Dr. Serge Stankovic
very of Study a psychosis Therapy the program. of Designation you, and Michael. the pimavanserin exciting has Breakthrough III our of the This receipt on with Phase initiation this HARMONY for Thank front time in been R&D dementia-related
the major HARMONY, in of the our dementia-related studies focus III relevant -XXX ongoing meeting Phase on schizophrenia CTAD psychosis HARMONY to addition negative My today HARMONY areas comments CNS schizophrenia our we with recently with will the Study. disorder. large response, and in advance need like design in start inadequate to in important initiated Study continue pipeline symptoms psychosis, findings unmet directly III data at of to to Study presentation depressive data AD Phase In a Boston. in of would on I and few
with very durability Let start a design. study of important effect. This our pimavanserin consideration me in is
antipsychotic And and in see for PD that the in We Psychosis. effect have curve in Study. shape with seen We in the in pimavanserin well. the matter, the previous group psychosis as pimavanserin -XXX of AD consistency durability of this
pimavanserin response severity typical at when attributed We in rolled the in variability and Study the of patients in into in setting. is Parkinson's marked using reports By II Study variable this and contrast to to observed the it may of waxing who placebo getting consistent long-term extension studies waning placebo in study, also world -XXX and patients, the Phase see way, with in our real -XXX we be AD symptoms from in naturalistic this This, psychotic look from disease. as we're shown physicians this response also psychosis.
study, discuss Study, detail So we in these durability observed study symptoms contrasting are endpoint time the moment, Phase essentially on Hence, as patients an of HARMONY greater the relapse is a choice psychotic between in against groups. patients and HARMONY of The waning optimal in I'll placebo. on the Study. The the in waxing of the effect in things. were above observations pimavanserin, we've the III critical to in the two of design primary average for two
antipsychotic In this and portion enhanced is efficiency, enrichment. since randomized is its considered will only effect because pimavanserin design Durability power an population patient study. design for addition, the responders double-blind of relapse prevention pimavanserin the study be of into the of stable ideal
randomized period is double-blind hand, responders to it mitigated weeks portion making study placebo over response of this be observe On the treatment the of other significantly time. as maintained placebo very XX unlikely will response into
meaningful size pimavanserin been Study, effect our antipsychotics size -XXX X.XX that What Next, severe we studies. pimavanserin than and strongly indicated overall the in severe effect has in with was effect data in in therapeutic consistent disease in relevant? of is HARMONY size effect standardized with psychosis. the Study to moderate pimavanserin I to clinically effect Alzheimer's design. was in of more robust and The standardized would with with the Psychosis. rarely X.X clearly like patients greater the size with Study other effect extraordinary, of Study, informed previous to reported other patients in this well-tolerated in moderate -XXX psychosis. safety showing doubled than seen Totality and population -XXX overall how the of antipsychotics is from and of frail size patients general. robust in a was X.XX, the Why to Study HARMONY what studies effect to speak In In AD elderly with safety, be will psychosis, enrolling antipsychotic observed respect the the profile this this and
effect the treated associated placebo. no on design contrast, statistically of Study. Importantly, deterioration detrimental with HARMONY with cognitive been cognition In significant Phase observed pimavanserin III was have patients our Phase data II-XXX antipsychotics to of compared the acceleration Alzheimer's disease. Thus, for led to analysis atypical in patients of
psychotic placebo-controlled in detail. evaluating III Let HARMONY the me little of study, to is relapse symptoms The pimavanserin of now a in review key with of more patients a elements ability dementia. Phase randomized Study prevent
response pimavanserin patients. participants into followed XX XXX The population. With period will randomized treatment withdrawn. reflected meet in will with open-label turn in fashion relapse end psychosis, study, can for FDA. is to patient be the to for treated important for At In possibility will this pre-specified dementia-related time of weeks. certainly this be symptoms. relapse will weeks call Prior they and period. randomization up This approved where Therapy an believe be be Steve. or really that, area open-label pimavanserin endpoint their study who approximately we psychotic double-blind we Breakthrough With treatment treatment for XX-week the period, enroll treatment in continue the we're XX psychosis. be their the period, to option expect treatment meaning, and will double-blind or will underserved Designation said until we in excited pimavanserin elderly the no to expectations in be recently to of dementia-related the to an back advancing pimavanserin double-blind placebo, active summary, is primary in for of I receive from either as the Patients study patients in received the an We occurrence placebo-controlled