291 | ) | | | 366 | | | | (18,703 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 33,915 | | | | 115,641 | | | | 161,640 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (80,934 | ) | | | (106,363 | ) | | | (157,788 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of Anaheim distribution center | | | 25,000 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | | 275 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Purchases of available-for-sale short-term investments | | | — | | | | (171,400 | ) | | | (296,031 | ) |
Maturities of available-for-sale short-term investments | | | — | | | | 202,900 | | | | 324,831 | |
Purchases of held-to-maturity short-term investments (Note 11) | | | — | | | | (23,300 | ) | | | — | |
Maturities of held-to-maturity short-term investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,611 | |
| | |
| | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (55,659 | ) | | | (98,163 | ) | | | (114,377 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Borrowings under long-term debt obligations (Note 11) | | | — | | | | 23,300 | | | | — | |
Borrowings under credit facility | | | 235,689 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Principle payments under credit facility | | | (235,689 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Repurchase and retirement of common stock | | | (52,911 | ) | | | — | | | | (99,346 | ) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 1,850 | | | | 4,295 | | | | 8,570 | |
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation | | | 5 | | | | 292 | | | | 942 | |
Principal payments under capital lease and long-term debt obligations | | | (11 | ) | | | (45 | ) | | | (347 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Net cash(used in)/provided by financing activities | | | (51,067 | ) | | | 27,842 | | | | (90,181 | ) |
| | |
| | |
NET (DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | (72,811 | ) | | | 45,320 | | | | (42,918 | ) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of fiscal year | | | 97,587 | | | | 52,267 | | | | 95,185 | |
| | |
| | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of fiscal year | | $ | 24,776 | | | $ | 97,587 | | | $ | 52,267 | |
| | |
| | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 601 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 6 | |
Cash (refunded)/paid for income taxes | | $ | (14,937 | ) | | $ | 10,668 | | | $ | 42,251 | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Decrease)/increase in accrued property and equipment | | $ | (5,707 | ) | | $ | (6,358 | ) | | $ | 5,023 | |
Purchases of property pursuant to capital lease obligations | | $ | 20 | | | $ | 11 | | | | — | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
| |
1. | NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Nature of Business – Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is a leading lifestyle specialty retailer rooted in the youth culture and fashion vibe of Southern California. The Company sells casual apparel with a limited selection of accessories and footwear designed to meet the needs of teens and young adults. The Company operates a nationwide, primarily mall-based chain of retail stores, under the names “Pacific Sunwear” and “PacSun.” In addition, the Company operates ane-commerce website at www.pacsun.com which sells PacSun merchandise online, provides content and community for its target customers, and provides information about the Company. As of January 31, 2009, the Company leased and operated 932 stores among all 50 states and Puerto Rico, comprised of 3,587,683 square feet.
The results of operations for all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements excludes the financial impact of the Company’s former demo and One Thousand Steps concepts due to the designation of these operations as discontinued operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, respectively (see Note 2). During fiscal 2007, the Company closed 74 demo stores, which specialized in fashion-focused streetwear apparel, as well as its nine-store One Thousand Steps footwear concept, which was originally launched in April 2006 and discontinued in January 2008. During fiscal 2008, the Company closed its remaining 153 demo stores.
The Company’s fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31st. Fiscal year-end dates for all periods presented or discussed herein are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year | | Year-End Date | | | # of Weeks | |
|
2009 | | | January 30, 2010 | | | | 52 | |
2008 | | | January 31, 2009 | | | | 52 | |
2007 | | | February 2, 2008 | | | | 52 | |
2006 | | | February 3, 2007 | | | | 53 | |
Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp. and Miraloma Corp. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Presentation – The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
Use of Estimates – The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America necessarily requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments – Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 (“SFAS 107”), “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires management to disclose the estimated fair value of certain assets and liabilities defined by SFAS 107 as financial instruments. Financial instruments are generally defined by SFAS 107 as cash, evidence of ownership interest in an entity, or a contractual obligation that both conveys to one entity a right to receive cash or other financial instruments from another entity and imposes on the other entity the obligation to deliver cash or other financial instruments to the first entity. As of January 31, 2009, management believes that the carrying amounts of cash, receivables and payables approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-7
Cash and Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid financial instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of commercial paper and money market funds.
Merchandise Inventories – Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market utilizing the retail method. At any given time, inventories include items that have been marked down to management’s best estimate of their fair market value. These estimates are based on a combination of factors, including current selling prices, current and projected inventory levels, current and projected rates of sell-through, known markdownand/or promotional events expected to create a permanent decrease in inventory value, estimated inventory shrink and aging of specific items. Reserves of approximately $3.5 million have been accrued against existing inventory at January 31, 2009 in consideration of these factors. Actual results have historically been within the Company’s expectations and the reserves established for such items. While the Company does not expect actual results to differ materially from its estimates, to the extent they do differ for any of these factors, the Company may have to record additional reserves in subsequent periods, which could reduce its gross margins and operating results.
Property and Equipment – All property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:
| | |
Property Category | | Depreciation Term |
|
Buildings | | 39 years |
Building improvements | | Lesser of remaining estimated useful life of the building or estimated useful life of the improvement |
Leasehold improvements | | Lesser of remaining lease term (at inception, generally 10 years) or estimated useful life of the improvement |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | Generally 5 years (ranging from 3 to 15 years), depending on the nature of the asset |
Other Long-Lived Assets – The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.” Factors that are considered important and that could trigger an impairment review include a current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses and a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses or insufficient income associated with the use of a long-lived asset or asset group. Other factors include a significant change in the manner of the use of the asset or a significant negative industry or economic trend. This evaluation is performed based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operating activities compared with the carrying value of the related assets. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized, measured by the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the assets, with such estimated fair values determined using the best information available, generally the discounted future cash flows of the assets using a rate that approximates the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. See Note 3, “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets,” for a discussion of asset impairment charges recognized in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Insurance Reserves – The Company uses a combination of third-party insurance and self-insurance for workers’ compensation, employee medical and general liability insurance. For each type of insurance, the Company has defined stop-loss or deductible provisions that limit the Company’s maximum exposure to claims. The Company maintains reserves for estimated claims associated with these programs, both reported and incurred but not reported, based on historical claims experience and other estimated assumptions.
Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method as set forth in SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences
F-8 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, in the judgment of the Company’s management, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including recent financial operations, projected future taxable income, scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies, and the length of tax asset carryforward periods. The realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable earnings in certain jurisdictions. If the Company subsequently determines that the carrying value of these assets, which had been written down, would be realized in the future, the value of the deferred tax assets would be increased, thereby increasing net income in the period when that determination was made.
