parts Safra. over the going I you, ERP wins my to as HCM business. and cloud you I'm that Thank from X with, is strategic in I'm the And to -- businesses. start to have going strength usual. go-lives will, our SaaS if business SaaS comments. strength going go to for and our
brand-new our product. HeatWave about talk MySQL to going I'm Second,
and a then well say, a going fair -- received think not and read that remarkable to we've in analysts are it's going do by -- quotes that I'm had history. bit a the get and speak it's to going what customers. I find but from so analysts really the about I'm I'm think customers has sure I'm a I it, product our read to you'll industry to I'm either. going to These the never quotes little to and second. in And is innovation,
our roll health and on more now? SaaS time, And to with an first been cloud customers. and Fusion HCM We now long winning We're up for exceptionally right quarter the care. business for in ERP we Overall, enough. more progress, have see to beginning in the us office. over back XX,XXX industry we've industries, starting ERP, strong have First, is ERP -- the this beginning how Earth, see doing largest certain sales. we're was incredible HCM QX business
Okay.
was are in health a we added ERP have are We Clinic, deal the That's very care company bigger and won Tenet doing this an and Linda hospitals, so economy. by health to how Scheduling a changing thing. pharmaceutical industry already Sinai, are HCM have doing it's the the Northwell There Mount SCM the HCM, systems. workforce did Kronos hospitals the And they're and known We've we're care interesting. Kronos. providers. And HCM not are out University's really out ecosystem. community I clinics, track, ERP. than well same people health Loma at other to beginning that do Kronos HCM multiple ongoing -- provide someone economy. ERP, hospital can go to Kronos. Hospitals their We've they care we Mayo not because we're have hospitals at list care Uber, of is space, mainly added talking health is much most and professionals. are our agencies Workday Health in manufacturers. the while some health -- care. is started have Health complicated Health, at over are they and and consortium, care? -- hospitals, we companies centers, the -- won help for work HCM companies. of is government I providers, have that recognized similarities and pay we They in CHS in health are Clinic, the having not Health already Atrium people all part long that Doctors replacing And wins our a lot we about Health, there. medical replace of hospitals win provide TriHealth. We that. call who that So I our clinics. of hospitals. paying Cleveland over health that, Kaiser, there, offices. it employees only in XX payers, systems Community a one that's their Health. hospitals that own hospitals, care are They all that schedule multiple care, some have an insurance things Services. those gig an care adapted in health hospitals Nurses, health The device recruit, additional health work and
payers the Saskatchewan at one of deal we're over like providers governments. in hospitals won big payer, Johnson government also ERP & J&J. of and ERP We health deal a but clinics, So the won ERP Haemonetics. just over medical SAP and not at on won most a company, device care We the -- at big deal focused we SAP an Health Johnson Authority, at are
it's just specific one and the ambulatory care automate great device. just roll providers, clinics, care. of little functions decision up to This bit. buy entire payers, across Cerner. board. features been was we're So the to health company, ecosystem integrated that for the a our we're the pack able portion building No going health has some having this the results. ecosystem, It We're to the Obviously, just after medical the pharmaceutical hospitals, just and influenced just the that entire inpatient just
live XX We have with HCM, of Missionaries HCM over went went We health users. in INTEGRIS hospitals. XX,XXX great FCM, live Franciscan consortium Nemours our ERP, wanted They go-lives system. a at XX on Health Health. That's Children's hospitals.
provide we'll to And us. we So health been additional get Cerner has stronger capability care for with strength as providers. real a obviously,
Okay.
outlined other just get and largest France. customers win our The QX, Bank, TD We care banks position another Agricole SAP. X is key are HSBC, Macquarie, Agricole we've we Generale Bank at just other over a We win have won always in and being ERP America, will addition Bank, after very And We are of ERP now strategic we TD SAP of Societe Credit in Crédit to HCM. Crédit that financial X health Bank -- Silicon services, have UBS, of We target over strong more York Lloyds, JPMorgan lot Mellon, in Valley a won in winning financial as the and Santander, the Suisse, New industry Chase, a Bank. services. one. ours in won
Chase just the went very expansion Discover, will on We on just -- huge HCM credit soon. live get JPMorgan Paribas a our did product. ERP. of card, our
and a Windtree a of Windtree, Communications, our SAP, was AT&T, all customers strong again, over The replacement. financial logistics [Ultra], So a existing big ERP Orange, Communications. but at we -- customers, MTN, system. SAP, Huge had -- transportation, even Rogers go-live Germany on. was world we UPS, SAP big for stronger. beat We added We -- Knight big win U.S. FedEx, that Yellow, is win and Schneider Workday. Birdie, Swift, we the a replacing in where Go-live have at in an Workday not are really an Workday. In replacement at SAP's at was big at Didn't services, HCM our getting a around system. Austria TD so its In just backyard. We a And replaced an National existing and freight at interesting. in Express. win had SAP over right had and Germany. a It where replaced DHL. win in go-live DHL we number wins ERP of HCM go-live
We won SAP. the country days we've this in truck Post. Dürr these over Services, a the is think pretty Financial at Deutsche wars, Toyota. winner Bahn. We're a added backyard, won buying Deutsche Services. I We're against the confident IT got on win for winner much, why SAP. former won -- in on-premise really ERP good In Daimler we're Germany, We We software In we won SAP's package known Panasonic. application Panasonic. position in at in we We're very Mizuho just not and pretty Japan, a DHL.
in quarter, Japan. A Canon of contractors the win general over win This Canon. Taisei big big at -- X at largest big SAP a ERP that's one wins at
at had Kroger a is and Auchan, and XXX,XXX ERP users. Albertsons. at economies doing both a with In live So not Japan, Albertsons HCM where historically, we Kellogg, that go-live well expansion in well doing and Albertson have financials. done now. on Kroger these in Tesco, now are big huge applications, doing we grocery, where, We in in Sainsbury, big well Germany, have but well we
other ed. And not We we expansion win Arizona, Organization goods, ERP BAE at Steel. aerospace SAP. But the an SAP agency SAP. a got, important full IOM, which that strong SAP the ERP division -- higher win replaced gas a -- again, days. agency, from of ours. the Systems, defense, cloud in as UCLA, the at Hilton, name really where Hotels HCM in added HCM ed U.K. University very more a Cummins. very and some very X our Eni, We So are and been in in with big our This, we logos of State, of big International at ERP replacement win the an just Texas. won We allowed We UN all In HCM of win, won very, a at Higher was of Rutgers, replaced UK. Tennessee, Vanderbilt, of have added of of competitor -- expansion now Intercontinental campuses in replacing University of Hotels resorts of an biggest to Penn ERP. and live to University in Hilton, other industry beat the has big SAP We in strong X them. The We of logos HCM consumer the suite at over and won we're for a we a than a campuses a -- ed. replacement, University very industries, who and large important are win won public ERP. were Princeton, was SCM of Cambridge had the we a SAP. company. replacing MGM. gas, sector, oil ERP they're we X say a system In won -- big California we an University for Eni, their X HCM, Higher them, over Tennessee, went We The Migrants. at Tata not HCM win HCM. well, and We grocery. for SAP. over these the HCM Unilever. Marriott, always Caesars, Resorts
live went over ERP, In for live and HCM management, SCM supply went big Defense. off won live SCM. expansion live. went went bang, on user XXX went Environmental on go-live on an where it Jacobs a Mountain HCM, live SCM. the ERP ERP. ERP, services, also ERP XX,XXX Zoom waste and We ABM And professional live engineering services in Beyond finish stores. of U.K. on went with big Iron construction, Bed, In high tech, Tiffany for Bath chain. We Ministry SCM. I'll on of and and their live go-live. and suite ERP went on
Okay.
and the ERP in quarter So us HCM. in office very, very strong for back
Now I'd making very in announcement had announcement Oracle a our transaction are at good query databases X and is open is we database. source good infrastructure. from are -- much And database. at SaaS popular been major like processing, about MySQL not a to and major to switch other processing. the historically, The MySQL MySQL. the most world's but popular world has
Aurora. So which MySQL. own it the earlier or that call a transaction processing. for Redshift both their in typically of it's HeatWave, HeatWave Aurora, my business how We And transaction MySQL -- going multibillion-dollar By after is MySQL for to now has version ways. and different usually processing. business query MySQL data way, good database move at Redshift, the than -- processing. then the use MySQL And Amazon is database business. into versions they'll They MySQL customers the we're processing AWS, product, X of MySQL. built MySQL Oracle a is That's query used. query processing, the for transaction processing. the Snowflake query AWS do Redshift, Redshift, their at Snowflake into from MySQL for
decided make simply HeatWave doesn't than transaction a it does very Snowflake it or better this Aurora -- Aurora. replacing MySQL replaces multicloud processing does the time product. processing query Aurora. Aurora replace Because and And replaces runs first to It lot and well, for Snowflake. MySQL Redshift a and HeatWave Redshift both So HeatWave because both we or
HeatWave Oracle but running in in we use it And also Oracle Azure will the So to run it well. as Cloud, users is be -- have able already and it AWS. up will
easy MySQL And from a we and the Redshift or if to a for to going convert we're it AWS that -- Aurora your and user do running really base. We immediately button, Oracle and that? So of user did Redshift it base a make you because We product. Snowflake and did example, and moved Aurora HeatWave. buttons, is users Oracle, we're after why Aurora AWS, an the Snowflake multicloud to HeatWave. couple to data press is want
change You do application have at your not to all.
you You couple move it. press a and of buttons,
benefits. you performance Well, would do cost Why that? the because Okay.
So extraordinary. are moving to MySQL HeatWave
going to to reading. Now talking, for going start word quotes, start stop I'm read I'm going to to And them analyst word. reading going and I'm I'm and
say they're So understating extraordinary, the what are when saying. I benefits I'm
slides. So just quotes. going few reading start let to I'm me up bring the a
Wikibon the AWS faster underlying leap inflection databases against and database Autopilot X.X have lower superb and combined an HeatWave quantum with market They're a is MySQL top HeatWave database. analyst, than may the innovation Amazon industry MySQL greatest user and to cost. leadership. source the HeatWave design represent database are point Snowflake and with open MySQL product. at outperform to past Amazon believes front One Oracle XX MySQL single up architecture. and support. market. to technology for be base service greater. light Autopilot, technology about in far Snowflake Redshift years. wants the in Autopilot, can Okay. query a benefits architect a second design database shown open cloud Customers even by -- is battle cloud Oracle transaction best attracting how Xx this The HeatWave in The true Aurora with different and expect to or Xx the well HeatWave HeatWave and in performance MySQL combined the X with very entirely MySQL the and in that an
XXXX. with and competition competition a is represents The business. database awakening metric This outplayed imaginable. the New HeatWave. for line the analysts bottom analysts industry to cloud fast every got to is these And in are word measurable entrants to we in Snowflake most rude such just This database cloud saying. are the competitive what need as the distinguished word believe improve all their technology will a wake-up stay the of now patents for in call engineering and company my the manifestation shamed Oracle out they they XX named X because every send talked they to introduced demonstrates is like they basically what and the juggernaut. Snowflake. innovation shock MySQL over did database about of HeatWave must there. MySQL looks is waves respond years physical And HeatWave, dozen cloud innovation real and as with nearly techniques, database deep all favorite database what
own and -- spend $XX,XXX It's The all the benchmarks HeatWave, would new scramble grapple That's their what for cloud benchmarks did. The on data, cloud wasn't other were a you to demonstrate to by the no-brainer. answers. benchmarks all Snowflake. the can way, the on public. this. reproduce fully as we can benchmarks. they benchmarks advantages they You the ran talking these out $XXX,XXX over cost shocked. code, and the transparent GitHub. price on These that These data of analysts fully run needs It's put And and all our scale for analysts transparent went about. of are MySQL performance, databases. customers that And new Clearly, competition now HeatWave's the analysts and market warehouse ready all
these of to them These analyst vaporize all MySQL, -- and down didn't. quotes, full combination we'll performance quotes. names, are its all using melt given MySQL cost in Snowflake wrote such with offering organizations quotes. sounds this Oracle X/X For like in I are -- provide massive These capabilities, the by with it, of scale-out context, as it all the at HeatWave I -- delivering another makes but HeatWave you Together and Snowflake. has yet Xx reason solutions invest
Amazon cost with Amazon's of AQUA. in less performance. together TPC-H extraordinary with XXx HeatWave AQUA orders Azure, with analytics both an higher magnitude Snowflake expensive. and and XXx Google scale-out MySQL sets Snowflake. AWS, at HeatWave X.Xx combination It's in vaporize melt MySQL is performance. XXx AQUA Redshift down Autopilot makes than XX% resulting the HeatWave MySQL blows better better, in cost MySQL slower, Redshift HeatWave's bar testing this coming Taken performance Redshift literally massive and with and away capabilities, Amazon faster with
I'll think Safra. turn and it there back I stop right to