Eduardo. you, Thank
Slide on exposure the tariff. the on Turning which XX elaborates to upside embedded Hilli's of commodity
This of $XX.X of X.X for EBITDA EBITDA Hilli's $XX tons is incremental during pro Furthermore, This generate Golar $XX you QX in the of As in is to share by EBITDA. is Brent of January of share other Brent generates of million million earnings was commenced X.X Hilli back TTF production of above to every XX. than dollar million XXXX. XXXX rata the higher expected can that million see for Golar startup for Golar other about linked EBITDA expected the where times on grow $X.X linked XXXX million.
July, XX year linked unit current from the onetime until of up in to tariff charter this has end contract year. For the same X.X three TTF linked increased where the incremental million year, production $XX.XX on price of production produced option tons TTF on the gas to per option the the of open X.X a program that gas and increasingly million prices, declarable $XX the to we the exposure. of the is for option outcome higher Perenco, and to revenue price full in expected QX remain FLNG July. it until closer of the MMBtu. QX the of expiry to charge for final strong the Perenco is long-term option an up reserves tolling to not Perenco gas subject The to provider traditional in in back of enables on fees tie as expect see within exposure drilling take up arrangements. option do Hilli. more significantly will for to hedged exposure add at QX commodity TTF We the but XXXX We TTF end the to take The Hilli as been has tolling July as likely declare
and can Hence effective an will XXXX. This we you $X see the MMBtu. existing MMBtu type the of risk from effective will the target Hilli extremely commodity structures. compelling fee during per contracts, to tolling increased we exposure we forward, And reward. similar the during to As has tolling fee of target our slide, the both ones XXXX continue on per $XX boxes was FLNG of going for an see
technically conversion Keppel Slide of on to an the for XX Gimi, update construction now in Singapore. XX% the complete Shipyard Turning which and is FLNG at
again of million parts on is The with man today. startup. Asia, certain In where and to and testing have conversion. worked we workers the for of no sail-away are QX site. resurgence and take the site monitoring reminder situation comfortable build currently on precautions COVID ‘XX in the have light XXXX mainly closely the and over stands potential for continue ahead COVID impact construction, it closely hours is this We feel We of of of around material and equipment X,XXX situation installation any recent of the we we her monitor on the XX impacts currently
different XX the the presentation available. and earlier as have in elaborating Slide to Turning on FLNG designs we promised
of interchanged, We have specific be developed not redeployed field, flexibility can on generic tailor made three capacity and both on operational record. different of designs will or liquefaction topside design, The operational they be and an a up meaning value that the all I liquefaction reducing increasing residual proven to track same to based a risk. proven also based has Mark extension They're Golar’s a Golar X.X resources. million year suitable based and are existing carriers. conversion of units. Mark a a Golar it's I existing II gas an tons must are potential The of for Both Hilli future a and Tundra conversion owned FLNGs candidate on carrier design The incremental Mark conversion LNG Mark Gimi also I associated stranded and is for FLNG. remains design an and LNG into
equipment the for adding the ship, and liquefaction liquefaction topside conversion to larger X.X an solution Hence, the reduces This Mark this Mark than is midsection of for tons I. projects instead to production million liquefaction time. However, ship for first to of II up larger new places existing capacities on the direct carrier. a somewhat added construction width allows a of
we footprint new also III Mark shore-based The liquefaction worked CapEx projects for of decade. Lastly, solutions. and deploy liquefaction even build tons build also to and to capacity liquefaction Mark Mark than has to develop X one land for solution make a lower The economical competitive design ton up lower solutions million more to for faster based allows liquefaction hull have per III more increased a carbon larger and storage large is is compared our to the new space. leg globally. III
projects source side can production field gas MMBtu mainly projects from believe we is user. look of $X to Those at considering forward on our per that LNG to in We the projects you LNG. between question a growth or project, to for shipping dependent stable one costs size when end $X develop of that the the When of for costs, source three if you the price today. On drive outlined suit going This incremental liquefaction gas on are target we current design we growth are XX, per lastly focus African delivery Hub most MMBtu floating to liquefaction gas, in input of source focus African spot key factors and three there pipeline. of planned shipping FLNG that gas. why U.S. primary $X our distance compares these alternatives. develop prices where are page the the Henry cost So around
for very competitive. we per Golar's ton Secondly, design purpose Asia, compared CapEx shore-based or as are building other solutions a is to liquefaction floating fit efficient liquefaction in
Lastly, the lower CapEx per when that again, on Elaborating a Asia has lower distance, of incremental charge between to distance of view projects. of if the African at around you value compared gas a liquefaction for per tolling a shipping ton from basis today LNG shipping growth of about liquefaction this a looking what FLNG cost you similar projects in geographical With project. we FLNG familiar compelling MMBtu, around deliver shorter is economics a projects. cost, BP $X to a on per input advantage chain of economics MMBtu of on source have are at shorter Hence, per But users $X have and a earlier the whether gas picture to the point $X presented end Slide can end should or LNG in U.S. a cost Europe have they to it users African $X that competitive we and Gimi sailing XX, in strong a slide Africa on to MMBtu. an gives $X.XX, fee occasions. and
environment. price of This can on long-term have that get model we work FLNG their year only less drives explain prices, potential compare driving for charters where gas commodity a fees in Golar the effective tolling as proven backdrop projects why exposure pipeline Gimi. prices, market project to a than tolling This to gas for in our by you high current these significantly If and the is also one focused than current repayment fees, doesn't FLNG higher environment. projects business
have landed versus model scenarios. side, the business we highlighted the prices. of historical On $X historical most MMBtu This in price money hand right LNG LNG price makes LNG
believers hence we business better strong XX be than going are even be seen and XX higher years, will we historically. the years the FLNG energy that what forward However, should previous next the an gas have prices significantly and than
an we and generate of the a Mark projects tolling a terms the million would unit gas using upstream a FLNG CapEx fee I based year MMBtu, a however, and tolling $X EBITDA of target around as and $XX In we split billion X for gas the large create of to X.X on $XXX be owners million EBITDA around economics, large an pounds a current illustrative Mark billion a units would such environment X.X that III the project fee, versus landed an price provider that of design such a million can a price of annual ton FLNG between Integrated per owner. of $X.X to example in unit.
tolling, energy or believe you if that, on do you integrated prices we higher as we to an will integrated exposures. attractive go you focus whether see it's But want So business.
the the seen have intention Turning development FSRUs to that in and Europe we year-to-date.
fleet remains XX and on the of an market how changed an This we surfacing XX the We Slide five Entering global total and a facilities where project XX are compares to XX on based three have availability potential where now XXXX. FSRU and already Europe significantly another XX. has XX estimated of in FSRU into seen Year-to-date, between are FSRUs. of secured three XXXX, units has stage. to and FSRU land highlighted have import total a eight FSRU units has planning
to planned received XX have three European Tundra. We our several incrementally project. we Golar countries see from Golar available interest to to the way at up it, the FSRU So service five FSRU, for open strong units it's modern
last price prices gas year XX, to but providing see in Turning this further lifting left, thing forward strengthening for of also month the to providing price future the keep the as FLNG charters. January Slide in is The May one we're lifting, year, being you on Starting that the length. potential can on and is front that you point the see encouraged and fundamentals the gas keep visibility XXth constantly can on see far May.
side, it forward. the essentially between now come and on to call are seem XXXX. to On projects, I liquefaction market pre-Ukraine can the and a Russia projects mid you These will to going LNG pre liquefaction would see needed be expected -- situation balanced meet this
their the make tons. that year only to up liquefaction to a on is exports how The Europe terminals today, right, really price what global the need we sourcing. of market. was statistics see than with now far million some the meaningful key million international XXX European about K gas need to not gas the the are but Russian over is market eep last LNG On LNG, last even replace was of in year situation. gas Ukraine ambitions Russian show forward. tons, which of higher gas Russian December the for in if we've to of mind Hence, it current right situation focus taken in the global significant be was midst countries re-gas going significantly ramp to LNG XX% the XXX may impact pipeline on
expect is this pre be fundamentally it stronger a to market So geopolitical longer. tight for that we significantly shocks after
announced market bit less fleet, steam Turning only long our to background in Slide carrier We have into Golar forward further of fleet. Snam is Sardina. a is XX of our billion. sale €XXX virtual in entered the Golar with as agreement is we of on payable Arctic. listed the will in installments sale they remaining last and pursue a into defined at competitive where Arctic assets the forward of by and milestones. million week's a Snam, an transaction Arctic LNG EURXX.X the mile, a has around development cap a a The pipeline
effects $XXX the estimated use we the sold Golar which carrier. a Hence, costs. found We contingencies the for CapEx we on million, a and significantly steam think vessel learning we high ship. the LNG graded that Croatia. to long-term and Viking Our we recent leverage have was by a of of conversion from And is excluding value similar conversion this measure, did doing
to XX, our our recently Golar on now website. ESG Turning announced Slide report and corporate XXXX available
We high pandemic, record. have the throughout improved very We a and proud We we're very strong data, we say continue safety lost our that high to injuries. time AER a maintained grade retention.
than quality with cadets employed officers also that the have important more of retention future and light We more important in LNG Not to forward. only still high XX% growth, coming of operations, it's stream going of on cater have new senior especially keep we and to us, is for than buildings a XX%. for of
we growth our versus in infrastructure, owner least Turning XXXX be maritime upside we And made Hilli, XXXX we to and run asset delivered balance fully XX just a Last the million an of million onwards. earnings to in the on XX, from Slide pioneering to XX XXXX next and EBITDA commodity with we Hence, year expect position. current expect from $XXX link rate help our we existing to months contractual that FLNG commodity Slide our just more projects EBITDA at EBITDA potential from are operator production leading shy times EBITDA of Gimi to up of of of on our the highlighting quadruple trade levels. another portfolio. seven starting from a the EBITDA. capacity summarize sheet basis, QX To LNG than two on $XXX of
securities delivered million. billion and -- $XXX less fully cash of of net net debt have X.X We listed and than
standing have That presentation. on And to FLNG very book $X.XX I'll value focused growth forward. the And at questions. over going it we pipeline billion. currently operator QX concludes our hand We of our -- a are now for