The Company accounts for tax positions in accordance with FIN 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This pronouncement prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the Company’s tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions.
Litigation – The Company is involved from time to time in litigation incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of current litigation will not likely have a material adverse effect upon the results of operations or financial condition of the Company and, from time to time, may make provisions for probable litigation losses. As of January 31, 2009, litigation reserves were not material to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole (see “Litigation” in Note 12).
Revenue Recognition – Sales are recognized upon purchase by customers at the Company’s retail store locations or upon delivery to and acceptance by the customer for orders placed through the Company’s website. The Company records the sale of gift cards as a current liability and recognizes a sale when a customer redeems a gift card. The amount of the gift card liability is determined taking into account our estimate of the portion of gift cards that will not be redeemed or recovered (“gift card breakage”). Gift card breakage is generally recognized as revenue after 24 months, at which time the likelihood of redemption is considered remote based on our historical redemption data. Gift card breakage has never been more than 0.4% of sales in any fiscal year. The Company accrues for estimated sales returns by customers based on historical sales return results. Sales return accrual activity for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year | |
| | | |
(in $000s) | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| |
|
Beginning balance | | $ | 722 | | | $ | 794 | | | $ | 734 | |
Provisions | | | 24,144 | | | | 25,667 | | | | 24,345 | |
Usage | | | (24,430 | ) | | | (25,739 | ) | | | (24,285 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Ending balance | | $ | 436 | | | $ | 722 | | | $ | 794 | |
| | |
| | |
E-commerce Shipping and Handling Revenues and Expenses – The Company accounts for shipping and handling revenues and expenses in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (“EITF”)00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs.” All shipping and handling revenues and expenses relate to sales activity generated from the Company’s websites. Amounts charged to the Company’s internet customers for shipping and handling revenues are included in net sales. Amounts paid by the Company for internet shipping and handling expenses are included in cost of goods sold and encompass payments to third party shippers and costs to store, move and prepare merchandise for shipment.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-9
Customer Loyalty Programs – The Company accounts for its customer loyalty programs in accordance withEITF 00-22, “Accounting for ‘Points’ and Certain Other Time-Based or Volume-Based Sales Incentive Offers, and Offers for Free Products or Services to Be Delivered in the Future.” Generally, these programs offer customers dollar-for-dollar discounts on future merchandise purchases within stated redemption periods if they purchase specified levels of merchandise in a current transaction. The impact of these programs is recognized ratably as a direct reduction in net sales over the series of transactions required to both earn and redeem the customer discounts. Redemptions generally occur within 30 days of original issuance.
Cost of Goods Sold, including Buying, Distribution and Occupancy Costs – Cost of goods sold includes the landed cost of merchandise and all expenses incurred by the Company’s buying and distribution functions. These costs include inbound freight, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs, and any other costs borne by the Company’s buying department and distribution center. Occupancy costs include store rents, common area charges, as well as store expenses related to telephone service, supplies, repairs and maintenance, insurance, loss prevention, and taxes and licenses.
Vendor Allowances – The Company accounts for allowance money received from vendors in accordance withEITF 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.” Cash consideration received from a vendor includes vendor allowances, rebates, cooperative advertising payments, etc. The Company recognizes cash received from vendors as a reduction in the price of the vendor’s products and accordingly, as a reduction in cost of sales at the time the related inventory is sold.
Straight-Line Rent – The Company accounts for rent expense in accordance with SFAS 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and FTB85-3, “Accounting for Operating Leases with Scheduled Rent Increases.” Accordingly, rent expense under the Company’s store operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the original term of each store’s lease, inclusive of rent holiday periods during store construction and excluding any lease renewal options. The Company expenses pre-opening rent in accordance with FASB Staff Position13-1, “Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period.”
Deferred Lease Incentives – The Company accounts for landlord allowances in accordance with SFAS 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Technical Bulletin (“FTB”)88-1, “Issues Relating to Accounting for Leases.” Accordingly, all amounts received from landlords to fund tenant improvements are recorded as a deferred lease incentive liability and then amortized as a credit to rent expense over the related store’s lease term.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses – Selling, general and administrative expenses include payroll, depreciation and amortization, advertising, credit authorization charges, expenses associated with the counting of physical inventories, and all other general and administrative expenses not directly related to merchandise or operating the Company’s stores.
Advertising Costs – Costs associated with the production or placement of advertising, such as photography, design, creative talent, editing, magazine insertion fees and other costs associated with such advertising, are expensed the first time the advertising appears publicly. Advertising costs were $16 million, $17 million, and $17 million in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation – The Company accounts for stock-based compensation expense under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” The Company recorded non-cash, stock-based compensation in the consolidated statement of operations for each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year | |
| | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | |
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in cost of goods sold | | $ | 1,972 | | | $ | 2,335 | | | $ | 1,836 | |
Stock-based compensation expense included in selling, general and administrative expenses | | $ | 3,351 | | | $ | 3,416 | | | $ | 3,919 | |
F-10 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
Earnings Per Share – The Company reports earnings per share in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 128, “Earnings Per Share.” Basic earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted for the incremental shares attributed to outstanding options to purchase common stock. For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, incremental shares included in, and anti-dilutive options excluded from, the calculations for each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year | |
| | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | |
|
Incremental shares | | | — | | | | 270,964 | | | | 369,269 | |
Anti-dilutive options and non-vested shares | | | 2,564,554 | | | | 2,308,227 | | | | 2,376,996 | |
Anti-dilutive options and non-vested shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because either the option exercise price or the grant date fair value of the non-vested share is greater than the market price of the Company’s common stock.
Comprehensive Operations – The Company reports comprehensive operations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income.” SFAS 130 establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income. Components of comprehensive (loss) income include net (loss) income, foreign currency translation adjustments and gains/losses associated with investments available for sale. There was no difference between net (loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income for any of the periods presented.
Vendor and Merchandise Concentrations – During each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, Quiksilver (which incorporates the Quiksilver, Roxy, and DC Shoes brands) accounted for 10%, 12%, and 11% of total net sales, respectively, and Billabong (which incorporates both Billabong and Element brands) accounted for 11%, 10%, and 11% of total net sales, respectively. No other individual branded vendor accounted for more than 10% of total net sales for any period.
