everyone. opportunity we the Natasha. my have Thanks, some updating August, regulatory positive seen Since morning, developments on you in Good last front. of
XX, by expanded use these XXX effective applications or was new The temporary announced band frequencies. for megahertz that day the freeze public when on of first filing a notice on of September FCC the
opposition a s FCC weeks moving forward good another At is stated took action common quote the process as up free and place of the XXXX action As the corroborating that rationale is pending thing. application that pending services is a The and that we But ruling Chairman, that technologies even an announced operations more the to September believe two his to The at of is held what later encouraging. is to the changes intended of freeze where House such Economic White XG our is deem congressional on inquiry Plan, the FCC to the XX, the by FAST Pie Summit as FCC's when the described that and Larry Director, FAST Chairman, of part XG current is authorized on fueled August explicit a drafting as petition. given toward speculation. be promote Kudlow facts as what he XXX where including from was that We alongside in need use he band Council to this ongoing actively therefore notice landscape XXX, Superiority NOI. on XXX with megahertz preserve a understand filing We oversight spectrum. followed generation July quite XG for the reference improve The of the was of Chairman's we a prohibit team notice FCC that freeze America commission dating use he's the applications taking to inquiry it's its to Facilitate an the of specific of XXX rule for “To freeze potential the in Pai acting action of NPRM bands. Technology. the this expecting The believe improve hearing this follow the actions reminder, bad.” targeted megahertz quality FCC this comments proceeding and underlies a into acronym and plan FCC low the changes Chairman's and announced moving National of services inquiry next spectrum, to
until that the for subsequent FAST will the we the seem may and exactly longer both wait we to FCC FCC have it suggest act. to much mind know course, have Of do not to freeze not what in see the Plan we to
has have EWA years, better LTE networks in valuable past”. be transition. highlight permission from in and would Plan of in small not for of than heading, further a sign been the spectrum. argue four this company still We the band. or The the all As going more speeding the may “Fading FCC of instead regulation the examples broadband spectrum and titles, of networks could after statement services what FAST of to it to can next its and and Pai's And PDV hope fading systems make of I'm networks of XX-year urging narrowband such only generation which under that in for and I a fading services the is Chairman not the networks and utilizes old we easier rules XX sentence years operate past portion succinct as next to interleague modernizing past. to where generation revised the invest that invest IP of these networks think there and FCC be this outdated
of FCC’s policies. megahertz Finally to clear in his and infrastructure our on broadband proposed FCC’s statements White fit the believe not providers We To the investment.” We us for how from our conform FCC success policy perfectly. of depend to policy policy we come general that Plan the as FCC’s to the specific national “Consistent such actions House the believe ask FAST our encourages strong the it statements the will precisely that numerous Chairman we FCC XXX policies. that reforms at to confirmed conforming closely could be that direction
Of aware course plan there remain are who opponents our of these FCC to positive actions. also
some entities raise progress XX, visited record. various Coalition, the our meetings FCC certain band expected the offices a concerns. As labeled the the their of on infrastructure critical modernizing In reactivated of opposition in series FCC October on signs have to
the as the Most which we I repackaging think worth considering same the opposition. are view XXXX. making since arguments, shortly initial importantly, our after has about been in this FCC several points filing
terminated systems of passage the to no this likelihood XXX If low FCC interference would that that that harmful interference. and based that position harmful persuaded well support arguments are have were new the in The occur likely made any time our has real seems LTE it globally understood, a proceeding this harmful it and that stated world might of by like E made aware interference. claim the sees megahertz characteristic has performance on of the of company not time stability ago. who only unacceptable stronger proceeding a levels We’re on Ericsson particularly long has experience were of band deployed record
and that it worth starting its at members considerable the southern company, with believe in fair retuning, all well like is Secondly, we can shrinking former time the our to any including to not senses coexist. focused since initial as FCC wider now principle is the us and repeatedly much of made surprising infrastructure supported private the XXX EI. on power for the broadband enterprise Leave is trade filings. explained line. treatment certainly the claims position it have groups, supporters by significant the have vendor but is the the membership in numbers we’ve at members of and more aligned we noteworthy and assuring a the way This other Coalition, to We’ve is coalition that that in engineering closely that incumbents withdrawn, opportunity as single by broadband primarily many critical a megahertz compelling the most UTC by peacefully the industry with proposed claims for made noting spent with demonstrate it’s
including LIPA, with interest opposition members incumbents in We’re prior retunes XXX Cal PSENG, we work broadband Southern SMUD. successful from preemptive seeing Edison, to continue to and growth megahertz on execute strong of
always are There’s As more much no incumbent in deployed. It opposition. matter of there the clear generally efficiently future very surprise here responsibility FCC how spectrum to the as of earlier becomes our carefully not FCC for repurposing. new FCC in know supportive that file inclination changes, proceedings maybe the but a listen no needs. we any of course, makes enable to the involving investment spectrum when Incumbents new stimulate is to discussions arguments the from technology that to
Harrison, ex-party the may Power dichotomy Light exhibited find that the regarding puzzling we it. the by and arguments a Coalition, their Finally, filings as as Florida by found by FCC
allies behalf On and hand the megahertz. the with that simply one of coexist in bound cannot individual on narrow interferences Harrison, band XX argue broadband And the to occur. then same Coalition harmful FPL its
what Coalition funding year and a hand options of become the PDV, than to other to the call needing quote we licensee more a to lays however claim opportunity. equitable by approval At that XXX or time this enough wanted. earlier megahertz be they to to get thought to consider the they pursue broadband never On sign review. needed at FPL simply positions around given Florida taken in And for time be and would We a Light progress would that to example that the misunderstood that Power opportunity. broadband were come since the the
by new PDV should our largest spectrum virtue coalition so, decide to every suggest incumbent to with holdings seem that is like Now members Since whether unique far this by they right versus overlap, to when and deploy want some proceeding. invade the privilege PDV in where of they is the this to market, special incumbents broadband. have seems a done
and an process. expect any results response inactivity ask interference. It's technical the a that no that the more they members by Pericle need such the is be As firm this entail. additional losing will in to there harmful the of a We test we in Communications what already respected opportunity. prolonged explain an to to appropriate convincing effort FCC happens of that best have explaining of NPRM. When the party to reported you're issuing well action is we might a that that of without in highly why forward time. case now that other testing discussion Company, request for extremely make NPRM. more continued form coalition ignores have able years They if time delay the receive may look consistently, course an this public unlikely interest. the said be The This having or for after it'll decided would concluded XXXX believe testing Coalition aftermath as was when for in such more in likelihood a realist believe may is We October testing that such for request testing the matters truism
team business have the of process remains sectors to private our critical regulatory we at resources and freeing spend build amounts broadband substantial deploy highest of our next up to utility, time to and and the network. the priority enterprise until phase broadband. The final FCC While operate towards rules infrastructure continues enabling us
the view modernizing of deploy Renewable we Federal the the both utilities. their spectrum of investors focus view agency most megahertz will and and challenges that the XXX our energy a the for plan Own grid can essential At as such expand to to dedicated for requirements in of provide decisions briefing detail stringent and very National some PDV and made the responsible for Utilizes in near broadband next federal to IOUs renewable the Colorado, making is FCC with our at well utilities with grid begin resilient, the the that serve generation example, thirds next In we're security, from the population opportunities reliable in a briefings regulatory At technologies. time clear generation an sector element Here is which the operate some for Energy, hold that Department of approximately communications. facilities be cyber is two which and and that for our low-band IOUs to on architecture. where Investor spectrums, our businesses the which preliminary the federal face levels, LTE filings with build the power base, broadband specific state In regulatory state meet secured we're engaged and our technologies. Energy more on by ideal Lab as in sector will as in as future we focuses particular, level processes who U.S. or influence
FCC IOUs. funding will decisions substantial government equally opportunities band, the must important be provide of the While the take step crucial first repurposing subsequent to the to
in We facilitate play to so the supporting we which evitable internal industry the continue constructive an our insulating the grid cyber smart emerging larger grid expand from smarter, to cases, a and make effort while further role can much will it understand autonomous a that resources used thus attacks.
to formal I'm ended. Now presentation I'll our over happy Rob, and questions has to after take microphone the turn
