Cybersource 10Q 2006 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006.

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 000-26477

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware

77-0472961

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1295 CHARLESTON ROAD

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA 94043

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)

(650) 965-6000

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changes since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer x		Non-accelerated-filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of October 20, 2006, there were 34,921,810 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

INDEX TO REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006


		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements:

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005	5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	21

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	22

Item1A.	Risk Factors	23

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	29

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	29

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders	29

Item 5.	Other Information	29

Item 6.	Exhibits	30

Signatures		31

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)


	September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005 (1)
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,634		$	14,383
Short-term investments		32,816			32,618
Accounts receivable, net		8,307			8,592
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,783			2,843
Deferred income taxes		2,183			3,192

Total current assets		66,723			61,628
Property and equipment, net		3,441			2,542
Intangible assets, net		2,910			—
Other noncurrent assets		2,009			1,157

Total assets	$	75,083		$	65,327

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	639		$	519
Other accrued liabilities		5,736			5,944
Deferred revenue		2,148			1,931

Total current liabilities		8,523			8,394

Deferred tax liability		1,218			—

Total liabilities		9,741			8,394

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		35			34
Additional paid-in capital		367,963			361,710
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(235	)		(439	)
Accumulated deficit		(302,421	)		(304,372	)

Total stockholders’ equity		65,342			56,933

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	75,083		$	65,327

(1)	Derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2005.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005		2006		2005
Revenues:
Transaction and support	$	15,928		$	10,844	$	44,034	$	29,858
Enterprise software		738			747		2,285		2,998
Professional services		693			938		3,022		2,745

Total revenues		17,359			12,529		49,341		35,601
Cost of revenues:
Transaction and support		8,353			4,575		21,859		12,128
Enterprise software		58			163		172		664
Professional services		362			548		1,591		1,446

Cost of revenues		8,773			5,286		23,622		14,238

Gross profit		8,586			7,243		25,719		21,363

Operating expenses:
Product development		2,433			1,919		6,816		5,857
Sales and marketing		3,740			2,632		10,639		8,176
General and administrative		2,585			1,408		7,084		4,109

Total operating expenses		8,758			5,959		24,539		18,142

Income (loss) from operations		(172	)		1,284		1,180		3,221
Other income		—			—		400		—
Interest income		632			363		1,668		900

Income before income taxes		460			1,647		3,248		4,121
Income tax provision		174			19		1,297		72

Net income	$	286		$	1,628	$	1,951	$	4,049

Basic earnings per share	$	0.01		$	0.05	$	0.06	$	0.12

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.01		$	0.05	$	0.05	$	0.11

Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic earnings per share		34,764			33,523		34,534		33,338

Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted earnings per share		37,945			36,092		37,337		35,720

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	1,951		$	4,049
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,061			587
Stock-based compensation		3,396			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		285			(383	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,060			(773	)
Deferred income taxes		1,229			—
Other noncurrent assets		(852	)		(517	)
Accounts payable		120			186
Accrued liabilities		(208	)		(469	)
Deferred revenue		217			(72	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		8,259			2,608

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,881	)		(1,170	)
Acquisition of BidPay.com		(1,990	)		—
Purchases of short-term investments		(40,475	)		(49,813	)
Maturities of short-term investments		40,311			49,156

Net cash used in investing activities		(4,035	)		(1,827	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		3,981			2,317
Repurchase of common stock		(1,123	)		(2,405	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		2,858			(88	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		169			(163	)

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		7,251			530
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		14,383			13,052

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	21,634		$	13,582

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of CyberSource Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “CyberSource” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 10, 2006, SEC File No. 000-26477.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

Prior to the January 1, 2006 adoption of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS 148”). SFAS 148 required disclosure of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. As permitted under SFAS 148, the Company adopted the disclosure only provisions and continued to follow the intrinsic value method of accounting for employee stock options in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”).

Effective January 1, 2006, the beginning of the Company’s first fiscal quarter of 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Compensation expense recognized included the estimated expense for stock options granted on and subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the fair value at grant date estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R, and the estimated expense for the portion vesting during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, for options granted prior to, but not vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the fair value at grant date estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Results for prior periods have not been restated, as provided for under the modified-prospective method. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $1.3 and $3.4 million, respectively, before income taxes.

As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, the Company’s income before income taxes, reduced by the expense for stock option awards, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, was $1.3 million and $3.4 million lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. Also as a result of adopting SFAS 123R, the Company’s net income, reduced by the expense for stock option awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, was $0.8 million and $2.0 million lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. Both basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2006 would have been $0.02 higher if the Company had not adopted SFAS No. 123R., Both basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 would have been $0.06 higher if the Company had not adopted SFAS No. 123R.

The following table shows the effect on net earnings and earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 had compensation cost been recognized based upon the estimated fair value on the grant date of stock options, and employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) shares, in accordance with SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148 (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
Net income, as reported	$	1,628		$	4,049
Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income		—			—
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards (net of tax)		(775	)		(2,202	)

Pro forma net income	$	853		$	1,847

Basic earnings per share, as reported	$	0.05		$	0.12

Basic earnings per share, proforma	$	0.03		$	0.06

Diluted earnings per share, as reported	$	0.05		$	0.11

Diluted earnings per share, proforma	$	0.02		$	0.05

For stock options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and ESPP shares purchased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company determined the fair value at the date of grant or purchase using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the following weighted average assumptions:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Stock options:
Risk-free interest rate	4.69	%	4.04	%	4.64	%- 4.69%	3.93	%
Dividend yield	—		—		—		—
Volatility	0.61		0.49		0.61-0.64		0.49
Expected life (years)	2.96		4.12		2.96		4.12
Employee stock purchase plan shares:
Risk-free interest rate	—		3.70	%	—		3.44	%
Dividend yield	—		—		—		—
Volatility	—		0.45		—		0.45
Expected life (months)	—		6		—		6

The expected life of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. Expected stock price volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock over the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining expected life. The Company has not paid dividends in the past and does not plan to pay any dividends in the near future.

The weighted average fair value of options granted was $4.57 and $3.08 per share for options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $5.02 and $2.42 per share for options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The weighted average fair value for shares purchased under the Company’s ESPP was $1.73 per share during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. In July 2005, the Company amended the ESPP, permitting eligible employees to authorize payroll deductions of up to 10% of their base compensation to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at 95% of the fair market value of the common stock on the purchase date. As a result of this amendment and the provisions of SFAS 123R, shares granted under the ESPP are non-compensatory. As of September 30, 2006, 700,000 shares are authorized for issuance under the ESPP.

Stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock are granted at prices equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. Options generally vest monthly over a four year period beginning from the date of grant and generally expire six to ten years from the date of grant. Options granted to non-employee directors generally become vested nine months from the date of grant. Nearly all outstanding stock options are non-qualified stock options. As of September 30, 2006, 16.6 million shares are authorized for issuance under the Company’s stock option plans.

The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of options granted are evaluated and revised, as necessary, to reflect market

conditions and the Company’s experience. Options granted are valued using the single option valuation approach, and the resulting expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the option. Compensation expense is recognized only for those options expected to vest, with forfeitures estimated at the date of grant based on the Company’s historical experience and future expectations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the effect of forfeitures on the pro forma expense amounts was recognized as the forfeitures occurred.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is presented in the following table:


	Shares		Weighted average exercise price per share		Weighted average remaining contractual life	Aggregate intrinsic value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2005	6,358,136		$	5.83
Granted	2,637,100			9.41
Exercised	(1,071,313	)		3.59
Forfeited	(288,139	)		7.57

Outstanding as of September 30, 2006	7,635,784		$	7.31	6.04	$	40,578,669
Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2006	7,177,979		$	7.21	6.03	$	39,250,900
Exercisable as of September 30, 2006	3,853,497		$	6.65	5.70	$	26,042,183

As of September 30, 2006, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $12.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.0 years. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was approximately $1.5 million and $6.0 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was approximately $1.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the total cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $1.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the total cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $1.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company granted 100,000 restricted shares at a weighted average grant date fair value of $10.46. No shares have vested as of September 30, 2006.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are calculated under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). Under SFAS 109, the liability method is used in accounting for income taxes, which includes the effects of temporary differences between financial and taxable amounts of assets and liabilities as well as the effects of net operating loss and credit carryforwards to determine deferred tax assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are established and adjusted when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to more likely than not be realized.