The merchandise assortment for the Company as a percentage of net sales for each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year | |
| | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | |
|
Young Mens Apparel | | | 41 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 37 | % |
Juniors Apparel | | | 42 | % | | | 33 | % | | | 29 | % |
Accessories | | | 13 | % | | | 17 | % | | | 20 | % |
Footwear | | | 4 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 14 | % |
| | |
| | |
Total | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
| | |
| | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This new standard provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. This framework is intended to provide increased consistency in how fair value determinations are made under various existing accounting standards which permit, or in some cases require, estimates of fair market value. SFAS 157 also expands financial statement disclosure requirements about a company’s use of fair value measurements, including the effect of such measures on earnings. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Nos.157-1 and157-2, which partially deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 effective February 3, 2008, for all financial assets and financial liabilities as required; however, the adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not affect the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements when fully adopted in fiscal 2009.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-11
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities,” (“SFAS 159”), which permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The Company adopted this standard at the beginning of the Company’s fiscal year beginning February 3, 2008. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations,” (“SFAS 141(R)”), which requires the Company to record fair value estimates of contingent consideration and certain other potential liabilities during the original purchase price allocation, expense acquisition costs as incurred and does not permit certain restructuring activities previously allowed underEITF 95-3 to be recorded as a component of purchase accounting. The Company will adopt this standard at the beginning of the Company’s fiscal year in 2010 for all prospective business acquisitions, if any.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51,” (“SFAS 160”), which causes non-controlling interests in subsidiaries to be included in the equity section of the balance sheet. The Company will adopt this standard at the beginning of the Company’s fiscal year in 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
| |
2. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
Financial results of the Company’s former demo and One Thousand Steps concepts are reported as “loss from discontinued operations (net of tax effects)” in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive operations due to the designation of these operations as discontinued operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, respectively. During fiscal 2007, the Company closed 74 demo stores which specialized in fashion-focused streetwear apparel as well as its nine-store One Thousand Steps (“OTS”) footwear concept, which was originally launched in April 2006 and discontinued in January 2008. Subsequently in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company closed its remaining 153 demo stores. The determination to take this action resulted from a comprehensive review and evaluation of the real estate portfolio and profit performance of the Company’s demo and OTS stores and after having exhausted other strategic alternatives.
The Company estimated that it would make total cash payments of approximately $50-60 million during fiscal 2008 in order to terminate all demo store leases and pay all liquidation-related employee retention and severance costs and agency fees associated with the demo liquidation effort. Total actual cash payments made during fiscal 2008 associated with the discontinuation of demo were approximately $58 million. A tabular reconciliation of the charges incurred, payments made, and reconciling adjustments made during fiscal 2008 to account for the discontinuation of demo is set forth below in millions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Lease
| | | Employee
| | | | | | | |
| | Termination
| | | Retention and
| | | | | | | |
| | Costs | | | Severance Costs | | | Agency Fees | | | Total | |
| | | |
|
Liability at February 2, 2008(1) | | $ | 4.0 | | | $ | 3.4 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7.4 | |
Cash payments | | | (47.8 | ) | | | (6.0 | ) | | | (4.0 | ) | | | (57.8 | ) |
Charges to expense | | | 45.7 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 4.0 | | | | 52.5 | |
Adjustments to liability(2) | | | (1.9 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | — | | | | (2.1 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Liability at January 31, 2009 | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | |
| | |
(1) In January 2008, the Company announced its intent to discontinue the demo business. Amounts accrued at February 2, 2008 represent charges incurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 for stores already closed and severance charges communicated to employees prior to the end of fiscal 2007.
(2) Adjustments to the demo liquidation liabilities were based on settlement amounts that differed from the original estimate as a result of good faith negotiations with individual landlords and actual performance of the liquidation process.
No further cash payments related to the discontinuation of demo are expected. All charges incurred in the discontinuation of demo are included in the financial results of the discontinued operations disclosed above within this Note.
F-12 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
The operating results of the discontinued operations are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| | | February 3,
| |
Fiscal Year Ended | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| |
|
Net sales | | $ | 27,051 | | | $ | 153,697 | | | $ | 205,939 | |
Loss before income tax benefit | | | (40,683 | ) | | | (125,512 | ) | | | (41,711 | ) |
Income tax benefit | | | (16,106 | ) | | | (49,338 | ) | | | (16,577 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations | | $ | (24,577 | ) | | $ | (76,174 | ) | | $ | (25,134 | ) |
Loss from discontinued operations per diluted share | | $ | (0.37 | ) | | $ | (1.09 | ) | | $ | (0.35 | ) |
| |
3. | IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS |
Store Assets
The Company assesses whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that potentially indicate the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. As a result of these evaluations during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of approximately $29 million, $1 million and $1 million in each year, respectively, within selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations to write-down the carrying value of long-lived store assets to their estimated fair values.
Goodwill
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets.” The Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amount of goodwill annually in conjunction with the preparation of its annual financial statements or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be fully recoverable. With the significant deterioration in the retail business climate as well as a large decline in the market value of the Company’s common stock during the third quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company determined an interim evaluation of goodwill recoverability was warranted. Impairment is assessed when the fair value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, is less than its carrying amount. The amount of impairment loss recognized is equal to the difference between the reporting unit goodwill carrying value and the implied fair value of the goodwill, with the implied fair value determined using the best information available, generally the discounted future cash flows of the assets. As a result of the Company’s assessment, it was determined that the goodwill created in connection with its 1986 four-store acquisition in California and its 1997 fifteen-store acquisition in Florida was fully impaired and we recorded a pre-tax, non-cash goodwill impairment charge of approximately $6 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2008. After recording the impairment charge, the Company has no goodwill remaining on its consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2009.
The Company operates exclusively in the retail apparel industry in which the Company distributes, designs and produces clothing and related products catering to the teen/young adult demographic through primarily mall-based retail stores. In recent years, the Company’s operating and reportable segments included the operations of the demo and OTS store concepts. The Company now operates a single business (PacSun) after having discontinued the demo and OTS businesses. Within PacSun, the Company has identified three operating segments (Core stores, Value stores, and pacsun.com) as defined by SFAS 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” The three operating segments have been aggregated into one reportable segment based on the similar nature of products sold, production, merchandising and distribution processes involved, target customers, and economic characteristics among the three operating segments.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-13
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation expense according to the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), “Share-based Payment.” The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of its recognized stock-based compensation expense. Forfeitures are estimated at the date of grant based on historical rates and reduce the compensation expense to be recognized. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercises. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of grant. Expected volatility is based primarily on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company records stock-based compensation expense using the graded vesting method over the vesting period, which is generally three to four years. The Company’s stock-based awards generally begin vesting one year after the grant date and, for stock options, expire in seven to ten years or three months after termination of employment with the Company. The Company’s stock-based compensation expense resulted from awards of stock options, non-vested shares, and stock appreciation rights, as well as from shares purchased under the Company’s employee share purchase plan.
