Thanks, Mark.
the Our continued to prescription was our by XXXX. compared prescriptions in were XX% demand, commercial up the the quarter third increased of quarter third LINZESS XX% during third impressively, driven year-over-year growth the during quarter. And performance LINZESS. new-to-brand,
than the For became LINZESS the during any option. or first branded is time one it treatment, meaning third ever, number more and quarter, chronic the other prescribed IBS-C generic constipation prescribed
IIIb the occasional last we our grew this announced to introduced abdominal sales June. million compared DTC symptom campaign time market, nearly U.S. withdrawal the impact for of from a last materials X% continued the consumer growth launch April from generic September our in the factors, refreshed of to and this of attribute We MiraLAX including LINZESS year. positive in number data constipation and $XXX the to then prescription Phase that
each one Let briefly of about these. talk me
having was are First, have more this strong LINZESS to of growth seen but choosing major patients. lasting the LINZESS different we to prescription disruption options, that year. are IBS-C effect, this seeking withdrawal MiraLAX their the prescription of this patients, category. constipation and now for seems physicians only in be Not contributing a last chronic a And November
communicating in data, symptoms to abdominal discomfort July, our sales and the LINZESS Regarding physicians abdominal began pain with symptom force our in bloating, Phase of in overall III IBS-C. delivered patients about benefit relieving
discomfort. materials We year. this including with new and our FDA bloating plan state disease a include supplemental We reference application about the symptoms file to in also abdominal the a to refreshed later September including information to consumer drug IBS-C,
ahead, including patient addressable we the other cycle our continue believe are population, there's in linaclotide. and significant that mechanism such We of life as to our possibly brand. evaluating of Allergan continue utility to strengthen expanding to indications management and pediatrics to understanding the enhancing or opportunities Looking clinical grow the several,
a treat with certain GI patients IBS our patients as XXXX, delayed-release pipeline. and intestinal I'll portion linaclotide to pain with Estimates associated pain developing pain. with from GI Turning GI of suggest nonopioid formulation conditions start a for their abdominal of chronically to use are our that relieving we agent opioids disorders. including that significant Allergan suffering
events a nonopioid GI generally with drug GI developing with associated risks potential specifically is the disorders, patients Given opioid and for critical need. pain of adverse the
are in past IBS-D in initially associated study treatment We Enrollment trial mid-XXXX Phase XXXX. year. a Phase of exploring topline study very this early data now of the half versus the going with expecting is XXXX well. with XXXX this are would as as data in II May. these are expectation initiated to second a results initiate And the If we III for pain result, and original Phase a II our end we next as pivotal of expect positive, of
not at to meeting pain impact showing for a pain study These with week last Gastroenterology associated to of the did as data abdominal of exploring supports volunteers. relieving College XXXX Phase of Phase in desired that, data data IBS-D. consistency rationale XXXX effect IBS-C or American healthy I stool bowel our presented positive movement function our and the relieve complement II XXXX abdominal related further for We
to the trials persistent efficacy to continue bothersome The treatment on potential symptoms bile enroll regurgitation patients. to acid heartburn. designed most and are two of sequestrant XXXX, Phase of GERD. evaluate Turning GERD; our and X for persistent These trials the safety
enrolled Patients to have meaning As are rigorous they a a reminder, intended acid positive endoscopy. which to in trial. the positive requires studies Bravo required these appropriate test patients for are an reflux ensure are test,
non-erosive esophagitis GERD are we patients. enrolling both Additionally, erosive and patients
study have the to-date. enrolled of the enrollment has we due than over to originally We the study, But been of expected. slower demands half
target XXXX. At the of in half topline second continue to time, this data we
recruiting to monitoring enrollment as have already actions central We taken introducing are support it further and closely. such
of opportunities to support additional number and we update expect a to to you considering also enrollment are as move forward. We continue
an potential for it from care sharing for suffer continue despite We heartburn as more forward. million standard program of on to who with patients excited move regurgitation do XXXX you look represents to improve both to as XX and opportunity about are estimated taking the forward care important this We very an we believe PPI. we
portfolio As as I team and company. LINZESS and XXXX mentioned, continues broader GI among community, a a to There further the and leaders ACG Ironwood about GI key were noticeable. the the is around XXXX, at Meeting be establishing opinion excitement buzz GI significant our and both leading of Ironwood us
the for that, our over to With turn quarter. discuss results call Gina financial to the I'll