UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-1004
FORM 10-Q
| | |
[X] | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
OR
| | |
[ ] | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-11846
AptarGroup, Inc.
| | |
DELAWARE | | 36-3853103 |
(State of Incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
475 WEST TERRA COTTA AVENUE, SUITE E, CRYSTAL LAKE, ILLINOIS 60014
815-477-0424
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filerþ | | Accelerated filero | | Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting companyo |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date
| | |
Class | | Outstanding at October 29, 2009 |
| | |
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share | | 67,582,990 shares |
AptarGroup, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009
INDEX
i
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
AptarGroup, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
In thousands, except per share amounts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Sales | | $ | 473,668 | | | $ | 532,180 | | | $ | 1,345,992 | | | $ | 1,615,757 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation shown below) | | | 320,675 | | | | 366,637 | | | | 899,222 | | | | 1,102,325 | |
Selling, research & development and administrative | | | 64,370 | | | | 72,528 | | | | 204,971 | | | | 230,471 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 33,054 | | | | 32,537 | | | | 94,590 | | | | 99,864 | |
Facilities consolidation and severance | | | 2,631 | | | | — | | | | 5,726 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 420,730 | | | | 471,702 | | | | 1,204,509 | | | | 1,432,660 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | 52,938 | | | | 60,478 | | | | 141,483 | | | | 183,097 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Income (Expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | (3,965 | ) | | | (5,261 | ) | | | (12,569 | ) | | | (14,204 | ) |
Interest income | | | 772 | | | | 3,475 | | | | 2,758 | | | | 10,334 | |
Equity in results of affiliates | | | — | | | | 194 | | | | — | | | | 417 | |
Miscellaneous, net | | | (164 | ) | | | (635 | ) | | | (1,393 | ) | | | (1,320 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (3,357 | ) | | | (2,227 | ) | | | (11,204 | ) | | | (4,773 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Before Income Taxes | | | 49,581 | | | | 58,251 | | | | 130,279 | | | | 178,324 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for Income Taxes | | | 16,114 | | | | 18,557 | | | | 41,746 | | | | 56,475 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 33,467 | | | $ | 39,694 | | | $ | 88,533 | | | $ | 121,849 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | | $ | 31 | | | $ | (43 | ) | | $ | 90 | | | $ | (24 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Attributable to AptarGroup, Inc. | | $ | 33,498 | | | $ | 39,651 | | | $ | 88,623 | | | $ | 121,825 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Attributable to AptarGroup, Inc. Per Common Share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.49 | | | $ | 0.59 | | | $ | 1.31 | | | $ | 1.79 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 1.27 | | | $ | 1.72 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Number of Shares Outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 67,691 | | | | 67,670 | | | | 67,691 | | | | 67,958 | |
Diluted | | | 69,489 | | | | 69,937 | | | | 69,790 | | | | 70,812 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends Per Common Share | | $ | 0.15 | | | $ | 0.15 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 0.41 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying unaudited notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
AptarGroup, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
In thousands, except per share amounts
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
|
Current Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and equivalents | | $ | 294,851 | | | $ | 192,072 | |
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $11,756 in 2009 and $11,900 in 2008 | | | 325,392 | | | | 343,937 | |
Inventories, net | | | 229,871 | | | | 244,775 | |
Prepaid and other | | | 66,119 | | | | 78,965 | |
| | | | |
| | | 916,233 | | | | 859,749 | |
| | | | |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment: | | | | | | | | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 323,427 | | | | 297,093 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 1,606,682 | | | | 1,484,353 | |
| | | | |
| | | 1,930,109 | | | | 1,781,446 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation | | | (1,179,046 | ) | | | (1,078,063 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | 751,063 | | | | 703,383 | |
Land | | | 19,484 | | | | 17,499 | |
| | | | |
| | | 770,547 | | | | 720,882 | |
| | | | |
|
Other Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Investments in affiliates | | | 750 | | | | 712 | |
Goodwill | | | 232,987 | | | | 227,041 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 10,121 | | | | 14,061 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 10,571 | | | | 9,377 | |
| | | | |
| | | 254,429 | | | | 251,191 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 1,941,209 | | | $ | 1,831,822 | |
| | | | | | |
See accompanying unaudited notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
AptarGroup, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
In thousands, except per share amounts
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Equity | | | | | | | | |
|
Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable | | $ | 66,493 | | | $ | 39,919 | |
Current maturities of long-term obligations | | | 23,968 | | | | 24,700 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 282,482 | | | | 310,408 | |
| | | | |
| | | 372,943 | | | | 375,027 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Obligations | | | 210,773 | | | | 226,888 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred Liabilities and Other: | | | | | | | | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 21,732 | | | | 24,561 | |
Retirement and deferred compensation plans | | | 60,985 | | | | 62,476 | |
Deferred and other non-current liabilities | | | 13,659 | | | | 11,072 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | |
| | | 96,376 | | | | 98,109 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Equity: | | | | | | | | |
AptarGroup, Inc. stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1 million shares authorized, none outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, $.01 par value | | | 805 | | | | 801 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | 267,237 | | | | 254,216 | |
Retained earnings | | | 1,124,161 | | | | 1,065,998 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 206,897 | | | | 139,300 | |
Less treasury stock at cost, 13.8 and 12.5 million shares as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively | | | (338,710 | ) | | | (329,285 | ) |
| | | | |
Total AptarGroup, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity | | | 1,260,390 | | | | 1,131,030 | |
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | | | 727 | | | | 768 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Equity | | | 1,261,117 | | | | 1,131,798 | |
| | | | |
Total Liabilities and Equity | | $ | 1,941,209 | | | $ | 1,831,822 | |
| | | | | | |
See accompanying unaudited notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
AptarGroup, Inc.CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Unaudited)
In thousands, except per share amounts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | AptarGroup, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Other | | | Common | | | | | | | Capital in | | | Non- | | | | |
| | Comprehensive | | | Retained | | | Comprehensive | | | Stock | | | Treasury | | | Excess of | | | Controlling | | | Total | |
| | Income | | | Earnings | | | Income/(Loss) | | | Par Value | | | Stock | | | Par Value | | | Interest | | | Equity | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance — December 31, 2007: | | | | | | $ | 950,566 | | | $ | 214,294 | | | $ | 794 | | | $ | (275,658 | ) | | $ | 229,022 | | | $ | 553 | | | $ | 1,119,571 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 153,489 | | | | 153,495 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (6 | ) | | | 153,489 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | (61,217 | ) | | | | | | | (61,250 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 33 | | | | (61,217 | ) |
Changes in unrecognized pension gains/losses and related amortization, net of tax | | | (13,164 | ) | | | | | | | (13,164 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (13,164 | ) |
Treasury Locks, net of tax | | | (595 | ) | | | | | | | (595 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (595 | ) |
Net gain on Derivatives, net of tax | | | 15 | | | | | | | | 15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 78,528 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock option exercises & restricted stock vestings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | | | | 3,942 | | | | 25,194 | | | | | | | | 29,143 | |
Cash dividends declared on common stock | | | | | | | (38,063 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (38,063 | ) |
Noncontrolling interest in entity acquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 188 | | | | 188 | |
Treasury stock purchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (57,569 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (57,569 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance — December 31, 2008: | | | | | | $ | 1,065,998 | | | $ | 139,300 | | | $ | 801 | | | $ | (329,285 | ) | | $ | 254,216 | | | $ | 768 | | | $ | 1,131,798 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 88,533 | | | | 88,623 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (90 | ) | | | 88,533 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | 66,988 | | | | | | | | 66,939 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 49 | | | | 66,988 | |
Changes in unrecognized pension gains/losses and related amortization, net of tax | | | 596 | | | | | | | | 596 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 596 | |
Changes in treasury locks, net of tax | | | 60 | | | | | | | | 60 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 60 | |
Net gain on Derivatives, net of tax | | | 2 | | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 156,179 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock option exercises & restricted stock vestings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | 2,308 | | | | 13,021 | | | | | | | | 15,333 | |
Cash dividends declared on common stock | | | | | | | (30,460 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (30,460 | ) |
Treasury stock purchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (11,733 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (11,733 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance — September 30, 2009: | | | | | | $ | 1,124,161 | | | $ | 206,897 | | | $ | 805 | | | $ | (338,710 | ) | | $ | 267,237 | | | $ | 727 | | | $ | 1,261,117 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statement
4
AptarGroup, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
In thousands, brackets denote cash outflows
| | | | | | | | |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 88,533 | | | $ | 121,849 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 90,409 | | | | 96,072 | |
Amortization | | | 4,181 | | | | 3,792 | |
Stock option based compensation | | | 8,440 | | | | 9,916 | |
Provision for bad debts | | | 973 | | | | 1,827 | |
Facilities consolidation and severance | | | 4,679 | | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (6,299 | ) | | | (4,437 | ) |
Retirement and deferred compensation plans | | | (6,066 | ) | | | 815 | |
Equity in results of affiliates in excess of cash distributions received | | | — | | | | (220 | ) |
Changes in balance sheet items, excluding effects from foreign currency adjustments: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 31,777 | | | | (37,618 | ) |
Inventories | | | 24,992 | | | | 5,508 | |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | 7,012 | | | | (7,571 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | (40,362 | ) | | | 8,060 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 2,197 | | | | (6,387 | ) |
Other changes, net | | | 11,682 | | | | 11,555 | |
| | | | |
Net Cash Provided by Operations | | | 222,148 | | | | 203,161 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (103,021 | ) | | | (157,287 | ) |
Disposition of property and equipment | | | 1,295 | | | | 592 | |
Intangible assets acquired | | | (270 | ) | | | (755 | ) |
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | | | (7,577 | ) | | | (13,166 | ) |
Investment in affiliates | | | — | | | | (807 | ) |
Collection (issuance) of notes receivable, net | | | 54 | | | | (960 | ) |
| | | | |
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities | | | (109,519 | ) | | | (172,383 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from notes payable | | | 26,654 | | | | — | |
Repayments of notes payable | | | — | | | | (38,616 | ) |
Proceeds from long-term obligations | | | 7,975 | | | | 100,000 | |
Repayments of long-term obligations | | | (25,667 | ) | | | (23,579 | ) |
Dividends paid | | | (30,460 | ) | | | (27,870 | ) |
Proceeds from stock options exercises | | | 4,959 | | | | 12,813 | |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | (11,070 | ) | | | (57,569 | ) |
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options | | | 1,151 | | | | 3,886 | |
| | | | |
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities | | | (26,458 | ) | | | (30,935 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash | | | 16,608 | | | | (12,402 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents | | | 102,779 | | | | (12,559 | ) |
Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | 192,072 | | | | 313,739 | |
| | | | |
Cash and Equivalents at End of Period | | $ | 294,851 | | | $ | 301,180 | |
| | | | | | |
See accompanying unaudited notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
AptarGroup, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in Thousands, Except per Share Amounts, or Otherwise Indicated)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AptarGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The terms “AptarGroup” or “Company” as used herein refer to AptarGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair statement of consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Accordingly, these unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year.
