Increases in food safety revenues were partially offset by continued reductions in StarLink™ test kit sales, which were approximately $527,000 in the first six months of 2004 compared to $792,000 in the same period in the prior year. Production of the StarLink™ trait was discontinued in 2001, and the Company expects the rate of testing for this trait to diminish at a more rapid rate.
Water quality revenues decreased 18% to $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $3.9 million for the same period in the prior year. This decline reflects a decline in the number of remediation projects and correlated use of on-site testing. Also contributing to the decline was pricing pressure from direct competitors and lab-based testing services and the Company’s efforts to discontinue production and sales of low margin products, including several “build to order” test kits. Remediation and pesticide product line sales have declined at a faster rate than revenue generation from new product introductions and sales and large, one-time equipment sales made during the “Orange” terror alert in the first half of 2003 have not been replaced by new sales.
Antibody revenues decreased 15% to $5.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $6.0 million for the same period in the prior year. This decrease reflects a decline in demand for polyclonal antibody services in the first six months of 2004 compared to the same period in the prior year. The number of customers has remained constant, but the number of customer projects has dropped from the high levels experienced in the second quarter of 2003. This decrease also reflects the Company’s continuing efforts to remediate or decline business that results in non-margin producing revenue, including the discontinuation or reduction of work under three management agreements for monoclonal antibody services in low margin applications. Included in the antibody revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2004 is $212,000 of revenue associated with the Company’s sale of certain “catalog” inventories that were written-off in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Gross profits (total revenues less manufacturing expenses) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 declined $406,000, or 6%, to $6.8 million as compared to $7.2 million for the same period in the prior year. The decline reflects the lower revenue levels in the 2004 period as compared to the same period in 2003. Gross margin percentages increased for the six months ended June 30, 2004, to 58% as compared to 56% in the same period of 2003. The improvement in gross margin percentages for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is primarily related to the Company’s ongoing efforts in manufacturing process improvement and supply chain management. Also contributing to the improvement in gross margin was the $212,000 in revenue associated with the Company’s sale of certain “catalog” inventories that were written-off in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Manufacturing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 declined $721,000, or 13%, to $5.0 million as compared to $5.7 million for the same period in the prior year. The decline primarily reflects the lower revenue levels in the 2004 period as compared to the same period in 2003.
Back to Index
Research and development spending was $1.3 million, or 11% of net revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $1.3 million, or 10% of net revenues, for the same period in the prior year.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $330,000 to $4.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $5.0 million in the same period of the prior year. Included in the selling, general and administrative expenses for the six month period ended June 30, 2003, was a $315,000 provision for severance and related expenses associated with the Company’s termination of its former CEO in May 2003. Also in the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company benefited from the recovery of a $100,000 receivable it had written off in 2001.
The Company recorded interest income of $14,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to interest expense of $23,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003, due to higher levels of invested cash during the 2004 period.
Income before taxes totaled $818,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $821,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003.
The Company’s effective tax rate of 31% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is below the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to research and development credits and the utilization of foreign net operating losses not previously benefited.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $566,000, or $0.03 per diluted share, compared to net income of $546,000, or $0.03 per diluted share, in for the six months ended June 30, 2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities of $1.1 million and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was primarily the result of the earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) generated during each of the respective periods of $1.3 million. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
Net cash used in investing activities of $87,000 and $98,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was driven by capital expenditures for office and manufacturing equipment during the periods.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased to $198,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from $73,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003, primarily due to the higher proceeds from the issuance of short-term debt to finance the Company’s 2004 insurance premiums with a commercial lender, net of scheduled repayments on this financing as well as scheduled repayments on existing bank debt.
The Company's working capital, which equals current assets less current liabilities, increased to $12.6 million at June 30, 2004, compared to $11.7 million at December 31, 2003. Outstanding debt increased $170,000 from $1.2 million at December 31, 2003 to $1.4 million on June 30, 2004, primarily due the Company entering into an agreement to finance its 2004 insurance premiums with a commercial lender.
14
Back to Index
On May 5, 2000, the Company entered into a financing agreement with a commercial bank. This agreement provides for a $4 million term loan, all of which had been paid on or before December 31, 2002, and for a revolving line of credit of up to $5 million, none of which was outstanding and approximately $2.4 million of which was available at June 30, 2004, based on eligible assets. The revolving line of credit bears a variable interest rate of between 1.75% and 2.75% over LIBOR depending upon the ratio of the Company’s funded debt to EBITDA, and is subject to a borrowing base determined by the Company’s eligible accounts receivable. The Company’s annual effective rate of interest on this line of credit, taking into account the variable interest rate and LIBOR, was approximately 2.85% at June 30, 2004. On December 13, 2001 the Company entered into an agreement with a commercial bank to finance the construction of new facilities at its Windham, Maine location. This agreement provided for up to $1.5 million in financing, $1.1 million of which was outstanding at June 30, 2004, and is repayable over seven years, with principal payments that began on October 1, 2002. The loan bears a variable interest rate of between 2% and 3% over LIBOR depending upon the ratio of the Company’s funded debt to EBITDA. Payments are due monthly, with equal amortization of principal payments plus interest. The Company’s annual effective rate of interest on this loan at June 30, 2004, was approximately 3.10%. Under the terms of the above financing, the Company is required to meet certain quarterly financial covenants. The loan covenants were modified to a minimum quick ratio of 2.25 and a minimum tangible net worth of $22.5 million for the first three quarters of 2003, and the Company met the requirements during those periods. Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2003, the original provisions of the loan agreement regarding financial covenants became operative, namely a ratio of EBITDA to current maturities of debt plus interest and cash paid for taxes greater than 1.50 and a ratio of funded debt to EBITDA not to exceed 3.25. The Company was not in compliance with these fourth quarter 2003 covenants at December 31, 2003. In February 2004, the Company and the lender agreed to amend the terms of the EBITDA covenants, effective as of December 31, 2003, to exclude the impact of up to $3.3 million of charges the Company incurred in the fourth quarter of 2003, and therefore, the Company met the covenant requirements for the fourth quarter of 2003. Under the amended covenant, the Company was in compliance with these required ratios at June 30, 2004 and expects that it will be able to meet all of its financial covenants with respect to this indebtedness for 2004.
Based upon its cash on hand, credit facilities, current product sales and the anticipated sales of new products, the Company believes it has, or has access to, sufficient resources to meet its operating requirements at least through July 2005. The Company's ability to meet its long-term capital needs will depend on a number of factors, including compliance with existing and new loan covenants, the success of its current and future products, the focus and direction of its research and development program, competitive and technological advances, future relationships with corporate partners, government regulation, the Company's marketing and distribution strategy, its successful sale of additional common stock and/or the Company successfully locating and obtaining other financing, and the success of the Company's plan to make future acquisitions. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to meet the future liquidity requirements that may arise from these inherent and similar uncertainties.
15
Back to Index
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
EBITDA measures are presented as the Company believes this provides investors and the Company’s management with additional information to measure the Company’s liquidity. EBITDA measures are not a measure of performance under GAAP, and therefore should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income or cash flows from operations. Additionally, the Company’s EBITDA calculations may differ from the EBITDA calculations for other companies.
The calculation of the Company’s EBITDA measure (as discussed above), and the reconciliation of the Company’s EBITDA measure to net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, is as follows:
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
| |
| | 2004 | | | 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 1,076 | | $ | 1,219 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | |
Receivables | | 42 | | | 661 | |
Inventories | | (149 | ) | | (170 | ) |
Other current assets | | 172 | | | 325 | |
Other assets | | — | | | (23 | ) |
Accounts payable | | 106 | | | 79 | |
Accrued expenses | | 47 | | | (855 | ) |
Interest income (expense), net | | (14 | ) | | 23 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
EBITDA | $ | 1,280 | | $ | 1,259 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has exposure to changing interest rates, and is currently not engaged in hedging activities. Interest on approximately $1.1 million of outstanding indebtedness is at a variable rate of between 2% to 3% over the published LIBOR, based upon the Company’s ratio of funded debt to EBITDA, and was 3% over LIBOR on average for the year. At the Company’s current level of indebtedness, each 1% change in the variable interest rate will have an effect of $11,000 on the Company’s annual interest expense charges.
The Company conducts operations in the United Kingdom. The consolidated financial statements of the Company are denominated in U.S. dollars and changes in exchange rates between foreign countries and the U.S. dollar will affect the translation of financial results of foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars for purposes of recording the Company’s consolidated financial results. Historically, the effects of translation have not been material to the consolidated financial results.
16
Back to Index
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. A controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
| 31.1 | | Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| | | |
| 31.2 | | Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| | | |
| 32.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | |
| 32.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
17
Back to Index
The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the second quarter of 2004, but did furnish the following reports:
On April 7, 2004, the Company furnished a report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 7 and Item 9, announcing that its Microtox® system had been proposed by the US EPA for whole effluent toxicity applications
On May 6, 2004, the Company furnished a report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 7 and Item 9, announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. This 8-K was amended on May 7, 2004.
On June 15, 2004, the Company furnished a report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 7 and Item 9, announcing the launch of its Listeria testing product and providing a financial outlook for the second quarter to end June 30, 2004.
18
Back to Index
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | STRATEGIC DIAGNOSTICS INC. |
| | | |
Date: | | August 12, 2004 | /s/ Matthew H. Knight Matthew H. Knight President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | |
Date: | | August 12, 2004 | /s/ Stanley J. Musial Stanley J. Musial Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
19