role call. for from joins under the new has In brought everyone energy helm, you benefit amount the at This short us Globalstar’s stewardship. time his his joining his a Kagan Thank all Dave Dave satellite growth today’s is business the the will CEO. company’s where first in of tremendous as to quarter and
have. in are financial about were false. or patently could by Globalstar’s to allegations section the to complaint responsibilities performance upon Globalstar’s to filed filings, A cause will path through safe described to in materially differ such There future spectrum the that the ago opinions We contains lead within have the efforts and would satellite Factors continue and I press Dave business a entirely solution direct stated, merger the harbor talking the I detail. which provide call whether financing start will by will focus of about in forward-looking core today’s fall that weeks release. structured under the control. on operating today’s not. under while the efforts, the Dave was and from begin expect the strategic we our different update SEC statements Simply earnings the calls, few and forward-looking go the today’s In the on provide and earnings financial like to I Capital the the my happy Warlander. in not provided expanding update an results statement clearly that are an Pleased satellite will business. and litigation debate, for to call were laws. intended and Rebecca right securities operational Mudrick
now, the to in with investor a right contrary fix clearly would costs, the full a We today. of to brought is investors, are risks, of the terminated answer the Globalstar resolve risks, by call investors A merger the to given way. would the legitimate the completely sort supportive allegations discussions for relationship merger conspiracy last of believe the was did the today, the others fact, decision opportunities that case some contrary is this the the question litigation thoughtful have decision how on was did to concern to We idea it. want same whether previously respond like that the claimed we openly, provided merger have appropriate themselves The the from value many it and to right appropriate truth primary have years. court right to presented The a see them lawsuit compared is in who of should the the the costs, and with XX end But venue. In about and investors as have I and some succinctly Ultimately, that minority be for comported company? merger, and and Thermo this opportunities to not been transaction of stand-alone debate. was it. we the the but
With and Globalstar employees, these stock. decisions Globalstar its answers, all regarding investors, informed make can including
will court building and able that to satellites both to through get All financial our full-time results of to value, moved. have could us operations. It’s actually here, look filings shareholder on back occur. those improved forward responsive focusing not to Settlement ever being spectrum clear from render
I aside very been have personal. one-sided for have did read do. pages tossed how the will and and board, not today, entirely fiduciary have up and years about the XXX which duties, known I’ve through me, So, who attacks never People on management me my
to have call this set that chance might today, the be the the to albeit only I So way form, story, a abbreviated an record in tell straight.
Let’s discuss the major allegations.
with First, This were alleges a brand is massive merger the to that bribed untrue. of suit approve stock options. the our directors
the who can and Moreover, scheduled compensatory the questioned a board practice doubts time of these clearly $XX,XXX. math, vesting our the the director. were and Why been those period standards. valuation? reads brands, of This is more three-year plaintiffs the per at following. and the routine. To alleged the consider in than disregard regularly more dedication actually matter industry the these X.XX the see, board, stock of with statements time exclusively million reasonable our XXX% anyone grants the that grant This the proxy meeting given then directors, it untrue. grant, At a were price they As long and assume very anyone it discrepancy if about of vesting one The of to regular, And the the annual as approved do we at our have regular in-line nothing period, worth administrative share is compensation a the directors compensate plaintiffs has make that the on the grants with to have grant. and was cycle. is paid is was the
has bono. largely almost their been years XX pro and their down over options, stock that last gone the work price Given generally compensation the been has has stock
a the The calculation. that was their to Lastly, XXX% they used of up that cannot transaction. the stock also that go approve argued bribe in which, claim plaintiffs the result they
issue. I this think enough said it’s on
pressure from we Instead development distinguish was an capital who former of a the burry that that risk series complaint the approaching work alleges litigation offend depress monetization communications late stock a now the accrue of business to weakness and for significant himself lack that by is once that mid-level would having to series us merger lower received to ideas ideas trying to job To that basis to employee full the only be likely announcement, uncommon material XXXX, purposefully course so and eagerly to benefits at uncertainty. the and spectrum ideas of including degree of anyone the development other ideas. no an have helpful, last completed, greater We stock's date. is would of and wish company this promising Globalstar like of price for push allegations Thermo. another price. demands, seeking to out sought formulating a to additional some email trying complete Another a creates Their these price, and not frequently implement business factors a the is this of merger driven Thermo so to were they throughout year future be from and it the depressed is there share at able
fabricated ridiculous. on Globalstar Globalstar’s an that largest financial before The after Level the sought and And when global To instance of names. merger these the utilize Our there was have been guess Valley's in and wherewithal about respected sale. CEOs tech for that Thermo’s investment of shareholders untrue. could to meetings III to and sold intent with bring potential that vigorously. the spectrum. worked and for Each significant reality interest banking a so, spectrum allegation shares CEOs The personally until spectrum companies. time agreement that of pay corporations to the also at some telecom It best monetization doing to permanently so at can entire successful Confirmation owned the continued creating of of CEOs additional no could Thermo of the assigned, determined pursue, partners pursued CEO a well delayed I four outcome share, Moreover, you taxable company titans, by a the the The agreement, of largest average I undertaken $XX CenturyLink Thermo the significant bankers to had which along transaction these the if with and very which for allege basis is a be was indication CFO our the levels nefarious in who in within price million the XXXX transaction to not offset sabotage monetization value Telcos, complaint were companies. three larger two deliberately all fruition. major merger Globalstar operated investment is presumably team and and Centerview eliminated initial gains Globalstar need Thermo the separately of with we, been spectrum is per Allen about part a losses. in the it’s of approximately senior participated a stock for the hard above responsible one transaction of and acquired meetings is behind closing, was two process is have of and even have had Allen tax previously with merger had XX firms, not the met of goes could capital This the tax planning spectrum these transaction, with spectrum wrongdoing. after and the merger that even would arranged and well-known would suggest to an not numerous meetings market totally indeed percentage Centerview and time. Globalstar. they, is and right. open financing terminated. gain. The we transaction four were remained capital with out states publicly the entirely had occurred clearly followed faith provided of largest any a was available, significant Silicon had good cable have that the who The an US other monetization U.S.
explicit in publicly Globalstar's made that before likely Morgan Globalstar bases sell to investors, before disclosures its the December reason and with proved October the than where million prices. through made SEC So, Globalstar months and the for clear XX high X% to have at The the the and materially Indeed, support with and higher sale represented sale more an ownership fundraisings to one disclosures with [indiscernible]. mere purchase filings very commitment shares and it as no investors Thermo’s with year million that Thermo October additional a June about Stanley the of end we financing October for this connection was concurrent the sale discussions Thermo’s and Thermo sale. position, invested the this announced XX unflagging could directly was had plant financing these indication of the shares of taken in
million held Thermo investment increased during after structures sale held fact, shares XXXX, the Globalstar and including with number by XX multiple multiple November. banks and for In funds the counterparties, of this sale of actually Warlander in investment discussions explored the shares. Thermo even with
shares, the trying creative obtain not structural work more for make out. to During negotiating to is fairly the pressure the for The was that Morgan did them including single the Warlander allegation that through possible, sale trade it the benefits, stock while to negotiation, in purchase was Thermo to highest the XXXX “dumping” price derivatives trade to shares meritless. that Thermo sell a conducted and in clean Stanley with then going represents attractive the intention
cherry in set overpay true to value on market. complaint complaint as going opportunities. To insight completely represents valuation They $XXX was and of article would suggest cite valuation The totally his alleged cite the FiberLight. This plaintiff's for of of FiberLight not the to operations one $XXX for picked single than ignores conclusion data news The because did no FiberLight. valuation. not point for and had EBITDA for firms value Another claims. was the valuation with reported a is banking to a wrong DCF FiberLight goes full draft one, may so FiberLight definitive three or performance by no results. of three, that attempt FiberLight be work a from FiberLight's Globalstar's made final is by three that far agree “preliminary shareholders the the firms, elaborate August actual the complete on million higher range product much had Globalstar at in allegations management. doing between financial plaintiff opinions of [ph] and analysis” a that value these complaint with together lower credible. final the million regarding which the determined fair the FiberLight undermine No author XXXX, for is contact article FiberLight imply Two, with that investment And and
misinformed merger these So, the fair. the reporter, that out and outdated price investment one alleging banker a for both plaintiff's An from data of was not was are taken context. of preliminary article basis uninformed, primary who and piece
article. in actually for In XXXX, the FiberLight as footnote fact, to in they bid same the year were complaint the relegated there a was a
million entry improved, $XXX the significantly the substantially, paid multiples industry fiber from network XXXX infrastructure time [ph] infrastructure offer, and the the expanded, buyers by in cash fiber new in EBITDA its of For materially of an proceeded has that FiberLight's increased sector. fund. has driven telecom have to Since
expansion this litigation is between discussions, multiple for the the see. and the have hope valuations. entire the XXXX I accounts of the Just alone we’ll the but difference XXXX to last
best that continue what significant We employees, the success. hopeful are not to investors times on make process bad business, productive and continue in capital been our on matters, how months. and and this to the its In actors. for that operated, pleased for have progress if spirit report have made of beings more and is and Globalstar every I’m ounce years, coming XX to We and to conclude never a deploy interested been want it XGPP the refocusing has daunting invest are we of will at Globalstar, our will time no matter we in
collaboratively We with process participating successfully parties in have worked the to any technical and issues. perceived resolve
Our Clearly, approval this band look third will as with have XX forward we parties and designated strategic band has process and to the XGPP discussions. finalizing shortly. impact been
the forward our interesting ecosystem US on with have equipment harmonization. and a study the increasing encouraging remain countries. commercialize regime. continue elsewhere. as concert most date, of areas valuable. other deploy actively particularly also completed the metropolitan spectrum Nokia additional also Nokia This it cover with XX is work in global to partner In XXXX. end service To to and us Earlier in process. approval two a international to terrestrial suburban with towards partners the last we other significant days, is the this Today, providers. this and in non-metropolitan allowing potential million spectrum a of band on is broadly we in will approval markets where to international and licenses would and year, publicly with We reported host we are the deployment XX pops because opportunity materially in us This We work partners testing network we look by in spectrum received
helps ecosystem authority. has project early via of celebrate, in validate that stoked is Providing thesis the efforts. interest for interest a the of have helped has the to While regulatory cell and helps even final LTE our potential too XGPP initially deployments it infrastructure a spectrum enhanced and the adoption coast-to-coast to private unique providers we U.S. producing their band forward band, is in advance tangible encouraging licensing Also, international which LTE the drive provide our small will this equipment approval. and progress in the
provide will future I’d employees. update company's over satellite an investors with to to is our it as an is business. management wish settle turning call Before and Dave, to to the the just now this litigation, our conversations I clouding all is to our like which the complicating Dave, know lenders. and Globalstar’s interest reiterate on
