Cybersource 10Q 2007 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007.

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 000-26477

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware

77-0472961

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1295 CHARLESTON ROAD

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA 94043

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(650) 965-6000

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changes Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated-filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of July 23, 2007, there were 35,485,792 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

INDEX TO REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007


		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements:

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006	5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	20

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	21

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	22

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	33

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	33

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders	33

Item 5.	Other Information	34

Item 6.	Exhibits	34

Signatures		35

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)


	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006 (1)
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	28,397		$	21,701
Short-term investments		32,788			33,243
Accounts receivable, net		10,835			9,614
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,594			1,823
Deferred income taxes		1,827			2,320

Total current assets		76,441			68,701

Property and equipment, net		3,556			3,618
Intangible assets, net		2,777			2,845
Non-current deferred income taxes, net		9,629			9,629
Other noncurrent assets		2,280			2,250

Total assets	$	94,683		$	87,043

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	363		$	409
Other accrued liabilities		7,751			6,056
Deferred revenue		1,995			1,950

Total current liabilities		10,109			8,415

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		35			35
Additional paid-in capital		373,549			368,606
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		55			(52	)
Accumulated deficit		(289,065	)		(289,961	)

Total stockholders’ equity		84,574			78,628

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	94,683		$	87,043

(1)	Derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006		2007			2006
Revenues:
Transaction and support	$	21,307		$	14,511	$	42,039		$	28,106
Enterprise software		601			764		1,268			1,547
Professional services		985			1,123		1,711			2,329

Total revenues		22,893			16,398		45,018			31,982

Cost of revenues:
Transaction and support		11,895			7,068		23,353			13,506
Enterprise software		70			56		135			114
Professional services		452			580		845			1,229

Cost of revenues		12,417			7,704		24,333			14,849

Gross profit		10,476			8,694		20,685			17,133

Operating expenses:
Product development		2,892			2,269		5,483			4,383
Sales and marketing		4,829			3,494		9,198			6,899
General and administrative		3,255			2,562		6,047			4,499

Total operating expenses		10,976			8,325		20,728			15,781

Income (loss) from operations		(500	)		369		(43	)		1,352

Other income		19			400		72			400
Interest income		722			554		1,395			1,036

Income before income taxes		241			1,323		1,424			2,788

Income tax provision		81			533		528			1,123

Net income	$	160		$	790	$	896		$	1,665

Basic earnings per share	$	—		$	0.02	$	0.03		$	0.05

Diluted earnings per share	$	—		$	0.02	$	0.02		$	0.04

Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic earnings per share		35,276			34,616		35,144			34,419

Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted earnings per share		37,472			37,325		37,439			37,002

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	896		$	1,665
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		934			637
Income from investment in joint venture		(83	)		—
Stock-based compensation		3,143			2,058
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		8			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,221	)		116
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(771	)		1,166
Deferred income taxes		493			1,060
Other noncurrent assets		53			(560	)
Accounts payable		(46	)		(37	)
Accrued liabilities		1,695			(1,377	)
Deferred revenue		45			127

Net cash provided by operating activities		5,146			4,855

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment		(812	)		(1,063	)
Acquisition of BidPay.com		—			(1,990	)
Purchases of short-term investments		(35,868	)		(19,580	)
Maturities of short-term investments		36,331			18,872

Net cash used in investing activities		(349	)		(3,761	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		2,163			2,773
Repurchase of common stock		(363	)		(1,123	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,800			1,650
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		99			166

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		6,696			2,910
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		21,701			14,383

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	28,397		$	17,293

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of CyberSource Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “CyberSource” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 13, 2007, SEC File No. 000-26477.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which the Company adopted as of January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1.8 million and $1.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $3.1 million and $2.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Stock Options

Stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock are granted at prices equal to the fair market value on the grant date. Options generally vest monthly over a four year period beginning from the grant date and generally expire six to ten years from the grant date. Options granted to non-employee directors generally become vested nine to twelve months from the grant date. Nearly all outstanding stock options are non-qualified stock options.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2007 is presented in the following table:


	Shares		Weighted average exercise price per share		Weighted average remaining contractual life	Aggregate intrinsic value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2006	7,500,916		$	7.37
Granted	1,135,000			12.34
Exercised	(514,821	)		4.12
Forfeited	(178,747	)		10.61

Outstanding as of June 30, 2007	7,942,348		$	8.22	5.07	$	36,490,453

Vested and expected to vest as of June 30, 2007	7,545,032		$	8.11	5.05	$	35,732,819
Exercisable as of June 30, 2007	4,291,033		$	7.02	4.67	$	27,236,803

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was approximately $2.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was approximately $1.1 million and $4.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2007, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $14.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.85 years. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the total cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $1.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the total cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $0.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

For stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company determined the fair value at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the following weighted average assumptions which are evaluated and revised, as necessary, to reflect market conditions and the Company’s experience:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007	2006
Risk-free interest rate	4.74	%	4.64	%	4.47%-4.74%	4.64	%
Dividend yield	—		—		—	—
Volatility	0.51		0.64		0.51-0.58	0.64
Expected life (years)	3.46		2.96		3.46	2.96

The expected life of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. Expected stock price volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock over the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining expected life. The Company has not paid dividends in the past and does not plan to pay any dividends in the near future.

The weighted average fair value of options granted was $5.50 and $6.42 per share for options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $5.49 and $5.05 per share for options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company granted 100,000 restricted shares at a weighted average grant date fair value of $10.46. No shares have vested as of June 30, 2007.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are calculated under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). Under SFAS 109, the liability method is used in accounting for income taxes, which includes the effects of temporary differences between financial and taxable amounts of assets and liabilities as well as the effects of net operating loss and credit carryforwards to determine deferred tax assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are established and adjusted when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to more likely than not be realized.

2. ACQUISITIONS

BidPay.com

In March 2006, the Company acquired BidPay.com, Inc. (“BidPay”), a payment service provider for online auctions. Founded in 1999, BidPay developed a platform based on proprietary technology and acquired over 4.0 million registered users prior to ceasing operations in December 2005. The Company’s primary reason for the acquisition of BidPay is to expand its services into the payment market for online auctions. The aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.0 million consisted of cash consideration of approximately $2.0 million, including $0.2 million of acquisition costs, and $1.0 million in deferred taxes related to the difference between the financial and tax basis of the assets acquired, in exchange for BidPay’s proprietary technology, its databases, and certain intellectual property rights, including exclusive rights to the BidPay brand.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 98-3, “Determining Whether a Nonmonetary Transaction Involves Receipt of Productive Assets or of a Business,” the Company determined that it had acquired productive assets as opposed to a business. As a result, no amount of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill. The total purchase price of $3.0 million was allocated based on the fair values presented below (in thousands):


	Fair Market Value		Straight-line Amortization
			(years)
Technology platform	$	269	3
Customer list		269	6
Trade name		2,451	—

Total	$	2,989

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), the Company concluded that there were no identifiable factors that would limit the useful life of the BidPay trade name and that it intends to use the BidPay trade name indefinitely. As a result, the Company assigned an indefinite useful life to the BidPay trade name and therefore, is not amortizing the portion of the purchase price allocated to the trade name. The Company is required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”) to perform tests for impairment of its intangible assets, other than goodwill, annually and more frequently whenever events or circumstances suggest that its intangible assets may be impaired. The Company recorded approximately $34,000 and $68,000 of amortization expense related to intangible assets in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and $23,000 and $30,000 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.

Estimated future amortization expense for the intangible assets recorded on the Company’s June 30, 2007 balance sheet is as follows (in thousands):


Remainder of 2007	$	67
2008		134
2009		60
2010		45
2011		45
2012		8

Total	$	359

The pro forma results of operations have not been presented for the acquisition of BidPay because the effect of this acquisition was not considered material.

Authorize.Net Holdings, Inc.

On June 17, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire Authorize.Net Holdings, Inc. (“Authorize.Net”) in a stock and cash transaction valued at approximately $565 million, as of the close of the Nasdaq Global Market System on June 15, 2007. Upon completion of the merger, Authorize.Net stockholders will receive 1.1611 shares of CyberSource common stock for each outstanding share of Authorize.Net common stock and their pro-rata share of approximately $125 million in the form of a cash payment.

The merger is subject to customary conditions to closing, including (i) the approval of the holders of CyberSource common stock, (ii) the approval of the holders of Authorize.Net’s common stock, (iii) the declaration by the Securities Exchange Commission that the joint proxy statement/prospectus is effective, (iv) the lapse of applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, (v) the absence of any material adverse effect with respect to each party’s business (in each case, subject to certain exceptions), and (vi) the approval of CyberSource common stock to be issued in the merger to be listed on Nasdaq.

3. BALANCE SHEET DETAIL

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):


	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
Prepaid expenses	$	1,112	$	1,253
Prepaid acquisition costs		568		—
Acquiring receivable		461		441
Receivable related to stock option exercises		347		—
Value added taxes receivable		48		119
Other current assets		58		10

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	2,594	$	1,823

Other non-current assets consist of the following (in thousands):


	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
Prepaid rent	$	1,771	$	1,968
Deposits		322		225
Other non-current assets		187		57

Total other non-current assets	$	2,280	$	2,250

Other accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):


	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
Employee benefits and related expenses	$	2,603	$	3,167
Accrued cost of revenues		2,386		1,617
Other liabilities		2,762		1,272

Total other accrued liabilities	$	7,751	$	6,056

4. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available that is evaluated by the chief operating decision maker or decision-making group to make decisions about how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Company views its operations as principally three segments, commerce transaction services and support, enterprise software and professional services and manages the business based on the revenues of these segments.