In order to be comparable to the current period presentation, in the second quarter 2009 the Company revised its 2008 classification relating to a French research and development tax credit from Provision for Income Taxes to Selling, Research & Development and Administrative.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
NOTE 2 — INVENTORIES
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, approximately 20% and 23%, respectively, of the total inventories are accounted for by using the LIFO method. Inventories, by component net of reserves, consisted of:
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 87,752 | | | $ | 93,081 | |
Work in progress | | | 58,233 | | | | 55,228 | |
Finished goods | | | 87,996 | | | | 99,310 | |
| | | | |
Total | | | 233,981 | | | | 247,619 | |
Less LIFO Reserve | | | (4,110 | ) | | | (2,844 | ) |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 229,871 | | | $ | 244,775 | |
| | | | | | |
NOTE 3 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill since the year ended December 31, 2008 are as follows by reporting segment:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pharma | | | Beauty & Home | | | Closures | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2008 | | $ | 28,133 | | | $ | 158,823 | | | $ | 40,085 | | | $ | 227,041 | |
Acquisitions (See Note 10) | | | — | | | | 666 | | | | — | | | | 666 | |
Foreign currency exchange effects | | | 1,074 | | | | 3,409 | | | | 797 | | | | 5,280 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of September 30, 2009 | | $ | 29,207 | | | $ | 162,898 | | | $ | 40,882 | | | $ | 232,987 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
6
The table below shows a summary of intangible assets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | September 30, 2009 | | | December 31, 2008 | |
| | Weighted Average | | | Gross | | | | | | | | | | | Gross | | | | | | | |
| | Amortization | | | Carrying | | | Accumulated | | | Net | | | Carrying | | | Accumulated | | | Net | |
| | Period (Years) | | | Amount | | | Amortization | | | Value | | | Amount | | | Amortization | | | Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortized intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Patents | | | 14 | | | $ | 19,873 | | | $ | (15,046 | ) | | $ | 4,827 | | | $ | 18,854 | | | $ | (13,357 | ) | | $ | 5,497 | |
License agreements and other | | | 6 | | | | 26,034 | | | | (20,740 | ) | | | 5,294 | | | | 25,641 | | | | (17,077 | ) | | | 8,564 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total intangible assets | | | 9 | | | $ | 45,907 | | | $ | (35,786 | ) | | $ | 10,121 | | | $ | 44,495 | | | $ | (30,434 | ) | | $ | 14,061 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aggregate amortization expense for the intangible assets above for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $2,113 and $1,297, respectively. Aggregate amortization expense for the intangible assets above for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 was $4,181 and $3,792, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31 is as follows:
| | | | |
2009 | | $ | 5,274 | |
2010 | | | 3,813 | |
2011 | | | 2,300 | |
2012 | | | 1,367 | |
2013 | | | 1,103 | |
Future amortization expense may fluctuate depending on changes in foreign currency rates. The estimates for amortization expense noted above are based upon foreign exchange rates as of September 30, 2009.
NOTE 4 — RETIREMENT AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Domestic Plans | | | Foreign Plans | |
Three months ended September 30, | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Service cost | | $ | 1,091 | | | $ | 1,109 | | | $ | 479 | | | $ | 419 | |
Interest cost | | | 955 | | | | 883 | | | | 638 | | | | 556 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (932 | ) | | | (755 | ) | | | (251 | ) | | | (212 | ) |
Amortization of net loss | | | 60 | | | | 48 | | | | 160 | | | | 193 | |
Amortization of prior service cost | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 97 | | | | 20 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 1,175 | | | $ | 1,286 | | | $ | 1,123 | | | $ | 976 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Domestic Plans | | | Foreign Plans | |
Nine months ended September 30, | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Service cost | | $ | 3,273 | | | $ | 3,045 | | | $ | 1,315 | | | $ | 1,275 | |
Interest cost | | | 2,865 | | | | 2,611 | | | | 1,835 | | | | 1,689 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (2,796 | ) | | | (2,309 | ) | | | (720 | ) | | | (644 | ) |
Amortization of net loss | | | 180 | | | | 60 | | | | 459 | | | | 583 | |
Amortization of prior service cost | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 278 | | | | 61 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 3,525 | | | $ | 3,410 | | | $ | 3,167 | | | $ | 2,964 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS
In order to meet or exceed minimum funding levels required by U.S. law, the Company expects to contribute approximately $10 million to its domestic defined benefit plans in 2009 and has contributed $8.9 million as of September 30, 2009. The Company also expects to contribute approximately $15 million to its foreign defined benefit plans in 2009 and as of September 30, 2009, has contributed approximately $0.6 million.
7
NOTE 5 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company maintains a foreign exchange risk management policy designed to establish a framework to protect the value of the Company’s non-functional denominated transactions from adverse changes in exchange rates. Sales of the Company’s products can be denominated in a currency different from the currency in which the related costs to produce the product are denominated. Changes in exchange rates on such inter-country sales impact the Company’s results of operations. The Company’s policy is not to engage in speculative foreign currency hedging activities, but to minimize its net foreign currency transaction exposure defined as firm commitments and transactions recorded and denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. The Company may use foreign currency forward exchange contracts, options and cross currency swaps to hedge these risks.
The Company maintains an interest rate risk management strategy to minimize significant, unanticipated earnings fluctuations that may arise from volatility in interest rates.
For derivative instruments designated as hedges, the Company formally documents the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as the risk management objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions, and the method of assessing hedge effectiveness. Additionally, in order to designate any derivative instrument as a hedge of an anticipated transaction, the significant characteristics and expected terms of any anticipated transaction must be specifically identified, and it must be probable that the anticipated transaction will occur.
FAIR VALUE HEDGES
The Company has an interest rate swap to convert a portion of its fixed-rate debt into variable-rate debt. Under the interest rate swap contract, the Company exchanges, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate amounts, which is calculated based on an agreed upon notional amount.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company recorded the fair value of the derivative instrument of $818 thousand in other non-current assets with a corresponding increase to debt related to the fixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreement with a notional principal value of $10 million. No gain or loss related to the change in fair value was recorded in the income statement for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008 as any hedge ineffectiveness for the period was immaterial.
CASH FLOW HEDGES
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had one foreign currency cash flow hedge. A French entity of AptarGroup, AptarGroup Holding SAS, has hedged the risk of variability in Euro equivalent associated with the cash flows of an intercompany loan granted in Brazilian Real. The forward contracts utilized were designated as a hedge of the changes in the cash flows relating to the changes in foreign currency rates relating to the loan and related forecasted interest. The notional amount of the foreign currency forward contracts utilized to hedge cash flow exposure was 4.2 million Brazilian Real ($2.4 million) as of September 30, 2009. The notional amount of the foreign currency forward contracts utilized to hedge cash flow exposure was 5.5 million Brazilian Real ($2.9 million) as of September 30, 2008.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company did not recognize any net gain (loss) as any hedge ineffectiveness for the period was immaterial, and the Company did not recognize any net gain (loss) related to the portion of the hedging instrument excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts hedge certain forecasted transactions for two and a half years (March 2012).
HEDGE OF NET INVESTMENTS IN FOREIGN OPERATIONS
A significant number of the Company’s operations are located outside of the United States. Because of this, movements in exchange rates may have a significant impact on the translation of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company’s foreign entities. A weakening U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies has an additive translation effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Conversely, a strengthening U.S. dollar has a dilutive effect. The Company in some cases maintains debt in these subsidiaries to offset the net asset exposure. The Company does not otherwise actively manage this risk using derivative financial instruments. In the event the Company plans on a full or partial liquidation of any of its foreign subsidiaries where the Company’s net investment is likely to be monetized, the Company will consider hedging the currency exposure associated with such a transaction.
OTHER
As of September 30, 2009, the Company recorded the fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts of $1.6 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $693 thousand in prepayments and other and $2.2 million in deferred and other non-current liabilities in the balance sheet. All forward exchange contracts outstanding as of September 30, 2009 had an aggregate contract amount of $212 million.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Statement of Financial Position as of September 30, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Derivative | | | | Derivative |
(in thousands) | | | | Assets | | | | Liabilities |
Derivative Contracts Designated as | | Balance Sheet | | September 30, | | | | September 30, |
Hedging Instruments | | Location | | 2009 | | Balance Sheet Location | | 2009 |
Interest Rate Contracts | | Other Assets Miscellaneous | | $ | 818 | | | | $ | — |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | | | | — | | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities | | | 250 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | | | | — | | Deferred and other non- current liabilities | | | 371 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 818 | | | | | 621 |
8
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Derivative | | | | Derivative |
(in thousands) | | | | Assets | | | | Liabilities |
Derivative Contracts Designated as | | Balance Sheet | | September 30, | | | | September 30, |
Hedging Instruments | | Location | | 2009 | | Balance Sheet Location | | 2009 |
Derivative Contracts Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | Prepayments & Other | | | 693 | | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities | | | 1,394 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | | | | — | | Deferred and other non-current liabilities | | | 1,782 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 693 | | | | $ | 3,176 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Derivative Contracts | | | | $ | 1,511 | | | | $ | 3,797 |
| | | | | | | | |
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Financial Performance
for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in | |
| | | | | | Income on Derivative | |
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging | | Location of Gain or (Loss) | | | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
Relationships | | Recognized in Income on Derivative | | | September 30, 2009 | | | September 30, 2009 | |
Interest Rate Contracts | | (a) | | | $ — | | | $ — | |
(a) | | Interest rate swap uses the short-cut method which adjusts short term debt. Therefore, there is no net impact on income. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 | |
Derivatives in Cash Flow | | Amount of | | | Location of | | | | | | | Location of Gain | | | Amount of Gain or | |
Hedging Relationships | | Gain or | | | Gain or | | | Amount of | | | or (Loss) | | | (Loss) Recognized | |
| | (Loss) | | | (Loss) | | | Gain or | | | Recognized in | | | in Income of | |
| | Recognized | | | Reclassified | | | (Loss) From | | | Income on | | | Derivative | |
| | in OCI on | | | From | | | Accumulated | | | Derivative | | | (Ineffective Portion | |
| | Derivative | | | Accumulated | | | OCI Into | | | (Ineffective | | | and Amount | |
| | (Effective | | | OCI Into | | | Income | | | Portion and | | | Excluded From | |
| | Portion) | | | Income | | | (Effective | | | Amount Excluded | | | Effectiveness | |
| | | | | (Effective | | | Portion) | | | from Effectiveness | | | Testing) | |
| | 2009 | | | Portion) | | | 2009 | | | Testing) | | | 2009 | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | $ | 17 | | | | | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 17 | | | | | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | |
Derivatives in Cash Flow | | Amount of | | | Location of | | | | | | | Location of Gain | | | Amount of Gain or | |
Hedging Relationships | | Gain or | | | Gain or | | | Amount of | | | or (Loss) | | | (Loss) Recognized | |
| | (Loss) | | | (Loss) | | | Gain or | | | Recognized in | | | in Income of | |
| | Recognized | | | Reclassified | | | (Loss) From | | | Income on | | | Derivative | |
| | in OCI on | | | From | �� | | Accumulated | | | Derivative | | | (Ineffective Portion | |
| | Derivative | | | Accumulated | | | OCI Into | | | (Ineffective | | | and Amount | |
| | (Effective | | | OCI Into | | | Income | | | Portion and | | | Excluded From | |
| | Portion) | | | Income | | | (Effective | | | Amount Excluded | | | Effectiveness | |
| | | | | (Effective | | | Portion) | | | from Effectiveness | | | Testing) | |
| | 2009 | | | Portion) | | | 2009 | | | Testing) | | | 2009 | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | $ | 7 | | | | | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 7 | | | | | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in | |
| | | | | | Income on Derivative | |
Derivatives Not Designated as | | Location of Gain or (Loss) | | | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
Hedging Instruments | | Recognized in Income on Derivative | | | September 30, 2009 | | | September 30, 2009 | |
| | Other Income (Expense), | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Exchange Contracts | | Miscellaneous, net | | $(1,149) | | $(3,253) |
9
NOTE 6 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company, in the normal course of business, is subject to a number of lawsuits and claims both actual and potential in nature. Management believes the resolution of these claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse or positive effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
Under its Certificate of Incorporation, the Company has agreed to indemnify its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was serving, at its request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy that covers a portion of its exposure. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. The Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of September 30, 2009.
NOTE 7 — STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On July 17, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase an additional four million shares of its outstanding common stock. There is no expiration date for this repurchase program.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company repurchased 99 thousand shares for an aggregate amount of $3.5 million. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has outstanding authorizations to repurchase up to approximately 4.2 million additional shares. The timing of and total amount expended for the share repurchase depend upon market conditions.
NOTE 8 — EARNINGS PER SHARE
AptarGroup’s authorized common stock consists of 199 million shares, having a par value of $.01 each. Information related to the calculation of earnings per share is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | September 30, 2009 | | | September 30, 2008 | |
| | Diluted | | | Basic | | | Diluted | | | Basic | |
Consolidated operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income available to common stockholders | | $ | 33,498 | | | $ | 33,498 | | | $ | 39,651 | | | $ | 39,651 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average equivalent shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares of common stock | | | 67,691 | | | | 67,691 | | | | 67,670 | | | | 67,670 | |
Effect of dilutive stock based compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 1,791 | | | | — | | | | 2,261 | | | | — | |
Restricted stock | | | 7 | | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total average equivalent shares | | | 69,489 | | | | 67,691 | | | | 69,937 | | | | 67,670 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.49 | | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 0.59 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Nine months ended | | | | |
| | September 30, 2009 | | September 30, 2008 |
| | Diluted | | Basic | | Diluted | | Basic |
Consolidated operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income available to common stockholders | | $ | 88,623 | | | $ | 88,623 | | | $ | 121,825 | | | $ | 121,825 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average equivalent shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares of common stock | | | 67,691 | | | | 67,691 | | | | 67,958 | | | | 67,958 | |
Effect of dilutive stock based compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 2,094 | | | | — | | | | 2,845 | | | | — | |
Restricted stock | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 9 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total average equivalent shares | | | 69,790 | | | | 67,691 | | | | 70,812 | | | | 67,958 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share | | $ | 1.27 | | | $ | 1.31 | | | $ | 1.72 | | | $ | 1.79 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 9 — SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates in the packaging components industry, which includes the development, manufacture and sale of consumer product dispensing systems. Operations that sell spray and lotion dispensing systems primarily to the personal care, fragrance/cosmetic and household markets form the Beauty & Home segment. Operations that sell dispensing systems to the pharmaceutical market form the Pharma segment. Operations that sell closures to each market served by AptarGroup form the Closures segment.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company evaluates performance of its business segments and allocates resources based upon earnings before interest expense in excess of
10
interest income, stock option and corporate expenses, income taxes and unusual items (collectively referred to as “Segment Income”). Financial information regarding the Company’s reportable segments is shown below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Total Sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beauty & Home | | $ | 242,485 | | | $ | 275,501 | | | $ | 673,612 | | | $ | 855,269 | |
Closures | | | 124,867 | | | | 142,548 | | | | 365,302 | | | | 421,756 | |
Pharma | | | 109,382 | | | | 118,351 | | | | 315,989 | | | | 351,052 | |
Other | | | 49 | | | | 31 | | | | 126 | | | | 204 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Sales | | | 476,783 | | | | 536,431 | | | | 1,355,029 | | | | 1,628,281 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Intersegment Sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beauty & Home | | $ | 2,864 | | | $ | 3,847 | | | $ | 8,378 | | | $ | 10,941 | |
Closures | | | 79 | | | | 124 | | | | 251 | | | | 811 | |
Pharma | | | 124 | | | | 249 | | | | 284 | | | | 573 | |
Other | | | 48 | | | | 31 | | | | 124 | | | | 199 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Intersegment Sales | | $ | 3,115 | | | $ | 4,251 | | | $ | 9,037 | | | $ | 12,524 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beauty & Home | | $ | 239,621 | | | $ | 271,654 | | | $ | 665,234 | | | $ | 844,328 | |
Closures | | | 124,788 | | | | 142,424 | | | | 365,051 | | | | 420,945 | |
Pharma | | | 109,258 | | | | 118,102 | | | | 315,705 | | | | 350,479 | |
Other | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net Sales | | $ | 473,668 | | | $ | 532,180 | | | $ | 1,345,992 | | | $ | 1,615,757 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beauty & Home (1) | | $ | 16,815 | | | $ | 21,409 | | | $ | 38,769 | | | $ | 76,451 | |
Closures (1) | | | 10,443 | | | | 12,280 | | | | 35,800 | | | | 35,597 | |
Pharma (1) | | | 31,269 | | | | 35,077 | | | | 91,752 | | | | 101,171 | |
Corporate Expenses & Other | | | (5,722 | ) | | | (8,772 | ) | | | (26,141 | ) | | | (31,049 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Income before interest and taxes | | $ | 52,805 | | | $ | 59,994 | | | $ | 140,180 | | | $ | 182,170 | |
Interest expense, net | | | (3,193 | ) | | | (1,786 | ) | | | (9,811 | ) | | | (3,870 | ) |
Net income/(loss) attributable to noncontrolling Interests | | | (31 | ) | | | 43 | | | | (90 | ) | | | 24 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 49,581 | | | $ | 58,251 | | | $ | 130,279 | | | $ | 178,324 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1): Included in the segment income figures reported above are consolidation/severance expenses, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CONSOLIDATION/SEVERANCE EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beauty & Home | | $ | (1,246 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,503 | ) | | $ | — | |
Closures | | | (1,385 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,223 | ) | | | — | |
Pharma | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidation/Severance Expenses | | $ | (2,631 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (5,726 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 10 — ACQUISITIONS
In August 2009, the Company acquired Covit do Brasil Componentes de Alumínio para Perfumaria Ltda. (Covit do Brasil) for approximately $7.6 million in cash. Covit do Brasil has been operating in Brazil since 2005 developing and supplying anodized aluminum parts primarily for the fragrance/cosmetic market. Covit do Brasil will generally be supplying parts to other companies within AptarGroup. No debt was assumed in the transaction. Covit do Brasil’s annual revenues are approximately $7.0 million, of which approximately $6.0 million are with AptarGroup subsidiaries. The excess purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired was allocated to Goodwill. Goodwill of approximately $666 thousand was recorded on the transaction. The results of operations subsequent to the acquisition are included in the reported income statement. Covit do Brasil is included in the Beauty and Home reporting segment.
In October 2008, the Company purchased the remaining 50% that it did not already own of Seaplast S.A. for approximately $6.3 million in cash. Seaplast S.A. is located in Spain and primarily produces dispensing closures. The consolidated statement of income includes Seaplast S.A.’s results of operations from October 29, 2008, the date of the acquisition. Prior to this date, 50% of Seaplast S.A.’s results were included in equity and results from affiliates. Goodwill of approximately $2.6 million was recorded on the transaction. Seaplast S.A. is included in the Closures reporting segment.
In April 2008, the Company acquired the equipment, inventory and intellectual property of CCL Industries’ Bag-on-Valve business (“CCLBOV”) for approximately $9.3 million in cash. No debt was assumed in the transaction. CCLBOV’s annual revenues are approximately $9.0 million. The excess purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired was allocated to Goodwill. Goodwill of approximately $3.4 million was recorded on the transaction. CCLBOV was located in Canada but the
11
assets purchased were transferred to existing AptarGroup facilities in the U.S. before the end of the second quarter 2008. CCLBOV is included in the Beauty and Home reporting segment.
At the end of March 2008, the Company acquired 70% of the outstanding shares of Next Breath LLC (“Next Breath”) for approximately $4.1 million in cash. No debt was assumed in the transaction. Next Breath, located in Baltimore, Maryland, is a contract service organization specializing in analytical testing of nasal and inhalation products on behalf of pharmaceutical, biotech, drug delivery and device companies. Next Breath’s annual sales are approximately $2.0 million. The excess purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to Goodwill. Goodwill of approximately $3.7 million was recorded on the transaction. Next Breath is included in the Pharma reporting segment.
None of these acquisitions had a material impact on the results of operations in 2008 or 2009 and therefore no proforma information is required.
NOTE 11 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The company applies the non-substantive vesting approach to valuating stock-based compensation, which means that an award is fully vested when the employee’s retention of the award is no longer contingent on providing subsequent service. Under this approach, compensation costs are recognized over the requisite service period of the award instead of ratably over the vesting period stated in the grant. As such, costs would be recognized immediately, if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or over the period from the date of grant until retirement eligibility if retirement eligibility is reached before the end of the vesting period stated in the grant.
The Company issues stock options and restricted stock units to employees under Stock Awards Plans approved by shareholders. Stock options are issued to non-employee directors for their services as directors under Director Stock Option Plans approved by shareholders. Options are awarded with the exercise price equal to the market price on the date of grant and generally become exercisable over three years and expire 10 years after grant. Restricted stock units generally vest over three years.
Compensation expense recorded attributable to stock options for the first nine months of 2009 was approximately $8.4 million ($6.3 million after tax), or $0.09 per share (basic and diluted). Approximately $7.6 million of the compensation expense was recorded in selling, research & development and administrative expenses and the balance was recorded in cost of sales. Compensation expense recorded attributable to stock options for the first nine months of 2008 was approximately $9.9 million ($7.1 million after tax), or $0.10 per share (basic and diluted). Approximately $9.1 million of the compensation expense was recorded in selling, research & development and administrative expenses and the balance was recorded in cost of sales.
The Company uses historical data to estimate expected life and volatility. The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted under the Stock Awards Plans was $7.33 and $10.02 per share in 2009 and 2008, respectively. These values were estimated on the respective dates of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
| | | | | | | | |
Stock Awards Plans: | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Dividend Yield | | | 1.6 | % | | | 1.4 | % |
Expected Stock Price Volatility | | | 24.2 | % | | | 22.4 | % |
Risk-free Interest Rate | | | 2.2 | % | | | 3.7 | % |
Expected Life of Option (years) | | | 6.9 | | | | 7.0 | |
The fair value of stock options granted under the Director Stock Option Plan was $7.90 and $12.08 per share in 2009 and 2008, respectively. These values were estimated on the respective date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
| | | | | | | | |
Director Stock Option Plans: | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Dividend Yield | | | 1.7 | % | | | 1.3 | % |
Expected Stock Price Volatility | | | 24.9 | % | | | 22.3 | % |
Risk-free Interest Rate | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3.8 | % |
Expected Life of Option (years) | | | 6.9 | | | | 7.0 | |
A summary of option activity under the Company’s stock option plans as of September 30, 2009, and changes during the period then ended is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock Awards Plans | | | Director Stock Option Plans | |
| | | | | | Weighted Average | | | | | | | Weighted Average | |
| | Shares | | | Exercise Price | | | Shares | | | Exercise Price | |
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2009 | | | 7,743,827 | | | $ | 24.51 | | | | 157,000 | | | $ | 23.25 | |
Granted | | | 1,252,270 | | | | 30.56 | | | | 48,000 | | | | 30.17 | |
Exercised | | | (454,242 | ) | | | 14.21 | | | | — | | | | — | |
12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock Awards Plans | | | Director Stock Option Plans | |
| | | | | | Weighted Average | | | | | | | Weighted Average | |
| | Shares | | | Exercise Price | | | Shares | | | Exercise Price | |
|
Forfeited or expired | | | (15,180 | ) | | | 32.07 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 | | | 8,526,675 | | | $ | 25.94 | | | | 205,000 | | | $ | 24.87 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 | | | 6,060,647 | | | $ | 23.13 | | | | 157,000 | | | $ | 23.25 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years): | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 | | | 6.1 | | | | | | | | 5.1 | | | | | |
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 | | | 5.0 | | | | | | | | 4.4 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 | | $ | 97,609 | | | | | | | $ | 2,588 | | | | | |
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 | | $ | 86,324 | | | | | | | $ | 2,243 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intrinsic Value of Options Exercised ($000) During the Nine Months Ended: | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2009 | | $ | 7,733 | | | | | | | $ | — | | | | | |
September 30, 2008 | | $ | 20,242 | | | | | | | $ | — | | | | | |
The fair value of shares vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $11.0 million and $10.4 million, respectively. Cash received from option exercises was approximately $5.0 million and the actual tax benefit realized for the tax deduction from option exercises was approximately $1.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the remaining valuation of stock option awards to be expensed in future periods was $6.8 million and the related weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized is 1.4 years.
The fair value of restricted stock unit grants is the market price of the underlying shares on the grant date. A summary of restricted stock unit activity as of September 30, 2009, and changes during the period then ended is presented below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted-Average | |
| | Shares | | | Grant-Date Fair Value | |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2009 | | | 21,739 | | | $ | 32.03 | |
Granted | | | 3,792 | | | | 29.72 | |
Vested | | | (10,353 | ) | | | 31.16 | |
| | | | |
Nonvested at September 30, 2009 | | | 15,178 | | | $ | 32.04 | |
| | | | | | |
Compensation expense recorded attributable to restricted stock unit grants for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 was approximately $136 and $370 thousand, respectively. The fair value of units vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $323 and $262 thousand, respectively. The intrinsic value of units vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $319 and $324 thousand, respectively. As of September 30, 2009 there was $10 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost relating to restricted stock unit awards which is expected to be recognized over a one year period.
NOTE 12 — INCOME TAX UNCERTAINTIES
The Company had approximately $10.3 and $9.7 million recorded for income tax uncertainties as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The amount, if recognized, that would impact the effective tax rate is $9.6 and $8.9 million, respectively. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes to the amount recorded for income tax uncertainties over the next 12 months.
NOTE 13 — FAIR VALUE
Authoritative guidelines require the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:
| • | | Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. |
| • | | Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets. |
| • | | Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability. |
As of September 30, 2009, the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities were categorized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swap(a) | | $ | 818 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 818 | | | $ | — | |
Forward exchange contracts(b) | | | 693 | | | | — | | | | 693 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets at fair value | | $ | 1,511 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,511 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forward exchange contracts(b) | | $ | 3,797 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,797 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities at fair value | | $ | 3,797 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,797 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
13
As of December 31, 2008, the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities were categorized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swap(a) | | $ | 1,068 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,068 | | | $ | — | |
Forward exchange contracts(b) | | | 10,865 | | | | — | | | | 10,865 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets at fair value | | $ | 11,933 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,933 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forward exchange contracts(b) | | $ | 1,195 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,195 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities at fair value | | $ | 1,195 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,195 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Based on third party quotation from financial institution |
(b) | | Based on observable market transactions of spot and forward rates |
Based on the variable borrowing rates currently available to the Company for long-term obligations with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of the Company’s long-term obligations approximates its book value.
NOTE 14 — FACILITIES CONSOLIDATION AND SEVERANCE
In the second quarter of 2009, the Company announced a plan to consolidate two French dispensing closure manufacturing facilities and several sales offices in North America and Europe and has subsequently expanded the program to include additional headcount reductions. The total costs associated with the consolidation/severance programs are estimated to be approximately $7 million, of which $2.6 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2009. Year to date costs associated with the plan are $5.7 million through the third quarter. The majority of the remaining costs are expected to be recorded as incurred in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first half of 2010. All charges related to the facilities consolidation and severance program are reported separately in the income statement.
As of September 30, 2009 we have recorded the following pre-tax charges associated with our consolidation/severance programs within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning | | | Charges for | | | | | | | | | | | Ending | |
| | Reserve at | | | the Quarter | | | | | | | | | | | Reserve at | |
| | 7/01/09 | | | Ended 9/30/09 | | | Cash Paid | | | FX Impact | | | 9/30/09 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee severance | | $ | 1,755 | | | $ | 2,376 | | | $ | (566 | ) | | $ | 382 | | | $ | 3,947 | |
Other costs | | | 1,064 | | | | 255 | | | | (618 | ) | | | 31 | | | | 732 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | $ | 2,819 | | | $ | 2,631 | | | $ | (1,184 | ) | | $ | 413 | | | $ | 4,679 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 15 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through November 3, 2009, which is the date the financial statements were issued. No events have occurred that would require adjustment to or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements which were issued on November 3, 2009.
14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, OR OTHERWISE INDICATED)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Sales | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation shown below) | | | 67.7 | | | | 68.9 | | | | 66.8 | | | | 68.2 | |
Selling, research & development and administration | | | 13.6 | | | | 13.6 | | | | 15.2 | | | | 14.3 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 7.0 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 7.0 | | | | 6.2 | |
Facilities Consolidation and Severance Expenses | | | 0.5 | | | | — | | | | 0.5 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | 11.2 | | | | 11.4 | | | | 10.5 | | | | 11.3 | |
Other income (expense) | | | (0.7 | ) | | | (0.5 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 10.5 | | | | 10.9 | | | | 9.7 | | | | 11.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 7.1 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | 7.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effective Tax Rate | | | 32.5 | % | | | 31.9 | % | | | 32.0 | % | | | 31.7 | % |
NET SALES
Net sales for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $474 million and $1.3 billion, respectively, and represented decreases of 11% and 17%, respectively, over the same periods a year ago. The average U.S. dollar exchange rate strengthened compared to the Euro in 2009 compared to 2008, and as a result, changes in exchange rates negatively impacted sales and accounted for approximately 5% and 8% of the sales decrease for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Sales from acquired companies added approximately 1% to the sales for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009. The remaining sales decrease was due primarily to weak sales of our products to the fragrance/cosmetic market and the pass through of price decreases primarily in our Closures segment to our customers related to lower resin costs.
For further discussion on net sales by reporting segment, please refer to the segment analysis of net sales and segment income on the following pages.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, net sales by geographic location:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2009 | | | % of Total | | | 2008 | | | % of Total | | | 2009 | | | % of Total | | | 2008 | | | % of Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | $ | 135,652 | | | | 28 | % | | $ | 138,116 | | | | 26 | % | | $ | 382,778 | | | | 28 | % | | $ | 401,532 | | | | 25 | % |
Europe | | | 273,142 | | | | 58 | % | | | 321,165 | | | | 60 | % | | | 779,710 | | | | 58 | % | | | 1,016,384 | | | | 63 | % |
Other Foreign | | | 64,874 | | | | 14 | % | | | 72,899 | | | | 14 | % | | | 183,504 | | | | 14 | % | | | 197,841 | | | | 12 | % |
COST OF SALES (EXCLUSIVE OF DEPRECIATION SHOWN BELOW)
Our cost of sales as a percent of net sales decreased to 67.7% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 68.9% in the third quarter of 2008.
The following factors positively impacted our cost of sales percentage in the third quarter of 2009:
Cost Savings Efforts.Due to the current economic condition, we have implemented cost reduction programs to bring costs in line with current production levels.
Mix of Products Sold.Compared to the prior year, our Pharma segment sales represented a larger percentage of our overall sales. This positively impacts our cost of sales percentage as margins on our pharmaceutical products typically are higher than the overall company average.
Strengthening of the U.S. Dollar.We are a net importer from Europe into the U.S. of products produced in Europe with costs denominated in Euros. As a result, when the U.S. dollar or other currencies strengthen against the Euro, products produced in Europe (with costs denominated in Euros) and sold in currencies that are stronger compared to the Euro, have a positive impact on cost of sales as a percentage of net sales.
The following factor negatively impacted our cost of sales percentage in the third quarter of 2009:
15
Underutilized Overhead Costs in Certain Operations.Several of our business operations, especially in the Beauty & Home business segment, saw a decrease in unit volumes. As a result of these lower production levels, overhead costs were underutilized, thus negatively impacting cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales.
Our cost of sales as a percent of net sales decreased to 66.8% in the first nine months of 2009 compared to 68.2% in the first nine months of 2008. The decrease is primarily due to the same factors mentioned above.
SELLING, RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE
Our Selling, Research & Development and Administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased by approximately $8.2 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period a year ago. Changes in currency rates accounted for approximately $1.8 million of the decrease in SG&A in the quarter. The remainder of the decrease is due primarily to cost savings efforts as mentioned above. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, SG&A as a percentage of net sales remained consistent at 13.6% when compared to the prior year.
SG&A decreased by approximately $25.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period a year ago. Changes in currency rates accounted for approximately $13.9 million of the decrease in SG&A. The remainder of the decrease is due primarily to the reasons mentioned above. SG&A as a percentage of net sales increased primarily due to lower sales volumes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the percentage increased to 15.2% compared to 14.3% of net sales in the same period of the prior year.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased approximately $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2009 to $33.0 million compared to $32.5 million in the third quarter of 2008. Changes in foreign currency rates accounted for a $1.3 million decrease, resulting in a net increase of $1.8 million on a constant currency basis. The increase is related to the write-off of certain license agreements that were deemed to have no value in the third quarter plus higher than normal capital expenditures during 2008. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net sales increased to 7.0% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 6.1% for the same period a year ago due to the decrease in sales.
Depreciation and amortization decreased approximately $5.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 to $94.6 million compared to $99.9 million for the first nine months of 2008. Changes in foreign currency rates accounted for an $8.1 million decrease for a net increase of $2.8 million on a constant currency basis. The explanation for this increase is the same as the third quarter comments above. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of sales increased to 7.0% of net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 6.2% in the same period of the prior year.
FACILITIES CONSOLIDATION AND SEVERANCE
Facilities consolidation and severance expenses were $2.6 million (0.5% of sales) in the third quarter of 2009. There were no corresponding expenses in 2008. The amount represents the recognition of expenses related to the Company’s previously announced plan to consolidate several facilities and reduce headcount. The total amount recorded since the program was initiated during the second quarter of 2009 is $5.7 million (0.5% of sales). The total costs associated with the consolidation/severance programs are estimated to be approximately $7 million. Annual savings are estimated to be in the range of $3 million to $4 million primarily beginning in 2010.
OPERATING INCOME
Operating income decreased approximately $7.6 million in the third quarter of 2009 to $52.9 million compared to $60.5 million in the same period in the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to the decrease in sales of our products, particularly in the Beauty & Home segment, the strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to the Euro which is having a negative impact on the translation of our results in U.S. dollars and the impact of the facilities consolidation and severance program as discussed above. Operating income as a percentage of net sales decreased to 11.2% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 11.4% for the same period in the prior year.
Operating income decreased approximately $41.6 million in the first nine months of 2009 to $141.5 million compared to $183.1 million in the same period in the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to the same reasons mentioned above when discussing the third quarter results. Operating income as a percentage of sales decreased to 10.5% in the first nine months of 2009 compared to 11.3% for the same period in the prior year.
NET OTHER EXPENSE
Net other expenses in the third quarter of 2009 increased to $3.4 million from $2.2 million in the same period in the prior year. Interest income decreased by $2.7 million due to lower interest rates earned on investments.
Net other expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased to $11.2 million from $4.8 million in the same period in the prior year mainly due to decreased interest income of $7.6 million.
16
EFFECTIVE TAX RATE
The reported effective tax rate increased to 32.5% and 32.0% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to 31.9% and 31.7% for the same periods ended September 30, 2008. The increases relate primarily to the mix of where the income was earned during these periods of time.
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO APTARGROUP, INC.
We reported net income of $33.5 million and $88.6 million in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $39.7 million and $121.8 million for the same periods in the prior year.
BEAUTY & HOME SEGMENT
Operations that sell spray and lotion dispensing systems primarily to the personal care, fragrance/cosmetic and household markets form the Beauty & Home segment.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Net Sales | | $ | 239,621 | | | $ | 271,654 | | | $ | 665,234 | | | $ | 844,328 | |
Segment Income (1) | | | 16,815 | | | | 21,409 | | | | 38,769 | | | | 76,451 | |
Segment Income as a percentage of Net Sales | | | 7.0 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | 5.8 | % | | | 9.1 | % |
(1) Segment income is defined as earnings before net interest, stock option and corporate expenses, income taxes and certain unusual items. The Company evaluates performance of its business units and allocates resources based upon segment income. For a reconciliation of segment income to income before income taxes, see Note 9 — Segment information to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1.
Net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 decreased 12% in the third quarter of 2009 to $239.6 million compared to $271.7 million in the third quarter of the prior year. Acquisitions did not have a material impact on the sales growth in the third quarter. Exchange rate changes negatively impacted sales by approximately 5% during the quarter. Excluding changes in exchange rates, sales decreased 7% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to continued weak demand from the fragrance / cosmetics market in North America and Europe, which decreased 15% from the third quarter of 2008. This weakness was partially offset by continued strong demand from South America. We also benefited from improved sales in the personal care market as demand for our lotion pumps increased related to consumers heightened interest in cleanliness in light of H1N1 concerns.
Net sales for the first nine months of 2009 decreased 21% in the first nine months of 2009 to $665.2 million compared to $844.3 million in the first nine months of the prior year. The strengthening U.S. dollar compared to the Euro negatively impacted sales and represented approximately 8% of the 21% decrease in sales. Acquisitions did not materially impact the sales growth in the first nine months of 2009. Excluding changes in exchange rates, sales decreased 13% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of the prior year. Sales of our products excluding foreign currency changes to the fragrance/cosmetic market decreased approximately 20% in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008. Sales excluding foreign currency changes to the personal care market decreased approximately 2% in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Segment income in the third quarter of 2009 decreased approximately 21% to $16.8 million compared to $21.4 million reported in the same period in the prior year. Acquisitions did not materially impact segment income in the quarter. The decrease in segment income is due primarily to underutilized overhead and the negative impact of a $1.2 million charge related to severance expenses. The segment has implemented cost savings activities in an effort to offset this decrease in segment income. Excluding the charge for severance expenses, Beauty & Home segment income declined 16% or $3.3 million.
Segment income in the first nine months of 2009 decreased approximately 49% to $38.8 million compared to $76.5 million reported in the same period in the prior year. Acquisitions had an immaterial impact on segment income in the first nine months. Profitability decreased primarily due to under absorbed fixed costs and $1.5 million of severance expenses, as mentioned above. Unit volumes continue to be lower when compared to last year. A focus during the first nine months of the year has been on cost savings activities in an effort to offset as much as possible the negative impact of these volume reductions.
CLOSURES SEGMENT
The Closures segment designs and manufactures primarily dispensing closures. These products are sold primarily to the personal care, household and food/beverage markets.
17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Sales | | $ | 124,788 | | | $ | 142,424 | | | $ | 365,051 | | | $ | 420,945 | |
Segment Income | | | 10,443 | | | | 12,280 | | | | 35,800 | | | | 35,597 | |
Segment Income as a percentage of Net Sales | | | 8.4 | % | | | 8.6 | % | | | 9.8 | % | | | 8.5 | % |
Net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 decreased approximately 12% in the third quarter of 2009 to $124.8 million compared to $142.4 million in the third quarter of the prior year. The strengthening U.S. dollar compared to the Euro negatively impacted sales and represented approximately 5% of the 12% decrease. Acquisitions accounted for a 2% increase in sales. Excluding changes in exchange rates and acquisitions, sales decreased 9% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same quarter of the prior year. Lower tooling sales contributed a $4.1 million decrease when comparing the third quarter of 2009 to the same period in the prior year. This represents a 51% decrease from the third quarter in 2008. Product sales, excluding foreign currency changes, to the personal care market decreased approximately 11% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to the pass-through of resin cost decreases and weak demand in Europe. We continue to see strong demand for our food and beverage closures in North America and this offset some of the weakness in Europe.
Net sales for the first nine months of 2009 decreased approximately 13% to $365.1 million compared to $420.9 million in the first nine months of the prior year. Once again, the strengthening U.S. dollar compared to the Euro negatively impacted sales and represented approximately 8% of the 13% decrease. Acquisitions accounted for a 2% increase in sales. Excluding changes in exchange rates, sales decreased 7% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of the prior year. Sales excluding foreign currency changes to the personal care and household markets decreased approximately 11% and 20%, respectively, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the resin price pass through discussed above. This decrease was offset by a 10% increase in sales to the food/beverage market.
Segment income in the third quarter of 2009 decreased approximately 15% to $10.4 million compared to $12.3 million reported in the same period in the prior year. The primary cause for the decline is the negative impact of a $1.4 million charge relating to consolidation/severance expenses. Excluding the charge for consolidation/severance expenses, Closures segment income declined 4% or $0.5 million.
Segment income in the first nine months of 2009 increased approximately 1% to $35.8 million compared to $35.6 million reported in the same period of the prior year. Included in these results are approximately $4.2 million of consolidation/restructuring expenses. The increase in segment income is primarily due to cost savings and the normal delay in the pass-through of lower resin costs to our customers in the first half of 2009.
PHARMA SEGMENT
Operations that sell dispensing systems to the pharmaceutical market form the Pharma segment.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Net Sales | | $ | 109,258 | | | $ | 118,102 | | | $ | 315,705 | | | $ | 350,479 | |
Segment Income | | | 31,269 | | | | 35,077 | | | | 91,752 | | | | 101,171 | |
Segment Income as a percentage of Net Sales | | | 28.6 | % | | | 29.7 | % | | | 29.1 | % | | | 28.9 | % |
Our net sales for the Pharma segment declined by 7% in the third quarter of 2009 to $109.3 million compared to $118.1 million in the third quarter of 2008. Changes in foreign currency rates negatively impacted the sales growth and accounted for approximately 4% of the 7% sales decline. The remaining 3% decline is primarily due to softer demand for our metered dose valves, but overall the segment reported relatively stable peformance.
Our net sales for the Pharma segment declined by 10% in the first nine months of 2009 to $315.7 million compared to $350.5 million in the first nine months of 2008. Changes in foreign currency rates negatively impacted the sales growth by approximately 8% for the first nine months of 2009.
Segment income in the third quarter of 2009 decreased approximately 11% to $31.3 million compared to $35.1 million reported in the same period in the prior year. The decrease in profit is primarily due to lower sales and the impact of changes in currency exchange rates.
Segment income in the first nine months of 2009 decreased approximately 9% to $91.8 million compared to $101.2 million reported in the same period in the prior year. The decrease in profitability for the first nine months of 2009 is primarily due to changes in currency exchange rates.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
A significant number of our operations are located outside of the United States. Because of this, movements in exchange rates may have a material impact on the translation of the financial statements of our foreign entities. Our primary foreign exchange exposure is to the Euro, but we have foreign exchange exposure to South American and Asian currencies, among others. We manage our foreign exchange exposures principally with forward exchange contracts to hedge certain transactions and firm purchase and sales commitments denominated in foreign currencies. A weakening U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies has an additive translation effect on our financial statements. Conversely, a strengthening U.S. dollar has a dilutive effect. In some
18
cases, we sell products denominated in a currency different from the currency in which the related costs are incurred. Changes in exchange rates on such inter-country sales could materially impact our results of operations.
QUARTERLY TRENDS
Our results of operations in the last quarter of the year typically are negatively impacted by plant shutdowns in December. In the future, our results of operations in a quarterly period could be impacted by factors such as changes in product mix, changes in material costs, changes in growth rates in the industries to which our products are sold, recognition of equity based compensation expense for retirement eligible employees in the period of grant and changes in general economic conditions in any of the countries in which we do business.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flow from operations and our revolving credit facility. Cash and equivalents increased to $294.9 million from $192.1 million at December 31, 2008. Total short and long-term interest bearing debt increased in the first nine months of 2009 to $301.2 million from $291.5 million at December 31, 2008. The ratio of our Net Debt (interest bearing debt less cash and cash equivalents) to Net Capital (stockholder’s equity plus Net Debt) decreased at the end of September 2009 to 0.5% compared to 8.1% at December 31, 2008.
In the first nine months of 2009, our operations provided approximately $222.1 million in cash flow compared to $203.2 million for the same period a year ago. In both periods, cash flow from operations was primarily derived from earnings before depreciation and amortization. The increase in cash flow from operations is due primarily to a reduction in working capital compared to the prior year. During the first nine months of 2009, we utilized the majority of the operating cash flows to finance capital expenditures and share repurchases.
We used $109.5 million in cash for investing activities during the first nine months of 2009, compared to $172.4 million during the same period a year ago. The decrease in cash used for investing activities is due primarily to $54.3 million less spent on capital expenditures in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008. Cash outlays for capital expenditures for 2009 are estimated to be approximately $130 million but could vary due to changes in exchange rates as well as the timing of capital projects. In 2008, approximately $6.3 million in cash was used to purchased the remaining 50% that it did not already own of Seaplast S.A., approximately $9.3 million in cash was used to acquire the bag-on-valve business of CCL Industries and approximately $4.1 million in cash was used to acquire 70% of the outstanding shares of Next Breath LLC. In 2009, approximately $7.6 million in cash was used to acquire Covit do Brasil.
We used approximately $26.5 million in cash on financing activities in the first nine months of 2009 compared to $30.9 million in cash provided in the first nine months of the prior year. The decrease in cash used by financing activities was not significant.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we plan to repay a $100 million intercompany loan to the U.S. from a subsidiary in Europe. This repayment is expected to be funded by a dividend from Europe and increased borrowings in the U.S. under our revolving credit facility.
Our revolving credit facility and certain long-term obligations require us to satisfy certain financial and other covenants including:
| | | | |
| | Requirement | | Level at September 30, 2009 |
Debt to total capital ratio | | Maximum of 55% | | 19% |
Based upon the above debt to total capital ratio covenant we would have the ability to borrow an additional $1.2 billion before the 55% requirement would be exceeded.
Our foreign operations have historically met cash requirements with the use of internally generated cash or borrowings. Foreign subsidiaries have financing arrangements with several foreign banks to fund operations located outside the U.S., but all these lines are uncommitted. Cash generated by foreign operations has generally been reinvested locally. The majority of our $294.9 million in cash and equivalents is located outside of the U.S.
We believe we are in a strong financial position and have the financial resources to meet business requirements in the foreseeable future. We have historically used cash flow from operations as our primary source of liquidity. In the event that customer demand would decrease significantly for a prolonged period of time and negatively impact cash flow from operations, we would have the ability to restrict and significantly reduce capital expenditure levels, which historically have been the most significant use of cash for us. A prolonged and significant reduction in capital expenditure levels could increase future repairs and maintenance costs as well as have a negative impact on operating margins if we were unable to invest in new innovative products.
On October 14, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share payable on November 18, 2009 to stockholders of record as of October 28, 2008.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We lease certain warehouse, plant and office facilities as well as certain equipment under noncancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through the year 2055. Most of the operating leases contain renewal options and certain equipment leases include options to purchase during or at the end of the lease term. Other than operating lease obligations, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
19
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new standard establishing the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (Codification) as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will not be authoritative in their own right as they will only serve to update the Codification. The issuance of this standard and the Codification does not change GAAP. We have adopted this standard for the current reporting period.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables. This update will allow companies to allocate consideration received for qualified separate deliverables using estimated selling price for both delivered and undelivered items when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable. Additional disclosures discussing the nature of multiple element arrangements, the types of deliverables under the arrangements, the general timing of their delivery, and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this new standard but do believe it will have a material impact on our financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB further updated the fair value measurement guidance to clarify how an entity should measure liabilities at fair value. The update reaffirms fair value is based on an orderly transaction between market participants, even though liabilities are infrequently transferred due to contractual or other legal restrictions. However, identical liabilities traded in the active market should be used when available. When quoted prices are not available, the quoted price of the identical liability traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities traded as an asset, or another valuation approach should be used. This update also clarifies that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a separate input or adjustment in the measurement of fair value. The guidance provided in this update is effective for the first reporting period beginning after issuance. Therefore, we have adopted this standard for the current reporting period.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which provides amendments to previous guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. This standard clarifies the characteristics that identify a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and changes how a reporting entity identifies a primary beneficiary that would consolidate the VIE from a quantitative risk and rewards calculation to a qualitative approach based on which variable interest holder has controlling financial interest and the ability to direct the most significant activities that impact the VIE’s economic performance. This statement requires the primary beneficiary assessment to be performed on a continuous basis. It also requires additional disclosures about an entity’s involvement with a VIE, restrictions on the VIE’s assets and liabilities that are included in the reporting entity’s consolidated balance sheet, significant risk exposures due to the entity’s involvement with the VIE, and how its involvement with a VIE impacts the reporting entity’s consolidated financial statements. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this new standard but don’t believe it will have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued an update to accounting standards related to an employer’s disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This update amends the disclosure requirements for employer’s disclosure of plan assets for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement plans. The objective of this update is to provide users of financial statements with an understanding of how investment allocation decisions are made, the major categories of plan assets held by the plans, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, significant concentration of risk within the company’s plan assets, and for fair value measurements determined using significant unobservable inputs a reconciliation of changes between the beginning and ending balances. The update is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Therefore, we will adopt the new disclosure requirements in the 2009 annual reporting period.
OUTLOOK
As we look to the fourth quarter, some of our customers remain cautious going into the end of the year given the continuing weak consumer sentiment and, consequently, our global visibility remains limited at this time. However, we are cautiously optimistic that inventories may be reaching the lowest level in certain markets though we expect the softness in the fragrance/cosmetic market to continue in the near-term. We will continue to diligently manage our costs without jeopardizing the flexibility necessary to respond to our customers’ demands and we will maintain our strong balance sheet.
When comparing our fourth quarter results to the prior year, it is important to note that declining resin costs in the fourth quarter of 2008 caused a $5.2 million reduction in our LIFO inventory reserve. This positive effect of approximately $.05 per diluted share is not expected to repeat in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Excluding facilities consolidation and severance program charges, we anticipate diluted earnings per share for the fourth quarter to be in the range of $.43 to $.48 per share compared to $.46 per share in the prior year.
20
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis and certain other sections of this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would” and “could” are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us. Accordingly, our actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements due to known or unknown risks and uncertainties that exist in our operations and business environment, including but not limited to:
• | | economic, environmental and political conditions worldwide; |
• | | changes in customer and/or consumer spending levels; |
• | | the cost of materials and other input costs (particularly resin, metal, anodization costs and transportation and energy costs); |
• | | the availability of raw materials and components (particularly from sole sourced suppliers); |
• | | significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; |
• | | our ability to increase prices; |
• | | our ability to contain costs and improve productivity; |
• | | changes in capital availability or cost, including interest rate fluctuations; |
• | | our ability to meet future cash flow estimates to support our goodwill impairment testing; |
• | | direct or indirect consequences of acts of war or terrorism; |
• | | difficulties in complying with government regulation; |
• | | competition, including technological advances; |
• | | our ability to protect and defend our intellectual property rights; |
• | | the timing and magnitude of capital expenditures; |
• | | our ability to identify potential new acquisitions and to successfully acquire and integrate such operations or products; |
• | | work stoppages due to labor disputes; |
• | | the demand for existing and new products (including delays in orders); |
• | | fiscal and monetary policy, including changes in worldwide tax rates; |
• | | our ability to manage worldwide customer launches of complex technical products, in particular in developing markets; |
• | | the success of our customers’ products, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry; |
• | | difficulties in product development and uncertainties related to the timing or outcome of product development; |
• | | significant product liability claims; |
• | | the timing, cost and successful completion of our facilities consolidation plan; |
• | | our successful implementation of a new worldwide ERP system starting in 2009 without disruption to our operations; and |
• | | other risks associated with our operations. |
Although we believe that our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Please refer to Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) of Part 1 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional risk factors affecting the Company.
21
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
A significant number of our operations are located outside of the United States. Because of this, movements in exchange rates may have a significant impact on the translation of the financial condition and results of operations of our entities. Our primary foreign exchange exposure is to the Euro, but we also have foreign exchange exposure to South American and Asian currencies, among others. A weakening U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies has an additive translation effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Conversely, a strengthening U.S. dollar has a dilutive effect.
Additionally, in some cases, we sell products denominated in a currency different from the currency in which the related costs are incurred. Any changes in exchange rates on such inter-country sales may impact our results of operations.
We manage our exposures to foreign exchange principally with forward exchange contracts to hedge certain firm purchase and sales commitments and intercompany cash transactions denominated in foreign currencies.
The table below provides information as of September 30, 2009 about our forward currency exchange contracts. The majority of the contracts expire before the end of the fourth quarter of 2009 with the exception of a few contracts on intercompany loans that expire in third quarter of 2013.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Average | | | Min / Max | |
| | Contract Amount | | | Contractual | | | Notional | |
Buy/Sell | | (in thousands) | | | Exchange Rate | | | Volumes | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Euro/U.S. Dollar | | $ | 110,511 | | | | 1.4580 | | | | 109,733-111,062 | |
Swiss Franc/Euro | | | 60,051 | | | | 0.6665 | | | | 52,861-60,051 | |
Euro/Swiss Franc | | | 14,997 | | | | 1.5052 | | | | 13,291-15,116 | |
U.S. Dollar/Euro | | | 6,793 | | | | 0.7117 | | | | 6,453-8,506 | |
Czech Koruna/Euro | | | 6,130 | | | | 0.0391 | | | | 6,102-6,855 | |
Euro/Brazilian Real | | | 5,778 | | | | 4.7538 | | | | 5,778-5,778 | |
Canadian Dollar/U.S. Dollar | | | 1,461 | | | | 0.9220 | | | | 1,000-1,900 | |
Euro/British Pound | | | 1,140 | | | | 0.8869 | | | | 407-1,140 | |
Euro/Czech Koruna | | | 1,027 | | | | 25.6498 | | | | 435-1,027 | |
U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar | | | 961 | | | | 1.0844 | | | | 961-961 | |
Mexican Peso/U.S. Dollar | | | 850 | | | | 0.0742 | | | | 850-953 | |
Euro/Japanese Yen | | | 803 | | | | 127.4944 | | | | 803-923 | |
Other | | | 1,111 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 211,613 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
As of September 30, 2009, we have recorded the fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts of $1.6 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $0.8 million in prepayments and $2.2 million in deferred and other non-current liabilities in the balance sheet.
At September 30, 2009, we had a fixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreement designated as a hedge with a notional principal value of $10 million which requires us to pay an average variable interest rate (which was 1.2% at September 30, 2009) and receive a fixed rate of 6.6%. The variable rate is adjusted semiannually based on London Interbank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”). Variations in market interest rates would produce changes in our net income. If interest rates increase by 100 basis points, net income related to the interest rate swap agreement would decrease approximately $0.1 million assuming a tax rate of 32%. As of September 30, 2009, we recorded the fair value of the fixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreement of $0.8 million in miscellaneous other assets with an offsetting adjustment to debt. No gain or loss was recorded in the income statement in 2009 as any hedge ineffectiveness for the period is immaterial.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company’s management has evaluated, with the participation of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 30, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company implemented an enterprise resource planning system at an individually significant entity located in Germany. Consequently, the control environment has been modified at this location. Other than the change mentioned above, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 that materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the FCP Aptar Savings Plan (the “Plan”) sold 260 shares of our common stock on behalf of the participants at an average price of $37.02 per share, for an aggregate amount of $10 thousand. At September 30, 2009, the Plan owns 17,023 shares of our common stock. The employees of AptarGroup S.A.S. and Valois S.A.S., our subsidiaries, are eligible to participate in the Plan. All eligible participants are located outside of the United States. An independent agent purchases shares of common stock available under the Plan for cash on the open market and we do not issue shares. We do not receive any proceeds from the purchase of Common Stock under the Plan. The agent under the Plan is Banque Nationale de Paris Paribas Asset Management. No underwriters are used under the Plan. All shares are sold in reliance upon the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 provided by Regulation S promulgated under that Act.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The following table summarizes the Company’s purchases of its securities for the quarter ended September 30, 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Total Number Of Shares | | | Maximum Number Of | |
| | Total Number | | | | | | | Purchased As Part Of | | | Shares That May Yet Be | |
| | Of Shares | | | Average Price | | | Publicly Announced | | | Purchased Under The | |
Period | | Purchased | | | Paid Per Share | | | Plans Or Programs | | | Plans Or Programs | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7/1 - 7/31/09 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 4,263,652 | |
8/1 - 8/31/09 | | | 49,804 | | | | 35.46 | | | | 49,804 | | | | 4,213,848 | |
9/1 - 9/30/09 | | | 49,401 | | | | 35.20 | | | | 49,401 | | | | 4,164,447 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 99,205 | | | $ | 35.33 | | | | 99,205 | | | | 4,164,447 | |
The Company announced the existing repurchase program on July 19, 2006. On July 17, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase an additional four million shares of its outstanding common stock. There is no expiration date for these repurchase programs.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On October 30, 2009, Eric Ruskoski provided notice to the Company that his employment agreement, as amended and restated on July 18, 2008, should not be extended. As a result, Mr. Ruskoski’s employment agreement will terminate on December 1, 2011, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms.
On October 30, 2009, the Company and Carl Siebel Consulting GmbH, a consulting firm owned by Carl Siebel, amended their existing consulting agreement dated as of October 17, 2007 so that the term of the agreement will expire on June 30, 2010, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
| | |
Exhibit 10.1 | | First Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated as of October 30, 2009 by and between AptarGroup, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Carl Siebel Consulting GmbH |
| | |
Exhibit 10.2 | | Notice dated October 30, 2009 relating to the Employment Agreement between AptarGroup, Inc., and Eric Ruskoski entered into on December 1, 2003, and amended and restated on July 18, 2008 |
| | |
Exhibit 31.1 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
Exhibit 31.2 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
Exhibit 32.1 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
Exhibit 32.2 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
23
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | AptarGroup, Inc. |
| | (Registrant) |
| | |
| | By/s/ Robert W. Kuhn |
| | Robert W. Kuhn |
| | Executive Vice President and |
| | Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and |
| | Principal Financial Officer) |
| | |
| | Date: November 3, 2009 |
24
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
| | |
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Description |
| | |
10.1 | | First Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated as of October 30, 2009 is by and between AptarGroup, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Carl Siebel Consulting GmbH |
10.2 | | Employment Agreement between AptarGroup, Inc., and Eric Ruskoski entered into on December 1, 2003, and amended and restated on July 18, 2008 |
31.1 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |