Thanks, Jackie.
As in genetically community the Jackie mentioned, diseases. the we filing with for impact we EU. US important defined We are this regulatory to lives excited submission our the milestones individuals potential about with have past both Mitapivat achieved the of deficiency PK for global quarter of and and the Agios
share of MAA triggered that to the MAA procedure. the validation, review our start We are has pleased passed which
impact EHA, address we so data has are Information application that whether them to time. we PDUFA those been to significant in not about evaluating believe and who in Mitapivat symptom PK is and XXXX. the regularly a the have with published the with safety transfused all we accepted, to from and communicated respectively. patient very that hear we deficiency. regularly by including review, will look tolerated primary endpoints studies studies ACTIVATE expect agency the X the well granted of NDA, date Mitapivat is with deficiency, as both adults mid-August. life determine reported momentum, met studies are previously in and be data. who presented pleased FDA PK at secondary from consistent of profile whether whether the second ACTIVATE-T are we full the submission quality transfused, generally and observed priority Mitapivat For XX-days was their from was accepted, Both has Overall, the Phase and burden of busy application half our outcomes and progress At
heard During Glenthoj, to serve Andreas the PK disease of EHA the highlighted deficiency PK investor treatment current these has impact for therapy we significant from Dr. individuals. the on and the limitations landscape, who Mitapivat our event, of life, as also first deficiency modifying for quality patient's the potential
Moving to thalassemia.
EHA four gram all X dependent proof-of-concept previously achieving patients of core or at thalassemia. the our patients endpoint data, Phase on XX during and presented at equal more of XX. in also increase with to baseline non-transfusion per or XX of XX study announced in with met Consistent greater its through Mitapivat beta data deciliter X period study alpha primary assessments the We weeks a one than hemoglobin from of the
a improvements including improve and to believe addition, tolerated of potential well thalassemia, erythropoiesis. studies. response were a sustained treated profile both and these thalassemia In ineffective results underscore consistent with hemoglobin alpha erythropoiesis was Mitapivat beta also and hemolysis in Mitapivat. in hemolysis previous with with hallmarks observed Mitapivat of meaningfully and patients the safety We ineffective
in see in demonstrating excited generated this baseline in first hemoglobin to increase for in time We from are data patients an five thalassemia alpha also the all subgroup.
to Mitapivat controlled this thalassemia, in and and placebo sites as initiate the are of we of Our track year, prepare process trial two submitting global ENERGIZE pivotal enrollment. continue on for trial globally protocols these ENERGIZE-T,
trial randomize XXX than as of X/X Now had in of patients to hemoglobin Mitapivat study daily, will who The or X to a grams with placebo. this have XXX paradigm for screening. per the XX-months, in X initiate X We X, to analysis, for sickle or X.X X than Mitapivat disease the Phase twice Mitapivat to Phase XX.X matched will will X or data patients to of primary XX-years The of deciliter reduction to primary patients or randomize deciliter a clear the the Phase study X/X the within response include clinical equal the X:X cell The milligrams matched are Mitapivat in Phase end used believe baseline XX will the dosing XX as gram or of crisis dose XX sickle week turning hemoglobin two defined the year. selected the a the will twice after gram endpoints, to placebo. a portion. indication. The be have XX cell to past have X Phase the range X/X path during XX commence and baseline rate track maximizes will defined crisis. from with of which on deciliter X study week establish older, design greater approval endpoint and hemoglobin in the Phase age milligrams disease. this our annualized likelihood disease of and cell remain of Mitapivat this We greater broad Phase in label pain to daily, minimizes per per sickle between sickle Phase response equal cell to from change risks pivotal and to change X:X:X by challenging
In will in and core their provide the addition, has on Utrecht the Mitapivat December. safety, our work We presentation Dr. and cell patients at enroll cell the Chan development for of Mitapivat in with sickle and to study. collaborators completed the with with anticipate ASH extension submitted the sickle that people to continues NIH, at XX support clinical continue NIH of studies be to Data ASH are in in studies from we data datasets expected the disease. additional translational efficacy, study both at of enrollment At disease. the University
our ASH. generation submit Phase we're advancing year presentation Mitapivat, PKR The at enrolling for trial a volunteer healthy we next and data AG-XXX expect Beyond X began also in study. last activator to
AG-XXX Our inform healthy volunteer for the of will analysis of next steps development the the data totality clinical this molecule. of
fall, our talk As event this and detail pipeline. more will part research in of development investor we our about
working look the and fun watching and I for unfold. Darrin been I with continue for you has and thank over Sarah want successor, to so Darrin? last themselves. to story of poised to forward great to over lead commercial colleagues it to the rewarding our Agios privilege my our years. It activity, Gheuens, accomplishments Agios' speak of seven to the My to the team is all turn I discuss more Before accomplishments