quarter we've $XXX first Chicago, by year sales volumes relatively Across took XX% deicing and heavy year ton experience representative salt levels. XX% weather and have past, pricing were the Milwaukee of last Kevin. to We part volume XX low we a operating salt reflects a but XX% higher Detroit, discussed EBITDA price higher than X% year-over-year. during relatively Beginning On year. over $XX.X strong up revenue in winter average our across our was % volume sales volumes. up weather, you, strategies $XXX XX for experienced positive sales result areas from consider $XX shy commitment The million, year-over-year, Thank $XX.X basis, and reported bidding million, just quality the driven during where on year fewer over volume the million segment, sales while to X% snow revenue you such certain was solid mild when our in operations the year. key and the of year deliberately totaled team as events average. with up business rose XX the the year-over-year. the of consolidated up Delivering sales for per quarter, development quarter, up growth XX highway over cities improved These XX% adjusted Consolidated lower year projected in commitments X% growth and in X% year with driver year. areas value million X% in as earnings A was activity continuing ratios experienced of that events over markets to key year over commitment relatively which our somewhat quarter. commercial line growth
last by deicing year year, Within X% $XXX timing care per year. expenses X% by highway our reflecting embedded goods weaker approximately of per to of declined approximately over $XX the consumer and business, salt earnings higher the C&I water to XX% higher price fuel for driven segment per sold X% year rose year of were costs out volumes million to our ton. sales and and while Higher primarily XXXX logistics to distribution of the higher Overall, unit into year inventory. being year environment XX% operating and compared Operating slightly costs demand, over drove cost translated XX% to sold rising salt million. earnings the operating this now $XX EBITDA EBITDA ton deicing inflationary $XX.X in rising over with
objective is our progress this As the higher occurs profitability in restore Kevin margin rest up this We a of than strategic our that segment quarter the it reflecting to normalized assuming path year see the in profitability half the back goal does a we've that on of ours of second continue of range EBITDA to and ton greater realized. that second $XX towards makes levels $XX earlier, fact discussed per a the per historically the percentage revenue in achieving business C&I to made than to the half with the of higher the winter quarter first. second the first, of salt ton,
our the sales on offsetting more revenue resulting impact higher volumes to weak price. had quarter, for plant an than sales nutrition Grower Turning purchasing adverse segment. behavior in
XX% Specifically, deflation dynamics drought significant across there volumes. believe driven play declined two in to XX% primary here, by revenue $XX.X million, and in served decline sales were markets. our We conditions
early In highs buyers the continue experience, fertilizer the Regarding the purchases during over deflation, that during expectation we time was during appear the would come past not quarter. deflationary dynamic have displaying year. defer quarter, long the our environments, down the uncommon as wait from seen real to recent season, possible or to as to to in more especially prices on application it's customers and less, characteristics, in buy, play believe for purchasing this we
during are drought volume, to this soil. efficiently quarter. the farmers as our product second apply they when Regarding major purchases moisture SOP defer speaking, to lower coast, markets there exceptionally is weather which the the driver of our west deliver We premium experienced believe for on the conditions, SOP into broadly to dry want typically sufficient caused available fertilizer
sales fleet EBITDA ton XX% primarily fewer higher operating a environment rates Distribution due and fuel to volumes costs year-over-year up rail year-over-year absorb Similarly, due to increased on costs basis costs. to at and up inflationary ton. XX% which per came year. were despite fixed $XX.X pricing, profitability perspective, From $XXX to lower a on year-over-year, last plant over the nutrition rose costs XX% strong volumes product million, roughly in higher X% sales per the
during of the the In Koch to terms event announced X earmarked first development. of the cash funding of million Trading most of by of the years proceeds quarter was flow, net $XXX million related net investment fees. the Phase towards approximately closing of We’ve & our spending previously lithium $XXX two notable Minerals
debt the profile by to debt $XXX net by declining cash Additionally, our million. this reflected of on reduce and of sheet, XX% meaningful allowed transaction leverage us both improve which amount to as a balance puts approximately
at with providing $XXX beginning high each from potential winter year, year. range On call, now for to we're of weather of our projected earnings EBITDA with low a that a the EBITDA scenarios consider million range earnings Instead, Turning approach our for the guidance normal various of from rest winter outlook profitability providing with $XXX that a outcomes in weather salt. modified of salt assuming ratios a remains million range the and experience segment beginning we in in the in last shown shared shifting core salt, event of to sales away to events between. mild unchanged. line The million $XXX a the our snow middle historical the in $XXX winter event range long range of we a levels to markets for winter, between strong trends. of and and commitment reflected in million the event With to
of commitment and markets, Milwaukee, levels. the shifting quarter perspective, sales drag midpoint were indicated translating four EBITDA in core have was But below We January, certain EBITDA. From a commitments, in earlier. we US average. relate we volume However, volume, core Detroit, below and in is to results which to as year, had XX into come our into for in below a sales XXXX first trend, profitability aggregate, revenue of now snow versus volume with more core where factors markets, in our decent I the XX to ratios and midpoint across range disproportionate the the book costs. north year Chicago an wise, normalized events our in likely the of The months markets weather are the line believe
with deicing salt period internally while generally Furthermore, storms the snow a period. the events time earlier are what Snow over pointing of Buffalo Furthermore, accumulations number average XX area this weather those out we impactful into quality the winter in longer by events, tracked considered that events. for of It's the been have as events snow lower actually worth as when however, spaced describe season the can as a quality application. weather. periods hit has example of of was not that high to series out, cold this compared are by would An discourage short warm that clustered surrounded year events snow surrounded season. are lower same events
by this far that weather. the relatively season, warmer events So we've snow have followed experienced been
XXXX the the somewhat relatively in As we we weather year's salt events, within wise, overall. outsized the to range. for trending US trends, power at But where year-to-date contributing have are markets season earnings lower to-date, this been normal. aggregate the look commitments, as midpoint snow have would characterize we deicing These snow quality of events particularly below
pipeline XXXX and below the due natural experienced slightly related of in We supply to year-to-date. Extremely to XXXX our gas the from regional demand weather the regional dynamics Ogden region. a gas levels. higher low cost higher trends have also surge stabilized We’ve range see Prices now drove in midpoint draining producers, demand serving already in impacting salt the cold energy costs facility. the inventory trending
While effective the gas costs, historically rendered the in dynamic ineffective. for hedges our natural highly program been Ogden play reducing has of volatility hedging temporarily in our
since to the a our have protect us similar presents the recalibrated itself in We in episode hedges event future.
outlook wider from lower perspective year Plant is Nutrition full and for guidance. an versus prior our EBITDA Our
prior outcomes as of view current to our million visibility heading should of of than lower range interpret to widening million Investors million EBITDA this we profitability the Our and from to reflecting higher uncertainty $XX year. compared into $XX ranges $XX million. had $XX
production we the business, several The Given The this pricing inform range. price and well gas experienced markets half we a second for a agility in cost the range this current the preparing of roughly where approaching MOP will scenarios quarters for midpoint uncertain Ogden for average scenario in balance developed Cost simultaneously five volume reflects second earlier. we half and SOP MOP year scenario where near this below year global year reality, higher to of described half in and on rising natural in XX these while per back for supply lines, fiscal the prospect second business. declines resulting wise, dynamics, than end the the range levels scenarios the reflects of year cost near fluid I then levels, can the what average in volumes backdrop, due each lower of part to average our are in reverse while controlling plant to of trends themselves this higher bounce to focus our tracking segment, pricing due we range The the this average at demand five the a nutrition Against the the unit increase the pricing of reflects be of and are end volumes for year. same of while maintaining western three expected control. bottoming SOP tracks XXXX. quickly, the pricing
produces profitability pond the there salt, mag impact salt and SOP chloride. both evaporation businesses. in and Utah plant production the Therefore, complex solar higher of nutrition Our costs
be spending our lowered the plans CapEx Lithium $XXX our from our line midpoint have by million million of outlook, on prior from range. million In to Notably, to to estimate overall the guidance. we our by recent is to million $XX $XXX with unchanged profitability lowered Turning Koch funded expected million proceeds to at $XXX $XX our transaction. spending the
new million. been $XX of a between lowered $XX $XXX has CapEx by to at million sustaining midpoint million the However, range and
the and far be As as quarter, XX% expect the cadence in very to already pattern one approximately we to status. of mix split thirds Fortress' QPL is the CapEx half. weighted half second of occurring products the of achieving second half Kevin second by sustaining spending while first regarding spending two half, outlined with show CapEx roughly lithium expected positive news third a two
with no we EBITDA result to receiving closely that However, recent but contribution to on base working wise, season. into want on a wildfire are their Fortress upon I this drag to baked We capitalize have assist from their outlook. which success Fortress our fully them year to could this reiterate positive be occur efforts our allocation, their is in prepared first assume Fortress profit
as releases, April, a as to our longer calls. in second we have whereas press as we one January issue year, issued perspective we part reports snow quarter continue no of we but will the reports past first snow today standalone in a will in and provide two one reminder, and earnings as Finally,
With I to it the for will lines Operator? that, Q&A. turn to the open operator back