For each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the fair value of the Company’s stock-based compensation activity was determined using the following weighted average assumptions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | Stock Awards | | ESPP | | Stock Awards | | ESPP | | Stock Awards | | ESPP |
|
Expected Option Life | | 4 years | | 0.5 years | | 4 years | | 0.5 years | | 5 years | | 0.5 years |
Stock Volatility | | 40.3% - 63.5% | | 45.4% - 57.0% | | 34.7% - 37.9% | | 31.9% - 45.4% | | 41.3% - 48.7% | | 31.9% - 35.4% |
Risk-free Interest Rates | | 1.2% - 3.0% | | 2.1% - 3.2% | | 3.1% - 4.9% | | 3.2% - 5.0% | | 4.6% - 5.1% | | 4.5% - 5.2% |
Expected Dividends | | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | | None |
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $0.4 million, $2 million and $6 million, respectively.
At January 31, 2009, outstanding incentive and nonqualified options had exercise prices ranging from $1.20 to $28.90 per share, with an average exercise price of $18.57 per share, and generally begin vesting one year after the grant date. Options generally vest over three or four years. The options generally expire seven or ten years from the date of grant or three months after employment or services are terminated.
At January 31, 2009, incentive and nonqualified options to purchase 2,219,248 shares were outstanding and 6,106,393 shares were available for future grant under the Company’s stock compensation plans. During fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized tax benefits of $1.6 million, $0.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, resulting from the exercise of certain nonqualified stock options.
Under the Company’s stock option plans, incentive and nonqualified options have been granted to employees and directors to purchase common stock at prices equal to the fair value of the Company’s shares at the respective grant
F-14 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
dates. A summary of stock option (incentive and nonqualified) activity under the Company’s 2005 Performance Incentive Plan for fiscal 2008 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Weighted-
| | |
| | | | | Weighted-
| | Average
| | Aggregate
|
| | | | | Average
| | Remaining
| | Intrinsic
|
| | | | | Exercise
| | Contractual
| | Value
|
Stock Options | | Shares | | | Price | | Term (Yrs.) | | ($000s) |
|
|
Outstanding at February 2, 2008 | | | 2,821,794 | | | $19.96 | | | | |
Granted | | | 586,080 | | | 12.37 | | | | |
Exercised | | | (126,498 | ) | | 9.49 | | | | |
Forfeited or expired | | | (1,062,128 | ) | | 19.90 | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Outstanding at January 31, 2009 | | | 2,219,248 | | | $18.57 | | 4.09 | | $450 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Vested and expected to vest at January 31, 2009 | | | 1,817,712 | | | $19.49 | | 3.70 | | $172 |
Exercisable at January 31, 2009 | | | 1,493,713 | | | $20.06 | | 3.32 | | $— |
The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of options granted during each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $4.28, $6.68 and $9.36, respectively.
Additional information regarding options outstanding as of January 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable |
| | | | Weighted
| | Weighted
| | | | Weighted
|
| | | | Average
| | Average
| | | | Average
|
| | Number
| | Remaining
| | Exercise
| | Number
| | Exercise
|
Range of Exercise Prices | | Outstanding | | Contractual Life | | Price | | Exercisable | | Price |
|
$ 1.20 – $10.78 | | 253,078 | | 3.51 | | $ | 9.10 | | 160,078 | | $ | 9.52 |
11.06 – 12.50 | | 85,381 | | 3.57 | | | 12.35 | | 85,381 | | | 12.35 |
12.67 – 13.19 | | 339,202 | | 6.00 | | | 13.18 | | 10,102 | | | 12.96 |
13.36 – 19.02 | | 180,122 | | 4.38 | | | 14.86 | | 147,164 | | | 14.72 |
19.10 – 19.10 | | 286,000 | | 5.31 | | | 19.10 | | 178,667 | | | 19.10 |
19.16 – 20.86 | | 262,034 | | 2.86 | | | 20.56 | | 167,059 | | | 20.46 |
20.97 – 22.69 | | 264,919 | | 4.61 | | | 22.03 | | 225,647 | | | 21.94 |
22.79 – 24.75 | | 243,562 | | 3.71 | | | 24.05 | | 223,956 | | | 24.10 |
24.82 – 27.08 | | 298,950 | | 2.17 | | | 26.74 | | 289,909 | | | 26.74 |
28.43 – 28.90 | | 6,000 | | 2.65 | | | 28.82 | | 5,750 | | | 28.82 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
$ 1.20 – $28.90 | | 2,219,248 | | 4.09 | | $ | 18.57 | | 1,493,713 | | $ | 20.06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested shares as of January 31, 2009, and changes during the year then ended, is presented below. Non-vested shares contain a time-based restriction as to vesting. These awards generally vest over four years with 25% of the grant vesting each year on the anniversary of the grant date.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted-Average
| |
| | | | | Grant-Date
| |
Non-vested Shares | | Shares | | | Fair Value | |
| |
|
Outstanding at February 2, 2008 | | | 769,075 | | | $ | 19.01 | |
Granted | | | 328,701 | | | | 12.22 | |
Vested | | | (156,202 | ) | | | 19.06 | |
Forfeited or expired | | | (363,603 | ) | | | 17.80 | |
| | |
| | |
Outstanding at January 31, 2009 | | | 577,971 | | | $ | 15.85 | |
| | |
| | |
At January 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $10 million of compensation cost related to non-vested stock option and non-vested share awards not yet recognized. This compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-15
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) – The Company maintains an ESPP, which provides a method for Company employees to voluntarily purchase Company common stock at a 10% discount from fair market value as of the beginning or the end of each six-month purchasing period, whichever is lower. The ESPP covers substantially all employees, excluding executives, who have three months of service with the Company. The ESPP is intended to constitute an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and therefore the Company did not recognize compensation expense related to the ESPP for fiscal 2005. As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company recognized $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million in compensation expense related to the ESPP for each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, 218,851, 65,825 and 65,889 shares were issued at an average price of $2.97, $14.69 and $16.14, respectively, under the ESPP.
The components of income tax (benefit)/expense from continuing operations for the fiscal periods presented were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | |
Current income taxes: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | (34,309 | ) | | $ | 24,035 | | | $ | 38,337 | |
State | | | (254 | ) | | | 5,663 | | | | 5,820 | |
| | |
| | |
Total current | | | (34,563 | ) | | | 29,698 | | | | 44,157 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred income taxes: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | 13,554 | | | | 170 | | | | (2,635 | ) |
State | | | 1,722 | | | | (3,032 | ) | | | (351 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Total deferred | | | 15,276 | | | | (2,862 | ) | | | (2,986 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Total income tax (benefit)/expense | | $ | (19,287 | ) | | $ | 26,836 | | | $ | 41,171 | |
| | |
| | |
Included in fiscal 2008 and 2007 current taxes were tax benefits of approximately $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, relating to FIN 48 liabilities.
A reconciliation of income tax (benefit)/expense from continuing operations to the amount of income tax (benefit)/expense that would result from applying the federal statutory rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes for the fiscal periods presented was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | |
|
Provision for income taxes at statutory rate | | $ | (20,486 | ) | | $ | 25,425 | | | $ | 37,074 | |
State income taxes,net of federal income tax benefit | | | 952 | | | | 1,240 | | | | 3,555 | |
Life insurance proceeds | | | — | | | | (1,215 | ) | | | — | |
Other | | | 247 | | | | 1,386 | | | | 542 | |
| | |
| | |
Total income tax (benefit)/expense | | $ | (19,287 | ) | | $ | 26,836 | | | $ | 41,171 | |
| | |
| | |
F-16 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
The major components of the Company’s overall net deferred tax asset of approximately $21 million and $27 million at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | |
|
Current net deferred tax (liability)/asset | | $ | (1,218 | ) | | $ | 12,179 | |
Long-term net deferred tax asset | | | 24,641 | | | | 15,231 | |
| | |
| | |
| | | 23,423 | | | | 27,410 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (2,657 | ) | | | — | |
| | |
| | |
Overall net deferred tax asset | | $ | 20,766 | | | $ | 27,410 | |
| | |
| | |
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | | |
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards | | $ | 40,770 | | | $ | 4,664 | |
Deferred lease incentives | | | 21,937 | | | | 31,004 | |
Deferred rent | | | 7,318 | | | | 8,148 | |
Deferred and stock-based compensation | | | 3,562 | | | | 5,244 | |
Inventory cost capitalization | | | 2,450 | | | | 2,610 | |
Sublease loss reserves | | | 268 | | | | 661 | |
Lease termination liabilities | | | — | | | | 1,658 | |
Other | | | 1,932 | | | | 8,395 | |
| | |
| | |
| | | 78,237 | | | | 62,384 | |
Less valuation allowance | | | (2,657 | ) | | | — | |
| | |
| | |
Total deferred tax assets | | $ | 75,580 | | | $ | 62,384 | |
| | |
| | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | $ | (45,726 | ) | | $ | (31,853 | ) |
State income taxes | | | (3,569 | ) | | | (3,121 | ) |
Prepaid expense | | | (5,519 | ) | | | — | |
| | |
| | |
Total deferred tax liabilities | | | (54,814 | ) | | | (34,974 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Net deferred tax asset | | $ | 20,766 | | | $ | 27,410 | |
| | |
| | |
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the difference between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement and tax purposes. Deferred income taxes assets are required to be reduced by a valuation allowance when it is determined that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. During 2008, the Company provided a valuation allowance of $2.7 million related to Kansas state investment tax credits that may not be utilized before expiration. The Company’s determination that it would not fully realize this deferred tax asset was based on the significant deterioration in the retail business climate resulting in revisions to its projected future taxable earnings in this jurisdiction.
As of January 31, 2009, the Company had tax effected federal net operating losses (“NOLs”) of approximately $24.9 million available to offset future federal taxable income. In addition, as of January 31, 2009 the Company had tax effected state NOLs of approximately $10.2 million available to offset future state income taxable income. Federal and state NOLs will expire at various times and in varying amounts in our fiscal tax years 2012 through 2028. The Company also had federal and Kansas credit carryforwards of approximately $1.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively. The Company’s federal and Kansas carryforwards will begin to expire in 2027 and 2017, respectively.
As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, unrecognized income tax benefits accounted for under FIN 48 totaled approximately $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Of those amounts, approximately $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, represent unrecognized tax benefits that would, if recognized, favorably affect the Company’s effective income tax rate in any future periods. The Company does not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next twelve months.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-17
The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits (including interest) at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008:
| | | | | | | | |
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits, opening balance | | | $1,652 | | | $ | 2,444 | |
Gross increases – tax positions in prior period | | | 78 | | | | 295 | |
Gross decreases – tax positions in prior period | | | (432 | ) | | | (542 | ) |
Gross increases – tax positions in current period | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Settlements | | | — | | | | — | |
Lapse of statute of limitations | | | (100 | ) | | | (546 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Unrecognized tax benefits, ending balance | | | $1,199 | | | $ | 1,652 | |
| | |
| | |
Estimated interest and penalties related to the underpayment of income taxes are included in income tax expense and totaled less than $0.1 million for fiscal 2008. Accrued interest and penalties was approximately $0.2 million and $0.6 million at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and multiple other state and local jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations for years prior to 2005 and, with few exceptions, is no longer subject to state and local examinations for years before 2004. During the third quarter ended November 1, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service completed an examination of the Company’s federal income tax return for the 2005 tax year resulting in no change.
As of the dates presented, other current assets consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | |
Income taxes receivable | | $ | 30,251 | | | $ | 5,200 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 25,573 | | | | 25,228 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | — | | | | 12,179 | |
Non-trade accounts receivable | | | 3,119 | | | | 10,211 | |
| | |
| | |
Total other current assets | | $ | 58,943 | | | $ | 52,818 | |
| | |
| | |
| |
8. | PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
As of the dates presented, property and equipment consisted of the following categories:
| | | | | | | | |
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | |
Leasehold improvements | | $ | 325,540 | | | $ | 310,654 | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | | 288,634 | | | | 303,924 | |
Buildings and building improvements | | | 39,835 | | | | 47,768 | |
Land | | | 11,227 | | | | 25,895 | |
| | |
| | |
Total gross property and equipment | | | 665,236 | | | | 688,241 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | (341,892 | ) | | | (311,998 | ) |
| | |
| | |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 323,344 | | | $ | 376,243 | |
| | |
| | |
On April 29, 2008, the Company entered into a new, asset-backed credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders (the “New Credit Facility”) which expires April 29, 2013. The New Credit Facility provides for a secured revolving line of credit of up to $150 million, which can be increased to up to $225 million subject to lender approval. Extensions of credit
F-18 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
under the New Credit Facility are limited to a borrowing base consisting of specified percentages of eligible categories of assets, primarily cash and inventory (generally, 75% of inventories). The New Credit Facility is available for direct borrowing and, subject to borrowing base availability ($77 million at January 31, 2009), up to $75 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit and up to $15 million is available for swing-line loans. The New Credit Facility is secured by the Company’s cash, cash equivalents, deposit accounts, securities accounts, credit card receivables and inventory. Direct borrowings under the New Credit Facility bear interest at the Administrative Agent’s alternate base rate (as defined, 1.7% at January 31, 2009) or at optional interest rates that are primarily dependent upon LIBOR or the Federal Funds Effective Rate for the time period chosen. The New Credit Facility replaces a $200 million unsecured credit agreement, dated as of September 14, 2005, by and between the Company and a syndicate of lenders (the “Prior Credit Facility”). The Prior Credit Facility, which was scheduled to mature on September 14, 2010, was terminated concurrently with the execution of the New Credit Facility. The Company currently believes that the New Credit Facility, existing cash balances and cash flows from operations during fiscal 2009 will be sufficient to meet its operating needs for at least the next 12 months. At January 31, 2009, the Company had no direct borrowings and $11 million in letters of credit outstanding under the New Credit Facility. The remaining availability at January 31, 2009 was $66 million and the weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings during fiscal 2008 was 4.0%.