The following tables present revenues and cost of revenues by the Company’s three reportable segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. There were no inter-business unit sales or transfers. The Company does not report operating expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest income, income taxes, capital expenditures or identifiable assets by its segments to the CEO. The Company’s CEO reviews the revenues and cost of revenues from each of the Company’s reportable segments, and all of the Company’s expenses are managed by and reported to the CEO on a consolidated basis. Revenues and cost of revenues are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Revenues:
Transaction and support	$	21,307	$	14,511	$	42,039	$	28,106
Enterprise software		601		764		1,268		1,547
Professional services		985		1,123		1,711		2,329

Total revenues	$	22,893	$	16,398	$	45,018	$	31,982

Cost of revenues:
Transaction and support	$	11,895	$	7,068	$	23,353	$	13,506
Enterprise software		70		56		135		114
Professional services		452		580		845		1,229

Total cost of revenues	$	12,417	$	7,704	$	24,333	$	14,849

No customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006		2007		2006
Net income	$	160		$	790	$	896	$	1,665
Change in cumulative translation adjustment		110			156		99		166
Unrealized gain (loss) on short-term investments		(7	)		13		8		28

Comprehensive income	$	263		$	959	$	1,003	$	1,859

6. LEGAL MATTERS

In July and August 2001, various class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against the Company, its Chairman and CEO, a former officer, and four brokerage firms that served as underwriters in its initial public offering. The actions were filed on behalf of persons who purchased the Company’s stock issued pursuant to or traceable to the initial public offering during the period from June 23, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The action alleges that the Company’s underwriters charged secret excessive commissions to certain of their customers in return for allocations of the Company’s stock in the offering. The two individual defendants are alleged to be liable because of their involvement in preparing and signing the registration statement for the offering, which allegedly failed to disclose the supposedly excessive commissions. On December 7, 2001, an amended complaint was filed in one of the actions to expand the purported class to persons who purchased the Company’s stock issued pursuant to or traceable to the follow-on public offering during the period from November 4, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The lawsuit filed against the Company is one of several hundred lawsuits

filed against other companies based on substantially similar claims. On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended complaint was filed to consolidate all of the complaints and claims into one case. The consolidated amended complaint alleges claims that are virtually identical to the amended complaint filed on December 7, 2001 and the original complaints. In October 2002, the claims against the Company’s officer and a former officer that were named in the amended complaint were dismissed without prejudice. In July 2002, the Company, along with other issuer defendants in the case, filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint with prejudice. On February 19, 2003, the court issued a written decision denying the motion to dismiss with respect to CyberSource and the individual defendants. On July 2, 2003, a committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved a proposed partial settlement with the plaintiffs in this matter. The settlement would have provided, among other things, a release of the Company and of the individual defendants for the alleged wrongful conduct in the Amended Complaint in exchange for a guarantee from the Company’s insurers regarding recovery from the underwriter defendants and other consideration from the Company regarding its underwriters. The plaintiffs have continued to litigate against the underwriter defendants. The district court directed that the litigation proceed within a number of “focus cases” rather than in all of the 310 cases that have been consolidated. The Company’s case is not one of these focus cases. On October 13, 2004, the district court certified the focus cases as class actions. The underwriter defendants appealed that ruling, and on December 5, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district court’s class certification decision. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing. In light of the Second Circuit opinion, the Company has informed the district court that this settlement cannot be approved because the defined settlement class, like the litigation class, cannot be certified. The Company cannot predict whether the Company will be able to renegotiate a settlement that complies with the Second Circuit’s mandate. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the Company cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the matter. However, any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by the Company’s insurers.

On August 11, 2004, the Company filed suit in the Northern District of California against Retail Decisions, Inc. (“ReD US”) and Retail Decisions Plc (“ReD UK”) (collectively, “ReD”), Case No. 3:04-CIV-03268, alleging that ReD infringes the Company’s U.S. Patent No. 6,029,154 (the “‘154 Patent”). The Company served ReD US with the complaint on August 12, 2004, and the Company served ReD UK with the complaint on August 13, 2004. On September 30, 2004, ReD responded to the Company’s complaint. ReD filed a motion to stay the case for 90 days pending a determination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) as to whether it will grant ReD’s request that the PTO re-examine the ‘154 Patent. ReD also filed a motion for a more definite statement by the Company with respect to its allegation that ReD is willfully infringing the ‘154 Patent. In addition, ReD UK filed a motion to dismiss the action against it on the ground that it is not subject to personal jurisdiction in the Northern District of California. On October 27, 2004, ReD filed a request for re-examination with the PTO, based on prior art ReD discovered that allegedly invalidates the Patent. On October 28, 2004, the Company filed an opposition to ReD’s motion to stay the case for 90 days and an opposition to ReD’s motion for a more definite statement with respect to willful infringement. Based on ReD UK’s representation that ReD US is the sole entity that develops, operates, and distributes the eBitGuard service, the Company agreed to dismiss ReD UK while reserving the right to reinstitute action against ReD UK in the event the Company later discovers that ReD UK is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. In return, ReD UK agreed that if the Company later establishes that personal jurisdiction existed, the Company could re-file against ReD UK in this action without prejudice to its damages claim. The Company also filed an amended complaint, removing ReD UK as a named defendant and restating the willful infringement claim. On November 16, 2004, the court granted ReD’s motion to stay the proceedings pending the PTO’s decision as to whether it will grant ReD’s request for re-examination. On December 30, 2004, the PTO granted ReD’s request for a re-examination. On January 19, 2005, ReD filed a motion to dismiss the case without prejudice or to extend the stay until completion of the re-examination process. On January 24, 2005, the court extended the stay pending the re-examination process, vacated ReD’s motion to dismiss, and ordered quarterly updates as to the status of the re-examination process. On April 25, 2005, the parties filed a joint status report that was approved by the court. On June 20, 2005, the PTO issued a preliminary office action rejecting all of the claims of the ‘154 Patent based on one of the prior art references cited by ReD. On July 14, 2005, the Company met with the PTO examiner handling the re-examination to distinguish the prior art from the claims of the ‘154 Patent. On August 9, 2006, the PTO issued a final office action rejecting all of the claims of the ‘154 Patent. On September 7, 2006, the Company filed a response to the office action requesting certain amendments to the claims. On October 10, 2006, the PTO filed a response rejecting the amendments and extending the Company’s deadline to file a notice of appeal. On October 30, 2006, the Company filed a notice of appeal. On December 22, 2006, the Company filed the appeal brief. On May 3, 2007, the PTO issued a “Notice of Intent to Issue Reexam Certificate,” reversing its action of August 9, 2006. Accordingly, the patent has been re-validated and the Company expects to receive a new patent certificate shortly. While there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the lawsuit, the Company does not presently believe that the lawsuit would have a material effect on the its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company is currently party to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the outcome of any of these claims or any of the above mentioned legal matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

7. COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

On January 24, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized management to use up to $10.0 million over a twelve-month period beginning on January 30, 2007 to repurchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock. During the period beginning January 30, 2007 and ended June 30, 2007, the Company repurchased 30,400 shares at an average price of $11.93 per share, including repurchase costs. All of the repurchased shares were cancelled and returned to the status of authorized, unissued shares.

During the period beginning July 1, 2007 and ending July 31, 2007, the Company repurchased 390,400 shares at an average price of $11.96 per share, including repurchase costs.

On February 7, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized management to use up to $10.0 million over a twelve-month period beginning on February 10, 2006 to repurchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock. During the period from February 10, 2006 through January 29, 2007, the Company repurchased 268,005 shares at an average price of $9.18 per share, including repurchase costs. All of the repurchased shares were cancelled and returned to the status of authorized, unissued shares. For the period beginning January 30, 2007 through February 9, 2007, the common stock repurchase program authorized on February 7, 2006 was superseded by the common stock repurchase program authorized on January 24, 2007.

8. GUARANTEES

From time to time, the Company enters into certain types of contracts that require the Company to indemnify parties against third-party claims on a contingent basis. These contracts primarily relate to: (i) licenses for software and services; (ii) certain real estate leases, under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners for environmental and other liabilities, and other claims arising from the Company’s use of the applicable premises; and (iii) certain agreements with the Company’s officers, directors and employees, under which the Company may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationship.

The terms of such obligations vary. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated. Because the obligated amounts of these types of agreements often are not explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations, and no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on its balance sheet as of June 30, 2007.

9. INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the tax-effected temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities and for net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

During 2006, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $9.7 million. This benefit included a $9.9 million reduction in the valuation allowance related to a portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets that will more likely than not be realized. This determination was based on projected taxable income. In evaluating the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence including its past operating results and its forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, the Company makes assumptions to forecast U.S. federal, U.S. state, and international operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment regarding the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with the forecasts used to manage the Company’s business. The Company intends to maintain the remaining valuation allowance until sufficient further positive evidence exists to support further reversals of the valuation allowance. The Company’s income tax expense recorded in the future will be reduced to the extent of offsetting decreases in its valuation allowance.

Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation, No. 48

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a company’s income tax return, and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. Step one, Recognition, requires a company to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. Step two, Measurement, is based on the largest amount of benefit, which is more likely than not to be realized on ultimate settlement. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 is recognized as a change in accounting principle, recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on the adoption date. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company did not recognize any increase or decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken in prior periods, therefore, there was no corresponding adjustment in retained earnings.

Upon adoption of FIN 48, the Company’s policy to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the Company’s provision for (benefit from) income taxes, did not change. As of June 30, 2007, the Company did not have any accrual for payment of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

The Company did not have any amounts of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 (adoption date) and June 30, 2007. Also, the Company did not have any amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect its effective tax rate.

The Company files U.S. federal, U.S. state, and foreign tax returns and has determined that its major tax jurisdictions are the United States and the United Kingdom. For these jurisdictions, the 1998 to 2006 tax years remain subject to examination by the appropriate governmental agencies.

10. RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company must adopt these new requirements no later than the first quarter of 2008. The Company has not yet determined the effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 157, or if it will adopt the requirements prior to the first fiscal quarter of 2008.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including statements regarding our expectations, estimations, intentions, beliefs or strategies regarding the future. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

(a) our statement that we do not plan to pay any dividends in the near future; (b) our expectation to recognize stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options over a weighted average period of approximately 2.85 years; (c) our expectation that our effective tax rate in 2007 will be approximately 38%; (d) our estimated amortization expense for our intangible assets; (e) our belief that cash and short-term investment balances as of June 30, 2007 will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months; (f) our conclusion that, due to the nature of our short-term investments, there is no material market risk exposure with respect to such investments; (g) our expectation that, as the gross margins from our global acquiring services business are significantly lower than our historical transaction and support gross margins, our overall gross margins will continue to decrease as our global acquiring services revenues increase in the future; (h) our belief that if we are unable to adapt to changing market conditions, merchant requirements or emerging industry standards, our business would be materially harmed; (i) our expectation that product development expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007 will moderately decrease as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, and that, as a percentage of revenue, product development expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007 will moderately decrease as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007; (j) our expectation that sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2007 will be relatively consistent in absolute dollars as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, and, as a percentage of revenue, we expect that sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007 to moderately decrease as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007; (k) our expectation that general and administrative expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007 will increase in absolute dollars due primarily to integration fees related to the acquisition of Authorize.Net, and that, as a percentage of revenue, we expect general and administrative expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007, to increase as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007; (l) our future minimum lease payments; (m) our intention to maintain the remaining valuation allowance until sufficient further positive evidence exists to support further reversals of the valuation allowance; (n) our expectation that quarterly results will fluctuate significantly; (o) our statement that, as part of our future business strategy, we may pursue strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses or technologies that would provide additional product or service offerings, additional industry expertise, a broader client base or an expanded geographic presence; (p) statements suggesting that to remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of our products and services and the underlying network infrastructure; (q) our expectation that competitive pressures may result in the reduction of our prices or our market share or both, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition; (r) statements regarding our success depending on our ability to grow, or scale, our commerce transaction systems to accommodate increases in the volume of traffic on our systems, especially during peak periods of demand; (s) statements regarding our future growth also depending in part on our proprietary technology and licensed technology, the success of our relationships with existing and future sales alliances that market our products and services to their merchant accounts and our ability to both internally develop and license leading technologies to enhance our existing products and services; (t) statements regarding the use of and interest in the Internet; (u) statements regarding the increase in the significance of the Internet as a commercial marketplace; (v) the statement regarding our belief that our fraud screen service may require us to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act; (w) statements regarding our belief that the potential adverse effects of the proposed settlement of the pending class action lawsuits involving stock issued or traceable to the Company’s initial public offering would be borne by insurers; (x) statements regarding our belief that litigation outcomes of class action lawsuits and other claims will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; (y) our belief that an adverse outcome in a lawsuit relating to the ‘154 Patent will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; (z) our statement regarding a reduction to income tax expense recorded in the future resulting from realizing deferred tax assets; (aa) our belief that our future success will depend upon our ability to retain our key management personnel; (bb) our belief that if BidPay.com’s revenue increases, our potential liability for chargebacks also would increase; (cc) our expectation that we will recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period of the award; (dd) our expectation that interest income will increase in the three months ended September 30, 2007 due to anticipated higher cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances; (ee) our belief that if we are not successful in the payment market for online auctions, we will incur substantial charges as a result of exiting this business; (ff) our expectation that competition will intensify in the future; (gg) our belief that periodic interruptions will continue to occur from time to time; (hh) our statement that Authorize.Net stockholders will receive 1.1611 shares of CyberSource common stock for each outstanding share of Authorize.Net common stock; (ii) our statement that Authorize.Net stockholders will receive a pro-rata share of approximately $125 million in the form of a cash payment; (jj) our expectation that the transaction with Authorize.Net will close early in the fourth quarter 2007; (kk) our expectation that because our gross margins from our global acquiring services business are significantly lower than our historical transaction and support gross margins, our overall gross margins will continue to decrease as our global acquiring services revenues increase in the future; and (lll), our expectation that we will use the BidPay trade name indefinitely.

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statement for the reasons and factors detailed below under Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and in other sections of this Report on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are based on information available to us on the date of this Report on Form 10-Q, and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. See Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” below, as well as such other risks and uncertainties as are detailed in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports and filings for a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Such factors include but are not limited to the following cautions: (1) we are subject to the risks encountered by early stage companies, such as risks of intense competition and rapid technological change in our industry, risks that we may not be able to fully utilize relationships with our strategic partners and indirect sales channels and risks that any fluctuations in our quarterly operating results will be significant relative to our revenues; (2) inability to comply with new accounting pronouncements; (3) inability to capitalize on increasing need for our global acquiring services; (4) there is no assurance that we will realize sufficient revenues to achieve ongoing profitability; (5) our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements; (6) potential system failures, compromised security measures or lack of capacity issues could negatively affect demand for our services; (7) exposure to unanticipated income tax liabilities; (8) the outcome of pending litigation is subject to significant uncertainty and predictions regarding such outcomes may not be accurate; (9) third parties may claim that the technology employed in providing our current or future products and services infringes upon their rights; (10) lack of acceptance in the payment market for online auctions; (8) unanticipated trends with respect to seasonality of the retail sector; (11) unanticipated difficulties associated with integration of the BidPay business; (12) loss of key management personnel to competitors; and (13) the failure to consummate the Authorize.Net acquisition or, if such acquisition is consummated, the failure to effectively integrate the Authorize.Net organization and business.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 13, 2007 (SEC File No. 000-26477).

OVERVIEW

We derive our revenues from monthly commerce transaction processing fees and global acquiring fees, support service fees, professional services and the sale of enterprise software licenses and related maintenance. Transaction and global acquiring revenues are recognized in the period in which the transactions occur. Professional services revenue and support service fees are recognized as the related services are provided and costs are incurred. Enterprise software license revenue is recognized when the contract is signed, the software is delivered and the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Enterprise software maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, no customer accounted for more than 10% of revenues.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. We believe that the following are the more critical judgment areas in the application of our accounting policies that currently affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”) and Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” (“SOP 97-2”), as amended. SAB 104 and SOP 97-2 require that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (4) is based on management’s judgments regarding the collectibility of fees. Should changes in conditions cause management to determine these criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected.

We derive a significant portion of our transaction processing revenues from global acquiring fees charged to merchants for payment processing services. Our fees, which are primarily a percentage of the dollar amount of each transaction processed, are based upon the merchant’s monthly charge volume and risk profile. In addition, we record revenues for miscellaneous services related to global acquiring, such as fees for processing credit card chargebacks. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent” (“EITF 99-19”), we recognize these fees on a gross basis as we are the primary agent in the transaction in the period the merchants’ transactions are processed. Related interchange fees paid to card issuing banks and assessments paid to credit card associations are recognized in cost of revenues at that time.

We use the residual method of accounting as permitted by Statement of Position 98-9 (“SOP 98-9”) to recognize revenue when a software license includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) exists for all undelivered elements. We allocate revenue to each element based on its fair value as determined by VSOE. We defer revenue for any undelivered elements and recognize the deferred revenue when the product is delivered or over the period in which the service is performed.

We derive our professional services revenue from time and material contracts and fixed-price contracts, which require the accurate estimation of the cost, scope and duration of each engagement. Revenue and the related costs for these projects are generally recognized as those services are delivered. Estimates are made regarding time to complete the projects and revisions to estimates are reflected in the period in which changes become known. If we do not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be performed, or do not manage our projects properly within the planned periods of time or satisfy obligations under the contracts, then future professional service margins may be significantly and negatively affected or losses on existing contracts may need to be recognized.

Accounts Receivable

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments as well as for potential sales returns. If the financial condition of our customers was to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. These estimates are based on historical bad debt experience and other known factors. If the historical data we used to determine these estimates does not properly reflect future losses, additional allowances may be required.

Reserve for Merchant Losses

We have potential liability for certain transactions processed through our global acquiring services if the payments associated with such transactions are rejected, refused, or returned for reasons such as consumer fraud or billing disputes. For instance, if a billing dispute between a merchant and payer is not ultimately resolved in favor of the merchant, the disputed transaction may be charged back to the merchant’s bank and credited to the payer’s account. If the charged back amount cannot be recovered from the merchant’s account, or if the merchant refuses or is financially unable to reimburse its bank for the charged back amount, we may bear the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the payer’s bank. We could also incur fraud losses as a result of merchant fraud. Merchant fraud occurs when a merchant, rather than a customer, intentionally uses a stolen or counterfeit card, card number, or other bank account number to process a false sales transaction, or knowingly fails to deliver merchandise or services in an otherwise valid transaction. We may be responsible for any losses for certain transactions if we are unable to collect from the merchant. We evaluate the merchant’s risk for potential losses based on historical experience and other relevant factors and record a loss reserve accordingly. If the data we use to determine potential losses does not properly reflect future losses, additional reserves may be required.

Legal Contingencies

We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes of these proceedings as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of accruals required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis. As discussed in Note 6 of the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements, as of June 30, 2007, we do not believe our current proceedings will have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular quarter or annual period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or as a result of the effectiveness of our strategies related to these proceedings.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the tax-effected temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities, and for net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

During 2006, we recorded an income tax benefit of $9.7 million. This benefit included a $9.9 million reduction in the valuation allowance related to a portion of our deferred tax assets that will more likely than not be realized, based on future projected taxable income. In evaluating our ability to realize our deferred tax assets we consider all available positive and negative evidence including our past operating results and our forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, we make assumptions to forecast U.S. federal, U.S. state, and international operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment regarding the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with the forecasts used to manage our business. We intend to maintain the remaining valuation allowance until sufficient further positive evidence exists to support further reversals of the valuation allowance. Our income tax expense recorded in the future will be reduced to the extent of offsetting decreases in our valuation allowance.

Stock-based Compensation

Under the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, “SFAS 123R”), we use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate stock-based compensation expense at the grant date

based on the fair value of the award and we recognize the expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award. Determining the appropriate fair value model and assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards requires judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and expected life. As of June 30, 2007, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $14.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.85 years.

Long-Lived Assets

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”) requires that we perform tests for impairment of our intangible assets, other than goodwill, annually and more frequently whenever events or circumstances suggest that our intangible assets may be impaired. As of June 30, 2007, we had recorded intangible assets related to our acquisition of BidPay.com (“BidPay”) in March 2006, with a carrying value of approximately $2.8 million. To evaluate potential impairment, SFAS 144 requires us to assess whether the future cash flows related to these assets will be greater than their carrying value at the time of the test. Accordingly, while our cash flow assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses, there is significant judgment in determining the cash flows attributable to our intangible assets over their respective estimated useful lives.

We are required to periodically evaluate our intangible asset balances for impairment. If we incur impairments to our intangible assets, it could have an adverse impact on our future earnings.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth certain items in our condensed consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of revenue for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenues	54.2		47.0		54.1		46.4

Gross profit	45.8		53.0		45.9		53.6

Operating expenses:
Product development	12.6		13.8		12.2		13.7
Sales and marketing	21.1		21.3		20.4		21.6
General and administrative	14.2		15.6		13.4		14.1

Total operating expenses	47.9		50.7		46.0		49.4

Income (loss) from operations	(2.1	)	2.3		(0.1	)	4.2
Interest and other income	3.2		5.8		3.3		4.5

Income before income taxes	1.1		8.1		3.2		8.7
Income tax provision	0.4		3.3		1.2		3.5

Net income	0.7	%	4.8	%	2.0	%	5.2	%

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006

Revenues. Revenues were $22.9 million for the three months ended June 30 2007, as compared to $16.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $6.5 million or 39.6%. Transaction and support revenues were $21.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $14.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $6.8 million or 46.8%. Approximately 50% of the increase in transaction and support revenues was from existing customers, primarily resulting from an increase in global acquiring services, as well as an increase in transaction volumes processed. The remaining increase in transaction and support revenues was from new customers that entered into contracts during the twelve months ended June 30, 2007. Global acquiring revenues represented 42.8% of our transaction and support revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to 36.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Our global acquiring revenue may also include fees generated for gateway services as it is becoming more common to charge the customer a bundled price for global acquiring and gateway services. We processed approximately 269.2 million transactions during the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to approximately 198.7 million transactions processed during the three months ended June 30, 2006. Enterprise software license and maintenance revenues decreased to $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007, a decrease of approximately 21.3% as compared to the $0.8 million in the three months ended

June 30, 2006. The decrease in software license and maintenance revenues is primarily due to a decrease in the number of new license agreements entered into during the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006. Professional services revenues were $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of approximately $0.1 million or 12.3%. The decrease in professional services revenues is primarily due to a general decrease in demand for professional services projects that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2007. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Cost of Revenues. Transaction and support cost of revenues consists primarily of costs incurred in the delivery of commerce transaction services, including personnel costs in our operations and customer support functions, processing and interchange fees relating to our global acquiring services, other third-party fees, depreciation of capital equipment used in our network infrastructure and costs related to the hosting of our servers at third-party hosting centers in the United States and the United Kingdom. Transaction and support cost of revenues was $11.9 million or 55.8% of transaction and support revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $7.1 million or 48.7% of transaction and support revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of transaction and support revenues is primarily due to higher processing fees paid to third parties such as the credit card issuing banks, payment processors and card associations related to our global acquiring services, which are variable costs that increase in absolute dollars as the related revenue increases and decrease as the related revenue decreases. As the gross margins from our global acquiring services business are significantly lower than our historical transaction and support gross margins, we expect our overall gross margins to continue to decrease as our global acquiring services revenues increase in the future. Enterprise software cost of revenues is composed of customer support personnel costs, third party fees and fulfillment costs. Enterprise software cost of revenues was $0.1 million or 11.6% of enterprise software revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared with the $0.1 million or 7.3% of enterprise software revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Professional services cost of revenues consists principally of personnel-related costs and expenses, and a portion of allocated overhead costs related to providing professional services. Professional services cost of revenues was $0.5 million or 45.9% of professional services revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $0.6 million or 51.6% of professional services revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease in absolute dollars is primarily due to lower personnel-related costs resulting from a decrease in personnel necessary to support our professional services projects during the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in professional services cost of revenues as a percentage of professional services revenues is primarily due to an increase in higher-margin projects during the three months ended June 30, 2007. Included in cost of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, is approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense.

Product Development. Product development expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs of employees engaged in the maintenance of existing services as well as research, design and development of new services and, to a lesser extent, facility costs and related overhead. Product development expenses were $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $0.6 million or 27.5%. The increase is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense which increased by approximately $0.4 million. Stock-based compensation expense included in product development expenses was approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As a percentage of revenue, product development expenses decreased to 12.6% in the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to 13.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease is primarily due to the increase in revenue from existing and new customers during the three months ended June 30, 2007, offset, to a certain extent, by the increase in compensation expense. We expect product development expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007 will be relatively consistent in absolute dollars with the three months ended June 30, 2007. As a percentage of revenue, we expect product development expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007 to moderately decrease as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation of sales and marketing personnel, market research and advertising costs and, to a lesser extent, facility costs and related overhead. Sales and marketing expenses were $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $1.3 million or 38.2%. The increase is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense which increased by approximately $1.0 million and marketing expenses which increased by approximately $0.1 million. Stock-based compensation expense included in sales and marketing expenses was approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses were 21.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2007, consistent with the 21.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2006. We expect that sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007, will be relatively consistent in absolute dollars with the three months ended June 30, 2007. As a percentage of revenue, we expect sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007 to moderately decrease as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for administrative personnel, fees for outside professional services and, to a lesser extent, facility costs and related overhead. General and administrative expenses were $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $0.7 million or 27.0%. The increase is primarily due to an increase in compensation related expenses which increased by approximately $0.4 million and an increase in third party professional fees

which increased by approximately $0.2 million. Stock-based compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses was approximately $0.9 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses were 14.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to 15.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease is primarily due to the increase in revenue from existing and new customers during the three months ended June 30, 2007, offset, to a certain extent, by the increase in compensation expense. We expect that general and administrative expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007, will increase in absolute dollars due primarily to integration fees related to the acquisition of Authorize.Net. As a percentage of revenue, we expect general and administrative expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2007, to increase as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.

Other Income.Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 consists primarily of joint venture income from CyberSource K.K. of approximately $36,000, offset by other miscellaneous losses of approximately $17,000.

Interest Income. Interest income consists of interest earnings on cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and was $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to an increase in average balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments during the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006 as a result of our income from operations in the twelve months ended June 30, 2007 and slightly higher investment yields. We expect interest income to increase in the three months ended September 30, 2007 due to anticipated higher cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances.

Income Tax Provision.We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $0.1 million, or an effective tax rate of 34%, for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $0.5 million, or an effective tax rate of 40%, for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease in our provision for income taxes is primarily due to decreases in federal and state income taxes, driven by lower taxable income period over period and proportionately more earnings expected to be realized in jurisdictions with lower statutory tax rates. There were no significant discrete items that impacted the effective tax rate in the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

We expect our effective tax rate in 2007 to be approximately 38%. However, our effective tax rate could fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis and could be adversely affected to the extent earnings are lower than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or by changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles, or interpretations thereof. In addition, we are subject to the examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities.

During the fourth quarter of 2006, we recorded a reduction in the valuation allowance related to a portion of our deferred tax assets that will more likely than not be realized, based on future projected taxable income. We intend to maintain the remaining valuation allowance until sufficient further positive evidence exists to support further reversals of the valuation allowance. Our income tax expense recorded in the future will be reduced to the extent of offsetting decreases in our valuation allowance.

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006

Revenues. Revenues were $45.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $32.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $13.0 million or 40.8%. Transaction and support revenues were $42.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $28.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $13.9 million or 49.6%. Approximately 60% of the increase in transaction and support revenues was from existing customers, primarily resulting from an increase in global acquiring services as well as an increase in transaction volumes processed. The remaining increase in transaction and support revenues was from new customers that entered into contracts during the twelve months ended June 30, 2007. We processed approximately 533.4 million transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to approximately 395.1 million processed during the six months ended June 30, 2006. Global acquiring revenues represented approximately 42.7% of our transaction and support revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to 34.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Our global acquiring revenue may also include fees generated for gateway services as it is becoming more common to charge the customer a bundled price for transaction services provided. Enterprise software license and maintenance revenues were $1.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of approximately $0.3 million or 18.0%. The decrease in software license and maintenance revenues was due primarily to a decrease in the number of new license agreements entered into during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. Professional services revenues decreased to $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, a decrease of approximately 26.5%, as compared to $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, due to a general decrease in demand for professional services projects that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007. No customer accounted for more than 10.0% of our revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Cost of Revenues. Transaction and support cost of revenues was $23.4 million or 55.6% of transaction and support revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $13.5 million or 48.1% of transaction and support revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of transaction and support revenues is primarily due to higher processing fees paid to third parties such as the credit card issuing banks, payment processors and card associations related to our global acquiring services, which are variable costs that increase in absolute dollars as the related revenue increases and decrease as the related revenue decreases. As the gross margins from our global acquiring services business are significantly lower than our historical transaction and support gross margins, we expect our overall gross margins to continue to decrease as our global acquiring services revenues increase in the future. Enterprise software cost of revenues was $0.1 million or 10.6% of enterprise software revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007, consistent with the $0.1 million or 7.4% of enterprise software revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Professional services cost of revenues was $0.8 million or 49.4% of professional services revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $1.2 million or 52.8% of professional services revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease in absolute dollars is primarily due to lower personnel-related costs resulting from a decrease in personnel necessary to support our professional services projects during the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in professional services cost of revenues as a percentage of professional services revenues is primarily due to an increase in higher-margin projects during the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Product Development. Product development expenses were $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $1.1 million or 25.1%. The increase in absolute dollars is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense which increased by approximately $0.6 million and product development expenses related to BidPay which increased by approximately $0.2 million. Stock-based compensation expense included in product development expenses was approximately $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As a percentage of revenue, product development expenses decreased to 12.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 13.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease is primarily due to the increase in revenue from existing and new customers, offset, to a certain extent, by the increase in compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $9.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $2.3 million or 33.3%. The increase in absolute dollars is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense of approximately $2.0 million and marketing expenses which increased by approximately $0.1 million. Stock-based compensation expense included in sales and marketing expenses was approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 20.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to 21.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease is primarily due to the increase in revenue from existing and new customers during the six months ended June 30, 2007, offset, to a certain extent, by the increase in compensation and marketing expenses.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $1.5 million or 34.4%. The increase in absolute dollars is primarily due to an increase in headcount and related compensation expense of approximately $1.0 million and an increase in third party professional fees which increased by approximately $0.2 million. Stock-based compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses was approximately $1.6 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses decreased to 13.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 14.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease is primarily due an increase in revenue from existing and new customers during the six months ended June 30, 2007, offset, to a certain extent, by the increases in compensation expense and third party professional fees.

Other Income. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 consists primarily of joint venture income from CyberSource K.K. of approximately $0.1 million, offset by other miscellaneous losses of approximately $17,000. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 consists of settlement proceeds of $0.4 million we received for dismissing a lawsuit that we filed against CardSystems Solutions, Inc. in October 2005.

Interest Income. Interest income was $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase is due primarily to higher investment yields and higher average cash and short-term investment balances during the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Income Tax Provision.We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $61.2 million as of June 30, 2007 compared to $54.9 million as of December 31, 2006. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased by approximately $6.2 million from December 31, 2006 to June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily due to the following (in thousands):


	Six months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006
Cash provided by operating activities	$	5,146		$	4,855
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		2,163			2,773
Acquisition of BidPay		—			(1,990	)
Payment of bonuses under company-wide bonus plan		(953	)		(989	)
Purchases of equipment		(812	)		(1,063	)
Repurchases of common stock		(363	)		(1,123	)

On June 17, 2007, we entered into an agreement to acquire Authorize.Net in a stock and cash transaction valued at approximately $565 million, as of the close of the Nasdaq Global Market System on June 15, 2007. Upon completion of the merger, Authorize.Net stockholders will receive 1.1611 shares of our common stock for each outstanding share of Authorize.Net common stock and their pro-rata share of approximately $125 million in the form of a cash payment.

The merger is subject to customary conditions to closing, including (i) the approval of the holders of our common stock, (ii) the approval of the holders of Authorize.Net’s common stock, (iii) the declaration by the Securities Exchange Commission that the joint proxy statement/prospectus is effective, (iv) the lapse of applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, (v) the absence of any material adverse effect with respect to each party’s business (in each case, subject to certain exceptions), and (vi) the approval of our common stock to be issued in the merger to be listed on Nasdaq.

We believe that our cash and short-term investment balances as of June 30, 2007 will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months, including $23.6 million in severance costs and $4.6 million in direct transaction costs associated with our acquisition of Authorize.Net. See “Risk Factors” below for further detail regarding expenses related to the acquisition of Authorize.Net. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including the level of investment we make in new businesses, new products or new technologies. Except for the Authorize.Net acquisition, we currently have no agreements or understandings with respect to any future investments. To the extent that our existing cash resources and future earnings are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to obtain additional equity or debt financing. Additional funds may not be available or, if available, we may not be able to obtain them on favorable terms.

The following is a table summarizing our significant commitments as of June 30, 2007, consisting of future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable and operating leases (in thousands):


Contractual obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1 – 3 years		3 – 5 years		More than 5 years
Operating leases	$	6,396	$	1,218	$	2,884	$	2,229	$	65

Total commitments	$	6,396	$	1,218	$	2,884	$	2,229	$	65

Recent Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We must adopt these new requirements no later than the first quarter of 2008. We have not yet determined the effect on our consolidated financial statements, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 157, or if we will adopt the requirements prior to the first fiscal quarter of 2008.

Factors That May Affect Future Results

A description of the risk factors associated with our business is included under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this report.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We provide our services to customers primarily in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in Europe and elsewhere throughout the world. As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors, such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. The majority of sales are currently made in U.S. dollars or pounds sterling. A strengthening of the dollar or the pound sterling could make our products less competitive in foreign markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates.

Due to the nature of our short-term investments, we have concluded that there is no material market risk exposure with respect to such investments.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our CEO and CFO concluded that there was no change in our internal controls that occurred during the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting and that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Our management, including the CEO and the CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. We confirm that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and that our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In July and August 2001, various class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against us, our Chairman and CEO, a former officer, and four brokerage firms that served as underwriters in our initial public offering. The actions were filed on behalf of persons who purchased our stock issued pursuant to or traceable to the initial public offering during the period from June 23, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The action alleges that our underwriters charged secret excessive commissions to certain of their customers in return for allocations of our stock in the offering. The two individual defendants are alleged to be liable because of their involvement in preparing and signing the registration statement for the offering, which allegedly failed to disclose the supposedly excessive commissions. On December 7, 2001, an amended complaint was filed in one of the actions to expand the purported class to persons who purchased our stock issued pursuant to or traceable to the follow-on public offering during the period from November 4, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The lawsuit filed against us is one of several hundred lawsuits filed against other companies based on substantially similar claims. On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended complaint was filed to consolidate all of the complaints and claims into one case. The consolidated amended complaint alleges claims that are virtually identical to the amended complaint filed on December 7, 2001 and the original complaints. In October 2002, the claims against our officer and a former officer that were named in the amended complaint were dismissed without prejudice. In July 2002, we, along with other issuer defendants in the case, filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint with prejudice. On February 19, 2003, the court issued a written decision denying the motion to dismiss with respect to CyberSource and the individual defendants. On July 2, 2003, a committee of our Board of Directors approved a proposed partial settlement with the plaintiffs in this matter. The settlement would have provided, among other things, a release of CyberSource and of the individual defendants for the alleged wrongful conduct in the Amended Complaint in exchange for a guarantee from our insurers regarding recovery from the underwriter defendants and other consideration from us regarding our underwriters. The plaintiffs have continued to litigate against the underwriter defendants. The district court directed that the litigation proceed within a number of “focus cases” rather than in all of the 310 cases that have been consolidated. Our case is not one of these focus cases. On October 13, 2004, the district court certified the focus cases as class actions. The underwriter defendants appealed that ruling, and on December 5, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district court’s class certification decision. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing. In light of the Second Circuit opinion, we have informed the district court that this settlement cannot be approved because the defined settlement class, like the litigation class, cannot be certified. We cannot predict whether we will be able to renegotiate a settlement that complies with the Second Circuit’s mandate. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the matter. However, any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by our insurers.

On August 11, 2004, we filed suit in the Northern District of California against Retail Decisions, Inc. (“ReD US”) and Retail Decisions Plc (“ReD UK”) (collectively, “ReD”), Case No. 3:04-CIV-03268, alleging that ReD infringes our U.S. Patent No. 6,029,154 (the “‘154 Patent”). We served ReD US with the complaint on August 12, 2004, and we served ReD UK with the

complaint on August 13, 2004. On September 30, 2004, ReD responded to our complaint. ReD filed a motion to stay the case for 90 days pending a determination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) as to whether it will grant ReD’s request that the PTO re-examine the ‘154 Patent. ReD also filed a motion for a more definite statement by us with respect to our allegation that ReD is willfully infringing the ‘154 Patent. In addition, ReD UK filed a motion to dismiss the action against it on the ground that it is not subject to personal jurisdiction in the Northern District of California. On October 27, 2004, ReD filed a request for re-examination with the PTO, based on prior art ReD discovered that allegedly invalidates the Patent. On October 28, 2004, we filed an opposition to ReD’s motion to stay the case for 90 days and an opposition to ReD’s motion for a more definite statement with respect to willful infringement. Based on ReD UK’s representation that ReD US is the sole entity that develops, operates, and distributes the eBitGuard service, we agreed to dismiss ReD UK while reserving the right to reinstitute action against ReD UK in the event we later discover that ReD UK is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. In return, ReD UK agreed that if we later establish that personal jurisdiction existed, we could re-file against ReD UK in this action without prejudice to our damages claim. We also filed an amended complaint, removing ReD UK as a named defendant and restating the willful infringement claim. On November 16, 2004, the court granted ReD’s motion to stay the proceedings pending the PTO’s decision as to whether it will grant ReD’s request for re-examination. On December 30, 2004, the PTO granted ReD’s request for a re-examination. On January 19, 2005, ReD filed a motion to dismiss the case without prejudice or to extend the stay until completion of the re-examination process. On January 24, 2005, the court extended the stay pending the re-examination process, vacated ReD’s motion to dismiss, and ordered quarterly updates as to the status of the re-examination process. On April 25, 2005, the parties filed a joint status report that was approved by the court. On June 20, 2005, the PTO issued a preliminary office action rejecting all of the claims of the ‘154 Patent based on one of the prior art references cited by ReD. On July 14, 2005, we met with the PTO examiner handling the re-examination to distinguish the prior art from the claims of the ‘154 Patent. On August 9, 2006, the PTO issued a final office action rejecting all of the claims of the ‘154 Patent. On September 7, 2006, we filed a response to the office action requesting certain amendments to the claims. On October 10, 2006, the PTO filed a response rejecting the amendments and extending our deadline to file a notice of appeal. On October 30, 2006, we filed a notice of appeal. On December 22, 2006, we filed the appeal brief. On May 3, 2007, the PTO issued a “Notice of Intent to Issue Reexam Certificate,” reversing its action of August 9, 2006. Accordingly, the patent has been re-validated and we expect to receive a new patent certificate shortly. While there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the lawsuit, we do not presently believe that the lawsuit would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

We are currently party to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any of these claims or any of the above mentioned legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Set forth below, elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in other documents we file with the SEC are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. The occurrence of any of the developments or risks identified below may make the occurrence of one or more of the other risk factors below more likely to occur.

Other than the addition of risk factors related to our acquisition of Authorize.Net, there are no material changes to the Risk Factors described under the title “Factors That May Affect Future Performance” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The fact that some of the risk factors may be the same or similar to our past filings means only that the risks are present in multiple periods.

RISKS RELATED TO THE ACQUISITION OF AUTHORIZE.NET

The Issuance of Shares of CyberSource Common Stock to Authorize.Net Stockholders in the Merger Will Substantially Reduce the Percentage Interests of CyberSource Stockholders

Following the merger, the issuance of additional shares of CyberSource common stock to Authorize.Net stockholders will cause a significant dilution of the interest of current CyberSource common stockholders. We anticipate that completion of the merger will result in the current holders of Authorize.Net’s equity securities owning approximately 46% of the combined company, based on the number of shares of Authorize.Net and CyberSource outstanding on June 30, 2007.

Sales of Substantial Amounts of Our Common Stock in the Open Market by Authorize.Net Stockholders Could Depress CyberSource’s Stock Price

Other than shares held by affiliates of Authorize.Net or us, shares of our common stock that are issued to stockholders of Authorize.Net, including those shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options to purchase our common stock by Authorize.Net option holders, will be freely tradable by the stockholders of Authorize.Net without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act.

As of July 15, 2007, we had approximately 35,438,087 common shares outstanding and approximately 7,859,414 common shares subject to outstanding options and other rights to purchase or acquire its shares. We currently expect that we will issue approximately 32,776,589 shares of our common stock to Authorize.Net stockholders pursuant to the merger based on the total issued and outstanding shares of Authorize.Net common stock as of June 30, 2007. In addition, we will assume outstanding options issued under the Authorize.Net stock option plan to acquire approximately 700,000 shares of our common stock at the closing of the merger.

If the merger with Authorize.Net closes and if Authorize.Net’s stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market following the transaction, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, the market price of our common stock may decrease. These sales might also make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities at a time and price that it otherwise would deem appropriate.

Potential Customer, Merchant and Employee Uncertainty Related to the Merger Could Harm the Combined Company

Our potential customers or those of Authorize.Net may, in response to the merger, determine not to purchase services from us or Authorize.Net. Any such determinations not to purchase by our customers or Authorize.Net’s customers could seriously harm the business of the combined company. Similarly, our employees and Authorize.Net’s employees may experience uncertainty about their future role with the combined company. This may adversely affect the combined company’s ability to attract and retain key management, marketing, sales, customer support and technical personnel, which could harm the combined company. Furthermore, certain Authorize.Net resellers may deem us as a competitor because we offer merchant acquiring services that may overlap with services offered by certain resellers.

We May Fail to Realize All of the Anticipated Benefits of the Merger, Which Could Adversely Affect the Value of Our Common Stock After the Merger

The merger involves the integration of CyberSource and Authorize.Net, two companies that have previously operated independently. We and Authorize.Net entered into the merger agreement with the expectation that, among other things, the merger would create opportunities to achieve cost savings and revenue synergies, to share technological developments and to achieve other synergistic benefits.

The success of the merger will depend, in part, on our ability to achieve the anticipated cost synergies and other strategic benefits from combining the businesses of CyberSource and Authorize.Net. We expect the combined company to benefit from operational synergies resulting from the consolidation of capabilities and elimination of redundancies, as well as greater efficiencies from increased scale and market integration. However, to realize these anticipated benefits, we must successfully combine the businesses of CyberSource and Authorize.Net. If we are not able to achieve these objectives, the anticipated cost synergies and other strategic benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. We may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the transaction in the amounts and times projected for a number of reasons, including that the integration may take longer than anticipated, be more costly than anticipated or have unanticipated adverse results relating to CyberSource’s and Authorize.Net’s existing businesses.

If the Merger is Not Consummated by November 30, 2007, Either we or Authorize.Net May Choose Not to Proceed With the Merger

Either we or Authorize.Net may terminate the merger agreement if the merger has not been completed by November 30, 2007, unless the terminating party failed to comply with any provision of the agreement and thereby caused, or materially contributed to, the failure of the merger to occur by that date.

We and Authorize.Net Will Incur Significant Costs in Connection With the Merger

We and Authorize.Net will incur substantial expenses related to the merger whether or not the merger is completed. We estimate that we will incur direct transaction costs of approximately $4.6 million associated with the merger, approximately $1.6 million of which are not contingent on the completion of the merger. Authorize.Net estimates that it will incur direct transaction costs of approximately $8.4 million. Moreover, in the event that the merger agreement is terminated, we may, under some circumstances, be required to pay Authorize.Net a $17 million termination fee.

In the event the merger is completed, we expect to incur significant additional expenses. We will make cash payments to certain Authorize.Net directors, officers and employees, relating to severance pay in cancellation of their options and other costs, in the aggregate amount of approximately $23.6 million, based on our closing stock price and the number of issued and outstanding shares of Authorize.Net common stock on June 15, 2007. There are a large number of systems that must be integrated, including management information, purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, billing, payroll and benefits, fixed asset and lease administration systems and regulatory compliance. While we have assumed that a certain level of expenses would be incurred, there are a number of factors beyond our control that could affect the total amount or the timing of all of the expected integration expenses including, among others, constraints arising under U.S. federal or state antitrust laws (such as limitations on sharing of

information) that may prevent or hinder us from fully developing integration plans and constraints arising as a result of the regulatory approval process. Moreover, many of the expenses that will be incurred, by their nature, are impracticable to estimate at the present time. These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that we expect to achieve from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings and revenue synergies related to the integration of the businesses following the completion of the merger. These integration expenses likely will result in us taking significant charges against earnings, both cash and non-cash, primarily from the amortization of intangibles following the completion of the merger. The amount and timing of any such charges are uncertain at present. In addition, there is no assurance that the combined company will not incur additional material charges in subsequent quarters to reflect additional costs associated with the merger.

Whether or Not the Merger is Completed, the Announcement and Pendency of the Merger Could Impact or Cause Disruptions in Our Business, Which Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

If the merger is not completed, our ongoing business may be adversely affected and we will be subject to several risks, including:

•

the attention of our management may have been directed toward the completion of the merger and transaction-related considerations and may be diverted from our day-to-day business operations; and

•

customer perception may be negatively impacted, which could affect our ability to compete for, or to win, new and renewal business in the marketplace.

Any Delay in Completing the Merger May Reduce or Eliminate the Benefits Expected

In addition to the required regulatory approvals, the merger is subject to a number of other conditions beyond our control that may prevent, delay or otherwise materially adversely affect its completion. We cannot predict whether and when these other conditions will be satisfied. Further, these conditions could delay the completion of the merger for a significant period of time or prevent it from occurring. The following conditions, in addition to other customary closing conditions, must be satisfied or waived, if permissible, before we and Authorize.Net are obligated to complete the merger:

•

the approval of the merger agreement by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the common stock of Authorize.Net;

•

receipt of all requisite regulatory approvals (which must remain in full force and effect through the completion of the merger) and expiration of all statutory waiting periods in respect thereof without imposition of a condition on such approval that could have a material adverse effect on the combined company;

•

the absence of any statute, rule, regulation, judgment, decree, injunction or other order that prohibits or makes illegal the completion of the merger;

•

effectiveness of the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission containing a joint proxy statement/prospectus to be sent to the CyberSource and Authorize.Net stockholders in connection with their respective stockholder meetings;

•

the shares of our common stock to be received by Authorize.Net stockholders in the merger are listed on the Nasdaq Global Market;

•

subject to specified materiality standards, the representations and warranties made by the other party (or parties) in the merger agreement must be true and correct; and

•

each party must have performed in all material respects all obligations required to be performed by it under the merger agreement at or before the completion of the merger.

Any delay in completing the merger could cause us not to realize some or all of the synergies that we expect to achieve if the merger is successfully completed within its expected timeframe.

If We are Not Successful in Integrating the Authorize.Net Business and Organization, the Anticipated Benefits of the Merger May Not be Realized

Historically, we and Authorize.Net have operated as independent companies and will do so until the completion of the merger. Achieving the anticipated benefits of the merger will depend, in part, on the integration of technology, operations and personnel of CyberSource and Authorize.Net. We cannot assure you that the integration will be successful or that the anticipated benefits of the merger will be fully realized. The challenges involved in this integration include the following:

•

persuading the employees that our and Authorize.Net’s business cultures are compatible and retaining the combined company’s key personnel;

•

maintaining the dedication of management resources to integration activities without diverting attention from the day-to-day business of the combined company;

•

maintaining management’s ability to focus on anticipating, responding to or utilizing changing technologies in the electronic payment industry;

•

maintaining Authorize.Net’s key reseller relationships;

•

demonstrating to customers that the merger will not result in adverse changes to the ability of the combined company to address the needs of customers of the loss of attention or business focus;

•

closing the Marlborough, Massachusetts office of Authorize.Net;

•

integrating the Utah and Washington offices of Authorize.Net into our corporate structure;

•

keeping existing independent sales organization channels intact; and

•

keeping and retaining key Authorize.Net employees after the merger.

It is not certain that we and Authorize.Net can be successfully integrated in a timely manner or at all or that any of the anticipated benefits will be realized. In addition, we cannot assure you that there will not be substantial unanticipated costs associated with the integration process, that integration activities will not result in a decrease in revenues, a decrease in the value of our common stock, or that there will not be other material adverse effects from our integration efforts.

If we are unable to successfully integrate Authorize.Net, or if the benefits of the merger do not meet the expectations of financial or industry analysts, the market price of our common stock may decline.

Loss of Key Personnel Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Business and Results of Operations of the Combined Company

The success of the combined company after the merger will depend in part upon the ability of the combined company to retain key employees of both companies. Competition for qualified personnel can be very intense. In addition, key employees may depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty or difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the combined company. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we or Authorize.Net will be able to retain key employees. Loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on the business and results of operations of the combined company.

The Common Stock of the Combined Company May be Affected by Factors Different From Those Affecting the Price of CyberSource Common Stock or Authorize.Net Common Stock

On completion of the merger, holders of CyberSource common stock and Authorize.Net common stock will be holders of common stock of the combined company. As the current businesses of CyberSource and Authorize.Net are different, the results of operations as well as the price of common stock on completion of the merger may be affected by factors different than those factors affecting CyberSource and Authorize.Net as independent stand-alone entities. The combined company will face additional risks and uncertainties not otherwise facing each independent company in the merger.

The Combined Company Will Face Uncertainties Related to the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Public companies in the United States are required to review their internal controls over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will achieve its stated goal under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Although each of our and Authorize.Net’s management has determined, and each of their respective independent registered public accounting firms have attested, that their respective internal controls were effective as of as of the end of their most recent fiscal years, there can be no assurance that the integration of CyberSource and Authorize.Net, and their respective internal control systems and procedures, will not result in or lead to a future material weakness in the combined company’s internal controls, or that the combined company or its independent registered public accounting firm will not identify a material weakness in the combined company’s internal controls in the future. A material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting would require management and the combined company’s independent public accounting firm to evaluate its internal controls as ineffective. If internal controls over financial reporting are not considered adequate, the combined company may experience a loss of public confidence, which could have an adverse effect on its business and stock price.

Internal Control Deficiencies or Weaknesses That are Not Yet Identified Could Emerge

Over time the combined company may identify and correct deficiencies or weaknesses in its internal controls and, where and when appropriate, report on the identification and correction of these deficiencies or weaknesses. However, the internal control procedures can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that deficiencies or weaknesses are identified. Deficiencies or weaknesses that are not yet identified by us or Authorize.Net could emerge and the identification and correction of these deficiencies or weaknesses could have a material impact on the results of operations for the combined company.

Failure to Manage Future Growth Effectively May Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Combined Company’s Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In the event that the combined company experiences rapid growth in its operations, a significant strain may be placed upon management, administrative, operational and financial infrastructure. Its success will depend in part upon the ability of the executive officers to manage growth effectively. The combined company’s ability to grow also depends upon its ability to successfully hire, train, supervise and manage new employees, obtain financing for its capital needs, expand its systems effectively, allocate its human resources optimally, maintain clear lines of communication between its transactional and management functions and its finance and accounting functions, and manage the pressures on its management and administrative, operational and financial infrastructure. There can be no assurance that the combined company will be able to accurately anticipate and respond to the changing demands it will face as it integrates and continues to expand its operations, and it may not be able to manage growth effectively or to achieve growth at all. Any failure to manage the future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on the combined company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Charges to Earnings Resulting From the Application of the Purchase Method of Accounting Might Adversely Affect the Market Value of Our Common Stock Following the Merger

In accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the merger will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, which will result in charges to earnings that could have an adverse impact on the market value of our common stock following the completion of the merger. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total estimated purchase price will be allocated to Authorize.Net’s net tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets or expense for research and development based on their fair values as of the date of completion of the merger. Any excess of the purchase price over those fair values will be recorded as goodwill. The combined company will incur additional amortization expense based on the identifiable amortizable intangible assets acquired pursuant to the merger agreement and their relative useful lives. Additionally, to the extent the value of goodwill or identifiable intangible assets or other long-lived assets may become impaired, the combined company will be required to incur material charges relating to the impairment. These amortization and potential impairment charges could have a material impact on the combined company’s results of operations.

We currently estimate that we will initially incur approximately $23 million of incremental annual amortization expense after completion of the merger. Changes in earnings per share, including as a result of this incremental expense, could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

The Expected Fluctuations of Our Quarterly Results Could Cause Our Stock Price to Fluctuate or Decline

We expect that our quarterly operating results will fluctuate significantly in the future based upon a number of factors, many of which are not within our control. We base our operating expenses on anticipated market growth and our operating expenses are relatively fixed in the short term. As a result, if our revenues are lower than we expect, our quarterly operating results may not meet the expectations of public market analysts or investors, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our quarterly results may fluctuate in the future as a result of many factors, including the following:

•

changes in the size and number of transactions processed on behalf of customers as a result of seasonality, success of each customer’s business, general economic conditions or regulatory requirements restricting our customers;

•

our ability to attract new customers and to retain our existing customers;

•

customer acceptance of new products and services we may offer, including our global acquiring business and the BidPay.com business that we re-launched, and if such businesses are not operated profitably, the write down of intangible assets related to such businesses;

•

customer acceptance of our pricing model;

•

customer acceptance of our software and our professional services offerings;

•

the success of our sales and marketing programs;

•

an interruption with one or more of our processors, other financial institutions and technology service providers;

•

seasonality of the retail sector;

•

changes in accounting rules and regulations;

•

war or other international conflicts; and

•

weakness in the general U.S. economy and the lack of available capital for our customers and potential future customers.

Other factors that may affect our quarterly results are set forth elsewhere in this section. As a result of these factors, our revenues are not predictable with any significant degree of certainty.

Due to the uncertainty surrounding our revenues and expenses, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our historical operating results should not be relied upon as an indicator of our future performance.

Our Stock Price May Fluctuate Substantially Due to Factors Outside Our Control

The market price for our common stock may be affected by a number of factors outside our control, including the following:

•

the announcement of new products, services or enhancements by our competitors;

•

quarterly variations in our competitors’ results of operations;

•

changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;

•

developments in our industry; and

•

general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors.

These factors and fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The Intense Competition in Our Industry Could Reduce or Eliminate the Demand for Our Products and Services

The market for our products and services is intensely competitive and subject to rapid technological change. We expect competition to intensify in the future. We face competition from merchant acquirers, independent sales organizations, and payment processors such as Chase Paymentech Solutions, First Data Corporation, iPayment Inc., and Royal Bank of Scotland. We also face competition from transaction service providers such as Authorize.Net (with whom we have entered into an agreement to acquire), PayPal, and Retail Decisions as well as e-commerce providers such as Bertelsmann Financial Services, Digital River, and GSI Commerce Inc. Further, other companies, including financial services and credit companies may enter the market and provide competing services.

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, substantially greater financial, technical, marketing or other resources, or greater name recognition than we do. Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. Competition could seriously impede our ability to sell additional products and services on terms favorable to us. Our current and potential competitors may develop and market new technologies that render our existing or future products and services obsolete, unmarketable or less competitive. Our current and potential competitors may make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with other solution providers, thereby increasing their ability to address the needs of our existing or prospective customers. Our current and potential competitors may establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with our current or future channel partners, thereby limiting our ability to sell products and services through these channels. We expect that competitive pressures may result in the reduction of our prices or our market share or both, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We May Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Our Business Could be Materially and Adversely Affected if We Fail to Adequately Integrate Acquired Businesses

As part of our future business strategy, we may pursue strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses or technologies that would provide additional product or service offerings, additional industry expertise, a broader client base or an expanded geographic presence. For example, during the first quarter of 2006, we acquired BidPay.com with the view of participating in the payment market for online auctions, an area in which we do not have any experience. In addition, on June 17, 2007, we entered into an agreement to acquire Authorize.Net. If we do not successfully integrate a strategic acquisition, or if the benefits of the transaction do not meet the expectations of financial or industry analysts, the market price of our common stock may decline.

Any future acquisition could result in the use of significant amounts of cash, dilutive issuances of equity securities, or the incurrence of debt or amortization expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:

•

difficulties in assimilating the operations, technologies, products and personnel of an acquired company;

•

risks of entering markets in which we have either no or limited prior experiences, such as the payment market for online auctions;

•

the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; and

•

the potential loss of key employees of an acquired company.

Potential System Failures and Lack of Capacity Issues Could Negatively Affect Demand for Our Services

Our ability to deliver services to our merchants depends on the uninterrupted operation of our commerce transaction processing systems. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

•

“denial of service” attacks;

•

computer viruses;

•

war, earthquake, fire, flood and other manmade or natural disasters; and

•

power loss, telecommunications or data network failure, operator negligence, improper operation by employees, physical and electronic break-ins and similar events.

Despite the fact that we have implemented redundant servers in third-party hosting centers located in San Jose, California, and Denver, Colorado, we may still experience service interruptions for the reasons listed above and a variety of other reasons. If our redundant servers are not available, we may not have sufficient business interruption insurance to compensate us for resulting losses. We have experienced periodic interruptions, affecting all or a portion of our systems, which we believe will continue to occur from time to time. For example, on November 12, 1999, our services were unavailable for approximately ten hours due to an internal system problem. We have also subsequently experienced service interruptions and performance issues. Any interruption in our systems that impairs our ability to efficiently and timely provide services could damage our reputation and reduce demand for our services.

Our success also depends on our ability to grow, or scale, our commerce transaction systems to accommodate increases in the volume of traffic on our systems, especially during peak periods of demand. We may not be able to anticipate increases in the use of our systems or successfully expand the capacity of our network infrastructure. Our inability to expand our systems to handle increased traffic could result in system disruptions, slower response times and other difficulties in providing services to our merchant customers, which could materially harm our business.

A Breach of Our eCommerce Security Measures Could Reduce Demand for Our Services

A requirement of the continued growth of e-Commerce is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. We rely on public key cryptography, an encryption method that utilizes two keys, a public and a private key, for encoding and decoding data, and digital certificate technology, or identity verification, to provide the security and authentication necessary for secure transmission of confidential information. Regulatory and export restrictions may prohibit us from using the most secure cryptographic protection available and thereby expose us to an increased risk of data interception. A party who is able to circumvent security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or interrupt our operations. Any compromise or elimination of security could reduce demand for our services.

We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against security breaches and to address any problems they may cause. Concerns over the security of the Internet and other online transactions and the privacy of users may also inhibit the growth of the Internet and other online services generally, and the Web in particular, especially as a means of conducting commercial transactions. Because our activities involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information, such as credit card numbers, security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. Our security measures may not prevent security breaches, and failure to prevent security breaches may disrupt our operations.

BidPay.com May Incur Losses Resulting From User Fraud or Disputes Between Users of Our Service and There Can Be No Assurance That We Will Be Successful in This Business

BidPay.com has incurred losses, and is subject to future significant risk of losses resulting from fraud and disputes between users of our service including:

•

the initiation of a chargeback for both legitimate reasons and in cases of consumer fraud;

•

non-delivery of goods or services due to merchant fraud or disputes regarding the quality of goods or services provided;

•

identify theft or the unauthorized use of a credit card resulting from consumer or merchant fraud; and

•

potential breaches of system security.

Failure to identify fraudulent transactions or resolve disputes between users would increase BidPay.com’s losses. We have established systems and procedures designed to detect and reduce the impact of consumer and merchant fraud, but we cannot assure that these measures are or will be effective. During the second quarter of 2007, BidPay.com revenue was approximately $130,000 and generated losses. If BidPay.com’s revenue increases, our potential liability for such chargebacks also would increase.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in this business. As of June 30, 2007, we had recorded intangible assets related to our acquisition of BidPay.com in March 2006, with a carrying value of approximately $2.8 million. If we are not successful, we will incur substantial charges as a result of exiting this business.

We Could Incur Chargeback or Merchant Fraud Losses

We have established systems and procedures designed to detect and reduce the impact of consumer fraud and merchant fraud, but we cannot assure you that these measures are or will be effective. To date, we have not incurred any significant losses relating to charged back transactions. During the second quarter of 2007, our global acquiring revenue represented approximately 42.8% of our transaction and support revenue. Our global acquiring revenue may also include fees generated for gateway services as it is becoming more common to charge the customer a bundled price for transaction services provided. To the extent our global acquiring revenue grows, our potential liability for such chargebacks or merchant fraud increases.

If We Are Not Able to Fully Utilize Relationships With Our Sales Alliances, We May Experience Lower Revenue Growth and Higher Operating Costs

Our future growth will depend in part on the success of our relationships with existing and future sales alliances that market our products and services to their merchant accounts. If these relationships are not successful or do not develop as quickly as we anticipate, our revenue growth may be adversely affected. Accordingly, we may have to increase our sales and marketing expenses in an attempt to secure additional merchant accounts.

Our Market is Subject to Rapid Technological Change and to Compete We Must Continually Enhance Our Systems to Comply with Evolving Standards

To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of our products and services and the underlying network infrastructure. The Internet and the e-Commerce industries are characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user requirements and preferences, frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies, and the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render our technology and systems obsolete. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to both internally develop and license leading technologies to enhance our existing products and services and develop new products and services. We must continue to address the increasingly

sophisticated and varied needs of our merchants, and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis. The development of proprietary technology involves significant technical and business risks. We may fail to develop new technologies effectively or to adapt our proprietary technology and systems to merchant requirements or emerging industry standards. If we are unable to adapt to changing market conditions, merchant requirements or emerging industry standards, our business would be materially harmed.

The Demand for Our Products and Services Could Be Negatively Affected by a Reduced Growth of e-Commerce or Delays in the Development of the Internet Infrastructure

Sales of goods and services over the Internet do not currently represent a significant portion of overall sales of goods and services. We depend on the growing use and acceptance of the Internet as an effective medium of commerce by merchants and customers in the United States and internationally. The sale of goods and services over the Internet has gained acceptance more slowly outside of the United States. We cannot be certain that acceptance and use of the Internet will continue to develop or that a sufficiently broad base of merchants and consumers will adopt, and continue to use, the Internet as a medium of commerce.

The increase in the significance of the Internet as a commercial marketplace may occur more slowly than anticipated for a number of reasons, including potentially inadequate development of the necessary network infrastructure or delayed development of enabling technologies and performance improvements. If the number of Internet users, or the use of Internet resources by existing users, continues to grow, it may overwhelm the existing Internet infrastructure. Delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols required to handle increased levels of Internet activity could also have a detrimental effect. These factors could result in slower response times or adversely affect usage of the Internet, resulting in lower numbers of commerce transactions and lower demand for our products and services.

Our International Business Exposes Us to Additional Foreign Risks

Products and services provided to merchants outside the United States accounted for 9.7% and 10.5% of our revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In March 2000, we entered into a joint venture agreement with Japanese partners Marubeni Corporation and Trans-Cosmos, Inc. and established CyberSource K.K. to provide commerce transaction services to the Japanese market. Conducting business outside of the United States is subject to additional risks that may affect our ability to sell our products and services and result in reduced revenues, including:

•

changes in regulatory requirements;

•

reduced protection of intellectual property rights;

•

evolving privacy laws in Europe;

•

the burden of complying with a variety of foreign laws; and

•

war, political or economic instability or constraints on international trade.

In addition, some software contains encryption technology that renders it subject to export restrictions and we may become liable to the extent we violate these restrictions. We might not successfully market, sell or distribute our products and services in local markets and we cannot be certain that one or more of these factors will not materially adversely affect our future international operations, and consequently, our business, financial condition and operating results.

Also, sales of our products and services conducted through our subsidiary in the United Kingdom are primarily denominated in pounds sterling. We may experience fluctuations in revenues or operating expenses due to fluctuations in the value of the pounds sterling relative to the U.S. Dollar. We do not currently enter into transactions with the specific purpose to hedge against currency exchange fluctuations.

Changes in Accounting Standards Regarding Stock Option Plans Will Reduce Our Profitability and Could Limit the Desirability of Granting Stock Options, Which Could Harm Our Ability to Attract and Retain Employees

We have included employee stock-based compensation costs in our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, as discussed in Note 1 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The full impact is dependent upon, among other things, the outcome of our current assessment of different long-term incentive strategies involving stock awards in order to continue to attract and retain employees, the total number of stock awards granted and the tax benefit that we may or may not receive from stock-based expenses. In addition, new regulations implemented by The Nasdaq Stock Market requiring stockholder approval for all stock option plans could make it more difficult for us to grant options to employees in the future. To the extent that new regulations make it more difficult or expensive to grant stock options to employees, we may incur increased compensation costs, change our equity compensation strategy or find it difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business.

If We Lose Key Personnel, We May Not be Able to Successfully Manage Our Business and Achieve Our Objectives

We believe our future success will depend upon our ability to retain our key management personnel, including William S. McKiernan, our Chief Executive Officer, and other key members of management because of their experience and knowledge regarding the development, special opportunities and challenges of our business. None of our current key employees are subject to an employment contract which enables us to retain them for a specific period of time. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining key employees in the future.

We May Not Be Able to Adequately Protect Our Proprietary Technology and May Be Infringing Upon Third-Party Intellectual Property Rights

Our success depends upon our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret rights, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary rights.

As part of our confidentiality procedures, we enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees, contractors, vendors and potential customers and alliances. Despite these precautions, third parties could copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology without authorization, or develop similar technology independently. Effective protection of intellectual property rights may be unavailable or limited in foreign countries. We cannot assure you that the protection of our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products and services or design around any patents or other intellectual property rights we hold.

We also cannot assure you that third parties will not claim that the technology employed in providing our current or future products and services infringe upon their rights. We have not conducted any search to determine whether any of our products and services or technologies may be infringing upon patent rights of third parties. As the number of products and services in our market increases and functionalities increasingly overlap, companies such as ours may become increasingly subject to infringement claims. In addition, these claims also might require us to enter into royalty or license agreements. Any infringement claims, with or without merit, could absorb significant management time and lead to costly litigation. If required to do so, we may not be able to obtain royalty or license agreements, or obtain them on terms acceptable to us.

We May Become Subject to Government Regulation and Legal Uncertainties That Would Adversely Affect Our Financial Results

We are not currently subject to direct regulation by any domestic or foreign governmental agency, other than regulations applicable to businesses generally, export control laws and laws or regulations directly applicable to e-Commerce. However, due to the increasing usage of the Internet, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may be applicable or may be adopted in the future with respect to conducting business over the Internet covering issues such as:

•

taxes;

•

user privacy;

•

pricing;

•

content;

•

right to access personal data;

•

copyrights;

•

distribution; and

•

characteristics and quality of products and services.

For example, we believe that our fraud screen service may require us to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “Act”). As a precaution, we have implemented processes that we believe will enable us to comply with the Act if we were deemed a consumer reporting agency. Complying with the Act requires us to provide information about personal data stored by us. Failure to comply with the Act could result in claims being made against us by individual consumers and the Federal Trade Commission.

Furthermore, the growth and development of the market for e-Commerce may prompt more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on those companies conducting business online. The adoption of additional laws or regulations may decrease the growth of the Internet or other online services, which could, in turn, decrease the demand for our products and services and increase our cost of doing business.

The applicability of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights, encryption and other intellectual property issues, taxation, libel, export or import matters and personal privacy to the Internet is uncertain. The vast majority of laws were adopted prior to the broad commercial use of the Internet and related technologies. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes to these laws intended to address these issues, including some recently proposed changes in the United States regarding taxation and encryption and in the European Union regarding contract formation and privacy, could create uncertainty in the Internet marketplace and impose additional costs and other burdens. These uncertainties, costs and burdens could reduce demand for our products and services or increase the cost of doing business due to increased litigation costs or increased service delivery costs.

The Anti-Takeover Provisions in Our Certificate of Incorporation Could Adversely Affect the Rights of the Holders of Our Common Stock

Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and our Certificate of Incorporation may make a change in control more difficult to finalize, even if a change in control would be beneficial to the stockholders. These provisions may allow our Board of Directors to prevent changes in our management and controlling interests. Under Delaware law, our Board of Directors may adopt additional anti-takeover measures in the future.

One anti-takeover provision that we have is the ability of our Board of Directors to determine the terms of preferred stock and issue preferred stock without the approval of the holders of the common stock. Our Certificate of Incorporation allows the issuance of up to 5,610,969 shares of preferred stock. As of June 30, 2007, there are no shares of preferred stock outstanding. However, because the rights and preferences of any series of preferred stock may be set by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion without approval of the holders of the common stock, the rights and preferences of this preferred stock may be superior to those of the common stock. Accordingly, the rights of the holders of common stock may be adversely affected.

Our Fraud Detection Services and Marketing Agreement With Visa U.S.A. Can Be Terminated

In July 2001, we entered into an agreement with Visa U.S.A. to jointly develop and promote the CyberSource Advanced Fraud Screen Service Enhanced by Visa for use in the United States. Under the terms of the agreement, Visa agreed to promote and market the new product to its member financial institutions and Internet merchants. The agreement expires in July 2008, but can be terminated by either party with ninety days prior written notice. Thereafter, the agreement renews automatically for additional periods of one year, unless terminated by either party.

Failure to Maintain Effective Internal Controls in Accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business and Stock Price

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm addressing these assessments. The threshold for what constitutes a significant deficiency in internal control under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been set quite low and, during the course of our annual testing, we may find one or more material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that we will be able to remedy any deficiencies we may find in a cost effective manner and in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. In addition, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Failure to maintain an effective internal control environment could have a material adverse effect on our business and our stock price.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On January 24, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized management to use up to $10.0 million over a twelve-month period beginning on January 30, 2007 to repurchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock. During the period from April 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007, we repurchased 30,400 shares at an average price of $11.93 per share, including repurchase costs. All of the repurchased shares were cancelled and returned to the status of authorized, unissued shares.


Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares Yet to Be Purchased Under the Program at the End of the Period (000’s)
April 1, 2007 to April 30, 2007	—		—	—		—
May 1, 2007 to May 31, 2007	—		—	—		—
June 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007	30,400	$	11.93	30,400	$	9,637

Total	30,400	$	11.93	30,400	$	9,637

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS

Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on May 17, 2007. The stockholders voted on proposals to:

Elect six Directors of the Company to serve until the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders.

Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP as the independent auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2007.

The proposals were approved by the following votes:

Election of Directors


Nominee	For	Withheld
William S. McKiernan	30,163,920	3,517,843
John J. McDonnell, Jr.	33,035,298	646,465
Steven P. Novak	33,038,363	643,400
Richard Scudellari	26,690,056	6,991,707
Kenneth R. Thornton	33,038,363	643,400
Scott R. Cruickshank*	30,160,810	3,520,953

*	In conjunction with the execution of the merger agreement with Authorize.Net, Scott Cruickshank, President and Chief Operating Officer of CyberSource, resigned from his position as a member of the board of directors of CyberSource, effective on June 17, 2007.

Ratify appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP


For	Against	Abstain
33,270,538	361,690	49,535

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

In accordance with Section 10A(i)(2) of the Exchange Act and Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are responsible for disclosing the non-audit services approved in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 by the Audit Committee (“Audit Committee”) of the Board of Directors to be performed by Ernst & Young, our independent auditors. Non-audit services are defined in the law as services other than those provided in connection with an audit or a review of our financial statements. The non-audit services approved by the Audit Committee in the second quarter are each considered by us to be audit-related services which are closely related to the financial audit process. Each of the services has been pre-approved by the Audit Committee and its chairman has been given the authority to pre-approve additional services pursuant to limited authority delegated by the Audit Committee.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

(a)

Exhibits


Exhibit Number		Description
3.1*(1)		Certificate of Incorporation of CyberSource Corporation, as amended.

3.2*(1)		CyberSource Corporation’s Bylaws, as amended.

3.3(2)		Amendment to the Bylaws.

3.4(3)		Amendment to the Bylaws.

3.5(4)		Amendment to the Bylaws.

3.6(5)		Amendment to the Bylaws.

31.1		Certification of William S. McKiernan, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant dated August 8, 2007, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Steven D. Pellizzer, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant dated August 8, 2007, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of William S. McKiernan, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant dated August 8, 2007, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Steven D. Pellizzer, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant dated August 8, 2007, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*(1)	Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-77545).

(2)	Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Registration No. 333-77545) filed on June 17, 1999.

(3)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 99.2 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2005.

(4)	Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2006.

(5)	Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2006.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION
	(Registrant)

Date: August 8, 2007	By	/s/ Steven D. Pellizzer
		Steven D. Pellizzer
		Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
		(Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigious
Readability	H.S. sophomore Good

Cybersource (CYBS) Inactive 10-Q2007 Q2 Quarterly report

Content analysis

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents