Anadigics (ANAD) 10-Q 2011 Q3 Quarterly report

    UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

/x/QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 2, 2011.
Or
/ /TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ____________.
Commission File No. 0-25662
ANADIGICS, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware	22-2582106
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
141 Mt. Bethel Road, Warren, New Jersey	07059
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
(908) 668-5000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes [ ]  No [X]

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock as of July 2, 2011 was 67,813,862 (excluding 114,574 shares held in treasury).

INDEX

ANADIGICS, Inc.

PART I	Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Condensed consolidated balance sheets – July 2, 2011 and December 31, 2010
	Condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income – Three and six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010
	Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows – Six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010
	Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements – July 2, 2011
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
PART II.	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
Item 5.	Other Information
Item 6.	Exhibits
	Signatures

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ANADIGICS, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

	July 2, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(Unaudited)			(Note 1)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	77,422		$	97,129
Short-term marketable securities		11,174			-
Accounts receivable, net		16,905			35,299
Inventories		21,265			20,734
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		4,896			3,319
Total current assets		131,662			156,481
Marketable securities		14,848			8,964
Plant and equipment:
Equipment and furniture		208,227			205,493
Leasehold improvements		46,483			46,482
Projects in process		2,211			3,693
		256,921			255,668
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(196,569	)		(187,549	)
		60,352			68,119
Other assets		240			248
Total assets	$	207,102		$	233,812
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	11,098		$	17,968
Accrued liabilities		6,956			10,191
Accrued restructuring costs		186			-
Total current liabilities		18,240			28,159
Other long-term liabilities		2,557			2,689
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 144,000 shares authorized, 67,928 issued at July 2, 2011 and 66,916 issued at December 31, 2010		679			669
Additional paid-in capital		595,875			589,562
Accumulated deficit		(413,518	)		(389,790	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,528			2,782
Treasury stock at cost: 115 shares		(259	)		(259	)
Total stockholders’ equity		186,305			202,964
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	207,102		$	233,812

See accompanying notes.

ANADIGICS, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Net sales	$	35,583		$	51,666		$	79,046		$	95,197
Cost of sales		29,044			33,853			60,347			63,900
Gross profit		6,539			17,813			18,699			31,297
Research and development expenses		11,340			12,214			24,913			23,995
Selling and administrative expenses		7,329			6,892			16,765			13,884
Restructuring and impairment (recovery) charges		1,047			(1,717	)		1,047			(1,717	)
Operating (loss) income		(13,177	)		424			(24,026	)		(4,865	)
Interest income		131			93			272			186
Interest expense		(8	)		(43	)		(25	)		(95	)
Other income, net		-			317			51			377
Net (loss) income	$	(13,054	)	$	791		$	(23,728	)	$	(4,397	)
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.19	)	$	0.01		$	(0.35	)	$	(0.07	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.19	)	$	0.01		$	(0.35	)	$	(0.07	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing (loss) earnings per share
Basic		67,616			64,902			67,327			64,553
Diluted		67,616			67,106			67,327			64,553

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Net (loss) income	$	(13,054	)	$	791		$	(23,728	)	$	(4,397	)
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities		291			(101	)		845			301
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(8	)		(31	)		7			(54	)
Reclassification adjustment:
Net recognized gain on marketable securities previously included in other comprehensive income		(46	)		(169	)		(106	)		(169	)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(12,817	)	$	490		$	(22,982	)	$	(4,319	)

See accompanying notes.

ANADIGICS, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

	Six months ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(23,728	)	$	(4,397	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		9,469			9,267
Stock based compensation		6,066			4,861
Marketable securities recovery, accretion and other		(116	)		(341	)
Recovery on sale of China building		-			(1,717	)
(Gain) loss on disposal of equipment		(16	)		30
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		18,394			(9,701	)
Inventories		(531	)		(1,558	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(1,569	)		(1,164	)
Accounts payable		(5,895	)		4,001
Accrued liabilities and other liabilities		(3,192	)		34
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,118	)		(685	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of plant and equipment		(2,643	)		(2,642	)
Proceeds from sale of building and equipment		-			1,757
Purchases of marketable securities		(16,303	)		-
Proceeds from sales and redemptions of marketable securities		100			1,075
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(18,846	)		190
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common stock		257			368
Net cash provided by financing activities		257			368
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(19,707	)		(127	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		97,129			83,172
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	77,422		$	83,045

See accompanying notes.

ANADIGICS, Inc.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) – JULY 2, 2011

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the three and six month period ended July 2, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

 The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 The Company has evaluated subsequent events and determined that there were no subsequent events to recognize or disclose in these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 Changes to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of Accounting Standards Updates (ASU’s) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).

 There were no recently issued ASU’s requiring adoption by the Company as of July 2, 2011 or that are expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

INCOME TAXES

 The Company maintains a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets.  Accordingly, the Company has not recorded a benefit or provision for income taxes. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to the underpayment of income taxes in income tax expense. No unrecognized tax benefits, interest or penalties were accrued at July 2, 2011. The Company’s U.S. federal net operating losses have occurred since 1998 and as such, tax years subject to potential tax examination could apply from that date because carrying-back net operating loss opens the relevant year to audit.

WARRANTY

 Based on the examination of historical returns and other information it deems critical, the Company estimates that a current charge to income will need to be provided in order to cover future warranty obligations for products sold during the year. The accrued liability for warranty costs is included in Accrued liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.Changes in the Company’s product warranty reserve are as follows:

	Six months ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Beginning balance		571			994
Additions charged to costs and expenses		451			501
Claims processed		(660	)		(686	)
Ending balance		362			809

2. RESTRUCTURING, MANAGEMENT SEPARATION CHARGES AND IMPAIRMENT RECOVERY

RESTRUCTURING

 In May 2011, the Company implemented a workforce reduction that eliminated approximately 40 positions, resulting in a Restructuring charge of $1,047 for severance and related benefits during the second quarter of 2011. The unpaid balance at July 2, 2011 was $186 and was recorded within Accrued restructuring costs.

MANAGEMENT SEPARATION CHARGES

 During the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded certain management separation charges of $838 and $2,111, inclusive of accelerated stock-based compensation of $568 and $116, within Research and development and Selling and administrative expenses, respectively. The management separation charges arose from the resignations of our former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and another Executive Officer, and included contractual separation pay, accelerated vesting of certain equity awards, and certain other costs. The unpaid balance at July 2, 2011 was $189 and was recorded within Accrued liabilities.

IMPAIRMENT RECOVERY

 During the second quarter of 2010, the Company sold its wafer fabrication building in Kunshan, China for net proceeds of $1,717, resulting in the partial recovery of a related impairment charge. During 2008, the Company had written-off the value of its unfinished wafer fabrication building following an evaluation of alternatives in light of the then current circumstances, including: surplus industry production capacity, reduced demand experienced by the Company as well as the broader macroeconomic environment. As a result of its analysis of projected discounted cashflows, the Company recorded a $12,957 impairment charge in 2008 related to the China wafer fabrication facility.

3. (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE

 The reconciliation of shares used to calculate basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share consists of the following:

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	July 2, 2011		July 3, 2010		July 2, 2011		July 3, 2010
Weighted average common shares for basic (loss) earnings per share		67,616		64,902		67,327		64,553
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options (*)		-		1,689		-		-
Unvested restricted shares (*)		-		515		-		-
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted (loss) earnings per share		67,616		67,106		67,327		64,553

* Incremental shares from restricted shares and stock options are computed using the treasury stock method.

 For the three and six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, potential additional dilution arising from any of the Company's outstanding stock options or unvested restricted stock (shares or units) are detailed below. Such potential dilution was excluded as their effect was anti-dilutive.

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	July 2, 2011		July 3, 2010		July 2, 2011		July 3, 2010
Stock options		4,959		1,764		4,959		4,933
Unvested restricted shares and units		2,604		365		2,604		2,060

4. FAIR VALUE AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). Inputs used to measure fair value are classified in the following hierarchy:

Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
Level 3	Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability

 The Company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table presents a summary of fair value information for available-for-sale securities as at December 31, 2010 and July 2, 2011:

					Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Security Type	Amortized Cost Basis (1)		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Former-auction corporate debt security (2)	$	1,624	$	2,960	$	2,960	$	-	$	-
Auction Rate Securities
Corporate Debt (2)		726		1,199		-		-		1,199
Preferred Equity		2,404		3,110		-		-		3,110
State and Municipal Debt (2)		1,419		1,695		-		-		1,695
Total at December 31, 2010	$	6,173	$	8,964	$	2,960	$	-	$	6,004
Fixed Income Securities (3)	$	14,297	$	14,284	$	14,284	$	-	$	-
U.S. Government Agency debt securities (3)		2,000		1,997		1,997		-		-
Former-auction corporate debt security (2)		1,653		3,128		3,128		-		-
Auction Rate Securities
Corporate Debt (2)		744		1,488		-		-		1,488
Preferred Equity		2,404		3,423		-		2,565		858
State and Municipal Debt (2)		1,394		1,702		-		1,702		-
Total at July 2, 2011	$	22,492	$	26,022	$	19,409	$	4,267	$	2,346

(1)   Difference between amortized cost basis and fair value represents gross unrealized gain or loss.

(2)   Available for sale debt securities with contractual maturities in excess of 10 years.

(3)   Available for sale debt securities with contractual maturities of 2 years or less.

 The fair value of each of the following instruments approximates their carrying value because of the short maturity of these instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

AUCTION RATE SECURITIES AND FORMER-AUCTION CORPORATE DEBT SECURITY

 Auction rate securities (ARS) are generally long-term financial instruments that provided liquidity through a Dutch auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined calendar intervals, generally every 28 days. The mechanism generally allowed existing investors to rollover their holdings while continuing to own their respective securities or liquidating their holdings by selling their securities at par value. The Company generally invested in these securities for short periods of time as part of its cash management program. During the second half of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008, auction rate corporate, state and municipal debt, and preferred securities failed to auction due to sell orders exceeding buy orders and trading continues to be constrained. The funds associated with the failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs, a suitable buyer is found outside of the auction process or an issuer redeems its security.

 At July 2, 2011, ARS market information in certain cases was insufficient to determine the fair value of the Company’s investments in ARS. Given the complexity of ARS investments, the Company obtained the assistance of an independent valuation firm to assist management in assessing the fair value of its ARS portfolio. The third party valuations developed to estimate the ARS fair value were determined using a combination of two calculations (1) a discounted cash flow model, where the expected cash flows of the ARS are discounted to the present using a yield that incorporates compensation for illiquidity, and (2) a market comparables method, where the ARS are valued based on indications, from the secondary market, of what discounts buyers demand when purchasing similar ARS. The valuations include numerous assumptions such as assessments of the underlying structure of each security, expected cash flows, discount rates, credit ratings, workout periods, and overall capital market liquidity.

 During 2008, a corporate debt ARS position with a face value of $4,000 was exchanged for the underlying 30 year notes due 2037 (former-auction corporate debt security). At July 2, 2011, the Company values this security on a Level 1 basis, with a fair value of $3,128. Interest income of $46 and $92 was recognized to accrete the amortized cost basis of the Company’s existing and former-auction debt securities during the three and six month periods ended July 2, 2011, respectively. In 2010, interest accretion of $392 was recorded in the fourth quarter.

 The Company considers it more likely than not that it will sell its existing and former-auction debt securities prior to a recovery in valuation.

 For the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, the table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for each type of security valued using a Level 3 valuation.

($ in 000’s)	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Six months ended July 2, 2011
	State & Municipal Security (a)			Corporate Debt Security (b)			Preferred Equity Securities (c)			Total
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	1,695		$	1,199		$	3,110		$	6,004
Total gains or losses realized/unrealized
Included in earnings (loss)
- quarter ended April 2, 2011		53			9			-			62
- quarter ended July 2, 2011		22			9			-			31
Included in other comprehensive income(loss)
- quarter ended April 2, 2011		(22	)		84			97			159
- quarter ended July 2, 2011		54			187			216			457
Purchases, redemptions, and settlements:
Purchases		-			-			-			-
Redemptions
- quarter ended April 2, 2011		(100	)		-			-			(100	)
- quarter ended July 2, 2011		-			-			-			-
Settlements		-			-			-			-
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (d)
- quarter ended April 2, 2011		-			-			-			-
- quarter ended July 2, 2011		(1,702	)		-			(2,565	)		(4,267	)
Balance at July 2, 2011	$	-		$	1,488		$	858		$	2,346
Amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings(loss) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date
- as of April 2, 2011		23			9			-			32
- as of July 2, 2011		-			9			-			9
Level 3 securities held at July 2, 2011:
Face value		-		$	2,500		$	3,125		$	5,625
Financial ratings		-			A		A2 & NR
Weighted average interest rate (*)		-			2.0	%		1.9	%		2.0	%
Maturity date		-			2036			N/A

* Interest rates are reset every one to three months based on a premium to AA Commercial Paper, LIBOR or Treasury Bill rates.

(a) Security represents an interest in pooled student loans that are guaranteed by the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

(b) Security issued by a publicly-held insurance company trust, which holds investments in  U.S. Government obligations, highly rated commercial paper and money market funds and other investments approved by two credit rating agencies. The trust is funded by life insurance residuals. If the residuals are insufficient, the security becomes an obligation of the publicly-held insurance company.

(c) Preferred securities issued by i) diversified closed-end management investment company and ii) subsidiaries of two publicly-held debt default insurers.  The investment company is governed by the Investment Company Act of 1940 with regard to operating standards, antifraud rules, diversification requirements and an asset coverage requirement for asset backing of 200% of the par value of the preferred stock issued.  One of the debt default insurers no longer pays interest and the security has been written to zero.

(d) After having assessed external valuations and observing sustained trading in similar securities through July 2, 2011, the Company transferred its state and municipal debt security and closed-end preferred security from Level 3 to Level 2.

 For the three and six month period ended July 3, 2010, the table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for each type of security valued using a Level 3 valuation.

($ in 000’s)	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Six months ended July 3, 2010
	State & Municipal Security (a)			Corporate Debt Security (b)			Preferred Equity Securities (c)			Total
Balance at January 1, 2010	$	1,805		$	1,106		$	3,703		$	6,614
Total gains or losses realized/unrealized
Included in earnings (loss)
- quarter ended April 3, 2010		38			-			-			38
- quarter ended July 3, 2010		38			-			265			303
Included in other comprehensive income(loss)
- quarter ended April 3, 2010		37			23			42			102
- quarter ended July 3, 2010		23			(11	)		(122	)		(110	)
Purchases, redemptions, and settlements:
Purchases		-			-			-			-
Redemptions
- quarter ended April 3, 2010		(100	)		-			-			(100	)
- quarter ended July 3, 2010		(100	)		-			(875	)		(975	)
Settlements		-			-			-			-
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-			-			-			-
Balance at July 3, 2010	$	1,741		$	1,118		$	3,013		$	5,872

5. INVENTORIES

 Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.  Inventories consist of the following:

	July 2, 2011		December 31, 2010
Raw materials	$	4,589	$	3,615
Work in process		7,442		10,792
Finished goods		9,234		6,327
Total	$	21,265	$	20,734

6. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

Equity Compensation Plans

The Company had 4 equity compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance to employees and/or directors:

The 1995 Long-Term Incentive and Share Award Plan for Officers and Directors (terminated February 28, 2005)  (1995 Plan);

The 1997 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan (1997 Plan);

The 2005 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan (2005 Plan, collectively with the 1995 Plan and the 1997 Plan, the Plans); and

The Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESP Plan).

 Employees and outside directors have been granted restricted stock shares or units (collectively, restricted stock) and options to purchase shares of common stock under stock option plans adopted in 1995, 1997 and 2005. An aggregate of 4,913, 5,100 and 16,050 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 1995 Plan, the 1997 Plan and the 2005 Plan, respectively. The Plans provide for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other share based awards to eligible employees and directors, as defined in the Plans. Option grants have terms of ten years and become exercisable in varying amounts over periods of up to three years. To date, no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the Plans. On February 1, 2009, a CEO inducement award of 700 stock options was granted outside of the Plans and the unvested portion of that award contractually vested upon separation on March 28, 2011.

 In 1995, the Company adopted the ESP Plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. All full-time employees of ANADIGICS, Inc. and part-time employees, as defined in the ESP Plan, are eligible to participate in the ESP Plan. An aggregate of 6,694 shares of common stock were reserved for offering under the ESP Plan. Offerings are made at the commencement of each calendar year and must be purchased by the end of that calendar year. Pursuant to the terms of the ESP Plan, shares purchased and the applicable per share price were 488 and $3.83, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 The table below summarizes stock based compensation by source and by financial statement line item for the three and six month periods:

	Three months ended					Six months ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010		July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Amortization of restricted stock	$	2,198		$	1,810	$	4,886		$	3,661
Amortization of ESP Plan		200			200		400			400
Amortization of stock option awards		178			294		780			800
Total stock based compensation	$	2,576		$	2,304	$	6,066		$	4,861
By Financial Statement line item
Cost of sales	$	593		$	589	$	1,203		$	1,162
Research and development expenses		727			832		2,273			1,683
Selling and administrative expenses		1,336			883		2,670			2,016
Restructuring charge		(80	)		-		(80	)		-

 No tax benefits have been recorded due to the Company’s full valuation allowance position.

 Stock based compensation for the six months ended July 2, 2011 includes $684 for equity awards associated with the management separation charge recorded during the first quarter of 2011.

Restricted Stock and Stock Option Awards

 Commencing in August 2004, the Company began granting restricted stock shares. The value of restricted stock grants are fixed upon the date of grant and amortized over the related vesting period of six months to three years.  Restricted stock is subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to vesting.  The Company estimates that approximately 2.5% of its restricted stock and stock option awards are forfeited annually (exclusive of LTI’s, as described below).  The restricted stock shares carry voting and certain forfeitable dividend rights commencing upon grant, whereas restricted stock units do not. Neither restricted stock shares nor restricted stock units may be traded or transferred prior to vesting.  Grant, vest and forfeit activity and related weighted average (WA) price per share for restricted stock and for stock options during the period from January 1, 2010 to July 2, 2011 is presented in tabular form below:

	Restricted Stock Shares					Restricted Stock Units					Stock Options
	Shares			WA price/ share		Units			WA price/ unit		Issuable upon exercise			WA exercise price
Outstanding at January 1, 2010		638		$	9.90		828		$	3.36		5,307		$	5.32
Granted		-			-		2,009			4.33		121			5.08
Shares vested/options exercised		(279	)		9.74		(1,338	)		3.56		(758	)		1.99
Forfeited/expired		(179	)		11.66		(39	)		4.16		(527	)		12.90
Balance at December 31, 2010		180		$	8.39		1,460		$	4.49		4,143		$	4.96
Granted		-			-		2,432			6.08		1,061			3.29
Shares vested/options exercised		(178	)		8.40		(896	)		4.78		(117	)		2.18
Forfeited/expired		(1	)		9.72		(393	)		6.04		(128	)		11.43
Balance at July 2, 2011		1		$	6.08		2,603		$	5.64		4,959		$	4.50

 In June 2011, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer were awarded a base grant of 417 long-term incentive (LTI) stock options contingent upon the Company’s shareholder return performance against the performance of the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index component companies.  The award and performance will be evaluated annually in one-third increments measuring Company shareholder returns during the one, two and three year periods following the award. Depending upon performance, the number of shares issuable pursuant to the LTI stock options can range from 50% to 150% of the base option shares.  Company performance below the 25th-percentile in a measurement period would result in no vesting for that period.  The LTI stock options have an exercise price of $3.24, a ten year term to expiration, and an average fair value of $2.62.  The fair value estimate was calculated with the assistance of a valuation consultant using a Monte Carlo Simulation model.

 Stock based compensation for the six months ended July 2, 2011 includes $684 for equity awards associated with the management separation charge recorded during the six months ended July 2, 2011.

	As of July 2, 2011
Unrecognized stock based compensation cost
Option plans	$	3,537
Restricted stock	$	11,105
Weighted average remaining recognition period
Option plans	2.2 years
Restricted stock	2.2 years

Stock options outstanding at July 2, 2011 are summarized as follows:

Range of exercise prices		Outstanding Options at July 2, 2011		Weighted average remaining contractual life		Weighted average exercise price		Exercisable at July 2, 2011		Weighted average exercise price
$	1.39 - $1.93		857		7.4	$	1.93		588	$	1.93
$	2.03 - $3.30		2,482		4.2	$	2.61		1,438	$	2.15
$	3.65 - $8.79		727		4.3	$	6.36		608	$	6.60
$	8.84 - $18.98		893		3.9	$	10.71		893	$	10.71

Valuation Method for ESP Plan and Stock Option Awards

 The fair value of these equity awards was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions and fair values for stock based compensation grants used for the six month periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 were (excludes the aforementioned LTI option grants):

	Six months ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Stock option awards:
Risk-free interest rate		2.2	%		2.6	%
Expected volatility		65	%		85	%
Average expected term (in years)		5.0			5.0
Expected dividend yield		0.0	%		0.0	%
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$	1.85		$	3.21
ESP Plan:
Risk-free interest rate		0.2	%		0.3	%
Expected volatility		58	%		61	%
Average expected term (in years)		1.0			1.0
Expected dividend yield		0.0	%		0.0	%
Weighted average fair value of purchase option	$	1.05		$	1.44

 For equity awards with expected terms of greater than one year, the assumption for expected volatility is based on a combination of implied and historical volatility, whereas for equity awards with an expected term of one year or less, the assumption is solely based on the Company’s historical volatility.

7. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 On or about November 11, 2008, plaintiff Charlie Attias filed a putative securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, captioned Charlie Attias v. Anadigics, Inc., et al., No. 3:08-cv-05572, and, on or about November 21, 2008, plaintiff Paul Kuznetz filed a related class action lawsuit in the same court, captioned Paul J. Kuznetz v. Anadigics, Inc., et al., No. 3:08-cv-05750 (jointly, the "Class Actions").  The Complaints in the Class Actions, which were consolidated under the caption In re Anadigics, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 3:08-cv-05572, by an Order of the District Court dated November 24, 2008, seek unspecified damages for alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, in connection with alleged misrepresentations and omissions in connection with, among other things, Anadigics's manufacturing capabilities and the demand for its products.  On October 23, 2009, plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, (the “First Amended Complaint”), which names the Company, a current officer and a former officer-director, and alleges a proposed class period that runs from July 24, 2007 through August 7, 2008.  On December 23, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint; that motion was fully briefed as of March 30, 2010.  After holding extensive oral argument on defendants' motion on August 3, 2010, the District Court found plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint to be deficient, but afforded them another opportunity to amend their pleading.  The District Court therefore denied defendants' motion to dismiss without prejudice to defendants' renewing the motion in response to plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, which plaintiffs filed on October 4, 2010.  The Second Amended Complaint, which contains the same substantive claims that were alleged in the First Amended Complaint, alleges a proposed class period that runs from February 12, 2008 through August 7, 2008.  Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on December 3, 2010.  That motion is fully briefed and pending before the District Court.

 On or about January 14, 2009, a shareholder's derivative lawsuit, captioned Sicari v. Anadigics, Inc., et al., No. SOM-L-88-09, was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, and, on or about February 2, 2009, a related shareholder's derivative lawsuit, captioned Moradzadeh v. Anadigics, Inc., et al., No. SOM-L-198-09, was filed in the same court (jointly, the "Derivative Lawsuits").  The Derivative Lawsuits seek unspecified damages for alleged state law claims against certain of the Company's current and former directors arising out of the matters at issue in the Class Actions.  By Order dated March 6, 2009, the New Jersey Superior Court consolidated the Derivative Lawsuits under the caption In re Anadigics, Inc. Derivative Litigation, No. SOM-L-88-09.  By Order dated March 27, 2009, the Superior Court stayed the Derivative Lawsuits pending disposition of the defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint in the Class Actions.  By Order dated September 13, 2010, the Superior Court extended the stay of the Derivative Lawsuits until the disposition of defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the Class Actions.

 Because the Class Actions and the Derivative Lawsuits, which are in a preliminary stage, do not specify alleged monetary damages, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any, to the Company in connection therewith.

 The Company is also a party to ordinary course litigation arising out of the operation of our business. The Company believes that the ultimate resolution of such ordinary course litigation should not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

ANADIGICS, Inc.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

ANADIGICS, Inc. (“we” or the “Company”) is a leading provider of semiconductor solutions in the growing broadband wireless and wireline communications markets.  Our products include radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers (PAs), tuner integrated circuits, active splitters, line amplifiers and other components, which can be sold individually or packaged as integrated front end modules (FEMs).  We believe that we are well-positioned to capitalize on the high growth and convergence occurring in the voice, data and video segments of the broadband wireless and wireline communications markets.

 Our RF power amplifier products enable mobile handsets, datacards and other devices to access third generation (3G) wireless networks utilizing international standards including WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access), HSPA (High Speed Packet Access), CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) and EVDO (Evolution Data Optimized).  Further, we provide RF power amplifiers for the advanced fourth generation (4G) wireless services including LTE (Long Term Evolution) and WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access).   Our WiFi products enable connectivity for wireless mobile devices and other computing devices and our CATV (Cable Television) products enable fixed-point, wireline broadband communications over cable modem and set-top box products, CATV infrastructure and Fiber-To-The-Premises (FTTP).

 Our business strategy focuses on enabling anytime, anywhere connectivity which enhances the consumer’s broadband and wireless experience. We develop RF front end solutions for communications equipment manufacturers and we partner with industry-leading wireless and wireline chipset providers who incorporate our solutions into their reference designs.  Our solutions cost-effectively enhance communications devices by improving RF performance, efficiency, reliability, time-to-market and integration while reducing the size, weight and cost of these products.

 We focus on leveraging our technological knowledge and advantages to be a leading technology-enabler via innovative semiconductor solutions for broadband wireless and wireline communications.  We believe our patented InGaP-plus technology, which combines bipolar amplifying structures and pHEMT RF switches on the same die, provides us with a competitive advantage in the marketplace.  Additionally, we believe proprietary designs of our HELP™ (High Efficiency at Low Power) power amplifiers provide our customers a competitive advantage by delivering performance required for 3G and 4G devices with lower battery power consumption and longer use time than comparable products in these markets.

 Revenue during the second quarter of 2011 declined in comparison to the first quarter of 2011 due to wireless product demand reductions at one of our largest customers resulting from certain of such customer’s programs reaching end of life and a loss in market share related to the customer’s change in chipset suppliers that do not utilize our power amplifiers.  In early May 2011, we reduced our workforce by approximately 40 employees and recorded a restructuring charge of $1.0 million during the second quarter of 2011. We anticipate cost savings from this restructuring to approximate $3.8 million on an annualized basis.

 We believe our markets are, and will continue to remain, competitive which could result in continued quarterly volatility in our net sales. This competition has resulted in, and is expected over the long-term to continue to result in competitive or declining average selling prices for our products and increased challenges in maintaining or increasing market share.

 We were incorporated in Delaware in 1984. Our corporate headquarters are located at 141 Mt. Bethel Road, Warren, New Jersey 07059, and our telephone number at that address is 908-668-5000.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 The following table sets forth unaudited consolidated statements of operations data as a percent of net sales for the periods presented:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales		81.6	%		65.6	%		76.3	%		67.1	%
Gross margin		18.4	%		34.4	%		23.7	%		32.9	%
Research and development expenses		31.9	%		23.6	%		31.5	%		25.2	%
Selling and administrative expenses		20.6	%		13.3	%		21.2	%		14.6	%
Restructuring and impairment (recovery) charges		2.9	%		(3.3	)%		1.3	%		(1.8	)%
Operating (loss) income		(37.0	)%		0.8	%		(30.3	)%		(5.1	)%
Interest income		0.3	%		0.2	%		0.3	%		0.2	%
Interest expense		-			(0.1	)%		-			(0.1	)%
Other income, net		-			0.6	%		-			0.4	%
Net (loss) income		(36.7	)%		1.5	%		(30.0	)%		(4.6	)%

 NET SALES.  Net sales decreased 31.1% during the second quarter of 2011 to $35.6 million from $51.7 million in the second quarter of 2010.  For the six months ended July 2, 2011, net sales were $79.0 million, a 17.0% decrease from net sales of $95.2 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010.

 Sales of integrated circuits for wireless applications decreased 33.0% during the second quarter of 2011 to $25.6 million from $38.3 million in the second quarter of 2010.  For the six months ended July 2, 2011, net sales of integrated circuits for wireless applications decreased 9.9% to $61.8 million from $68.6 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010. These decreases in sales were primarily due to decreased demand in our WCDMA cellular device markets.

 Sales of integrated circuits for broadband applications decreased 25.7% during the second quarter of 2011 to $9.9 million from $13.4 million in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended July 2, 2011, net sales of integrated circuits for broadband applications decreased 35.1% to $17.2 million from $26.6 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010.  This decrease in sales was primarily due to decreased demand from cable set-top box applications.

 GROSS MARGIN. Gross margin during the second quarter of 2011 decreased to 18.4% of net sales from 34.4% of net sales in the second quarter of 2010.  For the six months ended July 2, 2011, gross margin decreased to 23.7% from 32.9% for the six months ended July 3, 2010.  The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to lower production and sales volume and a concentration of fixed costs as a percent of smaller revenues.

 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Company-sponsored research and development expenses decreased 7.2% during the second quarter of 2011 to $11.3 million from $12.2 million during the second quarter of 2010 primarily due to our tighter cost controls over our key projects. Company sponsored research and development expenses for the six month period ended July 2, 2011 increased 3.8% to $24.9 million from $24.0 million during the six month period ended July 3, 2010, primarily due to a management separation charge of $0.8 million recorded in the first quarter of 2011.

 SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling and administrative expenses increased 6.3% during the second quarter of 2011 to $7.3 million from $6.9 million during the second quarter of 2010, principally due to increased stock compensation. Selling and administrative expenses for the six month period ended July 2, 2011 increased 20.8% to $16.8 million from $13.9 million during the six month period ended July 3, 2010. A management separation charge of $2.1 million is included in the first quarter of 2011.

 RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT (RECOVERY) CHARGES.  During the second quarter of 2011, we implemented workforce reductions, which eliminated approximately 40 positions, resulting in a restructuring charge of $1.0 million for severance and related benefits. During the second quarter of 2010, we sold the wafer fabrication building in Kunshan, China which had been fully written-off in 2008. The sale resulted in a net recovery of $1.7 million.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 As of July 2, 2011, we had $77.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $26.0 million in short and long-term marketable securities.

 Operating activities used $1.1 million in cash during the six month period ended July 2, 2011, primarily as a result of our operating results adjusted for non-cash expenses, offset by $7.2 million of cash generated by reducing working capital. Investing activities, consisting principally of net purchases of marketable securities of $16.2 million and purchases of fixed assets of $2.6 million, used $18.8 million of cash during the six month period ended July 2, 2011. Financing activities provided $0.2 million of cash proceeds received from stock option exercises.

 We had unconditional purchase obligations at July 2, 2011 of approximately $1.5 million.

 Within our $26.0 million in marketable securities at July 2, 2011, we held a total of $14.3 million of fixed income securities, $2.0 million of U.S. government agency debt securities, $6.6 million of auction rate securities (ARS), and $3.1 million as a former-auction corporate debt security, which was originally purchased as an ARS prior to its exchange for the underlying 30 year notes due 2037. ARS are generally financial instruments of long-term duration with interest rates that are reset in short intervals through auctions. During the second half of 2007 and first quarter of 2008, auction rate corporate, state and municipal debt, and preferred securities failed to auction due to sell orders exceeding buy orders. When there is insufficient demand for the securities at the time of an auction and the auction is not completed, the interest rates reset to predetermined higher rates (default rates). While certain issuers have redeemed certain of their ARS since 2008, the market remains constrained by illiquidity and the lack of free trading. The funds associated with the remaining failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs, a suitable buyer is found outside of the auction process or an issuer redeems its security. If the credit ratings of the security issuers deteriorate and any decline in market value below our amortized cost basis is determined to be other-than-temporary, we would be required to adjust the carrying value of the investment through an additional impairment charge. For the six months ended July 2, 2011, fair market values of certain of our ARS, when combined with the fair market values of our former-auction corporate debt security, increased by $0.9 million, which was recorded to other comprehensive income.

 We anticipate selling the existing and former-auction corporate debt securities prior to a recovery in valuation. We will continue to monitor and evaluate these investments for impairment and for short term classification purposes. We may not be able to access cash by selling the aforementioned debt or preferred securities without the loss of principal until a buyer is located, a future auction for these investments is successful, they are redeemed by their issuers or they mature. If we are unable to sell these securities in the market or they are not redeemed, then we may be required to hold them to maturity or in perpetuity for the preferred ARS. Based on our ability to access our cash, our expected operating cash flows, and our other sources of cash, we do not anticipate that the potential illiquidity of these investments will affect our ability to execute our current business plan.

 We believe that our existing sources of capital, including our existing cash and marketable securities, will be adequate to satisfy operational needs and anticipated capital needs for at least the next twelve months. We may elect to finance all or part of our future capital requirements through additional equity or debt financing.

IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 Changes to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of Accounting Standards Updates (ASU’s) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).

 There were no recently issued ASU’s requiring adoption by the Company as of July 2, 2011 or that are expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains projections and other forward-looking statements (as that term is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).  These projections and forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance and can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as “believe”, “anticipate”, “expect”, or words of similar import. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives, estimates or goals are forward-looking statements.  No assurances can be given, however, that these events will occur or that these projections will be achieved, and actual results and developments could differ materially from those projected as a result of certain factors.  Important factors that could cause actual results and developments to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such projections and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following risks which are described in greater detail in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K referred to below: (i) our history of recent losses and the possibility that we may continue to incur losses; (ii) our results of operations can vary significantly due to the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry and our end markets; (iii) our dependence on a small number of customers; (iv) our operating results may be harmed if we fail to sell a high volume of products; (v) the existence of intense competition in the markets for our products, which could result in a decrease in our products’ prices and sales; (vi) our need to keep pace with rapid product and process development and technological changes as well as product cost reductions to be competitive; (vii) potential difficulty selling products if Original Equipment Manufacturers and Original Design Manufacturers do not design our products into their equipment; (viii) lengthy product development and sales cycles associated with many of our products may result in significant expenditures before generating any revenues related to those products; (ix) uncertainties involving the ordering and shipment of our products could adversely affect our business; (x) we may face failures in our manufacturing processes or processes of our vendors; (xi) our dependence on foreign semiconductor component, assembly and test operations contractors could lead to delays in product shipments; (xii) the short life cycles of some of our products and nature of semiconductor production may leave us with obsolete or excess inventories; (xiii) our products have experienced rapidly declining unit prices; (xiv) sources for certain components, materials and equipment are limited, which could result in delays or reductions in product shipments; (xv) any pursuit of selective acquisitions and alliances which dilute the ownership of our current shareholders and the management and integration of additional operations which may be expensive and divert management time; (xvi) any failure to perform or meet customer requirements; (xvii) cost reduction measures may again be required and could be inadequate or not realize their anticipated savings; (xviii) the variability of our manufacturing yields may affect our gross margins; (xix) unfavorable economic conditions; (xx) our gallium arsenide semiconductors may cease to be competitive with silicon alternatives; (xxi) capital required for our business may not be available when we need it; (xxii) our marketable securities’ liquidity and valuation could be affected by disruption in financial markets; (xxiii) our success depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; (xxiv) risks due to our international customer base and our subcontracting operations; (xxv) stringent environmental laws and regulations both domestically and abroad; (xxvi) any failure to protect our intellectual property rights or avoid claims that we have infringed on the intellectual property rights of others; (xxvii) we have had significant volatility in our stock price and it may fluctuate in the future; (xxviii) certain provisions in our governing documents, our shareholders’ rights agreement and of Delaware law could deter, delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us and prevent shareholders from realizing a takeover premium; (xxix) an adverse outcome, to the extent not covered by insurance, in the class action or shareholder derivative lawsuits in which we and certain of our officers and directors are defendants. The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included herein or detailed from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 The Company's market risk has not changed significantly for the risks disclosed in Item 7A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  As of July 2, 2011, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our Management, including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  Based on that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of July 2, 2011.

 There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 Because of their inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

ANADIGICS, Inc.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM  1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 On or about November 11, 2008, plaintiff Charlie Attias filed a putative securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, captioned Charlie Attias v. Anadigics, Inc., et al., No. 3:08-cv-05572, and, on or about November 21, 2008, plaintiff Paul Kuznetz filed a related class action lawsuit in the same court, captioned Paul J. Kuznetz v. Anadigics, Inc., et al., No. 3:08-cv-05750 (jointly, the "Class Actions").  The Complaints in the Class Actions, which were consolidated under the caption In re Anadigics, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 3:08-cv-05572, by an Order of the District Court dated November 24, 2008, seek unspecified damages for alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, in connection with alleged misrepresentations and omissions in connection with, among other things, Anadigics's manufacturing capabilities and the demand for its products.  On October 23, 2009, plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, (the “First Amended Complaint”), which names the Company, a current officer and a former officer-director, and alleges a proposed class period that runs from July 24, 2007 through August 7, 2008.  On December 23, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint; that motion was fully briefed as of March 30, 2010.  After holding extensive oral argument on defendants' motion on August 3, 2010, the District Court found plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint to be deficient, but afforded them another opportunity to amend their pleading.  The District Court therefore denied defendants' motion to dismiss without prejudice to defendants' renewing the motion in response to plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, which plaintiffs filed on October 4, 2010.  The Second Amended Complaint, which contains the same substantive claims that were alleged in the First Amended Complaint, alleges a proposed class period that runs from February 12, 2008 through August 7, 2008.  Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on December 3, 2010.  That motion is fully briefed and pending before the District Court.

 On or about January 14, 2009, a shareholder's derivative lawsuit, captioned Sicari v. Anadigics, Inc., et al., No. SOM-L-88-09, was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, and, on or about February 2, 2009, a related shareholder's derivative lawsuit, captioned Moradzadeh v. Anadigics, Inc., et al., No. SOM-L-198-09, was filed in the same court (jointly, the "Derivative Lawsuits").  The Derivative Lawsuits seek unspecified damages for alleged state law claims against certain of the Company's current and former directors arising out of the matters at issue in the Class Actions.  By Order dated March 6, 2009, the New Jersey Superior Court consolidated the Derivative Lawsuits under the caption In re Anadigics, Inc. Derivative Litigation, No. SOM-L-88-09.  By Order dated March 27, 2009, the Superior Court stayed the Derivative Lawsuits pending disposition of the defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint in the Class Actions.  By Order dated September 13, 2010, the Superior Court extended the stay of the Derivative Lawsuits until the disposition of defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the Class Actions.

 Because the Class Actions and the Derivative Lawsuits, which are in a preliminary stage, do not specify alleged monetary damages, we are unable to reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any, to the Company in connection therewith.

 We are also a party to ordinary course litigation arising out of the operation of our business. We believe that the ultimate resolution of such ordinary course litigation should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

 The Company held its annual meeting of stockholders on May 12, 2011 at which the Company’s stockholders voted on:

·   The election of two Class I Directors of the Company to hold office until 2014.

·   The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

·   To approve an advisory vote on executive compensation.

·   To approve an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

 The four matters listed above were voted upon and approved by the shareholders of the Company as follows:

·   The election of Harry Rein as Class I Director was approved by holders of 33,504,532 shares of the Company’s outstanding capital stock.  Holders of 1,021,053 shares voted against such election. Holders of 185,623 shares abstained from voting on such election and broker non-votes totaled 23,996,767.

·   The election of Dennis Strigl as Class I Director was approved by holders of 33,901,368 shares of the Company’s outstanding capital stock.  Holders of 625,695 shares voted against such election. Holders of 184,145 shares abstained from voting on such election and broker non-votes totaled 23,996,767.  Messrs. Rein and Strigl join the continuing Directors of the Company Messrs. Bachow, Fellows, Michels, Rosenzweig, and Solomon.

·   The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accountants was approved by holders of 57,455,395  shares of the Company’s outstanding capital stock. Holders of 475,381  shares voted against the ratification.  Holders of 777,199 shares abstained from voting on such ratification.

·   The advisory vote to approve executive compensation was approved by holders of 31,619,879 shares of the Company’s outstanding capital stock. Holders of 994,386 shares voted against the proposal.  Holders of 2,096,943 shares abstained from voting on such proposal and broker non-votes totaled 23,996,767.

·   The advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation was approved by holders as follows: 28,500,417 shares voted in favor of an annual vote, 550,301 shares voted in favor of a vote every two years and 3,579,796 shares voted in favor of a vote every three years. Holders of 2,080,694 shares abstained from voting on such proposal and broker non-votes totaled 23,996,767.

·   As a result of the shareholders preference for an annual advisory vote on executive compensation, the Company has determined to include an advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation in its proxy materials for the annual shareholders meeting in 2012.

ITEM  6. EXHIBITS

31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Ronald Michels, President and Chief Executive Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc.

31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Thomas C. Shields, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc.

32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Ronald Michels, President and Chief Executive Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc.

32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Thomas C. Shields, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc.

SIGNATURES

 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ANADIGICS, INC.

By:	/s/ Thomas C. Shields
	Thomas C. Shields
	Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 11, 2011