The Company is not subject to any financial covenant restrictions under the New Credit Facility unless total remaining borrowing availability under the facility falls below $15 million at any point in time, or 10% of the aggregate lender commitments in the event the facility were increased beyond $150 million. The Company is restricted from incurring additional indebtedness or liens in excess of certain levels specified by the New Credit Facility. In general, the Company is not allowed to incur additional secured indebtedness, but can obtain unsecured indebtedness outside of the New Credit Facility up to $150 million. Additionally, the New Credit Facility contains specific limits on particular kinds of indebtedness as defined in the facility agreement.
| |
10. | OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES |
As of the dates presented, other current liabilities consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | January 31,
| | | February 2,
| |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | |
Other current liabilities | | $ | 13,714 | | | $ | 19,569 | |
Accrued compensation and benefits | | | 13,584 | | | | 21,619 | |
Accrued gift cards | | | 12,134 | | | | 15,493 | |
Sales taxes payable | | | 5,177 | | | | 3,024 | |
Accrued capital expenditures | | | 1,737 | | | | 7,444 | |
Deferred taxes | | | 1,218 | | | | — | |
Accrued lease terminations | | | — | | | | 3,958 | |
| | |
| | |
Total other current liabilities | | $ | 47,564 | | | $ | 71,107 | |
| | |
| | |
| |
11. | INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND TRANSACTION – OLATHE, KANSAS |
On July 17, 2007, Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, completed an industrial revenue bond financing transaction with the city of Olathe, Kansas (the “City”) that will provide property tax savings for 10 years on the Company’s new distribution center located in the City. In the transaction, the City purchased the land and building from the Company through the issuance to the Company of approximately $23.3 million in industrial revenue bonds due January 1, 2018 (“Bonds”) and contemporaneously leased the land and building to the Company for an identical term. The Company can call the Bonds at any time it chooses, but would lose its property tax benefit in the event this transaction was to be cancelled. In the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, the land and building remain a component of property and equipment, the investment in the Bonds is included in other assets, and the related long-term lease is included in other long-term liabilities.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-19
The Company, as holder of the Bonds, is due interest at 7% per annum with interest payable semi-annually in arrears on January 1 and July 1. This interest income is directly offset by the interest-only lease payments on the distribution center, which are due at the same time and in the same amount as the interest income. Both the Bonds and the corresponding lease have10-year terms. If, at any time, the Company chooses to call the Bonds, the proceeds from the Bonds would be required to immediately terminate the lease. The Company’s intention is to maintain the property tax benefit related to the Olathe facility. Accordingly, both the Bonds and the lease are classified as long-term due to the Company’s intent to hold the Bonds until maturity and the structure of the lease, which includes a balloon principal payment and bargain purchase requirement at the end of the lease term.
| |
12. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Operating Leases – The Company leases its retail stores and certain equipment under operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through January 2021. Substantially all of the Company’s retail store leases require the Company to pay common area maintenance charges, insurance, property taxes and percentage rent ranging from 3% to 14% based on sales volumes exceeding certain minimum sales levels. The initial terms of such leases are typically ten years, many of which contain renewal options exercisable at the Company’s discretion. Most leases also contain rent escalation clauses that come into effect at various times throughout the lease term. Rent expense is recorded under the straight-line method over the life of the lease (see “Straight-Line Rent” in Note 1). Other rent escalation clauses can take effect based on changes in primary mall tenants throughout the term of a given lease. Most leases also contain cancellation or kick-out clauses in the Company’s favor that relieve the Company of any future obligation under a lease if specified sales levels are not achieved by a specified date. None of the Company’s retail store leases contain purchase options.
As of January 31, 2009, minimum future rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows:
| | | | |
Fiscal year ending: | | | |
January 30, 2010 | | $ | 95,866 | |
January 29, 2011 | | | 90,229 | |
February 3, 2012 | | | 78,056 | |
February 2, 2013 | | | 65,804 | |
February 2, 2014 | | | 56,210 | |
Thereafter | | | 138,392 | |
| | | | |
Total future operating lease commitments | | $ | 524,557 | |
| | | | |
The table above does not include common area maintenance (CAM) charges, which are also a required contractual obligation under the Company’s store operating leases. In many of the Company’s leases, CAM charges are not fixed and can fluctuate significantly from year to year for any particular store. For fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, store rental expenses, including CAM, for our stores (in millions) were $165, $158, and $149, respectively, of which $4, $5 and $6, respectively, was paid as percentage rent based on sales volume. The Company expects total CAM expenses to continue to increase from year to year or as long-term leases come up for renewal at current market rates in excess of original lease terms.
Litigation – The Company is involved from time to time in litigation incidental to its business. The Company believes that the outcome of current litigation will not likely have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition and, from time to time, the Company may make provisions for probable litigation losses. Depending on the actual outcome of pending litigation, charges in excess of any provisions could be recorded in the future, which may have an adverse effect on its operating results.
Indemnities, Commitments, and Guarantees – During its normal course of business, the Company has made certain indemnities, commitments and guarantees under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain
F-20 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
transactions. These indemnities include those given to various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease and indemnities to directors and officers of the Company to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of California. The duration of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees varies, and in certain cases, is indefinite. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these indemnities, commitments and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets other than as disclosed below.
Letters of Credit – The Company has issued guarantees in the form of commercial letters of credit, of which there were approximately $11 million outstanding at January 31, 2009 as security for merchandise shipments from overseas. All in-transit merchandise covered by letters of credit is accrued for in accounts payable.
Accrued Sublease Loss Charges – The Company remains liable under an operating lease covering a former store location. The term of the lease ends December 31, 2012. The Company has subleased this location to third parties at rates that are less than the Company’s required lease payments. Accordingly, the Company had approximately $1 million accrued to recognize its net remaining contractual lease obligation related to these premises at January 31, 2009. To the extent any sublessee defaults upon its sublease obligations, the Company may incur additional charges related to this lease in the future. The Company’s remaining contractual obligation under the original lease, exclusive of any sublease income, was approximately $3 million at January 31, 2009.
Common Stock Repurchase and Retirement – The Company ended fiscal 2008 with approximately $48 million available under a stock repurchase plan that was originally approved by its Board of Directors and announced in July 2008. This repurchase authorization does not expire until all authorized funds have been expended. In accordance with California law, all repurchased shares are immediately retired. During fiscal 2008, we repurchased shares as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Maximum
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Value of
| |
| | | | | | | | # of Shares
| | | | | | Shares that
| |
| | | | | | | | Purchased
| | | | | | May Yet be
| |
| | | | | Average
| | | as Part of
| | | Cost of
| | | Purchased
| |
| | | | | Price
| | | Publicly
| | | Shares
| | | Under the
| |
| | # of Shares
| | | Paid Per
| | | Announced
| | | Purchased
| | | Plan
| |
Period | | Purchased | | | Share | | | Plan | | | ($000s) | | | ($000s) | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 50,508 | |
April 2008 | | | 799,010 | | | $ | 12.83 | | | | 799,010 | | | $ | 10,248 | | | $ | 40,260 | |
May 2008 | | | 1,280,000 | | | | 9.26 | | | | 1,280,000 | | | | 11,853 | | | $ | 28,407 | |
June 2008(1) | | | 2,944,900 | | | | 9.64 | | | | 2,944,900 | | | | 28,384 | | | $ | 23 | |
July 2008(2) | | | 323,634 | | | | 7.50 | | | | 323,634 | | | | 2,426 | | | $ | 47,597 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 5,347,544 | | | $ | 9.89 | | | | 5,347,544 | | | $ | 52,911 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
(1) In June 2008, the Company completed the remainder of its $100 million stock repurchase program announced in May 2006. This repurchase authorization expired when the funds were fully expended.
(2) As announced in July 2008, the Board of Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase up to $50 million of its common stock. This repurchase authorization does not expire until all authorized funds have been expended.
The Company maintains an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Executive Plan”) covering Company officers that is funded by participant contributions and periodic Company discretionary contributions. The Company had approximately $5 million and $8 million recorded in other assets at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively, representing investments held by the Company to cover the vested participant balances in the Executive Plan. These deferred compensation asset investments are classified as trading securities and are stated at fair market value in accordance with SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Fair market value is determined by the most recent publicly quoted market price of the securities at the balance sheet date. Vested participant balances are included in other long-term liabilities and were approximately $4 million and $7 million as of
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-21
January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively. The Company made contributions to the Executive Plan during each of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 of $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
The Company also maintains an Employee Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees who have reached age 21 and have one year of service with the Company. The 401(k) Plan is funded by employee contributions and periodic Company discretionary contributions, which are subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company made contributions to the 401(k) Plan, net of forfeitures, of approximately $1.5 million for each of fiscal 2008 and 2007 and approximately $1 million for fiscal 2006.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company’s management committed to a plan to sell a parcel of land that had been held for future development. In connection with the planned sale, the Company recorded a pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge of approximately $5 million associated with a reduction in the fair value of this land less estimated selling costs. The impairment charge is included in other income and expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company has classified the remaining carrying value of this land of approximately $4 million as held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2009. The sale of the land closed in February 2009 and the Company received approximately $4 million in net cash proceeds.
| |
16. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
Effective February 3, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
| | |
| • | Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
|
| • | Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. |
|
| • | Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions. |
As of January 31, 2009, the Company held deferred compensation assets associated with its Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Executive Plan”) that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Executive Plan covers Company officers and is funded by participant contributions and periodic Company contributions. The investments held by the Company are included in other assets and are intended to cover the vested participant balances in the Executive Plan. These deferred compensation asset investments are classified as trading securities and are stated at fair market value in accordance with SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Fair value is determined by the most recent publicly quoted market price of the securities at the balance sheet date. The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2009 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements at January 31, 2009 | |
| | | |
| | | | | Quoted Prices
| | | Significant
| | | | |
| | | | | in Active
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| |
| | | | | Markets for
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| |
| | | | | Identical Assets
| | | Inputs
| | | Inputs
| |
| | Total | | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | |
| | | |
|
Deferred compensation assets | | $ | 4,695 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,695 | | | $ | — | |
F-22 Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008
Subsequently, on March 25, 2009, the Company liquidated all deferred compensation assets in the Executive Plan at the current fair market value of $4.4 million and will record a charge of $0.3 million to other expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
| |
17. | SALE OF ANAHEIM DISTRIBUTION CENTER |
In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company announced the closing of its Anaheim, California distribution center and its intent to sell the facility as part of a plan to consolidate its logistics operations in Olathe, Kansas. In connection with the planned sale, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, which represented the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value of materials handling equipment and furniture and fixtures, less estimated costs to sell, and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. The sale of the Anaheim distribution center closed in November 2008 and the Company received approximately $25 million in net cash proceeds. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of approximately $9 million which is included in other income in the consolidated statement of operations.
| |
18. | QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) |
The table below presents summarized quarterly financial results on a continuing operations basis for each of fiscal 2008 and 2007. The Company discontinued its nine-store footwear concept, One Thousand Steps, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 ending February 2, 2008. The Company designated demo as a discontinued operation during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 ended May 3, 2008 (see Note 2). Accordingly, the information presented below excludes the operating impact of demo and One Thousand Steps for all periods. All amounts in the table below are expressed in thousands of dollars, except for share and per share amounts.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | First
| | | Second
| | | Third
| | | Fourth
| |
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2009: | | Quarter | | | Quarter | | | Quarter | | | Quarter | |
| |
Net sales | | $ | 266,867 | | | $ | 312,726 | | | $ | 323,612 | | | $ | 351,681 | |
Gross margin | | | 75,465 | | | | 95,258 | | | | 92,776 | | | | 56,608 | |
(Loss)/income from continuing operations | | | (11,969 | ) | | | 3,708 | | | | (3,520 | ) | | | (27,464 | ) |
Net (loss)/income | | | (37,102 | ) | | | 2,796 | | | | (2,474 | ) | | | (27,042 | ) |
(Loss)/income from continuing operations per share, diluted | | | (0.17 | ) | | | 0.06 | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | (0.42 | ) |
Net (loss)/income per share, diluted | | | (0.53 | ) | | | 0.04 | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | (0.42 | ) |
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted | | | 69,915,802 | | | | 66,704,159 | | | | 64,968,707 | | | | 65,059,597 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 2, 2008: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | | 268,106 | | | | 311,775 | | | | 341,874 | | | | 384,273 | |
Gross margin | | | 75,198 | | | | 101,846 | | | | 114,726 | | | | 122,156 | |
(Loss)/income from continuing operations | | | (338 | ) | | | 9,258 | | | | 17,143 | | | | 19,744 | |
Net (loss)/income | | | (5,058 | ) | | | (10,502 | ) | | | (20,037 | ) | | | 5,230 | |
(Loss)/income from continuing operations per share, diluted | | | — | | | | 0.13 | | | | 0.25 | | | | 0.28 | |
Net (loss)/income per share, diluted | | | (0.07 | ) | | | (0.15 | ) | | | (0.29 | ) | | | 0.07 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted | | | 69,578,259 | | | | 70,064,804 | | | | 69,949,070 | | | | 70,069,528 | |
Earnings per basic and diluted share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented based on diluted shares outstanding per quarter and, therefore, may not sum to the totals for the year. Additionally, the sum of the four quarterly amounts for any line item may not agree to the fiscal year total in the consolidated financial statements due to rounding.
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Form 10-K 2008 F-23
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit # | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Filing Date |
|
|
| 3 | .1 | | Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company | | | 10-Q | | | | 8/31/04 | |
| 3 | .2 | | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company | | | 8-K | | | | 12/24/98 | |
| 3 | .3 | | Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company | | | 8-K | | | | 11/26/08 | |
| 4 | .1 | | Specimen stock certificate | | | S-1 | | | | 2/4/93 | |
| 10 | .1* | | Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and each of its executive officers and directors | | | S-1 | | | | 2/4/93 | |
| 10 | .2* | | Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust Agreement | | | 10-K | | | | 3/17/95 | |
| 10 | .3*+ | | Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective May 30, 2001 | | | | | | | | |
| 10 | .4*+ | | Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective December 31, 2008 (subject to section 409A deferrals) | | | | | | | | |
| 10 | .5* | | Amended and Restated Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. 1999 Stock Award Plan dated March 24, 2004 | | | 10-Q | | | | 5/21/04 | |
| 10 | .6* | | Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan | | | 8-K | | | | 5/24/05 | |
| 10 | .7* | | Amended and Restated Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated November 17, 2004 | | | 10-Q | | | | 12/9/04 | |
| 10 | .8* | | Form of Performance-Based Bonus Award Agreement | | | 10-Q | | | | 12/9/04 | |
| 10 | .9* | | Form of Notice of Director Stock Appreciation Right Award Agreement | | | 8-K | | | | 5/23/06 | |
| 10 | .10* | | Form of Notice of Employee Stock Appreciation Right Award Agreement | | | 8-K | | | | 5/23/06 | |
| 10 | .11* | | Form of Notice of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement | | | 8-K | | | | 5/23/06 | |
| 10 | .12*+ | | Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, as amended and restated as of November 20, 2008 | | | | | | | | |
| 10 | .13* | | Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 2005 between the Company and Thomas M. Kennedy | | | 10-K | | | | 4/12/05 | |
| 10 | .14* | | Amendment No. 1, dated December 14, 2006, to the Employment Agreement between the Company and Thomas M. Kennedy | | | 8-K | | | | 12/18/06 | |
| 10 | .15* | | Amendment No. 2, dated September 28, 2007, to the Employment Agreement between the Company and Thomas M. Kennedy | | | 10-Q | | | | 12/3/07 | |
| 10 | .16* | | Employment Separation and General Release Agreement between the Company and Thomas M. Kennedy, dated as of December 12, 2008 | | | 8-K | | | | 12/15/08 | |
| 10 | .17* | | Severance Agreement, dated February 15, 2005, between the Company and Lou Ann Bett | | | 8-K | | | | 5/6/05 | |
| 10 | .18* | | Retention Bonus Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, between the Company and Lou Ann Bett | | | 8-K | | | | 10/30/07 | |
| 10 | .19* | | Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Sally Frame Kasaks, Interim Chief Executive Officer | | | 10-Q | | | | 12/5/06 | |
| 10 | .20* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2007, between the Company and Sally Frame Kasaks | | | 8-K | | | | 5/23/07 | |
| 10 | .21*+ | | Amendment No. 1, effective December 31, 2008, to the Employment Agreement and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between the Company and Sally Frame Kasaks | | | | | | | | |
| 10 | .22* | | Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement between the Company and Sally Frame Kasaks | | | 8-K | | | | 5/23/07 | |
| 10 | .23* | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between the Company and Sally Frame Kasaks | | | 8-K | | | | 5/23/07 | |
| 10 | .24*+ | | Summary of Board of Directors’ Compensation for fiscal 2009 | | | | | | | | |
| 10 | .25*+ | | Summary of Named Executive Officers Annual Compensation for fiscal 2009 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit # | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Filing Date |
|
|
| 10 | .26 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2008, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, BB&T Company, U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., as Co-Documentation Agents, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Arrangers, and a syndicate of other lenders | | | 8-K | | | | 5/2/08 | |
| 10 | .27 | | Security Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2008, by the Company, Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp., Miraloma Corp., and certain future subsidiaries of the Company, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent | | | 8-K | | | | 5/2/08 | |
| 10 | .28 | | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2008, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and a syndicate of other lenders | | | 10-Q | | | | 8/29/08 | |
| 10 | .29 | | Trust Indenture, dated as of July 17, 2007, between the City of Olathe, Kansas and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee | | | 8-K | | | | 7/23/07 | |
| 10 | .30 | | Lease Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2007, between the City of Olathe, Kansas and Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp. | | | 8-K | | | | 7/23/07 | |
| 21 | .1+ | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant | | | | | | | | |
| 23 | .1+ | | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | | | | | | | |
| 31 | .1+ | | Written statements of Sally Frame Kasaks and Michael L. Henry pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | |
| 32 | .1+ | | Written statement of Sally Frame Kasaks and Michael L. Henry pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
+ Filed herewith