2. BIDPAY.COM ACQUISITION

In March 2006, the Company acquired BidPay.com, Inc. (“BidPay”), a payment service provider for online auctions. Founded in 1999, BidPay developed a platform based on proprietary technology and acquired over 4.0 million registered users prior to ceasing operations in December 2005. The Company’s primary reason for the acquisition of BidPay is to expand its services into the payment market for online auctions. The aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.0 million consisted of cash consideration of approximately $2.0 million, including $0.2 million of acquisition costs, and $1.0 million in deferred taxes related to the difference between the financial and tax basis of the assets acquired, in exchange for BidPay’s proprietary technology, its databases, and certain intellectual property rights, including exclusive rights to the BidPay brand.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 98-3, “Determining Whether a Nonmonetary Transaction Involves Receipt of Productive Assets or of a Business,” the Company determined that it had acquired productive assets as opposed to a business. As a result, no amount of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill. The total purchase price of $3.0 million was allocated based on the fair values presented below (in thousands):


	Fair Market Value		Straight-line Amortization
			(years)
Technology platform	$	269	3
Customer list		269	6
Trade name		2,451	—

Total	$	2,989

The Company recorded approximately $49,000 and $79,000 of amortization expense related to intangible assets in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the intangible assets on the Company’s September 30, 2006 balance sheet for the fiscal years ended December 31, is as follows (in thousands):


Remainder of 2006	$	34
2007		134
2008		134
2009		60
2010		45
Thereafter		52

Total	$	459

The pro forma results of operations have not been presented for the acquisition of BidPay because the effect of this acquisition was not considered material.

3. BALANCE SHEET DETAIL

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Prepaid expenses	$	1,218	$	1,505
Value added taxes receivable		60		956
Acquiring receivable		370		185
Notes receivable		—		175
Other current assets		135		22

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	1,783	$	2,843

Other

non-current assets consist of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Prepaid rent	$	1,682	$	824
Deposits		286		265
Other non-current assets		41		68

Total other non-current assets	$	2,009	$	1,157

Other accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Employee benefits and related expenses	$	2,398	$	2,415
Accrued cost of revenues		1,682		920
Other liabilities		1,656		2,609

Total other accrued liabilities	$	5,736	$	5,944

4. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available that is evaluated by the chief operating decision maker or decision-making group to make decisions about how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Company views its operations as principally three segments, commerce transaction services and support, enterprise software and professional services and manages the business based on the revenues of these segments.

The following tables present revenues and cost of revenues by the Company’s three reportable segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. There were no inter-business unit sales or transfers. The Company does not report operating expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest income, income taxes, capital expenditures or identifiable assets by its segments to the CEO. The Company’s CEO reviews the revenues and cost of revenues from each of the Company’s reportable segments, and all of the Company’s expenses are managed by and reported to the CEO on a consolidated basis. Revenues and cost of revenues are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Revenues:
Commerce transaction services and support	$	15,928	$	10,844	$	44,034	$	29,858
Enterprise software		738		747		2,285		2,998
Professional services		693		938		3,022		2,745

Total revenues	$	17,359	$	12,529	$	49,341	$	35,601

Cost of revenues:
Transaction and support	$	8,353	$	4,575	$	21,859	$	12,128
Enterprise software		58		163		172		664
Professional services		362		548		1,591		1,446

Total cost of revenues	$	8,773	$	5,286	$	23,622	$	14,238

No customer accounted for more than 10.0% of the Company’s revenues during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.

5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005			2006		2005
Net income	$	286	$	1,628		$	1,951	$	4,049
Change in cumulative translation adjustment		3		(22	)		169		(163	)
Unrealized gain on short-term investments		7		(18	)		35		18

Comprehensive income	$	296	$	1,588		$	2,155	$	3,904

6. LEGAL MATTERS

In July and August 2001, various class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against the Company, its Chairman and CEO, a former officer, and four brokerage firms that served as underwriters in the Company’s initial public offering. The actions were filed on behalf of persons who purchased the Company’s stock issued pursuant to or traceable to the initial public offering during the period from June 23, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The action alleges that the Company’s underwriters charged secret excessive commissions to certain of their customers in return for allocations of the Company’s stock in the offering. The two individual defendants are alleged to be liable because of their involvement in preparing and signing the registration statement for the offering, which allegedly failed to disclose the supposedly excessive commissions. On December 7, 2001, an amended complaint was filed in one of the actions to expand the purported class to persons who purchased the Company’s stock issued pursuant to or traceable to the follow-on public offering during the period from November 4, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The lawsuit filed against the Company is one of several hundred lawsuits filed against other companies based on substantially similar claims. On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended complaint was filed to consolidate all of the complaints and claims into one case. The consolidated amended complaint alleges claims that are virtually identical to the amended complaint filed on December 7, 2001 and the original complaints. In October 2002, the Company’s officer and a former officer that were named in the amended complaint were dismissed without prejudice. In July 2002, the Company, along with other issuer defendants in the case, filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint with prejudice. On February 19, 2003, the court issued a written decision denying the motion to dismiss with respect to CyberSource and the individual defendants. On July 2, 2003, a committee of the Company’s Board of Directors conditionally

approved a proposed partial settlement with the plaintiffs in this matter. The settlement would provide, among other things, a release of the Company and of the individual defendants for the conduct alleged in the action to be wrongful in the Amended Complaint. The Company would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the partial settlement, including agreeing to assign away, not assert, or release certain potential claims the Company may have against its underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by the Company’s insurers. The committee agreed to approve the settlement subject to a number of conditions, including the participation of a substantial number of other Issuer Defendants in the proposed settlement, the consent of the Company’s insurers to the settlement, and the completion of acceptable final settlement documentation. On August 31, 2005, the court issued a formal preliminary approval for the settlement. On April 24, 2006, a hearing was held for the court to consider the motion for final approval of the settlement. The court has not yet ruled on the motion. While there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the lawsuit, the Company does not presently believe that an adverse outcome in the lawsuit would have a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

On August 11, 2004, the Company filed suit in the Northern District of California against Retail Decisions, Inc. (“ReD US”) and Retail Decisions Plc (“ReD UK”) (collectively, “ReD”), Case No. 3:04-CIV-03268, alleging that ReD infringes the Company’s U.S. Patent No. 6,029,154 (the “‘154 Patent”). The Company served ReD US with the complaint on August 12, 2004, and the Company served ReD UK with the complaint on August 13, 2004. On September 30, 2004, ReD responded to the Company’s complaint. ReD filed a motion to stay the case for 90 days pending a determination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) as to whether it will grant ReD’s request that the PTO re-examine the ‘154 Patent. ReD also filed a motion for a more definite statement by the Company with respect to its allegation that ReD is willfully infringing the ‘154 Patent. In addition, ReD UK filed a motion to dismiss the action against it on the ground that it is not subject to personal jurisdiction in the Northern District of California. On October 27, 2004, ReD filed a request for re-examination with the PTO, based on prior art ReD discovered that allegedly invalidates the patent. On October 28, 2004, the Company filed an opposition to ReD’s motion to stay the case for 90 days and an opposition to ReD’s motion for a more definite statement with respect to willful infringement. Based on ReD UK’s representation that ReD US is the sole entity that develops, operates, and distributes the eBitGuard service, the Company agreed to dismiss ReD UK while reserving the right to reinstitute action against ReD UK in the event the Company later discovers that ReD UK is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. In return, ReD UK agreed that if the Company later establishes that personal jurisdiction existed, the Company could re-file against ReD UK in this action without prejudice to its damages claim. The Company also filed an amended complaint, removing ReD UK as a named defendant and restating the willful infringement claim. On November 16, 2004, the court granted ReD’s motion to stay the proceedings pending the PTO’s decision as to whether it will grant ReD’s request for re-examination. On December 30, 2004, the PTO granted ReD’s request for a re-examination. On January 19, 2005, ReD filed a motion to dismiss the case without prejudice or to extend the stay until completion of the re-examination process. On January 24, 2005, the court extended the stay pending the re-examination process, vacated ReD’s motion to dismiss, and ordered quarterly updates as to the status of the re-examination process. On April 25, 2005, the parties filed a joint status report that was approved by the court. On June 20, 2005, the PTO issued a preliminary office action rejecting all of the claims of the ‘154 patent based on one of the prior art references cited by ReD. On July 14, 2005, the Company met with the PTO examiner handling the re-examination to distinguish the prior art from the claims of the ‘154 patent. On August 9, 2006, the PTO issued a final office action rejecting all of the claims of the ‘154 patent. On September 7, 2006, the Company filed a response to the office action requesting certain amendments to the claims. On October 10, 2006, the PTO filed a response rejecting the amendments and extending the Company’s deadline to file a notice of appeal. On October 30, 2006, the Company filed a notice of appeal. While there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the lawsuit, the Company does not presently believe that the lawsuit would have a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company is currently party to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the outcome of any of these claims or any of the above mentioned legal matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

7. COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

period from February 8, 2006 through September 30, 2006, the Company repurchased 131,800 shares at an average price of $8.52 per share, including repurchase costs. All of the repurchased shares were cancelled and returned to the status of authorized, unissued shares.

