UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDEDMarch 31, 2011
or
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Transition Period From to
Commission file number000-23377
INTERVEST BANCSHARES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | | | |
Delaware | | | | 13-3699013 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) or organization) | | | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
One Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 400 New York, New York 10020-2002 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
|
(212) 218-2800 |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
|
Not Applicable |
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
YES XX NO .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).*
YES NO __. * The registrant has not yet been phased into the interactive data requirements.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | |
Large Accelerated Filer | | Accelerated Filer | | |
Non-Accelerated FilerXX | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller Reporting Company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
YES NO XX.
Indicate number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
As of April 29, 2011, there were 21,126,489 shares of Class A common stock, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding.
INTERVEST BANCSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Safe Harbor Statement
We are making this statement in order to satisfy the “Safe Harbor” provision contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements contained in this report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact may include forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “assume,” “indicate,” “continue,” “target,” “goal,” and similar words or expressions of the future are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Except for historical information, the matters discussed herein are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may affect our actual results of operations. The following important factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in forward looking statements: changes in general economic conditions and real estate values in our market areas; changes in regulatory policies and enforcement actions; fluctuations in interest rates; demand for loans and deposits; changes in tax laws or the availability of net operating losses, the effects of additional capital, the availability of regulatory waivers; and competition. Reference is made to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for further discussion of risks and uncertainties regarding our business. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future prospects. Our risk factors are disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and updated as needed in Item 1A of Part II of this report on Form 10-Q.
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION -ITEM 1. Financial Statements
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands, except par value) | | | At March 31, 2011 | | | | At December 31, 2010 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | (Audited) | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 9,778 | | | $ | 5,190 | |
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments | | | 19,301 | | | | 18,721 | |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | | 29,079 | | | | 23,911 | |
Securities held to maturity, net(estimated fair value of $580,409 and $606,658, respectively) | | | 589,940 | | | | 614,335 | |
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost | | | 10,105 | | | | 9,655 | |
Loans receivable(net of allowance for loan losses of $32,400 and $34,840, respectively) | | | 1,268,146 | | | | 1,302,486 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 8,246 | | | | 8,925 | |
Loan fees receivable | | | 5,225 | | | | 5,470 | |
Premises and equipment, net | | | 4,268 | | | | 4,612 | |
Foreclosed real estate(net of valuation allowance of $2,688) | | | 27,064 | | | | 27,064 | |
Deferred income tax asset | | | 45,339 | | | | 47,079 | |
Other assets | | | 26,713 | | | | 27,331 | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,014,125 | | | $ | 2,070,868 | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposit accounts | | $ | 4,528 | | | $ | 4,149 | |
Interest-bearing deposit accounts: | | | | | | | | |
Checking (NOW) accounts | | | 10,048 | | | | 10,126 | |
Savings accounts | | | 9,380 | | | | 10,123 | |
Money market accounts | | | 423,956 | | | | 436,740 | |
Certificate of deposit accounts | | | 1,258,718 | | | | 1,304,945 | |
Total deposit accounts | | | 1,706,630 | | | | 1,766,083 | |
Borrowed funds: | | | | | | | | |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | | 22,500 | | | | 25,500 | |
Subordinated debentures - capital securities | | | 56,702 | | | | 56,702 | |
Accrued interest payable on all borrowed funds | | | 2,870 | | | | 2,326 | |
Mortgage note payable | | | - | | | | 148 | |
Total borrowed funds | | | 82,072 | | | | 84,676 | |
Accrued interest payable on deposits | | | 3,137 | | | | 4,593 | |
Mortgage escrow funds payable | | | 28,510 | | | | 20,709 | |
Other liabilities | | | 5,585 | | | | 8,847 | |
Total liabilities | | | 1,825,934 | | | | 1,884,908 | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock($1.00 par value; 300,000 shares authorized; 25,000 issued and outstanding) | | | 25 | | | | 25 | |
Additional paid-in-capital, preferred | | | 24,975 | | | | 24,975 | |
Preferred stock discount | | | (1,052 | ) | | | (1,148 | ) |
Class A common stock($1.00 par value; 62,000,000 shares authorized; 21,126,489 issued and outstanding) | | | 21,126 | | | | 21,126 | |
Additional paid-in-capital, common | | | 84,720 | | | | 84,705 | |
Unearned compensation on restricted common stock awards | | | (686 | ) | | | (749 | ) |
Retained earnings | | | 59,083 | | | | 57,026 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 188,191 | | | | 185,960 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 2,014,125 | | | $ | 2,070,868 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | |
($ in thousands, except per share data) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable | | $ | 20,970 | | | $ | 26,019 | |
Securities | | | 2,618 | | | | 3,607 | |
Other interest-earning assets | | | 6 | | | | 5 | |
Total interest and dividend income | | | 23,594 | | | | 29,631 | |
INTEREST EXPENSE | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 12,450 | | | | 16,148 | |
Subordinated debentures - capital securities | | | 542 | | | | 514 | |
FHLB advances and all other borrowed funds | | | 251 | | | | 479 | |
Total interest expense | | | 13,243 | | | | 17,141 | |
Net interest and dividend income | | | 10,351 | | | | 12,490 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 2,045 | | | | 9,639 | |
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses | | | 8,306 | | | | 2,851 | |
NONINTEREST INCOME | | | | | | | | |
Income from the early repayment of mortgage loans | | | 9 | | | | 498 | |
Income from mortgage lending activities | | | 256 | | | | 268 | |
Customer service fees | | | 118 | | | | 107 | |
Gain from the sales of securities available for sale | | | - | | | | 693 | |
Loss from early call of investment securities | | | - | | | | (524 | ) |
Impairment writedowns on investment securities | | | (105 | ) | | | (530 | ) |
All other | | | 45 | | | | - | |
Total noninterest income | | | 323 | | | | 512 | |
NONINTEREST EXPENSES | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 1,780 | | | | 1,618 | |
Occupancy and equipment, net | | | 415 | | | | 470 | |
Data processing | | | 93 | | | | 295 | |
Professional fees and services | | | 498 | | | | 626 | |
Stationery, printing, supplies, postage and delivery | | | 69 | | | | 82 | |
FDIC insurance | | | 1,122 | | | | 1,166 | |
General insurance | | | 140 | | | | 134 | |
Director and committee fees | | | 106 | | | | 94 | |
Advertising and promotion | | | 7 | | | | 23 | |
Real estate activities expense | | | 325 | | | | 976 | |
Provision for real estate losses | | | - | | | | 2,001 | |
All other | | | 180 | | | | 181 | |
Total noninterest expenses | | | 4,735 | | | | 7,666 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes | | | 3,894 | | | | (4,303 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | 1,741 | | | | (1,825 | ) |
| | | | |
Net earnings (loss) | | | 2,153 | | | | (2,478 | ) |
Preferred stock dividend requirements and discount amortization | | | (427 | ) | | | (409 | ) |
Net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders | | $ | 1,726 | | | $ | (2,887 | ) |
Basic earnings (loss) per common share | | $ | 0.08 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | | $ | 0.08 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) |
Cash dividends per common share | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
($ in thousands) | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
| | | | |
PREFERRED STOCK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning and end of period | | | 25,000 | | | $ | 25 | | | | 25,000 | | | $ | 25 | |
| | | | |
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL, PREFERRED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning and end of period | | | | | | | 24,975 | | | | | | | | 24,975 | |
| | | | |
PREFERRED STOCK DISCOUNT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | | | | | | (1,148 | ) | | | | | | | (1,534 | ) |
Amortization of preferred stock discount | | | | | | | 96 | | | | | | | | 97 | |
Balance at end of period | | | | | | | (1,052 | ) | | | | | | | (1,437 | ) |
| | | | |
CLASS A COMMON STOCK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning and end of period | | | 21,126,489 | | | | 21,126 | | | | 8,095,151 | | | | 8,095 | |
| | | | |
CLASS B COMMON STOCK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning and end of period | | | - | | | | - | | | | 580,000 | | | | 580 | |
| | | | |
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL, COMMON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | | | | | | 84,705 | | | | | | | | 81,353 | |
Compensation expense related to grants of stock options | | | | | | | 15 | | | | | | | | 10 | |
Balance at end of period | | | | | | | 84,720 | | | | | | | | 81,363 | |
| | | | |
RETAINED EARNINGS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | | | | | | 57,026 | | | | | | | | 110,560 | |
Net earnings (loss) | | | | | | | 2,153 | | | | | | | | (2,478 | ) |
Preferred stock dividends accrued | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | (312 | ) |
Preferred stock discount amortization | | | | | | | (96 | ) | | | | | | | (97 | ) |
Balance at end of period | | | | | | | 59,083 | | | | | | | | 107,673 | |
| | | | |
TREASURY COMMON STOCK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning and end of period | | | - | | | | - | | | | (404,339 | ) | | | (10,000 | ) |
| | | | |
UNEARNED COMPENSATION - RESTRICTED STOCK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | | | | | | (749 | ) | | | | | | | - | |
Amortization of unearned compensation on restricted stock grants to compensation expense | | | | | | | 63 | | | | | | | | - | |
Balance at end of period | | | | | | | (686 | ) | | | | | | | - | |
Total stockholders’ equity at end of period | | | 21,151,489 | | | $ | 188,191 | | | | 8,295,812 | | | $ | 211,274 | |
| | | | |
Preferred stockholder’s equity | | | 25,000 | | | $ | 23,948 | | | | 25,000 | | | $ | 23,563 | |
Common stockholders’ equity | | | 21,126,489 | | | | 164,243 | | | | 8,270,812 | | | | 187,711 | |
Total stockholders’ equity at end of period | | | 21,151,489 | | | $ | 188,191 | | | | 8,295,812 | | | $ | 211,274 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) before preferred dividend requirements | | $ | 2,153 | | | $ | (2,478 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 84 | | | | 98 | |
Provisions for loan and real estate losses | | | 2,045 | | | | 11,640 | |
Deferred income tax expense | | | 1,740 | | | | 628 | |
Compensation expense related to grants of common stock and options | | | 78 | | | | 10 | |
Amortization of deferred debenture offering costs | | | 9 | | | | 9 | |
Amortization of premiums (accretion) of discounts and deferred loan fees, net | | | (228 | ) | | | 98 | |
Net gain from sales of securities available for sale | | | - | | | | (693 | ) |
Net gain from sale of premises and equipment | | | (44 | ) | | | - | |
Impairment writedowns on investment securities | | | 105 | | | | 530 | |
Net increase in accrued interest payable on debentures | | | 550 | | | | 520 | |
Net decrease in official checks outstanding | | | (3,568 | ) | | | (1,052 | ) |
Net change in all other assets and liabilities | | | 579 | | | | (3,687 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 3,503 | | | | 5,623 | |
| | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Maturities and calls of securities held to maturity | | | 77,030 | | | | 215,678 | |
Purchases of securities held to maturity | | | (53,381 | ) | | | (97,430 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale | | | - | | | | 24,772 | |
(Purchases) redemptions of FRB and FHLB stock, net | | | (450 | ) | | | 719 | |
Repayments of loans receivable, net | | | 32,962 | | | | 10,765 | |
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment | | | 379 | | | | - | |
Purchases of premises and equipment, net | | | (75 | ) | | | (14 | ) |
Net cash provided by investing activities | | | 56,465 | | | | 154,490 | |
| | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in deposits | | | (59,453 | ) | | | (103,212 | ) |
Net increase in mortgage escrow funds payable | | | 7,801 | | | | 7,597 | |
Net repayments of FHLB advances - original terms of 3 months or less | | | - | | | | (11,000 | ) |
Net repayments of FHLB advances - original terms of more than 3 months | | | (3,000 | ) | | | (5,000 | ) |
Principal repayments of mortgage note payable | | | (148 | ) | | | (5 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (54,800 | ) | | | (111,620 | ) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 5,168 | | | | 48,493 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 23,911 | | | | 7,977 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 29,079 | | | $ | 56,470 | |
| | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest | | $ | 14,146 | | | $ | 18,718 | |
Cash paid during the period for income taxes | | | 141 | | | | 719 | |
Loans transferred to foreclosed real estate | | | - | | | | 27,993 | |
Preferred stock dividend requirements and amortization of related discount | | | 427 | | | | 409 | |
Securities held to maturity transferred to securities available for sale | | | - | | | | 24,079 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 - Principles of Consolidation, Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The condensed consolidated financial statements in this report on Form 10-Q have not been audited except for information derived from our audited 2010 consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and should be read in conjunction with our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted in this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our accounting and reporting policies conform to GAAP and general practices within the banking industry and are consistent with those described in note 1 to the financial statements included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated by the information contained in this Form 10-Q.
In preparing our financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change currently relate to the determination of our allowance for loan losses, valuation allowance for real estate losses, other than temporary impairment assessments of our security investments and the need for and amount of a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset. These estimates involve a higher degree of complexity and subjectivity and may require assumptions about highly uncertain matters. Current market conditions increase the risk and complexity of the judgments in these estimates. In our opinion, all material adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods presented in this report have been made. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Our results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year or any other interim period.
Note 2 - Description of Business
Intervest Bancshares Corporation (IBC) is a bank holding company incorporated in 1993 under the laws of the State of Delaware. IBC’s Class A common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market: symbol IBCA. IBC is the parent company of Intervest National Bank (INB) and IBC owns 100% of its capital stock. IBC also owned 100% of Intervest Mortgage Corporation (IMC) whose business had focused on commercial and multifamily real estate lending funded by the issuance of its subordinated debentures in public offerings. IMC was merged into IBC effective January 1, 2011 and IMC’s remaining net assets of $9.5 million were transferred to IBC. IBC does not engage in any other substantial business activities other than a limited amount of real estate mortgage lending, including the participation in loans originated by INB. From time to time, IBC issues debt and equity securities to raise funds as needed for working capital purposes. References to “we,” “us” and “our” in these notes refer to IBC and INB on a consolidated basis, unless otherwise specified.
Our business is banking and real estate lending conducted through INB’s operations. INB is a nationally chartered commercial bank that opened on April 1, 1999. We have only one operating segment, which is defined as a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses whose separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by a company’s chief decision makers to perform resource allocations and performance assessments.
INB’s headquarters and full-service banking office is located in Rockefeller Plaza in New York City, and it has a total of six full-service banking offices in Pinellas County, Florida - four in Clearwater, one in Clearwater Beach and one in South Pasadena. INB conducts a personalized commercial and consumer banking business that attracts deposits from the general public. It provides internet banking services through its web site www.intervestnatbank.com, which also attracts deposit customers from outside its primary market areas. INB uses the deposits, together with funds generated from its operations, principal repayments of loans and securities and other sources, to originate mortgage loans secured by commercial and multifamily real estate and to purchase investment securities. The offices of IBC and INB’s headquarters and full-service banking office are located on the entire fourth floor of One Rockefeller Plaza in New York City, New York, 10020-2002. The main telephone number is 212-218-2800.
7
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 2 - Description of Business - Continued
Our business strategy is to attract deposits and use those funds to originate commercial and multifamily real estate loans on a profitable basis, while maintaining the combination of efficient customer service and loan underwriting and a low-cost infrastructure. We rely upon the relationships we have developed with our borrowers and brokers with whom we have done business in the past as primary sources of new loans. We believe that our ability to rapidly and efficiently process and close mortgage loans gives us a competitive advantage. We also emphasize providing exceptional customer service as a means to attract and retain customers. We deliver personalized service and respond with flexibility to customer needs. We believe the above factors distinguish us from larger banks that operate in our primary market areas. In addition, we have a website, I-netMortgageClearingHouse.com, which is an interactive web portal connecting buyers and sellers of real estate mortgages. The website provides access to banks and credit unions throughout the country so that prospective buyers of mortgage loans can access information about potential portfolio properties and sellers of loans can efficiently list mortgages for sale. We expect this website to be beneficial to our business strategy.
Our lending activities emphasize the origination, for our portfolio, of first mortgage loans secured by commercial and multifamily real estate. As a matter of policy, we do not own or originate construction/development loans or condominium conversion loans. We tend to lend in geographical areas that are in the process of being revitalized or redeveloped, with a concentration of loans on properties located in New York and Florida. We solicit deposit accounts from individuals, small businesses and professional firms located throughout our primary market areas in New York and Florida through the offering of a variety of deposit products.
Note 3 - Securities
The carrying value (amortized cost) and estimated fair value of securities held to maturity are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Number of Securities | | | Amortized Cost | | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | | Estimated Fair Value | | | Wtd-Avg Yield | | | Wtd-Avg Remaining Maturity | |
At March 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government agencies (1) | | | 338 | | | $ | 585,465 | | | $ | 923 | | | $ | 6,494 | | | $ | 579,894 | | | | 1.64 | % | | | 4.5 Years | |
Corporate (2) | | | 8 | | | | 4,475 | | | | - | | | | 3,960 | | | | 515 | | | | 2.03 | % | | | 22.3 Years | |
| | | 346 | | | $ | 589,940 | | | $ | 923 | | | $ | 10,454 | | | $ | 580,409 | | | | 1.64 | % | | | 4.8 Years | |
At December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government agencies (1) | | | 345 | | | $ | 609,755 | | | $ | 1,661 | | | $ | 5,468 | | | $ | 605,948 | | | | 1.63 | % | | | 4.8 Years | |
Corporate (2) | | | 8 | | | | 4,580 | | | | - | | | | 3,870 | | | | 710 | | | | 2.02 | % | | | 22.6 Years | |
| | | 353 | | | $ | 614,335 | | | $ | 1,661 | | | $ | 9,338 | | | $ | 606,658 | | | | 1.63 | % | | | 5.0 Years | |
(1) | Consist of debt obligations of U.S. government sponsored agencies - FHLB, FNMA, FHLMC and FFCB. |
(2) | Consist of variable-rate pooled trust preferred securities backed by obligations of companies in the banking industry. Amortized cost at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is reported net of other than temporary impairment charges of $3.6 million and $3.5 million, respectively. |
The estimated fair values of securities with gross unrealized losses segregated between securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months at the respective dates and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Less Than Twelve Months | | | Twelve Months or Longer | | | Total | |
($ in thousands) | | Number of Securities | | | Estimated Fair Value | | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | | Estimated Fair Value | | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | | Estimated Fair Value | | | Gross Unrealized Losses | |
At March 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government agencies | | | 218 | | | $ | 363,425 | | | $ | 6,494 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 363,425 | | | $ | 6,494 | |
Corporate | | | 8 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 515 | | | | 3,960 | | | | 515 | | | | 3,960 | |
| | | 226 | | | $ | 363,425 | | | $ | 6,494 | | | $ | 515 | | | $ | 3,960 | | | $ | 363,940 | | | $ | 10,454 | |
At December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government agencies | | | 186 | | | $ | 316,238 | | | $ | 5,468 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 316,238 | | | $ | 5,468 | |
Corporate | | | 8 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 710 | | | | 3,870 | | | | 710 | | | | 3,870 | |
| | | 194 | | | $ | 316,238 | | | $ | 5,468 | | | $ | 710 | | | $ | 3,870 | | | $ | 316,948 | | | $ | 9,338 | |
We believe that the cause of the unrealized gains and losses on the U.S. government agencies securities portfolio is directly related to changes in market interest rates, which has been consistent with our experience.
8
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 3 - Securities, Continued
In general, as interest rates rise, the estimated fair value of fixed-rate securities will decrease; as interest rates fall, their value will increase. All of the securities in the agency portfolio have either fixed interest rates or have predetermined scheduled interest rate increases and have call features that allow the issuer to call the security at par before its stated maturity without penalty. INB, which holds the portfolio, has the ability and intent to hold all of the investments for a period of time sufficient for the estimated fair value of the securities with unrealized losses to recover, which may be at the time of maturity. Historically, INB has always recovered the cost of its investments in U.S. government agency securities upon maturity. We view all the gross unrealized losses related to the agency portfolio to be temporary for the reasons noted above. The estimated fair values disclosed in the table above for U.S. government agency securities are obtained from third-party brokers who provide quoted prices derived from active markets for identical or similar securities.
INB also owns trust preferred securities that are also classified as held to maturity. The estimated fair values of these securities are depressed due to the weakened economy, the financial condition of a large number of the issuing banks and from restrictions that have been or can be placed on the payment of interest by regulatory agencies, all of which have severely reduced the demand for these securities and rendered their trading market inactive. We concluded that an adverse change in the estimated future cash flows has occurred to such a level that all of these securities have been other than temporarily impaired to varying degrees. The OTTI determinations are based on the amount of deferred and defaulted interest payments on the underlying collateral by the issuing banks such that it is no longer probable that INB will recover its full investment in the applicable security over time as indicated by an expected cash flow analysis prepared by a third party broker utilizing guidance prescribed under GAAP. There can be no assurance that there will not be further write downs on these trust preferred securities as conditions change.
The following table provides various information regarding trust preferred securities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) Cusip # (1) | | Credit Rating | | | Cost Basis | | | Write Downs (2) | | | Adj. Cost Basis | | | Estimated Fair Value (3) | | | Unrealized Loss | | | % of Collateral Defaulted | | | % of Collateral Deferred | | | # of Banks in Pool | | | OTTI (4) | | | Discount Margin (4) | |
At March 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
74041PAEO | | | C | | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | (651 | ) | | $ | 349 | | | $ | 22 | | | $ | (327 | ) | | | 34.53 | % | | | 10.29 | % | | | 39 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.90 | % |
74040XAD6 | | | C+ | | | | 1,016 | | | | (263 | ) | | | 753 | | | | 141 | | | | (612 | ) | | | 14.39 | % | | | 15.94 | % | | | 54 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.80 | % |
74040XAE4 | | | C+ | | | | 994 | | | | (241 | ) | | | 753 | | | | 141 | | | | (612 | ) | | | 14.39 | % | | | 15.94 | % | | | 54 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.80 | % |
74040XAE4 | | | C+ | | | | 994 | | | | (241 | ) | | | 753 | | | | 141 | | | | (612 | ) | | | 14.39 | % | | | 15.94 | % | | | 54 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.80 | % |
74040YAF9 | | | C | | | | 981 | | | | (629 | ) | | | 352 | | | | 13 | | | | (339 | ) | | | 16.32 | % | | | 29.17 | % | | | 58 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.70 | % |
74040YAE2 | | | C | | | | 1,000 | | | | (648 | ) | | | 352 | | | | 13 | | | | (339 | ) | | | 16.32 | % | | | 29.17 | % | | | 58 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.70 | % |
74041UAE9 | | | C+ | | | | 1,022 | | | | (441 | ) | | | 581 | | | | 22 | | | | (559 | ) | | | 7.56 | % | | | 27.42 | % | | | 64 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.57 | % |
74041UAE9 | | | C+ | | | | 1,023 | | | | (441 | ) | | | 582 | | | | 22 | | | | (560 | ) | | | 7.56 | % | | | 27.42 | % | | | 64 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.57 | % |
| | | | | | $ | 8,030 | | | $ | (3,555 | ) | | $ | 4,475 | | | $ | 515 | | | $ | (3,960 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
74041PAEO | | | C | | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | (642 | ) | | $ | 358 | | | $ | 33 | | | $ | (325 | ) | | | 34.53 | % | | | 9.34 | % | | | 39 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.90 | % |
74040XAD6 | | | C+ | | | | 1,016 | | | | (262 | ) | | | 754 | | | | 154 | | | | (600 | ) | | | 14.39 | % | | | 15.94 | % | | | 54 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.80 | % |
74040XAE4 | | | C+ | | | | 994 | | | | (241 | ) | | | 753 | | | | 152 | | | | (601 | ) | | | 14.39 | % | | | 15.94 | % | | | 54 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.80 | % |
74040XAE4 | | | C+ | | | | 994 | | | | (241 | ) | | | 753 | | | | 152 | | | | (601 | ) | | | 14.39 | % | | | 15.94 | % | | | 54 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.80 | % |
74040YAF9 | | | C | | | | 981 | | | | (629 | ) | | | 352 | | | | 12 | | | | (340 | ) | | | 15.69 | % | | | 29.80 | % | | | 58 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.70 | % |
74040YAE2 | | | C | | | | 1,000 | | | | (648 | ) | | | 352 | | | | 12 | | | | (340 | ) | | | 15.69 | % | | | 29.80 | % | | | 58 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.70 | % |
74041UAE9 | | | C+ | | | | 1,022 | | | | (393 | ) | | | 629 | | | | 98 | | | | (531 | ) | | | 7.56 | % | | | 26.17 | % | | | 64 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.57 | % |
74041UAE9 | | | C+ | | | | 1,023 | | | | (394 | ) | | | 629 | | | | 97 | | | | (532 | ) | | | 7.56 | % | | | 26.17 | % | | | 64 | | | | Yes | | | | 1.57 | % |
| | | | | | $ | 8,030 | | | $ | (3,450 | ) | | $ | 4,580 | | | $ | 710 | | | $ | (3,870 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) At March 31, 2011 all of these securities were on cash basis accounting because INB is currently not receiving contractual interest payments on these securities. The cash flows for the interest payments on these securities are being redirected to a more senior class of bondholders to pay down the principal balance on the more senior class faster. This occurs when deferral and default activity reduces the security’s underlying performing collateral to a level where a predetermined coverage test fails and requires cash flows from interest payments to be redirected to a senior class of security holders. If no additional deferrals or defaults occur, such test will eventually be met again through the redirection of the cash flow and cash interest payments would resume on INB’s bonds, although no such assurance can be given as to the amount and timing of the resumption, if any. In April 2011, INB received payments of interest on several securities – cusip # 74040XAD6 and 74040XAE4.
9
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 3 - Securities, Continued
(2) Writedowns are derived from the difference between the book value of the security and the projected present value of the security’s cash flows as indicated per an analysis performed using guidance prescribed by GAAP.
(3) Obtained from Moody’s pricing service, which uses a complex valuation model that factors in numerous assumptions and data, including anticipated discounts related to illiquid trading markets, credit and interest rate risk, which under GAAP would be considered Level 3 inputs. INB believes that the actual values that would be realized in an orderly market under normal credit conditions between a willing buyer and seller would approximate the projected present value of the securities’ cash flows and therefore, these estimated fair values are used for disclosure purposes only and are not used for calculating and recording impairment. INB also has the intent and the ability to retain these trust preferred securities until maturity and currently has no intention of selling them.
(4) In determining whether there is OTTI, INB relies on a cash flow analysis as prescribed under GAAP and prepared by a third party broker to determine whether conditions are such that the projected cash flows are insufficient to recover INB’s principal investment. The basic methodology under GAAP is to compare the present value of the cash flows that are derived from assumptions made with respect to deferrals, defaults and prepayments from quarter to quarter. A decline in the present value versus that for the previous quarter is considered to be an adverse change. The discount margin in the table above represents the incremental credit spread used to derive the discount rate for present value computations. Other assumptions utilized: prepayments of 1% annually and 100% at maturity and annual defaults of 75 bps with a 15% recovery after a 2 year lag.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities held to maturity by remaining term to contractual maturity at March 31, 2011 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Amortized Cost | | | Estimated Fair Value | | | Average Yield | |
Due in one year or less | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | % |
Due after one year through five years | | | 395,246 | | | | 393,507 | | | | 1.49 | |
Due after five years through ten years | | | 183,664 | | | | 180,081 | | | | 1.93 | |
Due after ten years | | | 11,030 | | | | 6,821 | | | | 2.24 | |
| | $ | 589,940 | | | $ | 580,409 | | | | 1.64 | % |
In March 2010, securities held to maturity with a carrying value of $24.1 million (estimated fair value of $24.8 million) were transferred to available-for-sale and promptly sold. A gross gain of $0.7 million was realized. The securities sold consisted of non-callable, fixed-rate U.S. government agency securities that were scheduled to mature at various times from 2011 through 2013. This transaction was undertaken to enhance INB’s capital level in response to its higher regulatory capital requirements. At March 31, 2001 and December 31, 2010, there were no securities classified as available for sale. There were no sales of securities in the first quarter of 2011.
Note 4 - Loans Receivable
Major classifications of loans receivable are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At March 31, 2011 | | | At December 31, 2010 | |
($ in thousands) | | # of Loans | | | Amount | | | # of Loans | | | Amount | |
Commercial real estate loans | | | 362 | | | $ | 922,992 | | | | 372 | | | $ | 948,275 | |
Residential multifamily loans | | | 187 | | | | 368,395 | | | | 193 | | | | 380,180 | |
Land development and other land loans | | | 10 | | | | 12,255 | | | | 10 | | | | 12,550 | |
Residential 1-4 family loans | | | 2 | | | | 410 | | | | 2 | | | | 416 | |
Commercial business loans | | | 20 | | | | 1,379 | | | | 20 | | | | 1,454 | |
Consumer loans | | | 7 | | | | 104 | | | | 8 | | | | 107 | |
Loans receivable, gross | | | 588 | | | | 1,305,535 | | | | 605 | | | | 1,342,982 | |
Deferred loan fees | | | | | | | (4,989 | ) | | | | | | | (5,656 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees | | | | | | | 1,300,546 | | | | | | | | 1,337,326 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | | | | | (32,400 | ) | | | | | | | (34,840 | ) |
Loans receivable, net | | | | | | $ | 1,268,146 | | | | | | | $ | 1,302,486 | |
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were $45.2 million and $52.9 million of loans, respectively, on nonaccrual status and $5.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively, of accruing troubled debt restructured loans (TDRs), and all were considered impaired loans. All of our loans are evaluated for impairment on a loan-by-loan basis.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, a specific valuation allowance (included in the overall allowance for loan losses) totaling $3.8 million and $7.2 million, respectively, was maintained on impaired loans.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were three loans totaling $3.9 million and three loans totaling $7.5 million, respectively, that were ninety days past due and still accruing interest.
10
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Continued
The unpaid principal balance (which approximates our recorded investment) of impaired loans and corresponding impairment valuation allowance summarized by collateral type and location follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) At March 31, 2011 | | New York | | | Florida | | | New Jersey | | | Ohio | | | Total | | | Valuation Allowance | | | # of Loans | |
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retail | | $ | 3,017 | | | $ | 9,504 | | | $ | 500 | | | $ | 2,640 | | | $ | 15,661 | | | $ | 810 | | | | 5 | |
Office Building | | | 1,265 | | | | 17,485 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 18,750 | | | | 1,064 | | | | 3 | |
Warehouse | | | 2,614 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,614 | | | | 112 | | | | 2 | |
Mixed Use | | | 9,024 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9,024 | | | | 1,280 | | | | 3 | |
Residential mulitifamily | | | 1,126 | | | | 2,000 | | | | - | | | | 1,647 | | | | 4,773 | | | | 581 | | | | 3 | |
Totals | | $ | 17,046 | | | $ | 28,989 | | | $ | 500 | | | $ | 4,287 | | | $ | 50,822 | | | $ | 3,847 | | | | 16 | |
At December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retail | | $ | 3,017 | | | $ | 10,834 | | | $ | 500 | | | $ | 4,712 | | | $ | 19,063 | | | $ | 3,741 | | | | 5 | |
Office Building | | | 5,973 | | | | 17,485 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 23,458 | | | | 2,542 | | | | 4 | |
Warehouse | | | 2,614 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,614 | | | | 112 | | | | 2 | |
Mixed Use | | | 3,929 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,929 | | | | 515 | | | | 2 | |
Residential multifamily | | | 2,981 | | | | 2,863 | | | | - | | | | 1,647 | | | | 7,491 | | | | 295 | | | | 4 | |
Totals | | $ | 18,514 | | | $ | 31,182 | | | $ | 500 | | | $ | 6,359 | | | $ | 56,555 | | | $ | 7,205 | | | | 17 | |
Selected information related to impaired loans is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Interest income that was not recorded on nonaccrual loans under contractual terms | | $ | 626 | | | $ | 1,257 | |
Average principal balance of nonaccrual loans | | | 52,958 | | | | 105,597 | |
Average principal balance of accruing TDR loans | | | 4,131 | | | | 105,210 | |
Age analysis of our loan portfolio is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Current 0-30 Days | | | Past Due 31-59 Days | | | Past Due 60-89 Days | | | Past Due 90 or more Days | | | Total Past Due | | | Total Nonaccrual | |
At March 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accruing Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | | $ | 866,880 | | | $ | 10,379 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,314 | | | $ | 13,693 | | | $ | - | |
Residential multifamily | | | 353,651 | | | | 11,406 | | | | - | | | | 565 | | | | 11,971 | | | | - | |
Land | | | 12,255 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
All other | | | 1,893 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | |
Total accruing loans | | | 1,234,679 | | | | 21,785 | | | | - | | | | 3,879 | | | | 25,664 | | | | - | |
Nonaccrual Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate (1) | | | 24,434 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 17,985 | | | | 17,985 | | | | 42,419 | |
Residential multifamily | | | - | | | | 1,125 | | | | - | | | | 1,648 | | | | 2,773 | | | | 2,773 | |
Total nonaccrual loans | | | 24,434 | | | | 1,125 | | | | - | | | | 19,633 | | | | 20,758 | | | | 45,192 | |
Total loans | | $ | 1,259,113 | | | $ | 22,910 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 23,512 | | | $ | 46,422 | | | $ | 45,192 | |
At December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accruing Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | | $ | 892,332 | | | $ | 2,731 | | | $ | 680 | | | $ | 7,100 | | | $ | 10,511 | | | $ | - | |
Residential multifamily | | | 364,649 | | | | 4,331 | | | | 3,328 | | | | 381 | | | | 8,040 | | | | - | |
Land | | | 12,256 | | | | 294 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 294 | | | | - | |
All other | | | 1,977 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | |
Total accruing loans | | | 1,271,214 | | | | 7,356 | | | | 4,008 | | | | 7,481 | | | | 18,845 | | | | - | |
Nonaccrual Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate (1) | | | 22,743 | | | | 14,834 | | | | - | | | | 7,855 | | | | 22,689 | | | | 45,432 | |
Residential multifamily | | | - | | | | 1,131 | | | | - | | | | 6,360 | | | | 7,491 | | | | 7,491 | |
Total nonaccrual loans | | | 22,743 | | | | 15,965 | | | | - | | | | 14,215 | | | | 30,180 | | | | 52,923 | |
Total loans | | $ | 1,293,957 | | | $ | 23,321 | | | $ | 4,008 | | | $ | 21,696 | | | $ | 49,025 | | | $ | 52,923 | |
(1) Included $18.1 million and $21.5 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of TDRs for which payments are being made in accordance with restructured terms, but the loans are maintained on nonaccrual status in accordance with regulatory guidance. The remaining portion of this category is comprised of certain loans that are on nonaccrual status and interest from loan payments are being recognized on a cash basis.
11
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Continued
Information regarding the credit quality of the loan portfolio based on internally assigned grades follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Pass | | | Special Mention | | | Substandard (1) | | | Total | |
At March 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | | $ | 840,790 | | | $ | 16,751 | | | | $ 65,451 | | | $ | 922,992 | |
Residential multifamily | | | 339,474 | | | | 11,172 | | | | 17,749 | | | | 368,395 | |
Land | | | 9,283 | | | | - | | | | 2,972 | | | | 12,255 | |
All other | | | 1,893 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,893 | |
Total loans | | $ | 1,191,440 | | | $ | 27,923 | | | | $ 86,172 | | | $ | 1,305,535 | |
Allocation of allowance for loan losses | | $ | 23,304 | | | $ | 646 | | | | $ 8,450 | | | $ | 32,400 | |
At December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | | $ | 858,632 | | | $ | 23,295 | | | | $ 66,348 | | | $ | 948,275 | |
Residential multifamily | | | 346,589 | | | | 14,127 | | | | 19,464 | | | | 380,180 | |
Land | | | 9,417 | | | | 2,837 | | | | 296 | | | | 12,550 | |
All other | | | 1,977 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,977 | |
Total loans | | $ | 1,216,615 | | | $ | 40,259 | | | | $ 86,108 | | | $ | 1,342,982 | |
Allocation of allowance for loan losses | | $ | 23,236 | | | $ | 1,174 | | | | $ 10,430 | | | $ | 34,840 | |
(1) Substandard loans consist of $45.2 million of nonaccrual loans, $5.6 million of accruing TDRs and $35.3 million of other performing loans at March 31, 2011 and $52.9 million of nonaccrual loans, $3.6 million of accruing TDRs and $29.6 million of other performing loans at December 31, 2010. For a discussion regarding the internal credit grade criteria, see note 3 to the financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The geographic distribution of the loan portfolio by state follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At March 31, 2011 | | | At December 31, 2010 | |
($ in thousands) | | Amount | | | % of Total | | | Amount | | | % of Total | |
New York | | $ | 892,139 | | | | 68.3 | % | | | $ 916,485 | | | | 68.2 | % |
Florida | | | 300,357 | | | | 23.0 | | | | 310,560 | | | | 23.1 | |
New Jersey | | | 32,269 | | | | 2.5 | | | | 32,482 | | | | 2.4 | |
Pennsylvania | | | 23,067 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 23,360 | | | | 1.7 | |
Connecticut | | | 11,755 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 11,816 | | | | 0.9 | |
Georgia | | | 9,162 | | | | 0.7 | | | | 9,254 | | | | 0.7 | |
Virginia | | | 8,332 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 8,377 | | | | 0.6 | |
North Carolina | | | 7,827 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 7,859 | | | | 0.6 | |
Kentucky | | | 7,787 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 7,826 | | | | 0.6 | |
Ohio | | | 5,138 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 7,215 | | | | 0.6 | |
All other states | | | 7,702 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 7,748 | | | | 0.6 | |
| | $ | 1,305,535 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | $1,342,982 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Note 5 - Allowance for Loan Losses
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by loan type follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Commercial Real Estate | | | Residential Multifamily | | | Land | | | All Other | | | Total | |
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 21,919 | | | $ | 11,356 | | | $ | 1,553 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 34,840 | |
Loan chargeoffs | | | (4,164 | ) | | | (349 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (4,513 | ) |
Loan recoveries | | | - | | | | 28 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 28 | |
Provision (credit) for loan losses | | | 1,934 | | | | 169 | | | | (57 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | 2,045 | |
Balance at end of period (1) | | $ | 19,689 | | | $ | 11,204 | | | $ | 1,496 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 32,400 | |
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 19,275 | | | $ | 11,696 | | | $ | 1,650 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 32,640 | |
Loan chargeoffs | | | (3,047 | ) | | | (9,531 | ) | | | (1,401 | ) | | | - | | | | (13,979 | ) |
Loan recoveries | �� | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Provision (credit) for loan losses | | | 3,404 | | | | 5,698 | | | | 538 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 9,639 | |
Balance at end of period (1) | | $ | 19,632 | | | $ | 7,863 | | | $ | 787 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | 28,300 | |
(1) Impairment for all of our impaired loans is calculated on a loan-by-loan basis using either the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral less estimated selling costs (for collateral dependent loans) or the present value of the loan’s cash flows (for non-collateral dependent loans). Any calculated impairment is recognized as a valuation allowance within the overall allowance for loan losses and a charge through the provision for loan losses. We may charge off any portion of the impaired loan with a corresponding decrease to the valuation allowance when such impairment is deemed uncollectible.
12
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 6 - Foreclosed Real Estate and Valuation Allowance for Real Estate Losses
Real estate acquired through foreclosure by property type is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At March 31, 2011 | | | At December 31, 2010 | |
($ in thousands) | | # of Properties | | | Amount (1) | | | # of Properties | | | Amount (1) | |
Commercial real estate | | | 2 | | | $ | 7,932 | | | | 2 | | | $ | 7,932 | |
Residential multifamily | | | 3 | | | | 14,573 | | | | 3 | | | | 14,573 | |
Land | | | 2 | | | | 4,559 | | | | 2 | | | | 4,559 | |
| | | 7 | | | $ | 27,064 | | | | 7 | | | $ | 27,064 | |
(1) Reported net of valuation allowance.
Activity in the valuation allowance for real estate losses is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | | 2011 | | | | 2010 | |
Valuation allowance at beginning of period | | $ | 2,688 | | | $ | 2,793 | |
Provision for real estate losses charged to expense | | | - | | | | 2,001 | |
Real estate chargeoffs | | | - | | | | - | |
Valuation allowance at end of period | | $ | 2,688 | | | $ | 4,794 | |
Note 7 - Deposits
Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit accounts are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At March 31, 2011 | | | | | | At December 31, 2010 | |
($ in thousands) | | Amount | | | Wtd-Avg Stated Rate | | | | | | Amount | | | Wtd-Avg Stated Rate | |
Within one year | | $ | 436,384 | | | | 3.02 | % | | | | | | $ | 431,881 | | | | 3.09 | % |
Over one to two years | | | 339,089 | | | | 3.47 | | | | | | | | 349,174 | | | | 3.63 | |
Over two to three years | | | 270,936 | | | | 4.23 | | | | | | | | 298,287 | | | | 4.26 | |
Over three to four years | | | 125,759 | | | | 3.64 | | | | | | | | 113,587 | | | | 3.78 | |
Over four years | | | 86,550 | | | | 4.32 | | | | | | | | 112,016 | | | | 4.13 | |
| | $ | 1,258,718 | | | | 3.55 | % | | | | | | $ | 1,304,945 | | | | 3.65 | % |
CDs of $100,000 or more totaled $614 million at March 31, 2011 and $639 million at December 31, 2010 and included brokered CDs of $138 million and $159 million, respectively. At March 31, 2011, CDs of $100,000 or more by remaining maturity were as follows: $185 million due within one year; $164 million due over one to two years; $150 million due over two to three years; $63 million due over three to four years; and $52 million thereafter.
Note 8 - FHLB Advances and Lines of Credit
At March 31, 2011, INB had access to $38 million of unsecured credit lines that were cancelable at any time. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRB), INB can borrow from these institutions on a secured basis. At March 31, 2011, INB had available collateral consisting of investment securities and certain loans that could be pledged to support additional total borrowings of approximately $621 million from the FHLB and FRB if needed.
The following is a summary of certain information regarding FHLB advances in the aggregate:
| | | | | | | | |
| | At or for the Quarter Ended March 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Balance at period end | | | $22,500 | | | | $45,500 | |
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end | | | $25,500 | | | | $55,500 | |
Average outstanding balance for the period | | | $24,800 | | | | $52,161 | |
Weighted-average interest rate paid for the period | | | 4.09 | % | | | 3.70 | % |
Weighted-average interest rate at period end | | | 4.07 | % | | | 3.89 | % |
13
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 8 - FHLB Advances and Lines of Credit, Continued
Scheduled contractual maturities of outstanding FHLB advances as of March 31, 2011 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Amount | | | Wtd. Avg. Rate | |
Maturing in the period April 1 through December 31, 2011 | | $ | 5,000 | | | | 3.98 | % |
Maturing in 2012 | | | 10,500 | | | | 4.02 | % |
Maturing in 2013 | | | 7,000 | | | | 4.22 | % |
| | $ | 22,500 | | | | 4.07 | % |
Note 9 - Subordinated Debentures - Capital Securities
Capital Securities (commonly referred to as trust preferred securities) outstanding at March 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Principal | | | Accrued Interest Payable | | | Interest Rate | |
Capital Securities II - debentures due September 17, 2033 | | | $15,464 | | | | $ 673 | | | | 3.26 | % |
Capital Securities III - debentures due March 17, 2034 | | | 15,464 | | | | 640 | | | | 3.10 | % |
Capital Securities IV - debentures due September 20, 2034 | | | 15,464 | | | | 554 | | | | 2.71 | % |
Capital Securities V - debentures due December 15, 2036 | | | 10,310 | | | | 945 | | | | 6.83 | % |
| | | $56,702 | | | | $2,812 | | | | | |
The securities are obligations of IBC’s wholly owned statutory business trusts, Intervest Statutory Trust II, III, IV and V, respectively. Each Trust was formed with a capital contribution from IBC and for the sole purpose of issuing and administering the Capital Securities.
The proceeds from the issuance of the Capital Securities together with the capital contribution for each Trust were used to acquire IBC’s Junior Subordinated Debentures that are due concurrently with the Capital Securities. The Capital Securities, net of IBC’s capital contributions of $1.7 million, total $55 million and qualify as regulatory Tier 1 capital up to certain limits. IBC has guaranteed the payment of distributions on, payments on any redemptions of, and any liquidation distribution with respect to the Capital Securities. Issuance costs associated with Capital Securities II to IV were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the securities using the straight-line method. The unamortized balance totaled $844,000 at March 31, 2011. There were no issuance costs associated with Capital Securities V.
As of March 31, 2011, interest payments on the Junior Subordinated Debentures (and the corresponding distributions on the Capital Securities) are payable in arrears as follows:
| • | | Capital Securities II - quarterly at the rate of 2.95% over 3 month libor; |
| • | | Capital Securities III - quarterly at the rate of 2.79% over 3 month libor; |
| • | | Capital Securities IV- quarterly at the rate of 2.40% over 3 month libor; and |
| • | | Capital Securities V - quarterly at the fixed rate of 6.83% per annum until September 15, 2011 and |
thereafter at the rate of 1.65% over 3 month libor.
Interest payments may be deferred at any time and from time to time during the term of the Junior Subordinated Debentures at IBC’s election for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods, or 5 years. There is no limitation on the number of extension periods IBC may elect, provided, however, no deferral period may extend beyond the maturity date of the Junior Subordinated Debentures. During an interest deferral period, interest will continue to accrue on the Junior Subordinated Debentures and interest on such accrued interest will accrue at an annual rate equal to the interest rate in effect for such deferral period, compounded quarterly from the date such interest would have been payable were it not deferred. At the end of the deferral period, IBC will be obligated to pay all interest then accrued and unpaid. In February 2010, IBC exercised its right to defer interest payments. This deferral does not constitute a default under the indentures governing the securities. At March 31, 2011, IBC had accrued a total of $2.8 million of interest payments on the Junior Subordinated Debentures.
14
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 9 - Subordinated Debentures - Capital Securities, Continued
All of the Capital Securities are subject to mandatory redemption as follows: (i) in whole, but not in part, upon repayment of the Junior Subordinated Debentures at stated maturity or earlier, at the option of IBC, within 90 days following the occurrence and continuation of certain changes in the tax or capital treatment of the Capital Securities, or a change in law such that the statutory trust would be considered an investment company, contemporaneously with the redemption by IBC of the Junior Subordinated Debentures; and (ii) in whole or in part at any time for Capital Securities II, III, and IV and on or after September 15, 2011 for Capital Securities V contemporaneously with the optional redemption by IBC of the Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole or in part. Any redemption would be subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals.
Note 10 - Stockholders’ Equity and Dividends in Arrears
IBC is authorized to issue up to 63,000,000 shares of its capital stock, consisting of 62,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, 700,000 shares of Class B common stock and 300,000 shares of preferred stock. IBC’s board of directors determines the powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations, and restrictions thereof on any series of preferred stock issued. A total of 25,000 shares of preferred stock are designated as Series A and are owned by the U.S. Treasury as described in note 11 to financial statements included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a condition of its public common stock offering in 2010, IBC agreed to no longer issue or authorize the issuance of any Class B common stock and IBC is asking its stockholders (at its 2011 annual meeting of stockholders to be held in May 2011) to vote on and approve a proposal to amend and restate IBC’s Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate any and all references to Class B common stock and to rename its Class A common stock “common stock.”
In February 2010, IBC ceased declaration and payment of dividends on the preferred stock held by the Treasury as required by its regulator. IBC has missed five dividend payments as of the date of filing of this report.
At March 31, 2011, the amount of Preferred Share Dividends undeclared, unpaid and in arrears totaled $1.7 million. The preferred stock carries a 5% per year cumulative preferred dividend rate, payable quarterly. The dividend rate increases to 9% beginning in December 2013. Dividends compound if they accrue and are not paid and they also reduce earnings or increase losses available to common stockholders. A failure to pay a total of six preferred share dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, gives the holders of the shares the right to elect two directors to IBC’s board of directors. That right would continue until IBC pays all dividends in arrears.
In April 2011, IBC agreed with the Treasury to have one or more employees of the Office of Financial Stability (“OFS”) attend and observe IBC’s and INB’s full Board of Director meetings as well as certain meetings of committees of each Board, as appropriate. The observers will participate primarily by listening to discussions and presentations in such meetings, limiting their participation to clarifying questions on materials distributed, presentations made or actions proposed or taken at such meetings.
Note 11 - Common Stock Options and Warrant
IBC has a shareholder-approved Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) under which stock options, restricted stock and other forms of incentive compensation may be awarded from time to time to officers, employees and directors of IBC and its subsidiaries. The maximum number of shares of Class A common stock that may be awarded under the Plan is 750,000. As of March 31, 2011, 77,160 shares of Class A common stock were available for award under the Plan. There were no grants during the reporting periods in this report. There was no activity in outstanding awards for the three-months ended March 31, 2011. For a summary of outstanding options and warrant held by the Treasury, see note 14 to the financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of each award and totaled $78,000 and $10,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded as an expense and a corresponding increase to stockholders’ equity. At March 31, 2011, pre-tax compensation cost related to all nonvested awards of options and restricted stock not yet recognized totaled $811,000 and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.66 years.
15
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 12 - Deferred Tax Asset
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had a deferred tax asset totaling $45.3 million and $47.1 million, respectively. The tax asset relates to the unrealized benefit for net temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases that will result in future income tax deductions as well as an unused net operating loss carryforward (NOL) of $54.2 million for Federal purposes and $86.2 million for state and local purposes as of March 31, 2011. The NOLs are available to be applied against our future taxable income. The NOLs expire in 2030.
We have determined that a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets was not required at any time during the reporting periods in this report because we believe that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax asset will be fully realized. This conclusion is based on our prior earnings history (exclusive of the NOL generated in the second quarter of 2010) coupled with evidence (such as our profitable fourth quarter of 2010 and first quarter of 2011, and future projections of taxable income) indicating that we will be able to generate an adequate amount of future taxable income over a reasonable period of time to fully utilize the deferred tax asset.
Our ability to realize our deferred tax asset could be reduced in the future if our estimates of future taxable income from our operations and tax planning strategies do not support the realization of our deferred tax asset. In addition, the amount of our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes realizable for income tax purposes may be reduced under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code as a result of future offerings of our capital securities, which could trigger a “change in control” as defined in Section 382. IBC currently has no plan to issue additional capital securities.
Note 13 - Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Net earnings (loss) applicable to common stockholders and the weighted-average number of shares used for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share computations are summarized in the table that follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Net earnings (loss) applicable to common stockholders | | | $1,726,000 | | | | $(2,887,000) | |
Weighted-Average number of common shares outstanding (1) | | | 21,126,489 | | | | 8,270,812 | |
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share | | | $0.08 | | | | $(0.35) | |
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share | | | $0.08 | | | | $(0.35) | |
(1) All outstanding options and warrant to purchase common stock during each of the periods above were not dilutive for purposes of the diluted earnings per share computations.
Note 14 - Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
We are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These instruments can be in the form of commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit and standby letters of credit, and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Our maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Such commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and normally require payment of fees to us. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. INB from time to time issues standby letters of credit, which are conditional commitments issued by INB to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in the underwriting of letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in originating loans.
16
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 14 - Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments, Continued
The contractual amounts of off-balance sheet financial instruments is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | At March 31, | | | At December 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Unfunded loan commitments | | | $32,808 | | | | $6,305 | |
Available lines of credit | | | 836 | | | | 816 | |
| | | $33,644 | | | | $7,121 | |
Note 15 - Regulatory Capital and Regulatory Matters
In December 2010, INB entered into a formal written agreement (the “Formal Agreement”) with its primary regulator, The Office of The Comptroller of the Currency of the United States of America (“OCC”). The Formal Agreement superseded and replaced a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) entered into on April 7, 2009 between INB and the OCC. The Formal Agreement requires INB to take certain actions, including the development of strategic and capital plans covering at least three years, completing a management assessment, and developing programs related to: loan portfolio management; criticized assets; credit concentrations; loan review; accounting for other real estate owned; maintaining an adequate allowance for loan losses; liquidity risk management; and interest rate risk. INB is required to and is submitting periodic progress reports to the OCC regarding various aspects of the foregoing actions. INB’s Board of Directors appointed a compliance committee to monitor and coordinate INB’s performance under the Formal Agreement.
We are aggressively working to address the requirements of the Formal Agreement. All of the steps and actions we have and will continue to take are subject to the on-going review, satisfaction and acceptance of the OCC. Timing with respect to full compliance with the Formal Agreement cannot be predicted and many of the steps and actions we have taken will need to be in place and operating effectively for a period of time as determined by the OCC in order to achieve full compliance with the Formal Agreement.
The Formal Agreement also limits INB’s ability to pay dividends to IBC and requires INB to maintain Tier 1 capital at least equal to 9% of adjusted total assets, Tier 1 capital at least equal to 10% of risk-weighted assets; and total risk-based capital at least equal to 12% of risk-weighted assets. These are the same levels that INB agreed with the OCC to maintain beginning April 7, 2009. Furthermore, INB is not allowed to accept brokered deposits without the prior approval of the OCC and it is also required, in the absence of a waiver from the FDIC, based on a determination that INB operates in high cost deposit markets, to maintain its deposit pricing at or below the national rates published by the FDIC, plus 75 basis points. At March 31, 2011, all of INB’s deposit products were at levels at or below the FDIC national rates plus 75 basis points. The FDIC’s national rate is a simple average of rates paid by U.S. depository institutions as calculated by the FDIC.
In January 2011, as a result of INB’s Formal Agreement with the OCC, IBC also entered into a written agreement (the “Federal Reserve Agreement”) with its primary regulator, the FRB, which requires IBC’s Board of Directors to take the steps necessary to utilize IBC’s financial and managerial resources to serve as a source of strength to INB, including causing INB to comply with its Formal Agreement. In addition, IBC cannot declare or pay dividends without the prior approval of the FRB and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Board of Governors (the “Banking Director”). IBC also cannot take any payments representing a reduction in capital from INB without prior approval of the FRB and IBC cannot not make any distributions of interest, principal or other sums on its subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without prior approval from the FRB and the Banking Director. Furthermore, IBC may not incur, increase or guarantee any debt or purchase or redeem any shares of its stock without prior approval of the FRB. IBC was required to and submitted within 90 days of the date of the Federal Reserve Agreement a plan to continue to maintain sufficient capital. Finally, IBC must notify the FRB when appointing any new director or senior executive officer or changing responsibilities of any senior executive officer, and IBC is also restricted in making certain severance and indemnification payments. We are committed to and are taking all necessary actions to promptly address the requirements of the Federal Reserve Agreement.
17
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 15 - Regulatory Capital and Regulatory Matters, Continued
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we believe that IBC and INB met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. As of the date of filing of this report, we are not aware of any conditions or events that would have changed the status of such compliance with regulatory capital requirements from March 31, 2011.
Information regarding our regulatory capital and related ratios is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | INB | | | IBC Consolidated | |
| | At March 31, | | | At December 31, | | | At March 31, | | | At December 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Tier 1 Capital (1) | | | $201,129 | | | | $197,660 | | | | $210,954 | | | | $208,091 | |
Tier 2 Capital | | | 18,720 | | | | 19,254 | | | | 18,833 | | | | 19,370 | |
Total risk-based capital | | | $219,849 | | | | $216,914 | | | | $229,787 | | | | $227,461 | |
Net risk-weighted assets | | | $1,484,407 | | | | $1,525,185 | | | | $1,493,060 | | | | $1,534,108 | |
Average assets for regulatory purposes | | | $2,003,105 | | | | $2,057,155 | | | | $2,013,762 | | | | $2,069,318 | |
Total capital to risk-weighted assets | | | 14.81% | | | | 14.22% | | | | 15.39% | | | | 14.83% | |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | | | 13.55% | | | | 12.96% | | | | 14.13% | | | | 13.56% | |
Tier 1 capital to average assets | | | 10.04% | | | | 9.61% | | | | 10.48% | | | | 10.06% | |
(1) IBC’s consolidated Tier 1 capital at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 included $55 million of IBC’s outstanding qualifying trust preferred securities and $25 million of IBC’s cumulative perpetual preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury.
The table that follows presents information regarding capital adequacy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Capital Requirements | |
| | Actual Capital | | | Minimum Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions | | | To Be “Well Capitalized” Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions | | | Minimum Under Agreement with OCC | |
($ in thousands) | | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | | | Amount | | | Ratio | |
Consolidated at March 31, 2011: (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital to risk-weighted assets | | $ | 229,787 | | | | 15.39 | % | | | $119,445 | | | | 8.00 | % | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | | $ | 210,954 | | | | 14.13 | % | | | $ 59,722 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | |
Tier 1 capital to average assets | | $ | 210,954 | | | | 10.48 | % | | | $ 80,550 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | |
Consolidated at December 31, 2010: (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital to risk-weighted assets | | $ | 227,461 | | | | 14.83 | % | | | $122,729 | | | | 8.00 | % | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | | $ | 208,091 | | | | 13.56 | % | | | $ 61,364 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | |
Tier 1 capital to average assets | | $ | 208,091 | | | | 10.06 | % | | | $ 82,773 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | | | | NA | |
INB at March 31, 2011: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital to risk-weighted assets | | $ | 219,849 | | | | 14.81 | % | | | $118,753 | | | | 8.00 | % | | | $148,441 | | | | 10.00 | % | | | $178,129 | | | | 12.00 | % |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | | $ | 201,129 | | | | 13.55 | % | | | $ 59,376 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | $ 89,064 | | | | 6.00 | % | | | $148,441 | | | | 10.00 | % |
Tier 1 capital to average assets | | $ | 201,129 | | | | 10.04 | % | | | $ 80,124 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | $100,155 | | | | 5.00 | % | | | $180,279 | | | | 9.00 | % |
INB at December 31, 2010: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital to risk-weighted assets | | $ | 216,914 | | | | 14.22 | % | | | $122,015 | | | | 8.00 | % | | | $152,519 | | | | 10.00 | % | | | $183,022 | | | | 12.00 | % |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | | $ | 197,660 | | | | 12.96 | % | | | $ 61,007 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | $ 91,511 | | | | 6.00 | % | | | $152,519 | | | | 10.00 | % |
Tier 1 capital to average assets | | $ | 197,660 | | | | 9.61 | % | | | $ 82,286 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | $102,858 | | | | 5.00 | % | | | $185,144 | | | | 9.00 | % |
(1) Assuming IBC had excluded all of its eligible outstanding trust preferred securities (which totaled $55 million) from its Tier 1 capital and included the entire amount in its Tier 2 capital, consolidated proforma capital ratios at March 31, 2011 would have been 15.39%, 10.45% and 7.74%, respectively.
Note 16 - Contingencies
We are periodically a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, such as foreclosure proceedings. Based on review and consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe that there is any pending or threatened proceeding against us, which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
18
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Currently, we have no assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, such as a securities available for sale portfolio. From time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets or liabilities on a non-recurring basis, such as impaired loans, impaired investment securities and foreclosed real estate. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or writedowns of individual assets. In accordance with GAAP, we group our assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. For level 3, valuations are generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These assumptions reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques may include the use of discounted cash flow models. The results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. See note 21 to the financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion of valuation levels 1 and 2.
The following table provides information regarding our assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Carrying Value At March 31, 2011 | | | Total Losses (3) For the Quarter Ended March 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | Total | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Impaired loans (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | | $ | 46,049 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 46,049 | | | $ | 402 | | | $ | 4,211 | |
Residential multifamily | | | 4,773 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,773 | | | | 608 | | | | 6,330 | |
Land | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 612 | |
Total impaired loans | | | 50,822 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 50,822 | | | | 1,010 | | | | 11,153 | |
Impaired securities (2) | | | 4,475 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,475 | | | | 105 | | | | 530 | |
Foreclosed real estate | | | 27,064 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 27,064 | | | | - | | | | 2,001 | |
(1) Comprised of nonaccrual loans and accruing TDRs and excludes a specific valuation allowance of $3.8 million. See note 4.
(2) Comprised of certain investments in trust preferred securities considered other than temporarily impaired. See note 3.
(3) Represents total losses recognized on all assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period indicated. The loss for impaired loans represents the change (before net chargeoffs) during the period in the corresponding specific valuation allowance and the loss for foreclosed real estate represents writedowns in carrying values subsequent to foreclosure (recorded as provisions for real estate losses) adjusted for any gains or losses from the sale of the properties during the period. The loss on investment securities represents OTTI charges recorded as a component of noninterest income.
The following table presents information regarding the change is assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Impaired Securities | | | Impaired Loans | | | Foreclosed Real Estate | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | $ | 4,580 | | | $ | 56,555 | | | $ | 27,064 | |
Net new impaired loans | | | - | | | | 7,250 | | | | - | |
Other than temporary impairment writedowns | | | (105 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Principal repayments/sales | | | - | | | | (8,587 | ) | | | - | |
Chargeoffs of impaired loans | | | - | | | | (4,396 | ) | | | - | |
Balance at March 31, 2011 | | $ | 4,475 | | | $ | 50,822 | | | $ | 27,064 | |
The fair value estimates of all of our financial instruments shown in the table that follows are made at a specific point in time based on available information. Where available, quoted market prices are used. A significant portion of our financial instruments, such as our mortgage loans, do not have an active marketplace in which they can be readily sold or purchased to determine fair value. Consequently, fair value estimates for such instruments are based on assumptions made by us that include the instrument’s credit risk characteristics and future estimated cash flows and prevailing interest rates. As a result, these fair value estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Accordingly, changes in any of our assumptions could cause the fair value estimates to deviate substantially. A discussion regarding the assumptions used to compute the estimated fair values disclosed in the table below can be found in note 21 to the financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
19
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements, Continued
The carrying and estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At March 31, 2011 | | | At December 31, 2010 | |
($ in thousands) | | Carrying Value | | | Fair Value | | | Carrying Value | | | Fair Value | |
Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 29,079 | | | $ | 29,079 | | | $ | 23,911 | | | $ | 23,911 | |
Securities held to maturity, net | | | 589,940 | | | | 580,409 | | | | 614,335 | | | | 606,658 | |
FRB and FHLB stock | | | 10,105 | | | | 10,105 | | | | 9,655 | | | | 9,655 | |
Loans receivable, net | | | 1,268,146 | | | | 1,298,604 | | | | 1,302,486 | | | | 1,336,412 | |
Loan fees receivable | | | 5,225 | | | | 4,234 | | | | 5,470 | | | | 4,441 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 8,246 | | | | 8,246 | | | | 8,925 | | | | 8,925 | |
Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 1,706,630 | | | | 1,756,217 | | | | 1,766,083 | | | | 1,821,899 | |
Borrowed funds plus accrued interest payable | | | 82,072 | | | | 82,059 | | | | 84,676 | | | | 83,661 | |
Accrued interest payable on deposits | | | 3,137 | | | | 3,137 | | | | 4,593 | | | | 4,593 | |
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commitments to lend | | | 266 | | | | 266 | | | | 143 | | | | 143 | |
Note 18 - Recent Accounting Standards Update
In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU’) No. 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” The new disclosures require significantly more information about credit quality in a financial institution’s loan portfolio. The statement addresses only disclosures and does not change recognition or measurement of the allowance. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2011 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-01, “Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20.” This ASU deferred the effective date of certain portions of ASU No. 2010-20 as it relates to troubled debt restructurings.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02 Receivables (Topic 310): “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”. The amendments in this update apply to all creditors, such as us, that restructure receivables that fall within the scope of Subtopic 310-40, Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, a creditor must separately conclude that both of the following exist: (a) the restructuring constitutes a concession by the creditor and (b) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties.
The amendments to Topic 310 clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession as follows:
1. If a debtor does not otherwise have access to funds at a market rate for debt with similar risk characteristics as the restructured debt, the restructuring would be considered to be at a below-market rate, which may indicate that the creditor has granted a concession. In that circumstance, a creditor should consider all aspects of the restructuring in determining whether it has granted a concession. If a creditor determines that it has granted a concession, the creditor must make a separate assessment about whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties to determine whether the restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring.
2. A temporary or permanent increase in the contractual interest rate as a result of a restructuring does not preclude the restructuring from being considered a concession because the new contractual interest rate on the restructured debt could still be below the market interest rate for new debt with similar risk characteristics. In such situations, a creditor should consider all aspects of the restructuring in determining whether it has granted a concession. If a creditor determines that it has granted a concession, the creditor must make a separate assessment about whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties to determine whether the restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring.
3. A restructuring that results in a delay in payment that is insignificant is not a concession. However, an entity should consider various factors in assessing whether a restructuring resulting in a delay in payment is insignificant.
20
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 18 - Recent Accounting Standards Update, Continued
The amendments to Topic 310 clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties as follows: A creditor may conclude that a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, even though the debtor is not currently in payment default. A creditor should evaluate whether it is probable that the debtor would be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. In addition, the amendments to Topic 310 clarify that a creditor is precluded from using the effective interest rate test in the debtor’s guidance on restructuring of payables (paragraph 470-60-55-10) when evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring.
ASU 2011-02 is effective for our first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and is to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying this ASU, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. We do not expect that the adoption of this new ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
21
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Review by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Hacker, Johnson & Smith P.A., P.C., our independent registered public accounting firm, has made a limited review of our financial data as of March 31 2011 and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 presented in this document, in accordance with the standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
The report of Hacker, Johnson & Smith P.A., P.C. furnished pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation S-X is included on the following page herein.
22
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Intervest Bancshares Corporation
New York, New York:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2011 and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 10, 2011, we, based on our audit expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Hacker, Johnson & Smith P.A., P.C.
HACKER, JOHNSON & SMITH P.A., P.C.
Tampa, Florida
April 29, 2011
23
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations that follows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying quarterly financial statements in this report on Form 10-Q as well as our entire 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Intervest Bancshares Corporation (“IBC”) is the parent company of Intervest National Bank (“INB”). References in this report to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to these entities on a consolidated basis, unless otherwise specified. For a discussion of our business, see note 2 to the financial statements included in this report. Our business is also affected by various risk factors - see Item 1A of Part II of this report.
Critical Accounting Policies
A detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies and the factors and estimates we use in applying them can be found under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies” on pages 46 to 50 in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
A comparison of selected consolidated balance sheet information follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At March 31, 2011 | | | | | | At December 31, 2010 | |
($ in thousands) | | Carrying Value | | | % of Total Assets | | | | | | Carrying Value | | | % of Total Assets | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 29,079 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | | | | $ | 23,911 | | | | 1.2 | % |
Security investments, net | | | 600,045 | | | | 29.8 | | | | | | | | 623,990 | | | | 30.1 | |
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees and loan loss allowance | | | 1,268,146 | | | | 63.0 | | | | | | | | 1,302,486 | | | | 62.9 | |
Foreclosed real estate, net of valuation allowance | | | 27,064 | | | | 1.3 | | | | | | | | 27,064 | | | | 1.3 | |
All other assets | | | 89,791 | | | | 4.5 | | | | | | | | 93,417 | | | | 4.5 | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,014,125 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | | | | $ | 2,070,868 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Deposits | | $ | 1,706,630 | | | | 84.7 | % | | | | | | $ | 1,766,083 | | | | 85.3 | % |
Borrowed funds and related interest payable | | | 82,072 | | | | 4.1 | | | | | | | | 84,676 | | | | 4.1 | |
All other liabilities | | | 37,232 | | | | 1.9 | | | | | | | | 34,149 | | | | 1.6 | |
Total liabilities | | | 1,825,934 | | | | 90.7 | | | | | | | | 1,884,908 | | | | 91.0 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 188,191 | | | | 9.3 | | | | | | | | 185,960 | | | | 9.0 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 2,014,125 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | | | | $ | 2,070,868 | | | | 100.0 | % |
General
Total assets at March 31, 2011 decreased to $2.01 billion from $2.07 billion at December 31, 2010, primarily reflecting a decrease in loans receivable and security investments. These decreases were funded by a reduction in deposit liabilities and borrowed funds.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents increased to $29 million at March 31, 2011 from $24 million at December 31, 2010. The level of cash and cash equivalents fluctuates based on various factors, including our liquidity needs, loan demand, deposit flows, calls of securities, repayments of borrowed funds and alternative investment opportunities. See the section “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this report for a discussion of our liquidity.
Security Investments
Security investments consist of securities held to maturity and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB) stock totaling $600 million at March 31, 2011 and $624 million at December 31, 2010.
Securities are classified as held to maturity and are carried at amortized cost when we have the intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Such investments, all of which are held by INB, decreased to $590 million at March 31, 2011, from $614 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease reflected $72.5 million of calls, $5.1 million of maturities and $0.1 million of impairment writedowns. The aggregate of these items exceeded $53.4 million of new purchases during the period. At March 31, 2011, the securities portfolio consisted of investment grade rated debt obligations of the Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Farm Credit Bank, Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation totaling $585.5 million and noninvestment grade rated corporate securities (consisting of variable-rate pooled trust preferred securities backed by obligations of companies in the banking industry) totaling $4.5 million.
24
As discussed in more detail in note 3 to the financial statements included in this report, impairment charges totaling $3.6 million have been recorded on the trust preferred security investments.
At March 31, 2011, the held to maturity portfolio had a weighted-average yield to earliest call date of 1.64% and a weighted-average remaining contractual maturity of 4.8 years. Nearly all of the securities have fixed interest rates or have predetermined rate increases and call features that allow the issuer to call the security before its stated maturity without penalty. Over the next twelve months, approximately $168 million of securities in the portfolio could potentially be called assuming market interest rates remain at or near current levels. A large portion of the resulting proceeds would then be reinvested into similar securities and potentially at lower rates. At the time of purchase, securities with callable features routinely have higher yields than non-callable securities with the same maturity. However, the callable features or the expiration of the non-callable period of the security will most likely result in the early call of securities in a declining or flat rate environment, which results in re-investment risk of the proceeds.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the held-to-maturity portfolio’s estimated fair value was $580 million and $607 million, respectively. At March 31, 2011, the portfolio had a net unrealized loss of $9.5 million, compared to a net unrealized loss of $7.7 million at December 31, 2010. See note 3 to the financial statements included in this report for information on and a discussion of unrealized losses.
In order for INB to be a member of FRB and FHLB, INB must maintain an investment in the capital stock of each entity, which amounted to $5.8 million and $4.3 million, respectively, at March 31, 2011. The FRB stock has historically paid a dividend of 6%, while the FHLB stock dividend fluctuates quarterly and was most recently at the rate of 5.8%. The total required investment fluctuates based on INB’s capital level for the FRB stock and INB’s loans and outstanding FHLB borrowings for the FHLB stock.
Loans Receivable, Net of Deferred Fees
Total loans receivable, net of unearned fees, amounted to $1.30 billion at March 31, 2011, a $37 million decrease from $1.34 billion at December 31, 2010. The decrease was due to an aggregate of $39.5 million of principal repayments (resulting from $30.8 million of loan payoffs and $8.7 million of normal amortization) and $4.5 million of loan chargeoffs, partially offset by $6.6 million of new loan originations. The loans paid off had a weighted-average contractual yield of 6.68%. The new loan originations are secured by commercial and multifamily real estate and the loans are all fixed-rate with a weighted-average yield and term of 5.73% and 3 years, respectively. Fixed-rate loans constituted approximately 78% of the consolidated loan portfolio at March 31, 2011. See the section “Asset and Liability Management” in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion of fixed-rate loans.
The loan portfolio is concentrated in mortgage loans secured by commercial and multifamily real estate properties located in New York (68%) and Florida (23%). The properties include rental and cooperative/condominium apartment buildings, office buildings, mixed-use properties, shopping centers, hotels, restaurants, industrial/warehouse properties, parking lots/garages, mobile home parks, self storage facilities and some vacant land. At March 31, 2011, such loans consisted of 559 loans with an aggregate principal balance of $1.30 billion and an average loan size of $2.3 million. Loans with principal balances of more than $10 million consisted of 10 loans totaling $132 million, with the largest loan being $16.2 million. Loans with principal balances of $5 million to $10 million consisted of 54 loans and aggregated to $356 million.
The following table sets forth the types of properties securing the mortgage loan portfolio:
| | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | At Mar 31, 2011 | | | At Dec 31, 2010 | |
Commercial Real Estate: | | | | | | | | |
Retail stores | | $ | 480,938 | | | $ | 492,596 | |
Office buildings | | | 232,134 | | | | 239,047 | |
Industrial/warehouse | | | 77,375 | | | | 77,890 | |
Hotels | | | 54,730 | | | | 55,044 | |
Mobile home parks | | | 16,609 | | | | 21,082 | |
Parking lots/garages | | | 24,270 | | | | 25,488 | |
Other | | | 36,936 | | | | 37,128 | |
Residential Multifamily (5 or more units) | | | 368,395 | | | | 380,180 | |
Vacant Land | | | 12,255 | | | | 12,550 | |
Residential All Other | | | 410 | | | | 416 | |
| | $ | 1,304,052 | | | $ | 1,341,421 | |
25
The following table sets forth information regarding loans of more than $10 million at March 31, 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) Property Type | | Property Location | | Principal Balance | | | Interest Rate | | | Maturity Date | | | Status | |
Office building | | New York, New York | | $ | 16,212 | | | | 6.00% | | | | Aug 2013 | | | | Performing | |
Office building | | New York, New York | | | 15,640 | | | | 6.13% | | | | Apr 2015 | | | | Performing | |
Retail stores | | White Plains, New York | | | 15,334 | | | | 6.00% | | | | Sep 2015 | | | | Performing | |
Office building | | Miami, Florida | | | 14,834 | | | | 6.50% | | | | Oct 2011 | | | | Nonaccrual | |
Residential Multifamily | | Tampa, Florida | | | 12,834 | | | | 5.75% | | | | Sep 2020 | | | | Performing | |
Office building | | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida | | | 12,279 | | | | 5.88% | | | | May 2011 | | | | Performing | |
Retail stores | | Manorville, New York | | | 11,430 | | | | 6.25% | | | | Sep 2024 | | | | Performing | |
Retail stores | | Brooklyn, New York | | | 11,312 | | | | 6.00% | | | | Nov 2013 | | | | Performing | |
Hotel | | New York, New York | | | 11,261 | | | | 6.45% | | | | Jul 2012 | | | | Performing | |
Office building | | New York, New York | | | 10,751 | | | | 6.00% | | | | Apr 2014 | | | | Performing | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 131,887 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For additional information concerning the loan portfolio, see note 4 to the financial statements included in this report.
Nonperforming Assets
The table below summarizes nonperforming assets, past due loans and selected ratios as of the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | At Dec 31, 2010 | | | At Mar 31, 2011 | |
Nonaccrual loans (1) | | $ | 52,923 | | | $ | 45,192 | |
Real estate acquired through foreclosure | | | 27,064 | | | | 27,064 | |
Investment securities on a cash basis (2) | | | 2,318 | | | | 4,475 | |
Total nonperforming assets | | $ | 82,305 | | | $ | 76,731 | |
Loan past due 90 days and still accruing (3) | | $ | 7,481 | | | $ | 3,879 | |
Loans past due 60-89 days and still accruing | | $ | 4,008 | | | $ | - | |
Loans past due 31-59 days and still accruing (4) | | $ | 7,356 | | | $ | 21,785 | |
Nonperforming assets to total assets | | | 3.97 | % | | | 3.81 | % |
Nonaccrual loans to total gross loans | | | 3.94 | % | | | 3.46 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to total net loans | | | 2.61 | % | | | 2.49 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans | | | 65.83 | % | | | 71.69 | % |
(1) Include restructured loans (TDRs) of $21.5 million at December 31, 2010 and $18.1 million at March 31, 2011 that are performing in accordance with their restructured terms but are classified as nonaccrual in accordance with regulatory guidance.
(2) | See note 3 to the financial statements included in this report. |
(3) At March 31, 2011, the balance consisted of 3 loans that have matured for which the borrowers were making monthly loan payments. Two loans totaling $2.0 million were extended at market terms in April 2011. One loan for $1.9 million is also past maturity and the borrower continues to make monthly loan payments.
(4) At March 31, 2011, these loans were comprised as follows: Five loans ($12.3 million) matured—payments are current and extensions are in process, three loans ($6.0 million) are historically slow payers, one loan ($0.9 million) was brought current in April and one loan ($2.6 million) is expected to be extended.
The table that follows summarizes the change in nonaccrual loans for the period indicated.
| | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Quarter Ended Mar 31, 2011 | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 52,923 | |
New additions | | | 5,250 | |
Sales and principal repayments | | | (8,585 | ) |
Chargeoffs | | | (4,396 | ) |
Transfers to foreclosed real estate | | | - | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 45,192 | |
The table that follows summarizes the change in accruing TDRs for the period indicated.
| | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Quarter Ended Mar 31, 2011 | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 3,632 | |
New additions | | | 2,000 | |
Principal repayments | | | (2 | ) |
Chargeoffs | | | - | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 5,630 | |
26
In addition to nonaccrual loans and accruing TDRs, at March 31, 2011, there were an additional 14 loans totaling $35.3 million for which there were concerns regarding the ability of the borrowers to meet existing repayment terms. These loans are also classified as substandard for regulatory purposes and reflect the distinct possibility, but not the probability, that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Such loans may never become delinquent, nonaccrual or impaired. Potential problem loans are considered in the determination of the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
The table that follows details foreclosed real estate we owned at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property Type ($ in thousands) | | City | | | State | | | Date Acquired | | | Carrying Value (1) | |
Undeveloped Land | | | Hollywood | | | | Florida | | | | Feb 2008 | | | | $2,645 | |
Hotel | | | Orlando | | | | Florida | | | | Apr 2009 | | | | 5,820 | |
Office Building | | | Yonkers | | | | New York | | | | Aug 2009 | | | | 2,112 | |
Residential Multifamily | | | Austell | | | | Georgia | | | | Sep 2009 | | | | 3,696 | |
Undeveloped Land | | | Perryville | | | | Maryland | | | | Apr 2010 | | | | 1,914 | |
Residential Multifamily | | | Louisville | | | | Kentucky | | | | Jul 2010 | | | | 7,488 | |
Residential Multifamily | | | Louisville | | | | Kentucky | | | | Jul 2010 | | | | 3,389 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $27,064 | |
(1) Carrying value is reported net of any valuation allowance that has been recorded due to decreases in the estimated fair value of the property subsequent to the date of foreclosure. The total valuation allowance amounted to $2.7 million. See note 6 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information.
For additional information on nonaccrual loans, past due loans and real estate owned, see the note 4 and 6 to the financial statements included in this report.
Allowance For Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses amounted to $32.4 million at March 31, 2011, compared to $34.8 million at December 31, 2010. The allowance represented 2.49% of total loans (net of deferred fees) outstanding at March 31, 2011, compared to 2.61% at December 31, 2010. The net change in the allowance was due to $4.5 million of chargeoffs, partially offset by a $2.0 million loan loss provision. During the quarter, there were $3.3 million of chargeoffs resulting from updated appraisals on three performing TDRs (classified as nonaccrual and impaired as noted earlier) and the remainder of $1.2 million was from the payoff of several nonaccrual and underperforming loans at a discount to their carrying value.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses included a specific valuation allowance in the aggregate amount of $3.8 million and $7.2 million, respectively, for total nonaccrual and restructured loans, all of which are considered impaired loans.
For additional information on the allowance for loan losses, see note 5 to the financial statements included in this report.
All Other Assets
All other assets at March 31, 2011 (as denoted in the table under the caption “Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010”) decreased to $90 million, from $93 million at December 31, 2010, primarily due to a $1.7 million decrease in our deferred tax asset. For additional information on the deferred tax asset, see note 12 to the financial statements included in this report.
Deposits
Total deposits at March 31, 2011 decreased to $1.71 billion from $1.77 billion at December 31, 2010, due to a $46 million decrease in time deposits and a $13 million decrease in money market deposit accounts. At March 31, 2011, certificate of deposit accounts totaled $1.26 billion, and checking, savings and money market accounts aggregated to $448 million. The same categories of deposit accounts totaled $1.31 billion and $461 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010.
Certificate of deposit accounts represented 73.8% of total consolidated deposits at March 31, 2011, compared to 73.9% at December 31, 2010. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, certificate of deposit accounts included $138 million and $159 million of brokered deposits, respectively. For additional information on deposits, see the section “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and note 7 to the financial statements included in this report.
27
Borrowed Funds and Related Interest Payable
Total borrowed funds and related interest payable decreased to $82 million at March 31, 2011, from $85 million at December 31, 2010, due to the maturity and repayment of $3.0 million of FHLB borrowings and the early payoff of a $0.1 million mortgage note, partially offset by a $0.5 million increase in accrued interest payable on junior subordinated notes relating to IBC’s outstanding trust preferred securities.
For additional information on and discussion of borrowed funds, see notes 8 and 9 to the financial statements included in this report, as well as the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
All Other Liabilities
All other liabilities at March 31, 2011 (as denoted in the table under the caption “Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010”) amounted to $37 million, compared to $34 million at December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to a higher level of mortgage escrow funds payable.
Stockholders’ Equity
The following table sets forth the changes in stockholders’ equity:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | | Amount | | | Class A Shares | | | Amount Per Share (2) | |
Common stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2010 | | | $162,108 | | | | 21,126,489 | | | | $7.67 | |
Net income before preferred dividend requirements | | | 2,153 | | | | - | | | | 0.10 | |
Amortization of preferred stock discount | | | (96 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Compensation from stock options and restricted stock | | | 78 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Common stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2011 | | | $164,243 | | | | 21,126,489 | | | | $7.77 | |
Preferred stockholder’s equity at December 31, 2010 (1) | | | $23,852 | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of preferred stock discount | | | 96 | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stockholder’s equity at March 31, 2011 | | | $23,948 | | | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2011 | | | $188,191 | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Represents 25,000 shares of IBC’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A owned by the United States Department of the Treasury. See note 11 to the financial statements included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and note 10 to the financial statements included in this report on Form 10-Q. In February 2010, IBC suspended the declaration and payment of the preferred dividends. At March 31, 2011, the amount of preferred share dividends unpaid and in arrears totaled $1.7 million. Dividends in arrears are recorded as reduction in common stockholders’ equity only when they are declared and payable. |
(2) | Common stock book value per share, after adjusting for the preferred dividends in arrears, was $7.69 at March 31, 2011. |
28
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
Overview
We reported net earnings available to common stockholders for the first quarter of 2011 (“Q1-11”) of $1.7 million, or $0.08 per diluted common share, compared to a net loss available to common stockholders of $2.9 million, or $0.35 per share, for the first quarter of 2010 (“Q1-10”). The results and earnings per share amounts reported for both periods were net of $0.4 million of preferred dividend requirements related to IBC’s outstanding preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury.
Net earnings for Q1-11 increased by $4.6 million over Q1-10 due to a $9.6 million decrease in the total provision for loan and real estate losses, a $0.6 million decrease in real estate expenses and a $0.3 million decrease in noninterest expenses. The aggregate of these items was partially offset by a $2.1 million decrease in net interest and dividend income, a $0.2 million decrease in noninterest income and a $3.6 million increase in tax expense.
Selected information regarding results of operations follows:
| | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Q1-2011 | | | Q1-2010 | |
Interest and dividend income | | $ | 23,594 | | | $ | 29,631 | |
Interest expense | | | 13,243 | | | | 17,141 | |
Net interest and dividend income | | | 10,351 | | | | 12,490 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 2,045 | | | | 9,639 | |
Noninterest income | | | 323 | | | | 512 | |
Noninterest expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Provisions for real estate losses | | | - | | | | 2,001 | |
Real estate activities expenses | | | 325 | | | | 976 | |
All other noninterest expenses | | | 4,410 | | | | 4,689 | |
Earnings (loss) before taxes | | | 3,894 | | | | (4,303 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | 1,741 | | | | (1,825 | ) |
Net earnings (loss) before preferred dividend requirements | | | 2,153 | | | | (2,478 | ) |
Preferred dividend requirements (1) | | | 427 | | | | 409 | |
Net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders | | $ | 1,726 | | | $ | (2,887 | ) |
(1) Represents dividend requirements of 5% on $25 million of cumulative Series A preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury and amortization of related preferred stock discount. See note 10 to the financial statements included in this report.
Net Interest and Dividend Income
Net interest and dividend income is our primary source of earnings and is influenced by the amount, distribution and repricing characteristics of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as by the relative levels and movements of interest rates. Net interest and dividend income is the difference between interest income earned on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings.
Our net interest and dividend income, which is detailed in the table that follows, decreased by $2.1 million to $10.4 million in Q1-11 from $12.5 million in Q1-10. The decrease reflected the planned reduction in our assets and liabilities and a slightly lower net interest margin. Total average interest-earning assets decreased by $305 million in Q1-11 from Q1-10 in part due to the previously reported bulk loan sale in May 2010, with the remainder due to loan payoffs and principal repayments exceeding a reduced volume of new loan originations. These cash inflows were used to fund deposit outflow and repayments of maturing borrowed funds. The net reduction in the size of our balance sheet positively impacted our regulatory capital ratios.
Our net interest margin decreased to 2.14% in Q1-11 from 2.23% in Q1-10, as the yield on our average interest-earning assets decreased by 42 basis points to 4.88% in Q1-11, from 5.30% in Q1-10, while our average cost of funds decreased at a slightly slower pace of 40 basis points to 2.96% in Q1-11, from 3.36% in Q1-10. The decrease in the margin reflected the impact of the bulk loan sale, a large portion of which included the sale of $108 million of performing troubled debt restructured loans (TDRs) and other loans yielding approximately 5%, payoffs of other higher yielding loans and early calls of U.S. government agency security investments coupled with the reinvestment of the proceeds into similar securities with lower market interest rates, all of which was largely offset by lower rates paid on depositor accounts.
29
The following table provides information on our: average assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity; yields earned on interest-earning assets; and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. The yields and rates shown are based on a computation of income/expense (including any related fee income or expense) for each period divided by average interest-earning assets/interest-bearing liabilities during each period. Average balances are derived from daily balances. Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest and dividend income by the average of total interest-earning assets during each period. The interest rate spread is the difference between the average yield earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin is greater than the interest rate spread due to the additional income earned on those assets funded by non-interest-bearing liabilities, primarily demand deposits, and stockholders’ equity.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, 2011 | | | | | | March 31, 2010 | |
($ in thousands) | | Average Balance | | | Interest Inc./Exp. | | | Yield/ Rate (2) | | | | | | Average Balance | | | Interest Inc./Exp. | | | Yield/ Rate (2) | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans (1) | | $ | 1,329,413 | | | $ | 20,970 | | | | 6.40 | % | | | | | | $ | 1,680,810 | | | $ | 26,019 | | | | 6.28 | % |
Securities | | | 615,357 | | | | 2,618 | | | | 1.73 | | | | | | | | 566,635 | | | | 3,607 | | | | 2.58 | |
Other interest-earning assets | | | 17,055 | | | | 6 | | | | 0.14 | | | | | | | | 19,145 | | | | 5 | | | | 0.11 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 1,961,825 | | | $ | 23,594 | | | | 4.88 | % | | | | | | | 2,266,590 | | | $ | 29,631 | | | | 5.30 | % |
Noninterest-earning assets | | | 84,174 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 69,002 | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,045,999 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,335,592 | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest checking deposits | | $ | 10,141 | | | $ | 21 | | | | 0.84 | % | | | | | | $ | 9,284 | | | $ | 28 | | | | 1.22 | % |
Savings deposits | | | 9,602 | | | | 15 | | | | 0.63 | | | | | | | | 11,435 | | | | 31 | | | | 1.10 | |
Money market deposits | | | 433,657 | | | | 951 | | | | 0.89 | | | | | | | | 495,024 | | | | 1,574 | | | | 1.29 | |
Certificates of deposit | | | 1,278,780 | | | | 11,463 | | | | 3.64 | | | | | | | | 1,445,389 | | | | 14,515 | | | | 4.07 | |
Total deposit accounts | | | 1,732,180 | | | | 12,450 | | | | 2.91 | | | | | | | | 1,961,132 | | | | 16,148 | | | | 3.34 | |
FHLB advances | | | 24,800 | | | | 250 | | | | 4.09 | | | | | | | | 52,161 | | | | 476 | | | | 3.70 | |
Debentures - capital securities | | | 56,702 | | | | 542 | | | | 3.88 | | | | | | | | 56,702 | | | | 514 | | | | 3.68 | |
Mortgage note payable | | | 87 | | | | 1 | | | | 4.66 | | | | | | | | 165 | | | | 3 | | | | 7.37 | |
Total borrowed funds | | | 81,589 | | | | 793 | | | | 3.94 | | | | | | | | 109,028 | | | | 993 | | | | 3.69 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | $ | 1,813,769 | | | $ | 13,243 | | | | 2.96 | % | | | | | | $ | 2,070,160 | | | $ | 17,141 | | | | 3.36 | % |
Noninterest-bearing deposits | | | 4,060 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,396 | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing liabilities | | | 41,347 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 47,801 | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stockholder’s equity | | | 23,885 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 23,530 | | | | | | | | | |
Common stockholders’ equity | | | 162,938 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 190,705 | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 2,045,999 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,335,592 | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest and dividend income/spread | | | | | | $ | 10,351 | | | | 1.92 | % | | | | | | | | | | $ | 12,490 | | | | 1.94 | % |
Net interest-earning assets/margin (3) | | $ | 148,056 | | | | | | | | 2.14 | % | | | | | | $ | 196,430 | | | | | | | | 2.23 | % |
Ratio of total interest-earning assets to total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1.08 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.10 | | | | | | | | | |
Other Ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Return on average assets (2) | | | 0.42 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -0.42 | % | | | | | | | | |
Return on average common equity (2) | | | 5.29 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -5.20 | % | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest expense to average assets (2) (5) | | | 0.86 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.80 | % | | | | | | | | |
Efficiency ratio (4) | | | 41 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 36 | % | | | | | | | | |
Average stockholders’ equity to average assets | | | 9.13 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.17 | % | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Includes average nonaccrual loans of $53.0 million in the 2011 period versus $105.6 million in the 2010 period. |
Interest not accrued on such loans and excluded from the table totaled $0.6 million in the 2011 period versus $1.3 million in the 2010 period.
(3) | Net interest margin is reported exclusive of income from loan prepayments, which is included as a component of our noninterest income. Inclusive of income from loan prepayments, the margin would compute to 2.14% and 2.32% for the 2011and 2010 period, respectively. |
(4) | Defined as noninterest expenses (excluding the provisions for loan and real estate losses and real estate activities expenses) as a percentage of net interest and dividend income plus noninterest income. |
(5) | Noninterest expenses for this ratio excludes real estate activities expenses. |
30
The following table provides information regarding changes in interest and dividend income and interest expense. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior volume), (2) changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by prior rate) and (3) changes in rate-volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 vs. 2010 | |
| | Increase (Decrease) Due To Change In: | |
($ in thousands) | | Rate | | | Volume | | | Rate/Volume | | | Total | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 504 | | | $ | (5,517 | ) | | | $ (36) | | | $ | (5,049 | ) |
Securities | | | (1,204 | ) | | | 314 | | | | (99 | ) | | | (989 | ) |
Other interest-earning assets | | | 1 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | (699 | ) | | | (5,204 | ) | | | (134 | ) | | | (6,037 | ) |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest checking deposits | | | (9 | ) | | | 3 | | | | (1 | ) | | | (7 | ) |
Savings deposits | | | (13 | ) | | | (5 | ) | | | 2 | | | | (16 | ) |
Money market deposits | | | (495 | ) | | | (198 | ) | | | 70 | | | | (623 | ) |
Certificates of deposit | | | (1,554 | ) | | | (1,695 | ) | | | 197 | | | | (3,052 | ) |
Total deposit accounts | | | (2,071 | ) | | | (1,895 | ) | | | 268 | | | | (3,698 | ) |
FHLB advances | | | 51 | | | | (253 | ) | | | (24 | ) | | | (226 | ) |
Debentures - capital securities | | | 28 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 28 | |
Mortgage note payable | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | - | | | | (2 | ) |
Total borrowed funds | | | 78 | | | | (254 | ) | | | (24 | ) | | | (200 | ) |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | (1,993 | ) | | | (2,149 | ) | | | 244 | | | | (3,898 | ) |
Net change in interest and dividend income | | $ | 1,294 | | | $ | (3,055 | ) | | | $ (378) | | | $ | (2,139 | ) |
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses decreased to $2.0 million in Q1-11 from $9.6 million in Q1-10. The decrease reflected fewer problem loans and credit rating downgrades as compared to the prior period, as well as q decrease in gross loans outstanding (due to loan payoffs and principal repayments exceeded new loan originations).
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income decreased to $0.3 million Q1-11 from $0.5 million in Q1-10, primarily due to a $0.5 million decrease in income from loan prepayments, partially offset by a lower level ($0.4 million) of impairment writedowns on investment securities. See note 3 to the financial statements included in this report for a discussion of impairment writedowns.
Noninterest Expenses
The provision for real estate losses decreased from $2.0 million in Q1-10 to none for Q1-11. The reduction reflected less real estate owned and the results of our periodic market valuations of the properties we own through foreclosure. Decreases in the estimated fair value of the properties are recorded as an increase to the valuation allowance and a charge to the provision for real estate losses. In Q1-11, we determined based on our evaluation that a provision for real estate losses was not necessary.
Real estate activities expenses decreased to $0.3 million in Q1-11 from $1.0 million in Q1-10, reflecting a lower level of nonperforming assets. These expenses are comprised of real estate taxes, insurance, utilities and other charges required to protect our interest in real estate acquired through foreclosure and various properties collateralizing our nonaccrual loans.
All other noninterest expenses decreased to $4.4 million in Q1-11 from $4.7 million in Q1-10, primarily due to a $0.2 million decrease in INB’s data processing costs. In late 2010, INB converted its core data processing system to a new lower-cost provider. This new system is expected to save approximately $0.8 million annually for each of the next seven years as compared to the previous cost structure.
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded a provision for income expense of $1.7 million in Q1-11 due to pre-tax income, compared to a tax benefit of $1.8 million on a pre-tax loss in Q1-10. Our effective income tax rate (inclusive of state and local taxes) was 44.7% in Q1-11, compared to 42.4% in Q1-10. The expense for the 2011 period reflects the partial utilization of our deferred tax asset. For additional information on our deferred tax asset, see note 12 to the financial statements included in this report.
31
Off-Balance Sheet and Other Financing Arrangements
We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of our business to meet the financing needs of our customers. For a further information on and discussion of these financial instruments, see note 14 to the financial statements included in this report.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following discussion serves as an update to the section “Liquidity and Capital Resources” beginning on page 65 of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and should be read in conjunction with that discussion. For detail concerning our actual cash flows for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, see the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows included in this report.
Intervest National Bank. In the first quarter of 2011, as a result of INB’s planned efforts during 2010 to decrease the overall size of its balance sheet to improve its regulatory capital ratios, INB experienced additional net deposit outflow attributable to the repayment of $21 million of maturing brokered deposits and $38 million from INB’s lower deposits rates offered for its deposit products. INB’s total deposits may decrease further during the remainder of 2011 from the expected repayment of its maturing brokered deposits and from the potential effects of deposit rate restrictions imposed on INB as a result of its Formal Agreement with its regulator. These restrictions, may negatively impact INB’s ability to offer competitive deposit rates in its primary deposit-gathering market areas. INB is required (in the absence of obtaining a waiver from the FDIC) to maintain its deposit pricing at or below the national rates published by the FDIC, plus 75 basis points. The FDIC’s national rate is a simple average of rates paid by U.S. depository institutions as calculated by the FDIC. Furthermore, INB is not allowed to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits without the prior approval of the OCC. INB has not accessed the brokered deposit market since September 2009. INB expects to fund any additional deposit outflow through a portion of the cash flows from the repayments of loans and/or expected calls of its agency security investments. INB’s current objective is to maintain its deposit rates at levels that are in compliance with its deposit rate restrictions while attempting to promote a stable deposit base that can be adjusted to its cash flow needs. INB has historically targeted its loan-to-deposit ratio in a range from 75% to 85%. This ratio was 72% at March 31, 2011.
Total deposits decreased to $1.71 billion at March 31, 2011, from $1.77 billion at December 31, 2010, reflecting decreases of $46 million in certificate of deposit accounts (CDs) and $13 million in money market deposit accounts. At March 31, 2011, CDs totaled $1.26 billion, and checking, savings and money market accounts aggregated to $448 million. CDs represented 73.8% of total deposits and CDs of $100,000 or more totaled $614 million and included $138 million of brokered deposits. Brokered deposits had a weighted-average remaining term and stated interest rate of 2.5 years and 4.94%, respectively, at March 31, 2011, and $27 million mature by March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2011, $436 million, or 35%, of total CDs (inclusive of brokered deposits) mature within one year. INB expects to repay its brokered deposits as they mature and to retain or replace a significant portion of its remaining maturing CDs.
In the first quarter of 2011, INB repaid $3.0 million of its maturing FHLB advances. At March 31, 2011, INB had $22.5 million of FHLB advances outstanding, of which $5.0 million mature by December 31, 2011, $10.5 million in 2012 and $7.0 million in 2013. INB expects to have the flexibility to either repay or replace its outstanding borrowings as they mature. At March 31, 2011, INB had access to secured borrowings of $621 million and to overnight unsecured lines of credit totaling $38 million. In the event that any of INB’s existing lines of credit were not accessible or were limited, INB could designate all or a portion of its un-pledged U.S. government agency investment securities portfolio as available for sale and sell such securities as needed to provide liquidity.
At March 31, 2011, INB had cash and short-term investments totaling $27 million, and $235 million of its loan portfolio (excluding nonaccrual loans) mature within one year. Additionally, over the next twelve months, $168 million in INB’s security investments could potentially be called if interest rates remain at or near current levels. A large portion of any calls are expected to be reinvested into similar securities. INB also expects to extend or refinance a large portion of its maturing loans. At March 31, 2011, INB had commitments to lend of $34 million, most of which are anticipated to be funded over the next 12 months from the sources of funds described above. As discussed in note 15 to the financial statements included in this report, INB’s regulatory capital ratios at March 31, 2011 exceeded its current minimum requirements and INB does not expect to need additional capital over the next twelve months.
32
Intervest Bancshares Corporation. At March 31, 2011, IBC had cash and short-term investments totaling $5.3 million, of which $4.9 million was available for use (inclusive of $3.3 million on deposit with INB). At March 31, 2011, IBC had undeclared and unpaid preferred (TARP) dividends in arrears of $1.7 million and accrued and unpaid interest on its outstanding trust preferred securities of $2.8 million.
INB historically has paid cash dividends to IBC to fund the interest payments due on IBC’s trust preferred securities as well as for IBC’s payment of dividends on the preferred stock. Since January 2010, INB has suspended the payment of dividends to IBC as required by its primary regulator, the OCC. Since February 2010, IBC, as required by its primary regulator, the FRB, has also suspended the payment of dividends on its capital stock and payment of interest on its trust preferred securities. Dividends in arrears are recorded as a reduction in common stockholders’ equity only when they are declared and payable. The regularly scheduled interest payments on the trust preferred securities continue to be accrued for payment in the future and are reported as interest expense in our financial statements. The interest and preferred dividend payments referred to above can only resume at such time as both IBC and INB are permitted to do so and upon the determination that such payments are consistent with IBC’s and INB’s overall financial performance and capital requirements.
The deferral of interest payments does not constitute a default under the indentures governing the trust preferred securities. If IBC misses six quarterly preferred dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the Treasury, the current holder of the preferred stock, has the right to appoint two directors to IBC’s Board of Directors until all accrued but unpaid dividends have been paid. IBC had missed five dividend payments as of March 31, 2011. In April 2011, IBC agreed with the Treasury to have one or more employees of the Office of Financial Stability (“OFS”) attend and observe IBC’s and INB’s full Board of Director meetings as well as certain meetings of committees of each Board, as appropriate. The observers will participate primarily by listening to discussions and presentations in such meetings, limiting their participation to clarifying questions on materials distributed, presentations made or actions proposed or taken at such meetings.
As discussed in note 15 to the financial statements included in this report, IBC’s regulatory capital ratios at March 31, 2011 exceeded its current minimum requirements and IBC does not expect to need additional capital over the next twelve months.
General. Additional information concerning investment securities, deposits, borrowings and preferred stock, including interest rates, dividends and maturity dates thereon, can be found in notes 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 15 to the financial statements included in this report.
We consider our current liquidity and sources of funds sufficient to satisfy our outstanding lending commitments and maturing liabilities. We are not aware of any trends, known demands, commitments or uncertainties other than those discussed above or elsewhere in this report that are expected to have a material impact on our future operating results, liquidity or capital resources. However, there can be no assurances that adverse conditions will not arise in the credit and capital markets or from the restrictions placed on us by our regulators (with respect to brokered deposits, caps on deposit rates offered, payment of dividends and incurrence of new debt) that would adversely impact our liquidity and ability to raise funds (through attracting and retaining deposits or from borrowings or sales of assets) to meet our operations and satisfy our outstanding lending commitments and maturing liabilities or raise new working capital if needed.
Regulatory Capital and Other Matters
IBC and INB are subject to various regulatory capital requirements and each is operating under formal agreements with their respective primary regulator as discussed in more detail in the section “Supervision and Regulation” in Item 1 “Business” and in note 20 to the financial statements included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in note 15 to the financial statements included in this report on Form 10-Q.
33
Asset and Liability Management
We have interest rate risk that arises from differences in the repricing of our assets and liabilities within a given time period. We have never engaged in trading or hedging activities, nor invested in interest rate derivatives or entered into interest rate swaps. The primary objective of our asset/liability management strategy is to limit, within established guidelines, the adverse effect of changes in interest rates on our net interest income and capital.
To this regard, INB, whose assets represent 99% of our consolidated assets, engages an outside consultant to prepare quarterly reports using an earnings simulation model to quantify the effects of various interest rate scenarios on its projected net interest and dividend income over projected periods. These computations begin with our gap analysis that is adjusted for additional assumptions regarding balance sheet growth and composition, and the pricing and re-pricing and maturity characteristics of INB’s assets and liabilities.
Gap analysis measures the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that mature or reprice within a given time period. For a further discussion of gap analysis, including the factors that affect its computation and results, see pages 68 and 69 of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As noted in the footnotes to the gap table below, there are numerous assumptions that are made by us to compute the gap. A change in any of these assumptions would materially alter the results of the gap analysis as well as the simulation model.
The table below summarizes our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of March 31, 2011, that are scheduled to mature or reprice within the periods shown.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 0-3 | | | 4-12 | | | Over 1-5 | | | Over 5 | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | Months | | | Months | | | Years | | | Years | | | Total | |
Loans (1) | | $ | 97,627 | | | $ | 236,703 | | | $ | 813,465 | | | $ | 112,548 | | | $ | 1,260,343 | |
Securities held to maturity (2) | | | 275,292 | | | | 227,913 | | | | 80,260 | | | | 2,000 | | | | 585,465 | |
Short-term investments | | | 19,301 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 19,301 | |
FRB and FHLB stock | | | 4,293 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,812 | | | | 10,105 | |
Total rate-sensitive assets | | $ | 396,513 | | | $ | 464,616 | | | $ | 893,725 | | | $ | 120,360 | | | $ | 1,875,214 | |
Deposit accounts (3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest checking deposits | | $ | 10,048 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 10,048 | |
Savings deposits | | | 9,380 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9,380 | |
Money market deposits | | | 423,956 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 423,956 | |
Certificates of deposit | | | 76,304 | | | | 360,079 | | | | 775,252 | | | | 47,083 | | | | 1,258,718 | |
Total deposits | | | 519,688 | | | | 360,079 | | | | 775,252 | | | | 47,083 | | | | 1,702,102 | |
FHLB advances (1) | | | - | | | | 12,000 | | | | 10,500 | | | | - | | | | 22,500 | |
Subordinated debentures- capital securities (1) | | | 46,392 | | | | 10,310 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 56,702 | |
Accrued interest on all borrowed funds (1) | | | 2,870 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,870 | |
Total borrowed funds | | | 49,262 | | | | 22,310 | | | | 10,500 | | | | - | | | | 82,072 | |
Total rate-sensitive liabilities | | $ | 568,950 | | | $ | 382,389 | | | $ | 785,752 | | | $ | 47,083 | | | $ | 1,784,174 | |
GAP (repricing differences) | | $ | (172,437 | ) | | $ | 82,227 | | | $ | 107,973 | | | $ | 73,277 | | | $ | 91,040 | |
Cumulative GAP | | $ | (172,437 | ) | | $ | (90,210 | ) | | $ | 17,763 | | | $ | 91,040 | | | $ | 91,040 | |
Cumulative GAP to total assets | | | (8.6 | )% | | | (4.5 | )% | | | 0.9 | % | | | 4.5 | % | | | 4.5 | % |
Significant assumptions used in preparing the gap table above follow:
(1) | Floating-rate loans, loans with predetermined rate increases and floating-rate borrowings are included in the period in which their interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period in which they mature. Fixed-rate loans and borrowings are scheduled according to their contractual maturities. Deferred loan fees and the effect of possible loan prepayments are excluded from the analysis. Nonaccrual loans of $45.2 million are also excluded from the table although some portion is expected to return to an interest-earning status in the near term. |
(2) | Securities are scheduled according to the earlier of their next callable date or the date on which the interest rate on the security is scheduled to change. Nearly all have predetermined interest rate increases or “steps up” to a specified rate on one or more predetermined dates. Generally, the security becomes eligible for redemption by the issuer at the date of the first scheduled step-up. The net carrying value ($4.5 million) of corporate securities that are on a cash basis of accounting are excluded from the table. |
(3) | Interest checking, savings and money market deposits are regarded as 100% readily accessible withdrawable accounts and certificates of deposit are scheduled according to their contractual maturity dates. This assumption contributes significantly to the liability sensitive position reported per the one-year gap analysis. However, if such deposits were treated differently, the one-year gap would then change. Depositors may not necessarily immediately withdraw funds in the event deposit rates offered by INB did not change as quickly and uniformly as changes in general market rates. |
34
At March 31, 2011, the gap analysis above indicated that our interest-bearing liabilities that were scheduled to mature or reprice within one-year exceeded our interest-earning assets that were scheduled to mature or reprice within one-year. This one-year interest rate sensitivity gap amounted to a negative $90 million, or a negative 4.5% of total assets, at March 31, 2011. As a result of the negative one-year gap, the composition of our balance sheet at March 31, 2011 was considered “liability-sensitive,” indicating that our interest-bearing liabilities would generally reprice with changes in interest rates more rapidly than our interest-earning assets.
Based on our recent analysis of the earnings simulation model described earlier, the two-year cumulative risk to our net interest and dividend income would be a negative 5.8% for a 100 basis point rate decrease shock and a negative 8.0% for a 200 basis point rate increase shock. The model covers a 24 month horizon and assumes interest rate changes are gradually ramped up or down over a 12 month horizon using various assumptions based upon a parallel yield curve shift and subsequently sustained at those levels for the remainder of the simulation horizon.
There can be no assurances that a sudden and substantial change in interest rates may not adversely impact our net interest and dividend income to a larger extent if interest rates on our assets and liabilities do not change at the same speed, to the same extent, or on the same basis, than those assumed in the model.
Recent Accounting Standards
See note 18 to the financial statements included in this report for a discussion of this topic.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in our lending, security investing, deposit-taking and borrowing activities. We do not engage in and accordingly have no risk related to trading accounts, commodities, interest rate hedges or foreign exchange. The measurement of market risk associated with financial instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting on-and off-balance sheet transactions are aggregated, and the resulting net positions are identified. Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments which reflect changes in market prices and rates, can be found in note 17 to the financial statements included in this report. We also actively monitor and manage our interest rate risk exposure as discussed under the caption “Asset and Liability Management.”
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Principal Executive and Financial Officers, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Principal Executive and Financial Officers have concluded that as of March 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
We are periodically a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, such as foreclosure proceedings. Based on review and consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe that there is any pending or threatened proceeding against us, which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
This item requires disclosure of any new or material changes to our risk factors disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, where such factors are discussed on pages 28 through 38. There were no new or material changes to the risk factors during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not Applicable
35
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved)
ITEM 5. Other Information
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report.
| | |
31.0 | | Certification of the principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.1 | | Certification of the principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.0 | | Certification of the principal executive and financial officers pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| | INTERVEST BANCSHARES CORPORATION |
| | (Registrant) |
| |
Date: April 29, 2011 | | By: /s/ Lowell S. Dansker |
| | Lowell S. Dansker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
Date: April 29, 2011 | | By: /s/ John J. Arvonio |
| | John J. Arvonio, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) |
36