Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-9494
TIFFANY & CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State of incorporation) | 13-3228013 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
727 Fifth Ave. New York, NY (Address of principal executive offices) | 10022 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(212) 755-8000
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report _________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerþ | Accelerated filero | Non-accelerated filero | Smaller reporting companyo | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yeso Noþ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS: Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, $.01 par value, 127,275,827 shares outstanding at the close of business on August 31, 2011.
TIFFANY & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 2011
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 2011
2
Table of Contents
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
TIFFANY & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
July 31, 2011 | January 31, 2011 | July 31, 2010 | ||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 532,981 | $ | 681,591 | $ | 566,725 | ||||||
Short-term investments | 32,210 | 59,280 | 47,949 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $12,400, $11,783 and $12,326 | 182,001 | 185,969 | 156,708 | |||||||||
Inventories, net | 1,836,874 | 1,625,302 | 1,553,117 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 67,964 | 41,826 | 16,114 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 115,474 | 90,577 | 76,780 | |||||||||
Total current assets | 2,767,504 | 2,684,545 | 2,417,393 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 738,172 | 665,588 | 661,387 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 185,020 | 202,902 | 188,014 | |||||||||
Other assets, net | 240,192 | 182,634 | 179,767 | |||||||||
$ | 3,930,888 | $ | 3,735,669 | $ | 3,446,561 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 97,272 | $ | 38,891 | $ | 44,221 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 61,728 | 60,855 | 269,960 | |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 274,301 | 258,611 | 165,757 | |||||||||
Income taxes payable | 20,687 | 55,691 | 16,198 | |||||||||
Merchandise and other customer credits | 66,764 | 65,865 | 60,546 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities | 520,752 | 479,913 | 556,682 | |||||||||
Long-term debt | 534,673 | 588,494 | 467,855 | |||||||||
Pension/postretirement benefit obligations | 205,298 | 217,435 | 189,978 | |||||||||
Deferred gains on sale-leasebacks | 125,173 | 124,980 | 124,932 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 193,256 | 147,372 | 141,112 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||||||
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 2,000 shares, none issued and outstanding | — | — | — | |||||||||
Common Stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 240,000 shares, issued and outstanding 128,164, 126,969 and 126,488 | 1,281 | 1,269 | 1,265 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 951,552 | 863,967 | 813,600 | |||||||||
Retained earnings | 1,378,054 | 1,324,804 | 1,182,840 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax | 20,849 | (12,565 | ) | (31,703 | ) | |||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 2,351,736 | 2,177,475 | 1,966,002 | |||||||||
$ | 3,930,888 | $ | 3,735,669 | $ | 3,446,561 | |||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
TIFFANY & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended July 31, | Six Months Ended July 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 872,712 | $ | 668,760 | $ | 1,633,730 | $ | 1,302,346 | ||||||||
Cost of sales | 358,015 | 282,008 | 675,340 | 549,616 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 514,697 | 386,752 | 958,390 | 752,730 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 374,157 | 273,146 | 681,884 | 533,707 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from operations | 140,540 | 113,606 | 276,506 | 219,023 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other expenses, net | 9,619 | 11,121 | 19,766 | 23,259 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from operations before income taxes | 130,921 | 102,485 | 256,740 | 195,764 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 40,878 | 34,810 | 85,634 | 63,664 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 90,043 | $ | 67,675 | $ | 171,106 | $ | 132,100 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.04 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.03 | ||||||||
Weighted-average number of common shares: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 128,030 | 126,897 | 127,816 | 126,798 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 129,794 | 128,385 | 129,587 | 128,464 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TIFFANY & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Other | Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ | Retained | Comprehensive | Common Stock | Paid-In | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | Earnings | (Loss) Gain | Shares | Amount | Capital | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances, January 31, 2011 | $ | 2,177,475 | $ | 1,324,804 | $ | (12,565 | ) | 126,969 | $ | 1,269 | $ | 863,967 | ||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) | 57,016 | — | — | 1,914 | 19 | 56,997 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax effect of exercise of stock options and vesting of RSUs | 14,561 | — | — | — | — | 14,561 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense | 15,239 | — | — | — | — | 15,239 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Common Stock under the Employee Profit Sharing and Retirement Savings Plan | 4,500 | — | — | 64 | 1 | 4,499 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of Common Stock | (52,487 | ) | (48,768 | ) | — | (783 | ) | (8 | ) | (3,711 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends on Common Stock | (69,088 | ) | (69,088 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred hedging loss, net of tax | (4,648 | ) | — | (4,648 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax | 343 | — | 343 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | 36,021 | — | 36,021 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on benefit plans, net of tax | 1,698 | — | 1,698 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | 171,106 | 171,106 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances, July 31, 2011 | $ | 2,351,736 | $ | 1,378,054 | $ | 20,849 | 128,164 | $ | 1,281 | $ | 951,552 | |||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 31, | July 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings are as follows: | ||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 90,043 | $ | 67,675 | $ | 171,106 | $ | 132,100 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax: | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred hedging (loss) gain | (5,638 | ) | (2,733 | ) | (4,648 | ) | 2,075 | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 6,325 | 1,089 | 36,021 | (2,171 | ) | |||||||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities | (596 | ) | (447 | ) | 343 | 636 | ||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on benefit plans | 835 | 474 | 1,698 | 1,022 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings | $ | 90,969 | $ | 66,058 | $ | 204,520 | $ | 133,662 | ||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
TIFFANY & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 171,106 | $ | 132,100 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 71,596 | 72,292 | ||||||
Lease exit charge | 30,884 | — | ||||||
Amortization of gain on sale-leasebacks | (5,412 | ) | (4,927 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | (15,749 | ) | (3,936 | ) | ||||
Provision for inventories | 14,870 | 14,184 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (2,854 | ) | (19,069 | ) | ||||
Provision for pension/postretirement benefits | 15,414 | 13,442 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense | 15,090 | 12,795 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | 8,688 | 5,235 | ||||||
Inventories | (195,739 | ) | (133,495 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (21,536 | ) | (7,596 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (21,300 | ) | (53,546 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable | (19,391 | ) | (45,058 | ) | ||||
Merchandise and other customer credits | 221 | (5,821 | ) | |||||
Other, net | (1,993 | ) | (36,711 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 43,895 | (60,111 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Purchases of marketable securities and short-term investments | (33,771 | ) | (48,461 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities and short-term investments | 66,364 | — | ||||||
Capital expenditures | (111,016 | ) | (50,760 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable funded | (56,605 | ) | — | |||||
Other | (1,674 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (136,702 | ) | (99,221 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Proceeds from credit facility borrowings, net | 51,174 | 17,775 | ||||||
Repayment of long-term debt | (58,915 | ) | — | |||||
Repurchase of Common Stock | (52,487 | ) | (47,138 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 57,016 | 31,192 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | 15,749 | 3,936 | ||||||
Cash dividends on Common Stock | (69,088 | ) | (57,130 | ) | ||||
Purchase of non-controlling interests | — | (7,000 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (56,551 | ) | (58,365 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 748 | (1,280 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (148,610 | ) | (218,977 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 681,591 | 785,702 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of six months | $ | 532,981 | $ | 566,725 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
TIFFANY & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. | CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tiffany & Co. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained. Controlling interest is determined by majority ownership interest and the absence of substantive third-party participating rights or, in the case of variable interest entities (“VIE“s), if the Company has the power to significantly direct the activities of a VIE, as well as the obligation to absorb significant losses of or the right to receive significant benefits from the VIE. Intercompany accounts, transactions and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. The interim statements are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (which represent normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position as of July 31, 2011 and 2010 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The condensed consolidated balance sheet data for January 31, 2011 is derived from the audited financial statements, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in connection with these financial statements. As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, these financial statements do not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.
The Company’s business is seasonal in nature, with the fourth quarter typically representing at least one-third of annual net sales and approximately one-half of annual net earnings. Therefore, the results of its operations for the three and six months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of the entire fiscal year.
2. | RECEIVABLES AND FINANCE CHARGES |
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses associated with the accounts receivable recorded on the balance sheet. The allowance is determined based on a combination of factors including, but not limited to, the length of time that the receivables are past due, the Company’s knowledge of the customer, economic and market conditions and historical write-off experiences.
For the receivables associated with Tiffany & Co. credit cards (“Credit Card Receivables”), the Company uses various indicators to determine whether to extend credit to customers and the amount of credit. Such indicators include reviewing prior experience with the customer, including sales and collection history, and using applicants’ credit reports and scores provided by credit rating agencies. Credit Card Receivables require minimum balance payments. The Company classifies a Credit Card account as overdue if a minimum balance payment has not been received within the allotted timeframe (generally 30 days), after which internal collection efforts commence. For all accounts receivable recorded on the balance sheet, once all internal collection efforts have been exhausted and management has reviewed the account, the account balance is written off and may be sent for external collection or legal action. At July 31, 2011, the carrying amount of the Credit Card Receivables (recorded in accounts receivable, net in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet) was $54,351,000, of which 97% was considered current. The allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses associated with the Credit Card Receivables (approximately $2,000,000 at July 31, 2011) was determined based on the factors discussed above, and did not change significantly from January 31, 2011. Finance charges on Credit Card accounts are not significant.
The Company may, from time to time, extend loans to diamond mining and exploration companies in order to obtain rights to purchase the mine’s output. Management evaluates these and any other loans that may arise for potential impairment by reviewing the parties’ financial statements and projections and other economic factors on a periodic basis. The carrying amount of loans receivable outstanding including accrued interest (primarily included within other assets, net on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet) was $57,396,000 as of July 31, 2011. The Company has not recorded any impairment charges on such loans as of July 31, 2011.
7
Table of Contents
3. | INVENTORIES |
(in thousands) | July 31, 2011 | January 31, 2011 | July 31, 2010 | |||||||||
Finished goods | $ | 1,035,615 | $ | 988,085 | $ | 978,021 | ||||||
Raw materials | 656,772 | 534,879 | 469,804 | |||||||||
Work-in-process | 144,487 | 102,338 | 105,292 | |||||||||
Inventories, net | $ | 1,836,874 | $ | 1,625,302 | $ | 1,553,117 | ||||||
4. | INCOME TAXES |
The effective income tax rate for the three months ended July 31, 2011 was 31.2% versus 34.0% in the prior year. The decline is primarily due to the reversal of a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets where management has determined it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized in the future. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended July 31, 2011 was 33.4% versus 32.5% in the prior year. In the six months ended July 31, 2010, the Company recorded a net income tax benefit of $3,096,000 primarily due to a change in the tax status of certain subsidiaries associated with the acquisition in 2009 of additional equity interests in diamond sourcing and polishing operations.
During the six months ended July 31, 2011, the change in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits and accrued interest and penalties was not significant.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As a matter of course, various taxing authorities regularly audit the Company. The Company’s tax filings are currently being examined by tax authorities in jurisdictions where its subsidiaries have a material presence, including New York state tax years 2004-2007, New York City tax years 2006-2008, New Jersey tax years 2006-2009 and by the Internal Revenue Service tax years 2006-2009. Tax years from 2004-present are open to examination in U.S. Federal and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. The Company believes that its tax positions comply with applicable tax laws and that it has adequately provided for these matters. However, the audits may result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result in the Company owing additional taxes. Management anticipates that it is reasonably possible that the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $20,000,000 in the next 12 months, a portion of which may affect the effective tax rate; however, management does not currently anticipate a significant affect on net earnings. Future developments may result in a change in this assessment.
5. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed as net earnings divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of stock options and unvested restricted stock units.
The following table summarizes the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators for the basic and diluted EPS computations:
Three Months Ended July 31, | Six Months Ended July 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings for basic and diluted EPS | $ | 90,043 | $ | 67,675 | $ | 171,106 | $ | 132,100 | ||||||||
Weighted-average shares for basic EPS | 128,030 | 126,897 | 127,816 | 126,798 | ||||||||||||
Incremental shares based upon the assumed exercise of stock options and unvested restricted stock units | 1,764 | 1,488 | 1,771 | 1,666 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS | 129,794 | 128,385 | 129,587 | 128,464 | ||||||||||||
8
Table of Contents
For the three months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, there were 351,000 and 487,000 stock options and restricted stock units excluded from the computations of earnings per diluted share due to their antidilutive effect. For the six months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, there were 332,000 and 459,000 stock options and restricted stock units excluded from the computations of earnings per diluted share due to their antidilutive effect.
6. | HEDGING INSTRUMENTS |
Background Information
The Company uses derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swap agreements, forward contracts, put option contracts and net-zero-cost collar arrangements (combination of call and put option contracts) to mitigate its exposures to changes in interest rates, foreign currency and precious metal prices. Derivative instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values, as either assets or liabilities, with an offset to current or comprehensive earnings, depending on whether the derivative is designated as part of an effective hedge transaction and, if it is, the type of hedge transaction. If a derivative instrument meets certain hedge accounting criteria, the derivative instrument is designated as one of the following on the date the derivative is entered into:
• | Fair Value Hedge — A hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment. For fair value hedge transactions, both the effective and ineffective portions of the changes in the fair value of the derivative and changes in the fair value of the item being hedged are recorded in current earnings. | ||
• | Cash Flow Hedge — A hedge of the exposure to variability in the cash flows of a recognized asset, liability or a forecasted transaction. For cash flow hedge transactions, the effective portion of the changes in fair value of derivatives are reported as other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and are recognized in current earnings in the period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects current earnings. Amounts excluded from the effectiveness calculation and any ineffective portions of the change in fair value of the derivative are recognized in current earnings. |
The Company formally documents the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items for a derivative to qualify as a hedge at inception and throughout the hedged period. The Company also documents its risk management objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions and method of assessing hedge effectiveness. Additionally, for hedges of forecasted transactions, the significant characteristics and expected terms of a forecasted transaction must be specifically identified, and it must be probable that each forecasted transaction will occur. If it were deemed probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur, the gain or loss on the derivative financial instrument would be recognized in current earnings. Derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedge instrument and the item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period.
The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Types of Derivative Instruments
Interest Rate Swap Agreements — The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to convert its fixed rate 2002 Series D and 2008 Series A obligations to floating rate obligations. Since the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate long-term debt is sensitive to interest rate changes, the interest rate swap agreements serve as a hedge to changes in the fair value of these debt instruments. The Company hedges its exposure to changes in interest rates over the remaining maturities of the debt agreements being hedged. The Company accounts for the interest rate swaps as fair value hedges. As of July 31, 2011, the notional amount of interest rate swap agreements outstanding was $160,000,000.
Foreign Exchange Forward and Put Option Contracts — The Company uses foreign exchange forward contracts or put option contracts to offset the foreign currency exchange risks associated with foreign currency-denominated liabilities, intercompany transactions and forecasted purchases of merchandise between entities with differing functional currencies. For put option contracts, if the market exchange rate at
9
Table of Contents
the time of the put option contract’s expiration is stronger than the contracted exchange rate, the Company allows the put option contract to expire, limiting its loss to the cost of the put option contract. The Company assesses hedge effectiveness based on the total changes in the put option contracts’ cash flows. These foreign exchange forward contracts and put option contracts are designated and accounted for as either cash flow hedges or economic hedges that are not designated as hedging instruments.
In 2010, the Company de-designated all of its outstanding put option contracts (notional amount of $10,000,000 outstanding at July 31, 2011) and entered into offsetting call option contracts. These put and call option contracts are accounted for as undesignated hedges. Any gains or losses on these de-designated put option contracts are substantially offset by losses or gains on the call option contracts.
As of July 31, 2011, the notional amount of foreign exchange forward contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges was $167,900,000 and the notional amount of foreign exchange forward contracts accounted for as undesignated hedges was $21,596,000. The term of all outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts as of July 31, 2011 ranged from less than one month to 15 months.
Precious Metal Collars & Forward Contracts — The Company periodically hedges a portion of its forecasted purchases of precious metals for use in its internal manufacturing operations in order to minimize the effect of volatility in precious metal prices. The Company may use a combination of call and put option contracts in net-zero-cost collar arrangements (“precious metal collars”) or forward contracts. For precious metal collars, if the price of the precious metal at the time of the expiration of the precious metal collar is within the call and put price, the precious metal collar expires at no cost to the Company. The Company accounts for its precious metal collars and forward contracts as cash flow hedges. The Company assesses hedge effectiveness based on the total changes in the precious metal collars and forward contracts’ cash flows. The maximum term over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability of future cash flows for all forecasted transactions is 12 months. As of July 31, 2011, there were approximately 14,600 ounces of platinum and 535,300 ounces of silver precious metal derivative instruments outstanding.
Information on the location and amounts of derivative gains and losses in the condensed consolidated financial statements is as follows:
Three Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-Tax Gain | Pre-Tax Loss | Pre-Tax Gain | Pre-Tax Loss | |||||||||||||
Recognized in | Recognized in | Recognized in | Recognized in | |||||||||||||
Earnings on | Earnings on | Earnings on | Earnings on | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Derivatives | Hedged Item | Derivatives | Hedged Item | ||||||||||||
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreementsa | $ | 1,775 | $ | (1,486 | ) | $ | 4,441 | $ | (3,899 | ) | ||||||
Six Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-Tax Gain | Pre-Tax Loss | Pre-Tax Gain | Pre-Tax Loss | |||||||||||||
Recognized in | Recognized in | Recognized in | Recognized in | |||||||||||||
Earnings on | Earnings on | Earnings on | Earnings on | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Derivatives | Hedged Item | Derivatives | Hedged Item | ||||||||||||
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreementsa | $ | 1,750 | $ | (1,492 | ) | $ | 4,906 | $ | (4,297 | ) | ||||||
10
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Amount of (Loss) | Amount of (Loss) | |||||||||||||||
Gain Reclassified | Gain Reclassified | |||||||||||||||
Pre-Tax Loss | from Accumulated | Pre-Tax Loss | from Accumulated | |||||||||||||
Recognized in OCI | OCI into Earnings | Recognized in OCI | OCI into Earnings | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (Effective Portion) | (Effective Portion) | (Effective Portion) | (Effective Portion) | ||||||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsb | $ | (8,959 | ) | $ | (1,156 | ) | $ | (1,968 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | ||||
Put option contractsb | (51 | ) | (701 | ) | (1,769 | ) | (692 | ) | ||||||||
Precious metal collarsb | — | 213 | (1 | ) | (466 | ) | ||||||||||
Precious metal forward contractsb | (518 | ) | 910 | (1,435 | ) | 322 | ||||||||||
$ | (9,528 | ) | $ | (734 | ) | $ | (5,173 | ) | $ | (873 | ) | |||||
Six Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Amount of (Loss) | Amount of (Loss) | |||||||||||||||
Pre-Tax (Loss) | Gain Reclassified | Pre-Tax (Loss) | Gain Reclassified | |||||||||||||
Gain Recognized | from Accumulated | Gain Recognized | from Accumulated | |||||||||||||
in OCI (Effective | OCI into Earnings | in OCI (Effective | OCI into Earnings | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Portion) | (Effective Portion) | Portion) | (Effective Portion) | ||||||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsb | $ | (10,158 | ) | $ | (2,053 | ) | $ | 643 | $ | (266 | ) | |||||
Put option contractsb | (61 | ) | (1,339 | ) | (1,416 | ) | (1,507 | ) | ||||||||
Precious metal collarsb | — | 607 | 276 | (1,178 | ) | |||||||||||
Precious metal forward contractsb | 2,073 | 1,815 | 1,370 | 460 | ||||||||||||
$ | (8,146 | ) | $ | (970 | ) | $ | 873 | $ | (2,491 | ) | ||||||
Pre-Tax Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||
on Derivative | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
(in thousands) | July 31, 2011 | July 31, 2010 | ||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: | ||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsa | $ | 94 | c | $ | (99 | )c | ||
Call option contractsb | 25 | 82 | ||||||
Put option contractsb | (25 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||
$ | 94 | $ | (99 | ) | ||||
11
Table of Contents
Pre-Tax Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||
on Derivative | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
(in thousands) | July 31, 2011 | July 31, 2010 | ||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: | ||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsa | $ | 541 | c | $ | (614 | )c | ||
Call option contractsb | 92 | 148 | ||||||
Put option contractsb | (92 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||
$ | 541 | $ | (614 | ) | ||||
a | The gain or loss recognized in earnings is included within Interest and other expenses, net on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings. | |
b | The gain or loss recognized in earnings is included within Cost of sales on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings. | |
c | Gains or losses on the undesignated foreign exchange forward contracts substantially offset foreign exchange losses or gains on the liabilities and transactions being hedged. |
There was no material ineffectiveness related to the Company’s hedging instruments for the periods ended July 31, 2011 and 2010. The Company expects approximately $6,134,000 of net pre-tax derivative losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income at July 31, 2011 will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. This amount will vary due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and precious metal prices.
For information regarding the location and amount of the derivative instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, refer to “Note 7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments.”
Concentration of Credit Risk
A number of major international financial institutions are counterparties to the Company’s derivative financial instruments. The Company enters into derivative financial instrument agreements only with counterparties meeting certain credit standards (a credit rating of A/A2 or better at the time of the agreement) and limits the amount of agreements or contracts it enters into with any one party. The Company may be exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by individual counterparties or the entire group of counterparties.
7. | FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. U.S. GAAP prescribes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 inputs are considered to carry the most weight within the fair value hierarchy due to the low levels of judgment required in determining fair values.
Level 2 — Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions. Level 3 inputs are considered to carry the least weight within the fair value hierarchy due to substantial levels of judgment required in determining fair values.
12
Table of Contents
The Company uses the market approach to measure fair value for its mutual funds, time deposits and derivative instruments. The Company’s interest rate swap agreements are primarily valued using the 3-month LIBOR rate. The Company’s put and call option contracts, as well as its foreign exchange forward contracts, are primarily valued using the appropriate foreign exchange spot rates. The Company’s precious metal collars and forward contracts are primarily valued using the relevant precious metal spot rate. For further information on the Company’s hedging instruments and program, see “Note 6. Hedging Instruments.”
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value at July 31, 2011 are classified in the tables below in one of the three categories described above:
Carrying | Estimated Fair Value | Total Fair | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Value | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds a | $ | 39,564 | $ | 39,564 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 39,564 | ||||||||||
Time depositsb | 32,210 | 32,210 | — | — | 32,210 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreementsa | 7,905 | — | 7,905 | — | 7,905 | |||||||||||||||
Precious metal forward contractsc | 2,322 | — | 2,322 | — | 2,322 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsc | 75 | — | 75 | — | 75 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial assets | $ | 82,076 | $ | 71,774 | $ | 10,302 | $ | — | $ | 82,076 | ||||||||||
Carrying | Estimated Fair Value | Total Fair | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Value | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsd | $ | 8,258 | $ | — | $ | 8,258 | $ | — | $ | 8,258 | ||||||||||
Precious metal forward contractsd | 146 | — | 146 | — | 146 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsd | 34 | — | 34 | — | 34 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities | $ | 8,438 | $ | — | $ | 8,438 | $ | — | $ | 8,438 | ||||||||||
13
Table of Contents
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value at July 31, 2010 are classified in the tables below in one of the three categories described above:
Carrying | Estimated Fair Value | Total Fair | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Value | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds a | $ | 41,318 | $ | 41,318 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 41,318 | ||||||||||
Time depositsb | 47,949 | 47,949 | — | — | 47,949 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreementsa | 6,901 | — | 6,901 | — | 6,901 | |||||||||||||||
Put option contractsc | 856 | — | 856 | — | 856 | |||||||||||||||
Precious metal forward contractsc | 1,220 | — | 1,220 | — | 1,220 | |||||||||||||||
Precious metal collarsc | 151 | — | 151 | — | 151 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsc | 184 | — | 184 | — | 184 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial assets | $ | 98,579 | $ | 89,267 | $ | 9,312 | $ | — | $ | 98,579 | ||||||||||
Carrying | Estimated Fair Value | Total Fair | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Value | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contractsd | $ | 452 | $ | — | $ | 452 | $ | — | $ | 452 | ||||||||||
Total financial liabilities | $ | 452 | $ | — | $ | 452 | $ | — | $ | 452 | ||||||||||
a | Included within Other assets, net on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. | |
b | Included within Short-term investments on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. | |
c | Included within Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. | |
d | Included within Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates carrying value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities. The fair value of debt with variable interest rates approximates carrying value. The fair value of debt with fixed interest rates was determined using the quoted market prices of debt instruments with similar terms and maturities. The total carrying value of short-term borrowings and long-term debt was $693,673,000 and $782,036,000 and the corresponding fair value was approximately $850,000,000 and $850,000,000 at July 31, 2011 and 2010.
8. | DEBT |
In May 2011, the Company entered into a ¥4,000,000,000 ($49,240,000 at issuance) one-year uncommitted credit facility. Borrowings may be made on one-, three- or 12-month terms bearing interest at the LIBOR rate plus 0.25%, subject to bank approval. As of July 31, 2011, the Company had borrowed the full amount under the facility.
9. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
In March 2011, Laurelton Diamonds, Inc., a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Laurelton”), as lender, entered into a $50,000,000 amortizing term loan facility agreement (the “Loan”) with Koidu
14
Table of Contents
Holdings S.A. (“Koidu”), as borrower, and BSG Resources Limited, as a limited guarantor. Koidu operates a kimberlite diamond mine in Sierra Leone (the “Mine”) from which Laurelton now acquires diamonds. Koidu is required under the terms of the Loan to apply the proceeds of the Loan to capital expenditures necessary to expand the Mine, among other purposes. The Loan is required to be repaid in full by March 2017 through semi-annual payments scheduled to begin in March 2013. Interest accrues at a rate per annum that is the greater of (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% or (ii) 4%. In consideration of the Loan, Laurelton was granted the right to purchase at fair market value diamonds recovered from the Mine that meet Laurelton’s quality standards. The Loan may be drawn in multiple installments subject to certain contingencies; as of July 31, 2011, the Loan was fully funded. The assets of Koidu, including all equipment and rights in respect of the Mine, are subject to the security interest of a lender that is not affiliated with the Company. The Loan will be partially secured by diamonds that have been extracted from the Mine and that have not been sold to third parties. The Company has evaluated the variable interest entity consolidation requirements with respect to this transaction and has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary, as it does not have the power to direct any of the activities that most significantly impact Koidu’s economic performance.
In April 2010, Tiffany and Company, the Company’s principal operating subsidiary (“Tiffany”) committed to a plan to consolidate and relocate its New York headquarters staff to a single location in New York City from three separate locations leased in midtown Manhattan. The move occurred in June 2011. Tiffany intends to sublease its existing properties through the end of their lease terms which run through 2015, but expects to recover only a portion of its rent obligations due to current market conditions. Accordingly, Tiffany recorded expenses of $34,497,000 and $42,719,000 during the three months and six months ended July 31, 2011 primarily within selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings, of which $30,884,000 is related to the fair value of the remaining non-cancelable lease obligations reduced by the estimated sublease rental income. The remaining expense is due to the acceleration of the useful lives of certain property and equipment, incremental rent expense during the transition period and lease termination payments. The expenses recorded during the three and six months ended July 31, 2010 were $3,945,000 and $4,805,000 and were primarily included within SG&A expenses.
10. | STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss)
July 31, | January 31, | July 31, | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax: | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | $ | 77,436 | $ | 41,415 | $ | 14,341 | ||||||
Deferred hedging loss | (5,840 | ) | (1,192 | ) | (532 | ) | ||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities | 485 | 142 | (1,263 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized loss on benefit plans | (51,232 | ) | (52,930 | ) | (44,249 | ) | ||||||
$ | 20,849 | $ | (12,565 | ) | $ | (31,703 | ) | |||||
15
Table of Contents
11. | EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS |
The Company maintains several pension and retirement plans, and also provides certain health-care and life insurance benefits.
Net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit expense included the following components:
Three Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net Periodic Benefit Cost: | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 3,592 | $ | 3,274 | $ | 504 | $ | 347 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 6,274 | 5,998 | 753 | 696 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (4,849 | ) | (4,455 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 267 | 269 | (165 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of net loss | 1,404 | 760 | 3 | — | ||||||||||||
Net expense | $ | 6,688 | $ | 5,846 | $ | 1,095 | $ | 878 | ||||||||
Six Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net Periodic Benefit Cost: | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 7,182 | $ | 6,543 | $ | 1,007 | $ | 694 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 12,481 | 11,995 | 1,505 | 1,392 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (9,697 | ) | (8,910 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 533 | 538 | (330 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of net loss | 2,727 | 1,520 | 6 | — | ||||||||||||
Net expense | $ | 13,226 | $ | 11,686 | $ | 2,188 | $ | 1,756 | ||||||||
12. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s reportable segments are as follows:
• | Americas includes sales in TIFFANY & CO. stores in the United States, Canada and Latin/South America, as well as sales of TIFFANY & CO. products in certain markets through business-to-business, Internet, catalog and wholesale operations; | ||
• | Asia-Pacific includes sales in TIFFANY & CO. stores, as well as sales of TIFFANY & CO. products in certain markets through Internet and wholesale operations; | ||
• | Japan includes sales in TIFFANY & CO. stores, as well as sales of TIFFANY & CO. products through business-to-business, Internet and wholesale operations; | ||
• | Europe includes sales in TIFFANY & CO. stores, as well as sales of TIFFANY & CO. products in certain markets through Internet and wholesale operations; and | ||
• | Other consists of all non-reportable segments. Other consists primarily of wholesale sales of TIFFANY & CO. merchandise to independent distributors for resale in certain emerging markets (such as the Middle East and Russia) and wholesale sales of diamonds obtained through bulk purchases that were subsequently deemed not suitable for the Company’s needs. In addition, Other includes earnings received from third-party licensing agreements. |
16
Table of Contents
Certain information relating to the Company’s segments is set forth below:
Three Months Ended July 31, | Six Months Ended July 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net sales: | ||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 438,223 | $ | 350,433 | $ | 812,875 | $ | 665,691 | ||||||||
Asia-Pacific | 173,241 | 111,490 | 340,488 | 233,826 | ||||||||||||
Japan | 142,502 | 118,031 | 265,860 | 233,080 | ||||||||||||
Europe | 101,349 | 76,893 | 186,975 | 145,521 | ||||||||||||
Total reportable segments | 855,315 | 656,847 | 1,606,198 | 1,278,118 | ||||||||||||
Other | 17,397 | 11,913 | 27,532 | 24,228 | ||||||||||||
$ | 872,712 | $ | 668,760 | $ | 1,633,730 | $ | 1,302,346 | |||||||||
Earnings (losses) from operations*: | ||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 94,683 | $ | 68,970 | $ | 169,096 | $ | 123,892 | ||||||||
Asia-Pacific | 46,706 | 24,366 | 95,340 | 56,540 | ||||||||||||
Japan | 41,116 | 31,228 | 72,807 | 62,224 | ||||||||||||
Europe | 24,182 | 16,841 | 43,950 | 31,469 | ||||||||||||
Total reportable segments | 206,687 | 141,405 | 381,193 | 274,125 | ||||||||||||
Other | 1,434 | 862 | 1,612 | 1,110 | ||||||||||||
$ | 208,121 | $ | 142,267 | $ | 382,805 | $ | 275,235 | |||||||||
* | Represents earnings from operations before unallocated corporate expenses, interest and other expenses, net and other expense. |
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the segments’ earnings from operations to the Company’s consolidated earnings from operations before income taxes:
Three Months Ended July 31, | Six Months Ended July 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from operations for segments | $ | 208,121 | $ | 142,267 | $ | 382,805 | $ | 275,235 | ||||||||
Unallocated corporate expenses | (33,084 | ) | (24,716 | ) | (63,580 | ) | (51,407 | ) | ||||||||
Interest and other expenses, net | (9,619 | ) | (11,121 | ) | (19,766 | ) | (23,259 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense | (34,497 | ) | (3,945 | ) | (42,719 | ) | (4,805 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings from operations before income taxes | $ | 130,921 | $ | 102,485 | $ | 256,740 | $ | 195,764 | ||||||||
Unallocated corporate expenses include costs related to administrative support functions which the Company does not allocate to its segments. Such unallocated costs include those for centralized information technology, finance, legal and human resources departments.
Other expense in the three and six months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010 represents charges associated with Tiffany’s consolidation and relocation of its New York headquarters staff to a single location. See “Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies.”
13. | SUBSEQUENT EVENT |
On August 18, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share of Common Stock. This dividend will be paid on October 11, 2011 to stockholders of record on September 20, 2011.
17
Table of Contents
PART I. Financial Information
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
OVERVIEW
Tiffany & Co. (the “Company”) is a holding company that operates through its subsidiary companies. The Company’s principal subsidiary, Tiffany and Company (“Tiffany”), is a jeweler and specialty retailer whose principal merchandise offering is fine jewelry. The Company also sells timepieces, sterling silverware, china, crystal, stationery, fragrances and accessories. Through Tiffany and Company and other subsidiaries, the Company is engaged in product design, manufacturing and retailing activities.
The Company’s reportable segments are as follows:
• | Americas includes sales in TIFFANY & CO. stores in the United States, Canada and Latin/South America, as well as sales of TIFFANY & CO. products in certain markets through business-to-business, Internet, catalog and wholesale operations; |
• | Asia-Pacific includes sales in TIFFANY & CO. stores, as well as sales of TIFFANY & CO. products in certain markets through Internet and wholesale operations; |
• | Japan includes sales in TIFFANY & CO. stores, as well as sales of TIFFANY & CO. products through business-to-business, Internet and wholesale operations; |
• | Europe includes sales in TIFFANY & CO. stores, as well as sales of TIFFANY & CO. products in certain markets through Internet and wholesale operations; and |
• | Other consists of all non-reportable segments. Other consists primarily of wholesale sales of TIFFANY & CO. merchandise to independent distributors for resale in certain emerging markets (such as the Middle East and Russia) and wholesale sales of diamonds obtained through bulk purchases that were subsequently deemed not suitable for the Company’s needs. In addition, Other includes earnings received from third-party licensing agreements. |
All references to years relate to fiscal years ended or ending on January 31 of the following calendar year.
HIGHLIGHTS
• | Worldwide net sales increased 30% in the three months (“second quarter”) and 25% in the six months (“first half”) ended July 31, 2011. Sales in all reportable segments increased in both periods. |
• | On a constant-exchange-rate basis (see “Non-GAAP Measures” below), worldwide net sales increased 24% in the second quarter and 20% in the first half and comparable store sales increased 22% in the second quarter and 18% in the first half. |
• | The Company added a net of three TIFFANY & CO. stores (two in the Americas, two in Europe and a net reduction of one in Japan) in the first half. Management’s current worldwide objective is to open 16 stores (net) in 2011. |
• | Operating margin decreased 0.9 percentage point in the second quarter and increased 0.1 percentage point in the first half. Gross margin in both periods increased over the prior year. However, the Company recorded charges (primarily within selling, general and administrative expenses) of $34,497,000 and $42,719,000 during the second quarter and first half of 2011 and $3,945,000 and $4,805,000 during the same periods in the prior year associated with Tiffany’s consolidation and relocation of its New York headquarters staff to a single location (see “Item 1. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies”). Excluding those charges, operating margin increased 2.5 percentage points in the second quarter and 2.3 percentage points in the first half. |
• | Net earnings increased 33% to $90,043,000, or $0.69 per diluted share, in the second quarter and 30% to $171,106,000, or $1.32 per diluted share, in the first half. |
18
Table of Contents
• | Consistent with the Company’s strategy to maintain substantial control over product supply through direct diamond sourcing, in March 2011 a subsidiary of the Company entered into a $50,000,000 amortizing term loan facility agreement with Koidu Holdings S.A. and in return was granted the right to purchase diamonds meeting the Company’s quality standards recovered from their kimberlite diamond mine in Sierra Leone (see “Item 1. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies”). |
• | The Company repaid ¥5,000,000,000 ($58,915,000 upon payment) of debt that came due in April. |
NON-GAAP MEASURES
The Company’s reported sales reflect either a translation-related benefit from strengthening foreign currencies or a detriment from a strengthening U.S. dollar.
The Company reports information in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Internally, management monitors its sales performance on a non-GAAP basis that eliminates the positive or negative effects that result from translating international sales into U.S. dollars (“constant-exchange-rate basis”). Management believes this constant-exchange-rate basis provides a more representative assessment of sales performance and provides better comparability between reporting periods.
The Company’s management does not, nor does it suggest that investors should, consider such non-GAAP financial measures in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company presents such non-GAAP financial measures in reporting its financial results to provide investors with an additional tool to evaluate the Company’s operating results. The following table reconciles sales percentage increases from the GAAP to the non-GAAP basis versus the previous year:
Second Quarter 2011 vs. 2010 | First Half 2011 vs. 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Constant- | Constant- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP | Translation | Exchange- | GAAP | Translation | Exchange- | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Effect | Rate Basis | Reported | Effect | Rate Basis | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Worldwide | 30 | % | 6 | % | 24 | % | 25 | % | 5 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||||
Americas | 25 | % | 1 | % | 24 | % | 22 | % | 1 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia-Pacific | 55 | % | 10 | % | 45 | % | 46 | % | 8 | % | 38 | % | ||||||||||||
Japan | 21 | % | 13 | % | 8 | % | 14 | % | 12 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
Europe | 32 | % | 15 | % | 17 | % | 28 | % | 10 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
Comparable Store Sales: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Worldwide | 28 | % | 6 | % | 22 | % | 24 | % | 6 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
Americas | 24 | % | 1 | % | 23 | % | 21 | % | 1 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia-Pacific | 51 | % | 10 | % | 41 | % | 41 | % | 8 | % | 33 | % | ||||||||||||
Japan | 22 | % | 14 | % | 8 | % | 15 | % | 12 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
Europe | 25 | % | 14 | % | 11 | % | 23 | % | 11 | % | 12 | % |
19
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Sales
Net sales by segment were as follows:
Second Quarter | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | Increase | |||||||||
Americas | $ | 438,223 | $ | 350,433 | 25 | % | ||||||
Asia-Pacific | 173,241 | 111,490 | 55 | % | ||||||||
Japan | 142,502 | 118,031 | 21 | % | ||||||||
Europe | 101,349 | 76,893 | 32 | % | ||||||||
Other | 17,397 | 11,913 | 46 | % | ||||||||
$ | 872,712 | $ | 668,760 | 30 | % | |||||||
First Half | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | Increase | |||||||||
Americas | $ | 812,875 | $ | 665,691 | 22 | % | ||||||
Asia-Pacific | 340,488 | 233,826 | 46 | % | ||||||||
Japan | 265,860 | 233,080 | 14 | % | ||||||||
Europe | 186,975 | 145,521 | 28 | % | ||||||||
Other | 27,532 | 24,228 | 14 | % | ||||||||
$ | 1,633,730 | $ | 1,302,346 | 25 | % | |||||||
Comparable Store Sales.Reference will be made to comparable store sales below. Comparable store sales include only sales transacted in Company-operated stores and boutiques. A store’s sales are included in comparable store sales when the store has been open for more than 12 months. In markets other than Japan, sales for relocated stores are included in comparable store sales if the relocation occurs within the same geographical market. In Japan, sales for a new store or boutique are not included if the store or boutique was relocated from one department store to another or from a department store to a free-standing location. In all markets, the results of a store in which the square footage has been expanded or reduced remain in the comparable store base.
Americas.In the second quarter, total sales increased $87,790,000, or 25%, primarily due to an increase in the average price per unit sold. Total sales also benefited from an increase in the number of units sold. Comparable store sales increased $71,758,000, or 24%, consisting of increases in both New York Flagship store sales of 41%, which benefited from strong foreign tourist demand, and comparable branch store sales of 20%. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, sales increased 24% and comparable store sales increased 23%. Combined Internet and catalog sales in the Americas increased $5,783,000, or 16%, due to similar increases in the number of orders and in the average price per order.
In the first half, total sales increased $147,184,000, or 22%, primarily due to an increase in the average price per unit sold. Total sales also benefited from an increase in the number of units sold. Comparable store sales increased $118,264,000, or 21%, consisting of increases in both New York Flagship store sales of 33%, which benefited from strong foreign tourist demand, and comparable branch store sales of 18%. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, sales increased 21%, and comparable store sales increased 20%. Combined Internet and catalog sales in the Americas increased $10,767,000, or 15%, due to similar increases in the number of orders and in the average price per order.
Asia-Pacific.In the second quarter, total sales increased $61,751,000, or 55%, due to similar increases in the average price per unit sold and in the number of units sold. Comparable store sales increased $53,834,000, or 51%. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, sales increased 45% and comparable store sales increased 41% due to sales growth in most countries, with the largest increase in the Greater China region.
In the first half, total sales increased $106,662,000, or 46%, primarily due to an increase in the average price per unit sold. Total sales also benefited from an increase in the number of units sold. Comparable store sales increased $89,553,000, or 41%, and non-comparable store sales grew $13,127,000. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, sales
20
Table of Contents
increased 38% and comparable store sales increased 33% in the first half due to sales growth in most countries, with the largest increase in the Greater China region.
Japan.In the second quarter, total sales increased $24,471,000, or 21%, entirely due to an increase in the average price per unit sold, which was partly offset by a decrease in the number of units sold. Comparable store sales increased $23,651,000, or 22%. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, both total sales and comparable store sales increased 8%.
In the first half, total sales increased $32,780,000, or 14%, entirely due to an increase in the average price per unit sold, which was partly offset by a decrease in the number of units sold. Comparable store sales increased $31,632,000, or 15%. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, sales increased 2% and comparable store sales increased 3%. Sales in Japan were affected by earthquake-related events in the first quarter. Certain locations were closed for approximately one week following the earthquake and some operated on reduced hours for a period of time; however, all locations have re-opened and are operating under normal hours.
Europe.In the second quarter, total sales increased $24,456,000, or 32%, primarily due to an increase in the number of units sold. Total sales also benefited from an increase in the average price per unit sold. Comparable store sales increased $17,456,000, or 25%, and non-comparable store sales grew $3,868,000. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, sales increased 17% and comparable store sales rose 11%, due to strong growth in most of Continental Europe and growth in the U.K.
In the first half, total sales increased $41,454,000, or 28%, primarily due to an increase in the number of units sold. Total sales also benefited from an increase in the average price per unit sold. Comparable store sales increased $29,961,000, or 23%, and non-comparable store sales grew $6,854,000. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, sales increased 18% and comparable store sales increased 12%, due to strong growth in most of Continental Europe and growth in the U.K.
Store Data.Management currently expects to add 16 (net) Company-operated TIFFANY & CO. stores and boutiques in 2011, increasing the store base by 7%, including six stores in the Americas, three stores in Europe, eight stores in Asia-Pacific and a net reduction of one location in Japan. The following table shows locations which have already been opened or closed, or where plans have been finalized:
Openings (Closings) | Remaining Openings | |||
Location | as of July 31, 2011 | 2011 | ||
Americas: | ||||
Calgary, Canada | Second Quarter | |||
Northbrook, Illinois | Second Quarter | |||
Las Vegas — Fashion Show Mall, Nevada | Third Quarter | |||
Richmond, Virginia | Third Quarter | |||
Brasilia, Brazil | Third Quarter | |||
Vancouver — Oakridge Centre, Canada | Fourth Quarter | |||
Asia-Pacific: | ||||
Chongquing, China | Third Quarter | |||
Guangzhou, China | Third Quarter | |||
Nanjing, China | Third Quarter | |||
Daegu, Korea | Third Quarter | |||
Incheon, Korea | Third Quarter | |||
Wuhan, China | Fourth Quarter | |||
Seoul — Apkujung, Korea | Fourth Quarter | |||
Taichung — Far Eastern, Taiwan | Fourth Quarter | |||
Japan: | ||||
Hakata Hankyu | First Quarter | |||
Kokura Izutsuya | (First Quarter) | |||
Wakayama Kintetsu | (First Quarter) | |||
Europe: | ||||
Frankfurt — Frankfurt International Airport, Germany | Second Quarter | |||
Zurich — Zurich Airport, Switzerland | Second Quarter | |||
Milan — Excelsior, Italy | Third Quarter |
21
Table of Contents
Other.Other sales increased $5,484,000, or 46%, in the second quarter primarily due to increased sales of TIFFANY & CO. merchandise to independent distributors in emerging markets as well as increased wholesale sales of rough diamonds. Other sales increased $3,304,000, or 14%, in the first half primarily due to increased sales of TIFFANY & CO. merchandise to independent distributors in emerging markets which was partly offset by lower wholesale sales of rough diamonds.
Gross Margin
Second Quarter | First Half | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales | 59.0 | % | 57.8 | % | 58.7 | % | 57.8 | % | ||||||||
Gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of net sales) increased by 1.2 percentage points in the second quarter and by 0.9 percentage point in the first half due to sales leverage on fixed costs.
Management periodically reviews and adjusts its retail prices when appropriate to address product cost increases, specific market conditions and longer-term changes in foreign currencies/U.S. dollar relationships. Among the market conditions that the Company addresses are consumer demand for the product category involved, which may be influenced by consumer confidence, and competitive pricing conditions. The Company uses derivative instruments to mitigate foreign exchange and precious metal price exposures (see “Item 1. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 6. Hedging Instruments”). In the first half of the year the Company increased retail prices to address higher product costs and its strategy is to pursue that approach when appropriate in the future.
Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses
Second Quarter | First Half | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales | 42.9 | % | 40.8 | % | 41.7 | % | 41.0 | % | ||||||||
SG&A expenses increased $101,011,000, or 37%, in the second quarter. The Company recorded nonrecurring charges of $34,497,000 and $3,656,000 in the second quarters of 2011 and 2010 associated with Tiffany’s consolidation and relocation of its New York headquarters staff into a single location (see “Item 1. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies”). Excluding these charges, SG&A expenses increased $70,170,000, or 26%, primarily due to increased marketing expenses of $20,015,000, increased labor and benefit costs of $19,112,000, increased depreciation and store occupancy expenses related to new and existing stores of $14,725,000 and increased sales-related variable costs of $6,128,000.
SG&A expenses increased $148,177,000, or 28%, in the first half. The Company recorded nonrecurring charges of $42,506,000 and $4,444,000 in the first half of 2011 and 2010 associated with Tiffany’s consolidation and relocation of its New York headquarters staff into a single location (see “Item 1. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies”). Excluding these charges, SG&A expenses increased $110,115,000, or 21%, primarily due to increased labor and benefit costs of $29,516,000, increased marketing expenses of $26,975,000, increased depreciation and store occupancy expenses related to new and existing stores of $27,102,000 and increased sales-related variable costs of $10,194,000.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 2.1 percentage points in the second quarter and 0.7 percentage point in the first half. Excluding the nonrecurring charges noted above, SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased 1.4 percentage points in the second quarter and 1.5 percentage points in the first half due to the leveraging effect of fixed costs.
22
Table of Contents
Earnings from Operations
Second | Second | |||||||||||||||
Quarter | % of Net | Quarter | % of Net | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | Sales* | 2010 | Sales* | ||||||||||||
Earnings from operations: | ||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 94,683 | 21.6 | % | $ | 68,970 | 19.7 | % | ||||||||
Asia-Pacific | 46,706 | 27.0 | % | 24,366 | 21.9 | % | ||||||||||
Japan | 41,116 | 28.9 | % | 31,228 | 26.5 | % | ||||||||||
Europe | 24,182 | 23.9 | % | 16,841 | 21.9 | % | ||||||||||
Other | 1,434 | 8.2 | % | 862 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||
208,121 | 142,267 | |||||||||||||||
Unallocated corporate expenses | (33,084 | ) | (3.8 | )% | (24,716 | ) | (3.7 | )% | ||||||||
Other expense | (34,497 | ) | (3,945 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earnings from operations | $ | 140,540 | 16.1 | % | $ | 113,606 | 17.0 | % | ||||||||
* | Percentages represent earnings from operations as a percentage of each segment’s net sales. |
Earnings from operations increased 24% in the second quarter. On a segment basis, the ratio of earnings from operations (before the effect of unallocated corporate expenses and other expense) to each segment’s net sales in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was as follows:
• | Americas — the ratio increased 1.9 percentage points primarily resulting from the leveraging of operating expenses as well as an increase in gross margin; |
• | Asia-Pacific — the ratio increased 5.1 percentage points primarily due to the leveraging of operating expenses as well as an increase in gross margin; |
• | Japan — the ratio increased 2.4 percentage points primarily due to an increase in gross margin; |
• | Europe — the ratio increased 2.0 percentage points primarily due to an increase in gross margin; and |
• | Other — the ratio increased 1.0 percentage point. |
First Half | % of Net | First Half | % of Net | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | Sales* | 2010 | Sales* | ||||||||||||
Earnings from operations: | ||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 169,096 | 20.8 | % | $ | 123,892 | 18.6 | % | ||||||||
Asia-Pacific | 95,340 | 28.0 | % | 56,540 | 24.2 | % | ||||||||||
Japan | 72,807 | 27.4 | % | 62,224 | 26.7 | % | ||||||||||
Europe | 43,950 | 23.5 | % | 31,469 | 21.6 | % | ||||||||||
Other | 1,612 | 5.9 | % | 1,110 | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||
382,805 | 275,235 | |||||||||||||||
Unallocated corporate expenses | (63,580 | ) | (3.9 | )% | (51,407 | ) | (3.9 | )% | ||||||||
Other expense | (42,719 | ) | (4,805 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earnings from operations | $ | 276,506 | 16.9 | % | $ | 219,023 | 16.8 | % | ||||||||
* | Percentages represent earnings from operations as a percentage of each segment’s net sales. |
Earnings from operations increased 26% in the first half. On a segment basis, the ratio of earnings from operations (before the effect of unallocated corporate expenses and other expense) to each segment’s net sales in the first half of 2011 and 2010 was as follows:
• | Americas — the ratio increased 2.2 percentage points primarily resulting from the leveraging of operating expenses; |
23
Table of Contents
• | Asia-Pacific — the ratio increased 3.8 percentage points primarily due to the leveraging of operating expenses as well as an increase in gross margin; |
• | Japan — the ratio increased 0.7 percentage point primarily due to an increase in gross margin partly offset by increased operating expenses; |
• | Europe — the ratio increased 1.9 percentage points primarily due an increase in gross margin; and |
• | Other — the ratio increased 1.3 percentage points. |
Unallocated corporate expenses include costs related to administrative support functions which the Company does not allocate to its segments. Such unallocated costs include those for centralized information technology, finance, legal and human resources departments. Total unallocated corporate expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 0.1 percentage point in the second quarter and were consistent with the prior year in the first half.
Other expense in the second quarter and first half of 2011 and 2010 represents charges associated with Tiffany’s consolidation and relocation of its New York headquarters staff to a single location. See “Item 1. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies.”
Interest and Other Expenses, net
Interest and other expenses, net decreased $1,502,000 in the second quarter of 2011 and $3,493,000 in the first half.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 31.2% in the second quarter of 2011 versus 34.0% in the prior year. The decline is primarily due to the reversal of a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets where management has determined it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized in the future. The effective income tax rate was 33.4% in the first half of 2011 versus 32.5% in the prior year. The effective income tax rate for the first half of 2010 reflected a net income tax benefit of $3,096,000 primarily due to a change in the tax status of certain subsidiaries associated with the acquisition in 2009 of additional equity interests in diamond sourcing and polishing operations.
2011 Outlook
Management’s outlook for full year 2011 is based on the following assumptions, which may or may not prove valid, and should be read in conjunction with “Item 1A. Risk Factors” on page 30:
• | A high-teens percentage increase in worldwide net sales (in U.S. dollars). Sales assumptions by region (in U.S. dollars) include a high-teens percentage increase in the Americas, at least a 30% increase in Asia-Pacific, at least a 20% increase in Europe and a high single-digit percentage increase in Japan. Other sales are expected to increase approximately 25%. |
• | The opening of 17 Company-operated stores (six in the Americas, eight in Asia-Pacific and three in Europe), as well as a net reduction of one location in Japan. |
• | An increase in operating margin of more than one full point due to an improved ratio of SG&A expenses to sales and a higher gross margin. |
• | Interest and other expenses, net of approximately $45,000,000. |
• | An effective income tax rate of approximately 34%. |
• | Net earnings increasing 25% — 28% to $3.65 — $3.75 per diluted share. |
• | An increase in net inventories of more than 15%. |
• | Capital expenditures of approximately $250,000,000. |
The above assumptions for operating margin and net earnings per diluted share do not include expenses of $42,719,000 recorded in the first half of 2011 primarily related to the fair value of the remaining non-cancelable lease obligations reduced by the estimated sublease rental income, as well as the acceleration of the useful lives of certain
24
Table of Contents
property and equipment, incremental rent during the transition period and lease termination payments associated with Tiffany’s consolidation and relocation of its New York headquarters staff to a single location (see “Item 1. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies”). Tiffany expects overall savings of more than $100,000,000 over the 15-year lease term of the new location as a result of an overall reduction in rent expense; these estimated savings are based on current rental costs and assumptions made regarding future potential rent increases at the existing locations. Changes in market conditions may affect the total expenses ultimately recorded.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company’s liquidity needs have been, and are expected to remain, primarily a function of its ongoing, seasonal and expansion-related working capital requirements and capital expenditures needs. Over the long term, the Company manages its cash and capital structure to maintain a strong financial position that provides flexibility to pursue future strategic initiatives. Management regularly assesses its working capital needs, capital expenditure requirements, debt service, dividend payouts, share repurchases and other investments. Management believes that cash on hand, internally-generated cash flows and the funds available under its revolving credit facilities are sufficient to support the Company’s liquidity and capital requirements for the foreseeable future.
The following table summarizes cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:
First Half | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 43,895 | $ | (60,111 | ) | |||
Investing activities | (136,702 | ) | (99,221 | ) | ||||
Financing activities | (56,551 | ) | (58,365 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | 748 | (1,280 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (148,610 | ) | $ | (218,977 | ) | ||
Operating Activities
The Company had a net cash inflow from operating activities of $43,895,000 in the first half of 2011 compared with an outflow of $60,111,000 in the same period in 2010. The variance between 2011 and 2010 is primarily due to increased net earnings as well as adjustments for non-cash items. Additionally, the first half of 2011 includes the Company’s contribution of $25,000,000 to its pension plan versus a contribution of $40,000,000 in the comparable period in 2010, both of which are reflected in Other, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Working Capital.Working capital (current assets less current liabilities) and the corresponding current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) were $2,246,752,000 and 5.3 at July 31, 2011, compared with $2,204,632,000 and 5.6 at January 31, 2011 and $1,860,711,000 and 4.3 at July 31, 2010.
Accounts receivable, less allowances at July 31, 2011 were 2% lower than January 31, 2011 due to the seasonality of the Company’s business. Accounts receivable, less allowances at July 31, 2011 were 16% higher than July 31, 2010, due to sales growth. Strengthening foreign currency exchange rates increased accounts receivable balances by 6% compared to July 31, 2010.
Inventories, net at July 31, 2011 were 13% higher than January 31, 2011 and were 18% higher than July 31, 2010. Finished goods inventories rose 5% and 6% from January 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010 and combined raw material and work-in-process inventories rose 26% and 39% in those same periods, all to support sales growth, new store openings, new product launches and expanded assortments, as well as reflecting higher product and raw material acquisition costs. In addition, strengthening foreign currency exchange rates increased inventory balances by 4% compared to July 31, 2010.
Investing Activities
The Company had a net cash outflow from investing activities of $136,702,000 in the first half of 2011 compared with an outflow of $99,221,000 in the first half of 2010. The increased outflow in the current year is primarily due to higher capital expenditures (as a result of increased store openings and renovations and the relocation of the New York
25
Table of Contents
headquarters) and notes receivable funded, which was partly offset by proceeds received from the sale of marketable securities and short-term investments.
Financing Activities
The Company had a net cash outflow from financing activities of $56,551,000 in the first half of 2011 compared with an outflow of $58,365,000 in the first half of 2010.
Recent Borrowings.The Company had net repayments of or net proceeds from short-term and long-term borrowings as follows:
First Half | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings: | ||||||||
Proceeds from credit facility borrowings, net | $ | 51,174 | $ | 17,775 | ||||
Long-term borrowings: | ||||||||
Repayments | (58,915 | ) | — | |||||
Net (repayments of) proceeds from total borrowings | $ | (7,741 | ) | $ | 17,775 | |||
There was $97,272,000 outstanding and $403,848,000 available under revolving credit facilities at July 31, 2011. The weighted average interest rate for the outstanding amount at July 31, 2011 was 1.71%.
In May 2011, the Company entered into a ¥4,000,000,000 ($49,240,000 at issuance) one-year uncommitted credit facility. Borrowings may be made on one-, three- or 12-month terms bearing interest at the LIBOR rate plus 0.25%, subject to bank approval. As of July 31, 2011, the Company had borrowed the full amount under the facility.
In April 2011, the Company used cash on hand and credit facility borrowings to repay the full amount outstanding of a ¥5,000,000,000 ($58,915,000 at payment date) 15-year term loan, bearing interest at a rate of 4.50%.
The ratio of total debt (short-term borrowings, current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt) to stockholders’ equity was 29% at July 31, 2011, 32% at January 31, 2011 and 40% at July 31, 2010.
At July 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
Share Repurchases.The Company’s share repurchase activity was as follows:
Second Quarter | First Half | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Cost of repurchases | $ | 24,548 | $ | 32,881 | $ | 52,487 | $ | 47,138 | ||||||||
Shares repurchased and retired | 330 | 799 | 783 | 1,118 | ||||||||||||
Average cost per share | $ | 74.29 | $ | 41.16 | $ | 67.00 | $ | 42.15 |
In January 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program (“2011 Program”) and terminated the previously existing program. The 2011 Program authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $400,000,000 of its Common Stock through open market or private transactions. The 2011 Program expires on January 31, 2013. The timing of repurchases and the actual number of shares to be repurchased depend on a variety of discretionary factors such as stock price, cash-flow forecasts and other market conditions. At least annually, the Company’s Board of Directors reviews its policies with respect to dividends and share repurchases with a view to actual and projected earnings, cash flows and capital requirements. At July 31, 2011, there remained $339,532,000 of authorization for future repurchases under the 2011 Program.
Contractual Obligations
In March 2011, Laurelton Diamonds, Inc., a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Laurelton”), as lender, entered into a $50,000,000 amortizing term loan facility agreement (the “Loan”) with Koidu Holdings S.A. (“Koidu”), as borrower, and BSG Resources Limited, as a limited guarantor. Koidu operates a kimberlite diamond mine in Sierra Leone (the “Mine”) from which Laurelton now acquires diamonds. Koidu is required under the terms of the Loan to apply the proceeds of the Loan to capital expenditures necessary to expand the Mine, among other purposes. The Loan is required to be repaid in full by March 2017 through semi-annual payments scheduled to begin in March 2013. Interest accrues at a rate per annum that is the greater of (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% or (ii) 4%. In consideration of the Loan, Laurelton was granted the right to purchase at fair market value diamonds recovered from the Mine that meet
26
Table of Contents
Laurelton’s quality standards. The Loan may be drawn in multiple installments subject to certain contingencies; as of July 31, 2011 the loan was fully funded. The assets of Koidu, including all equipment and rights in respect of the Mine, are subject to the security interest of a lender that is not affiliated with the Company. The Loan will be partially secured by diamonds that have been extracted from the Mine and that have not been sold to third parties.
Management anticipates that it is reasonably possible that the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $20,000,000 in the next 12 months, a portion of which may affect the effective tax rate; however, management does not currently anticipate a significant affect on net earnings. Future developments may result in a change in this assessment.
The Company’s contractual cash obligations and commercial commitments at July 31, 2011 and the effects such obligations and commitments are expected to have on the Company’s liquidity and cash flows in future periods have not changed significantly since January 31, 2011, except as noted above.
Seasonality
As a jeweler and specialty retailer, the Company’s business is seasonal in nature, with the fourth quarter typically representing at least one-third of annual net sales and approximately one-half of annual net earnings. Management expects such seasonality to continue.
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 concerning the Company’s goals, plans and projections with respect to store openings, sales, retail prices, gross margin, expenses, effective tax rate, net earnings and net earnings per share, inventories, capital expenditures, cash flow and liquidity. In addition, management makes other forward-looking statements from time to time concerning objectives and expectations. One can identify these forward-looking statements by the fact that they use words such as “believes,” “intends,” “plans,” and “expects” and other words and terms of similar meaning and expression in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. One can also identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Such forward-looking statements are based on management’s current plan and involve inherent risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual outcomes to differ materially from the current plan. The Company has included important factors in the cautionary statements included in its 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in this quarterly report, particularly under “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” that the Company believes could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement.
Although the Company believes it has been prudent in its plans and assumptions, no assurance can be given that any goal or plan set forth in forward-looking statements can or will be achieved, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements which speak only as of the date this quarterly report was first filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any of the forward-looking information included in this document, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in expectations or otherwise.
27
Table of Contents
PART I. Financial Information
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The Company is exposed to market risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, precious metal prices and interest rates, which could affect its consolidated financial position, earnings and cash flows. The Company manages its exposure to market risk through its regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company uses derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for trading or speculative purposes, and does not maintain such instruments that may expose the Company to significant market risk.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company uses foreign exchange forward contracts or put option contracts to offset the foreign currency exchange risks associated with foreign currency-denominated liabilities, intercompany transactions and forecasted purchases of merchandise between entities with differing functional currencies. The fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts and put option contracts is sensitive to changes in foreign exchange rates. Gains or losses on foreign exchange forward contracts substantially offset losses or gains on the liabilities and transactions being hedged. For put option contracts, if the market exchange rate at the time of the put option contract’s expiration is stronger than the contracted exchange rate, the Company allows the put option contract to expire, limiting its loss to the cost of the put option contract. There were no outstanding put option contracts as of July 31, 2011. The term of all outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts as of July 31, 2011 ranged from less than one month to 15 months.
Precious Metal Price Risk
The Company periodically hedges a portion of its forecasted purchases of precious metals for use in its internal manufacturing operations in order to minimize the effect of volatility in precious metals prices. The Company may use either a combination of call and put option contracts in net-zero-cost collar arrangements (“precious metal collars”) or forward contracts. For precious metal collars, if the price of the precious metal at the time of the expiration of the precious metal collar is within the call and put price, the precious metal collar expires at no cost to the Company. The maximum term over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability of future cash flows for all forecasted transactions is 12 months.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to convert certain fixed rate debt obligations to floating rate obligations. Additionally, since the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate long-term debt is sensitive to interest rate changes, the interest rate swap agreements serve as hedges to changes in the fair value of these debt instruments. The Company hedges its exposure to changes in interest rates over the remaining maturities of the debt agreements being hedged.
28
Table of Contents
PART I. Financial Information
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), the Registrant’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In the ordinary course of business, the Registrant reviews its system of internal control over financial reporting and makes changes to its systems and processes to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that the Registrant maintains an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems and automating manual processes.
The Registrant’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have determined that there have been no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report identified in connection with the evaluation described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Registrant’s management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, necessarily applied their judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures. By their nature, such controls and procedures cannot provide absolute certainty, but can provide reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives. Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are (i) designed to provide such reasonable assurance and (ii) are effective at that reasonable assurance level.
29
Table of Contents
PART II. Other Information
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
As is the case for any retailer, the Registrant’s success in achieving its objectives and expectations is dependent upon general economic conditions, competitive conditions and consumer attitudes. However, certain factors are specific to the Registrant and/or the markets in which it operates. The following “risk factors” are specific to the Registrant; these risk factors affect the likelihood that the Registrant will achieve the financial objectives and expectations communicated by management:
(i) Risk: that challenging global economic conditions and related low levels of consumer confidence over a prolonged period of time could adversely affect the Registrant’s sales.
As a retailer of goods which are discretionary purchases, the Registrant’s sales results are particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions and consumer confidence. Consumer confidence is affected by general business conditions; changes in the market value of securities and real estate; inflation; interest rates and the availability of consumer credit; tax rates; and expectations of future economic conditions and employment prospects.
Consumer spending for discretionary goods generally declines during times of falling consumer confidence, which negatively affects the Registrant’s earnings because of its cost base and inventory investment.
Many of the Registrant’s competitors may react to any declines in consumer confidence by reducing retail prices and promoting such reductions; such reductions and/or inventory liquidations can have a short-term adverse effect on the Registrant’s sales, especially given the Registrant’s policy of not engaging in price promotional activity.
The Registrant has invested in and operates a significant number of stores in the greater China region and anticipates significant further expansion. Should the Chinese economy experience an economic slowdown, the sales and profitability of those stores in this region could be affected.
Uncertainty surrounding the current global economic environment makes it more difficult for the Registrant to forecast operating results. The Registrant’s forecasts employ the use of estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from forecasts, and those differences could be material.
(ii) Risk: that sales will decline or remain flat in the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the Holiday selling season.
The Registrant’s business is seasonal in nature, with the fourth quarter typically representing at least one-third of annual net sales and approximately one-half of annual net earnings. Poor sales results during the Registrant’s fourth quarter will have a material adverse effect on the Registrant’s sales and profits and will result in higher inventories.
(iii) Risk: that regional instability and conflict will disrupt tourist travel and local consumer spending.
Unsettled regional and global conflicts or crises such as military actions, terrorist activities, natural disasters, government regulations or other conditions creating disruptions or disincentives to, or changes in the pattern, practice or frequency of tourist travel to the various regions and local consumer spending where the Registrant operates retail stores could adversely affect the Registrant’s sales and profits.
(iv) Risk: that weakening foreign currencies may negatively affect the Company’s sales and profitability.
The Registrant operates retail stores and boutiques in various countries outside of the U.S. and, as a result, is exposed to market risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. In 2010, sales in countries outside of the U.S. in aggregate represented approximately half of the Registrant’s net sales and more than half of its earnings from continuing operations, of which Japan represented 18% of the Registrant’s net sales and 27% of the Registrant’s earnings from continuing operations. In order to maintain its worldwide relative pricing structure, a substantial weakening of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar would require the Registrant to raise its retail prices or reduce its profit margins in various locations outside of the U.S. Consumers in those markets may not accept significant price increases on the Registrant’s goods; thus, there is a risk that a substantial weakening of foreign currencies will result in reduced sales and profitability.
30
Table of Contents
The results of the operations of the Registrant’s international subsidiaries are exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results of the applicable subsidiaries are translated from the local currency into U.S. dollars during the process of financial statement consolidation. If the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions will decrease consolidated net sales and profitability.
In addition, a weakening in foreign currency exchange rates may create disincentives to, or changes in the pattern, practice or frequency of tourist travel to the various regions where the Registrant operates retail stores which could adversely affect the Registrant’s net sales and profitability.
(v) Risk: that volatile global economic conditions may have a material adverse effect on the Registrant’s liquidity and capital resources.
The global economy and the credit and equity markets have undergone significant disruption in recent years. Any prolonged economic weaknesses could have an adverse effect on the Registrant’s cost of borrowing, could diminish its ability to service or maintain existing financing and could make it more difficult for the Registrant to obtain additional financing or to refinance existing long-term obligations.
Any significant deterioration in the stock market could negatively affect the valuation of pension plan assets and result in increased minimum funding requirements.
(vi) Risk: that the Registrant will be unable to continue to offer merchandise designed by Elsa Peretti.
Merchandise designed by Ms. Peretti accounted for 10% of 2010 net sales. Tiffany has an exclusive long-standing license arrangement with Ms. Peretti to sell her designs and use her trademarks; this arrangement is subject to royalty payments as well as other requirements. This license may be terminated by Tiffany or Ms. Peretti on six months notice, even in the case where no default has occurred. Also, no agreement has been made for the continued sale of the designs or use of the trademarks ELSA PERETTI following the death or disability of Ms. Peretti, who is now 71 years of age. Loss of this license would have a material adverse effect on the Registrant’s business through lost sales and profits.
(vii) Risk: that changes in costs of diamonds and precious metals or reduced supply availability might adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to produce and sell products at desired profit margins.
Most of the Registrant’s jewelry and non-jewelry offerings are made with diamonds, gemstones and/or precious metals. Presently, the Registrant purchases a significant portion of the world’s rough and polished white diamonds that meet the Registrant’s quality standards. Acquiring diamonds is difficult because of supply limitations and Tiffany may not be able to maintain a comprehensive selection of diamonds in each retail location due to the broad assortment of sizes, colors, clarity grades and cuts demanded by customers. A significant change in the costs or supply of these commodities could adversely affect the Registrant’s business, which is vulnerable to the risks inherent in the trade for such commodities. A substantial increase or decrease in the cost or supply of raw materials and/or high-quality rough and polished diamonds within the quality grades, colors and sizes that customers demand could affect, negatively or positively, customer demand, sales and gross profit margins.
If trade relationships between the Registrant and one or more of its significant vendors were disrupted, the Registrant’s sales could be adversely affected in the short-term until alternative supply arrangements could be established.
(viii) Risk: that the Registrant will be unable to lease sufficient space for its retail stores in prime locations.
The Registrant, positioned as a luxury goods retailer, has established its retail presence in choice store locations. If the Registrant cannot secure and retain locations on suitable terms in prime and desired luxury shopping locations, its expansion plans, sales and profits will be jeopardized.
In Japan, many of the retail locations are within department stores. TIFFANY & CO. boutiques located in department stores in Japan represented 79% of net sales in Japan and 14% of consolidated net sales in 2010. In recent years, the Japanese department store industry has, in general, suffered declining sales and there is a risk that such financial difficulties will force further consolidations or store closings. Should one or more Japanese department store
31
Table of Contents
operators elect or be required to close one or more stores now housing a TIFFANY & CO. boutique, the Registrant’s sales and profits would be reduced while alternative premises were being obtained. The Registrant’s commercial relationships with department stores in Japan, and their abilities to continue as leading department store operators, have been and will continue to be substantial factors affecting the Registrant’s business in Japan.
(ix) Risk: that the value of the TIFFANY & CO. trademark will decline due to the sale of counterfeit merchandise by infringers.
The TIFFANY & CO. trademark is an asset which is essential to the competitiveness and success of the Registrant’s business and the Registrant takes appropriate action to protect it. Tiffany actively pursues those who produce or sell counterfeit TIFFANY & CO. goods through civil action and cooperation with criminal law enforcement agencies. However, the Registrant’s enforcement actions have not stopped the imitation and counterfeit of the Registrant’s merchandise or the infringement of the trademark, and counterfeit TIFFANY & CO. goods remain available in many markets. In recent years, there has been an increase in the availability of counterfeit goods, predominantly silver jewelry, in various markets by street vendors and small retailers, as well as on the Internet. The continued sale of counterfeit merchandise could have an adverse effect on the TIFFANY & CO. brand by undermining Tiffany’s reputation for quality goods and making such goods appear less desirable to consumers of luxury goods. Damage to the Brand would result in lost sales and profits.
(x) Risk: that the Registrant’s business is dependent upon the distinctive appeal of the TIFFANY & CO. brand.
The TIFFANY & CO. brand’s association with quality, luxury and exclusivity is integral to the success of the Registrant’s business. The Registrant’s expansion plans for retail and direct selling operations and merchandise development, production and management support the Brand’s appeal. Consequently, poor maintenance, promotion and positioning of the TIFFANY & CO. brand, as well as market over-saturation, may adversely affect the business by diminishing the distinctive appeal of the TIFFANY & CO. brand and tarnishing its image. This would result in lower sales and profits.
(xi) Risk: that the earthquake-related events that have occurred in Japan in March of 2011 will have a significant effect on the Registrant’s sales and profits in the fiscal year ending January 31, 2012 and beyond.
In 2010, Japan represented 18% of the Registrant’s consolidated worldwide net sales and 27% of the Registrant’s earnings from continuing operations. The effect of earthquake-related events, including the availability of electric power, public transportation, personal income tax rates, currency conversion rates and consumer confidence, could have an adverse effect on the Registrant’s sales and profits for some period of time.
32
Table of Contents
PART II. Other Information
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
The following table contains the Company’s stock repurchases of equity securities in the second quarter of 2011:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(d) Maximum Number | ||||||||||||||||
(c) Total Number of | (or Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Shares (or Units) | Value) of Shares, (or | |||||||||||||||
(a) Total Number of | (b) Average | Purchased as Part of | Units) that May Yet Be | |||||||||||||
Shares (or Units) | Price Paid per | Publicly Announced | Purchased Under the | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Share (or Unit) | Plans or Programs | Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
May 1, 2011 to May 31, 2011 | 119,157 | $ | 68.67 | 119,157 | $ | 355,897,000 | ||||||||||
June 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011 | 115,414 | $ | 74.30 | 115,414 | $ | 347,322,000 | ||||||||||
July 1, 2011 to July 31, 2011 | 95,860 | $ | 81.27 | 95,860 | $ | 339,532,000 | ||||||||||
TOTAL | 330,431 | $ | 74.29 | 330,431 | $ | 339,532,000 |
In January 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program (“2011 Program”) and terminated the previously existing program. The 2011 Program authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $400,000,000 of its Common Stock through open market or private transactions. The 2011 Program expires on January 31, 2013.
33
Table of Contents
ITEM 6 | Exhibits |
(a) Exhibits:
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
101 | The following financial information from Tiffany & Co.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2011, furnished with the SEC, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings; (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Earnings; (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
34
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TIFFANY & CO. (Registrant) | ||||
Date: September 1, 2011 | By: | /s/ Patrick F. McGuiness | ||
Patrick F. McGuiness | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) |