Equity LifeStyle Properties (ELS) 10-K 2009 FY Annual report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

þ	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from          to

Commission FileNumber: 1-11718

EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	36-3857664 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois (Address of Principal Executive Offices)	60606 (Zip Code)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(312) 279-1400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(Title of Class)	(Name of Exchange on Which Registered)
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $1,019.6 million as of June 30, 2009 based upon the closing price of $37.18 on such date using beneficial ownership of stock rules adopted pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to exclude voting stock owned by Directors and Officers, some of whom may not be held to be affiliates upon judicial determination.

At February 23, 2010, 30,349,089 shares of the Registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Part III incorporates by reference portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 11, 2010.

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page
PART I.
	Item 1.	Business		3
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		10
	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		19
	Item 2.	Properties		19
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		27
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		27
PART II.
	Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		28
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		29
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		31
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		53
		Forward-Looking Statements		53
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		54
	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		54
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		54
	Item 9B.	Other Information		55
PART III.
	Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		56
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation		56
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		56
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence		56
	Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		56
PART IV.
	Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		57
EX-12
EX-21
EX-23
EX-24.1
EX-24.2
EX-24.3
EX-24.4
EX-24.5
EX-24.6
EX-24.7
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

2

PART I

Item 1.   Business

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

General

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with MHC Operating Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) and other consolidated subsidiaries (“Subsidiaries”), are referred to herein as the “Company,” “ELS,” “we,” “us,” and “our.” ELS has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1993.

The Company is a fully integrated owner and operator of lifestyle-oriented properties (“Properties”). The Company leases individual developed areas (“sites”) with access to utilities for placement of factory built homes, cottages, cabins or recreational vehicles (“RVs”). Customers may lease individual sites or enter into right-to-use contracts providing the customer access to specific Properties for limited stays. The Company was formed in December 1992 to continue the property operations, business objectives and acquisition strategies of an entity that had owned and operated Properties since 1969. As of December 31, 2009, we owned or had an ownership interest in a portfolio of 304 Properties located throughout the United States and Canada consisting of 110,575 residential sites. These Properties are located in 27 states and British Columbia (with the number of Properties in each state or province shown parenthetically) as follows: Florida (86), California (48), Arizona (35), Texas (15), Pennsylvania (12), Washington (14), Colorado (10), Oregon (9), North Carolina (8), Delaware (7), New York (6), Nevada (6), Virginia (6), Indiana (5), Maine (5), Wisconsin (5), Illinois (4), Massachusetts (3), Michigan (3), New Jersey (3), South Carolina (3), New Hampshire (2), Ohio (2), Tennessee (2), Utah (2), Alabama (1), Kentucky (1), and British Columbia (1).

Properties are designed and improved for several home options of various sizes and designs that are produced off-site, installed and set on designated sites (“Site Set”) within the Properties. These homes can range from 400 to over 2,000 square feet. The smallest of these are referred to as “Resort Cottages.” Properties may also have sites that can accommodate a variety of RVs. Properties generally contain centralized entrances, internal road systems and designated sites. In addition, Properties often provide a clubhouse for social activities and recreation and other amenities, which may include restaurants, swimming pools, golf courses, lawn bowling, shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, laundry facilities and cable television service. In some cases, utilities are provided or arranged for by us; otherwise, the customer contracts for the utility directly. Some Properties provide water and sewer service through municipal or regulated utilities, while others provide these services to customers fromon-site facilities. Properties generally are designed to attract retirees, empty-nesters, vacationers and second home owners; however, certain of our Properties focus on affordable housing for families. We focus on owning properties in or near large metropolitan markets and retirement and vacation destinations.

Employees and Organizational Structure

We have approximately 3,200 full-time, part-time and seasonal employees dedicated to carrying out our operating philosophy and strategies of value enhancement and service to our customers. The operations of each Property are coordinated by anon-site team of employees that typically includes a manager, clerical staff and maintenance workers, each of whom works to provide maintenance and care of the Properties. Direct supervision ofon-site management is the responsibility of our regional vice presidents and regional and district managers. These individuals have significant experience in addressing the needs of customers and in finding or creating innovative approaches to maximize value and increase cash flow from property operations. Complementing this field management staff are approximately 138 full-time corporate employees who assiston-site and regional management in all property functions.

3

Formation of the Company

The operations of the Company are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The Company contributed the proceeds from its initial public offering in 1993 and subsequent offerings to the Operating Partnership for a general partnership interest. In 2004, the general partnership interest was contributed to MHC Trust, a private REIT subsidiary owned by the Company. The financial results of the Operating Partnership and the Subsidiaries are consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, since certain activities, if performed by the Company, may not be qualifying REIT activities under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the Company has formed taxable REIT subsidiaries, as defined in the Code, to engage in such activities.

Realty Systems, Inc. (“RSI”) is a wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary of the Company that is engaged in the business of purchasing and selling or leasing Site Set homes that are located in Properties owned and managed by the Company. RSI also provides brokerage services to residents at such Properties for those residents who move from a Property but do not relocate their homes. RSI may provide brokerage services, in competition with other local brokers, by seeking buyers for the Site Set homes. Subsidiaries of RSI also operate ancillary activities at certain Properties consisting of operations such as golf courses, pro shops, stores and restaurants. Several Properties are also wholly owned by taxable REIT subsidiaries of the Company.

Business Objectives and Operating Strategies

Our strategy seeks to maximize both current income and long-term growth in income. We focus on properties that have strong cash flow and we expect to hold such properties for long-term investment and capital appreciation. In determining cash flow potential, we evaluate our ability to attract and retain high quality customers in our Properties who take pride in the Property and in their home. These business objectives and their implementation are determined by our Board of Directors and may be changed at any time. Our investment, operating and financing approach includes:

•  Providing consistently high levels of services and amenities in attractive surroundings to foster a strong sense of community and pride of home ownership;

•  Efficiently managing the Properties to increase operating margins by controlling expenses, increasing occupancy and maintaining competitive market rents;

•  Increasing income and property values by continuing the strategic expansion and, where appropriate, renovation of the Properties;

•  Utilizing management information systems to evaluate potential acquisitions, identify and track competing properties and monitor customer satisfaction;

•  Selectively acquiring properties that have potential for long-term cash flow growth and to create property concentrations in and around major metropolitan areas and retirement or vacation destinations to capitalize on operating synergies and incremental efficiencies; and

•  Managing our debt balances such that we maintain financial flexibility, minimize exposure to interest rate fluctuations, and maintain an appropriate degree of leverage to maximize return on capital.

Our strategy is to own and operate the highest quality properties in sought-after locations near urban areas, retirement and vacation destinations across the United States. We focus on creating an attractive residential environment by providing a well-maintained, comfortable Property with a variety of recreational and social activities and superior amenities as well as offering a multitude of lifestyle housing choices. In addition, we regularly conduct evaluations of the cost of housing in the marketplaces in which our Properties are located and survey rental rates of competing properties. From time to time we also conduct satisfaction surveys of our customers to determine the factors they consider most important in choosing a property. We improve site utilization and efficiency by tracking types of customers and usage patterns and marketing to those specific customer groups.

4

Acquisitions and Dispositions

Over the last decade our portfolio of Properties has grown significantly from owning or having an interest in 157 Properties with over 53,000 sites to owning or having an interest in 304 Properties with over 110,000 sites. We continually review the Properties in our portfolio to ensure that they fit our business objectives. Over the last five years we sold 16 Properties, and we redeployed capital to markets we believe have greater long-term potential. In that same time period we acquired 46 Properties located in high growth areas such as Florida, Arizona and California.

We believe that opportunities for property acquisitions are still available. Increasing acceptability of and demand for a lifestyle that includes Site Set homes and RVs as well as continued constraints on development of new properties continue to add to their attractiveness as an investment. We believe we have a competitive advantage in the acquisition of additional properties due to our experienced management, significant presence in major real estate markets and substantial capital resources. We are actively seeking to acquire additional properties and are engaged in various stages of negotiations relating to the possible acquisition of a number of properties.

We anticipate that new acquisitions will generally be located in the United States, although we may consider other geographic locations provided they meet our acquisition criteria. We utilize market information systems to identify and evaluate acquisition opportunities, including a market database to review the primary economic indicators of the various locations in which we expect to expand our operations. Acquisitions will be financed from the most appropriate sources of capital, which may include undistributed funds from operations, issuance of additional equity securities, sales of investments, collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings and issuance of debt securities. In addition, the Company may acquire properties in transactions that include the issuance of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“Units”) as consideration for the acquired properties. We believe that an ownership structure that includes the Operating Partnership will permit us to acquire additional properties in transactions that may defer all or a portion of the sellers’ tax consequences.

When evaluating potential acquisitions, we consider such factors as:

•  The replacement cost of the property including land values, entitlements and zoning;

•  The geographic area and type of the property;

•  The location, construction quality, condition and design of the property;

•  The current and projected cash flow of the property and the ability to increase cash flow;

•  The potential for capital appreciation of the property;

•  The terms of tenant leases or usage rights, including the potential for rent increases;

•  The potential for economic growth and the tax and regulatory environment of the community in which the property is located;

•  The potential for expansion of the physical layout of the property and the number of sites;

•  The occupancy and demand by customers for properties of a similar type in the vicinity and the customers’ profile;

•  The prospects for liquidity through sale, financing or refinancing of the property; and

•  The competition from existing properties and the potential for the construction of new properties in the area.

When evaluating potential dispositions, we consider such factors as:

•  The ability to sell the Property at a price that we believe will provide an appropriate return for our stockholders;

•  Our desire to exit certain non-core markets and recycle the capital into core markets; and

•  Whether the Property meets our current investment criteria.

5

When investing capital we consider all potential uses of the capital including returning capital to our stockholders. Our Board of Directors continues to review the conditions under which we will repurchase our stock. These conditions include, but are not limited to, market price, balance sheet flexibility, other opportunities and capital requirements.

Property Expansions

Several of our Properties have available land for expanding the number of sites available to be utilized by our customers. Development of these sites (“Expansion Sites”) is evaluated based on the following: local market conditions; ability to subdivide; accessibility through the Property or externally; infrastructure needs including utility needs and access as well as additional common area amenities; zoning and entitlement; costs; topography; and ability to market new sites. When justified, development of Expansion Sites allows us to leverage existing facilities and amenities to increase the income generated from the Properties. Where appropriate, facilities and amenities may be upgraded or added to certain Properties to make those Properties more attractive in their markets. Our acquisition philosophy has included the desire to own Properties with potential Expansion Site development. Approximately 83 of our Properties have expansion potential, with approximately 5,600 acres available for expansion.

Leases or Usage Rights

At our Properties, a typical lease entered into between the owner of a home and the Company for the rental of a site is for a month-to-month or year-to-year term, renewable upon the consent of both parties or, in some instances, as provided by statute. These leases are cancelable, depending on applicable law, for non-payment of rent, violation of Property rules and regulations or other specified defaults. Non-cancelable long-term leases, with remaining terms ranging up to ten years, are in effect at certain sites within 31 of the Properties. Some of these leases are subject to rental rate increases based on the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), in some instances taking into consideration certain floors and ceilings and allowing for pass-throughs of certain items such as real estate taxes, utility expenses and capital expenditures. Generally, market rate adjustments are made on an annual basis. At Properties zoned for RV use, long-term customers typically enter into rental agreements and many typically prepay for their stay. Many resort customers will also leave deposits to reserve a site for the following year. Generally these customers cannot live full time on the Property. At resort Properties designated for use by customers who have purchased a right-to-use or membership contract, the contract generally grants the customer access to designated Properties on a continuous basis of up to 14 days. The customer typically makes a nonrefundable upfront payment and annual dues payments are required to renew the contract. The contracts provide for an annual dues increase generally based on increases in the CPI. Approximately 31% of the current customers are not subject to annual dues increases because their dues were frozen in accordance with the terms of their contract, generally because the customer is over 61 years old or disabled.

Regulations and Insurance

General.  Our Properties are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to recreational facilities such as swimming pools, clubhouses and other common areas, regulations relating to providing utility services, such as electricity, to our customers, and regulations relating to operating water and wastewater treatment facilities at certain of our Properties. We believe that each Property has all material permits and approvals necessary to operate.

Rent Control Legislation.  At certain of our Properties, state and local rent control laws, principally in California, limit our ability to increase rents and to recover increases in operating expenses and the costs of capital improvements. Enactment of such laws has been considered from time to time in other jurisdictions. We presently expect to continue to maintain Properties, and may purchase additional properties, in markets that are either subject to rent control or in which rent-limiting legislation exists or may be enacted. For example, Florida has enacted a law that generally provides that rental increases must be reasonable. Also, certain jurisdictions in California in which we own Properties limit rent increases to changes in the CPI or some percentage thereof. As part of our effort to realize the value of our Properties subject to restrictive regulation, we have initiated lawsuits against several municipalities imposing such regulation in an attempt to balance the interests of our stockholders

6

with the interests of our customers (see Item 3. “Legal Proceedings”). Further, at certain of our Properties primarily used as membership campgrounds, some state statutes limit our ability to close the Property unless we make a reasonable substitute property available for the members’ use. Many states also have consumer protection laws regulating right-to-use or campground membership sales and the financing of such sales. Some states have laws requiring the Company to register with a state agency and obtain a permit to market (see Item 1A. “Risk Factors”).

Insurance.  The Properties are covered against fire, flood, property damage, earthquake, windstorm and business interruption by insurance policies containing various deductible requirements and coverage limits. Recoverable costs are classified in other assets as incurred. Insurance proceeds are applied against the asset when received. Recoverable costs relating to capital items are treated in accordance with the Company’s capitalization policy. The book value of the original capital item is written off once the value of the impaired asset has been determined. Insurance proceeds relating to capital costs are recorded as income in the period they are received.

Our current property and casualty insurance policies, which we plan to renew, expire on March 31, 2010. We have a $100 million loss limit with respect to our all-risk property insurance program including Named Windstorm and a $25 million loss limit for California Earthquake. Policy deductibles primarily range from $100,000 to 5% of insurable values specifically for Named Windstorm, Named Storm Flood and California Earthquake. Losses in a100-year Flood zone are subject to varying deductibles with a maximum exposure of $500,000. A deductible indicates ELS’ maximum exposure, subject to policy sub-limits, in the event of a loss.

INDUSTRY

We believe that modern properties similar to ours provide an opportunity for increased cash flows and appreciation in value. These may be achieved through increases in occupancy rates and rents, as well as expense controls, expansion of existing Properties and opportunistic acquisitions, for the following reasons:

•  Barriers to Entry:  We believe that the supply of new properties in locations targeted by the Company will be constrained due to barriers to entry. The most significant barrier has been the difficulty of securing zoning from local authorities. This has been the result of (i) the public’s historically poor perception of manufactured housing, and (ii) the fact that properties generate less tax revenue because the homes are treated as personal property (a benefit to the homeowner) rather than real property. Another factor that creates substantial barriers to entry is the length of time between investment in a property’s development and the attainment of stabilized occupancy and the generation of revenues. The initial development of the infrastructure may take up to two or three years. Once a property is ready for occupancy, it may be difficult to attract customers to an empty property. Substantial occupancy levels may take several years to achieve.

•  Industry Consolidation:  According to various industry reports, there are approximately 50,000 manufactured home properties and approximately 8,500 RV properties (excluding government owned properties) in North America. Most of these properties are not operated by large owner/operators and of the RV properties approximately 1,200 contain 200 sites or more. We believe that this relatively high degree of fragmentation provides us, as a national organization with experienced management and substantial financial resources, the opportunity to purchase additional properties.

•  Customer Base:  We believe that properties tend to achieve and maintain a stable rate of occupancy due to the following factors: (i) customers typically own their own homes, (ii) properties tend to foster a sense of community as a result of amenities such as clubhouses and recreational and social activities, (iii) since moving a Site Set home from one property to another involves substantial cost and effort, customers often sell their home in-place (similar to site-built residential housing) with no interruption of rental payments to us.

•  Lifestyle Choice:  According to the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association, nearly 1 in 10 U.S. vehicle-owning households owns an RV and there are eight million current RV owners. The 78 million people born from 1946 to 1964 or “baby boomers” make up the fastest growing segment of this market. Every

7

day 11,000 Americans turn 50 according to U.S. Census figures. We believe that this population segment, seeking an active lifestyle, will provide opportunities for future cash flow growth for the Company. Current RV owners, once finished with the more active RV lifestyle, will often seek more permanent retirement or vacation establishments. The Site Set housing choice has become an increasingly popular housing alternative for retirement, second-home, and “empty-nest” living. According to U.S. Census figures, the baby-boom generation will constitute almost 16% of the U.S. population within the next 20 years. Among those individuals who are nearing retirement (age 46 to 64), approximately 33% plan on moving upon retirement.

We believe that the housing choices in our Properties are especially attractive to such individuals throughout this lifestyle cycle. Our Properties offer an appealing amenity package, close proximity to local services, social activities, low maintenance and a secure environment. In fact, many of our Properties allow for this cycle to occur within a single Property.

•  Construction Quality:  Since 1976, all factory built housing has been required to meet stringent federal standards, resulting in significant increases in quality. The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) standards for Site Set housing construction quality are the only federally regulated standards governing housing quality of any type in the United States. Site Set homes produced since 1976 have received a “red and silver” government seal certifying that they were built in compliance with the federal code. The code regulates Site Set home design and construction, strength and durability, fire resistance and energy efficiency, and the installation and performance of heating, plumbing, air conditioning, thermal and electrical systems. In newer homes, top grade lumber and dry wall materials are common. Also, manufacturers are required to follow the same fire codes as builders of site-built structures. In addition, although Resort Cottages do not come under the same regulation, many of the manufacturers of Site Set homes also produce Resort Cottages with many of the same quality standards.

•  Comparability to Site-Built Homes:  The Site Set housing industry has experienced a trend towards multi-section homes. Many modern Site Set homes are longer (up to 80 feet, compared to 50 feet in the 1960’s) and wider than earlier models. Many such homes have nine-foot ceilings or vaulted ceilings, fireplaces and as many as four bedrooms, and closely resemble single-family ranch style site-built homes.

•  Second Home Demographics:  According to 2009 National Association of Realtors (“NAR”) reports, sales of second homes in 2008 accounted for 30% of residential transactions, or 1.63 million second-home sales in 2008. There were approximately 8.1 million vacation homes in 2008. The typical vacation-home buyer is 46 years old and earned $97,200 in 2008. According to 2008 NAR reports, approximately 57% of vacation home-owners prefer to be near an ocean, river or lake; 38% close to boating activities; 32% close to hunting or fishing activities; and 17% close to winter recreations. In looking ahead, NAR believes that baby boomers are still in their peak earning years, and the leading edge of their generation is approaching retirement. As they continue to have the financial wherewithal to purchase second homes as a vacation property, investment opportunity, or perhaps as a retirement retreat, those baby boomers will continue to drive the market for second-homes. We believe it is likely that over the next decade we will continue to see historically high levels of second home sales and resort homes and cottages in our Properties will also continue to provide a viable second home alternative to site-built homes.

Notwithstanding our belief that the industry information highlighted above provides the Company with significant long-term growth opportunities, our short-term growth opportunities could be disrupted by the following:

•  Shipments — According to statistics compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau, shipments of new manufactured homes have been declining since 2005. Shipments of new manufactured homes for the first eleven months in 2009 decreased over 40% to 46,200 units as compared to shipments of new manufactured homes for the first eleven months in 2008 of 77,500 units. The decline for 2008 as compared to 2007 was almost 15%. According to the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association (“RVIA”), wholesale shipments of RVs declined 30.1% in 2009 to 165,700 units as compared to 2008, but experienced an increase of almost 25% in the last six months of 2009 as compared to the last six months of 2008. Industry experts have predicted that 2010 RV shipments will increase almost 30%, as compared to 2009, to 215,900.

8

Manufactured Housing and Recreation Vehicle
Annual Shipments 2000-2009 (MH 2009 YTD: through November)

(1)	Source: Institute for Building Technology and Safety
(2)	Source: RVIA

•  Sales — Retail sales of RVs declined almost 25% to 161,100 for the first 11 months of 2009, as compared to 214,400 the first 11 months of 2008. A total of 232,000 RVs were sold during the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decline of almost 25% over the prior year. RVIA has indicated that the RV industry is seeing signs of improvement and the recovery is expected to strengthen slowly as credit availability, job security, and consumer confidence improve. Gains are expected in 2010 as negative financial factors give way to improved market conditions.

•  Availability of financing — The current credit crisis has made it difficult for manufactured home and RV manufacturers to obtain floor plan financing and for potential customers to obtain loans for manufactured home or RV purchases. RVIA states that the federal economic credit and stimulus packages designed to stimulate RV lending and which provide tax deductions to buyers of RVs may help promote sales of RVs. However, there is very little availability in terms of financing for manufactured home buyers. As compared to financing available to owners and purchasers of site-built single family homes, financing of a manufactured home involves higher down payments, higher FICO scores, higher interest rates and shorter maturity. Additionally, certain government stimulus packages have resulted in government guarantees of site-built single family home loans, thereby increasing the supply of financing for that market.

Please see our risk factors, financial statements and related notes contained in thisForm 10-K for more information.

9

Available Information

We file reports electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy information and statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC athttp://www.sec.gov. We maintain an Internet site with information about the Company and hyperlinks to our filings with the SEC athttp://www.equitylifestyle.com,free of charge. Requests for copies of our filings with the SEC and other investor inquiries should be directed to:

Investor Relations Department

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Two North Riverside Plaza

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Phone:1-800-247-5279

e-mail: investor_relations@equitylifestyle.com

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

Our Performance and Common Stock Value Are Subject to Risks Associated With the Real Estate Industry.

Adverse Economic Conditions and Other Factors Could Adversely Affect the Value of Our Properties and Our Cash Flow.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of our Properties. These factors include:

•  changes in the national, regional and local economic climate;

•  local conditions such as an oversupply of lifestyle-oriented properties or a reduction in demand for lifestyle-oriented properties in the area, the attractiveness of our Properties to customers, competition from manufactured home communities and other lifestyle-oriented properties and alternative forms of housing (such as apartment buildings and site-built single family homes);

•  the ability of manufactured home and RV manufacturers to adapt to changes in the economic climate and the availability of units from these manufacturers;

•  the ability of our potential customers to sell their existing site-built residence in order to purchase a resort home or cottage in our Properties and heightened price sensitivity for seasonal and second homebuyers;

•  the ability of our potential customers to obtain financing on the purchase of a resort home, resort cottage or RV;

•  government stimulus intended to primarily benefit purchasers of site-built housing;

•  availability and price of gasoline, especially for our transient customers;

•  our ability to collect rent, annual payments and principal and interest from customers and pay or control maintenance, insurance and other operating costs (including real estate taxes), which could increase over time;

•  the failure of our assets to generate income sufficient to pay our expenses, service our debt and maintain our Properties, which may adversely affect our ability to make expected distributions to our stockholders;

•  our inability to meet mortgage payments on any Property that is mortgaged, in which case the lender could foreclose on the mortgage and take the Property;

•  interest rate levels and the availability of financing, which may adversely affect our financial condition;

10

•  changes in laws and governmental regulations (including rent control laws and regulations governing usage, zoning and taxes), which may adversely affect our financial condition;

•  poor weather, especially on holiday weekends in the summer, could reduce the economic performance of our Northern resort Properties; and

•  our ability to sell new or upgraded right-to-use contracts and to retain customers who have previously purchased a right-to-use contract.

New Acquisitions May Fail to Perform as Expected and Competition for Acquisitions May Result in Increased Prices for Properties.  We intend to continue to acquire properties. Newly acquired Properties may fail to perform as expected. We may underestimate the costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to standards established for its intended market position. Difficulties in integrating acquisitions may prove costly or time-consuming and could divert management attention. Additionally, we expect that other real estate investors with significant capital will compete with us for attractive investment opportunities. These competitors include publicly traded REITs, private REITs and other types of investors. Such competition increases prices for properties. We expect to acquire properties with cash from secured or unsecured financings, proceeds from offerings of equity or debt, undistributed funds from operations and sales of investments. We may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms.

Because Real Estate Investments Are Illiquid, We May Not be Able to Sell Properties When Appropriate. Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. We may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions, forcing us to accept lower than market value. This inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders.

Some Potential Losses Are Not Covered by Insurance.  We carry comprehensive insurance coverage for losses resulting from property damage, liability claims and business interruption on all of our Properties. In addition we carry liability coverage for other activities not specifically related to property operations. These coverages include, but are not limited to, Directors & Officers liability, Employer Practices liability and Fiduciary liability. We believe that the policy specifications and coverage limits of these policies should be adequate and appropriate. There are, however, certain types of losses, such as lease and other contract claims that generally are not insured. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of coverage limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a Property or the anticipated future revenue from a Property. In such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the Property.

Our current property and casualty insurance policies, which we plan to renew, expire on March 31, 2010. We have a $100 million loss limit with respect to our all-risk property insurance program including Named Windstorm and a $25 million loss limit for California Earthquake. Policy deductibles primarily range from $100,000 to 5% of insurable values specifically for Named Windstorm, Named Storm Flood and California Earthquake. Losses in a100-year Flood zone are subject to varying deductibles with a maximum exposure of $500,000. A deductible indicates ELS’ maximum exposure, subject to policy sub-limits, in event of a loss.

There can be no assurance that the actions of the U.S. government, Federal Reserve and other governmental and regulatory bodies for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets, or market response to those actions, will achieve the intended effect, and our business may not benefit from and may be adversely impacted by these actions and further government or market developments could adversely impact us.  Since mid-2007, and particularly during the second half of 2008, the financial services industry and the securities markets generally were materially and adversely affected by significant declines in the values of nearly all asset classes and by a serious lack of liquidity. This was initially triggered by declines in the values of subprime mortgages, but spread to all mortgage and real estate asset classes, to leveraged bank loans and to nearly all asset classes, including equities. The global markets have been characterized by substantially increased volatility and short-selling and an overall loss of investor confidence, initially in financial institutions, but more recently in companies in a number of other industries and in the broader markets. The decline in asset values has caused increases in margin calls for investors, requirements that derivatives counterparties post additional collateral and

11

redemptions by mutual and hedge fund investors, all of which have increased the downward pressure on asset values and outflows of client funds across the financial services industry. In addition, the increased redemptions and unavailability of credit have required hedge funds and others to rapidly reduce leverage, which has increased volatility and further contributed to the decline in asset values.

In response to the recent unprecedented financial issues affecting the banking system and financial markets and going concern threats to investment banks and other financial institutions, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”), was signed into law on October 3, 2008. The EESA provides the U.S. Secretary of Treasury with the authority to establish a Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”), to purchase from financial institutions up to $700 billion of residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on, or related to, such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008. EESA also provides for a program that would allow companies to insure their troubled assets. On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), a $787 billion stimulus bill for the purpose of stabilizing the economy by creating jobs, among other things. As of February 25, 2010, the U.S. Treasury is managing or overseeing the following programs under TARP: the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”), the Systemically Significant Failing Institutions Program (“SSFIP”), the Auto Industry Financing Program (“AIFP”), the Legacy Securities Public-Private Investment Program (“S-PPIP”) and the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan (“HASP”) which is partially financed by TARP. HASP, also known as “The Making Home Affordable Program”, offers the following options for homeowners: (1) refinancing mortgage loans through the Home Affordable Refinance Program (“HARP”), (2) modifying first and second mortgage loans through the Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) and the Second Lien Modification Program (“2MP”) and (3) offering other alternatives to foreclosure through the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA). According to a U.S. Treasury press releases, HASP, along with other financial stability programs have improved credit conditions as evidenced by statistics such as: 1) near historic lows on residential mortgage rates and 2) stabilization of home prices.

These can be no assurance that the EESA, TARP or other programs will have a beneficial impact on the financial markets or the economy. In addition, the U.S. Government, Federal Reserve and other governmental and regulatory bodies have taken or are considering taking other actions to address the financial crisis. We cannot predict whether or when such actions may occur or what impact, if any, such actions could have on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In fact, such actions may have a significant negative impact on our customers to the extent they benefit only owners of site-built single family housing and not to purchasers of Site Set homes who lease the underlying land and RVs.

Adverse changes in general economic conditions may adversely affected our business.

Our success is dependent upon economic conditions in the U.S. generally, and in the geographic areas in which a substantial number of our Properties are located. Adverse changes in national economic conditions and in the economic conditions of the regions in which we conduct substantial business may have an adverse effect on the real estate values of our Properties and our financial performance and the market price of our common stock.

In a recession or under other adverse economic conditions, non-earning assets and write-downs are likely to increase as debtors fail to meet their payment obligations. Although we maintain reserves for credit losses and an allowance for doubtful accounts in amounts that we believe should be sufficient to provide adequate protection against potential write-downs in our portfolio, these amounts could prove to be insufficient.

Campground Membership Properties Laws and Regulations Could Adversely Affect the Value of Certain Properties and Our Cash Flow.

Many of the states in which the Company does business have laws regulating right-to-use or campground membership sales. These laws generally require comprehensive disclosure to prospective purchasers, and give purchasers the right to rescind their purchase generally between three-to-five days after the date of sale. Some states have laws requiring the Company to register with a state agency and obtain a permit to market. The

12

Company is subject to changes, from time to time, in the application or interpretation of such laws that can affect its business or the rights of its members.

In some states, including California, Oregon and Washington, laws place limitations on the ability of the owner of a campground property to close the property unless the customers at the property receive access to a comparable property. The impact of the rights of customers under these laws is uncertain and could adversely affect the availability or timing of sale opportunities or the ability of the Company to realize recoveries from Property sales.

The government authorities regulating the Company’s activities have broad discretionary power to enforce and interpret the statutes and regulations that they administer, including the power to enjoin or suspend sales activities, require or restrict construction of additional facilities and revoke licenses and permits relating to business activities. The Company monitors its sales and marketing programs and debt collection activities to control practices that might violate consumer protection laws and regulations or give rise to consumer complaints.

Certain consumer rights and defenses that vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction may affect the Company’s portfolio of contracts receivable. Examples of such laws include state and federal consumer credit andtruth-in-lending laws requiring the disclosure of finance charges, and usury and retail installment sales laws regulating permissible finance charges.

In certain states, as a result of government regulations and provisions in certain of the right-to-use or campground membership agreements, the Company is prohibited from selling more than ten memberships per site. At the present time, these restrictions do not preclude the Company from selling memberships in any state. However, these restrictions may limit the Company’s ability to utilize Properties for public usageand/or the Company’s ability to convert sites to more profitable or predictable uses, such as annual rentals.

Debt Financing, Financial Covenants and Degree of Leverage Could Adversely Affect Our Economic Performance.

Scheduled Debt Payments Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition.  Our business is subject to risks normally associated with debt financing. The total principal amount of our outstanding indebtedness was approximately $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2009. Our substantial indebtedness and the cash flow associated with serving our indebtedness could have important consequences, including the risks that:

•  our cash flow could be insufficient to pay distributions at expected levels and meet required payments of principal and interest;

•  we will be required to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to pay our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund the implementation of our business strategy, acquisitions, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

•  our debt service obligations could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

•  we may not be able to refinance existing indebtedness (which in virtually all cases requires substantial principal payments at maturity) and, if we can, the terms of such refinancing might not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness;

•  if principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions, such as new equity capital, our cash flow will not be sufficient in all years to repay all maturing debt; and

•  if prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing (such as the possible reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans) result in higher interest rates, increased interest expense would adversely affect cash flow and our ability to service debt and make distributions to stockholders.

Ability to obtain mortgage financing or to refinance maturing mortgages may adversely affect our financial condition.  During 2009, we have received financing proceeds from Fannie Mae secured by mortgages on

13

individual manufactured home Properties. The terms of the Fannie Mae financings have been relatively attractive as compared to other potential lenders. If financing proceeds are no longer available from Fannie Mae for any reason or if Fannie Mae terms are no longer attractive, it may adversely affect cash flow and our ability to service debt and make distributions to stockholders.

Financial Covenants Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition.  If a Property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the mortgagee could foreclose on the Property, resulting in loss of income and asset value. The mortgages on our Properties contain customary negative covenants, which among other things, limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the Property and to discontinue insurance coverage. In addition, our credit facilities contain certain customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including total debt to assets ratios, debt service coverage ratios and minimum ratios of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt. Foreclosure on mortgaged Properties or an inability to refinance existing indebtedness would likely have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our Degree of Leverage Could Limit Our Ability to Obtain Additional Financing.  Our debt to market capitalization ratio (total debt as a percentage of total debt plus the market value of the outstanding common stock and Units held by parties other than the Company) was approximately 47% as of December 31, 2009. The degree of leverage could have important consequences to stockholders, including an adverse effect on our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes, and makes us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy generally.

We Depend on Our Subsidiaries’ Dividends and Distributions.

Substantially all of our assets are indirectly held through the Operating Partnership. As a result, we have no source of operating cash flow other than from distributions from the Operating Partnership. Our ability to pay dividends to holders of common stock depends on the Operating Partnership’s ability first to satisfy its obligations to its creditors and make distributions payable to third party holders of its preferred Units and then to make distributions to MHC Trust and common Unit holders. Similarly, MHC Trust must satisfy its obligations to its creditors and preferred stockholders before making common stock distributions to us.

Stockholders’ Ability to Effect Changes of Control of the Company is Limited.

Provisions of Our Charter and Bylaws Could Inhibit Changes of Control.  Certain provisions of our charter and bylaws may delay or prevent a change of control of the Company or other transactions that could provide our stockholders with a premium over the then-prevailing market price of their common stock or which might otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders. These include the Ownership Limit described below. Also, any future series of preferred stock may have certain voting provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be beneficial to our stockholders.

Maryland Law Imposes Certain Limitations on Changes of Control.  Certain provisions of Maryland law prohibit “business combinations” (including certain issuances of equity securities) with any person who beneficially owns 10%or more of the voting power of outstanding common stock, or with an affiliate of the Company who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock (an “Interested Stockholder”), or with an affiliate of an Interested Stockholder. These prohibitions last for five years after the most recent date on which the Interested Stockholder became an Interested Stockholder. After the five-year period, a business combination with an Interested Stockholder must be approved by two super-majority stockholder votes unless, among other conditions, our common stockholders receive a minimum price for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the Interested Stockholder for its shares of common stock. The Board of Directors has exempted from these provisions under the Maryland law any business combination with Samuel Zell, who is the Chairman of the Board of the Company, certain holders of Units who received them at the time of our initial public offering, the General Motors Hourly Rate Employees Pension

14

Trust and the General Motors Salaried Employees Pension Trust, and our officers who acquired common stock at the time we were formed and each and every affiliate of theirs.

We Have a Stock Ownership Limit for REIT Tax Purposes.  To remain qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the federal income tax laws applicable to REITs) at any time during the last half of any taxable year. To facilitate maintenance of our REIT qualification, our charter, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits Beneficial Ownership (as defined in our charter) by any single stockholder of more than 5% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding capital stock. We refer to this as the “Ownership Limit.” Within certain limits, our charter permits the Board of Directors to increase the Ownership Limit with respect to any class or series of stock. The Board of Directors, upon receipt of a ruling from the IRS, opinion of counsel, or other evidence satisfactory to the Board of Directors and upon 15 days prior written notice of a proposed transfer which, if consummated, would result in the transferee owning shares in excess of the Ownership Limit, and upon such other conditions as the Board of Directors may direct, may exempt a stockholder from the Ownership Limit. Absent any such exemption, capital stock acquired or held in violation of the Ownership Limit will be transferred by operation of law to us as trustee for the benefit of the person to whom such capital stock is ultimately transferred, and the stockholder’s rights to distributions and to vote would terminate. Such stockholder would be entitled to receive, from the proceeds of any subsequent sale of the capital stock transferred to us as trustee, the lesser of (i) the price paid for the capital stock or, if the owner did not pay for the capital stock (for example, in the case of a gift, devise of other such transaction), the market price of the capital stock on the date of the event causing the capital stock to be transferred to us as trustee or (ii) the amount realized from such sale. A transfer of capital stock may be void if it causes a person to violate the Ownership Limit. The Ownership Limit could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company and, therefore, could adversely affect our stockholders’ ability to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for their common stock.

Conflicts of Interest Could Influence the Company’s Decisions.

Certain Stockholders Could Exercise Influence in a Manner Inconsistent With the Stockholders’ Best Interests.  As of December 31, 2009, Mr. Samuel Zell and certain affiliated holders beneficially owned approximately 11.9% of our outstanding common stock (in each case including common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and the exchange of Units). Mr. Zell is the chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. Accordingly, Mr. Zell has significant influence on our management and operation. Such influence could be exercised in a manner that is inconsistent with the interests of other stockholders.

Mr. Zell and His Affiliates Continue to be Involved in Other Investment Activities.  Mr. Zell and his affiliates have a broad and varied range of investment interests, including interests in other real estate investment companies involved in other forms of housing, including multifamily housing. Mr. Zell and his affiliates may acquire interests in other companies. Mr. Zell may not be able to control whether any such company competes with the Company. Consequently, Mr. Zell’s continued involvement in other investment activities could result in competition to the Company as well as management decisions, which might not reflect the interests of our stockholders.

Members of Management May Have a Conflict of Interest Over Whether To Enforce Terms of Mr. McAdams’s Employment and Noncompetition Agreement.  Mr. McAdams is our President and has entered into an employment and noncompetition agreement with us. For the most part these restrictions apply to him both during his employment and for two years thereafter. Mr. McAdams is also prohibited from otherwise disrupting or interfering with our business through the solicitation of our employees or clients or otherwise. To the extent that we choose to enforce our rights under any of these agreements, we may determine to pursue available remedies, such as actions for damages or injunctive relief, less vigorously than we otherwise might because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with Mr. McAdams. Additionally, the non-competition provisions of his agreement, despite being limited in scope and duration, could be difficult to enforce, or may be subject to limited enforcement, should litigation arise over it in the future. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K.

15

Risk of Eminent Domain and Tenant Litigation.

We own Properties in certain areas of the country where real estate values have increased faster than rental rates in our Properties either because of locally imposed rent control or long term leases. In such areas, we have learned that certain local government entities have investigated the possibility of seeking to take our Properties by eminent domain at values below the value of the underlying land. While no such eminent domain proceeding has been commenced, and we would exercise all of our rights in connection with any such proceeding, successful condemnation proceedings by municipalities could adversely affect our financial condition. Moreover, certain of our Properties located in California are subject to rent control ordinances, some of which not only severely restrict ongoing rent increases but also prohibit us from increasing rents upon turnover. Such regulation allows customers to sell their homes for a premium representing the value of the future discounted rent-controlled rents. As part of our effort to realize the value of our Properties subject to rent control, we have initiated lawsuits against several municipalities in California. In response to our efforts, tenant groups have filed lawsuits against us seeking not only to limit rent increases, but to be awarded large damage awards. If we are unsuccessful in our efforts to challenge rent control ordinances, it is likely that we will not be able to charge rents that reflect the intrinsic value of the affected Properties. Finally, tenant groups in non-rent controlled markets have also attempted to use litigation as a means of protecting themselves from rent increases reflecting the rental value of the affected Properties. An unfavorable outcome in the tenant group lawsuits could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

Environmental and Utility-Related Problems Are Possible and Can be Costly.

Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at such property. The owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage and for investigation andclean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination. Such laws typically imposeclean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of theclean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from that site.

Environmental laws also govern the presence, maintenance and removal of asbestos. Such laws require that owners or operators of property containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, that they notify and train those who may come into contact with asbestos and that they undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, if asbestos would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building. Such laws may impose fines and penalties on real property owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos fibers.

Utility-related laws and regulations also govern the provision of utility services and operations of water and wastewater treatment facilities. Such laws regulate, for example, how and to what extent owners or operators of property can charge renters for provision of, for example, electricity, and whether and to what extent such utility services can be charged separately from the base rent. Such laws also regulate the operations and performance of water treatment facilities and wastewater treatment facilities. Such laws may impose fines and penalties on real property owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements.

We Have a Significant Concentration of Properties in Florida and California, and Natural Disasters or Other Catastrophic Events in These or Other States Could Adversely Affect the Value of Our Properties and Our Cash Flow.

As of December 31, 2009, we owned or had an ownership interest in 304 Properties located in 27 states and British Columbia, including 86 Properties located in Florida and 48 Properties located in California. The occurrence of a natural disaster or other catastrophic event in any of these areas may cause a sudden decrease in the value of our Properties. While we have obtained insurance policies providing certain coverage against

16

damage from fire, flood, property damage, earthquake, wind storm and business interruption, these insurance policies contain coverage limits, limits on covered property and various deductible amounts that the Company must pay before insurance proceeds are available. Such insurance may therefore be insufficient to restore our economic position with respect to damage or destruction to our Properties caused by such occurrences. Moreover, each of these coverages must be renewed every year and there is the possibility that all or some of the coverages may not be available at a reasonable cost. In addition, in the event of such natural disaster or other catastrophic event, the process of obtaining reimbursement for covered losses, including the lag between expenditures incurred by us and reimbursements received from the insurance providers, could adversely affect our economic performance.

Market Interest Rates May Have an Effect on the Value of Our Common Stock.

One of the factors that investors consider important in deciding whether to buy or sell shares of a REIT is the distribution rates with respect to such shares (as a percentage of the price of such shares) relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates go up, prospective purchasers of REIT shares may expect a higher distribution rate. Higher interest rates would not, however, result in more funds for us to distribute and, in fact, would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our publicly traded securities to go down.

We Are Dependent on External Sources of Capital.

To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders each year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain). In addition, we intend to distribute all or substantially all of our net income so that we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our earnings. Because of these distribution requirements, it is not likely that we will be able to fund all future capital needs, including for acquisitions, from income from operations. We therefore will have to rely on third-party sources of debt and equity capital financing, which may or may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of things, including conditions in the capital markets generally and the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings. As a result of the current credit crisis it may be difficult for us to meet one or more of the requirements for qualification as a REIT, including but not limited to our distribution requirement. Moreover, additional equity offerings may result in substantial dilution of stockholders’ interests, and additional debt financing may substantially increase our leverage.

Our Qualification as a REIT is Dependent on Compliance With U.S. Federal Income Tax Requirements.

We believe we have been organized and operated in a manner so as to qualify for taxation as a REIT, and we intend to continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, however, is governed by highly technical and complex provisions of the Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. In connection with certain transactions, we have received, and relied, on advice of counsel as to the impact of such transactions on our qualification as a REIT. Our qualification as a REIT requires analysis of various facts and circumstances that may not be entirely within our control, and we cannot provide any assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) will agree with our analysis or the analysis of our tax counsel. In particular, the proper federal income tax treatment of right-to-use membership contracts is uncertain and there is no assurance that the IRS will agree with the Company’s treatment of such contracts. If the IRS were to disagree with our analysis or our tax counsel’s analysis of facts and circumstances, our ability to qualify as a REIT may be adversely affected. These matters can affect our qualification as a REIT. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions might significantly change the tax laws with respect to the requirements for qualification as a REIT or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of qualification as a REIT.

If, with respect to any taxable year, we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT (and specified relief provisions under the Code were not applicable to such disqualification), we could not deduct distributions to stockholders in computing our net taxable income and we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our net

17

taxable income at regular corporate rates. Any U.S. federal income tax payable could include applicable alternative minimum tax. If we had to pay U.S. federal income tax, the amount of money available to distribute to stockholders and pay indebtedness would be reduced for the year or years involved, and we would no longer be required to distribute money to stockholders. In addition, we would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless we were entitled to relief under the relevant statutory provisions. Although we currently intend to operate in a manner designed to allow us to qualify as a REIT, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause us to revoke the REIT election.

Interpretation of and Changes to Accounting Policies and Standards Could Adversely Affect Our Reported Financial Results.

Our Accounting Policies and Methods Are the Basis on Which We Report Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and They May Require Management to Make Estimates About Matters that Are Inherently Uncertain.  Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to the manner in which we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. Management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods in order to ensure that they comply with generally accepted accounting principles and reflect management’s judgment as to the most appropriate manner in which to record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances yet might result in reporting materially different amounts than would have been reported under a different alternative.

Changes in Accounting Standards Could Adversely Affect Our Reported Financial Results.  The bodies that set accounting standards for public companies, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the SEC and others, periodically change or revise existing interpretations of the accounting and reporting standards that govern the way that we report our financial condition and results of operations. These changes can be difficult to predict and can materially impact our reported financial results. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised accounting standard, or a revised interpretation of an accounting standard, retroactively, which could have a negative impact on reported results or result in the restatement of our financial statements for prior periods.

The FASB sets generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) that we follow to ensure we consistently report our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. References to GAAP issued by the FASB in thisForm 10-K are to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”). The FASB finalized the Codification effective for periods ending on or after September 15, 2009. The Codification does not change how the Company accounts for its transactions or the nature of the related disclosures made.

Our Accounting Policies for the Sale of Right-To-Use Contracts Will Result in a Substantial Deferral of Revenue in our Financial Results.  Beginning August 14, 2008, the Company began selling right-to-use contracts. Customers who purchase right-to-use contracts are generally required to make an upfront nonrefundable payment to the Company. The Company incurs significant selling and marketing expenses to originate the right-to-use contracts, and the majority of expenses must be expensed in the period incurred, while the related sales revenues are generally deferred and recognized over the expected life of the contract which is estimated based upon historical attrition rates. The expected life of a right-to-use contract is currently estimated to be between one and 31 years. As a result, the Company may incur a loss from the sale of right-to-use contracts, build up a substantial deferred sales revenue liability balance, and recognize substantial non-cash revenue in years subsequent to the original sale. This accounting may make it difficult for investors to interpret the financial results from the sale of right-to-use contracts. The Company submitted correspondence to the Office of the Chief Accountant at the SEC describing the right-to-use contracts and subsequently discussed the revenue recognition policy with respect to the contracts with the SEC. The SEC does not object to the Company’s application of the Codification Topic “Revenue Recognition” (“FASB ASC 605”) (prior authoritative guidance: Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, “Revenue Recognition in Consolidated Financial Statements, Corrected”) with respect to the deferral of the upfront nonrefundable payments received from the sale of right-to-use contracts.

18

See Note 2 (n) in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K for the Company’s revenue recognition policy.

Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments

On December 23, 2009, the SEC sent us a letter with comments on our Proxy Statement andForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The comments relate to income statement presentation, segment reporting, the transfer of inventory homes to fixed assets, revenue recognition policies related to right-to-use contracts, footnote disclosure of the Privileged Access acquisition, footnote disclosure of joint venture investments and disclosure of senior management bonus targets. We responded to the SEC’s letter on January 25, 2010 and as of February 24, 2010 we have not received a response from the SEC.

Item 2.   Properties

General

Our Properties provide attractive amenities and common facilities that create a comfortable and attractive home for our customers, with most offering a clubhouse, a swimming pool, laundry facilities and cable television service. Many also offer additional amenities such as sauna/whirlpool spas, golf courses, tennis, shuffleboard and basketball courts, exercise rooms and various social activities such as concerts. Since most of our customers generally rent our sites on a long-term basis, it is their responsibility to maintain their homes and the surrounding area. It is our role to ensure that customers comply with our Property policies and to provide maintenance of the common areas, facilities and amenities. We hold periodic meetings with our Property management personnel for training and implementation of our strategies. The Properties historically have had, and we believe they will continue to have, low turnover and high occupancy rates.

Property Portfolio

As of December 31, 2009, we owned or had an ownership interest in a portfolio of 304 Properties located throughout the United States and British Columbia containing 110,575 residential sites.

The distribution of our Properties throughout the United States reflects our belief that geographic diversification helps insulate the portfolio from regional economic influences. We intend to target new acquisitions in or near markets where our Properties are located and will also consider acquisitions of Properties outside such markets. Refer to Note 2 (c) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K.

Bay Indies located in Venice, Florida and Viewpoint located in Mesa, Arizona, our two largest properties as determined by property operating revenues, accounted for approximately 2.0% and 1.9%, respectively, of our total property operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Properties we owned as of December 31, 2009, categorized by our major markets (excluding Properties owned through joint ventures).

																	Total
															Total		Number		Annual			Annual
											Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
											pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
								Acres			Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP		MH/RV		(c)			(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
Florida
East Coast:
Sunshine Key	38801 Overseas Hwy	Big Pine Key	FL		33043		RV		54							409		55		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	9,128	$	10,418
Carriage Cove	Five Carriage Cove Way	Daytona Beach	FL		32119		MH		59							418		418		90.2	%		91.6	%	$	5,604	$	5,572
Coquina Crossing	4536 Coquina Crossing Dr.	Elkton	FL		32033		MH		316			26		145		563		563		92.9	%		91.1	%	$	5,459	$	5,193
Bulow Plantation	3165 Old Kings Road South	Flagler Beach	FL		32136		MH		323			181		722		276		276		98.2	%		98.6	%	$	5,734	$	5,326
Bulow RV	3345 Old Kings Road South	Flagler Beach	FL		32136		RV		(f	)						352		79		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,109	$	4,944
Carefree Cove	3273 N.W. 37th St	Ft. Lauderdale	FL		33309		MH		20							164		164		93.3	%		93.3	%	$	6,470	$	6,328
Park City West	10550 W. State Road 84	Ft. Lauderdale	FL		33324		MH		60							363		363		89.5	%		89.3	%	$	5,882	$	5,734

19

																	Total
															Total		Number		Annual			Annual
											Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
											pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
								Acres			Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP		MH/RV		(c)			(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
Sunshine Holiday	2802 W. Oakland Park Blvd.	Ft. Lauderdale	FL		33311		MH		32							274		274		82.8	%		88.1	%	$	6,195	$	5,835
Sunshine Holiday RV	2802 W. Oakland Park Blvd.	Ft. Lauderdale	FL		33311		RV		(f	)						131		45		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,658	$	5,515
Maralago Cay	6280 S. Ash Lane	Lantana	FL		33462		MH		102			5				603		603		90.9	%		90.7	%	$	7,347	$	7,001
Coral Cay	2801 NW 62nd Avenue	Margate	FL		33063		MH		121							819		819		86.7	%		84.7	%	$	6,094	$	6,028
Lakewood Village	3171 Hanson Avenue	Melbourne	FL		32901		MH		68							349		349		87.7	%		87.1	%	$	5,892	$	5,664
Holiday Village	1335 Fleming Ave Box 228	Ormond Beach	FL		32174		MH		43							301		301		87.7	%		85.7	%	$	4,866	$	4,814
Sunshine Holiday	1701 North US Hwy 1	Ormond Beach	FL		32174		RV		69							349		132		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,590	$	4,323
The Meadows	2555 PGA Boulevard	Palm Beach Gardens	FL		33410		MH		55							379		379		84.4	%		85.2	%	$	6,439	$	6,263
Breezy Hill RV	800 NE 48th Street	Pompano Beach	FL		33064		RV		52							762		355		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,999	$	5,810
Highland Wood RV	900 NE 48th street	Pompano Beach	FL		33064		RV		15							148		13		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,184	$	5,075
Lighthouse Pointe	155 Spring Drive	Port Orange	FL		32129		MH		64							433		433		85.7	%		86.6	%	$	4,932	$	4,708
Pickwick	4500 S. Clyde Morris Blvd	Port Orange	FL		32119		MH		84			4				432		432		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,111	$	4,923
Indian Oaks	780 Barnes Boulevard	Rockledge	FL		32955		MH		38							208		208		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,411	$	4,137
Countryside	8775 20th Street	Vero Beach	FL		32966		MH		125							644		644		89.8	%		89.6	%	$	5,646	$	5,395
Heritage Plantation	1101 Ranch Road	Vero Beach	FL		32966		MH		64							435		435		83.7	%		83.4	%	$	5,550	$	5,312
Holiday Village	1000 S.W. 27th Avenue	Vero Beach	FL		32968		MH		20							128		128		17.2	%		28.9	%	$	3,959	$	4,239
Sunshine Travel	9455 108th Avenue	Vero Beach	FL		32967		RV		30			6		48		300		159		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,533	$	4,200
Central:
Clerbrook	20005 U.S. Highway 27	Clermont	FL		34711		RV		288							1,255		461		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,323	$	4,251
Lake Magic	9600 Hwy 192 West	Clermont	FL		34714		RV		69							471		126		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,303	$	4,018
Orlando	2110 US Highway 27 S	Clermont	FL		34714		RV		270			30		136		850		72		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,290		—
Southern Palms	One Avocado Lane	Eustis	FL		32726		RV		120							950		362		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,087	$	4,016
Grand Island	13310 Sea Breeze Lane	Grand Island	FL		32735		MH		35							362		362		58.8	%		58.8	%	$	5,169	$	4,903
Sherwood Forest	5302 W. Irlo Bronson Hwy	Kissimmee	FL		34746		MH		124							769		769		93.4	%		94.3	%	$	5,119	$	4,847
Sherwood Forest RV	5300 W. Irlo Bronson Hwy	Kissimmee	FL		34746		RV		107			43		149		513		149		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,907	$	4,692
Tropical Palms(g)	2650 Holiday Trail	Kissimmee	FL		34746		RV		59							541		—		—			—			—		—
Coachwood Colony	2610 Dogwood Place	Leesburg	FL		34748		MH		29							202		202		87.6	%		90.1	%	$	3,882	$	3,879
Mid-Florida Lakes	199 Forest Dr.	Leesburg	FL		34788		MH		290							1,225		1,225		80.7	%		80.7	%	$	5,616	$	5,406
Southernaire	1700 Sanford Road	Mt. Dora	FL		32757		MH		14							114		114		80.7	%		84.3	%	$	3,616	$	4,151
Oak Bend	10620 S.W. 27th Ave.	Ocala	FL		34476		MH		62			3				262		262		89.3	%		89.3	%	$	4,620	$	4,330
Villas at Spanish Oaks	3150 N.E. 36th Avenue	Ocala	FL		34479		MH		69							459		459		87.4	%		86.5	%	$	4,588	$	4,373
Three Flags RV Resort	1755 E State Rd 44	Wildwood	FL		34785		RV		23							221		—		—			—			—		—
Winter Garden	13905 W. Colonial Dr.	Winter Garden	FL		34787		RV		27							350		142		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,183	$	4,074
Gulf Coast (Tampa/Naples):
Toby’s RV	3550 N.E. Hwy 70	Arcadia	FL		34266		RV		44							379		274		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,487	$	2,543
Manatee	800 Kay Road NE	Bradenton	FL		34212		RV		42							415		216		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,635	$	4,806
Windmill Manor	5320 53rd Ave. East	Bradenton	FL		34203		MH		49							292		292		95.9	%		95.9	%	$	5,426	$	5,417
Glen Ellen	2882 Gulf to Bay Blvd	Clearwater	FL		33759		MH		12							106		106		86.8	%		90.6	%	$	4,907	$	4,722
Hillcrest	2346 Druid Road East	Clearwater	FL		33764		MH		25							278		278		92.1	%		93.9	%	$	4,782	$	4,701
Holiday Ranch	4300 East Bay Drive	Clearwater	FL		33764		MH		12							150		150		86.0	%		89.3	%	$	4,365	$	4,229
Silk Oak	28488 US Highway 19 N	Clearwater	FL		33761		MH		19							181		181		89.5	%		90.1	%	$	4,899	$	4,728
Crystal Isles	11419 W. Ft. Island Drive	Crystal River	FL		34429		RV		32							260		46		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,996	$	5,154
Lake Haven	1415 Main Street	Dunedin	FL		34698		MH		48							379		379		88.4	%		90.8	%	$	6,584	$	6,482
Fort Myers Beach Resort	16299 San Carlos Blvd.	Fort Myers	FL		33908		RV		31							306		88		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,728	$	5,689
Gulf Air Resort	17279 San Carlos Blvd. SW	Fort Myers	FL		33931		RV		25							246		154		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,849	$	4,775
Barrington Hills	9412 New York Avenue	Hudson	FL		34667		RV		28							392		261		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,046	$	2,920

20

																Total
														Total		Number		Annual			Annual
										Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
										pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
								Acres		Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP		MH/RV		(c)		(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
Down Yonder	7001 N. 142nd Avenue	Largo	FL		33771		MH		50						361		361		97.5	%		98.9	%	$	6,351	$	6,113
East Bay Oaks	601 Starkey Road	Largo	FL		33771		MH		40						328		328		96.3	%		97.3	%	$	4,795	$	4,762
Eldorado Village	2505 East Bay Drive	Largo	FL		33771		MH		25						227		227		96.9	%		97.4	%	$	4,872	$	4,661
Shangri La	249 Jasper Street N.W.	Largo	FL		33770		MH		14						160		160		81.3	%		89.4	%	$	4,825	$	5,263
Vacation Village	6900 Ulmerton Road	Largo	FL		33771		RV		29						293		174		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,230	$	4,173
Pasco	21632 State Road 54	Lutz	FL		33549		RV		27						255		176		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,575	$	3,522
Buccaneer	2210 N. Tamiami Trail N.E.	N. Ft. Myers	FL		33903		MH		223		39		162		971		971		98.5	%		98.5	%	$	5,897	$	5,805
Island Vista MHC	3000 N. Tamiami Trail	N. Ft. Myers	FL		33903		MH		121						616		616		82.1	%		84.7	%	$	3,908	$	4,049
Lake Fairways	19371 Tamiami Trail	N. Ft. Myers	FL		33903		MH		259						896		896		99.7	%		99.4	%	$	6,087	$	5,819
Pine Lakes	10200 Pine Lakes Blvd.	N. Ft. Myers	FL		33903		MH		314						584		584		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	7,233	$	6,781
Pioneer Village	7974 Samville Rd.	N. Ft. Myers	FL		33917		RV		90						733		381		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,077	$	3,890
The Heritage	3000 Heritage Lakes Blvd.	N. Ft. Myers	FL		33917		MH		214		22		132		453		453		98.0	%		98.7	%	$	5,362	$	5,084
Windmill Village	16131 N. Cleveland Ave.	N. Ft. Myers	FL		33903		MH		69						491		491		88.6	%		91.6	%	$	4,906	$	4,723
Country Place	2601 Country Place Blvd.	New Port Richey	FL		34655		MH		82						515		515		99.6	%		99.8	%	$	5,053	$	4,905
Hacienda Village	7107 Gibraltar Ave	New Port Richey	FL		34653		MH		66						505		505		96.4	%		97.8	%	$	5,058	$	4,773
Harbor View	6617 Louisna Ave	New Port Richey	FL		34653		MH		69						471		471		98.1	%		98.5	%	$	4,255	$	3,993
Bay Lake Estates	1200 East Colonia Lane	Nokomis	FL		34275		MH		34						228		228		94.7	%		93.0	%	$	5,955	$	6,150
Royal Coachman	1070 Laurel Road East	Nokomis	FL		34275		RV		111						546		430		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	6,139	$	6,042
Silver Dollar	12515 Silver Dollar Drive	Odessa	FL		33556		RV		412						459		392		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,323	$	4,776
Terra Ceia	9303 Bayshore Road	Palmetto	FL		34221		RV		18						203		132		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,581	$	3,555
Lakes at Countrywood	745 Arbor Estates Way	Plant City	FL		33565		MH		122						424		424		93.4	%		92.7	%	$	4,190	$	3,959
Meadows at Countrywood	745 Arbor Estates Way	Plant City	FL		33565		MH		140		13		110		799		799		95.6	%		95.4	%	$	5,008	$	4,699
Oaks at Countrywood	745 Arbor Estates Way	Plant City	FL		33565		MH		44						168		168		76.2	%		76.2	%	$	4,290	$	3,984
Harbor Lakes	3737 El Jobean Road #294	Port Charlotte	FL		33953		RV		80						528		294		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,555	$	4,470
Gulf View	10205 Burnt Store Road	Punta Gorda	FL		33950		RV		78						206		53		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,505	$	4,328
Tropical Palms MHC	17100 Tamiami Trailem	Punta Gorda	FL		33955		MH		50						294		294		88.1	%		86.5	%	$	3,473	$	3,240
Winds of St. Armands No	4000 N. Tuttle Ave.	Sarasota	FL		34234		MH		74						471		471		94.9	%		94.9	%	$	6,427	$	6,402
Winds of St. Armands So	3000 N. Tuttle Ave.	Sarasota	FL		34234		MH		61						306		306		98.4	%		99.3	%	$	6,291	$	5,915
Peace River	2555 US Highway 17	South Wauchula	FL		33873		RV		72		38				454		18		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,979		—
Topics	13063 County Line Road	Spring Hill	FL		34609		RV		35						230		197		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,022	$	2,889
Pine Island	5120 Stringfellow Road	St. James City	FL		33956		RV		31						363		81		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,927	$	5,010
Bay Indies	950 Ridgewood Ave	Venice	FL		34285		MH		210						1,309		1,309		93.1	%		93.3	%	$	7,127	$	6,683
Ramblers Rest	1300 North River Rd.	Venice	FL		34293		RV		117						647		431		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,747	$	4,677
Sixth Avenue	39345 6th Avenue	Zephyrhills	FL		33542		MH		14						140		140		87.1	%		91.0	%	$	2,468	$	2,436
Total Florida Market:									7,162		410		1,604		36,802		28,233		93.2	%		93.6	%	$	4,996	$	4,925
California
Northern California:
Monte del Lago	13100 Monte del Lago	Castroville	CA		95012		MH		54						310		310		95.5	%		96.8	%	$	12,679	$	12,282
Colony Park	3939 Central Avenue	Ceres	CA		95307		MH		20						186		186		94.1	%		90.9	%	$	6,417	$	6,713
Russian River	33655 Geysers Rd	Cloverdale	CA		95425		RV		41						135		10		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,468		—
Snowflower	41776 Yuba Gap Dr	Emigrant Gap	CA		95715		RV		551		200				268		—		—			—			—		—
Four Seasons	3138 West Dakota	Fresno	CA		93722		MH		40						242		242		90.5	%		88.4	%	$	4,194	$	4,163
Yosemite Lakes	31191 Harden Flat Rd	Groveland	CA		95321		RV		403		30		111		299		—		—			—			—		—

21

																	Total
															Total		Number		Annual			Annual
											Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
											pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
								Acres			Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP		MH/RV		(c)			(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
Tahoe Valley	1175 Melba Drive	Lake Tahoe	CA		96150		RV		86			20		200		413		—		—			—			—		—
Sea Oaks	1675 Los Osos Valley Rd., #221	Los Osos	CA		93402		MH		18							125		125		98.4	%		98.4	%	$	6,063	$	6,012
Ponderosa	7291 Highway 49	Lotus	CA		95651		RV		22							170		6		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,616		—
Turtle Beach	703 E Williamson Rd	Manteca	CA		95337		RV		39							79		8		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,979		—
Coralwood	331 Coralwood	Modesto	CA		95356		MH		22							194		194		76.3	%		78.9	%	$	8,587	$	8,433
Lake Minden	1256 Marcum Rd	Nicolaus	CA		95659		RV		165			82		540		323		4		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,710		—
Lake of the Springs	14152 French Town Rd	Oregon House	CA		95962		RV		954			507		1,014		541		68		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,233		—
Concord Cascade	245 Aria Drive	Pacheco	CA		94553		MH		31							283		283		98.9	%		100.0	%	$	7,842	$	7,682
San Francisco RV	700 Palmetto Ave	Pacifica	CA		94044		RV		12							182		—		—			—			—		—
Quail Meadows	5901 Newbrook Drive	Riverbank	CA		95367		MH		20							146		146		94.5	%		96.6	%	$	8,157	$	8,238
California Hawaiian	3637 Snell Avenue	San Jose	CA		95136		MH		50							418		418		98.6	%		99.3	%	$	10,573	$	10,209
Sunshadow	1350 Panoche Avenue	San Jose	CA		95122		MH		30							121		121		98.3	%		98.3	%	$	10,143	$	9,884
Village of the Four Seasons	200 Ford Road	San Jose	CA		95138		MH		30							271		271		94.5	%		95.2	%	$	9,610	$	9,348
Westwinds (4 Properties)	500 Nicholson Lane	San Jose	CA		95134		MH		88							723		723		93.1	%		92.1	%	$	11,137	$	11,034
Laguna Lake	1801 Perfumo Canyon Road	San Luis Obispo	CA		93405		MH		100							300		300		99.3	%		100.0	%	$	5,694	$	5,514
Contempo Marin	400 Yosemite Road	San Rafael	CA		94903		MH		63							396		396		97.5	%		97.2	%	$	8,789	$	8,482
DeAnza Santa Cruz	2395 Delaware Avenue	Santa Cruz	CA		95060		MH		30							198		198		93.9	%		93.9	%	$	11,280	$	10,165
Santa Cruz Ranch RV Resort	917 Disc Drive	Scotts Valley	CA		95066		RV		7							106		—		—			—			—		—
Royal Oaks	415 Akers Drive N.	Visalia	CA		93291		MH		20							149		149		98.7	%		90.6	%	$	5,122	$	5,215
Southern California:
Soledad Canyon	4700 Crown Valley Rd	Acton	CA		93510		RV		273			45		182		1,251		23		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,887		—
Date Palm Country Club	36-200 Date Palm Drive	Cathedral City	CA		92234		MH		232			3		24		538		538		97.6	%		98.3	%	$	11,186	$	10,694
Date Palm RV	36-100 Date Palm Drive	Cathedral City	CA		92234		RV		(f	)						140		—		—			—			—		—
Oakzanita	11053 Highway 79	Descanso	CA		91916		RV		145			5				146		8		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,895		—
Rancho Mesa	450 East Bradley Ave.	El Cajon	CA		92021		MH		20							158		158		69.0	%		65.8	%	$	11,413	$	11,259
Rancho Valley	12970 Hwy 8 Business	El Cajon	CA		92021		MH		19							140		140		97.9	%		97.9	%	$	11,498	$	11,191
Royal Holiday	4400 W Florida Ave	Hemet	CA		92545		MH		22							196		196		63.3	%		66.5	%	$	4,882	$	4,860
Idyllwild	24400 Canyon Trail Drive	Idyllwild	CA		92549		RV		191			52		120		287		27		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,424		—
Pio Pico	14615 Otay Lakes Rd	Jamul	CA		91935		RV		176			10				512		80		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,509		—
Wilderness Lakes	30605 Briggs Rd	Menifee	CA		92584		RV		73							529		11		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,774		—
Morgan Hill	12895 Uvas Rd	Morgan Hill	CA		95037		RV		62							339		17		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,191		—
Pacific Dunes Ranch	1205 Silver Spur Place	Oceana	CA		93445		RV		48							215		—		—			—			—		—
San Benito	16225 Cienega Rd	Paicines	CA		95043		RV		199			23				523		27		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,647		—
Palm Springs	77500 Varner Rd	Palm Desert	CA		92211		RV		35							401		42		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,311		—
Las Palmas	1025 S. Riverside Ave.	Rialto	CA		92376		MH		18							136		136		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,713	$	5,452
Parque La Quinta	350 S. Willow Ave. #120	Rialto	CA		92376		MH		19							166		166		100.0	%		99.4	%	$	5,698	$	5,407
Rancho Oso	3750 Paradise Rd	Santa Barbara	CA		93105		RV		310			40				187		17		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,229		—
Meadowbrook	8301 Mission Gorge Rd.	Santee	CA		92071		MH		43							338		338		99.4	%		97.9	%	$	9,018	$	8,926
Lamplighter	10767 Jamacha Blvd.	Spring Valley	CA		91978		MH		32							270		270		95.6	%		96.7	%	$	11,828	$	11,471
Santiago Estates	13691 Gavina Ave. #632	Sylmar	CA		91342		MH		113			9				300		300		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	11,031	$	10,555
Total California Market									4,926			1,026		2,191		13,350		6,652		95.9	%		93.3	%	$	6,564	$	8,466
Arizona
Countryside RV	2701 S. Idaho Rd	Apache Junction	AZ		85219		RV		53							560		294		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,022	$	2,931
Golden Sun RV	999 W Broadway Ave	Apache Junction	AZ		85220		RV		33							329		217		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,998	$	2,845
Casita Verde RV	2200 N. Trekell Rd.	Casa Grande	AZ		85222		RV		14							192		104		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,309	$	2,222
Fiesta Grande RV	1511 East Florence Blvd.	Casa Grande	AZ		85222		RV		77							767		485		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,719	$	2,610
Foothills West RV	10167 N. Encore Dr.	Casa Grande	AZ		85222		RV		16							188		129		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,299	$	2,199

22

																	Total
															Total		Number		Annual			Annual
											Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
											pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
								Acres			Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP		MH/RV		(c)			(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
Verde Valley	6400 Thousand Trails Rd, SP # 16	Cottonwood	AZ		86326		RV		273			129		515		352		37		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,685		—
Casa del Sol East II	10960 N. 67th Avenue	Glendale	AZ		85304		MH		29							239		239		84.1	%		84.5	%	$	6,756	$	6,733
Casa del Sol East III	10960 N. 67th Avenue	Glendale	AZ		85304		MH		28							236		236		78.8	%		81.8	%	$	6,912	$	6,720
Palm Shadows	7300 N. 51st. Avenue	Glendale	AZ		85301		MH		33							294		294		90.5	%		82.7	%	$	5,484	$	5,257
Monte Vista	8865 E. Baseline Road	Mesa	AZ		85209		RV		142			56		515		832		765		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,295	$	5,111
Viewpoint	8700 E. University	Mesa	AZ		85207		RV		332			55		467		1,954		1,537		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,873	$	4,695
Hacienda de Valencia	201 S. Greenfield Rd.	Mesa	AZ		85206		MH		51							366		366		97.0	%		98.4	%	$	6,016	$	5,897
The Highlands at Brentwood	120 North Val Vista Drive	Mesa	AZ		85213		MH		45							268		268		99.3	%		99.3	%	$	6,635	$	6,551
The Mark	625 West McKellips	Mesa	AZ		85201		MH		60			4				410		410		64.1	%		62.9	%	$	5,656	$	5,383
Apollo Village	10701 N. 99th Ave.	Peoria	AZ		85345		MH		29			3				238		238		97.1	%		92.4	%	$	5,194	$	5,393
Casa del Sol West I	11411 N. 91st Avenue	Peoria	AZ		85345		MH		31							245		245		94.7	%		94.3	%	$	6,273	$	6,293
Carefree Manor	19602 N. 32nd Street	Phoenix	AZ		85050		MH		16							130		130		97.7	%		93.1	%	$	4,832	$	4,929
Central Park	205 West Bell Road	Phoenix	AZ		85023		MH		37							293		293		99.3	%		99.0	%	$	5,992	$	5,901
Desert Skies	19802 N. 32 Street	Phoenix	AZ		85024		MH		24							165		165		99.4	%		100.0	%	$	5,306	$	5,130
Sunrise Heights	17801 North 16th Street	Phoenix	AZ		85022		MH		28							199		199		98.0	%		94.0	%	$	5,733	$	5,657
Whispering Palms	19225 N. Cave Creek Rd.	Phoenix	AZ		85024		MH		15							116		116		96.6	%		94.8	%	$	4,644	$	4,507
Sedona Shadows	6770 W. U.S. Hwy 89A	Sedona	AZ		86336		MH		48			6		10		198		198		99.5	%		100.0	%	$	7,503	$	7,074
Venture In	270 N. Clark Rd.	Show Low	AZ		85901		RV		26							389		278		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,835	$	2,699
Paradise	10950 W. Union Hill Drive	Sun City	AZ		85373		RV		80							950		816		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,957	$	3,764
The Meadows	2401 W. Southern Ave.	Tempe	AZ		85282		MH		60							391		391		97.2	%		94.4	%	$	6,430	$	6,171
Fairview Manor	3115 N. Fairview Avenue	Tucson	AZ		85705		MH		28							237		237		81.9	%		80.9	%	$	4,564	$	4,636
Araby	6649 E. 32nd. St.	Yuma	AZ		85365		RV		25							337		294		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,123	$	3,015
Cactus Gardens	10657 S. Ave. 9-E	Yuma	AZ		85365		RV		43							430		295		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,120	$	2,057
Capri RV	3380 South 4th Ave	Yuma	AZ		85365		RV		20							303		243		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,795	$	2,791
Desert Paradise	10537 South Ave., 9E	Yuma	AZ		85365		RV		26							260		122		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,170	$	2,076
Foothill	12705 E. South Frontage Rd.	Yuma	AZ		85367		RV		18							180		74		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,131	$	2,115
Mesa Verde	3649 & 3749 South 4th Ave.	Yuma	AZ		85365		RV		28							345		311		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,679	$	2,637
Suni Sands	1960 East 32nd Street	Yuma	AZ		85365		RV		34							336		197		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,607	$	2,539
Total Arizona Market									1,802			253		1,507		12,729		10,223		96.2	%		95.4	%	$	4,380	$	4,329
Colorado
Hillcrest Village	1600 Sable Boulevard	Aurora	CO		80011		MH		72							601		601		83.7	%		81.0	%	$	6,771	$	6,672
Cimarron	12205 North Perry	Broomfield	CO		80020		MH		50							327		327		81.7	%		82.6	%	$	6,756	$	6,483
Holiday Village	3405 Sinton Road	Co. Springs	CO		80907		MH		38							240		240		73.3	%		75.8	%	$	6,869	$	6,678
Bear Creek	3500 South King Street	Denver	CO		80236		MH		12							124		124		89.5	%		91.8	%	$	6,659	$	6,498
Holiday Hills	2000 West 92nd Avenue	Denver	CO		80260		MH		99							736		736		81.8	%		83.3	%	$	6,654	$	6,525
Golden Terrace	17601 West Colfax Ave.	Golden	CO		80401		MH		32							265		265		80.8	%		82.6	%	$	7,293	$	7,211
Golden Terrace South	17601 West Colfax Ave.	Golden	CO		80401		MH		15							80		80		60.0	%		67.5	%	$	7,146	$	7,080
Golden Terrace South RV	17801 West Colfax Ave.	Golden	CO		80401		RV		(f	)						80		—		—			—			—		—
Golden Terrace West	17601 West Colfax Ave.	Golden	CO		80401		MH		39			7				316		316		76.6	%		81.3	%	$	7,112	$	7,049
Pueblo Grande	999 Fortino Blvd. West	Pueblo	CO		81008		MH		33							251		251		79.7	%		84.1	%	$	4,046	$	4,005
Woodland Hills	1500 W. Thornton Pkwy.	Thorton	CO		80260		MH		55							434		434		80.2	%		80.2	%	$	6,464	$	6,208
Total Colorado Market									445			7		0		3,454		3,374		78.7	%		81.0	%	$	6,577	$	6,441

23

																Total
														Total		Number		Annual			Annual
										Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
										pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
								Acres		Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP		MH/RV		(c)		(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
Northeast
Waterford	205 Joan Drive	Bear	DE		19701		MH		159						731		731		96.4	%		95.5	%	$	6,300	$	6,134
Whispering Pines	32045 Janice Road	Lewes	DE		19958		MH		67		2				393		393		80.7	%		82.4	%	$	4,842	$	4,580
Mariners Cove	35356 Sussex Lane #1	Millsboro	DE		19966		MH		101						375		375		96.8	%		95.7	%	$	6,926	$	6,923
Aspen Meadows	303 Palace Lane	Rehoboth	DE		19971		MH		46						200		200		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,476	$	5,117
Camelot Meadows	303 Palace Lane	Rehoboth	DE		19971		MH		61						301		301		100.0	%		99.7	%	$	5,157	$	4,854
McNicol	303 Palace Lane	Rehoboth	DE		19971		MH		25						93		93		98.9	%		98.9	%	$	4,865	$	4,565
Sweetbriar	83 Big Burn Lane	Rehoboth	DE		19958		MH		38						146		146		98.6	%		98.6	%	$	4,872	$	4,677
Gateway to Cape Cod	90 Stevens Rd PO Box 217	Rochester	MA		02770		RV		80						194		33		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,672		—
Old Chatham RV	310 Old Chatham Road	South Dennis	MA		02660		RV		47		11				312		266		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,621	$	3,625
Sturbridge	19 Mashapaug Rd	Sturbridge	MA		01566		RV		223						155		23		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,092		—
Mount Desert Narrows	1219 State Highway 3	Bar Harbor	ME		04609		RV		90		12				206		5		100.0	%		—		$	2,600		—
Patten Pond	1470 Bucksport Road	Ellsworth	ME		04605		RV		43		60				137		21		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,248	$	2,450
Moody Beach	266 Post Road	Moody	ME		04054		RV		48						203		53		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,621		—
Pinehurst RV Park	7 Oregon Avenue, P.O. Box 174	Old Orchard Beach	ME		04064		RV		58						550		506		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,782	$	2,700
Narrows Too	1150 Bar Harbor Road	Trenton	ME		04605		RV		42						207		7		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,357	$	3,165
Forest Lake	192 Thousand Trails Dr	Advance	NC		27006		RV		306		81				305		16		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,117		—
Scenic	1314 Tunnel Rd.	Asheville	NC		28805		MH		28						205		205		77.1	%		94.2	%	$	3,790	$	3,537
Waterway RV	850 Cedar Point Blvd.	Cedar Point	NC		28584		RV		27						336		324		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,458	$	3,220
Twin Lakes	1618 Memory Lane	Chocowinity	NC		27817		RV		132		8		54		400		322		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,765	$	2,611
Green Mountain Park	2495 Dimmette Rd	Lenoir	NC		28645		RV		1077		400		360		447		74		100.	%		—	(b)	$	1,001		—
Lake Gaston	561 Fleming Dairy Road	Littleton	NC		27850		RV		69						235		99		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,780		—
Lake Myers RV	2862 US Highway 64 West	Mocksville	NC		27028		RV		74						425		297		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,070	$	2,046
Goose Creek	350 Red Barn Road	Newport	NC		28570		RV		92		6		51		735		615		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,519	$	3,227
Sandy Beach RV	677 Clement Hill Road	Contoocook	NH		03229		RV		40						190		104		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,213	$	3,188
Tuxbury Resort	88 Whitehall Road	South Hampton	NH		03827		RV		193		100				305		193		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,903	$	2,982
Lake & Shore	545 Corson Tavern Rd	Ocean View	NJ		08230		RV		162						401		146		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,754		—
Chestnut Lake	631 Chestnut Neck Rd	Port Republic	NJ		08241		RV		32						185		37		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,838		—
Sea Pines	US Route #9 Box 1535	Swainton	NJ		08210		RV		75						549		191		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,732		—
Rondout Valley Resort	105 Mettachonts Rd	Accord	NY		12404		RV		184		94				398		41		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,759		—
Alpine Lake	78 Heath Road	Corinth	NY		12822		RV		200		54				500		286		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,768	$	2,697
	175 E. Schroon River Road, P.O.
Lake George Escape	Box 431	Lake George	NY		12845		RV		178		30				576		20		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	4,710	$	4,898
Greenwood Village	370 Chapman Boulevard	Manorville	NY		11949		MH		79		14		7		512		512		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	7,098	$	6,865
Brennan Beach	80 Brennan Beach	Pulaski	NY		13142		RV		201						1,377		1,153		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	1,993	$	1,977
Lake George Schroon Valley	1730 Schroon River Rd	Warrensburg	NY		12885		RV		151						151		20		100.0	%		—		$	2,403		—
Sun Valley	451 E. Maple Grove Rd.	Bowmansville	PA		17507		RV		86						265		177		100.0	%		—	(a)	$	2,375		—
Green Acres	8785 Turkey Ridge Road	Breinigsville	PA		18031		MH		149						595		595		91.3	%		91.9	%	$	6,748	$	6,584
Gettysburg Farm	6200 Big Mountain Rd	Dover	PA		17315		RV		124						265		33		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,647		—
Timothy Lake South	RR #6,Box 6627 Timothy Lake Rd	East Stroudsburg	PA		18301		RV		65						327		16		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,922		—
Timothy Lake North	RR #6,Box 6627 Timothy Lake Rd	East Stroudsburg	PA		18301		RV		98						323		43		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,843		—
Circle M	2111 Millersville Road	Lancaster	PA		17603		RV		103						380		44		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,068		—
Hershey Preserve	493 S. Mt. Pleasant Rd	Lebanon	PA		17042		RV		196		20				297		35		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,428		—
Robin Hill	149 Robin Hill Rd.	Lenhartsville	PA		19534		RV		44						270		181		100.0	%		—	(a)	$	2,725		—

24

																	Total
															Total		Number		Annual			Annual
											Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
											pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
									Acres		Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP			MH/RV		(c)		(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
PA Dutch County	185 Lehman Road	Manheim	PA		17545			RV		102						269		41		100.0	%		—		$	1,505		—
Spring Gulch	475 Lynch Road	New Holland	PA		17557			RV		114						420		96		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	3,811	$	3,709
Scotrun	PO Box 428 Route 611	Scotrun	PA		18355			RV		66						178		51		100.0	%		—		$	1,891		—
Appalachian	60 Motel Drive	Shartlesville	PA		19554			RV		86		30		200		357		141		100.0	%		—		$	2,541		—
Carolina Landing	120 Carolina Landing Dr	Fair Play	SC		29643			RV		73						192		9		100.0	%		—		$	1,456		—
Inlet Oaks	5350 Highway 17	Murrells Inlet	SC		29576			MH		35						172		172		98.3	%		94.9	%	$	3,569	$	3,545
The Oaks at Point South	1292 Campground Rd	Yemassee	SC		29945			RV		10						93		—		—			—			—		—
Meadows of Chantilly	4200 Airline Parkway	Chantilly	VA		22021			MH		82						500		500		94.4	%		93.4	%	$	10,081	$	9,625
Harbor View	15 Harbor View Circle	Colonial Beach	VA		22443			RV		76						146		—		100.0	%		—	(b)		—		—
Lynchburg	405 Mollies Creek Rd	Gladys	VA		24554			RV		170		59				222		15		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,030		—
Chesapeake Bay	12014 Trails Lane	Gloucester	VA		23061			RV		282		80				392		96		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,457		—
Virginia Landing	40226 Upshur Neck Rd	Quinby	VA		23423			RV		839		178				233		13		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	630		—
Williamsburg	4301 Rochambeau Drive	Williamsburg	VA		23188			RV		65						211		28		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,700		—
Total Northeast Market										7,293		1,239		672		18,542		10,094		98.7	%		98.1	%	$	3,161	$	4,212
Midwest
Hidden Cove Outdoor Resort	687 Country Road 3916	Arley	AL		35541			RV		81		60		200		79		3		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,600		—
O’Connell’s	970 Green Wing Road	Amboy	IL		61310			RV		286		100		600		668		355		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,648	$	2,632
Pine Country	5710 Shattuck Road	Belvidere	IL		61008			RV		131						126		64		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,606		—
Willow Lake Estates	161 West River Road	Elgin	IL		60123			MH		111						617		617		66.6	%		68.2	%	$	9,237	$	9,225
Golf Vista Estates	25807 Firestone Drive	Monee	IL		60449			MH		144		4				408		408		93.4	%		94.6	%	$	6,995	$	6,891
Indian Lakes	7234 E. SR Highway 46	Batesville	IN		47006			RV		545		159		318		1,000		182		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,664		—
Horsehoe Lakes	12962 S. 225 W.	Clinton	IN		47842			RV		289		96		96		123		2		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,040		—
Twin Mills RV	1675 W SR 120	Howe	IN		46746			RV		137		5		50		501		210		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,076	$	2,042
Lakeside	7089 N. Chicago Road	New Carlisle	IN		46552			RV		13						91		65		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,312	$	2,187
Oak Tree Village	254 Sandalwood Ave.	Portage	IN		46368			MH		76						361		361		69.0	%		70.6	%	$	5,159	$	5,036
Diamond Caverns Resort	1878 Mammoth Cave Pkwy	Park City	KY		42160			RV		714		350		469		220		—		—			—			—		—
Bear Cave Resort	4085 N. Red Bud Trail	Buchanan	MI		49107			RV		26		10				136		—		—			—			—		—
Saint Claire	1299 Wadhams Rd	Saint Claire	MI		48079			RV		210		100				229		15		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,729		—
Creekside	5100 Clyde Pk. Ave. SW	Wyoming	MI		49509			MH		29						165		165		57.6	%		64.2	%	$	5,747	$	5,722
Kenisee Lake	2021 Mill Creek Rd	Jefferson	OH		44047			RV		143		50				119		2		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,150		—
Wilmington	1786 S.R. 380	Wilmington	OH		45177			RV		109		41				169		43		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,435		—
Natchez Trace	1363 Napier Rd	Hohenwald	TN		38462			RV		672		140				531		—		—			—			—		—
Cherokee Landing	PO Box 37	Middleton	TN		38052			RV		254		124				339		—		—			—			—		—
						��
Fremont	E. 6506 Highway 110	Fremont	WI		54940			RV		98		5				325		61		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,816	$	2,750
Yukon Trails	N2330 Co Rd. HH	Lyndon Station	WI		53944			RV		150		30				214		124		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	1,660	$	1,616
Plymouth Rock	N. 7271 Lando St.	Plymouth	WI		53073			RV		133						609		406		100.0	%		—	(a)	$	2,048		—
Tranquil Timbers	3668 Grondin Road	Sturgeon Bay	WI		54235			RV		125						270		141		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	1,742	$	1,719
Arrowhead	W1530 Arrowhead Road	Wisconsin Dells	WI		53965			RV		166		40		200		377		151		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	1,644	$	1,578
Total Midwest Market										4,642		1,314		1,933		7,677		3,375		94.0	%		90.7	%	$	2,858	$	3,808
Nevada, Utah, New Mexico
Bonanza	3700 East Stewart Ave	Las Vegas	NV		89110			MH		43						353		353		64.3	%		63.5	%	$	6,083	$	6,053
Boulder Cascade	1601 South Sandhill Rd	Las Vegas	NV		89104			MH		39						299		299		80.9	%		77.3	%	$	6,567	$	6,599
Cabana	5303 East Twain	Las Vegas	NV		89122			MH		37						263		263		95.8	%		98.5	%	$	6,848	$	6,566
Flamingo West	8122 West Flamingo Rd.	Las Vegas	NV		89147			MH		37						258		258		96.9	%		99.6	%	$	7,536	$	7,216
Villa Borega	1111 N. Lamb Boulevard	Las Vegas	NV		89110			MH		40						293		293		80.2	%		84.0	%	$	6,595	$	6,714

25

																Total
														Total		Number		Annual			Annual
										Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
										pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
								Acres		Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP		MH/RV		(c)		(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
Las Vegas	4295 Boulder Highway	Las Vegas	NV		89121		RV		11						217		10		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,950		—
Westwood Village	1111 N. 2000 West	Farr West	UT		84404		MH		46						314		314		93.3	%		94.3	%	$	4,539	$	4,295
All Seasons	290 N. Redwood Rd	Salt Lake City	UT		84116		MH		19						121		121		84.3	%		83.5	%	$	5,393	$	5,321
Total Nevada, Utah, New Mexico Market									272		0		0		2,118		1,911		87.0	%		85.8	%	$	5,814	$	6,109
Northwest
Cultus Lake (Canada)	1855 Columbia Valley Hwy	Lindell Beach	BC		V2R 4W6		RV		15						178		22		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,000		—
Thousand Trails Bend	17480 S Century Dr	Bend	OR		97707		RV		289		100		145		351		10		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,306		—
Pacific City	30000 Sandlake Rd	Cloverdale	OR		97112		RV		105						307		11		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,653		—
South Jetty	05010 South Jetty Rd	Florence	OR		97439		RV		57						204		3		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,433		—
Seaside Resort	1703 12th Ave	Seaside	OR		97138		RV		80						251		14		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,314		—
Whaler’s Rest Resort	50 SE 123rd St	South Beach	OR		97366		RV		39						170		12		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,499		—
Mt. Hood	65000 E Highway 26	Welches	OR		97067		RV		115		30		202		436		97		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	5,381	$	5,229
Shadowbrook	13640 S.E. Hwy 212	Clackamas	OR		97015		MH		21						156		156		96.8	%		97.4	%	$	7,031	$	7,456
Falcon Wood Village	1475 Green Acres Road	Eugene	OR		97408		MH		23						183		183		86.9	%		86.9	%	$	5,519	$	5,766
Quail Hollow	2100 N.E. Sandy Blvd.	Fairview	OR		97024		MH		21						137		137		94.9	%		94.2	%	$	6,882	$	7,314
Birch Bay	8418 Harborview Rd	Blaine	WA		98230		RV		31						246		9		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,356		—
Mt. Vernon	5409 N. Darrk Ln	Bow	WA		98232		RV		311		200		600		251		10		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,589		—
Chehalis	2228 Centralia-Alpha Rd	Chehalis	WA		98532		RV		309		85				360		—		—			—			—		—
Grandy Creek	7370 Russell Rd	Concrete	WA		98237		RV		63						179		4		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,535		—
La Conner	16362 Snee Oosh Rd	La Conner	WA		98257		RV		106		5				319		19		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,288		—
Leavenworth	20752-4 Chiwawa Loop Rd	Leavenworth	WA		98826		RV		300		50				266		1		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,620		—
Thunderbird Resort	26702 Ben Howard Rd	Monroe	WA		98272		RV		45		2				136		1		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	3,200		—
Little Diamond	1002 McGowen Rd	Newport	WA		99156		RV		360		119				520		6		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,612		—
Oceana Resort	2733 State Route 109	Oceana City	WA		98569		RV		16						84		6		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,500		—
Crescent Bar Resort	9252 Crescent Bar Rd NW	Quincy	WA		98848		RV		14						115		2		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,200		—
Long Beach	2215 Willows Rd	Seaview	WA		98644		RV		17						144		3		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,100		—
Paradise Resort	173 Salem Plant Rd	Silver Creek	WA		98585		RV		60						214		5		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,502		—
Cascade Resort(g)	34500 SE 99th St	Snoqualmie	WA		98065		RV		20						163		—		—			—			—		—
Kloshe Illahee	2500 S. 370th Street	Federal Way	WA		98003		MH		50						258		258		97.7	%		98.8	%	$	8,877	$	8,640
Total Northwest Market									2467		591		947		5,628		969		98.9	%		95.5	%	$	3,427	$	6,439
Texas
Bay Landing	2305 Highway 380 W	Bridgeport	TX		76426		RV		443		235				293		24		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,619		—
Colorado River	1062 Thousand Trails Lane	Columbus	TX		78934		RV		218		51				132		24		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,583		—
Lake Texoma	209 Thousand Trails Dr	Gordonville	TX		76245		RV		201		79				301		65		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,737		—
Lakewood	4525 Graham Road	Harlingen	TX		78552		RV		30						301		112		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	1,925	$	1,970
Paradise Park RV	1201 N. Expressway 77	Harlingen	TX		78552		RV		60						563		300		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,974	$	2,965
Sunshine RV	1900 Grace Avenue	Harlingen	TX		78550		RV		84						1,027		403		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,367	$	2,380
Tropic Winds	1501 N Loop 499	Harlingen	TX		78550		RV		112		74				531		108		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,788	$	2,778
Medina Lake	215 Spettle Rd	Lakehills	TX		78063		RV		208		50				387		75		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,826		—
Paradise South	9909 N. Mile 2 West Rd.	Mercedes	TX		78570		RV		49						493		175		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,017	$	2,080
Lake Tawakoni	1246 Rains Co. Rd 1470	Point	TX		75472		RV		480		11				320		55		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,522		—
Fun n Sun RV	1400 Zillock Rd	San Benito	TX		78586		RV		135		40				1,435		625		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,966	$	2,880
Southern Comfort	1501 South Airport Drive	Weslaco	TX		78596		RV		40						403		330		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,627	$	2,658
Country Sunshine	1601 South Airport Road	Weslaco	TX		78596		RV		37						390		181		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	2,620	$	2,638
Lake Whitney	417 Thousand Trails Dr	Whitney	TX		76692		RV		403		158				261		46		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	1,959		—

26

																Total
														Total		Number		Annual			Annual
										Develo-				Number		of Annual		Site			Site			Annual		Annual
										pable				of Sites		Sites		Occupancy			Occupancy			Rent		Rent
								Acres		Acres		Expansion		as of		as of		as of			as of			as of		as of
Property	Address	City	State	ZIP		MH/RV		(c)		(d)		Sites(e)		12/31/09		12/31/09		12/31/09			12/31/08			12/31/09		12/31/08
Lake Conroe	11720 Old Montgomery Rd	Willis	TX		77318		RV		129		30		300		363		125		100.0	%		—	(b)	$	2,668		—
Total Texas Market									2629		728		300		7,200		2,648		100.00	%		100.00	%	$	2,280	$	2,544
Grand Total All Markets									31,638		5,568		9,154		107,500		67,479		93.63	%		92.59	%	$	4,451	$	5,253

(a)	Represents a former joint venture Property acquired in 2009.
(b)	Property is primarily designated for use by customers with right-to-use contracts. Annual sites, if any, as of 12/31/2008 have been omitted from the table, as the information would not provide meaningful comparisons.
(c)	Acres are approximate. Acreage for some recent acquisitions was estimated based upon 10 sites per acre.
(d)	Acres are approximate. There can be no assurance that developable acres will be developed. Development is contingent on many factors including, but not limited to, cost, ability to subdivide, accessibility, infrastructure needs, zoning, entitlement and topography.
(e)	Expansion sites are approximate and only represent sites that could be developed and is further dependent upon necessary approvals. Certain Properties with expansion sites noted may have vacancy and therefore, expansion sites may not be added.
(f)	Acres for this RV park are included in the acres for the adjacent manufactured home community listed directly above this Property.
(g)	Property not operated by the Company during all of 2009. Property is leased to a third party operator or was closed for all or a portion of 2009.

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings

The legal proceedings disclosure is incorporated herein by reference from Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form10-K.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

27

PART II

Item 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol ELS. On February 23, 2010, the reported closing price per share of ELS common stock on the NYSE was $48.86 and there were approximately 10,060 beneficial holders of record. The high and low sales prices and closing sales prices on the NYSE and distributions for our common stock during 2009 and 2008 are set forth in the table below:

							Distributions
	Close		High		Low		Declared
2009
1st Quarter	$	38.10	$	42.44	$	28.34	$	0.250
2nd Quarter		37.18		46.28		33.56		0.250
3rd Quarter		42.79		47.47		34.09		0.300
4th Quarter		50.47		51.18		40.57		0.300
2008
1st Quarter	$	49.37	$	52.26	$	39.77	$	0.200
2nd Quarter		44.00		53.64		43.62		0.200
3rd Quarter		53.03		56.00		40.93		0.200
4th Quarter		38.36		52.90		22.64		0.200

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

						Total Number of Shares	Maximum Number of
		Total Number		Average Price		Purchased as Part of	Shares that May Yet
		of Shares		Paid per		Publicly Announced	be Purchased Under
Period		Purchased(a)		Share(a)		Plans or Programs	the Plans or Programs
	10/1/09-10/31/09		—		—	None	None
	11/1/09-11/30/09		277	$	47.66	None	None
	12/1/09-12/31/09		21,116	$	50.22	None	None

(a) Of the common stock repurchased from October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, 21,393 shares were repurchased at the open market price and represent common stock surrendered to the Company to satisfy income tax withholding obligations due as a result of the vesting of Restricted Share Grants. Certain executive officers of the Company may from time to time adopt non-discretionary, written trading plans that comply with CommissionRule 10b5-1, or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation. CommissionRule 10b5-1 provides executives with a method to monetize their equity-based compensation in an automatic and non-discretionary manner over time.

28

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating information on a historical basis. The historical operating data has been derived from the historical financial statements of the Company. The following information should be read in conjunction with all of the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in thisForm 10-K.

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Historical Financial Information

	(1)Years Ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
	(Amounts in thousands, except for per share and property data)
Property Operations:
Community base rental income	$	253,379		$	245,833		$	236,933		$	225,815		$	213,280
Resort base rental income		124,822			111,876			102,372			89,925			74,371
Right-to-use annual payments(2)		50,765			19,667			—			—			—
Right-to-use contracts current period, gross(2)		21,526			10,951			—			—			—
Right-to-use contracts, deferred, net of prior period amortization(2)		(18,882	)		(10,611	)		—			—			—
Utility and other income		47,685			41,633			36,849			30,643			27,367
Property operating revenues		479,295			419,349			376,154			346,383			315,018
Property operating and maintenance		180,870			152,363			127,342			116,179			103,832
Real estate taxes		31,674			29,457			27,429			26,246			24,671
Sales and marketing, gross(2)		13,536			7,116			—			—			—
Sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net(2)		(5,729	)		(3,644	)		—			—			—
Property management		33,383			25,451			18,385			17,079			15,919
Property operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)		253,734			210,743			173,156			159,504			144,422
Income from property operations		225,561			208,606			202,998			186,879			170,596
Home Sales Operations:
Gross revenues from home sales		7,136			21,845			33,333			61,247			66,014
Cost of home sales		(7,471	)		(24,069	)		(30,713	)		(54,498	)		(57,471	)
Gross (loss) profit from home sales		(335	)		(2,224	)		2,620			6,749			8,543
Brokered resale revenues, net		758			1,094			1,528			2,129			2,714
Home selling expenses		(2,383	)		(5,776	)		(7,555	)		(9,836	)		(8,838	)
Ancillary services revenues, net		2,745			1,197			2,436			3,027			2,227
Income (loss) from home sales operations and other		785			(5,709	)		(971	)		2,069			4,646
Other Income and Expenses:
Interest income		5,119			3,095			1,732			1,975			1,406
Income from other investments, net(3)		8,168			17,006			22,476			20,102			16,609
General and administrative		(22,279	)		(20,617	)		(15,591	)		(12,760	)		(13,624	)
Rent control initiatives		(456	)		(1,555	)		(2,657	)		(1,157	)		(1,081	)
Interest and related amortization		(98,311	)		(99,406	)		(103,070	)		(103,161	)		(100,712	)
Loss on early debt retirement(4)		—			(24	)		—			—			(20,630	)
Depreciation on corporate assets		(1,039	)		(390	)		(437	)		(410	)		(804	)
Depreciation on real estate and other costs		(69,049	)		(66,193	)		(63,554	)		(60,276	)		(55,608	)
Total other expenses, net		(177,847	)		(168,084	)		(161,101	)		(155,687	)		(174,444	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures		2,896			3,753			2,696			3,583			6,508
Consolidated income from continuing operations		51,395			38,566			43,622			36,844			7,306
Discontinued Operations:
Discontinued operations		181			257			289			520			1,927
Depreciation on discontinued operations		—			—			—			(84	)		(410	)
Gain (loss) from discontinued real estate		4,685			(79	)		12,036			(192	)		2,279
Income from discontinued operations		4,866			178			12,325			244			3,796
Consolidated net income		56,261			38,744			55,947			37,088			11,102
(Income) loss allocated to non-controlling interests:
Common OP Units		(6,113	)		(4,297	)		(7,705	)		(4,318	)		539
Perpetual Preferred OP Units(5)		(16,143	)		(16,144	)		(16,140	)		(16,138	)		(13,974	)
Net income (loss) available for Common Shares	$	34,005		$	18,303		$	32,102		$	16,632		$	(2,333	)

29

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Historical Financial Information (continued)

	(1)As of December 31,
	2009		2008		2007		2006		2005
	(Amounts in thousands, except for per share and property data)
Earnings per Common Share — Basic:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1.08	$	0.74	$	0.92	$	0.70	$	(0.23	)
Income from discontinued operations	$	0.15	$	0.01	$	0.41	$	0.01	$	0.13
Net income (loss) available for Common Shares	$	1.23	$	0.75	$	1.33	$	0.71	$	(0.10	)
Earnings per Common Share — Fully Diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1.07	$	0.74	$	0.90	$	0.68	$	(0.23	)
Income from discontinued operations	$	0.15	$	0.01	$	0.41	$	0.01	$	0.13
Net income (loss) available for Common Shares	$	1.22	$	0.75	$	1.31	$	0.69	$	(0.10	)
Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding	$	1.10	$	0.80	$	0.60	$	0.30	$	0.10
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — basic		27,582		24,466		24,089		23,444		23,081
Weighted average Common OP Units outstanding		5,075		5,674		5,870		6,165		6,285
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — fully diluted		32,944		30,498		30,414		30,241		29,366
Balance Sheet Data:
Real estate, before accumulated depreciation(6)	$	2,538,215	$	2,491,021	$	2,396,115	$	2,337,460	$	2,152,567
Total assets		2,166,319		2,091,647		2,033,695		2,055,831		1,948,874
Total mortgages and loans		1,547,901		1,662,403		1,659,392		1,717,212		1,638,281
Non-controlling interests		200,000		200,000		200,000		200,000		200,000
Total equity(7)		254,427		96,234		88,717		59,912		41,895
Other Data:
Funds from operations(8)	$	118,082	$	97,615	$	92,752	$	82,367	$	52,827
Total Properties (at end of period)		304		309		311		311		285
Total sites (at end of period)		110,575		112,211		112,779		112,956		106,337

(1)	See the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company contained in thisForm 10-K. Certain revenue amounts reported in previously issued statements of operations have been reclassified in the attached statements of operations due to the Company’s expansion of the related revenue activity.
	Property operations, home sale operations, and other income and expenses are discussed in Item 7 contained in thisForm 10-K.
(2)	New activity starting on August 14, 2008 due to the acquisition of the operations of Privileged Access, LP (“Privileged Access”).
(3)	Between November 10, 2004 and August 13, 2008, Income from other investments, net included rental income from the lease of membership Properties to Thousand Trails (“TT”) or its subsequent owner, Privileged Access. On August 14, 2008, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Privileged Access, which included the operations of TT. The lease of membership Properties to TT was terminated upon closing. As a result of the lease termination, beginning August 14, 2008, Income from other investments, net no longer included rental income from the lease of membership Properties. See Note 2 (j) in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form10-K.
(4)	On December 2, 2005, we refinanced approximately $293 million of secured debt maturing in 2007 with an effective interest rate of 6.8% per annum. This refinanced debt was secured by two cross-collateralized loan pools consisting of 35 Properties. The transaction generated approximately $337 million in proceeds from loans secured by individual mortgages on 20 Properties. The blended interest rate on the refinancing was approximately 5.3% per annum, and the loans mature in 2015. Transaction costs resulting from early debt retirement were approximately $20.0 million.
(5)	During 2005, we issued $25 million of 8.0625% Series D and $50 million of 7.95% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preference Units to institutional investors. Proceeds were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the Company’s lines of credit.
(6)	We believe that the book value of the Properties, which reflects the historical costs of such real estate assets less accumulated depreciation, is less than the current market value of the Properties.

30

(7)	On June 29, 2009, we issued 4.6 million shares of common stock in an equity offering for proceeds of approximately $146.4 million, net of offering costs.
(8)	Refer to Item 7 contained in thisForm 10-K for information regarding why we present funds from operations and for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to net income.

Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data” and the historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in thisForm 10-K.

2009 Accomplishments

•  Issued 4.6 million shares of common stock in an equity offering for proceeds of approximately $146.4 million, net of offering costs.

•  Raised annual dividend to $1.10 per share in 2009, up from $0.80 per share in 2008.

•  Paid off 20 maturing mortgages totaling approximately $106.7 million, funded with approximately $107.5 million of new and refinanced debt on six properties.

Overview and Outlook

Occupancy in our Properties as well as our ability to increase rental rates directly affects revenues. Our revenue streams are predominantly derived from customers renting our sites on a long-term basis.

We have approximately 65,000 annual sites, approximately 8,900 seasonal sites, which are leased to customers generally for three to six months, and approximately 9,300 transient sites, occupied by customers who lease sites on a short-term basis. The revenue from seasonal and transient sites is generally higher during the first and third quarters. We expect to service over 100,000 customers at our transient sites and we consider this revenue stream to be our most volatile. It is subject to weather conditions, gas prices, and other factors affecting the marginal RV customer’s vacation and travel preferences. Finally, we have approximately 24,300 sites designated as right-to-use sites which are primarily utilized to service the approximately 112,000 customers who own right-to-use contracts. We also have interests in Properties containing approximately 3,100 sites for which revenue is classified as Equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

	Total Sites as of Dec. 31, 2009
	(Rounded to 000s)
Community sites(1)		44,400
Resort sites:
Annual		20,600
Seasonal		8,900
Transient		9,300
Right-to-use(2)		24,300
Joint Ventures(3)		3,100
		110,600

(1)	Includes 165 sites from discontinued operations.
(2)	Includes approximately 2,500 sites rented on an annual basis.
(3)	Joint Venture income is included in Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures.

A significant portion of our rental agreements on community sites are directly or indirectly tied to published CPI statistics that are issued during June through September each year. We currently expect our 2010

31

community base rental income to increase approximately 2% as compared to 2009. We have already notified approximately 65% of our community site customers with rent increases reflecting this revenue growth.

Our home sales volumes and gross profits have been declining since 2005. We believe that the disruption in the site-built housing market may be contributing to the decline in our home sales operations as potential customers are not able to sell their existing site-built homes as well as increased price sensitivity for seasonal and second homebuyers. We believe that our potential customers are also having difficulty obtaining financing on resort homes, resort cottages and RV purchases. There are few options for potential customers who seek to obtain manufactured home financing. The options that are available currently require at least a 5% down payment and interest rates ranging from approximately 8% to 13%. This is in contrast to purchasers of site-built homes, who own the underlying land and that may benefit from various government stimulus packages designed to keep interest rates and down payments low. The continued decline in homes sales activity resulted in our decision to significantly reduce our new homes sales operation during the last couple of months of 2008 and until such time as new home sales markets improve. We believe that renting our vacant new homes may represent an attractive source of occupancy and potentially convert to a new homebuyer in the future. We are also focusing on smaller, more energy efficient and more affordable homes in our manufactured home Properties. We also believe that some customers that are capable of purchasing are opting instead to rent due to the current economic environment.

Our rental operations have been increasing since 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2009, occupied manufactured home rentals increased to 1,753, or 93.3%, from 907 for the year ended December 31, 2007. Net operating income increased to approximately $11.2 million in 2009 from approximately $5.9 million in 2007. We believe that unlike the home sales business, at this time we compete effectively with other types of rentals (i.e. apartments). We are currently evaluating whether we want to continue to invest in additional rental units.

In our resort Properties, we continue to work on extending customer stays. We have had success converting transient customers to seasonal customers and seasonal customers to annual customers. We also have and continue to introduce low-cost products that focus on the installed base of almost eight million RV owners. Such products may include right-to-use contracts that entitle the purchasers to use certain properties (the “Agreements”).

Several different Agreements are currently offered to new customers. These front-line Agreements are generally distinguishable from each other by the number of Properties a customer can access. The Agreements generally grant the customer the contractual right-to-use designated space within the Properties on a continuous basis for up to 14 days. The Agreements generally require nonrefundable upfront payments as well as annual payments.

Existing customers may be offered an upgrade Agreement from time-to-time. The upgrade Agreement is currently distinguishable from a new Agreement that a customer would enter into by (1) increased length of consecutive stay by 50% (i.e. up to 21 days); (2) ability to make earlier advance reservations; (3) discounts on rental units and (4) access to additional properties, which may include discounts at non-membership RV Properties. Each upgrade requires an additional nonrefundable upfront payment. The Company may finance the upfront nonrefundable payment under any Agreement.

Government Stimulus

In response to recent market disruptions, legislators and financial regulators implemented a number of mechanisms designed to add stability to the financial markets, including the provision of direct and indirect assistance to distressed financial institutions, assistance by the banking authorities in arranging acquisitions of weakened banks and broker-dealers, implementation of programs by the Federal Reserve to provide liquidity to the commercial paper markets and temporary prohibitions on short sales of certain financial institution securities. Numerous actions have been taken by the Federal Reserve, Congress, U.S. Treasury, the SEC and others to address the current liquidity and credit crisis that has followed the sub-prime crisis that commenced in 2007. These measures include, but are not limited to various legislative and regulatory efforts, homeowner relief that encourages loan restructuring and modification; the establishment of significant liquidity

32

and credit facilities for financial institutions and investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate, including two 50 basis point decreases in October of 2008; emergency action against short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program for money market funds; the establishment of a commercial paper funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial paper issuers; and coordinated international efforts to address illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector. It is not clear at this time what impact these liquidity and funding initiatives of the Federal Reserve and other agencies that have been previously announced, and any additional programs that may be initiated in the future will have on the financial markets, including the extreme levels of volatility and limited credit availability currently being experienced, or on the U.S. banking and financial industries and the broader U.S. and global economies. The Company believes that programs intended to provide relief to current or potential site-built single family homeowners negatively impacts its business.

Further, the overall effects of the legislative and regulatory efforts on the financial markets is uncertain, and they may not have the intended stabilization effects. Should these legislative or regulatory initiatives fail to stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Even if legislative or regulatory initiatives or other efforts successfully stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and we may incur increased capital requirements and constraints or additional costs in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment. It is uncertain what effects recently enacted or future legislation or regulatory initiatives will have on us. Given the volatile nature of the current market disruption and the uncertainties underlying efforts to mitigate or reverse the disruption, we may not timely anticipate or manage existing, new or additional risks, contingencies or developments, including regulatory developments and trends in new products and services, in the current or future environment. Our failure to do so could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Insurance

Approximately 70 Florida Properties suffered damage from the five hurricanes that struck the state during August and September 2004. As of January 27, 2010, the Company estimates its total claim to be approximately $21.0 million. The Company has made claims for full recovery of these amounts, subject to deductibles. Through December 31, 2009, the Company has made total expenditures of approximately $18.0 million. The Company has reserved approximately $2.0 million related to these expenditures ($0.7 million in 2005 and $1.3 million in 2004). Approximately $6.9 million of these expenditures have been capitalized per the Company’s capitalization policy through December 31, 2009.

The Company has received proceeds from insurance carriers of approximately $10.7 million through December 31, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, approximately $1.6 million has been recognized as a gain on insurance recovery, which is net of approximately $0.3 million of legal fees and included in income from other investments, net. On June 22, 2007, the Company filed a lawsuit related to some of the unpaid claims against certain insurance carriers and its insurance broker. See Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K for further discussion of this lawsuit.

Supplemental Property Disclosure

We provide the following disclosures with respect to certain assets:

•  Tropical Palms — On July 15, 2008, Tropical Palms, a 541-site resort Property located in Kissimmee, Florida, was leased to a new operator for 12 years. The lease provides for an initial fixed annual lease payment of $1.6 million, which escalates at the greater of CPI or 3%. Percentage rent payments are provided for beginning in 2010, subject to gross revenue floors. The Company will match the lessee’s capital investment in new rental units at the Property up to a maximum of $1.5 million. The lessee will pay the Company additional rent equal to 8% per year on the Company’s capital investment. The lease income recognized during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $1.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively, and is included in income from other investments, net. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company spent approximately $0.6 million and zero, respectively, to match the lessee’s investment in new rental units at the Property.

33

Property Acquisitions, Joint Ventures and Dispositions

The following chart lists the Properties or portfolios acquired, invested in, or sold since January 1, 2008:

Property	Transaction Date	Sites
Total Sites as of January 1, 2008			112,779
Property or Portfolio (# of Properties in parentheses):
Grandy Creek(1)	January 14, 2008		179
Lake George Schroon Valley Resort(1)	January 23, 2008		151
Expansion Site Development and other:
Sites added (reconfigured) in 2008			282
Sites added (reconfigured) in 2009			(1	)
Dispositions:
Morgan Portfolio JV(5)	2008		(1,134	)
Round Top JV(1)	February 13, 2009		(319	)
Pine Haven JV(1)	February 13, 2009		(625	)
Caledonia(1)	April 17, 2009		(247	)
Casa Village(1)	July 20, 2009		(490	)
Total Sites as of December 31, 2009			110,575

Since December 31, 2007, the gross investment in real estate increased from $2,396 million to $2,538 million as of December 31, 2009, due primarily to the aforementioned acquisitions and dispositions of Properties during the period.

Markets

The following table identifies our five largest markets by number of sites and provides information regarding our Properties (excluding Properties owned through Joint Ventures and our 82 right-to-use Properties).

								Percent of Total
	Number of				Percent of			Property Operating
Major Market	Properties		Total Sites		Total Sites			Revenues(1)
Florida		81		35,277		42.4	%		42.8	%
Arizona		32		12,377		14.9	%		13.0	%
California		31		7,360		8.8	%		17.2	%
Texas		8		5,143		6.2	%		2.2	%
Colorado		10		3,454		4.1	%		4.8	%
Other		55		19,619		23.6	%		20.0	%
Total		217		83,230		100.0	%		100.0	%

(1) Property operating revenues for this calculation excludes approximately $75.3 million of property operating revenue from our right-to-use Properties.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which require us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures. We believe that the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

34

The FASB finalized the Codification of GAAP effective for periods ending on or after September 15, 2009. References to GAAP issued by the FASB are to the Codification. The Codification does not change how the Company accounts for its transactions or the nature of the related disclosures made.

Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”),we allocated the purchase price of Properties we acquired on or prior to December 31, 2008 to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on their fair values. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we utilize a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be available in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective Property and other market data. We also consider information obtained about each Property as a result of our due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.

For business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009, the purchase price of Properties will be in accordance with the Codification Topic “Business Combinations” (“FASB ASC 805”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141R, “Business Combinations”). FASB ASC 805 replaces SFAS No. 141 but retains the fundamental requirements set forth in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (also known as the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. FASB ASC 805 replaces, with limited exceptions as specified in the statement, the cost allocation process in SFAS No. 141 with a fair value based allocation process.

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, including our investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions and legal factors. Future events could occur which would cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.

Real estate is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We generally use a30-year estimated life for buildings acquired and structural and land improvements (including site development), a ten-year estimated life for building upgrades and a five-year estimated life for furniture, fixtures and equipment. New rental units are generally depreciated using a20-year estimated life from each model year down to a salvage value of 40% of the original costs. Used rental units are generally depreciated based on the estimated life of the unit with no estimated salvage value.

The values of above-and below-market leases are amortized and recorded as either an increase (in the case of below-market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above-market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease. The value associated with in-place leases is amortized over the expected term, which includes an estimated probability of lease renewal. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred and significant renovations and improvements that improve the asset and extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized over their estimated useful life.

Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for leases with its customers as operating leases. Rental income is recognized over the term of the respective lease or the length of a customer’s stay, the majority of which are for a term of not greater than one year. We will reserve for receivables when we believe the ultimate collection is less than probable. Our provision for uncollectible rents receivable was approximately $2.2 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

The Company accounts for the sales of right-to-use contracts in accordance with the Codification Topic “Revenue Recognition” (“FASB ASC 605”) (prior authoritative guidance: Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, “Revenue Recognition in Consolidated Financial Statements, Corrected”). A right-to-use contract gives the customer the right to a set schedule of usage at a specified group of properties. Customers may choose to upgrade their contracts to increase their usage and the number of properties they may access. A contract

35

requires the customer to make an upfront nonrefundable payment and annual payments during the term of the contract. The stated term of a right-to-use contract is generally three years and the customer may renew his contract by continuing to make the annual payments. The Company will recognize the upfront non-refundable payments over the estimated customer life which, based on historical attrition rates, the Company has estimated to be from one to 31 years. For example, we have currently estimated that 7.9% of customers who purchase a new right-to-use contract will terminate their contract after five years. Therefore, the upfront nonrefundable payments from 7.9% of the contracts sold in any particular period are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years as the estimated customer life for 7.9% of our customers who purchase a contract is five years. The historical attrition rates for upgrade contracts are lower than for new contacts, and therefore, the nonrefundable upfront payments for upgrade contracts are amortized at a different rate than for new contracts. The decision to recognize this revenue in accordance with FASB ASC 605 was made after corresponding with the Office of the Chief Accountant at the SEC during September and October of 2008.

Right-to-use annual payments paid by customers under the terms of the right-to-use contracts are deferred and recognized ratably over the one-year period in which the services are provided.

Income from home sales is recognized when the earnings process is complete. The earnings process is complete when the home has been delivered, the purchaser has accepted the home and title has transferred.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Rental revenue from our tenants is our principal source of revenue and is recognized over the term of the respective lease or the length of a customer’s stay, the majority of which are for a term of not greater than one year. We monitor the collectibility of accounts receivable from our tenants on an ongoing basis. We will reserve for receivables when we believe the ultimate collection is less than probable and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded during each period and the associated bad debt expense is included in our property operating and maintenance expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The allowance for doubtful accounts is netted against rent and other customer receivables, net on our consolidated balance sheets. Our provision for uncollectible rents receivable was approximately $2.2 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

We may also finance the sale of homes to our customers through loans (referred to as “Chattel Loans”). The valuation of an allowance for doubtful accounts for the Chattel Loans is calculated based on delinquency trends and a comparison of the outstanding principal balance of each note compared to the N.A.D.A. (National Automobile Dealers Association) value and the current market value of the underlying manufactured home collateral. A bad debt expense is recorded in home selling expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The allowance for doubtful accounts is netted against the notes receivables on our consolidated balance sheets. The allowance for these Chattel Loans as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

The Company may also finance the nonrefundable upfront payments on sales of right-to-use contracts (“Contracts Receivable”). Based upon historical collection rates and current economic trends, when a sale is financed a reserve is established for a portion of the Contracts Receivable balance estimated to be uncollectible. The allowance and the rate at which the Company provides for losses on its Contracts Receivable could be increased or decreased in the future based on the Company’s actual collection experience. The allowance for these Contract Receivables as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $1.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Variable Interest Entities

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” the current authoritative guidance of which is the Codification Topic “Consolidation” (“FASB ASC 810”). FASB ASC 810 seeks to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. The Statement addresses the effects on certain provisions of FASB ASC810-10-15, Variable Interest Entities,as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. It also discusses the application of

36

certain key provisions of FASB ASC810-10-15, including those in which the accounting and disclosures under FASB ASC810-10-15 do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter.

The Company will re-evaluate and apply the provisions of FASB ASC810-10-15 to existing entities if certain events occur which warrant re-evaluation of such entities. In addition, the Company will apply the provisions of FASB ASC810-10-15 to all new entities in the future. The Company also consolidates entities in which it has a controlling direct or indirect voting interest. The equity method of accounting is applied to entities in which the Company does not have a controlling direct or indirect voting interest, but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions. The cost method is applied when (i) the investment is minimal (typically less than 5%) and (ii) the Company’s investment is passive.

Valuation of Financial Instruments

The valuation of financial instruments under the Codification Topic “Financial Instruments” (“FASB ASC 825”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments”) and the Codification Topic “Derivatives and Hedging” (“FASB ASC 815”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”) requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. Where possible, we base the fair values of our financial instruments on listed market prices and third party quotes. Where these are not available, we base our estimates on other factors relevant to the financial instrument.

The Company currently does not have any financial instruments that require the application of FASB ASC 825 or FASB ASC 815.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective January 1, 2003 using the modified prospective method described in FASB Statement No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure”. The Company adopted the Codification Topic “Stock Compensation” (“FASB ASC 718”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment”) on July 1, 2005, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or its financial position. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees, consultants and directors.

Non-controlling Interests

In December 2007, the FASB issued the Codification Topic “Consolidation” (“FASB ASC 810”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements”), an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. FASB ASC 810 seeks to improve uniformity and transparency in reporting of the net income attributable to non-controlling interests in the consolidated financial statements of the reporting entity. The statement requires, among other provisions, the disclosure, clear labeling and presentation of non-controlling interests in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations. Per FASB ASC 810, a non-controlling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are non-controlling interests. Under FASB ASC 810, such non-controlling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. However, securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets at the option of the holder, not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of permanent equity. This would result in certain outside ownership interests being included as redeemable non-controlling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions. Additionally, with respect to

37

non-controlling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the contract by delivery of its own shares, the Company considered the guidance in the Codification Topic “Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” (“FASB ASC815-40”) (prior authoritative guidance:EITF 00-19 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock”) to evaluate whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of shares that could be required to be delivered under share settlement of the contract.

In accordance with FASB ASC 810, effective January 1, 2009, the Company, for all periods presented, has reclassified the non-controlling interest for Common OP Units from the mezzanine section under Total Liabilities to the Equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. The caption Common OP Units on the consolidated balance sheets also includes $0.5 million of private REIT Subsidiaries preferred stock. Based on the Company’s analysis, Perpetual Preferred OP Units will remain in the mezzanine section. The presentation of income allocated to Common OP Units and Perpetual Preferred OP Units on the consolidated statements of operations has been moved to the bottom of the statement prior to Net income available to Common Shares.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with any unconsolidated investments or joint ventures that we believe have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” the current authoritative guidance of which is the Codification Sub-Topic “Subsequent Events” (“FASB ASC855-10”). FASB ASC855-10 seeks to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The Statement sets forth the period and circumstances after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. The Statement introduces the concept of financial statements being available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The Statement applies to interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FASB ASC855-10 has had no material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Our management evaluated for subsequent events through the time of our filing on February 25, 2010.

38

Results of Operations

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008

The following table summarizes certain financial and statistical data for the Property Operations for all Properties owned and operated for the same period in both years (“Core Portfolio”) and the Total Portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands). The Core Portfolio may change from time-to-time depending on acquisitions, dispositions and significant transactions or unique situations. The Core Portfolio in this comparison of the year ended December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2008 includes all Properties acquired on or prior to December 31, 2007 and which were owned and operated by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2009.

	Core Portfolio										Total Portfolio
					Increase/			%									Increase/			%
	2009		2008		(Decrease)			Change			2009			2008			(Decrease)			Change
Community base rental income	$	253,379	$	245,833	$	7,546			3.1	%	$	253,379		$	245,833		$	7,546			3.1	%
Resort base rental income		105,601		104,304		1,297			1.2	%		124,822			111,876			12,946			11.6	%
Right-to-use annual payments		—		—		—			—			50,765			19,667			31,098			158.1	%
Right-to-use contracts current period, gross		—		—		—			—			21,526			10,951			10,575			96.6	%
Right-to-use contracts, deferred, net of prior period amortization		—		—		—			—			(18,882	)		(10,611	)		8,271			77.9	%
Utility and other income		41,422		38,921		2,501			6.4	%		47,685			41,633			6,052			14.5	%
Property operating revenues		400,402		389,058		11,344			2.9	%		479,295			419,349			59,946			14.3	%
Property operating and maintenance		130,473		131,821		(1,348	)		(1.0	)%		180,870			152,363			28,507			18.7	%
Real estate taxes		28,012		27,963		49			0.2	%		31,674			29,457			2,217			7.5	%
Sales and marketing, gross		—		—		—			—			13,536			7,116			6,420			90.2	%
Sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net		—		—		—			—			(5,729	)		(3,644	)		(2,085	)		(57.2	%)
Property management		20,095		20,999		(904	)		(4.3	)%		33,383			25,451			7,932			31.2	%
Property operating expenses		178,580		180,783		(2,203	)		(1.2	)%		253,734			210,743			42,991			20.4	%
Income from property operations	$	221,822	$	208,275	$	13,547			6.5	%	$	225,561		$	208,606		$	16,955			8.1	%

Property Operating Revenues

The 2.9% increase in the Core Portfolio property operating revenues reflects (i) a 3.3% increase in rates for our community base rental income offset by a 0.2% decrease in occupancy, (ii) a 1.2% increase in revenues for our core resort base income comprised of an increase of 5.5% in annual revenues, offset by a 8.4% decrease in seasonal resort revenue and a 2.7% decrease in transient revenue, and (iii) an increase of 6.4% in core utility and other income primarily due to increased pass-throughs at certain Properties. The Total Portfolio property operating revenues increase of 14.3% is primarily due to the consolidation of the right-to-use Properties beginning August 14, 2008 as a result of the PA Transaction. The right-to-use annual payments represent the annual payments earned on right-to-use contracts acquired in the PA Transaction or sold since the PA

39

Transaction on August 14, 2008. The right-to-use contracts current period, gross represents all right-to-use contract sales during the year. The right-to-use contracts, deferred represents the deferral of current period sales into future periods, offset by the amortization of revenue deferred in prior periods. See Note 2 (n) in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K.

Property Operating Expenses

The 1.2% decrease in property operating expenses in the Core Portfolio reflects a 1.0% decrease in property operating and maintenance expenses and a 4.3% decrease in property management expenses. Our Total Portfolio property operating and maintenance expenses and real estate taxes increased due to the consolidation of the right-to-use Properties beginning August 14, 2008 as a result of the PA Transaction. Total Portfolio sales and marketing expense are all related to the costs incurred for the sale of right-to-use contracts. Sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net represents commissions on right-to-use contract sales deferred until future periods to match the deferral of the right-to-use contract sales, offset by the amortization of prior period commission. Total Portfolio property management expenses primarily increased due to the PA Transaction.

Home Sales Operations

The following table summarizes certain financial and statistical data for the Home Sales Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands, except sales volumes).

	2009			2008			Variance			% Change
Gross revenues from new home sales	$	3,397		$	19,013		$	(15,616	)		(82.1	)%
Cost of new home sales		(4,681	)		(21,219	)		16,538			77.9	%
Gross loss from new home sales		(1,284	)		(2,206	)		922			41.8	%
Gross revenues from used home sales		3,739			2,832			907			32.0	%
Cost of used home sales		(2,790	)		(2,850	)		60			2.1	%
Gross profit (loss) from used home sales		949			(18	)		967			5,372.2	%
Brokered resale revenues, net		758			1,094			(336	)		(30.7	)%
Home selling expenses		(2,383	)		(5,776	)		3,393			58.7	%
Ancillary services revenues, net		2,745			1,197			1,548			129.3	%
Income (loss) from home sales operations and other	$	785		$	(5,709	)	$	6,494			113.8	%
Home sales volumes:
New home sales(1)		113			378			(265	)		(70.1	)%
Used home sales(2)		747			407			340			83.5	%
Brokered home resales		612			786			(174	)		(22.1	%)

(1)	Includes third party home sales of 28 and 71 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(2)	Includes third party home sales of seven and one for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Income from home sales operations increased primarily as a result of lower home selling expenses and increased ancillary services revenues, net. Gross loss from new home sales was offset by profit from used home sales and resales. Gross loss from new home sales includes an increase in inventory reserve of approximately $0.9 million. The increase in used home sales profit and volumes is primarily due to sales of resort cottages at the right-to-use Properties. Home selling expenses for 2009 have decreased compared to 2008 as a result of lower new home sales volumes and decreased advertising costs. Ancillary services revenues, net, increased primarily due to the inclusion of the ancillary activities of the right-to-use Properties consolidated by the Company as of August 14, 2008.

40

Rental Operations

The following table summarizes certain financial and statistical data for manufactured home Rental Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands). Except as otherwise noted, the amounts below are included in Ancillary services revenue, net, in the Home Sales Operations table in previous section.

	2009			2008			Variance			% Change
Manufactured homes:
New Home	$	6,570		$	3,870		$	2,700			69.8	%
Used Home		9,187			7,100			2,087			29.4	%
Rental operations revenue(1)		15,757			10,970			4,787			43.6	%
Property operating and maintenance		2,036			2,022			14			0.7	%
Real estate taxes		176			127			49			38.6	%
Rental operations expenses		2,212			2,149			63			2.9	%
Income from rental operations		13,545			8,821			4,724			53.6	%
Depreciation		(2,361	)		(1,222	)		(1,139	)		(93.2	)%
Income from rental operations, net of depreciation	$	11,184		$	7,599		$	3,585			47.2	%
Number of occupied rentals — new, end of period		595			433			162			37.4	%
Number of occupied rentals — used, end of period		1,158			799			359			44.9	%

(1) Approximately $11.9 million and $8.4 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are included in Community base rental income in the Property Operations table.

The increase in income from rental operations and depreciation expense is primarily due to the increase in the number of occupied rentals.

Other Income and Expenses

The following table summarizes other income and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands).

	2009			2008			Variance			% Change
Interest income	$	5,119		$	3,095		$	2,024			65.4	%
Income from other investments, net		8,168			17,006			(8,838	)		(52.0	)%
General and administrative		(22,279	)		(20,617	)		(1,662	)		(8.1	)%
Rent control initiatives		(456	)		(1,555	)		1,099			70.7	%
Interest and related amortization		(98,311	)		(99,430	)		1,119			1.1	%
Depreciation on corporate assets		(1,039	)		(390	)		(649	)		(166.4	)%
Depreciation on real estate and other costs		(69,049	)		(66,193	)		(2,856	)		(4.3	)%
Total other expenses, net	$	(177,847	)	$	(168,084	)	$	(9,763	)		(5.8	)%

Interest income is higher primarily due to interest income on Contracts Receivable purchased on August 14, 2008 in the PA Transaction or originated after the PA Transaction. Income from other investments, net, decreased primarily due to lower Privileged Access lease income of $14.9 million received during 2008 offset by the following incremental increases in 2009: $1.1 million of insurance proceeds, $1.1 million in Tropical Palms lease payments, Caledonia sale and Caledonia lease income of $1.0 million, and net RPI and TTMSI income of $1.9 million. General and administrative expense increased primarily due to higher payroll, professional fees, and rent and utilities. General and administrative in 2009 includes approximately $0.4 million of costs related to

41

transactions required to be expensed in accordance with FASB ASC 805. Prior to 2009, such costs were capitalized in accordance with SFAS No. 141.

The Company has determined that certain depreciable assets acquired during years prior to 2009 were inadvertently omitted from prior year depreciation expense calculations. Since the total amounts involved were immaterial to the Company’s financial position and results of operations, the Company has decided to record additional depreciation expense in 2009 to reflect this adjustment. As a result, the year ended December 31, 2009 includes approximately $1.8 million of prior period depreciation expense.

Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

For the year ended December 31, 2009, equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $0.9 million primarily due to a $1.1 million gain in 2009 on the sale of our 25% interest in two Diversified Portfolio joint ventures, offset by a $0.6 million gain in 2008 on the payoff of our share of seller financing in excess of basis on one Lakeshore investment, and a gain of $1.6 million in 2008 on the sale of our interest in four Morgan joint venture Properties in 2008.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2008 to Year Ended December 31, 2007

The following table summarizes certain financial and statistical data for the Property Operations for all Properties owned and operated for the same period in both years (“Core Portfolio”) and the Total Portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (amounts in thousands). The Core Portfolio may change from time-to-time depending on acquisitions, dispositions and significant transactions or unique situations. The Core Portfolio in this comparison of the year ended December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2007 includes all Properties acquired on or prior to December 31, 2006 and which were owned and operated by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2008.

	Core Portfolio									Total Portfolio
					Increase/		%								Increase/			%
	2008		2007		(Decrease)		Change			2008			2007		(Decrease)			Change
Community base rental income	$	245,833	$	236,933	$	8,900		3.8	%	$	245,833		$	236,933	$	8,900			3.8	%
Resort base rental income		98,884		95,895		2,989		3.1	%		111,876			102,372		9,504			9.3	%
Right-to-use annual payments		—		—		—		—			19,667			—		19,667			100.0	%
Right-to-use contracts current period, gross		—		—		—		—			10,951			—		10,951			100.0	%
Right-to-use contracts, deferred, net of prior period amortization		—		—		—		—			(10,611	)		—		(10,611	)		(100.0	)%
Utility and other income		38,389		36,380		2,009		5.5	%		41,633			36,849		4,784			13.0	%
Property operating revenues		383,106		369,208		13,898		3.8	%		419,349			376,154		43,195			11.5	%
Property operating and maintenance		128,738		123,656		5,082		4.1	%		152,363			127,342		25,021			19.6	%
Real estate taxes		27,434		27,046		388		1.4	%		29,457			27,429		2,028			7.4	%
Sales and marketing, gross		—		—		—		—			7,116			—		7,116			100.0	%
Sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net		—		—		—		—			(3,644	)		—		(3,644	)		(100.0	)%
Property management		20,293		18,147		2,146		11.8	%		25,451			18,385		7,066			38.4	%
Property operating expenses		176,465		168,849		7,616		4.5	%		210,743			173,156		37,587			21.7	%
Income from property operations	$	206,641	$	200,359	$	6,282		3.1	%	$	208,606		$	202,998	$	5,608			2.8	%

42

Property Operating Revenues

The 3.8% increase in the Core Portfolio property operating revenues reflects (i) a 3.7% increase in rates for our community base rental income combined with a 0.1% increase in occupancy, (ii) a 3.1% increase in revenues for our resort base income comprised of an increase of 6.9% in annual and 2.8% in seasonal resort revenue, offset by a decrease of 8.5% in transient revenue, and (iii) an increase of 5.5% in utility and other income primarily due to increased pass-throughs at certain Properties. The Total Portfolio property operating revenues increase of 11.5% was primarily due to the consolidation of the right-to-use Properties beginning August 14, 2008 as a result of the PA Transaction. The right-to-use annual payments represent the annual payments earned on right-to-use contracts acquired in the PA Transaction or sold since the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008. The right-to-use contracts current period, gross represents all right-to-use contract sales since the PA Transaction. The right-to-use contracts, deferred represents the deferral of current period sales into future periods. See Note 2 (n) in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K.

Property Operating Expenses

The 4.5% increase in property operating expenses in the Core Portfolio reflects a 4.1% increase in property operating and maintenance expenses and a 11.8% increase in property management expenses. The Core property operating and maintenance expense increase is primarily due to payroll and utility expenses. Our Total Portfolio property operating and maintenance expenses increased by 21.7% due to the consolidation of the right-to-use Properties beginning August 14, 2008 as a result of the PA Transaction. Total Portfolio sales and marketing expense, including commissions, are all related to the costs incurred for the sale of right-to-use contracts since the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008. Total Portfolio property management expenses primarily increased due to the PA Transaction and the increase in computer software costs. The sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net represents commissions on right-to-use contract sales deferred until future periods to match the deferral of the right-to-use contract sales.

Home Sales Operations

The following table summarizes certain financial and statistical data for the Home Sales Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (amounts in thousands, except sales volumes).

	2008			2007			Variance			% Change
Gross revenues from new home sales	$	19,013		$	31,116		$	(12,103	)		(38.9	)%
Cost of new home sales		(21,219	)		(28,067	)		6,848			(24.4	)%
Gross (loss) profit from new home sales		(2,206	)		3,049			(5,255	)		(172.4	)%
Gross revenues from used home sales		2,832			2,217			615			27.7	%
Cost of used home sales		(2,850	)		(2,646	)		(204	)		(7.7	)%
Gross loss from used home sales		(18	)		(429	)		411			95.8	%
Brokered resale revenues, net		1,094			1,528			(434	)		(28.4	)%
Home selling expenses		(5,776	)		(7,555	)		1,779			23.5	%
Ancillary services revenues, net		1,197			2,436			(1,239	)		(50.9	)%
Loss from home sales operations and other	$	(5,709	)	$	(971	)	$	(4,738	)		(488.0	)%
Home sales volumes:
New home sales(1)		378			440			(62	)		(14.1	)%
Used home sales(2)		407			296			111			37.5	%
Brokered home resales		786			967			(181	)		(18.7	%)

(1)	Includes third party home sales of 71 and 45 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
(2)	Includes third party home sales of one and nine for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

43

Loss from home sales operations increased as a result of lower new and brokered resale volumes, lower gross profits per home sold and the write-off of inventory home rebate receivable. The decrease in home selling expenses is primarily due to lower sales volumes and decreased advertising costs. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company reclassified all of its new and used manufactured home inventory to Buildings and other depreciable property. The homes were reclassified as the Company expects to rent the homes due to the decline in home sales. Ancillary service revenues, net decreased by 50.9% primarily due to $1.2 million of depreciation on new and used rental homes.

Rental Operations

During the year ended December 31, 2008, $57.8 million of manufactured home inventory, including reserves of approximately $0.8 million, was reclassified to Buildings and other depreciable property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The inventory moved included all new and used manufactured home inventory, which the Company is primarily renting. The following table summarizes certain financial and statistical data for manufactured home Rental Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands). Except as otherwise noted, the amounts below are included in Ancillary services revenue, net in the Home Sales Operations table in previous section.

	2008			2007		Variance			% Change
Manufactured homes:
New Home Revenues	$	3,870		$	1,596	$	2,274			142.5	%
Used Home Revenues		7,100			5,446		1,654			30.4	%
Rental operations revenue(1)		10,970			7,042		3,928			55.8	%
Property operating and maintenance		2,022			1,105		917			83.0	%
Real estate taxes		127			67		60			89.6	%
Rental operations expenses		2,149			1,172		977			83.4	%
Income from rental operations		8,821			5,870		2,951			50.3	%
Depreciation		(1,222	)		—		(1,222	)		(100.0	)%
Income from rental operations, net of depreciation	$	7,599		$	5,870	$	1,729			29.5	%
Number of occupied rentals — new, end of period		433			191		242			126.7	%
Number of occupied rentals — used, end of period		799			716		83			11.6	%

(1) Approximately $8.4 million and $5.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are included in Community base rental income in the Property Operations table.

The increase in rental operations revenue and expenses is primarily due to the increase in the number of occupied rentals. The increase in depreciation is due to the depreciation of the rental units starting during 2008 after being reclassified to Buildings and other depreciable property.

44

Other Income and Expenses

The following table summarizes other income and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (amounts in thousands).

	2008			2007			Variance			% Change
Interest income	$	3,095		$	1,732		$	1,363			78.7	%
Income from other investments, net		17,006			22,476			(5,470	)		(24.3	)%
General and administrative		(20,617	)		(15,591	)		(5,026	)		(32.2	)%
Rent control initiatives		(1,555	)		(2,657	)		1,102			41.5	%
Interest and related amortization		(99,430	)		(103,070	)		3,640			3.5	%
Depreciation on corporate assets		(390	)		(437	)		47			10.8	%
Depreciation on real estate assets		(66,193	)		(63,554	)		(2,639	)		(4.2	)%
Total other expenses, net	$	(168,084	)	$	(161,101	)	$	(6,983	)		(4.3	)%

Interest income is higher primarily due to interest income on Contracts Receivable purchased in the PA Transaction. Income from other investments, net decreased due to the reduction in Privileged Access lease payments of $4.6 million and a $0.9 million write off of a Privileged Access restatement bonus. General and administrative expense increased due to higher compensation cost increases, including the Long-term Inventive Plan, of $3.8 million and increased professional fees of $0.8 million. Rent control initiatives decreased as a result of the refunding of $0.4 million in legal fees from 21st Mortgage Corporation suit in 2008 as well as a decrease in trial activity compared to 2007 (see Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K). Interest and related amortization decreased due to lower interest rates and amounts outstanding. Depreciation on real estate assets includes $0.8 million of unamortized lease costs expensed related to the termination of the Privileged Access leases.

Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

For the year ended December 31, 2008, equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $1.1 million primarily due to a $0.6 million gain on the payoff of our share of seller financing in excess of our basis on one Lakeshore investment, and a gain of $1.6 million on the sale of our interest in four Morgan joint venture Properties. The increase was offset by distributions received in 2007 from three joint ventures relating to debt financings by the joint ventures. These distributions exceeded the Company’s basis and were included in income from unconsolidated joint ventures in 2007. In addition, 2007 included activity at nine former joint ventures, which have been purchased by the Company.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $145.1 million in cash and cash equivalents primarily held in treasury reserve accounts, and $370.0 million available on its lines of credit. The increase in the cash balance during the year ended December 31, 2009 is primarily due to $146.4 million of net proceeds generated from the sale of 4.6 million shares of our common stock in a public offering that closed on June 29, 2009. The Company expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements, including its distributions, generally through its working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from the sale of Properties and availability under the existing lines of credit. The Company expects to meet certain long-term liquidity requirements such as scheduled debt maturities, property acquisitions and capital improvements by use of its current cash balance, long-term collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings including borrowings under its existing lines of credit and the issuance of debt securities or additional equity securities in the Company, in addition to net cash provided by operating activities. During 2009 and 2008, we received financing proceeds from Fannie Mae secured by mortgages on individual manufactured home Properties. The terms of the Fannie Mae financings were relatively attractive as compared to other potential lenders. If financing proceeds are no longer available from Fannie Mae for any reason or if Fannie Mae terms are no longer attractive, it may adversely affect cash flow

45

and our ability to service debt and make distributions to stockholders. The Company has approximately $183 million of scheduled debt maturities in 2010 (excluding scheduled principal payments on debt maturing in 2011 and beyond). The Company expects to satisfy its 2010 maturities with its existing cash balance and approximately $64.2 million of new financing proceeds we expect to receive in 2010.

The table below summarizes cash flow activity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (amounts in thousands).

	For the Twelve Months Ended
	December 31,
	2009			2008			2007
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	150,389		$	113,890		$	122,791
Net cash used in investing activities		(34,756	)		(33,104	)		(25,604	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(15,817	)		(41,259	)		(93,007	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	99,816		$	39,527		$	4,180

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $36.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $113.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in 2009 is primarily due to increases in income from property operations, income from home sales operations and increases in our deferred revenue from the sale of right-to-use contracts. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $122.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. This decrease reflects increases in property operating income and interest income, offset by an increase in depreciation expense, decreases in income from other investments, net, and home sales.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities reflects the impact of the following investing activities:

Acquisitions

2009 Acquisitions

On February 13, 2009, the Company acquired the remaining 75% interests in three Diversified Portfolio joint ventures known as (i) Robin Hill, a 270-site property in Lenhartsville, Pennsylvania, (ii) Sun Valley, a265-site property in Brownsville, Pennsylvania, and (iii) Plymouth Rock, a 609-site property in Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin. The gross purchase price was approximately $19.2 million, and we assumed mortgage loans of approximately $12.9 million with a value of approximately $11.9 million and a weighted average interest rate of 6% per annum.

On August 31, 2009, the Company acquired an internet and media based advertising business located in Orlando, Florida for approximately $3.7 million.

2008 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2008, we acquired two Properties (see Note 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K). The combined investment in real estate for the acquisitions and investments was approximately $3.9 million and was funded with withdrawals of $2.1 million from our tax-deferred exchange account and borrowings from our lines of credit. The Company also acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Privileged Access for an unsecured note payable of $2.0 million. Prior to the purchase, Privileged Access had a12-year lease with the Company for 82 Properties that terminated upon closing. The $2.0 million unsecured note payable accrued interest at 10% per annum and was paid off December 17, 2009.

46

2007 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we acquired three Properties and acquired the remaining 75% interest in two joint ventures (see Note 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K). The combined investment in real estate for the acquisitions and investments was approximately $36.1 million and was funded with new financing of $8.7 million, withdrawals of $18.1 million from our tax-deferred exchange account, and borrowings from our lines of credit.

Dispositions

On February 13, 2009, the Company sold its 25% interest in two Diversified Portfolio joint ventures known as (i) Pine Haven, a 625-site property in Ocean View, New Jersey and (ii) Round Top, a 319-site property in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. A gain on sale of approximately $1.1 million was recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and is included in Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures.

On April 17, 2009, we sold Caledonia, a 247-site Property in Caledonia, Wisconsin, for proceeds of approximately $2.2 million. The Company recognized a gain on sale of approximately $0.8 million which is included in Income from other investments, net. In addition, we received approximately $0.3 million of deferred rent due from the previous tenant.

On July 20, 2009, we sold Casa Village, a 490-site Property in Billings, Montana for a stated purchase price of approximately $12.4 million. The buyer assumed $10.6 million of mortgage debt that had a stated interest rate of 6.02% and was schedule to mature in 2013. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of approximately $5.1 million. Cash proceeds from the sale, net of closing costs were approximately $1.1 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company sold its 25% interest in the following properties, Newpoint in New Point, Virginia, Virginia Park in Old Orchard Beach, Maine, Club Naples in Naples, Florida, and Gwynn’s Island in Gwynn, Virginia, four properties held in the Morgan Portfolio, for approximately $2.1 million. A gain on sale of approximately $1.6 million was recognized. The Company also received approximately $0.3 million of escrowed funds related to the purchase of five Morgan Properties in 2005.

During year ended December 31, 2007, we sold three Properties for approximately $23.7 million. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $12.1 million. In order to partially defer the taxable gain on the sales, the sales proceeds, net of an eligible distribution of $2.4 million, were deposited in a tax-deferred exchange account. The proceeds from the sales were subsequently used in the like-kind acquisitions of four Properties.

We currently have one all-age Property, known as Creekside, held for disposition. On December 29, 2009, adeed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement, signed by the Company was sent to the loan servicer regarding our nonrecourse mortgage loan of approximately $3.6 million secured by Creekside. See Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K.

The operating results of all properties sold or held for disposition have been reflected in the discontinued operations of the Consolidated Statements of Operations contained in thisForm 10-K.

Notes Receivable Activity

The notes receivable activity during the year ended December 31, 2009 of $0.4 million in cash inflow reflects net repayments of $0.5 million from our Chattel Loans, net repayments of $1.6 million from our Contract Receivables and a net outflow of $1.7 million on other notes receivable.

The notes receivable activity during the year ended December 31, 2008 of $1.3 million in cash outflow reflects net lending of $2.8 million from our Chattel Loans and no net impact from our Contract Receivables. Contracts Receivable purchased in the PA Transaction contributed a net $19.6 million increase in non-cash inflow.

47

Investments in and distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company received approximately $2.9 million in distributions from our joint ventures. Approximately $2.9 million of these distributions were classified as a return on capital and were included in operating activities. Of these distributions, approximately $1.1 million relates to the gain on sale of the Company’s 25% interest in two Diversified joint ventures.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company invested approximately $5.7 million in its joint ventures to increase the Company’s ownership interest in Voyager RV Resort to 50% from 25%. The Company also received approximately $0.4 million held for the initial investment in one of the Morgan Properties.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received approximately $4.2 million in distributions from our joint ventures. Approximately $3.7 million of these distributions were classified as return on capital and were included in operating activities. The remaining distributions of approximately $0.5 million were classified as a return of capital and were included in investing activities.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company invested approximately $2.7 million in developing one of the Bar Harbor joint venture Properties, which resulted in an increase of the Company’s ownership interest per the joint venture agreement. As of December 31, 2007, the Bar Harbor joint venture was consolidated with the operations of the Company as the Company determined that as of December 31, 2007 we were the primary beneficiary by applying the standards of FIN 46R. This consolidation had decreased the Company’s investment in joint venture approximately $11.1 million, with an offsetting increase in investment in real estate.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company received approximately $5.2 million in distributions from our joint ventures. $5.1 million of these distributions were classified as return on capital and were included in operating activities. The remaining distributions of approximately $0.1 million were classified as a return of capital and were included in investing activities and were related to refinancings at three of our joint venture Properties. Approximately $2.5 million of the distributions received exceeded the Company’s basis in its joint venture and as such were recorded in income from unconsolidated joint ventures.

In addition, the Company recorded approximately $2.9 million, $3.8 million and $2.7 million of net income from joint ventures, net of $1.3 million, $1.8 million and $1.4 million of depreciation, in the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Due to the Company’s inability to control the joint ventures, the Company accounts for its investment in the joint ventures using the equity method of accounting.

Capital improvements

The table below summarizes capital improvements activity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007(amounts in thousands).

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2009		2008		2007
Recurring Cap Ex(1)	$	17,415	$	15,319	$	14,458
New construction — expansion		818		850		2,059
New construction — upgrades(2)		2,874		4,869		3,316
Home site development(3)		8,185		5,414		7,421
Hurricane related		—		66		1,512
Total Property		29,292		26,518		28,766
Corporate(4)		1,584		198		618
Total Capital improvements	$	30,876	$	26,716	$	29,384

(1) Recurring capital expenditures (“Recurring CapEx”) are primarily comprised of common area improvements, furniture, and mechanical improvements.

48

(2)	New construction — upgrades primarily represents costs to improve and upgrade Property infrastructure or amenities.
(3)	Home site development includes acquisitions of or improvements to rental units for the year ended December 31, 2009. Acquisitions of or improvements to rental units in the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were included in Inventory changes on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.
(4)	Includes approximately $1.2 million spent to renovate the corporate headquarters, of which approximately $0.9 million was reimbursed by the landlord as a tenant allowance.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities reflects the impact of the following:

Mortgages and Credit Facilities

Financing, Refinancing and Early Debt Retirement

2009 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company closed on approximately $107.5 million of new financing, on six manufactured home properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 6.32% that mature in 10 years. We used the proceeds from the financing to pay-off approximately $106.7 million on 20 Properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 7.36%.

On February 13, 2009, in connection with the acquisition of the remaining 75% interests in the Diversified Portfolio joint venture, we assumed mortgages of approximately $11.9 million with a weighted average interest rate of 5.95% and weighted average maturity of five years.

On December 17, 2009, the Company paid off the $2 million unsecured note payable to Privileged Access.

2008 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company closed on approximately $231.0 million of new financing on 15 manufactured home Properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 6.01% that mature in 10 years. We used the proceeds from the financing to pay-off approximately $245.8 million on 28 Properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.54%.

2007 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company completed the following transactions:

•  Paid off approximately $19.0 million of mortgage debt on four manufactured home Properties.

•  In connection with the acquisition of Mesa Verde, during the first quarter of 2007, the Company assumed $3.5 million in mortgage debt bearing interest at 4.94% per annum and was repaid in May 2008.

•  In connection with the acquisition of Winter Garden, during the second quarter of 2007, the Company assumed $4.0 million in mortgage debt bearing interest at 4.3% per annum and was repaid in August 2008.

•  In September 2007, we amended our existing unsecured Lines of Credit (“LOC”) to expand our borrowing capacity from $275 million to $370 million. The lines of credit continue to accrue interest at LIBOR plus a maximum of 1.20% per annum, have a 0.15% facility fee, mature on June 30, 2010, and have a one-year extension option. We incurred commitment and arrangement fees of approximately $0.3 million to increase our borrowing capacity.

Secured Property Debt

As of December 31, 2009, our secured long-term debt balance was approximately $1.6 billion, with a weighted average interest rate in 2009 of approximately 6.1% per annum. The debt bears interest at rates

49

between 5.0% and 10.0% per annum and matures on various dates primarily ranging from 2010 to 2019. Excluding scheduled principal amortization, we have approximately $184 million of long-term debt maturing in 2010 and approximately $56 million maturing in 2011. The weighted average term to maturity for the long-term debt is approximately 5.5 years.

During the first half of 2010, the Company expects to close on approximately $64.2 million of financing on three manufactured home Properties at a weighted average interest rate of 6.92% per annum, maturing in 10 years. We have locked rate with Fannie Mae on these loans. There can be no assurance such financings will occur or as to the timing and terms of such anticipated financing.

The Company expects to satisfy its secured debt maturities of approximately $184 million occurring prior to December 31, 2010 with the proceeds from the financings of the three mortgages noted above and its existing cash balance, which is approximately $145 million as of December 31, 2009. The expected timing and amounts of the most significant payoffs are as follows: i) approximately $100 million in April of 2010 and ii) approximately $75 million in August of 2010.

Unsecured Debt

We have two unsecured Lines of Credit (“LOC”) with a maximum borrowing capacity of $350 million and $20 million, respectively, which bear interest at a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a maximum of 1.20% per annum, have a 0.15% facility fee, mature on June 30, 2010, and have a one-year extension option. The weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 for our unsecured debt was approximately 1.7% per annum. Throughout the year ended December 31, 2009, we borrowed $50.9 million and paid down $143.9 million on the lines of credit for a net pay down of $93.0 million. As of December 31, 2009, there were no amounts outstanding on the lines of credit.

Other Loans

During 2007, we borrowed $4.3 million to finance our insurance premium payments. As of December 31, 2007, this loan had been paid off.

During December 2009, we borrowed approximately $1.5 million which is secured by individual manufactured homes. This financing provided by the dealer requires monthly payments, bears interest at 8.5% and matures on the earlier of: 1) the date the home is sold, or 2) November 20, 2016.

Certain of the Company’s mortgages and credit agreements contain covenants and restrictions including restrictions as to the ratio of secured or unsecured debt versus encumbered or unencumbered assets, the ratio of fixed charges-to-earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), limitations on certain holdings and other restrictions.

Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2009, we were subject to certain contractual payment obligations as described in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Contractual Obligations	Total			2010			2011			2012			2013			2014			2015			Thereafter
Long Term Borrowings(1)	$	1,548,692		$	203,663		$	75,719		$	21,806		$	121,685		$	200,829		$	533,392		$	391,598
Weighted average interest rates		6.12	%		5.91	%		5.82	%		5.78	%		5.78	%		5.79	%		5.82	%		6.14	%

(1) Balance excludes net premiums and discounts of $0.8 million. Balances include debt maturing and scheduled periodic principal payments.

The Company does not include Preferred OP Unit distributions, interest expense, insurance, property taxes and cancelable contracts in the contractual obligations table above.

The Company leases land under non-cancelable operating leases at certain of the Properties expiring in various years from 2013 to 2054, with terms which require twelve equal payments per year plus additional rents

50

calculated as a percentage of gross revenues. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, ground lease rent was approximately $1.9 million, $1.8 million, and $1.6 million, respectively. Minimum future rental payments under the ground leases are approximately $1.9 million for each of the next five years and approximately $18.7 million thereafter.

With respect to maturing debt, the Company has staggered the maturities of its long-term mortgage debt over an average of approximately six years, with no more than $533 million (which is due in 2015) in principal maturities coming due in any single year. The Company believes that it will be able to refinance its maturing debt obligations on a secured or unsecured basis; however, to the extent the Company is unable to refinance its debt as it matures, it believes that it will be able to repay such maturing debt from operating cash flow, asset salesand/or the proceeds from equity issuances. With respect to any refinancing of maturing debt, the Company’s future cash flow requirements could be impacted by significant changes in interest rates or other debt terms, including required amortization payments.

Equity Transactions

In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the Company must distribute 90% or more of its taxable income (excluding capital gains) to its stockholders. The following regular quarterly distributions have been declared and paid to common stockholders and non-controlling interests since January 1, 2007.

	For the Quarter		Stockholder Record
Distribution Amount Per Share	Ending		Date		Payment Date
$0.1500		March 31, 2007		March 30, 2007		April 13, 2007
$0.1500		June 30, 2007		June 29, 2007		July 13, 2007
$0.1500		September 30, 2007		September 28, 2007		October 12, 2007
$0.1500		December 31, 2007		December 28, 2007		January 11, 2008
$0.2000		March 31, 2008		March 28, 2008		April 11, 2008
$0.2000		June 30, 2008		June 27, 2008		July 11, 2008
$0.2000		September 30, 2008		September 26, 2008		October 10, 2008
$0.2000		December 31, 2008		December 26, 2008		January 9, 2009
$0.2500		March 31, 2009		March 27, 2009		April 10, 2009
$0.2500		June 30, 2009		June 26, 2009		July 10, 2009
$0.3000		September 30, 2009		September 25, 2009		October 9, 2009
$0.3000		December 31, 2009		December 24, 2009		January 8, 2010

2009 Activity

On November 10, 2009, the Company announced that in 2010 the annual distribution per common share will be $1.20 per share up from $1.10 per share in 2009 and $0.80 per share in 2008. This decision recognizes the Company’s investment opportunities and the importance of its dividend to its stockholders.

On June 29, 2009, the Company issued 4.6 million shares of common stock in an equity offering for approximately $146.4 million in proceeds, net of offering costs.

On December 31, 2009, September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership paid distributions of 8.0625% per annum on the $150 million Series D 8% Units and 7.95% per annum on the $50 million of Series F 7.95% Units.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we received approximately $4.9 million in proceeds from the issuance of shares of common stock, through stock option exercises and the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).

51

2008 Activity

On December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the Operating Partnership paid distributions of 8.0625% per annum on the $150 million Series D 8% Units and 7.95% per annum on the $50 million of Series F 7.95% Units.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, we received approximately $4.7 million in proceeds from the issuance of shares of common stock through stock option exercises and the Company’s ESPP.

2007 Activity

On December 28, 2007, September 28, 2007, June 29, 2007 and March 30, 2007, the Operating Partnership paid distributions of 8.0625% per annum on the $150 million Series D 8% Units and 7.95% per annum on the $50 million of Series F 7.95% Units.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we received approximately $3.7 million in proceeds from the issuance of shares of common stock through stock option exercises and the Company’s ESPP.

Inflation

Substantially all of the leases at the Properties allow for monthly or annual rent increases which provide us with the opportunity to achieve increases, where justified by the market, as each lease matures. Such types of leases generally minimize the risks of inflation to the Company. In addition, our resort Properties are not generally subject to leases and rents are established for these sites on an annual basis. Our right-to-use contracts generally provide for an annual dues increase, but dues may be frozen under the terms of certain contracts if the customer is over 61 years old.

Funds From Operations

Funds from Operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe FFO, as defined by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), is generally an appropriate measure of performance for an equity REIT. While FFO is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance for equity REITs, it does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP, and it should not be considered as an alternative to these indicators in evaluating liquidity or operating performance.

We define FFO as net income, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or actual or estimated losses from sales of properties, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We receive up-front non-refundable payments from the sale of right-to-use contracts. In accordance with GAAP, the upfront non-refundable payments and related commissions are deferred and amortized over the estimated customer life. Although the NAREIT definition of FFO does not address the treatment of nonrefundable right-to-use payments, we believe that it is appropriate to adjust for the impact of the deferral activity in our calculation of FFO. We believe that FFO is helpful to investors as one of several measures of the performance of an equity REIT. We further believe that by excluding the effect of depreciation, amortization and gains or actual or estimated losses from sales of real estate, all of which are based on historical costs and which may be of limited relevance in evaluating current performance, FFO can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and among other equity REITs. We believe that the adjustment to FFO for the net revenue deferral of upfront non-refundable payments and expense deferral of right-to-use contract commissions also facilitates the comparison to other equity REITs. Investors should review FFO, along with GAAP net income and cash flow from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities, when evaluating an equity REIT’s operating performance. We compute FFO in accordance with our interpretation of standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, nor does it represent cash available to pay distributions and

52

should not be considered as an alternative to net income, determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indication of our financial performance, or to cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions.

The following table presents a calculation of FFO for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (amounts in thousands):

	2009			2008			2007
Computation of funds from operations:
Net income available for common shares	$	34,005		$	18,303		$	32,102
Income allocated to common OP Units		6,113			4,297			7,705
Right-to-use contract sales, deferred, net		18,882			10,611			—
Right-to-use contract commissions, deferred, net		(5,729	)		(3,644	)		—
Depreciation on real estate assets and other		69,049			66,193			63,554
Depreciation on unconsolidated joint ventures		1,250			1,776			1,427
(Gain) loss on real estate		(5,488	)		79			(12,036	)
Funds from operations available for common shares	$	118,082		$	97,615		$	92,752
Weighted average common shares outstanding — fully diluted		32,944			30,498			30,414

Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our earnings, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent on prevailing market interest rates. The primary market risk we face is long-term indebtedness, which bears interest at fixed and variable rates. The fair value of our long-term debt obligations is affected by changes in market interest rates. At December 31, 2009, approximately 100% or approximately $1.5 billion of our outstanding debt had fixed interest rates, which minimizes the market risk until the debt matures. For each increase in interest rates of 1% (or 100 basis points), the fair value of the total outstanding debt would decrease by approximately $83.2 million. For each decrease in interest rates of 1% (or 100 basis points), the fair value of the total outstanding debt would increase by approximately $88.0 million.

At December 31, 2009, none of our outstanding debt was short-term and at variable rates.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used, words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “believe,” “project,” “intend,” “may be” and “will be” and similar words or phrases, or the negative thereof, unless the context requires otherwise, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to:

•  our ability to control costs, real estate market conditions, the actual rate of decline in customers, the actual use of sites by customers and our success in acquiring new customers at our Properties (including those recently acquired);

•  our ability to maintain historical rental rates and occupancy with respect to Properties currently owned or that we may acquire;

•  our assumptions about rental and home sales markets;

•  in the age-qualified Properties, home sales results could be impacted by the ability of potential homebuyers to sell their existing residences as well as by financial, credit and capital markets volatility;

53

•  results from home sales and occupancy will continue to be impacted by local economic conditions, lack of affordable manufactured home financing and competition from alternative housing options including site-built single-family housing;

•  impact of government intervention to stabilize site-built single family housing and not manufactured housing;

•  the completion of future acquisitions, if any, and timing with respect thereto and the effective integration and successful realization of cost savings;

•  ability to obtain financing or refinance existing debt on favorable terms or at all;

•  the effect of interest rates;

•  the dilutive effects of issuing additional common stock;

•  the effect of accounting for the sale of agreements to customers representing a right-to-use the Properties under the Codification Topic “Revenue Recognition” (prior authoritative guidance: Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,Revenue Recognition in Consolidated Financial Statements, Corrected); and

•  other risks indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

These forward-looking statements are based on management’s present expectations and beliefs about future events. As with any projection or forecast, these statements are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. The Company is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements whether as a result of such changes, new information, subsequent events or otherwise.

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements onpage F-1 of thisForm 10-K.

Item 9.   Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer), maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures, designed to provide reasonable assurance that information the Company is required to disclose in the reports that the Company files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports.

The Company’s management with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009. Based on that evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurances to the timely collection, evaluation and disclosure of information relating to the Company that would potentially be subject to disclosure under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated there under as of December 31, 2009.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no material changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

54

Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined inRules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Based on management’s assessment, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in“Internal Control-Integrated Framework.”

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report onPage F-2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 9B.   Other Information

Pursuant to the authority granted in the Stock Option and Award Plan, in November 2009 the Compensation Committee approved the annual award of stock options to be granted to the Chairman of the Board, the Compensation Committee Chairperson and Lead Director, the Executive Committee Chairperson, and the Audit Committee Chairperson and Audit Committee Financial Expert on February 1, 2010 for their services rendered in 2009. On February 1, 2010, Mr. Samuel Zell was awarded options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock, which he elected to receive as 20,000 shares of restricted common stock, for services rendered as Chairman of the Board; Mrs. Sheli Rosenberg was awarded options to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock, which she elected to receive as 5,000 shares of restricted common stock, for services rendered as Lead Director and Chairperson of the Compensation Committee; Mr. Howard Walker was awarded options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock, which he elected to receive as 3,000 shares of restricted common stock, for services rendered as Chairperson of the Executive Committee; and Mr. Philip Calian was awarded options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock, which he elected to receive as 3,000 shares of restricted common stock, for services rendered as Audit Committee Financial Expert and Audit Committee Chairperson. One-third of the options to purchase common stock and the shares of restricted common stock covered by these awards vests on each of December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012.

55

PART III

Item 10 and 11.   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, and Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 10 and 11 will be contained in the 2009 Proxy Statement and is therefore incorporated by reference, and thus Item 10 and 11 has been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) toForm 10-K.

Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans required by Item 12 follows:

					Number of
					Securities
	Number of				Remaining Available
	Securities to be				for Future Issuance
	Issued Upon		Weighted-Average		Under Equity
	Exercise of		Exercise Price of		Compensation Plans
	Outstanding		Outstanding		(Excluding Securities
	Options, Warrants		Options, Warrants		Reflected in Column
	and Rights		and Rights		(a))
Plan Category	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)		841,851		39.86		970,442
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)		N/A		N/A		323,259
Total		841,851		39.86		1,293,701

(1)

Includes shares of common stock under the Company’s Stock Option and Award Plan adopted in December 1992, and amended and restated from time to time, most recently amended effective March 23, 2001. The Stock Option and Award Plan and certain amendments thereto were approved by the Company’s stockholders.

(2)

Represents shares of common stock under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which was adopted by the Board of Directors in July 1997, as amended in May 2006. Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, eligible employees make monthly contributions which are used to purchase shares of common stock at a purchase price equal to 85% of the lesser of the closing price of a share of common stock on the first or last trading day of the purchase period. Purchases of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan are made on the first business day of the next month after the close of the purchase period. Under New York Stock Exchange rules then in effect, stockholder approval was not required for the Employee Stock Purchase Plan because it is a broad-based plan available generally to all employees.

The information required by Item 403 ofRegulation S-K “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” required by Item 12 will be contained in the 2009 Proxy Statement and is therefore incorporated by reference, and thus has been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) toForm 10-K.

Items 13 and 14.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence, and Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by Item 13 and Item 14 will be contained in the 2009 Proxy Statement and is therefore incorporated by reference, and thus Item 13 and 14 has been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) toForm 10-K.

56

PART IV

Item 15.   Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules

1. Financial Statement

See Index to Financial Statements and Schedules onpage F-1 of thisForm 10-K.

2. Financial Statement Schedules

See Index to Financial Statements and Schedules onpage F-1 of thisForm 10-K.

3. Exhibits:

In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this Annual Report onForm 10-K, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about us or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:

•  should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;

•  have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

•  may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and

•  were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about us may be found elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K and our other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website athttp://www.sec.gov.

2	(a)	Admission Agreement between Equity Financial and Management Co., Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. and MHC Operating Partnership
3	.1(p)	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. effective May 15, 2007
3	.4(r)	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws effective August 8, 2007
3	.5(k)	Amended and Restated Articles Supplementary of Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. effective March 16, 2005
3	.6(k)	Articles Supplementary of Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. effective June 23, 2005
4	.1(w)	Amended and Restated 8.0625% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preference Units Term Sheet and Joinder to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
4	.2(w)	7.95% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preference Units Term Sheet and Joinder to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
4	.3(w)	Form of Specimen Stock Certificate Evidencing the Common Stock of Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc., par value $0.01 per share
9		Not applicable

57

	10	.3(b)	Agreement of Limited Partnership of MHC-De Anza Financing Limited Partnership
	10	.4(c)	Second Amended and Restated MHC Operating Limited Partnership Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated March 15, 1996
	10	.5(l)	Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership for MHC Operating Limited Partnership, dated February 27, 2004
	10	.10(d)	Form of Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. 1997 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan
	10	.11(g)	Amended and Restated Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. 1992 Stock Option and Stock Award Plan effective March 23, 2001
	10	.12(f)	$110,000,000 Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note (DeAnza Mortgage) dated June 28, 2000
	10	.19(h)	Agreement of Plan of Merger (Thousand Trails), dated August 2, 2004
	10	.20(h)	Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Plan of Merger (Thousand Trails), dated September 30, 2004
	10	.21(h)	Amendment No. 2 to Agreement of Plan of Merger (Thousand Trails), dated November 9, 2004
	10	.27(n)	Credit Agreement ($225 million Revolving Facility) dated June 29, 2006
��	10	.28(n)	Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement ($50 million Revolving Facility) dated July 14, 2006
	10	.29(m)	Amended and Restated Thousand Trails Lease Agreement dated April 14, 2006
	10	.31(m)	Amendment No. 3 to Agreement and Plan of Merger (Thousand Trails) dated April 14, 2006
	10	.33(o)	Amendment of Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated May 3, 2006
	10	.34(o)	Form of Indemnification Agreement
	10	.35(q)	Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan dated May 15, 2007
	10	.36(q)	Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan -- Form of 2007 Award Agreement dated May 15, 2007
	10	.37(s)	First Amendment to Credit Agreement ($400 million Revolving Facility) dated September 21, 2007
	10	.38(s)	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement ($20 million Revolving Facility) dated September 21, 2007
	10	.39(t)	Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated as of January 1, 2008 by and between Thousand Trails Operations Holding Company, L.P. and MHC TT Leasing Company, Inc.
	10	.41(t)	Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2008 by and between Joe McAdams and Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
	10	.42(u)	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated as of March 1, 2008 between MHC TT Leasing Company, Inc. and Thousand Trails Operations Holding Company, L.P.
	10	.43(v)	Form of Trust Agreement Establishing Howard Walker Deferred Compensation Trust, dated December 8, 2000
	10	.44(x)	Underwriting Agreement, dated June 23, 2009 by and among Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc., MHC Operating Limited Partnership, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
	11		Not applicable
	12	(y)	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
	13		Not applicable
	14	(o)	Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. Business Ethics and Conduct Policy, dated July 2006
	16		Not applicable
	18		Not applicable
	21	(y)	Subsidiaries of the registrant
	22		Not applicable
	23	(y)	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

58

24	.1(y)	Power of Attorney for Philip C. Calian dated February 16, 2010
24	.2(y)	Power of Attorney for David J. Contis dated February 17, 2010
24	.3(y)	Power of Attorney for Thomas E. Dobrowski dated February 17, 2010
24	.4(y)	Power of Attorney for Sheli Z. Rosenberg dated February 17, 2010
24	.5(y)	Power of Attorney for Howard Walker dated February 17, 2010
24	.6(y)	Power of Attorney for Gary Waterman dated February 18, 2010
24	.7(y)	Power of Attorney for Samuel Zell dated February 17, 2010
31	.1(y)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
31	.2(y)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
32	.1(y)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32	.2(y)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The following documents are incorporated herein by reference.

(a)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-55994
(b)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 1994
(c)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1996
(d)	Included as Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement dated March 28, 1997, relating to Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 13, 1997
(e)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-3 Registration Statement, filed November 12, 1999 (SEC File No. 333-90813)
(f)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2000
(g)	Included as Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 30, 2001
(h)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated November 16, 2004
(i)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated November 22, 2004
(j)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2004
(k)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q dated June 30, 2005
(l)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2005
(m)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated April 14, 2006
(n)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q dated June 30, 2006
(o)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2006
(p)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2007
(q)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2007
(r)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated August 8, 2007
(s)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 2007
(t)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated January 4, 2008
(u)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2008
(v)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated December 8, 2000, filed on September 25, 2008
(w)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form S-3 ASR dated May 6, 2009
(x)	Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated June 23, 2009
(y)	Filed herewith

59

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC.,

a Maryland corporation

Date: February 25, 2010	By:  /s/  Thomas P. Heneghan Thomas P. Heneghan Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 25, 2010	By:  /s/  Michael B. Berman Michael B. Berman Executive Vice President   and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer   and Principal Accounting Officer)

60

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. — Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date
/s/  Thomas P. Heneghan Thomas P. Heneghan	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), and Director *Attorney-in-Fact	February 25, 2010
/s/  Michael B. Berman Michael B. Berman	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) *Attorney-in-Fact	February 25, 2010
*Samuel Zell Samuel Zell	Chairman of the Board	February 25, 2010
*Howard Walker Howard Walker	Vice-Chairman of the Board	February 25, 2010
*Philip C. Calian Philip C. Calian	Director	February 25, 2010
*David J. Contis David J. Contis	Director	February 25, 2010
*Thomas E. Dobrowski Thomas E. Dobrowski	Director	February 25, 2010
*Sheli Z. Rosenberg Sheli Z. Rosenberg	Director	February 25, 2010
*Gary Waterman Gary Waterman	Director	February 25, 2010

61

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC.

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-5 and F-6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-8 and F-9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-10
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		S-1
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation		S-2

Note that certain schedules have been omitted, as they are not applicable to the Company.

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.

We have audited Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc’s (Equity Lifestyle Properties or the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Equity Lifestyle Properties’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, and the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15, of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., and our report dated February 25, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/  

Ernst & Young LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 25, 2010

F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (Equity Lifestyle Properties or the Company), as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and the schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Equity Lifestyle Properties at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2(o) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for non-controlling interests upon the adoption of new accounting pronouncements effective January 1, 2009, and applied retrospectively.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Equity Lifestyle Properties’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/  

Ernst & Young LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 25, 2010

F-3

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008

	December 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
	(Amounts in thousands, except for share data)
ASSETS
Investment in real estate:
Land	$	544,722		$	541,979
Land improvements		1,744,443			1,725,752
Buildings and other depreciable property		249,050			223,290
		2,538,215			2,491,021
Accumulated depreciation		(629,768	)		(561,104	)
Net investment in real estate		1,908,447			1,929,917
Cash and cash equivalents		145,128			45,312
Notes receivable, net		29,952			31,799
Investment in joint ventures		9,442			9,676
Rents and other customer receivables, net		421			1,040
Deferred financing costs, net		11,382			12,408
Inventory, net		2,964			12,934
Deferred commission expense		9,373			3,644
Escrow deposits and other assets		49,210			44,917
Total Assets	$	2,166,319		$	2,091,647
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgage notes payable	$	1,547,901		$	1,569,403
Unsecured lines of credit		—			93,000
Accrued payroll and other operating expenses		71,508			66,656
Deferred revenue — sale ofright-to-use contracts		29,493			10,611
Accrued interest payable		8,036			8,335
Rents and other customer payments received in advance and security deposits		44,368			41,302
Distributions payable		10,586			6,106
Total Liabilities		1,711,892			1,795,413
Commitments and contingencies
Non-controlling interests — Perpetual Preferred OP Units		200,000			200,000
Equity:
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value 100,000,000 shares authorized for 2009 and 2008; 30,350,745 and 25,051,322 shares issued and outstanding for 2009 and 2008, respectively		301			238
Paid-in capital		456,696			320,084
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings		(238,467	)		(241,609	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		218,530			78,713
Non-controlling interests — Common OP Units		35,897			17,521
Total Equity		254,427			96,234
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	2,166,319		$	2,091,647

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-4

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

	2009			2008			2007
	(Amounts in thousands,
	except per share data)
Property Operations:
Community base rental income	$	253,379		$	245,833		$	236,933
Resort base rental income		124,822			111,876			102,372
Right-to-use annual payments		50,765			19,667			—
Right-to-use contracts current period, gross		21,526			10,951			—
Right-to-use contracts, deferred, net of prior period amortization		(18,882	)		(10,611	)		—
Utility and other income		47,685			41,633			36,849
Property operating revenues		479,295			419,349			376,154
Property operating and maintenance		180,870			152,363			127,342
Real estate taxes		31,674			29,457			27,429
Sales and marketing, gross		13,536			7,116			—
Sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net		(5,729	)		(3,644	)		—
Property management		33,383			25,451			18,385
Property operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)		253,734			210,743			173,156
Income from property operations		225,561			208,606			202,998
Home Sales Operations:
Gross revenues from home sales		7,136			21,845			33,333
Cost of home sales		(7,471	)		(24,069	)		(30,713	)
Gross (loss) profit from home sales		(335	)		(2,224	)		2,620
Brokered resale revenues, net		758			1,094			1,528
Home selling expenses		(2,383	)		(5,776	)		(7,555	)
Ancillary services revenues, net		2,745			1,197			2,436
Income (loss) from home sales and other		785			(5,709	)		(971	)
Other Income and Expenses:
Interest income		5,119			3,095			1,732
Income from other investments, net		8,168			17,006			22,476
General and administrative		(22,279	)		(20,617	)		(15,591	)
Rent control initiatives		(456	)		(1,555	)		(2,657	)
Interest and related amortization		(98,311	)		(99,430	)		(103,070	)
Depreciation on corporate assets		(1,039	)		(390	)		(437	)
Depreciation on real estate and other costs		(69,049	)		(66,193	)		(63,554	)
Total other expenses, net		(177,847	)		(168,084	)		(161,101	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures		2,896			3,753			2,696
Consolidated income from continuing operations		51,395			38,566			43,622
Discontinued Operations:
Discontinued operations		181			257			289
Gain (loss) from discontinued real estate		4,685			(79	)		12,036
Income from discontinued operations		4,866			178			12,325
Consolidated net income		56,261			38,744			55,947
Income allocated to non-controlling interests:
Common OP Units		(6,113	)		(4,297	)		(7,705	)
Perpetual Preferred OP Units		(16,143	)		(16,144	)		(16,140	)
Net income available for Common Shares	$	34,005		$	18,303		$	32,102

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F-5

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

	2009		2008		2007
	(Amounts in thousands,
	except per share data)
Earnings per Common Share — Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.08	$	0.74	$	0.92
Income from discontinued operations	$	0.15	$	0.01	$	0.41
Net income available for Common Shares	$	1.23	$	0.75	$	1.33
Earnings per Common Share — Fully Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.07	$	0.74	$	0.90
Income from discontinued operations	$	0.15	$	0.01	$	0.41
Net income available for Common Shares	$	1.22	$	0.75	$	1.31
Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding	$	1.10	$	0.80	$	0.60
Tax status of Common Shares distributions deemed paid during the year:
Ordinary income	$	0.72	$	0.80	$	0.60
Long-term capital gain	$	0.24	$	—	$	—
Unrecaptured section 1250 gain	$	0.14	$	—	$	—
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — basic		27,582		24,466		24,089
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — fully diluted		32,944		30,498		30,414

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F-6

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes In Equity

For The Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

						Distributions in
						Excess of			Non-controlling
						Accumulated			interests-
	Common					Comprehensive			Common OP
	Stock		Paid-in Capital			Earnings			Units			Total Equity
	(Amounts in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	229	$	304,483		$	(257,594	)	$	12,794		$	59,912
Conversion of OP Units to common stock		4		655						(659	)		—
Issuance of common stock through exercise of options		3		2,577									2,580
Issuance of common stock through employee stock purchase plan				1,183									1,183
Compensation expenses related to stock options and restricted stock				4,268									4,268
Repurchase of common stock				(883	)								(883	)
Adjustment for Common OP Unitholders in the Operating Partnership				(1,480	)					1,480			—
Net income							32,102			7,705			39,807
Distributions							(14,606	)		(3,544	)		(18,150	)
Balance, December 31, 2007		236		310,803			(240,098	)		17,776			88,717
Conversion of OP Units to common stock				1,463						(1,463	)		—
Issuance of common stock through exercise of options		2		3,205									3,207
Issuance of common stock through employee stock purchase plan				1,501									1,501
Compensation expenses related to stock options and restricted stock				5,162									5,162
Repurchase of common stock				(600	)								(600	)
Adjustment for Common OP Unitholders in the Operating Partnership				(1,450	)					1,450			—
Net income							18,303			4,297			22,600
Distributions							(19,814	)		(4,539	)		(24,353	)
Balance, December 31, 2008		238		320,084			(241,609	)		17,521			96,234
Conversion of OP Units to common stock				2,516						(2,516	)		—
Issuance of common stock through exercise of options		2		3,537									3,539
Issuance of common stock through employee stock purchase plan				1,344									1,344
Issuance of common stock through stock offering		46		146,317									146,363
Compensation expenses related to stock options and restricted stock		15		4,640									4,655
Repurchase of common stock or Common OP Units				(1,193	)					(188	)		(1,381	)
Adjustment for Common OP Unitholders in the Operating Partnership				(20,549	)					20,549			—
Net income							34,005			6,113			40,118
Distributions							(30,863	)		(5,582	)		(36,445	)
Balance, December 31, 2009	$	301	$	456,696		$	(238,467	)	$	35,897		$	254,427

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F-7

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

	2009			2008			2007
	(Amounts in thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Consolidated net income	$	56,261		$	38,672		$	55,946
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Gain) Loss on sale of discontinued real estate and other		(5,483	)		79			(12,036	)
Depreciation expense		73,670			68,700			65,419
Amortization expense		3,090			2,956			2,894
Debt premium amortization		(1,232	)		(632	)		(1,608	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures		(4,146	)		(5,528	)		(4,123	)
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures		2,936			3,717			5,052
Amortization of stock-related compensation		4,655			5,162			4,268
Revenue recognized fromright-to-use contract sales		(2,644	)		(340	)		—
Commission expense recognized related toright-to-use contract sales		821			112			—
Accrued long term incentive plan compensation		1,053			1,098			685
Increase in provision for uncollectible rents receivable		654			353			269
Increase in provision for inventory reserve		839			63			250
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Rent and other customer receivables, net		(40	)		(236	)		(152	)
Inventory		2,060			(5,129	)		4,516
Deferred commission expense		(6,550	)		(3,756	)		—
Escrow deposits and other assets		7,825			(1,208	)		(1,244	)
Accrued payroll and other operating expenses		(3,504	)		1,564			82
Deferred revenue — sales ofright-to-use contracts		21,526			10,951			—
Rents received in advance and security deposits		(1,402	)		(2,708	)		2,573
Net cash provided by operating activities		150,389			113,890			122,791
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Acquisition of real estate and other		(8,219	)		(2,217	)		(24,774	)
Proceeds from disposition of rental properties		3,278			—			23,261
Net tax-deferred exchange (deposit) withdrawal		(786	)		2,124			(2,294	)
Joint Ventures:
Investments in		—			(5,545	)		(3,656	)
Distributions from		—			524			152
Net repayments (borrowings) of notes receivable		1,847			(1,274	)		11,091
Capital improvements		(30,876	)		(26,716	)		(29,384	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(34,756	)		(33,104	)		(25,604	)

F-8

	2009			2008			2007
	(Amounts in thousands)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net proceeds from stock options and employee stock purchase plan		4,883			4,708			3,734
Distributions to Common Stockholders, Common OP Unitholders, and Perpetual Preferred OP Unitholders		(48,109	)		(38,849	)		(32,013	)
Stock repurchase and Unit redemption		(1,381	)		(600	)		(883	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		146,363			—			—
Lines of credit:
Proceeds		50,900			201,200			126,200
Repayments		(143,900	)		(211,200	)		(154,400	)
Principal repayments on disposition		—			—			(1,992	)
Principal payments and mortgage debt payoff		(130,235	)		(224,442	)		(16,169	)
New financing proceeds		107,264			231,047			—
Early debt retirement		—			—			(17,174	)
Debt issuance costs		(1,602	)		(3,123	)		(310	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(15,817	)		(41,259	)		(93,007	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		99,816			39,527			4,180
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		45,312			5,785			1,605
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	145,128		$	45,312		$	5,785
Supplemental Information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	96,030		$	96,668		$	101,206
Non-cash activities:
Proceeds from loan to pay insurance premiums		—			—			4,344
Inventory reclassified to Buildings and other depreciable property		6,727			57,797			—
Manufactured homes acquired with dealer financing		1,389
Dealer financing		1,389
Acquisitions
Assumption of assets and liabilities:
Inventory		185			2,139			22
Escrow deposits and other assets		11,267			12,361			560
Accrued payroll and other operating expenses		5,195			15,413			313
Rents and other customer payments received in advance and security deposits		3,933			19,821			1,158
Notes receivable		—			19,571			—
Investment in real estate		18,116			10,417			45,532
Debt assumed and financed on acquisition		11,851			7,037			8,528
Mezzanine and joint venture investments applied to real estate acquisition		—			—			11,297
Dispositions
Disposition of assets and liabilities, net		(14	)		—			28
Investment in real estate		13,831			—			23,289
Debt assumed by buyer on disposition		10,539			—			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F-9

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 —  Organization of the Company and Basis of Presentation

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with MHC Operating Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) and other consolidated subsidiaries (“Subsidiaries”), is referred to herein as the “Company,” “ELS,” “we,” “us,” and “our.” The Company is a fully integrated owner and operator of lifestyle-oriented properties (“Properties”). The Company leases individual developed areas (“sites”) with access to utilities for placement of factory built homes, cottages, cabins or recreational vehicles (“RVs”). At certain Properties, the Company provides access to its sites throughright-to-use or membership contracts. We believe that we have qualified for taxation as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes since our taxable year ended December 31, 1993. We plan to continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. We cannot, therefore, guarantee that we have qualified or will qualify in the future as a REIT. The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters that may not be totally within our control and we cannot provide any assurance that the IRS will agree with our analysis. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from sources that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. We are also required to distribute to stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income computed without regard to our deduction for dividends paid and our net capital gain. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $88 million that can be utilized to offset future distribution requirements. The fact that we hold our assets through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT qualification. Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT. We do not believe, however, that any pending or proposed tax law changes would jeopardize our REIT qualification.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates. Also, unless the IRS granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company is subject to certain foreign, state and local taxes on its income and property and U.S. federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

The operations of the Company are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The Company contributed the proceeds from its initial public offering and subsequent offerings to the Operating Partnership for a general partnership interest. In 2004, the general partnership interest was contributed to MHC Trust, a private REIT subsidiary owned by the Company. The financial results of the Operating Partnership and the Subsidiaries are consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, since certain activities, if performed by the Company, may cause us to earn income which is not qualifying for the REIT gross income tests, the Company has formed taxable REIT subsidiaries, as defined in the Code, to engage in such activities.

Several Properties are wholly owned by taxable REIT subsidiaries of the Company. In addition, Realty Systems, Inc. (“RSI”) is a wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary of the Company that is engaged in the business of purchasing and selling or leasing Site Set homes that are located in Properties owned and managed by the Company. RSI also provides brokerage services to residents at such Properties for those residents who move from a Property but do not relocate their homes. RSI may provide brokerage services, in competition with other local brokers, by seeking buyers for the Site Set homes. Subsidiaries of RSI also operate ancillary activities at certain Properties consisting of operations such as golf courses, pro shops, stores and restaurants.

The limited partners of the Operating Partnership (the “Common OP Unitholders”) receive an allocation of net income that is based on their respective ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership that is shown on the Consolidated Financial Statements as Non-controlling interests — Common OP Units. As of December 31, 2009, the Non-Controlling Interests — Common OP Units represented 4,914,040 units of limited partnership interest (“OP Units”) which are convertible into an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common

F-10

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 —  Organization of the Company and Basis of Presentation (continued)

stock. The issuance of additional shares of common stock or Common OP Units changes the respective ownership of the Operating Partnership for both the Non-controlling interests — Common OP Units.

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a)   Basis of Consolidation

The Company consolidates its majority-owned subsidiaries in which it has the ability to control the operations of the subsidiaries and all variable interest entities with respect to which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company also consolidates entities in which it has a controlling direct or indirect voting interest. All inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s acquisitions on or prior to December 31, 2008 were all accounted for as purchases in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”). For business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009, the purchase price of Properties will be accounted for in accordance with the Codification Topic “Business Combinations” (“FASB ASC 805”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141R, “Business Combinations”).

The Company has applied the CodificationSub-Topic “Variable Interest Entities” (“FASB ASC810-10-15”) (prior authoritative guidance: Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities an interpretation of ARB 51”). The objective of FASB ASC810-10-15 is to provide guidance on how to identify a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and determine when the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and results of operations of a VIE need to be included in a company’s consolidated financial statements. A company that holds variable interests in an entity will need to consolidate such entity if the company absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses or receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns if they occur, or both (i.e., the primary beneficiary). The Company has also applied the CodificationSub-Topic “Control of Partnerships and Similar Entities” (“FASB ASC810-20”) (prior authoritative guidance: Emerging Issues Task Force04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights”), which determines whether a general partner or the general partners as a group controls a limited partnership or similar entity and therefore should consolidate the entity. The Company will apply FASB ASC810-10-15 and FASB ASC810-20 to all types of entity ownership (general and limited partnerships and corporate interests).

The Company applies the equity method of accounting to entities in which the Company does not have a controlling direct or indirect voting interest or is not considered the primary beneficiary, but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions. The cost method is applied when (i) the investment is minimal (typically less than 5%) and (ii) the Company’s investment is passive.

(b)   Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. All property and site counts are unaudited.

(c)   Markets

We manage all our operations on aproperty-by-property basis. Since each Property has similar economic and operational characteristics, the Company has one reportable segment, which is the operation of land lease Properties. The distribution of the Properties throughout the United States reflects our belief that geographic diversification helps insulate the portfolio from regional economic influences. We intend to target new

F-11

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

acquisitions in or near markets where the Properties are located and will also consider acquisitions of Properties outside such markets.

(d)   Inventory

As of December 31, 2009, inventory primarily consists of merchandise inventory as almost all Site Set inventory has been reclassified to buildings and other depreciable property. (See Note 7 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K). Inventory as of December 31, 2008, primarily consisted of new and used Site Set Resort Cottages and is stated at the lower of cost or market. Home sales revenues and resale revenues are recognized when the home sale is closed. The expense for home inventory reserve is included in the cost of home sales in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(e)   Real Estate

In accordance with FASB ASC 805, which is effective for acquisitions on or after January 1, 2009, we recognize all the assets acquired and all the liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. We also expense transaction costs as they are incurred.

Acquisitions prior to December 31, 2008 were accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141. We allocated the purchase price of Properties we acquire to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on their fair values. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we utilize a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be available in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective Property and other market data. We also consider information obtained about each Property as a result of our due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.

Real estate is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We generally use a30-year estimated life for buildings acquired and structural and land improvements (including site development), a ten-year estimated life for building upgrades and a five-year estimated life for furniture, fixtures and equipment. New rental units are generally depreciated using a20-year estimated life from each model year down to a salvage value of 40% of the original costs. Used rental units are generally depreciated based on the estimated life of the unit with no estimated salvage value.

The values of above-and below-market leases are amortized and recorded as either an increase (in the case of below-market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above-market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease. The value associated with in-place leases is amortized over the expected term, which includes an estimated probability of lease renewal. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred and significant renovations and improvements that improve the asset and extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized over their estimated useful life.

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, including our investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions and legal factors. Future events could occur which would cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.

For Properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the fair value of the Property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the Property measured at the time the Company has a commitment to sell the Propertyand/or is actively marketing the Property for sale. A Property to be disposed of is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less costs to sell. Subsequent to the date that a Property is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded. The Company accounts for its Properties held for disposition in accordance with the CodificationSub-Topic “Impairment or Disposal of Long

F-12

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Lived Assets” (“FASB ASC360- 10-35”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”). Accordingly, the results of operations for all assets sold or held for sale have been classified as discontinued operations in all periods presented.

(f)   Identified Intangibles and Goodwill

We record acquired intangible assets and acquired intangible liabilities at their estimated fair value separate and apart from goodwill. We amortize identified intangible assets and liabilities that are determined to have finite lives over the period the assets and liabilities are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the property or business acquired. Intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable and its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value.

The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying amounts of identified intangible assets and goodwill, a component of “Escrow deposits and other assets” on our consolidated balance sheets, were approximately $19.6 million and $12.0 million, respectively. Accumulated amortization of identified intangibles assets was approximately $0.6 million and $0.1 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(g)   Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all demand and money market accounts and certificates of deposit with a maturity date, when purchased, of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 include approximately $0.4 million of restricted cash.

(h)   Notes Receivable

Notes receivable generally are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances net of any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, unamortized discounts or premiums, and an allowance. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Discounts or premiums are amortized to income using the interest method. In certain cases we finance the sales of homes to our customers (referred to as “Chattel Loans”) which loans are secured by the homes. The allowance for the Chattel Loans is calculated based on a review of loan agings and a comparison of the outstanding principal balance of the Chattel Loans compared to the current estimated market value of the underlying manufactured home collateral.

The Company also provides financing for nonrefundable upfront payments on sales ofright-to-use contracts (“Contracts Receivable”). Based upon historical collection rates and current economic trends, when a sale is financed, a reserve is established for a portion of the Contracts Receivable balance estimated to be uncollectible. The allowance and the rate at which the Company provides for losses on its Contracts Receivable could be increased or decreased in the future based on the Company’s actual collection experience. (See Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K).

On August 14, 2008, we purchased Contract Receivables that were recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition of approximately $19.6 million under the Codification Topic “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“FASB ASC310-30”) (prior authoritative guidance: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP)03-3, “Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt

F-13

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Securities Acquired in a Transfer”). The fair value of these Contracts Receivable includes an estimate of losses that are expected to be incurred over the estimated remaining lives of the receivables, and therefore no allowance for losses was recorded for these receivables as of the transaction date. Through December 31, 2009, the credit performance of these receivables has generally been consistent with the assumptions used in determining the initial fair value of these loans, and our original expectations regarding the amounts and timing of future cash flows has not changed. A probable decrease in management’s expectation of future cash collections related to these receivables could result in the need to record an allowance for credit losses related to these loans in the future. A significant and probable increase in expected cash flows would generally result in an increase in interest income recognized over the remaining life of the underlying pool of receivables.

(i)   Investments in Joint Ventures

Investments in joint ventures in which the Company does not have a controlling direct or indirect voting interest, but can exercise significant influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting whereby the cost of an investment is adjusted for the Company’s share of the equity in net income or loss from the date of acquisition and reduced by distributions received. The income or loss of each entity is allocated in accordance with the provisions of the applicable operating agreements. The allocation provisions in these agreements may differ from the ownership interests held by each investor. Differences between the carrying amount of the Company’s investment in the respective entities and the Company’s share of the underlying equity of such unconsolidated entities are amortized over the respective lives of the underlying assets, as applicable. See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K.

(j)   Income from Other Investments, net

On August 14, 2008, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Privileged Access, LP (“Privileged Access”) for an unsecured note payable of $2.0 million (the “PA Transaction”). Prior to August 14, 2008, income from other investments, net, primarily included revenue relating to the Company’s former ground leases with Privileged Access. The ground leases were terminated on August 14, 2008 due to the PA Transaction. The ground leases with Privileged Access were for approximately 24,300 sites at 82 of the Company’s Properties and were accounted for in accordance with Codification Topic “Leases” (“FASB ASC 840”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases”). The Company recognized income related to these ground leases of approximately $15.8 million and $20.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(k)   Insurance Claims

The Properties are covered against losses caused by various events including fire, flood, property damage, earthquake, windstorm and business interruption by insurance policies containing various deductible requirements and coverage limits. Recoverable costs are classified in other assets as incurred. Insurance proceeds are applied against the asset when received. Recoverable costs relating to capital items are treated in accordance with the Company’s capitalization policy. The book value of the original capital item is written off once the value of the impaired asset has been determined. Insurance proceeds relating to the capital costs are recorded as income in the period they are received.

Approximately 70 Florida Properties suffered damage from five hurricanes that struck the state during 2004 and 2005. The Company estimates its total claim to be approximately $21.0 million and has made claims for full recovery of these amounts, subject to deductibles.

The Company has received proceeds from insurance carriers of approximately $10.7 million through December 31, 2009. The proceeds were accounted for in accordance with the Codification Topic

F-14

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

“Contingencies” (“FASB ASC 450”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”). During the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, approximately $1.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, has been recognized as a gain on insurance recovery, which is net of approximately $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of contingent legal fees and included in income from other investments, net.

On June 22, 2007, the Company filed a lawsuit related to some of the unpaid claims against certain insurance carriers and its insurance broker. See Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K for further discussion of this lawsuit.

(l)   Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments include short-term investments, notes receivable, accounts receivable, accounts payable, other accrued expenses, and mortgage notes payable. The fair values of all financial instruments, including notes receivable, were not materially different from their carrying values at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

The valuation of financial instruments under the Codification Topic “Financial Instruments” (“FASB ASC 825”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments”) and the Codification Topic “Derivatives and Hedging” (“FASB ASC 815”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”) requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. Where possible, we base the fair values of our financial instruments on listed market prices and third party quotes. Where these are not available, we base our estimates on other factors relevant to the financial instrument.

(m)   Deferred Financing Costs, net

Deferred financing costs, net include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term financing. The costs are being amortized over the terms of the respective loans on a level yield basis. Unamortized deferred financing fees are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date. Upon amendment of the lines of credit, unamortized deferred financing fees are accounted for in accordance with, CodificationSub-Topic “Modifications and Extinguishments” (“FASB ASC470-50-40”) (prior authoritative guidance: Emerging Issues Task ForceNo. 98-14, “Debtor’s Accounting for Changes inLine-of-Credit or Revolving-Debt Arrangements”). Accumulated amortization for such costs was $12.5 million and $13.1 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(n)   Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for leases with its customers as operating leases. Rental income is recognized over the term of the respective lease or the length of a customer’s stay, the majority of which are for a term of not greater than one year. We will reserve for receivables when we believe the ultimate collection is less than probable. Our provision for uncollectible rents receivable was approximately $2.2 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Company accounts for the sales ofright-to-use contracts in accordance with the Codification Topic “Revenue Recognition” (“FASB ASC 605”) (prior authoritative guidance: Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, “Revenue Recognition in Consolidated Financial Statements, Corrected”). Aright-to-use contract gives the customer the right to a set schedule of usage at a specified group of Properties. Customers may choose to upgrade their contracts to increase their usage and the number of Properties they may access. A contract requires the customer to make an upfront nonrefundable payment and annual payments during the term of the

F-15

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

contract. The stated term of aright-to-use contract is generally three years and the customer may renew his contract by continuing to make the annual payments. The Company will recognize the upfront non-refundable payments over the estimated customer life which, based on historical attrition rates, the Company has estimated to be from one to 31 years. For example, we have currently estimated that 7.9% of customers who purchase a newright-to-use contract will terminate their contract after five years. Therefore, the upfront nonrefundable payments from 7.9% of the contracts sold in any particular period are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years as the estimated customer life for 7.9% of our customers who purchase a contract is five years. The historical attrition rates for upgrade contracts are lower than for new contacts, and therefore, the nonrefundable upfront payments for upgrade contracts are amortized at a different rate than for new contracts. The decision to recognize this revenue in accordance with FASB ASC 605 was made after corresponding with the Office of the Chief Accountant at the SEC during September and October of 2008.

Right-to-use annual payments paid by customers under the terms of theright-to-use contracts are deferred and recognized ratably over the one-year period in which the services are provided.

Income from home sales is recognized when the earnings process is complete. The earnings process is complete when the home has been delivered, the purchaser has accepted the home and title has transferred.

(o)   Non-Controlling Interests

Net income is allocated to Common OP Unitholders based on their respective ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership. Such ownership percentage is calculated by dividing the number of Common OP Units held by the Common OP Unitholders (4,914,040 and 5,366,741 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively) by the total OP Units held the Common OP Unitholders and the Company. Issuance of additional shares of common stock or Common OP Units changes the percentage ownership of both the Non-controlling interests — Common OP Units and the Company.

Due in part to the exchange rights (which provide for the conversion of Common OP Units into shares of common stock on aone-for-one basis), such transactions and the proceeds there from are treated as capital transactions and result in an allocation between stockholders’ equity and Non-controlling Interests to account for the change in the respective percentage ownership of the underlying equity of the Operating Partnership.

In accordance with the Codification Topic “Consolidation” (“FASB ASC 810”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements”), effective January 1, 2009, the Company, for all periods presented, has reclassified the non-controlling interest for Common OP Units, approximately $17.5 million as of December 31, 2008, from the mezzanine section under Total Liabilities to the Equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. The caption Common OP Units on the consolidated balance sheets also includes $0.5 million of private REIT Subsidiaries preferred stock. Based on the Company’s analysis, Perpetual Preferred OP Units remain in the mezzanine section. The presentation of income allocated to Common OP Units, approximately $4.3 million and $7.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and Perpetual Preferred OP Units, approximately $16.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, on the consolidated statements of operations has been moved to the bottom of the statement prior to Net income available to Common Shares.

(p)   Income Taxes

Due to the structure of the Company as a REIT, the results of operations contain no provision for U.S. federal income taxes for the REIT, but the Company is still subject to certain foreign, state and local income, excise or franchise taxes. In addition, the Company has several taxable REIT subsidiaries which are subject to federal and state income taxes at regular corporate tax rates.

F-16

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

The Company expensed federal, foreign, state and local taxes of approximately $0.6 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, which includes taxes payable from activities managed through taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). Overall, the TRSs have federal net operating loss carryforwards. No net tax benefits have been recorded by the TRSs since it is not considered more likely than not that the deferred tax asset related to the TRSs net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized.

The Company adopted the provisions of Codification Topic “Income Taxes” (“FASB 740”) (prior authoritative guidance: Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”) on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FASB 740 resulted in no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state jurisdictions and Canada. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, ornon-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006.

As of December 31, 2009, net investment in real estate and notes receivable had a U.S. federal tax basis of approximately $1.4 billion (unaudited) and $24.5 million (unaudited), respectively.

(q)   Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company recognizes all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The Company currently does not have any derivative instruments.

(r)   Stock Compensation

The Company adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 148”) and FASB ASC 718. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees (see Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K).

(s)   Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” the current authoritative guidance of which is the CodificationSub-Topic “Subsequent Events” (“FASB ASC855-10”). FASB ASC855-10 seeks to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The Statement sets forth the period and circumstances after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. The Statement introduces the concept of financial statements being available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The Statement applies to interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FASB ASC855-10 has had no material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Our management evaluated for subsequent events through the time of our filing on February 25, 2010.

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” the current authoritative guidance of which is the Codification Topic “Consolidation” (“FASB ASC 810”). FASB ASC 810 seeks to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved

F-17

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 —  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

with variable interest entities. The Statement addresses the effects on certain provisions of FASB ASC810-10-15, Variable Interest Entities, as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. It also discusses the application of certain key provisions of FASB ASC810-10-15, including those in which the accounting and disclosures under FASB ASC810-10-15 do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FASB ASC 810 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position on Emerging Issues Task Force Issue03-6, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“FSPEITF 03-6-1”), the current authoritative guidance of which is the CodificationSub-Topic “Earnings Per Share” (“FASB ASC260-10”). FSPEITF 03-6-1 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) pursuant to the two-class method. FSPEITF 03-6-1 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions of FSPEITF 03-6-1. Early application was not permitted. Adoption on January 1, 2009 did not materially impact our earnings per share calculation.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS No. 162”). The Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The purpose is to remove the focus of setting the GAAP hierarchy from the auditor and giving the entity the responsibility of setting the GAAP hierarchy. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The adoption of SFAS No. 162 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

(t)   Reclassifications

Certain 2007 and 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. This reclassification had no material effect on the consolidated balance sheets or statement of operations of the Company.

Note 3 —  Earnings Per Common Share

Earnings per common share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Codification Topic “Earnings Per Share” (“FASB ASC 260”) (prior authoritative guidance: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share”) defines the calculation of basic and fully diluted earnings per share. Basic and fully diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average shares outstanding during each year and basic earnings per share exclude any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. The conversion of OP Units has been excluded from the basic earnings per share calculation. The conversion of an OP Unit to a share of common stock has no material effect on earnings per common share.

F-18

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3 —  Earnings Per Common Share (continued)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (amounts in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2009		2008		2007
Numerators:
Income from Continuing Operations:
Income from continuing operations — basic	$	29,819	$	18,157	$	22,160
Amounts allocated to dilutive securities		5,433		4,265		5,322
Income from continuing operations — fully diluted	$	35,252	$	22,422	$	27,482
Income from Discontinued Operations:
Income from discontinued operations — basic	$	4,186	$	146	$	9,942
Amounts allocated to dilutive securities		680		32		2,383
Income from discontinued operations — fully diluted	$	4,866	$	178	$	12,325
Net Income Available for Common Shares:
Net income available for Common Shares — basic	$	34,005	$	18,303	$	32,102
Amounts allocated to dilutive securities		6,113		4,297		7,705
Net income available for Common Shares — fully diluted	$	40,118	$	22,600	$	39,807
Denominator:
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — basic		27,583		24,466		24,089
Effect of dilutive securities:
Redemption of Common OP Units for Common Shares Shares		5,075		5,674		5,870
Employee stock options and restricted shares		286		358		455
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — fully diluted		32,944		30,498		30,414

Note 4 —  Common Stock and Other Equity Related Transactions

On May 18, 2007 the stockholders approved the increase of authorized common stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000.

F-19

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 —  Common Stock and Other Equity Related Transactions (continued)

The following table presents the changes in the Company’s outstanding common stock for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (excluding OP Units of 4,914,040, 5,366,741, and 5,836,043 outstanding at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively):

	2009			2008			2007
Shares outstanding at January 1,		25,051,322			24,348,517			23,928,652
Common stock issued through conversion of OP Units		448,501			469,302			254,025
Common stock issued through exercise of options		213,721			169,367			143,841
Common stock issued through stock grants		27,000			50,000			18,000
Common stock issued through ESPP and DRIP		34,769			32,184			22,820
Common stock repurchased and retired		(24,568	)		(18,048	)		(18,821	)
Common stock issued through stock offering		4,600,000			—			—
Shares outstanding at December 31,		30,350,745			25,051,322			24,348,517

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s percentage ownership of the Operating Partnership was approximately 86.1% and 82.4%, respectively. The remaining approximately 13.9% and 17.6%, respectively, was owned by the Common OP Unitholders.

The following regular quarterly distributions have been declared and paid to common stockholders and non-controlling interests since January 1, 2007:

	For the Quarter	Stockholder
Distribution Amount Per Share	Ending	Record Date	Payment Date
$0.1500	March 31, 2007	March 30, 2007	April 13, 2007
$0.1500	June 30, 2007	June 29, 2007	July 13, 2007
$0.1500	September 30, 2007	September 28, 2007	October 12, 2007
$0.1500	December 31, 2007	December 28, 2007	January 11, 2008
$0.2000	March 31, 2008	March 28, 2008	April 11, 2008
$0.2000	June 30, 2008	June 27, 2008	July 11, 2008
$0.2000	September 30, 2008	September 26, 2008	October 10, 2008
$0.2000	December 31, 2008	December 26, 2008	January 9, 2009
$0.2500	March 31, 2009	March 27, 2009	April 10, 2009
$0.2500	June 30, 2009	June 26, 2009	July 10, 2009
$0.3000	September 30, 2009	September 25, 2009	October 9, 2009
$0.3000	December 31, 2009	December 24, 2009	January 8, 2010

The Company adopted the 1997 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) in July 1997. Pursuant to the ESPP, as amended on May 3, 2006, certain employees and directors of the Company may each annually acquire up to $250,000 of common stock of the Company. The aggregate number of shares of common stock available under the ESPP shall not exceed 1,000,000, subject to adjustment by the Company’s Board of Directors. The common stock may be purchased monthly at a price equal to 85% of the lesser of: (a) the closing price for a share of common stock on the last day of the offering period; and (b) the closing price for a share of common stock on the first day of the offering period. Shares of common stock issued through the ESPP for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were 34,450 and 31,770, respectively.

F-20

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 —  Common Stock and Other Equity Related Transactions (continued)

On June 29, 2009, the Company issued 4.6 million shares of common stock in an equity offering for proceeds of approximately $146.4 million, net of offering costs.

Note 5 — Investment in Real Estate

Investment in Real Estate is comprised of (amounts in thousands):

Properties Held for Long Term

	December 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Investment in real estate:
Land	$	543,613		$	539,702
Land improvements		1,741,142			1,715,627
Buildings and other depreciable property		248,907			222,699
		2,533,662			2,478,028
Accumulated depreciation		(628,839	)		(557,001	)
Net investment in real estate	$	1,904,823		$	1,921,027

Properties Held for Sale

	December 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Investment in real estate:
Land	$	1,109		$	2,277
Land improvements		3,301			10,125
Buildings and other depreciable property		143			591
		4,553			12,993
Accumulated depreciation		(929	)		(4,103	)
Net investment in real estate	$	3,624		$	8,890

Land improvements consist primarily of improvements such as grading, landscaping and infrastructure items such as streets, sidewalks or water mains. Buildings and other depreciable property consist of permanent buildings in the Properties such as clubhouses, laundry facilities, maintenance storage facilities, rental units and furniture, fixtures and equipment. See Note 7 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K for disclosure regarding the reclassification of resort cottage inventory to Buildings and other depreciable property during the year ended December 31, 2009.

All acquisitions have been accounted for utilizing the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of operations of acquired assets are included in the statements of operations from the dates of acquisition. Certain purchase price adjustments may be made within one year following the acquisitions. We acquired all of

F-21

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5 — Investment in Real Estate (continued)

these Properties from unaffiliated third parties. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company acquired the following Properties (dollars in millions):

1) During the year ended December 31, 2009, we acquired the remaining 75% interests in the following three Diversified Portfolio joint ventures known as:

					Real		Debt			Net
Closing Date	Property	Location	Total Sites		Estate		Assumed			Equity
February 13, 2009	Plymouth Rock	Elkhart Lake, WI		609	$	10.7	$	6.4	(a)	$	4.3
February 13, 2009	Robin Hill	Lenhartsville, PA		270		5.0		3.5			1.5
February 13, 2009	Sun Valley	Brownsville, PA		265		3.5		1.9			1.6

(a) Net of approximately $1.1 million ofmark-to-market discount.

2) During the year ended December 31, 2008, we acquired the following Properties:

					Real				Net
Closing Date	Property	Location	Total Sites		Estate		Debt		Equity
January 14, 2008	Grandy Creek	Concrete, WA		179	$	1.8	$	—	$	1.8
January 23, 2008	Lake George Schroon Valley	Warrensburg, NY		151		2.1		—		2.1

3) During the year ended December 31, 2007, we acquired the following Properties:

					Real					Net
Closing Date	Property	Location	Total Sites		Estate		Debt			Equity
January 29, 2007	Mesa Verde (a)	Yuma, AZ		345	$	5.9	$	3.5		$	2.4
June 27, 2007	Winter Garden (a)	Winter Garden, FL		350		10.9		4.0			6.9
August 3, 2007	Pine Island	St. James City, FL		363		6.5		—			6.5
September 26, 2007	Santa Cruz RV Ranch	Scotts Valley, CA		106		5.5		—			5.5
October 11, 2007	Tuxbury Resort	Amesbury, MA		305		7.3		1.1	(b)		6.1

(a)	Purchased remaining 75% interest in the two Diversified Investments joint venture Properties above, in which we had an existing 25% joint venture ownership interest of $0.7 million. The gross purchase price for Mesa Verde includes $0.3 million in prepaid rent.
(b)	Net of approximately $0.1 million ofmark-to-market adjustment.

Investment in real estate also increased due to the consolidation of the Bar Harbor joint venture as of December 31, 2007. See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K.

We actively seek to acquire additional Properties and currently are engaged in negotiations relating to the possible acquisition of a number of Properties. At any time these negotiations are at varying stages, which may include contracts outstanding, to acquire certain Properties, which are subject to satisfactory completion of our due diligence review.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company has one Property designated as held for disposition pursuant to FASB ASC360-10-35. The Company determined that this Property no longer met its investment criteria. As such, the results from operations of this Property is classified as income from discontinued operations. The Property classified as held for disposition is listed in the table below.

Property	Location	Sites
Creekside	Wyoming, MI		165

F-22

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5 — Investment in Real Estate (continued)

On December 29, 2009, adeed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement, signed by the Company was sent to the loan servicer regarding our nonrecourse mortgage loan of approximately $3.6 million secured by Creekside. See Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in thisForm 10-K.

During the three years ended December 31, 2009, the Company sold the following Properties. Except for Caledonia, the operating results have been reflected in discontinued operations.

1)	On July 20, 2009, we sold Casa Village, a 490-site manufactured home Property in Billings, Montana for a stated purchase price of approximately $12.4 million. The buyer assumed $10.6 million of mortgage debt that had a stated interest rate of 6.02% and was schedule to mature in 2013. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of approximately $5.1 million. Cash proceeds from the sale, net of closing costs, were approximately $1.1 million.
2)	On April 17, 2009, we sold Caledonia, a 247-site resort Property in Caledonia, Wisconsin, for proceeds of approximately $2.2 million. The Company recognized a gain on sale of approximately $0.8 million which is included in Income from other investments, net. In addition, we received approximately $0.3 million of deferred rent due from the previous tenant.
3)	On November 30, 2007, we sold Holiday Village, a 519-site all-age manufactured home Property in Sioux City, Iowa for approximately $2.6 million and a gain of approximately $0.6 million.
4)	On July 6, 2007, the Company sold Del Rey, a 407-site manufactured home Property in Albuquerque, New Mexico, for proceeds of approximately $13.0 million and recognized a gain on sale of approximately $6.9 million. The proceeds were deposited in a tax-deferred exchange account and the proceeds were subsequently used for the acquisition of Pine Island and Tuxbury Resort discussed above.
5)	On January 10, 2007, the Company sold, Lazy Lakes, a 100-site resort Property in the Florida Keys for proceeds of approximately $7.7 million and recognized a gain on sale of approximately $4.6 million. The proceeds were deposited in a tax-deferred exchange account and were subsequently used for the acquisitions of Winter Garden and Mesa Verde discussed above.

The following table summarizes the combined results of operations of Properties held for sale or sold during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (amounts in thousands):

	2009			2008			2007
Rental income	$	1,424		$	2,121		$	3,020
Utility and other income		96			155			243
Property operating revenues		1,520			2,276			3,263
Property operating expenses		(758	)		(1,101	)		(1,972	)
Income from property operations		762			1,175			1,291
Income (loss) from home sales operations		22			8			(65	)
Interest and amortization		(604	)		(926	)		(937	)
Gain (loss) on real estate		4,686			(79	)		12,036
Income from discontinued operations	$	4,866		$	178		$	12,325

Note 6 —  Investment in Joint Ventures

The Company recorded approximately $2.9 million and $3.8 million of equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures, net of approximately $1.3 million and $1.8 million of depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company received approximately $2.9 million and

F-23

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6 —  Investment in Joint Ventures (continued)

$4.2 million in distributions from such joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Approximately $2.9 million and $3.7 million of such distributions were classified as a return on capital and were included in operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The remaining distributions were classified as a return of capital and classified as investing activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Approximately $1.3 million and $2.7 million of the distributions received in the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, exceeded the Company’s basis in its joint venture and as such were recorded in income from unconsolidated joint ventures. Distributions include amounts received from the sale or liquidation of equity in joint venture investments.

On February 13, 2009, the Company purchased the remaining 75% interest in the Diversified Portfolio joint venture Properties in which we had an existing 25% joint venture interest. The Properties are known as Robin Hill in Lenhartsville, Pennsylvania, Sun Valley in Bowmansville, Pennsylvania and Plymouth Rock in Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin. Also on February 13, 2009, the Company sold its 25% interest in the Diversified Portfolio joint ventures known as Round Top, in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Pine Haven in Ocean View, New Jersey. A gain on sale of approximately $1.1 million was recognized and is included in equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company invested approximately $5.7 million to acquire an additional 25% interest in Voyager RV Resort, increasing the Company’s ownership interest to 50%. The additional investment was determined on a total purchase price of $50.5 million and mortgage debt of $22.5 million. The Company exercised its option to acquire the remaining percentage of Bar Harbor joint venture from its joint venture partner. Under the formula provided for in the call option section of the joint venture agreement, no additional consideration was required to be paid to exercise the option and the Company now owns 100% of the three Bar Harbor Properties. The Company sold its 25% interest in the four Morgan Portfolio joint ventures known as New Point in New Point, Virginia, Virginia Park in Old Orchard Beach, Maine, Club Naples in Naples, Florida and Gwynn’s Island in Gwynn, Virginia, for a sales price of approximately $2.1 million. The sales price for the four Morgan Portfolio joint ventures was based on a total sales price of approximately $25.7 million net of mortgage debt of approximately $17.2 million. A gain on the sale of approximately $1.6 million was recognized. The Company also received approximately $0.4 million held for the initial investment in one of the Morgan Properties.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received approximately $4.2 million in distributions from our joint ventures. $3.7 million of these distributions were classified as return on capital and were included in operating activities. The remaining distributions of approximately $0.5 million were classified as a return of capital and were included in investing activities and were related to the sale of the Company’s 25% interest in four of our joint venture Properties. Approximately $2.7 million of the distributions received exceeded the Company’s basis in its joint venture and as such were recorded in income from unconsolidated joint ventures. Of these distributions, $0.6 million relates to the gain on the payoff of our share of seller financing in excess of our joint venture basis on one Lakeshore investment.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company invested approximately $2.7 million in developing one of the Bar Harbor joint venture Properties, which resulted in an increase of the Company’s ownership interest per the joint venture agreement. As of December 31, 2007, the Bar Harbor joint venture had been consolidated with the operations of the Company as the Company had determined that as of December 31, 2007 we are the primary beneficiary by applying the standards of FASB ASC810-10-15. This consolidation had decreased the Company’s investment in joint venture by approximately $11.1 million, with an offsetting increase in investment in real estate.

F-24

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6 —  Investment in Joint Ventures (continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company received approximately $5.2 million in distributions from our joint ventures. $5.1 million of these distributions were classified as return on capital and were included in operating activities. The remaining distributions of approximately $0.1 million were classified as a return of capital and were included in investing activities and were related to refinancings at three of our joint venture Properties. Approximately $2.5 million of the distributions received exceeded the Company’s basis in its joint venture and as such were recorded in income from unconsolidated joint ventures.

The following table summarizes the Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint ventures (with the number of Properties shown parenthetically for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively):

							Investment as of				JV Income For Year Ended
		Number		Economic			December 31,		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
Investment	Location	of Sites		Interest(a)			2009		2008		2009		2008		2007
Meadows Investments	Various (2,2)		1,027		50	%	$	245	$	406	$	877	$	838	$	698
Lakeshore Investments	Florida (2,2)		342		65	%		133		110		277		890		276
Voyager	Arizona (1,1)		1,706		50	%(b)		8,732		8,953		550		470		313
Other Investments	Various (0,5)(c)		—		25	%		332		207		1,192		1,555		1,409
			3,075				$	9,442	$	9,676	$	2,896	$	3,753	$	2,696

(a)	The percentages shown approximate the Company’s economic interest as of December 31, 2009. The Company’s legal ownership interest may differ.
(b)	Voyager joint venture primarily consists of a 50% interest in Voyager RV Resort. A 25% interest in the utility plant servicing the Property is included in Other Investments.
(c)	In February 2009, the Company sold its 25% interest in two Diversified Portfolio joint ventures.

Note 7 — Inventory

The following table sets forth Inventory as of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands):

	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
New homes(1)	$	174	$	8,436
Used homes(2)		—		312
Other (3)		2,790		4,651
Total inventory (4)		2,964		13,399
Inventory reserve		—		(465	)
Inventory, net of reserves	$	2,964	$	12,934

(1)	Includes 18 and 261 new units for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(2)	Includes zero and 27 used units for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(3)	Other inventory primarily consists of merchandise inventory.
(4)	Includes zero and $0.3 million in discontinued operations as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, $6.7 million of new and used resort cottage inventory and related reserves were reclassified to fixed assets. During the year ended December 31, 2008, $57.8 million of manufactured home inventory, including reserves of approximately $0.8 million, was reclassified to Buildings

F-25

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7 — Inventory (continued)

and other depreciable property. The inventory reclassified is primarily rented to customers on an annual basis. The reclassification was made to reflect the current use of the resources as rental units.

Note 8 — Notes Receivable

As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $30.0 million and $31.8 million in notes receivable, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has approximately $10.4 million and $12.0 million, respectively, in Chattel Loans receivable, which yield interest at a per annum average rate of approximately 8.8%, have an average term and amortization of 3 to 20 years, require monthly principal and interest payments and are collateralized by homes at certain of the Properties. These notes are recorded net of allowances of approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximately $1.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively, was repaid and an additional $0.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively, was loaned to customers.

As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $17.4 million and $19.5 million, respectively, of Contracts Receivables, including allowances of approximately $1.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. These Contracts Receivables represent loans to customers who have purchasedright-to-use contracts. The Contracts Receivable yield interest at a per annum average rate of 16.5%, have a weighted average term remaining of approximately four years and require monthly payments of principal and interest. During the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximately $9.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively, was repaid and an additional $8.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively, was loaned to customers.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million respectively, in notes, which bear interest at a per annum rate of prime plus 0.5% and mature on December 31, 2011. The notes are collateralized with partnership interests in certain joint ventures.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had approximately $2.0 million and zero, respectively, in notes, which bear interest at a per annum rate of 11.0% and matures on July 6, 2010. The note is collateralized by first priority mortgages on four resort properties.

Note 9 — Long-Term Borrowings

Secured Debt

As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had outstanding mortgage indebtedness on Properties held for long term of approximately $1,542.5 million and $1,555 million, respectively, and approximately $4 million and $14 million of mortgage indebtedness as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, on Properties held for sale. The weighted average interest rate on this mortgage indebtedness for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was approximately 6.1% per annum and 5.9% per annum, respectively. The debt bears interest at rates of 5.0% to 10.0% per annum and matures on various dates ranging from 2010 to 2019. Included in our December 31, 2008 debt balance are three capital leases with balances of approximately $6.7 million with imputed interest rates of 13.1% per annum. The outstanding balances on these capital leases were paid off on July 1, 2009. The debt encumbered a total of 140 and 151 of the Company’s Properties as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and the carrying value of such Properties was approximately $1,680 million and $1,694 million, respectively, as of such dates.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has outstanding debt secured by certain manufactured homes of $1.5 million and $0 million, respectively. This financing provided by the manufactured home dealer requires monthly payments, bears interest at 8.5% and matures on the earlier of: 1) the date the home is sold, or 2) November 20, 2016.

F-26

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9 — Long-Term Borrowings (continued)

Financing, Refinancing and Early Debt Retirement

2009 activity

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company closed on approximately $107.5 million of new financing, on six manufactured home properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 6.32%. We used the proceeds from the financing to pay-off approximately $106.7 million on 20 Properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 7.36%. During December 2009, we borrowed approximately $1.5 million which is secured by individual manufactured homes.

On February 13, 2009, in connection with the acquisition of the remaining 75% interests in the Diversified Portfolio joint venture, we assumed mortgages of approximately $12.9 million with a value of approximately $11.9 million.

On December 17, 2009, the Company paid off the $2 million unsecured note payable to Privileged Access.

2008 activity

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company closed on approximately $231.0 million of new financing, on 15 manufactured home properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 6.01%. We used the proceeds from the financing to pay-off approximately $245.8 million of mortgage debt on 28 manufactured home properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.54%. The proceeds were also used to pay down amounts outstanding on our lines of credit.

Unsecured Loans

We have two unsecured Lines of Credit (“LOC”) of $350 million and $20 million that bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a maximum of 1.20% per annum, have a 0.15% facility fee, mature on June 30, 2010, and have a one-year extension option. The weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 for our unsecured debt was approximately 1.7% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we borrowed $50.9 million and paid down $143.9 million on the lines of credit for a net pay-down of $93.0 million. As of December 31, 2009, there were no amounts outstanding on the line of credit.

Other Loans

Aggregate payments of principal on long-term borrowings for each of the next six years and thereafter are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year	Amount
2010	$	203,663
2011		75,719
2012		21,806
2013		121,685
2014		200,829
2015		533,392
Thereafter		391,598
Net unamortized premiums		(791	)
Total	$	1,547,901

F-27

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9 — Long-Term Borrowings (continued)

Note 10 — Deferred Revenue-sale ofright-to-use contracts and Deferred Commission Expense

The sales ofright-to-use contracts are recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 605. The Company will recognize the upfront non-refundable payments over the estimated customer life which, based on historical attrition rates, the Company has estimated to be between one to 31 years. The commissions paid on the sale ofright-to-use contracts will be deferred and amortized over the same period as the related sales revenue.

Components of the change in deferred revenue-sale ofright-to-use contracts and deferred commission expense are as follows (amounts in thousands):

	2009			2008
Deferred revenue — sale ofright-to-use contracts, as of January 1,	$	10,611		$	—
Deferral of newright-to-use contracts		21,526			10,951
Deferred revenue recognized		(2,644	)		(340	)
Net increase in deferred revenue		18,882			10,611
Deferred revenue — sale ofright-to-use contracts, as of December 31,	$	29,493		$	10,611
Deferred commission expense, as of January 1,	$	3,644		$	—
Costs deferred		6,550			3,756
Amortization of deferred costs		(821	)		(112	)
Net increase in deferred commission expense		5,729			3,644
Deferred commission expense, December 31,	$	9,373		$	3,644

Note 11 — Lease Agreements

The leases entered into between the customer and the Company for the rental of a site are generallymonth-to-month or for a period of one to ten years, renewable upon the consent of the parties or, in some instances, as provided by statute. Non-cancelable long-term leases are in effect at certain sites within approximately 31 of the Properties. Rental rate increases at these Properties are primarily a function of increases in the Consumer Price Index, taking into consideration certain conditions. Additionally, periodic market rate adjustments are made as deemed appropriate. Future minimum rents are scheduled to be received under non-cancelable tenant leases at December 31, 2009 as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year	Amount
2010	$	68,068
2011		70,232
2012		49,950
2013		26,867
2014		16,363
Thereafter		36,744
Total	$	268,224

Note 12 — Ground Leases

The Company leases land under non-cancelable operating leases at certain of the Properties expiring in various years from 2013 to 2054, with terms which require twelve equal payments per year plus additional rents calculated as a percentage of gross revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2009, ground lease rent was approximately $1.9 million and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, ground lease rent was

F-28

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12 — Ground Leases (continued)

approximately $1.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Minimum future rental payments under the ground leases as of December 31, 2009 as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year	Amount
2010	$	1,917
2011		1,910
2012		1,917
2013		1,914
2014		1,915
Thereafter		18,660
Total	$	28,233

Note 13 — Transactions with Related Parties

Privileged Access

On August 14, 2008, the Company closed on the PA Transaction by acquiring substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Privileged Access for an unsecured note payable of $2.0 million which was paid off during the year ended December 31, 2009. Prior to the purchase, Privileged Access had a12-year lease with the Company for 82 Properties that terminated upon closing. At closing, approximately $4.8 million of Privileged Access cash was deposited into an escrow account for liabilities that Privileged Access has retained. The balance in the escrow account as of December 31, 2009 was approximately $1.9 million.

Mr. McAdams, the Company’s President effective January 1, 2008, owns 100% of Privileged Access. The Company has entered into an employment agreement effective as of January 1, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”) with Mr. McAdams which provides for an initial term of three years, but such Employment Agreement can be terminated at any time. The Employment Agreement provides for a minimum annual base salary of $0.3 million, with the option to receive an annual bonus in an amount up to three times his base salary. Mr. McAdams is also subject to a non-compete clause and to mitigate potential conflicts of interest shall have no authority, on behalf of the Company and its affiliates, to enter into any agreement with any entity controlling, controlled by or affiliated with Privileged Access. Prior to forming Privileged Access, Mr. McAdams was a member of our Board of Directors from January 2004 to October 2005. Simultaneous with his appointment as president of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., Mr. McAdams resigned as Privileged Access’s Chairman, President and CEO. However, he was on the board of PATT Holding Company, LLC (“PATT”), until the entity was dissolved in 2008.

Mr. Heneghan, the Company’s CEO, was a member of the board of PATT, pursuant to the Company’s rights under its resort Property leases with Privileged Access to represent the Company’s interests from April 14, 2006 to August 13, 2008. Mr. Heneghan did not receive compensation in his capacity as a member of such board.

In connection with the PA Transaction, the Company hired most of the property employees and certain property management and corporate employees of Privileged Access. Subsequent to the PA Transaction, the Company reimbursed Privileged Access for services provided in 2008 by Privileged Access employees retained by Privileged Access, which were necessary for the transition of the former Privileged Access operations to the Company.

Privileged Access had the following substantial business relationships with the Company, which were all terminated with the closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008. As of both December 31, 2009 and

F-29

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 13 — Transactions with Related Parties (continued)

December 31, 2008, there were no payments owed to the Company or by the Company with respect to the relationships described below.

•  Prior to August 14, 2008, the Company was leasing approximately 24,300 sites at 82 resort Properties (which includes 60 Properties operated by a subsidiary of Privileged Access known as the “TT Portfolio”) to Privileged Access or its subsidiaries. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 we recognized zero, $15.8 million, and $20.5 million, respectively, in rent from these leasing arrangements. The lease income is included in Income from other investments, net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company reimbursed zero and approximately $2.7 million, respectively, to Privileged Access for capital improvements.

•  Effective January 1, 2008, the leases for these Properties provided for the following significant terms: a) annual fixed rent of approximately $25.5 million, b) annual rent increases at the higher of Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or a renegotiated amount based upon the fair market value of the Properties, c) expiration date of January 15, 2020, and d) two5-year extension terms at the option of Privileged Access. The January 1, 2008 lease for the TT Portfolio also included provisions where the Company paid Privileged Access $1 million for entering into the amended lease. The $1 million payment was being amortized on a pro-rata basis over the remaining term of the lease as an offset to the annual lease payments and the remaining balance at August 14, 2008 of $0.9 million was expensed and is included in Income from other investments, net during the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Company had subordinated its lease payment for the TT Portfolio to a bank that loaned Privileged Access $5 million. The Company acquired this loan as part of the PA Transaction and paid off the loan during the year ended December 31, 2008.

•  From June 12, 2006 through July 14, 2008, Privileged Access had leased 130 cottage sites at Tropical Palms, a resort Property located near Orlando, Florida. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we earned no rent and approximately $0.8 million, respectively, in rent from this leasing arrangement. The lease income is included in the Resort base rental income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Tropical Palms lease expired on July 15, 2008, and the entire property was leased to a new independent operator for 12 years.

•  On April 14, 2006, the Company loaned Privileged Access approximately $12.3 million at a per annum interest rate of prime plus 1.5%, maturing in one year and secured by Thousand Trails membership sales contract receivables. The loan was fully paid off during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.

•  The Company previously leased 40 to 160 sites at three resort Properties in Florida, to a subsidiary of Privileged Access from October 1, 2007 until August 14, 2008. The sites varied during each month of the lease term due to the seasonality of the resort business in Florida. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized less than $0.2 million in rent from this leasing arrangement. The lease income is included in the Resort base rental income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

•  The Company previously leased 40 to 160 sites at Lake Magic, a resort Property in Clermont, Florida, to a subsidiary of Privileged Access from December 15, 2006 until September 30, 2007. The sites varied during each month of the lease term due to the seasonality of the resort business in Florida. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we recognized zero and approximately $0.2 million, respectively, in rent from this leasing arrangement. The lease income is included in the Resort base rental income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

•  The Company had an option to purchase the subsidiaries of Privileged Access, including TT, beginning on April 14, 2009, at the then fair market value, subject to the satisfaction of a number of significant

F-30

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 13 — Transactions with Related Parties (continued)

contingencies (“ELS Option”). The ELS Option terminated with the closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008. The Company had consented to a fixed price option where the Chairman of PATT could acquire the subsidiaries of Privileged Access anytime before December 31, 2011. The fixed price option also terminated on August 14, 2008.

•  Privileged Access and the Company previously agreed to certain arrangements in which we utilized each other’s services. Privileged Access assisted the Company with functions such as: call center management, property management, information technology, legal, sales and marketing. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company incurred no expense and approximately $0.6 million, respectively, for the use of Privileged Access employees. The Company received approximately $0.1 million from Privileged Access for Privileged Access use of certain Company information technology resources during the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company and Privileged Access engaged a third party to evaluate the fair market value of such employee services.

In addition to the arrangements described above, the Company had the following smaller arrangements with Privileged Access. In each arrangement, the amount of income or expense, as applicable, recognized by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 is zero and were less than $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. There are no amounts due under these arrangements as of December 31, 2009 or December 31, 2008.

•  Since November 1, 2006, the Company leased 41 to 44 sites at 22 resort Properties to Privileged Access (the “Park Pass Lease”). The Park Pass Lease terminated with the closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008.

•  The Company and Privileged Access entered into a Site Exchange Agreement beginning September 1, 2007 and ending May 31, 2008. Under the Site Exchange Agreement, the Company allowed Privileged Access to use 20 sites at an Arizona resort Property known as Countryside. In return, Privileged Access allowed the Company to use 20 sites at an Arizona resort Property known as Verde Valley Resort (a property in the TT Portfolio).

•  The Company and Privileged Access entered into a Site Exchange Agreement for a one-year period beginning June 1, 2008 and ending May 31, 2009. Under the Site Exchange Agreement, the Company allowed Privileged Access to use 90 sites at six resort Properties. In return, Privileged Access allowed the Company to use 90 sites at six resort Properties leased to Privileged Access. The Site Exchange Agreement was terminated with the closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008.

•  On September 15, 2006, the Company and Privileged Access entered into a Park Model Sales Agreement related to a Texas resort Property in the TT Portfolio known as Lake Conroe. Under the Park Model Sales Agreement, Privileged Access was allowed to sell up to 26 park models at Lake Conroe. Privileged Access was obligated to pay the Company 90% of the site rent collected from the park model buyer. All 26 homes have been sold as of December 31, 2007. The Park Model Sales Agreement terminated with the closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008.

•  The Company advertises in Trailblazer magazine that was published by a subsidiary of Privileged Access prior to August 14, 2008. Trailblazer is an award-winning recreational lifestyle magazine for active campers, which is read by more than 65,000 paid subscribers. Beginning on August 14, 2008, the Company began publishing Trailblazer in accordance with the terms of the PA Transaction.

•  On July 1, 2008, the Company and Privileged Access entered into an agreement, where Privileged Access sold the Company’s used resort cottages at certain Properties leased to Privileged Access. The Company paid Privileged Access a commission for selling the inventory and the agreement was terminated on August 14, 2008.

F-31

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 13 — Transactions with Related Parties (continued)

•  On April 1, 2008, the Company entered into a lease for a corporate apartment located in Chicago, Illinois for use by Mr. McAdams and other employees of the Company and Privileged Access. The Company paid monthly rent payments, plus utilities and housekeeping expenses and Mr. McAdams reimbursed the Company for a portion of the rent. Prior to August 14, 2008, Privileged Access reimbursed the Company for a portion of the rent and utilities and housekeeping expenses. Such lease terminated on December 31, 2008.

Corporate headquarters

The Company leases office space from Two North Riverside Plaza Joint Venture Limited Partnership, an entity affiliated with Mr. Zell, the Company’s Chairman of the Board. Payments made in accordance with the lease agreement to this entity amounted to approximately $1.0 million, $0.6 million, and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximately $60,000 and $62,000, respectively, were accrued with respect to this office lease.

Other

In January 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with the son of Mr. Howard Walker, to provide assistance with the Company’s internet web marketing strategy. Mr. Walker is Vice-Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. The consulting agreement was for a term of six months at a total cost of no more than $48,000 and expired on June 30, 2009.

Note 14 — Stock Option Plan and Stock Grants

The Company’s Stock Option and Stock Award Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted in December 1992 and amended and restated from time to time, most recently effective March 23, 2001. Pursuant to the Plan, officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company are offered the opportunity (i) to acquire shares of common stock through the grant of stock options (“Options”), including non-qualified stock options and, for key employees, incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code; and (ii) to be awarded shares of common stock (“Restricted Stock Grants”), subject to conditions and restrictions determined by the Compensation, Nominating, and Corporate Governance Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee will determine the vesting schedule, if any, of each Option and the term, which term shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant. As to the Options that have been granted through December 31, 2009 to officers, employees and consultants, generally, one-third are exercisable one year after the initial grant, one-third are exercisable two years following the date such Options were granted and the remaining one-third are exercisable three years following the date such Options were granted. Stock Options are awarded at the New York Stock Exchange closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. A maximum of 6,000,000 shares of common stock are available for grant under the Plan and no more than 250,000 shares may be subject to grants to any one individual in any calendar year.

Grants under the Plan are made by the Compensation Committee, which determines the individuals eligible to receive awards, the types of awards, and the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any award. In addition, the terms of two specific types of awards are contemplated under the Plan:

•  The first type of award is a grant of Options or Restricted Stock Grants of common stock made to each member of the Board at the meeting held immediately after each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders. Generally, if the director elects to receive Options, the grant will cover 10,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. If the director elects to receive a Restricted Stock Grant of common stock, he or she will receive an award of 2,000 shares of

F-32

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14 — Stock Option Plan and Stock Grants (continued)

common stock. Exercisability or vesting with respect to either type of award will be one-third of the award after six months, two-thirds of the award after one year, and the full award after two years.

•  The second type of award is a grant of common stock in lieu of 50% of their bonus otherwise payable to individuals with a title of Vice President or above. A recipient can request that the Compensation Committee pay a greater or lesser portion of the bonus in shares of common stock.

The Company adopted FASB ASC 718 on July 1, 2005, which replaced SFAS 123. Since the Company had chosen to use the modified-prospective method for recognizing stock-based compensation and uses the Black-Scholes-Merton Model for valuing the options, the result of the adoption had no material impact of the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

Restricted Stock Grants

On February 1, 2010, the Company awarded Restricted Stock Grants for 74,665 shares of common stock to certain members of senior management of the Company. These Restricted Stock Grants vest on December 31, 2010. The fair market value of these Restricted Stock Grants was approximately $3.7 million as of the date of grant and is recorded as a compensation expense and paid in capital over the vesting period.

In 2008, the Company awarded Restricted Stock Grants for 30,000 shares of common stock to Joe McAdams in accordance with the terms of his Employment Agreement. These Restricted Stock Grants vest over two years with one-third vesting on January 4, 2008, one-third vesting on January 1, 2009 and one-third vesting on January 1, 2010. The fair market value of these Restricted Stock Grants was approximately $1.3 million as of the date of grant and is recorded as compensation expense and paid in capital over the two-year vesting period.

In 2006, the Company awarded Restricted Stock Grants for 147,500 shares of common stock to certain members of senior management of the Company. These Restricted Stock Grants vest over three years. The fair market value of these Restricted Stock Grants was approximately $8.1 million as of the date of grant and is recorded as compensation expense and paid in capital over the three-year vesting period.

In 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company awarded Restricted Stock Grants for 27,000, 20,000, and 18,000 shares of common stock, respectively, to directors with a fair market value of approximately $1,025,000, $929,000, and $984,000 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $4.1 million, $4.6 million and $3.7 million related to Restricted Stock Grants in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Compensation expense to be recognized subsequent to December 31, 2009 for Restricted Stock Grants not yet vested was approximately $0.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average term of 0.7 years.

Stock Options

The fair value of each grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. The following table includes the assumptions that were made and the estimated fair values:

Assumption	2009			2008			2007
Dividend yield		2.5	%		5.5	%		5.8	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.8	%		3.7	%		4.7	%
Expected life		7 years			4 years			4 years
Expected volatility		21.0	%		16.9	%		15.6	%
Estimated Fair Value of Options Granted	$	410,972		$	516,904		$	705,554

F-33

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14 — Stock Option Plan and Stock Grants (continued)

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity, and related information for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 follows:

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average		Outstanding
	Shares Subject			Exercise Price		Contractual
	to Options			Per Share		Life (in years)
Balance at December 31, 2006		968,593		$	24.85
Options granted		165,000			54.86
Options exercised		(143,854	)		57.86
Options canceled		(1,200	)		17.60
Balance at December 31, 2007		988,539			30.88		5.1
Options granted		135,000			44.36
Options exercised		(169,367	)		45.24
Options canceled		(400	)		16.38		5.4
Balance at December 31, 2008		953,772			34.92
Options granted		102,800			37.70
Options exercised		(213,721	)		43.34
Options canceled		(1,000	)		15.69
Balance at December 31, 2009		841,851			39.94		6.0
Exercisable at December 31, 2009		728,315			39.88		5.6

As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, 970,442 shares, 1,099,242 shares and 1,283,842 shares remained available for grant, respectively; of these 573,525 shares, 600,525 shares and 650,525 shares, respectively, remained available for Restricted Stock Grants.

Note 15 — Preferred Stock

The Company’s Board of Directors is authorized under the Company’s charter, without further stockholder approval, to issue, from time to time, in one or more series, 10,000,000 shares of $.01 par value preferred stock (the “Preferred Stock”), with specific rights, preferences and other attributes as the Board may determine, which may include preferences, powers and rights that are senior to the rights of holders of the Company’s common stock. However, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock may require stockholder approval pursuant to the rules and regulations of The New York Stock Exchange. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company issued no Preferred Stock.

Note 16 — Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan

On May 15, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) to provide a long-term cash bonus opportunity to certain members of the Company’s management and executive officers. Such Board approval was upon recommendation by the Company’s Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Committee”). On January 18, 2010, the Committee approved payments under the LTIP of approximately $2.8 million.

F-34

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 16 — Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (continued)

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President were not participants in the LTIP. The approved payments are expected to be paid in cash upon completion of the Company’s annual audit for the 2009 fiscal year, which is expected to be completed on or before March 1, 2010.

The Company accounted for the LTIP in accordance with FASB ASC 718. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had accrued compensation expense of approximately $2.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively, related to the LTIP, including approximately $1.1 million and $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Note 17 — Savings Plan

The Company has a qualified retirement plan, with a salary deferral feature designed to qualify under Section 401 of the Code (the “401(k) Plan”), to cover its employees and those of its Subsidiaries, if any. The 401(k) Plan permits eligible employees of the Company and those of any Subsidiary to defer up to 60% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis subject to certain maximum amounts. In addition, the Company will match 100% of the participant’s contribution up to the first 3% and then 50% of the next 2% for a maximum potential match of 4%.

In addition, amounts contributed by the Company will vest, on a prorated basis, according to the participant’s vesting schedule. After five years of employment with the Company, the participants will be 100% vested for all amounts contributed by the Company. Additionally, a discretionary profit sharing component of the 401(k) Plan provides for a contribution to be made annually for each participant in an amount, if any, as determined by the Company. All employee contributions are 100% vested. The Company’s contribution to the 401(k) Plan was $840,000, $465,000, and $399,000, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies

California Rent Control Litigation

As part of the Company’s effort to realize the value of its Properties subject to rent control, the Company has initiated lawsuits against several municipalities in California. The Company’s goal is to achieve a level of regulatory fairness in California’s rent control jurisdictions, and in particular those jurisdictions that prohibit increasing rents to market upon turnover. Regulations in California allow tenants to sell their homes for a premium representing the value of the future discounted rent-controlled rents. In the Company’s view, such regulation results in a transfer of the value of the Company’s stockholders’ land, which would otherwise be reflected in market rents, to tenants upon the sales of their homes in the form of an inflated purchase price that cannot be attributed to the value of the home being sold. As a result, in the Company’s view, the Company loses the value of its asset and the selling tenant leaves the Property with a windfall premium. The Company has discovered through the litigation process that certain municipalities considered condemning the Company’s Properties at values well below the value of the underlying land. In the Company’s view, a failure to articulate market rents for sites governed by restrictive rent control would put the Company at risk for condemnation or eminent domain proceedings based on artificially reduced rents. Such a physical taking, should it occur, could represent substantial lost value to stockholders. The Company is cognizant of the need for affordable housing in the jurisdictions, but asserts that restrictive rent regulation does not promote this purpose because the benefits of such regulation are fully capitalized into the prices of the homes sold. The Company estimates that the annual rent subsidy to tenants in these jurisdictions may be in excess of $15 million. In a more well balanced regulatory environment, the Company would receive market rents that would eliminate the subsidy and homes would trade at or near their intrinsic value.

F-35

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

In connection with such efforts, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the City of Santa Cruz, California and that, pursuant to the settlement agreement, the City amended its rent control ordinance to exempt the Company’s Property from rent control as long as the Company offers a long term lease which gives the Company the ability to increase rents to market upon turnover and bases annual rent increases on the CPI. The settlement agreement benefits the Company’s stockholders by allowing them to receive the value of their investment in this Property through vacancy decontrol while preserving annual CPI based rent increases in this age-restricted Property.

The Company has filed two lawsuits in federal court against the City of San Rafael, challenging its rent control ordinance on constitutional grounds. The Company believes that one of those lawsuits was settled by the City agreeing to amend the ordinance to permit adjustments to market rent upon turnover. The City subsequently rejected the settlement agreement. The Court initially found the settlement agreement was binding on the City, but then reconsidered and determined to submit the claim of breach of the settlement agreement to a jury. In October 2002, a jury found no breach of the settlement agreement.

Based on the United States Supreme Court’s 2005 property rights rulings, in 2006 the Court hearing the San Rafael cases allowed the Company to assert alternative takings theories challenging the City’s ordinance as violating the takings clause and substantive due process. The Company’s constitutional claims against the City were tried in a bench trial during April 2007. On January 29, 2008, the Court issued its Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Order Thereon (the “Order”). The Company filed the Order onForm 8-K on January 31, 2008.

On April 17, 2009, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its Order for Entry of Judgment (“April 2009 Order”), and its “Order” relating to the parties’ requests for attorneys’ fees (the “Fee Order”). The Company filed the April 2009 Order and the Fee Order onForm 8-K on April 20, 2009. In the April 2009 Order, the Court stated that the judgment to be entered will gradually phase out the City’s site rent regulation scheme that the Court has found unconstitutional. Existing residents of the Company’s Property in San Rafael will be able to continue to pay site rent as if the Ordinance were to remain in effect for a period of ten years. Enforcement of the Ordinance will be immediately enjoined with respect to new residents of the Property and expire entirely ten years from the date of judgment. When a current site lessee at the Property transfers his leasehold to a new resident upon the sale of the accompanying mobilehome, the Ordinance shall be enjoined as to the next resident and any future resident. The Ordinance shall be enjoined as to all residents ten years from the entry of judgment.

The Fee Order awarded certain amounts of attorneys’ fees to the Company with respect to its constitutional claims, certain amounts to the City with respect to the Company’s contract claims, the net effect of which was that the City must pay the Company approximately $1.8 million for attorneys’ fees. On June 10, 2009, the Court entered an order on fees and costs which, in addition to the net attorneys’ fees of approximately $1.8 million the Court previously ordered the City to pay the Company, orders the City to pay to the Company net costs of approximately $0.3 million. On June 30, 2009, the Court entered final judgment as anticipated by the April 2009 Order. The City filed a notice of appeal, and posted a bond of approximately $2.1 million securing a stay pending appeal of the enforcement of the order awarding attorneys’ fees and costs to the Company. The residents’ association, which intervened in the case, filed a motion in the Court of Appeals, which the City joined, seeking a stay of the injunctions, which the Court of Appeals denied. The Company filed a notice of cross-appeal. On February 2, 2010, the City and the Association filed their opening brief on appeal.

The Company’s efforts to achieve a balanced regulatory environment incentivize tenant groups to file lawsuits against the Company seeking large damage awards. The homeowners association at Contempo Marin (“CMHOA”), a 396-site Property in San Rafael, California, sued the Company in December 2000 over a prior settlement agreement on a capital expenditure pass-through after the Company sued the City of San Rafael in

F-36

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

October 2000 alleging its rent control ordinance is unconstitutional. In the Contempo Marin case, the CMHOA prevailed on a motion for summary judgment on an issue that permits the Company to collect only $3.72 out of a monthly pass-through amount of $7.50 that the Company believed had been agreed to by the CMHOA in a settlement agreement. The CMHOA continued to seek damages from the Company in this matter. The Company reached a settlement with the CMHOA in this matter which allows the Company to recover $3.72 of the requested monthly pass-through and does not provide for the payment of any damages to the CMHOA. On January 12, 2007, the Court granted CMHOA’s motion for attorneys’ fees in the amount of approximately $0.3 million and denied the Company’s motion for attorneys’ fees. The Company appealed both decisions, which were affirmed. Accordingly, the Company paid the CMHOA’s attorneys’ fees as previously ordered by the trial court and, pursuant to an agreement of the parties, incurred on appeal. The Company believes that such lawsuits will be a consequence of the Company’s efforts to change rent control since tenant groups actively desire to preserve the premium value of their homes in addition to the discounted rents provided by rent control. The Company has determined that its efforts to rebalance the regulatory environment despite the risk of litigation from tenant groups are necessary not only because of the $15 million annual subsidy to tenants, but also because of the condemnation risk.

In June 2003, the Company won a judgment against the City of Santee in California Superior Court (case no. 777094). The effect of the judgment was to invalidate, on state law grounds, two (2) rent control ordinances the City of Santee had enforced against the Company and other property owners. However, the Court allowed the City to continue to enforce a rent control ordinance that predated the two invalid ordinances (the “prior ordinance”). As a result of the judgment the Company was entitled to collect a one-time rent increase based upon the difference in annual adjustments between the invalid ordinance(s) and the prior ordinance and to adjust its base rents to reflect what the Company could have charged had the prior ordinance been continually in effect. The City of Santee appealed the judgment. The Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court refused to stay enforcement of these rent adjustments pending appeal. After the City was unable to obtain a stay, the City and the tenant association each sued the Company in separate actions alleging the rent adjustments pursuant to the judgment violate the prior ordinance (Case Nos. GIE 020887 and GIE 020524). They seek to rescind the rent adjustments, refunds of amounts paid, and penalties and damages in these separate actions. On January 25, 2005, the California Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in part and affirmed it in part with a remand. The Court of Appeal affirmed that one ordinance was unlawfully adopted and therefore void and that the second ordinance contained unconstitutional provisions. However, the Court ruled the City had the authority to cure the issues with the first ordinance retroactively and that the City could sever the unconstitutional provisions in the second ordinance. On remand, the trial court was directed to decide the issue of damages to the Company from these ordinances, which the Company believes is consistent not only with the Company receiving the economic benefit of invalidating one of the ordinances, but also consistent with the Company’s position that it is entitled to market rent and not merely a higher amount of regulated rent. In the remand action, the trial court granted a motion for restitution filed by the City in Case No. GIE 020524. The Company filed a notice of appeal on July 2, 2008. In order to avoid further trial and the related expenses, the Company agreed to a stipulated judgment, which requires the Company to put into escrow after entry of the judgment, pending appeal, funds sufficient to pay the judgment with prejudgment interest while preserving the Company’s appellate rights. Subsequently, the trial court also awarded the City some but not all of the prejudgment interest it sought. The stipulated judgment was entered on November 5, 2008, and the Company deposited into the escrow the amounts required by the judgment and continues to deposit monthly disputed amounts until the disputes are resolved on appeal. The appeal has been fully briefed and is set for oral argument on March 11, 2010. The tenant association continued to seek damages, penalties and fees in their separate action based on the same claims made on the tenants’ behalf by the City in the City’s case. The Company moved for judgment on the pleadings in the tenant association’s case on the ground that the tenant association’s case is moot in light of the stipulated judgment in the City’s case. On November 6, 2008, the Court granted the Company’s motion for judgment on the

F-37

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

pleadings without leave to amend. The tenant association sought reconsideration of that ruling, which was denied. The tenant association filed a notice of appeal, has filed its Opening Brief, and the Company has filed its Response Brief.

In addition, the Company has sued the City of Santee in federal court alleging all three of the ordinances are unconstitutional under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Thus, it is the Company’s position that the ordinances are subject to invalidation as a matter of law in the federal court action. Separately, the Federal District Court granted the City’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the Company’s federal court lawsuit. This decision was based not on the merits, but on procedural grounds, including that the Company’s claims were moot given its success in the state court case. The Company appealed the decision, and on May 3, 2007 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision on procedural grounds. The Company intends to continue to pursue an adjudication of its rights on the merits in Federal Court through claims that are not subject to such procedural defenses.

The Company believes that the severity of the economic impact on its Properties caused by rent control will enable it to continue to challenge the rent regulations under the Fifth Amendment and the due process clause.

Colony Park

On December 1, 2006, a group of tenants at the Company’s Colony Park Property in Ceres, California filed a complaint in the California Superior Court for Stanislaus County alleging that the Company has failed to properly maintain the Property and has improperly reduced the services provided to the tenants, among other allegations. The Company has answered the complaint by denying all material allegations and filed a counterclaim for declaratory relief and damages. The case will proceed in Superior Court because the Company’s motion to compel arbitration was denied and the denial was upheld on appeal. Discovery has commenced. The Company filed a motion for summary adjudication of various of the plaintiffs’ claims and allegations, which was denied. The Court has set a trial date for July 20, 2010. The Company believes that the allegations in the first amended complaint are without merit, and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

California’s Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) issued a Notice of Violation dated August 21, 2006 regarding the sewer system at Colony Park. The notice ordered the Company to replace the Property’s sewer system or show justification from a third party explaining why the sewer system does not need to be replaced. The Company has provided such third party report to HCD and believes that the sewer system does not need to be replaced. Based upon information provided by the Company to HCD to date, HCD has indicated that it agrees that the entire system does not need to be replaced.

California Hawaiian

On April 30, 2009, a group of tenants at the Company’s California Hawaiian Property in San Jose, California filed a complaint in the California Superior Court for Santa Clara County alleging that the Company has failed to properly maintain the Property and has improperly reduced the services provided to the tenants, among other allegations. The Company moved to compel arbitration and stay the proceedings, to dismiss the case, and to strike portions of the complaint. By order dated October 8, 2009, the Court granted the Company’s motion to compel arbitration and stayed the court proceedings pending the outcome of the arbitration. The plaintiffs filed with the Court of Appeal a petition for writ seeking to overturn the trial court’s arbitration and stay orders. The Company submitted a preliminary opposition and the Court of Appeal has issued an order allowing further written submissions and requests for oral argument. The Company believes that the allegations in the complaint are without merit, and intends to vigorously defend the litigation.

F-38

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

Hurricane Claim Litigation

On June 22, 2007 the Company filed suit, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois (Case No. 07CH16548), against its insurance carriers, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Essex Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, and Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, regarding a coverage dispute arising from losses suffered by the Company as a result of hurricanes that occurred in Florida in 2004 and 2005. The Company also brought claims against Aon Risk Services, Inc. of Illinois, the Company’s former insurance broker, regarding the procurement of appropriate insurance coverage for the Company. The Company is seeking declaratory relief establishing the coverage obligations of its carriers, as well as a judgment for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair settlement practices and, as to Aon, for failure to provide ordinary care in the selling and procuring of insurance. The claims involved in this action exceed $11 million.

In response to motions to dismiss, the trial court dismissed: (1) the requests for declaratory relief as being duplicative of the claims for breach of contract and (2) certain of the breach of contract claims as being not ripe until the limits of underlying insurance policies have been exhausted. On or about January 28, 2008, the Company filed its Second Amended Complaint. Aon filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in its entirety as against Aon, and the insurers moved to dismiss portions of the Second Amended Complaint as against them. The insurers’ motion was denied and they have now answered the Second Amended Complaint. Aon’s motion was granted, with leave granted to the Company to file an amended pleading containing greater factual specificity. The Company did so by adding to the Second Amended Complaint a new Count VII against Aon, which the Company filed on August 15, 2008. Aon then answered the new Count VII in part and moved to strike certain of its allegations. The Court left Count VII undisturbed, except for ruling that the Company’s alternative claim that Aon was negligent in carrying out its duty to give notice to certain of the insurance carriers on the Company’s behalf should be re-pleaded in the form of a breach of contract theory. On February 2, 2009, the Company filed such a claim in the form of a new Count VIII against Aon. Aon has answered Count VIII. Discovery is proceeding.

Since filing the lawsuit, the Company has received additional payments from Essex Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, and Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, of approximately $2.6 million. In January 2008 the Company entered a settlement with Hartford Fire Insurance Company pursuant to which Hartford paid the Company the remaining disputed limits of Hartford’s insurance policy, in the amount of approximately $0.5 million, and the Company dismissed and released Hartford from additional claims for interest and bad faith claims handling.

California and Washington Wage Claim Class Actions

On October 16, 2008, the Company was served with a class action lawsuit in California state court filed by a single named plaintiff. The suit alleges that, at the time of the PA Transaction, the Company and other named defendants willfully failed to pay former California employees of Privileged Access and its affiliates (“PA”) who became employees of the Company all of the wages they earned during their employment with PA, including accrued vacation time. The suit also alleges that the Company improperly “stripped” those employees of their seniority. The suit asserts claims for alleged violation of the California Labor Code; alleged violation of the California Business & Professions Code and for alleged unfair business practices; alleged breach of contract; alleged breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing; and for alleged unjust enrichment. The complaint seeks, among other relief, compensatory and statutory damages; restitution; pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; attorney’s fees, expenses and costs; penalties; and exemplary and punitive damages. The complaint does not specify a dollar amount sought. On December 18, 2008, the Company filed a demurrer seeking dismissal of the complaint in its entirety without leave to amend. On May 14, 2009, the Court granted the Company’s demurrer and dismissed the complaint, in part without leave to amend and in part with leave to amend. On June 2, 2009, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On July 6, 2009, the Company filed a demurrer seeking dismissal of the amended complaint in its entirety without leave to amend. On October 20, 2009, the Court granted the

F-39

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

Company’s demurrer and dismissed the amended complaint, in part without leave to amend and in part with leave to amend. On November 9, 2009, the plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. On December 11, 2009, the Company filed a demurrer seeking dismissal of the third amended complaint in its entirety without leave to amend. On February 23, 2010, the court dismissed without leave to amend the claim for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealings, and otherwise denied the Company’s demurrer. The Company will vigorously defend the lawsuit.

On December 16, 2008, the Company was served with a class action lawsuit in Washington state court filed by a single named plaintiff, represented by the same counsel as the plaintiff in the California class action. The complaint asserts on behalf of a putative class of Washington employees of PA who became employees of the Company substantially similar allegations as are alleged in the California class action. The Company moved to dismiss the complaint. On April 3, 2009, the court dismissed: (1) the first cause of action, which alleged a claim under the Washington Labor Code for failure to pay accrued vacation time; (2) the second cause of action, which alleged a claim under the Washington Labor Code for unpaid wages on termination; (3) the third cause of action, which alleged a claim under the Washington Labor Code for payment of wages less than entitled; and (4) the fourth cause of action, which alleged a claim under the Washington Consumer Protection Act. The court did not dismiss the fifth cause of action for breach of contract, the sixth cause of action of the breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing; and the seventh cause of action for unjust enrichment. On May 22, 2009, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment on the causes of action not previously dismissed, which was denied. With leave of court, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, the material allegations of which the Company denied in an answer filed on September 11, 2009. The Company will vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Cascade

On December 10, 2008, the King County Hospital District No. 4 (the “Hospital District”) filed suit against the Company seeking a declaratory judgment that it had properly rescinded an agreement to acquire the Company’s Thousand Trails — Cascade Property (“Cascade”) located 20 miles east of Seattle, Washington. The agreement was entered into after the Hospital District had passed a resolution authorizing the condemnation of Cascade. Under the agreement, in lieu of a formal condemnation proceeding, the Company agreed to accept from the Hospital District $12.5 million for the Property with an earnest money deposit of approximately $0.4 million. The Company has not included in income the earnest money deposit received. The closing of the transaction was originally scheduled in January 2008, and was extended to April 2009. The Company has filed an answer to the Hospital District’s suit and a counterclaim seeking recovery of the amounts owed under the agreement. On February 27, 2009, the Hospital District filed a summary judgment motion arguing that it was entitled to rescind the agreement because the Property is zoned residential and the Company did not provide the Hospital District a residential real estate disclosure form. On April 2, 2009, the Court denied the Hospital District’s summary judgment motion, ruling that a real property owner who is compelled to transfer land under the power of eminent domain is not legally required to provide a disclosure form. The Hospital District filed a motion for reconsideration of the summary judgment ruling. On April 22, 2009, the Court reaffirmed its ruling that a real property owner that is compelled to transfer land under eminent domain is not legally required to provide a disclosure form. On May 22, 2009, the Court denied the Hospital District’s motion for reconsideration in its entirety, reaffirmed its ruling that condemnation was the reason for the transaction between the Company and the Hospital District, and ruled that the Hospital District is not entitled to take discovery in an effort to establish otherwise. Discovery is proceeding. The Company will vigorously pursue its rights under the agreement. Due to the anticipated transfer of the Property, the Company closed Cascade in October 2007.

F-40

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

Brennan Beach

The Law Enforcement Division of the New York Department of Environmental Compliance (“DEC”) has investigated certain allegations relating to the operation of the onsite wastewater treatment plant and the use of adjacent wetlands at Brennan Beach, which is located in Pulaski, New York. The allegations included assertions of unlawful point source discharges, permit discharge exceedances, and placing material in a wetland buffer area without a permit. Representatives of the Company attended meetings with the DEC in November 2007, April 2008, May 2008 and June 2008, at which the alleged violations were discussed, and the Company has cooperated with the DEC investigation. No formal notices have been issued to the Company asserting specific violations, but the DEC has indicated that it believes the Company is responsible for certain of the alleged violations. As a result of discussions with the DEC, the Company has agreed to enter into a civil consent order pursuant to which the Company will pay a penalty and undertake an environmental benefit project at a total cost of approximately $0.2 million in connection with the alleged violations. Based on that agreement the DEC has prepared a proposed consent order on which the Company has submitted comments. The amounts expected to be paid under the consent order were accrued as property operating expenses during the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

Gulf View in Punta Gorda

In 2004, the Company acquired ownership of various property owning entities, including an entity owning a property called Gulf View, in Punta Gorda, Florida. Gulf View continues to be held in a special purpose entity. At the time of acquisition of the entity owning Gulf View, it was financed with a secured loan that was cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with a loan on another property whose ownership entity was not acquired. At the time of acquisition, the Operating Partnership guaranteed certain obligations relating to exceptions from the non-recourse nature of the loans. Because of certain penalties associated with repayment of these loans, the loans have not been restructured and the terms and conditions remain the same today. The approximate outstanding amount of the loan secured by Gulf View is $1.4 million and of the crossed loan secured by the other property is $5.5 million. The Company is not aware of any notice of default regarding either of the loans; however, should the owner of the cross-collateralized property default, the special purpose entity owning Gulf View and the Operating Partnership may be impacted to the extent of their obligations.

Creekside

We currently have one all-age property, called Creekside, in Wyoming, Michigan, held for disposition. On December 29, 2009, the Company sent to the loan servicer adeed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement executed by the Company (the “Proposed DIL Agreement”) regarding our nonrecourse mortgage loan of approximately $3.6 million secured by the Property. On January 25, 2010, the lender gave notice of default and declared payment of the entire loan balance to be immediately due and payable, and has demanded payment from the Company to the extent of any liability under personal recourse exceptions to the non-recourse provisions of the loan agreement without specifying whether or to what extent it claims any amounts are owed under such exceptions. The Company denies that any such amounts are owed or that there is any personal liability to which the lender has recourse.

On February 2, 2010, the lender filed a complaint in the Kent County, Michigan, Circuit Court (the “Complaint”) seeking appointment of a receiver for the Property. A receiver was appointed by agreed order on February 5, 2010. The Complaint also alleged, among other things, on information and belief that the borrower has misappropriated rents from the Property subsequent to its defaults under the loan agreement. The lender has also subsequently stated that payment of accrued and unpaid management fees to the Company’s affiliate that managed the Property may constitute an unauthorized transfer in violation of Michigan’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. The Company disputes and will vigorously defend against any allegation that there has been any misappropriation of rents, any unauthorized or improper transfers, or that there is any personal liability for any amounts claimed to be due and owing. By letter dated February 9, 2010, the lender acknowledged receipt of our Proposed DIL

F-41

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

Agreement but has not accepted it at this time, and instead indicated that a “Prenegotiation Agreement” in a form acceptable to the lender must first be entered by the parties, after which discussions may begin on possible alternatives to foreclosure.

Other

The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Such proceedings include, but are not limited to, notices, consent decrees, additional permit requirements and other similar enforcement actions by governmental agencies relating to the Company’s water and wastewater treatment plants and other waste treatment facilities. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, the Company’s operations are subject to audit by various taxing authorities. Management believes that all proceedings herein described or referred to, taken together, are not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company. In addition, to the extent any such proceedings or audits relate to newly acquired Properties, the Company considers any potential indemnification obligations of sellers in favor of the Company.

Note 19 — Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

The following is unaudited quarterly data for 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts):

	First		Second		Third		Fourth
	Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter
2009	3/31		6/30		9/30		12/31
Total revenues (a)	$	133,043	$	122,317	$	131,519	$	120,488
Income from continuing operations(a)	$	13,556	$	2,830	$	7,093	$	6,341
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (a)	$	88	$	74	$	4,038	$	(14	)
Net income available for Common Shares	$	13,644	$	2,904	$	11,131	$	6,327
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — Basic		24,945		25,163		29,993		30,145
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — Diluted		30,523		30,693		35,242		35,248
Net income per Common Share outstanding — Basic	$	0.55	$	0.12	$	0.37	$	0.21
Net income per Common Share outstanding — Diluted	$	0.54	$	0.11	$	0.37	$	0.21

F-42

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 19 — Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) — (Continued)

	First		Second		Third		Fourth
	Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter
2008	3/31		6/30		9/30		12/31
Total revenues (a)	$	123,205	$	110,909	$	118,578	$	116,449
Income (loss) from continuing operations(a)	$	12,712	$	4,069	$	1,456	$	(80	)
Income from discontinued operations (a)	$	13	$	40	$	26	$	67
Net income (loss) available for Common Shares	$	12,725	$	4,109	$	1,482	$	(13	)
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — Basic		24,200		24,370		24,527		24,765
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding — Diluted		30,386		30,540		30,572		30,505
Net income per Common Share outstanding — Basic	$	0.53	$	0.17	$	0.06	$	0.00
Net income per Common Share outstanding — Diluted	$	0.52	$	0.17	$	0.06	$	0.00

(a) Amounts may differ from previously disclosed amounts due to reclassification of discontinued operations.

F-43

Schedule II

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
December 31, 2009

			Additions
	Balance at		Charged to		Charged					Balance at
	Beginning		Costs and		to Other					End of
	of Period		Expenses		Accounts		Deductions(1)			Period
For the year ended December 31, 2007: Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	885,000	$	1,865,000		—	$	(1,596,000	)	$	1,154,000
For the year ended December 31, 2008: Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	1,154,000	$	1,951,000		—	$	(1,977,000	)	$	1,128,000
For the year ended December 31, 2009: Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	1,128,000	$	2,513,400		—	$	(1,914,900	)	$	1,726,500

(1) Deductions represent tenant receivables deemed uncollectible.

S-1

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
										Costs Capitalized
										Subsequent to				Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to				Acquisition				at Close of
						Company				(Improvements)				Period 12/31/09
								Depreciable				Depreciable				Depreciable				Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land		Property		Land		Property		Land		Property		Total		Depreciation			Acquisition
Properties Held for Long Term
Hidden Cove	Arley	AL		—			212		610		—		—		212		610		822		(80	)		2006
Apollo Village	Phoenix	AZ		(4,775	)		932		3,219		—		1,225		932		4,444		5,376		(2,034	)		1994
Araby	Yuma	AZ		(3,020	)		1,440		4,345		—		289		1,440		4,634		6,074		(924	)		2003
Cactus Gardens	Yuma	AZ		(4,485	)		1,992		5,984		—		261		1,992		6,245		8,237		(1,132	)		2004
Capri RV	Yuma	AZ		(4,897	)		1,595		4,774		—		149		1,595		4,923		6,518		(617	)		2006
Carefree Manor	Phoenix	AZ		(3,161	)		706		3,040		—		728		706		3,768		4,474		(1,432	)		1998
Casa del Sol East II	Glendale	AZ		(4,634	)		2,103		6,283		—		2,222		2,103		8,505		10,608		(2,661	)		1996
Casa del Sol East III	Glendale	AZ		(5,991	)		2,450		7,452		—		646		2,450		8,098		10,548		(3,085	)		1998
Casa del Sol West I	Peoria	AZ		(9,953	)		2,215		6,467		—		1,951		2,215		8,418		10,633		(2,863	)		1996
Casita Verde RV	Casa Grande	AZ		(2,204	)		719		2,179		—		55		719		2,234		2,953		(285	)		2006
Central Park	Phoenix	AZ		(12,259	)		1,612		3,784		—		1,363		1,612		5,147		6,759		(3,862	)		1983
Countryside RV	Apache Junction	AZ		—			2,056		6,241		—		503		2,056		6,744		8,800		(1,657	)		2002
Desert Paradise	Yuma	AZ		(1,350	)		666		2,011		—		88		666		2,099		2,765		(430	)		2004
Desert Skies	Phoenix	AZ		(4,869	)		792		3,126		—		606		792		3,732		4,524		(1,447	)		1998
Fairview Manor	Tucson	AZ		—			1,674		4,708		—		1,502		1,674		6,210		7,884		(2,519	)		1998
Fiesta Grande RV	Casa Grande	AZ		(9,305	)		2,869		8,653		—		302		2,869		8,955		11,824		(1,131	)		2006
Foothill	Yuma	AZ		(1,350	)		459		1,402		—		119		459		1,521		1,980		(313	)		2003
Foothills West RV	Casa Grande	AZ		(2,277	)		747		2,261		—		51		747		2,312		3,059		(290	)		2006
Golden Sun RV	Apache Junction	AZ		—			1,678		5,049		—		126		1,678		5,175		6,853		(1,306	)		2002
Hacienda De Valencia	Mesa	AZ		(14,478	)		833		2,701		—		4,367		833		7,068		7,901		(3,859	)		1984
Monte Vista	Mesa	AZ		(23,857	)		11,402		34,355		—		3,210		11,402		37,565		48,967		(6,839	)		2004
Mesa Verde	Cottonwood	AZ		—			1,387		4,148		—		289		1,387		4,437		5,824		(447	)		2007
Palm Shadows	Glendale	AZ		(7,890	)		1,400		4,218		—		984		1,400		5,202		6,602		(2,723	)		1993
Paradise	Sun City	AZ		—			6,414		19,263		11		1,371		6,425		20,634		27,059		(4,161	)		2004
Sedona Shadows	Sedona	AZ		(11,093	)		1,096		3,431		—		1,273		1,096		4,704		5,800		(1,782	)		1997
Seyenna Vistas	Mesa	AZ		—			1,360		4,660		—		2,080		1,360		6,740		8,100		(3,114	)		1994
Suni Sands	Yuma	AZ		(2,949	)		1,249		3,759		—		245		1,249		4,004		5,253		(786	)		2004
Sunrise Heights	Phoenix	AZ		(5,348	)		1,000		3,016		—		1,361		1,000		4,377		5,377		(1,913	)		1994
The Highlands at Brentwood	Mesa	AZ		(10,527	)		1,997		6,024		—		1,742		1,997		7,766		9,763		(3,909	)		1993
The Meadows	Tempe	AZ		—			2,613		7,887		—		3,422		2,613		11,309		13,922		(5,158	)		1994
Verde Valley	Cottonwood	AZ		—			1,437		3,390		19		692		1,456		4,081		5,537		(645	)		2004
Venture In	Show Low	AZ		(6,561	)		2,050		6,188		—		252		2,050		6,440		8,490		(826	)		2006
Viewpoint	Mesa	AZ		(42,989	)		24,890		56,340		15		3,461		24,905		59,801		84,706		(11,494	)		2004
Whispering Palms	Phoenix	AZ		(3,106	)		670		2,141		—		268		670		2,409		3,079		(1,018	)		1998

S-2

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
										Costs Capitalized
										Subsequent to					Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to				Acquisition					at Close of
						Company				(Improvements)					Period 12/31/09
								Depreciable					Depreciable				Depreciable				Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land		Property		Land			Property		Land		Property		Total		Depreciation			Acquisition
Cultus Lake	Lindell Beach	BC		—			410		968		5			129		416		1,097		1,513		(175	)		2004
California Hawaiian	San Jose	CA		(32,749	)		5,825		17,755		—			2,726		5,825		20,481		26,306		(8,316	)		1997
Colony Park	Ceres	CA		(5,528	)		890		2,837		—			557		890		3,394		4,284		(1,507	)		1998
Concord Cascade	Pacheco	CA		—			985		3,016		—			1,710		985		4,726		5,711		(3,342	)		1983
Contempo Marin	San Rafael	CA		—			4,787		16,379		—			3,013		4,787		19,392		24,179		(10,001	)		1994
Coralwood	Modesto	CA		(5,983	)		—		5,047		—			430		—		5,477		5,477		(2,332	)		1997
Date Palm Country Club	Cathedral City	CA		(14,230	)		4,138		14,064		(23	)		4,240		4,115		18,304		22,419		(9,384	)		1994
Date Palm RV	Cathedral City	CA		—			—		216		—			313		—		529		529		(284	)		1994
DeAnza Santa Cruz	Santa Cruz	CA		(5,529	)		2,103		7,201		—			1,661		2,103		8,862		10,965		(4,294	)		1994
Four Seasons	Fresno	CA		—			756		2,348		—			326		756		2,674		3,430		(1,158	)		1997
Idyllwild	Pine Cove	CA		—			313		737		4			536		317		1,273		1,590		(162	)		2004
Laguna Lake	San Luis Obispo	CA		—			2,845		6,520		—			441		2,845		6,961		9,806		(2,886	)		1998
Lake Minden	Nicolaus	CA		—			961		2,267		13			631		974		2,898		3,872		(452	)		2004
Lake of the Springs	Oregon House	CA		—			1,062		2,504		14			351		1,076		2,855		3,931		(452	)		2004
Lamplighter	Spring Valley	CA		(23,632	)		633		2,201		—			1,135		633		3,336		3,969		(2,466	)		1983
Las Palmas	Rialto	CA		(3,536	)		1,295		3,866		—			258		1,295		4,124		5,419		(798	)		2004
Meadowbrook	Santee	CA		—			4,345		12,528		—			1,854		4,345		14,382		18,727		(5,546	)		1998
Monte del Lago	Castroville	CA		(21,400	)		3,150		9,469		—			2,355		3,150		11,824		14,974		(4,713	)		1997
Morgan Hill	Morgan Hill	CA		—			1,856		4,378		25			364		1,881		4,742		6,623		(780	)		2004
Nicholson Plaza	San Jose	CA		—			—		4,512		—			251		—		4,763		4,763		(1,946	)		1997
Oakzanita Springs	Descanso	CA		—			396		934		5			763		401		1,696		2,097		(221	)		2004
Pacific Dunes Ranch	Oceana	CA		(5,584	)		1,940		5,632		—			123		1,940		5,755		7,695		(1,072	)		2004
Palm Springs	Palm Desert	CA		—			1,811		4,271		24			301		1,835		4,572		6,407		(751	)		2004
Parque La Quinta	Rialto	CA		(4,742	)		1,799		5,450		—			117		1,799		5,567		7,366		(1,137	)		2004
Pio Pico	Jamul	CA		—			2,626		6,194		35			1,009		2,661		7,202		9,863		(1,138	)		2004
Ponderosa	Lotus	CA		—			900		2,100		—			215		900		2,315		3,215		(285	)		2006
Quail Meadows	Riverbank	CA		(5,010	)		1,155		3,469		—			386		1,155		3,855		5,010		(1,513	)		1998
Rancho Mesa	El Cajon	CA		(9,264	)		2,130		6,389		—			629		2,130		7,018		9,148		(2,665	)		1998
Rancho Oso	Santa Barbara	CA		—			860		2,029		11			482		872		2,511		3,383		(383	)		2004
Rancho Valley	El Cajon	CA		—			685		1,902		—			1,100		685		3,002		3,687		(2,171	)		1983
Royal Holiday	Hemet	CA		—			778		2,643		—			2,147		778		4,790		5,568		(1,414	)		1998
Royal Oaks	Visalia	CA		—			602		1,921		—			530		602		2,451		3,053		(997	)		1997
Russian River	Cloverdale	CA		—			368		868		5			129		373		997		1,370		(159	)		2004
San Benito	Paicines	CA		—			1,411		3,328		19			495		1,430		3,822		5,252		(604	)		2004
San Francisco RV	Pacifica	CA		—			1,660		4,973		—			270		1,660		5,243		6,903		(792	)		2005

S-3

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
										Costs Capitalized
										Subsequent to				Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to				Acquisition				at Close of
						Company				(Improvements)				Period 12/31/09
								Depreciable				Depreciable				Depreciable				Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land		Property		Land		Property		Land		Property		Total		Depreciation			Acquisition
Santa Cruz Ranch RV	Scotts Valley	CA		—			1,183		3,549		—		186		1,183		3,735		4,918		(290	)		2007
Santa Cruz Ranch Warehouse	Scotts Valley	CA		—			412		388		—		—		412		388		800		(30	)		2007
Santiago Estates	Sylmar	CA		(15,377	)		3,562		10,767		—		1,135		3,562		11,902		15,464		(4,703	)		1998
Sea Oaks	Los Osos	CA		—			871		2,703		—		418		871		3,121		3,992		(1,253	)		1997
Snowflower	Emigrant Gap	CA		—			308		727		4		275		312		1,001		1,313		(137	)		2004
Soledad Canyon	Acton	CA		—			2,933		6,917		39		1,042		2,972		7,959		10,931		(1,273	)		2004
Sunshadow	San Jose	CA		—			—		5,707		—		249		—		5,956		5,956		(2,473	)		1997
Tahoe Valley	Lake Tahoe	CA		—			1,357		4,071		—		144		1,357		4,215		5,572		(837	)		2004
Turtle Beach	Manteca	CA		—			268		633		4		35		272		668		940		(114	)		2004
Village of the Four Seasons	San Jose	CA		(14,241	)		5,229		15,714		—		458		5,229		16,172		21,401		(3,025	)		2004
Westwinds (4 properties)	San Jose	CA		—			—		17,616		—		6,360		—		23,976		23,976		(10,361	)		1997
Wilderness Lake	Menifee	CA		—			2,157		5,088		29		588		2,186		5,676		7,862		(938	)		2004
Yosemite Lakes	Groveland	CA		—			2,045		4,823		27		1,075		2,072		5,897		7,969		(903	)		2004
Bear Creek	Denver	CO		(4,709	)		1,100		3,359		—		412		1,100		3,771		4,871		(1,476	)		1998
Cimarron	Broomfield	CO		(15,567	)		863		2,790		—		776		863		3,566		4,429		(2,866	)		1983
Golden Terrace	Golden	CO		(14,011	)		826		2,415		—		1,389		826		3,804		4,630		(2,467	)		1983
Golden Terrace South	Golden	CO		—			750		2,265		—		724		750		2,989		3,739		(1,248	)		1997
Golden Terrace West	Golden	CO		(16,579	)		1,694		5,065		—		1,054		1,694		6,119		7,813		(4,450	)		1986
Hillcrest Village	Aurora	CO		(26,464	)		1,912		5,202		289		2,696		2,201		7,898		10,099		(6,299	)		1983
Holiday Hills	Denver	CO		(36,585	)		2,159		7,780		—		4,566		2,159		12,346		14,505		(9,515	)		1983
Holiday Village	Co. Springs	CO		(11,447	)		567		1,759		—		1,165		567		2,924		3,491		(2,171	)		1983
Pueblo Grande	Pueblo	CO		(7,590	)		241		1,069		—		649		241		1,718		1,959		(1,277	)		1983
Woodland Hills	Thornton	CO		(10,631	)		1,928		4,408		—		2,614		1,928		7,022		8,950		(3,731	)		1994
Aspen Meadows	Rehoboth	DE		(5,423	)		1,148		3,460		—		467		1,148		3,927		5,075		(1,589	)		1998
Camelot Meadows	Rehoboth	DE		(12,518	)		527		2,058		1,251		4,270		1,778		6,328		8,106		(2,388	)		1998
Mariners Cove	Millsboro	DE		(15,876	)		990		2,971		—		5,552		990		8,523		9,513		(4,417	)		1987
McNicol	Rehoboth	DE		(2,615	)		562		1,710		—		168		562		1,878		2,440		(715	)		1998
Sweetbriar	Rehoboth	DE		(2,933	)		498		1,527		—		412		498		1,939		2,437		(855	)		1998
Waterford	Bear	DE		(29,869	)		5,250		16,202		—		1,281		5,250		17,483		22,733		(4,917	)		1996
Whispering Pines	Lewes	DE		(9,525	)		1,536		4,609		—		1,253		1,536		5,862		7,398		(3,864	)		1998
Barrington Hills	Hudson	FL		—			1,145		3,437		—		417		1,145		3,854		4,999		(772	)		2004
Bay Indies	Venice	FL		(38,504	)		10,483		31,559		10		4,867		10,493		36,426		46,919		(18,325	)		1994
Bay Lake Estates	Nokomis	FL		(4,299	)		990		3,390		—		1,572		990		4,962		5,952		(2,314	)		1994
Breezy Hill RV	Pompano Beach	FL		—			5,424		16,555		—		1,144		5,424		17,699		23,123		(4,238	)		2002
Buccaneer	N. Ft. Myers	FL		(17,324	)		4,207		14,410		—		2,418		4,207		16,828		21,035		(8,253	)		1994

S-4

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
										Costs Capitalized
										Subsequent to					Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to				Acquisition					at Close of
						Company				(Improvements)					Period 12/31/09
								Depreciable					Depreciable				Depreciable					Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land		Property		Land			Property		Land		Property		Total			Depreciation			Acquisition
Bulow Village RV	Flagler Beach	FL		—			—		228		—			632		—		860		860			(174	)		2001
Bulow Plantation	Flagler Beach	FL		—			3,637		949		—			5,993		3,637		6,942		10,579			(2,610	)		1994
Carefree Cove	Fort Lauderdale	FL		(4,439	)		1,741		5,170		—			496		1,741		5,666		7,407			(1,046	)		2004
Carriage Cove	Daytona Beach	FL		(12,032	)		2,914		8,682		—			1,093		2,914		9,775		12,689			(3,982	)		1998
Clerbrook	Clermont	FL		(11,080	)		3,883		11,700		—			619		3,883		12,319		16,202			(1,577	)		2006
Coachwood	Leesburg	FL		(3,939	)		1,602		4,822		—			178		1,602		5,000		6,602	��		(988	)		2004
Coquina Crossing	Elkton	FL		—			5,286		5,545		(12	)		16,656		5,274		22,201		27,475			(5,087	)		1999
Coral Cay	Margate	FL		(18,401	)		5,890		20,211		—			7,022		5,890		27,233		33,123			(12,480	)		1994
Country Place	New Port Richey	FL		(15,687	)		663		—		18			7,282		681		7,282		7,963			(4,160	)		1986
Countryside	Vero Beach	FL		(16,139	)		3,711		11,133		—			5,584		3,711		16,717		20,428			(6,002	)		1998
Crystal Isles	Crystal River	FL		(2,630	)		926		2,787		—			328		926		3,115		4,041			(589	)		2004
Down Yonder	Largo	FL		(13,357	)		2,652		7,981		—			236		2,652		8,217		10,869			(2,039	)		1998
East Bay Oaks	Largo	FL		(11,745	)		1,240		3,322		—			925		1,240		4,247		5,487			(3,317	)		1983
Eldorado Village	Largo	FL		(8,083	)		778		2,341		—			765		778		3,106		3,884			(2,397	)		1983
Fort Myers Beach Resort	Fort Myers Beach	FL		—			1,188		3,548		—			—		1,188		3,548		4,736			(823	)		2004
Glen Ellen	Clearwater	FL		—			619		1,882		—			64		619		1,946		2,565			(469	)		2002
Grand Island	Grand Island	FL		—			1,723		5,208		125			3,708		1,848		8,916		10,764			(2,388	)		2001
Gulf Air Resort	Fort Myers Beach	FL		—			1,609		4,746		—			—		1,609		4,746		6,355			(951	)		2004
Gulf View	Punta Gorda	FL		(1,421	)		717		2,158		—			833		717		2,991		3,708			(561	)		2004
Hacienda Village	New Port Richey	FL		—			4,297		13,088		—			1,807		4,297		14,895		19,192			(3,341	)		2002
Harbor Lakes	Port Charlotte	FL		—			3,384		10,154		—			328		3,384		10,482		13,866			(2,064	)		2004
Harbor View	New Port Richey	FL		(7,270	)		4,045		12,146		(15	)		98		4,030		12,244		16,274			(3,022	)		2002
Heritage Plantation	Vero Beach	FL		(12,829	)		2,403		7,259		—			1,859		2,403		9,118		11,521			(4,378	)		1994
Highland Wood RV	Pompano Beach	FL		(2,086	)		1,043		3,130		(13	)		125		1,030		3,255		4,285			(797	)		2002
Hillcrest	Clearwater	FL		(7,566	)		1,278		3,928		—			999		1,278		4,927		6,205			(2,080	)		1998
Holiday Ranch	Clearwater	FL		(4,753	)		925		2,866		—			292		925		3,158		4,083			(1,296	)		1998
Holiday Village	Vero Beach	FL		—			350		1,374		—			210		350		1,584		1,934			(652	)		1998
Holiday Village	Ormond Beach	FL		(10,138	)		2,610		7,837		—			196		2,610		8,033		10,643			(1,969	)		2002
Indian Oaks	Rockledge	FL		(2,793	)		1,089		3,376		—			881		1,089		4,257		5,346			(1,778	)		1998
Island Vista	North Ft. Myers	FL		(14,800	)		5,004		15,066		—			149		5,004		15,215		20,219			(1,893	)		2006
Lake Fairways	N. Ft. Myers	FL		(29,393	)		6,075		18,134		35			1,946		6,110		20,080		26,190			(9,999	)		1994
Lake Haven	Dunedin	FL		(11,187	)		1,135		4,047		—			2,936		1,135		6,983		8,118			(4,527	)		1983
Lake Magic	Clermont	FL		—			1,595		4,793		—			149		1,595		4,942		6,537			(964	)		2004
Lakes at Countrywood	Plant City	FL		(9,046	)		2,377		7,085		—			1,543		2,377		8,628		11,005			(2,496	)		2001
Lakewood Village	Melbourne	FL		(9,474	)		1,862		5,627		—			1,481		1,862		7,108		8,970			(3,487	)		1994

S-5

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
										Costs Capitalized
										Subsequent to					Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to				Acquisition					at Close of
						Company				(Improvements)					Period 12/31/09
								Depreciable					Depreciable				Depreciable				Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land		Property		Land			Property		Land		Property		Total		Depreciation			Acquisition
Lighthouse Pointe	Port Orange	FL		(13,863	)		2,446		7,483		23			1,157		2,469		8,640		11,109		(3,543	)		1998
Manatee	Bradenton	FL		—			2,300		6,903		—			278		2,300		7,181		9,481		(1,416	)		2004
Maralago Cay	Lantana	FL		(20,497	)		5,325		15,420		—			4,783		5,325		20,203		25,528		(7,783	)		1997
Meadows at Countrywood	Plant City	FL		(17,020	)		4,514		13,175		—			3,904		4,514		17,079		21,593		(6,591	)		1998
Mid-Florida Lakes	Leesburg	FL		(21,543	)		5,997		20,635		—			8,202		5,997		28,837		34,834		(13,212	)		1994
Oak Bend	Ocala	FL		(5,570	)		850		2,572		—			1,077		850		3,649		4,499		(1,948	)		1993
Oaks at Countrywood	Plant City	FL		—			1,111		2,513		(265	)		4,309		846		6,822		7,668		(1,867	)		1998
Orlando	Clermon	FL		—			2,975		7,017		40			1,112		3,015		8,129		11,144		(1,299	)		2004
Park City West	Fort Lauderdale	FL		(15,199	)		4,184		12,561		—			464		4,184		13,025		17,209		(2,533	)		2004
Pasco	Lutz	FL		—			1,494		4,484		—			289		1,494		4,773		6,267		(928	)		2004
Peace River	Wauchula	FL		—			900		2,100		—			105		900		2,205		3,105		(244	)		2006
Pickwick	Port Orange	FL		(7,568	)		2,803		8,870		—			1,083		2,803		9,953		12,756		(3,886	)		1998
Pine Lakes	N. Ft. Myers	FL		(37,800	)		6,306		14,579		21			6,816		6,327		21,395		27,722		(10,290	)		1994
Pioneer Village	N. Ft. Myers	FL		(9,635	)		4,116		12,353		—			1,246		4,116		13,599		17,715		(2,665	)		2004
Ramblers Rest	Venice	FL		(15,328	)		4,646		14,201		—			1,955		4,646		16,156		20,802		(1,917	)		2006
Royal Coachman	Nokomis	FL		—			5,321		15,978		—			802		5,321		16,780		22,101		(3,303	)		2004
Shangri La	Largo	FL		(4,179	)		1,722		5,200		—			43		1,722		5,243		6,965		(1,036	)		2004
Sherwood Forest	Kissimmee	FL		(30,738	)		4,852		14,596		—			5,016		4,852		19,612		24,464		(7,444	)		1998
Sherwood Forest RV	Kissimmee	FL		—			2,870		3,621		568			1,997		3,438		5,618		9,056		(2,227	)		1998
Silk Oak	Clearwater	FL		—			1,649		5,028		—			64		1,649		5,092		6,741		(1,230	)		2002
Silver Dollar	Odessa	FL		(8,498	)		4,107		12,431		—			1,180		4,107		13,611		17,718		(2,653	)		2004
Sixth Ave	Zephryhills	FL		(2,101	)		837		2,518		—			21		837		2,539		3,376		(519	)		2004
Southern Palms	Eustis	FL		—			2,169		5,884		—			2,770		2,169		8,654		10,823		(3,284	)		1998
Southernaire	Mt. Dora	FL		(1,944	)		796		2,395		—			63		796		2,458		3,254		(488	)		2004
Sunshine Holiday	Ormond Beach	FL		—			2,001		6,004		—			490		2,001		6,494		8,495		(1,255	)		2004
Sunshine Holiday RV	Fort Lauderdale	FL		(7,903	)		3,099		9,286		—			348		3,099		9,634		12,733		(1,800	)		2004
Sunshine Key	Big Pine Key	FL		(15,337	)		5,273		15,822		—			1,541		5,273		17,363		22,636		(3,346	)		2004
Sunshine Travel	Vero Beach	FL		—			1,603		4,813		—			154		1,603		4,967		6,570		(973	)		2004
Terra Ceia	Palmetto	FL		(2,350	)		965		2,905		—			81		965		2,986		3,951		(595	)		2004
The Heritage	N. Ft. Myers	FL		(12,381	)		1,438		4,371		346			3,998		1,784		8,369		10,153		(3,950	)		1993
The Meadows	Palm Beach Gardens	FL		(5,684	)		3,229		9,870		—			2,131		3,229		12,001		15,230		(4,113	)		1999
Three Flags RV Resort	Wildwood	FL		—			228		684		—			19		228		703		931		(93	)		2006
Toby’s	Arcadia	FL		—			1,093		3,280		—			5		1,093		3,285		4,378		(701	)		2003
Topics	Spring Hill	FL		(2,078	)		844		2,568		—			329		844		2,897		3,741		(579	)		2004
Tropical Palms	Kissimmee	FL		—			5,677		17,116		—			5,583		5,677		22,699		28,376		(4,769	)		2004

S-6

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
										Costs Capitalized
										Subsequent to				Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to				Acquisition				at Close of
						Company				(Improvements)				Period 12/31/09
								Depreciable				Depreciable				Depreciable				Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land		Property		Land		Property		Land		Property		Total		Depreciation			Acquisition
Tropical Palms	Punta Gorda	FL		(7,346	)		2,365		7,286		—		251		2,365		7,537		9,902		(942	)		2006
Vacation Village	Largo	FL		—			1,315		3,946		—		152		1,315		4,098		5,413		(790	)		2004
Villas at Spanish Oaks	Ocala	FL		(12,600	)		2,250		6,922		—		1,133		2,250		8,055		10,305		(4,250	)		1993
Windmill Manor	Bradenton	FL		(5,676	)		2,153		6,125		—		1,453		2,153		7,578		9,731		(2,892	)		1998
Windmill Village	N. Ft. Myers	FL		(16,689	)		1,417		5,440		—		1,879		1,417		7,319		8,736		(5,751	)		1983
Winds of St. Armands North	Sarasota	FL		(19,653	)		1,523		5,063		—		2,807		1,523		7,870		9,393		(5,436	)		1983
Winds of St. Armands South	Sarasota	FL		(12,647	)		1,106		3,162		—		993		1,106		4,155		5,261		(3,217	)		1983
Winter Garden	Winter Garden	FL		—			2,321		6,962		—		77		2,321		7,039		9,360		(612	)		2007
Pine Island Resort	St. James City	FL		—			1,678		5,044		—		88		1,678		5,132		6,810		(412	)		2007
Golf Vistas Estates	Monee	IL		(13,577	)		2,843		4,719		—		6,513		2,843		11,232		14,075		(4,108	)		1997
O’Connell’s	Amboy	IL		(4,596	)		1,648		4,974		—		393		1,648		5,367		7,015		(1,186	)		2004
Pine Country	Belvidere	IL		—			53		166		—		66		53		232		285		(25	)		2006
Willow Lake Estates	Elgin	IL		(17,503	)		6,138		21,033		—		5,200		6,138		26,233		32,371		(12,508	)		1994
Indian Lakes	Batesville	IN		—			450		1,061		6		528		456		1,589		2,045		(212	)		2004
Horseshoe Lake	Clinton	IN		—			155		365		2		136		157		501		658		(68	)		2004
Lakeside	New Carlisle	IN		—			426		1,281		—		50		426		1,331		1,757		(275	)		2004
Oak Tree Village	Portage	IN		(9,552	)		—		—		569		3,811		569		3,811		4,380		(2,477	)		1987
Twin Mills RV	Howe	IN		(2,480	)		1,399		4,186		—		157		1,399		4,343		5,742		(449	)		2006
Diamond Caverns Resort & Golf Club	Park City	KY		—			530		1,512		—		—		530		1,512		2,042		(198	)		2006
Gateway to Cape Cod	Rochester	MA		—			91		288		—		72		91		360		451		(36	)		2006
Old Chatham RV	South Dennis	MA		—			1,760		5,293		—		19		1,760		5,312		7,072		(782	)		2005
Sturbridge	Sturbridge	MA		—			110		347		—		177		110		524		634		(50	)		2006
Moody Beach	Moody	ME		—			93		292		—		105		93		397		490		(39	)		2006
Pinehirst RV Park	Old Orchard Beach	ME		(5,655	)		1,942		5,827		—		123		1,942		5,950		7,892		(872	)		2005
Mt. Desert Narrows	Bar Harbor	ME		—			1,037		3,127		—		30		1,037		3,157		4,194		(220	)		2007
Narrows Too	Trenton	ME		—			1,463		4,408		—		5		1,463		4,413		5,876		(309	)		2007
Patton Pond	Ellsworth	ME		—			267		802		—		60		267		862		1,129		(60	)		2007
Bear Cave Resort	Buchanan	MI		—			176		516		—		—		176		516		692		(90	)		2006
St Clair	St Clair	MI		—			453		1,068		6		214		459		1,282		1,741		(200	)		2004
Forest Lake	Advance	NC		—			986		2,325		13		381		999		2,706		3,705		(434	)		2004
Goose Creek	Newport	NC		(11,610	)		4,612		13,848		750		1,312		5,362		15,160		20,522		(2,931	)		2004
Green Mountain Park	Lenoir	NC		—			1,037		3,075		—		—		1,037		3,075		4,112		(381	)		2006
Lake Gaston	Littleton	NC		—			130		409		—		51		130		460		590		(50	)		2006
Lake Myers RV	Mocksville	NC		—			1,504		4,587		—		13		1,504		4,600		6,104		(503	)		2006

S-7

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
										Costs Capitalized
										Subsequent to					Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to				Acquisition					at Close of
						Company				(Improvements)					Period 12/31/09
								Depreciable					Depreciable				Depreciable				Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land		Property		Land			Property		Land		Property		Total		Depreciation			Acquisition
Scenic	Asheville	NC		(3,698	)		1,183		3,511		—			6		1,183		3,517		4,700		(442	)		2006
Twin Lakes	Chocowinity	NC		(3,518	)		1,719		3,361		(10	)		228		1,709		3,589		5,298		(702	)		2004
Waterway RV	Cedar Point	NC		(5,786	)		2,392		7,185		—			88		2,392		7,273		9,665		(1,441	)		2004
Sandy Beach RV	Contoocook	NH		(5,025	)		1,755		5,265		—			71		1,755		5,336		7,091		(789	)		2005
Tuxbury Resort	South Hampton	NH		(586	)		3,557		3,910		—			126		3,557		4,036		7,593		(299	)		2007
Chestnut Lake	Port Republic	NJ		—			337		796		4			54		342		849		1,191		(144	)		2004
Lake & Shore	Ocean View	NJ		—			397		1,192		(19	)		403		378		1,595		1,973		(158	)		2006
Sea Pines	Swainton	NJ		—			208		625		(10	)		76		198		701		899		(74	)		2006
Bonanza	Las Vegas	NV		(8,936	)		908		2,643		—			1,560		908		4,203		5,111		(2,976	)		1983
Boulder Cascade	Las Vegas	NV		(8,262	)		2,995		9,020		—			2,292		2,995		11,312		14,307		(4,267	)		1998
Cabana	Las Vegas	NV		(7,613	)		2,648		7,989		—			525		2,648		8,514		11,162		(4,375	)		1994
Flamingo West	Las Vegas	NV		(14,186	)		1,730		5,266		—			1,439		1,730		6,705		8,435		(3,295	)		1994
Las Vegas	Las Vegas	NV		—			1,049		2,473		14			221		1,063		2,694		3,757		(442	)		2004
Villa Borega	Las Vegas	NV		(9,967	)		2,896		8,774		—			1,011		2,896		9,785		12,681		(3,972	)		1997
Alpine Lake	Corinth	NY		(13,772	)		4,783		14,125		153			177		4,936		14,302		19,238		(2,122	)		2005
Brennan Beach	Pulaski	NY		(20,357	)		7,325		21,141		0			1,311		7,325		22,452		29,777		(3,270	)		2005
Greenwood Village	Manorville	NY		(25,413	)		3,667		9,414		484			4,273		4,151		13,687		17,838		(4,954	)		1998
Lake George Escape	Lake George	NY		—			3,562		10,708		—			420		3,562		11,128		14,690		(1,728	)		2005
Lake George Schroon Valley	Warrensburg	NY		—			540		1,626		—			2		540		1,628		2,168		(104	)		2008
Rondout Valley Resort	Accord	NY		—			1,115		3,240		—			—		1,115		3,240		4,355		(404	)		2006
Kenisee Lake	Jefferson	OH		—			295		696		4			56		299		751		1,050		(124	)		2004
Wilmington	Wilmington	OH		—			235		555		3			59		238		614		852		(101	)		2004
Bend	Bend	OR		—			733		1,729		10			224		743		1,953		2,696		(314	)		2004
Falcon Wood Village	Eugene	OR		(5,018	)		1,112		3,426		—			448		1,112		3,874		4,986		(1,571	)		1997
Mt. Hood	Welches	OR		—			1,817		5,733		—			83		1,817		5,816		7,633		(1,550	)		2002
Pacific City	Cloverdale	OR		—			1,076		2,539		14			659		1,091		3,198		4,289		(498	)		2004
Quail Hollow	Fairview	OR		—			—		3,249		—			415		—		3,664		3,664		(1,501	)		1997
Seaside	Seaside	OR		—			891		2,101		12			353		903		2,454		3,357		(389	)		2004
Shadowbrook	Clackamas	OR		(6,098	)		1,197		3,693		—			366		1,197		4,059		5,256		(1,714	)		1997
South Jetty	Florence	OR		—			678		1,598		9			65		687		1,663		2,350		(280	)		2004
Whalers Rest	South Beach	OR		—			754		1,777		10			373		764		2,150		2,914		(332	)		2004
Appalachian	Shartlesville	PA		—			1,666		5,044		—			338		1,666		5,382		7,048		(534	)		2006
Circle M	Lancaster	PA		—			347		1,041		—			174		330		1,215		1,545		(124	)		2006
Dutch County	Manheim	PA		—			93		278		—			48		88		326		414		(35	)		2006
Gettysburg Farm	Dover	PA		—			117		350		—			35		111		385		496		(41	)		2006

S-8

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
										Costs Capitalized
										Subsequent to				Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to				Acquisition				at Close of
						Company				(Improvements)				Period 12/31/09
								Depreciable				Depreciable				Depreciable				Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land		Property		Land		Property		Land		Property		Total		Depreciation			Acquisition
Green Acres	Breinigsville	PA		(29,747	)		2,680		7,479		—		3,834		2,680		11,313		13,993		(7,001	)		1988
Hershey	Lebanon	PA		—			1,284		3,028		17		528		1,301		3,556		4,857		(585	)		2004
Robin Hill	Lenhartsville	PA		—			1,263		3,786		—		—		1,263		3,786		5,049		(116	)		2009
Scotrun	Scotrun	PA		—			161		483		—		39		153		522		675		(58	)		2006
Spring Gulch	New Holland	PA		(4,405	)		1,593		4,795		—		119		1,593		4,914		6,507		(999	)		2004
Sun Valley	Bowmansville	PA		—			866		2,601		—		24		866		2,625		3,491		(80	)		2009
Timothy Lake North	East Stroudsburg	PA		—			311		933		—		111		296		1,044		1,340		(158	)		2006
Timothy Lake South	East Stroudsburg	PA		—			216		649		—		5		206		654		860		(70	)		2006
Carolina Landing	Fair Play	SC		—			457		1,078		6		128		463		1,206		1,669		(194	)		2004
Inlet Oaks	Murrells Inlet	SC		(4,775	)		1,546		4,642		—		37		1,546		4,679		6,225		(584	)		2006
The Oaks at Point South	Yemassee	SC		—			267		810		—		—		267		810		1,077		(107	)		2006
Natchez Trace	Hohenwald	TN		—			533		1,257		7		160		540		1,417		1,957		(220	)		2004
Cherokee Landing	Middleton	TN		—			118		279		2		10		120		289		409		(50	)		2004
Bay Landing	Bridgeport	TX		—			438		1,033		6		40		444		1,074		1,518		(181	)		2004
Colorado River	Columbus	TX		—			466		1,099		6		67		472		1,165		1,637		(197	)		2004
Country Sunshine	Weslaco	TX		—			627		1,881		—		753		627		2,634		3,261		(487	)		2004
Fun n Sun RV	San Benito	TX		—			2,533		—		412		10,970		2,945		10,970		13,915		(4,270	)		1998
Lake Conroe	Willis	TX		—			1,363		3,214		18		1,152		1,381		4,366		5,747		(649	)		2004
Lake Tawakoni	Point	TX		—			691		1,629		9		98		700		1,728		2,428		(273	)		2004
Lake Texoma	Gordonville	TX		—			488		1,151		6		443		494		1,594		2,088		(239	)		2004
Lake Whitney	Whitney	TX		—			679		1,602		9		221		688		1,823		2,511		(294	)		2004
Lakewood	Harlingen	TX		—			325		979		—		98		325		1,077		1,402		(232	)		2004
Medina Lake	Lakehills	TX		—			936		2,208		12		644		949		2,852		3,801		(442	)		2004
Paradise Park RV	Harlingen	TX		—			1,568		4,705		—		228		1,568		4,933		6,501		(967	)		2004
Paradise South	Mercedes	TX		—			448		1,345		—		207		448		1,552		2,000		(293	)		2004
Southern Comfort	Weslaco	TX		—			1,108		3,323		—		187		1,108		3,510		4,618		(684	)		2004
Sunshine RV	Harlingen	TX		—			1,494		4,484		—		798		1,494		5,282		6,776		(921	)		2004
Tropic Winds	Harlingen	TX		—			1,221		3,809		—		267		1,221		4,076		5,297		(1,077	)		2002
All Seasons	Salt Lake City	UT		(3,368	)		510		1,623		—		344		510		1,967		2,477		(835	)		1997
Westwood Village	Farr West	UT		(10,794	)		1,346		4,179		—		1,571		1,346		5,750		7,096		(2,402	)		1997
Chesapeake Bay	Cloucester	VA		—			1,230		2,900		16		444		1,246		3,345		4,591		(538	)		2004
Harbor View	Colonial Beach	VA		—			67		202		—		295		64		497		561		(48	)		2006
Lynchburg	Gladys	VA		—			266		627		4		81		269		708		977		(113	)		2004
Meadows of Chantilly	Chantilly	VA		(33,857	)		5,430		16,440		—		5,846		5,430		22,286		27,716		(10,596	)		1994
Virginia Landing	Quinby	VA		—			602		1,419		8		93		610		1,512		2,122		(254	)		2004

S-9

Schedule III
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
											Costs Capitalized
											Subsequent to					Gross Amount Carried
						Initial Cost to					Acquisition					at Close of
						Company					(Improvements)					Period 12/31/09
									Depreciable				Depreciable					Depreciable				Accumulated			Date of
Real Estate	Location		Encumbrances			Land			Property		Land		Property			Land		Property		Total		Depreciation			Acquisition
Williamsburg	Williamsburg	VA		—			117			350		—		34			111		384		495		(43	)		2006
Birch Bay	Blaine	WA		—			502			1,185		7		28			509		1,213		1,722		(208	)		2004
Cascade	Snoqualmie	WA		—			822			1,939		11		253			833		2,192		3,025		(354	)		2004
Chehalis	Chehalis	WA		—			590			1,392		8		194			598		1,585		2,183		(255	)		2004
Crescent Bar	Quincy	WA		—			314			741		4		32			318		772		1,090		(121	)		2004
Grandy Creek	Concrete	WA		—			—			—		475		1,456			475		1,456		1,931		(93	)		2004
Kloshe Illahee	Federal Way	WA		(17,383	)		2,408			7,286		—		493			2,408		7,779		10,187		(3,195	)		1997
La Conner	La Conner	WA		—			600			1,416		8		438			608		1,854		2,462		(282	)		2004
Leavenworth	Leavenworth	WA		—			786			1,853		10		302			796		2,156		2,952		(338	)		2004
Little Diamond	Newport	WA		—			353			834		5		70			358		904		1,262		(146	)		2004
Long Beach	Seaview	WA		—			321			758		4		111			326		869		1,195		(136	)		2004
Mount Vernon	Bow	WA		—			621			1,464		8		430			629		1,894		2,523		(290	)		2004
Oceana	Oceana City	WA		—			283			668		4		32			287		701		988		(115	)		2004
Paradise	Silver Creek	WA		—			466			1,099		6		128			472		1,226		1,699		(199	)		2004
Thunderbird	Monroe	WA		—			500			1,178		7		99			506		1,277		1,783		(210	)		2004
Arrowhead	Wisconsin Dells	WI		—			522			1,616		—		7			522		1,623		2,145		(189	)		2006
Fremont	Fremont	WI		(4,012	)		1,437			4,296		—		244			1,437		4,540		5,976		(803	)		2004
Plymouth Rock	Elkhart Lake	WI		(6,524	)		2,293			6,879		—		—			2,293		6,879		9,172		(214	)		2009
Tranquil Timbers	Sturgeon Bay	WI		—			714			2,152		—		75			714		2,227		2,941		(269	)		2006
Yukon Trails	Lyndon Station	WI		—			556			1,629		—		112			556		1,741		2,297		(314	)		2004
Subtotal of Properties Held for Long Term				(1,542,791	)		537,852			1,564,224		5,828		331,993			543,613		1,896,661		2,440,274		(610,200	)
Properties Held for Sale
Creekside	Wyoming	MI		(3,628	)		1,109			3,444		—		—			1,109		3,444		4,553		(929	)		1998
Subtotal of Properties Held for Sale				(3,628	)		1,109			3,444		—		(202	)		1,109		3,444		4,553		(929	)
Realty Systems, Inc.				(1,482	)		—			—		—		77,815			—		77,815		77,815		(6,344	)		2002
Management Business and other				(1	)		(67	)		436		3		15,783			—		15,568		15,572		(12,291	)		1990
				(1,547,901	)		538,894			1,568,104		5,828		425,389			544,722		1,993,493		2,538,215		(629,768	)

NOTES:

(1) For depreciable property, the Company uses a30-year estimated life for buildings acquired and structural and land improvements, aten-to-fifteen year estimated life for building upgrades and athree-to-seven year estimated life for furniture and fixtures.

S-10

(2)	The schedule excludes Properties in which the Company has a non-controlling joint venture interest and accounts for using the equity method of accounting.
(3)	The balance of furniture and fixtures included in the total amounts was approximately $42.8 million as of December 31, 2009.
(4)	The aggregate cost of land and depreciable property for federal income tax purposes was approximately $2.5 billion, as of December 31, 2009.
(5)	All Properties were acquired, except for Country Place Village, which was constructed.
(6)	Creekside was held for sale as of December 31, 2009, pursuant to FASB ASC360-10-35.

S-11

Schedule III

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(amounts in thousands)

The changes in total real estate for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were as follows:

	2009			2008		2007
Balance, beginning of year	$	2,491,021		$	2,396,115	$	2,337,460
Acquisitions		18,116			10,393		45,646
Improvements		30,876			26,716		29,384
Dispositions and other		(8,525	)		—		(16,375	)
Inventory reclassification		6,727			57,797		—
Balance, end of year	$	2,538,215		$	2,491,021	$	2,396,115

The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were as follows:

	2009(a)			2008(b)		2007
Balance, beginning of year	$	561,104		$	494,211	$	435,809
Depreciation expense		72,419			66,893		63,991
Dispositions and other		(3,755	)		—		(5,589	)
Balance, end of year	$	629,768		$	561,104	$	494,211

(a) Includes approximately $2.4 million of depreciation from rental operations included in Ancillary services revenues, net.

(b) Depreciation expense excludes approximately $0.8 million of unamortized lease costs expenses related to the termination of the Privileged Access lease and includes approximately $1.2 million of depreciation from rental operations included in Ancillary services revenues, net.

S-12