On January 26, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized management to use up to $10.0 million over a twelve-month period beginning at February 1, 2005 to repurchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock. During the period from February 1, 2005 and ended September 30, 2005, the Company repurchased 443,000 shares at an average price of $5.43 per share, including repurchase costs. All of the repurchased shares were cancelled and returned to the status of authorized, unissued shares.

8. GUARANTEES

From time to time, the Company enters into certain types of contracts that require the Company to indemnify parties against third-party claims on a contingent basis. These contracts primarily relate to: (i) licenses for software and services; (ii) certain real estate leases, under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners for environmental and other liabilities, and other claims arising from the Company’s use of the applicable premises; and (iii) certain agreements with the Company’s officers, directors and employees, under which the Company may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationship.

The terms of such obligations vary. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated. Because the obligated amounts of these types of agreements often are not explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations, and no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on its balance sheet as of September 30, 2006 or 2005.

9. INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the tax-effected temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities and for net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance to reserve for the benefit of its deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding its ability to realize these assets.

During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $3.1 million. This benefit included a $3.2 million reduction in the valuation allowance related to a portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets that will more likely than not be realized. This determination was primarily based on projected taxable income. In evaluating the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence including its past operating results and its forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, the Company makes assumptions to forecast federal, state, and international operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment regarding the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with the forecasts used to manage the Company’s business. The Company intends to maintain the remaining valuation allowance until sufficient further positive evidence exists to support further reversals of the valuation allowance. The Company’s income tax expense recorded in the future will be reduced to the extent of offsetting decreases in its valuation allowance.

10. RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards” (“FSP 123R-3”). FSP 123R-3 requires an entity to follow either the transition guidance for the additional-paid-in-capital pool as prescribed in SFAS 123R or the alternative transition method as described in the FSP 123R-3. An entity that adopts SFAS 123R using the modified prospective application may make a one-time election to adopt the transition method described in this FSP 123R-3. An entity may take up to one year from the later of its initial adoption of SFAS 123R or the effective date of FSP 123R-3 to evaluate its available transition alternatives and make its one-time election. FSP 123R-3 became effective in November 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of FSP 123R-3 could have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FIN 48 could have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including statements regarding our expectations, estimations, intentions, beliefs or strategies regarding the future. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

(a) our statement that we do not plan to pay any dividends in the near future; (b) our expectation to recognize stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options over approximately 3.0 years; (c) our intention to expand services into the payment market for online auctions; (d) our estimated amortization expense for our intangible assets; (e) our belief that cash and short-term investment balances will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months; (f) our conclusion that, due to the nature of our short-term investments, which are primarily government bonds, there is no material market risk exposure with respect to such investments; (g) statements that higher processing fees paid to third parties related to our global acquiring services will continue to increase in absolute dollars as the related revenue increases; (h) our expectation that our overall gross margins will continue to decrease as our global acquiring services revenues increase in the future; (i) our expectation that product development expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006 will be relatively consistent with the three months ended September 30, 2006, and that, as a percentage of revenue, product development expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006 will moderately decrease as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006 due to expected revenue growth; (j) our expectation that sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2006 will increase in absolute dollars as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006, and that, as a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006 will be relatively consistent with the three months ended September 30, 2006; (k) our expectation that general and administrative expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006 will increase in absolute dollars as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006, due to higher compensation related expenses related to SFAS 123R, and that, as a percentage of revenue, we expect general and administrative expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006, to be relatively consistent with the three months ended September 30, 2006; (l) our future minimum lease payments; (m) our intention to maintain the remaining valuation allowance until sufficient further positive evidence exists to support further reversals of the valuation allowance; (n) our expectation that quarterly results will fluctuate significantly; (o) our statement that, as part of our future business strategy, we may pursue strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses or technologies that would provide additional product or service offerings, additional industry expertise, a broader client base or an expanded geographic presence; (p) statements suggesting that to remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of our products and services and the underlying network infrastructure; (q) our expectation that competitive pressures may result in the reduction of our prices or our market share or both; (r) statements regarding our success depending on our ability to grow, or scale, our commerce transaction systems to accommodate increases in the volume of traffic on our systems, especially during peak periods of demand; (s) statements regarding our future growth also depending in part on our proprietary technology and licensed technology, the success of our relationships with existing and future sales alliances that market our products and services to their merchant accounts and our ability to both internally develop and license leading technologies to enhance our existing products and services; (t) statements regarding the use of and interest in the Internet; (u) statements regarding the increase in the significance of the Internet as a commercial marketplace; (v) the statement regarding our belief that our fraud screen service may require us to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act; (w) statements regarding our belief that the potential adverse effects of the proposed settlement of the pending class action lawsuits involving stock issued or traceable to the Company’s initial public offering would be borne by insurers; (x) statements regarding our belief that litigation outcomes of class action lawsuits and other claims will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; (y) our belief that an adverse outcome in a lawsuit relating to such patent will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; (z) our statement regarding a reduction to income tax expense resulting from realizing deferred tax assets; and (aa) our belief that our future success will depend upon our ability to retain our key management personnel.

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statement for the reasons and factors detailed below under Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and in other sections of this Report on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are based on information available to us on the date of this Report on Form 10-Q, and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. See Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” below, as well as such other risks and uncertainties as are detailed in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports and filings for a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Such factors include but are not limited to the following cautions: (1) we are subject to the risks encountered by early stage companies, such as risks of intense competition and rapid technological change in our industry, risks that we may not be able to fully utilize relationships with our strategic partners and indirect sales channels and risks that any fluctuations in our quarterly operating results will be significant relative to our revenues; (2) inability to comply with new accounting pronouncements; (3) inability to capitalize on increasing need for our global acquiring services; (4) there is no assurance that we will realize sufficient revenues to achieve ongoing profitability; (5) our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements;

(6) potential system failures, compromised security measures or lack of capacity issues could negatively affect demand for our services; (7) exposure to unanticipated income tax liabilities; (8) the outcome of pending litigation is subject to significant uncertainty and predictions regarding such outcomes may not be accurate; (9) third parties may claim that the technology employed in providing our current or future products and services infringes upon their rights; (10) lack of acceptance in the payment market for online auctions; (8) unanticipated trends with respect to seasonality of the retail sector; (11) unanticipated difficulties associated with integration of the BidPay business; and (12) loss of key management personnel to competitors. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 10, 2006 (SEC File No. 000-26477).

OVERVIEW

We derive our revenues from monthly commerce transaction processing fees and global acquiring fees, support service fees, professional services and the sale of enterprise software licenses and related maintenance. Transaction and global acquiring revenues are recognized in the period in which the transactions occur. Professional services revenue and support service fees are recognized as the related services are provided and costs are incurred. Enterprise software license revenue is recognized when the contract is signed, the software is delivered and the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Enterprise software maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, no customer accounted for more than 10% of revenues.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. We believe that the following are the more critical judgment areas in the application of our accounting policies that currently affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”) and Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, (“SOP 97-2”), as amended. SAB 104 and SOP 97-2 require that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (4) is based on management’s judgments regarding the collectibility of fees. Should changes in conditions cause management to determine these criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected.

We derive a significant portion of our transaction processing revenues from global acquiring fees charged to merchants for payment processing services. Our fees, which are primarily a percentage of the dollar amount of each transaction processed, are based upon the merchant’s monthly charge volume and risk profile. In addition, we record revenues for miscellaneous services related to global acquiring, such as fees for processing credit card chargebacks. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent (“EITF 99-19”), we recognize these fees on a gross basis as we are the primary agent in the transaction in the period the merchants’ transactions are processed. Related interchange fees paid to card issuing banks and assessments paid to credit card associations are recognized in cost of revenues at that time.

We use the residual method of accounting as permitted by Statement of Position 98-9 (“SOP 98-9”) to recognize revenue when a software license includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) exists for all undelivered elements. We allocate revenue to each element based on its fair value as determined by VSOE. We defer revenue for any undelivered elements and recognize the deferred revenue when the product is delivered or over the period in which the service is performed.

We derive a significant portion of our professional services revenue from fixed-price contracts, which require the accurate estimation of the cost, scope and duration of each engagement. Professional services revenue is recognized separately from enterprise software and transaction processing fees because the arrangements qualify as service transactions as defined by SOP 97-2. These services are accounted for separately from enterprise software and transaction processing fees as they are not essential to the functionality of the licensed software, and are available services from other vendors. Revenue and the related costs for these projects are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. Estimates are made regarding time to complete the projects and revisions to estimates are reflected in the period in which changes become known. If we do not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be performed, or do not manage our projects properly within the planned periods of time or satisfy obligations under the contracts, then future professional service margins may be significantly and negatively affected or losses on existing contracts may need to be recognized.

Accounts Receivable

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments as well as for potential sales returns. If the financial condition of our customers was to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. These estimates are based on historical bad debt experience and other known factors. If the historical data we used to determine these estimates does not properly reflect future losses, additional allowances may be required.

Reserve for Merchant Losses

We have potential liability for certain transactions processed through our global acquiring services if the payments associated with such transactions are rejected, refused, or returned for reasons such as consumer fraud or billing disputes. For instance, if a billing dispute between a merchant and payer is not ultimately resolved in favor of the merchant, the disputed transaction may be charged back to the merchant’s bank and credited to the payer’s account. If the charged back amount cannot be recovered from the merchant’s account, or if the merchant refuses or is financially unable to reimburse its bank for the charged back amount, we may bear the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the payer’s bank. We could also incur fraud losses as a result of merchant fraud. Merchant fraud occurs when a merchant, rather than a customer, intentionally uses a stolen or counterfeit card, card number, or other bank account number to process a false sales transaction, or knowingly fails to deliver merchandise or services in an otherwise valid transaction. We may be responsible for any losses for certain transactions if we are unable to collect from the merchant. We evaluate the merchant’s risk for potential losses based on historical experience and other relevant factors and record a loss reserve accordingly. If the data we use to determine potential losses does not properly reflect future losses, additional reserves may be required.

Legal Contingencies

We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes of these proceedings as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of accruals required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis. As discussed in Note 6 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2006 we do not believe our current proceedings will have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular quarter or annual period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or as a result of the effectiveness of our strategies related to these proceedings.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the tax-effected temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities and for net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2005, we recorded a full valuation allowance to reserve for the benefit of our deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding our ability to realize these assets.

During the fourth quarter of 2005, we recorded an income tax benefit of $3.1 million. This benefit included a $3.2 million reduction in the valuation allowance related to a portion of our deferred tax assets that will more likely than not be realized. This determination was primarily based on projected taxable income. In evaluating our ability to realize our deferred tax assets we consider all available positive and negative evidence including our past operating results and our forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, we make assumptions to forecast federal, state, and international operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment regarding the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with the forecasts used to manage our business. We intend to maintain the remaining valuation allowance until sufficient further positive evidence exists to support further reversals of the valuation allowance. To date, we have not forecasted earnings beyond fiscal 2006 and therefore, have not recorded any further income tax benefit for the additional reduction of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance. Should we determine that additional deferred tax assets may be realizable in the future, a reduction to income tax expense and the effective tax rate would be recorded in the period such determination was made. Our income tax expense recorded in the future will be reduced to the extent of offsetting decreases in our valuation allowance.

Stock-based Compensation

Prior to the January 1, 2006 adoption of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), we accounted for stock-based compensation using Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS 148”). SFAS 148 required disclosure of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. As permitted under SFAS 148, we adopted the disclosure only provisions and continued to follow the intrinsic value method of accounting for employee stock options in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”).

Effective January 1, 2006, the beginning of our first fiscal quarter of 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Compensation expense recognized included the estimated expense for stock options granted on and subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the fair value at grant date estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R, and the estimated expense for the portion vesting during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, for options granted prior to, but not vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the fair value at grant date estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Results for prior periods have not been restated, as provided for under the modified-prospective method.

As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, our income before income taxes, reduced by the expense for stock option awards, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, was $1.3 million and $3.4 million lower, respectively, than if we had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. Also as a result of adopting SFAS 123R, our net income, reduced by the expense for stock option awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, was $0.8 million and $2.0 million lower, respectively, than if we had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2006, would have both been $0.03, and would have been $0.12 and $0.11 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, if we had not adopted SFAS 123R. As of September 30, 2006, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $12.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.0 years.

Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, we used the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate stock-based compensation expense at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and we will recognize the expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award. Determining the appropriate fair value model and assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards requires judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and expected life.

Long-Lived Assets

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”) requires that we perform tests for impairment of our intangible assets other than goodwill annually and more frequently whenever events or circumstances suggest that our intangible assets may be impaired. As of September 30, 2006, we had recorded intangible assets related to our acquisition of BidPay.com (“BidPay”) in March 2006, with a carrying value of approximately $3.0 million. To evaluate potential impairment, SFAS 144 requires us to assess whether the future cash flows related to these assets will be greater than their carrying value at the time of the test. Accordingly, while our cash flow assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses, there is significant judgment in determining the cash flows attributable to our intangible assets over their respective estimated useful lives.

We are required to periodically evaluate our intangible assets balances for impairment. If we incur impairments to our intangible assets, it would have an adverse impact on our future earnings.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth certain items in our condensed consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of revenue for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenues	50.5		42.2		47.9		40.0

Gross profit	49.5		57.8		52.1		60.0
Operating expenses:
Product development	14.0		15.3		13.8		16.5
Sales and marketing	21.6		21.0		21.6		23.0
General and administrative	14.9		11.2		14.3		11.5

Total operating expenses	50.5		47.5		49.7		51.0

Income (loss) from operations	(1.0	)	10.3		2.4		9.0
Interest and other income, net	3.6		2.9		4.2		2.5

Income before income taxes	2.6		13.2		6.6		11.5
Income tax provision	1.0		0.2		2.6		0.2

Net income	1.6	%	13.0	%	4.0	%	11.3	%

THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005

Revenues. Revenues were $17.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $12.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $4.8 million or 38.6%. Transaction and support revenues were $15.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $10.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $5.1 million or 46.9%. Approximately 75% of the increase in transaction and support revenues was from existing customers, primarily resulting from an increase in global acquiring services, as well as an increase in transaction volumes processed. The remaining increase in transaction and support revenues was from new customers that entered into contracts during the twelve months ended September 30, 2006. Global acquiring revenues represented 36.7% of our transaction and support revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to 27.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2005. Our global acquiring revenue may also include fees generated for gateway services as it is becoming more common to charge the customer a bundled price for transaction services provided. We processed approximately 203.9 million transactions during the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to approximately 159.5 million transactions processed during the three months ended September 30, 2005. Enterprise software license and maintenance revenues were $0.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2006, consistent with the three months ended September 30, 2005. Professional services revenues were $0.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of approximately $0.2 million or 26.1%. The decrease in professional services revenues is primarily due to a decrease in the number of projects that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2006. No customer accounted for more than 10.0% of our revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.

Cost of Revenues. Transaction and support cost of revenues consists primarily of costs incurred in the delivery of commerce transaction services, including personnel costs in our operations and customer support functions, processing fees paid to third parties related to our global acquiring services, other third-party fees, depreciation of capital equipment used in our network infrastructure and costs related to the hosting of our servers at third-party hosting centers in the United States and the United Kingdom. Transaction and support cost of revenues was $8.4 million or 52.4% of transaction and support revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $4.6 million or 42.2% of transaction and support revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of transaction and support revenues is primarily due to higher processing fees paid to third parties such as the credit card issuing banks, payment processors and card associations related to our global acquiring services, which are variable costs that increase in absolute dollars as the related revenue increases and decrease as the related revenue decreases. As the gross margins from our global acquiring services business are significantly lower than our historical transaction and support gross margins, we expect our overall gross margins to continue to decrease as our global acquiring services revenues increase in the future. Enterprise software cost of revenues is composed of customer support personnel costs, third party fees and fulfillment costs. Enterprise software cost of revenues was $0.1 million or 7.9 % of enterprise software revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $0.2 million or 21.8% of enterprise software revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage of enterprise software revenue is primarily due to a decrease in third-party fees resulting from fewer transactions in which we resold third-party software in conjunction with sales of our software. Professional services cost of revenues consists principally of personnel-related costs and expenses, and a portion of allocated overhead costs related to providing professional services. Professional services cost of revenues was $0.4 million or 52.2% of professional services revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $0.5 million or 58.4% of professional services revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in absolute dollars is primarily due to lower personnel-related costs resulting from a decrease in personnel necessary to support our professional services projects during the three months ended September 30, 2006. The decrease in professional services cost of revenues as a percentage of professional services revenues is primarily due to an increase in higher-margin projects during the three months ended September 30, 2006. Included in cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006, is approximately $0.1 million of stock-based compensation expense, resulting from the adoption of SFAS 123R.

Product Development. Product development expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs of employees engaged in the maintenance of existing services as well as research, design and development of new services and, to a lesser extent, facility costs and related overhead. Product development expenses were $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $0.5 million or 26.8%. The increase is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense, including stock-based compensation expense of approximately $0.2 million. As a percentage of revenue, product development expenses decreased to 14.0% in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to 15.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2005.

The decrease is primarily due to the increase in revenue from existing and new customers during the three months ended September 30, 2006, offset, to a certain extent, by the increase in compensation expense. We expect that product development expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006 will be relatively consistent with the three months ended September 30, 2006. As a percentage of revenue, we expect product development expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006 to moderately decrease as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006 due to expected revenue growth.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation of sales and marketing personnel, market research and advertising costs and, to a lesser extent, facility costs and related overhead. Sales and marketing expenses were $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $1.1 million or 42.1%. The increase is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense which increased by approximately $1.0 million, including stock-based compensation expense of approximately $0.3 million. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses were 21.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to 21.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2005. We expect that sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006, will increase in absolute dollars as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006, as we continue to develop our sales and marketing infrastructure to support expected revenue growth. As a percentage of revenue, we expect sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006, to be relatively consistent with the three months ended September 30, 2006.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for administrative personnel, fees for outside professional services and, to a lesser extent, facility costs and related overhead. General and administrative expenses were $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $1.2 million or 83.6%. The increase is primarily due to an increase in compensation related expenses which increased by approximately $1.1 million, including stock-based compensation expense of approximately $0.7 million. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses were 14.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to 11.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The increase is primarily due to the increases in compensation expense, offset, to a certain extent, by the increase in revenue from existing and new customers during the three months ended September 30, 2006. We expect that general and administrative expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006, will increase in absolute dollars due primarily to higher compensation related expenses related to SFAS 123R. As a percentage of revenue, we expect general and administrative expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2006, to be relatively consistent with the three months ended September 30, 2006.

Interest Income. Interest income consists of interest earnings on cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and was $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The increase is primarily due to higher investment yields and higher average cash and short-term investment balances during the three months ended September 30, 2006.

Income Tax Provision.We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $19,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The increase is primarily due to the reversal of our valuation allowance related to a portion of our deferred tax assets which was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005, resulting in an increase in our effective annual tax rate to approximately 38% for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to approximately 2% for the three months ended September 30, 2005. Without the reduction in our valuation allowance in the prior year, the effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2006, would have been approximately 2%, which represents certain minimum federal, state and foreign income tax liabilities after reduction for utilization of net operating losses not previously benefited. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to state taxes and the tax impact of foreign operations.

Should we determine that additional deferred tax assets may be realizable in the future, a reduction to income tax expense and the effective tax rate would be recorded in the period such determination was made.

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005

Revenues. Revenues were $49.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $35.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $13.7 million or 38.6%. Transaction and support revenues were $44.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $29.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $14.2 million or 47.5%. Approximately 80% of the increase in transaction and support revenues was from existing customers, primarily resulting from an increase in global acquiring services as well as an increase in transaction volumes processed. The remaining increase in transaction and support revenues was from new customers that entered into contracts during the twelve months ended September 30, 2006. We processed approximately 599.0 million transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to approximately 444.4 million processed during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Global acquiring revenues represented approximately 35.3% of our transaction and support revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to 24.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Our global acquiring revenue may also include fees generated for gateway services as it is becoming more common to

charge the customer a bundled price for transaction services provided. Enterprise software license and maintenance revenues were $2.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of approximately $0.7 million or 23.8%. The decrease in software license and maintenance revenues was due primarily to one license agreement which generated approximately $0.5 million in software license and maintenance revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. No software transactions of this magnitude were recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Professional services revenues increased to $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of approximately 10.1%, as compared to $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, due to an increase in the number of professional services projects that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. No customer accounted for more than 10.0% of our revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.

Cost of Revenues. Transaction and support cost of revenues was $21.9 million or 49.6% of transaction and support revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $12.1 million or 40.6% of transaction and support revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of transaction and support revenues is primarily due to higher processing fees paid to third parties such as the credit card issuing banks, payment processors and card associations related to our global acquiring services, which are variable costs that increase in absolute dollars as the related revenue increases and decrease as the related revenue decreases. As the gross margins from our global acquiring services business are significantly lower than our historical transaction and support gross margins, we expect our overall gross margins to continue to decrease as our global acquiring services revenues increase in the future. Enterprise software cost of revenues was $0.2 million or 7.5% of enterprise software revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $0.7 million or 22.1% of enterprise software revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage of enterprise software revenue is primarily due to a decrease in third-party fees as there were fewer transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, in which we resold third-party software in conjunction with sales of our software. Professional services cost of revenues was $1.6 million or 52.6% of professional services revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $1.4 million or 52.7% of professional services revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in absolute dollars is due to higher personnel-related costs resulting from an increase in utilization of personnel necessary to support our professional services projects.

Product Development. Product development expenses were $6.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $5.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $1.0 million or 16.4%. The increase in absolute dollars is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense of approximately $0.9 million, including stock-based compensation expense of approximately $0.6 million. As a percentage of revenue, product development expenses decreased to 13.8% in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 16.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease is primarily due to the increase in revenue from existing and new customers, offset by the increase in compensation expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $8.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $2.5 million or 30.1%. The increase in absolute dollars is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense of approximately $2.1 million, including stock-based compensation of approximately $0.7 million. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 21.6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to 23.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease is primarily due to the increase in revenue from existing and new customers during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, offset by the increase in compensation and marketing expenses.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $3.0 million or 72.4%. The increase in absolute dollars is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense of approximately $2.5 million, including stock-based compensation of approximately $1.7 million and, to a lesser extent, an increase in third party professional fees which increased by approximately $0.3 million. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses increased to 14.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 11.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase is primarily due to the increases in compensation expense and third party professional fees, offset by the increase in revenue from existing and new customers during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Other Income. Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 consists of settlement proceeds of $0.4 million received pursuant to the CardSystems Settlement Agreement as discussed in Note 6 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest Income. Interest income was $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase is due primarily to higher investment yields and higher average cash and short-term investment balances during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Income Tax Provision.We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $72,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $54.5 million as of September 30, 2006 compared to $47.0 million as of December 31, 2005. Significant cash flow activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows (in thousands):


	Nine months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005
Cash provided by operating activities	$	8,259		$	2,608
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		3,981			2,317
Acquisition of BidPay		(1,990	)		—
Payment of bonuses under company-wide bonus plan		(629	)		(632	)
Purchases of equipment		(1,881	)		(1,170	)
Repurchases of common stock		(1,123	)		(2,405	)

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased by approximately $7.4 million from December 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to the following:

•

cash flows from operating activities of $8.3 million primarily due to increased revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2006; and

•

proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options and the issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan of $4.0 million.

These increases are offset by decreases in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments due to the following:

•

the acquisition of BidPay for approximately $2.0 million;

•

purchases of computer hardware and software of approximately $1.9 million;

•

repurchases of common stock under the company’s repurchase program of approximately $1.1 million; and

•

the payment of company-wide bonuses of approximately $0.6 million.

We believe that our cash and short-term investment balances as of September 30, 2006 will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including the level of investment we make in new businesses, new products or new technologies. We currently have no agreements or understandings with respect to any future investments or acquisitions. To the extent that our existing cash resources and future earnings are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to obtain additional equity or debt financing. Additional funds may not be available or, if available, we may not be able to obtain them on favorable terms.

The following is a table summarizing our significant commitments as of September 30, 2006, consisting of future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable and operating leases (in thousands):


Contractual obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1 – 3 years		3 – 5 years		More than 5 years
Operating leases	$	6,345	$	1,847	$	2,307	$	1,949	$	242

Total commitments	$	6,345	$	1,847	$	2,307	$	1,949	$	242

Recent Pronouncements

In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards” (“FSP 123R-3”). FSP 123R-3 requires an entity to follow either the transition guidance for the additional-paid-in-capital pool as prescribed in SFAS 123R or the alternative transition method as described in the FSP 123R-3. An entity that adopts SFAS 123R using the modified prospective application may make a one-time election to adopt the transition method described in this FSP 123R-3. An entity may take up to one year from the later of its initial adoption of SFAS 123R or the effective date of FSP 123R-3 to evaluate its available transition alternatives and make its one-time election. FSP 123R-3 became effective in November 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of FSP 123R-3 could have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FIN 48 could have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Factors That May Affect Future Results

A description of the risk factors associated with our business is included under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this report.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We provide our services to customers primarily in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in Europe and elsewhere throughout the world. As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors, such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. All sales are currently made in U.S. dollars or pounds sterling. A strengthening of the dollar or the pound sterling could make our products less competitive in foreign markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates.

Due to the nature of our short-term investments, which are primarily government bonds, we have concluded that there is no material market risk exposure with respect to such investments.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s CEO (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) (“CFO”) have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2006 (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings under the Exchange Act. In addition, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control subsequent to the date of the previously mentioned evaluation.

The Company’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In July and August 2001, various class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against us, our Chairman and CEO, a former officer, and four brokerage firms that served as underwriters in our initial public offering. The actions were filed on behalf of persons who purchased our stock issued pursuant to or traceable to the initial public offering during the period from June 23, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The action alleges that our underwriters charged secret excessive commissions to certain of their customers in return for allocations of our stock in the offering. The two individual defendants are alleged to be liable because of their involvement in preparing and signing the registration statement for the offering, which allegedly failed to disclose the supposedly excessive commissions. On December 7, 2001, an amended complaint was filed in one of the actions to expand the purported class to persons who purchased our stock issued pursuant to or traceable to the follow-on public offering during the period from November 4, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The lawsuit filed against us is one of several hundred lawsuits filed against other companies based on substantially similar claims. On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended complaint was filed to consolidate all of the complaints and claims into one case. The consolidated amended complaint alleges claims that are virtually identical to the amended complaint filed on December 7, 2001 and the original complaints. In October 2002, our officer and a former officer that were named in the amended complaint were dismissed without prejudice. In July 2002, we, along with other issuer defendants in the case, filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint with prejudice. On February 19, 2003, the court issued a written decision denying the motion to dismiss with respect to CyberSource and the individual defendants. On July 2, 2003, a committee of our Board of Directors conditionally approved a proposed partial settlement with the plaintiffs in this matter. The settlement would provide, among other things, a release of us and of the individual defendants for the conduct alleged in the action to be wrongful in the Amended Complaint. We would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the partial settlement, including agreeing to assign away, not assert, or release certain potential claims we may have against our underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by our insurers. The committee agreed to approve the settlement subject to a number of conditions, including the participation of a substantial number of other Issuer Defendants in the proposed settlement, the consent of our insurers to the settlement, and the completion of acceptable final settlement documentation. On August 31, 2005, the court issued a formal preliminary approval for the settlement. On April 24, 2006, a hearing was held for the court to consider the motion for final approval of the settlement. The court has not yet ruled on the motion. While there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the lawsuit, we do not presently believe that an adverse outcome in the lawsuit would have a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

On August 11, 2004, we filed suit in the Northern District of California against Retail Decisions, Inc. (“ReD US”) and Retail Decisions Plc (“ReD UK”) (collectively, “ReD”), Case No. 3:04-CIV-03268, alleging that ReD infringes our U.S. Patent No. 6,029,154 (the “‘154 Patent”). We served ReD US with the complaint on August 12, 2004, and we served ReD UK with the complaint on August 13, 2004. On September 30, 2004, ReD responded to our complaint. ReD filed a motion to stay the case for 90 days pending a determination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) as to whether it will grant ReD’s request that the PTO re-examine the ‘154 Patent. ReD also filed a motion for a more definite statement by us with respect to our allegation that ReD is willfully infringing the ‘154 Patent. In addition, ReD UK filed a motion to dismiss the action against it on the ground that it is not subject to personal jurisdiction in the Northern District of California. On October 27, 2004, ReD filed a request for re-examination with the PTO, based on prior art ReD discovered that allegedly invalidates the patent. On October 28, 2004, we filed an opposition to ReD’s motion to stay the case for 90 days and an opposition to ReD’s motion for a more definite statement with respect to willful infringement. Based on ReD UK’s representation that ReD US is the sole entity that develops, operates, and distributes the eBitGuard service, we agreed to dismiss ReD UK while reserving the right to reinstitute action against ReD UK in the event we later discover that ReD UK is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. In return, ReD UK agreed that if we later establish that personal jurisdiction existed, we could re-file against ReD UK in this action without prejudice to our damages claim. We also filed an amended complaint, removing ReD UK as a named defendant and restating the willful infringement claim. On November 16, 2004, the court granted ReD’s motion to stay the proceedings pending the PTO’s decision as to whether it will grant ReD’s request for re-examination. On December 30, 2004, the PTO granted ReD’s request for a re-examination. On January 19, 2005, ReD filed a motion to dismiss the case without prejudice or to extend the stay until completion of the re-examination process. On January 24, 2005, the court extended the stay pending the re-examination process, vacated ReD’s motion to dismiss, and ordered quarterly updates as to the status of the re-examination process. On April 25, 2005, the parties filed a joint status report that was approved by the court. On June 20, 2005, the PTO issued a preliminary office action rejecting all of the claims of the ‘154 patent based on one of the prior art references cited by ReD. On July 14, 2005, we met with the PTO examiner handling the re-examination to distinguish the prior art from the claims of the ‘154 patent. On August 9, 2006, the PTO issued a final office action rejecting all of the claims of the ‘154 patent. On September 7, 2006, we filed a response to the office action requesting certain amendments to the claims. On October 10, 2006, the PTO filed a response rejecting the amendments and extending our deadline to file a notice of appeal. On October 30, 2006, we filed a notice of appeal. While there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the lawsuit, we do not presently believe that the lawsuit would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

We are currently party to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any of these claims or any of the above mentioned legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Set forth below, elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in other documents we file with the SEC are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. The occurrence of any of the developments or risks identified below may make the occurrence of one or more of the other risk factors below more likely to occur.

The Risk Factors set forth below under the heading “BidPay May Incur Losses Resulting From User Fraud or Disputes Between Users of Our Service” is the only material change to the Risk Factors described under the title “Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

The Expected Fluctuations of Our Quarterly Results Could Cause Our Stock Price to Fluctuate or Decline

We expect that our quarterly operating results will fluctuate significantly in the future based upon a number of factors, many of which are not within our control. We base our operating expenses on anticipated market growth and our operating expenses are relatively fixed in the short term. As a result, if our revenues are lower than we expect, our quarterly operating results may not meet the expectations of public market analysts or investors, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our quarterly results may fluctuate in the future as a result of many factors, including the following:

•

changes in the size and number of customer transactions as a result of seasonality, success of each customer’s business, general economic conditions or regulatory requirements restricting our customers;

•

our ability to attract new customers and to retain our existing customers;

•

customer acceptance of new products and services we may offer, including our global acquiring business and the Bidpay business we re-started;

•

customer acceptance of our pricing model;

•

customer acceptance of our software and our professional services offerings;

•

the success of our sales and marketing programs;

•

an interruption with one or more of our gateway processors and channel partners;

•

seasonality of the retail sector;

•

changes in accounting rules and regulations;

•

war or other international conflicts; and

•

weakness in the general U.S. economy and the lack of available capital for our customers and potential future customers.

Other factors that may affect our quarterly results are set forth elsewhere in this section. As a result of these factors, our revenues are not predictable with any significant degree of certainty.

Due to the uncertainty surrounding our revenues and expenses, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our historical operating results should not be relied upon as an indicator of our future performance.

Our Stock Price May Fluctuate Substantially Due to Factors Outside Our Control

The market price for our common stock may be affected by a number of factors outside our control, including the following:

•

the announcement of new products, services or enhancements by our competitors;

•

quarterly variations in our competitors’ results of operations;

•

changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;

•

developments in our industry; and

•

general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors.

These factors and fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The Intense Competition in Our Industry Could Reduce or Eliminate the Demand for Our Products and Services

The market for our products and services is intensely competitive and subject to rapid technological change. We expect competition to intensify in the future. We face competition from merchant acquirers, independent sales organizations, and payment processors such as Chase Paymentech Solutions, First Data Corporation, LLC., IPayment Inc., and Royal Bank of Scotland. We also face competition from transaction service providers such as Lightbridge, PayPal, and Retail Decisions as well as e-commerce providers such as Bertelsmann Financial Services, Digital River, and GSI Commerce Inc. Further, other companies, including financial services and credit companies may enter the market and provide competing services.

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, substantially greater financial, technical, marketing or other resources, or greater name recognition than we do. Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. Competition could seriously impede our ability to sell additional products and services on terms favorable to us. Our current and potential competitors may develop and market new technologies that render our existing or future products and services obsolete, unmarketable or less competitive. Our current and potential competitors may make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with other solution providers, thereby increasing their ability to address the needs of our existing or prospective customers. Our current and potential competitors may establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with our current or future channel partners, thereby limiting our ability to sell products and services through these channels. We expect that competitive pressures may result in the reduction of our prices or our market share or both, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We May Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Our Business Could be Materially and Adversely Affected if We Fail to Adequately Integrate Acquired Businesses

As part of our future business strategy, we may pursue strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses or technologies that would provide additional product or service offerings, additional industry expertise, a broader client base or an expanded geographic presence. For example, during the first quarter of 2006, we acquired BidPay with the view of participating in the payment market for online auctions, an area in which we do not have any experience. If we do not successfully integrate a strategic acquisition, or if the benefits of the transaction do not meet the expectation of financial or industry analysts, the market price of our common stock may decline. Any future acquisition could result in the use of significant amounts of cash, dilutive issuances of equity securities, or the incurrence of debt or amortization expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:

•

difficulties in assimilating the operations, technologies, products and personnel of an acquired company;

•

risks of entering markets in which we have either no or limited prior experiences, such as the payment market for online auctions;

•

the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; and

•

the potential loss of key employees of an acquired company.

Potential System Failures and Lack of Capacity Issues Could Negatively Affect Demand for Our Services

Our ability to deliver services to our merchants depends on the uninterrupted operation of our commerce transaction processing systems. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

•

“denial of service” attacks;

•

computer viruses;

•

war, earthquake, fire, flood and other manmade or natural disasters; and

•

power loss, telecommunications or data network failure, operator negligence, improper operation by employees, physical and electronic break-ins and similar events.

Despite the fact that we have implemented redundant servers in third-party hosting centers located in Santa Clara, California, and Mesa, Arizona, we may still experience service interruptions for the reasons listed above and a variety of other reasons. If our redundant servers are not available, we may not have sufficient business interruption insurance to compensate us for resulting losses. We have experienced periodic interruptions, affecting all or a portion of our systems, which we believe will continue to occur from time to time. For example, on November 12, 1999, our services were unavailable for approximately ten hours due to an internal system problem. We have also subsequently experienced service interruptions and performance issues. Any interruption in our systems that impairs our ability to efficiently and timely provide services could damage our reputation and reduce demand for our services.

Our success also depends on our ability to grow, or scale, our commerce transaction systems to accommodate increases in the volume of traffic on our systems, especially during peak periods of demand. We may not be able to anticipate increases in the use of our systems or successfully expand the capacity of our network infrastructure. Our inability to expand our systems to handle increased traffic could result in system disruptions, slower response times and other difficulties in providing services to our merchant customers, which could materially harm our business.

A Breach of Our eCommerce Security Measures Could Reduce Demand for Our Services

A requirement of the continued growth of e-Commerce is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. We rely on public key cryptography, an encryption method that utilizes two keys, a public and a private key, for encoding and decoding data, and digital certificate technology, or identity verification, to provide the security and authentication necessary for secure transmission of confidential information. Regulatory and export restrictions may prohibit us from using the most secure cryptographic protection available and thereby expose us to an increased risk of data interception. A party who is able to circumvent security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or interrupt our operations. Any compromise or elimination of security could reduce demand for our services.

We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against security breaches and to address any problems they may cause. Concerns over the security of the Internet and other online transactions and the privacy of users may also inhibit the growth of the Internet and other online services generally, and the Web in particular, especially as a means of conducting commercial transactions. Because our activities involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information, such as credit card numbers, security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. Our security measures may not prevent security breaches, and failure to prevent security breaches may disrupt our operations.

BidPay May Incur Losses Resulting From User Fraud or Disputes Between Users of Our Service

BidPay has significant risk of loss resulting from fraud and disputes between users of our service including:

•

the initiation of a chargeback for both legitimate reasons and in cases of consumer fraud;

•

non-delivery of goods or services due to merchant fraud or disputes regarding the quality of goods or services provided;

•

identify theft or the unauthorized use of a credit card resulting from consumer or merchant fraud; and

•

potential breaches of system security.

Failure to identify fraudulent transactions or resolve disputes between users would increase BidPay’s loss. We have established systems and procedures designed to detect and reduce the impact of consumer and merchant fraud, but we cannot assure that these measures are or will be effective. During the third quarter of 2006, BidPay revenue was approximately $148,000. As BidPay’s revenue increases, our potential liability for such chargebacks increases.

We Could Incur Chargeback or Merchant Fraud Losses

charged back to the merchant’s bank and credited to the payer’s account. If the charged back amount cannot be recovered from the merchant’s account, or if the merchant refuses or is financially unable to reimburse its bank for the charged back amount, we may bear the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the payer’s bank. We could also incur fraud losses as a result of merchant fraud. Merchant fraud occurs when a merchant, rather than a customer, intentionally uses a stolen or counterfeit card, card number, or other bank account number to process a false sales transaction, or knowingly fails to deliver merchandise or services in an otherwise valid transaction. We may be responsible for any losses for certain transactions if we are unable to collect from the merchant. To date, we have not incurred any significant losses relating to charged back transactions.

We have established systems and procedures designed to detect and reduce the impact of consumer fraud and merchant fraud, but we cannot assure you that these measures are or will be effective. To date, we have not incurred any significant losses relating to charged back transactions. During the third quarter of 2006, our global acquiring revenue represented approximately 36.7% of our transaction and support revenue. Our global acquiring revenue may also include fees generated for gateway services as it is becoming more common to charge the customer a bundled price for transaction services provided. To the extent our global acquiring revenue grows, our potential liability for such chargebacks or merchant fraud increases.

Changes in Accounting Standards Regarding Stock Option Plans Will Reduce Our Profitability and Could Limit the Desirability of Granting Stock Options, Which Could Harm Our Ability to Attract and Retain Employees

FASB issued its final standard that requires us to record an expense related to employee stock option grants and stock purchases. As a result, we have included employee stock-based compensation costs in our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as discussed in Note 1 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The full impact is dependent upon, among other things, the outcome of the Company’s current assessment of different long-term incentive strategies involving stock awards in order to continue to attract and retain employees, the total number of stock awards granted and the tax benefit that the Company may or may not receive from stock-based expenses. In addition, new regulations implemented by The NASDAQ Stock Market requiring shareholder approval for all stock option plans could make it more difficult for us to grant options to employees in the future. To the extent that new regulations make it more difficult or expensive to grant stock options to employees, we may incur increased compensation costs, change our equity compensation strategy or find it difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business.

If We Are Not Able to Fully Utilize Relationships With Our Sales Alliances, We May Experience Lower Revenue Growth and Higher Operating Costs

Our future growth will depend in part on the success of our relationships with existing and future sales alliances that market our products and services to their merchant accounts. If these relationships are not successful or do not develop as quickly as we anticipate, our revenue growth may be adversely affected. Accordingly, we may have to increase our sales and marketing expenses in an attempt to secure additional merchant accounts.

Our Market is Subject to Rapid Technological Change and to Compete We Must Continually Enhance Our Systems to Comply with Evolving Standards

To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of our products and services and the underlying network infrastructure. The Internet and the e-Commerce industries are characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user requirements and preferences, frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies, and the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render our technology and systems obsolete. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to both internally develop and license leading technologies to enhance our existing products and services and develop new products and services. We must continue to address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our merchants, and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis. The development of proprietary technology involves significant technical and business risks. We may fail to develop new technologies effectively or to adapt our proprietary technology and systems to merchant requirements or emerging industry standards. If we are unable to adapt to changing market conditions, merchant requirements or emerging industry standards, our business would be materially harmed.

The Demand for Our Products and Services Could Be Negatively Affected by a Reduced Growth of e-Commerce or Delays in the Development of the Internet Infrastructure

Sales of goods and services over the Internet do not currently represent a significant portion of overall sales of goods and services. We depend on the growing use and acceptance of the Internet as an effective medium of commerce by merchants and customers in the United States and internationally. Rapid growth in the use of and interest in the Internet is a relatively recent development. In particular, the sale of goods and services over the Internet has gained acceptance more slowly outside of the United States. We cannot be certain that acceptance and use of the Internet will continue to develop or that a sufficiently broad base of merchants and consumers will adopt, and continue to use, the Internet as a medium of commerce.

The increase in the significance of the Internet as a commercial marketplace may occur more slowly than anticipated for a number of reasons, including potentially inadequate development of the necessary network infrastructure or delayed development of enabling technologies and performance improvements. If the number of Internet users, or the use of Internet resources by existing users, continues to grow, it may overwhelm the existing Internet infrastructure. Delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols required to handle increased levels of Internet activity could also have a detrimental effect. These factors could result in slower response times or adversely affect usage of the Internet, resulting in lower numbers of commerce transactions and lower demand for our products and services.

If We Lose Key Personnel, We May Not be Able to Successfully Manage Our Business and Achieve Our Objectives

We believe our future success will depend upon our ability to retain our key management personnel, including William S. McKiernan, our Chief Executive Officer, and other key members of management because of their experience and knowledge regarding the development, special opportunities and challenges of our business. None of our current key employees are subject to an employment contract which enables us to retain them for a specific period of time. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining key employees in the future.

We May Not Be Able to Adequately Protect Our Proprietary Technology and May Be Infringing Upon Third-Party Intellectual Property Rights

Our success depends upon our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret rights, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary rights.

As part of our confidentiality procedures, we enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees, contractors, vendors and potential customers and alliances. Despite these precautions, third parties could copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology without authorization, or develop similar technology independently. Effective protection of intellectual property rights may be unavailable or limited in foreign countries. We cannot assure you that the protection of our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products and services or design around any patents or other intellectual property rights we hold.

We also cannot assure you that third parties will not claim that the technology employed in providing our current or future products and services infringe upon their rights. We have not conducted any search to determine whether any of our products and services or technologies may be infringing upon patent rights of third parties. As the number of products and services in our market increases and functionalities increasingly overlap, companies such as ours may become increasingly subject to infringement claims. In addition, these claims also might require us to enter into royalty or license agreements. Any infringement claims, with or without merit, could absorb significant management time and lead to costly litigation. If required to do so, we may not be able to obtain royalty or license agreements, or obtain them on terms acceptable to us.

We May Become Subject to Government Regulation and Legal Uncertainties That Would Adversely Affect Our Financial Results

We are not currently subject to direct regulation by any domestic or foreign governmental agency, other than regulations applicable to businesses generally, export control laws and laws or regulations directly applicable to e-Commerce. However, due to the increasing usage of the Internet, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may be applicable or may be adopted in the future with respect to conducting business over the Internet covering issues such as:

•

taxes;

•

user privacy;

•

pricing;

•

content;

•

right to access personal data;

•

copyrights;

•

distribution; and

•

characteristics and quality of products and services.

For example, we believe that our fraud screen service may require us to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “Act”). As a precaution, we have implemented processes that we believe will enable us to comply with the Act if we were deemed a consumer reporting agency. Complying with the Act requires us to provide information about personal data stored by us. Failure to comply with the Act could result in claims being made against us by individual consumers and the Federal Trade Commission.

Furthermore, the growth and development of the market for e-Commerce may prompt more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on those companies conducting business online. The adoption of additional laws or regulations may decrease the growth of the Internet or other online services, which could, in turn, decrease the demand for our products and services and increase our cost of doing business.

The applicability of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights, encryption and other intellectual property issues, taxation, libel, export or import matters and personal privacy to the Internet is uncertain. The vast majority of laws were adopted prior to the broad commercial use of the Internet and related technologies. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes to these laws intended to address these issues, including some recently proposed changes in the United States regarding taxation and encryption and in the European Union regarding contract formation and privacy, could create uncertainty in the Internet marketplace and impose additional costs and other burdens. These uncertainties, costs and burdens could reduce demand for our products and services or increase the cost of doing business due to increased litigation costs or increased service delivery costs.

Our International Business Exposes Us to Additional Foreign Risks

Products and services provided to merchants outside the United States accounted for 10.1%, 9.6% and 9.4% of our revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, in 2005 and 2004, respectively. In March 2000, we entered into a joint venture agreement with Japanese partners Marubeni Corporation and Trans-Cosmos, Inc. and established CyberSource K.K. to provide commerce transaction services to the Japanese market. Conducting business outside of the United States is subject to additional risks that may affect our ability to sell our products and services and result in reduced revenues, including:

•

changes in regulatory requirements;

•

reduced protection of intellectual property rights;

•

evolving privacy laws in Europe;

•

the burden of complying with a variety of foreign laws; and

•

war, political or economic instability or constraints on international trade.

In addition, some software contains encryption technology that renders it subject to export restrictions and we may become liable to the extent we violate these restrictions. We might not successfully market, sell and distribute our products and services in local markets and we cannot be certain that one or more of these factors will not materially adversely affect our future international operations, and consequently, our business, financial condition and operating results.

Also, sales of our products and services conducted through our subsidiary in the United Kingdom are denominated in Pounds Sterling. We may experience fluctuations in revenues or operating expenses due to fluctuations in the value of the Pound Sterling relative to the U.S. Dollar. We do not currently enter into transactions with the specific purpose to hedge against currency exchange fluctuations.

The Anti-Takeover Provisions in Our Certificate of Incorporation Could Adversely Affect the Rights of the Holders of Our Common Stock

Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and our Certificate of Incorporation may make a change in control more difficult to finalize, even if a change in control would be beneficial to the stockholders. These provisions may allow our Board of Directors to prevent changes in our management and controlling interests. Under Delaware law, our Board of Directors may adopt additional anti-takeover measures in the future.

One anti-takeover provision that we have is the ability of our Board of Directors to determine the terms of preferred stock and issue preferred stock without the approval of the holders of the common stock. Our Certificate of Incorporation allows the issuance of up to 5,610,969 shares of preferred stock. As of September 30, 2006, there are no shares of preferred stock outstanding. However, because the rights and preferences of any series of preferred stock may be set by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion without approval of the holders of the common stock, the rights and preferences of this preferred stock may be superior to those of the common stock. Accordingly, the rights of the holders of common stock may be adversely affected.

Our Fraud Detection Services and Marketing Agreement With Visa U.S.A. Can Be Terminated

In July 2001, we entered into an agreement with Visa U.S.A. to jointly develop and promote the CyberSource Advanced Fraud Screen Service Enhanced by Visa for use in the United States. Under the terms of the agreement, Visa agreed to promote and market the new product to its member financial institutions and Internet merchants. The agreement expires in July 2007, but can be terminated by either party with ninety days prior written notice. Thereafter, the agreement renews automatically for additional periods of one year, unless terminated by either party.

Failure to Maintain Effective Internal Controls in Accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business and Stock Price

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm addressing these assessments. The threshold for what constitutes a significant deficiency in internal control under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been set quite low and, during the course of our annual testing, we may find one or more material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that we will be able to remedy any deficiencies we may find in a cost effective manner and in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. In addition, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Failure to maintain an effective internal control environment could have a material adverse effect on our business and our stock price.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On February 7, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized management to use up to $10.0 million during the period beginning February 8, 2006 through December 31, 2006 to repurchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock. During the period from February 8, 2006 through September 30, 2006, we repurchased 131,800 shares at an average price of $8.52 per share, including repurchase costs. All of the repurchased shares were cancelled and returned to the status of authorized, unissued shares.


Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares Yet to Be Purchased Under the Program at the End of the Period (000’s)
January 1, 2006 to January 31, 2006	—		—	—		—
February 1, 2006 to February 28, 2006	—		—	—		—
March 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006	—		—	—		—
April 1, 2006 to April 30, 2006	—		—	—		—
May 1, 2006 to May 31, 2006	131,800	$	8.52	131,800	$	8,877
June 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006	—		—	—		—
July 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006	—		—	—		—
August 1, 2006 to August 31, 2006	—		—	—		—
September 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006	—		—	—		—

Total	131,800	$	8.52	131,800	$	8,877

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

In accordance with Section 10A(i)(2) of the Exchange Act and Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are responsible for disclosing the non-audit services approved in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 by the Audit Committee (“Audit Committee”) of the Board of Directors to be performed by Ernst & Young, our independent auditors. Non-audit services are defined in the law as services other than those provided in connection with an audit or a review of our financial statements. The non-audit services approved by the Audit Committee in the third quarter are each considered by us to be audit-related services which are closely related to the financial audit process. Each of the services has been pre-approved by the Audit Committee and its chairman has been given the authority to pre-approve additional services pursuant to limited authority delegated by the Audit Committee.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits


Exhibit Number		Description
3.1*		Certificate of Incorporation of CyberSource Corporation, as amended.

3.2*		CyberSource Corporation’s Bylaws, as amended.

31.1		Certification of William S. McKiernan, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant dated November 3, 2006, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Steven D. Pellizzer, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant dated November 3, 2006, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of William S. McKiernan, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant dated November 3, 2006, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Steven D. Pellizzer, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant dated November 3, 2006, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-77545).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION (Registrant)

Date: November 3, 2006	By	/s/ Steven D. Pellizzer
		Steven D. Pellizzer
		Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigious
Readability	H.S. sophomore Good

Cybersource (CYBS) Inactive 10-Q2006 Q3 Quarterly report

Content analysis

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents